DOCSLIB.ORG

(Coffea Arabica L.) in Coffee Value Chain: a Case Study of Darolabu District, Eastern Ethiopia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Coffea Arabica L.) in Coffee Value Chain: a Case Study of Darolabu District, Eastern Ethiopia Assessment of Factors Affecting Quality of Hararge Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Coffee Value Chain: A Case Study of Darolabu District, Eastern Ethiopia A Research Project Submitted to Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied sciences In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Agricultural Production Chain Management, Specialization Horticulture Chains By Mohammedsani Amin Ameyu September 2014 Wageningen The Netherlands ©Copyright. Mohammedsani Amin Ameyu, 2014. All Rights reserved DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis work to my beloved wife Mafuza Usmael Kasim, and to my mother Saniya Kalil and father Amin Ameyu whose unqualified encouragement and support made it possible for me to commence and complete this training by their continuous prayers. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Most of all I express my deepest thanks to my Almighty ‘ALLAH’ for giving me spiritual strength, encouragement and guidance to complete this thesis and presenting with me anytime. May his Name be praised! He made it possible for things to happen. I wish to express my gratitude and appreciation to my Supervisor Jos van Hal for their encouragement, guidance, support, constructive criticisms and useful suggestions that made this thesis an invaluable learning experience for me. The author is deeply indebted to all those who took part in filling and responding to the questionnaire and share their experiences and knowledge which made the completion of the study possible. Many farmers and other actors, too difficult to mention by names, graciously assisted with the required data. They cooperated so well in answering lengthy questions. I wish to acknowledge their contributions. I am indebted a special word of appreciation to Dutch Government through Netherland Fellowship Program (NFP) for granted me a full scholarship chance for pursue Master Degree in the Netherlands. My thankfulness also goes to the hosting institution, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied sciences and its staff, for academic and technical support through all this study period. I additional wish to express my genuine thanks and acknowledgments to Ahimed Aliyi, Kinde Lemessa and all members of coffee research team of Mechara Agriculture Research Center for their support and encouragements. iii Table of Contents DEDICATION .............................................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. iii LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. viii LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................. x ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Coffee Production ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Research Problem ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Problem owner ................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Research Objective .......................................................................................................... 2 1.6 Research questions .......................................................................................................... 3 1.7 Significance of the Study .................................................................................................. 3 1.8 Scope and Limitations of the Study................................................................................... 3 1.9 Organization of the Thesis ................................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 Coffee Quality ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Factors Affecting Coffee Quality ....................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Genetic factors ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Pedo-climatic ............................................................................................................. 5 2.2.3 Coffee shade tree ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2.4 Management practices ............................................................................................... 6 2.2.5 Harvesting methods ................................................................................................... 6 2.2.6 Post-harvest processing and handling practices ........................................................ 7 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Description of study area .................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Research design ............................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Research strategies .........................................................................................................10 3.3.1 Desk Study ................................................................................................................10 3.3.2 Survey .......................................................................................................................10 3.3.3 Interviews ..................................................................................................................11 3.4 Research Framework ......................................................................................................11 3.5 Conceptual Framework ....................................................................................................12 iv 3.6 Data analysis ...................................................................................................................12 CHAPTER 4. RESULTS ...........................................................................................................13 4.1 Finding from Field Survey ................................................................................................13 4.1.1 Respondent characteristics .......................................................................................13 4.1.2 Coffee Production in Darolabu district .......................................................................13 4.1.3 Local coffee variety growing ......................................................................................14 4.1.4 Coffee field management practices ...........................................................................15 4.1.5 Harvest and post-harvest management .....................................................................18 4.1.6 Coffee marketing .......................................................................................................20 4.1.7 Coffee Production Constraints...................................................................................21 4.1.8 Extension service provided to farmers .......................................................................21 4.2 Findings from the interviews ............................................................................................21 4.2.1 Characteristics of marketing actors ...........................................................................22 4.2.2 Post harvest practice by marketing actors .................................................................22 4.2.3 Mixing of different quality coffee ................................................................................23 4.2.4 Coffee quality identification .......................................................................................24 4.2.5 Quality control strategy..............................................................................................24 4.2.6 Price information and setting .....................................................................................25 4.2.7 Coffee marketing cost and selling price .....................................................................25 4.2.8 Coffee marketing constraints .....................................................................................26 4.3 Coffee Value Chain .........................................................................................................26 4.3.1 Actors and their Functions in the Chain .....................................................................28
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: 2015 HRF Projects Map (As of 31 December 2015)
    Ethiopia: 2015 HRF projects map (as of 31 December 2015) Countrywide intervention ERITREA Legend UNICEF - Nutrition - $999,753 Concern☃ - VSF-G ☈ ! Refugee camp WFP - Nutrition (CSB) - $1.5m National capital Shimelba Red Sea SUDAN Regional intervention International boundary Hitsa!ts Dalul UNICEF - Health - $1.0m ! !Hitsats ! ! Undetermined boundary ! ! SCI Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Kelete Berahile ☃☉ May-Ayni Kola ! Somali, Gambella, SNPR & NRC - ☉ Ts!elemti Temben Awelallo Lake IRC - ★ ! ☄ ! ♫ Tanqua ! SUDAN ! ! ! Dire Dawa Adi Harush ! Enderta Abergele ! Ab Ala Afdera Project woredas Tselemt ! NRC - Debark GAA - ☇ ! WFP (UNHAS) - Coordination ☈ Abergele! Erebti ☋☉ Plan Int. - ACF - ☃ Dabat Sahla ☃Megale Bidu and Support Service - $740,703 Janamora Wegera! Clusters/Activities ! Ziquala Somali region Sekota ! ! Concern - SCI Teru ! Agriculture CRS - Agriculture/Seed - $2,5m ☃ ☃ Kurri ! Dehana ! ☋ ! Gaz Alamata ! Elidar GAA - ☋ Amhara,Ormia and SNNP regions ! ☃☉ Gonder Zuria Gibla ! Gulf of ! Education Plan Int. - Ebenat Kobo SCI☃☉ ☃ ! Gidan ☄ Lasta ! Aden CARE - Lay Guba ! Ewa ! ☃ ! Meket Lafto Gayint ! Food security & livelihood WV - ☃ Dubti ☈ ☉ ! Tach Habru Chifra SCI - ☃ Delanta ! ! - Tigray Region, Eastern Zone, Kelete Awelall, ! Gayint IMC - ☃ Health ☉ Simada Southern Zone, Alamata and Enderta woredas ! ! Mile DJIBOUTI ☊ Mekdela ! Bati Enbise SCI- Nutrition ! Argoba ☃☉ WV - ☃ Sar Midir Legambo ☃ ! Oxfam GB - Enarj ! ☉ ! ! Ayisha Non Food Items - Amhara region, North Gonder (Gonder Zuria), Enawga ! Antsokiya Dalfagi ! ! ! Concern
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Grid Solar Market Assessment Ethiopia
    ETHIOPIA MARKET INTELLIGENCE USING GOGLA DATA Sales and investment data from the Global Off-Grid Lighting Association (GOGLA) provide details on the off-grid solar sector in Ethiopia. Ethiopia’s pico-solar sector has seen strong growth in the last few years. Most of the pico-solar sector’s growth pertains to systems ranging in size from 0- to 1.5-watt-peak (Wp) systems. Sales of pico/SHS units OFF-GRID SOLAR ENERGY MARKET Jan 2017 - Dec 2018 ETHIOPIA Summary Version of the 2019 Power Africa Off-grid Solar Market Assessment Report Full report available online at: usaid.gov/powerafrica/beyondthegrid Power Africa aims to achieve 30,000 INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES • Ethiopia’s gross domestic product (GDP) topped $84 billion in 2018 and grew at megawatts of new generated power, 10% over 10 years, while its poverty rate declined 20% between 2006 and 2017. The government of Ethiopia is currently implementing ambitious growth and create 60 million new electrical connections, transformation policies aimed at achieving carbon neutrality by 2025, which Sales by business model will require expansion of the off-grid solar sector. Jul-Dec 2018 and reach 300 million Africans by 2030. • With 90% of Ethiopia’s population living within 10 km of the grid, on-grid electrifi cation is a priority. However, the Ethiopian grid is unreliable with frequent outages and voltage fl uctuation. Mini-grids and solar home systems may be complementary solutions to grid extension to improve reliability of electricity service. usaid.gov/powerafrica • Agriculture makes up about 40% of GDP and 78% of employment in Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Somali Region
    Food Supply Prospects FOR THE SECOND HALF OF YEAR 2013 ______________________________________________________________________________ Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) September, 2013 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF LOCAL NAMES .................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................. 2 EXCUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 7 REGIONAL SUMMARY OF FOOD SUPPLY PROSPECT ............................. 11 SOMALI .............................................................................................. 11 OROMIA ............................................................................................. 16 TIGRAY ............................................................................................... 22 AMHARA ............................................................................................ 25 AFAR .................................................................................................. 28 SNNP .................................................................................................. 32 Annex – 1: NEEDY POPULATION AND FOOD REQUIREMENT BY WOREDA (Second half of 2013) ............................................................................ 35 0 | P a g e GLOSSARY
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group
    DRMTechnical Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2016 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction The El Niño global climactic event significantly affected the 2015 meher/summer rains on the heels of failed belg/ spring rains in 2015, driving food insecurity, malnutrition and serious water shortages in many parts of the country. The Government and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in December 2015 requesting US$1.4 billion to assist 10.2 million people with food, health and nutrition, water, agriculture, shelter and non-food items, protection and emergency education responses. Following the delay and erratic performance of the belg/spring rains in 2016, a Prioritization Statement was issued in May 2016 with updated humanitarian requirements in nutrition (MAM), agriculture, shelter and non-food items and education.The Mid-Year Review of the HRD identified 9.7 million beneficiaries and updated the funding requirements to $1.2 billion. The 2016 HRD is 69 per cent funded, with contributions of $1.08 billion from international donors and the Government of Ethiopia (including carry-over resources from 2015). Under the leadership of the Government of Ethiopia delivery of life-saving and life- sustaining humanitarian assistance continues across the sectors. However, effective humanitarian response was challenged by shortage of resources, limited logistical capacities and associated delays, and weak real-time information management. This Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR) provides a summary of the cluster financial inputs against outputs and achievements against cluster objectives using secured funding since the launch of the 2016 HRD.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA IDP Situation Report May 2019
    ETHIOPIA IDP Situation Report May 2019 Highlights • Government return operations continue at full scale and sites are being dismantled. • Where security is assured and rehabilitation support provided, IDPs have opted to return to their areas of origin. IDPs who still feel insecure and have experienced trauma prefer to relocate elsewhere or integrate within the community. Management of IDP preferences differs in every IDP caseload. • There is minimal to no assistance in areas of return. Local authorities have requested international partner sup- port to address the gap. Meanwhile, public-private initiatives continue to fundraise for the rehabilitation of IDPs. • The living condition of the already vulnerable host communities has deteriorated having shared their limited resources with the IDPs for over a year. I. Displacement context Government IDP return operations have been implemented at full scale since early May 2019 following the 8 April 2019 announcement of the Federal Government’s Strategic Plan to Address Internal Displacement and a costed Re- covery/Rehabilitation Plan. By end May, most IDP sites/camps were dismantled, in particular in East/West Wollega and Gedeo/West Guji zones. Humanitarian partners have increased their engagement with Government at all levels aiming to improve the implementation of the Government return operation, in particular advocating for the returns to happen voluntarily, in safety, sustainably and with dignity. Overall, humanitarian needs remain high in both areas of displacement and of return. Most assistance in displace- ment areas is disrupted following the mass Government return operation and the dismantling of sites, while assis- tance in areas of return remain scant to non-existent, affecting the sustainability of the returns.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA, DEDER SUPPORT Woreda Adminstration Office (August 2019) Publication: 28 Augsut 2019 ETHIOPIA
    SITE MANAGEMENT SITE PROFILE - ETHIOPIA, DEDER SUPPORT Woreda Adminstration Office (August 2019) Publication: 28 Augsut 2019 ETHIOPIA Context Current Priority Needs Site Overview Site Population Woreda Adminstaration office site in Deder woreda in East Harerge Zone, was established on September 18 2017 Current Population as of in response to inter-ethnic clashes. 1 NFI Site Location August 9 2019 2 Nutrition Latitude: 9.313450 Methodology Longitude:41.441890 889 individuals The information for this site profile was collected through key informant interviews and group discussions with the 3 Livelihood Site Area: 1,600 m² Site Management Committees and beneficiaries by the Site Management Support(SMS) team in the area. Population Established in: Sep. 18 2017 206 households figures are collected and aligned through SMS and DTM and allow for the most accurate analysis possible. * Priority needs as reported by residents through SMS-run Complaint and Feedback Mechanism Sector Overview Demographics Vulnerabilities Implementing Sector Indicator Target Achieved Agencies 0% Unaccompanied children Male Female SMS Relevant Site Management Committee(s) have been formed 4 5 IOM 0% Orphaned Children Women are represented in Camp Governance Structure Yes Yes IOM 48% Individuals 52% # of IDPs involved in capacity building meeting and workshops 20 12 IOM 9% Pregnant and Lactating Women Regular Site Coordination meeting Yes Yes IOM 18% 0-5 years 19% Complaint and Feedback Mechanism is operational Yes Yes IOM # of service monitoring maps produced and shared
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Fattening Practices in West Hararghe: Potentials and Constraints of Beef Cattle Production in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
    Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 11, No. 8; 2019 ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Cattle Fattening Practices in West Hararghe: Potentials and Constraints of Beef Cattle Production in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Bezahegn Abebe1 1 Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Oda Bultum University, Ethiopia Correspondence: Bezahegn Abebe, Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Oda Bultum University, Chiro, Ethiopia. Tel: 251-9138-93686. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 2, 2019 Accepted: February 16, 2019 Online Published: June 15, 2019 doi:10.5539/jas.v11n8p120 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n8p120 Abstract The present study was conducted to investigate the status of beef cattle production system, major available beef cattle feed, constraints, and challenges of cattle fattening in Gemechis, Mesela, Tulo and Oda Bultum District, Western Hararge Zone, Oromia National Regional State. To select the districts and individual cattle fatteners, purposive selection techniques were applied based on their potentiality and beef cattle ownership, respectively. Accordingly a total of 120 cattle fatteners were included and interviewed using pre tested structured questionnaire. In addition to semi-structured questionnaire, group discussions and key informant interviews were carried out to support the survey data. As the assessment result showed fattening length in highland regions was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than those of midland regions with mean value of 5.0±0.18 and 4.1±0.18 respectively. Green feeds from maize and sorghum origin which includes thinning contributes a major role as livestock feed during wet season whereas crop residues (mainly maize and sorghum stover) in wet season and wheat bran ‘frushika’ are the dominant feed resources supplement for cattle fatteners in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Humanitarian Fund 2016 Annual Report
    2016 Annual Report Ethiopia Humanitarian Fund Ethiopia Humanitarian Fund 2016 Annual Report TABLE of CONTENTS Forward by the Humanitarian Coordinator 04 Dashboard – Visual Overview 05 Humanitarian Context 06 Allocation Overview 07 Fund Performance 09 Donor Contributions 12 Annexes: Summary of results by Cluster Map of allocations Ethiopia Humanitarian Fund projects funded in 2016 Acronyms Useful Links 1 REFERENCE MAP N i l e SAUDI ARABIA R e d ERITREA S e a YEMEN TIGRAY SUDAN Mekele e z e k e T Lake Tana AFAR DJIBOUTI Bahir Dar Gulf of Aden Asayita AMHARA BENESHANGUL Abay GUMU Asosa Dire Dawa Addis Ababa Awash Hareri Ji Jiga Gambela Nazret (Adama) GAMBELA A EETHIOPIAT H I O P I A k o b o OROMIA Awasa Omo SOMALI SOUTH S SNNPR heb SUDAN ele le Gena Ilemi Triangle SOMALIA UGANDA KENYA INDIAN OCEAN 100 km National capital Regional capital The boundaries and names shown and the designations International boundary used on this map do not imply official endorsement or Region boundary acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary River between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of Lake South Sudan has not yet been determined. 2 I FOREWORD DASHBOARD 3 FOREWORD FOREWORD BY THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR In 2016, Ethiopia continued to battle the 2015/2016 El Niño-induced drought; the worst drought to hit the country in fifty years. More than 10.2 million people required relief food assistance at the peak of the drought in April. To meet people’s needs, the Government of Ethiopia and humanitar- ian partners issued an initial appeal for 2016 of US$1.4 billion, which increased to $1.6 billion in August.
    [Show full text]
  • SITE PROFILE - ETHIOPIA, GORO GUTU SUPPORT Agriculture Office (July 2019) Publication: 01 July 2019 ETHIOPIA
    SITE MANAGEMENT SITE PROFILE - ETHIOPIA, GORO GUTU SUPPORT Agriculture Office (July 2019) Publication: 01 July 2019 ETHIOPIA Context Current Priority Needs Site Overview Site Population Agriculture Office site in Goro Gutu woreda in East Harerge Zone, was established on September 18 2017 in Current Population as response to inter-ethnic clashes. 1 Shelter Site Location June 26 2019 2 NFI Latitude: 9.374940 Methodology Longitude:41.366250 677 individuals The information for this site profile was collected through key informant interviews and group discussions with the 3 Food Site Area: 1,950 m² Site Management Committees and beneficiaries by the Site Management Support(SMS) team in the area. Population Established in: Sep. 18 2017 141 households figures are collected and aligned through SMS and DTM and allow for the most accurate analysis possible. Sector Overview Demographics Vulnerabilities Implementing Sector Indicator Target Achieved Agencies 0% Unaccompanied children Male Female SMS Relevant Site Management Committee(s) have been formed 4 5 IOM 0% Orphaned Children Women are represented in Camp Governance Structure Yes Yes IOM 47% Individuals 53% # of IDPs involved in capacity building meeting and workshops 20 10 IOM 8% Pregnant and Lactating Women Regular Site Coordination meeting Yes Yes IOM 7% 0-5 years 8% Complaint and Feedback Mechanism is operational Yes Yes IOM # of service monitoring maps produced and shared with partners 1 1 IOM 2% Elderly People 19% 6-17 years 23% Site plan available to service providers Yes No IOM # of
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Zones Analysis Ethiopia
    Improved livelihoods for smallholder farmers LIVELIHOOD ZONES ANALYSIS A tool for planning agricultural water management investments Ethiopia Prepared by Dr. Girma Medhin in consultation with FAO, 2011 About this report The AgWater Solutions Project aimed at designing agricultural water management (AWM) strategies for smallholder farmers in sub Saharan Africa and in India. The project was managed by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and operated jointly with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI) and International Development Enterprise (IDE). It was implemented in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Tanzania, Zambia and in the States of Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal in India. Several studies have highlighted the potential of AWM for poverty alleviation. In practice, however, adoption rates of AWM solutions remain low, and where adoption has taken place locally, programmes aimed at disseminating these solutions often remain a challenge. The overall goal of the project was to stimulate and support successful pro-poor, gender-equitable AWM investments, policies and implementation strategies through concrete, evidence-based knowledge and decision-making tools. The project has examined AWM interventions at the farm, community, watershed, and national levels. It has analyzed opportunities and constraints of a number of small-scale AWM interventions in several pilot research sites across the different project countries, and assessed their potential in different agro-climatic, socio-economic and political contexts. This report was prepared as part of the efforts to assess the potential for AWM solutions at national level. The livelihood zones analysis divides the country in a series of areas where rural people share relatively homogeneous living conditions on the basis of a combination of biophysical and socio-economic determinants.
    [Show full text]