DOCSLIB.ORG

Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report Chapters 1 – 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report Chapters 1 – 7 Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report Chapters 1 – 7 East West Rail Consultation: 31 March – 9 June 2021 This document contains the full Consultation Technical Report, without the Appendices. To access the Appendices, please visit www.eastwestrail.co.uk 01. Introduction 18 - 26 1.1. Chapter Summary 18 1.2. East West Rail 19 1.3. The Project 19 1.4. Consultation 23 1.5. Technical Report 26 02. The Case for East West Rail 27 - 31 2.1. Chapter Summary 27 2.2. The overall case for East West Rail 28 2.3. Benefits of railways over road improvements 31 03. Project Objectives 32 - 42 3.1. Chapter Summary 32 3.2. Introduction 33 3.3. Safety 34 3.4. Environment 34 3.5. EWR Services 34 3.6. Connectivity 36 3.7. Customer Experience and Stations 37 3.8. Powering EWR Services 38 3.9. Freight on EWR 38 3.10. Depots and Stabling 38 3.11. Telecommunications 42 04. Additional Works and Construction 43 - 52 4.1. Chapter Summary 43 4.2. Additional Works 43 4.3. Construction 45 05. Approach to Developing the Designs 53 - 67 5.1. Chapter Summary 53 5.2. Assessment Factors 54 5.3. Developing Designs in Project Sections A and B: 58 Identifying the need for upgrade works (Oxford to Bedford) 5.4. Developing Designs in Project Sections C, D and E: 58 New railway development from Bedford to Cambridge 06. Project Section A: Oxford to Bicester 68 - 99 6.1. Chapter Summary 69 6.2. Oxford Area 70 6.3. Oxford Parkway Station 80 6.4. Bicester Village Station 82 6.5. Level Crossing at London Road, Bicester 84 2 | East West Rail Consultation: March – June 2021 Consultation Technical Report 07. Project Section B: Bletchley and the Marston Vale Line 100 - 229 7.1. Chapter Summary 101 7.2. Introduction 104 7.3. Service Concepts 109 7.4. Bletchley Station 141 7.5. Fenny Stratford Additional Track 144 7.6. Level Crossings on the Marston Vale Line 146 7.7. Marston Vale Line Infrastructure Upgrade 228 08. Project Section C: Bedford 230 - 299 8.1. Chapter Summary 230 8.2. Introduction 234 8.3. Bedford St Johns 238 8.4. Bedford Station 250 8.5. North Bedford 268 8.6. Conclusion 297 09. Project Section D: Clapham Green to The Eversdens 300 - 371 9.1. Chapter Summary 301 9.2. Introduction 303 9.3. Option Development 306 9.4. Options Considered – Station Locations 310 9.5. Options Considered – Nine Alignment Options 314 9.6. Comparison of Nine Route Alignment Options 328 9.7. Conclusions - Alignment Short-list for Consultation 360 9.8. Conclusions - Emerging Preferred Options 369 10. Project Section E: Harlton to Hauxton 372 - 407 10.1. Chapter Summary 372 10.2. Introduction 373 10.3. Option Development 377 10.4. Options Considered 379 10.5. Conclusions (Project Section E) 404 11. Project Section F: The Shelfords to Cambridge Station 408 - 423 11.1. Chapter Summary 408 11.2. Introduction 416 11.3. Proposed work in the Cambridge area 411 11.4. Hauxton Junction to Shepreth Branch Junction 412 11.5. Hauxton Road Level Crossing 413 11.6. New Shepreth Branch Junction 415 11.7. Four Tracking from Shepreth Branch Junction to 417 Addenbrooke’s Road Bridge Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: March – June 2021 | 3 11.8. Four Tracking from Long Road Sixth Form College Area to 419 Cambridge Station and Cambridge Station Alterations 11.9. Cambridge Station 421 12. Next steps and ongoing work 424 - 426 4 | East West Rail Consultation: March – June 2021 Consultation Technical Report Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: March – June 2021 | 5 Glossary Term Description A A428 Improvement Scheme The scheme promoted by Highways England to upgrade the A428 between Black Cat roundabout east of Bedford and Caxton Gibbet roundabout west of Cambourne Air Quality Directive European Directive 2008/50/EC on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe Air Quality Management An area designated by a local authority, where it believes Area the Government’s objectives for air quality will not be achieved without additional interventions Alternative In this report, ‘alternative’ is used when referring to a possible solution that has been considered but has been discounted and is not expected to be taken forward Assessment Factors The factors used to assess and compare different options for the Project Oxford-Cambridge Arc The area between Oxford and Cambridge, incorporating (the Arc) the county areas of Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire and Cambridgeshire At-grade junction A railway junction where tracks cross at the same level. Also known as a flat junction B Balancing pond A pond into which water drains, with the intention of ensuring that local watercourses are not overloaded during periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall Ballast Stone or gravel used to form the bed of a railway track Biodiversity net gain An approach to development that leaves biodiversity in a better state than before the development took place Blockade The closure of a rail route for an extended period (typically more than two to three days) Bridleway A route over which the public have rights to pass on foot, cycle and on horseback Business case assessment An assessment to determine the justification for undertaking a project by considering benefits, costs and risks 6 | East West Rail Consultation: March – June 2021 Consultation Technical Report Term Description C Cambourne North Station Option for a new station to the north of Cambourne Cambourne South Station Option for a new station to the south of Cambourne Cambridgeshire A proposed transit system connecting Cambridge to Autonomous Metro Alconbury, St Neots, Mildenhall and Haverhill Capital costs Cost incurred during delivery of a project in purchasing buildings, land, construction works, and equipment as opposed to the costs of operating, maintaining or decommissioning the project Clearance Space available around a moving train Clock-face timetable A timetable arranged so that trains arrive or depart at the same times in the hour, every hour (for instance at 10, 30 and 50 minutes past the hour) Code of Construction A public document which will provide contractors and Practice (COCP) suppliers with details of the measures, controls, and standards of work that they must follow Conflicting movements A movement that requires a train to cross another route on the railway, at the same level, or trains to travel in opposite directions on the same route, in order to continue a journey Congested Infrastructure An element of railway infrastructure for which demand for infrastructure capacity cannot be fully satisfied during certain periods, even after coordination of different requests for capacity. Defined by The Railways (Access Management and Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regulations 2016 Connection stage Work will be divided into three connection stages which relate directly to a full journey and not just a piece of track: Connection Stage 1 (CS1): Oxford - Bletchley and Milton Keynes (services may be first opened to Bletchley in a two- phased approach) Connection Stage 2 (CS2) : Oxford - Bedford Connection Stage 3 (CS3): Oxford - Cambridge Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: March – June 2021 | 7 Term Description C Conservation Area An area of notable architectural or historic interest or importance in relation to which change is managed by law Core Section The section of the Project between Clapham Green and The Eversdens, also referred to as Project Section D in this report Critical path The longest sequence of activities in a plan or programme which must be completed on time in order to achieve completion of a project on a due date Crossovers A connection between two tracks where points/switches on each track allow trains to pass from one track to the other Culvert A tunnel carrying a stream or open drain Cut and cover Earth and similar material that needs to be excavated as part of construction works (for example to form a cutting) Cut Earth and similar material that needs to be excavated as part of construction works (for example to form a cutting) D Development Consent Order Order made by the relevant Secretary of State to (DCO) authorise the construction, operation and maintenance of a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP). In relation to East West Rail, this would be the Secretary of State for Transport Department for Transport Government department responsible for the English (DfT) transport network and a limited number of transport matters in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland that have not been devolved E Earthworks General term for the excavation and placement of soil, rock and other material; or for existing cuttings and embankments East Coast Main Line (ECML) Railway line running from London King’s Cross to Edinburgh through Sandy and St Neots East Midlands Railway Train operator running services between London, the East (EMR) Midlands and Yorkshire East West Rail EWR A proposed new rail link, which would connect communities between Oxford, Milton Keynes, Bedford and Cambridge 8 | East West Rail Consultation: March – June 2021 Consultation Technical Report Term Description E East West Rail Company Ltd Company set up by the Secretary of State for Transport to (EWR Co) develop East West Rail Embankment An earthwork construction that allows railway lines to pass at an acceptable level and gradient above the surrounding ground that is generally composed of soil and rock F Fare revenue Income generated from passenger fares Fill Earth and similar material that needs to be placed as part of construction works (for example in new embankments) First-mile journey The first part of a journey between the starting point and a railway station, regardless of its actual length Flat junction A railway junction where tracks cross at the same level.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Technical Report
    Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: 31 March – 9 June 2021 This document contains the full Consultation Technical Report, without the Appendices. To access the Appendices, please visit www.eastwestrail.co.uk 01. Introduction 18 - 26 07. Project Section B: Bletchley and the Marston Vale Line 100 - 229 1.1. Chapter Summary 18 7.1. Chapter Summary 101 1.2. East West Rail 19 7.2. Introduction 104 1.3. The Project 19 7.3. Service Concepts 109 1.4. Consultation 23 7.4. Bletchley Station 141 1.5. Technical Report 26 7.5. Fenny Stratford Additional Track 144 02. The Case for East West Rail 27 - 31 7.6. Level Crossings on the Marston Vale Line 146 2.1. Chapter Summary 27 7.7. Marston Vale Line Infrastructure Upgrade 228 2.2. The overall case for East West Rail 28 08. Project Section C: Bedford 230 - 299 2.3. Benefits of railways over road improvements 31 8.1. Chapter Summary 230 03. Project Objectives 32 - 42 8.2. Introduction 234 3.1. Chapter Summary 32 8.3. Bedford St Johns 238 3.2. Introduction 33 8.4. Bedford Station 250 3.3. Safety 34 8.5. North Bedford 268 3.4. Environment 34 8.6. Conclusion 297 3.5. EWR Services 34 09. Project Section D: Clapham Green to The Eversdens 300 - 371 3.6. Connectivity 36 9.1. Chapter Summary 301 3.7. Customer Experience and Stations 37 9.2. Introduction 303 3.8. Powering EWR Services 38 9.3. Option Development 306 3.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Capacity Statement
    Framework Capacity Statement Network Rail December 2016 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 1 Contents 1. Purpose 1.1 Purpose 4 2. National overview 2.1 Infrastructure covered by this statement 6 2.2 Framework agreements in Great Britain 7 2.3 Capacity allocation in Great Britain 9 2.4 National capacity overview – who operates where 10 2.5 National capacity overview – who operates when 16 3. Network Rail’s Routes 3.1 Anglia Route 19 3.2 London North East & East Midlands Route 20 3.3 London North Western Route 22 3.4 Scotland Route 24 3.5 South East Route 25 3.6 Wales Routes 27 3.7 Wessex Route 28 3.8 Western Route 29 4. Sub-route and cross-route data 4.1 Strategic Routes / Strategic Route Sections 31 4.2 Constant Traffic Sections 36 Annex: consultation on alternative approaches A.1 Questions of interpretation of the requirement 39 A.2 Potential solutions 40 A.3 Questions for stakeholders 40 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 2 1. Purpose Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 3 1.1 Purpose the form in which data may be presented. The contracts containing the access rights are publicly available elsewhere, and links are provided in This statement is published alongside Network Rail’s Network Statement section 2.2. However, the way in which the rights are described when in order to meet the requirements of European Commission Implementing combined on the geography of the railway network, and over time, to meet Regulation (EU) 2016/545 of 7 April 2016 on procedures and criteria the requirements of the regulation, is open to some interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • South Caldecotte Development Framework AMENDED DD 120319 Low Res.Indd
    ANNEX B Urban Design & Landscape Architecture South Caldecotte Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document REVISED CONSULTATION DRAFT www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla February 2019 South Caldecotte Development Framework SPD This document has been prepared by Milton Keynes Council’s Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Team. For further information please contact: David Blandamer Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Placemaking Milton Keynes Council Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ T +44 (0) 1908 254836 F +44 (0) 1908 252329 E [email protected] 2 Urban Design & Landscape Architecture Contents SECTION 1 SECTION 3 INTRODUCTION DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 1.1 Introduction 7 3.1 Introduction 35 1.2 Role of the Development Framework 7 3.2 The Vision 35 1.3 Status of Development Framework 7 3.3 Land Uses 36 1.4 Planning Policy Background 73.4 Landscape and Open Space Strategy 36 1.5 Planning Summary 103.5 Movement Framework 38 3.6 Design 41 SECTION 2 3.7 Sustainability 44 3.8 Indicative Development Framework Plan 46 THE SITE AND ITS CONTEXT 2.1 Introduction 13 SECTION 4 2.2 South Caldecotte 13 DELIVERY 2.3 Surrounding Area and Edge Conditions 14 2.4 Topography, Views and Drainage 18 4.1 Infrastructure Delivery 49 2.5 Landscape Character 20 2.6 Habitat and Vegetation 22 4.2 Management and Maintenance 49 2.7 Access and Movement 244.3 Outline Application 49 2.8 Heritage 284.4 Design and Access Statements 49 2.9 Utilities 30 2.10 Opportunities and Constraints 32 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla 3 South
    [Show full text]
  • July–December 2003 • $10.00 / ERA Tour of Traction in the Czech
    July–December 2003 • $10.00 / ERA Tour of Traction in the Czech Republic The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. erausa.org/headlights Contents Staff July–December 2003 editor and art director Volume 66, Number 7–12 Edward “Sandy” Campbell, Jr. editorial committee Frank S. Miklos and Raymond R. Berger contributors cover story Jeff Erlitz, James N. J. Henwood, John Pappas and Bob Penisi (Railroad Avenue Enterprises) Traction in the Czech Republic Electric Railroaders’ The ERA spent nine days in the Czech Republic in May of this year. 28 Association, Inc. It was the most recent in a very successful series of ERA tours to former Soviet Bloc countries in eastern Europe where streetcar systems still E form the backbone of transit. John Pappas has filed this comprehensive trip report and photo essay of a fascinating visit. 2003–2004 Officers & Directors president Frank S. Miklos first vice president Charles A. Akins second vice president; corresponding secretary Raymond R. Berger third vice president; recording secretary William K. Guild director Randy Litz treasurer Michael Glikin librarian Richard C. Evans trip & convention chairman Jack May membership secretary Lewis Hitch National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal The classic loop at the “end of civilization.” A-Tower, Room 4A Modernized T3 1517, contrasting with its as-built New York City sister 1603 from a batch of T3s built between Mailing Address P.O. Box 3323 1963 and 1972, take layover at the Obrany Grand Central Station end of line 4 in Brno. New York, N.Y. 10163-3323 john pappas Subscriptions Headlights is sent free to members of the ERA.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Central Bedfordshire Local Plan 2035: Consultation Draft July 2017 Response by Cambridgeshire County Council
    APPENDIX 1 CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE LOCAL PLAN 2035: CONSULTATION DRAFT JULY 2017 RESPONSE BY CAMBRIDGESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Cambridgeshire County Council welcomes the opportunity to respond to Central Bedfordshire’s draft Local Plan. These comments have been prepared by Officers of the Council and submitted in accordance with the instructions and timescales set out by Central Bedfordshire. It should be noted that the same comments will be reported to the next meeting of the Economy and Environment Committee (12th October) for formal endorsement by this Council. 2. GENERAL TRANSPORT COMMENTS The A428 and A1 Corridors 2.1 The primary transport corridor between Central Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire centres on the A428, which has a number of existing congestion issues, particularly around St Neots at the western end, at the Caxton Gibbet roundabout at the junction of the A428 and the A1198 and then again at the Cambridge end of the road. In addition to this, it should be noted that a number of development/growth proposals already exist at various points along the A428, with growth at St Neots in the Huntingdonshire District and also at both Cambourne and Bourn Airfield in the South Cambridgeshire District. 2.2 Highways England has consulted on route options for an improved A428 dual carriageway between Caxton Gibbet and the Black Cat roundabout, forming part of the Oxford to Cambridge Expressway. It is anticipated that a preferred route announcement will be made in autumn 2017, with construction expected to start in 2020. 2.3 The Council notes that Highways England is also exploring options for improving the A1 between the M25 and Peterborough for possible inclusion in the Government’s Roads Investment Strategy (RIS2).
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for a Bigger Better Railway Railfuture Annual Review 2017 1
    Annual Review 2017 Campaigning for a bigger better railway Railfuture Annual Review 2017 1 www.railfuture.org.uk pushed into next year and beyond. Honorary Meanwhile, franchising is facing its most uncertain future since privatisation and there are doubts President’s whether the current model can survive. address It may seem that given all the travails of the railway, groups fighting for The coming year on the railways is full of both uncertainty and local improvements or reopenings opportunity. On the one hand, there may face an uphill task. Not is more money available for railway necessarily. The kind of ideas and investment than ever before, after an schemes that we are putting forward amazing settlement of the may well fit in with Network Rail’s Christian Wolmar investment plans which start in April wider plans. There is a new emphasis There may never be a better time to 2019. On the other hand, in the short term, the overspending during the on devolution, on listening to engage with the wider industry than current five year period means that ‘stakeholders’ and on finding quick during these rather troubled times. schemes have been reined back or wins. Go for it. which will stimulate economic Chair’s review growth. Campaigning for a bigger better Our key national campaigns for 2018 railway sounds simple, but what do are therefore: passengers first, fares we mean? and ticketing, route modernisation and a bigger railway. A better railway is one which puts the passenger first. Successful businesses Railfuture aims to put forward have excellent customer service realistic proposals to improve rail woven into their culture, gaining the services.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Party Funding
    THIRD PARTY FUNDING IS WORKING IAN BAXTER, Strategy Director at SLC Rail, cheers enterprising local authorities and other third parties making things happen on Britain’s complex railway n 20 January 1961, John F. Kennedy used being delivered as central government seeks be up to them to lead change, work out how his inaugural speech as US President more external investment in the railway. to deliver it and lever in external investment Oto encourage a change in the way of into the railway. It is no longer safe to assume thinking of the citizens he was to serve. ‘Ask DEVOLUTION that central government, Network Rail or not what your country can do for you,’ intoned So, the theme today is: ‘Ask not what the train operators will do this for them. JFK, ‘but what you can do for your country.’ the railway can do for you but what However, it hardly needs to be said, least of Such a radical suggestion neatly sums up you can do for the railway’. all to those newly empowered local railway the similar change of approach represented Central government will sponsor, develop, promoters themselves, enthusiastic or sceptical, collectively by the Department for Transport’s fund and deliver strategic railway projects that the railway is a complex entity. That March 2018 ‘Rail Network Enhancements required for UK plc, such as High Speed 2, applies not only in its geographical reach, Pipeline’ (RNEP) process, Network Rail’s ‘Open for electrification, long-distance rolling stock scale and infrastructure, but also in its regularly Business’ initiative and the ongoing progress of replacement or regeneration at major stations reviewed post-privatisation organisation, often devolution of railway planning and investment like London Bridge, Reading or Birmingham New competing or contradictory objectives, multiple to the Scottish and Welsh governments, Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE
    ITEM 1 TRANSPORT COMMITTEE NEWS 07 MARCH 2000 This report may be of interest to: All Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE Accountable Officer: John Inman Author: Stephen Mortimer 1. Purpose 1.1 To advise the Committee of developments relating to Milton Keynes’ rail services. 2. Summary 2.1 West Coast Main Line Modernisation and Upgrade is now in the active planning stage. It will result in faster and more frequent train services between Milton Keynes Central and London, and between Milton Keynes Central and points north. Bletchley and Wolverton will also have improved services to London. 2.2 Funding for East-West Rail is now being sought from the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (SSRA) for the western end of the line (Oxford-Bedford). Though the SSRA have permitted a bid only for a 60 m.p.h. single-track railway, excluding the Aylesbury branch and upgrade of the Marston Vale (Bedford-Bletchley) line, other Railtrack investment and possible developer contributions (yet to be investigated) may allow these elements to be included, as well as perhaps a 90 m.p.h. double- track railway. As this part of East-West Rail already exists, no form of planning permission is required; however, Transport and Works Act procedures are to be started to build the missing parts of the eastern end of the line. 2.3 New trains were introduced on the Marston Vale line, Autumn 1999. A study of the passenger accessibility of Marston Vale stations identified various desirable improvements, for which a contribution of £10,000 is required from this Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunel's Dream
    Global Foresights | Global Trends and Hitachi’s Involvement Brunel’s Dream Kenji Kato Industrial Policy Division, Achieving Comfortable Mobility Government and External Relations Group, Hitachi, Ltd. The design of Paddington Station’s glass roof was infl u- Renowned Engineer Isambard enced by the Crystal Palace building erected as the venue for Kingdom Brunel London’s fi rst Great Exhibition held in 1851. Brunel was also involved in the planning for Crystal Palace, serving on the The resigned sigh that passed my lips on arriving at Heathrow building committee of the Great Exhibition, and acclaimed Airport was prompted by the long queues at immigration. the resulting structure of glass and iron. Being the gateway to London, a city known as a melting pot Rather than pursuing effi ciency in isolation, Brunel’s of races, the arrivals processing area was jammed with travel- approach to constructing the Great Western Railway was to ers from all corners of the world; from Europe of course, but make the railway lines as fl at as possible so that passengers also from the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North and South could enjoy a pleasant journey while taking in Britain’s won- America. What is normally a one-hour wait can stretch to derful rural scenery. He employed a variety of techniques to two or more hours if you are unfortunate enough to catch a overcome the constraints of the terrain, constructing bridges, busy time of overlapping fl ight arrivals. While this only adds cuttings, and tunnels to achieve this purpose. to the weariness of a long journey, the prospect of comfort Rain, Steam and Speed – The Great Western Railway, a famous awaits you on the other side.
    [Show full text]