Blocking+Public+Participation.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Carleton Party Name Contact #’S Web Site Notes Conservative Pierre Tel: 613-992-2772 2011 – 54% Poilievre Fax: 613-992-1209 2015 – 47% (-7%)
Ottawa Area MPs January 25, 2016 Carleton Party Name Contact #’s Web Site Notes Conservative Pierre Tel: 613-992-2772 http://pierremp.ca 2011 – 54% Poilievre Fax: 613-992-1209 2015 – 47% (-7%) Email: [email protected] Address: 1139 Mill Street (Main Office) Manotick ON K4M 1A5 Phone: 1 613 692-3331 Profile: Pierre Poilievre, PC, MP; born June 3, 1979 is a Canadian politician and was the Minister of Employment and Social Development and Minister of State. He is currently a member of the Canadian House of Commons representing the suburban Ottawa riding of Carleton. First elected in 2004, Poilievre was re-elected in 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2015. Poilievre received the second highest vote total of any candidate in the 2008 election. Poilievre was born in Calgary, Alberta, the son of schoolteachers. Poilievre is Franco-Albertan in origin. He studied international relations at the University of Calgary, following a period of study in commerce at the same institution. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Calgary. Poilievre has done policy work for Canadian Alliance MPs Stockwell Day and Jason Kenney, and prior to running for office himself; worked as a full-time assistant to Day. He also worked for Magna International, focusing on communications, and has done public relations work. In 1999, writing as Pierre Marcel Poilievre, he contributed an essay, "Building Canada Through Freedom" to the book @Stake—"As Prime Minister, I Would...", a collection of essays from Magna International's "As Prime Minister" awards program. In his essay he argued, among other things, for a two-term limit for all Members of Parliament. -
A STUDYGUIDE by Robert Lewis
A STUDYGUIDE BY ROBERT LEWIS www.metromagazine.com.au www.theeducationshop.com.au McLibel (Franny Armstrong, 2005) is an 85-minute documentary film about the attempt by McDonald’s to stop the distribution of a pamphlet that they claimed defamed them. wo of the distributors of the settlement negotiations. Even spies. BEFORE WATCHING THE pamphlet, London Greenpeace FILM Tmembers Helen Steel and Dave Seven years later, in February 2005, Morris, defended themselves in what the marathon legal battle finally McLibel is about the court case turned out to be Britain’s longest-ever concluded at the European Court of that was brought by McDonald’s in civil trial. Human Rights. And the result took Britain to stop the distribution of the everyone by surprise – especially the pamphlet ‘What’s wrong with McDon- McLibel is the story of two ordinary British Government. ald’s?’. The pamphlet made many people who humiliated McDonald’s in accusations against McDonald’s. the biggest corporate PR disaster in McLibel is not just about hamburgers. history. McDonald’s loved using the It is about the importance of freedom To understand what the case was UK libel laws to suppress criticism. of speech now that multinational about you need to study the pamphlet. Major media organizations like the corporations are more powerful than BBC and The Guardian crumbled and countries. It is a long pamphlet, so to make the apologized. task easier it has been divided into Filmed over ten years by no-budget sub-sections in Table 1 on (page 3). But then they sued gardener Helen Director Franny Armstrong, McLibel The whole class should look at the Steel and postman Dave Morris. -
News Advertiser Thursday,OPEN May 12Th Thurs.Wednesday, April 30, May 2009 25Th FREE INSTALLATION @ 7:00 P.M
THE ifestyle BLAISDALE B L I MONTESSORI L L A R I O S S D S HOME PRODUCTS A L T E E M O N SCHOOL NEW AWNINGS OPEN HOUSE News Advertiser Thursday,OPEN May 12th Thurs.Wednesday, April 30, May 2009 25th FREE INSTALLATION @ 7:00 p.m. @ 7:00@ 7:00 p.m. p.m. HOUSEat Westney Campus 56at OldRougemount Kingston Rd., Campus PICKERING On All New Orders! 20 O’Brien Crt., Ajax Pickering365 Kingston Village, Rd., Ajax Pickering 905-686-9607 905-509-5005 lifestyleproducts.ca Th ursday, April 28, 2011 Blaisdale.com 12 months - grade 8 POLITICS 3 Debate no-show Pickering candidate instructed to skip it: teacher POLICE 4 Markham murder Ajax man in custody SPORTS 21 JASON LIEBREGTS / METROLAND In the PICKERING -- Councillors Doug Dickerson and Peter Rodrigues, along with Rob Gagen, centre, chairman of Pickering Blooms committee, octagon launched Pickering Blooms by planting echinacea (coneflowers), Pickering’s newly adopted flower, in the front garden of City Hall. Pickering fighter in Ontario’s first Pickering program sprouts anew UFC card CITY TO BLOOM AGAIN WITH COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT facebook.com/newsdurham KRISTEN CALIS Gardeners are now hard at work to make their participation from all residents and businesses [email protected] properties look bright and inviting for spring, and schools to bring awareness to our commu- twitter.com/newsdurham and Pickering staff members, councillors and nity and enhance its beauty through that orga- PICKERING -- Although it wasn’t the sunniest volunteers plan to help enhance the commu- nization,” said Ward 2 Regional Councillor Bill Pressrun 51,400 • 32 pages of days, the rain stopped long enough Tuesday nity this season by promoting the community McLean, Pickering Blooms co-chairman. -
Core 1..186 Hansard
CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 060 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 18, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 3683 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 18, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. (a) the motion shall again be considered on a day designated by the Government after consultation with the House Leaders of the other parties, but in any case not later than the tenth sitting day after the interruption; Prayers (b) debate on the motion shall be resumed at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment on the day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section and shall not be further interrupted or adjourned; and (c) when no Member rises to speak or after three hours of debate, whichever is GOVERNMENT ORDERS earlier, the Speaker shall put all questions necessary to dispose of the motion, provided that, if a recorded division is requested on the motion considered on a (1000) Ï day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this Standing Order, it shall stand [English] deferred to an appointed time on the next Wednesday, no later than the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on that day. STANDING ORDERS (3) Not more than one motion for the concurrence in a report from a standing or Hon. Anne McLellan (for the Leader of the Government in the special committee may be moved on any sitting day. -
Protecting Activists from Abusive Litigation: Slapps in the Global
PROTECTING ACTIVISTS FROM ABUSIVE LITIGATION SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH AND HOW TO RESPOND SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH Features and Policy Responses Author: Nikhil Dutta, Global Programs Legal Advisor, ICNL, [email protected]. Our thanks go to the following colleagues and partners for valuable discussions and input on this report: Abby Henderson; Charlie Holt; Christen Dobson; Ginna Anderson; Golda Benjamin; Lady Nancy Zuluaga Jaramillo; Zamira Djabarova; the Cambodian Center for Human Rights; iProbono; and SEEDS for Legal Initiatives. Published in July 2020 by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL NORTH 2 III. SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 4 A. Instances of Reported SLAPPs in the South 4 i. Thailand 5 ii. India 7 iii. Philippines 10 iv. South Africa 12 v. Other Instances of Reported SLAPPS in the South 13 B. Features of Reported SLAPPs in the South 15 IV. POLICY RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL NORTH 19 A. Enacting Protections for Public Participation 19 B. Creating Expedited Dismissal Procedures for SLAPPs 20 C. Endowing Courts with Supplemental Authorities to Manage SLAPPs 23 D. Permitting Recovery of Costs by SLAPP Targets 24 E. Authorizing Government Intervention in SLAPPs 25 F. Establishing Public Funds to Support SLAPP Defense 25 G. Imposing Compensatory and Punitive Damages on SLAPP Filers 25 H. Levying Penalties on SLAPP Filers 26 I. Reforming SLAPP Causes of Action 27 V. POLICY RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 27 A. Thailand 28 B. Philippines 30 C. Indonesia 33 VI. DEVISING FUTURE RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 33 REFERENCES 37 I. -
Core 1..164 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 16.00)
House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 007 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, October 24, 2013 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 321 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, October 24, 2013 The House met at 10 a.m. [Translation] Ms. Françoise Boivin: Mr. Speaker, I seek the unanimous consent of the House to move the following motion: That, Prayers notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, clauses 471 and 472 related to the appointment of Supreme Court justices be withdrawn from Bill C-4, A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS 2013 and other measures, and do compose Bill C-6; that Bill C-6 be deemed read a first time and be printed; that the order for second Ï (1005) reading of the said bill provide for the referral to the Standing [English] Committee on Justice and Human Rights; that Bill C-4 retain the status on the Order Paper that it had prior to the adoption of this FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND REPORTS ANALYSIS order; that Bill C-4 be reprinted as amended; and that the law clerk CENTRE and parliamentary counsel be authorized to make any technical The Speaker: I have the honour to lay upon the table the audit changes and corrections as may be necessary to give effect to this report of the Privacy Commissioner concerning the Financial motion. Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada. You understand, Mr. -
The Following Report Is No Longer Current, and Is to Be Used for Historical Purposes Only
The following report is no longer current, and is to be used for historical purposes only. CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by DENA JONES for the Animal Welfare Institute 2 CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by Dena Jones May 2008 Animal Welfare Institute Crimes Without Consequences: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by Dena Jones Animal Welfare Institute P.O. Box 3650 Washington, DC 20027 www.awionline.org Copyright © 2008 by the Animal Welfare Institute Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-938414-94-1 LCCN 2008925385 i CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 5 1.1 About the author........................................................................ 6 1.2 About the Animal Welfare Institute ........................................... 6 1.3 Acknowledgements ................................................................... 6 2. Overview of Food Animal Slaughter in the United States ...................... 7 2.1 Animals Slaughtered ................................................................. 7 2.2 Types of Slaughter Plants .......................................................... 12 2.3 Number of Plants ..................................................................... -
Legal Research Paper Series
Legal Research Paper Series NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY By Rita K. Lomio and J. Paul Lomio Research Paper No. 6 October 2005 Robert Crown Law Library Crown Quadrangle Stanford, California 94305-8612 NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRPAHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY I. Books II. Reports III. Law Review Articles IV. Newspaper Articles (including legal newspapers) V. Sound Recordings and Films VI. Web Resources I. Books RESEARCH GUIDES AND BIBLIOGRAPHIES Hoffman, Piper, and the Harvard Student Animal Legal Defense Fund The Guide to Animal Law Resources Hollis, New Hampshire: Puritan Press, 1999 Reference KF 3841 G85 “As law students, we have found that although more resources are available and more people are involved that the case just a few years ago, locating the resource or the person we need in a particular situation remains difficult. The Guide to Animal Law Resources represents our attempt to collect in one place some of the resources a legal professional, law professor or law student might want and have a hard time finding.” Guide includes citations to organizations and internships, animal law court cases, a bibliography, law schools where animal law courses are taught, Internet resources, conferences and lawyers devoted to the cause. The International Institute for Animal Law A Bibliography of Animal Law Resources Chicago, Illinois: The International Institute for Animal Law, 2001 KF 3841 A1 B53 Kistler, John M. Animal Rights: A Subject Guide, Bibliography, and Internet Companion Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2000 HV 4708 K57 Bibliography divided into six subject areas: Animal Rights: General Works, Animal Natures, Fatal Uses of Animals, Nonfatal Uses of Animals, Animal Populations, and Animal Speculations. -
50-Year Case of Election Fever
Help Generations help kids generationsfoundation.com O 514-933-8585 OCTOBER2008 theseniortimes.com VOL.XXIIIN 1 INSIDE Dancing duo makes ‘em smile p. 7 50-year case of election Cotler frustrated by fever inaction on Darfur p. 11 p. 3 She needs you! p. 13 Editorial: Strong candidates make voting decisions tough With storm clouds signaling economic meltdown for the NDP, Conservatives and Green Party who son is waging a high-profile campaign. Former as- hovering over the United States,the debates in the are attracting attention and would make excellent tronaut Marc Garneau is the Liberal star candidate Canadian general election seemed liked a passing MPs. Green Party leader Elizabeth May urges there – certainly a man of honour and achievement, sunshower.Addtothatthedramaof Obamaversus Canadians to vote with their hearts, but some are who has proved his dedication to the common good. McCain,and his risky choice of Sarah Palin as run- calling for strategic voting, to support whomever The NDP’s Peter Deslauriers, former head of the ning mate,and you have all the makings of drama, is strongest to prevent a Tory majority. Dawson College teachers’ union, is also an attrac- even if at times it resembled a daytime soap opera. Some may feel that Liberal leader Stéphane Dion, tive candidate for NDG–Lachine, up against Mar- But we have a real battle going on right here, an honest, hardworking, principled and brilliant lene Jennings, who has become a well-known with all the opinion surveys pointing to a renewed man, has been pilloried for not being as good with advocate of minority rights. -
Canadian Defamation Law Is Noncompliant with International Law
Canadian defamation law is noncompliant with international law Prepared for the OCLA by volunteer Denis G. Rancourt, PhD 1 February 2016 SUMMARY: Defamation law in Canada is contrary to international law, in both design and practice. Under international law, the right to hold an opinion is absolute, and the right of freedom of expression can be restricted “for respect of the rights or reputations of others” solely using written laws that must conform to the “strict tests of necessity and proportionality”. With Canadian civil defamation law, the state has unfettered discretion from an unwritten common law that provides presumed falsity, presumed malice, unlimited presumed damages, and broad gag orders enforceable by jail, using a subjective judicial test for “defamation” without requiring any evidence of actual damage to reputation. Also, Canada’s practice of its defamation law materially aggravates the noncompliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (eleven impugned rules and practices are described). A final section broadly examines the underlying social and historic reasons for having developed an oppressive defamation law, followed by recommendations. 1. The most important legal instrument to supress expression in Canada is the common law of defamation, which acts both directly and by creating chill. Using this instrument, any corporation or individual with sufficient financial means to pursue a defamation lawsuit can intimidate and silence any publisher, writer, media outlet, social-media commentator, blogger, vlogger, or public speaker.1 2. This article is divided in four parts. First, I prove that the Canadian common law of defamation is in violation of international law, and is therefore unconstitutional. -
The Canadian Defamation Action: an Empirical Study
THE CANADIAN DEFAMATION ACTION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY Hilary Young* This article presents the results of a quantitative study of Canadian defamation law actions, focusing on reported decisions between 1973 and 1983 and between 2003 and 2013. It aims to contribute to debate about defamation law reform, to contribute to scholarly work in defamation law or in tort law and remedies more generally, and to inform lawyers who are involved in defamation litigation. Its findings include: that damages have almost doubled when adjusted for inflation between these two periods; that corporate defamation cases make up about a third of defamation cases; that plaintiffs established liability much less often between 2003 and 2013 than between 1973 and 1983; that punitive damages are awarded much more often to corporations than to human plaintiffs, and in higher amounts; that punitive damages were awarded in about a quarter of cases in both periods; and that the rate of liability is greater for publications on the internet (including email) than publications in other media. Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude quantitative des actions en diffamation intentées au Canada, mettant plus particulièrement l’accent sur les décisions publiées entre 1973 et 1983 et entre 2003 et 2013. Il vise à contribuer au débat sur la réforme du droit de la diffamation, ainsi qu’aux travaux de recherche spécifiques sur le droit de la diffamation ou plus généralement sur le droit de la responsabilité délictuelle et le droit en matière de mesures de réparation. L’article cherche également à guider les avocats impliqués dans des litiges en diffamation. -
Grant V. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61 DATE: 20091222 DOCKET: 32932
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61 DATE: 20091222 DOCKET: 32932 BETWEEN: Peter Grant and Grant Forest Products Inc. Appellants / Respondents on cross-appeal and Torstar Corporation, Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, Bill Schiller, John Honderich and Mary Deanne Shears Respondents / Appellants on cross-appeal - and - Ottawa Citizen, Canadian Newspaper Association, Ad IDEM/Canadian Media Lawyers’ Association, RTNDA Canada/Association of Electronic Journalists, Magazines Canada, Canadian Association of Journalists, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, Writers’ Union of Canada, Professional Writers Association of Canada, Book and Periodical Council, PEN Canada, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Danno Cusson Interveners CORAM: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: McLachlin C.J. (Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Charron, (paras. 1 to 141) Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. concurring) CONCURRING REASONS: Abella J. (paras. 142 to 146) NOTE: This document is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the Canada Supreme Court Reports. ______________________________ GRANT v. TORSTAR CORP. Peter Grant and Grant Forest Products Inc. Appellants/Respondents on cross-appeal v. Torstar Corporation, Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, Bill Schiller, John Honderich and Mary Deanne Shears Respondents/Appellants on cross-appeal and Ottawa Citizen, Canadian Newspaper Association, Ad IDEM/Canadian Media Lawyers’ Association, RTNDA Canada/Association of Electronic Journalists, Magazines Canada, Canadian Association of Journalists, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, Writers’ Union of Canada, Professional Writers Association of Canada, Book and Periodical Council, PEN Canada, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Danno Cusson Interveners Indexed as: Grant v.