Blocking+Public+Participation.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Blocking+Public+Participation.Pdf BLOCKING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 1 14-01-29 12:28 PM Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 2 14-01-29 12:28 PM BLOCKING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION THE USE OF STRATEGIC LITIGATION TO SILENCE POLITICAL EXPRESSION Byron Sheldrick Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 3 14-01-29 12:28 PM This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Wilfrid Laurier University Press acknowledges the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund for our publishing activities. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Sheldrick, Byron M., author Blocking public participation : the use of strategic litigation to silence political expression / Byron Sheldrick. Includes bibliographical references and index. Issued in print and electronic formats. ISBN 978-1-55458-929-6 (pbk.).—ISBN 978-1-55458-930-2 (pdf).— ISBN 978-1-55458-931-9 (epub) 1. Political participation—Canada. 2. Frivolous suits (Civil procedure)—Canada. I. Title. KE4425.S44 2014 342.7108’54 C2013-905911-3 KF4483.A8S44 2014 C2013-905912-1 Cover design by Martyn Schmoll. Front-cover image from iStockphoto. Text design by James Leahy. © 2014 Wilfrid Laurier University Press Waterloo, Ontario, Canada www.wlupress.wlu.ca This book is printed on FSC recycled paper and is certified Ecologo. It is made from 100% post-consumer fibre, processed chlorine free, and manufactured using biogas energy. Printed in Canada Every reasonable effort has been made to acquire permission for copyright material used in this text, and to acknowledge all such indebtedness accurately. Any errors and omissions called to the publisher’s attention will be corrected in future printings. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written consent of the publisher or a licence from the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright). For an Access Copyright licence, visit http://www.accesscopyright.ca or call toll free to 1-800-893-5777. Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 4 14-01-29 12:28 PM In memory of my father Melville A. Sheldrick Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 5 14-01-29 12:28 PM Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 6 14-01-29 12:28 PM Contents Acknowledgements ix 1 slapps: Courts, Democracy, and Participation 1 2 slapps: Balancing Law and Democracy 11 3 slapps in Canada 39 4 slapps Come to Parliament 63 5 The Regulation of slapps 89 6 Resisting and Defending against slapps 123 7 Final Thoughts 141 Appendix: Legal Resources 149 Notes 151 Works Cited 153 Index 165 Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 7 14-01-29 12:28 PM Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 8 14-01-29 12:28 PM Acknowledgements The inspiration for this book came from a conversation with my son one evening as we watched the national news. It had just been announced that Prime Minister Stephen Harper was suing the Liberal Party of Canada, as well as the leader of the party and several other members of Parliament, over comments published on their website in the so-called Cadman affair. My son turned to me and said, “He can’t do that, can he?” The answer, of course, was that “well, yes, he can.” The specific case fell outside of the scope of parliamentary privilege, and there was no legal barrier to it. At the same time, I shared my son’s discomfort with the notion that political issues between the parties could lead to litigation. This led to research into the scope of parliamentary privilege that was presented in 2009–10 at the annual conferences of the Atlantic Provinces’ Political Science As- sociation and the British Association of Canadian Studies. That research forms the basis of Chapter 4 of this book. It concluded that our current structures of parliamentary privilege are ill suited to modern political prac- tices. Lawsuits like the Prime Minister’s allegations against the Liberal party, I argued, should be understood as examples of strategic litigation against public participation. This, in turn, led to the observation that this was a relatively ignored topic in Canadian political science and that a fuller book-length examination of the topic would be a timely addition to the academic literature on Canadian public interest law. In pursuing a major book project, one requires the support of a collegial and intellectually stimulating environment. Accordingly, I need to thank Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 9 14-01-29 12:28 PM x Acknowledgements my colleagues at the University of Guelph for creating a rich and dynamic environment for intellectual inquiry. In particular, thanks go to Troy Rid- dell and Dennis Baker, who share a commitment to studying the inter- section of law and politics. Even though we might disagree about much, they are wonderful colleagues and I am proud to count them among my good friends. I would also like to thank Candace Johnson, Craig Johnson, Carol Dauda, David Macdonald, Tim Mau, Ian Spears, Jordi Diez, Janine Clark, Tamara Small, and the rest of the Department of Political Science at Guelph for their friendship and support. And I would like to thank my staff: Debbie Bowie, who keeps my life organized and without whom the department simply could not function; and Geri McCauley and Renée Tavascia, who both do such fabulous jobs. I also need to thank Laura Maclean, a student in our Environmental Governance program who was an invaluable research assistant. I also want to express my appreciation and thanks to Dr. O.P. Dwivedi, who sadly passed away shortly after this book was completed. O.P. epitomized what it is to be a scholar in the tru- est sense of the word. He was a remarkable man and he is greatly missed. This book was written while on a research leave after the completion of my first term as Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Guelph. That leave was spent as a visiting scholar in the Department of Political Science at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St. John’s. I owe a particular debt to David Close, who facilitated and supported my coming to Memorial. I also need to thank Luke Ashworth, Head of Department at MUN, who provided me with office space and resources, but kindly made no real demands of me. Luke was working on his own manuscript throughout the year, and his support and encourage- ment were greatly appreciated. My time at MUN provided me with the space and time to read, think, and write. As anyone who has served as chair of department knows, these are resources that are in scare supply while dealing with the administrative realities of university life. Memorial University, St. John’s, and Newfoundland now hold special places in my life, and I hope that I am able to maintain my connection to them long into the future. Special thanks to Russ Williams, Amanda Bittner, Matt Kerby, Alex Marland, Miriam Anderson, Dimitrios Panagos, Scott Mat- thews, and Kelly Blidook. You were fabulous colleagues during my year in Newfoundland, and I greatly value your friendship. I owe a huge debt to Ryan Chynces, Brian Henderson, Lisa Quinn, Blaire Comacchio, and all the staff at Wilfrid Laurier University Press for their support, patience, and encouragement, as well as the anonymous Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 10 14-01-29 12:28 PM Acknowledgements xi reviewers of the manuscript for their very helpful comments. Their contri- butions helped make this a better book than it otherwise would have been. I also need to thank Rodolphe Devillers from the Department of Geo- graphy at MUN. While Rodolphe was enjoying his own research leave, my family was able to rent his wonderful house in Torbay. The views of the ocean, including playful whales and soaring bald eagles, provided the perfect setting for a productive year of writing and contemplation, all the while observing the changing nature of the land and sea. Of course, New- foundland is well known for the harshness of its climate, particularly dur- ing the winter. Over the course of my time there I came to appreciate the wonder and beauty of that climate. “Onward through the fog” is more than a Newfoundland statement about the weather; it’s a philosophy of life. It is, perhaps, particularly applicable to academic life. I now understand the fierceness of a winter storm, the sound of gale-force winds, and the diversity and beauty of the snow. Sometimes, being snowed in can be an amazing experience and just what the mind and body require. I must also thank my family for their continued love and support: my partner Robin, and our children Lachlan and Morag. Over the past several years I’m sure they have seen me at my best (hopefully) and my worst (sadly). Yet they continue to put up with me, occasionally laugh at my jokes, and forgive my propensity to dance and sing in public. Without them my life would be far less rich and fulfilling and I cherish them so very much. This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Federa- tion for the Humanities and Social Science, through the Awards to Schol- arly Publications Program, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Finally, this book is motivated by the struggles and commitment of so- cial activists. These are people who labour, often without compensation, because they are dedicated to the vision of a better world and are not pre- pared to accept the world we live in as a given. Their efforts, commitment, and sacrifice, continue to inspire! Byron Sheldrick Guelph, Ontario Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 11 14-01-29 12:28 PM Sheldrick_Final_Proofs2.indb 12 14-01-29 12:28 PM slapps: Courts, Democracy, and 1 Participation In 1995, the lumber company Daishowa, seeking an injunction to pre- vent an ongoing boycott of their products, sued a small non-profit social group, the Friends of the Lubicon.
Recommended publications
  • Carleton Party Name Contact #’S Web Site Notes Conservative Pierre Tel: 613-992-2772 2011 – 54% Poilievre Fax: 613-992-1209 2015 – 47% (-7%)
    Ottawa Area MPs January 25, 2016 Carleton Party Name Contact #’s Web Site Notes Conservative Pierre Tel: 613-992-2772 http://pierremp.ca 2011 – 54% Poilievre Fax: 613-992-1209 2015 – 47% (-7%) Email: [email protected] Address: 1139 Mill Street (Main Office) Manotick ON K4M 1A5 Phone: 1 613 692-3331 Profile: Pierre Poilievre, PC, MP; born June 3, 1979 is a Canadian politician and was the Minister of Employment and Social Development and Minister of State. He is currently a member of the Canadian House of Commons representing the suburban Ottawa riding of Carleton. First elected in 2004, Poilievre was re-elected in 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2015. Poilievre received the second highest vote total of any candidate in the 2008 election. Poilievre was born in Calgary, Alberta, the son of schoolteachers. Poilievre is Franco-Albertan in origin. He studied international relations at the University of Calgary, following a period of study in commerce at the same institution. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Calgary. Poilievre has done policy work for Canadian Alliance MPs Stockwell Day and Jason Kenney, and prior to running for office himself; worked as a full-time assistant to Day. He also worked for Magna International, focusing on communications, and has done public relations work. In 1999, writing as Pierre Marcel Poilievre, he contributed an essay, "Building Canada Through Freedom" to the book @Stake—"As Prime Minister, I Would...", a collection of essays from Magna International's "As Prime Minister" awards program. In his essay he argued, among other things, for a two-term limit for all Members of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDYGUIDE by Robert Lewis
    A STUDYGUIDE BY ROBERT LEWIS www.metromagazine.com.au www.theeducationshop.com.au McLibel (Franny Armstrong, 2005) is an 85-minute documentary film about the attempt by McDonald’s to stop the distribution of a pamphlet that they claimed defamed them. wo of the distributors of the settlement negotiations. Even spies. BEFORE WATCHING THE pamphlet, London Greenpeace FILM Tmembers Helen Steel and Dave Seven years later, in February 2005, Morris, defended themselves in what the marathon legal battle finally McLibel is about the court case turned out to be Britain’s longest-ever concluded at the European Court of that was brought by McDonald’s in civil trial. Human Rights. And the result took Britain to stop the distribution of the everyone by surprise – especially the pamphlet ‘What’s wrong with McDon- McLibel is the story of two ordinary British Government. ald’s?’. The pamphlet made many people who humiliated McDonald’s in accusations against McDonald’s. the biggest corporate PR disaster in McLibel is not just about hamburgers. history. McDonald’s loved using the It is about the importance of freedom To understand what the case was UK libel laws to suppress criticism. of speech now that multinational about you need to study the pamphlet. Major media organizations like the corporations are more powerful than BBC and The Guardian crumbled and countries. It is a long pamphlet, so to make the apologized. task easier it has been divided into Filmed over ten years by no-budget sub-sections in Table 1 on (page 3). But then they sued gardener Helen Director Franny Armstrong, McLibel The whole class should look at the Steel and postman Dave Morris.
    [Show full text]
  • News Advertiser Thursday,OPEN May 12Th Thurs.Wednesday, April 30, May 2009 25Th FREE INSTALLATION @ 7:00 P.M
    THE ifestyle BLAISDALE B L I MONTESSORI L L A R I O S S D S HOME PRODUCTS A L T E E M O N SCHOOL NEW AWNINGS OPEN HOUSE News Advertiser Thursday,OPEN May 12th Thurs.Wednesday, April 30, May 2009 25th FREE INSTALLATION @ 7:00 p.m. @ 7:00@ 7:00 p.m. p.m. HOUSEat Westney Campus 56at OldRougemount Kingston Rd., Campus PICKERING On All New Orders! 20 O’Brien Crt., Ajax Pickering365 Kingston Village, Rd., Ajax Pickering 905-686-9607 905-509-5005 lifestyleproducts.ca Th ursday, April 28, 2011 Blaisdale.com 12 months - grade 8 POLITICS 3 Debate no-show Pickering candidate instructed to skip it: teacher POLICE 4 Markham murder Ajax man in custody SPORTS 21 JASON LIEBREGTS / METROLAND In the PICKERING -- Councillors Doug Dickerson and Peter Rodrigues, along with Rob Gagen, centre, chairman of Pickering Blooms committee, octagon launched Pickering Blooms by planting echinacea (coneflowers), Pickering’s newly adopted flower, in the front garden of City Hall. Pickering fighter in Ontario’s first Pickering program sprouts anew UFC card CITY TO BLOOM AGAIN WITH COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT facebook.com/newsdurham KRISTEN CALIS Gardeners are now hard at work to make their participation from all residents and businesses [email protected] properties look bright and inviting for spring, and schools to bring awareness to our commu- twitter.com/newsdurham and Pickering staff members, councillors and nity and enhance its beauty through that orga- PICKERING -- Although it wasn’t the sunniest volunteers plan to help enhance the commu- nization,” said Ward 2 Regional Councillor Bill Pressrun 51,400 • 32 pages of days, the rain stopped long enough Tuesday nity this season by promoting the community McLean, Pickering Blooms co-chairman.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..186 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 060 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 18, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 3683 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 18, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. (a) the motion shall again be considered on a day designated by the Government after consultation with the House Leaders of the other parties, but in any case not later than the tenth sitting day after the interruption; Prayers (b) debate on the motion shall be resumed at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment on the day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section and shall not be further interrupted or adjourned; and (c) when no Member rises to speak or after three hours of debate, whichever is GOVERNMENT ORDERS earlier, the Speaker shall put all questions necessary to dispose of the motion, provided that, if a recorded division is requested on the motion considered on a (1000) Ï day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this Standing Order, it shall stand [English] deferred to an appointed time on the next Wednesday, no later than the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on that day. STANDING ORDERS (3) Not more than one motion for the concurrence in a report from a standing or Hon. Anne McLellan (for the Leader of the Government in the special committee may be moved on any sitting day.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Activists from Abusive Litigation: Slapps in the Global
    PROTECTING ACTIVISTS FROM ABUSIVE LITIGATION SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH AND HOW TO RESPOND SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH Features and Policy Responses Author: Nikhil Dutta, Global Programs Legal Advisor, ICNL, [email protected]. Our thanks go to the following colleagues and partners for valuable discussions and input on this report: Abby Henderson; Charlie Holt; Christen Dobson; Ginna Anderson; Golda Benjamin; Lady Nancy Zuluaga Jaramillo; Zamira Djabarova; the Cambodian Center for Human Rights; iProbono; and SEEDS for Legal Initiatives. Published in July 2020 by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL NORTH 2 III. SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 4 A. Instances of Reported SLAPPs in the South 4 i. Thailand 5 ii. India 7 iii. Philippines 10 iv. South Africa 12 v. Other Instances of Reported SLAPPS in the South 13 B. Features of Reported SLAPPs in the South 15 IV. POLICY RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL NORTH 19 A. Enacting Protections for Public Participation 19 B. Creating Expedited Dismissal Procedures for SLAPPs 20 C. Endowing Courts with Supplemental Authorities to Manage SLAPPs 23 D. Permitting Recovery of Costs by SLAPP Targets 24 E. Authorizing Government Intervention in SLAPPs 25 F. Establishing Public Funds to Support SLAPP Defense 25 G. Imposing Compensatory and Punitive Damages on SLAPP Filers 25 H. Levying Penalties on SLAPP Filers 26 I. Reforming SLAPP Causes of Action 27 V. POLICY RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 27 A. Thailand 28 B. Philippines 30 C. Indonesia 33 VI. DEVISING FUTURE RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 33 REFERENCES 37 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..164 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 16.00)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 007 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, October 24, 2013 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 321 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, October 24, 2013 The House met at 10 a.m. [Translation] Ms. Françoise Boivin: Mr. Speaker, I seek the unanimous consent of the House to move the following motion: That, Prayers notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, clauses 471 and 472 related to the appointment of Supreme Court justices be withdrawn from Bill C-4, A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS 2013 and other measures, and do compose Bill C-6; that Bill C-6 be deemed read a first time and be printed; that the order for second Ï (1005) reading of the said bill provide for the referral to the Standing [English] Committee on Justice and Human Rights; that Bill C-4 retain the status on the Order Paper that it had prior to the adoption of this FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND REPORTS ANALYSIS order; that Bill C-4 be reprinted as amended; and that the law clerk CENTRE and parliamentary counsel be authorized to make any technical The Speaker: I have the honour to lay upon the table the audit changes and corrections as may be necessary to give effect to this report of the Privacy Commissioner concerning the Financial motion. Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada. You understand, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Report Is No Longer Current, and Is to Be Used for Historical Purposes Only
    The following report is no longer current, and is to be used for historical purposes only. CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by DENA JONES for the Animal Welfare Institute 2 CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by Dena Jones May 2008 Animal Welfare Institute Crimes Without Consequences: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by Dena Jones Animal Welfare Institute P.O. Box 3650 Washington, DC 20027 www.awionline.org Copyright © 2008 by the Animal Welfare Institute Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-938414-94-1 LCCN 2008925385 i CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 5 1.1 About the author........................................................................ 6 1.2 About the Animal Welfare Institute ........................................... 6 1.3 Acknowledgements ................................................................... 6 2. Overview of Food Animal Slaughter in the United States ...................... 7 2.1 Animals Slaughtered ................................................................. 7 2.2 Types of Slaughter Plants .......................................................... 12 2.3 Number of Plants .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Research Paper Series
    Legal Research Paper Series NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY By Rita K. Lomio and J. Paul Lomio Research Paper No. 6 October 2005 Robert Crown Law Library Crown Quadrangle Stanford, California 94305-8612 NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRPAHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY I. Books II. Reports III. Law Review Articles IV. Newspaper Articles (including legal newspapers) V. Sound Recordings and Films VI. Web Resources I. Books RESEARCH GUIDES AND BIBLIOGRAPHIES Hoffman, Piper, and the Harvard Student Animal Legal Defense Fund The Guide to Animal Law Resources Hollis, New Hampshire: Puritan Press, 1999 Reference KF 3841 G85 “As law students, we have found that although more resources are available and more people are involved that the case just a few years ago, locating the resource or the person we need in a particular situation remains difficult. The Guide to Animal Law Resources represents our attempt to collect in one place some of the resources a legal professional, law professor or law student might want and have a hard time finding.” Guide includes citations to organizations and internships, animal law court cases, a bibliography, law schools where animal law courses are taught, Internet resources, conferences and lawyers devoted to the cause. The International Institute for Animal Law A Bibliography of Animal Law Resources Chicago, Illinois: The International Institute for Animal Law, 2001 KF 3841 A1 B53 Kistler, John M. Animal Rights: A Subject Guide, Bibliography, and Internet Companion Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2000 HV 4708 K57 Bibliography divided into six subject areas: Animal Rights: General Works, Animal Natures, Fatal Uses of Animals, Nonfatal Uses of Animals, Animal Populations, and Animal Speculations.
    [Show full text]
  • 50-Year Case of Election Fever
    Help Generations help kids generationsfoundation.com O 514-933-8585 OCTOBER2008 theseniortimes.com VOL.XXIIIN 1 INSIDE Dancing duo makes ‘em smile p. 7 50-year case of election Cotler frustrated by fever inaction on Darfur p. 11 p. 3 She needs you! p. 13 Editorial: Strong candidates make voting decisions tough With storm clouds signaling economic meltdown for the NDP, Conservatives and Green Party who son is waging a high-profile campaign. Former as- hovering over the United States,the debates in the are attracting attention and would make excellent tronaut Marc Garneau is the Liberal star candidate Canadian general election seemed liked a passing MPs. Green Party leader Elizabeth May urges there – certainly a man of honour and achievement, sunshower.Addtothatthedramaof Obamaversus Canadians to vote with their hearts, but some are who has proved his dedication to the common good. McCain,and his risky choice of Sarah Palin as run- calling for strategic voting, to support whomever The NDP’s Peter Deslauriers, former head of the ning mate,and you have all the makings of drama, is strongest to prevent a Tory majority. Dawson College teachers’ union, is also an attrac- even if at times it resembled a daytime soap opera. Some may feel that Liberal leader Stéphane Dion, tive candidate for NDG–Lachine, up against Mar- But we have a real battle going on right here, an honest, hardworking, principled and brilliant lene Jennings, who has become a well-known with all the opinion surveys pointing to a renewed man, has been pilloried for not being as good with advocate of minority rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Defamation Law Is Noncompliant with International Law
    Canadian defamation law is noncompliant with international law Prepared for the OCLA by volunteer Denis G. Rancourt, PhD 1 February 2016 SUMMARY: Defamation law in Canada is contrary to international law, in both design and practice. Under international law, the right to hold an opinion is absolute, and the right of freedom of expression can be restricted “for respect of the rights or reputations of others” solely using written laws that must conform to the “strict tests of necessity and proportionality”. With Canadian civil defamation law, the state has unfettered discretion from an unwritten common law that provides presumed falsity, presumed malice, unlimited presumed damages, and broad gag orders enforceable by jail, using a subjective judicial test for “defamation” without requiring any evidence of actual damage to reputation. Also, Canada’s practice of its defamation law materially aggravates the noncompliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (eleven impugned rules and practices are described). A final section broadly examines the underlying social and historic reasons for having developed an oppressive defamation law, followed by recommendations. 1. The most important legal instrument to supress expression in Canada is the common law of defamation, which acts both directly and by creating chill. Using this instrument, any corporation or individual with sufficient financial means to pursue a defamation lawsuit can intimidate and silence any publisher, writer, media outlet, social-media commentator, blogger, vlogger, or public speaker.1 2. This article is divided in four parts. First, I prove that the Canadian common law of defamation is in violation of international law, and is therefore unconstitutional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Defamation Action: an Empirical Study
    THE CANADIAN DEFAMATION ACTION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY Hilary Young* This article presents the results of a quantitative study of Canadian defamation law actions, focusing on reported decisions between 1973 and 1983 and between 2003 and 2013. It aims to contribute to debate about defamation law reform, to contribute to scholarly work in defamation law or in tort law and remedies more generally, and to inform lawyers who are involved in defamation litigation. Its findings include: that damages have almost doubled when adjusted for inflation between these two periods; that corporate defamation cases make up about a third of defamation cases; that plaintiffs established liability much less often between 2003 and 2013 than between 1973 and 1983; that punitive damages are awarded much more often to corporations than to human plaintiffs, and in higher amounts; that punitive damages were awarded in about a quarter of cases in both periods; and that the rate of liability is greater for publications on the internet (including email) than publications in other media. Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude quantitative des actions en diffamation intentées au Canada, mettant plus particulièrement l’accent sur les décisions publiées entre 1973 et 1983 et entre 2003 et 2013. Il vise à contribuer au débat sur la réforme du droit de la diffamation, ainsi qu’aux travaux de recherche spécifiques sur le droit de la diffamation ou plus généralement sur le droit de la responsabilité délictuelle et le droit en matière de mesures de réparation. L’article cherche également à guider les avocats impliqués dans des litiges en diffamation.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant V. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61 DATE: 20091222 DOCKET: 32932
    SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61 DATE: 20091222 DOCKET: 32932 BETWEEN: Peter Grant and Grant Forest Products Inc. Appellants / Respondents on cross-appeal and Torstar Corporation, Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, Bill Schiller, John Honderich and Mary Deanne Shears Respondents / Appellants on cross-appeal - and - Ottawa Citizen, Canadian Newspaper Association, Ad IDEM/Canadian Media Lawyers’ Association, RTNDA Canada/Association of Electronic Journalists, Magazines Canada, Canadian Association of Journalists, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, Writers’ Union of Canada, Professional Writers Association of Canada, Book and Periodical Council, PEN Canada, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Danno Cusson Interveners CORAM: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: McLachlin C.J. (Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Charron, (paras. 1 to 141) Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. concurring) CONCURRING REASONS: Abella J. (paras. 142 to 146) NOTE: This document is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the Canada Supreme Court Reports. ______________________________ GRANT v. TORSTAR CORP. Peter Grant and Grant Forest Products Inc. Appellants/Respondents on cross-appeal v. Torstar Corporation, Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, Bill Schiller, John Honderich and Mary Deanne Shears Respondents/Appellants on cross-appeal and Ottawa Citizen, Canadian Newspaper Association, Ad IDEM/Canadian Media Lawyers’ Association, RTNDA Canada/Association of Electronic Journalists, Magazines Canada, Canadian Association of Journalists, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, Writers’ Union of Canada, Professional Writers Association of Canada, Book and Periodical Council, PEN Canada, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Danno Cusson Interveners Indexed as: Grant v.
    [Show full text]