DOCSLIB.ORG

Bw1 Foia Cbp 004530

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bw1 Foia Cbp 004530 BW1 FOIA CBP 004773 BW1 FOIA CBP 004774 BW1 FOIA CBP 004775 BW1 FOIA CBP 004776 BW1 FOIA CBP 004777 BW1 FOIA CBP 004778 BW1 FOIA CBP 004779 BW1 FOIA CBP 004780 BW1 FOIA CBP 004781 BW1 FOIA CBP 004782 BW1 FOIA CBP 004783 BW1 FOIA CBP 004784 BW1 FOIA CBP 004785 BW1 FOIA CBP 004786 BW1 FOIA CBP 004787 BW1 FOIA CBP 004788 BW1 FOIA CBP 004789 BW1 FOIA CBP 004790 BW1 FOIA CBP 004791 BW1 FOIA CBP 004792 BW1 FOIA CBP 004793 BW1 FOIA CBP 004794 BW1 FOIA CBP 004795 BW1 FOIA CBP 004796 BW1 FOIA CBP 004797 BW1 FOIA CBP 004798 BW1 FOIA CBP 004799 BW1 FOIA CBP 004800 BW1 FOIA CBP 004801 BW1 FOIA CBP 004802 BW1 FOIA CBP 004803 BW1 FOIA CBP 004804 BW1 FOIA CBP 004805 BW1 FOIA CBP 004806 BW1 FOIA CBP 004807 BW1 FOIA CBP 004808 BW1 FOIA CBP 004809 BW1 FOIA CBP 004810 BW1 FOIA CBP 004811 BW1 FOIA CBP 004812 BW1 FOIA CBP 004813 Josh McEnany From: Josh McEnany Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 9:54 AM To: Josh McEnany Subject: FW: Improvement and Construction, Operation and Maintenance in Imperial County From: Julie Hagen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 8:14 AM To: PETRILLA, JOHN Cc: Raymond Cuero; Tina Estrada Subject: Improvement and Construction, Operation and Maintenance in Imperial County GoodMorning, ViejasBandofKumeyaayIndiansreceivedyournoticeonimprovinganexistingborderroadandweareconcernwiththe factthereareculturalresourcesinthevicinity.ViejasBandwouldliketoknowifthereisgoingtobeaNativeAmerican Culturalmonitorpresentwhenyouaredoingyourimprovementstohelpyouwithavoidinganyimpactstocultural resources.Thankyou Julie Hagen Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Environmental Coordinator Phone: 619-659-2339 Cell: 619-890-2346 1 BW1 FOIA CBP 004814 BW1 FOIA CBP 004815 Public Comment Response Matrix Draft EA for the Improvement and Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of Proposed All-Weather Road in the El Centro Station Area of Responsibility, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), El Centro Sector December 2012 # Location Comment Reviewer CBP’s Response Page Line Section 0 The Native American Heritage Commission did conduct a Sacred Dave Singleton, Lands File (SLF) search of its inventory and Native American Program cultural resources were not identified in the location you specified. Analyst, Native Thank you for your 1 General American comment and analyses. Heritage Commission The U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) has responsibility through treaties between the United States and Mexico to maintain the integrity of the border. Included in the demarcation of the boundary through the John L. Merino, Thank you for your maintenance of permanent boundary monuments to include access Principal comment, no structures 2 General for their inspection and maintenance. Any proposed construction Engineer, would be built as part of must allow for line of sight visibility between each of the USIBWC the Proposed Action. boundary monuments. The USIBWC requires that all structures be off-set from the international boundary by a minimum of 3 feet and allow a clear line of sight between any affected boundary monuments. The USIBWC will not approve any construction near the Thank you for your international boundary in the United States that increases, comment. No construction concentrates, or relocates overland drainage flows into either John L. Merino, or improvement activities country. Principal would increase, concentrate 3 General Engineer, or relocate any overland USIBWC drainages flowing into either the United States or Mexico. BW1 FOIA CBP 004816 Public Comment Response Matrix Draft EA for the Improvement and Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of Proposed All-Weather Road in the El Centro Station Area of Responsibility, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), El Centro Sector December 2012 # Location Comment Reviewer CBP’s Response Page Line Section When available, the USIBWC requests the preliminary design Thank you for your drawings and hydraulic studies be submitted to the USIBWC for comment. Design review and approval prior to begi nning any construction near the drawings for Phase A (2 international boundary. Miles of All-Weather Road John L. Merino, Improvements from Mount Principal Signal Road moving West) 4 General Engineer, has been submitted to the USIBWC USIBWC for approval. Phase B will be submitted for approval prior to construction activities occurring. The Cultural Resources Department of the Cocopah Indian Tribe appreciates your consultation efforts on this project. We are Jill McCormick, pleased that you contacted this department on this cultural Thank you for your Cultural resource issue for the purpose of solicitation of our input and to comment and support. Resource 5 General address our concerns on this matter. We concur with the Findings CBP will keep the Cocopah Manager, of No Significant Impact (FONSI) determination made by your Indian Tribe informed as Cocopah Indian agency. We would like to continue to be kept informed on the the project moves forward. Tribe progression of the project and be a apart of the consultation process in the future. On page 304, 3.2.1 Affected Environment, lines 8-10 state, “IID has an extant gravel/sand quarry located near the eastern terminus of the project area. This site is currently not in use; however, IID could continue operations in the future.” (See Figure 3-1, page 3- Donald Vargas, 5).” In 2012 IID relinquished the mineral materials sites and did Environmental The document has been not renew the permit for gravel and clay out of the Mount Signal Specialist, revised to reflect that IID 6 3-4 8-10 3.2.1 Gravel Pit. The BLM concluded that the IID had completed all Imperial has no intention of using the reclamation tasks and responsibilities associated with the Irrigation the quarry site in the future. operation of the Mount Signal Gravel Pit and complied with all District BLM conditions an general stipulations. The Mount Signal Gravel Pit is located within the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 17 South, Range 12 East, San Bernardino Meridian. BW1 FOIA CBP 004817 Public Comment Response Matrix Draft EA for the Improvement and Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of Proposed All-Weather Road in the El Centro Station Area of Responsibility, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), El Centro Sector December 2012 # Location Comment Reviewer CBP’s Response Page Line Section The project site lies outside the All-American Canal (AAC) Donald Vargas, Service Area Boundary. Thus, the developer is ineligible to draw Environmental water from the Westside Main Canal/AAC for this project and will Specialist, CBP will obtain its water 7 General be required to contract water from a commercial source. Imperial from a contract source. Irrigation District Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians received your notice on Julie Hagen improving an existing border road and we are concern with the Viejas Band of Native American monitors fact there are cultural resources in the vicinity. Viejas Band would Kumeyaay 8 General will be onsite during like to know if there is going to be a Native American Cultural Indians construction. monitor present when you are doing your improvements to help Environmental you with avoiding any impacts to cultural resources. Coordinator BW1 FOIA CBP 004818 BW1 FOIA CBP 004819 BW1 FOIA CBP 004820 BW1 FOIA CBP 004821 BW1 FOIA CBP 004822 BW1 FOIA CBP 004823 BW1 FOIA CBP 004824 BW1 FOIA CBP 004825 BW1 FOIA CBP 004826 BW1 FOIA CBP 004827 BW1 FOIA CBP 004828 BW1 FOIA CBP 004829 STATE OF CALIFORNIA – THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION rd 1725 23 Street, Suite 100 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-7100 (916) 445-7000 Fax: (916) 445-7053 [email protected] www.ohp.parks.ca.gov December 20, 2012 Reply in Reference To: CBP_2012_1210_001 Christopher Colacicco, Director Real Estate and Environmental Services Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW EPA West Building, B-155 Washington, DC 20229 Re: Section 106 Consultation for Improvement, Construction, Operation and Maintenance of 1.6 Miles of All-Weather Road, Imperial County Dear Director Colacicco: Thank you for initiating consultation regarding the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) efforts to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470f), as amended, and its implementing regulation found at 36 CFR Part 800. You have identified the undertaking as the construction, operation and maintenance of 1.6 miles of all-weather road in Imperial County. Project activities include the improvement of a segment of existing border road between Border Monuments 224 and 225 through widening, installation of drainage features and new access road. It is my understanding that Native American tribes have been notified about this project but no comments have been received at this time. No listed or eligible National Register resources have been identified within the project area and CBP is requesting my concurrence with their finding of no historic properties affected. After reviewing the information submitted by CBP, I have no objection to this finding. Please be advised that under certain circumstances, such as an unanticipated discovery or a change in project description, you may have future responsibilities for this undertaking under 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for seeking my comments and considering historic properties as part of your project planning. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Ed Carroll of my staff at (916) 445- 7006 or at email at [email protected]. Sincerely, Carol Roland-Nawi, PhD State Historic Preservation Officer BW1 FOIA CBP 004830 BW1 FOIA CBP 004831 APPENDIX B BIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT BW1 FOIA CBP 004832 BW1 FOIA CBP 004833 Biological Survey for the West Desert Road El Centro Station, El Centro Sector Dates Surveyed: June 28, 2012 Climate: Calm winds, Sunny, 85° F Biologist: Josh McEnany – Gulf South Research Corporation John Ginter – Gulf South Research Corporation U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is proposing the improvement, construction, operation, and maintenance of approximately 2 miles of all-weather road along the U.S./Mexico border within the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Gall Mite, Aceria Drabae
    United States Department of Field release of the gall mite, Agriculture Aceria drabae (Acari: Marketing and Regulatory Eriophyidae), for classical Programs biological control of hoary Animal and Plant Health Inspection cress (Lepidium draba L., Service Lepidium chalapense L., and Lepidium appelianum Al- Shehbaz) (Brassicaceae), in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, January 2018 Field release of the gall mite, Aceria drabae (Acari: Eriophyidae), for classical biological control of hoary cress (Lepidium draba L., Lepidium chalapense L., and Lepidium appelianum Al-Shehbaz) (Brassicaceae), in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, January 2018 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior MAR 2 7 2019
    U,S. FISH & WILDLIFE S1:!;RVICE United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ' .' Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office �-,.111,'"!il'f; In Reply Refer to: 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-2605 0SESMF00- Sacramento, California 95825-1846 2018-F-3331-1 MAR 2 7 2019 Mr. Alessandro Amaglio RegionalEnvironmental Officer, Region IX Federal Emergency Management Agency 1111 Broadway, Suite 1200 Oakland, California 94607 Subject: Programmatic Formal Section 7 Consultationon Federal Emergency Management Agency's Disaster, Mitigation, and Preparedness Programs within the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office'sJurisdiction, California Dear Mr. Amaglio: This letter is in response to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) request to initiate formalsection 7 consultationunder the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act), and provides the U.S. Fish and WildlifeServic e's (Service) programmatic biological opinion on FEMA's Disaster, Mitigation, and Preparedness Programs (proposed project) in Californiaas described in FEMA's June 20, 2018 Programmatic Biological Assessmentfor Disaster, Mitigation, and PreparednessPrograms in California (programmatic biological assessment). We received your June 20, 2018, letter requestinginitiation of consultation in our Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office (SFWO) on June 20, 2018. On September 14, 2018, we received a letter fromFEMA changing effectsdeterminations for 20 species. At issue are the effects of FEMA's proposed action on 35 federally-listed species and their designated or proposed criticalhabitats which the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office has lead responsibility and seven federally-listed species and their critical habitat which occur within the jurisdiction of the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office but for which other Service field officeshave lead responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Phytochemical and Pharmacological Potential of Watercress Plant
    Online - 2455-3891 Vol 11, Issue 12, 2018 Print - 0974-2441 Review Article A REVIEW ON PHYTOCHEMICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF WATERCRESS PLANT SACHIN CHAUDHARY*, HAZAR HISHAM, DOHA MOHAMED Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah-27272, United Arab Emirates. Email: [email protected] Received: 31 August 2018, Revised and Accepted: 20 October 2018 ABSTRACT Nasturtium officinale (family: Brassicaceae) that is commonly known as watercress is a fast-growing aquatic or semi-aquatic perennial plant native to Europe, Central Asia. It is a highly significant food supplement, extensively consumed with salad, juices, or other dishes as an ingredient, flavor, or garnish. The leaves are traditionally used as stomachic, depurative, diuretic, expectorant, hypoglycemic, odontalgic, and stimulant. Meanwhile, it has been used to treat jaundice, asthma, bronchitis, scurvy, tuberculosis, urinary tract infection, and calculi. N. officinale is rich in glucosinolates, Keywords:carotenoids, Asthma, polyphenols, Carotenoids, as well asFolic Vitamin acid, Hypoglycemic, C, Vitamin A, and Tuberculosis, α-tocopherol. Vitamin. It is the main source of iron, calcium, iodine, and folic acid. © 2019 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4. 0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i12.29422 INTRODUCTION The fruits are 10–25 mm long and 2 mm wide and found on stalks that are 8–12 mm long. The fruits are thin, slightly curved cylinders and Herbs and traditional medicines are the most reasonable source of contain four rows of small, round seeds [30,31].
    [Show full text]
  • An Addendum to the FY 2016/2017 Gravity Sewer Improvements Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), State Clearinghouse No
    June 12, 2019 ADDENDUM TO THE FY 2016/2017 GRAVITY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION INTRODUCTION This environmental document is an addendum to the FY 2016/2017 Gravity Sewer Improvements Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), State Clearinghouse No. 2017122069, by the Ross Valley Sanitary District (the District). Amendments to the Final IS/MND1 for the project include: 1) addressing a change of construction methods, and 2) fulfilling requirements for submittal of a State Revolving Fund (SRF) application. These changes and additions to the project have necessitated further environmental review. As demonstrated in this Addendum, the IS/MND continues to serve as the appropriate document addressing the environmental impacts of these improvements pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Background The IS/MND was prepared to address construction-level impacts to the existing deficient gravity sewer mains owned by the District in two areas: the Butterfield/Meadowcroft alignment (Butterfield alignment) and the Nokomis alignment (see Figures 2 and 3 in the IS/MND). The IS/MND evaluated potential environmental effects on aesthetics, agriculture and forestry, air quality, biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation,
    [Show full text]
  • State of California the Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT of FISH and GAME Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database
    State of California The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database STATE & FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED & THREATENED ANIMALS OF CALIFORNIA January 2010 This is a list of animals found within California or off the coast of the State that have been classified as Endangered or Threatened by the California Fish & Game Commission (state list) or by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior or the U.S. Secretary of Commerce (federal list). The official California listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 670.5. The official federal listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is published in the Federal Register, 50 CFR 17.11. The California Endangered Species Act of 1970 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Rare”. The California Endangered Species Act of 1984 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Threatened”. On January 1, 1985, all animal species designated as “Rare” were reclassified as “Threatened”. Animals that are candidates for state listing and animals proposed for federal listing are also included on this list. A state candidate species is one that the Fish and Game commission had formally noticed as being under review by the Department for addition to the State list. A federal proposed species is one for which a proposed regulation has been published in the Federal Register. Code Designation: Totals as of January 2010 SE = State-listed as Endangered 45 ST = State listed as Threatened 34 SR = State listed as Rare – old designation, all animals reclassified to Threatened on 1/1/85 0 FE = Federally listed as Endangered (21.5% of all U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: a Flora of Southwestern Arizona. Part 20
    Felger, R.S. and S. Rutman. 2016. Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: A Flora of Southwestern Arizona. Part 20. Eudicots: Solanaceae to Zygophyllaceae. Phytoneuron 2016-52: 1–66. Published 4 August 2016. ISSN 2153 733X AJO PEAK TO TINAJAS ALTAS: A FLORA OF SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA PART 20. EUDICOTS: SOLANACEAE TO ZYGOPHYLLACEAE RICHARD STEPHEN FELGER Herbarium, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 & International Sonoran Desert Alliance PO Box 687 Ajo, Arizona 85321 *Author for correspondence: [email protected] SUSAN RUTMAN 90 West 10th Street Ajo, Arizona 85321 [email protected] ABSTRACT A floristic account is provided for Solanaceae, Talinaceae, Tamaricaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, and Zygophyllaceae as part of the vascular plant flora of the contiguous protected areas of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Tinajas Altas Region in southwestern Arizona—the heart of the Sonoran Desert. This account includes 40 taxa, of which about 10 taxa are represented by fossil specimens from packrat middens. This is the twentieth contribution for this flora, published in Phytoneuron and also posted open access on the website of the University of Arizona Herbarium: <http//cals.arizona.edu/herbarium/content/flora-sw-arizona>. Six eudicot families are included in this contribution (Table 1): Solanaceae (9 genera, 21 species), Talinaceae (1 species), Tamaricaceae (1 genus, 2 species), Urticaceae (2 genera, 2 species), Verbenaceae (4 genera, 7 species), and Zygophyllaceae (4 genera, 7 species). The flora area covers 5141 km 2 (1985 mi 2) of contiguous protected areas in the heart of the Sonoran Desert (Figure 1). The first article in this series includes maps and brief descriptions of the physical, biological, ecological, floristic, and deep history of the flora area (Felger et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This Is a Consolidated List Of
    RWKiger 26 Jul 18 Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 24 and 25. In citations of articles, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix "a"; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with "b". Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes. Aares, E., M. Nurminiemi, and C. Brochmann. 2000. Incongruent phylogeographies in spite of similar morphology, ecology, and distribution: Phippsia algida and P. concinna (Poaceae) in the North Atlantic region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 220: 241–261. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges. = Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft. Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. = Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica. Acta Horti Bot. Prag. = Acta Horti Botanici Pragensis. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. = Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. [Shokubutsu Bunrui Chiri.] Acta Phytotax.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Allen's OCCNPS Presentation About Plant Families.Pages
    Stigma How to identify flowering plants Style Pistil Bob Allen, California Native Plant Society, OC chapter, occnps.org Ovary Must-knows • Flower, fruit, & seed • Leaf parts, shapes, & divisions Petal (Corolla) Anther Stamen Filament Sepal (Calyx) Nectary Receptacle Stalk Major local groups ©Bob Allen 2017 Apr 18 Page !1 of !6 A Botanist’s Dozen Local Families Legend: * = non-native; (*) = some native species, some non-native species; ☠ = poisonous Eudicots • Leaf venation branched; veins net-like • Leaf bases not sheathed (sheathed only in Apiaceae) • Cotyledons 2 per seed • Floral parts in four’s or five’s Pollen apertures 3 or more per pollen grain Petal tips often • curled inward • Central taproot persists 2 styles atop a flat disk Apiaceae - Carrot & Parsley Family • Herbaceous annuals & perennials, geophytes, woody perennials, & creepers 5 stamens • Stout taproot in most • Leaf bases sheathed • Leaves alternate (rarely opposite), dissected to compound Style “horns” • Flowers in umbels, often then in a secondary umbel • Sepals, petals, stamens 5 • Ovary inferior, with 2 chambers; styles 2; fruit a dry schizocarp Often • CA: Apiastrum, Yabea, Apium*, Berula, Bowlesia, Cicuta, Conium*☠ , Daucus(*), vertically Eryngium, Foeniculum, Torilis*, Perideridia, Osmorhiza, Lomatium, Sanicula, Tauschia ribbed • Cult: Apium, Carum, Daucus, Petroselinum Asteraceae - Sunflower Family • Inflorescence a head: flowers subtended by an involucre of bracts (phyllaries) • Calyx modified into a pappus • Corolla of 5 fused petals, radial or bilateral, sometimes both kinds in same head • Radial (disk) corollas rotate to salverform • Bilateral (ligulate) corollas strap-shaped • Stamens 5, filaments fused to corolla, anthers fused into a tube surrounding the style • Ovary inferior, style 1, with 2 style branches • Fruit a cypsela (but sometimes called an achene) • The largest family of flowering plants in CA (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Poaceae: Chloridoideae)
    Peterson, P.M., K. Romaschenko, and Y. Herrera Arrieta. 2017. Four new subtribes: Allolepiinae, Jouveinae, Kaliniinae, and Sohnsiinae in the Cynodonteae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Phytoneuron 2017-44: 1–9. Published 18 July 2017. ISSN 2153 733 FOUR NEW SUBTRIBES: ALLOLEPIINAE, JOUVEINAE, KALINIINAE, AND SOHNSIINAE IN THE CYNODONTEAE (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE) PAUL M. PETERSON and KONSTANTIN ROMASCHENKO Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC 20013-7012 [email protected] YOLANDA HERRERA ARRIETA Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA Durango, C.P. 34220, MÉXICO ABSTRACT Allolepis, Jouvea, Kalina , and Sohnsia are small (only Jouvea contains two species), often overlooked genera that are morphologically and genetically isolated within the tribe Cynodonteae. We present a molecular phylogeny using sequence data from seven plastid markers ( ccsA, ndhA intron, ndhF, rpl32-trnL, rpoC2, rps16-trnK , and rps16 intron) and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS 1 & 2). Since Allolepis, Jouvea, Kalinia, and Sohnsia do not align within any of the 21 existing Cynodonteae subtribes, we describe Allolepiinae , Jouveinae , Kaliniinae , and Sohnsiinae as new. In addition, we provide descriptions, habitat, distribution, and comments for each subtribe. Allolepis texana (Vasey) Scribn., Jouvea pilosa (J. Presl) Scribn, J. straminea E. Fourn., and Sohnsia filifolia (E. Fourn.) Airy Shaw are dioecious, caespitose grasses, whereas Kalinia obtusiflora (E. Fourn.) H.L. Bell & Columbus has 4–8 mm wide, sharp-pointed rhizomes and perfect florets. Historically, these western hemisphere grasses were placed in other genera, i.e., Brizopyrum (Presl, 1830; Fournier 1886) , Calamochloa (Fournier 1877), Distichlis (Lamson-Scribner 1899), Eragrostis (Lamson-Scribner 1897) , Poa (Kunth 1833; Vasey 1890b), and Rhachidospermum (Vasey 1890a), until recently being aligned within the Cynodonteae (Columbus 2007; Peterson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]