DOCSLIB.ORG

IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY Traffic and Transport Study Report No. 16-129 September 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY Traffic and Transport Study Report No. 16-129 September 2016 IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY Traffic and Transport Study Report No. 16-129 September 2016 IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY Traffic and Transport Study Odyssey Markides Elizabeth House 39 York Road London Tel: 0207 620 2444 Fax: 0207 620 1168 [email protected] Report No. 16-129 September 2016 IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY 16-129 Traffic and Transport Study September 2016 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET REV ISSUE PURPOSE AUTHOR CHECKED REVIEWED APPROVED DATE 1 Draft Iver Feasibility Study SC/DP SC JB JB 25/08/26 2 Second Draft Feasibility SC/JB SC JB JB 09/09/16 Study 3 Final Iver Feasibility Study SC/JB SC JB JB 26/09/16 i IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY 16-129 Traffic and Transport Study September 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Odyssey Markides (OM) has been instructed by Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC) to undertake Phase 1 of the Iver Feasibility Study to examine existing traffic and transport conditions in and around Iver Parish and the impact of future major infrastructure project developments. South Bucks District Council (SBDC) and BCC are aware that the volume of Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) movements in and around Iver has been a concern of local residents for some time. These elevated levels of HGV traffic are primarily a result of the number of HGV generating industrial sites located within and adjacent to the study area. There are a number of barriers to HGV movement on the road network, including width and weight restrictions and low bridges mean that HGV flows are restricted to certain routes through the study area, further focussing their impact on particular locations. Since 2012 the Iver area has been the location for a number of planned and approved Infrastructure and Development Projects Crossrail, Heathrow Express Depot, M4 Smart Motorways, the Western Rail Link to Heathrow (WRLtH) and the potential Heathrow Airport expansion. There are also a number of proposed developments in The Ivers area that will require planning permission through the Minerals and Waste Local Authority (BCC); CEMEX North Park Extraction and relocation of the Hillingdon Outdoor Activity Centre. These projects have the potential to exacerbate current issues with HGVs and traffic flow levels in the area. BCC have recognised this is therefore the most appropriate time to undertake a detailed transport study of the area to ensure that a strategy for ameliorating the effects of these proposals is available and that the opportunity they offer to improve the existing situation is embraced. The projects and existing issues need to be reviewed in the context of the draft joint Local Plan being developed between SBDC and CDC with potential requirements for Greenbelt release for residential redevelopment to meet housing targets within both districts. This Traffic and Transport Study is Phase 1 of a four stage overall Study which will incorporate further assessment work from Highways England and HS2 as well as a study ii IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY 16-129 Traffic and Transport Study September 2016 of the impacts of a potential expansion of Heathrow Airport, with a final overview impact Study. This Phase 1 study focuses on: • Reviewing existing traffic and transport issues, including cycling, walking and public transport links; • Assessing the impact of ongoing and planned NSIPs and future development sites; • Reviewing the options for resolving existing and future issues; and • Identifying potential mitigation options to take forward. A public exhibition was held on 26 th July 2016 at Iver Village Hall to provide information about the NSIPs and development projects in the area, as well as outline the Study and initial survey results. Feedback from residents and stakeholders has been included within the Study and assists with the issues and mitigations sections. Existing Conditions Review The Study Area has a number of key east-west and north-south links. The main route through Iver Village is the B470 (Langley Park Road/High Street) which, connects Langley to the west with Yiewsley and Uxbridge to the east and north east respectively. The other key east-west route is the North Park/Richings Way/Thorney Mill Road which connects Langley with West Drayton. The main north-south links in the northern part of the Study Area are Wood Lane, connecting the A412 to the B470, and Swallow Street/Love Lane and Bangors Road South, offering further connections to Iver High Street. To the south of the Study Area, Thorney Lane North/South connects the High Street to Thorney Mill Road/Richings Way and Mansion Lane/Hollow Hill Lane/Market Lane connects Langley Park Road to North Park/Parlaunt Road. A Transport and Highways Audit has been undertaken for the whole of the Study Area which reviews the existing highway network, public transport provision and pedestrian and cycling infrastructure. The audit also identifies any issues within the Study Area that may require improvement. The Audit shows that the most usable north-south routes through the Study Area for HGVs are Thorney Lane South / North and Wood Lane. To get between these roads it is necessary for HGVs to either travel via North Park / Langley High Street / Langley Park Road (which has a height restriction under the railway line and passes through the iii IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY 16-129 Traffic and Transport Study September 2016 centre of Langley) or via Iver High Street (which is historic in character, constrained in width and therefore unsuitable to accommodate HGVs). The bus provision is very limited in terms of frequency and destinations covered, with large sections being hail and ride. Iver Heath has the best provision with services every 15-20 minutes but Iver Village has limited services. On-street parking has led to bus route alterations in the Richings Park area, which hinder bus usage further. Bus stop provision is poor at certain locations with limited shelters and footway connections creating potentially hazardous conditions. None of the bus stops have accessibility platforms. Iver Rail Station is currently served by First Great Western services between Paddington and Didcot Parkway every 30 minutes Monday to Saturday. This Station will become a Crossrail Station in 2019 with increased service frequencies and accompanying station improvements expected; although questions are raised about the supporting bus service provision to Iver Village and potential future improvements. The Station is not currently step free and the lack of a station car park leads to significant on street parking around the Richings Park area. This will only be exacerbated with the Crossrail Services. There is adequate pedestrian infrastructure provided in the built up parts of the Study Area for internal connections, but widths are constrained in places and connections could be improved. Some junctions do not have any crossing facilities and provision is poor at others. Cycling infrastructure is extremely limited on the BCC Local Highway Network. The PROW network is expansive within the Study Area, connecting to Uxbridge, Langley, Cowley, Fulmer and George Green and also providing links within the Study Area separate from the busy highway network. There may well be potential for improvements and new PROW connections to be created to provide better permeability with Public Bridleway provision allowing cycling which is currently not allowed along the public footpaths. Usage of these routes would need to be encouraged and the routes need to be maintained as many are currently overgrown. The traffic surveys undertaken in the area have identified that flows are within the road link capacities across the study area, which is indicative that there is not a significant iv IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY 16-129 Traffic and Transport Study September 2016 congestion issue. However, the ‘environmental capacity’ of Iver High Street and the northern end of Thorney Lane North is exceeded, with these roads carrying traffic flow levels above what is appropriate for the character and non-traffic functions that these streets fulfil. HGV levels are above the national average across the study area, particularly on Iver High Street, Thorney Lane North and South and Richings Way. A substantial amount of this HGV traffic is associated with the Ridgeway Trading Estate, Court Lane and Thorney Business Park sites, which between them generate approaching 1900 HGV movements per day. Approximately two-thirds of the daily northbound HGV movements on Thorney Lane North are made up of traffic from these three sites. Infrastructure and Development Projects The specific Infrastructure and Development Projects have been reviewed in terms of construction and operational impacts for the Study Area. A timetable for implementation of these projects has been created from which a cumulative impact analysis has been undertaken for HGV movements within the Study Area. HEx causes the greatest impact on Iver Heath between 2017-2019 when HOAC and Pinewood combine with the continuous New Denham Quarry vehicles and the HEx traffic. Particular acute impacts will be felt along Church Road given the existing issues and the fact the A412 is a main construction route for many of the projects with vehicles travelling north through the Study Area. The WRLtH project will generate significant impacts due to tunnelling operations but this project is at an early planning stage and information on construction traffic levels is unavailable. It is clear however there could be synergies with the CEMEX mineral extraction which could substantially reduce vehicles towards the last 3 years of operation. The main impacts on Richings Way will occur between 2020-2022 when the WRLtH and CEMEX are both operational. An indirect operational impact of the WRLtH results in the closure of Hollow Hill Lane and displacement of traffic on the B470 (High Street). BCC are undertaking a monitoring exercise to review the impact of the experimental closure of Hollow Hill Lane by Slough v IVER FEASIBILITY STUDY 16-129 Traffic and Transport Study September 2016 BC which will include surveys in September 2016 to compare to the June 2016 surveys undertaken pre-closure of Hollow Hill lane.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Note: Development That Should Have Been Assessed As Part of the Cumulative Assessment
    th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Joint Note: Development that should have been assessed as part of the cumulative assessment Statement on behalf of: LB Hillingdon, Slough BC, South Bucks DC and Bucks CC. 1. Project 1: Western Rail Link to Heathrow th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Highways England Comment 1.1 The Western Rail Link to Heathrow proposal it not yet either a committed project nor is it the subject of a live application. Its details and effects are not yet known. 1.2 The proposal was announced on 5 February 2014 following consideration of four options by Network Rail. At the time the assessment for the M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway scheme (the "Scheme") was undertaken, the proposal was at “early stages of development” following its inclusion in the Route Utilisation Strategies published in March 2010. As such, it was not at a sufficiently developed stage to be included in the cumulative assessment for the Scheme and did not come within the guidelines set out in Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (“DMRB”) for those committed, reasonably foreseeable developments that should be included in an assessment. It is understood that an application may be brought forward in due course. Any application for the construction of the Western Rail Link will be required to take the M4 Scheme into account when assessing the effect of its proposals, rather than the reverse. 1.3 Network Rail submitted a Scoping Report (Environmental Impact Assessment – Scoping Report, Western Rail Link to Heathrow, Jacobs, April 2015) to the Planning Inspectorate in April 2015 that set the principles of the proposed approach to the construction of the relocated depot.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils
    Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 – Green Belt Preferred Options LC-330 Document Control Box Client Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Sustainability Appraisal of the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan Report Title (Regulation 18) Green Belt Preferred Options Status Final Filename LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS Date September 2017 Author DS Reviewed JE Approved ND Cover Photo: Looking East across option ‘National Epilepsy Centre, Chalfont St Peter’ © Lepus Consulting for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Chiltern and South Bucks SA Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS.docx Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 About the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan 2014-2036 ............................................... 4 1.4 The Regulation 18 Consultation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL Porep2372 (REDACTED) 7Th December 2016 Bc
    Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2372 (REDACTED) 7th December 2016 bc Planning Policy Team South Bucks District Council Neil Rowley Capswood E: Oxford Road DL: + Denham UB9 4LH Dear Sir or Madam, Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan - Green Belt Preferred Options Consultation Representation on behalf of Thorney Lane LLP for Land at Thorney Lane, Iver We write on behalf of our client, Thorney Lane LLP, the current landowner of the site at Thorney Lane, Iver. This site is Preferred Option 13 (‘Area North of Iver Station’). In short we support the proposed removal of Preferred Option 13 from the Green Belt. Please find enclosed: Completed comments form Transport Representations by JMP Masterplan by Savills Urban Design Studio Site Description The proposed site comprises the Thorney Business Park, and open land to the east and west. Thorney Business Park comprises a variety of business units, including larger scale industrial and waste processing uses. The entire site is located to the south of Iver and is approximately 52 ha in size. It is bound by the Grand Union Canal Slough Arm to the north, Thorney Lane and the M25 to the east, and the railway line to the south. To the west is an area of open farmland designated for waste management purposes and Mansion Lane Caravan Site. The immediately surrounding area is mixed in character, with farmland to the north west and south west, and Iver Golf Club to the west. Immediately to the north of the site is Ridgeway Trading Estate, and the residential area of Iver Village to the north of that.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Committee, 06/03/2019
    Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4LH 01895 837236 [email protected] www.southbucks.gov.uk Planning Committee Wednesday, 6 March 2019 at 4.15 pm Council Chamber, Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham A G E N D A Item 1. Evacuation Procedure 2. Apologies for Absence 3. Minutes (Pages 5 - 8) To approve the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 6 February 2019. 4. Declarations of Interest 5. Applications and Plans The files for each application are available for public inspection at the Council Offices. A. Committee decision required following a site visit and/or public speaking PL/18/3175/FA: 34 Syke Cluan, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9EH (Pages 9 - 20) 18/00426/FUL: 19 & 21 Bathurst Walk, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9AS (Pages 21 - 44) Chief Executive: Bob Smith Director of Resources: Jim Burness Director of Services: Steve Bambrick B. Committee decision required without a site visit or public speaking None. C. Committee observations required on applications to other Authorities None. D. To receive a list of applications already determined under delegated powers by the Head of Planning and Economic Development (Pages 45 - 82) For information 6. Planning Appeals and Schedule of Outstanding Matters (Pages 83 - 86) For information Note: All reports will be updated orally at the meeting if appropriate and may be supplemented by additional reports at the Chairman’s discretion. Membership: Planning Committee Councillors: R Bagge (Chairman) J Jordan (Vice-Chairman) D Anthony M Bezzant T Egleton B Gibbs
    [Show full text]
  • AP2 ES Report
    HIGH SPEED RAIL ȍǧ Ȏ Supplementary Environmental Statement and ͮ ͱ| Technical appendices ơǦ ͮͬͭͱ ͮͯǤͱǤͮ ͮȂͱ www.gov.uk/hs2 HIGH SPEED RAIL ȍǧ Ȏ Supplementary Environmental Statement and ͮ ͱ| Technical appendices ơǦ ͮͬͭͱ ͮͯǤͱǤͮ ȋ ͮȌ ȋȌ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ȋ ͮȌǣ ȋ ͮȌǡ ǡ ͭͰͱ ͮǤ ǣͬͮͬͳ͵ͰͰͰ͵ͬʹ ǣ ̻͚ͮǤǤ ǣǤǤȀ͚ ̽ ȋ ͮȌǡͮͬͭͱǡ Ǥ ȋ ͮȌ Ǥ ͮǤ Ǥ ȋ ͮȌǤ ͳͱά ƤǤ Index Thistableshowsthetopicscoveredbythetechnicalappendicesinthisvolume,andthereference codesforthem. CFAnameandnumber Topic Code HeathrowExpressLangley Agriculture,forestryand HEXǦAGǦ001 soils Airquality HEXǦAQǦ001 CrossTopic HEXǦCTǦ001 Community HEXǦCMǦ001 Culturalheritage HEXǦCHǦ001 HEXǦCHǦ002 HEXǦCHǦ003 Ecology HEXǦECǦ001 LandQuality HEXǦLQǦ001 Landscapeandvisual HEXǦLVǦ001 assessment Sound,noiseandvibration HEXǦSVǦ001 HEXǦSVǦ002 HEXǦSVǦ003 SES and AP2 ES Appendix HEX-AG-001 Environmental topic: Agriculture, forestry AG and soils Appendix name: Data appendix 001 Community forum area: Heathrow Express HEx Depot, Langley i SES and AP2 ES Appendix HEX-AG-001 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Soils and agricultural land classification surveys 1 2.1 Background 1 2.2 Soils and land resources 2 2.3 Soil and land use interactions 2 3 Forestry 6 4 Assessment of effects on holdings 6 5 References 8 List of tables Table 1: Local agro-climatic conditions 3 Table 2: Area of woodland within a 2km study area of the proposed HEx depot 6 Table 3 : Summary of assessment of effected holding 6 List of figures Figure 1: ALC grade according to soil wetness (MAFF, 1988) 5 ii SES and AP2 ES Appendix HEX-AG-001 1 Introduction 1.1.1 The agriculture, forestry and soils appendix for the Supplementary Environmental Statement (SES) and the Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement (AP2) Volume 4: off route effects comprises: soils and Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) surveys (Section 2); forestry (Section 3); and the assessment of effects on holdings (Section 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Rail Access to Heathrow Airport an Innovative, Privately Financed New Railway Expanding Train Connections Across London and Southern England
    HEATHROW SOUTHERN Investor and Partner RAILWAY Transforming Rail Access to Heathrow Airport An innovative, privately financed new railway expanding train connections across London and southern England RAIL NETWORK CONNECTS POSITIVE EFFECT ON MODAL SHIFT BENEFITS COMMUNITIES THE ENVIRONMENT TO RAIL A new orbital route from Fast, frequent trains from Reduces emissions by Transfers 3 million road Hampshire and Surrey to Surrey, Hampshire and 8,600 tonnes of CO2 and journeys per year to rail Old Oak Common and South West London to 2 tons of NOx per year London Paddington Heathrow Airport GLOBAL GROWTH AND DELIVERABLE AFFORDABLE AND COMPETITIVENESS REGENERATION 10 km of new railway VALUE FOR MONEY Linking the region’s Enabling people to reach mainly in tunnel, filling a User funded, privately businesses to inward the jobs at Heathrow by missing link in the existing financed at no cost to investment and export public transport network taxpayers, from 2028 opportunities About the project Improving access to Heathrow Airport by train is an important environmental objective. Far too many passengers have no alternative but to use car, contributing to congestion and poor, illegal air quality in the area. Currently Heathrow is not linked at all by train to Surrey, Hampshire or South and South Proposed route Map Key West London. We aim to change that with Our proposed route starts at Heathrow’s Terminal 5 our innovative scheme which would serve the station and is intended to run mainly in tunnel and Heathrow Southern Railway Proposed Rail Infrastructure following major markets: be electrified to minimise environmental impact. Existing Rail Infrastructure ■ Fast, frequent direct trains from Surrey and It rises to the surface to connect to the existing Hampshire to Heathrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work
    W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 1 W1.1 Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work The Maidenhead Bridge over the River Thames at Maidenhead is a Grade II* listed structure. Installation of overhead electrification on top of the structure would be required. The design is being undertaken in conjunction with heritage specialists to help ensure that the impact on the structure is acceptable. Once installed, the gantries are likely to be visible on the bridge from viewpoints along the river and nearby. As an example, electrification for the Heathrow Express involved the provision of overhead electrification over Wharncliffe Viaduct in Ealing. Wharncliffe Viaduct Example of similar overhead electrification installations. Maidenhead Bridge www.crossrail.co.uk Helpdesk 0845 602 3813 Crossing the Capital Connecting the UK W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 2 W2.1 Maidenhead Maidenhead Stabling & Turnback It is proposed that a stabling facility be provided for up I Operational noise from the use of the sidings to 6 Crossrail trains in the former goods yard to the I Dust impact on nearby buildings during west of Maidenhead station, immediately beyond the construction. Appropriate dust mitigation junction of the Bourne End Branch. techniques would be incorporated within the The proposals are to modify the track layout and train Crossrail Construction Code in order to reduce sidings at Maidenhead to enable Crossrail trains to be the risk of a dust nuisance being caused. The reversed with a new siding to be developed within the Construction Code would require the establishment existing Network Rail sidings.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Professional
    February 2018 ciht.org.uk transportation professional Former colleagues reflect on Orbital interchange scheme bridge building bus patronage warm mix asphalt managing traffic Is Boris Johnson’s New study to Sustainability set Belgian city cuts Channel crossing explore reasons to be promoted out the cars plan a good idea? for declining use with specification from central area p4 p7 p20 p24 Visit CIHT’s official jobs website:cihtjobs.com @CIHTUK #CIHTconf CIHT Annual Conference 2018 Highways: Change, innovation and the future Thursday 8 March Park Plaza Victoria London SW1V 1EQ A DYNAMIC INTERACTIVE CONFERENCE The conference will explore how the Highways sector is changing and how innovation will drive continuous change Live presentations Interviews with infl uential industry leaders Informative break-out sessions Build your knowledge and skills, network with peers and contribute to your CPD Leading speakers and panel members addressing the conference include: ■ Roy Brannen, chief executive, Transport Scotland, who is the subject of the conference’s main interview and will off er a global perspective of the sector ■ Elliot Shaw, executive director of strategy and planning, Highways England, who will explain its approach to the next investment period on the strategic road network ■ Dave Wright, executive director for highways at Kier will share his experience from the company’s perspective as a leading Gold Corporate Partner ■ Dana Skelley OBE, director of strategy and operational excellence at Skanska Civil Engineering will draw on her experience
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Sth December 1981
    15620 THE LONDON GAZETTE, STH DECEMBER 1981 Particulars of the proposals are contained in the Wages HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 Council's Notice D (182), copies of which may be obtained on application to the Secretary of the Wages Council The Folkestone-Honiton Trunk Road (Ferndown Bypass, at the address given below. The Wages Council will con- Side Roads) Order 198 sider any written representation with respect to the pro- The Secretary of State for Transport hereby gives notice posals if made within 21 days from 8th December 1981. that he proposes, in relation to the new trunk road which Any such representation should bear the writer's address he proposes to construct as a bypass to Ferndown in the and signature and be sent to the Secretary, Boot and Shoe county of Dorset, to make under sections 14 and 125 of Repairing Wages Council (Great Britain), 12 St. James's the Highways Act 1980 an Order authorising him: Square, London SW1Y 4LL. It is desirable that persons (a) to improve, raise, lower or otherwise alter highways, making objections should state the precise nature of their (b) to stop up highways, objections and quote the number of the Wages Council's (c) to construct new highways, Notice of Proposals D (182). (a) to stop up private means of access to premises, and (e) to provide new means of access to premises, Yvonne M. Simmons, Secretary all at Ferndown aforesaid, and providing for the transfer 7th December 1981. (SSI) of each of the said new highways to the County Council of Dorset as from the date on which he notifies the Council that the new highways have been completed and are open for through traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Assessment
    HIGH SPEED RAIL(LONDON WEST- MIDLANDS) | SES3 and AP4 ES SES3 AP4 and HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON - WEST | Volume 5 | Technical appendices | Transport Assessment | Transport appendices 5 | Technical Volume MIDLANDS) Supplementary Environmental Statement 3 and Additional Provision 4 Environmental Statement Volume 5 | Technical appendices Transport Assessment (TR-001-000) High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square Revised version issued 30 October 2015 London E14 5AB T 020 7944 4908 E [email protected] Z70 SES3 and AP4 ES 3.5.1.10.1 AP4 SES3 and AP4 ES – VOLUME 5 SES3 and AP4 ES – VOLUME 5 www.gov.uk/hs2 AP4 SS&Pur A4P-1.indd 37 30/10/2015 15:49:36 HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON - WEST MIDLANDS) Supplementary Environmental Statement 3 and Additional Provision 4 Environmental Statement Volume 5 | Technical appendices Transport Assessment (TR-001-000) NOTE: this document was updated on 30th October 2015 to correct specific traffic data relating to CFAs 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. The corrected text is highlighted in yellow. These corrections do not affect the outcome of the traffic assessments. October 2015 SES3 and AP4 ES 3.5.1.10.1 www.gov.uk/hs2 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, London E14 5AB Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Part a – Your Details
    Classification: OFFICIAL PORep1502 (REDACTED) PART A – YOUR DETAILS Are you: An Individual An Organisation Other (please specify) Personal Details* Agent’s Details (if applicable) **Title Mr **First Name Thomas **Last Name Hutchinson Job Title Head of Projects (if on behalf of an organisation) Organisation Land and Partners Ltd (if applicable) **Address Telephone Number **Email Address *if an agent is appointed, you may wish to complete only the title and name boxes and, if applicable, the organisation box but please complete the full contact details for the agent. **Name and either email or address required if you wish to be added to the consultation database (see below). Consultation Database (Mailing List) The Councils have a Consultation Database (mailing list) used to keep individuals and organisations informed about Planning Policy Documents across both Council areas. Documents include: the Local Plan, Supplementary Planning Documents and Neighbourhood Plans, (please note some plans may not be applicable to your area). Chiltern District Council and South Bucks District Council are the Data Controllers for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998. Individuals and organisations on the Planning Policy Consultation Database will only be contacted by the Councils in relation to the preparation and production of planning policy documents. The Councils will not publish the names of those individuals on the database but may publish names of statutory bodies and organisations at certain stages of the Local Plan process. Please indicate if you want to be added to the joint consultation database (tick box below). Please note: you do not need to tick this box if you received a letter or email notification from the Councils prior to the start of the consultation, as you are already registered.
    [Show full text]
  • Building-Infrastructure
    Consultation Point: Building-Infrastructure Person ID 1214611 Full Name Mrs Frances Reynolds ID 891 Order 233 Number 11.1 Title Building-Infrastructure Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please Individual/Resident select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date 2016-12-10 Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is No this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as 9 precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness.
    [Show full text]