DOCSLIB.ORG

(Almost) Final Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Almost) Final Draft Herakles and Helen Defined by Their Paternity, Liminality, and Relationship with Hera by KRISTEN FULTON (Under the Direction of Naomi Norman) ABSTRACT Herakles and Helen are comparable figures from Greek mythology. They are known for their great strength and great beauty, respectively, but are rarely examined in relation to each other. This thesis explores their commonalities in regards to their paternity, liminality and relation to Hera. They are both children of Zeus, and this (negatively) impacts them in various ways. They both hold liminal positions because of their semi-divinity as they exist between the world of the gods and that of men. This liminality is compounded for Helen because of her gender. Finally, Herakles and Helen must both interact with Zeus’ wife Hera. She is vengeful and destructive to Herakles, but kind and benevolent to Helen. These three factors shape the characters and how they are represented across the chronology of Greek literature. INDEX WORDS: Helen, Helen of Troy, Herakles, Hercules, Heracles, Zeus, Paternity, Liminal, Liminality, Semi-divine, Hera HERAKLES AND HELEN DEFINED BY THEIR PATERNITY, LIMINALITY, AND RELATIONSHIP WITH HERA by KRISTEN FULTON BA, Emory University, 2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2014 © 2014 Kristen Fulton All Rights Reserved HERAKLES AND HELEN DEFINED BY THEIR PATERNITY, LIMINALITY AND RELATIONSHIP WITH HERA by KRISTEN FULTON Major Professor: Naomi Norman Committee: Charles Platter Benjamin Wolkow Electronic Version Approved: Julie Coffield Interim Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 PATERNITY .....................................................................................................3 Herakles: The Popular Accounts .................................................................3 Helen: The Popular Accounts ....................................................................14 Variation on the Theme: Two Fathers and Two Mothers..........................22 Final Observations .....................................................................................24 2 LIMINALITY..................................................................................................26 Herakles’ Semi-Divinity ............................................................................26 Herakles at War .........................................................................................30 Herakles in Death.......................................................................................35 Helen’s Femininity ....................................................................................39 Helen’s Semi-Divinity ...............................................................................46 Final Observations .....................................................................................49 3 RELATIONSHIP WITH HERA .....................................................................51 Hera and Herakles......................................................................................52 Hera’s Relationship with Herakles Compared with that with Hephaistos and Dionysos .............................................................................................57 iv Hera and Herakles’ Twelve Labors ...........................................................61 Hera and Helen ..........................................................................................66 Final Observations .....................................................................................69 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................71 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................73 v INTRODUCTION Herakles and Helen are two characters from ancient Greek mythology who have captured the imaginations of audiences1 for millennia, even up to today. Their stories have been remade and renewed since their conception because of their exceptional and super-human natures. Of course, besides their resonance with modern audiences, they were important to the corpus of ancient Greek myth. Around each figure there exists an entire cycle of stories, which in turn provide the soil in which many other myths take root. Both figures are admirable, but each has fatal flaws. Herakles is a tragic figure whose faults are overlooked in favor of his brute strength and bravery in the face of danger. He has stood as an example of a “manly man” since his inception. Helen is also somewhat of a tragic figure, but it is her flaws and mistakes for which she is best known. She is a paragon of feminine beauty, while simultaneously serving as a cautionary figure. From even these basic facts, one can see that there is ground for a comparison of the two figures. By juxtaposing Herakles and Helen, one may more easily see the personality and attributes the Greeks gave to each as an individual. Before this thesis, Herakles and Helen have not been handled together in such a direct manner, but this sort of study will be valuable to the examination, and thus understanding, of both characters. 1 I take some liberties with my usage of the term audience throughout this thesis. Depending on the medium and chronology, the audience may be spectators of a play or readers of a text. 1 Beyond the sort of superficial comparison mentioned previously, the two share other characteristics which will be the main focus of this thesis. First, they are both the offspring of Zeus, but each was raised by a surrogate father. Their paternity constantly influenced their lives and impacted the ways they are represented in literature. Second, as a result of their paternity, they are both liminal figures. Herakles and Helen exist between the mortal and immortal worlds, and they must constantly find a balance between the two. Then, beyond the issue of her mortality, Helen must also figure out how to exist as a woman in the male-dominated world of her myth. Finally, also as a result of their paternity, they are both impacted by the presence of their stepmother, Hera. I shall explore all three of these aspects of the two figures through the lenses of the ancient writers. Because the works dealing with Herakles and Helen are so numerous, I will restrict my survey to the Greek sources.2 I will focus on the ones that are most germane to each topic across a chronology ranging from Homer to Pseudo-Eratosthenes. 2 As Padilla mentions, “the great multiplicity of religious and narrative associations” of Herakles (and the same can be said for Helen) presented problems even for the ancients. cf. The Myths of Herakles in Ancient Greece (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1998): 1. 2 CHAPTER 1 PATERNITY One characteristic that Helen and Herakles have in common is their dual paternity. Throughout myth, both of their mothers, Leda and Alkmene respectively, had intercourse with Zeus, which led to their births. After each birth, however, the child was raised not by Zeus but by the woman’s mortal husband. This chapter explores how Greek literature discusses the paternity - both immortal and mortal - of Herakles and Helen, focusing primarily on how their paternity is described at birth and secondarily on how their paternity is described at other times in their lives. The way the issue of paternity is handled reveals how the authors writing the myths conceived of these divine figures, which in turn should inform the modern readers’ view of them.3 Herakles: The Popular Accounts The earliest mentions of Herakles’ parentage are in Homer and Hesiod. The references to Herakles’ birth in these works are rather brief, but notable nonetheless for establishing a divine father for Herakles and, thereby, the reason for his great abilities. In the Iliad, Zeus lists all his previous sexual exploits to Hera, ultimately attempting to 3 There are a few foreseeable issues that will arise from such a study, which will be discussed after the previously mentioned information is laid out. First, preliminarily, each character has two fathers, but not two mothers. An explanation, or at least exploration, of this fact may serve to clarify our perception of each character. Second, the authors variously refer to Helen and Herakles as the child of either their mortal or immortal father. We shall examine under what circumstances an author may choose one lineage over the other. 3 prove that none of those other women were as arousing as Hera herself. He says, “[I was never so enamoured by]…Alkmene in Thebes, who bore a dauntless son, Herakles” (οὐδ᾽ Ἀλκµήνης ἐνὶ Θήβῃ, / ἥ ῥ᾽ Ἡρακλῆα κρατερόφρονα γείνατο παῖδα…, 14.323-24).4 Later, Agamemnon explains how Hera gets her revenge on Zeus for sleeping with other women. “On that day when Alkmene was about to bear Herakles in well-crowned Thebes…” (ἤµατι τῷ ὅτ᾽ ἔµελλε βίην Ἡρακληείην / Ἀλκµήνη τέξεσθαι ἐϋστεφάνῳ ἐνὶ Θήβῃ…, Il. 19.98-99) - Zeus makes an announcement that the child born that day, referring to Herakles, will rule over men. Hera seizes the moment to take advantage of Zeus’ vagueness, and she makes him swear that whatever child is born that day will be king, and then manipulates Eileithyia, the goddess of childbirth, so that Herakles’ birth is delayed,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Odyssey Glossary of Names
    GLOSSARY OF NAMES GLOSSARY OF NAMES [Note, the following is raw output from OCR software, and is otherwise unedited.] (First appearance noted by book and line number.) Achaeans (A-kee'-unz): General term used by Homer to reFer to Greeks. 2.139 Acheron (A'-ker-on): River in the Underworld, land of the dead. 10.537 Achilles (A-kil'-eez): Son of Peleus and Thetis. He is the heroic leader of the Myrmidons in the Trojan War and is slain by Paris. Odysseus consults him in the Underworld. 3.117 Aeaea (Ee-ee'-a): Island on which Circe lives. 9.34 Aegisthus (Ee-jis'-thus): Son of Thyestes and Pelopia. He seduces Clytemnestra, wife of Agamemnon, while Agamemnon is away fighting the Trojan War and helps her slay Agamemnon when he returns. Orestes avenges this action years later by murdering both Clytemnestra and Aegisthus. 1.35 GLOSSARY OF NAMES Aegyptus (Ee-jip'-tus): The Nile River. 4.511 Aeolus (Ee'-oh-lus): King of the island Aeolia and keeper of the winds. 10.2 Aeson (Ee'-son): Son oF Cretheus and Tyro; father of Jason, leader oF the Argonauts. 11.262 Aethon (Ee'-thon): One oF Odysseus' aliases used in his conversation with Penelope. 19.199 Agamemnon (A-ga-mem'-non): Son oF Atreus and Aerope; brother of Menelaus; husband oF Clytemnestra. He commands the Greek Forces in the Trojan War. He is killed by his wiFe and her lover when he returns home; his son, Orestes, avenges this murder. 1.36 Agelaus (A-je-lay'-us): One oF Penelope's suitors; son oF Damastor; killed by Odysseus.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from Euripides' Herakles
    Excerpt from Euripides’ Herakles (lines 1189-1426) The action up until now: The goddess Hera has sent Madness upon Herakles. Madness has driven Herakles to kill his wife and his children. He mistook them for his enemies, being under the influence of Madness. Herakles is just coming out of the frenzied state he was in, and beginning to realise what he has done. He is contemplating suicide. Suddenly, Theseus of Athens appears on the scene. After a discussion with Herakles’ father Amphitryon, Theseus learns what has happened. At this moment, Herakles is lying in among his dead family members, ashamed of his actions, not wanting Theseus to see his face. I have included some lines here of the discussion between Theseus and Amphitryon, that will lead into the essential discussion between Herakles and Theseus. Theseus What do you mean? What has he done? Amphitryon Slain them in a wild fit of frenzy with arrows dipped in the venom of the hundred-headed hydra. Theseus This is Hera's work; but who lies there among the dead, old man? Amphitryon My son, my own enduring son, that marched with gods to Phlegra's plain, there to battle with giants and slay them, warrior that he was. Theseus Ah, ah! whose fortune was ever so cursed as his? Amphitryon Never will you find another mortal that has suffered more or been driven harder. Theseus Why does he veil his head, poor wretch, in his robe? Amphitryon He is ashamed to meet your eye; his kinsman's kind intent and his children's blood make him abashed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Post-Classical Works of Art, Literature, and Music Based on Myths of the Greeks and Romans
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 112 438 CS 202 298 AUTHOR Smith, Ron TITLE A Guide to Post-Classical Works of Art, Literature, and Music Based on Myths of the Greeks and Romans. PUB DATE 75 NOTE 40p.; Prepared at Utah State University; Not available in hard copy due to marginal legibility of original document !DRS PRICE MF-$0.76 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Art; *Bibliographies; Greek Literature; Higher Education; Latin Literature; *Literature; Literature Guides; *Music; *Mythology ABSTRACT The approximately 650 works listed in this guide have as their focus the myths cf the Greeks and Romans. Titles were chosen as being (1)interesting treatments of the subject matter, (2) representative of a variety of types, styles, and time periods, and (3) available in some way. Entries are listed in one of four categories - -art, literature, music, and bibliography of secondary sources--and an introduction to the guide provides information on the use and organization of the guide.(JM) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied
    [Show full text]
  • Folktale Types and Motifs in Greek Heroic Myth Review P.11 Morphology of the Folktale, Vladimir Propp 1928 Heroic Quest
    Mon Feb 13: Heracles/Hercules and the Greek world Ch. 15, pp. 361-397 Folktale types and motifs in Greek heroic myth review p.11 Morphology of the Folktale, Vladimir Propp 1928 Heroic quest NAME: Hera-kleos = (Gk) glory of Hera (his persecutor) >p.395 Roman name: Hercules divine heritage and birth: Alcmena +Zeus -> Heracles pp.362-5 + Amphitryo -> Iphicles Zeus impersonates Amphityron: "disguised as her husband he enjoyed the bed of Alcmena" “Alcmena, having submitted to a god and the best of mankind, in Thebes of the seven gates gave birth to a pair of twin brothers – brothers, but by no means alike in thought or in vigor of spirit. The one was by far the weaker, the other a much better man, terrible, mighty in battle, Heracles, the hero unconquered. Him she bore in submission to Cronus’ cloud-ruling son, the other, by name Iphicles, to Amphitryon, powerful lancer. Of different sires she conceived them, the one of a human father, the other of Zeus, son of Cronus, the ruler of all the gods” pseudo-Hesiod, Shield of Heracles Hera tries to block birth of twin sons (one per father) Eurystheus born on same day (Hera heard Zeus swear that a great ruler would be born that day, so she speeded up Eurystheus' birth) (Zeus threw her out of heaven when he realized what she had done) marvellous infancy: vs. Hera’s serpents Hera, Heracles and the origin of the MIlky Way Alienation: Madness of Heracles & Atonement pp.367,370 • murders wife Megara and children (agency of Hera) Euripides, Heracles verdict of Delphic oracle: must serve his cousin Eurystheus, king of Mycenae -> must perform 12 Labors (‘contests’) for Eurystheus -> immortality as reward The Twelve Labors pp.370ff.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Roman Mythology and Heroic Legend
    G RE E K AN D ROMAN M YTH O LOGY AN D H E R O I C LE GEN D By E D I N P ROFES SOR H . ST U G Translated from th e German and edited b y A M D i . A D TT . L tt LI ONEL B RN E , , TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE S Y a l TUD of Greek religion needs no po ogy , and should This mus v n need no bush . all t feel who ha e looked upo the ns ns and n creatio of the art it i pired . But to purify stre gthen admiration by the higher light of knowledge is no work o f ea se . No truth is more vital than the seemi ng paradox whi c h - declares that Greek myths are not nature myths . The ape - is not further removed from the man than is the nature myth from the religious fancy of the Greeks as we meet them in s Greek is and hi tory . The myth the child of the devout lovely imagi nation o f the noble rac e that dwelt around the e e s n s s u s A ga an. Coar e fa ta ie of br ti h forefathers in their Northern homes softened beneath the southern sun into a pure and u and s godly bea ty, thus gave birth to the divine form of n Hellenic religio . M c an c u s m c an s Comparative ythology tea h uch . It hew how god s are born in the mind o f the savage and moulded c nn into his image .
    [Show full text]
  • More Than Laughter in Plautus's Amphitryon Plautus's Amphitryon Is
    More than Laughter in Plautus’s Amphitryon Plautus’s Amphitryon is an anomaly among extant Roman comedies, because it is the one surviving example of a play in which gods appear alongside mortal characters. In Amphitryon the term tragicomoedia (tragicomedy) appears for the first time in Latin literature to describe this blending of comedy and tragedy, and it is the god Mercury who coins the term in the play’s prologue. However, while modern scholarship lacks other examples of tragicomedy, both literary references and south Italian vase painting provide evidence for a much older tradition that blended comedy and tragedy, a tradition that can be traced back in literature to the mimes of Epicharmus of Syracuse in the fifth century, the hilarotragoedia of Rhinthon in fourth-century Syracuse, and the so-called phlyakes vases of southern Italy. So Plautus’s Amphitryon, written and performed perhaps around 200 B.C., was not a novelty. Indeed, the play’s topic, focusing as it does on the conception of Heracles through Jupiter’s sexual adventure with Alcmena, was perhaps one of the most well-known myths about one of the most well-known heroes in the Greco-Roman world. Since the cast of Amphitryon includes two gods, a hero and his wife (who is mentioned in Homer), the play presents a group of beings different from the slaves, pimps, and foolish young lovers of Plautus’s other plays. With divine and heroic characters, Amphitryon delivers comedy in a different register. On the one hand it is funny to hear the god Mercury talk and behave like a comic slave; and, as Christenson has argued, the audience would have found it humorous to watch a male actor in drag play the part of pregnant Alcmena.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mythology
    Greek Mythology The Creation Myth “First Chaos came into being, next wide bosomed Gaea(Earth), Tartarus and Eros (Love). From Chaos came forth Erebus and black Night. Of Night were born Aether and Day (whom she brought forth after intercourse with Erebus), and Doom, Fate, Death, sleep, Dreams; also, though she lay with none, the Hesperides and Blame and Woe and the Fates, and Nemesis to afflict mortal men, and Deceit, Friendship, Age and Strife, which also had gloomy offspring.”[11] “And Earth first bore starry Heaven (Uranus), equal to herself to cover her on every side and to be an ever-sure abiding place for the blessed gods. And earth brought forth, without intercourse of love, the Hills, haunts of the Nymphs and the fruitless sea with his raging swell.”[11] Heaven “gazing down fondly at her (Earth) from the mountains he showered fertile rain upon her secret clefts, and she bore grass flowers, and trees, with the beasts and birds proper to each. This same rain made the rivers flow and filled the hollow places with the water, so that lakes and seas came into being.”[12] The Titans and the Giants “Her (Earth) first children (with heaven) of Semi-human form were the hundred-handed giants Briareus, Gyges, and Cottus. Next appeared the three wild, one-eyed Cyclopes, builders of gigantic walls and master-smiths…..Their names were Brontes, Steropes, and Arges.”[12] Next came the “Titans: Oceanus, Hypenon, Iapetus, Themis, Memory (Mnemosyne), Phoebe also Tethys, and Cronus the wily—youngest and most terrible of her children.”[11] “Cronus hated his lusty sire Heaven (Uranus).
    [Show full text]
  • The Voyage of the Argo and Other Modes of Travel in Apollonius’ Argonautica
    THE VOYAGE OF THE ARGO AND OTHER MODES OF TRAVEL IN APOLLONIUS’ ARGONAUTICA Brian D. McPhee A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Classics. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: William H. Race James J. O’Hara Emily Baragwanath © 2016 Brian D. McPhee ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Brian D. McPhee: The Voyage of the Argo and Other Modes of Travel in Apollonius’ Argonautica (Under the direction of William H. Race) This thesis analyzes the Argo as a vehicle for travel in Apollonius’ Argonautica: its relative strengths and weaknesses and ultimately its function as the poem’s central mythic paradigm. To establish the context for this assessment, the first section surveys other forms of travel in the poem, arranged in a hierarchy of travel proficiency ranging from divine to heroic to ordinary human mobility. The second section then examines the capabilities of the Argo and its crew in depth, concluding that the ship is situated on the edge between heroic and human travel. The third section confirms this finding by considering passages that implicitly compare the Argo with other modes of travel through juxtaposition. The conclusion follows cues from the narrator in proposing to read the Argo as a mythic paradigm for specifically human travel that functions as a metaphor for a universal and timeless human condition. iii parentibus meis “Finis origine pendet.” iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to my director and mentor, William Race.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer's Use of Myth Françoise Létoublon
    Homer’s Use of Myth Françoise Létoublon Epic and Mythology The Homeric Epics are probably the oldest Greek literary texts that we have,1 and their subject is select episodes from the Trojan War. The Iliad deals with a short period in the tenth year of the war;2 the Odyssey is set in the period covered by Odysseus’ return from the war to his homeland of Ithaca, beginning with his departure from Calypso’s island after a 7-year stay. The Trojan War was actually the material for a large body of legend that formed a major part of Greek myth (see Introduction). But the narrative itself cannot be taken as a mythographic one, unlike the narrative of Hesiod (see ch. 1.3) - its purpose is not to narrate myth. Epic and myth may be closely linked, but they are not identical (see Introduction), and the distance between the two poses a particular difficulty for us as we try to negotiate the the mythological material that the narrative on the one hand tells and on the other hand only alludes to. Allusion will become a key term as we progress. The Trojan War, as a whole then, was the material dealt with in the collection of epics known as the ‘Epic Cycle’, but which the Iliad and Odyssey allude to. The Epic Cycle however does not survive except for a few fragments and short summaries by a late author, but it was an important source for classical tragedy, and for later epics that aimed to fill in the gaps left by Homer, whether in Greek - the Posthomerica of Quintus of Smyrna (maybe 3 c AD), and the Capture of Troy of Tryphiodoros (3 c AD) - or in Latin - Virgil’s Aeneid (1 c BC), or Ovid’s ‘Iliad’ in the Metamorphoses (1 c AD).
    [Show full text]
  • Sani-Magazine-14-A-LLR.Pdf
    The digital magazine of Sani Resort | Summer 2014 In the MOOD TO THE BLUE FAST? essence sparkle K What’s for he T VACATION THE UNIQUE order EFFECT Circle Yacht by BREA Behind the Zaha HADID eating MYTH matters HALKIDIKI through its SANI festival An interview with New PEOPLE NFINITY I SANI RESORT through your EYES Nicholas COLERIDGE WELCOME GOOD LIFE 5 Sani Resort through your eyes 51 Sani Marina 6 Sani Resort is... 52 The Classic and the new Guard 57 The vacation effect contents 59 Hollywood comes to Greece click or tap 61 Summer Up yourself to go to article 64 Temples of pleasure NATURE DESIGN 8 The Blue essence 69 Infinity matters the new pool of Sani Beach Hotel 9 Go Green 70 Design object of the season 13 Hermes, the black-winged stilt 71 The Unique Circle Yacht a work by Zaha Hadid ARTS, PEOPLE & CULTURE GASTRONOMY 17 An interview with Nicholas Coleridge 75 The Byblos Caviar Lounge 22 Arts Corner 76 New eating order featuring the Tomata restaurant in Sani Marina 24 Sani Festival 78 What’s for breakfast? 29 Writer’s corner Panos Karnezis Holiday 83 Super strong 33 Behind the Myth 86 Sani Gourmet 14 Halkidiki through the times a short review 34 Insider’s guide to Halkidiki 87 Sani Gourmet 14 a photo essay 39 The Holy Mountain 41 Halkidiki through its people SANI NEWS 2 navigation tips go to contents page play video go to link EDITOR IN CHIEF PHOTOGRAPHS SANI MAGAZINE id Georgia Dodou Andreas Sfiridis Edition Summer 2014 [email protected] Aris Rammos PUBLISHER Corbis/Apeiron EDITORIAL TEAM Heinz Troll Sani S.A., 55 Nik.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL TOURS MYTHOLOGY Gallery of Greek and Roman Casts
    SPECIAL TOURS MYTHOLOGY Gallery of Greek and Roman Casts Battle of the Greeks and Amazons Temple of Apollo at Phigaleia (Bassai) Greek, late 5th c. B.C. The Mausoleion at Halikarnassos Greek, ca. 360-340 B.C. Myth: The Amazons lived in the northern limits of the known world. They were warrior women who fought from horseback usually with bow and arrows, but also with axe and spear. Their shields were crescent shaped. They destroyed the right breast of young Amazons, to facilitate use of the bow. The Attic hero Theseus had joined Herakles on his expedition against them and received the Amazon Antiope (or Hippolyta) as his share of the spoils of war. In revenge, the Amazons invaded Attica. In the subsequent battle Antiope was killed. This battle was represented in a number of works, notably the metopes of the Parthenon and the shield of the Athena Parthenos, the great cult statue by Pheidias that stood in the Parthenon. Symbolically, the battle represents the triumph of civilization over barbarism. Battle of the Gods and Giants Altar of Zeus and Athena, Pergamon (Zeus battling Giants) Greek, ca. 180 B.C. Myth: The giants, born of Earth, threatened Zeus and the other gods, and a fierce struggle ensued, the so-called Gigantomachy, or battle of the gods and giants. The giants were defeated and imprisoned below the earth. This section of the frieze from the altar shows Zeus battling three giants. The myth may reflect an event of prehistory, the arrival ca. 2000 B.C. of Greek- speaking invaders, who brought with them their own gods, whose chief god was Zeus.
    [Show full text]
  • Achilles in the Underworld: Iliad, Odyssey, and Aethiopis Anthony T
    EDWARDS, ANTHONY T., Achilles in the Underworld: "Iliad, Odyssey", and "Aethiopis" , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 26:3 (1985:Autumn) p.215 Achilles in the Underworld: Iliad, Odyssey, and Aethiopis Anthony T. Edwards I HE ACTION of Arctinus' Aethiopis followed immediately upon T the Iliad in the cycle of epics narrating the war at Troy. Its central events were the combat between Achilles and the Ama­ zon queen Penthesilea, Achilles' murder of Thersites and subsequent purification, and Achilles' victory over the Ethiopian Memnon, lead­ ing to his own death at the hands of Apollo and Paris. In his outline of the Aethiopis, Proclus summarizes its penultimate episode as fol­ lows: "Thetis, arriving with the Muses and her sisters, mourns her son~ and after this, snatching (allap1Tauao-a) her son from his pyre, Thetis carries him away to the White Island (AevK7) "1iuo~)." Thetis removes, or 'translates', Achilles to a distant land-an equivalent to Elysium or the Isles of the Blessed - where he will enjoy eternally an existence similar to that of the gods.! Unlike the Aethiopis, the Iliad presents no alternative to Hades' realm, not even for its hero: Achil­ les, who has learned his fate from his mother (9.410-16),foresees his arrival there (23.243-48); and in numerous references elsewhere to Achilles' death, the Iliad never arouses any alternative expectation.2 1 For Proclus' summary see T. W. Allen, ed., Homeri Opera V (Oxford 1946) 105f, esp. 106.12-15. On the identity of the AEVKT, ~(J'o<; with Elysium and the Isles of the Blessed see E.
    [Show full text]