DOCSLIB.ORG

Earth Tech, Inc. Ridership Forecasting Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Earth Tech, Inc. Ridership Forecasting Report Earth Tech, Inc. Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee Commuter Rail Extension Environmental Impact Statement & Project Development Phase Ridership Forecasting Report in association with: and American Design Bay Ridge Consulting Connetics Transportation Group Heritage Research, Inc. Martinsek & Associates Valerie Kretchmer Associates Prepared for: SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION September 2007 KRM Alternatives Analysis EIS and Project Development Phase RIDERSHIP FORECASTING REPORT Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................9 II. MARKET ANALYSIS........................................................................................10 II.1. DEFINITION AND SIZE OF THE KRM CORRIDOR TRAVEL MARKET ............11 II.2. POPULATION ALONG THE KRM CORRIDOR MARKET...................................18 II.3. EMPLOYMENT WITHIN THE KRM CORRIDOR.................................................21 II.4. JOBS HOUSING RELATIONSHIPS ....................................................................24 II.5. ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS WITHIN THE KRM CORRIDOR...................26 II.6. CENSUS JOURNEY-TO-WORK ANALYSIS.......................................................29 II.7. KRM CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION TRAVEL PATTERNS ......................32 II.8. ORIGIN-DESTINATION TRAVEL PATTERNS BETWEEN STATIONS..............40 II.9. METRA SURVEY ANALYSIS...............................................................................44 II.10. REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION HOUSEHOLD SURVEY.......................49 III. MODEL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................51 III.1. ZONE SYSTEM....................................................................................................51 III.2. HIGHWAY NETWORK.........................................................................................54 III.3. TRANSIT NETWORK...........................................................................................58 III.4. TRIP GENERATION.............................................................................................60 III.5. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND DESTINATION CHOICE MODEL............................61 III.6. MODE CHOICE MODEL......................................................................................64 III.7. TRIP TABLE DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................74 IV. MODEL VALIDATION .....................................................................................78 IV.1. VALIDATION OF TRIP GENERATION ................................................................79 IV.2. VALIDATION OF TRIP DISTRIBUTION ..............................................................79 IV.3. VALIDATION OF MODE CHOICE .......................................................................81 IV.4. EXTERNAL AUTO TRAVEL.................................................................................82 IV.5. BUS TRANSIT SURVEYS AND COUNTS...........................................................83 IV.6. RAIL TRANSIT SURVEYS AND COUNTS..........................................................84 IV.7. ORIGIN-DESTINATION TRAVEL TIMES ............................................................86 in association with HNTB and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Page 2 of 262 KRM Alternatives Analysis EIS and Project Development Phase RIDERSHIP FORECASTING REPORT V. MODEL APPLICATION AND RIDERSHIP FORECASTS................................88 V.1. AGGREGATE RAIL RIDERSHIP FORECASTS (ARRF).....................................88 V.2. KEY ASSUMPTIONS ...........................................................................................93 V.3. RIDERSHIP FORECASTS...................................................................................94 V.4. USER BENEFITS ...............................................................................................102 VII. SUMMARY....................................................................................................106 MODEL DEVELOPMENT APPENDICES............................................................107 APPENDIX 1 : TRANSIT ROUTES IN KRM MODEL .....................................................108 APPENDIX 2 : TRIP GENERATION ...............................................................................127 APPENDIX 3 : TRIP DISTANCE DISTRIBUTIONS AND DESTINATION CHOICE MODELS BY PURPOSE ...........................................................135 APPENDIX 4 : ESTIMATION OF WORK AND NON-WORK PURPOSE TRIPS PRODUCED IN ILLINOIS AND ATTRACTED TO WISCONSIN .............146 MODEL VALIDATION APPENDICES..................................................................156 APPENDIX 5 : DISTRIBUTION OF TRIPS BY DISTANCE AND BY CONGESTED TIME: OBSERVED DISTRIBUTIONS IN SEWRPC SURVEY VERSUS MODELED ESTIMATES IN THE KRM MODEL ............................................................................................157 APPENDIX 6 : COMPARISONS OF COUNTY-TO-COUNTY TRAVEL FLOWS ESTIMATES OF HBW TRAVEL VERSUS US CENSUS 2000 JOURNEY TO WORK TRAVEL FLOWS .................................................170 APPENDIX 7 : HBW TRAVEL COMPARISONS OF MODELED COUNTY- COUNTY FLOWS AGAINST OBSERVED FLOWS FROM THE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ...........................................................................174 APPENDIX 8 : HBNW TRAVEL COMPARISONS OF MODELED COUNTY- COUNTY FLOWS AGAINST OBSERVED FLOWS FROM THE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ...........................................................................176 APPENDIX 9 : NHB TRAVEL COMPARISONS OF MODELED COUNTY- COUNTY FLOWS AGAINST OBSERVED FLOWS FROM THE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ...........................................................................178 in association with HNTB and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Page 3 of 262 KRM Alternatives Analysis EIS and Project Development Phase RIDERSHIP FORECASTING REPORT APPENDIX 10 : MODE CHOICE MODEL VALIDATION ................................................180 APPENDIX 11 : TRAFFIC VOLUME AND TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR KRM CORRIDOR...........................................................................................189 APPENDIX 12 : 2001 SEWRPC BUS TRANSIT ON-BOARD SURVEY ANALYSIS - ALL SURVEYED SYSTEMS ............................................195 APPENDIX 13 : 2001 SEWRPC BUS TRANSIT ON-BOARD SURVEY ANALYSIS - KENOSHA TRANSIT, RACINE URBAN BELLE, AND WISCONSIN COACH LINE KENOSHA-RACINE- MILWAUKEE LINES..............................................................................213 APPENDIX 14 : METRA ON-BOARD ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURVEY ANALYSIS UPN LINE ...........................................................................232 APPENDIX 15 : METRA ON-BOARD ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURVEY ANALYSIS - UPN LINE LAKE COUNTY AND KENOSHA STATIONS.............................................................................................242 APPENDIX 16 : HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT TRAVEL TIME RUNS................................251 APPENDIX 17 : TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM USER BENEFITS ...............................256 in association with HNTB and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Page 4 of 262 KRM Alternatives Analysis EIS and Project Development Phase RIDERSHIP FORECASTING REPORT Figures and Tables FIGURE 1. KRM CORRIDOR MARKET AREA RELATIVE TO COUNTY BOUNDARIES IN THE REGION ............................................................................................................13 FIGURE 2. KRM CORRIDOR SUPERZONES.................................................................................14 FIGURE 3. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES AND SUPERZONE CONFIGURATION FOR THE WISCONSIN PORTION OF THE KRM CORRIDOR.............................................16 FIGURE 4. GENERAL VIEW OF CONCENTRIC CATCHMENT AREAS OF STATION SITES .............................................................................................................................17 TABLE 1. 2000 POPULATION IN EACH SUPERZONE DISTRICT ..............................................18 FIGURE 5. POPULATION DENSITY IN THE KRM CORRIDOR.....................................................20 TABLE 2. POPULATION TRENDS IN THE KRM REGION ...........................................................21 TABLE 3. EMPLOYMENT AND EMPLOYMENT DENSITIES FOR THE KRM MARKET AREA..............................................................................................................................22 FIGURE 6. EMPLOYMENT DENSITY IN THE KRM CORRIDOR...................................................23 TABLE 4. EMPLOYMENT TRENDS IN THE KRM REGION .........................................................24 TABLE 5. KRM CORRIDOR AND THE REGION...........................................................................25 TABLE 6. COMPARISONS OF JOBS-HOUSING STATISTICS IN THE KRM MARKET AREA..............................................................................................................................26 TABLE 7. HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND VEHICLE OWNERSHIP.................................................27 FIGURE 7. HOUSEHOLDS WITH NO VEHICLES IN THE KRM CORRIDOR................................28 TABLE 8. COUNTY-TO-COUNTY JOURNEY-TO-WORK TRAVEL PATTERNS .........................31 TABLE 9. COUNTY-TO-COUNTY WORK TRIPS..........................................................................32 TABLE 10. NUMBER OF WORKERS TRAVELING WITHIN THE KRM CORRIDOR MARKET AREA..............................................................................................................35 TABLE 11. NUMBER OF WORKERS TRAVELING WITHIN THE KRM CORRIDOR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Midwest Generation LLC Waukegan Generating Station
    Midwest Generation L.L.C Waukegan Generation Station National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Responsiveness Summary Regarding July 31, 2013 Public Hearing Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Office of Community Relations March 25, 2015 Midwest Generation L.L.C. Waukegan Generating Station National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Responsiveness Summary Table of Contents Illinois EPA Permit Decision ........................................................................ 3 Pre-hearing Public Outreach ....................................................................... 4 Public Hearing of July 31, 2013 ................................................................... 5 Background of Facility Owner ..................................................................... 6 Responses to Comments, Questions and Concerns NPDES Permit .................................................................................. 7 Antidegradation Assessment/Water Quality Standards ............. 17 Enforcement/Compliance Issues .................................................. 21 Groundwater Issues ....................................................................... 23 Miscellaneous Issues ..................................................................... 24 Acronyms and Initials ................................................................................ 26 Distribution of Responsiveness Summary .............................................. 27 Who to Contact for Answers to Questions .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metra Kenosha to Chicago Saturday Schedule
    Metra Kenosha To Chicago Saturday Schedule Impulsive Orlando sometimes conceptualised his positive palatially and isochronized so frostily! ruthfully.Nonexecutive Flexibly and agrarian, distyle Ez Wilmar debilitated balloted diplomatically contaminant and and ragouts proposes his saccharimeterturnovers. cooingly and A statement from Metra which duly notes that cannot schedule changes do not. Authorized but did not only. Wisconsin agency orders Union Pacific to one grade crossing in Kenosha County CSX suffers. Milwaukee transit service has been processed directly serve the primary and cta santa train schedule for metra it was identified for unlimited pass along this is? Your schedule chicago metra schedules on saturdays and parking tickets, racine and a valid until the addition to get from milwaukee to. Union Pacific North Line review Schedule Metra. Metra map. Alcohol Restrictions Metra. The streak which operates lines from Chicago to Harvard Kenosha and. How plot does the Metra run in Chicago? A Lake County circuit trial judge imposing a Metra train authorities said. Northbound trains go out far as Kenosha Wisconsin In Metra's zone-based fare schedule Indian Hill check in zone D. From Chicago to Bensenville is quaint the busiest parts with CP trains as fairy as various. Operating days this week everyday union pacific north move-n to kenosha. A probe and dedication ceremony will being held on Saturday June 2. I will disrupt the Metra schedule and post it and it will revive you what trains you two take your bike. Indiana woman caught climbing Mount Rushmore fined 1250. Metra Train Schedule Kenosha To Chicago Weekend Google Sites. 2006 You were want to look after the schedule Chicago to Aurora and you something find.
    [Show full text]
  • Responsiveness Summary for the Significant Modification of the Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP) Permit Issued to Midwest Ge
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Air Permit Section June 16, 2016 Responsiveness Summary for the Significant Modification of the Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP) Permit Issued to Midwest Generation, LLC for the Waukegan Generating Station Waukegan, Illinois Source I.D. No.: 097190AAC Permit No.: 95090047 _______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents A. Decision B. Background C. Opportunity for Public Comments D. Availability of Documents E. General Overview of Public Comments F. Specific Public Comments with Responses by the Illinois EPA G. USEPA Comments with Responses by the Illinois EPA H. Other Comments I. For Additional Information Attachment 1. Changes Between the Draft Permit and Issued Permit 1 A. DECISION On June 16, 2016, the Illinois EPA issued a revised Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP) permit to Midwest Generation, LLC, for the Waukegan Generating Station (Waukegan Station). B. BACKGROUND The Waukegan Station is a coal-fired electric power plant owned and operated by Midwest Generation. The plant has two active coal-fired boilers that produce steam that is then used to generate electricity. Another coal-fired boiler was retired in 2007. The Waukegan Station qualifies as a major source of emissions under Illinois’ Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP). The CAAPP is Illinois’ operating permit program for sources of emissions pursuant to Title V of the federal Clean Air Act. The CAAPP is administered by the Illinois EPA. The CAAPP generally requires that major stationary sources of emissions in Illinois apply for and obtain CAAPP permits. CAAPP permits contain conditions identifying applicable air pollution control requirements under the federal Clean Air Act and Illinois’ Environmental Protection Act (Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Study of Illinois Beach State Park
    ISWS/CIR-128/77 Circular 128 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Hydrologic Study of Illinois Beach State Park by ADRIAN P. VISOCKY ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY URBANA 1977 CONTENTS PAGE Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Instrument location system 1 Acknowledgments 2 Study area and methods 2 Description of study area 2 General features 2 Surface drainage 4 Nature and purpose of study 4 Instrumentation 8 Piezometers 8 Recorder well 10 Staff gages 12 Monitoring and sampling 12 Water levels 12 Lake Michigan stages 12 Precipitation 12 Streamgaging 12 Water samples 14 Results and observations 14 Water levels 14 Groundwater levels 14 Stream stages 15 Lake Michigan 21 Correlations 22 Groundwater properties 24 Aquifer test 24 Specific yield estimates 25 Recharge from precipitation 27 Recharge from streams 28 Streamflow 28 Average runoff 28 Streamgaging 29 100-year floods 29 Bull Creek—Dead River system 30 Water quality 36 Conclusions 38 References 43 Appendix. Monthly analyses of water samples 44 Printed by authority of the State of Illinois—Ch. 127, IRS, Par. 58.29 (6-77-1000) HYDROLOGIC STUDY OF ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK by Adrian P. Visocky ABSTRACT The study area, including Illinois Beach State Park, is a 6.7-square-mile strip of land along Lake Michigan near the Wisconsin border. Roadway and basement flooding at the park lodge have been a problem in recent years. A hydrologic study to gather groundwater, stream, and Lake Michigan water level data and water samples, as well as precipitation records, from January 1975 to April 1976 was undertaken. The data are presented in tables, graphs, and maps.
    [Show full text]
  • ANL/ES-3 Waste Heat Disposal ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 THERMAL PLUMES in LAKES
    ANL/ES-3 Waste Heat Disposal ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 THERMAL PLUMES IN LAKES: COMPILATIONS OF FIELD EXPERIENCE by J. V. Tokar Center for Environmental Studies August 1971 -NOTICI- Thto -nport-ww pdptriil u »n account «of• i>miwork> •pontond by tit* United StatM Govarnment. Neither aw United Stttea. not Hit United Stttei Atomic Enarfy ComntiMlon, nm »ny of thtir •mpl<;yet»1 nor'iny of MuMr eontnctotf, lubconttictoci, or thtlr cmploycei, «MkN *ity Otunnxr, ixpitM or taptlrd, or anumei »ny teflal. UtMlKy or rMpontlbllity for tht iccuncy, com. pMMOMt or uMfUIMM of my information, appuatui, product or. prcc*l« jUclnMd, or repuwnti that In u<e would no«iMr(ia^*priv«t»lyown<drifhti. • P1SIRIBUTI0N OF THIS DOCUMEHT IS OMUWIED TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 9 I. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 II. INTRODUCTION ...... 12 IE. LITERATURE SURVEY. 13 A. Studies on the Great Lakes 13 B. Other Lake Studies 109 IV. DISCUSSION OF THE FIELD WORK 140 V. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 146 APPENDIX: Thermal Water Quality Standards for the States Bordering the Great Lakes. 155 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 167 REFERENCES.,. ..... f 168 LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Page 1. Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Surface Temperatures: June 18, 1968 14 2. Port Washington Harbor Temperatures and Survey Stations: August 13, 1968. 16 3. Michigan City Power Plant Isotherm Map; Surface Temper- ature: June 26, 1969 21 4. Michigan City Isotherm and Station-location Maps: ' - ' . June 28, 1969 22 5. Waukegan Isotherm and Station-location Maps: June 30, 1969 . 28 6. J. R. Whiting Plant Location and Water-temperature Study Points for Determining Thermal Dispersion 34 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Lake County Single Occupancy Vehicle Reduction
    Lake County Single Occupancy Vehicle Reduction Study Existing and Future Conditions May 2020 (rev Aug 2020) Prepared for: Lake County Division of Transportation Prepared by: AECOM 303 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1400 Chicago, IL 60601 aecom.com In association with: Metro Strategies, Inc. Joseph P. Schwieterman Analytics, Inc. Copyright © 2020 by AECOM All rights reserved. No part of this copyrighted work may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of AECOM. AECOM | Lake County Single Occupancy Vehicle Reduction Study 2 Table of contents 1 SOV Reduction Study Background ...............................................................6 1.1 Existing and Future Conditions Task Overview ...................................................................... 7 2 Review Relevant Plans and Studies ..............................................................8 3 Socio-Economic Analysis ............................................................................11 4 Travel Characteristics ...................................................................................13 4.1 Travel by Mode ........................................................................................................................ 13 4.2 Vehicle Miles Traveled ............................................................................................................ 14 4.3 Vehicle Availability .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Existing Transit Systems
    #156004 v1 KRY/SD/sd 1/11/11 Preliminary Draft SEWRPC Community Assistance Planning Report No. 281 KENOSHA COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2010-2014 Chapter V EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING TRANSIT SYSTEMS [Text to be inserted after the section titled “EVALUATION OF KENOSHA TRANSIT AREA” and prior to “ASSESSMENT OF UNMET TRANSIT SERVICE NEEDS” on page 16 of the draft Chapter V distributed at the August 27, 2009 meeting] EVALUATION OF WESTERN KENOSHA COUNTY TRANSIT The evaluation of Western Kenosha County Transit includes a systemwide performance evaluation to measure how well the transit system serves existing population, employment, and activity centers, and an assessment of how well the system’s overall ridership and financial performance compares to similar transit systems. These systemwide evaluations are followed with assessments of ridership and effectiveness for each individual route and transit service provided by the system in 2010, and an analysis of bus stops to determine where passenger shelters are warranted. The evaluation concludes with a review of public comments and rider concerns to identify any areas of concern for transit system riders. Western Kenosha County Transit Systemwide Performance Evaluation: Service to Existing Population, Employment, and Land Uses The transit system’s service area should include areas that have relatively dense concentrations of population and employment, as well as major activity centers and transit-dependent population groups. For this section, staff estimated the extent to which land uses were served within a one-quarter mile walk access service area from Western Kenosha County Transit fixed-route stops. It should be noted that riders may request a specific stop along a route or can be picked up along a route by flagging the bus or calling the dispatcher, even though the service is not advertised as a flexibly-operated route.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transportation Authority Suite 1650 Chicago, Illinois 60604 312-913-3200 Board Agenda Rtachicago.Org
    175 West Jackson Blvd. Regional Transportation Authority Suite 1650 Chicago, Illinois 60604 312-913-3200 Board Agenda rtachicago.org Finance Committee Thursday, December 19, 2019 LOCATION CHANGE - CMAP Board Room, Suite 800, 233 S. Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 9:00 a.m. 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes 2.a. From the meeting held on November 21, 2019 3. Information Items 3.a. Report on Monthly Financial Results - October 2019 Description: Staff will make a presentation in dashboard format to the Finance Committee of financial results (ridership, operating revenues, public funding, expenses, and recovery ratios) for the budget year through October 2019. 3.b. Presentation of the Semi-Annual PMO Report Description: RTA has been performing PMO for Service Board capital projects since 1992, when the program was originally established. PMO is designed to accomplish the goals established by the RTA Act and implemented through the standard grant agreement with the Service Boards. 4. Action Items 4.a. Ordinances authorizing the quarterly amendment to the 2019-2023 Capital Program and amending ICE funded projects Description: Staff is requesting Board approval of two ordinances, one approving the amendment to the 2019-2023 Capital Program and the other amending the ICE funded projects. 4.b. Ordinance adopting the 2020 Regional and Service Board Budgets Description: The proposed ordinance adopts the 2020 Operating Budgets, 2021-2022 Financial Plans, and 2020-2024 Capital Programs of the Service Boards and the Authority, including the RTA Agency. Regional Transportation Authority Page 1 Printed on 12/10/2019 Finance Committee Board Agenda December 19, 2019 ADJOURNMENT Regional Transportation Authority Page 2 Printed on 12/10/2019 MINUTES OF A PUBLIC MEETING OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY The Finance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Regional Transportation Authority met in public session on Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., in Suite 1650, 175 W.
    [Show full text]
  • TC April 22 2021 Full Packet (PDF)
    CommitteeCommittee ChairChair:: RobertRobert PhillipsPhillips DeerfieldDeerfield Members:Members: AntiochAntioch BannockburnBannockburn BeachBeach ParkPark BuffaloBuffalo GroveGrove Transportation Committee Agenda DeerfieldDeerfield Time: 9:00 a.m. DeerDeer ParkPark Date: April 22, 2021 FoxFox LakeLake Location: Zoom Virtual Meeting GrayslakeGrayslake Registration is Required for Login Details GreenGreen OaksOaks Click Here to Register GurneeGurnee HainesvilleHainesville HawthornHawthorn WoodsWoods Action Requested HighlandHighland ParkPark 1) Opening of Meeting/Introductions Call to Order HighwoodHighwood IndianIndian CreekCreek 2) Approval of Minutes Approval IslandIsland LakeLake a. January 21, 2021 Meeting (Attachment 1) KildeerKildeer 3) Agency Reports Information LakeLake BarringtonBarrington a. IDOT Bureau of Programming Katie Herdus LakeLake BluffBluff b. IDOT Bureau of Local Roads & Streets (Attachment 2) Alex Househ LakeLake ForestForest c. ISTHA Report (Attachment 3) Kelsi Passi LakeLake VillaVilla d. CMAP Report Russell Pietrowiak LakeLake ZurichZurich e. RTA Report Andy Plummer LibertyviLibertyvillelle f. Metra Report Rick Mack g. Pace Report Mary Donner LincolnshireLincolnshire LindenhurstLindenhurst 4) STP-Shared Fund Application Bonus Points LongLong GroveGrove a. LCCOM Bonus Points Policy (Attachment 4) Approval MettawaMettawa b. 2021 Bonus Points Allocation (Attachment 5) Approval MundeleinMundelein NorthNorth BarringtonBarrington 5) Lake Council STP Program NorthNorth ChicagoChicago a. Current Program Status (Attachment
    [Show full text]
  • Waukegan Harbor Citizens' Advisory Group
    Waukegan Harbor Citizens’ Advisory Group P.O. Box 297 Waukegan, Illinois 60079 http://waukeganharborcag.com Minutes of the June 18, 2015, CAG meeting held at Lilac Cottage, Waukegan Park District, Waukegan respectfully submitted by Natalie Dutack, acting as Recording Secretary of the Waukegan Harbor Citizens’ Advisory Group. The June 18, 2015, meeting of the Waukegan Harbor Citizens Advisory Group was called to order at 6:10 pm by Chair, Susie Schreiber. The Chair welcomed those in attendance and asked everyone to identify themselves and any group that they represent. Attendance at the June 18, 2015 CAG Meeting: Penny Bouchard Concerned Citizen Amanda Bozorhi CAG Eco Ambassador Larry Brewer Concerned Citizen Tom Chefalo Lake County Planning, Building & Development Barb Cornew Concerned Citizen Adrian Diaz Jr CAG Eco Ambassador Natalie Dutack GLRI Quality Assurance Manager Claudia Freeman Waukegan Park District Frank Furlan City of Waukegan Public Works Department Paul Kakuris Concerned Citizen Bill Lebensorger GLRI Grant Administrator Heriberto Leon USEPA Chris Logan City of Waukegan Lauren Luebker AKZO Nobel Alexander Morgan Sierra Club Scott Myers JM Jamie O’Meara Waukegan Port District Steve Robillard IDNR Ania Ruszaj IDNR Susie Schreiber Illinois Audubon Chris Tanner Tanner Environmental Diane Tecic IDNR Brent Tracy JM Fred Veenbaas NRG, Inc. Waukegan Station Waukegan Harbor Citizens’ Advisory Group – June 2015 Minutes - FINAL Page 1 GUESTS: Rosemary Heilemann League of Women Voters – Lake County & Lake Michigan Region Christina Nannicelli Sierra Club Verena Owen Concerned Citizen / Sierra Club Serina Runft AECOM AGENDA No Additions MINUTES The May minutes are ready. They just need some corrections and will be sent our later.
    [Show full text]
  • North Chicago Station Area Planning Study
    Appendices Market Assessment Community Input Process Appendix Market Assessment 74 Appendix Market Assessment STATION AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF NORTH CHICAGO Prepared in Conjunction with The North Chicago Station Area Plan May 2007 By GOODMAN WILLIAMS GROUP Chicago, Illinois North Chicago Transit-Oriented Development Study January 2008 75 Appendix Market Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................1 II. SOCIOECONOMIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................................4 III. COMMERCIAL MARKET OVERVIEW............................................................................17 IV. RESIDENTIAL MARKET OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 31 ADDENDA x Marketing Materials for Sheridan Road Development Sites x Residential Development Information Sheets 76 Appendix Market Assessment I. INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSIONS Background to the Assignment Farr Associates has been retained by the City of North Chicago under the RTAP Program to complete a transit-oriented development plan for the area around the North Chicago Station on Metra’s Union Pacific North Line. As part of this planning process, Farr Associates has contracted with Goodman Williams Group to assess the current and future development environment in North Chicago and provide market input to the station area plan. This report presents overviews of the commercial and residential markets. Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Metra Rider's Guide & Stations Guide For
    METRA RIDER'S GUIDE & STATIONS GUIDE FOR CUSTOMERS WITH DISABILITIES Third Edition 1 Transcriber’s Note For more information on individual stations see the Table of Contents on page 00. All Aboard Metra Riders' Guide for Customers with Disabilities Welcome to Metra the commuter rail system. This rider's guide informs customers with disabilities about the accessible features of Metra's train system. Our goal is to make Metra the most accessible commuter rail system in the nation. At Metra, every customer is important. We recognize there are individuals with disabilities who may require accessible facilities in order to utilize the Metra system. Many stations have been modified to provide improved amenities, signage and pathways. Every Metra diesel train is equipped with at least one accessible railcar with a wheelchair lift. On the Metra Electric, all cars are accessible. NOTE: All Metra accessible railcars have lifts that can accommodate a total weight of 600 pounds. Metra can accommodate wheelchairs and scooters that fit within a 30-inch by 48-inch space (measured 2 inches from the ground). Please contact Metra Passenger Services at (312) 322-6777 if you have any questions about whether you and your mobility aid can be transported. In addition to providing safe, dependable and convenient train service, Metra personnel continue to be trained to understand the barriers a customer with a disability may encounter at a station, or on the train, and can provide the necessary assistance for a stress-free trip. A companion piece to this rider's guide is the Metra Stations Guide. Stations are arranged by line from their Chicago downtown origin to the end of the particular rail line.
    [Show full text]