FAMOUS MIGRANTS Carl Schurz

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FAMOUS MIGRANTS Carl Schurz FAMOUS MIGRANTS Carl Schurz After his emigration in 1852 he became an US-American politician who was among other things the first German member in the US Senate. Biography Childhood Carl Christian Schurz was The father of Carl Schurz was named Christian born on 2nd March 1829 Schurz .Christian Schurz lived from 1797 to 1876 in Liblar. He was a and he was a teacher at a county school . German revolutionary, an His mother was also born in Liblar near Cologne . American statesman and Carl Schurz had two younger brothers and sisters, a reformer. At the end they were Heribert (1830-1838), Anna (1833-1908) of the 1840 years Schurz and Antoinette (1837-1923). was a radical German revolutionary. From 1833/34 on he went to the school at Liblar, After his emigration he from Easter 1837 attended the grammar school in became an accomplished Brühl and from 1839 to 1846 the “Marzellen journalist, newspaper Gymnasium” in Cologne. For financial reasons editor and orator, who in he had to leave the school and move to Bonn. There 1869 became the he got his exam as an external on the 28th of July, first German-born 1847. American elected to the United State Senate. From 1847 he studied philology and history at the From 1877 to 1881 he university of Bonn. Here he made friends with was State Secretary of the professor Gottfried Kinkel and joined the Bonn United States under students' society Rutherford B. Heyes. Frankonia in 1847. Carl Schurz: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schurz#/media/File:Carl-Schurz.jpg Emigration Quotation While in London, Schurz married fellow revolutionary Johannes „Ideale sind wie Sterne. Man kann sie nicht Ronge's sister-in-law, Margarethe Meyer, in July 1852 and then, like erreichen, aber man kann sich nach ihnen many other “Forty-Eighters”, emigrated to the United States. Living orientieren.“ (Ideals are like stars. One cannot initially in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Schurzes moved to reach them, but one can orientate himself after Watertown, Wisconsin, where Carl nurtured his interests in politics them.) and Margarethe began her seminal work in early childhood education. But in 1862 Schurz started his career during the Civil War when he joined the Union army of the United States of America. In a few months he rose to a General major and division commander of the US-army. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schurz#/media/File:Carl_Schurz_Signature.svg “No one can rise their idol but you can orientated on your idol.” Philip & Leonie (GBN, year 9) http://gutezitate.com/zitate-bilder/zitat-ideale-sind-wie-sterne-man- kann-sie-nicht-erreichen-aber-man-kann-sich-nach-ihnen- orientieren-carl-schurz-221026.jpg .
Recommended publications
  • Marie VON Bruiningki Tundeline Revolutsioon Märkmeid Ühest Faehlmanni Patsiendist
    Kristi Metste_Layout 1 30.03.12 11:26 Page 270 Marie VON BruiNiNgki TuNDeLiNe reVOLuTSiOON Märkmeid ühest Faehlmanni patsiendist KRISTI METSTE Der Doctor Fehlmann wird dich schelten, thust du nicht den Mantel an. Lastelaulust uurest Lievenite suguvõsast pärit Marie (Méry) von Bruiningki, Liivimaa maanõuniku Karl Axel Christer von Bruiningki noorema poja Ludolf SAugust von Bruiningki abikaasa nimi ei ole Eesti kultuuriloos päris tundmatu. Bruiningkite perekonna liikmena kuulus ta XIX sajandi esimesel poolel selle ümber koondunud sõprusringi, millele on eriti eesti nõukogude his - toriograafias omistatud tähtis roll. Ringi olemasolu on tähistanud küll valgus - tuslik-demokraatliku iseloomuga, eesrindliku, talurahva huve väljendava ideoloogia tekkimist (Eesti NSV ajalugu 1955: 627), küll radikaalse mõtte- suuna esilekerkimist ühiskondlik-poliitilises elus XIX sajandi esimesel poolel (Strods 1992: 105), küll pärisorjusevastase, 1848. aasta revolutsiooni ideid pooldanud kodanlik-demokraatliku suuna ilmnemist Tartu ülikooli õppe- jõudude hulgas (Tartu ülikooli ajalugu 1982: 86). Sellisteks järeldusteks pole põhjust andnud mitte ainult sõpruskonna mõningate liikmete kriitika valit - senud agraarsuhete aadressil, valgustuslik püüd parandada talupoegade haridustaset ja katsed läbi suruda nende olukorda kergendavaid reforme, vaid ka Marie Bruiningki kuulumine sellesse ringi. Et ta olevat 1848. aasta revolutsioonist Saksamaal aktiivselt osa võtnud, on talle omistatud selle sõp - ruskonna vaimse liidri roll. Friedrich Robert Faehlmann kuulus samuti
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Weerth Papers from RGASPI Nd
    Georg Weerth Papers from RGASPI n.d. International Institute of Social History Cruquiusweg 31 1019 AT Amsterdam The Netherlands hdl:10622/ARCH01681 © IISH Amsterdam 2021 Georg Weerth Papers from RGASPI n.d. Table of contents Georg Weerth Papers from RGASPI............................................................................................... 3 Context............................................................................................................................................... 3 Content and Structure........................................................................................................................3 Access and Use.................................................................................................................................4 Allied Materials...................................................................................................................................4 International Institute of Social History 2 Georg Weerth Papers from RGASPI n.d. Georg Weerth Papers from RGASPI Collection ID ARCH01681 Creator Weerth, Georg Period n.d. Extent 2 microfilms Language list Language of Material German Context Biographical Note Born in Detmold, Lippe 1822, died in Havana 1856; commercial employee, poet, communist writer; frequented literary circles in Barmen, Cologne and Bonn 1838-1843, met Hermann Püttmann and Gottfried Kinkel; lived in Bradford, England 1843-1846, got in touch with Friedrich Engels and familiar with the Chartist movement; from 1844 onwards his lyrics and prose
    [Show full text]
  • Dauntless Women in Childhood Education, 1856-1931. INSTITUTION Association for Childhood Education International, Washington,/ D.C
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 094 892 PS 007 449 AUTHOR Snyder, Agnes TITLE Dauntless Women in Childhood Education, 1856-1931. INSTITUTION Association for Childhood Education International, Washington,/ D.C. PUB DATE [72] NOTE 421p. AVAILABLE FROM Association for Childhood Education International, 3615 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20016 ($9.50, paper) EDRS PRICE NF -$0.75 HC Not Available from EDRS. PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Biographical Inventories; *Early Childhood Education; *Educational Change; Educational Development; *Educational History; *Educational Philosophy; *Females; Leadership; Preschool Curriculum; Women Teachers IDENTIFIERS Association for Childhood Education International; *Froebel (Friendrich) ABSTRACT The lives and contributions of nine women educators, all early founders or leaders of the International Kindergarten Union (IKU) or the National Council of Primary Education (NCPE), are profiled in this book. Their biographical sketches are presented in two sections. The Froebelian influences are discussed in Part 1 which includes the chapters on Margarethe Schurz, Elizabeth Palmer Peabody, Susan E. Blow, Kate Douglas Wiggins and Elizabeth Harrison. Alice Temple, Patty Smith Hill, Ella Victoria Dobbs, and Lucy Gage are- found in the second part which emphasizes "Changes and Challenges." A concise background of education history describing the movements and influences preceding and involving these leaders is presented in a single chapter before each section. A final chapter summarizes the main contribution of each of the women and also elaborates more fully on such topics as IKU cooperation with other organizations, international aspects of IKU, the writings of its leaders, the standardization of curriculuis through testing, training teachers for a progressive program, and the merger of IKU and NCPE into the Association for Childhood Education.(SDH) r\J CS` 4-CO CI.
    [Show full text]
  • Denkmal Für Die Forty-Eighters in Berlin
    Prof. Dr. Erardo C. Rautenberg Brandenburg an der Havel Denkmal für die Forty-Eighters in Berlin Revolutionäre Demokraten in den deutschen Feudalstaaten, anerkannte Bürger in den USA „Mit Wort und That für Volksfreiheit im alten und neuen Vaterlande“ (Stand: 19.01.2018) A. Das Projekt I. Der Anstoß Dirk Kurbjuweit, stellvertretender Chefredakteur des Nachrichtenmagazins „Der Spiegel“, hatte vorgeschlagen, vor dem im Wiederaufbau befindlichen Berliner Stadtschloss ein Denkmal für Forty-Eighters zu errichten („Der Spiegel“ Nr. 14/2.4.2016, S. 123). Damit ist er auf große Zustimmung gestoßen („Der Spiegel“ Nr. 17/23.4. 2016, S. 115 http://www.moin-moin.us/#!German-Secretary-of-State- Steinmeier-Supports-DER-SPIEGELs-48ers-Monument- Proposal/cjds/572f83ef0cf222003e9e0ffc ), worüber auch „The Guardian“ in der Ausgabe vom 30. April 2016 berichtete: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/30/germany-special-relationship-us- obama-carl-schurz-brexit Der damalige Bundesaußenminister Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier schrieb: „Im historischen Gedächtnis vieler Menschen haben die Amerikaner, unterstützt von den Briten und Franzosen, 1945 die Demokratie nach Deutschland gebracht. Dabei gab es aber schon vor 1933 eine parlamentarische Erfahrungsbasis, die von den Akteuren 1848 hart erkämpft wurde. Vor allem das Wirken deutscher Revolutionäre wie Carl Schurz, Friedrich Hecker, Gustav Struve und Franz Sigel in Amerika ist hier weitestgehend unbekannt. Deshalb ist das Denkmal für die sogenannten Forty- Eighters eine große Chance an die wechselseitige Einflussnahme beim Aufbau stabiler Demokratien auf beiden Seiten des Ozeans zu erinnern.“ Der damalige Chef des Bundespräsidialamtes, David Gill, schrieb mir: „Es liegt dem Bundespräsidenten sehr am Herzen, das Bewusstsein für die gemeinsame Freiheits- und Demokratietradition der USA und Deutschlands aufrechtzuerhalten.“ Weiter bekundeten Sympathie für das Projekt u.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Schurz Was in the Pledge Class of 1870
    Appendix Gamma2: The Breslau Intellectual Line Connecting brothers of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity at Cornell University, tracing their fraternal Big Brother/Little Brother line to the tri-Founders and their Pledges . Brother Carl Schurz was in the Pledge Class of 1870. . Carl Schurz was friends with Gottfriend . Felix Mendelssohn studied under Kinkel years . Carl Friedrich Zelter . . Gottfried Kinkel was spouse to . Carl Friedrich Zelter studied under Carl Johanna Kinkel. Friedrich Christian Fasch . . Johanna Kinkel studied music under . Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach studied Jewish musician, under Sylvius Leopold Weiss. Felix Mendelssohn . Below we present short biographies of the Breslau intellectual line of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity at Cornell University. “Who defends the House.” We begin with brother Carl Schurz (1870), tapped into Phi Kappa Psi at Cornell in the first class after the Founding: Carl Schurz (March 2, 1829 – May 14, 1906) was a German revolutionary, American statesman and reformer, and Union Army general in the American Civil War. He was also an accomplished author, newspaper editor and journalist, who in 1869 became the first German-born American elected to the United States Senate. His wife Margarethe Schurz and her sister Bertha von Ronge were instrumental in establishing the kindergarten system in the United States. During his later years, Schurz was perhaps the most prominent Independent The University of Bonn in American politics, noted for his high principles, his avoidance of political partisanship, and his moral conscience. Brother Schurz is famous for saying: "Our country right or wrong. When right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right." Many streets, schools, and parks are named in honor of him, including New York City's Carl Schurz Park.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intersection of Gender, Religion, and Culture in Nineteenth-Century
    THE INTERSECTION OF GENDER, RELIGION, AND CULTURE IN NINETEENTH‐ CENTURY GERMANIC SALONS Jennifer Lauren Psujek A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF MUSIC August: 2010 Committee: Mary Natvig, Advisor Eftychia Papanikolaou ii ABSTRACT Mary Natvig, Advisor Modern salons began as gatherings for conversation among the French aristocracy in the seventeenth century. By the eighteenth century it had become a bourgeois tradition, with its importance cumulating in the French Revolution. The French salon moved to Germany and Austria in the late eighteenth century, however, its heyday in those lands was in the nineteenth century. The salon became a place where women in both France and the Germanic lands could gain an education and power. What has yet to be discussed in scholarship is the extent to which the salon in the Germanic lands moved away from its French roots and Became its own unique tradition. First, purely musical salons began during the Biedermeier period, as will be seen when examining the German salons of Sara Levy, Amalie Beer, Lea Mendelssohn, Fanny Mendelssohn‐Hensel, and Clara Wieck‐Schumann. Second, Germany and Austria saw the first salons hosted by Jewish women. This thesis highlights those of Henriette Herz, Rahel Levin‐Varnhagen, Fanny von Arnstein, Sara Levy, Amalie Beer, Lea Mendelssohn, Fanny Mendelssohn‐Hensel, Berta Zuckerkandl, and Salka Viertel. Finally, to demonstrate the benefits of Germanic salon culture, the last chapter focuses on Johanna Kinkel’s involvement with the Berlin salon tradition. Kinkel was a composer, writer, and political activist.
    [Show full text]
  • Heroes of the Exile
    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels The Heroes of the Exile Written: May-June 1852; First Published: In Russian 1930, German MEW 1960; Translated by: Rodney Livingston Transcription/Markup: Andy Blunden 2002; Proofed and corrected by Mark Harris, 2010. Not often one can use a word like hilarious with Karl and Fred (though Fred was usually a much more lively and rapid writer), but Heroes of the Exile can be very funny. Wasn't published in his lifetime, though he intended it to be... (that is, it wasn't an “unfinished work” in the sense the Economic and Philsophical Manuscripts were, say).Here's a snippet from translator Rodney Livingstone's 1970 intro to Heroes -- This pamphlet is one of Marx's most brilliant satirical achievements. Its excellence as satire stands out all the more clearly for the fact that, unlike many of his other works which have a satirical element, the prime purpose of the work is satirical: a polemic on the world of German emigres with its venomous internecine struggles, its petty personality conflicts, complicated intrigues, pretentious political manoeuvres and sordid compromises with the realities of living in exile with “dubious sources of income”.It would be a mistake to suppose that the work was actuated by malice, that it was merely a series of personal attacks on people who irritated Marx. It is often supposed that Marx was essentially a heavy, humourless man and that if his works contain humour it is the expression only of a ponderous, “Germanic” predilection for sarcasm without true wit or feeling. His talent for polemic is then seen as springing from an almost obsessive compulsion to win, to be in the right, to beat down all opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Johanna Kinkel's Thurm Und Fluth
    THE NATIONAL ELΕMENT IN MUSIC INTERNATIONAL MUSICOLOGICAL CONFERENCE ATHENS (mEGARON-THE ATHENS CONCERT HALL) 18-20 January 2013 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ORGANIZED BY FACULTY OF mUSIC STUDIES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MUSIC LIBRARY OF GREECE ‘LILIAN VOUDOURI’ SUPPORTED BY mEGARON-tHE ATHENS CONCERT HALL ATHENS 2014 Johanna Kinkel’s Thurm und Fluth (Opus 19, No. 6): Revolutionary ideas and political optimism in a 19th‐century art song Anja Bunzel National University of Ireland, Maynooth [email protected] Abstract. Johanna Kinkel (1810‐1858) has for a long time been overshadowed by her husband, Gottfried Kinkel (1815‐1882), who was an influential German political propagandist in the 19th century. When he was arrested as a result of a pre‐unionist revolutionary speech in 1849, Johanna was not allowed to visit him, because the state es‐ timated her influence as being harmful for Gottfried’s peace of mind and his indoctrination. In fact, Johanna Kinkel was the co‐founder of the political magazine Maikäfer and she expressed her sympathy for her husband’s political activities in many letters and diary entries. Another interesting avenue to her political perceptions is her musical Œuvre including more than 80 art songs, three cantatas as well as incidental music. This paper aims to introduce Johanna Kinkel’s lied Thurm und Fluth, Opus 19, No. 6, which was published in 1848, one of the most eventful years on the way from scattered regionalism to a united Germany. The consistently ambiguous words are deliv‐ ered through a broad variety of compositional features, ranging from traditional formal aspects to fairly experi‐ mental harmonic and melodic progressions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carl Schurz Memorial Professorship at the University Of
    The Carl Schurz Memorial Professorship at the University of Wisconsin Madison, spring 2020 Michael Kaeding, Carl Schurz Visiting Professor 2019/20 Madison, spring 2020 Michael Kaeding, Carl Schurz Visiting Professor 2019/20 Table of contents 1. Carl Schurz, the German-American _______________________ 2 2. The idea ____________________________________________ 8 3. The history _________________________________________ 13 4. First Carl Schurz Memorial Professor – Professor Eugen Kühnemann ________________________________________ 16 5. Inaugural speech by first Carl Schurz Professor Kühnemann __ 220 6. Carl Schurz Visiting Professors 1912 – 2020 _______________ 31 7. Recommended reading and further information ____________ 38 8. Bibliography ________________________________________ 40 Annex _______________________________________________ 45 1 1. Carl Schurz, the German-American 1829 March 2, Carl Schurz born in Liblar near the commercial metropolis Cologne (Germany). 1847 Maturity examination in Cologne. Start of the student period in the intellectual capital Bonn. Acquaintance with Professor Gottfried Kinkel. 1848 Revolution in Paris, uprising in Vienna, street fights in Berlin, Frankfurter Nationalversammlung, Schurz takes part in the Revolt of 1848-49 in the Palatinate and Baden as journalist and soldier, Congress of democratic associations in Cologne, Schurz meets with Karl Marx 1849 Dissolution of the Frankfurter Nationalversammlung. Prussia throws down the republican uprising in southern Germany, fights in Ubstadt, Waghäusel and Rastatt. Schurz goes into the Palatinate and Baden, is shut up with the garrison in the fortress of Rastatt, escapes in the nick of time. Schurz emigrates. Professor Kinkel is sent to Naugard prison and later to Spandau prison. Schurz finds that other refugees had raised a purse to provide for Professor Kinkel´s escape. 1850 Schurz travels back to Germany illegally.
    [Show full text]
  • Adresse Eines Briefes Von Gottfried an Johanna Kinkel, Geschrieben Am 27
    Adresse eines Briefes von Gottfried an Johanna Kinkel, geschrieben am 27. Juli 1849 aus dem Kerker in Karlsruhe Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Bonn Abteilung Handschriften und Rara Nachlaß Gottfried und Johanna Kinkel Findbuch Bearbeitet von Ulrike Brandt-Schwarze und Mitarbeitern der Handschriftenabteilung Bonn 2001 Inhalt Vorwort V Einleitung VII Der Erwerb des Nachlasses durch die Universitätsbibliothek Bonn VIII Die Ordnung des Nachlasses XI Zur vorliegenden Erschließung des Nachlasses XV Zu Kinkels Korrespondenz und den Briefabschriften XVII Verzeichnis der abgekürzt zitierten Literatur XIX Teilnachlaß I 1 Übersicht Teilnachlaß I 3 1. Abteilung: Nachlaß Gottfried Kinkel: S 2366 – S 2387 5 2. Abteilung: Nachlaß Johanna Kinkel: S 2388 – S 2409 13 3. Abteilung 19 A: Nachlaß Gottfried Kinkel <jun.>: S 2410 – S 2415 19 B: Nachlaß Adelheid von Asten, geb. Kinkel: S 2416 – S 2419 (komplett Kriegsverlust) 20 C: Aus dem Besitz von Konrad Kinkel: S 2420 20 4. Abteilung: Urkunden und Dokumente: S 2421 21 5. Abteilung: Briefe: S 2422 – 2427 22 6. Abteilung: Drucksachen und Bilder: S 2428 – 2430 25 Teilnachlaß II 29 Übersicht Teilnachlaß II 31 I. Briefe von Freunden und Bekannten, überwiegend an Gottfried Kinkel: S 2660 – S 2663: Absender A – Z 37 II. Briefe und Aufzeichnungen von Gottfried Kinkel und anderen Familienmitgliedern, vornehmlich an Verwandte: S 2664 – S 2670 50 III. Briefabschriften: S 2671 – S 2676 65 IV. Tagebücher und Notizbücher: S 2677 – S 2680 83 V. Gottfried Kinkels Werk 102 V, A.: Theologie, Literatur u.a., Rhetorik: S 2681 – S 2692 102 V, B.: Kunstgeschichte u.a., Reisen, Lebensdokumente: S 2693 – S 2701 128 V, C.: Politik: S 2702 – S 2704 149 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Back: When Does the ‘War of the Spirits’ Start?
    Appendix Looking Back: When does the ‘War of the Spirits’ Start? George L. Mosse begins his classic analysis of German ideology in the 1870s, at a time when the unification of the country and the rise of industry evoked a fierce critical re- sponse from a section of the intellectual elite.1 The movement against modernisation continued to grow from then on, accelerating at the turn of the century and engaging with anti-Semitism and racism. During World War I, motifs and arguments previously mobilised for condemning the degradation wreaked by civilisation were deployed in the “war of the spirits.” They were aimed at the outside, against the enemies of the nation and the state. The point of departure for this process appears to have been as fascinating as its results. Did phenomena typical of the ‘war of the spirits’ appear in the early years of the “crisis of German ideology” as well, when the Reich was inaugurated? The outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War did not involve a national mobilisation at first. Both French and German journalists depicted it as a clash of world powers that would naturally conclude with the victory of their own side. At that point, declara- tions of faith in one’s nation’s capabilities did not yet require the demonising the op- ponent. This changed in September 1870, as a result of the inconceivable failure of the French army. Following the Emperor’s capitulation and the proclamation of the Third Republic, a juxtaposition between French civilisation and German barbarism emerged in public discourse along with revolutionary calls for a nationwide rout of the invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • European Forty‑Eighters' Fundraising Tours in the United States1
    STUDIA HISTORICA GEDANENSIA TOM V (2014) István Kornél Vida (University of Debrecen) “Passing the Plate for Revolution”: European Forty‑Eighters’ Fundraising Tours in the United States1 Historian George Macaulay Trevelyan called the European revolutions of 1848/49 "one of the turning points in human history when history actually failed to turn”.2 Nevertheless, for several months autocracy stamping on individual freedoms in so many countries seemed defeated and hopes were high that it would be replaced for good through national unification and the installation of popular self‑governments. The Spring of Nations affected over 50 countries one way or another, but eventually no co‑operation developed among the various revolutionary groups in different countries. Among several other factors, this resulted in the reactionary forces bracing up again and, sometimes with foreign assistance, managed to supress the revolutionary movements. Monarchy, conservativism and restoration prevailed in France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Hungary. Those hoping for change had to do with only a handful of lasting reforms: serfdom was abolished once and for all in Austria‑Hungary and in the Ausgleich of 1867 Emperor Francis Joseph had no other option but to give Hungarians more self‑determination. The absolute monarchy collapsed in Denmark and Louis Philippe of France was forced to abdicate in 1848 and live in exile in England. The defeat of freedom struggles was followed by brutal retaliation: the powers of restoration, shaken and insecure as they were, wanted to make sure that no such attempt could endanger their authority. In Hungary, the only country where the conflict had reached the scale of an all‑out war of independence to be suppressed only with the more‑than‑willing intervention by the troops of Russian 1 The article was written with the generous support of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, for which I am most grateful.
    [Show full text]