07/23/09 Agenda

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z)

Donna A. Keys-District I Jens Tripson-District 3 Gregory W. Smith-District 4 Pilar E. Turner-District 5 David L. Cox-Member at Large Sam Zimmerman-District 2 Carol Johnson - Non-voting liaison School Board

George Hamner, Jr., Chairman

The Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 7:00 p.m. ON THURSDAY, July 23, 2009, in the County Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, 180 I 27th Street, Vero Beach.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHALL ADJOURN NO LATER THAN 11:00 P.M. UNLESS THE MEETING IS EXTENDED OR CONTINUED TO A TIME CERTAIN BY A COMMISSION VOTE.

AGENDA

ITEM #I CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ITEM#2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. July 9, 2009

ITEM#3 ITEM NOT ON CONSENT

A. Realtors Association of Indian River County: Request for site plan approval to construct an office building and related improvements within the Quay Dock Road historic road buffer. Realtors Association oflndian River County, Owner. Kimley-Hom & Associates, Inc., Agent. The subject property is located at the southeast comer of US Highway I and Quay Dock Road. Zoning Classifications: CL, Limited Commercial, and RM-3, Residential Multi-Family (up to 3 units/acre). Land Use Designations: C/I, Commercial/Industrial, and L-1, Low Density I (up to 3 units/acre) [Quasi-Judicial]

F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\P&Z\Agenda & Lists 2009\7-23-09 Agenda.rt( ITEM#4 COMMISSIONERS MATTERS

ITEM#5 PLANNING MATTERS

A. Planning Information Package

ITEM#6 ATTORNEY'S MATTERS

ITEM#7 ADJOURNMENT

ANYONEWHOMAYWISHTOAPPEALANYDECISION, WHICHMAYBEMADEATTHISMEETING, WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED.

ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 772-226-1223, (TDD #772-770-5215) AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.

Meeting may be broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 -may be rebroadcast continuously Saturday 7:00 p.m. until Sunday morning 7:00 a.m. Meeting broadcast same as above on Comcast Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.

F:\Communily Developmcnt\Uscrs\CurDcv\P&ZIAgenda & Lists 2009\7-23-09 Agcnda.rtf ? PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

There was a meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) on Thursday, July 9, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, 1801 2?1h Street, Vero Beach, Florida. You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the meeting agenda, backup material and the minutes on Indian River County website www.ircgov.com/Boards/PZC/2009.

Present were members: Chairman George Hamner, Member-at Large; Donna Keys, District 1 Appointee; Sam Zimmerman, District 2 Appointee; Jens Tripson, District 3 Appointee; Greg Smith, District 4 Appointee; Pilar Turner, District 5 Appointee; and Dr. David Cox, Member-at-Large.

Absent was Carol Johnson, non-voting School Board Liaison (excused).

Also present was IRC staff: George Glenn, Assistant County Attorney; Bob Keating, Community Development Director; Stan Boling, Planning Director; Steven Deardeuff, Senior Planner; and Reta Smith, Recording Secretary.

Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance (6:10:22)

Chairman Hamner called the meeting to order and led all in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Approval of Minutes (6:11 :08)

ON MOTION BY Dr. Cox, SECONDED BY Ms. Turner, the members voted unanimously (7-0) to approve the minutes of the meeting of May 28, 2009, as presented.

Public Hearing (6:11:19)

Chairman Hamner read the following into the record:

A. Richard Bird's request to rezone ~ 1.70 acres from IL (Light Industrial) to CG (General Commercial). The subject property is located at the northwest corner of US Highway 1 and 5?1h

PZC/Unapproved 1 July 9, 2009 F:/BCC/AII Committees/PZC/2009 Ag&Min/PZCMin070909.doc Street, east of Old Dixie Highway. (RZON-+9030022-63880) [Quasi-Judicial]

The secretary administered the testimonial oath to those present who wished to speak at tonight's meeting on any quasi-judicial items.

Mr. Steven Deardeuff, IRC Senior Planner (6:12:10), reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated June 30, 2009, a copy of which is on file in the County Commission Office.

6:15:22 ON MOTION BY Mr. Smith, SECONDED BY Ms. Keys, the members voted unanimously (7-0) to approve staff's recommendation.

Commissioners Matters (6:16:26)

None.

Planning Matters (6:16:32)

Mr. Stan Boling, IRC Planning Director (6:17:13), outlined possible impacts of Senate Bill 360.

Discussion followed.

Attorney's Matters (6:51 :55)

None.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.

George Hamner, Chairman Date

Reta Smith, Recording Secretary Date

PZC/Unapproved 2 July 9, 2009 F:/BCC/AII Committees/PZC/2009 Ag&Min/PZCMin070909.doc MAJOR SITE PLAN (QUASl-,JUDICIAL)

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM

TO: The Honorable Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission

THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Planning Director

FROM: Mark Zans; Senior Planner, Current Development

DATE: July 15, 2009

SUBJECT: Realtors Association of Indian River County's Request for Site Plan Approval to Construct an Office Building and Related Improvements [SP-MA-09-05-15 / 2006060290-63685]

It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting of July 23, 2009.

DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS

Kimley-Hom & Associates Inc. has submitted an application for site plan approval on behalf of the Realtors Association of Indian River County to construct an office building and related improvements at the southeast comer of US Highway 1 and Quay Dock Road, a road designated as historic in the county's comprehensive plan (see attachment #7). Fronting 67th Street, Quay Dock Road, and U.S. Highway 1, the site is split zoned with CL (Commercial Limited) and RM-3 (Residential Multi family/ up to 3 units per acre) zoning. Recently, the county rezoned a small portion of the project site from RM-3 to CL to make up for the amount of CL zoned property lost from the site through right of-way dedication.

The site is currently vacant, and proposed to be developed as an office building, a permitted use in the CL zoning district. As proposed, the site plan shows that a small portion of the site improvements will be constructed within the Quay Dock Road historic road buffer. Under the county's scenic and historic roads regulations (see attachment #6), the proposed "encroachment" is allowed if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.

The Planning and Zoning Commission is now to consider approval of the request for site plan approval and construction of certain improvements within the Quay Dock Road historic road buffer.

F:\Community Development\Users\MARKZ\Docs\P&Z\J,009\RealtorsAssocationBuilding\p&zreport.rtf 1 ANALYSIS 1. Size of Development: 2.20 Acres or 95,832 square feet

2. Zoning Classifications: CL (Limited Commercial) RM-3 (Residential Multi-Family up to 3 units per acre)

Note: The western 62 % of the site is zoned CL, while the eastern 38 % is zoned RM-3.

3. Land Use Designations: C/I (Commercial/Industrial) L-1 (Low-Density I up to 3 units per acre)

4. Building Area: 8,097 square feet ( office and meeting room area) Note: The proposed building is one story.

5. Open Space: Required: 30.7%* Proposed: 52.0% Note: The required open space is calculated on a pro-rated basis using the minimum open space requirements of the CL (25%) and the RM-3 (40%) districts.

6. Traffic Circulation: Access to the site will be from one full movement driveway connection to 67th Street which will be paved (see #12 below). There will be no access or driveway connection to U.S. Highway I or Quay Dock Road. County traffic engineering has approved the internal traffic circulation plan and the project traffic study. Other than the 67th Street paving, no off-site traffic improvements are required or proposed,

7. Off-Street Parking: Required: 29 spaces Provided: 41 spaces (39 standard and 2 handicapped)

Note: The parking area is located adjacent to the office building at the west end of the site. Although the amount of parking exceeds the county minimum for office buildings, the "extra" spaces are needed to accommodate parking for meetings and seminars.

8. Utilities: The project will have public water and sewer service provided by the county. The Department of Utility Services and the Department of Health have approved these project utility provisions.

9. Tree Preservation: There are numerous existing oak and palm trees on the site. Of these, 16 oaks and 9 palms are to be preserved or relocated within the proposed development. The palm trees are located in the northern and western part of the site, with a majority of the oak trees at the eastern end of the site. No specimen size trees are being removed from the site; so no mitigation is required. During construction, tree protection barriers will need to be placed around all trees to be preserved. The county's environmental planning staff has approved the project's tree protection/ relocation plan.

10. Landscape Plan: The proposed landscape plan satisfies the requirements of Chapter 926 of the LDRs. As required, the site plan depicts a thoroughfare roadway landscape buffer and a local roadway / Type "B" buffer along U.S. Highway I and 67 th Street, respectively. Both landscape buffers include a 4' opaque feature above parking lot grade. The Quay Dock Road buffer varies in width from 25' to 45' and is equivalent to a Type "B" buffer with a 4' opaque feature.

F:\Community Development\Users\MARKZ\Docs\P&Z\2009\RealtorsAssocationBuilding\p&zreport.rtf 2 11. Stormwater Management: The preliminary stormwater management plan has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The plan proposes two stormwater management tracts (one dry, one wet) to be located along the site's north and east boundaries. Pursuant to Chapter 930 of the LDRs, a County Type "A" Stormwater Permit will be required prior to site plan release.

12. 67'h Street Improvements: The applicant proposes to widen 67'11 Street to two 11 foot lanes and to pave 67th street to a point 50 feet beyond the project entrance (full pavement). The applicant will be required to construct the 67'h Street improvements prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the project.

13. Quay Dock Road Historic Resource: Quay Dock Road is one of five roads in the county designated as "scenic and historic" in the comprehensive plan. (see attachment# 7). Pursuant to LDR Chapter 933.08, a 30' wide historic road buffer is required along the project site's Quay Dock Road frontage. Section 933.08 allows for "encroachments" into the buffer if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.

As proposed, the site plan depicts a Type "B" buffer (with a 4' opaque feature) that varies from 25' wide (west end) to 45' wide (east end) along the site's entire Quay Dock Road frontage. The proposed "encroachment" into the 30' wide buffer involves 14 parking spaces located along the western portion of the site's Quay Dock Road frontage encroaching into the south 5 feet of the buffer. Because the site has an unusual triangular shape and is affected by setback constraints resulting from front yards on 3 streets as well as the extra 30' buffer required along Quay Dock Road, staffs position is that the site plan design minimizes the amount of Quay Dock Road encroachment, while allowing reasonable development on a constrained site.

According to Section 902.06 of the LDRs, the HRAC (Historical Resources Advisory Committee) has the authority to review and evaluate any site plan, planned development, or subdivision that may impact a historic resource. In the past, the HRAC has reviewed and made recommendations on other projects that front Quay Dock Road (Winter Beach Village, The Antilles). Because the Realtors Association project fronts on Quay Dock Road and proposes an encroachment into the historic road buffer, the project was reviewed by HRAC on March 19, 2009. (see attachment #8). At the March 19th meeting, HRAC recommended approval of the subject project with the following guidelines:

I. That a minimum 30-foot Type "A" buffer be provided along the site's Quay Dock Road frontage.

2. That the height of proposed buildings along Quay Dock Road be limited to one story only.

3. That no construction access be permitted to the site from Quay Dock Road.

4. That no pedestrian access be provided from the project to Quay Dock Road due to concerns regarding pedestrian safety on the narrow road.

After the March 19, 2009 meeting, the applicant modified the site plan to generally comply with the HRAC recommended guidelines as follows:

F:\Community Development\Uscrs\MARKZ\Docs\P&Z\2009\RealtorsAssocationBuilding\p&zreport.rtf 3 a. Depicted a 25' to 45' wide Type "B" buffer with a 4' opaque feature along Quay Dock Road. The proposed buffer is comparable to the recommended 30' wide Type "A" buffer. b. Agreed to limit the office building to one story. c. Agreed not to allow permanent or construction access to or from Quay Dock Road. d. Agreed not construct sidewalk or pedestrian access or improvements along Quay Dock Road.

Staffs conclusion is that the small buffer encroachment proposed is justified and that potential impacts on Quay Dock Road will be mitigated by the project's consistency with the HRAC recommended project guidelines.

14. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:

North: Quay Dock Road, Boat Storage, Residential/ CG/ CL/ RM-3 East: Residential/ RS-3 South: 67'h Street, Residential/ RM-3 West: U.S Highway 1, Residential/ CL

15. Concurrency: As required under the county's concurrency regulations, the applicant has applied for and obtained a conditional concurrency certificate for the project. The concurrency certificate was issued based upon a concurrency analysis and a determination that adequate capacity is available to serve this project. In accordance with county concurrency regulations, the developer will be required to obtain final concurrency certificates prior to issuance of building permits,

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission grant site plan approval for the proposed office building, including the proposed 5' encroachment of parking spaces within a portion of the required 30' Quay Dock Road historic road buffer, with the following conditions:

I. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall:

(a) Pave 67 th Street from U.S. Highway I to a point 50 feet beyond the project entrance, and

(b) Install the Quay Dock Road historic road buffer as depicted on the project site plan.

Attachments: I. Application 2. Location Map APPROVED AS TO FORM 3. Site Plan ANDLEGALSUFF~ 4. Landscape Plan BY;;&~ 5. Aerial GEORGE A. GLENN 6. Scenic and Historic Road regulations, Section 933.08 ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY 7. Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 8.2 8. Minutes of March 19, 2009 HRAC meeting 9. Traffic Impact Summary

F:\Community Development\Users\MARKZ\Docs\P&Z\2009\RealtorsAssocationBuilding\p&zreport.rtf 4 ..,.,.. -

MAJOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION FORM (SPMJ)

COMPUTER ASSIGNED PROJECT#: ;?0 0 (,, 0 b ()). 10 FILE #

PROJECT NAME (PRINT): Realtors Association of Indian River County PROPOSED PROJECT USE: Office S P-fY\ A- 0 9- OS- /S-

PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE PROJECT NAME:_"_,.,S,.am.,_,,..e_"------

OWNER: (PRINT) AGENT: (PRINT) Realtors Association of Indian River County Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. NAME NAME 2182 Ponce De Leon Circle 601 21st Street, Suite 300 ADDRESS ADDRESS Vero Beach FL Vero Beach, FL CITY STATE CITY STATE 32960 <112) 567-....,3"""5_,_,1o"----- 32960 (772 ) 794-_4_0_43__ _ ZIP PHONE ZIP PHONE

(772n78-6490 );[email protected] (772/562-9689) [email protected] FAX E-MAIL FAX E-MAIL Carol Hawk James G. Vitter II P. E. CONTACT PERSON (J a.._S~ACT PERSON SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT

PROJECT ENGINEER: (PRINn PROJECT ARCHITECT:(PRINT) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. C.A.G. NAME NAME 601 21st Street, Suite 300 13 E. Melbourne Ave., Unit C ADDRESS ADDRESS Vero Beach FL Melbourne FL CITY STATE CITY STATE 32960 <:04:,,,3'---._ __ 32901 lli1)508 -~5~16=5~-- ZIP PHONE ZIP PHONE

(772n94-4043 )[email protected] (321m3-306~ [email protected] FAX E-MAIL FAX E-MAIL James G. Vitter II P.E. Kenneth Lebron CONTACT PERSON CONTACT PERSON

F:\Community Dcvelopment\Users\CurDev\APPS\Major SP App Packet.doc Revised September 2007 Page 12:ofl4

ATTACHM!flT 1 ..,... •J______..,,.,..

M I -, rn ,;ti ;ti a: iii&

e e

...... ~,.,-.,,~••••>'•~•~"""''" "'""•~~~'""°"' '"~"'"'' ~ "'"" '"'' ~' - ' &-"

J.-= .. .:::... :-_:··~-i-" -~ -_::=---::=------

!iiii!ih, '

:r~,t

REALTORS ASSN. OF INDIAN SITE PLAN

RIVER COUNTY , IRC ANO SJRWMO COMMENTS INOIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIOA ~ RE:VlS

h:t:J1

I I / I /

I / I / I I

I I . ~ I ! o:~~qi:;:jO: I I I

@ * :J !; ' !~ ' I '

REALTORS oc AS ~OTED """ '""'""" '""'°" KEim A. PELAN, RLA ASSN OF RIV INDIAN LANDSCAPE PLAN ''"'" OY lMC [

INDJAN m,t ER COUNTY '"""'" a, t>

(1) Restrictions. It shall be illegal and subject to the penalties provided herein for any person to engage in any of the following activities without prior authorization from the planning and zoning commission:

(a) The erection of structures within the thirty-foot buffer or designated protected area of any designated historic road.

(b) The placement of overhead utilities within the protected area, except that:

1. Utility drops may be installed to previously existing buildings within the protected area;

2. Primary electrical transmission lines carrying twenty-five thousand (25,000) volts or more may be exempted from this restriction by the county commission after site plan approval when such transmission lines propose to cross the protected area perpendicular to the scenic road;

3. Utility lines carrying less than twenty-five thousand (25,000) volts shall be installed underground. The installation of transformers shall be allowed when landscaped to prevent view from the road when servicing new development from underground electrical transmission lines.

(2) Rules and regulations. The board of county commissioners may from time to time adopt rules and regulations by resolution setting forth specific restrictions for the purpose of preserving scenic and historic roads. Such restrictions may relate to but shall not be limited to the following topics:

(a) Providing for the placement of information signs designating scenic and historic roads and providing historical information to members of the public;

ATTACHMfHT 6 (b) Providing special rules and regulations for the preservation and maintenance of the roads with the intent to protect and enhance their scenic quality.

(3) Use ofprotected area as required yard areas. The protected area defined by this article may be used to fulfill the requirements of these land development regulations pertaining to front, side or back yard setbacks.

(4) Management and protection ofscenic or historic roads. The public works department oflndian River County, the parks department and the community development department shall implement guidelines for maintenance of the scenic and historic roads. The following guidelines apply to all scenic and historic roads:

(a) Clear cutting of vegetation in the protected area of any scenic or historic road shall be prohibited, except under circumstances where sight lines are obstructed and contribute to traffic hazards;

(b) The cutting of selective vegetation within the protected area shall be allowed upon the recommendation of the community development department and approval of the county planning and zoning commission;

( c) The establishment of planting strips within the protected area to be comprised of native vegetation shall be allowed upon approval of the community development director;

( d) Improvements for providing adequate drainage for the roadbed and surrounding properties, and a program of maintenance to ensure the continued effectiveness of the systems may be established;

(e) The selective removal of trees and other vegetation from the protected area shall be allowed when such are damaged beyond restoration. In all cases, all such activity will comply with the Indian River County Tree Protection Chapter;

(f) Individual management plans for scenic and historic roadways may set additional restrictions or requirements for these roadways. Comprehensive Plan Recreation and Open Space Element

POLICY 7.2: The county shall continue to support the activities of the Indian River County/City of Vero Beach Recreation Department.

POLICY 7.3: The county may allow private leisure and recreation groups to use park areas for recreation programs and activities provided that the following conditions are met:

• The area of the park to be used must not currently be in use by the general public or designated for future use on the park master p Ian; , • A lease specifying duration of use, characteristics of use, insurance requirements, fllld other applicable conditions must be executed by the Board of County Commissioners; ,••"' • A _site plan or temporary use permit must be approved by the planning department;

• Any improvements made to the leased site must be done and paid for by the lessee with the improvements reverting to the county when the lease expires,

OBJECTIVE 8: Open Space

By 2004, publicly-owned or publicly-controlled open space acreage in Indian River County will have increased by at least 10% from the 1995 total of68,239 acres. ,' POLICY 8.1: The county shall acquire those environmentally sensitive areas programmed for acquisition in the conservation element of this plan. These areas will be used as open space, passive recreation areas, and historical sites, as appropriate. ·

POLICY 8.2: The county hereby designates the following roadways as scenic/historic roads:

• Jungle Trail • Fellsmere Grade • Quay Dock Road • Old Winter Beach Road • Gifford Dock Road

POLICY 8.3: By 2005, the county shall develop management plans for each of the scenic/historic roads. These management plans shall provide for the protection of open space resources adjacent to these roads and shall designate areas suitable for open space acquisition. These roads will be used as access ways, open space, and corridors incorporating passive and active recreational activities while maintaining their primary historical importance.

Community Development Department Indian River County 49 Supplement 2; Ord. 99-30, Adopted _10/26/99

ATTACHMENT 1 HISTORIC RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

There was a meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC) on Thursday, March 19, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. in the First Floor Conference Room A1-411 of the County Administration Building, 1801 2?1h Street, Vero Beach, Florida.

Present were Chris Crawford, Architect Appointee; Lynne Larkin, Attorney Appointee; Elizabeth Armistead, Citizen-at-Large Appointee; Ardra Rigby, Citizen-at Large Appointee; and Wesley S. Davis, Commissioner Liaison. Absent was Ruth Stanbridge, County Historian (excused).

Also present were IRC Staff: Roland DeBlois, Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief; Andy Sobczak, Community Development Planner; George Glenn, Assistant County Attorney; and Maria Resto, Commissioner Assistant, District 2.

You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the agenda and the minutes on the IRC website - http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/HRAC/2009.htm. Please note listed at the end of each agenda item refers to time location of these items on the audio recorded of the meeting.

Any residents interested in serving on a board or committee, an educational tool to gain an understanding of State of Florida laws regarding government in the sunshine, public records, and ethics is available for review on the IRC website - http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/Sunshine Presentation.pdf.

Call to Order (2:02 p.m.)

Chairman Crawford called the meeting to order, at which time it was noted there was a quorum.

Approval of Minutes of January 15, 2009 Meeting

ON MOTION BY Mrs. Larkin, SECONDED by Mrs. Armistead, the members voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the January 15, 2009 minutes as presented. (00:45)

Consideration of Proposed Development Fronting Historic Quay Dock Road: Realtors Association of Indian River County Commercial Office, 3250 6th Street

Mr. Roland DeBlois, IRC Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief, summarized the memorandum dated March 13, 2009 and presented an aerial view of the address area, copies of which are on file at the Commission Office.

HRAC/Unapproved I March 19, 2009 C:\Documents and Settings\roland\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKC\Min 03 jffj~)IMEffT 8 Mr. DeBlois explained Quay Dock Road was one of five roads in the County deemed "scenic and historic roads' in the Comprehensive Plan. He added the Realtors Association of Indian River County submitted a project application for a commercial office on a parcel bordering Quay Dock Road and as part of the process they were asking HRAC to assess the project's potential impact on historic resources.

Mr. DeBlois introduced Mr. Jim Vitter, Kimley Horn, who commented on the materials Mr. DeBlois presented regarding the Indian River Realtors Association office building project and the proposed vegetated buffer along the property Quay Dock Road frontage.

A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the proposed vegetated buffer and landscape plan for the project.

ON MOTION BY Mrs. Larkin, SECONDED by Mrs. Armistead, the members voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the proposed Realtors Association office adjacent to historic Quay Dock Road with the following requirements: (1 :01 :02)

• Applicant should consider lessening excess parking spaces or redesign to eliminate parking encroachment into the 30' protected area of Quay Dock Road, or consider overflow (non-paved) parking in the encroachment area. • Outdoor lighting should be "downward directional lighting" so as to minimize lighting nuisance to adjacent residential properties. • Realtors Association should erect a marker with information about historic Quay Dock Road (similar to marker at riverfront of Quay Dock). • Type B buffer standards, using native plant species, should be applied along entire stretch of Quay Dock Road frontage.

Update on Relocation of Historic Harshbarger House from Property at 2015 161h Avenue that is Proposed for Redevelopment.

Mr. DeBlois explained there was a prospective land owner who owns a property near to the Harshbarger property and was willing to move the Harshbarger house to his property.

Mrs. Armistead explained they were in the process of analyzing costs for the entire process and stated the two main issues were they might have to cut off the top of the house because of the height and the costs involved with the removal of asbestos.

HRAC/Unapproved 2 March 19, 2009 C:\Documents and Settings\roland\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKC\Min 03 19 09.doc City of Vero Beach Requirement for Certificates of Appropriateness Prior to Approval of Building Permits on Historic Properties.

Chairman Crawford reviewed the City of Vero Beach Historic Preservation Ordinance, a copy of which is on file at the Commission Office. Chairman Crawford explained the city of Vero Beach requirement for a Certificate of Appropriateness before getting an approval for building permits on historic properties. Chairman Crawford said he wanted to make sure the IRC Building Department knew of such requirement.

Budgeting for Financial Assistance for Preservation of Historic Properties

Chairman Crawford inquired if there was a budget, or if the County had some type of incentives, for historic property owners for rehabilitation or maintenance. Mr. DeBlois explained the County did not have funds for individuals who wanted to improve or preserve private historic structures.

A discussion ensued regarding the County's Environmental Bonds and its use for preservation of historic sites.

Status of Historic Survey and Its Use in Long Range Planning Matters

Mr. DeBlois provided a brief review of the Historic Structures Survey and the County-wide Archeological Survey.

Adjournment

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 3:38 p.m.

HRAC/Unapproved 3 March 19, 2009 C:\Documents and Settingslrolandllocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKC\Min 03 19 09.doc . ,._, ...... -' ', Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

REALTORS ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE TRAFFIC IMPACT SUMMARY (Revised December 2008) • 1. Location: Suite 300 60121s1 Slreet • North side of 67"' Street just east of US Highway 1 Vero Beach, Florida 2. Size: 32960 • 8,097 square-foot general office building

3. Trip Generation: • Net New Daily Trip Volume = 178 vehicular trips • Net New A.M. Peak-Hour Volume= 23 vehicular trips • Net New P.M. Peak-Hour Volume= 81 vehicular trips

4. Area of Influence Boundaries: • North - Old Dixie Highway • South - 49"' Street • East - US Highway 1 • West- US Highway 1

5. Significant Roads: • US Highway 1 - 45"' Street to Old Dixie Highway

6. Signi£cant Intersections: • None

7. Trip Distribution: • See Appendix A

8. Internal Capture: • None

9. Pass-by Capture: • General Office Building 8%

10. A.M. Peak Hour Directional% (ingress/ egress): • General Office Building 88% in/12% out

11. P.M. Peak Hour Directional% (ingress/ egress): • General Office Building 17% in/ 83% out

12. Traffic Count Factors Applied: • None

II TEL 772 562 7981 FAX 772 562 9689 ASSISTANTPUBLICWORKSD!RECTOR 1W C' /-=-r-.sz / E'I7i7/3e()/Ib'IJCIVTS s/2&0 ke .=;,f7_~1S,, r /7 &TTACHM£NT 'J Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

13. Off-Site Improvements: • None

14. Roadway Capacities (IRC Link Sheets): • See Appendix B

15. Assume roadway and/ or intersection improvements: • None

16. Significant Dates a) Pre-study conference: • September 3, 2008

b) Traffic counts: • None

c) Study approval: ......

17. SR 60 Interest Share Special Fee • SR 60 westbound between 82nd Avenue to 66"' Avenue: 2.73% assigned to link x 67 trips = 1.8291 trips 1.8291 trips x $4,054 per trip= $7,415.17

G:\47718000\ENG\TRAFFIC\Realtors Association -Traffic Impact Executive Summary.doc REAL TORS ASSOCIATION - 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING Traffic counts In the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as of 9/3/2008 % of LOS REMAINING VESTED PROJECT "D" LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET CAPACITY EXIST. W/PROJECT

685 28% 1010N S.R.A1A S. COUNTY LINE S. VB CITY L. 950 244 21 0 1010S S.R.A1A S. COUNTY LINE S. VBCITYL 950 322 11 0 617 35% 102% 1020N S.R.A1A S. VB CITYL. 1TTH STREET 930 939 13 0 -22 109% 1020S S.R.A1A S. VBCITYL 17TH STREET 930 1,014 3 0 -87 117% 1030N S.R.A1A 17TH STREET S.R.60 860 956 50 0 -146 1030S S.R:A1A 17TH STREET S.R.60 860 734 4 0 122 86% 109% 1040N S.R.A1A S.R.60 N. VBCITYL. 860 912 29 0 -81 98% 1040S S.R.A1A S.R.6D N. VB CITY L. 860 825 14 0 21 58 93% 1050N S.R.A1A N. VB CITY L. FRED TUERK RD. 860 782 20 0 -131 115% 1050S S.R.A1A N. VB CITY L. FRED TUERK RD. 860 981 10 0 368 57% 1060N S.R. A1A FRED TUERK RD. OLD WINTER BEACH RD 860 462 30 0 61% 10608 S.R.A1A FRED TUERK RD. OLD WINTER BEACH RD 860 514 14 0 332 253 71% 1070N S.R.A1A OLD WINTER BEACH RD N. IRS L. 860 566 41 0 57% 1070S S.R.A1A OLD WINTER BEACH RD N. IRS L. 860 469 20 0 371 73% 1080N S.RA1A N. IRS LN. C.R510 860 566 64 0 230 63% 10B0S S.R.A1A N. IRS LN. C.R.510 860 469 74 0 317 596 40% 1090N S.R. A1A C.R. 510 N. COUNTY LINE 998 343 59 0 383 62% 1090S S.R.A1A C.R. 510 N. COUNTY LINE 998 536 79 0 44% 1110N INDtAN RIVER BLVD. 4TH ST.@US1 12TH STREET 1860 789 27 0 1044 67% 1110S INOIAN RIVER BLVD. 4TH ST.@US1 12TH STREET 1860 1,184 61 0 615 56% 1120N INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 12TH STREET S. VB CITY L 1860 1,024 11 0 825 86% 1120S INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 12TH STREET S. VBCITYL 1860 1,541 51 0 268 55% 1130N JNDIAN RIVER BLVD. S. VB CllYL. 17THSTREET 1860 1,024 5 0 831 85% 1130S INDlAN RIVER BLVD. S. VBCITYL. 17TH STREET 1860 1,541 39 0 280 839 55% 1140N INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 17TH STREET 21STSTREET 1860 1,002 19 0 470 76% 1140S INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 17TH STREET 21STSTREET 1940 1,392 78 0 308 83% 1150N lNDIAN RIVER BLVD. 21STSTREET S.R.6D 1860 1.458 94 0 81% 1150S INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 21STSTREET S.R.6D 2242 1,706 108 0 428 68% 1160N INDIAN RIVER BLVD. S.R. 60 W. VB CITY L. 1860 1.222 46 0 592 50% 1160S INDIAN RIVER BLVD. S.R. 60 W.VBCITYL. 2240 1,119 10 0 1111 31o/a 1170N INDIAN RIVER BLVD. W. VB CITYL. US 1 @53RD ST. 1860 518 58 0 1284 23% 1170S INDIAN RIVER BLVD. W. VB CITY L. US 1 @53RD ST. 1937 419 21 0 1497 55% 1210N 1-95 N. COUNTY LINE C.R. 512 2740 1,504 0 0 1236 55% 1210s 1-95 N. COUNTY LINE C.R. 512 2740 1,509 10 0 1221 56% 1220N t-95 C.R.512 S.R. 60 2740 1,510 20 0 1210 56% 1220S 1.05 C.R.512 S.R. 60 2740 1,519 23 0 1198 61% 1230N 1-95 S.R. 60 OSLO ROAD 2890 1,726 48 0 1116 60% 1230S 1-95 S.R.60 OSLO ROAD 2890 1,712 35 0 1143 1137 61% 1240N 1-95 OSLO ROAD S. COUNTY LINE 2890 1,716 37 0 1156 60% 1240S 1-95 OSLO ROAD S. COUNTY LINE 2890 1,707 27 0 69¾ 1305N U.S.1 S. COUNTY LINE OSLO ROAD 1860 1,202 80 0 578 89¾ 1305S U.S.1 S. COUNTY LINE OSLO ROAD 1860 1,5B1 66 0 213 52% 1310N U.S.1 OSLO ROAD 4TH ST.@ IR BLVD. 2790 1,383 67 0 1340 1310S U.S.1 OSLO ROAD 4TH ST.@IR BLVD. 2790 1,820 91 0 879 68% 49% 1315N U.S.1 4TH ST.@ IR BLVD. 8TH STREET 1860 881 34 0 945 69% 1315S U.S.1 4TH ST.@ IR BLVD. 8TH STREET 1860 1,238 40 0 582 58% 1320N U.S.1 8TH STREET 12THSTREET 1860 1,046 36 0 778 68% 1320S U.S.1 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 1860 1,220 51 0 589 1325N U.S.1 12TH STREET S. VB CITY L. 1710 1,228 36 0 446 74% 95% 1325S U.S.1 12TH STREET S. VB CITYL. 1710 1,572 54 0 84 REALTORS ASSOCIATION • 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING Traffic counts in the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as ofS/3/2008

% of LOS REMAINING LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET CAPACITY EXIST. VESTED PROJECT "D" W/PROJECT 1330N U.S.1 S. VBCITYL. 17TH STREET 1710 1,228 37 0 445 74% 1330S U.S.1 S. VB CITY L. 17TH STREET 1710 1,572 54 0 84 95% 1335N U.S.1 17TH STREET S.R.60 1510 1,177 45 0 288 81% 1335S U.S.1 17TH STREET S.R. 60 1510 1,125 26 0 359 76% 1340N U.S.1 S.R.60 ROYAL PALM PL 1820 1,287 60 0 473 74% 1340S U.S.1 S.R. 60 ROYAL PALM PL 1510 895 15 0 600 60% 1345N U.S.1 ROYAL PALM PL ATLANTIC BLVD. 2116 998 50 0 1068 50% 1345S U.S.1 ROYAL PALM PL ATLANTIC BLVD. 1710 906 24 0 780 54% 1350N U.S.1 ATLANTIC BLVD. N. VB CITY L. 2322 1,039 50 0 1233 47% 1350S U.S.1 ATLANTIC BLVD. N. VB ClTYL. 2010 1,596 73 0 341 83% 1355N U.S.1 N. VB CITY L. OLD DIXIE HWY 2320 2,019 98 0 203 91% 1355S U.S.1 N. VB CITY L. OLD DIXIE HWY 2010 1,039 47 0 924 54% 1360N U.S.1 OLD DIXIE HWY 41ST STREET 2586 1,214 101 0 1271 51% 1360S U.S.1 OLD DIXIE HWY 41ST STREET 2010 843 45 0 1122 44% 1365N U.S.1 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 2352 1,093 80 0 1179 50% 1365S U.S.1 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 2010 790 36 0 1184 41% 1370N U.S.1 45TH STREET 49TH STREET 2384 1,281 95 0 1008 58% 1370S U.S.1 45TH STREET 49TH STREET 2010 747 32 15 1216 40% 1375N U.S.1 49TH STREET 65TH STREET 2568 1,604 147 0 817 68% 1375S U.S.1 49TH STREET 65TH STREET 2010 1,094 127 29 760 62% 1380N U.S.1 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 2631 1,565 134 31 901 66% 1380S U.S.1 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 1860 863 99 36 862 54% 1385N U.S.1 69TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY 2648 1,453 165 28 1002 62% 1385S U.S.1 69TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY 1860 831 113 0 916 51% 1390N U.S.1 OLD DIX!E HWY SCHUMANN DR. 2210 1,701 125 0 384 83% 1390S U.S.1 OLD DIXIE HWY SCHUMANN DR. 1860 1,350 132 0 378 80% 1395N U.S.1 SCHUMANN DR. C.R.512 1860 971 94 0 795 57% 1395S U.S.1 SCHUMANN DR. C.R.512 1860 998 114 0 748 60% 1400N U.S.1 C.R.512 N. SEB. CITY L. 1710 1,142 50 0 518 70% 1400S U.S.1 C.R. 512 N. SEB. CITY L. 1710 1,179 64 0 467 73% 1405N U.S.1 N. SEB. CITY L. ROSEL.AND RD. 1860 1,089 127 0 644 65% 1405S U.S.1 N. SEB. CITY L. ROSEL.AND RD. 1860 1,124 159 0 577 69% 1410N U.S.1 ROSELAND RD. N. COUNTY LINE 1860 1,150 96 0 614 67% 1410S U.S.1 ROSELAND RD. N. COUNTY LINE 1860 944 133 0 783 58% 1510N SCHUMANN DR. C.R. 51.0@ 66TH AVE. S. SEB. CITY L. 1377 853 9 0 515 63% 1510S SCHUMANN DR. C.R. 510@ 66TH AVE. S. SEB. CITY L. 1377 477 14 0 886 36% 1520N SCHUMANN DR. S. SEB. CITY L. U.S.1 860 142 7 0 711 17% 1520S SCHUMANN DR. S. SEB. CITY L U.S.1 860 138 19 0 703 18% 1610E ROSELAND RD. S.R. 512 N. SEB. CITY L. 860 337 23 0 500 42% 1610W ROSELAND RD. S.R.512 N. SEB. CITY L. 860 361 23 0 476 45¾ 1620E ROSELAND RD. N. SEB. CITY L. U.S.1 860 389 42 0 429 50% 1620W ROSELAND RD. N. SEB. C11Y L. U.S.1 860 459 41 0 360 58% 1710E C.R. 512 S.R.60 1-95 860 448 40 0 372 57% 1710W C.R.512 S.R.60 l-95 860 645 11 0 204 76% 1720E C.R. 512 1-95 C.R 510 1860 823 92 0 945 49% 1720W C.R.512 1-95 C.R.510 1860 729 25 0 1106 41% 1730E C.R.512 C.R.510 W. SEB. CITY L. 1860 737 60 0 1063 43% 1730W C.R. 512 C.R.510 W. SEB. CITY L. 1860 721 66 0 1073 42% 1740E C.R. 512 W. SEB. CITY L. ROSELAND RD. 1860 583 43 0 1264 32% 1740W C.R. 512 W. SEB. CITY L. ROSEL.AND RD. 1860 542 49 0 1269 32% 1750E C.R. 512 ROSELAND RD. U.S.1 1860 584 48 0 1228 34% REAL TORS ASSOCIATION • 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING T raffle counts In the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as of 9/3/2008

% of LOS REMAINING LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET CAPACITY EXIST. VESTED PROJECT "D" WI PROJECT 1750W C.R. 512 ROSELAND RD. U.S.1 1860 695 41 0 1124 40% 1810E C.R. 510 C.R.512 66TH AVE. 1860 272 185 0 1403 25% 1810W C.R.510 C.R.512 66TH AVE. 1880 667 106 0 1087 42% 1620E C.R.510 66TH AVE. 58TH AVE. 1860 321 109 0 1430 23% 1820W C.R. 510 66TH AVE. 58THAVE. 1860 667 116 0 1077 42% 1830E C.R. 510 58THAVE. U.S.1 1860 396 117 0 1347 28% 1830W C.R. 510 58TH AVE. U.S.1 1860 717 145 0 998 46% 1840E C.R. 510 U.S.1 S.R. A1A 1900 656 239 0 1005 47% 1840W C.R. 510 U.S.1 S.R. A1A 1900 426 172 0 1302 31% 1905E S.R.60 W. COUNTY LINE C.R. 512 1810 201 9 0 1600 12% 1905W S.R. 60 W. COUN"TY LINE C.R. 512 1810 206 9 0 1595 12% 1907E S.R. 60 C.R.512 100TH AVE. 1810 230 0 1579 13% 1907W S.R.60 C.R.512 100THAVE. 1810 230 0 0 1580 13% 1910E S.R.60 100TH AVE. 1-95 1860 435 114 0 1311 30% 1910W S.R. 60 100TH AVE. 1-95 1860 336 191 0 1333 28% 1915E S.R.60 1-95 82NDAVE. 1880 1,146 155 0 559 70% 1915W S.R.60 1-95 82NDAVE. 2000 1,509 190 0 301 85% 1920E S.R.60 82ND AVE. 66TH AVE. 2790 1,226 316 0 124a 55% 1920W S.R.60 82NDAVE. 66TH AVE. 2790 1,890 285 0 615 78% 1925E S.R. 60 66THAVE. 58THAVE. 2790 1,351 183 0 1256 55% 1925W S.R.60 66THAVE. 58TH AVE. 2790 1,792 261 0 737 74% 1930E S.R. 60 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 2790 1,339 218 0 1233 56% 1930W S.R. 60 58THAVE. 43RDAVE. 2790 1,651 358 0 781 72% 1935E S.R.60 43RDAVE. 27THAVE. 2790 1,390 193 0 1207 57-,,. 1935W S.R.60 43RDAVE. 27THAVE. 2790 1,656 288 0 846 70% 1940E S.R. 60 27THAVE. 20THAVE. 2790 1,225 146 0 1419 49% 1940W S.R.60 27TH AVE. 20TH AVE. 2790 1,285 291 0 1214 ss-,,~ 1945E S.R.60 20THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 3252 1,201 130 0 1921 41% 1945W S.R. 60 20THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 3252 1,281 208 0 1763 46% 1950E S.R.60 OLD DIXIE HWY 10THAVE. 3252 1,057 51 0 2144 34% 1950W S.R.60 OLD DIXIE HWY 10THAVE. 3252 999 136 0 2117 35% 1955E S.R.60 10TH AVE. U.S.1 3252 1,099 42 0 2111 35% 1955W S.R.60 10THAVE. U.S.1 3252 639 104 0 2509 23% 1960E S.R. 60 U.S.1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 3252 784 8 0 2460 24% 1960W S.R. 60 U.S.1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 3252 482 50 0 2720 16% 1965E S.R.60 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. ICWW 1860 980 7 0 873 53% 1965W S.R. 60 INDlAN RIVER BLVD. ICWW 1860 1,436 0 423 77% 1970E S.R. 60 ICWW S.R.A1A 1860 95B 9 0 893 52% 1970W S.R. 60 ICWW S.R.A1A 1860 1,017 7 0 836 55% 2020E 16TH STREET SBTHAVE. 43RDAVE. 860 150 52 0 658 23% 2020W 16TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 252 43 0 565 34% 2030E 16TH STREET 43RDAVE. 27TH AVE. 860 367 43 0 450 48% 2030W 16TH STREET 43RD AVE. 27THAVE. 860 538 36 0 286 67% 2040E 16TH STREET 27TH AVE. 20TH AVE. 860 597 29 0 234 73% 2040W 16TH STREET 27THAVE. 20TH AVE. 880 577 45 0 238 72% 2050E 16TH STREET 20TH AVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 1260 530 19 0 711 44% 2050W 16TH STREET 20THAVE. OLD D!XlE HWY 1260 775 36 0 449 64% 2060E 16TH/17TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 1710 584 37 0 1089 36% 2060W 16TH/17TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 1710 698 34 0 978 43% 2110E 17TH STREET U.S.1 INDlAN RIVER BLVD. 1710 495 25 0 1190 30% 2110W 17TH STREET U.S.1 !NDIAN RIVER BLVD. 1710 744 18 0 ... 45% REALTORS ASSOCIATION - 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING Traffic counts in the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as of 9/3/2008 % of LOS REMAINING PROJECT ''Du LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET CAPACITY EXIST. VESTED W/PROJECT 898 52% 2120E 17TH STREET INDIAN RIVER BLVD. S.R. A1A 1860 944 18 0 56% 2120W 17TH STREET INDIAN RIVER BLVD. S.R. A1A 1860 1,040 9 0 811 0 850 2% 2210E 12TH STREET 82NDAVE. 58TH AVE. 870 18 2 0 768 12% 2210W 12TH STREET 82NDAVE. 58TH AVE. 870 102 0 624 27% 2220E 12TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 188 48 0 0 567 34% 2220W 12TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 254 39 55 94% 2230E 12TH STREET 43RDAVE. 27THAVE. 860 783 22 0 0 408 53% 2230W 12TH STREET 43RDAVE. 27TH AVE. 860 433 19 380 56% 2240E 12TH STREET 27TH AVE. 20TH AVE. 860 463 17 0 0 330 62% 2240W 12TH STREET 27TH AVE. 20THAVE. 860 514 16 0 378 56% 2250E 12TH STREET 20THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 860 461 21 0 168 80% 2250W 12TH STREET 20THAVE. OLD DIX\E HWY 860 674 18 0 788 42% 2260E 12TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 1368 564 16 0 568 58% 2260W 12TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 1368 782 18 0 512 40% 2305N OLD DIXIE HWY S. COUNTY LINE OSLO ROAD 860 325 23 0 382 56% 2305S OLD DIXIE HWY S. COUNTY LINE OSLO ROAD 860 469 9 0 462 46% 2310N OLD DIXIE HWY OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 860 349 49 0 351 59% 2310S OLD DIXIE HWY OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 860 469 40 0 323 60% 2315N OLD DIXIE HVv'Y 4TH STREET BTH STREET 810 440 47 0 218 73% 2315S OLD DIXIE HVv'Y 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 810 546 46 0 250 69% 2320N OLD DIXIE HWY 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 810 535 25 0 100 88% 2320S OLD DIXIE HWY 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 810 683 27 418 48% 2325N OLD DIXIE HWY 12TH STREET S. VBCITYL. 810 383 9 0 13 0 406 50% 2325S OLD DIXIE HWY 12TH STREET S. VB CITYL. 810 391 0 458 46% 2330N OLD DIXIE HWY S. VB CITYL. 16THSTREET 850 383 9 0 449 47% 2330S OLD DIXIE HWY S. VB CITY L. 16THSTREET 850 391 10 0 647 36% 2335N OLD DIXIE HWY 16TH STREET S.R.60 850 286 17 0 620 27% 2335S OLD DIXIE HWY 16TH STREET S.R.60 850 214 16 0 808 29% 2345N OLD DIXIE HWY 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 860 214 38 651 24% 2345S OLD DIXIE HWY 41STSTREET 45TH STREET 860 182 27 0 680 21% 2350N OLD DIXIE HWY 45TH STREET 49TH STREET 860 128 52 0 0 694 19% 2350S OLD DIXIE HWY 45TH STREET 49THSTREET 860 134 32 0 613 29% 2355N OLD DIXIE HWY 49TH STREET 65TH STREET 860 162 85 70 0 654 24% 2355S OLD DIXIE HWY 49TH STREET 65TH STREET 860 136 625 27% 2360N OLD DIXIE HWY 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 860 215 20 0 13 0 751 13% 2360S OLD DIXIE HWY 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 860 96 20 0 635 26% 2365N OLD DIXIE HWY 69TH STREET C.R.510 860 205 9 0 760 12% 2365S OLD DIXIE HWY 69TH STREET C.R. 510 860 91 0 177 86% 2410N 27TH AVENUE S. COUNlY LINE OSLO ROAD 1268 648 243 0 0 100% 2410S 27TH AVENUE S. COUNTY LINE OSLO ROAD 1268 824 416 0 405 68% 2420N 27THAVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 1268 506 157 0 0 100% 2420S 27TH AVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 1268 551 252 384 62% 2430N 27TH AVENUE 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 1020 534 102 0 0 0 100% 2430S 27THAVENUE 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 1020 777 181 0 472 54% 2440N 27TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 1020 473 75 124 88% 2440S 27TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 1020 765 131 0 0 129 87% 2450N 27THAVENUE 12TH STREET S. VB CITY L. 1020 825 66 0 128 87% 24505 27TH AVENUE 12TH STREET S. VB CITY L. 1020 778 114 61 0 134 87% 2460N 27TH AVENUE S. VB CITY L. 16TH STREET 1020 825 0 130 87% 2460S 27THAVENUE S. VB CITY L. 16TH STREET 1020 778 112 0 190 81% 2470N 27THAVENUE 16TH STREET S.R.60 1020 792 38 REAL TORS ASSOCIATION - 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING Traffic counts in the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as of 9/3/2008 %of LOS REMAINING CAPACITY EXIST. VESTED PROJECT "D" LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET W/ PROJECT

2470S 27TH AVENUE 16TH STREET S.R. 60 1020 694 62 0 264 74% 2480N 27TH AVENUE S.R.60 ATLANTIC BLVD. 810 254 18 0 538 34% 2480S 27TH AVENUE S.R.60 ATLANTIC BLVD. 810 416 28 0 366 55% 2510N 27TH AVENUE ATLANTIC BLVD. AVIATION BLVD. 810 389 2 0 419 48% 2510S 27TH AVENUE ATLANTIC BLVD. AVIATION BLVD. 810 569 6 0 235 71% 2530E OSLO ROAD 82NDAVE. 58THAVE. 870 561 59 0 250 71% 2530W OSLO ROAD 82NDAVE. 58TH AVE. 870 184 84 0 622 29% 2540E OSLO ROAD 58TH AVE. 43ROAVE. 1953 561 187 0 1205 38% 2540W OSLO ROAD 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 1953 493 66 0 1394 29% 2550E OSLO ROAD 43RDAVE. 27TH AVE. 1953 792 156 0 1005 49°/. 2550W OSLO ROAD 43RDAVE. 27TH AVE. 1953 711 128 0 1114 43% 2560E OSLO ROAD 27THAVE. 20TH AVE. 1953 480 94 0 1379 29% 2560W OSLO ROAD 27THAVE. 20TH AVE. 1953 618 65 0 1270 35% 2570E OSLO ROAD 20THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 1953 763 159 0 1031 47% 2570W OSLO ROAD 20TH AVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 1953 665 140 0 1148 41% 2580E OSLO ROAD OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 1953 504 80 0 1369 30% 2580W OSLO ROAD OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 1953 684 95 0 1174 40% 2610E 6THAVENUE 17TH STREET S. VBClTYL. 860 335 5 0 520 40% 2610N 6THAVENUE 17TH STREET S. VBClTY L. 860 335 0 524 39% 2610S 6TH AVENUE 17TH STREET S. VBCITYL. 860 421 4 0 435 49% 2620N 6THAVENUE S. VB CITY L. S.R. 60 850 315 2 0 533 37'/o 2620S 6TH AVENUE S. VBCITYL. S.R. 60 850 421 0 428 50% 2710N 10TH AVENUE S.R.60 ROYAL PALM BLVD. 810 131 0 0 879 16% 2710S 10TH AVENUE S.R.60 ROYAL PALM BLVD. 810 184 0 0 626 23% 2720N 10TH AVENUE ROYAL PALM BLVD. 17TH STREET 810 218 0 0 592 27% 2720S 10TH AVENUE ROYAL PALM BLVD. 17TH STREET 810 184 0 0 626 23% 2810N 20TH AVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 860 310 66 0 484 44% 28108 20TH AVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 860 321 119 0 420 51% 2820N 20TH AVENUE 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 810 338 34 0 438 46% 2820S 20TH AVENUE 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 810 572 56 0 182 78% 2830N 20TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 810 325 25 0 460 43% 2830S 20TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 810 532 40 0 238 71% 2840N 20TH AVENUE 12TH STREET S. VB CITY L. 1710 317 15 0 1378 19% 28% 2840S 20TH AVENUE 12TH STREET S. VB CITY L. 1710 473 13 0 1224 2850N 20TH AVENUE S. VB CITY L. 16TH STREET 1800 317 7 0 1476 18% 2850S 20TH AVENUE S. VB CITY L. 16TH STREET 1800 473 13 0 1314 27% 2860N 20TH AVENUE 16TH STREET S.R. 60 1800 326 11 0 1463 19% 2860S 20TH AVENUE 16TH STREET S.R.60 1800 226 13 0 1561 13% 2870N 20TH AVENUE S.R.60 ATLANTIC BLVD. 850 163 8 0 879 20% 2870S 20TH AVENUE S.R.60 ATLANTIC BLVD. 850 72 12 0 766 10% 2905N 43RD AVENUE S. COUNTY LINE OSLO ROAD 950 348 138 0 464 51% 29058 43RDAVENUE S. COUNlY LINE OSLO ROAD 950 314 218 0 418 56% 2910N 43RDAVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 1068 483 124 0 481 57% 2910S 43RDAVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 1068 462 175 0 431 60% 2915N 43RD AVENUE 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 1020 499 105 0 416 59% 2915S 43RD AVENUE 4TH STREET BTH STREET 1020 661 157 0 202 80% 2920N 43RD AVENUE 8TH STREET 12THSTREET 1071 923 99 0 49 95% 2920S 43RD AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 1071 645 148 0 278 74% 2925N 43RD AVENUE 12TH STREET 16TH STREET 1071 499 74 0 498 54% 2925S 43RD AVENUE 12TH STREET 16TH STREET 1071 627 113 0 331 69% 2930N 43RD AVENUE 16TH STREET S.R. 60 1796 558 76 0 1162 35% REALTORS ASSOCIATION • 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING Traffic counts in the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as of 9/3/2008 % of LOS REMAINING EXIST. VESTED PROJECT "D" LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET CAPACITY WI PROJECT 1014 44% 2930S 43RD AVENUE 16TH STREET S.R.60 1796 675 107 0 0 1343 25% 2935N 43RDAVENUE S.R.60 26TH STREET 1796 386 67 33% 2935S 43RDAVENUE S.R.60 26TH STREET 1796 576 24 0 1196 0 405 53% 2940N 43RDAVENUE 26TH STREET 41ST STREET 860 361 94 462 46% 2940S 43RD AVENUE 26TH STREET 41STSTREET 860 362 36 0 486 43% 2945N 43RD AVENUE 41STSTREET 45TH STREET 860 305 69 0 538 37% 2945S 43RD AVENUE 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 860 284 38 0 0 532 38% 2950N 43ROAVENUE 45TH STREET 49TH STREET 860 208 120 0 660 23% 2950S 43RDAVENUE 45TH STREET 49TH STREET 860 148 52 1406 24% 3005N 58THAVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 1860 381 73 0 1240 33% 3005S 58TH AVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 1860 512 108 0 981 43% 3010N 58TH AVENUE 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 1710 672 57 0 874 49% 3010S 58TH AVENUE 4TH STREET 8TH STREET 1710 752 84 0 878 49% 3015N 58TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 1710 743 89 0 689 60% 3015S 58TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 1710 952 69 0 343 80% 3020N 58THAVENUE 12TH STREET 16TH STREET 1710 1,229 138 0 542 68% 3020S 58TH AVENUE 12TH STREET 16TH STREET 1710 1,055 113 0 361 79% 3025N 58TH AVENUE 16TH STREET S.R. 60 1710 1,139 210 0 535 69% 3025S 58TH AVENUE 16TH STREET S.R. 60 1710 981 194 0 817 56% 3030N 58TH AVENUE S.R.60 41STSTREET 1860 920 123 0 900 52% 3030S 58TH AVENUE S.R. 60 41ST STREET 1860 863 97 0 139 84% 3035N 58TH AVENUE 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 860 545 176 0 0 269 69% 3035S 58TH AVENUE 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 860 484 107 80% 3040N 58TH AVENUE 45TH STREET 49TH STREET 860 489 200 0 171 324 62% 3040S 58THAVENUE 45THSTREET 49TH STREET 860 418 118 0 94% 3045N 58TH AVENUE 49TH STREET 65TH STREET 860 545 265 0 so 324 62% 3045S 58TH AVENUE 49TH STREET 65TH STREET 860 402 134 0 343 60% 3050N 58TH AVENUE 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 860 412 105 0 413 52% 3050S 58TH AVENUE 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 860 330 117 0 359 58% 3055N 58TH AVENUE 69TH STREET C.R. 510 860 399 102 0 0 503 42% 3055S 58TH AVENUE 69TH STREET C.R.510 860 266 91 290 66% 3120N 66TH AVENUE S.R.60 26TH STREET 860 426 144 0 0 246 71% 3120S 66TH AVENUE S.R.60 26TH STREET 860 529 85 240 72% 3130N 66TH AVENUE 26TH STREET 41ST STREET 860 469 151 0 0 363 58% 3130S 66TH AVENUE 26TH STREET 41STSTREET 860 398 99 0 178 81% 3140N 66TH AVENUE 41ST STREET 45TH STREET 950 706 66 0 455 52% 3140S 66TH AVENUE 41STSTREET 45TH STREET 950 441 54 0 121 86% 3150N 66TH AVENUE 45TH STREET 65TH STREET 870 678 71 439 50% 3150S 66THAVENUE 45TH STREET 65TH STREET 870 376 55 0 145 83% 3160N 66TH AVENUE 65TH STREET 69THSTREET 870 681 44 0 478 45% 3160S 66TH AVENUE 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 870 350 42 0 1077 42% 3170N 66TH AVENUE 69TH STREET C.R.510 1860 723 60 0 0 1450 22% 3170S 66TH AVENUE 69TH STREET C.R. 510 1860 360 50 0 767 11% 3210N 74TH AVENUE 16TH STREET SR60 860 93 0 742 14% 32108 74TH AVENUE 16TH STREET SR60 860 118 0 0 771 19% 3310N 82NDAVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 950 161 18 0 0 708 25¾ 3310S 82NDAVENUE OSLO ROAD 4TH STREET 950 220 22 674 29% 3320N 82NDAVENUE 4TH STREET 12TH STREET 950 194 82 0 37% 3320S 82ND AVENUE 4TH STREET 12TH STREET 950 208 140 0 602 430 50% 3330N 82NDAVENUE 12TH STREET S.R.60 860 235 195 0 406 53% 3330S 82NDAVENUE 12TH STREET S.R. 60 860 224 230 0 REALTORS ASSOCIATION - 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING Traffic counts in the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as of 9/3/2008

% of LOS REMAINING LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET CAPACITY EXIST. VESTED PROJECT "D" WI PROJECT 3340N 82ND AVENUE S.R.60 65TH STREET 410 52 15 0 343 16% 3340S 82ND AVENUE S.R.60 65TH STREET 410 43 16 0 351 14% 3350N 82ND AVENUE 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 410 21 15 0 374 9% 3350S 82NDAVENUE 65TH STREET 69TH STREET 410 16 15 0 377 8% 3360N 98TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 860 134 42 0 684 20% 3360S 98TH AVENUE 8TH STREET 12TH STREET 860 188 78 0 594 31% 3370N 98TH AVENUE 12TH STREET 16TH STREET 860 92 106 0 662 23% 3370S 98TH AVENUE 12TH STREET 16TH STREET 860 54 194 0 612 29% 3380N 98TH AVENUE 16TH STREET SR60 860 28 106 0 726 16% 3380S 98TH AVENUE 16TH STREET SR60 860 25 194 0 641 25%. 3390N 98TH AVENUE SR60 26TH STREET 860 12 0 0 848 1% 3390S 98TH AVENUE SR60 26TH STREET 860 11 0 0 849 1% 3610E 77TH STREET 66TH AVE. U.S.1 820 60 6 0 754 8% 3610W 77TH STREET 66TH AVE. U.S.1 820 150 2 0 668 19% 3710E 69TH STREET 62NDAVE. 66TH AVE. 410 37 33 0 340 17% 3710W 69TH STREET 82NDAVE. 66THAVE. 410 24 33 0 353 14% 3720E 69TH STREET 66THAVE. 58THAVE. 870 33 17 0 820 6% 3720W 69TH STREET 66TH AVE. 58THAVE. 870 78 22 0 770 11% 3730E 69TH STREET 58THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 870 48 14 0 BOB 7% 3730W 69TH STREET 58THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 870 78 14 0 778 11% 3740E 69TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 870 49 4 0 817 6% 3740W 69TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 870 78 4 0 788 9% 3820E 65TH STREET 66TH AVE. 58THAVE. 870 36 20 0 814 6% 3820W 65TH STREET 66THAVE. 58TH AVE. 870 76 19 0 775 11% 3830E 65TH STREET 58TH AVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 870 74 17 0 779 10% 3830W 65TH STREET 58THAVE. OLD DIX!E HWY 870 110 16 0 744 14% 3840E 65TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 870 58 0 811 7% 3840W 65TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 870 68 4 0 798 8% 4220E 49TH STREET 66TH AVE. 5BTHAVE. 860 28 31 0 801 7% 4220W 49TH STREET 66TH AVE. 58THAVE. 860 33 19 0 808 6% 4230E 49TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 137 17 0 706 18% 4230W 49TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 166 28 0 686 23% 4240E 49TH STREET 43RDAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 810 167 66 0 577 29% 4240W 49TH STREET 43RDAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 810 33 71 0 706 13% 4250E 49TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 810 98 5 0 707 13% 4250W 49TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 810 119 21 0 670 17% 4320E 45TH STREET 66THAVE. 58THAVE. 860 97 9 0 754 12% 4320W 45TH STREET 66THAVE. 58TH AVE. 860 126 5 0 729 15% 4330E 45TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43ROAVE. 860 154 15 0 691 20% 4330W 45TH STREET 58THAVE. 43RDAVE. 860 208 40 0 612 29% 4340E 45TH STREET 43RDAVE. OLD DIX.IE HWY 860 243 22 0 595 31% 4340W 45TH STREET 43RDAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 860 303 25 0 532 38% 4350E 45TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY lNDIAN RIVER BLVD. 860 153 9 0 698 19% 4350W 45TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY INOIAN RIVER BLVD. 860 225 20 0 615 28% 4420E 41ST STREET 66TH AVE. 58THAVE. 870 78 7 0 785 10% 4420W 41ST STREET 66THAVE. 58TH AVE. 870 126 6 0 738 15% 4430E 41ST STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 198 21 0 641 25% 4430W 41ST STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 233 41 0 586 32% 4440E 41ST STREET 43RDAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 860 218 32 0 810 29% 4440W 41ST STREET 43RDAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 860 229 20 0 611 29% 4450E 41ST STREET OLD DIXIE HWY INDlAN RIVER BLVD. 860 157 5 0 698 19% REALTORS ASSOCIATION - 8,097 SF GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING Traffic counts ln the EXISTING column were collected in 2007 Trips indicated in the VESTED column are as of 9/3/2008

% of LOS REMAINING LINK ON STREET FROM STREET TO STREET CAPACITY EXIST. VESTED PROJECT "D" W/PROJECT 4450W 41ST STREET OLD DIXIE HWY INDIAN RIVER BlVO. 860 160 18 0 682 21% 4460E 37TH STREET U.S.1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 860 361 9 0 490 43% 4460W 37TH STREET U.S.1 IND!AN RIVER BLVD. 860 667 16 0 177 79% 4720E 26TH STREET 66TH AVE. 58TH AVE. 860 284 48 0 528 39% 4720W 26TH STREET 66THAVE. 56TH AVE. 860 479 49 0 332 61% 4730E 26TH STREET 58THAVE. 43RDAVE. 860 375 29 0 456 47% 4730W 26TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 546 38 0 276 68% 4740E 26TH STREET 43RDAVE. AVIATION BLVD. 860 430 11 0 419 51% 4740W 26TH STREET 43RDAVE. AVIATION BLVD. 860 608 17 0 235 73% 4750E 26TH STREET AVIATION BLVD. 27TH AVE. 860 150 10 0 700 19% 4750W 26TH STREET AVIATION BLVD. 27TH AVE. 860 280 15 0 565 34% 4830E 8TH STREET 5BTHAVE. 43RDAVE. 860 216 18 0 626 27% 4830W 8TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 215 9 0 636 26% 4840E 8TH STREET 43RDAVE. 27TH AVE. 860 595 46 0 219 75% 4840W 8TH STREET 43RDAVE. 27TH AVE. 860 460 27 0 373 57% 4850E 8TH STREET 27THAVE. 20TH AVE. 860 573 11 0 276 68% 4850W 8TH STREET 27THAVE. 20TH AVE. 860 543 9 0 308 64% 4860E 8TH STREET 20THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 810 359 16 0 435 46% 4860W 8TH STREET 20THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 810 664 19 0 127 84% 4870E 8TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY u.s.1 810 346 19 0 445 45% 4870W 8TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 810 526 26 0 258 68% 4880E 8TH STREET U.S.1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 860 279 12 0 569 34% 4880W 8TH STREET U.S.1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 860 542 12 0 306 64% 4910E 4TH STREET 82NDAVE. 58THAVE. 870 78 3 0 789 9% 4910W 4TH STREET 82NDAVE. 58THAVE. 870 111 0 758 13% 4930E 4TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 202 11 0 647 25% 4930W 4TH STREET 58TH AVE. 43RDAVE. 860 187 7 0 666 23% 4940E 4TH STREET 43RDAVE. 27TH AVE. 860 286 20 0 554 36% 4940W 4TH STREET 43RDAVE. 27THAVE. 860 428 16 0 416 52% 4950E 4TH STREET 27THAVE. 20TH AVE. 860 594 10 0 256 70% 4950W 4TH STREET 27TH AVE. 20THAVE. 860 522 13 0 325 62% 4960E 4TH STREET 20THAVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 860 352 37 0 471 45% 4960W 4TH STREET 20TH AVE. OLD DIXIE HWY 860 544 52 0 264 69% 4970E 4TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 810 403 32 0 375 54% 4970W 4TH STREET OLD DIXIE HWY U.S.1 810 547 38 0 225 72% 5010E 16THSTREET 74THAVENUE 82NDAVENUE 860 46 0 0 814 5% 5010W 16TH STREET 74TH AVENUE 82NDAVENUE 860 43 0 0 817 5% 5610E FRED TUERK DR. A1A W. OF COCONUT DR. 860 129 0 0 731 15% 5610W FRED TUERK DR. A1A W. OF COCONUT DR. 860 96 0 0 764 11•10 5710E W!NTER BEACH RD. A1A JUNGLE TRAIL 860 39 8 0 813 5% 5710W WINTER BEACH RD. A1A JUNGLE TRAIL 860 120 4 0 736 14% 5810E ATLANTIC BLVD. 27TH AVE. 20THAVE. 860 100 2 0 758 12% 5810W ATLANTIC BLVD. 27TH AVE. 20THAVE. 860 167 0 0 693 19% 5820E ATLANTIC BLVD. 20TH AVE. U.S.1 860 40 0 819 5% 5820W ATLANTIC BLVD. 20TH AVE. u.s.1 860 76 3 0 781 9% 5910E AVIATION BLVD. 26TH STREET 27THAVE. 1280 159 3 0 1118 13% 5910W AVIATION BLVD. 26TH STREET 27TH AVE. 1280 147 20 0 1113 13% 6010E ROYAL PALM BLVD. ROYAL PALM PL. INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 880 270 0 0 610 31% 6010W ROYAL PALM BLVD. ROYAL PALM PL. INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 880 116 9 0 755 14% 6110E ROYAL PALM PL. U.S.1 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. 880 341 5 0 534 39% 6110W ROYAL PALM PL. U.S.1 IND1AN RIVER BLVD. 880 396 17 0 467 47%

H:\Traffic Master\Realtors Association\[Realtors Association - Link Tables 9-3-08.xls]Link Tables PLANNING MATTERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM

TO: The Honorable Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission

Robert M. Keating, Community Development

FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director

DATE: July 9, 2009

SUBJECT: Planning Information Package for the July 23, 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting

For this meeting's packet, the following articles are provided:

(I) "Slump may swamp eco city", The Sunday Times, June 14, 2009, Dominic Rushe.

(2) "Pickens Drops Plan for Largest Wind Farm", The New York Times, July 7, 2009, Kate Galbraith.

(3) "My Word: Taking 'smart' out of growth", Orlando Sentinel, June 24, 2009, Ed Timberlake.

(4) "Hometown Democracy could prompt growth law changes, ex-DCA attorney says", FloridaEnvironments.com, June 23, 2009, Bruce Ritchie.

(5) "State outlines ocean 'zoning"', Gloucester Daily Times, July 1, 2009, Richard Gaines.

(6) "Organic Farms as Subdivision Amenities", The New York Times, July 1, 2009, Alec Appelbaum.

cc: Board of County Commissioners Joe Baird Michael Zito

F:\Comrnunity Development\Users\CurDev\P&Z\ARTICLES\Articles for 2009\7-23-09.doc Printer Friendly Page 1 of3

TIMES

From Tho Sundav Times Slump may swamp eco city The property cra'ih has cast doubts over plans for a green n1etropolis in Florida that has the backing ofBill Clinton

Dominic Rustie

In Central Florida, where the Ronald Reagan Turnpike meets Highway 441, lies a largely empty area of old cattle ranches and swamp known locally as Yeehaw Junction. Over the next decade property developers backed by a fast-food billionaire, and with the blessing of Bill Clinton, the former president, hope to turn the site into an eco city the size of Washington DC. If, that is, they can ever get the plans off the drawing board.

Destiny Florida is being developed by the property entrepreneur Anthony Pugliese and is backed by Fred Deluca, the billionaire co-founder of Subway, the sandwich chain. It is far more ambitious than the usual Florida land grab.

Destiny intends to be green from the ground up, a hub of eco-friendly business built round an environmentally friendly city that will preserve much of the rich local landscape. When finished, Pugliese hopes that "Destiny will position itself not just as the global model for sustainable building in the 21st century but also become the hub of green technology- like a [green] Silicon Valley for the United States, if not the world."

His plans, now being drawn up by Arup, the London-based design and engineering firm, certainly seem to have impressed Clinton. But some critics are already doubting Destiny's green credentials, claiming that its plans are nebulous and getting more so. A failure in Florida would be a black eye for the Clinton Climate Initiative, which supports "climate positive" developments in mainly urban areas.

Destiny is the largest of 16 sites chosen by Clinton alongside projects in London, Berlin, San Francisco and Warsaw. His approval has already attracted global interest from firms looking for a green base for their operations, said Pugliese, though he declined to give names, citing non-disclosure agreements.

While most of the other Clinton-backed schemes are developments of urban areas, Destiny intends to build a city from scratch covering 64 square miles and producing energy to meet at least 50% of its own demands.

The first building, a green-friendly petrol station selling ethanol and services for electric cars as well as regular fuels, is already under construction.

http://www. ti meson! ine. co. uk/tol/news/environment/ article6493 3 5 7 .ece?print=yes&randn... 6/15/2009 Printer Friendly Page 2 of3

The city will be designed using green technology throughout, said Pugliese. "We don't want to end up designing beautiful buildings and then plopping on solar panels. The idea is to design buildings that provide for solar panels and to design buildings that can incorporate all types of new technologies."

Half the world's population now lives in cities and that figure is expected to grow to 70% by 2050. Cities occupy only 2% of the world's land area, yet they are responsible for more than two-thirds of global energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions.

Clinton's "climate positive" developments will strive to reduce the amount of on-site carbon-dioxide emissions to below zero. In Destiny, solar panels will be used to supply power to homes and to feed into the grid. Rubbish from restaurants will be composted and grass cuttings will be made into fertiliser. LED lighting will be used in place of less energy efficient incandescent units.

Destiny also hopes to lead the way on water. The city will aim to capture as much rain water as possible and reuse "grey" water from sinks, showers and kitchens to irrigate vegetation as well as using local supplies of brackish water (more salty than fresh) wherever possible.

Even the golf course will eschew the legions of sprinklers usually associated with hot-weather ranges in favour of greens using less thirsty grass. "Water is going to become a big issue everywhere we go in the future. It's probably going to be more scarce than oil," said Pugliese.

Central Florida is the least developed area in this densely populated state. It also happens to be an area of outstanding bio-diversity, home to rare plants and animals. Without sensitive planning all this could be lost, said Pugliese.

He hopes to start construction by 2011 and the project could take 25 to 50 years to complete. "The fortunate part is that we are starting with a clean canvas," he said.

However, Destiny has more than ecological challenges to overcome in Florida. The property crash has hit the region hard. Florida is second only to Nevada in the number of repossessions and the state now has so many abandoned homes that the authorities are concerned the untended properties will create an extra hazard during the forthcoming hurricane season.

Destiny is not selling homes yet but it will need to raise cash - cash that is still in short supply. The credit crunch "hasn't affected us because we are not putting infrastructure into the ground at this time", said Pugliese, adding that Subway's Deluca had been "very important" in the funding of the project. "Right now, we are self-funding," he said, but Destiny would look at raising money through bond issues and possibly through taxes on residents.

Eric Draper, policy director of Audubon, the conservation group, said that "conceptually" he was supportive of Destiny's plans to set aside land for ecosystems. He said its scientists had seen early plans but were "not aware of specifics at this point". Charles Lee, Florida-based director of advocacy for Audubon, was less diplomatic. Destiny's plans had become "nebulous", he said. "They have gone through a couple of team leaders and, with each change in the team, things have become fuzzier and fuzzier," he said. "It's flopping around like a fish on the land."

Pugliese responded: "I don't understand what he's talking about. Our plans have only gotten better. We have studied every square inch so that we know where wildlife corridors are, where wetlands are, where environmentally sensitive plants are and animals. We understand the land and have only taken areas for building that have been disturbed and cannot be saved.

"There is always going to be someone who doesn't want you to build anything, ever again. They are the last ones to move to Florida and they don't want anyone else to come here. But that's not very practical and that's not going to happen."

Given Florida's demographics, the odds are that some new development will rise out of Yeehaw Junction. The credit crisis will ease, property markets will recover, green businesses will want new homes. As Pugliese goes back to the drawing board, though, a bigger question remains: how green is Destiny's destiny?

http://www. timesonline. co. uk/to I/news/environment/ article6493 3 57. ece ?print=yes&randn... 6/15/2009 Pickens Drops Plan for Largest Wind Farm - Green Inc. Blog - NYTimes.com Page I of 1

[hr ~,w !lork timr~ Green Inc.

JULY 7, 2009, 9:01 AM Pickens Drops Plan for Largest Wind Farm

By KA TE GALBRAITH Reuters T. Boone Pickens' widely advertised plan to build the world's largest wind farm has been abandoned. T. Boone Pickens, the legendary oilman, has abandoned his plan to build the world's largest wind farm, according to a report in The Dallas Morning News that was confirmed by a spokesman for Mr. Pickens. The report states that Mr. Pickens will instead build a handful of smaller wind farms around the Midwest. Possible locations include Wisconsin, Oklahoma and Kansas and Texas. The Texas Panhandle was to be the site of the original wind farm. Mr. Pickens has said in the past that he had to delay his wind plans due to the financing difficulties that have hit wind farms across the country in the last nine months, along with a fall-off in natural gas prices. The latest scaling back, according to the Dallas paper, is due to transmission constraints. Texas plans to build about $5 billion worth of transmission lines to help carry the wind from the western part of the state, but they will not go where Mr. Pickens had hoped. Originally, he had even planned to build his own transmission lines. Meanwhile, Mr. Pickens has embarked on a round of media appearances to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the launch of his energy plan, which promotes natural gas as a fuel for cars - as well as greater use of wind energy in electricity generation - as a method of getting the nation off of foreign oil.

In an early-morning appearance on Squawk Box, a CNBC show, Mr. Pickens said that while the climate bill was "extremely important and all," he was still focused on getting the nation off foreign oil. "The security issue doesn't go away," he said.

http://greeninc. b logs.nytimes. com/2 009/07 /07 /pickens-drops-plan-for-largest-wind-farm/?p... 7/9/2009 My Word: Taking 'smart' out of growth -- OrlandoSentinel.com Page I of2

orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/orl-edpmyword-hometown-democracy- 06062409jun24,0,3434376.story OrlandoSentinel.com My Word: Taking 'smart' out of growth

By Ed Timberlake

Special to the Sentinel

June 24, 2009

We Floridians recently learned that we will face a major ', growth-management decision on the 2010 ballot. Dubbed ~, Amendment 4, or Hometown Democracy by its ,~ supporters, this proposed rewrite of the Florida ~ Constitution would require that voters decide all technical ',/ land-use changes at the ballot box. /

In her June 10 My Word column ("Developers win, citizens lose"), Amendment 4 supporter Rebecca Eagan / contends that the amendment will "put some say-so in the / hands of residents." I. / The Florida town of St. Pete Beach already put its trust in / /// these claims, passing a local version of Amendment 4 / only to learn that the proposal is not designed to empower voters. It is designed to stop growth, regardless of what voters decide. When St. Pete Beach residents approved a new, pro-growth plan, local anti-growth advocates mounted numerous legal challenges to overturn the very elections they once demanded.

St. Pete Beach demonstrates that Amendment 4 is not truly a growth-management proposal. It is a proposal to eliminate growth management and replace it with nonstop political campaigning. Under this amendment, some of Florida's most important growth decisions would be relegated to 30-second bites and 20-cent political-mail pieces.

While Amendment 4 supporters claim that their proposal would reduce the influence of special interests, the opposite would be true. Under Amendment 4, special-interest groups on both sides of the development debate would gain more influence over the planning process.

Neighborhood associations, developers, elected officials and planning groups would no longer be encouraged to cooperate on land-use changes. Instead, they would be encouraged to "go for broke" by writing the most extreme proposals and hiring media consultants to sell them.

Amendment 4 would sideline ordinary citizens and push special interests on both sides to seek conflict rather than compromise.

The result: Campaign consultants would quickly replace public planners as the "experts" on growth

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/orl-edpmyword-hometown-democracy-060... 6/24/2009 My Word: Taking 'smart' out of growth -- OrlandoSentinel.com Page 2 of2 management. Citizens without the deep pockets necessary to wage high-priced media campaigns would be left without recourse or representation. Ultimately, many communities would suffer one of two extremes: rampant overdevelopment or no growth at all.

Some have argued that recent legislation from Tallahassee has suddenly made Amendment 4 a good idea. However, no policy proposal or new legislation - good or bad - will miraculously repair the fundamental problems with Amendment 4.

And while reasonable Floridians can be upset when the current system falls short, that alone is no justification to support Amendment 4 - a proposal that would dismantle smart growth altogether.

Ed Timberlake of Winter Park is the local chairman of Floridians for Smarter Growth.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/orl-edpmyword-hometown-democracy-060... 6/24/2009 FloridaEnvironments.com: Hometown Democracy could prompt growth law changes, ex-... Page I of 3

Creat-c Slog ! Sign ir1

FloridaEnvironrnen"ts.corn

Tuesday,June23,2009 Statcounter Followers

The proposed Florida Homeiown Democracy amendrnenl could Follow lead the Legislature to substant1aliy weal

The Fionda Division of Elections on Mo11day agreed lo place 1he measure on the ballot for the 20'10 general election in November The pmposed amendment would require voter approval of changes in locai comprehensive plans, which contain land-use maps and gmwth policies for cities 3nd counties.

Supporters of the proposal, including the SietFJ Club's Florida Already a member?Sign in chapler, say the ;:i.n1endrnent would wrest control of icc,;ii planning decisions ;:-ivv'ffY froin developers \Nhiie opponents, includinQ t1'1e Biog Archive F!o1·ida Cf1amlx~r of Co1i-1merce, say it would bring grnvvth lo a l1alt '\l' 2009 (118)

'f ,June (20) Cari Roth, vvho was thr::; Departrnent of Hornetown DernocraGy cou!d Commur1ity ,6Jfairs c1ene1·ai counsel unc!m prmnpt ~Fowth !av-1 Gov. Jeb Bush unlii 2002, said Monday the proposal doesn't preverIl lnt; Legislature Hor"rn::town Dl=;mocracy from changing growth mana~Jement imA/S ?roposa! Gor::s to \/oters

"I personally think it's the wrong way to go, PanE,\ explores Corps of she told the group Our Region Tomorrnw, a iaet!ands loss re£Jional planning initiative spearheaded by !.he Greater Study: /\1.pa!ad·,icolz:: River Taliahassee Chamber of Commerce. Roth is now chair of the land flrn,v cou!1J

"I lhink if we were to see that amemjmenl pass !here is :iothing !11 for "Hornetown t11c arncndrner:t 1hc.1t binds tl1c Legisia;:u;c to the currc1it comprehensive pl,~11·1 1:'lni\~11cJ:ne11t process," Roth said_ "ii 1t :-equires Oen1ocracy" a vole on evei-y co1npre!1ensive plan, Hie Leg1slc.1tlne 1:oulci FVVC c:1dopts freshwater turtle

diminish the c1mount of things that could be i11 the pian." ban VVHdHfe underpass skewered; "In that way. 1t probatJly enc.is up taking the pubiic ou! and Founder fires back dirninishing the planning r:ii-ocess."

http://bruceritchie.blogspot.com/2009/06/hometown-democracy-could-prompt-growth.html 6/24/2009 FloridaEnvironments.com: Hometown Democracy could prompt growth law changes, ex-... Page 2 of 3

parks going up $3 In response. Ross Stafford Burnaman, co-founder· of the Flmicla UF plans celiu!osic ethanol Hometown Democracy Inc. PAC, said, "I haven't talkecl to Cari plant at Buckeye near ... about rier theory. I don't share he1· view. Crist: No position yet on fr";dera! dri!linfJ fegis[a .. "Lel's face ii, some co1nmuniiies in Florida had co1np1·ehensive Nelson threatens federal p!ans decades before the state legislation was passed (in i 985 \~nf;rgy biH fnibuster requiring plans)." Burnanwn said. ''\Ne have locai home rule in our Constitution." Flc:L Supreme Court

Story copyrigf)[eci !Jy Bruce Ritchie and FforiclaEnviroun1enfs.com. Den1ocracy" mot... Do not copy or redistn·bute without permission. :\ic:N Co, airport faces possible DEF fines Posted by Bruce Ritchie at 4:54 Allif c+ VV!ldnfe agency advocatf;s state fand deai with com ... 0 COMMENTS. Controversy catches water bin sponsor by surprise .. Land buy to protect Naval air stalion approved Subscribe to: P0s!. Cot' ,ments (/.\torn} Crist signs invasive species

Pane! offers mixi';d views on Evf:rglades Land buy Group looks to bring drilling vote to bailot

~ (25)

• i\fYi! (34)

~... Match (15)

(9)

.,. (15) !» 2008 (16)

About Me

~l.f/ ~:~:;e::i~:r~dl:a;rowth fa1!I and envimnmental •· issues since 1993. He pmviousiy V1..1c1s a reporter for the Tallahassee Den1ocrat. the Gainesviile Sun cmd the Florida Times-Union. He is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists Conlact him al [email protected] or (850)

http://bruceritchie.blogspot.com/2009/06/hometown-democracy-could-prompt-growth.html 6/24/2009 State outlines ocean 'zoning' Page I of2

State outlines ocean 'zoning'

By Richard Gaines Staff Writer

July 01, 2009 05:50 am

Gov. Deval Patrick's administration yesterday released a draft zoning plan for the management of the inshore state ocean waters - one that bars development off the outside of Cape Cod while allowing regulated use of the waters around Cape Ann.

The plan also designates two areas off the south coast - one off Cutty hunk, the other southwest of Martha's Vineyard - as the only locations for possible commercial-sized wind turbines.

For the rest of the state waters - three-tenths of a mile seaward of the mean high water line, and excluding most developed harbor and port areas out to the three-mile border of the federal exclusive economic zone - development would be regulated and controlled by the use of performance standards. That would cover all state waters around Cape Ann.

The draft plan was introduced yesterday in a teleconference by Ian Bowles, the state's secretary of energy and environmental affairs.

It must undergo public and legislative reviews. But the plan - as defined in the state Oceans Act, the first to call for use and zoning plans for state ocean waters - does not need legislative approval. The plan was authorized by a legislative act signed by the governor in May 2008.

Bowles said the plan went through 18 public meetings and was modified by input from an advisory committee that included Mayor Carolyn Kirk and a legislative advisory panel that included state Sen. Bruce Tarr.

Input was also taken from a Science Advisory Committee.

Kirk characterized the plan as "conservative," in that the administration of Gov. Deval Patrick declined to fine-tune the potential uses of the state waters by the use of sub-zones. She also said that, by leading the federal government into the zoning process, the state hopes to influence federal decisions in the offing. President Obama announced plans to create a federal water zoning approach last month.

For the majority of the state waters, Bowles said the plan creates performance standards for different uses, and sets aside areas of special ecological designations.

Any proposed uses would be measured against the special designations, such as whale and fish habitat.

"The multi-use areas ... direct development away from high-value resources and concentrations of existing water-dependent uses," the draft executive summary of the plan states.

http://www.gloucestertimes.com/punews/local_story_ 181211419.html/resources_printstory 7/9/2009 State outlines ocean 'zoning' Page 2 of2

"The management areas and standards established by the ocean plan will guide resource users and managers and the public in the protection and wise use of our marine waters," said Deerin Babb-Brott, the state's assistant secretary for oceans. "And going forward, the commonwealth will refine the ocean plan as we continue to develop and incorporate new knowledge, ensuring that it is an adaptive, living document."

The no-development area is around the outer side of Cape Cod adjacent to the Cape Cod National Seashore.

The plan vetoes a proposed location in Buzzards Bay of the commercial South Coast wind project because "it conflicts with fishing and boating," said Bowles. But it offers the developer an alternative site southwest of Cuttyhunk.

"Massachusetts waters are rich with natural resources and busy with human activity," the executive summary states. By the terms of the enabling legislation, the ocean becomes a public trust resource.

That commonwealth concept, however, is at odds with action taken last week by the New England Fishery Management Council, which voted to convert the bounty of the sea from a commonly held resource into negotiable catch shares, to be distributed to federal fishing permit holders primarily fishing in harvesting collectives known as sectors.

Richard Gaines can be reached at [email protected]

http://www.gloucestertimes.com/punews/local_story_ 181211419.html/resources_printstory 7/9/2009 Home Buyers Are Drawn to Nearby Organic Farms - NYTimes.com Page I of3

'1:IJr .:Xrw -llork '1:im,·~

is ;or yo,Jr pc,·,,rm,al. r:r;,7 -, , ,.,;-m ,,·d,)1 ,,,,_,, ,1,c,\r1:1•1l:::11 k, yn1:1 :,ci,,-,··, , c:,,, ,·w-,·1r-·1, here rHc:c Ir: .:ny :i,twl• ·;,-;:: www nytreprints.com 1,:-1 ,,.,·111,,,., ,;;fm,;;,;t;m. Order a reprint of !his ariicle now.

July 1, 2009 Organic Farms as Subdivision Amenities

By ALEC APPELBAUM

SOUTH BURLINGTON, Vt. - The bewildered Iowan who converted his farm into a ballpark in "Field of Dreams" in 1989 might reverse the move today. From Vermont to central California, developers are creating subdivisions around organic farms to attract buyers. If you plant it, these developers believe, they will buy.

Increasingly, subdivisions, usually master-planned developments at which buyers buy home sites or raw land, have been treating farms as an amenity. "There are currently at least 200 projects that include agriculture as a key community component," said Ed McMahon, a senior fellow with the Urban Land Institute.

In 2001, investors in a stalled project with an agriculture component outside Boise, ldahQ, recruited Frank Martin to take over their development. Mr. Martin had been a manager at Prairie Crossing, a subdivision built around a working farm in the Chicago suburb of Gray's Lake.

By 2008, the 1,756-acre Idaho development had repaid a $12 million loan from the financing arm of General Motors; realized a 61 percent premium on the sale of its sites, compared with similar parcels with no farm nearby; and claimed a $2.8 million pretax profit by selling 785 of 800 lots, while keeping 1,000 acres open.

The success of the two developments proved the concept, and like-minded developers around the country are trying it on inactive farmland and even on formerly industrial land.

"Open space improves the return for a developer," Mr. McMahon said. "We have 16,000 subdivisions around golf courses, where developers found they could charge a lot premium of 25 to 50 percent over comparable tract subdivision. But most people who live on golf courses do not play golf."

The latest variation on this is blending in working agriculture, Mr. McMahon said. Living with a farm, he noted, can bring a buyer permanent views, wholesome activities for children, access to walking and riding trails and inclusion in an epicurean club.

Here in South Burlington, David Scheuer, a developer, runs a firm called Retrovest that specializes in pedestrian-friendly subdivisions. He is adapting the Prairie Crossing model with a 220-acre project called South Village, where he eventually hopes to sell 334 homes at prices of $200,000 to nearly $700,000.

A 16-acre segment of the property, which was not previously used for farming, is now producing lettuce, garlic and other crops, which are harvested for sale to homeowners and others from the area who have joined a local community-supported agriculture group. "Agriculture can be the caboose on the train," Mr. Scheuer said, "and housing can be the engine." Once he is selling 20 homes a year, he said, he hopes to pay the salary http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/0 l/business/energy-environment/0 I farm.html? _r= 1&part... 7/9/2009 Home Buyers Are Drawn to Nearby Organic Farms - NYTimes.com Page 2 of3

of a full-time farmer.

At the 220-home Serenbe project near Atlanta's airport, the cachet oflocal produce has been added to retiree-friendly businesses, including galleries, a bed-and-breakfast and three restaurants. Steve Nygren, an Atlanta restaurant impresario, started the project on his 900-acre farm.

"We preserved forest and pasture, and there were 20 acres left for an organic farm, and we also have a large wildflower meadow," Mr. Nygren said. "We've set up the design so 90 percent of the houses back up to one of those natural amenities. We are selling our lots at a premium that's probably three times what the raw lot is."

Mr. Nygren has focused Serenbe's second phase on "edible landscaping," he said. "At street corners there are blueberry bushes, fig bushes, peach trees and spotted apple trees."

And in more rural areas, developers are buying big tracts of ranchland and selling small lots to buyers. David Hamilton, a principal in Qroe Farm Preservation Development, is pursuing this approach at the sprawling Bundoran Farm subdivision outside Charlottesville, Va. "We go through a mapping process to see functional agricultural units, if they are good for apples or cattle or whatever, then see where they go together.

Qroe (pronounced "crow") leases some of the land to cattle ranchers and orchard managers. A buyer of a home site hires a builder from a developer-approved list. Qroe is marketing lots of under four acres for less than $400,000, Mr. Hamilton said. "You're buying two acres but access to 2,000 acres," he said.

Grady Lewis, a Virginia native who closed on his 2.67-acre lot in 2007 and moved into his 1,800-square-foot house at Bundoran with his wife, Diane, this spring, responded to Qroe's idea of preserving "rural quality."

When all the house lots have been sold, the rental income from the farmers, which currently goes to the developer, will go to the homeowners' association. "Beyond it being great to see 300 head of Angus scattered across the acres," Mr. Lewis said, "it's a cash-flow issue."

Farm-focused developers must juggle financing a few houses at a time with cultivating crops on a yearly cycle, so many rent farmland to professionals.

Mr. Scheuer hired David Miskell, a veteran Vermont organic farmer with a white beard, to help convert the property's damaged soil. Working organically, which Mr. Miskell translates to "a lot of manure," he and two hired farmers replenished the soil with enough nitrogen to grow greens, root crops and sunflowers this year. "Upfront costs are high to build fertility, but I doubt they are any higher than any golf course," Mr. Miskell said. "Mainly, wc arc growing healthy organic food for healthy homeowners."

Gus Burti, who lives with his wife, Maggie, at South Village, says the farm helped clinch their purchase after a two-year search of the area. "We used to live on a golf course in North Carolina and wanted to come back to Vermont," he said. "My wife loves to cook, and we like that it's organic."

Because a farm's open space takes land from the tax rolls, a developer often donates some land for public use. Hidden Springs sold a parcel to the local school district for $10,000, and Retrovest deeded South Burlington some land with road frontage for a soccer field and playground.

But developers stress that their housing units should stand on their own for the idea of the farm-as-amenity

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/business/energy-environment/O 1farm.html? _r= 1&part... 7/9/2009 Home Buyers Are Drawn to Nearby Organic Farms - NYTimes.com Page 3 of3

to click.

Mr. Scheuer, driving around a competing subdivision with nondescript open space, is convinced that despite the work that goes into a farm, it adds real value to a development. Scoffing at the look of the traditional development, he said, "IfI have to do this to make money, I'll find some other way to spend my time."

C_opyright 2_009 The New York Times Company

Privacy Policy I Terms of Service I Search I Corrections I . RSS J I First Look I Help I Contact Us I Work for Us I Site Map

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/business/energy-environment/O 1farm.html? _r= 1&part... 7/9/2009