DOCSLIB.ORG

Canon Law Society of America Proceedings of the Sixty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canon Law Society of America Proceedings of the Sixty CANON LAW SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONVENTION PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA OCTOBER 11 - 14,2004 CANON LAW SOCIETY OF AMERICA OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE COORDINATOR 108 NORTH PAYNE STREET, SUITE C ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2906 © Copyright 2005 by Canon Law Society of America ISBN: 1-932208-08-9 ISSN: 0277-9889 SAN: 237-6296 The Canon Law Society of America's programs and publications are designed solely to help canonists maintain their professional competence. In dealing with specific canonical matters, the canonist using Canon Law Society of America publications or orally conveyed information should also research original sources of authority. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of the Canon Law Society of America (CLSA), its Board of Governors, Staff or members. The CLSA does not endorses the views or opinions expressed by the individual authors. The publisher and authors specifically disclaim any liability, loss or risk, personal or otherwise, which is incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use, reliance, or application of any of the contents of this publication. Printed in the United States of America Canon Law Society of America Office of the Executive Coordinator 108 North Payne Street, Suite C Alexandria, VA 22314-2906 TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD Vii ADDRESSES The Sacraments: Actions of Christ and Actions of the Church Most Rev. Thomas G. Doran 1 Theology of Marriage: Complementarity Between the Latin and Eastern Codes Mr. Robert Flummerfelt 13 Les Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi in the Rites of Christian Initiation Rev. Msgr. Kevin W. Irwin 27 SEMINARS Finding Method in the Madness: Writing Sentences in Lack of Due Discretion Cases Rev. John P. Beat 57 The Sacrament of Reconciliation: Issues, Praxis and the Future Rev. Patrick J. Cogan, SA 81 Remuneration, Decent Support and Clerics Removed from the Ministry of the Church Rev. James I. Donlon 93 The Charter and Norms Two Years Later: Towards a Resolution of Recent Canonical Dilemmas Rev. Msgr. Ronny E. Jenkins 115 The Role of the Expert in Tribunal Proceedings Rev. Mr. Gerald T. Jorgensen 137 The RCIA: Canonical Issues Rev. Ronald F. Krisman 153 The Disruptive Religious: Part I: Religious Authority and the Disruptive Religious Sister Elissa A. Rinere, CP 171 in Part II: A Focus on the Individual Rev. Arthur J. Espelage, OFM 179 Calling God's Special Children to Holiness: Sacramental Access for the Mentally and Cognitively Challenged Mr. Peter Vere 195 Sacramental Life of Parishes without a Resident Pastor: Part I: The Parish Rev. Gary D: Yanus 207 Part II: The Role of the Parish Administrator Sister Therese Guerin Sullivan, SP 221 OFFICERS' REPORTS President Rev. Msgr. Mark L. Bartchak 243 Treasurer Very Rev. William J. King 253 Auditors' Report 257 Budget FY 2004-2005 275 Executive Coordinator Rev. Arthur J. Espelage, O.F.M. 287 COMMITTEE REPORTS STANDING COMMITTEES Budget 295 Convention Planning 295 Nominations 297 Professional Responsibility 299 Hearing Officers 300 Resolutions 301 ON-GOING COMMITTEES Advisory Opinions 302 Canonical Aspects of Questions Regarding Sexual Abuse of Minors ... 305 Canon Law Digest 306 Civil and Canon Law 306 Eastern Canon Law 309 Electronic Media 310 Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life Committee 311 IV Investment Review 312 Lay Canonists 313 Marriage Research 322 Publications 323 Roman Replies 324 Scholarship Fund 325 Translation of Legislative Texts 326 PROJECTS/TASK FORCES BOG Handbook Review and Revision 327 CLSA Strategic Planning Committee/CLSA Planning Task Force 327 Ex Corde Ecclesiae Application 328 Lay Ministry Handbook 329 Marriage Procedures Handbook 330 Special Task Force on Executive Coordinator's Office 331 Task Force on Issues Related to Marriage and Undocumented Persons .. 332 CONVENTION Convention Chairperson 334 Convention Liturgies 335 Tribunal Statistics 2003 338 BUSINESS MEETING Minutes 385 MISCELLANEOUS Homily Most Rev. Donald W. Wuerl 397 Citation for the Role of Law Award Rev. Msgr. Mark L. Bartchak 401 Response, Role of Law Award Rev. William H. Woestman, OMI 405 Contributors 411 List of Participants of 2004 Convention 413 List of New Members 422 Index for Proceedings 425 FORWARD I am pleased to present the Proceedings of the sixty-sixth annual convention held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, October 11 to 14,2004. The Canon Law Society of America annually publishes to our members and to others in the canonical community the major address and seminars presented at the annual meeting. Each year an attempt is made to produce the CLSA Proceedings as soon as possible after the convention. In the collection of materials for this manuscript, I wish to express my gratitude to the presenters who provided their final texts in a most timely fashion. Preparation of the texts for publication was facilitated this year by the submission of electronic versions of the presentations. In the preparation of the texts, every attempt was made to maintain consistency by relying on both The Chicago Manual of Style and the style of previous issues of CLSA Proceedings. In this year's edition of CLSA Proceedings, readers will find the inclusion of a participants list at the Pittsburgh Convention. This adaptation brings the CLSA into a similar format as our fellow societies in Australia, Canada, and Great Britain & Ireland. It responds to the request of those members who can use the material as proof for continuing education credits. Likewise, this year's volume contains a list of new CLSA members who joined the society between October 2003 and 2004. We welcome these new men and women joining the members of the CLSA. Indexing of past CLSA addresses and seminars is an important research tool. One will find an index for CLSA Proceedings, volumes 31 (1969) to 56 (1994) in the Proceedings of the Fifty-sixth Annual Convention, October 1994, in Atlanta, Georgia. A new index for volumes 57 (1995) to 66 (2004) will be found in this volume of CLSA Proceedings. For readers who wish electronically to access these indices, consult www.clsa.org. The Canon Law Society of America, established on November 12, 1939 as a professional association dedicated to the promotion of both the study and the application of canon law in the Catholic Church today numbers over 1600 members who reside in the United States and forty other countries. CLSA Proceedings 66 (2004) should take its place among previous volumes as a professional resource. The text contains a high degree of consistency and accuracy which should further scholarly research. vn Additional copies of this volume of CLSA Proceedings may be found at CLSA Publications, P.O. Box 463, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701-0463 or at the CLSA website: www.clsa.org. For telephone or fax orders consult: (Telephone) 301-362- 8197 or (Fax) 301-206-9789. For membership information on the Canon Law Society of America or business matters, contact the office of the Executive Coordinator or contact our website. Arthur J. Espelage, O.F.M. Executive Coordinator Canon Law Society of America 108 N. Payne Street, Suite C Alexandria, VA 22314-2906 Tel: 703-739-2560 Fax: 703-739-2562 E-mail: [email protected] vm CLSA PROCEEDINGS 66 (2004) 1-12 THE SACRAMENTS: ACTIONS OF CHRIST AND ACTIONS OF THE CHURCH MOST REV. THOMAS G. DORAN It is with deep appreciation to the Canon Law Society of America for its invitation to present the keynote address for this convention and I offer these remarks on the sacraments as actions of our Lord Jesus Christ and actions of his holy Catholic Church. This serves as a meditative background and reflection on what we are about in this week of deliberations, the 66th annual convention of our society. In his encyclical letter of last year, Pope John Paul II referred to the Holy Eucharist as "the heart of the mystery of the Church,"1 the source of the Christian Life. Bishop Wuerl so nicely underlined how the Mass figured into the history of this city at its inception. In the most Blessed Sacrament, as also in the other sacraments, Jesus Christ offers his life to us.2 In the sacraments, the Lord Jesus Christ bestows on the faithful nothing less than a participation in the divine life of the Trinity. Jesus said of the Eucharist: "As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me."3 As the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches us, "The desire and work of the Holy Spirit in the heart of the Church is that we may live from the life of the risen Christ."4 And '"Seated at the right hand of the Father' and pouring out the Holy Spirit on his Body which is the Church, Christ now acts through the sacraments he instituted to communicate his grace and his life."5 These are vital truths indeed. I am grateful for this opportunity to reflect on the Christian sacraments as life-giving actions of Jesus Christ and their relationship with the canonical laws of the Catholic Church which has been commissioned to draw all men into the divine life through the sacraments. 1 Ecclesia de Eucharistia, no. 1. 2 Ibid., no. 6. 3 Jn 6:57. 4 Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1091. 5 Ibid., no. 1084. The Situation of the Church In every age the need for the grace of Christ is apparent. "I am the vine and you are the branches," says our Lord, "apart from me you can do nothing."6 Without the life Christ Jesus bestows in the sacraments we cannot enter into communion with God, become new creatures and heirs of heaven, be forgiven of our sins, be united to the sacrifice of Christ Jesus on the cross, be fed with his life-giving Body and Blood, receive the gifts of the Holy Spirit, be comforted when we are sick or dying, enter into marriage as a sacred covenant in Christ, or be made deacons, priests or bishops to serve the Church.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of The
    The History of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America The American Orthodox Catholic Church Old Catholic Orthodox Church Archbishop Gregory Morra, OSB Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Episcopal Imprimatur of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Old Catholic Orthodox Church This history of the church is hereby released under the authority of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide which is a direct blood descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church chartered in 1927 by Metropolitan Platon and later led by Archbishop Aftimios Ofiesh of Brooklyn, New York and eventually recognized as The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America. In its current form the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide and the Old Catholic Orthodox Church subsidiary recognizes the contributions of the early fathers of this historic church in the person of Metropolitan-Patriarch Denis M. Garrison (Emeritus) through the lineage of Archbishop Aftimios of blessed memory as the true spiritual father of the Church. Therefore, the Holy Synod hereby confers its official imprimatur on the history of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide as a direct historical descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church as outlined in this document. Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Religiousbookclub
    pg0164_RBC Lent Easter2021 12/15/2020 9:46 AM Page 65 Selection • Savings • Service • Inside & Online Lent/Easter 2021 ReligiousThe BookClub SAVE $ Study with one of the most popular theologians! 57 SAVE Systematic Theology, Second Edition— $58 Video Lecture Bundle The New Testament in Its World— Wayne Grudem Video Lecture Bundle Keeping technical terms to a minimum, Grudem serves up a thorough overview of Chris tian beliefs. Blending el- N.T. Wright & Michael F. Bird ements of intellectual and spiritual formation, this best- “Highly readable. Brings together decades of ground- selling text illuminates the knowing and doing of theology. breaking research into one volume that will open readers’ Features cross-referenced bibliographies. Now all quotations eyes to the larger world. It presents the New Testament are taken from the ESV. Includes 1,718-page hardcover, books as historical, literary, and social phenomena located DVDs, workbook, and laminated study sheet. Zondervan. in the world of Second Temple Judaism, amidst Greco- Roman politics and culture,”—Englewood Review of Books. SY0119883 Retail $149.99 . .RBC $92.99 Includes 992-page hardcover, DVDs, and workbook. Words of Life— SY0119906 Retail $139.99 . .RBC $81.49 DVD Curriculum Hope in Times Adam Hamilton of Fear Hamilton, senior pastor of one of the fastest Timothy Keller growing churches “Keller’s work belongs on in the country, the bookshelf of every se- brings us an as- rious Bible student. It is tounding con- not a quick read, but, in- temporary reflec- stead, should be savored tion on the Ten like fine wine, one sip at Commandments. a time, to glean the full Juxtaposing scientific impact of his life-changing research and psychology message,”—Examiner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centrality of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass at Christendom College
    THE CENTRALITY OF THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS AT CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE The Church teaches that the Eucharist is “the source and summit of the Christian life”1 and that the celebration of the Mass “is a sacred action surpassing all others. No other action of the Church can equal its efficacy.”2 That is why “as a natural expression of the Catholic identity of the University. members of this community . will be encouraged to participate in the celebration of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist, as the most perfect act of community worship.”3 Those central truths are taught and lived at Christendom College, a “Catholic coeducational college institutionally committed to the Magisterium”4 of the Church, in the following ways: The Celebration of the Sacred Liturgy The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass • Mass is offered frequently: twice daily Monday through Thursday, three times on MONDAY (Friday), twice on Saturday, and once on Sunday (the day on which we gather as one family). • Mass in the Roman Rite is celebrated in all the ways offered by the Church: in the Ordinary Form in both English and Latin, and in the Extraordinary Form from one to three times per week, as circumstances permit. • The Ordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated with the solemnity appropriate to each feast, utilizing worthy sacred vessels and vestments, and drawing upon the Church’s rich tradition of chant, polyphony, and hymnody. • The Ordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated reverently and with rubrical fidelity. • No classes or other activities are scheduled during Mass times. • The majority of the College community attends daily Mass regularly and with great devotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History
    Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Updated February 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45087 Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Summary Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or “sense of” one or both houses of Congress. Censure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions’ sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly “censorious” resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. Resolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process “sense of” legislation. Since 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). The clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutionality of Censuring the President
    Legal Sidebari The Constitutionality of Censuring the President March 12, 2018 House Democrats have introduced a resolution that, if approved by the House, would formally “censure and condemn” President Trump for disparaging comments on immigration issues he allegedly made during a meeting with Members of Congress. This is the second presidential “censure” resolution introduced in the House this Congress. While each house of Congress has authority to discipline its own Members through censure, congressional censure of the President is rare. For that reason, there seems to be a recurring question as to whether Congress has the constitutional authority to adopt such a measure at all. As discussed below, it would appear that Congress may censure the President through a simple (one chamber) or concurrent (two chamber) resolution, or other non-binding measure, so long as the censure does not carry with it any legal consequence. This Sidebar will discuss examples of congressional censure of the President before addressing its constitutional validity. While Black’s Law Dictionary defines censure as “an official reprimand or condemnation…,” in practice, there is no clear rule for determining the legislative actions that may qualify as a “censure” of the President. Viewed broadly, censure of the President could include any legislative measure formally adopted by the House or Senate that expresses that body’s disagreement with specific presidential conduct. Using this definition, the first congressional censure of the President seemingly occurred in 1834 after President Andrew Jackson removed his Treasury Secretary for refusing to withdraw government deposits from the Bank of the United States. The approved Senate resolution stated that President Jackson had “assumed upon himself authority and power not conferred by the constitution and laws, but in derogation of both.” The Jackson resolution was subject to some debate, and three years later—once the President’s supporters regained control of the Senate—the resolution was officially expunged from the Senate Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation Joseph Mele
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 2008 Homiletics at the Threshold: Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation Joseph Mele Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Mele, J. (2008). Homiletics at the Threshold: Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/919 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOMILETICS AT THE THRESHOLD: POPE BENEDICT XVI‘S INVITATION A Dissertation Submitted to The McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Joseph M. Mele May 2008 Copyright by Joseph M. Mele 2008 HOMILETICS AT THE THRESHOLD: POPE BENEDICT XVI‘S INVITATION By Joseph M. Mele Approved Month Day, 2008 ____________________________ ____________________________ Name of Professor Name of Professor Professor of Professor of (Dissertation Director) (Committee Member) ____________________________ ____________________________ Name of Professor Name of Professor Professor of Professor of (Committee Member) (Committee Member) ___________________________ ____________________________ Name of Dean Name of External Reviewer Dean, The McAnulty
    [Show full text]
  • 1700 Faculties
    Book IV The Sanctifying Office of the Church Part I Sacramental Life §1700 FACULTIES The following faculties or permissions apply to all priests who are in good standing and who are incardinated in the Diocese or who have been approved by the Bishop to minister within the Diocese, even if they may be retired. In a spirit of trust and in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, every effort has been made to extend the discretionary authority of priests in the exercise of their ministry. Whatever special faculties or permissions have been given to pastors apply also to parochial administrators (c. 540, §1). These faculties and permissions are effective August 15, 1986 and remain in effect until revoked. Special Note The information contained in this section is, in many cases, repetitious of that in previous sections and has been included here for purposes of quick reference. Users are encouraged to consult specific sections for a more complete statement of Diocesan Policy and Procedures regarding sacramental matters. §1701 BAPTISM1 1701.1. Faculty To baptize those who are fourteen years of age or older. Procedures a) Canon 862 provides that outside the case of necessity, it is not lawful to confer baptism in the territory of another without permission. b) Without this faculty it would be necessary to refer such cases to the diocesan bishop (c. 863). c) As a rule, an adult is to be baptized in his or her own parish church (c. 857, §2). d) The sacrament of baptism is not to be conferred outside a legitimate canonically erected parish church or chapel, except in the case of necessity (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Theology and Canon Law: the Quest for a Sound Relationship Ladislas Orsy, S.J
    Theological Studies 50 (1989) MORAL THEOLOGY AND CANON LAW: THE QUEST FOR A SOUND RELATIONSHIP LADISLAS ORSY, S.J. The Catholic University of America HE PROBLEM: alienation. For all disinterested observers, it is a well- Tknown fact that at present the relationship between canon law and moral theology is at best disturbed, at worst downright nonexistent. Yet there should be an organic unity between the two. After all, moral theology defines many of the values canon law is promoting, and canon law creates obligations which have far-reaching consequences in the field of morality. Thus mutual understanding and a well-balanced relationship should be in the interest of both parties. The origins of this present-day alienation are found in the past history of the two sciences. To listen to the moralists, their theology has suffered badly at the hands of the canonists: they tried to make it into a thinly disguised branch of jurisprudence.1 To listen to the canonists, the nature of their rules and regulations has been misunderstood by the moralists: they tended to make them into divine precepts with appropriate sanc­ tions, including eternal damnation.2 All such accusations are, of course, simplifications. Nonetheless, among the unfair generalizations there is a grain of truth. Many times in history the two sciences encroached on each other's field, and by the introduction 1 The historical development of moral theology—certainly in the last 400 years—was closely tied to the administration of the sacrament of penance. Its main aim was to give guidance to confessors, especially for the purpose of assessing the right amount of penance.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Apostolicae Sedis
    ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ANNUS XII - VOLUMEN XII ROMAE TYPIS POLYGLOTTIS VATICANIS MCMXX fr fr Num. 1 ACTA APOSTOLICAE SEDIS COMMENTARIUM OFFICIALE ACTA BENEDICTI PP. XV CONSTITUTIO APOSTOLICA AGRENSIS ET PURUENSIS ERECTIO PRAELATURAE NULLIUS BENEDICTUS EPISCOPUS SERVUS SERVORUM DEI AD PERPETUAM REI MEMORIAM Ecclesiae universae regimen, Nobis ex alto commissum, onus Nobis imponit diligentissime curandi ut in orbe catholico circumscriptionum ecclesiasticarum numerus, ceu occasio vel necessitas postulat, augeatur, ut, coarctatis dioecesum finibus ac proinde minuto fidelium grege sin­ gulis Pastoribus credito, Praesules ipsi munus sibi commissum facilius ac salubrius exercere possint. Quum autem apprime constet dioecesim Amazonensem in Brasi­ liana Republica latissime patere, viisque quam maxime deficere, prae­ sertim in occidentali parte, in provinciis scilicet, quae Alto Aere et Alto Purus vocantur, ubi fideles commixti saepe saepius cum indigenis infidelibus vivunt et spiritualibus subsidiis, quibus christiana vita alitur et sustentatur, ferme ex integro carent; Nos tantae necessitati subve­ niendum duximus. Ideoque, collatis consiliis cum dilectis filiis Nostris S. R. E. Car­ dinalibus S. Congregationi Consistoriali praepositis, omnibusque mature perpensis, partem territorii dictae dioecesis Amazonensis, quod prae­ dictas provincias Alto Aere et Alto Purus complectitur, ab eadem dioe­ cesi distrahere et in Praelaturam Nullius erigere statuimus. 6 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale Quamobrem, potestate
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtue of Penance in the United States, 1955-1975
    THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Maria Christina Morrow UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2013 THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Chair _______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member Mary Ann Spearin Chair in Catholic Theology _______________________________________ Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ Jana M. Bennett, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ William C. Mattison, III, Ph.D. Committee Member iii ABSTRACT THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation examines the conception of sin and the practice of penance among Catholics in the United States from 1955 to 1975. It begins with a brief historical account of sin and penance in Christian history, indicating the long tradition of performing penitential acts in response to the identification of one’s self as a sinner. The dissertation then considers the Thomistic account of sin and the response of penance, which is understood both as a sacrament (which destroys the sin) and as a virtue (the acts of which constitute the matter of the sacrament but also extend to include non-sacramental acts). This serves to provide a framework for understanding the way Catholics in the United States identified sin and sought to amend for it by use of the sacrament of penance as well as non-sacramental penitential acts of the virtue of penance.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis Marriage Nullity Cases in the United States of America from 2016-2018
    Statistical Analysis Marriage Nullity Cases in the United States of America from 2016-2018 Introduction Over three years have passed since the reform of the process for the declaration of the nullity of marriage legislated by the Motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus and Mitis et misericors Iesus has gone into effect. Due to the novelty of the Processus brevior coram Episcopo, there is much interest in the way it is being used. Several have already produced statistical studies. There are the two studies for the Ibero- American tribunals.1 In addition, the Canon Law Society of Great Britain and Ireland published in its 2019 Newsletter a statistical analysis for Tribunal activity in 2017.2 There is also the periodical Proceedings of the Canon Law Society of America, which began in 2017 to published the statistics for the briefer process.3 Scope and Method The present study seeks to analyze the statistics regarding the first instance activity of ecclesiastical Tribunals in the United States of America from 2016 through 2018. While some of above-mentioned studies relied heavily on reports of the Central Office of Statistics of the Church, the raw data for this study was gathered exclusively from the Annual Reports on the State and Activity of the Tribunal submitted to the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. 4 Certainly this choice placed some limitations on the data intake; however, the report provides a unique data set including the number of appeals lodged by the defender of the bond. Throughout the study, several abbreviations are used: PB, processus brevior coram Episcopo PO, processus ordinarius DV, defensor vinculi 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See (Including Vatican City State)
    COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE EVALUATION OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (MONEYVAL) MONEYVAL(2012)17 Mutual Evaluation Report Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism THE HOLY SEE (INCLUDING VATICAN CITY STATE) 4 July 2012 The Holy See (including Vatican City State) is evaluated by MONEYVAL pursuant to Resolution CM/Res(2011)5 of the Committee of Ministers of 6 April 2011. This evaluation was conducted by MONEYVAL and the report was adopted as a third round mutual evaluation report at its 39 th Plenary (Strasbourg, 2-6 July 2012). © [2012] Committee of experts on the evaluation of anti-money laundering measures and the financing of terrorism (MONEYVAL). All rights reserved. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. For any use for commercial purposes, no part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the MONEYVAL Secretariat, Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law, Council of Europe (F-67075 Strasbourg or [email protected] ). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PREFACE AND SCOPE OF EVALUATION............................................................................................ 5 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]