Lessons from a Low-Cost Tram System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dubai: Creating the World's
THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Paris tram network reaches 65km l AnsaldoBreda enters Chinese LRT market l Edinburgh tramway to open early? DUBAI: CREATING THE WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 special Olsztyn Halberstadt Poland’s first How do you new-build sustain a system tramway in with a declining over 50 years population? DECEMBER 2012 No. 900 WWW . LRTA . ORG l WWW . TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 PESA Bydgoszcz SA 85-082 Bydgoszcz, ul. Zygmunta Augusta 11 tel. (+48)52 33 91 104 fax (+48)52 3391 114 www.pesa.pl e-mail: [email protected] Layout_Adpage.indd 1 26/10/2012 16:15 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 448 News 448 DECEMBER 2012 Vol. 75 No. 900 Three new lines take Paris tram network to 65km; www.tramnews.net Mendoza inaugurates light rail services; AnsaldoBreda EDITORIAL signs Chinese technology partnership; München orders Editor: Simon Johnston Siemens new Avenio low-floor tram. Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. 454 Olsztyn: Re-adopting the tram Associate Editor: Tony Streeter Marek Ciesielski reports on the project to build Poland’s E-mail: [email protected] first all-new tramway in over 50 years. Worldwide Editor: Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK. 457 15 Minutes with... Gérard Glas 454 E-mail: [email protected] Tata Steel’s CEO tells TAUT how its latest products offer News Editor: John Symons a step-change reduction in long-term maintenance costs. -
DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor. -
Multimodal Innovations Webinar Series
Multimodal Innovations Webinar Series February 23, 2021 Multimodal Innovations Webinar Series 2021 Jan. 26 Feb. 23 S-Line: Leveraging new rail access and Iconic Multimodal Stations at any transit- oriented development to spur scale and how they can spur economic growth economic development around them Mar. 23 Apr. 27 May 25 Equity & Accessibility Transit Technology Autonomous Vehicles - impact on Showcase pedestrian and bike safety, autonomous shuttles (CASSI) impact on public transportation 2 David Howard - Chief Deputy Secretary Today’s Speakers David Howard - Chief Deputy Secretary - NCDOT As the N.C. Department of Transportation's Chief Deputy Secretary, David Howard oversees Civil Rights Division, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, as well as Transportation Planning. Howard most recently served as Associate Administrator of Policy and Governmental Affairs for the Federal Highway Administration, where he was a principal advisor and managed a team involved in transportation policy development, legislative analysis, highway data collection and analysis, and international programs. His office was also responsible for overseeing the Federal Highway Administration's implementation of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act. Prior to joining the U.S. Department of Transportation, he served as the Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Fund Development for the Charlotte- Mecklenburg Housing Partnership, the largest developer of affordable workforce housing in the region. Howard was also a member of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission for six years before being elected in 2009 to serve as an at-large member of the Charlotte City Council. In addition, Howard has a wealth of national and state leadership experience, including the National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials, the National Urban Land Institute, The German Marshall Fund, the BMW Foundation's Responsible Leaders Community and the N.C. -
South Boulevard & South Tryon Street Corridor Study FINDINGS REPORT
South Boulevard & South Tryon Street Corridor Study FINDINGS REPORT City of Charlotte Department of Transportation June 30, 2017 South Boulevard & South Tryon Street 2 CORRIDOR STUDIES In 2016, the City of Charlotte began several multimodal planning studies to enhance pedestrian and bicycle travel on portions of arterials (thoroughfares) in Charlotte. The studies evaluate existing conditions, identify deficiencies, and make recommendations to improve the safety and ease of walking and biking along and across busy streets. These corridors were identified by many criteria including: four or more lanes, a posted speed limit over 35mph, top 15 transit ridership routes, no planned street improvements by other projects in the Community Investment Plan (CIP), and limited pedestrian crossing opportunities. The corridors currently being studied are: ӹ South Boulevard ӹ South Tryon Street ӹ West Boulevard ӹ Parkwood Ave & The Plaza This report describes why CDOT studied South Boulevard and South Tryon Street as well as CDOT’s findings from the study. The study recommendations and implementation schedule can be found starting on page 26. Parkwood Ave & The Plaza (2016) West Boulevard (2017) South Boulevard & South Tryon Street (2016) Figure 1: Corridor Studies in Charlotte South Boulevard & South Tryon Street 3 STUDY BACKGROUND Overview STUDY TIMELINE The South Boulevard & South Tryon Street Corridor Study analyzed the two corridors between Carson Boulevard and Clanton Road. These corridors provide key transportation links into Uptown from several 2016 neighborhoods including Dilworth, Wilmore and South End. Many apartment buildings and businesses have been constructed over the past several years, and the February Study initiated demands on the transportation system in this part of the city continue to evolve. -
Rails to Real Estate Development Patterns Along
Rails to Real Estate Development Patterns along Three New Transit Lines March 2011 About This Study Rails to Real Estate was prepared by the Center for Transit-Oriented Development (CTOD). The CTOD is the only national nonprofit effort dedicated to providing best practices, research and tools to support market- based development in pedestrian-friendly communities near public transportation. We are a partnership of two national nonprofit organizations – Reconnecting America and the Center for Neighborhood Technology – and a research and consulting firm, Strategic Economics. Together, we work at the intersection of transportation planning, regional planning, climate change and sustainability, affordability, economic development, real estate and investment. Our goal is to help create neighborhoods where young and old, rich and poor, can live comfortably and prosper, with affordable and healthy lifestyle choices and ample and easy access to opportunity for all. Report Authors This report was prepared by Nadine Fogarty and Mason Austin, staff of Strategic Economics and CTOD. Additional support and assistance was provided by Eli Popuch, Dena Belzer, Jeff Wood, Abigail Thorne-Lyman, Allison Nemirow and Melissa Higbee. Acknowledgements The Center for Transit-Oriented Development would like to thank the Federal Transit Administration. The authors are also grateful to several persons who assisted with data collection and participated in interviews, including: Bill Sirois, Denver Regional Transit District; Catherine Cox-Blair, Reconnecting America; Caryn Wenzara, City of Denver; Frank Cannon, Continuum Partners, LLC; Gideon Berger, Urban Land Institute/Rose Center; Karen Good, City of Denver; Kent Main, City of Charlotte; Loretta Daniel, City of Aurora; Mark Fabel, McGough; Mark Garner, City of Minneapolis; Michael Lander, Lander Group; Norm Bjornnes, Oaks Properties LLC; Paul Mogush, City of Minneapolis; Peter Q. -
French Light Rail
NEW FRENCH LIGHT RAIL SYSTEMS IN THE TWENTYFIRST CENTURY (Twentyone tramways, five tram-trains, five rubber-tyred tramways and one metro) -------------- by Graham Jellett Light Rail Transit Association Website: www.lrta.org Email: graham at jellett.plus.com Mobile: 07758087389 NEW TRAMWAYS, TRAM-TRAINS and METRO IN FRANCE from 2000 to 2017 Inner Urban Opening Inner Urban Opening Conurbation Population Year Conurbation Population Year STEEL WHEEL TRAMWAYS TRAM-TRAINS 1. Montpellier 264,538 2000 1. Paris T4 2,243,833 2006 2. Orléans 114,185 2000 2. Lyon 491,268 2010 3. Lyon 491,268 2000 3. Mulhouse 110,351 2010 4. Bordeaux 239,399 2003 4. Nantes 287,845 2011 5. Mulhouse 110,351 2006 5. Paris T11 2,243,833 2017 6. Valenciennes 43,471 2006 RUBBER-TYRED “TRAMWAYS” 7. Paris T3 2,243,833 2006 8. Marseille 850,636 2007 1. Nancy * 105,382 2001 9. Le Mans 143,240 2007 2. Caen * 108,793 2002 10. Nice 344,064 2007 3. Clermont- 140,597 2006 11. Toulouse 447,340 2010 Ferrand 12. Reims 180,752 2011 4. Paris T5 2,243,833 2013 13. Angers 148,803 2011 5. Paris T6 2,243,833 2014 14. Brest 140,547 2012 METRO 15. Dijon 151,504 2012 1. Rennes 208,033 2002 16. Le Havre 174,156 2012 (driverless) 17. Tours 134,633 2013 18. Paris T7 2,243,833 2013 Tramways, tram-trains and metros 19. Besançon 115,879 2014 are all electrically powered 20. Aubagne 45,800 2014 * Nancy and Caen trams also have 21. -
Charlotte, Nc 28203 Property Details
2001 SOUTH TRYON STREET | CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 PROPERTY DETAILS Friendly Pl PINOCA Beatties Ford Rd Tipton Dr Brookway Dr Starita Rd Munsee St Pine Grove Cir Amble Dr Winchester St Ironwood St Crestdale Dr W Craighead Rd Cushman St Manley St Kendall Dr Yu Squirrel Hill Rd N Dakota St ma St Snow White Ln r D n Black Ave Tennessee Ave Woodpark Blvd o Gilbert St t Abelwood Rd Rutgers Ave Argyle Dr W r JT Williams Jr Hi Dr e g Jessie St d d Hartley St R E d o r N Hoskins Rd Holly St Hidden Valley Rd o D w Birkdale Dr n e Porter St Ameron Dr r d i o s 13A h Ludlow Dr Gondola Ave e Sutton Dr T r i Knollcrest Dr N Cloudman St F • ± 10,867 SF of retail space available in Three30Five, a new developmentCarmine St with Toal St Odessa Ave Ridgeley Dr Hillcrest St d English Dr R Williamson St N Hoskins Rd Julia Ave Cinderella Rd Woodman Ave y Dr Webber Ave l r Morgan St N Crigler St e Marvin Smith Rd Alma Ct h Dr Webber Ave t S Ramsey St r o Sofley Rd Alabama Ave Service St Sampson St 36 Newland Rd N Northaven Dr Candystick Ln Thera Dr retail and approximatelyN Linwood Ave 42,500 SF of office completed Q1 2020 12 Wildwood Ave Ingle St S Cloudman St d Kennesaw Dr R Irma St Southwest Blvd Augusta St Burbank Dr Rozzelles Ferry Rd Whittington St k Senior Dr Kentbrook Dr e Wellingford St S Hoskins Rd e Upper Asbury Ave Hondures Dr r Custer St C Tennessee Ave HOSKINS Catherine Simmons Ave r a 16 Jennings St t UV Kentucky Ave Englehardt St g u Syracuse Dr S t S t Drury Dr e Johnson Rd Pennsylvania Ave W Blackmon St s n Madrid St i o t P Asbury Ave Hovis Rd -
Charlotte Streetcar Economic Development Study
Charlotte Streetcar Economic Development Study Prepared for: City of Charlotte Prepared by: Bay Area Economics (BAE) Warren & Associates Integra Realty Resources April 2009 Executive Summary Overview and Study Approach This Study presents an economic evaluation of the proposed Charlotte Streetcar, which would run on an approximately 10 mile corridor along Beatties Ford Road from Interstate-85 through Downtown and out along Elizabeth Avenue and Central Avenue to Eastland Mall. The central question addressed by this Study is how much funding could be anticipated from property-value based mechanisms, and what does this amount of potential funding mean for the feasibility of the proposed Charlotte Streetcar. The Study was prepared by BAE, a national urban economics and development advisory firm with expertise in transit-oriented development, in collaboration with Charlotte-based real estate firms Warren & Associates and Integra Realty Resources. The proposed Charlotte Streetcar would be an addition to existing City plans and proposals for multiple new rapid transit lines, including the Northeast Corridor Blue Line extension, North Corridor Purple Line commuter rail, Southeast Corridor Silver Line, and West Corridor. Different types of transit are being evaluated for use on the various corridors, including light rail, heavy commuter rail, bus rapid transit, and streetcar (the latter for the West Corridor). The Study involved identification of the lessons learned from other streetcar systems, thorough evaluation of local Charlotte markets and the proposed corridor, and preparation of detailed projections of potential property-value based funding. An academic literature review of streetcar systems (and related light rail) was conducted, along with qualitative and quantitative case study assessments of streetcar systems in other cities, and analysis of the impact of LYNX Blue Line on property values. -
C Olas in 2010
2010 7, place René-Clair 92653 Boulogne-Billancourt Cedex – France in 2010 Colas Tel.: +33 1 47 61 75 00 Fax: +33 1 47 61 76 00 www.colas.com Colas, a French Société Anonyme with share capital of €48,937,185 RCS Nanterre 552 025 314 02325 COLA_1103099_RA2010_GB_couv_portfolio.indd 1 13/05/11 17:14:35 LEADER IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRANSPORT Profi le 1 INFRASTRUCTURE Interview with the Chairman 2 Colas around the world 6 Consolidated key fi gures 8 Colas share 10 Simplifi ed fi nancial statements 12 Business report 15 The year in review 44 Colas Group management 78 COLA_1103099_RA2010_GB_couv_portfolio.indd 2 13/05/11 17:14:35 Backed by a workforce of nearly 70,000 people operating Colas is also involved in specialized complementary out of 800 autonomous work centers and 1,400 produc- lines of business, which means that the Group can pro- tion sites located in 40 countries on 5 continents, Colas is pose a wide range of products and services to its clients, a leader in the fi eld of construction and maintenance both public and private: manufacturing and installation of transport infrastructures, urban development and of safety equipment, road marking and traffi c control/ recreational facilities. In 2010, with 105,000 projects access management systems; production and applica- worldwide, the Group posted consolidated revenue at tion of waterproofi ng products, siding, roofi ng and 11.7 billion euros. installation of photovoltaic panels and membranes; lay- ing of pipes for the transport of fl uids; civil engineering; Roads represent -
Northeast Corridor Light Rail Project Land Use and ED
Northeast Corridor Light Rail Project FY 2013 New Starts Report Land Use and Economic Development September 2011 Charlotte Area Transit System 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202 Charlotte Area Transit System Northeast Corridor Light Rail Project LYNX BLUE LINE EXTENSION FY 2013 New Starts Report LAND USE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Contents Section I: Existing Land Use ........................................................................................................ 1 Existing Station Area Development ............................................................................................. 1 Corridor and Station Area Population, Housing Units and Employment ............................. 1 Listing and Description of High Trip Generators ................................................................. 2 Other Major Trip Generators in Station Areas ..................................................................... 14 Existing Area Development Character ........................................................................................ 18 Existing Land Use and Pedestrian Environment in Corridor and Station Areas .................. 18 Station Area Maps ............................................................................................................... 18 Station Area Photographs .................................................................................................... 18 9th Street Station Area .......................................................................................... 18 Parkwood -
Sandnes Benchmarking PT Issues: Key Facts, Numbers, Approaches
Sandnes Benchmarking Axel Kuehn Sandnes Benchmarking PT issues: key facts, numbers, approaches Final report 14th April 2016 Client: Sandnes Kommune Contractor: Axel Kuehn Independent Consultant Kantstrasse 12 76137 Karlsruhe Germany Tel: +49-721-3525267 Mobil: +49-170-2003385 Mail: [email protected] Sandnes Benchmarking Axel Kuehn Contents Pictures .................................................................................................................... 2 Glossary ................................................................................................................... 5 Sources .................................................................................................................... 6 A Background and understanding of study request ..................................... 7 B Benchmarking ............................................................................................... 9 B.1 Data issues ................................................................................................. 9 B.1.1 Data sources .............................................................................................. 9 B.1.2 Data quality .............................................................................................. 10 B.2 Selection of parameters 2008 and 2016 ................................................... 10 B.3 Benchmarking on agglomeration level ...................................................... 11 B.3.1 Selection of cities 2008 and 2016 ..................................................... -
Charlotte Area Transit System (Cats
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP NUMBER: 2018‐362 PROJECT NAME: CHARLOTTE AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM (CATS) GROUNDS MAINTENANCE ‐ FY2019 CATS SOUTH CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (SCLRT) NORTH CATS SOUTH CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (SCLRT) SOUTH CATS NORTH DAVIDSON BUS FACILITY (NDBF) OWNER: CITY OF CHARLOTTE C/O ENGINEERING AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIVISION DATE ISSUED: September 6, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) INSTRUCTIONS ....................................................................... 1 1.1 PUBLIC NOTICE ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 RFP SCHEDULE AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.4 EVALUATION CRITERIA & PROCESS ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 PROPOSAL FORMAT & CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 3 2 REPRESENTATIONS, CONDITIONS, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS ............................................... 4 2.1 COMMUNICATIONS ..........................................................................................................................................