DOCSLIB.ORG

Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Kánonjogi Posztgraduális Intézet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Kánonjogi Posztgraduális Intézet DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.HTK.2014.003 PÁZMÁNY PÉTER KATOLIKUS EGYETEM KÁNONJOGI POSZTGRADUÁLIS INTÉZET AZ ISTENTISZTELETI ÉS SZENTSÉGI KONGREGÁCIÓ FEJLŐDÉSE ÉS HATÁLYOS SZABÁLYOZÁSA Doktori disszertáció Moderátor: Szabó Péter Készítette: Bálint Róbert BUDAPEST 2014 DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.HTK.2014.003 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK RÖVIDÍTÉSJEGYZÉK..........................................................................VIII 0. BEVEZETÉS............................................................................................ 1 I. TÖRTÉNETI ÁTTEKINTÉS .................................................................. 14 1. A RÓMAI KÚRIA TÖRTÉNELMI FEJLŐDÉSE A RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ MEGALAPÍTÁSA ELŐTT............................ 14 1.1 AZ ELSŐ HÁROM SZÁZAD.................................................................... 15 1.2 A RÓMAI KÚRIA A KÖZÉPKORBAN...................................................... 17 1.3 A 13. SZÁZADTÓL V. SIXTUSIG............................................................ 19 2. A SZENT RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ TÖRTÉNETI FEJLŐDÉSE ..... 25 2.1 KÖZVETLEN ELŐZMÉNYEK .................................................................. 25 2.2 KONGREGÁCIÓRENDSZER LÉTREHOZÁSA............................................ 26 2.3 A SZENT RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ ALAPÍTÁSA ......................................... 30 2.4 A KONGREGÁCIÓ TOVÁBBI FEJLŐDÉSE................................................. 31 2.5 A RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ KAPCSOLATA A RÓMAI ROTÁVAL ................. 33 2.6 TÁRSKONGREGÁCIÓK ÉS BIZOTTSÁGOK............................................... 35 2.6.1 Ceremoniális Kongregáció............................................................. 35 2.6.2 A Búcsúk és Ereklyék Kongregációja............................................. 36 2.6.3 A Rítuskongregáció bizottságai..................................................... 37 2.7 A SAPIENTI CONSILIO APOSTOLI KONSTITÚCIÓ ................................... 38 2.8 ÚJABB VÁLTOZTATÁSOK A KONGREGÁCIÓ SZERVEZETÉN BELÜL......... 41 2.9 A CODEX IURIS CANONICI 1917 .......................................................... 42 II DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.HTK.2014.003 2.10 A II. VATIKÁNI ZSINAT ÉS A RÓMAI KÚRIA REFORMJA KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A SZENT RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓRA ........................................ 43 2.11 A REGIMINI ECCLESIAE UNIVERSAE APOSTOLI KONSTITÚCIÓ ............ 46 2.12 A SZENT RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ ÁTALAKÍTÁSA................................... 48 2.12.1 Sacra Rituum Congregatio apostoli konstitúció....................... 48 2.12.2 A Constans Nobis apostoli konstitúció .................................... 49 2.12.3 A Quoniam in celeri kirográf.................................................... 50 2.13 CODEX IURIS CANONICI 1983 ............................................................ 50 2.14 A PASTOR BONUS APOSTOLI KONSTITÚCIÓ ....................................... 51 2.15 A QUAERIT SEMPER MOTU PROPRIÓ .................................................. 51 3. A SZENTSÉGEK FEGYELME KONGREGÁCIÓJA........................ 53 3.1 A SZENTSÉGI KONGREGÁCIÓ ELŐFUTÁRAI ......................................... 53 3.1.1 A Szent Officium kongregációja ................................................... 53 3.1.2 A Zsinati Kongregáció.................................................................. 54 3.1.3 A Püspöki és Szerzetesi Kongregáció ............................................ 56 3.1.4 A Szent Rítuskongregáció............................................................. 57 3.1.5 A Hitterjesztési Kongregáció ........................................................ 58 3.1.6 Az Apostoli Dataria és a Szent Penitenciária ............................... 59 3.2 A SZENTSÉGI KONGREGÁCIÓ ALAPÍTÁSA ........................................... 60 II. KÁNONJOGI ÁTTEKINTÉS................................................................ 63 1. A RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ ÉS SZENTSÉGI KONGREGÁCIÓ ILLETÉKESSÉGE TÖRTÉNELMI FEJLŐDÉSBEN ........................... 63 1.1 A RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ ILLETÉKESSÉGE AZ IMMENSA AETERNI DEI APOSTOLI KONSTITÚCIÓ SZERINT............................................................. 63 III DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.HTK.2014.003 1.2 A RÍTUSKONGREGÁCIÓ ÉS SZENTSÉGI KONGREGÁCIÓ ILLETÉKESSÉGE A SAPIENTI CONSILIO APOSTOLI KONSTITUCIÓ SZERINT ............................... 65 1.2.1 A kongregációkról általában.......................................................... 65 1.2.2 A kongregációk típusai, tagjai....................................................... 66 1.2.3 A kongregációk hatalmának természete......................................... 70 1.2.4 A kongregációk illetékessége.......................................................... 71 1.2.5 A kongregációk eljárási módja....................................................... 72 1.2.6 A különböző ügyek jogi értéke....................................................... 73 1.2.7 A Szent Rítuskongregáció a Sapienti Consilio apostoli konstitúció szerint ................................................................................................... 75 1.2.7.1 A Szent Officium Kongregációja........................................ 75 1.2.7.2 A Keleti Egyház Kongregációja.......................................... 78 1.2.7.3 A Szentségek Fegyelme Kongregációja............................. 80 1.2.7.4 A Zsinati Kongregáció ........................................................ 81 1.2.7.5 A Szerzetesi Kongregáció ................................................... 82 1.2.7.6 A Hitterjesztési Kongregáció.............................................. 82 1.2.7.7 Ceremoniális Kongregáció.................................................. 83 1.2.7.8 A Szent Rítuskongregáció illetékessége ............................ 83 1.2.8 A Szentségek Fegyelme Kongregációjának illetékessége a Sapienti Consilio apostoli konstitúció szerint..................................................... 89 1.2.8.1 A tárgyalt ügyek .................................................................. 90 1.2.8.1.1 Szent Officium Kongregáció............................................... 91 1.2.8.1.2 A Szent Rítuskongregáció ................................................... 96 1.2.8.1.3 Zsinati Kongregáció ........................................................... 99 1.2.8.2 A résztvevő személyek..................................................... 102 IV DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.HTK.2014.003 1.2.8.2.1 A Szerzetes Kongregáció .................................................. 102 1.2.8.2.2 A Keleti Egyház Kongregációja......................................... 105 1.2.8.3 Az alárendelt terület.......................................................... 107 1.2.8.3.1 A Hitterjesztési Kongregáció............................................. 108 1.2.8.3.2 Keleti Egyház Kongregációja ............................................ 109 1.2.8.4 A követendő eljárás ........................................................... 111 1.2.8.4.1 A Római Rota................................................................... 111 1.2.8.4.2 A Szent Penitenciária ........................................................ 117 1.2.8.5 A Szentségi Kongregáció illetékessége............................ 118 1.3 AZ 1917-ES TÖRVÉNYKÖNYV SZERINTI ILLETÉKESSÉG....................... 126 1.4 A KONGREGÁCIÓ HATALMA SZÉKÜRESEDÉS ESETÉBEN ..................... 132 2. AZ ISTENTISZTELETI ÉS SZENTSÉGEK FEGYELMI KONGREGÁCIÓJA A HATÁLYOS JOG SZERINT .......................... 137 2.1 ÁLTALÁNOS MEGJEGYZÉSEK A PASTOR BONUS APOSTOLI KONSTITÚCIÓVAL KAPCSOLATBAN ......................................................... 138 2.1.1 Terminológia............................................................................... 140 2.1.2 A dikasztériumok jogi státusza ................................................... 141 2.1.3 A dikasztériumok szerkezete ....................................................... 141 2.1.4 Tagok kinevezése......................................................................... 142 2.1.5 Kilépés a dikasztériumból............................................................ 143 2.1.6 A dikasztériumok feladatai.......................................................... 144 2.1.7 Az illetékességi hatáskörök szabályozása ..................................... 144 2.2 A KONGREGÁCIÓKRÓL ÁLTALÁBAN.................................................. 146 2.2.1 Felépítésük.................................................................................. 146 2.2.2 Eljárásmódjuk............................................................................. 147 V DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.HTK.2014.003 2.2.3 A kongregációk feladatai ............................................................. 148 2.3 A KORMÁNYZATI HATALOMBAN VALÓ RÉSZESEDÉS ......................... 149 2.3.1 Törvényhozói hatalom................................................................. 150 2.3.2 Bírói hatalom .............................................................................. 158 2.3.3 Végrehajtói hatalom (közigazgatási hatalom) .............................. 159 2.4 AZ ISTENTISZTELETI ÉS SZENTSÉGI KONGREGÁCIÓ ILLETÉKESSÉGE A PASTOR BONUS APOSTOLI KONSTITÚCIÓ 62-70 CIKKELYEI ÉRTELMÉBEN160 2.4.1 Általános illetékesség (62. cikkely) .............................................. 161 2.4.2 Szentségek feletti illetékessége (63. cikkely)................................. 164 2.4.3 Illetékessége liturgikus téren (64. cikkely)................................... 167 2.4.4 Liturgikus intézmények, művészetek támogatása (65. cikkely).... 171 2.4.5 Hármas feladatköre (66. cikkely) ................................................. 172 2.4.6 El nem hált házasságok (67. cikkely) ..........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liturgy Update Archdiocese of New York Vol 5.1 - December 2017 Office of Liturgy LITURGY UPDATE Liturgical Memos
    Liturgy Update Archdiocese of New York Vol 5.1 - December 2017 Office of Liturgy LITURGY UPDATE Liturgical Memos December 24 and 25: Fourth Sunday of Advent and Christmas Day The Vigil for Christmas, and not the Fourth Sunday of Advent, should be celebrated at evening Masses on December 24 this year. The USCCB’s Secretariat of Divine Worship has noted that, in the opinion of most canonists, each of these days of obligation must be fulfilled with a separate Mass. December 30 and January 1: Feast of the Holy Family and Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God Inasmuch as the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God falls on a Monday in 2018 and is, therefore, Papal Motu Proprio on not a holy day of obligation, the Feast of the Holy Family should be Liturgical Translations celebrated at evening Masses on December 30, 2017. For more information, see the commentary Published in the September 2017 issue of The Holy See recently announced that Pope Francis has signed an Liturgy Update. Apostolic Letter issued motu proprio (on his own initiative) which March 17: amends a portion of the Code of Canon Law (c. 838) having to do Saint Patrick’s Day with the preparation, review, and approval of liturgical In 2018, the feast day of Saint translations. The letter, entitled Magnum principium, indicates Patrick (observed as a solemnity in that these changes are intended to clarify the respective roles of the Archdiocese of New York) falls the Apostolic See and conferences of bishops in the translation of on a Saturday in Lent.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship
    Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship Letter Voluntati obsequens to bishops, accompanying the booklet Jubilate Deo, 14 April 1974 Pope Paul VI has expressed often, and even recently, the wish that the faithful of all countries be able to sing at least a few Gregorian chants in Latin (for example, the Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Agnus Dei)1 In compliance, this Congregation has prepared the enclosed booklet Jubilate Deo, which provides a short collection of such Gregorian chants. I have the honour and office of sending you a copy of this booklet as a gift from the Pope himself. I also take this occasion to commend to your own pastoral concerns this new measure intended to ensure the carrying out of the prescription of Vatican Council II: ‘Steps should be taken enabling the faithful to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass belonging to them.’2 Whenever the faithful pray together as a community, they show at once the complex diversity of a people gathered ‘from every tribe, language, and nation’ and their unity in faith and charity. The diversity stands out in the many languages lawfully used in the liturgy and in the song settings suited to those languages. The languages and songs convey the religious spirit of each particular people, along with the identical teachings of faith; the different types of music correspond to the culture and traditions of each people. The unity of faith, on the other hand, stands out in a marked manner through the use of Latin and Gregorian chant.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf (Accessed January 21, 2011)
    Notes Introduction 1. Moon, a Presbyterian from North Korea, founded the Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity in Korea on May 1, 1954. 2. Benedict XVI, post- synodal apostolic exhortation Saramen- tum Caritatis (February 22, 2007), http://www.vatican.va/holy _father/benedict_xvi/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_ben-xvi _exh_20070222_sacramentum-caritatis_en.html (accessed January 26, 2011). 3. Patrician Friesen, Rose Hudson, and Elsie McGrath were subjects of a formal decree of excommunication by Archbishop Burke, now a Cardinal Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signa- tura (the Roman Catholic Church’s Supreme Court). Burke left St. Louis nearly immediately following his actions. See St. Louis Review, “Declaration of Excommunication of Patricia Friesen, Rose Hud- son, and Elsie McGrath,” March 12, 2008, http://stlouisreview .com/article/2008-03-12/declaration-0 (accessed February 8, 2011). Part I 1. S. L. Hansen, “Vatican Affirms Excommunication of Call to Action Members in Lincoln,” Catholic News Service (December 8, 2006), http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0606995.htm (accessed November 2, 2010). 2. Weakland had previously served in Rome as fifth Abbot Primate of the Benedictine Confederation (1967– 1977) and is now retired. See Rembert G. Weakland, A Pilgrim in a Pilgrim Church: Memoirs of a Catholic Archbishop (Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 2009). 3. Facts are from Bruskewitz’s curriculum vitae at http://www .dioceseoflincoln.org/Archives/about_curriculum-vitae.aspx (accessed February 10, 2011). 138 Notes to pages 4– 6 4. The office is now called Vicar General. 5. His principal consecrator was the late Daniel E. Sheehan, then Arch- bishop of Omaha; his co- consecrators were the late Leo J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on the General Instruction of the Roman Missal
    A Commentary on the General Instruction of the Roman Missal A Commentary on the General Instruction of the Roman Missal Developed under the Auspices of the Catholic Academy of Liturgy and Cosponsored by the Federation of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions Edited by Edward Foley Nathan D. Mitchell Joanne M. Pierce Foreword by the Most Reverend Donald W. Trautman, S.T.D., S.S.L. Chairman of the Bishops’ Committee on the Liturgy 1993–1996, 2004–2007 A PUEBLO BOOK Liturgical Press Collegeville, Minnesota A Pueblo Book published by Liturgical Press Excerpts from the English translation of Dedication of a Church and an Altar © 1978, 1989, International Committee on English in the Liturgy, Inc. (ICEL); excerpts from the English translation of Documents on the Liturgy, 1963–1979: Conciliar, Papal, and Curial Texts © 1982, ICEL; excerpts from the English translation of Order of Christian Funerals © 1985, ICEL; excerpts from the English translation of The General Instruction of the Roman Missal © 2002, ICEL. All rights reserved. Libreria Editrice Vaticana omnia sibi vindicat iura. Sine ejusdem licentia scripto data nemini licet hunc Lectionarum from the Roman Missal in an editio iuxta typicam alteram, denuo imprimere aut aliam linguam vertere. Lectionarum from the Roman Missal in an editio iuxta typicam alteram—edition iuxta typica, Copyright 1981, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Città del Vaticano. Excerpts from documents of the Second Vatican Council are from Vatican Council II: The Basic Sixteen Documents, edited by Austin Flannery, © 1996 Costello Publishing Company, Inc. Used with permission. Cover design by David Manahan, OSB. Illustration by Frank Kacmarcik, OblSB. © 2007 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume LVI July-August 2020 Archbishop of Hartford Most Rev
    Members Most Rev. Leonard P. Blair, Chairman Volume LVI July-August 2020 Archbishop of Hartford Most Rev. Paul S. Coakley Archbishop of Oklahoma City CDF Responds to Questions on the Baptismal Formula Most Rev. Samuel J. Aquila Archbishop of Denver Most Rev. Joseph M. Siegel The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Bishop of Evansville responded to two questions regarding the sacramental Most Rev. Christopher J. Coyne formula used for Baptism; the response was approved Bishop of Burlington Most Rev. John T. Folda June 24, 2020 and publicly released on August 6. Bishop of Fargo Baptisms attempted with the formula “N., we baptize Most Rev. Daniel E. Garcia you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Bishop of Monterey Most Rev. Timothy C. Senior Holy Spirit” are invalid, and affected persons must be Auxiliary Bishop of Philadelphia baptized in forma absoluta, not conditionally. Most Rev. Daniel H. Mueggenborg Auxiliary Bishop of Seattle In addition to the response, the Congregation released a Consultants Doctrinal Note that emphasizes the profound Right Rev. Gregory J. Polan, OSB significance of the sacramental formula of Baptism and Abbot Primate of the Benedictine Confederation that reiterates the negative consequences of attempts to Right Rev. Jeremy Driscoll, OSB modify it. The note reinforces the principle that Jesus Christ himself baptizes through Abbot of Mount Angel Abbey Rev. James W. Bessert the words and actions of the minister: “When celebrating a Sacrament, the Church in Rev. Ryan T. Ruiz fact functions as the Body that acts inseparably from its Head, since it is Christ the Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Worship of the Eucharist Outside Mass (1973)
    November 2017 Guidelines for the Worship of the Eucharist The Eucharist is a priceless treasure: by Outside of Mass not only celebrating it but also by Archdiocese of New York praying before it outside of Mass, we are enabled to make contact with the very Prepared by the Office of Liturgy wellspring of grace…. It is pleasant to spend time with [Jesus], to lie close to his breast like the Beloved Disciple (cf. Jn 13:25) and to feel the infinite love present in his heart. -Pope Saint John Paul II, Ecclesia de Eucharistia, 25 !1 November 2017 Introduction The following guidelines provide a summary of the ecclesial documentation concerning the worship of the Eucharist outside of Mass. They are intended to serve as an aid to clergy and others within the Archdiocese of New York who are entrusted with fostering the faithful's devotion to the Blessed Sacrament through eucharistic adoration, both individually and in community. Questions regarding these guidelines may be directed to the Office of Liturgy. Historical Background The practice of reserving the Eucharist is an ancient observance which has its origins in the earliest centuries of the Church's history. The first extant description of reserving the Eucharist in order to bring Holy Communion to the sick is recorded in Saint Justin Martyr's First Apology (c. 155-157). In the following century, Cyprian of Carthage described how Christians would bring the Eucharist to their homes to receive it during the week, since the celebration of the Eucharist took place only on Sundays at this point in Christian history.1 In a tradition beginning in the city of Rome, the Eucharist was sometimes reserved and then added to the Precious Blood during a later Mass celebrated in another location as a way of symbolically expressing the communion between parishes and their bishop or between various bishops.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmation As a Sacrament of Initiation by the Most Reverend
    FDLC NEWSLETTER June - July 2013 Vol. 40, No.3 Confirmation as a Sacrament of Initiation Most Reverend Samuel J. Aquila First appeared in L’Osservatore Romano, 2240: 4-5, 8 (Apr 4 2012). Reprinted with permission by the request of the Archbishop as preparatory reading for his presentation during the 2013 National Meeting of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions. © L'Osservatore Romano, 00120 Vatican City. All rights reserved. Other preparatory materials suggested by Archbishop Aquila and the other 2013 Study Day presenters may be downloaded from https://www.box.com/s/mg8hhol9ohmrqcualw1u The FDLC does not hold the copyright for any of the materials posted, but has received permission to post the articles for personal use in preparation for the Study Day. On 24 June 2011, Most Reverend Samuel Joseph Aquila, then Bishop of Fargo, North Dakota, gave the Hillenbrand Distinguished Lecture at the Liturgical Institute of the University of St Mary of the Lake, in Mundelein, Illinois. The following is his essay based on that lecture. Bishop Aquila is one of several bishops in the United States who have in recent years restored the administration of the sacraments of initiation to their ancient order of Baptism, Confirmation, and First Holy Communion. In August 2002, after consultation with the clergy and laity, I issued a pastoral letter on the sacrament of confirmation, titled Send Forth Your Spirit, and as bishop I restored the order of the sacraments of initiation for those children baptized as Catholics in infancy.1 Education played a most important role in the process as many of the faithful were unaware of the history of the sacrament of confirmation and especially of Church teaching over the past 40 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Regarding Adoration
    Information Regarding Adoration of the Most Blessed Sacrament No one can fail to see that the divine Eucharist bestows an incomparable dignity upon the Christian people. For it is not just while the Sacrifice is being offered and the Sacrament is being confected, but also after the Sacrifice has been offered and the Sacrament confected - while the Eucharist is reserved in churches or oratories - that Christ is truly Emmanuel, which means “God with us.” For He is in the midst of us day and night; He dwells in us with the fullness of grace and of truth. He raises the level of morals, fosters virtue, comforts the sorrowful, strengthens the weak and stirs up all those who draw near to Him to imitate Him, so that they may learn from His example to be meek and humble of heart, and to seek not their own interests but those of God. Anyone who has a special devotion to the sacred Eucharist and who tries to repay Christ’s infinite love for us with an eager and unselfish love of His own, will experience and fully understand - and this will bring great delight and benefit to his soul - just how precious is a life hidden with Christ in God and just how worthwhile it is to carry on a conversation with Christ, for there is nothing more consoling here on earth, nothing more efficacious for progress along the paths of holiness. Pope St. Paul VI – Mysterium Fidei Cover: Icon of the Ascension, Notre Dame Institute, Jerusalem, Photograph by Lawrence Lew, OP. Abbreviations ADP Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • JCD Dissertation Zielonka
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Influence of the Second Vatican Council on the Function of Papal Legates. Comparative Analysis of the 1917 and 1983 Codes of Canon Law and Selected Special Faculties. A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Canon Law Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Canon Law © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Dariusz J. Zielonka Washington, D.C. 2013 i This dissertation by Dariusz J. Zielonka fulfills the dissertation requirement for the doctoral degree in canon law approved by Kurt Martens, J.C.D., as Director, and by Robert Kaslyn, S.J., J.C.D., and Sean Sheridan, T.O.R., J.C.D., J.D., as Readers. !!!!!!____________________________________ !!!!!!Kurt Martens, J.C.D., Director !!!!!!____________________________________ !!!!!!Robert Kaslyn, S.J., J.C.D., Reader !!!!!!____________________________________ !!!!!!Sean Sheridan, T.O.R., J.C.D., J.D., Reader ii In memoriam: Tadeusz and Alina Zielonka My parents. May they rest in peace. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS! viii INTRODUCTION! 1 CHAPTER 1! 5 Papal Legates in the 1917 Code of Canon Law! 5 1.1. Introduction! 5 1.2. A Brief Historical Overview of the Office of Papal Legates! 6 1.2.1. Roman Republic! 6 1.2.2. The First Papal Legates! 9 1.2.3. Papal Legation in the Middle Ages / Gratian! 13 1.2.4. The First Permanent Papal Diplomatic Posts! 26 1.2.5. Shaping of Modern Papal Legation! 30 1.2.6. Papal Legation in the Twentieth Century and Today! 36 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Nuntiaturae Polonae
    ACTA NUNTIATURAE POLONAE ACADEMIA SCIENTIARUM ET LITTERARUM POLONA SUMPTIBUS FUNDATIONIS LANCKOROŃSKI ACTA NUNTIATURAE POLONAE TOMUS LII ANGELUS MARIA DURINI (1767-1772) * Volumen 1 (12 IV 1766 – 20 IV 1768) edidit WOJCIECH KĘDER CRACOVIAE 2016 CONSILIUM EORUM, QUI EDITORIBUS ACTORUM NUNTIATURAE POLONAE SUADENT: Marco Jačov, Ioannes Kopiec, Iosephus Korpanty, Vanda Lohman, Marius Markiewicz, Anna Michalewicz (secretarius), Stanislaus Wilk, Georgius Wyrozumski (praeses) Volumen hoc edendum curavit Vanda Lohman Summaria, studia et fontes auxiliarii in linguam Anglorum vertit Petrus Pieńkowski Indicem confecit Krzysztof W. Zięba Textum ad imprimendum composuit MKBB © Copyright by Polska Akademia Umiejętności Kraków 2016 ISBN 978-83-7676-259-3 LIST OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................. VII I. Angelo Maria Durini’s early years in Rome and in France ............................................ VII II. Angelo Maria Durini in Warsaw ........................... X III. Angelo Maria Durini in Avignon and in Lombardy ........................................ XXVI Sources of Angelo Maria Durini’s Nunciature .................... XXIX Index of sources published in present volume .................... XXXIII Works which contain Angelo Maria Durini’s letters and documents ........................................... XXXV Primary and secondary sources ................................. XXXVII Index of notas ................................................. XLV TEXT ........................................................ 1 Index of names and places ...................................... 383 INTRODUCTION I. Angelo Maria Durini’s early years in Rome and in France 1. The Durini family of Como Angelo Maria Durini came from the family living in Lombardy and known already in the Middle Ages. Lazzaro de Durino, who apparently lived in the vicinity of the town of Moltrasio at Como Lake at the beginning of the 15th century, can be considered the family founder. In the seventies of the 15th century his son Teobaldo moved to Como with his children.
    [Show full text]
  • Missions De La Congrégation
    MISSIONS DE LA CONGRÉGATION DES OBLATS DE MARIE IMMACULÉE __________ N° 193. — Mars 1911. _______ ROME ______ Bref de Pie X approuvant nos saintes Règles _______ LITTERÆ APOSTOLICÆ A. S. D. N. PIO PP. X CONCESSÆ AD CONFIRMATIONEM INSTITUTI NECNON REGULARUM ET CONSTITUTIONUM CONGREGATIONIS OBLATORUM SANCTISSIMÆ ET IMMACULATÆ VIRGINIS MARIÆ CUM APPROBATIONE ADDITIONUM ET IMMUTATIONUM QUÆ DECREVIT CAPITULUM GENERALE ANNO 1908 CELEBRATUM PIUS Papa X AD PERPETUAM REI MEMORIAM Decessorum nostrorum vestigiis insistentes, ad religiosorum virorum Congregationes, ex quibus Ecclesia Dei tot tantaque emolumenta nanciscitur, singulari paternæ Nostræ voluntatis studio oculos convertimus, vigili cura prospicientes, ut eædem illis omnibus præsidiis muniantur, — 2 — quæ ad ipsarum utilitatem, bonum atque incrementum magis accomodata atque opportuna Nobis videantur. Frugiferas has inter Congregationes jure meritoque accensenda est, quæ a Missionariis Oblatis Mariæ Immaculatae nomen habet, et ad Aquas Sextias in Provincia jam inde ab anno MDCCCXVI fundata, per Apostolicas Literas eadem hac forma die XXI Martii mensis anno MDCCCXXVI datas a Leone PP. XII rec. me., Praedecessore Nostro, tum Instituti tum regularum adprobationem obtinuit. Haec enim Congregatio, quæ sibi quasi titulum pro certamine bono certando assumpsit divini Magistri verba : « Evangelizare pauperibus misit me », nullo umquam tempore destitit in agri Dominici messem multos eosque sedulos cultores mittere, qui strenue laborantes laeti tandem cum exultatione portarent manipulos suos. Brevi in universum terrarum orbem, Deo favente, diffusa, novem in præsens ipsa Congregatio provinciis pollet. Quatuordecim Apostolici Vicariatus et in America Septentrionali et in Africa Meridionali et in Asia manent Oblatorum Missionariorum a Virgine Immaculata curis concrediti : ipsa tam vasto terrarum marisque intervallo dissita Australia plura ab hac Congregatione accepta referre debet beneficia.
    [Show full text]
  • “Anglican Use of the Roman Rite”? the Unity of the Liturgy in the Diversity of Its Rites and Forms Hans-Jürgen Feulner
    Antiphon 17.1 (2013): 31-72 “Anglican Use of the Roman Rite”? The Unity of the Liturgy in the Diversity of Its Rites and Forms Hans-Jürgen Feulner The internationally known German liturgist Balthasar Fischer († 2001) was rather far-sighted and somewhat euphoric, when, already in 1981, in connection with article 4 of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, he mentioned the ecumenical dimension of the liturgy: Nowhere does reunification any longer mean—and also not in the West—the adoption of the Roman liturgy and of specifically Catholic piety. Today one can very well imagine how the magnificent liturgy celebrated by our Anglican brothers, with some minute changes, could become a ritus legitime agnitus [lawfully acknowledged rite]; an English liturgical family among the liturgical families of the Catholic Church. With all the spiritual riches that have been amassed here in 400 years, she would join her wagon to the train of Catholic liturgies.1 On June 15, 2012, a decree of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) created the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of the Southern Cross2—the third Personal Ordinariate to date. This 1 Balthasar Fischer, “Liturgie oder Liturgien?”, in Trierer Theologische Zeitschrift 90 (1981) 265–275, here 273–274 (translation from German; emphasis added and my explanation of the Latin expression). Here the term “liturgical families” more probably means “rites.” 2 Holy See Press Office, “Erezione di Ordinariato Personale di Our Lady of the Southern Cross e nomina del primo Ordinario”, in Daily Bulletin (June 15, 2012): http://www.news.va/en/news/73782 (accessed 10/12/2012); Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Decree of Erection of the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of the Southern Cross” (June 15, 2012; Prot.N.
    [Show full text]