DOCSLIB.ORG

Household Income and Expenditure Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Household Income and Expenditure Survey National Summary Preliminary Report 1997 HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY Central Statistical Organization Yangon, Myanmar. 1998 CONTENTS Page Foreword 1. Introduction 1.1. Objectives of the Survey 1.2. Historical Background 2. Methodology 2 2. 1. Sample Design 2 2.2. Sample Size Determination 3 2.3. Sample Townships and Households 3 2.4. Estimation Procedure 4 2.4.1 Weighting 4 2.4.2 Survey Estimates 5 2.4.3 Limitations of the Data 6 3. Sample Survey Execution 6 3. I. Preparation 6 3 .2. Field Operation 7 3 .2.1. Recruitment of Enumerators 7 3.2.2. Compilation of List of Households 7 3.2.3. Training ofEnumerators 7 3.2.4. Field Work 7 3.2.5. Checking, Editing and Coding of the Forms 8 3.2.6. Closing ofField Work 8 3.3. Data Processing 8 3 .4. Coverage 9 4. Discussion on Results 9 4.1. Size of Household 9 4.1. l. Average Household Size 9 4.1.2. Percentage Distribution of Households by Household Size l 0 4.2. Monthly Household Income 12 4.2.1. Average Monthly Household Income by Source 13 4.2.2. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income Class 15 4.3. Monthly Household Expenditure I 7 4 .3. I. Average Monthly Household Expenditure 17 4.3.2. Monthly Household Expenditure on Food and Beverages 18 4.3.3. Monthly Household Expenditure on Non-food 19 4.3.4. Percentage Distribution ofHouseholds by Monthly Household Expenditure Class 21 5. Summary Findings 22 5.1. Average Household Size 22 5 .2. Household Size Distribution 23 5 .3. Average Monthly Household Income 23 5.4. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income Class 24 5.5. Average Monthly Household Expenditure 25 5.6. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class 26 5.7. Comparison with Household Expenditure Survey (1989) 27 6. Comments and Conclusion 28 Statistical Tables A. Main Tables B. Additional Tables Appendixes List of Ta bl es A. Main Tables 4.1 Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Union. 4.1.1. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Kach in State. 4.1.2. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Kayah State. 4.1.3. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Kayin State. 4.1.4. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Chin State. 4.1.5. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Sagaing Division. 4.1.6. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Tanintharyi Division. 4.1.7. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Bago Division. 4.1.8. Percentage Distribution ofHousehol.ds by Size, Magway Division. 4.1.9. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Mandalay Division. 4.1.10. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Mon State. 4.1.11. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Rakhine State. 4.1.12. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Yangon Division. 4.1.13. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Shan State. 4.1.14. Percentage Distribution of Households by Size, Ayeyarwady Division. .., 4.2.1. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Union. .) .., 4.2. 1. 1. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Kachin State. .) 4.2.1.2. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Kayah State. 3 4.2.1.3. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Kayin State. 4.2.1.4. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Chin State. 4.2.1.5. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Sagaing Division. 4.2.1.6. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Tanintharyi Division. 4.2.1. 7. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Bago Division. 4.2.1.8. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Magway Division. 4.2.1.9. Average Monthly Hous~hold Income by Source, Mandalay Division. 4.2.1.10. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Mon State. 4.2.1.11. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Rakhine State. · 4.2.1.12. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Yangon Division. 4.2.1.13. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Shan State. 4: 4.2.1.14. Average Monthly Household Income by Source, Ayeyarwady Division. 4: 4.2.2 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Union 46 4.2.2.1 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Kachin State 47 4.2.2.2 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Kayah State 47 4.2.2.3 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Kayin State 48 4.2.2.4 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Chin State 48 4.2.2.5 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Sagaing Division 49 4.2.2.6 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Tanintharyi Division 49 4.2.2. 7 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Bago Division 50 4.2.2.8 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Magway Division 50 4.2.2.9 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Mandalay Division 51 4.2.2.10 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class , Mon State 51 4.2.2. l l Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Rakhine State 52 4.2.2.12 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Yangon Division 52 4.2.2.13 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Shan State 53 4.2.2.14 Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Income class, Ayeyarwady Division 53 4.3.1. Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Union. 54 4.3. l. l Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Kachin State. 55 4.3.1.2 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Kayah State. 56 4.3.1.3 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Kayin State. 57 4.3.1.4 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Chin State. 58 4.3.1.5 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Sagaing Division. 59 4.3.1.6 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Tanintharyi Division. 60 4.3 .1. 7 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Bago Division. 6 ! 4 .3. 1. 8 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure, Group, Magway Division. 62 4.3.1.9 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Mandalay Division. 63 4.3.1.10 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Mon State. 64 4.3 .1.11 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Rakhine State. 6'.i 4.3.1.12 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Yangon Division. 66 4.3 .1.13 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Shan State. 6 7 4.3.1.14 Monthly Household Expenditure by Expenditure Group, Ayeyarwady Division. 68 4.3 .4. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Union. 69 4.3 .4.1. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Kachin State. 70 4.3 .4.2. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Kayah State. 70 4.3.4.3. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Kayin State. 71 4.3 .4.4. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Chin State. 71 4.3.4.5. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Sagaing Division. 72 4.3 .4.6. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Tanintharyi Division. 72 4.3.4.7. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Bago Division. 73 4.3.4.8. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Magway Division. 73 4.3.4.9. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Mandalay Division. 74 4.3 .4.10. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Mon State. 74 4.3 .4.11. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Rakhine State. 7 5 4.3.4.12. Percentage Distribution ofHouseholds by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Yangon Division. 7 5 4.3.4.13. Percentage Distribution ofHouseholds by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Shan State. 76 4.3.4.14. Percentage Distribution of Households by Monthly Household Expenditure Class, Ayeyarwady Division. 76 B. Additional Tables 4.1.15 Average Household Size. 77 4.1.16 Percentage Distribution of Households by Household Size Class, Overall. 78 4.1.17 Percentage Distribution of Households by Household Size Class, Urban. 79 4.1.18 Percentage Distribution of Households by Household Size Class, Rural. 80 4.2.1.15 Average Monthly Household Income 81 4.2.1.16 Ranking of States and Divisions by Average Monthly Household Income. 82 4.2.1.17 Median Monthly Household Income 83 4.2.1.18 Percentage Contribution of Wages and Salaries to Average Monthly Household Income. 84 4.2.1.19 Percentage Contribution of Entrepreneurial Income to Average Monthly Household Income. 85 4.2.2.15 Percentage Distribution of Households by Combined Monthly Household Income Class, 0.verall. 86 4.2.2.16 Percentage Distribution of Households by Combined Monthly Household Income Class, Urban. 87 4.2.2.17 Percentage Distribution of Households by Combined Monthly Household Income Class, Rural. 88 4.3.1.15 Average Monthly Household Expenditure. 89 4.3 .1.16 Ranking of States and Divisions by Average Monthly Household Expenditure. 90 4.3.J .17 Median Monthly Household Expenditure. 91 4.3 .2. Monthly Household Expenditure on Food and Beverages. 92 4.3 .2.1. Ranking of States and Divisions by Monthly Household Expenditure on Food and Beverages 93 4.3.3. Monthly Household Expenditure on Non-Food. 94 4.3 .3. I. Ranking of States and Divisions by Monthly Household Expenditure on Non-Food.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Important Facts About the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - Emref
    Important Facts about the 2015 Myanmar General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation (EMReF) 2015 October Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF 1 Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF ENLIGHTENED MYANMAR RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT FOUNDATION (EMReF) This report is a product of the Information Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation EMReF is an accredited non-profit research Strategies for Societies in Transition program. (EMReF has been carrying out political-oriented organization dedicated to socioeconomic and This program is supported by United States studies since 2012. In 2013, EMReF published the political studies in order to provide information Agency for International Development Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010- and evidence-based recommendations for (USAID), Microsoft, the Bill & Melinda Gates 2012). Recently, EMReF studied The Record different stakeholders. EMReF has been Foundation, and the Tableau Foundation.The Keeping and Information Sharing System of extending its role in promoting evidence-based program is housed in the University of Pyithu Hluttaw (the People’s Parliament) and policy making, enhancing political awareness Washington's Henry M. Jackson School of shared the report to all stakeholders and the and participation for citizens and CSOs through International Studies and is run in collaboration public. Currently, EMReF has been regularly providing reliable and trustworthy information with the Technology & Social Change Group collecting some important data and information on political parties and elections, parliamentary (TASCHA) in the University of Washington’s on the elections and political parties. performances, and essential development Information School, and two partner policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Import Law Dekkhina and President U Win Myint Were and S: 25 of the District Detained
    Current No. Name Sex /Age Father's Name Position Date of Arrest Section of Law Plaintiff Address Remark Condition Superintendent Myanmar Military Seizes Power Kyi Lin of and Senior NLD leaders S: 8 of the Export Special Branch, including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Import Law Dekkhina and President U Win Myint were and S: 25 of the District detained. The NLD’s chief Natural Disaster Administrator ministers and ministers in the Management law, (S: 8 and 67), states and regions were also 1 (Daw) Aung San Suu Kyi F General Aung San State Counsellor (Chairman of NLD) 1-Feb-21 Penal Code - Superintendent House Arrest Naypyitaw detained. 505(B), S: 67 of Myint Naing Arrested State Counselor Aung the (S: 25), U Soe San Suu Kyi has been charged in Telecommunicatio Soe Shwe (S: Rangoon on March 25 under ns Law, Official 505 –b), Section 3 of the Official Secrets Secret Act S:3 Superintendent Act. Aung Myo Lwin (S: 3) Myanmar Military Seizes Power S: 25 of the and Senior NLD leaders Natural Disaster including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi Superintendent Management law, and President U Win Myint were Myint Naing, Penal Code - detained. The NLD’s chief 2 (U) Win Myint M U Tun Kyin President (Vice Chairman-1 of NLD) 1-Feb-21 Dekkhina House Arrest Naypyitaw 505(B), S: 67 of ministers and ministers in the District the states and regions were also Administrator Telecommunicatio detained. ns Law Myanmar Military Seizes Power and Senior NLD leaders including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and President U Win Myint were detained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Union Report the Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Census Report Volume 2
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report The Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Volume Report : Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population May 2015 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 For more information contact: Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population Office No. 48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431 062 www.dop.gov.mm May, 2015 Figure 1: Map of Myanmar by State, Region and District Census Report Volume 2 (Union) i Foreword The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census (2014 MPHC) was conducted from 29th March to 10th April 2014 on a de facto basis. The successful planning and implementation of the census activities, followed by the timely release of the provisional results in August 2014 and now the main results in May 2015, is a clear testimony of the Government’s resolve to publish all information collected from respondents in accordance with the Population and Housing Census Law No. 19 of 2013. It is my hope that the main census results will be interpreted correctly and will effectively inform the planning and decision-making processes in our quest for national development. The census structures put in place, including the Central Census Commission, Census Committees and Offices at all administrative levels and the International Technical Advisory Board (ITAB), a group of 15 experts from different countries and institutions involved in censuses and statistics internationally, provided the requisite administrative and technical inputs for the implementation of the census.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF | 2.01 MB | IDP Sites in Kachin State
    MYANMAR IDP sites in Kachin State As of 30 June 2020 BHUTAN INDIA CHINA BANGLADESH MYANMAR Da Hun Dam Nay Pyi Taw LAOS Ma Ding Ta Su Htu Hta On Dam Da Zun Dam THAILAND Ga Waing Shing Wan Dam INDIA Nawngmun Pannandin Ah Li Awng Khu Ti Htu Ku Shin List of IDP Sites Kaw Leit Htu Lang Naing Pan Data provided by the Camp Coordination and Zi Yar Dam Ma Li Rein Ka San Khu Chei Kan Da Bu Dam Camp Management (CCCM) Cluster based on Khar Lam Baw Sar Dee Hton Dam Hpan Khu update of 30 June 2020 Nam Pan Dan Lon Khar Hkawng Lang Ah Wet Dam Nam Ro -2 San Dan Ah Wi Wan Nawngmun Kun Lin Gat Htu Ma Yi No. State Township IDP Site IDPs Lon Kan 1 AD-2000 Tharthana Compound 1,021 Man No Tan Wi Jar Wan War Sar Ka San Dan 2 Aung Thar Church 50 Ta Se Htu Da Zan 3 Htoi San Church 219 Nam Say Mon Ngo Sa Dup Ba Bawt 4 IDPs in Host 906 Nam Din Bhamo Htu San 5 Lisu Boarding-House 648 Ma Jawt Wawt Lon Yein War Hkan 6 Mu-yin Baptist Church 55 Ka Khin Ba Zu 93 Nawng Tan In Waing Bawt Ran Nam 7 Phan Khar Kone 346 Nam Ton Khu 94 Ah Lang Ga Ye Bang Ji Bon Hton Li 8 Robert Church 3,876 Nam Par Htang Ga 9 Chipwi KBC camp 860 Puta-OYi Kyaw Di Machanbaw San Dam Zi Aun 92 Shin Mway Yang 10 Chipwi Lhaovao Baptist Church (LBC) 895 Hpar Tar 11 Pan Wa (Host IDP) 20 Inn Lel Yan Hpu Lum Hton Hpu Zar Lee Ri Dam Ding Chet 12 5 Ward RC Church(lon Khin) 340 Hpat Ma Di Mee Kaw Lo Po Te Mone Yat 13 AG Church, Hmaw Si Sa 376 Chum Ding 14 AG Church, Maw Wan 59 In Ga Ding Sar Tar Kar Kun Sai Yang Tar Saw Nee 15 Baptist Church, Hmaw Si Sar(Lon Khin) 226 Shin Naw Ga Ma Jang Ga Chi Nan Zee Dam 16 Chin Church, Seik Mu 32 Tan Gyar MachanbawShar Lar Ga 17 Dhama Rakhita, Nyein Chan Tar Yar Ward(Lon Khin) 381 Zee Kone 18 Hlaing Naung Baptist 157 Ah KuKhaunglanhpu 19 Hmaw Wan, Anglican 14 20 Hpakant Baptist Church, Nam Ma Hpit 524 Wi Nin Puta-O Kun Sun Zan Yaw Tone 21 Karmaing RC Church 52 22 Lawa RC Church 231 Hpakant Wa Det Khaunglanhpu 23 Lawng Hkang Shait Yang Camp ( Lel Pyin) 678 Hpi Zaw Git Jar Ga 24 Lisu Baptist Church, Maw Shan Vil,.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge, Attitude & Practice
    Knowledge, Attitude & Practice (KAP) Survey on Earthquake Preparedness in Selected Earthquake-prone Areas of Myanmar April 2018 Contents ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 6 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Indicator 1: Government personnel’s awareness and confidence of earthquake response measures ....... 9 Logframe indicator findings .................................................................................................................. 9 Analysis: Awareness of functional roles and responsibilities ............................................................. 10 Analysis: Confidence to undertake roles ............................................................................................ 12 Indicator 2: Community members’ awareness of what to do before, during and after an earthquake .... 16 Logframe indicator findings
    [Show full text]
  • They Block Everything
    Cover: Border Post 6 camp for displaced “ civilians near the China border in Myanmar’s Kachin State. Myanmar government restrictions on humanitarian aid have resulted in shortages of blankets, clothing, THEY bedding, and other essential items, making harsh winters unnecessarily difficult for displaced civilians. ©James Higgins / Partners Relief and BLOCK Development, February 2016 EVERYTHING“ Avoidable Deprivations in Humanitarian Aid to Ethnic Civilians Displaced by War in Kachin State, Myanmar Fortify Rights works to ensure human rights for all. We investigate human rights violations, engage people with power on solutions, and strengthen the work of human rights defenders, affected communities, and civil society. We believe in the influence of evidence-based research, the power of strategic truth- telling, and the importance of working closely with individuals, communities, and movements pushing for change. We are an independent, nonprofit organization based in Southeast Asia and registered in the United States and Switzerland. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8 METHODOLOGY � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17 BACKGROUND �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 19 I. RESTRICTIONS ON HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 25 II� IMPACTS OF AID RESTRICTIONS ON DISPLACED POPULATIONS IN KACHIN STATE� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar ­ Languages | Ethnologue
    7/24/2016 Myanmar ­ Languages | Ethnologue Myanmar LANGUAGES Akeu [aeu] Shan State, Kengtung and Mongla townships. 1,000 in Myanmar (2004 E. Johnson). Status: 5 (Developing). Alternate Names: Akheu, Aki, Akui. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Ngwi-Burmese, Ngwi, Southern. Comments: Non-indigenous. More Information Akha [ahk] Shan State, east Kengtung district. 200,000 in Myanmar (Bradley 2007a). Total users in all countries: 563,960. Status: 3 (Wider communication). Alternate Names: Ahka, Aini, Aka, Ak’a, Ekaw, Ikaw, Ikor, Kaw, Kha Ko, Khako, Khao Kha Ko, Ko, Yani. Dialects: Much dialectal variation; some do not understand each other. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Ngwi-Burmese, Ngwi, Southern. More Information Anal [anm] Sagaing: Tamu town, 10 households. 50 in Myanmar (2010). Status: 6b (Threatened). Alternate Names: Namfau. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Sal, Kuki-Chin-Naga, Kuki-Chin, Northern. Comments: Non- indigenous. Christian. More Information Anong [nun] Northern Kachin State, mainly Kawnglangphu township. 400 in Myanmar (2000 D. Bradley), decreasing. Ethnic population: 10,000 (Bradley 2007b). Total users in all countries: 450. Status: 7 (Shifting). Alternate Names: Anoong, Anu, Anung, Fuchve, Fuch’ye, Khingpang, Kwingsang, Kwinp’ang, Naw, Nawpha, Nu. Dialects: Slightly di㨽erent dialects of Anong spoken in China and Myanmar, although no reported diഡculty communicating with each other. Low inherent intelligibility with the Matwang variety of Rawang [raw]. Lexical similarity: 87%–89% with Anong in Myanmar and Anong in China, 73%–76% with T’rung [duu], 77%–83% with Matwang variety of Rawang [raw]. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Central Tibeto-Burman, Nungish. Comments: Di㨽erent from Nung (Tai family) of Viet Nam, Laos, and China, and from Chinese Nung (Cantonese) of Viet Nam.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma’Sburma’S Northernnorthern Frontierfrontier Forestsforests
    Recommendations contained on pages 9 & 10 AA DisharmoniousDisharmonious TradeTrade ChinaChina andand thethe continuedcontinued destructiondestruction ofof Burma’sBurma’s northernnorthern frontierfrontier forestsforests A Review by Global Witness: 2006-09. October 2009 Table of Contents 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART B: GLOBAL WITNESS RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATIONS IN KACHIN STATE 2006-09 56-96 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 9 KACHIN STATE 56-68 2 PREFACE 3 9.1 Recent political developments in Kachin State 57 9.1.1 SPDC pressure on the armed ethnic opposition groups 60 3 INTRODUCTION 4 9.1.2 Dispute within and between the armed ethnic 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5-8 opposition groups 62 Box 1: Key Findings 5 9.1.2.1 Political debate within the KIO 63 5 RECOMMENDATIONS 9-10 9.1.2.2 The KIO and Lasang Awng Wa 63 9.1.2.3 NDA(K) infighting 65 ABBREVIATIONS 11 9.1.2.4 KIO and NDA(K) relations 65 9.2 Territorial control in Kachin State 66 PART A: GLOBAL WITNESS RESEARCH AND 9.2.1 Konglangphu 66 INVESTIGATIONS IN CHINA 2006-09 12-55 9.2.2 SPDC army posts in NDA(K) areas 67 9.2.3 Control in SPDC areas 67 6 THE BURMA-CHINA TIMBER TRADE 12-24 Box 5: The height of the illegal cross-border timber trade 68 6.1 Burma-China timber trade – analysis of trade data 14 10 THE DECLINE IN ILLEGAL LOGGING IN KACHIN STATE 69-96 6.2 Timber import procedures, theory and practice 16 10.1 Crackdown on illegal logging in Kachin State 70 6.2.1 The procedure in Burma 16 Box 6: Opinions about the logging ban 72 6.2.2 The procedure in China 16 10.2 Enforcement of the logging and timber transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Map
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Myanmar Administrative Map 94°E 96°E 98°E 100°E India China Bhutan Bangladesh Along India Vietnam KACHIN Myanmar Dong Laos South China Sea Bay of Bengal / Passighat China Thailand Daporija Masheng SAGAING 28°N Andaman Sea Philippines Tezu 28°N Cambodia Sea of the Philippine Gulf of Thailand Bangladesh Pannandin !( Gongshan CHIN NAWNGMUN Sulu Sea Namsai Township SHAN MANDALAY Brunei Malaysia Nawngmun MAGWAY Laos Tinsukia !( Dibrugarh NAY PYI TAW India Ocean RAKHINE Singapore Digboi Lamadi KAYAH o Taipi Duidam (! !( Machanbaw BAGO Margherita Puta-O !( Bomdi La !( PaPannssaauunngg North Lakhimpur KHAUNGLANHPU Weixi Bay of Bengal Township Itanagar PUTA-O MACHANBAW Indonesia Township Township Thailand YAN GON KAY IN r Khaunglanhpu e !( AYE YARWADY MON v Khonsa i Nanyun R Timor Sea (! Gulf of Sibsagar a Martaban k Fugong H i l NANYUN a Township Don Hee M !( Jorhat Mon Andaman Sea !(Shin Bway Yang r Tezpur e TANAI v i TANINTHARYI NNaaggaa Township R Sumprabum !( a Golaghat k SSeellff--AAddmmiinniisstteerreedd ZZoonnee SUMPRABUM Township i H Gulf of a m Thailand Myanmar administrative Structure N Bejiang Mangaldai TSAWLAW LAHE !( Tanai Township Union Territory (1) Nawgong(nagaon) Township (! Lahe State (7) Mokokchung Tuensang Lanping Region (7) KACHIN INDIA !(Tsawlaw Zunheboto Hkamti INJANGYANG Hojai Htan Par Kway (! Township !( 26°N o(! 26°N Dimapur !( Chipwi CHIPWI Liuku r Township e Injangyang iv !( R HKAMTI in w Township d HPAKANT MYITKYINA Lumding n i Township Township Kohima Mehuri Ch Pang War !(Hpakant
    [Show full text]
  • MYANMAR: IDP Sites in Kachin and Northern Shan States
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (1 June 2014) ! !( ! ! ! MYANMAR: IDP Sites in Kachin and ! northern! Shan States ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hpan Hkaing (2) ! ! !Man No Yat Bawt (Wa Ram) Jar Wan ! Ma Li Sar ! Yat Bawt (Li Suu) Ma Kan Dam !War Sar ! !Ta Se Htu ! ! !Pa Da Myar (Nam Bu Yam) Ah Let Dam! Da Zan Yae Ni To ! ! ! ! Man Pan! Nam Shei Ma Aun Nam! ! Mon Ngo ! Ta Kwar Auk San Kawng ! ! Nam Sa Tham ! ! Sin! Lon Dam! (2) ! ! ! ! Ma Li Di ! ! Sa Dup! Ah Tan Mar Meit Shi Dee! Par Hkee! ! ! ! Nam Say ! ! NAWNGMUN ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Htan Htawt! Ma Hti Sut Nam Bon! ! ! Man Khut !Ba Bawt ! Mu Don (2) Hta War Dam ! Htu San !Tan Zein Chan La War Tar ! ! !Nam Hkam ! Pin Sin Nam Din ! Ma Jawt Wawt! ! Lon Yein War Hkan ! ! ! ! ! !Shein Kan Kha La Me War Ji ! Ma Ran Hta Zin Htan Nawng Tan In Waing Bawt Ka Khin ! Dar Bang Auk ! ! ! ! Ba Zu Ah Ri Lein Ma Rein ! ! Ri Zum! ! !Tar Lang ! Nam Tar Lel Ran Za Kon ! ! Nawng Tan(Jubily)! ! Puta-O ! In Bu Bawt Ran Nam Min Zar !Rar War Haw ! ! Ma Lein Kan ! ! Nam Ton Khu ! INDIA ! ! Ni Nar War Ji Ah Lang Ga Ye Bang Hta Mae !( ! ! Ma Hkaung Dam! ! Ji Bon 8 ! Lin Kawng! ! ! 36 Hton Li ! CHINA ! Hpan Don ! Lar Tar Tee !( ! ! Nam Par ! ! Ya Khwi Dan ! ! ! San Dam Chi Htu HpanNam Yaw Di Yar Hpar Dee Mu Lar Aun! Htang Ga ! ! Zi Aun ! ! Machanbaw ! ! ! ! ! Ta Kwar Dam Yi Kyaw Di ! Chun Ding Wan Sam ! Lang No (2) ! ! ! ! Nin Lo Dam ! Pa La Na ! Auk Par Zei Mu Lar Haung Shin Mway Yang ! ! ! 37 ! Lar Kar Kaw ! Sa Ye Hpar ! Ah Day Di Hton Hpu! ! ! ! Khi Si Di !Hpar Tar Hpat
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized August 2017 SURVEY CONDUCT AND QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Myanmar Poverty and Living Conditions Survey 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Planning and Finance ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The team would like to thank, in particular, the Minister of Planning and Finance for his support to the Myanmar Poverty and Living Conditions Survey (MPLCS) and its analysis. The team warmly thanks the Deputy Minister of Planning and Finance for guidance in the MPLCS Steering Committee. Other special thanks go to members of the MPLCS Steering Committee and the MPLCS Technical Committee for their substantial and substantive guidance and support. The study team would also like to acknowledge the key role played by the Planning Department in supporting survey operations and analysis, and specifically U Maung Maung Tint, Director General, Planning Department, Daw Thway Thway Chit, in her capacity as Deputy Director General, Planning Department, and Dr Wah Wah Maung, Director General, Central Statistics Organization. Additional contributions were made by the National Nutrition Center, the Department of Health Planning, the Department of Population, the Department of Human Resources and Educational Planning, the Department of Human Resources and Education Planning, Department of Myanmar Education Research Bureau, the Department of Labor, the Department of Agricultural Planning, the Settlements and Land Records Department, and the Department of Population. Special thanks also go to the World Bank for their support to the survey and analysis, and more specifically to Ellen Goldstein, World Bank Country Director for Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia; Abdoulaye Seck, in his capacity as Country Manager for Myanmar; and Salman Zaidi, Program Manager of the Poverty and Equity Global Practice in the East Asia and Pacific Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cash Or In-Kind? Why Not Both?
    CASH OR IN-KIND? WHY NOT BOTH? RESPONSE ANALYSIS LESSONS FROM MULTIMODAL PROGRAMMING The Cash Learning Partnership CASH OR IN-KIND? WHY NOT BOTH? RESPONSE ANALYSIS LESSONS FROM MULTIMODAL PROGRAMMING 2 CASH OR IN-KIND? WHY NOT BOTH? RESPONSE ANALYSIS LESSONS FROM MULTIMODAL PROGRAMMING CASH OR IN-KIND? WHY NOT BOTH? Response analysis lessons from multimodal programming July 2017 3 C CASH OR IN-KIND? WHY NOT BOTH? RESPONSE ANALYSIS LESSONS FROM MULTIMODAL PROGRAMMING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Marie Boulinaud, independent consultant, drafted this document with support from Jenny Coneff, CaLP North America Regional Focal Point, under the overall technical guidance and coordination of Mulugeta Handino, Technical Advisor for Cash and Markets in Emergencies with Catholic Relief Services, and Daniel Enarson, former Food Security Advisor at Samaritan’s Purse. This document is a product of consultation with different organizations and more than fifteen managerial-level individuals across different sectors. It benefited from the extensive experience shared by Country Offices and Headquarters-based staff. A list of the key informants that informed this research follows in Appendix 2. The Technical and Operational Performance Support (TOPS) Program is the USAID/Food for Peace-funded learning mechanism that generates, captures, disseminates, and applies the highest quality information, knowledge, and promising practices in development food assistance programming, to ensure that more communities and households benefit from the U.S. Government’s investment in fighting global hunger. Through technical capacity building, a small grants program to fund research, documentation and innovation, and an in-person and online community of practice (the Food Security and Nutrition [FSN] Network), The TOPS Program empowers food security implementers and the donor community to make lasting impact for millions of the world’s most vulnerable people.
    [Show full text]