<<

Eosinophilia Panel by FISH Indications for Ordering Myeloid Malignancies Panel by Next Generation Sequencing 2011117 • Diagnose and classify myeloid and lymphoid • Assess for single , including substitutions with and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and insertions and deletions that may have diagnostic, and FGFR1 prognostic, and/or therapeutic significance • Provide prognostic and therapeutic information for these entities Disease Overview • Monitor therapeutic response Consensus Criteria Test Description • 2016 WHO classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia • Performed on bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood o Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with PDGFRA • Panel of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes rearrangement targeting specific rearrangements o Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with PDGFRB o FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion rearrangement o PDGFRB rearrangement o Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with FGFR1 o FGFR1 rearrangement rearrangement o Chronic eosinophilic -not otherwise specified Tests to Consider (CEL-NOS) Primary Test o Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with PCM1-JAK2 Eosinophilia Panel by FISH 2002378 (provisional entity) • Use for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of newly Incidence/Prevalence diagnosed myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with • The incidence and prevalence of hypereosinophilic eosinophilia syndromes has not been characterized; incidence rate Related Tests from 2001–2005 was ~0.036 per 100,000 individuals • with recurrent genetic abnormalities Analysis, Bone Marrow 2002292 comprise the minority of cases, with FIP1L1-PDGFRA • Use for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of fusion being the most common abnormality in this myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia subgroup (Shomali, 2019) • Assess rearrangement partners for FISH-positive cases with cytogenetically visible translocations Diagnostic Criteria Chromosome FISH, Interphase 2002298 See Table 1 • Test for individual probe ordering Genetics • Specific FISH probes must be indicated • Probes may include See Table 2 o PDGFRA o PDGFRB Test Interpretation o FGFR1 Analytic Sensitivity/Specificity: >95% o JAK2 o CBFB Results Myeloproliferative Disorders Panel by FISH 2002360 • Normal: no evidence of rearrangement • Detect specific recurrent genomic aberrations in • Abnormal: rearrangement detected suspected myeloproliferative neoplasms o Diagnostic of a clonal hematopoietic o BCR/ABL1 o PDGFRA and PDGFRB o PDGFRA ▪ Prognosis: improving with use of o PDGFRB inhibitors (TKIs) o FGFR1 ▪ Response to TKIs such as : yes

ARUP Laboratories is a nonprofit enterprise of the University of Utah and its Department of Pathology. 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 | (800) 522-2787 | (801) 583-2787 | www.aruplab.com | www.arupconsult.com © 2021 ARUP LABORATORIES | Content review July 2021 | Last update August 2021

o FGFR1-rearranged Reference ▪ Prognosis: poor ▪ Response to TKIs such as ponatinib and other small Shomali W, Gotlib J. World Health Organization-defined molecule inhibitors: under investigation eosinophilic disorders: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk Limitations stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. • FISH detects only rearrangements targeted by the probes 2019;94(10):1149-1167. • PDGFRB gene on 5q33 and FGFR1 gene on 8p11 have multiple rearrangement partners o Rearrangement partners are not identified by this test Table 1 WHO Classification Features Laboratory Myeloid and • Most frequently presents as CEL, but may • Morphology lymphoid present as AML, T-lymphoblastic o Peripheral blood and BM eosinophilia (markedly elevated) neoplasms with , or both o Typically <20% blasts in peripheral blood and BM PDGFRA o Acute transformation can follow CEL o Increased BM mast cells common rearrangement presentation • Genetics • Organ infiltration by o Typically due to FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion due to cytogenetically o Heart cryptic interstitial of CHIC2 in 4q12 o Lungs ▪ FISH or RT-PCR is necessary to document this genetic alteration; o Central nervous system cytogenetic studies are normal o • Splenomegaly in majority of patients • Pronounced male predominance (17:1), median age of onset late 40s Myeloid and • Presents with features of chronic • Morphology lymphoid myelomonocytic leukemia (usually with o Peripheral leukocytosis neoplasms with eosinophilia) o Hypercellular BM with typically <20% blasts PDGFRB • Splenomegaly in majority of patients o Increased BM mast cells common rearrangement • Male predominance (2:1), median age of • Genetics onset late 40s o Rearrangement involving 5q31-33 (PDGFRB) o Most common translocation- t(5;12)(q31-33;p13), resulting in ETV6-PDGFRB fusion ▪ Due to variant breakpoints in 5q31-q33, consider molecular confirmation by RT-PCR to confirm ETV6-PDGFRB fusion to guide imatinib therapy

Myeloid and • Often presents with peripheral • Morphology lymphoid eosinophilia in the context of o CEL (usually associated with peripheral blood or BM eosinophilia) neoplasms with lymphadenopathy and lymphoblastic AML, T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, or (least often) B- FGFR1 leukemia/lymphoma lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma or mixed-phenotype AL rearrangement • Slight male predominance (1.5:1), median • Genetics age of onset 32y o Rearrangement involving 8p11.2 (FGFR1) o Most common translocation- t(8;13)(p11.2;q12.1), resulting in ZMYM2-FGFR1 fusion

© 2021 ARUP LABORATORIES | Content review July 2021 | Last update August 2021

Table 2 Gene Structure/Function Mutations WHO Disease Association PDGFRA • Maps to 4q12 • FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement is a cytogenetically Myeloid and lymphoid • Cell-surface tyrosine kinase cryptic: 800 kb interstitial deletion (i.e., CHIC2 neoplasms with PDGFRA for members of the deletion) within 4q12 rearrangement platelet-derived growth factor • Other PDGFRA fusion have rarely been family identified such as t(1;4)(q44;q12) and • Results in a constitutively active t(4;10)(q12;p11.1-11.2) tyrosine kinase oncoprotein

PDGFRB • Maps to 5q32 • >30 fusion partners reported Myeloid and lymphoid • Cell surface tyrosine kinase • Most common rearrangement: t(5;12)(q32;p13) neoplasms with PDGFRB receptor for members of the resulting in ETV6-PDGFRB fusion rearrangement platelet-derived growth factor family • Results in a constitutively active tyrosine kinase oncoprotein FGFR1 • Maps to 8p11.2 • >10 fusion partners identified Myeloid and lymphoid • Cell surface tyrosine kinase • Most common rearrangement: t(8;13)(p11.2;q12.1) neoplasms with FGFR1 • Rearrangement results in resulting in ZMYM2-FGFR1 fusion rearrangement constitutive activation of FGFR1 with the fusion of the FGFR1 C- terminal catalytic domain with unrelated

© 2021 ARUP LABORATORIES | Content review July 2021 | Last update August 2021