DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 9.19 Terrestrial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 9.19 Terrestrial A1 in Northumberland: Morpeth to Ellingham Part A: Morpeth to Felton 6.7 Environmental Statement A1 in Northumberland: Morpeth[Scheme to Ellingham Name] [Scheme Number TR100xx] 1.3 Introduction to the Application Scheme Number: TR010041 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 6.7 EnvironmentalInfrastructure Planning (Applications: Statement Prescribed Forms – andAppendix Procedure) Regulations 2009 9.19 Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Part A APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 June 2020 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010041 Application Document Ref: TR010041/APP/6.7 Volume [x] [Month/year] A1 in Northumberland: Morpeth to Ellingham Part A: Morpeth to Felton 6.7 Environmental Statement Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 The A1 in Northumberland: Morpeth to Ellingham Development Consent Order 20[xx] Environmental Statement - Appendix Regulation Reference: APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010041 Reference Application Document Reference TR010041/APP/6.7 Author: A1 in Northumberland: Morpeth to Ellingham Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 0 June 2020 Application Issue Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010041 Application Document Ref: TR010041/APP/6.7 A1 in Northumberland B2104701 Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Version 2 April 2018 A1 in Northumberland Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Document Control Document Title B2104701 – Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report Author Catherine Burton Owner Nannette Hoyle, Highways England Distribution Document Status Final REVISION HISTORY Version Date Description Author Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey 1 January 2018 Catherine Burton Report Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey 2 April 2018 Catherine Burton Report REVIEWER LIST Name Role Andy McIlwraith Principal Ecologist APPROVALS Name Signature Title Date of Version Issue Peter Farrer April 2018 2 The original format of this document is copyright to Highways England. © Copyright 2017 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Version: 2 i Issued: April 2018 A1 in Northumberland Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................5 1.1 Scheme Background.............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Report Rationale.................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Definitions.............................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Legislative and Regulatory Context........................................................................................ 5 2 Methodology ..............................................................................................................6 2.1 Desk Study and Incidental Records .......................................................................................6 2.2 Survey Areas ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Survey Techniques ................................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Sample Timing....................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Identification ........................................................................................................................ 11 2.6 Taxonomic Coverage........................................................................................................... 11 2.7 Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.8 Survey Limitations ............................................................................................................... 13 3 Baseline....................................................................................................................14 3.1 Desk Study and Incidental Records ..................................................................................... 14 4 Results .....................................................................................................................18 4.2 River Coquet and Coquet Valley Woodlands SSSI .............................................................. 18 4.3 Site to the East of Burgham Park Golf Course .....................................................................23 4.4 Causey Park Farm............................................................................................................... 27 5 Summary..................................................................................................................31 6 Species of conservation importance.....................................................................32 6.1 IUCN Red List Category: Endangered (see Appendix B) .....................................................32 6.2 IUCN Red List Category: Near Threatened (see Appendix B).............................................. 32 6.3 GB Rarity Status: Nationally Scarce (see Appendix B).........................................................33 6.4 Species of Principal Importance (S41 NERC 2006; see Appendix A - Legislative and planning context)........................................................................................................................... 33 7 References...............................................................................................................35 8 Figures .....................................................................................................................36 Figure 1: Protected and Notable Terrestrial Invertebrate Species Desk Study Records ................ 36 Figure 2: Survey Area Locations................................................................................................... 36 Figure 3: River Coquet and Coquet Valley Woodlands SSSI Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Area36 Figure 4: Site to the East of Burgham Park Golf Club Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Area .......... 36 Figure 5: Causey Park Farm Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Area ................................................ 36 Appendix A - Legislative and planning context ............................................................37 Appendix B – IUCN Red List (IUCN 2012) and GB Rarity Status Categories..............38 Appendix C – Species Lists............................................................................................42 River Coquet and Coquet Valley Woodlands SSSI ....................................................................... 42 East of Burgham Park Golf Club ................................................................................................... 56 Causey Park Farm........................................................................................................................ 67 Appendix D – River Coquet and Coquet Valley Woodlands SSSI Citation .................74 Appendix E – Pantheon combined summary outputs ..................................................78 Version: 2 ii Issued: April 2018 A1 in Northumberland Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report River Coquet and Coquet Valley Woodlands SSSI ....................................................................... 78 East of Burgham Park Golf Club ................................................................................................... 79 Causey Park Farm........................................................................................................................ 80 Version: 2 iii Issued: April 2018 A1 in Northumberland Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This technical report presents the findings of terrestrial invertebrate surveys undertaken by Jacobs UK Ltd. (Jacobs) on behalf of Highways England. The aim of the survey was to assess terrestrial invertebrate species diversity and biotope/habitat quality at 3 locations within 500 m of the proposed upgrade to dual carriageway of the A1 between Morpeth and Felton: Section A - Morpeth to Felton. Phase 1 surveys carried out in 2016 were used to identify areas containing a mosaic of habitats that were likely to support a diverse range, and abundance of terrestrial invertebrates. River Coquet and Coquet Valley Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) also fell within the 500 m buffer and was identified as a survey location due to its conservation status and the listing of insects of conservation importance within its citation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk
    Dumfries & Galloway Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk. Keith is a former Dumfries & Galloway Council ranger and now helps to run Nocturnal Wildlife Tours based in Castle Douglas. The tours use a specially prepared night tours vehicle, complete with external mounted thermal camera and internal viewing screens. Each participant also has their own state- of-the-art thermal imaging device to use for the duration of the tour. This allows participants to detect animals as small as rabbits at up to 300 metres away or get close enough to see Badgers and Roe Deer going about their nightly routine without them knowing you’re there. For further information visit www.wildlifetours.co.uk email [email protected] or telephone 07483 131791 Contributing photographers p2 Small White butterfly © Ian Findlay, p4 Colvend coast ©Mark Pollitt, p5 Bittersweet © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Wildflower grassland ©Mark Pollitt, p6 Oblong Woodsia planting © National Trust for Scotland, Oblong Woodsia © Chris Miles, p8 Birdwatching © castigatio/Shutterstock, p9 Hedgehog in grass © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Hedgehog in leaves © Mark Bridger/Shutterstock, Hedgehog dropping © northeastwildlife.co.uk, p10 Cetacean watch at Mull of Galloway © DGERC, p11 Common Carder Bee © Bob Fitzsimmons, p12 Black Grouse confrontation © Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, p13 Black Grouse male ©Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, Female Black Grouse in flight © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Common Pipistrelle bat © Steven Farhall/ Shutterstock, p14 White Ermine © Mark Pollitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutela ZBORNÍK SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY a JASKY N I a RST VA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 11
    tutela ZBORNÍK SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY A JASKY N I A RST VA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 11 NATURAE 2007 1 O B S A H V E D E C K É Š T Ú D I E Jozef Šteffek – Patrícia Danková: Ekologické a ekosozologické vyhodnotenia tanatocenóz malakofauny z náplavov tokov Spišskej Magury ..................................................................... 5 Oto Majzlan: Chrobáky (Coleoptera) Šenkvického a Martinského lesa pri Senci .......... 27 Oto Majzlan: Letová aktivita nosáčikov (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) v NPR Bábsky Predseda redakčnej rady: les pri Nitre .................................................................................................................................... 43 doc. RNDr. Dana Šubová, CSc. Vladimír Straka – Oto Majzlan: Dvojkrídlovce (Diptera) troch lokalít v Chránenej krajinnej oblasti Strážovské vrchy .............................................................................................. 47 Michal Wiezik: Mravce (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) horských a vysokohorských biotopov južnej časti Kráľovohoľských Tatier ............................................................................................ 85 Redakčná rada: Jozef Školek: Sutinové spoločenstvá v NPR Mních ................................................................. 91 prof. RNDr. Peter Bitušík, CSc., RNDr. Miroslav Fulín, CSc., RNDr. Ľudovít Gaál, Stanislav Korenko: Pavúky (Arachnida, Araneae) východnej časti Kozích chrbtov .......... 103 prof. RNDr. Oto Majzlan, PhD., doc. RNDr. Ľubomír Panigaj, CSc., RNDr. Jozef Monika Hatinová – Kristina
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Bees in the Hoeksche Waard
    Wild bees in the Hoeksche Waard Wilson Westdijk C.S.G. Willem van Oranje Text: Wilson Westdijk Applicant: C.S.G. Willem van Oranje Contact person applicant: Bart Lubbers Photos front page Upper: Typical landscape of the Hoeksche Waard - Rotary Hoeksche Waard Down left: Andrena rosae - Gert Huijzers ​ ​ Down right: Bombus muscorum - Gert Huijzers ​ ​ Table of contents Summary 3 Preface 3 Introduction 4 Research question 4 Hypothesis 4 Method 5 Field study 5 Literature study 5 Bee studies in the Hoeksche Waard 9 Habitats in the Hoeksche Waard 11 Origin of the Hoeksche Waard 11 Landscape and bees 12 Bees in the Hoeksche Waard 17 Recorded bee species in the Hoeksche Waard 17 Possible species in the Hoeksche Waard 22 Comparison 99 Compared to Land van Wijk en Wouden 100 Species of priority 101 Species of priority in the Hoeksche Waard 102 Threats 106 Recommendations 108 Conclusion 109 Discussion 109 Literature 111 Sources photos 112 Attachment 1: Logbook 112 2 Summary At this moment 98 bee species have been recorded in the Hoeksche Waard. 14 of these species are on the red list. 39 species, that have not been recorded yet, are likely to occur in the Hoeksche Waard. This results in 137 species, which is 41% of all species that occur in the Netherlands. The species of priority are: Andrena rosae, A. labialis, A. wilkella, Bombus ​ jonellus, B. muscorum and B. veteranus. Potential species of priority are: Andrena pilipes, A. ​ ​ ​ gravida Bombus ruderarius B. rupestris and Nomada bifasciata. ​ ​ Threats to bees are: scaling up in agriculture, eutrophication, reduction of flowers, pesticides and competition with honey bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Arge Indicura N. Sp. Feeding on Potentilla and Sanguisorba (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Argidae) from Japan
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 35(1), pp. 55–71, March 22, 2009 Arge indicura n. sp. Feeding on Potentilla and Sanguisorba (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Argidae) from Japan Akihiko Shinohara1 and Hideho Hara2 1 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Hokkaido Forestry Research Institute, Koshunai, Bibai-shi, Hokkaido, 079–0198 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new argid sawfly, Arge indicura, is described from Japan. It was identified with Arge nigrovaginata Malaise, 1931, described from the Russian Far East, for more than seven decades, but a recent examination of Malaise’s type material has revealed the misidentification. Previously unknown immature stages are described, new host plant records are given, and the distribution and life history are discussed based on the specimens examined and rearing experiments. The mostly greenish, solitary and cryptic larvae feed on the leaves of Potentilla and Sanguisorba (also Fra- garia and Duchesnea in the laboratory), all belonging to the clade Sanpotina of the Rosaceae. Arge indicura probably has three generations a year in the lowland of central Honshu. Key words : Argidae, Arge indicura, new species, Potentilla, Sanguisorba. In the course of our revisionary works on the Our examination of the holotype of Arge pa- sawfly genus Arge of Japan and adjacent regions, gana var. nigrovaginata has revealed that the we have found that the Japanese species previ- Japanese species does not belong to Malaise’s ously determined as Arge nigrovaginata Malaise, taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Beewalk Report 2020
    BeeWalk Annual Report 2020 Richard Comont and Helen Dickinson BeeWalk Annual Report 2020 About BeeWalk BeeWalk is a standardised bumblebee-monitoring scheme active across Great Britain since 2008, and this report covers the period 2008–19. The scheme protocol involves volunteer BeeWalkers walking the same fixed route (a transect) at least once a month between March and October (inclusive). This covers the full flight period of the bumblebees, including emergence from overwintering and workers tailing off. Volunteers record the abundance of each bumblebee species seen in a 4 m x 4 m x 2 m ‘recording box’ in order to standardise between habitats and observers. It is run by Dr Richard Comont and Helen Dickinson of the Bumblebee Conservation Trust (BBCT). To contact the scheme organisers, please email [email protected]. Acknowledgements We are indebted to the volunteers and organisations past and present who have contributed data to the scheme or have helped recruit or train others in connection with it. Thanks must also go to all the individuals and organisations who allow or even actively promote access to their land for bumblebee recording. We would like to thank the financial contribution by the Redwing Trust, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, Garfield Weston Foundation and the many other organisations, charitable trusts and individuals who have supported the BeeWalk scheme in particular, and the Bumblebee Conservation Trust in general. In particular, the Biological Records Centre have provided website support, data storage and desk space free of charge. Finally, we would like to thank the photographers who have allowed their excellent images to be used as part of this BeeWalk Annual Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Bees
    Scottish Bees Introduction to bees Bees are fascinating insects that can be found in a broad range of habitats from urban gardens to grasslands and wetlands. There are over 270 species of bee in the UK in 6 families - 115 of these have been recorded in Scotland, with 4 species now thought to be extinct and insufficient data available for another 2 species. Bees are very diverse, varying in size, tongue-length and flower preference. In the UK we have 1 species of honey bee, 24 species of bumblebee and the rest are solitary bees. They fulfil an essential ecological and environmental role as one of the most significant groups of pollinating insects, all of which we depend upon for the pollination of 80% of our wild and cultivated plants. Some flowers are in fact designed specifically for bee pollination, to the exclusion of generalist pollinators. Bees and their relatives Bees are classified in the complex insect order Hymenoptera (meaning membrane-winged), which also includes many kinds of parasitic wasps, gall wasps, hunting wasps, ants and sawflies. There are about 150,000 species of Hymenoptera known worldwide separated into two sub-orders. The first is the most primitive sub-order Symphyta which includes the sawflies and their relatives, lacking a wasp-waist and generally with free-living caterpillar-like larvae. The second is the sub-order Apocrita, which includes the ants, bees and wasps which are ’wasp-waisted’ and have grub-like larvae that develop within hosts, galls or nests. The sub-order Apocrita is in turn divided into two sections, the Parasitica and Aculeata.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Sawfly Fauna of Corsica with the Description of a New Species Pontania Cyrnea Sp.N
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 054 Autor(en)/Author(s): Liston Andrew D., Späth Jochen Artikel/Article: New data on the sawfly fauna of Corsica with the description of a new species Pontania cyrnea sp.n. (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) 2-7 © Münchner Ent. Ges., download www.biologiezentrum.at NachrBl. bayer. Ent. 54 (1 /2), 2005 New data on the sawfly fauna of Corsica with the description of a new species Pontania cyrnea sp. n. (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) A. D. LISTON & J. SPÄTH Abstract Records of 38 taxa of Symphyta collected recently by the authors in Corsica are presented. 15 identified species are additions to the known Corsican fauna. Pontania cyrnea sp. n. is described and compared with the morphologically similar P. joergcnseni ENSLIN. The family Xyelidae is recorded for the first time on the island. A total of 71 symphytan species are now known from Corsica. Introduction CHEVIN (1999) published a list of 56 species of sawflies and other Symphyta (woodwasps, orus- sids) from Corsica. His paper is based mainly on material made available to him by specialists in other insect groups who have collected there. He also included data on specimens from Corsica in the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Paris), and mentioned a few taxa already recorded in papers by other symphytologists. The island had previously been visited by a single sawfly specialist, who examined only the leaf-mining species (BUHR 1941). In spring 2004 the junior author stated his intent to collect Symphyta in Corsica.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Puerto Rico
    Life: The Excitement of Biology 3(1) 15 On the Male and Female Genital Structures of Phyllobius (Metaphyllobius) glaucus (Scopoli, 1763) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Phyllobinii) from Turkey1 Mahmut Erbey2, Üzeyir Çağlar3, and Selami Candan3 Abstract: Several structures of the male genitalia (tegmen, parameres, manubrium, endophallus), and ninth abdominal sternite (spiculum gastrale) as well as the female genitalia (genital spicule and eight sternite, ovipositor, and spermatheca) of Phyllobius (Metaphyllobius) glaucus are described and illustrated for the first time as they are useful for separating P. glaucus from other congenerics. Key Words: Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Phyllobius glaucus, male and female genitalia Species of the polyphagous weevil genus Phyllobius generally live on cultivated shrubs and trees, particularly those in the families Urticaceae, Betulaceae, Salicaceae, and Rosaceae (Pesarini 1980). Their larvae often feed on the roots and, upon reaching adulthood, the beetles are seen on the shoots (Dieckmann 1980, Ross 1963). Sometimes, both larvae and adults cause major economic damage, particularly when grazing on young plants. Phyllobius (Metaphyllobius) glaucus (Scopoli, 1763) thrives from plains to mountainous and even subalpine zones (Dieckmann 1980). Figure 1. Phyllobius glaucus. Photo copyright 2005 J .K. Lindsey, http://www.commanster.eu. Used with permission. 1 Submitted on February 11, 2015. Accepted on February 21, 2015. Last revisions received on March9, 2015. 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Art and Science, Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey. E- mail: [email protected] . Corresponding Author. 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] , respectively. DOI:10.9784/LEB3(1)Erbey.01 Electronically available on April 18, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Familia Miridae (Insecta: Heteroptera) En La Península Ibérica, Islas Baleares E Islas Canarias (Edición 2018)
    Edición Electrónica DFI-0008 Checklist de Fauna Ibérica. Familia Miridae (Insecta: Heteroptera) en la península ibérica, islas Baleares e islas Canarias (edición 2018). Marta Goula, Marcos Roca-Cusachs, Fernando Prieto Piloña & Javier Pérez Valcárcel 31-12-2018 Documentos Fauna Ibérica, 8. Edición electrónica. ISSN: 2445-4133 Documentos Fauna Ibérica. Edición electrónica http://www.faunaiberica.es/publicaciones/dfi/dfi-0008.pdf Proyecto Fauna Ibérica Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). Madrid Editores: Autores: Mª Ángeles Ramos Sánchez Marta Goula Manuel Sánchez Ruiz Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA) i IRBIo, Facultat de Biologia. Universitat de Barcelona. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIC. Madrid. Av. Diagonal 643. E-08028 Barcelona. [email protected] Marcos Roca-Cusachs Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Facultat de Biologia. Universitat de Barcelona. Av. Diagonal 643. E-08028 Barcelona. [email protected] Fernando Prieto Piloña [email protected] Javier Pérez Valcárcel [email protected] Forma de citar el trabajo: Goula, M.; Roca-Cusachs, M.; Prieto Piloña, F. & Pérez Valcárcel, J. 2018. Checklist de Fauna Ibérica. Familia Miridae (Insecta: Heteroptera) en la península ibérica, islas Baleares e islas Canarias (edición 2018). En: Documentos Fauna Ibérica, 8. Ramos, M.A. & Sánchez Ruiz, M. (Eds.). Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC. Madrid: [2] + 35 pp. Edición electrónica ISSN 2445-4133 Fecha 31/12/2018 Con licencia Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - NoComercial - CompartirIgual (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original.
    [Show full text]