Anomalous Apparitions of Light in Colonial America: Visions of Comets, New Stars, the Aurora Borealis, and Rainbows

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anomalous Apparitions of Light in Colonial America: Visions of Comets, New Stars, the Aurora Borealis, and Rainbows ANOMALOUS APPARITIONS OF LIGHT IN COLONIAL AMERICA: VISIONS OF COMETS, NEW STARS, THE AURORA BOREALIS, AND RAINBOWS A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Megan E. Holmberg May 2019 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Miles Orvell, Advisory Chair, English Dr. Michael Kaufmann, English Dr. James Salazar, English Dr. Jessica Roney, External Member, Temple University Department of History ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the body of literature that formed around anomalous light apparitions (comets, new stars, the aurora borealis, and rainbows) as it explores questions about the representation and response to celestial and meteorological phenomena during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in colonial America. I further consider the ways that these texts’ meanings are informed by rational scientific thought and by other non-scientific or non-rational, emotive, or aesthetic modes of thinking. I consider how these phenomena elicit a set of empirical yet emotionally-charged observational practices that complicate how we understand the roles of the rational and the non-rational in the scientific literature of this period. I argue that non-rational passionate investments are evident within or as part of the period’s rational scientific literature; they act as the impetus for scientific inquiry therefore forming an integral part of the scientific endeavor. This dissertation further explores how the practice of writing about these phenomena generates and facilitates the formation of communities of amateur scientific observers in colonial America. I further investigate how practices of data collection contribute to knowledge about the regular and irregular behaviors of celestial bodies, and how this knowledge impacts everyday practices essential for survival such as farming and travelling. What science writing from this period demonstrates is the ability for multiple ways of thinking to be in play simultaneously; these texts show how several worldviews (i.e. science, Puritanism, popular religion) are intrinsic to each other. Because of their liminality, these texts function outside of traditional categories such science, religion, and natural philosophy. Furthermore, they destabilize traditional conceptions of genre with their blend of rational and non-rational modes of thought and their ii incorporation of fact and fiction. While I treat these literary texts within their historical contexts, I am also interested in the ways in which these texts reach modern audiences, particularly in academia at a time when the humanities and sciences are positioned against one another. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Miles Orvell, Dr. Michael Kaufmann, Dr. James Salazar, and Dr. Jessica Roney for making this project possible. I am especially grateful to the chair of my committee, Dr. Orvell, for his guidance and valuable feedback on the drafts of these chapters. I am indebted to Dr. Kaufmann’s excellent graduate course in Early American Literature because this is where I was first inspired to study the literature of early America. Likewise, I am indebted to Dr. Salazar for his guidance and assistance on these chapters. I am grateful to Dr. Roney for agreeing to be the outside reader and her feedback on my second chapter. Additionally, I would like to thank my former professors and mentors at Boston College: Dr. Rosemarie Bodenheimer, Dr. Elizabeth Kowaleski-Wallace, Dr. Robin Lydenberg, Dr. Kevin Ohi, and Dr. Frances Restuccia for encouraging me to continue my graduate work at the doctoral level. I owe a special thanks to Dr. Ohi for his unwavering faith in me. Lastly, I am grateful for the support of my family, especially my husband, Fred, my daughter, Sonia, and my cats, Lucy, Micetta, Io, Terra, and Cooper. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………..iv INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………..vi Chapters 1: COLONIAL SCIENCE: THE EARLY AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL LANDSCAPE……………………………………………………………………1 2: ‘COMETOMANIA’: THEORIES OF BLAZING STARS IN COLONIAL AMERICA…………………………………………………..…….41 3: ‘NEWS FROM THE STARS’: THE IMPACT OF FIXED AND NEW STARS ON COLONIAL AMERICAN LIFE……………………………………...…………81 4: ‘UNCOMMON OCCURENCES IN THE CLOUDS’: OBSERVING THE AURORA BOREALIS IN COLONIAL AMERICA………………………………………117 5: THE RAINBOW UNWOVEN: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RAINBOW IN COLONIAL AMERICA………………………………………………………..150 6: CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………187 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………196 v INTRODUCTION In 1719, the northern lights made a rare and magnificent appearance over Boston. This event incited people to venture outside to experience the wonderous display and inspired them to record and share their observations. Those who contributed to the body of writing on this event, such as Cotton Mather, Thomas Prince, and Thomas Robie, represent the aurora borealis in their writing by offering qualitative details about its size, shape and color; however, these empirical observations are accompanied by imaginative, aesthetic, and wonder-filled references to images of a great conflagration, spirits battling, and blood spilling in the sky. Comets, the appearance of new stars in the heavens, and rainbows elicited a similar set of rational and non-rational responses from observers as these phenomena were interpreted as confirming or challenging God’s intervention in the earthly realm.1 The stories these writers tell are curiously complex: they elude the colonial American sense of genre as well as our modern sense of it with their frequent interweaving of the rational and the non-rational, the real and the imagined, and fact and fiction. I argue that this elusiveness is what makes these texts transformative, both in their respective historical periods and our modern world, as they resist categorization and reveal the instability of genre. It is this instability, when genre fails to hold meaning together in one way or format, that catalyzes new imaginative pathways, ultimately leading to the transformation of knowledge boundaries. More pointedly, my project calls attention to the instability of “science” and “religion” as categories and it demonstrates how these labels fail as ways of discussing the texts' content. Literary analysis of these 1 I employ the terms “rational” and “non-rational” to discuss two modalities of thought and expression. Rational responses rely on reasoning and sound judgement while non- rational responses are emotive or rely on intuitive principles. vi early “scientific” texts reveals how the meaning behind these categories or genres is constantly shifting.2 My dissertation examines the body of literature that formed around anomalous light apparitions (comets, new stars, the aurora borealis, and rainbows) as it explores the following preliminary questions: How are these phenomena represented in colonial literature during the seventeenth and eighteenth century? Why does this set of phenomena come to the fore or, in other words, why is this culture so responsive to these phenomena? What groups of people were interested in the phenomena and why? How do these texts speak to the cultural issues of the time, such as the rise of science as an institution, the Enlightenment, and changes within the Puritan faith? In what ways are these texts’ meanings informed by rational scientific thought and in what ways are they informed by other non-scientific or non-rational, emotive, or aesthetic modes of thinking? As secondary questions, I consider: How do these texts function within a genre or constitute a genre? In what ways do the categories of “science” or “religion” support or fail these texts? What we think of as science in the twenty-first century is different from science in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, but is our modern sense of this disciplinary category—as producing something real, factual, and rational—stable? Within the body of literature on meteorological and celestial events, I consider how these phenomena elicit a set of rational yet emotionally-charged observational practices that complicate how we understand the roles of the rational and non-rational in 2 I use the term “science” with the awareness that science is not yet an established discipline as it is in the modern sense with categorical distinctions such as physics, geology, etc. While the term natural philosophy or natural history is more of an apt fit in certain contexts, I frequently use “science” to call attention to the practice of empirical observation that is underway during this period. vii the scientific literature of this period. My project is concerned with how passionate investments such as fear, wonder, and joy shape scientific inquiry and offer a lens through which we can understand the emerging discipline of science among colonists during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. I argue that these non-rational passionate investments are evident within or as part of the period’s rational, empirical scientific literature; they act as the impetus for scientific inquiry therefore forming an integral part of the scientific endeavor. In New England, these passionate investments typically manifest as religious ones; however, I purposefully avoid an argument that places all emotive outpourings within the scope of Puritanism as it is difficult to know when New Englanders’ emotions were prompted by their faith or when their faith acted as coping
Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN Norman, Oklahoma 2009 SCIENCE IN THE AMERICAN STYLE, 1700 – 1800 A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY ________________________ Prof. Paul A. Gilje, Chair ________________________ Prof. Catherine E. Kelly ________________________ Prof. Judith S. Lewis ________________________ Prof. Joshua A. Piker ________________________ Prof. R. Richard Hamerla © Copyright by ROBYN DAVIS M CMILLIN 2009 All Rights Reserved. To my excellent and generous teacher, Paul A. Gilje. Thank you. Acknowledgements The only thing greater than the many obligations I incurred during the research and writing of this work is the pleasure that I take in acknowledging those debts. It would have been impossible for me to undertake, much less complete, this project without the support of the institutions and people who helped me along the way. Archival research is the sine qua non of history; mine was funded by numerous grants supporting work in repositories from California to Massachusetts. A Friends Fellowship from the McNeil Center for Early American Studies supported my first year of research in the Philadelphia archives and also immersed me in the intellectual ferment and camaraderie for which the Center is justly renowned. A Dissertation Fellowship from the Gilder Lehrman Institute for American History provided months of support to work in the daunting Manuscript Division of the New York Public Library. The Chandis Securities Fellowship from the Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens brought me to San Marino and gave me entrée to an unequaled library of primary and secondary sources, in one of the most beautiful spots on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Political Theory in Colonial Massachusetts, 1688-1740
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1970 The Development of Political Theory in Colonial Massachusetts, 1688-1740 Ronald P. Dufour College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dufour, Ronald P., "The Development of Political Theory in Colonial Massachusetts, 1688-1740" (1970). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624699. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ssac-2z49 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL THEORY IN COLONIAL MASSACHUSETTS 1688 - 17^0 A Th.esis Presented to 5he Faculty of the Department of History 5he College of William and Mary in Virginia In I&rtial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Ronald P. Dufour 1970 ProQ uest Number: 10625131 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10625131 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Astronomy Lectures in Nineteenth Century Britain
    Commercial and Sublime: Popular Astronomy Lectures in Nineteenth Century Britain Hsiang-Fu Huang UCL Department of Science and Technology Studies Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in History and Philosophy of Science March 2015 2 I, Hsiang-Fu Huang, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Date of signature: 9th March 2015 Supervisors: Joe Cain (UCL) Simon Werrett (UCL) Examiners: Frank A. J. L. James (UCL / Royal Institution of Great Britain) Richard Bellon (Michigan State University) Date of examination: 16th December 2014 3 4 Abstract This thesis discusses the practitioners, sites, curriculums, apparatus and audiences of popular astronomy lecturing in nineteenth-century Britain. Lecturers who were active approximately between 1820 and 1860 are the focus. This thesis emphasises popularisers who were not scientific elites, including C. H. Adams (1803-1871), George Bartley (c. 1782-1858), and D. F. Walker (1778-1865). Activities of private popularisers are compared with those in scientific establishments, such as the Royal Institution. Private entrepreneurs were not inferior to institutional competitors and enjoyed popularity among audiences. Until the 1860s, popular astronomy lecturing was a shared arena of institutional and private popularisers. A theatrical turn occurred in the popular astronomy lecturing trade before 1820. Popularisers moved lectures into theatres and adopted theatrical facilities in performance. They developed large onstage devices, such as the transparent orrery, for achieving scenic and dramatic effects. These onstage astronomical lectures were a phenomenon in the early nineteenth century and were usually performed during Lent.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Astral Medicine Hiro Hirai Introduction
    CHAPTER EIGHT THE NEW ASTRAL MEDICINE Hiro Hirai Introduction The impact of astrology on medical theories and practice in the Renais- sance still remains to be fully explored. Besides the general influences of celestial bodies on sublunary and terrestrial beings, physicians were traditionally taught to take astrology into account in questions such as: 1) conception or nativity; 2) crises of health or illness, known as “criti- cal days”; and 3) medication. The link between medicine and astrology became especially firm after the work of Pietro d’Abano (1257–ca. 1315).1 In the Renaissance, two major factors contributed to the modifica- tion of this traditional relationship between medicine and astrology. One is the severe criticism of judicial astrology, advanced by Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463–1494) in his posthumous work, entitled Disputa- tions against Judicial Astrology (Disputationes adversus astrologiam divina- tricem) (Bologna, 1496). Many of his contemporaries (followed by modern historians) generally considered that Pico rejected the divinatory aspects of astrology and accepted only its physical dimensions, which can be labeled as “natural astrology.” According to this interpretation, the influ- ences of the celestial region were exerted only by physical means: motion, light and heat.2 Pico thus criticized the astrological aspects of the doctrine 1 See Nancy G. Siraisi, Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990). Cf. also Andrew Wear, “Galen in the Renaissance,” in Galen: Problems and Prospects, ed. Vivian Nutton (London: The Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 1981), pp. 229–267, esp. 245–250; Wolf-Dieter Müller-Jahncke, Astrologisch-magische Theorie und Praxis in der Heilkunde der frühen Neuzeit (Stuttgart: Steiner, 1985); Roger French, “Astrology in Medical Prac- tice,” in Practical Medicine from Salerno to the Black Death, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Science in Abraham Ibn Ezra's Sefer Ha-Olam
    RELIGION AND SCIENCE IN ABRAHAM IBN EZRA'S SEFER HA-OLAM (INCLUDING AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE HEBREW TEXT) Uskontotieteen pro gradu tutkielma Humanistinen tiedekunta Nadja Johansson 18.3.2009 1 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Abraham Ibn Ezra and Sefer ha-Olam ........................................................................ 3 1.2 Previous research ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The purpose of this study ............................................................................................. 8 2 SOURCE, METHOD AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ....................................... 10 2.1 Primary source: Sefer ha-Olam (the Book of the World) ........................................... 10 2.1.1 Edition, manuscripts, versions and date .............................................................. 10 2.1.2 Textual context: the astrological encyclopedia .................................................... 12 2.1.3 Motivation: technical handbook .......................................................................... 14 2.2 Method ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Translation and historical analysis ...................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Systematic analysis .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Almanacs of Massachusetts
    1912.] Almmmcs of Massachusetts. 15 NOTES ON THE ALMANACS OF MASSACHUSETTS. BY CHARLES L. NICHOLS The origin of the almanac is wrapped in as much obscurity as that of the science of astronomy upon which its usefulness depends. It is possible, however, to trace some of the steps of its evolution and to note the uses to which it has been applied as that evolution has taken place. « When Fabius, the secretary of Appius Claudius, stole the fasti-sacri or Kalendares of the Roman priest- hood three hundred years before Christ, and exhibited the white tablets on the walls of the Forum, he not only struck a blow for reUgious freedom, but also gave to the people a long coveted source of information. Until that period no fast or holy-day had been pro- claimed except by the decision of the priests, since by their secret methods were made the calculations for those days. From that time the calendar of days has belonged to the people themselves, and has held an important position in the almanac of all nations. When Ptolemy in 150, A. D., prepared his catalogue of stars, and laid the foundation for more exact and con- tinuous records of their movements, the development of the Ephemeris, or daily note-book of the planets' places in our almanacs was assured. The meaning of the "man of signs," which is still so commonly seen, was minutely described by Manil- ius in his Astronomicon, written in the reign of the Emperor Tiberius. Origen and Jamblicus state that the principle underlying this belonged to a much earlier 16 American Aritiquarian Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England's Future, 1660-1736
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2011 The Wondrous Chain of Providence: Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England's Future, 1660-1736 Thomas Joseph Gillan College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Gillan, Thomas Joseph, "The Wondrous Chain of Providence: Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England's Future, 1660-1736" (2011). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626655. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-rkeb-ec16 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wondrous Chain of Providence: Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England’s Future, 1660-1736 Thomas Joseph Gillan Winter Springs, Florida Bachelor of Arts, University of Central Florida, 2008 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Lyon G. Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May 2011 APPROVAL PAGE This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Thomas Joseph GillaiT"'J Approved by the Com^^ ^ ^ March, 2011 Committee Chair Associate Professor Chandos M. Brown, History The College of WrNiam and Mary Professor Ifhristopher Grasso, History The College of William and Mary Assistant Professor Nicholas S.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Library and Autographs of William F. Johnson
    * Copy / I - V CATALD DUE 30 X Ilibr&ry • &nd - OF WILLIAM F. JOHNSON, ESQ., w OK BOSTON, MASS. fVERY VALUABLE and Interesting Collection of English and American Literature comprising, under the title Americana, a num¬ ber of scarce works by the Mathers, Eliot and other authors of their day ; in General Literature, many Standard and Popular Works of Biography, History and Romance, and worthy of especial notice and attention, a Collection of FIRST EDITIONS of REMARKABLE INTEREST AND VALUE BY REASON OF BOTH RARITY AND BEAUTY OF CONDITION, including the most desired specimens of the works of Coleridge, Hunt, Lamb, Keats, Shelley, Thackeray, Browning, Bry¬ ant, Emerson, Hawthorne, Longfellow and others. Also to be mentioned a charming lot of CRUIKSH ANKIANA, and books illustrated by Leech and Rowlandson. In addition to all the book treasures there are Specimen Autographs of the best known and honored English and American Authors, Statesmen and others, many of them particularly desirable for condition or interesting con¬ tents. TO BE SOLD AT AUCTION Monday, Tuesday, "Wednesday and Thursday, JANUARY 2T—30, 1890, BANQS & 60.,,. , * i A ■» 1 > > > • «. it1 > » i ) >) > ) ) > 5 > 1 J > * ) » > 739 & 741 Broadway, New York. 7 ~ % > n > > ) t> ) >7 > SALE TO BEGIN AT 3 O’CLOCK!’ ' > 7 > ' 7 ' > > 7 ) 7 *7 >v > ) , 7 {y Buyers wl~io cannot attend tloe sale me\y have pcir- chases made to tlieir order toy ttie Auctioneers. •* \ in 3 7 . '" i 'O'b ■ 9 c 1 ( f' * ( 0 « C. < C I < < < I / I , < C l < C » c 1 « l ( 1C. C f «. < « c c c i r < < < < 6 < C < < C \ ( < « ( V ( c C ( < < < < C C C t C.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Frye and Robert Burton
    215 18 Frye and Robert Burton Not previously published. From my point of view the greatest book ever written at Oxford is the Anatomy of Melancholy. (Bible, 132) I In responding to a question by David Cayley about the use of the word ―anatomy,‖ Frye reveals the very high estimate he has of Robert Burton‘s The Anatomy of Melancholy: The word anatomy in Shakespeare‘s day and a little later meant a dissection for a synthetic overview. One of my favorite books in English literature—there are times when it is actually my favorite—is Burton‘s Anatomy of Melancholy. Of course, there were four humors then, but for Burton there was only the one, melancholy. That was the source of all mental and physical diseases in the world. So he writes an enormous survey of human life. It ranks with Chaucer and Dickens, except the characters are books rather than people. It was both an analysis of the causes and cures and treatment of melancholy and a kind of synthetic overview of human nature before it gets melancholy. On a much smaller scale there was Lyly‘s Euphues: The Anatomy of Wit, which has given us the word euphuism, meaning that if you‘re too bright and don‘t know enough you can get into trouble. That use of the term anatomy was one that I thought exactly fitted what I was doing.‖ (Interviews, 936–7)1 The title Anatomy of Criticism is obviously indebted to Burton, but the title was assigned to the book late in the publication process.
    [Show full text]
  • HPS Part II Students This Year
    Contents THE DEPARTMENT Introduction................................................................................................................... 2 Staff and Affiliates........................................................................................................ 3 Visitors and Students..................................................................................................... 4 Comings and Goings ..................................................................................................... 5 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................ 6 Prizes, Projects and Honours......................................................................................... 7 Seminars and Special Lectures...................................................................................... 8 STUDENTS Student Statistics......................................................................................................... 10 Part II Dissertation Titles ............................................................................................ 11 Part II Primary Sources Essay Titles........................................................................... 12 MPhil Essay and Dissertation Titles ........................................................................... 14 PhD Theses.................................................................................................................. 17 Transferable Skills......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Polite Eighteenth Century, 1750–1806 A
    AMERICAN SCIENCE AND THE PURSUIT OF “USEFUL KNOWLEDGE” IN THE POLITE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY, 1750–1806 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Elizabeth E. Webster Christopher Hamlin, Director Graduate Program in History and Philosophy of Science Notre Dame, Indiana April 2010 © Copyright 2010 Elizabeth E. Webster AMERICAN SCIENCE AND THE PURSUIT OF “USEFUL KNOWLEDGE” IN THE POLITE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY, 1750–1806 Abstract by Elizabeth E. Webster In this thesis, I will examine the promotion of science, or “useful knowledge,” in the polite eighteenth century. Historians of England and America have identified the concept of “politeness” as a key component for understanding eighteenth-century culture. At the same time, the term “useful knowledge” is also acknowledged to be a central concept for understanding the development of the early American scientific community. My dissertation looks at how these two ideas, “useful knowledge” and “polite character,” informed each other. I explore the way Americans promoted “useful knowledge” in the formative years between 1775 and 1806 by drawing on and rejecting certain aspects of the ideal of politeness. Particularly, I explore the writings of three central figures in the early years of the American Philosophical Society, David Rittenhouse, Charles Willson Peale, and Benjamin Rush, to see how they variously used the language and ideals of politeness to argue for the promotion of useful knowledge in America. Then I turn to a New Englander, Thomas Green Fessenden, who identified and caricatured a certain type of man of science and satirized the late-eighteenth-century culture of useful knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Culture of Print in Antebellum Augusta, Georgia 1828-1860
    i Informing the South: On the Culture of Print in Antebellum Augusta, Georgia 1828-1860 By Jamene Brenton Stewart A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Library & Information Studies) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 05/22/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Christine Pawley, Professor Library & Information Studies Louise Robbins, Emeritus Professor, Library & Information Studies Greg Downey, Professor, Library & Information Studies/Journalism and Mass Communication Susan E. Lederer, Professor, Medical History & Bioethics Jonathan Daniel Wells, Professor, History, Temple University ii © Jamene Brenton Stewart 2012 All Rights Reserve i Dedication This dissertation is decided to my grandparents Thomas and Lenora Bartley-Stewart, my great-aunts Birdie Sartor and Sister Minnie. I stand proudly on your shoulders. ii Acknowledgements To Dr. Jessie J. Walker mi compañero, chief council, and friend, I thank you for your unyielding support in all of my endeavors. How apt that you are a Hawkeye and I a Badger. I thank my advisor Professor Christine Pawley, who has worked with me on this project since year one of my doctoral studies. This work would not have been possible without your guidance and expertise. Additionally sincere thanks to my dissertation committee, Professors Louise Robbins, Greg Downey, Susan Lederer and Jonathan D. Wells. I must thank the American Antiquarian Society, which has helped transform me into a print culture historian. I will be forever grateful of the financial support I received from the Society, Isaiah Thomas Scholarship and Stephen Botein Fellowship, but most importantly the opportunity the AAS provided for me to interact with fascinating documents and meet amazing scholars; a special thanks to Drs.
    [Show full text]