DOCSLIB.ORG

Instruction Manual Meade Instruments Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Instruction Manual Meade Instruments Corporation Instruction Manual 8", 10", 12", 14", 16" LX200GPS Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescopes 7" LX200GPS Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescope with Autostar II Hand Controller Meade Instruments Corporation The Meade Schmidt-Cassegrain Optical System (2) (1) (1) (2) Ray (2) 1/2° Ray (1) 8.218" (2) 8.016" (1) 8.0" Secondary 8.0" Mirror Focal Plane Secondary Primary Baffle Tube Baffle Field Stops Correcting Primary Mirror Plate (8" model depicted in diagram. Not to scale.) In the Schmidt-Cassegrain design of the Meade 8", 10", 12", 14", and 16" LX200GPS models, light enters from the right, passes through a thin lens with 2-sided aspheric correction (“correcting plate”), proceeds to a spherical primary mirror, and then to a convex secondary mirror. The convex secondary mirror multiplies the effective focal length of the primary mirror and results in a focus at the focal plane, with light passing through a central perforation in the primary mirror. The Meade 8", 10" and 12" Schmidt-Cassegrain models include an oversize primary mirror, yielding a fully illuminated field- of-view significantly wider than is possible with a standard-size primary mirror. Note that light ray (2) in the figure would be lost entirely, except for the oversize primary. It is this phenomenon which results in Meade Schmidt-Cassegrains having off-axis field illuminations about 10% greater, aperture-for-aperture, than other Schmidt-Cassegrains utilizing standard-size primary mirrors. Field stops machined into the inside-diameter surface of the primary mirror baffle tube significantly increase lunar, planetary, and deep-space image contrast. These field stops effectively block off-axis stray light rays. The Meade Maksutov-Cassegrain Optical System The Meade 7" (178mm) Maksutov-Cassegrain Optical System Field Stops 8.25" 7" Focal Meniscus Plane Lens Primary Baffle Tube Secondary Baffle Primary Mirror (f/2.5) (Diagram not to scale) The Meade 7" Maksutov-Cassegrain design optimizes imaging performance by utilizing a combination of a two-sided spherical meniscus lens (right), a strongly aspheric f/2.5 primary mirror, and a spherical secondary mirror. The convex sec- ondary mirror multiplies the effective focal length of the primary by a factor of six, resulting in an overall a focal length of 2670mm and a focal ratio of f/15 system at the Cassegrain focus. The oversize 8.25" primary mirror results in a fully-illuminated (unvignetted) field of view significantly wider than can be obtained with Maksutov optics incorporating primary mirrors of the same aperture as their meniscus correcting lenses. Computer-optimized primary and secondary mirror baffles, as well as a sequence of field stops internal to the primary mir- ror baffle, yield lunar, planetary, stellar, and deep-space images of uncommonly high contrast and resolution. CONTENTS Quick-Start Guide .......................................................... 4 Telescope Features ...................................................... 6 WARNING! Autostar II Features........................................................ 9 Getting Started ..............................................................12 ® Never use a Meade LX200GPS Telescope Parts Listing ..............................................................12 to look at the Sun! Looking at or near the How to Attach the Tripod to the Telescope ..............12 Sun will cause instant and irreversible dam- How to Assemble Your Telescope ............................13 age to your eye. Eye damage is often pain- Choosing an Eyepiece..............................................14 less, so there is no warning to the observer Mounting and Adjusting the Viewfinder ....................15 that damage has occurred until it is too late. Observing ......................................................................16 Do not point the telescope or its viewfinder at Observing by Moving the Telescope Manually ........16 or near the Sun. Do not look through the tel- Terrestrial Observing ................................................16 escope or its viewfinder as it is moving. Observing Using Autostar II's Arrow Keys ................16 Children should always have adult supervi- Focusing the Eyepiece with the Microfocuser ..........17 sion while observing. Slew Speeds ............................................................17 Observe the Moon, Astronomical Observing ..........18 To Track an Object Automatically..............................18 Moving Through Autostar II’s Menus ..................18 Caution: Use care to install batteries in the Automatic Alignment............................................18 orientation indicated by illustration in the bat- Observe a Star Using Automatic Tracking ..........20 tery slots of the battery holder. Follow battery Go To Saturn ............................................................20 manufacturer's precautions. Do not install Using the Guided Tour..............................................20 batteries backwards or mix new and used Basic Autostar II Operation ............................................22 batteries. Do not mix battery types. If these Autostar II Navigation Exercise ................................22 precautions are not followed, batteries may Navigating Autostar II................................................23 explode, catch fire, or leak. Improperly Autostar II Menus ........................................................24 installed batteries void your Meade warranty. Menu Tree ................................................................24 Objects Menu............................................................25 Event Menu ..............................................................26 Glossary Menu, Utilities Menu ..................................27 If you are anxious to use your telescope Setup Menu ..............................................................28 for the first time, read the QUICK-START Hot Button Menus ....................................................31 GUIDE on pages 4 and 5. Advanced Autostar II Features ......................................32 Adding Observing Sites ............................................32 Creating User Objects ..............................................33 Observing Satellites, Landmarks ..............................34 16" LX200GPS Users: See APPENDIX F, Identify ......................................................................35 page 62, for features unique to the 16" Browse ......................................................................36 model. Alternate Alt/Az Alignment Methods..........................37 Initialize Autostar II (for Alternate Alignments) ..........37 Easy (Two-Star) Alignment ......................................37 Two-Star Alt/Az Alignment ........................................37 APPENDIX G 14" LX200GPS Users: See , To Set the Home Position Manually ....................38 page 66, for features unique to the 14" One-Star Alt/Az Alignment ........................................38 model. Periodic Error Correction ..........................................39 Photography ..................................................................40 Optional Accessories ......................................................41 Maintenance ..................................................................44 Specifications ................................................................47 ® The name "Meade" and the Meade logo are trademarks Appendix A: Equatorial (Polar) Alignment ......................50 registered with the U.S. Patent Office and in principal coun- Appendix B: Latitude Chart ............................................55 tries throughout the world. "LX200GPS" and "Autostar II" are Appendix C: How to Create Your Own Guided Tour......56 trademarks of Meade Instruments Corporation. Appendix D: Training the Drive ......................................60 "Easy Align" U.S. patent 6,392,799 and other patents pend- Appendix E: The Moon Menu ........................................61 ing. Appendix F: 16" LX200GPS Features............................62 Intelligent Network Architecture to Facilitate Parallel Task Appendix G: 14" LX200GPS Features ..........................66 Management U.S. patent 6,304,376 Appendix H: De-rotater and Microfocuser Assembly ....67 © 2003 Meade Instruments Corporation. Appendix I: Smart Mount................................................68 Basic Astronomy ............................................................70 QUICK-START GUIDE It is recommended that you attach the supplied tripod to the LX200GPS for observing. Perform the telescope and Autostar II setup indoors in the light so that you become familiar with the parts and operation before moving the tele- scope outside into the dark for observing. The setup is the same for the standard field tripod and the giant field tripod. ᕡ Remove the spreader bar (see above figure) from the shipping carton. Slide the spreader bar onto the threaded rod. Slide the rod through the tripod base. Position the spreader bar so that its three arms line up with the three tripod legs. ᕤ Threaded Rod “C” Clip in slot Tripod Base 1. Remove the field tripod from the shipping carton. Stand the tripod vertically with the tripod feet down and with the tripod still fully collapsed. Grasp two of the tripod legs and, with the full weight of the tripod on the third leg, gently pull the legs apart to a fully open position. 4. Place the "C" clip into the slot in the threaded rod above the tripod head—this clip holds the thread- ed rod in place. ᕢ ᕥ Tension Knob 5. Take
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris
    r bulletin 109 — february 2002 Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris D. Mehrholz, L. Leushacke FGAN Research Institute for High-Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques, Wachtberg, Germany W. Flury, R. Jehn, H. Klinkrad, M. Landgraf European Space Operations Centre (ESOC), Darmstadt, Germany Earth’s space-debris environment tracked, with estimates for the number of Today’s man-made space-debris environment objects larger than 1 cm ranging from 100 000 has been created by the space activities to 200 000. that have taken place since Sputnik’s launch in 1957. There have been more than 4000 The sources of this debris are normal launch rocket launches since then, as well as many operations (Fig. 2), certain operations in space, other related debris-generating occurrences fragmentations as a result of explosions and such as more than 150 in-orbit fragmentation collisions in space, firings of satellite solid- events. rocket motors, material ageing effects, and leaking thermal-control systems. Solid-rocket Among the more than 8700 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbits, motors use aluminium as a catalyst (about 15% only about 6% are operational satellites and the remainder is space by mass) and when burning they emit debris. Europe currently has no operational space surveillance aluminium-oxide particles typically 1 to 10 system, but a powerful radar facility for the detection and tracking of microns in size. In addition, centimetre-sized space debris and the imaging of space objects is available in the form objects are formed by metallic aluminium melts, of the 34 m dish radar at the Research Establishment for Applied called ‘slag’.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Greatest Projects and Their Engineers - VII
    America's Greatest Projects and Their Engineers - VII Course No: B05-005 Credit: 5 PDH Dominic Perrotta, P.E. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 076 77 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] America’s Greatest Projects & Their Engineers-Vol. VII The Apollo Project-Part 1 Preparing for Space Travel to the Moon Table of Contents I. Tragedy and Death Before the First Apollo Flight A. The Three Lives that Were Lost B. Investigation, Findings & Recommendations II. Beginning of the Man on the Moon Concept A. Plans to Land on the Moon B. Design Considerations and Decisions 1. Rockets – Launch Vehicles 2. Command/Service Module 3. Lunar Module III. NASA’s Objectives A. Unmanned Missions B. Manned Missions IV. Early Missions V. Apollo 7 Ready – First Manned Apollo Mission VI. Apollo 8 - Orbiting the Moon 1 I. Tragedy and Death Before the First Apollo Flight Everything seemed to be going well for the Apollo Project, the third in a series of space projects by the United States intended to place an American astronaut on the Moon before the end of the 1960’s decade. Apollo 1, known at that time as AS (Apollo Saturn)-204 would be the first manned spaceflight of the Apollo program, and would launch a few months after the flight of Gemini 12, which had occurred on 11 November 1966. Although Gemini 12 was a short duration flight, Pilot Buzz Aldrin had performed three extensive EVA’s (Extra Vehicular Activities), proving that Astronauts could work for long periods of time outside the spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Lunar Terminology
    Glossary of Lunar Terminology albedo A measure of the reflectivity of the Moon's gabbro A coarse crystalline rock, often found in the visible surface. The Moon's albedo averages 0.07, which lunar highlands, containing plagioclase and pyroxene. means that its surface reflects, on average, 7% of the Anorthositic gabbros contain 65-78% calcium feldspar. light falling on it. gardening The process by which the Moon's surface is anorthosite A coarse-grained rock, largely composed of mixed with deeper layers, mainly as a result of meteor­ calcium feldspar, common on the Moon. itic bombardment. basalt A type of fine-grained volcanic rock containing ghost crater (ruined crater) The faint outline that remains the minerals pyroxene and plagioclase (calcium of a lunar crater that has been largely erased by some feldspar). Mare basalts are rich in iron and titanium, later action, usually lava flooding. while highland basalts are high in aluminum. glacis A gently sloping bank; an old term for the outer breccia A rock composed of a matrix oflarger, angular slope of a crater's walls. stony fragments and a finer, binding component. graben A sunken area between faults. caldera A type of volcanic crater formed primarily by a highlands The Moon's lighter-colored regions, which sinking of its floor rather than by the ejection of lava. are higher than their surroundings and thus not central peak A mountainous landform at or near the covered by dark lavas. Most highland features are the center of certain lunar craters, possibly formed by an rims or central peaks of impact sites.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Space-Based Infrared Astronomy and the Air Force Infrared Celestial Backgrounds Program
    AFRL-RV-HA-TR-2008-1039 History of Space-Based Infrared Astronomy and the Air Force Infrared Celestial Backgrounds Program S. D. Price 18 April 2008 Approved for Public Release: Distribution Unlimited AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY Space Vehicles Directorate 29 Randolph Rd. Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010 AFRL-RV-HA-TR-2008-1039 This Technical Report has been reviewed and is approved for publication. / signed / ____________________________ Robert A. Morris, Chief Battlespace Environment Division / signed / / signed / _________________ _______________________________ Stephan D. Price Paul Tracy, Acting Chief Author Battlespace Surveillance Innovation Center This report has been reviewed by the ESC Public Affairs Office (PA) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service. Qualified requestors may obtain additional copies from the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). All others should apply to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). If your address has changed, if you wish to be removed from the mailing list, of if the address is no longer employed by your organization, please notify AFRL/VSIM, 29 Randolph Rd., Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010. This will assist us in maintaining a current mailing list. Do not return copies of this report unless contractual obligations or notices on a specific document require that it be returned. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the Tenth Saturn I Launch Vehicle Test Flight SA-10, MPR-SAT-FE-66-11, July 14, 1966
    HUNTSVILLE ALABAMA U N MPR-SAT-FE-66-i t J (Supersedes MPR-SAT-65-14) July 14, 1966 X69-75421 (ACCE$$}0_IN_) ./BER) " (THRU) _; <k/ ,ooo_, o (NASA'CR OR T__) (CATEGORYI _. AVAILABLE TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND CONTRACTORS ONLY RESULTSOFTHETENTHSATURN, LAUNCHVEHICLE [u] .C,_BsTfIc_o _ c_a_ _£Sk "+ , / +. _ ,+1 -: • 1_ ,t:_ 'v- Sc_e_t;*; SATURN FLIGHT EVALUATION WORKING GROUP GROUP-4 _/ Down_r_W_L3y_rvats; Declasf_ars. %, L " \ ',., ". MSFC - Fo_m 774 (Rev Ma_ 1_66) C • _, SECURITY NOTE This document contains irrformation affecting the national defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Law, Title 18, U.S.C. , Sec- tions 793 and 794 as amended. The revelation ol its contents in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. MPR-SAT-FE-66-11 RESULTS OF TIIE TENTH SATURN I LAUNCII VEIIICLE TEST FLIGHT SA-IO By Saturn Flight Evaluation Working Group George C. Marshall Space Flight Center AI3STIIA CT This report presents the results of the early engi- neering evaluation of the SA-10 test flight. Sixth of the Block II series, SA-i0 was the fifth Saturn vehicle to car W an Apollo boilerplate (BP-9) payload and the third in a series to carry a Pegasus payload (Pegasus C). The performance of each major vehicle system is discussed with special emphasis on malfunctions and deviations. This test flightof SA-10 was the tenth consecutive success for the Saturn I vehicles and marks the end el the Saturn I program This was the third flight test of the Pegasus meteoroid technology satellite, the third flight test to utilize the iterative guidance mode, the fourth flight test utilizing the ST-f24 guidance system forboth stages, andthe fifth flight test to dem- onstrate the closed loop performance of the path guidance during S-IV burn.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EARLY APOLLO PROGRAM Project Apollo Was an American Space Project Which Landed People on the Moon and Brought Them Safely Back to Earth
    AIAA AEROSPACE M ICRO-LESSON Easily digestible Aerospace Principles revealed for K-12 Students and Educators. These lessons will be sent on a bi-weekly basis and allow grade-level focused learning. - AIAA STEM K-12 Committee. THE EARLY APOLLO PROGRAM Project Apollo was an American space project which landed people on the Moon and brought them safely back to Earth. Most people know about Apollo 1, in which three astronauts lost their lives in a fire during a countdown rehearsal, and about Apollo 8, which flew to the Moon, orbited around it, and returned to Earth. Just about everybody knows about Apollo 11, which first landed astronauts on the Moon. But what happened in between these missions? This lesson explores the lesser-known but still essential building blocks of the later missions’ success. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): ● Discipline: Engineering Design ● Crosscutting Concept: Systems and System Models ● Science & Engineering Practice: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions GRADES K-2 K-2-ETS1-1. Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about a situation people want to change to define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. NASA engineers knew that Apollo astronauts would need special training to succeed in their missions to the moon, but how could they train under conditions similar to those the crew would encounter? One answer was to send them to places with barren areas and volcanic features that were like what they expected to find on the lunar surface. The astronauts received geology training as well as practicing maneuvers in their spacesuits and driving a replica of the GRADES K-2 (CONTINUED) lunar rover vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics Greenbelt, Maryland 20771
    1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 @S0002-7537~90!01201-X# The NASA Goddard Space Flight Center ~GSFC! The civil service scientific staff consists of Dr. Mario Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics ~LEP! performs Acun˜a, Dr. John Allen, Dr. Robert Benson, Dr. Thomas Bir- experimental and theoretical research on the heliosphere, the mingham, Dr. Gordon Bjoraker, Dr. John Brasunas, Dr. interstellar medium, and the magnetospheres and upper David Buhl, Dr. Leonard Burlaga, Dr. Gordon Chin, Dr. Re- atmospheres of the planets, including Earth. LEP space gina Cody, Dr. Michael Collier, Dr. John Connerney, Dr. scientists investigate the structure and dynamics of the Michael Desch, Mr. Fred Espenak, Dr. Joseph Fainberg, Dr. magnetospheres of the planets including Earth. Their Donald Fairfield, Dr. William Farrell, Dr. Richard Fitzenre- research programs encompass the magnetic fields intrinsic to iter, Dr. Michael Flasar, Dr. Barbara Giles, Dr. David Gle- many planetary bodies as well as their charged-particle nar, Dr. Melvyn Goldstein, Dr. Joseph Grebowsky, Dr. Fred environments and plasma-wave emissions. The LEP also Herrero, Dr. Michael Hesse, Dr. Robert Hoffman, Dr. conducts research into the nature of planetary ionospheres Donald Jennings, Mr. Michael Kaiser, Dr. John Keller, Dr. and their coupling to both the upper atmospheres and their Alexander Klimas, Dr. Theodor Kostiuk, Dr. Brook Lakew, magnetospheres. Finally, the LEP carries out a broad-based Dr. Ronald Lepping, Dr. Robert MacDowall, Dr. William research program in heliospheric physics covering the Maguire, Dr. Marla Moore, Dr. David Nava, Dr. Larry Nit- origins of the solar wind, its propagation outward through tler, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA News 01 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C
    NASA News 01 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 AC 202 755-8370 (0 3 For Release: o *[J£ Bill Pomeroy 00 c« Headquarters, Washington, D.C, 3 P. M., WEDNESDAY, Dfn (Phone: 202/755-8370) October 10, 1979 in ^ Ken Atchison 0 Headquarters, Washington, D.C, (Phone: 202/755-2497) a RELEASE NO: 79-126 a PEGASUS 2 REENTRY EXPECTED IN NOVEMBER w The Pegasus 2 spacecraft assembly, launched by NASA in 1965, is expected to reenter the Earth's atmosphere on or about Nov. 5, according to notification given NASA by the North American Air Defense Command. The command compiles information on satellite payloads, rocket bodies and other orbiting pieces that could survive the friction and heat of reentry and impact on Earth. Pegasus 2, launched May 25, 1965, was used to gather micrometeoroid data for use in the design of spacecraft. -more- -2- It was one of three such spacecraft, all launched in 1965. Pegasus 1 reentered Sept. 17, 1978, over Africa and Pegasus 3 reentered Aug. 4, 1969, over the Pacific Ocean. The Pegasus 2 assembly weighs about 10,430 kilograms (23,000 pounds) and is 21 meters (70 feet) long. The space- craft itself weighs about 1,450 kg (3,200 lb.). It is attached to the empty S-IV stage and the instrument unit of the Saturn I launch vehicle. None of the sections has any radioactive nuclear power sources or materials aboard. It is estimated that approximately 9,705 kg (21,400 lb.) of orbital hardware will be destroyed by reentry heating.
    [Show full text]
  • Voyage to Jupiter. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 312 131 SE 050 900 AUTHOR Morrison, David; Samz, Jane TITLE Voyage to Jupiter. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. Scientific and Technical Information Branch. REPORT NO NASA-SP-439 PUB DATE 80 NOTE 208p.; Colored photographs and drawings may not reproduce well. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 ($9.00). PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Technology; *Astronomy; Satellites (Aerospace); Science Materials; *Science Programs; *Scientific Research; Scientists; *Space Exploration; *Space Sciences IDENTIFIERS *Jupiter; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; *Voyager Mission ABSTRACT This publication illustrates the features of Jupiter and its family of satellites pictured by the Pioneer and the Voyager missions. Chapters included are:(1) "The Jovian System" (describing the history of astronomy);(2) "Pioneers to Jupiter" (outlining the Pioneer Mission); (3) "The Voyager Mission"; (4) "Science and Scientsts" (listing 11 science investigations and the scientists in the Voyager Mission);.(5) "The Voyage to Jupiter--Cetting There" (describing the launch and encounter phase);(6) 'The First Encounter" (showing pictures of Io and Callisto); (7) "The Second Encounter: More Surprises from the 'Land' of the Giant" (including pictures of Ganymede and Europa); (8) "Jupiter--King of the Planets" (describing the weather, magnetosphere, and rings of Jupiter); (9) "Four New Worlds" (discussing the nature of the four satellites); and (10) "Return to Jupiter" (providing future plans for Jupiter exploration). Pictorial maps of the Galilean satellites, a list of Voyager science teams, and a list of the Voyager management team are appended. Eight technical and 12 non-technical references are provided as additional readings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Mission at Kwajalein
    THE SPACE MISSION AT KWAJALEIN The Space Mission at Kwajalein Timothy D. Hall, Gary F. Duff, and Linda J. Maciel The United States has leveraged the Reagan The Reagan Test Site (RTS), located on Kwajalein Atoll in the central western Test Site’s suite of instrumentation radars and » Pacific, has been a missile testing facility its unique location on the Kwajalein Atoll to for the United States government since the enhance space surveillance and to conduct early 1960s. Lincoln Laboratory has provided technical space launches. Lincoln Laboratory’s technical leadership for RTS from the very beginning, with Labo- ratory staff serving assignments there continuously since leadership at the site and its connection to May 1962 [1]. Over the past few decades, the RTS suite the greater Department of Defense space of instrumentation radars has contributed significantly to community have been instrumental in the U.S. space surveillance and space launch activities. The space-object identification (SOI) enterprise success of programs to detect space launches, was motivated by early data collected with the Advanced to catalog deep-space objects, and to provide Research Projects Agency (ARPA)-Lincoln C-band exquisite radar imagery of satellites. Observables Radar (ALCOR), the first high-power, wide- band radar. Today, RTS sensors continue to provide radar imagery of satellites to the intelligence community. Since the early 1980s, RTS radars have provided critical data on the early phases of space launches out of Asia. RTS also supports the Space Surveillance Network’s (SSN) catalog-maintenance mission with radar data on high-priority near-Earth satellites and deep-space satellites, including geosynchronous satellites that are not visible from the other two deep-space radar sites, the Millstone Hill radar in Westford, Massachusetts, and Globus II in Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Launch Report
    Commercial Space Transportation QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT Featuring the launch results from the previous quarter and forecasts for the next two quarters 1st Quarter 1998 U n i t e d S t a t e s D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n • F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n A s s o c i a t e A d m i n i s t r a t o r f o r C o m m e r c i a l S p a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT 1 1ST QUARTER 1998 REPORT Objectives This report summarizes recent and scheduled worldwide commercial, civil, and military orbital space launch events. Scheduled launches listed in this report are vehicle/payload combinations that have been identified in open sources, including industry references, company manifests, periodicals, and government documents. Note that such dates are subject to change. This report highlights commercial launch activities, classifying commercial launches as one or more of the following: • Internationally competed launch events (i.e., launch opportunities considered available in principle to competitors in the international launch services market), • Any launches licensed by the Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration under U.S.
    [Show full text]