The History of the Boeing Model 40 a Contribution to Corporate and Air Line Growth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The History of the Boeing Model 40 a Contribution to Corporate and Air Line Growth The History of the Boeing Model 40 A Contribution to Corporate and Air Line Growth Boeing Historical Archives Boeing Historical Archives 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit January 7-10, 2008 Grand Serra Resort Hotel Reno, Nevada Mike Lavelle, Associate Fellow AIAA Fellow, Royal Aeronautical Society Museum of Flight Seattle, Washington Dedication This paper is dedicated to Mr. William E. Boeing Jr. for his stewardship and continuous support of aviation/aerospace education. Author and Mr. William E. Boeing Jr. Boeing Model 40B Roll Out Wenatchee, WA. October 6, 2007 This paper is copy write by author and The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2008 2 Acknowledgements This paper has been supported in one way or another by many people with whom I work. I like to thank them all for their time, assistance and feedback they provided while the paper was in the process of being researched and written. The Museum of Flight Staff • Alison Bailey - Associate Director of Development Museum of Flight • Andrew Boike - Annual Fund Coordinator Museum of Flight • Meredith Downs – Photo Archivist Museum of Flight • John Little – Exhibits Technician and Aviation Historian • Ernst Marris – Security Officer Museum of Flight • Dennis Parks – Director of Collections Museum of Flight • Katherine Williams – Archivist Dahlberg Center for Military Aviation History, Museum of Flight The Boeing Company Archives Staff • Mike Lombardi - The Boeing Company – Corporate Historian • Tom Lubbesmeyer – Boeing Historian \Archivist Museum of Flight Trustee • Brien S. Wygle – Retired Boeing Vice President and Company Test Pilot I would especially like to thank Andrew Boike and Brien Wygle who spent their own time helping with the papers editing and format. This paper is copy write by author and The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2008 3 Outline The History of the Boeing Model 40 A Contribution to Corporate and Air Line Growth • Introduction and Background o Overview Post Office Operations until 1923 o Early Aircraft used o Need for Updated equipment • The Contenders for the de Havilland DH-4 Replacement o The industry response o Boeing Model 40 Overall Performance o Boeing’s Design approach • Establishing the Industry o Events leading to Model 40 redesign o The Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Company • Bringing the Boeing Model 40A into Production o Key events and Activities o The Boeing Model 40 Line Operations o United Aircraft and Transportation Corporation o How many were built and What Model 40 is it • Where are they now – The Boeing Model 40 survivors and replicas. • Pictures of the constructions of The Museum of Flight Model 40 replica under construction. • Summary and conclusion. • References • About the Author This paper is copy write by author and The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2008 4 The History of the Boeing Model 40 Introduction and Background Overview of Post Office Operations until 1923 Aviation historian called 1919 the “First Year of Air Transportation”. That year marked the advent of the postwar passenger-carrying airplane; it was born amidst the glut of surplus wartime airplanes from all the combatants’ air arms. Within two months of the armistice, on January 8, 1919, Germany authorized airline development. The first German airline was the Deutsche Luft Reederei (D.L.R.), which opened passenger service between Berlin and Weimar, via Leipzig with war-surplus A.E.G. and D.F.W. biplanes. While in France, the Farman Brothers, well known aircraft designers before and during World War I opened scheduled service between Paris and Brussels using the Farman F.60 Goliath (figure 1a) in March of 1919. The British soon followed in August of 1919 when Aircraft Transport and Travel Ltd flew a modified D.H. 4A,(figure 1b) from London to Paris carrying cargo and one passenger initiating the first scheduled international air service. (Hallion 1977 p8) As we shall see the DH-4 also played a major role in the U.S. air transportation system with the U.S Postal Air Service. Kenneth Munson Illustration Farman F.60 Goliath (1a) de Havilland D.H. 4A (1b) Figure 1 In the United States the development of schedule commercial aviation did not start with passenger service as in Europe but was tied closely with the efforts of the United States Post Office. When the US Army began flying the mail from New 5 York to Washington D.C with Philadelphia as an intermediate stop in May of 1918, few realized that within less than two and half years this nascent 215-mile route would grow into a 3000 mile transcontinental air mail line. The initial force and credit behind this growth was Assistant Postmaster General Otto Praeger who by August of 1918 transitioned Army mail flights to civilian Post Office operations. Praeger, a self-taught former Washington D.C. correspondent from Texas was a demanding chief. During the summer of 1918, he appointed personnel to key management positions. One such person was Captain Benjamin Lipsner who resigned from the Army to become the first Superintendent of the Air Mail. Lipsner in turn hired qualified pilots, selected aircraft, and established logistical support along the Post Office’s route structure. Post Office Air Mail Routes 1918-1921 From R.E.G. Davies Airlines of the United States Since 1914 Figure 2 During the first year of operations, the Post Office realized an operational profit of $19,000. Postal revenues for the year totaled $162,000, while the cost to fly the mail was $143,000. The initial year of operations would be the only time that the airmail service generated a profit. Early Aircraft Used 6 However, this is understandable given the swift route expansions illustrated by Figure 2. During this growth period, the Post Office was trying to find the optimum aircraft for the route as the line expanded west. The Post Office utilized mostly World War I surplus aircraft that included the Curtiss JN-4H and, Army surplus de Havilland DH-4s. There was also a mix of new post war aircraft. Such as the seven Standard Aircraft Company’s JR-1Bs (figure 3a) and a new post World War I design, the all-metal German Junkers JL-6. (figure 3b). www.postalmuseum.si.edu Standard Aircraft Company JR-1B (3a) www.postalmuseum.si.edu All-Metal Junker JL-6 (3b) Figure 3 As a point of interest the Standard’s were the first non-military aircraft the U.S. Government purchased for $3500 each. They had 150 H.P. Hispanso-Suiza engines and could climb to 6000 feet faster than the Curtiss Jenny JN-4Hs. This would be an important performance consideration along the mountainous sections of the route. Early in fiscal year 1921 the Post Office paid aircraft manufactures $476,000 for new and modified aircraft. However, when they could not find the ideal aircraft for 7 their operational needs they selected what was considered to be best of what they had and began a program of standardization. The specific reasons for retiring these aircraft varied but generally included one or more of the following reasons, high cost of maintenance, safety, efficiency and/or overall aircraft performance. Figure 4 lists the aircraft types phased out. Aircraft Phased out • 7 Curtiss JN-4Hs 3 Glenn Martin Mailplanes • 7 Standard JR-1Bs 4 Junker JL 6s (F-13) • 17 Curtiss R-4ls 1 L,W.F. Type V • 20 Twin DH’s 2 Curtiss H-as Figure 4 Boeing Historical Archives de Havilland DH-4 Figure 5 Although a World War I British design the de Havilland DH-4 (figure 5) emerged from this pack of mixed aircraft a reliable work horse along the transcontinental route until the Post Office would turn their routes over to industry contractors at the beginning in 1926. During World War I the DH-4 was built for the Army Air Service by the Dayton- Wright Aircraft Company under license agreement from the Airco consortium of Great Britain. The American version of the aircraft was powered by a 12 cylinder 400 HP Liberty Engine. After World War I the Army Air Service had several 8 aircraft manufactures modernize the DH-4 airframe. For example, Boeing modernized one hundred airframes between March 6 and July 1, 1920 by repositioning the fuel tanks and pilot’s cockpit. This improved the safety of flight in the event of an engine fire. Additionally, the landing gear was also moved forward slightly to improve ground handling. In 1923 Boeing further improved DH- 4s by converting several airframes from wood to steel. Intended primarily for the Army, many of the modernized (DH-4M’s) were transferred to the Post Office, remaining in service until it ceased flying the mail in 1927. By mid-1924, using primarily the DH-4, regularly scheduled transcontinental mail service became a reality. In addition, to day flights, the Post Office pilots began regular night flights. They were guided by a lighted airway system with rotating beacons and brightly lit emergency landing fields, timing their night flying to reach the end of the lighted airway by daybreak. The Post Office resumed using special airmail postage, which it had discontinued in 1919. By 1924 Airmail now cost eight cents to travel in any of the three zones comprising the transcontinental route and could travel across the country for 24 cents. By the end of 1924, airmail planes were routinely completing the New York to San Francisco route within 34 hours. Need for Updated Equipment On April 7, 1924 realizing the need to replace the aging DH-4 fleet, the Post Office requested proposals from interested companies for an aircraft based on the following specifications: • Liberty Motor • Cruising Speed at least 95 M.P.H.
Recommended publications
  • Pratt & Whitney Overview
    Pratt & Whitney Pratt & Whitney, a United Technologies Corp. company (NYSE:UTX), is a world leader in the design, manufacture and service of aircraft engines, industrial gas turbines and space propulsion systems. Pratt & Whitney reported an operating profit of $2.0 billion in 2011 on revenues of $13.4 billion. The company has approximately 36,000 employees who support more than 11,000 customers around the world. Pratt & Whitney was founded in Hartford, Conn., MAJOR PRODUCTS COMPANY PROFILE in 1925 by Frederick Rentschler. Pratt & Whitney’s first aircraft engine was the 410-horsepower, air- Commercial Engines Financials cooled Wasp, which delivered unprecedented PW2000 for Boeing 757 Revenues: $13.4 billion (2011) performance and reliability for the time and PW4000 for Boeing 747, 767 and 777 Operating Profit: $2.0 billion (2011) transformed the aviation industry. Pratt & Whitney and Airbus A300, A310 and A330 has been leading change ever since. PW6000 for Airbus A318 Current Employment GP7000 for Airbus A380 Approximately 36,000 employees worldwide Pratt & Whitney develops game-changing V2500 for Airbus A319, A320 and A321 technologies for the future, such as the PurePower PW1000G engine for Customers PurePower® PW1000G engine, with patented Bombardier CSeries Aircraft More than 500 customers operate Geared Turbofan™ technology, for next generation Mitsubishi Regional Jet Pratt & Whitney large commercial engines of passenger aircraft. Pratt & Whitney Global Airbus A320neo and in 136 countries. Service Partners, the company’s worldwide large Irkut MC-21 Aircraft commercial engine maintenance, repair and Nearly 30 customers operate aircraft overhaul network, provides innovative services Military Engines powered by Pratt & Whitney military that delight customers around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Pratt and Whitney Aircraft's Commercial Spares Planning
    Communications of the IIMA Volume 6 Issue 3 Article 2 2006 A Case Study of Pratt and Whitney Aircraft's Commercial Spares Planning Vincent A. Mabert Indiana University Ashok Soni Indiana University Gerard Campbell Fairfield University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/ciima Part of the Management Information Systems Commons Recommended Citation Mabert, Vincent A.; Soni, Ashok; and Campbell, Gerard (2006) "A Case Study of Pratt and Whitney Aircraft's Commercial Spares Planning," Communications of the IIMA: Vol. 6 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/ciima/vol6/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communications of the IIMA by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Case Study of Pratt and Whitney Aircraft's Commercial Spares Planning Mabert, Son & Campbell A Case Study of Pratt and Whitney Aircraft's Commercial Spares Planning^ Vincent A. Mabert Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 [email protected] Ashok Soni Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 [email protected] Gerard Campbell Charles F. Dolan School of Business, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT 06824 [email protected] ABSTRACT This case study, which can be used as a teaching case, deals with jet engine spare parts planning at Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Company, a division of United Technologies Corporation. The case includes background on the company's history and an overview of their jet engine manufacturing operations.
    [Show full text]
  • East Hartford, CT Pratt & Whitney, a Recognized Leading Producer
    Co-op, Core Structures Group Job Code: 123314-01 Location: East Hartford, CT Pratt & Whitney, a recognized leading producer of the world's most advanced jet engines, is looking for dedicated individuals to become a part of our organization. If you would like to work in a dynamic environment and possess the motivation to incorporate new ideas into practice, this may be the opportunity you've been waiting for! Pratt & Whitney, a United Technologies Corp. company (NYSE:UTX), is a world leader in the design, manufacture and service of aircraft engines, auxiliary and ground power units, small turbojet propulsion products and industrial gas turbines. We reported an operating pro?t of $1.6 billion in 2012 on revenues of $14 billion. Our company has approximately 36,000 employees who support more than 11,000 customers around the world. Frederick Rentschler founded Pratt & Whitney in Hartford, Connecticut, in 1925. Our ?rst aircraft engine transformed the aviation industry. It was the 410-horsepower, aircooled Wasp, which delivered unprecedented performance and reliability for the time. We have been leading change ever since Work with a team of Structures Engineers to develop state-of-the-art high cycle fatigue (HCF) and low cycle fatigue (LCF) models for use in evaluating the next generation of jet engine components. Post process engine strain gage and performance data to create library of vibratory responses to be used in the development of a probabilistic Goodman Diagram approach to assess the vibratory response of jet engine blades and vanes. Also work on the development of Advanced LCF program which incorporates elastic plastic behavior, creep, and multi-axial fatigue into one life system.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 7 SMITHSONIAN ANNALS of FLIGHT SMITHSONIAN AIR
    Number 7 SMITHSONIAN ANNALS OF FLIGHT SMITHSONIAN AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM & SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti­ tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com­ mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of professional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These pub­ lications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, and other interested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available. S. DILLON RIPLEY Secretary Smithsonian Institution The Curtiss D-12 Aero Engine Curtiss D-12-E engine, 435 hp, 1930.
    [Show full text]
  • Pratt & Whitney
    Pratt & Whitney Pratt & Whitney Type Subsidiary of UTC Founded 1860 Headquarters East Hartford, Connecticut Key people Steven Finger, President Industry Aerospace Aircraft engines Products Gas turbines Spacecraft propulsion Website Pratt & Whitney Pratt & Whitney is an American aircraft engine manufacturer whose products are widely used in both civil and military aircraft. As one of the "big three" aero-engine manufacturers, it competes with General Electric and Rolls-Royce, although it has also formed joint ventures with both of these companies. In addition to aircraft engines, Pratt & Whitney manufactures fixed gas turbines for industry and power generation, marine turbines, railway locomotive engines, and rocket engines. History The Pratt & Whitney Company was founded in 1860 by Francis Pratt and Amos Whitney, with headquarters in Hartford, Connecticut. The company manufactured machine tools, tools for the makers of sewing machines, and gun-making machinery for use by the Union Army during the American Civil War. In 1925, Frederick Brant Rentschler approached Pratt & Whitney looking for funds and a location to build his new aircraft engine. Pratt & Whitney loaned him $250,000, the use of the Pratt & Whitney name, and space in their building. This was the beginning of the Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Company. Pratt & Whitney's first engine, the Wasp, was completed on Christmas Eve 1925. The Wasp developed 425 horsepower (317 kW) on its third test run. It easily passed the Navy qualification test in March 1926, and by October the Navy had ordered 200 engines. The Wasp exhibited speed, climb, performance and reliability that revolutionized American aviation. In 1929, Frederick Rentschler ended his association with Pratt & Whitney Machine Tool and formed United Aircraft and Transport Corporation, the predecessor to today's United Technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering the Future of Connecticut Aerospace
    replace Design Concept Powering the Future of Connecticut Aerospace United Technologies Chairman & CEO Louis Chênevert To maintain UTC’s leadership position and Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy announced in the aerospace industry, the company will invest in world-class facilities and an agreement under which UTC will invest up to laboratories to support its cutting-edge $500 million to upgrade and expand its aerospace research and development. research, development and manufacturing facilities over the next 5 years. During the same time period, These investments will also allow UTC to continue to attract and retain today’s the company expects to invest up to $4 billion in best engineering talent and Connecticut’s research and other capital expenditures in the state. next generation of innovators by This agreement ensures that Connecticut will remain providing exciting opportunities for top engineering and science graduates – the center of UTC’s aerospace research and including the best and brightest from development activities and the home of Pratt & Whitney’s the state’s colleges and universities. and Sikorsky’s headquarters for years to come. United Technologies Corporation 1 THE UTC INVESTMENTS Design Concepts 1. Pratt & Whitney’s new 425,000-square-foot 2 world headquarters and engineering facility on the East Hartford campus will attract global engineering talent and be a collaboration 1 hub for Pratt & Whitney’s manufacturing facilities around the world. replace 2. The state-of-the-art United Technologies Research Center will include 100,000 square feet of new and refurbished lab and office space designed to facilitate research in advanced product and manufacturing technologies, enable collaboration between UTC 1 2 and university researchers and help UTC attract the top scientists and engineers from around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability of Pratt & Whitney Tom Manning, University of Connecticut
    Sustainability of Pratt & Whitney Tom Manning, University of Connecticut, Waterbury CT USA Timothy J. Dowding, University of Connecticut, Stamford CT USA ABSTRACT This paper examines Pratt & Whitney’s corporate strategy of sustainability in its use of titanium and alloy ores in the manufacturing of its aircraft. It discusses the value chain of titanium and alloy ores from its initial extraction from the earth; it’s transformation into metal components and final incorporation as a key component in its aircraft. In addition, a sustainability audit of Pratt is conducted using 3 different audit tools that are accepted in the sustainability community. The sustainability audit is analyzed with recommendations as to how Pratt can improve its sustainability performance as a corporation. INTRODUCTION The definition of sustainable development has taken on many forms [1] and was defined in the World Health Organization 1987 Brundtland Commission Report as “sustainability meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” [2]. In terms of our daily lives, it makes sense to behave in this manner for living daily and taking care of the planet for others to benefit. However, when we apply this approach to corporations and large businesses it can get quite cumbersome. How does a company accomplish meeting its needs while leaving the ability of future generations to do the same? When we consider this, three operational criteria arise. First, economic objectives should not be maximized without satisfying environmental and social constraints. Second, environmental benefits should not necessarily be maximized without satisfying economic and social constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Pratt & Whitney CLEEN Technologies Briefing
    FAA CLEEN October 27, 2010 Atlanta, GA UTC Business and Technology Hamilton Sundstrand Pratt & Whitney Sikorsky Otis UTC Fire & Security UTC Power Carrier Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 2 UTC Pioneers Willis Carrier Elisha Graves Otis Igor Sikorsky Fred Rentschler Thomas Hamilton David Sundstrand Charles Chubb Walter Kidde Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 3 History Dependable Engines Frederick Rentschler Production Assembly of Dependable Engines “The best airplanes can only be designed around the best engines.” - Frederick Rentschler Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 4 Innovation Milestones JT3 PWR Redstone R-1830 R-2800 A-7 Engine PW4000 F135 PurePower® PW1000G Engine Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 5 Pratt & Whitney Leading Industry Change Commercial P&W Power P&W Canada Military Engines and Rocketdyne Systems Engines Global Services Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 6 GTF Development On-Track October – First Engine to Test Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 7 GTF Propulsion Architecture Lowest Fuel Burn + Noise 0 -5 -10 CR Prop EIS 2018-20 BPR ~ 40-80 current -15 737/A320 BPR ~ 5 -20 -25 GTF EIS ~ 2013 BPR ~ 9-12 NASA GTF EIS ~ 2017-20 -30 N+1 BPR ~ 15-20 -35 -40 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 % FUEL BURN Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 8 Why the Geared Turbofan? Kiernan/10-27-10/mnc FAA CLEEN Consortium – Georgia Tech, 27 October 2010 J6060_FAA_Consortium - 9 Geared Turbofan Relative to Direct Drive fuel maint.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Engines Turbofan Focus 2016
    COMMERCIAL ENGINES TURBOFAN FOCUS 2016 IN ASSOCIATION WITH More than 10,500 engines ordered and now delivering to Demand. customers worldwide, on schedule. The architecture of reliability. cfmaeroengines.com And supplied. CFM International is a 50/50 joint company between GE and Safran Aircraft Engines PERFORMANCE | EXECUTION | TECHNOLOGY MORE TO BELIEVE IN FlightGlobal | 3 C37571.015_CFM_DEMAND_FlightInt_Jul16_267x197_v1.indd 1 24/06/2016 17:08 COMMERCIAL ENGINES 2016 CONTENTS ENGINE EVENTS Memorable recent events 4 What to watch for the future 4 ENGINE ANALYSIS How engine market share battles are playing out 5 How GTF and Leap are shifting to operational mode 7 Engine selection trends on the A320neo 9 Can China and Russia threaten the single-aisle duopoly? 11 AT A GLANCE Commercial engines: manufacturer market share 14 Engine market share by market group 15 Airliner turbofan engines: production timeline 16 Engine options by commercial aircraft 17 Commercial aircraft by engine type 18 COMMERCIAL ENGINE MANUFACTURERS AND TYPES Aviadvigatel 19 ACAE 21 CFM International 22 Engine Alliance 26 General Electric 28 International Aero Engines 33 Powerjet 35 Pratt & Whitney 37 Rolls-Royce 42 ENGINE CENSUS Operator listing by commercial engine type 47 The information contained in our databases and used in this presentation has been assembled from many sources, and whilst reasonable care has been taken to ensure accuracy, the information is supplied on the understanding that no legal liability whatsoever shall attach to FlightGlobal, its offices,
    [Show full text]
  • Taking the Long View AIAA Annual Report 2008–2009
    TAKING THE LONG VIEW AIAA ANNUAL REPORt 2008–2009 Supplement to Aerospace America June 2009 AIAA HONORS AND AWARDS Recognizing Excellence AIAA is proud to honor the very best in our industry – those individuals and teams who have taken aerospace technology to the next level, who have advanced the quality and depth of the aerospace profession, and who have leveraged their aerospace knowledge for the benefit of society. The Honors and Awards program began recognizing achievements in aerospace before the American Rocket Society and the Institute of the Aerospace Sciences merged to become AIAA in 1963. There are now over 80 different awards. The oldest date back to the 1930s and 1940s and today two awards—the Reed Award for Aeronautics and Goddard Award for Astronautics—represent the highest honors that AIAA can bestow. At the 2008 Aerospace Spotlight Awards Gala, AIAA President George Muellner presented the Reed Aeronautics Award to Alain Garcia, Technical Advisor to the CEO of Airbus S.A.S., Toulouse, France (top left photo); the Goddard Astronautics For well over 70 years, thousands of the industry’s best and brightest Award to Charles Elachi, Director of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (top right); the AIAA Public Service have been recognized for their outstanding achievements in and Award to Amanda Wright Lane, great-grandniece of Orville and Wilbur Wright (below left); and the AIAA Distinguished significant contributions to aerospace, in technical fields as well as Service Award to John Blanton, Chief Consulting Engineer, Heat Transfer, GE Energy, Greenville, S.C. (below right). in public service, publications, section participation, and sustained service to AIAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Engines 2013
    SPECIAL REPORT COMMERCIAL ENGINES 2013 IN ASSOCIATION WITH Sponsor Advert LEAP year We’re writing to confirm a date we made with our customers in 2008. The first LEAP engine will begin testing this autumn. Right on schedule. Just like our last 21 engines. Adjust your calendars, we’ve made this a LEAP year. Go to cfmaeroengines.com See the LEAP engine come to life. Get the CFM LEAP app NOW. CFM International is a 50/50 joint company between Snecma (Safran) and GE. Superior performance | Lower cost of ownership | Greater reliability MORE TO BELIEVE IN Flightglobal Insight | 3 C31925.029_CFM_CALENDAR_CommEngRep_17June_267x197_v1.indd 1 06/06/2013 15:02 COMMERCIAL ENGINES 2013 FOREWORD So far so good is probably the best way to summarise progress on engine for the A320neo family. The PW1100G – which has entered key commercial engine programmes during the past 12 months. flight testing – was designed with a variable area fan nozzle, but Prospects for the long-term profitability of many of the world’s P&W has decided this can be removed to “make the engine lighter airlines rest on the ability of CFM International and Pratt & Whitney and less complex”. to deliver the powerplants that should enable the next generation of narrowbodies to provide a step-change improvement in operating In the widebody sector, the prototype Airbus A350 XWB had its Rolls- economics. Royce Trent XWB engines installed and was expected to fly for the first time by the end of June 2013. The recent grounding of the latest Choosing the right engine may never have been more important – widebody twinjet to enter airline service - Boeing’s 787 - means the or harder – than with the Airbus A320neo family.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revista Aérea Collection
    The Revista Aérea Collection Dan Hagedorn and Pedro Turina 2008 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series A: Aircraft...................................................................................................... 4 Series B: Propulsion............................................................................................. 218 Series C: Biography............................................................................................. 262 Series D: Organizations......................................................................................
    [Show full text]