DOCSLIB.ORG

Option Selection Report Version 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Option Selection Report Version 1 Option Selection Report Version 1 Project Name: Crossrail Step Free Access Iver Railway Station OP Reference: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Sponsor/Client: Crossrail Project Manager: Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Version: 01 Date: 17/12/2013 Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 OPTIONS REPORT & CONCEPT DESIGNS 2 2.1 Selected Option 4 2.1.1 Station Access 5 2.1.2 Platform Access 5 2.2 Discarded Options 5 2.2.1 Viable Options 5 2.3 Constructability Assessment 6 2.4 Access and Possession Strategy 7 2.5 Project Schedule 8 2.6 Whole Life Cost Assessment of Options 8 2.7 Estimates (excluding whole life costings) 8 2.8 QRA 8 2.9 Risk Register 8 2.10 Assumptions 8 2.11 Signed Design Compliance Certificate 9 2.12 Asset Condition Surveys / GI / Topographical 9 3 INTERFACES WITH OTHER PROJECTS 9 4 CDM INFORMATION 9 5 SAFETY VERIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 10 6 CONSENTS STRATEGY 10 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 10 8 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS STRATEGY 10 9 ENGINEERING OUTPUTS 11 10 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 11 FORMAL ACCEPTANCE OF SELECTED OPTION BY CLIENT, FUNDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS 12 APPENDICES 13 Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Version: 01 Date: 17/12/2013 APPENDICES A. Information received B. Description of accessible route C. Listing of works required D. Photos E. Drawings F. Risk register G. Information required H. Hazard log I. Investigation reports / summaries J. Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Version: 01 Date: 17/12/2013 Issue Record Issue No Brief History Of Amendment Date of Issue 00 Draft Issue 06/12/2013 01 First Issue 17/12/2013 Distribution List Name Organisation Issue No. Crossrail 01 Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Version: 01 Date: 17/12/2013 1 Executive Summary This report presents options to provide a compliant step free access route to all usable platforms at Iver Station. Viable solutions have been evaluated with respect to all relevant disciplines to determine the most suitable option. Platforms 1 and 2 do not serve stopping trains during normal operations, however, a step free access route will be provided to these platforms for potential perturbed operations. At present all passengers arrive at Iver via Wellesley Avenue to the south of the station. From the pavement level, there are steps up to an existing footbridge and steps down to each of the platforms. The preferred solution at this station is the installation of a new horizontal walkway from Wellesley Avenue pavement, west of the station building, to meet a new ramp up to the existing footbridge. Access to platforms 2/3 and 4 will be provided by removing the parapet panels opposite the existing stairs and installing new lifts. In addition, a ramp will be installed from the new walkway down to platform 1 with one half turn which will be closed during normal operations. There are no major issues or abnormal risks anticipated with the construction project. The estimated construction cost is Page 1 of 12 Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Version: 01 Date: 17/12/2013 2 Options Report & Concept Designs Study Scope This Option Selection Report considers how step free access can be provided to the platforms at Iver Railway Station. This station is located on the Great Western Mainline some 17 miles west of London at ELR MLN1 14 miles 60 chains, where the railway is running through a shallow cutting. Location Plan Source: Google Earth Pro. Licence number JCPMKDSJZFMCABS This Option Selection Report covers the following areas:- Civil and structural engineering Planning and aesthetics Mechanical & Electrical engineering Lift requirements and specification Telecoms Signal sighting Environmental matters Other railway systems and services Page 2 of 12 Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Version: 01 Date: 17/12/2013 The basic requirements of an accessible route are that it shall be:- step free and/or have ramps of restricted gradient and length meet requirements for minimum width have appropriate non slip finishes have adequate signage be lit to appropriate levels be free of constraints and obstacles This study does not address the provision or suitability of other facilities at the station for persons of reduced mobility, beyond the basic provision of the accessible route. Items such as ticket sales facilities, waiting provision and customer information systems etc. are not considered in any detail and are not assessed for compliance with the relevant requirements. 2.1 Selected Option The preferred option for this station is the installation of lifts to the rear of the existing footbridge on platforms 2/3 and 4. A new ramp will provide access from the pavement of Wellesley Avenue to the deck level of the existing footbridge so as to bypass the existing steps adjacent to the ticket office. In addition, a ramp is proposed down to platform 1 from pavement level. From a visual inspection there are no anticipated structural issues with modifying the existing footbridge or installing the proposed lifts and ramps. These works can be carried out with sensitivity to the existing structures, thus there are no significant planning or aesthetic issues expected. In addition, the selected option does not pose any significant issues for signal sighting as there will be no new obstructions to sight lines. There is adequate space on platforms 2/3 and 4 to accommodate Network Rail standard 16 person lifts with associated free standing lift motor rooms. It is anticipated that the lift shafts will be clad in masonry at the lower level, with profiled metal sheet cladding above. The lift shafts and pits will probably be founded on piles, whilst the ramp to platform 1 will be constructed on shallow foundations or piles in the existing embankment. Following our desk study, there are no anticipated geotechnical issues with excavation or new foundations at the station however further investigation is required prior the next phase of design. There will be works required to upgrade the existing electrical supply and distribution systems at the station, including some re-design of other proposed Crossrail station enhancement works which have not yet been constructed. In addition, the telecommunications and lighting system enhancement will need to be integrated with the existing footbridge. Minor enhancements to retained access routes may include resurfacing to achieve a suitably level and slip resistant finish. At present we have not received any information regarding overhead line electrification of Iver Station other than basic OLE post locations. This interface should be addressed at the next stage of design. Areas for temporary site facilities and access for construction equipment are limited at Iver Station. It is proposed that a compound area be erected south of the station building for a site office and welfare facilities. A larger potential compound area for storage of materials and equipment has been identified north of the railway lines to the west of the station. The outline costings for the selected option have been included in section 2.7. Page 4 of 12 Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0001 Version: 01 Date: 17/12/2013 2.1.1 Station Access Access to the station building adjacent to platform 1 is solely via Wellesley Avenue to the south of the station. There are no steps to the existing ticket window, although the adjacent shallow roadside kerb will need to be dropped locally to create step free access for disabled persons arriving by road. As there are no disabled persons parking spaces, a drop-off point will need to be established on the road in the vicinity of the ticket office and the new access ramp. 2.1.2 Platform Access At present the platforms can only be accessed via a footbridge from Wellesley Avenue to the south of the railway, there being 8 steps up onto the main footbridge from the station entrance, a total rise of approximately 1.2m. From the footbridge there are 28 steps down to each platform, with the platform level approximately 4.8m below footbridge deck level. It is proposed that a ramp be constructed along the south embankment from the western side of the existing footbridge between the stairs to platform 1 and the stairs to Wellesley Avenue. This short span of the footbridge will require strengthening or replacement to accommodate the new ramp. The foot of this ramp will give level access to and from the pavement. The walking route from the pavement to the existing footbridge will be approximately 30m. Construction of this new walkway will also require a local kerb drop and re-routing of the mesh fence along the pavement approximately 23m west of the footbridge. Lifts are proposed to provide step free access from the main footbridge to platforms 2/3 and 4. These will be installed on the east side of the footbridge opposite the existing stairs with a 1500mm long, covered landing at the entrance to the lift. There is available platform footprint for a 2400mm square, 16-person lift on both platforms. For this layout, both single-entry and through-lifts are viable, with through lifts specified for this station as the preferred option. Following an evaluation of the station usage, it may be more acceptable to install smaller 8- person through lifts. The lift motor rooms can be constructed on platforms 2/3 and 4 to the east of the lift shafts. Step free access to platform 1 will be provided by a continuation of the ramp to the west of the footbridge down to platform level. The walking distance from Wellesley Avenue pavement to platform 1 will be approximately 75m. As platform 1 is not used during normal operation, a gate will be installed across the ramp to direct passengers up to the main bridge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils
    Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 – Green Belt Preferred Options LC-330 Document Control Box Client Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Sustainability Appraisal of the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan Report Title (Regulation 18) Green Belt Preferred Options Status Final Filename LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS Date September 2017 Author DS Reviewed JE Approved ND Cover Photo: Looking East across option ‘National Epilepsy Centre, Chalfont St Peter’ © Lepus Consulting for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Chiltern and South Bucks SA Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS.docx Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 About the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan 2014-2036 ............................................... 4 1.4 The Regulation 18 Consultation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL Porep2372 (REDACTED) 7Th December 2016 Bc
    Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2372 (REDACTED) 7th December 2016 bc Planning Policy Team South Bucks District Council Neil Rowley Capswood E: Oxford Road DL: + Denham UB9 4LH Dear Sir or Madam, Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan - Green Belt Preferred Options Consultation Representation on behalf of Thorney Lane LLP for Land at Thorney Lane, Iver We write on behalf of our client, Thorney Lane LLP, the current landowner of the site at Thorney Lane, Iver. This site is Preferred Option 13 (‘Area North of Iver Station’). In short we support the proposed removal of Preferred Option 13 from the Green Belt. Please find enclosed: Completed comments form Transport Representations by JMP Masterplan by Savills Urban Design Studio Site Description The proposed site comprises the Thorney Business Park, and open land to the east and west. Thorney Business Park comprises a variety of business units, including larger scale industrial and waste processing uses. The entire site is located to the south of Iver and is approximately 52 ha in size. It is bound by the Grand Union Canal Slough Arm to the north, Thorney Lane and the M25 to the east, and the railway line to the south. To the west is an area of open farmland designated for waste management purposes and Mansion Lane Caravan Site. The immediately surrounding area is mixed in character, with farmland to the north west and south west, and Iver Golf Club to the west. Immediately to the north of the site is Ridgeway Trading Estate, and the residential area of Iver Village to the north of that.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Committee, 06/03/2019
    Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4LH 01895 837236 [email protected] www.southbucks.gov.uk Planning Committee Wednesday, 6 March 2019 at 4.15 pm Council Chamber, Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham A G E N D A Item 1. Evacuation Procedure 2. Apologies for Absence 3. Minutes (Pages 5 - 8) To approve the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 6 February 2019. 4. Declarations of Interest 5. Applications and Plans The files for each application are available for public inspection at the Council Offices. A. Committee decision required following a site visit and/or public speaking PL/18/3175/FA: 34 Syke Cluan, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9EH (Pages 9 - 20) 18/00426/FUL: 19 & 21 Bathurst Walk, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9AS (Pages 21 - 44) Chief Executive: Bob Smith Director of Resources: Jim Burness Director of Services: Steve Bambrick B. Committee decision required without a site visit or public speaking None. C. Committee observations required on applications to other Authorities None. D. To receive a list of applications already determined under delegated powers by the Head of Planning and Economic Development (Pages 45 - 82) For information 6. Planning Appeals and Schedule of Outstanding Matters (Pages 83 - 86) For information Note: All reports will be updated orally at the meeting if appropriate and may be supplemented by additional reports at the Chairman’s discretion. Membership: Planning Committee Councillors: R Bagge (Chairman) J Jordan (Vice-Chairman) D Anthony M Bezzant T Egleton B Gibbs
    [Show full text]
  • AP2 ES Report
    HIGH SPEED RAIL ȍǧ Ȏ Supplementary Environmental Statement and ͮ ͱ| Technical appendices ơǦ ͮͬͭͱ ͮͯǤͱǤͮ ͮȂͱ www.gov.uk/hs2 HIGH SPEED RAIL ȍǧ Ȏ Supplementary Environmental Statement and ͮ ͱ| Technical appendices ơǦ ͮͬͭͱ ͮͯǤͱǤͮ ȋ ͮȌ ȋȌ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ȋ ͮȌǣ ȋ ͮȌǡ ǡ ͭͰͱ ͮǤ ǣͬͮͬͳ͵ͰͰͰ͵ͬʹ ǣ ̻͚ͮǤǤ ǣǤǤȀ͚ ̽ ȋ ͮȌǡͮͬͭͱǡ Ǥ ȋ ͮȌ Ǥ ͮǤ Ǥ ȋ ͮȌǤ ͳͱά ƤǤ Index Thistableshowsthetopicscoveredbythetechnicalappendicesinthisvolume,andthereference codesforthem. CFAnameandnumber Topic Code HeathrowExpressLangley Agriculture,forestryand HEXǦAGǦ001 soils Airquality HEXǦAQǦ001 CrossTopic HEXǦCTǦ001 Community HEXǦCMǦ001 Culturalheritage HEXǦCHǦ001 HEXǦCHǦ002 HEXǦCHǦ003 Ecology HEXǦECǦ001 LandQuality HEXǦLQǦ001 Landscapeandvisual HEXǦLVǦ001 assessment Sound,noiseandvibration HEXǦSVǦ001 HEXǦSVǦ002 HEXǦSVǦ003 SES and AP2 ES Appendix HEX-AG-001 Environmental topic: Agriculture, forestry AG and soils Appendix name: Data appendix 001 Community forum area: Heathrow Express HEx Depot, Langley i SES and AP2 ES Appendix HEX-AG-001 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Soils and agricultural land classification surveys 1 2.1 Background 1 2.2 Soils and land resources 2 2.3 Soil and land use interactions 2 3 Forestry 6 4 Assessment of effects on holdings 6 5 References 8 List of tables Table 1: Local agro-climatic conditions 3 Table 2: Area of woodland within a 2km study area of the proposed HEx depot 6 Table 3 : Summary of assessment of effected holding 6 List of figures Figure 1: ALC grade according to soil wetness (MAFF, 1988) 5 ii SES and AP2 ES Appendix HEX-AG-001 1 Introduction 1.1.1 The agriculture, forestry and soils appendix for the Supplementary Environmental Statement (SES) and the Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement (AP2) Volume 4: off route effects comprises: soils and Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) surveys (Section 2); forestry (Section 3); and the assessment of effects on holdings (Section 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Rail Access to Heathrow Airport an Innovative, Privately Financed New Railway Expanding Train Connections Across London and Southern England
    HEATHROW SOUTHERN Investor and Partner RAILWAY Transforming Rail Access to Heathrow Airport An innovative, privately financed new railway expanding train connections across London and southern England RAIL NETWORK CONNECTS POSITIVE EFFECT ON MODAL SHIFT BENEFITS COMMUNITIES THE ENVIRONMENT TO RAIL A new orbital route from Fast, frequent trains from Reduces emissions by Transfers 3 million road Hampshire and Surrey to Surrey, Hampshire and 8,600 tonnes of CO2 and journeys per year to rail Old Oak Common and South West London to 2 tons of NOx per year London Paddington Heathrow Airport GLOBAL GROWTH AND DELIVERABLE AFFORDABLE AND COMPETITIVENESS REGENERATION 10 km of new railway VALUE FOR MONEY Linking the region’s Enabling people to reach mainly in tunnel, filling a User funded, privately businesses to inward the jobs at Heathrow by missing link in the existing financed at no cost to investment and export public transport network taxpayers, from 2028 opportunities About the project Improving access to Heathrow Airport by train is an important environmental objective. Far too many passengers have no alternative but to use car, contributing to congestion and poor, illegal air quality in the area. Currently Heathrow is not linked at all by train to Surrey, Hampshire or South and South Proposed route Map Key West London. We aim to change that with Our proposed route starts at Heathrow’s Terminal 5 our innovative scheme which would serve the station and is intended to run mainly in tunnel and Heathrow Southern Railway Proposed Rail Infrastructure following major markets: be electrified to minimise environmental impact. Existing Rail Infrastructure ■ Fast, frequent direct trains from Surrey and It rises to the surface to connect to the existing Hampshire to Heathrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work
    W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 1 W1.1 Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work The Maidenhead Bridge over the River Thames at Maidenhead is a Grade II* listed structure. Installation of overhead electrification on top of the structure would be required. The design is being undertaken in conjunction with heritage specialists to help ensure that the impact on the structure is acceptable. Once installed, the gantries are likely to be visible on the bridge from viewpoints along the river and nearby. As an example, electrification for the Heathrow Express involved the provision of overhead electrification over Wharncliffe Viaduct in Ealing. Wharncliffe Viaduct Example of similar overhead electrification installations. Maidenhead Bridge www.crossrail.co.uk Helpdesk 0845 602 3813 Crossing the Capital Connecting the UK W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 2 W2.1 Maidenhead Maidenhead Stabling & Turnback It is proposed that a stabling facility be provided for up I Operational noise from the use of the sidings to 6 Crossrail trains in the former goods yard to the I Dust impact on nearby buildings during west of Maidenhead station, immediately beyond the construction. Appropriate dust mitigation junction of the Bourne End Branch. techniques would be incorporated within the The proposals are to modify the track layout and train Crossrail Construction Code in order to reduce sidings at Maidenhead to enable Crossrail trains to be the risk of a dust nuisance being caused. The reversed with a new siding to be developed within the Construction Code would require the establishment existing Network Rail sidings.
    [Show full text]
  • Part a – Your Details
    Classification: OFFICIAL PORep1502 (REDACTED) PART A – YOUR DETAILS Are you: An Individual An Organisation Other (please specify) Personal Details* Agent’s Details (if applicable) **Title Mr **First Name Thomas **Last Name Hutchinson Job Title Head of Projects (if on behalf of an organisation) Organisation Land and Partners Ltd (if applicable) **Address Telephone Number **Email Address *if an agent is appointed, you may wish to complete only the title and name boxes and, if applicable, the organisation box but please complete the full contact details for the agent. **Name and either email or address required if you wish to be added to the consultation database (see below). Consultation Database (Mailing List) The Councils have a Consultation Database (mailing list) used to keep individuals and organisations informed about Planning Policy Documents across both Council areas. Documents include: the Local Plan, Supplementary Planning Documents and Neighbourhood Plans, (please note some plans may not be applicable to your area). Chiltern District Council and South Bucks District Council are the Data Controllers for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998. Individuals and organisations on the Planning Policy Consultation Database will only be contacted by the Councils in relation to the preparation and production of planning policy documents. The Councils will not publish the names of those individuals on the database but may publish names of statutory bodies and organisations at certain stages of the Local Plan process. Please indicate if you want to be added to the joint consultation database (tick box below). Please note: you do not need to tick this box if you received a letter or email notification from the Councils prior to the start of the consultation, as you are already registered.
    [Show full text]
  • Building-Infrastructure
    Consultation Point: Building-Infrastructure Person ID 1214611 Full Name Mrs Frances Reynolds ID 891 Order 233 Number 11.1 Title Building-Infrastructure Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please Individual/Resident select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date 2016-12-10 Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is No this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as 9 precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail-And-Tube-Map.Pdf
    towards To Milton Keynes, towards Aylesbury Chesham Northampton, St Albans Abbey Rugby, Coventry towards and Birmingham Princes Risborough and Aylesbury Watford Amersham Junction Cockfosters Chalfont & Latimer 724 to London Oakwood Chorleywood Saunderton Rickmansworth Southgate Arnos Grove to London ycombe Bounds Green Wood Green High W Beaconsfield Turnpike Lane Manor House Gerrards Cross to London Seer Green & Jordans Denham Finsbury Park towards towards towards Denham Golf Club Arsenal 724 Ruislip Greenford Rayners Lane Ealing Broadway W Holloway Road Uxbridge est Ealing HarlingtonHayes & Caledonian Road Heathrow’s Rail Links Langley DraytonW Southall Hanwell MainlineActon est London Iver King’s Cross St Pancras Slough Paddington Burnham Russell Square Maidenhead T aplow UNDER Holborn towards 724 South Ealing CONSTRUCTION Stratford Boston Manor Northfields Ealing Common Covent Garden or Canary Hounslow HounslowCentral East A10 Leicester Square Wharf T Hounslow W wyford Osterley Piccadilly Circus Green Park Hatton Cross T HammersmithBaronsEarl’ CourtGloucesterSouth RoadKnightsbridgeKensingtonHyde Park Cnr. Acton urnham Green* s Court Reading est Town towards Bristol, Brentford Leamington Spa, Kew Bridge The Cotswolds Syon Lane RA1 RA1 Chiswick and South Wales Isleworth London Barnes Bridge V Waterloo LHR Hounslow auxhall Reading West Queenstown Road Windsor & Eton Clapham Junction RA2 285 St MargaretsRichmondNorth SheenMortlake Barnes Putney W Datchet andsworth Riverside 490 T Sunnymedesraysbury wickenham Earley W Whitton towards Newbury,
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Access: Heathrow Airport Hub Station Option FINAL for CONSULTATION AIRPORTS COMMISSION
    Appraisal Framework Module 4. Surface Access: Heathrow Airport Hub Station Option FINAL FOR CONSULTATION AIRPORTS COMMISSION 28th October 2014 Appraisal Framework Module 4. Surface Access: Heathrow Airport Hub Station Option Document Control Sheet Project: Appraisal Framework Module 4. Client: Airports Commission Document title: Surface Access: Heathrow Airport Hub Station Option Project No: B1988000 Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME ORIGINAL Richard Hibbert Stephen Rutherford Stephen Rutherford Rajat Bose NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Approved by Check and Review procedure and that I approve Stephen Rutherford them for issue DATE July 2014 Document status: DRAFT Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME Revision 1 Jon Hale Stephen Rutherford Stephen Rutherford NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Approved by Check and Review procedure and that I approve Stephen Rutherford them for issue DATE October 2014 Document status : FINAL Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn/Winter 2018/19 MOVING YOUR EXPECTATIONS Expert Residential and Commercial Conveyancing
    INSPIREThe Oakwood Estates Property Magazine Autumn/Winter 2018/19 MOVING YOUR EXPECTATIONS Expert Residential and Commercial Conveyancing. Pure Property Law began in 2010 when the founders, Nadine Blacklock and Donna Spence, formed a partnership which is established on delivering an exceptional level of service with fees which are both What sets us apart: transparent and fair. The partners’ values permeate our business which has evolved, largely through repeat business and word-of-mouth • Online case tracking and phone app recommendations, into a thriving practice with offices in the heart of Ascot, Berkshire. • SMS updates at key stages • Use of the most up to date technology reducing Nadine & Donna are vastly experienced Solicitors who work closely with their attentive assistants, combining their resources of talent to provide transaction time their respective clients with an efficient and friendly service. Whether you have moved several times or are buying your first home, they will aim to • Our proven track record at delivering excellent make your experience with them a pleasurable one. Building lasting levels of service and client care since 2010 relationships with our clients is fundamental to our success, and the positive reviews we receive are testimony to our ability to meet or exceed • Our system of allocating you one dedicated expectations. Solicitor who will look after you throughout the Our dedicated teams of professionals cover all aspects of both Residential transaction and Commercial Conveyancing; from the purchase of a leasehold studio apartment to the sale of a Family Seat; from the sale of a small retail • Our experienced Solicitors and team members premises to the purchase of an industrial factory, our expertise is at your disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Planning Committee, 05/12/2018 16:15
    Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4LH 01895 837236 [email protected] www.southbucks.gov.uk Planning Committee Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 4.15 pm Council Chamber, Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham A G E N D A Item 1. Evacuation Procedure 2. Apologies for Absence 3. Minutes (Pages 5 - 12) To approve the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 7 November 2018 4. Declarations of Interest 5. Applications and Plans The files for each application are available for public inspection at the Council Offices. A. Committee decision required following a site visit and/or public speaking 18/00426/FUL 19 & 21 Bathurst Walk, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9AS (Pages 13 - 28) PL/18/3057/FA Land To Rear Of 1 and 3 St James Walk, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9EN (Pages 29 - 40) Chief Executive: Bob Smith Director of Resources: Jim Burness Director of Services: Steve Bambrick B. Committee decision required without a site visit or public speaking None. C. Committee observations required on applications to other Authorities None. D. To receive a list of applications already determined under delegated powers by the Head of Planning and Economic Development (Pages 41 - 74) For information 6. Planning Appeals and Schedule of Outstanding Matters (Pages 75 - 78) For information Note: All reports will be updated orally at the meeting if appropriate and may be supplemented by additional reports at the Chairman’s discretion. Membership: Planning Committee Councillors: R Bagge (Chairman) J Jordan (Vice-Chairman) D Anthony M Bezzant T
    [Show full text]