DOCSLIB.ORG

Beginner's Guide to Space

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beginner's Guide to Space NOT FOR SALE BEGINNER'S GUIDE TO SPACE A PUBLICATION OF PAKISTAN SPACE & UPPER ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH COMMISSION BEGINNER'S GUIDE TO SPACE A PUBLICATION OF PAKISTAN SPACE & UPPER ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH COMMISSION BEGINNER'S GUIDE TO SPACE PUBLICATION Pakistan Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission REVIEW AND EDITING TEAM Kiran Zehra Zaidi Hassam Muhammad Khan Illustration by : Aley Ali Public Relations & Media Management - SUPARCO Publication Year : 2015 PAKISTAN SPACE & UPPER ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH COMMISSION Space Information Booklet CONTENT Section 1 OUR UNIVERSE 1.1 OUR SOLAR SYSTEM 01 1.1.1 The Sun 01 1.1.2 Mercury 02 1.1.3 Venus 02 1.1.4 Earth 02 1.1.4.1 The Earth's Moon 03 1.1.5 Mars 03 1.1.6 Jupiter 04 1.1.7 Saturn 04 1.1.8 Uranus 04 1.1.9 Neptune 04 1.1.10 The Kuiper Belt and Beyond 05 1.2 ASTERIODS 06 1.3 METEOROIDS AND METEORITES 06 1.4 COMETS 06 1.5 STARS 07 1.5.1 Constellations 07 1.5.2 Colors of Stars 08 1.5.3 Distance between Stars 08 1.6 BLACK HOLE 08 1.7 ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE 08 1.7.1 Hubble's Law 09 1.7.2 The Big Bang Theory 09 1.7.3 The Inflation Theory 09 1.7.4 Properties of Universe 10 1.7.5 Dark Matter 10 1.7.6 Dark Energy 10 1.8 GALAXIES 11 Section 2 SPACE EXPLORATION 2.1 OVERVIEW OF SPACE EXPLORATION 12 2.2 EARLY ARTIFICIAL SATELLITES 12 2.3 PLANETARY STUDIES 12 2.3.1 Missions to Mercury 13 2.3.1.1 Mariner 10 Mission 13 2.3.1.2 MESSENGER Mission 13 2.3.1.3 BepiColombo Mission 13 2.3.2 Missions to Venus 14 2.3.2.1 Early Flybys, Landers and Orbiters-Soviet and NASA Missions 14 Pakistan Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission Space Information Booklet 2.3.2.2 Other Soviet missions 15 2.3.2.3 Magellan probe 15 2.3.2.4 Venus Express 15 2.3.3 Missions to Mars 16 2.3.3.1 Mariner program 16 2.3.3.2 The Soviet Mars Program 16 2.3.3.3 Viking Program 16 2.3.3.4 Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Pathfinder 17 2.3.3.5 Mars Odyssey and Mars Express 17 2.3.3.6 Mars Exploration Rover Mission 17 2.3.3.7 Mars Science Laboratory-Curiosity Rover 17 2.3.4 Missions to Jupiter 18 2.3.5 Missions to Saturn 18 2.3.6 Mission to Pluto-New Horizons 19 2.4 SUN OBSERVING SATELLITES AND OTHER SOLAR SYSTEM MISSIONS 19 2.4.1 Solar & Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) 19 2.4.2 Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) 20 2.4.3 Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) 20 2.4.4 NEAR Mission 20 2.4.5 Deep Impact Mission 21 2.4.6 Rosetta Mission 21 2.4.7 Dawn Mission 21 2.4.8 The Voyager Program & the Voyager Interstellar Mission 21 2.5 ROCKETS 22 2.6 SCIENTIFIC SATELLITES 23 2.6.1 Earth Observing Satellites 23 2.6.2 Astronomical Satellites 23 2.6.2.1 Hubble Space telescope 24 2.6.2.2 Chandra X-ray Observatory 24 2.6.2.3 Spitzer Space Telescope 24 2.6.2.4 Herschel Space Observatory 25 2.6.2.5 Planck Observatory 25 2.6.2.6 Kepler Observatory 25 2.6.2.7 James Webb Telescope 25 2.7 LUNAR MISSIONS 26 2.8 SPACE STATIONS 26 2.8.1 Salyut Space Station 26 2.8.2 Skylab Space Station 26 2.8.3 Mir Space Station 26 2.8.4 International Space Station 27 2.8.5 Chinese Tiangong Space Station 27 2.9 SPACE SHUTTLES 28 Pakistan Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission Space Information Booklet Section 3 THE EARTH 3.1 EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE 29 3.2 COMPOSITION OF ATMOSPHERE 29 3.3 LAYERS OF ATMOSPHERE 29 3.3.1 Troposphere 29 3.3.2 Stratosphere 29 3.3.3 Mesosphere 29 3.3.4 Thermosphere 30 3.4 BEYOND THE ATMOSPHERE 30 3.5 ROTATING EARTH 30 Section 4 SATELLITE SYSTEMS 4.1 INTRODUCTION TO SATELLITES 31 4.2 ORBIT TYPES 31 4.2.1 Geostationary Orbit 31 4.2.2 Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) 32 4.2.3 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) 32 4.2.4 Elliptical Orbits 33 4.2.5 Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO) 33 4.3 SATELLITE LAUNCH VEHICLE 33 4.3.1 T ypes of SLV with respect to Propellants 33 4.4 OPERATION OF SATELLITES IN SPACE 34 4.4.1 Power 34 4.4.2 Direction or Orientation 34 4.4.3 Heat Dissipation 34 4.4.4 Radiation Protection 34 4.5 RE-ENTRY AND SATELLITE DISPOSAL 34 4.6 TYPES OF SATELLITES 35 4.6.1 Communication Satellites 35 4.6.2 Earth Observation Satellites 35 4.6.2.1 Earth observation satellite with respect to sensors 35 4.6.3 Navigation Satellites 36 4.6.4 Weather Satellites 36 4.6.5 Military Satellites 36 4.6.6 Scientific Satellites 36 Section 5 SPACE TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS 5.1 SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING 37 5.1.1 Types of Remote Sensors 37 Pakistan Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission Space Information Booklet 5.1.1.1 Passive Remote Sensors 37 5.1.1.2 Active Remote Sensors 38 5.1.2 Information Extraction using Remote Sensing 38 5.1.3 Applications of Remote Sensing 38 5.1.3.1 Agriculture 38 5.1.3.2 Forestry 38 5.1.3.3 Geology 39 5.1.3.4 Natural Disasters 39 5.1.3.5 Cartography 39 5.1.3.6 Geographic Information System 39 5.1.3.7 Environmental Assessment 40 5.2 SATELLITE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Page 40 5.2.1 Telemedicine 40 5.2.2 Tele-Education 40 5.3 SATELLITE POSITIONING AND NAVIGATION Page 40 5.3.1 Global Positioning System (GPS) 41 5.3.2 Galileo Positioning System 41 5.3.3 GLONASS 41 5.3.4 COMPASS 41 5.4 SATELLITE METEOROLOGY 42 5.4.1 Advantages of Satellite Meteorology 42 5.4.2 Applications of Satellite Meteorology 42 5.4.2.1 Weather Forecasting 42 5.4.2.2 Drought Monitoring 42 5.4.2.3 Forest Fire Monitoring 42 5.4.2.4 Sea Surface Temperature Monitoring 42 5.4.2.5 Fog and Haze Monitoring 42 Section 6 NATIONAL SPACE AGENCY OF PAKISTAN-SUPARCO 6.1 INTRODUCTION 43 6.2 FUNCTIONS 43 6.3 MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS 43 6.4 SPACE APPLICATIONS 44 Pakistan Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission Space Information Booklet Section 1 OUR UNIVERSE 1.1 OUR SOLAR SYSTEM Our solar system is the one we know the most about. The Sun is at its centre. Our solar system includes everything that orbits or goes around the Sun. Planets, moons, asteroids; comets and dust are all part of the solar system. Our solar system lies near the edge of the Milky Way galaxy. The Milky Way is shaped like a whirlpool. All the stars in the galaxy, including our Sun, orbit around the centre of the Milky Way. With the discovery of Pluto in The Solar System 1930, astronomers considered the Solar System to have nine planets. Pluto was classified as the ninth planet and it remained so for 75 years but in 2006, International Astronomical Union classified Pluto as a ‘dwarf planet’ due to its smaller mass. In view of this, our solar system now consists of eight planets. Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are known as the inner planets, as they are nearest to the sun. They form a group of rocky planets. The outer planets are Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. 1.1.1 The Sun The Sun The sun is a bright star, and it is the largest object in our solar system. At sunset or sunrise when it is safe to look at the sun, we can see the sun’s photosphere, the level in the sun from which visible photons escape most easily. Dark sunspots come and go on the sun but only rarely are they large enough to be visible to the unaided eye. The solar atmosphere consists of three layers of hot, low-density gas: the photosphere, chromosphere, and corona. The granulation of the photosphere is produced by convection currents of hot gas rising from below. Larger super-granules appear to be caused by larger convection currents deeper in the sun. The chromosphere is most easily visible during total solar eclipses, when it flashes into view for a few seconds. It is a thin, hot layer of gas just above the photosphere, and its pink color is caused by the Balmer emission lines in its spectrum. Filtergrams of the chromosphere reveal spicules, flame like structures extending upward into the lower corona. The corona is the sun’s outermost atmospheric layer and can be imaged using a coronagraph. It is composed of a very-low-density; very hot gas extending many solar radii from the visible sun. It’s high temperature — over 2 million K — is believed to be maintained by the magnetic field extending up through the photosphere — the magnetic carpet— and by magnetic waves coming from below the photosphere. Parts of the corona give rise to the solar wind, a breeze of low density ionized gas streaming away from the sun. Astronomers can study the motion, density, and temperature of gases inside the sun by analyzing the way the solar surface oscillates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured By
    Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured by MAVEN By Ali Rahmati Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Physics and Astronomy, and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Professor Thomas E. Cravens, Chair ________________________________ Professor Philip S. Baringer ________________________________ Professor David Braaten ________________________________ Professor Mikhail V. Medvedev ________________________________ Professor Stephen J. Sanders Date Defended: 22 January 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Ali Rahmati certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured by MAVEN ________________________________ Professor Thomas E. Cravens, Chair Date approved: 22 January 2016 ii Abstract Mars possesses a hot oxygen exosphere that extends out to several Martian radii. The main source for populating this extended exosphere is the dissociative recombination of molecular oxygen ions with electrons in the Mars ionosphere. The dissociative recombination reaction creates two hot oxygen atoms that can gain energies above the escape energy at Mars and escape from the planet. Oxygen loss through this photochemical reaction is thought to be one of the main mechanisms of atmosphere escape at Mars, leading to the disappearance of water on the surface. In this work the hot oxygen exosphere of Mars is modeled using a two-stream/Liouville approach as well as a Monte-Carlo simulation. The modeled exosphere is used in a pickup ion simulation to predict the flux of energetic oxygen pickup ions at Mars. The pickup ions are created via ionization of neutral exospheric oxygen atoms through photo-ionization, charge exchange with solar wind protons, and electron impact ionization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voyager Program ______
    Astronomy Cast Episode 199 The Voyager Program ________________________________________________________________________ Fraser: Astronomy Cast Episode 199 for Monday September 20, 2010, The Voyager Program. Welcome to Astronomy Cast, our weekly facts-based journey through the cosmos, where we help you understand not only what we know, but how we know what we know. My name is Fraser Cain, I'm the publisher of Universe Today, and with me is Dr. Pamela Gay, a professor at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Hi, Pamela, how are you doing? Pamela: I’m doing well, how are you doing, Fraser? Fraser: Great. 199... that’s really close to 200! Pamela: Yes, yes it is. Fraser: I know a lot of people want us to do something special for 200, but I don’t know. We’ll have to think of something. Either that, or you can just, you know, explain how to do gravitational mathematics. Everyone get pen and paper out... Pamela: No, there are some things I like myself too much to do. Explaining tensor calculus falls into that category. Fraser: Over the radio... Pamela: Over the radio, yes... Fraser: Alright, so launched in 1977, the twin Voyager spacecraft were sent to explore the outer planets... Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Because of a unique alignment of the planets, Voyager II was the first spacecraft to ever make a close approach to Uranus and Neptune. Let’s take a look back at this amazing program and see where the spacecraft are today. And I wanted to add that “are today” because they’re still going! Pamela: I know..
    [Show full text]
  • Voyager Design Studies
    e > c IbAGESI (CODE) I L 3/ ~ (CATEGORY) a VOYAGER DESIGN STUDIES Volume One: Summary Prepared Under Contract Number NASw 697 .Research and Advanced Development Division .Avco Corpo- ration m Wilmington, Massachusetts National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration m Avco/RAD m TR-63-34 .15 October 1963 _... FOREWORD The Voyager Design Study final report is divided into six volumes, for convenience in handling. A brief description of the contents of each volume is listed below. Volume I -- Summary A completely self-contained synopsis of the entire study. Volume I1 - - Scientific Mission Analvsis Mission analysis, evolution of the Voyager program, and science payload. Volume 111 -- Systems Analysis Mission and system tradeoff studies; trajectory analysis; orbit and landing site selection; reliability; sterilization Volume rV -- Orbiter-Bus System Design Engineering and design details of the orbiter-bus Volume V -- Lander System Design Engineering and design details of the lander. Volume VI -- Development Plan Proposed development plan, schedules, costs, problem areas. 2 .- This document consists of 126 pages, 116 copies, Series A L VOYAGER DESIGN STUDIES Volume I: Summary AVCQRAD-TR-63-34 ’ 15 October 1963 Prepared under Contract No. NASw 697 by FU3SEARCH AND ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT DIVISION AVCO CORPORATION Wilmington, Massachusetts for NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ....................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 2 2 . MISSION
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 7-24-2018 2:00 PM Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury Jeffrey Daniels The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Neish, Catherine D. The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Geology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Jeffrey Daniels 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Geology Commons, Physical Processes Commons, and the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Daniels, Jeffrey, "Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5657. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5657 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Impact cratering is an abrupt, spectacular process that occurs on any world with a solid surface. On Earth, these craters are easily eroded or destroyed through endogenic processes. The Moon and Mercury, however, lack a significant atmosphere, meaning craters on these worlds remain intact longer, geologically. In this thesis, remote-sensing techniques were used to investigate impact melt emplacement about Mercury’s fresh, complex craters. For complex lunar craters, impact melt is preferentially ejected from the lowest rim elevation, implying topographic control. On Venus, impact melt is preferentially ejected downrange from the impact site, implying impactor-direction control. Mercury, despite its heavily-cratered surface, trends more like Venus than like the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • N€WS 'RELEASE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS and SPACE Admln ISTRATION 400 MARYLAND AVENUE, SW, WASHINGTON 25, D.C
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19630002483 2020-03-11T16:50:02+00:00Z b " N€WS 'RELEASE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMlN ISTRATION 400 MARYLAND AVENUE, SW, WASHINGTON 25, D.C. TELEPHONES WORTH 2-4155-WORTH. 3-1110 RELEASE NO. 62-182 MARINER SPACECRAFT Mariner 2, the second of a series of spacecraft designed for planetary exploration,- will be launched within a few days (no earlier than August 17) from the Atlantic Missile Range, Cape Canaveral, Florida, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mariner 1, launched at 4:21 a.m. (EST) on July 22, 1962 from AMR, was destroyed by the Range Safety Officer after about 290 seconds of flight because of a deviation from the planned flight path. Measures have been taken to correct the difficulties experienced in the Mariner 1 launch. These measures include a more rigorous checkout of the Atlas rate beacon and revision of the data editing equation. The data editing equation Is designed as a guard against acceptance of faulty databy the ground guidance equipment. The Mariner 2 spacecraft and its mission are identical to the first Mariner. Mariner 2 will carry six experiments. Two of these instruments, infrared and microwave radiometers, will make measurements at close range as Mariner 2 flys by Venus and communicate this in€ormation over an interplanetary distance of 36 million miles, Four other experiments on the spacecraft -- a magnetometer, ion chamber and particle flux detector, cosmic dust detector and solar plasma spectrometer -- will gather Information on interplantetary phenomena during the trip to Venus and in the vicinity of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Science Laboratory Entry Capsule Aerothermodynamics and Thermal Protection System
    Mars Science Laboratory Entry Capsule Aerothermodynamics and Thermal Protection System Karl T. Edquist ([email protected], 757-864-4566) Brian R. Hollis ([email protected], 757-864-5247) NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681 Artem A. Dyakonov ([email protected], 757-864-4121) National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA 23666 Bernard Laub ([email protected], 650-604-5017) Michael J. Wright ([email protected], 650-604-4210) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 Tomasso P. Rivellini ([email protected], 818-354-5919) Eric M. Slimko ([email protected], 818-354-5940) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109 William H. Willcockson ([email protected], 303-977-5094) Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, Littleton, CO 80125 Abstract—The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) spacecraft TABLE OF CONTENTS is being designed to carry a large rover (> 800 kg) to the 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 surface of Mars using a blunt-body entry capsule as the 2. COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS ................................. 2 primary decelerator. The spacecraft is being designed for 3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS .................................... 5 launch in 2009 and arrival at Mars in 2010. The 4. TPS TESTING AND MODEL DEVELOPMENT.......... 7 combination of large mass and diameter with non-zero 5. SUMMARY ........................................................... 11 angle-of-attack for MSL will result in unprecedented REFERENCES........................................................... 11 convective heating environments caused by turbulence prior BIOGRAPHY ............................................................ 12 to peak heating. Navier-Stokes computations predict a large turbulent heating augmentation for which there are no supporting flight data1 and little ground data for validation.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of Contents
    Complete List of Contents Volume 1 Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center ......213 Publisher’s Note ......................................................... vii Chandra X-Ray Observatory ....................................223 Introduction ................................................................. ix Clementine Mission to the Moon .............................229 Preface to the Third Edition ..................................... xiii Commercial Crewed vehicles ..................................235 Contributors ............................................................. xvii Compton Gamma Ray Observatory .........................240 List of Abbreviations ................................................. xxi Cooperation in Space: U.S. and Russian .................247 Complete List of Contents .................................... xxxiii Dawn Mission ..........................................................254 Deep Impact .............................................................259 Air Traffic Control Satellites ........................................1 Deep Space Network ................................................264 Amateur Radio Satellites .............................................6 Delta Launch Vehicles .............................................271 Ames Research Center ...............................................12 Dynamics Explorers .................................................279 Ansari X Prize ............................................................19 Early-Warning Satellites ..........................................284
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Geochemistry of the Martian Crust: Integrating Mission Datasets
    Seventh International Conference on Mars 3179.pdf EVOLUTION AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE MARTIAN CRUST: INTEGRATING MISSION DATASETS. B. C. Hahn1 and S. M. McLennan1, 1Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-2100 ([email protected], [email protected]). Introduction: The Martian crust is an important the Odyssey GRS has an inherently low resolving ca- geochemical reservoir. It is the only portion of the pacity with a spatially large footprint and thus cannot planet surveyed by broad-scale remote sensing obser- be used effectively for fine-scale regional analysis. vations (beginning with the Mariner program through Additionally, element abundance maps are subject to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter) or by in situ lander considerable smoothing and auto-correlation effects experiments (from the Viking missions through the due to element correction factors, the large footprint Mars Exploration Rovers). Mars experienced a unique and necessary data processing [6, 10]. This too, limits mechanism for crustal emplacement, resurfacing, and GRS analysis to areally-large regional or global stud- recycling [1] – different from the continuous plate tec- ies. For cross-instrument data analysis (e.g., comparing tonic regime of Earth or the episodic, widespread ba- GRS elemental abundances to TES mineralogies or salt flooding of Venus. USGS relative apparent surface ages), higher- Further, it is well-established that crusts of the in- resolution global datasets (e.g., TES mineralogical ner planets and rocky satellites become substantially maps) must be smoothed to GRS’s lower-resolution. enriched in a suite of geochemically important ele- The Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Oppor- ments during early differentiation and further evolu- tunity, have each traveled several kilometers across the tion [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • NASA and Planetary Exploration
    **EU5 Chap 2(263-300) 2/20/03 1:16 PM Page 263 Chapter Two NASA and Planetary Exploration by Amy Paige Snyder Prelude to NASA’s Planetary Exploration Program Four and a half billion years ago, a rotating cloud of gaseous and dusty material on the fringes of the Milky Way galaxy flattened into a disk, forming a star from the inner- most matter. Collisions among dust particles orbiting the newly-formed star, which humans call the Sun, formed kilometer-sized bodies called planetesimals which in turn aggregated to form the present-day planets.1 On the third planet from the Sun, several billions of years of evolution gave rise to a species of living beings equipped with the intel- lectual capacity to speculate about the nature of the heavens above them. Long before the era of interplanetary travel using robotic spacecraft, Greeks observing the night skies with their eyes alone noticed that five objects above failed to move with the other pinpoints of light, and thus named them planets, for “wan- derers.”2 For the next six thousand years, humans living in regions of the Mediterranean and Europe strove to make sense of the physical characteristics of the enigmatic planets.3 Building on the work of the Babylonians, Chaldeans, and Hellenistic Greeks who had developed mathematical methods to predict planetary motion, Claudius Ptolemy of Alexandria put forth a theory in the second century A.D. that the planets moved in small circles, or epicycles, around a larger circle centered on Earth.4 Only partially explaining the planets’ motions, this theory dominated until Nicolaus Copernicus of present-day Poland became dissatisfied with the inadequacies of epicycle theory in the mid-sixteenth century; a more logical explanation of the observed motions, he found, was to consider the Sun the pivot of planetary orbits.5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dsc Pub Edited
    Deep Space Chronicle: Foreword Foreword From the 1950s to the present, to some and asteroids, have been visited. We have Americans, space has represented prestige placed spacecraft in orbit around our Moon and a positive image for the United States on and the planets Venus, Mars, and Jupiter; we the world stage. To others, it has signified have landed on Venus, Mars, and our Moon. the quest for national security. Some view it NASA’s stunning missions to explore the as a place to station telecommunications outer Solar System have yielded a treasure of satellites and little else. To still others, space knowledge about our universe, how it origi- is, or should be, about gaining greater knowl- nated, and how it works. NASA’s exploration edge of the universe. It represents, for them, of Mars—coupled with the efforts of the pure science and the exploration of the Soviet Union/Russia—has powerfully shown unknown. Even so, the history of space sci- the prospect of past life on the Red Planet. ence and technology is one of the largely neg- Missions to Venus (including some that lected aspects in the history of the space landed on it) and Mercury have increased our program. This important monograph by Asif understanding of the inner planets. Lunar A. Siddiqi chronicles the many space probes exploration has exponentially advanced that have been sent from Earth to explore human knowledge about the origins and evo- other bodies of the solar system. It provides lution of the solar system. Most importantly, a chronological discussion of all space we have learned that, like Goldilocks and the probes, both those developed by the United three bears, Earth is a place in which every- States and those developed by the Soviet thing necessary to sustain life is “just right,” Union/Russia and other nations; basic data while all the other planets of our system about them; their findings; and their status seem exceptionally hostile.
    [Show full text]