Reclaimlng NATIONAL IDENTITY in the Hawallan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reclaimlng NATIONAL IDENTITY in the Hawallan UNIVERSITY OF HAWNJ LIBRARY FROM RESISTANCE TO AFFIRMATION, WE ARE WHO WE WERE: RECLAIMlNG NATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE HAWAllAN SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT 1990 - 2003 A DISSERTATION SUBMITIED TO THE GRADUATE DMSION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTlAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSPHY IN ANTHROPOLOGY MAY 2003 By Lynette Hi'ilani Cruz Dissertation Committee: Bion Griffin, Chairperson Robert Borofsky Alice Dewey Leslie Sponsel James Dator Abstract Inmost texts about Hawaiian history, the Hawaiian Kingdom was overthrown in 1893. Hawai'i, as a result, was then governed first by a Provisional Government, then by the Republic ofHawai'i. Such texts further note that in 1898, Hawai'i was annexed to the United States and, subsequently, became the State ofHawai'i through a vote ofthe people in 1959. This dissertation examines Hawaiian history from a different perspective, one based on the issue of'legality', and on documentation that surfaced in the 1990s that challenges the United States' claim to annexation ofHawai'i. The illegality ofthe takeover by haole businessmen, the resistance ofQueen Lili'uokalani and her loyal subjects to the takeover, statements by then-President Grover Cleveland referencing the overthrow as an "Act ofWar," in many ways set the tone for the present-day sovereignty movement. Highlighted are some ofthe activities within the Hawaiian sovereignty movement during the 1990s and the first few years ofthis century that are turning points in the struggle for Hawaiian sovereignty. Identified spokespersons for the movement are extensively cited, as well as individuals with strong but thoughtful opinions. Many ofthe citations used were gathered and saved from emails or from relevant websites. iii Prophecy, and the acknowledgement ofspirituality as a grounding force in a unified movement, is a significant element, and serves to remind activists, and especially Hawaiian activists, that the work to re-establish the nation can only succeed ifit is based in Hawaiian cultural concepts that are pono (correct or in proper relationship). Maintaining 'right relationships' between the people, the heavens and the earth is necessary to successfully carry forward the reclaimed Hawaiian nation and the identity ofthe people as Hawaiian nationals, as the Queen directed a century ago. Most importantly, it allows those involved in the struggle to see themselves, not as victims, but as masters oftheir own fate. IV Table OfContents Abstract .iii Preface '" vii Chapter I: Introduction l Beginning with the Queen 1 Chapters.. ............................•................................... .. 14 Chapter II: Theory and Methodology 19 A Hawaiian Perspective 39 Researching Online - Contemporary Research Methods 45 Chapter Ill: Hawaiian Sovereignty - An Introduction and Overview..... 48 What is Sovereignty? 48 Why Sovereignty?......................................................... 50 Political Sovereignty... 55 Chapter IV: Some Key Players inthe Sovereignty Movement 58 Kekuni Blaisdell............... 58 Mililani Trask............................................................... 65 Pu'uhonua Bumpy Kanahele 70 Poka Laenui (aka Hayden Burgess) 76 Chapter V: Expressions ofCultural Sovereignty...... 84 OfSacred Times and Sacred Places 84 Ka Lei Maile Ali'i: The Queen's Women 88 Allies 90 Kupa·a 91 Japanese American Citizens League 93 American Friends Service Committee - A Quaker-based Organization 96 Ahupua'a Action Alliance 99 Kanakamaoliallies Discussion List 107 Chapter VI: Contention Within the Sovereignty Movement: Federal Recognition vs. Independence .112 Understanding Hawaiian History 116 Significant Actions in the Movement 124 Perfect Title Company 124 The Issue of'Ceded Lands' 138 OHA & Aluli, et al v. State ofHawai'i and HFDC 142 The John Marsh Case: Marsh v. Commissioner ofInternal Revenue Service 149 Chapter VII: Symbols and Modes ofResistance 155 Flags 155 T-shirts, Banners, Signs 164 Culture as Resistance 165 ChapterVill: 1998-2003 168 The Hawaiian Kingdom in the International Arena ".. 172 The Living Nation Working Group 179 v Chapter IX: Thoughts about Significance and Assessment 186 Rediscovery and Recovery '" ., 189 Mourning and Dreaming......................................... 192 Chapter X: Inside Out I Outside In 198 A Prophecy 198 Appendix A: An Afterword 214 Appendix B: Chronology ofSignificant Events in the Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement 1990 - 2003 " 224 Bibliography .,226 vi Preface One hundred and ten years ago, in 1893, Hawaiians found themselves at a political, economic and cultural crossroads, not the first time in the history ofthis independent nation. A gang ofthieves, white men masquerading as clever businessmen and honorable Christians, many ofthem descendants of missionaries, attempted to steal the Kingdom. Queen Lili'uokalani, herselfan astute and well-educated woman, knew that a time ofturmoil was coming for the little Kingdom in the Pacific. She gathered around her those who held the nation close to their hearts, and mounted a campaign ofresistance, in defiance ofthe military might ofthe United States. Standing onher second floor balcony at 'Iolani Palace, she could see, from the short distance to Honolulu Harbor, the American warship Boston, with its guns pointed at her, as embodying the nation. With that very real threat before her, she made a decision on behalfofher people to steer the course ofhistory to provide for Hawaiians ofthe future an opportunity to regain what would be taken-a country, a language, a memory ofnationhood, the freedom to be and to remain Hawaiian subjects through a process ofnatural political evolution. The Queen left evidence ofher handiwork here and there-stories, songs, newspaper articles, directions for gathering petition signatures in protest of annexation, hosting oftea parties in Washington, D.C. to win allies for the vii Kingdom, letters, photos-and today Hawaiians are busily collecting the bits and pieces left that tell oftheir own history, and what went down in 1893 at the so­ called overthrow ofthe Hawaiian Kingdom. Today there is a large and dynamic movement fur Hawaiian sovereignty, much ofit the direct result ofHawaiians learning about their history, and taking up the banner ofthe Queen, who continues to live in the minds and hearts ofHawaiian patriots. The thrust toward acquiring historic data, learning genealogy and Hawaiian language, reconnecting to the spiritual mana in nature, and practicing culture as passed down through the generations came about because ofthe realization that the indices that describe Hawaiians today-most inprison, most on welfare, highest morbidity rate, worst health, least educated, most economically depressed--stem from injuries ofa century ago, injuries compounded and perpetuated by occupation ofthe Hawaiian homeland by a foreign nation that has continued until this day. The resistance movement has steadily gained ground since 1893, and especially in the period from 1993 to the present, because Hawaiian activists are no longer reflecting on themselves as simply victims, as being the cause oftheir own disability. Rather they are seeing themselves as evidence ofinjury. As Skippy Ioane, noted composer and musician ofHawaiian resistance music writes, "we are the evidence, not the crime." viii The movement grows stronger daily as more Hawaiians come to understand their history, reconnect to ancestors and spirituality, and as a result, express their mana through loving and nurturing their physical enviromnent. Using Hawaiian cultural concepts, especiallyaloha (love and respect) and lculeana (responsibility), as guides for behavior, Hawaiians in struggle daily commit themselves to efforts toward recovery. Learning about and practicing legal strategies laid out in Hawaiian Kingdom law has empowered the ordinary Hawaiian to resist and to challenge the state of Hawai'i and the United States, despite the personal and financial costs. Hawaiians oftoday, who have recovered a legal and accurate Hawaiian history, know that their cost cannever be more than what the Queen paid. It might be fair to say that the "reason" for the sovereignty movement today is to reconnect to what is above and what is below-to allow the mana to flow from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven, through the people who are in right relationship to both heaven and earth. When the connection is re-established, when balance is re-created, energy will flow and the earth will be cared for, all ancestors will be acknowledged and the Hawaiian people will thrive. The movement for Hawaiian sovereignty is more thanjust to create a political entity. The movement is to create some semblance ofbalance in the world in a way that would bring honor to the Queen and perpetuate her legacy. ix FROM RESISTANCE TO AFFIRMATION, WE ARE WHO WE WERE: RECLAIMING NATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE HAWAIIAN SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT 1990-2003 CHAPTER I Introduction Beginning with the Queen "Oh, honest Americans, as Christians hear mefor my downtrodden people! Their form of government is as dear to them as yours is as precious to you. Quite warmly as you love your country, so they love theirs. With all your goodly possessions. covering a territory so Immense that there yet remain parts unexplored, possessing islands that. although new at hand, had to be neutral ground in time ofwar, do not covet the little vineyard ofNaboth's. so far from your shores, lest the punishment ofAhabfall upon you. ifnot in your day. in that ofyour children, for "be not deceived, God is not moclced " The people to
Recommended publications
  • Hawaiian Historical Society
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII LIBRARY PAPERS OF THE HAWAIIAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY NUMBER 17 PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SOCIETY SEPTEMBER 30, 1930 PAPERS OF THE HAWAIIAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY NUMBER 17 PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SOCIETY , SEPTEMBER 30, 1930 Printed by The Printshop Co., Ltd. 1930 CONTENTS Page Proceedings of the Hawaiian Historical Society Meeting, September 30, 1930 _.. 5 Historical Notes- 7 By Albert Pierce Taylor, Secretary Reminiscences of the Court of Kamehameha IV and Queen Emma 17 By Col. Curtis Piehu Iaukea former Chamberlain to King Kalakaua The Adoption of the Hawaiian Alphabet 28 By Col. Thomas Marshall Spaulding, U.S.A. The Burial Caves- of Pahukaina 34 By Emma Ahuena Davis on Taylor Annexation Scheme of 1854 That Failed: Chapter Eighteen —Life of Admiral Theodoras Bailey, U.S.N ,.. 39 By Francis R. Stoddard «f (Read by Albert Pierce Taylor) - • . • Kauai Archeology 53 By Wendell C. Bennett Read before Kauai Historical Society, May 20, 1929 Burial of King Keawe '.. 63 By John P. G. Stokes PROCEEDINGS OF THE HAWAIIAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY MEETING SEPTEMBER 30, 1930 Meeting of the Society was called for this date, at 7:30 P. M., in the Library of Hawaii, to hear several Papers which were prepared by members on varied historical phases relating to the Hawaiian Islands. Bishop H. B. Restarick, president, in the chair; A. P. Taylor, secretary and several of the trustees, more members than usual in attendance, and many visitors present, the assembly room being filled to capacity. Bishop Restarick announced that the names of Harold W. Bradley, of Pomona, Calif., engaged in historical research in Honolulu until recently, and Bishop S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Attorney General Legal Opinion 95-03
    Hawaii Attorney General Legal Opinion 95-03 July 17, 1995 The Honorable Benjamin J. Cayetano Governor of Hawaii Executive Chambers Hawaii State Capitol Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Dear Governor Cayetano: Re: Authority to Alienate Public Trust Lands This responds to your request for our opinion as to whether the State has the legal authority to sell or dispose of ceded lands. For the reasons that follow, we are of the opinion that the State may sell or dispose of ceded lands. We note that any proceeds of the sale or disposition must be returned to the trust and held by the State for use for one or more of the five purposes set forth in § 5(f) of the Admission Act, Pub. L. No. 86-3, 73 Stat. 4 (1959)(the "Admission Act"). In Part I of this opinion, we determine that under the Admission Act and the Constitution the State is authorized to sell ceded lands. In Part II, we conclude that the 1978 amendments to the State Constitution do not alter the State's authority. I. The Admission Act Authorizes the Sale or Disposition of Public Trust Land. The term "ceded land" as used in this opinion is synonymous with the phrase "public land and other public property" as defined in § 5(g) of the Admission Act: [T]he term "public lands and other public property" means, and is limited to, the lands and properties that were ceded to the United States by the Republic of Hawaii under the joint resolution of annexation approved July 7, 1898 (30 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • G:\OSG\Desktop
    No. 07-1372 In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF HAWAII, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF HAWAII BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONERS GREGORY G. GARRE Solicitor General Counsel of Record RONALD J. TENPAS Assistant Attorney General DARYL JOSEFFER EDWIN S. KNEEDLER Deputy Solicitors General WILLIAM M. JAY Assistant to the Solicitor General DAVID C. SHILTON JOHN EMAD ARBAB DAVID L. BERNHARDT Attorneys Solicitor Department of Justice Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Washington, D.C. 20240 (202) 514-2217 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the resolution adopted by Congress to ac- knowledge the United States’ role in the 1893 overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii strips the State of Hawaii of its present-day authority to sell, exchange, or transfer 1.2 million acres of land held in a federally created land trust unless and until the State reaches a political settle- ment with native Hawaiians about the status of that land. (I) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of the United States............................ 1 Statement............................................ 2 Summary of argument................................. 8 Argument: Congress’s apology left untouched the governing federal law, which precludes any injunction against sale of trust lands based on putative unrelinquished claims to those lands .............................. 11 I. The United States acquired absolute title at annexation and authorized Hawaii to sell or transfer lands as trustee, consistent with the trust requirements............................ 11 A. In annexing Hawaii, the United States acquired absolute title to the ceded lands..... 12 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from Ch. 2 on the Public Land Trust from Native Hawaiian
    Public Land Trust Excerpt from Ch. 2, "Public Land Trust" by Melody Kapilialoha MacKenzie, in Native Hawaiian Law: A Treatise (2015), a collaborative project of the Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation, Ka Huli Ao Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law at the William S. Richardson School of Law, and Kamehameha Publishing. Copyright © 2015 by the Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation & Ka Huli Ao Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law. All rights reserved. I. INTRODUCTION In 1898, based on a Joint Resolution of Annexation (Joint Resolution) enacted by the U.S. Congress, the Republic of Hawai‘i transferred approximately 1.8 million acres2 of Hawaiian Government and Crown Lands to the United States.3 Kamehameha III had set aside the Government Lands in the 1848 Māhele for the benefit of the chiefs and people. The Crown Lands, reserved to the sovereign, provided a source of income and support for the crown and, in turn, were a resource for the Hawaiian people.4 Although the fee-simple ownership system instituted by the Māhele and the laws that followed drastically changed Hawaiian land tenure, the Government and Crown Lands were held for the benefit of all the Hawaiian people. They marked a continuation of the trust concept that the sovereign held the lands on behalf of the gods and for the benefit of all.5 In the Joint Resolution, the United States implicitly recognized the trust nature of the Government and Crown Lands. Nevertheless, large tracts of these lands were set aside by the federal government for military purposes during the territorial period and continue under federal control today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Ceded Lands and the State's Claim
    OFFICE of HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS KA WAI OLA NEWSPAPER 711 Kapi‘olani Blvd., Ste. 500 • Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813-5249 'Apelila 2009 • Vol. 26, No. 4 www.oha.org/kwo/2009/04 Powered by Search Ka Wai Ola The myth of ceded lands and the state's Search Search Web claim to perfect title FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO KA WAI OLA KA WAI OLA WEB EDITIONS KA WAI OLA LOA WEB EDITIONS By Keanu Sai 'Apelila 2009: In the recent ceded lands hearing at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 25, Attorney General Mark Bennett repeatedly asserted that the State of Hawai'i has perfect title to more than 1 million acres of land that were transferred to the United States government upon annexation in 1898 and then transferred to the State of Hawai'i in 1959. This is an incorrect statement. This falsehood, however, is not based on arguments for or against the highly charged Hawaiian sovereignty movement; rather, it is a simple question to answer since ownership of land is not a matter of rhetoric but dependent on a sequence of deeds in a chain of title between the party granting title and the party receiving title. In fact, the term "perfect title" in real-estate terms means "a title that is free of liens and legal questions as to ownership of the property. A requirement for the sale of real estate." Download a complete What determines a perfect title is a chain of title that doesn't PDF version of this edition have a missing link.
    [Show full text]
  • America Practices Its Imperial Power
    Name: Date: Period: . Directions: Read the history of Hawaii’s annexation and the Queen’s letter to President McKinley before answering the critical thinking questions. America practices its Imperial Power Hawaii was first occupied by both the British and the French before signing a friendship treaty with the United States in 1849 that would protect the islands from European Imperialism. Throughout the 1800s many missionaries and businessmen travel to Hawaii. Protestant missionaries wished to convert the religion of locals and the businessmen are interested in establishing money making sugar plantations. Hawaii was a useful resource to the United States not only because of its rich land, but because of its location as well. The islands are located in a spot that U.S. leaders thought was ideal for a naval port. This base, Pearl Harbor, would give America presence in the Pacific Ocean and create a refueling port for ships in the middle of the ocean. When Queen Liliuokalani took the thrown in 1891 she wanted to limit the power that American business have in Hawaii. America also changed the trading laws, making it extremely expensive for the Hawaiian plantations to export their sugar product back to the mainland. In 1893 these plantation owners, led by Samuel Dole and with the support of the United States Marines revolt against the Queen and forced her into surrendering the thrown. With American businessmen in control, they set up their own government appointing Samuel Dole as governor. With plantation owners in control, it was in their best interest for their business trade to become a part of the United States and they requested to be annexed.
    [Show full text]
  • 1856 1877 1881 1888 1894 1900 1918 1932 Box 1-1 JOHANN FRIEDRICH HACKFELD
    M-307 JOHANNFRIEDRICH HACKFELD (1856- 1932) 1856 Bornin Germany; educated there and served in German Anny. 1877 Came to Hawaii, worked in uncle's business, H. Hackfeld & Company. 1881 Became partnerin company, alongwith Paul Isenberg andH. F. Glade. 1888 Visited in Germany; marriedJulia Berkenbusch; returnedto Hawaii. 1894 H.F. Glade leftcompany; J. F. Hackfeld and Paul Isenberg became sole ownersofH. Hackfeld& Company. 1900 Moved to Germany tolive due to Mrs. Hackfeld's health. Thereafter divided his time betweenGermany and Hawaii. After 1914, he visited Honolulu only threeor fourtimes. 1918 Assets and properties ofH. Hackfeld & Company seized by U.S. Governmentunder Alien PropertyAct. Varioussuits brought againstU. S. Governmentfor restitution. 1932 August 27, J. F. Hackfeld died, Bremen, Germany. Box 1-1 United States AttorneyGeneral Opinion No. 67, February 17, 1941. Executors ofJ. F. Hackfeld'sestate brought suit against the U. S. Governmentfor larger payment than was originallyallowed in restitution forHawaiian sugar properties expropriated in 1918 by Alien Property Act authority. This document is the opinion of Circuit Judge Swan in The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals forthe Second Circuit, February 17, 1941. M-244 HAEHAW All (BARK) Box 1-1 Shipping articleson a whaling cruise, 1864 - 1865 Hawaiian shipping articles forBark Hae Hawaii, JohnHeppingstone, master, on a whaling cruise, December 19, 1864, until :the fall of 1865". M-305 HAIKUFRUIT AND PACKlNGCOMP ANY 1903 Haiku Fruitand Packing Company incorporated. 1904 Canneryand can making plant installed; initial pack was 1,400 cases. 1911 Bought out Pukalani Dairy and Pineapple Co (founded1907 at Pauwela) 1912 Hawaiian Pineapple Company bought controlof Haiku F & P Company 1918 Controlof Haiku F & P Company bought fromHawaiian Pineapple Company by hui of Maui men, headed by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Hawaiian Sovereignty Studies 46-255 Kahuhipa St. Suite 1205 Kane'ohe, HI 96744 (808) 247-7942 Kenneth R
    Center for Hawaiian Sovereignty Studies 46-255 Kahuhipa St. Suite 1205 Kane'ohe, HI 96744 (808) 247-7942 Kenneth R. Conklin, Ph.D. Executive Director e-mail [email protected] Unity, Equality, Aloha for all To: HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY For hearing Tuesday, March 19, 2019 Re: SB 1451, SD1, HD1 RELATING TO STATE HOLIDAYS. Recognizes La Ku‘oko‘a, Hawaiian Recognition Day, as an official state holiday. (SB1451 HD1) TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION It is both funny and sad to see that so many legislators have signed their names in support of this bill, which is deceptively named and would be bad policy. Pandering to anti-American secessionists is a very bad idea. This bill is not about memorializing a success of diplomacy from 1843, it's about supporting a highly divisive cult of activists who want to enlist you as a partisan in an ideological civil war which threatens to rip the 50th star off our flag. SB1451,SD1,HD1 La Ku'oko'a Page !1 of !7 HSE JUD 3/19/19 Maybe you'll step away from this bill when you see how your predecessors in the 2007 legislature were lied to and fooled by the same gang now pushing this bill, and then those legislators were justly ridiculed for their pandering. The following points are proved in detail later in this testimony. Please take the time to read the details. 1. The word "ku'oko'a" does NOT mean "recognition" -- it means "independence". Look it up in the dictionary. Also apply, to two other bills, this lesson on how easy it is to fool you legislators about the meaning of Hawaiian words -- I refer to SB195 and SB642, which would make it law that if a bill "was originally drafted in Hawaiian and the English version was translated based on the Hawaiian version, the Hawaiian version shall be held binding." 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Hawaiian People
    0 A BRIEF HISTORY OP 'Ill& HAWAIIAN PEOPLE ff W. D. ALEXANDER PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM NEW YORK,: . CINCINNATI•:• CHICAGO AMERICAN BOOK C.OMPANY Digitized by Google ' .. HARVARD COLLEGELIBRAllY BEQUESTOF RCLANOBUr.ll,' , ,E DIXOII f,'.AY 19, 1936 0oPYBIGRT, 1891, BY AlilBIOAN BooK Co)[PA.NY. W. P. 2 1 Digit zed by Google \ PREFACE AT the request of the Board of Education, I have .fi. endeavored to write a simple and concise history of the Hawaiian people, which, it is hoped, may be useful to the teachers and higher classes in our schools. As there is, however, no book in existence that covers the whole ground, and as the earlier histories are entirely out of print, it has been deemed best to prepare not merely a school-book, but a history for the benefit of the general public. This book has been written in the intervals of a labo­ rious occupation, from the stand-point of a patriotic Hawaiian, for the young people of this country rather than for foreign readers. This fact will account for its local coloring, and for the prominence given to certain topics of local interest. Especial pains have been taken to supply the want of a correct account of the ancient civil polity and religion of the Hawaiian race. This history is not merely a compilation. It is based upon a careful study of the original authorities, the writer having had the use of the principal existing collections of Hawaiian manuscripts, and having examined the early archives of the government, as well as nearly all the existing materials in print.
    [Show full text]
  • 2:15 Pm Dirksen Senate Office Building
    United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Chairman Byron Dorgan August 6, 2009 – 2:15 pm Dirksen Senate Office Building Testimony of Robin Puanani Danner President & Chief Executive Officer Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement S. 1011 - Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2009 1 Aloha Chairman Dorgan, Vice Chairman Barrasso, Senator Inouye, Senator Akaka and other Members of the Committee. Thank you for your invitation to provide testimony on behalf of the Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement regarding the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2009, S.1011. My name is Robin Puanani Danner. I am native Hawaiian and a resident of Hawaiian Home Lands, the trust lands created under the enactment of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920. I submit this testimony in my capacity as President of the Council, founded to unify Native Hawaiian groups and organizations to promote the cultural, economic and community development of Native Hawaiians. Similar in purpose to the Alaska Federation of Natives and the National Congress of American Indians, CNHA achieves its mission through a strong policy voice, capacity building and connecting resources to the challenges in our communities. Today, CNHA has a membership of 102 Native Hawaiian organizations. We are governed by a 15- member board of directors elected by our member organizations. I would like to express CNHA’s strong support for S. 1011 with revisions. As President of CNHA, I have worked for many years with extraordinary Native leaders and others to improve the opportunities and resolve challenges faced by Native Hawaiians. This legislation, first introduced in 2000 is perhaps the single most important piece of public policy to advance solutions from within our communities and in partnership with the federal government and state of Hawaii.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Hawaiian Sovereignty Studies 46-255 Kahuhipa St. Suite 1205 Kane'ohe, HI 96744 (808) 247-7942 Kenneth R
    Center for Hawaiian Sovereignty Studies 46-255 Kahuhipa St. Suite 1205 Kane'ohe, HI 96744 (808) 247-7942 Kenneth R. Conklin, Ph.D. Executive Director e-mail [email protected] Unity, Equality, Aloha for all To: HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION For hearing Thursday, March 18, 2021 Re: HCR179, HR148 URGING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION TO REQUEST THE BOARD OF EDUCATION TO CHANGE THE NAME OF PRESIDENT WILLIAM MCKINLEY HIGH SCHOOL BACK TO THE SCHOOL'S PREVIOUS NAME OF HONOLULU HIGH SCHOOL AND TO REMOVE THE STATUE OF PRESIDENT MCKINLEY FROM THE SCHOOL PREMISES TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION There is only one reason why some activists want to abolish "McKinley" from the name of the school and remove his statue from the campus. The reason is, they want to rip the 50th star off the American flag and return Hawaii to its former status as an independent nation. And through this resolution they want to enlist you legislators as collaborators in their treasonous propaganda campaign. The strongest evidence that this is their motive is easy to see in the "whereas" clauses of this resolution and in documents provided by the NEA and the HSTA which are filled with historical falsehoods trashing the alleged U.S. "invasion" and "occupation" of Hawaii; alleged HCR179, HR148 Page !1 of !10 Conklin HSE EDN 031821 suppression of Hawaiian language and culture; and civics curriculum in the early Territorial period. Portraying Native Hawaiians as victims of colonial oppression and/or belligerent military occupation is designed to bolster demands to "give Hawaii back to the Hawaiians", thereby producing a race-supremacist government and turning the other 80% of Hawaii's people into second-class citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project
    Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project Gary T. Kubota Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project Gary T. Kubota Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project by Gary T. Kubota Copyright © 2018, Stories of Change – Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project The Kokua Hawaii Oral History interviews are the property of the Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project, and are published with the permission of the interviewees for scholarly and educational purposes as determined by Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project. This material shall not be used for commercial purposes without the express written consent of the Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project. With brief quotations and proper attribution, and other uses as permitted under U.S. copyright law are allowed. Otherwise, all rights are reserved. For permission to reproduce any content, please contact Gary T. Kubota at [email protected] or Lawrence Kamakawiwoole at [email protected]. Cover photo: The cover photograph was taken by Ed Greevy at the Hawaii State Capitol in 1971. ISBN 978-0-9799467-2-1 Table of Contents Foreword by Larry Kamakawiwoole ................................... 3 George Cooper. 5 Gov. John Waihee. 9 Edwina Moanikeala Akaka ......................................... 18 Raymond Catania ................................................ 29 Lori Treschuk. 46 Mary Whang Choy ............................................... 52 Clyde Maurice Kalani Ohelo ........................................ 67 Wallace Fukunaga ..............................................
    [Show full text]