Linearized Minimum Evolution Tree of 191 Taxa Including

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Linearized Minimum Evolution Tree of 191 Taxa Including 37 Liriope 8 Ophiopogon 9 Polygonatum 11 Peliosanthes Ruscaceae Danae 9 39 Ruscus 57 Semele 12 Disporopsis 36 Dracaena 94 Sansevieria 4 Comosperm Maianthemum Convallariaceae 4 93 Smilacina Convallaria 95 Aspidistra 45 Tricalista 50 53 Reineckea 39 Campylandra 54 Rohdea 49 Heteropolygonatum 13 Dasylirion Nolinaceae 81 Beucarnea 27 90 Calibanus Eriospermum 17 Iris ensata Arthropodium 75 Chamaexerus 99 Lomandra 95 Albuca 19 Ornithogalum Bowiea Hyancinathaceae Asparagales 19 37 Whiteheadia 6 25 Scilla (part I) 27 Muscarimia 80 Dichelostemma Milla 89 Bessera Themidaceae 25 Bloomeria 55 Triteleia 89 Galanthus 17 92 Lycoris 49 Stenomesson 80 Clivia 39 Amarylis Amaryllidaceae 2 Agapanthus 28 99 Allium Nothoscordum Alliaceae 64 Tulbaghia 73 Gilliesia 91 Solaria 75 Leucocoryne 73 Pabellonia 78 Asparagus Asparagaceae 99 Myrsiphyllum 48 Hemiphylacus Anemarrhena E Behnia Behniaceae 12 65 Echeandia 15 F 88 Leucocrinum 94 Chlorophytum Anthericaceae 91 Anthericum 53 45 Paradisea G Herreria 71 64 Agave 85 Manfreda Agave sensu lato 86 I Polianthes 68 Chlorogalum Agavaceae 49 Hesperaloe + Hosta, H 21 Yucca 15 21 Camassia Camassia, 46 Beschornia J 50 Hosta Chlorogalum 2 10 18 13 23 68 4 81 7 74 44 12 51 Acorus 17 Saururus 28 48 ‘ Pinus radiata Trillaceae Liliacae 2 37 Dianella 29 Phormium 34 Herpolirion Phormiaceae 15 Pasithea 47 45 Hemerocallis 74 Simethis Caesia 54 Johnsonia 10 89 Stawellia Xanthorrhea Xanthorrhoeaceae 92 Asphodeline 30 Asphodelus 57 Bulbinewie C 28 Jodrellia 97 27 Kniphofia Bulbinella 67 61 Eremurus 86 Trachyandra Asphodelaceae 56 Astroloba 39 Poellnitzia 74 Aloe 71 Lomatophyllum 37 Gasteria 57 Haworthia 55 Walleria Tecophilaceae 37 Zephyra 47 Tecophilae 41 Odontospermum 99 Kabuyea 58 Cyanella Xeronema Asparagales part II D 18 Doryanthes 76 Eleutherine 29 15 Iris 79 Aristea 36 33 Patersonia Isophysis Iridaceae 41 Ixia 61 Anomatheca 27 Freesia 42 Gladiolus Blandfordiaceae 71 Astelia 58 Collospermum 49 Milligania 79 Lanaria C Blandfordia Hypoxidaceae 34 Curculigo 25 89 Hypoxis 92 Rhodohypoxis Alania 99 Borya Boryaceae 23 98 Apostasia Neuwiedia 73 Pterostylus 97 Spiranthes 93 Cypripedium 64 Phragmipedium 2 91 Cephalanthus Orchidaceae 43 Epipactis 35 Tropidia 72 Arpophyllum 55 39 Encyclia 14 Neofinetia Glomera 22 99 Catasetum Dressleria 65 Maxillaria 93 Oncidium 77 Calathea 12 Maranta Costus 48 43 Strelitzi 94 Musa Zingiberiflorae 41 Orchidant 21 Riedelea Zingerberales 11 Anigozanthus Calectasia 85 Aechmea 71 Ananas 48 Puya 51 Catopsis 99 Hechtia Bromeliaceae 4 Tillandsi Poales 56 99 Kunhardtia Stegolepis 23 Prionium 24 Flagellar 13 27 Sparganium 0 77 Typha 99 Dioscorea Tacca Arecaceae Arecales 99 Aletris 2 Narthecium 59 Calamus 32 Metroxylon 6 37 Nypa Caryota 97 52 Podococcus Serenoa 14 Iriartea 31 Drymophloeus Colchicaceae 32 Phoenix 72 Colchicum 92 Gloriosa 55 Androcymbium Petermannia 45 92 Tripladenia 99 Burchardi 70 Disporum 93 Uvularia 98 Luzuriaga Alstroeme 68 23 99 Bomarea Campelia 99 Tradesca Alstromeriaceae 93 Tzebrina 63 Daiswa B 7 Liliales 99 Kinugasa Paris 89 50 Trillium Melanthiaceae Chamaelirium 65 Xerophyllum 47 Smilax Philesia Smilacaceae 93 46 Prosartes 73 Streptopus 49 58 Scoliopus Tricyrtis B 38 81 Calochortus A 87 Clintonia 34 Medeola 85 Lilium bulbo Lilaceae 97 Cardiocrinum 36 Lilium 31 Fritillaria 54 Nomocharis Croomia 99 Freycinetia 74 Pandanus 25 Vellozia 37 Sphaeraderia Cyclanthaceae Pandanales 44 97 Carludovica 68 Ludovia 97 Pleea A Tofieldia 51 Gymnostac 84 Zantedeschia 81 Lemna Araceae Ariflorae 12 40 Philodendra 46 Anthurium 31 Spathiphyllum 35 Montrichardia 36 Dieffenbachia 55 17 Xanthosoma Acorus Saururus Acoraceae Acorales 99 Degenaria 33 Magnolia Aristolochia 28 99 Asarum Saruma 29 Ascarina 97 Chloranthus Primitive Dicots Brasenia 48 Austrobaileya 82 Illicium 77 Schisandra Pinus radiata Pinus radiata .
Recommended publications
  • Flavonoids and Stilbenoids of the Genera Dracaena and Sansevieria: Structures and Bioactivities
    molecules Review Flavonoids and Stilbenoids of the Genera Dracaena and Sansevieria: Structures and Bioactivities Zaw Min Thu 1,* , Ko Ko Myo 1, Hnin Thanda Aung 2, Chabaco Armijos 3,* and Giovanni Vidari 4,* 1 Department of Chemistry, Kalay University, Kalay 03044, Sagaing Region, Myanmar; [email protected] 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Mandalay, Mandalay 100103, Myanmar; [email protected] 3 Departamento de Química y Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, San Cayetano Alto s/n, Loja 1101608, Ecuador 4 Medical Analysis Department, Faculty of Science, Tishk International University, Erbil 44001, Iraq * Correspondence: [email protected] (Z.M.T.); [email protected] (C.A.); [email protected] (G.V.) Received: 18 May 2020; Accepted: 2 June 2020; Published: 3 June 2020 Abstract: The genera Dracaena and Sansevieria (Asparagaceae, Nolinoideae) are still poorly resolved phylogenetically. Plants of these genera are commonly distributed in Africa, China, Southeast Asia, and America. Most of them are cultivated for ornamental and medicinal purposes and are used in various traditional medicines due to the wide range of ethnopharmacological properties. Extensive in vivo and in vitro tests have been carried out to prove the ethnopharmacological claims and other bioactivities. These investigations have been accompanied by the isolation and identification of hundreds of phytochemical constituents. The most characteristic metabolites are steroids, flavonoids, stilbenes, and saponins; many of them exhibit potent analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiproliferative, and cytotoxic activities. This review highlights the structures and bioactivities of flavonoids and stilbenoids isolated from Dracaena and Sansevieria. Keywords: Dracaena; Sansevieria; biological/pharmacological activities; flavonoids; stilbenoids 1. Introduction The taxonomic boundaries of the dracaenoid genera Dracaena and Sansevieria have long been debated.
    [Show full text]
  • Sansevieria in Florida-Past and Present1
    Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 95:295-298. 1982. SANSEVIERIA IN FLORIDA-PAST AND PRESENT1 Richard W. Henley R. Dodge (5) mentioned he found Sansevieria zeylanica University of Florida, IFAS, growing in several localities in southern Florida. Leaf sam Ornamental Horticultural Department, ples collected from Boca Chica Key measured approximately Stationed at Agricultural Research Center, 6 ft in length. Dodge prepared a more extensive report on Route 3, Box 580, Apopka, FL 32703 leaf fibers in the United States, published by USDA in 1893 (6) in which he mentioned the fiber of 5. guineensis, listed in Hortus Third (2) as S. hyacinthoides (L.) Druce., African Abstract. The genus Sansevieria has special significance bowstring hemp. It was sufficiently strong for hawsers and in Florida horticulture, where it has been grown as an experi cables and fine enough to be used by jewelers to string mental fiber crop, as an ornamental for interior use and, to a pearls. He further stated that the fiber was too valuable to lesser extent, landscaping outside. Introduction of Sansevieria be used as cordage because manila, sisal and common hemp to Florida is estimated to have occurred between 1765 and were sufficiently abundant and strong. He also indicated that 1820. By the 1890s there was limited testing of a few species the term bowstring hemp was also applied to S. zeylanica of Sansevieria in South Florida, primarily by private interests, (now S. trifasciata) and S. latifolia Bojer. Dodge mentioned for quality and yield of cordage fiber. During World War II, that fiber yield per acre was large because of the rank growth U.
    [Show full text]
  • And Sansevieria​
    C​ACTOLOGIA ​ P​HANTASTICA ​ 9(1) ISSN 2590-3403 17 January 2019 doi:10.5281/zenodo.3611373 ×Dravieria: Valid Publication of ​ ​ a Nothogeneric Name for Hybrids Between Dracaena and ​ ​ Sansevieria (Asparagaceae) ​ M​AARTEN​ H. J. ​VAN DER​ M​EER1 Abstract​—The nothogeneric name ×​Dravieria is proposed for hybrids between Dracaena​ ​ and Sansevieria​ . ​ Dracaena Vand., as traditionally circumscribed, is paraphyletic in regards to Sansevieria Thunb. (Lu e​ t al. 2014; Takawira-Nyenya e​ t al. 2018) Takawira-Nyenya et al. (2018) consequently subsumed S​ ansevieria into D​ racaena. This change has not ​ yet found its way to the general public, which will likely hold on to the familiar Sansevieria for decades to come. ​ The only intergeneric hybrid between D​ racaena and S​ ansevieria known to me is a purported cross between S​ ansevieria parva N.E.Br. (≡ D​ racaena parva (N.E.Br.) Byng & Christenh.) and D​ racaena surculosa Lindl. (as D​ racaena godseffiana ​ hort.) patented in 2016 under the name ‘SUDRASAN01’ (Suphachadiwong 2016). This cultivar is likely identical to the plant recently brought on the market in the Netherlands as D​ ravieria F​IREFLIES.​ ​ To my knowledge, the nothogeneric name D​ ravieria has not been validly published, which is why I propose it here: ×​Dravieria​ ​anon. ex ​ ​M.van der Meer n​ othogen. nov. = D​ racaena Vand. × S​ ansevieria Thunb. ​ ​ 1 Roggekamp 379 NL-2592 VV Den Haag [email protected] ORCiD: 0000-0002-5182-9615 CC BY-SA 4.0 1 ​ C​ACTOLOGIA ​ P​HANTASTICA ​ 9(1) ISSN 2590-3403 17 January 2019 doi:10.5281/zenodo.3611373 ×Dravieria ‘SUDRASAN01’ ​ ​ (reproduced from Suphachadiwong 2016) ×Dravieria FIREFLIES ​ ​ ​ at garden center GroenRijk de Wilskracht in The Hague, the Netherlands CC BY-SA 4.0 2 ​ C​ACTOLOGIA ​ P​HANTASTICA ​ 9(1) ISSN 2590-3403 17 January 2019 doi:10.5281/zenodo.3611373 Literature Lu, P., & Morden, C.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Chlorophytum Burundiense</I> (Asparagaceae), a New Species
    Plant Ecology and Evolution 144 (2): 233–236, 2011 doi:10.5091/plecevo.2011.609 SHORT COMMUNICATION Chlorophytum burundiense (Asparagaceae), a new species from Burundi and Tanzania Pierre Meerts Herbarium et Bibliothèque de botanique africaine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, CP 169, BE-1050 Brussels, Belgium Email: [email protected] Background and aims – In the context of our preparation of the treatment of the genus Chlorophytum for the ‘Flore d’Afrique centrale’, a new species is described from Burundi and Tanzania. Methods – Herbarium taxonomy and SEM of seeds. Key results – Chlorophytum burundiense Meerts sp. nov. is described. It is a small plant < 35 cm in height, with linear leaves < 6 mm wide, a dense raceme and large, deep purplish brown bracts. It is morphologically not closely related to any other species in the genus. It has a distinct habitat, growing in afromontane grassland and scrub at 2000–2500 m a.s.l. All collections but one originate from Burundi, and a single collection originates from SW Tanzania. A determination key is provided for Chlorophytum species with linear leaves occurring in Burundi. Key words – afromontane, determination key, new species, Chlorophytum, SEM, Burundi, Tanzania. INTRODUCTION silvaticum, C. sparsiflorum, C. stolzii, C. subpetiolatum, C. zingiberastrum (taxonomy and nomenclature after Nordal The circumscription of the genus Chlorophytum Ker Gawl. et al. 1997, Kativu et al. 2008). In addition, a species came (Asparagaceae in APG 2009) was revised by Obermeyer to our attention which could not be identified using Baker (1962), Marais & Reilly (1978), Nordal et al. (1990) and (1898), von Poellnitz (1942, 1946), Nordal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chloroplast Genome of Arthropodium Bifurcatum
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. The Chloroplast Genome of Arthropodium bifurcatum. A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand Simon James Lethbridge Cox 2010 Abstract This thesis describes the application of high throughput (Illumina) short read sequencing and analyses to obtain the chloroplast genome sequence of Arthropodium bifurcatum and chloroplast genome markers for future testing of hypotheses that explain geographic distributions of Rengarenga – the name Maori give to species of Arthropodium in New Zealand. It has been proposed that A.cirratum was translocated from regions in the north of New Zealand to zones further south due to its value as a food crop. In order to develop markers to test this hypothesis, the chloroplast genome of the closely related A.bifurcatum was sequenced and annotated. A range of tools were used to handle the large quantities of data produced by the Illumina GAIIx. Programs included the de novo assembler Velvet, alignment tools BWA and Bowtie, the viewer Tablet and the quality control program SolexaQA. The A.bifurcatum genome was then used as a reference to align long range PCR products amplified from multiple accessions of A.cirratum and A.bifurcatum sampled from a range of geographic locations. From this alignment variable SNP markers were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Population Dynamics of Two Closely Related Species Differing in Ploidy Level
    Comparative Population Dynamics of Two Closely Related Species Differing in Ploidy Level Lucie Cˇ erna´ 1, Zuzana Mu¨ nzbergova´ 1,2* 1 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 2 Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences, Pru˚honice, Czech Republic Abstract Background: Many studies compare the population dynamics of single species within multiple habitat types, while much less is known about the differences in population dynamics in closely related species in the same habitat. Additionally, comparisons of the effect of habitat types and species are largely missing. Methodology and Principal Findings: We estimated the importance of the habitat type and species for population dynamics of plants. Specifically, we compared the dynamics of two closely related species, the allotetraploid species Anthericum liliago and the diploid species Anthericum ramosum, occurring in the same habitat type. We also compared the dynamics of A. ramosum in two contrasting habitats. We examined three populations per species and habitat type. The results showed that single life history traits as well as the mean population dynamics of A. liliago and A. ramosum from the same habitat type were more similar than the population dynamics of A. ramosum from the two contrasting habitats. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that when transferring knowledge regarding population dynamics between populations, we need to take habitat conditions into account, as these conditions appear to be more important than the species involved (ploidy level). However, the two species differ significantly in their overall population growth rates, indicating that the ploidy level has an effect on species performance. In contrast to what has been suggested by previous studies, we observed a higher population growth rate in the diploid species.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 34 March 2016
    No. 34 March 2016 Sansevieria 34/2016 pages 14 - 26 The Genus Sansevieria: An Introduction to Molecular (DNA) Analysis and Preliminary Insights to Intrageneric Relationships Andrew S. Baldwin*, Robert H. Webb** *Department of Life Science, Mesa Community College, Mesa, Arizona **School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona Contact: [email protected] All photos by the Author Summary species? So, in this article, pretend that the genus San- Molecular biology, particularly as it involves the analysis sevieria, and the use of molecular biology, is on trial and of DNA, is growing in importance within plant taxon- you are the jury: will you vote for conviction or acquittal? omy to resolve how families and genera are related and to even resolve plant species from one another. Here, we Biogeography review some of the concepts of molecular biology with As the readers of this journal are well aware, Sansevieria an emphasis on how it may help to unravel certain long- is a cosmopolitan genus that occurs in Africa, the Middle debated issues within the genus Sansevieria as well as the East, and the Asian subcontinent. The diversity in form placement of this genus among other related genera. We is rather astonishing, ranging from tiny little plants, provide some preliminary data and offer a few insights some with stout, spiky leaves and others with thin, flat but caution against jumping to any conclusions about ones, to formidable shrubs 2-4 m in height. What holds Sansevierias without considerable additional data. this group of plants together within the genus Sansevier- ia are the similar flowers and seeds, but some believe that Introduction the flowers and seeds aren’t so unique to exclude larger, A well-respected succulent plant and cactus collector related plants currently within the genus Dracaena (Bos, and researcher from England reportedly refers to DNA 1984), and some molecular data bear this out (Lu and as “Damned Nasty Answers” because he doesn’t particu- Morden, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Phylogenetic Systematics: a Review of Concepts with Examples from the Agave Family
    Classification and Phylogenetic Systematics: A review of concepts with examples from the Agave Family David Bogler Missouri Botanical Garden • Taxonomy – the orderly classification of organisms and other objects • Systematics – scientific study of the diversity of organisms – Classification – arrangement into groups – Nomenclature – scientific names – Phylogenetics – evolutionary history • Cladistics – study of relationships of groups of organisms depicted by evolutionary trees, and the methods used to make those trees (parsimony, maximum likelihood, bayesian) “El Sotol” - Dasylirion Dasylirion wheeleri Dasylirion gentryi Agave havardii, Chisos Mountains Agavaceae Distribution Aristotle’s Scala Naturae Great Chain of Being 1579, Didacus Valades, Rhetorica Christiana hierarchical structure of all matter and life, believed to have been decreed by God Middle Ages Ruins of Rome Age of Herbalists Greek Authorities Aristotle Theophrastus Dioscorides Latin was the common language of scholars Plants and animals given Latinized names Stairway to Heaven From Llull (1304). Note that Homo is between the plant-animal steps and the sky-angel- god steps. Systematics - Three Kinds of Classification Systems Artificial - based on similarities that might put unrelated plants in the same category. - Linnaeus. Natural - categories reflect relationships as they really are in nature. - de Jussieu. Phylogenetic - categories based on evolutionary relationships. Current emphasis on monophyletic groups. - Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. Carolus Linnaeus 1707 - 1778 Tried to name and classify all organism Binomial nomenclature Genus species Species Plantarum - 1753 System of Classification “Sexual System” Classes - number of stamens Orders - number of pistils Linnaean Hierarchy Nested box-within-box hierarchy is consistent with descent from a common ancestor, used as evidence by Darwin Nomenclature – system of naming species and higher taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes
    Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes Shichao Chen1., Dong-Kap Kim2., Mark W. Chase3, Joo-Hwan Kim4* 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2 Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Gyeonggi- do, Korea, 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Abstract Phylogenetic analysis aims to produce a bifurcating tree, which disregards conflicting signals and displays only those that are present in a large proportion of the data. However, any character (or tree) conflict in a dataset allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. Although data-display network approaches exist, biologists cannot easily and routinely use them to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing hundreds of taxa. Here, we constructed an original neighbour-net for a large dataset of Asparagales to highlight the aspects of the resulting network that will be important for interpreting phylogeny. The analyses were largely conducted with new data collected for the same loci as in previous studies, but from different species accessions and greater sampling in many cases than in published analyses. The network tree summarised the majority data pattern in the characters of plastid sequences before tree building, which largely confirmed the currently recognised phylogenetic relationships. Most conflicting signals are at the base of each group along the Asparagales backbone, which helps us to establish the expectancy and advance our understanding of some difficult taxa relationships and their phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    th International Workshop of European Vegetation Survey Book of Abstracts „Flora, vegetation, environment and land-use at large scale” April– May, University of Pécs, Hungary ABSTRACTS 19th EVS Workshop “Flora, vegetation, environment and land-use at large scale” Pécs, Hungary 29 April – 2 May 2010 Edited by Zoltán Botta-Dukát and Éva Salamon-Albert with collaboration of Róbert Pál, Judit Nyulasi, János Csiky and Attila Lengyel Revised by Members of the EVS 2010 Scientifi c Committee Pécs, EVS Scientific Committee Prof MHAS Attila BORHIDI, University of Pécs, Hungary Assoc prof Zoltán BOTTA-DUKÁT, Institute of Ecology & Botany, Hungary Assoc prof Milan CHYTRÝ, Masaryk University, Czech Republic Prof Jörg EWALD, Weihenstephan University of Applied Sciences, Germany Prof Sandro PIGNATTI, La Sapientia University, Italy Prof János PODANI, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary Canon Prof John Stanley RODWELL, Lancaster University, United Kingdom Prof Francesco SPADA, La Sapientia University, Italy EVS Local Organizing Committee Dr. Éva SALAMON-ALBERT, University of Pécs Dr. Zoltán BOTTA-DUKÁT, Institute of Ecology & Botany HAS, Vácrátót Prof. Attila BORHIDI, University of Pécs Sándor CSETE, University of Pécs Dr. János CSIKY, University of Pécs Ferenc HORVÁTH, Institute of Ecology & Botany HAS, Vácrátót Prof. Balázs KEVEY, University of Pécs Dr. Zsolt MOLNÁR, Institute of Ecology & Botany HAS, Vácrátót Dr. Tamás MORSCHHAUSER, University of Pécs Organized by Department of Plant Systematics and Geobotany, University of Pécs H-7624 Pécs, Ifj úság útja 6. Tel.: +36-72-503-600, fax: +36-72-501-520 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ttk.pte.hu/biologia/botanika/ Secretary: Dr. Róbert Pál, Attila Lengyel Institute of Ecology & Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS) H-2163 Vácrátót, Alkotmány út 2-4 Tel.: +36-28-360-147, Fax: +36-28-360-110 http://www.obki.hu/ Directorate of Duna-Dráva National Park, Pécs H-7602 Pécs, P.O.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution Along the Crassulacean Acid Metabolism Continuum
    Review CSIRO PUBLISHING www.publish.csiro.au/journals/fpb Functional Plant Biology, 2010, 37, 995–1010 Evolution along the crassulacean acid metabolism continuum Katia SilveraA, Kurt M. Neubig B, W. Mark Whitten B, Norris H. Williams B, Klaus Winter C and John C. Cushman A,D ADepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, MS200, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557-0200, USA. BFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7800, USA. CSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Republic of Panama. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] This paper is part of an ongoing series: ‘The Evolution of Plant Functions’. Abstract. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) is a specialised mode of photosynthesis that improves atmospheric CO2 assimilation in water-limited terrestrial and epiphytic habitats and in CO2-limited aquatic environments. In contrast with C3 and C4 plants, CAM plants take up CO2 from the atmosphere partially or predominantly at night. CAM is taxonomically widespread among vascular plants andis present inmanysucculent species that occupy semiarid regions, as well as intropical epiphytes and in some aquatic macrophytes. This water-conserving photosynthetic pathway has evolved multiple times and is found in close to 6% of vascular plant species from at least 35 families. Although many aspects of CAM molecular biology, biochemistry and ecophysiology are well understood, relatively little is known about the evolutionary origins of CAM. This review focuses on five main topics: (1) the permutations and plasticity of CAM, (2) the requirements for CAM evolution, (3) the drivers of CAM evolution, (4) the prevalence and taxonomic distribution of CAM among vascular plants with emphasis on the Orchidaceae and (5) the molecular underpinnings of CAM evolution including circadian clock regulation of gene expression.
    [Show full text]