DOCSLIB.ORG

Insects of Lodgepole Pine: Impacts and Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insects of Lodgepole Pine: Impacts and Control 73 . INSECTS OF LODGEPOLE PINE: IMPACTS AND CONTROL Gene D. Amman and • Les Safranylk >Lodgepole Pine jhe species and its management SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS LODGEPOLE PINE THE SPECIES AND ITS MANAGEMENT • SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS May 8-10, 1984 Spokane, Washington, USA and repeated May 14-16, 1984 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Compiled and Edited By: DAVID M. BAUMGARTNER, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA RICHARD G. KREBILL, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Missoula, Montana, USA JAMES T. ARNOTT, Pacific Forest Research Centre, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada GORDON F. WEETMAN, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada • Symposium Sponsors: Alberta Forest Service British Columbia Forest Service Canadian Forest Service Forest Research Council of British Columbia Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture University of British Columbia Washington State University PUBLISHED 1985 .. Additional copies may be purchased from: Office of Conferences and Institutes Cooperative Extension 202 Van Doren Hall Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-5220 • INSECTS OF LODGEPOLE PINE: IMPACTS AND CONTROL • Gene D. Amman and Les Safranyik harvest, meFchantability can be funher reduced by insects ABSTRACT that bore holes into the wood unless logs are processed promptly (fig. lB). Of approximately 240 species of insects that feed on lodgepole pine, 35 are considered pests or potential pests. 3. GrO'Wth reduction. -Insects that remove large amounts of Nine insect species cause serious damage in periodic, local foliage or those that partially girdle trees reduce growth and infestations and one species, the mountain pine beetle, causes productivity because a longer time is required for a tree to catastrophic losses in repeated outbreaks over most of its reach merchantable size (fig. lC). distributional range. Stand management offers the best 4. Direct killing. -Bark beetles cause large losses in productivity possibility for reducing losses. Seed and cone insects do not by killing merchantable trees and by reducing numbers of extensively affect seed production; nursery stock can be pro­ merchantable trees to the point that harvest of residual trees tected through cultural practices and pesticide treatments. cannot be accomplished profitably (fig. ID). Several insects affecting young stands cause reduced height growth and permanent crooks in stems. Defoliating insects, As the intensity of forest management changes, insect prob· such as the lodgepole needle miner and pine sawflies, usually lems will change also. This fact is already apparent; several in· infest trees of all ages and cause growth loss and some mor· sect species previously considered to be innocuous under natural tality during severe outbreaks. Bark beetles, especially the stand conditions have caused extensive damage when planting mountain pine beetle, pose the most serious threat to and thinning were attempted . lodgepole pine management. Insect species have been divided into groups that affect the different stages in the life of lodgepole pine trees. Only some • of the more imponant species have been included. Nursery pests INTRODUCTION are not treated. These usually are general feeders and are covered in publications such as Sutherland and Van Erden Lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta Douglas, like most trees, pro­ ( 1980). The greatest effort has been placed on the mountain vides habitat for a variety of insect species throughout its pine beetle because of interest generated by severe, almost con· development. These range from moth larvae that feed on seed tinuous losses of lodgepole pine during the past 25 years. For and cones to bark beetles that cause widespread mortality of more detailed descriptions and life histories and for broader mature trees. coverage of insect species affecting lodgepole pine, you are re· Although we know which insect species most commonly af· ferred to Furniss and Carolin (1977) and Evans (1982). Recom· fect different stages of stand development, we lack fundamen· mendations for control of insects by chemical insecticides are tal knowledge of the significance most insect damage will have avoided purposely. Recommendations for use of pesticides on final harvest. The life table approach for forest stands change; some are no longer in effect, whereas improved (Waters, 1969) could be used for an integrated analysis of forest materials and methods are being developed. I stand productivity and an assessment of important agents af. fecting productivity, including insects . INSECTS OF REPRODUCTIVE STRUCTURES • Although animal and weather factors may destroy a large pro· Generally, insects affect productivity in four ways, as il· ponion oflodgepole pine reproductive structures some years, lustrated by the following examples: these losses have a negligible silvicultural effect (Tackle, 1961 ). •• I. Understacking.- Even though large amounts of seed are pro­ Studies of red pine cones suggest destruction of developing duced and large numbers of seedlings emerge, insects that cones by insects may actually enhance flower primordia pro­ destroy seed and seedlings can reduce productivity; losses duction and, consequently, the abundance of future feeding and during early stages of stand development can result in an breeding sites for cone insects (Mattson, 1978). understocked stand at the time of tree harvest. (fig. lA). 1Insecticides used for direct control or preventive sprays are reviewed con· 2. Reduction in merchantability. -Insects that kill terminal tinually by the Environmental Protection Agency. Therefore, persons con· • leaders can cause deformed or multistemmed trees that yield templating use_ of insecticides should ensure that the materials are currently less merchantable wood at time of tree harvest. Following registered for use. - 108 Gene D. Amman and Les Safranyik UNDERSTOCKING MERCHANTABILITY REDUCTION • HARVEST HARVEST / / / / / / / / / / > MORTALITY / / I !:: > ~ 8 I // a: ... / / v TIME A TIME B GROWTH REDUCnON DIRECT KILLING HARVEST HARVEST • / / >..... >..... I/ > > / ~ Q~ Q 8a: a: ... 0.. TIME-------- c TIME D Figure I.-A. Effect of stand understacking on productivity. B. Effect of reduction in tree merchantability on productivity. C. Effect of tree growth reduction on productivity. D. Effect of merchantable tree mortality on productivity. The closed-cone habit of lodgepole pine is at least partially and perhaps the reason damage has been considered low (Keen, responsible for the negligible effect of losses. In stands of 1958) is that few studies of only short duration have been con­ lodgepole pine where the dosed-cone habit prevails, millions ducted. A study of lodgepole pine cones in 1971 found only of viable seed may be stored per hectare for many years (Lotan 2 percent infested by insects (Parker, 1972). Larvae of the moths and Jensen, 1970). Following fire or cuning, this seed then is (Lepidoptera) are the most common insects infesting lodgepole available for seeding the area. In stands where the closed-cone pine reproductive structures. habit is limited, however, seed losses to insects could have a Lodgepole pine cone borer, Eucosma rescissoriana Heinrich • significant effect on attempts to generate some stands. In addi· (Lepidoptera: Olethreutida'!), larvae tunnel in second-year cones tion, some of these insects could become major factors when and feed on the scales and seeds, consuming the softer parts superior tree and seed selection programs for lodgepole pine of cones, leaving the woody veins and paper-thin layers at the are initiated. surface of the cone scales. Larval mines are packed with fme­ Since the Lodgepole Pine Symposium in 1973, a number of grained dark brown frass pellets. Damaged scales may fail to additional species have been reported feeding on the repro­ open at cone maturity, trapping sound seed within the cones ductive structure of lodgepole pine (Furniss and Carotin, 1977), (Hedlin 1981 ). The proportion of damaged cones is • et al., Gene D. Amman and Les Safranyik 109 • usually low, but is found to increase with spacing in western budworms (Stark and Borden, 1965). Cones are often com­ white pine plantations in Idaho. (Ollieu and Schenk, 1966 ). pletely excavated. The adults, which have tan forewings with rust-red mark· When the budworm larvae hatch in late summer, they may ings, emerge and lay eggs on cone scales. Larvae hatch from feed on the needles, and defoliation is the most conspicuous the eggs in about a wee~ and tunnel between cone scales into indicator of the insects' presence. But, if male and female flowers the seed, where they feed on seeds and scale tissue. The dirty and cones are present, those may be preferred feeding sites. Ex­ white larvae may damage more than one cone in completing ternal frass and webbing are signs of infestation. Flowers may development (Hedlin eta/., 1981). They drop to the forest floor be completely consumed and holes bored into the developing to spin cocoons and pupate in September and October. There cones (Hedlin eta!., 1981). the pupae overwinter and development is completed in the spring. Adults emerge in mid-to-late summer and lay eggs that are flattened and overlapping in long masses on the needles. When Laspeyresia toreuta (Grote), one of the seedworms the larvae hatch in late summer, they molt once, without (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), is associated with seed, upon which feeding, and overwinter in small webbed tents called hiber­ the larvae
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • And Pityogenes Knechteli (Swaine) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Lodgepole Pine
    " "SEMIOCHEMICAL-BASED COMMUNICATION IN INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN IPS PINI (SAY) AND PITYOGENES KNECHTELI (SWAINE) (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) IN LODGEPOLE PINE . THERESE M. POLAND and JOHN H. BORDEN Centre forPest Management,Department of Biological Sciences, SimonFraser University, Bumaby, l BritishColumbia,Canada V5A 1S6 ,_._, _ ::._.., _.,.... Abstract The Canadian Entomologist 126:269-276 (1994) .,:.... _ , . , a The pine engraver, Ips pini Say, and Pityogenes knechteli Swaine often co-exist in " , lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelmann. We tested the hypotheses that ,.. " P. knechteli produces an attractive pheromone and that the attraction of P. knechteli and _%_'.. • I. pini to conspecifics is inhibited by the presence of the other species. Pityogenes ._:,: knechteli males and females were attracted to bolts infested with conspecific males and •. , , to bolts infested with I. pini males; however, there was no significant cross-attraction of ...... •: _ - I. pini males or females to bolts infested with P. knechteli males. Attraction ofP. knechteli " :;• _ ..... ,and I. pini males and females to bolts infested with conspecific males was not inhibited • ,. ._ in the presence of bolts infested with males of the other bark beetle species. Pityogenes .... knechteli has no potential for compe.titive displacement of I. pini but may enhance the adverse effectof I. pini on.the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins. ; Poland, T.M., et J.H. Borden. 1994. Communication s6mio-chimique lors des interactions _e.. ., intersp6cifiquesentreIpspini (Say)et Pityogenesknechteli (Swaine) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) " " chez le Pin de Murray.The Canadian Entomologist 126:269-276 ? R_sum_ • _ ' Les scolytes Ips pini Say et Pityogenes knechteli Swaine cohabitent souvent dans des ' '_7:.':_ ......:'_:_::'_ Pins de Murray Pinus contorta var.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonality and Lure Preference of Bark Beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Associates in a Northern Arizona Ponderosa Pine Forest
    COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY Seasonality and Lure Preference of Bark Beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Associates in a Northern Arizona Ponderosa Pine Forest 1,2 1 3 1 M. L. GAYLORD, T. E. KOLB, K. F. WALLIN, AND M. R. WAGNER Environ. Entomol. 35(1): 37Ð47 (2006) ABSTRACT Ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona have historically experienced limited bark beetle-caused tree mortality, and little is known about the bark beetle community in these forests. Our objectives were to describe the ßight seasonality and lure preference of bark beetles and their associates in these forests. We monitored bark beetle populations for 24 consecutive months in 2002 and 2003 using Lindgren funnel traps with Þve different pheromone lures. In both years, the majority of bark beetles were trapped between May and October, and the peak captures of coleopteran predator species, Enoclerus (F.) (Cleridae) and Temnochila chlorodia (Mannerheim), occurred between June and August. Trap catches of Elacatis (Coleoptera: Othniidae, now Salpingidae), a suspected predator, peaked early in the spring. For wood borers, trap catches of the Buprestidae family peaked in late May/early June, and catches of the Cerambycidae family peaked in July/August. The lure targeted for Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte attracted the largest percentage of all Dendroc- tonus beetles except for D. valens LeConte, which was attracted in highest percentage to the lure targeted for D. valens. The lure targeted for Ips pini attracted the highest percentage of beetles for all three Ips species [I.pini (Say), I. latidens (LeConte), and I. lecontei Swaine] and the two predators, Enoclerus and T. chlorodia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Shoot Insects Common in British Columbia
    Environment Environnement 1+ Canada Canada Pine Shoot Insects Canadian Service Forestry canadien des Common in Serv~e forits British Columbia David Evans Pacific Forest Research Centre Victoria, British Columbia BC-X-233 PACIFIC FOREST RESEARCH CENTRE The Pacific Forest Research Centre (PFRC) is one of six regional research estab­ lishments of the Canadian Forestry Service of Environment Canada. The centre conducts a program of work directed toward the solution of major forestry problems and the development of more effective forest management techniques for use in British Columbia and the Yukon. The 30 research projects and over 150 studies which make up the research pro­ gram of PFRC are divided into three areas known as Forest Protection, Forest Environment and Forest Resources. These are supported by an Economics, Information and Administrative section and a number of specialized research support services such as analytical chemistry, computing microtechnique and remote sensing. Current research projecu, which focus on the establishment, growth and protection of the foresu, include: forest pathology problems, researd1 0f1 seed and cone insecU and disease, biological control of forest pesU, pest damage monitoring and assessment, seed and tree improvement, regenera­ tion and stand management. ISSN.()705·3274 Pine Shoot Insects Common in British Columbia David Evans Pacific Forest Research Centre 506 Wen Burnside Road. Victoria, British Columbia vaz 1M5 BC·X·233 1982 2 ABSTRACT RESUME This publication is an aid to the identification Ce document aidera a identifier les insectes of pine shoot insects on pines native to British Co­ des pousses du Pin sur les pins indigenes du Colombie­ lumbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae
    A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCULIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 1997 Major Subject; Entomology A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCVLIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATYPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis by TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to Texas AgcM University in partial fulltllment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved as to style and content by: Horace R. Burke (Chair of Committee) James B. Woolley ay, Frisbie (Member) (Head of Department) Gilbert L. Schroeter (Member) August 1997 Major Subject: Entomology A Faunal Survey and Zoogeographic Analysis of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) of the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. (August 1997) Tami Anne Carlow. B.S. , Cornell University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Horace R. Burke An annotated list of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptem) (excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) is presented for the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) of Texas. The list includes species that occur in Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Wigacy counties. Each of the 23S species in 97 genera is tteated according to its geographical range. Lower Rio Grande distribution, seasonal activity, plant associations, and biology. The taxonomic atTangement follows O' Brien &, Wibmer (I og2). A table of the species occuning in patxicular areas of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, such as the Boca Chica Beach area, the Sabal Palm Grove Sanctuary, Bentsen-Rio Grande State Park, and the Falcon Dam area is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) I
    Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) I A review of the suborder, the Western Palaearctic taxa of Xyeloidea and Pamphilioidea Edited by Matti Viitasaari Tremex Press Ltd., Helsinki Tremex Press I hl., /!/>'. 55, 00661 Helsinki, Finland Fax: i J5.S1'9-34650090 F.niail: [email protected] Weh site: www.kolumbus.fi/tremex © 2002 Tremex Press Ltd. All rights resemed, No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a re- trieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, without the permission in writing of the Copyright owner. ISBN 952-5274-01-2 Key words: bisecta, Hymenoptera, Symphyta, Xyelidae, Pamphiliidae, Megalodontesidae. Published 15 March 2002 Printed and bound in Jyväskylä, Finland by Gummerus Printing Front cover photograph: larvae of Craesus septentrionalis (Linnaeus) on Common Alder. Nature Photo Agency, Finland, Hannu Huovila. Contents Introduction 5 Outlines of the present study 5 Acknowledgements 8 The contributors 10 M. Viitasaari: The suborder Symphyta of the Hymenoptera 12 A cavalcade of landmarks in taxonomic research 12 Notes on faunistic record in Northern Europe 27 Monophyly and relationships of the Symphyta 30 Life history 34 Adult stage 34 Egg stage 39 Larval stage 40 Prepupal stage 41 Pupal stage 43 Voltinism and diapause strategies 44 Larval habits 45 Host spectrum 45 External feeders 47 Internal feeders 51 Gall-inducing sawflies 51 Early-season and late-season feeders 53 Reproduction, speciation and variation 54 Modes of reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromone-Based Disruption of Eucosma Sonomana and Rhyacionia Zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Using Aerially Applied Microencapsulated Pheromone1
    361 Pheromone-based disruption of Eucosma sonomana and Rhyacionia zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using aerially applied microencapsulated pheromone1 Nancy E. Gillette, John D. Stein, Donald R. Owen, Jeffrey N. Webster, and Sylvia R. Mori Abstract: Two aerial applications of microencapsulated pheromone were conducted on five 20.2 ha plots to disrupt western pine shoot borer (Eucosma sonomana Kearfott) and ponderosa pine tip moth (Rhyacionia zozana (Kearfott); Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) orientation to pheromones and oviposition in ponderosa pine plantations in 2002 and 2004. The first application was made at 29.6 g active ingredient (AI)/ha, and the second at 59.3 g AI/ha. Baited sentinel traps were used to assess disruption of orientation by both moth species toward pheromones, and E. sonomana infes- tation levels were tallied from 2001 to 2004. Treatments disrupted orientation by both species for several weeks, with the first lasting 35 days and the second for 75 days. Both applications reduced infestation by E. sonomana,but the lower application rate provided greater absolute reduction, perhaps because prior infestation levels were higher in 2002 than in 2004. Infestations in treated plots were reduced by two-thirds in both years, suggesting that while increas- ing the application rate may prolong disruption, it may not provide greater proportional efficacy in terms of tree pro- tection. The incidence of infestations even in plots with complete disruption suggests that treatments missed some early emerging females or that mated females immigrated into treated plots; thus operational testing should be timed earlier in the season and should comprise much larger plots. In both years, moths emerged earlier than reported pre- viously, indicating that disruption programs should account for warmer climates in timing of applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect Conditions in the United States 1966
    FOREST INSECT CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1966 FOREST SERVICE ' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Foreword This report is the 18th annual account of the scope, severity, and trend of the more important forest insect infestations in the United States, and of the programs undertaken to check resulting damage and loss. It is compiled primarily for managers of public and private forest lands, but has become useful to students and others interested in outbreak trends and in the location and extent of pest populations. The report also makes possible n greater awareness of the insect prob­ lem and of losses to the timber resource. The opening section highlights the more important conditions Nationwide, and each section that pertains to a forest region is prefaced by its own brief summary. Under the Federal Forest Pest Control Act, a sharing by Federal and State Governments the costs of surveys and control is resulting in a stronger program of forest insect and disease detection and evaluation surveys on non-Federal lands. As more States avail themselves of this financial assistance from the Federal Government, damage and loss from forest insects will become less. The screening and testing of nonpersistent pesticides for use in suppressing forest defoliators continued in 1966. The carbamate insecticide Zectran in a pilot study of its effectiveness against the spruce budworm in Montana and Idaho appeared both successful and safe. More extensive 'tests are planned for 1967. Since only the smallest of the spray droplets reach the target, plans call for reducing the spray to a fine mist. The course of the fine spray, resulting from diffusion and atmospheric currents, will be tracked by lidar, a radar-laser combination.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinus Contorta Dougl
    Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2008)32 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 05-Dec-2008 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2008)32 THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Cancels & replaces the same document of 04 December 2008 Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 44 CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON THE BIOLOGY OF LODGEPOLE PINE (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud.) English - Or. English JT03257048 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ENV/JM/MONO(2008)32 Also published in the Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology: No. 1, Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology: Survey Results (1995) No. 2, Analysis of Information Elements Used in the Assessment of Certain Products of Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 3, Report of the OECD Workshop on the Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 4, Industrial Products of Modern Biotechnology Intended for Release to the Environment: The Proceedings of the Fribourg Workshop (1996) No. 5, Consensus Document on General Information concerning the Biosafety of Crop Plants Made Virus Resistant through Coat Protein Gene-Mediated Protection (1996) No. 6, Consensus Document on Information Used in the Assessment of Environmental Applications Involving Pseudomonas (1997) No. 7, Consensus Document on the Biology of Brassica napus L. (Oilseed Rape) (1997) No. 8, Consensus Document on the Biology of Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum (Potato) (1997) No. 9, Consensus Document on the Biology of Triticum aestivum (Bread Wheat) (1999) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]