N€WS 'RELEASE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS and SPACE Admln ISTRATION 400 MARYLAND AVENUE, SW, WASHINGTON 25, D.C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

N€WS 'RELEASE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS and SPACE Admln ISTRATION 400 MARYLAND AVENUE, SW, WASHINGTON 25, D.C https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19630002483 2020-03-11T16:50:02+00:00Z b " N€WS 'RELEASE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMlN ISTRATION 400 MARYLAND AVENUE, SW, WASHINGTON 25, D.C. TELEPHONES WORTH 2-4155-WORTH. 3-1110 RELEASE NO. 62-182 MARINER SPACECRAFT Mariner 2, the second of a series of spacecraft designed for planetary exploration,- will be launched within a few days (no earlier than August 17) from the Atlantic Missile Range, Cape Canaveral, Florida, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mariner 1, launched at 4:21 a.m. (EST) on July 22, 1962 from AMR, was destroyed by the Range Safety Officer after about 290 seconds of flight because of a deviation from the planned flight path. Measures have been taken to correct the difficulties experienced in the Mariner 1 launch. These measures include a more rigorous checkout of the Atlas rate beacon and revision of the data editing equation. The data editing equation Is designed as a guard against acceptance of faulty databy the ground guidance equipment. The Mariner 2 spacecraft and its mission are identical to the first Mariner. Mariner 2 will carry six experiments. Two of these instruments, infrared and microwave radiometers, will make measurements at close range as Mariner 2 flys by Venus and communicate this in€ormation over an interplanetary distance of 36 million miles, Four other experiments on the spacecraft -- a magnetometer, ion chamber and particle flux detector, cosmic dust detector and solar plasma spectrometer -- will gather Information on interplantetary phenomena during the trip to Venus and in the vicinity of the planet. Flight time will vary from 92 days to 117 days, depending on the launch date. The closest approach of Mariner to Venus will be about 10,000 miles, The overall flight distance will be approximately 191 million miles, based on an August 17 launch. (over) , \ T P NASA assigned two launches for Mariner in 1962 because inherent dLfficulty of an interplanetary mission and to take advantage of the period this year during which Venus will be close to earth. The next launch opportunkty for Venus will not occur for 19 months, in 1964, Several factors make the Venus mission difficult -- the long flight time and the resultant demands in the spacecraft; subjecting of the spacecraft to a prolonged variation in temperature caused by the variation in distance from the sun and the increasing intensity of the sun; radiation effects in inter,planetary space are not fully known; the problem of transmitting a considerable amount of information over an extreme range, and a complex trajectory problem, Project Management for the Venus Mission was assigned to the California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, This includes responsibility for the spacecraft system and space flight operations, The Marshall Space Flight Center has the responsibility for providing the launch vehicle, with the support of the U.S.A.F. Space Systems Division, The Atlas D first stage is provided by General Dynamics Astronautics, and the Agena B second stage is provided by Lockheed Missiles and Space Company , Key personnel in the Mariner Project are: Fred D, Kochendorfer, Mariner Program Chief, NASA Headquarters; D, L, Forsythe, Agena Program Chief; Roberts J. Parks, Planetary Program Director for JPL; J, N, James, JPL, Mariner Project Manager; W, A, Collier, JPL, Assistant Project Manager; Dan Schneiderman, JPL, Spacecraft System Manager; Friedrich Duerr, MSFC, Launch Vehicle Systems Manager; Major J, G. Albert, Mariner Launch Vehicle Director for AFSSD; and H, T, Uskin, Director for NASA Programs, Iockheed Missiles and Space Company, Mariner tracking and communication will be provided by JPLIs Deep Space Instrumentation Facility with permanent stations at Goldstone, California, Woomera, Australia, and Johannesburg, South Africa and mobile stations at Cape Canaveral and near the permanent station at Johannesburg. Data floMing into these stations from the spacecraft will be routed to JPL's Spacecraft Flight Operations Center for correlation by an IBM 7090 computer sys tem. -2- SPACECRAFT DESCRIPTION The Mariner weighs 447 pounds and, in the launch position, is five feet-in-diameter at the base and 9 feet, 11 inches in height. In the cruise position, with solar panels and high-gain antenna extended , it is 16.5 feet acrws in span ar,d 11 feet, 11 inches i:: height. The design is a variation of the hexagonal concept used for the Ranger series. The hexagon framework base houses a liquid-fuel rocket motor, for trajectory correction, and six modules containing the attitude conuoi system, electronic circuitry for the scientific experiments, power supply, battery and charger, data encoder and command subsystem, digital computer and sequencer, and radio transmitter and receiver. Sun sensors and attitude control jets are mounted on the exterior of the base hexagon. A tubular superstructure extends upward from the base hexagon. Scientific experiments are attached to this framework. An omindirectional antenna is mounted at the peak of the superstructure. A parabolic, high- gain antenna is hinge-mounted below the base hexagon. Two solar panels are also hinged to the base hexagon. They fold up alongside the spacecraft during launch, parking orbit and injection and are folded down, like butter- fly wings when the craft is in space. A command antenna for receiving transmission from earth is mounted on one of the panels. The solar panels contain 9800 solar cells in 27 square feet of area. They will collect energy from the sun and convert it into electrical power at a minimum of 148 watts and a maximum of 222 watts. The amount of power available from the panels is expected io iiicrease slightly during the mission due to the increased intensity of the sun. Each solar cell has a protective glass filter that reduces the amount of heat absorbed from the sun, but does not interfere with the energy conversion process. The glass covers filter out the sun's ultraviolet and infrared radiation that would produce heat but not electrical energy. Prior to deployment of the solar panels, power will be supplied by a 33.3-pound silver-zinc rechargeable battery with a capacity of 1000 watt hours. The recharge capability is used to meet the long-term power -3- requirements of the Venus Mrssion, The battery will supply power directly for sw;tchrng and sharing pesk-leads w;Lh the sojar panels and also supply power c?ur;ng trajzctory correctlor. when the panels will not be directed a: tke s-dn., The power subsystem wi2 convert electricity from the solar panels and battery to 50 vc,t E400 cps; 26 volt, 400 cps and 25 8 to 33.3 volt DZ, Two-way commun_cation aboard the Maricer js supplied by the receiver/transmjtfer two transmitting antennas; the omnidirectional and high-gain antenna; and the commaEd antenna for receiving instruc- tions from earth, Transmilting power will be 3 watts. The high-gain antenna is hinged and equipped with a drive mechanism allowing it to be pointed at the earth on command, Anearth sensor is mounted on the aptenna yoke near the rim of the high-gain dish-shaped antenna to search for and keep the antenna pointed at the earth. Stabilization of the Spacecraft for yaw E pitch ard roll, is provided by ten cold gas jets mounted in four iozatisns (2 3 2 I 2 ,I fed by two titanium bottles containing 4 ., 3 pounds of netrcgen gas pressurized to 3500 PSI. The jets are linked by logic circuztry to three gyros in the attitude control subsystem, to the esrth sensor or! the parabolic antenna and to six sun sensors mounted or, the sgaczcrafr frame and cn the back of the two solar panels, The four primary SUR sensors are mounted on four of the six legs of the hexagon, and the two seccndary sensors on the backs of the solar panels ,, These are light-sensirive diodes which inform the attitude control system--gas jets and gyros--when they seen the sun, The atti- tude control system responds to these signals by rurning the spacecraft and pointing the longitudinal or roll axis, toward Ehe sun, Torquing of the spacecraft for these maneuvers 1s provided by the cold gas jets fed by the nitrogen gas regulated to 15 pounds per square inch pressure. There is calculated to be enough nitroger, :c operate the gas jets to maintain attitude control for a rrinimrm of 206 days, Computation for the subsystems ana the issuance of commands is a function of the digital 'Central Computer ar,d Sequencer. All events of the spacecraft are contained in three CC&S sequences. The launch sequence controls events from launch through the crilise mcde. The mid- course propulsion sequence controls the midcourse trajectory correction -4 - maneuver a The encounter sequence pc!-Lri des required commands for data collection in the vicinity of Venus, The CCGS provides the basic timing for the spacecraft subsystems. This time base will be supplied by a crystal control oscillator in the CCGS operating at 307.2 kc. This is divided down to 38,4 kc for timing in the power subsystem and dfvidea down again to 2400 and 400 cps for use by various subsystems The control oscillator provides the basic I' counting" rate for the CCGS to determine issuance of commands at the right time in the three CC&S sequences. The s~hsystemclmtered aronnd the base nf the spacecraft are insulated from the sun's heat by a shield covered with layers of aluminurn coated plastic film. At the bottom of the spacecraft,, just below the sub- system modules, is a second Tempera?ure Control Shield. It prevents too rapid loss of heat into space which would make the establishment of re- quired temperatures difficult to maifitain, The two shields form a sandwich that helps to minimize the heat control problem, Temperature control of the attitude control subsysrem is provided by louvers actuated by coiled bimetallic strips.
Recommended publications
  • The Space Impact of the Euro Crisis 50 Years After Mariner 2: Exploration at a Crossroads
    0827_SPN_DOM_00_019_00 (READ ONLY) 8/24/2012 11:39 AM Page 19 www.spacenews.com SPACENEWS 19 August27, 2012 TheSpaceImpact of the Euro Crisis < ROBBIN LAIRD and HARALD MALMGREN > he European sovereign debt crisis Europe will now be challenged in the ing to hide the reality of European bank of the savings of millions of European is not simply abump in historical form of rollbacks of the many inter- weaknesses. The main reason is that eu- citizens. Tprogress; it is the end of aperiod twined strands of integration, fraying rozone economies are far more bank- European leaders are also attempt- of historyand acritical point in Euro- what has been an intricate but incom- dependent than economies like those in ing to initiate amore comprehensive fis- pean and global transition in the 21st plete tapestry. It is questionable whether the United States or United Kingdom, cal union, with new decision-making century. Europe will be able to prevent stalling of where substantial nonbank financing al- mechanisms that transfer sovereignty in The confluence of several trend lines the integration process in the face of ternatives exist for the corporate sector. parallel with the new banking union. We — the unification of Germany,the end widening gaps among the interests of In the eurozone, banks are the fi- do not believe that any of the eurozone of the Soviet Union, the collapse of the each nation and even within each nation. nancial markets; in the U.S., banks are governments are ready for such apoliti- Berlin Wall, the expansion of NATO, Since the birth of the euro, the but one segment of amultifaceted fi- cal transition in which citizens in each the expansion of the European Union French and Germans were in the lead in nancial market.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Iowa Instruments in Space
    University of Iowa Instruments in Space A-D13-089-5 Wind Van Allen Probes Cluster Mercury Earth Venus Mars Express HaloSat MMS Geotail Mars Voyager 2 Neptune Uranus Juno Pluto Jupiter Saturn Voyager 1 Spaceflight instruments designed and built at the University of Iowa in the Department of Physics & Astronomy (1958-2019) Explorer 1 1958 Feb. 1 OGO 4 1967 July 28 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Launch Date Launch Date Launch Date Spacecraft Spacecraft Spacecraft Explorer 3 (U1T9)58 Mar. 26 Injun 5 1(U9T68) Aug. 8 (UT) ExpEloxrpelro r1e r 4 1915985 8F eJbu.l y1 26 OEGxOpl o4rer 41 (IMP-5) 19697 Juunlye 2 281 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Explorer 2 (launch failure) 1958 Mar. 5 OGO 5 1968 Mar. 4 Van Allen Probe A * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 3er 1 1915985 8M Oarc. t2. 611 InEjuxnp lo5rer 45 (SSS) 197618 NAouvg.. 186 Van Allen Probe B * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 4er 2 1915985 8Ju Nlyo 2v.6 8 EUxpKlo 4r e(rA 4ri1el -(4IM) P-5) 197619 DJuenc.e 1 211 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 1 * 2015 Mar. 12 ExpPloiorenre 5e r 3 (launch failure) 1915985 8A uDge.c 2. 46 EPxpiolonreeerr 4130 (IMP- 6) 19721 Maarr.. 313 HMEaRgCnIe CtousbpeShaetr i(cF oMxu-1ltDis scaatelell itMe)i ssion / 2 * 2021081 J5a nM. a1r2. 12 PionPeioenr e1er 4 1915985 9O cMt.a 1r.1 3 EExpxlpolorerer r4 457 ( S(IMSSP)-7) 19721 SNeopvt.. 1263 HMaalogSnaett oCsupbhee Sriact eMlluitlet i*scale Mission / 3 * 2021081 M5a My a2r1. 12 Pioneer 2 1958 Nov. 8 UK 4 (Ariel-4) 1971 Dec. 11 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 4 * 2015 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Passive Microwave Radiometer Channel Selection Based on Cloud and Precipitation Information Content Estimation
    475 Passive Microwave Radiometer Channel Selection Based on Cloud and Precipitation Information Content Estimation Sabatino Di Michele and Peter Bauer Research Department Submitted to Q. J. Royal Meteor. Soc. July 2005 Series: ECMWF Technical Memoranda A full list of ECMWF Publications can be found on our web site under: http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/ Contact: [email protected] c Copyright 2005 European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, England Literary and scientific copyrights belong to ECMWF and are reserved in all countries. This publication is not to be reprinted or translated in whole or in part without the written permission of the Director. Appropriate non-commercial use will normally be granted under the condition that reference is made to ECMWF. The information within this publication is given in good faith and considered to be true, but ECMWF accepts no liability for error, omission and for loss or damage arising from its use. Microwave Channel Selection from Precipitation Information Content Abstract The information content of microwave frequencies between 5 and 200 GHz for rain, snow and cloud wa- ter retrievals over ocean and land surfaces was evaluated using optimal estimation theory. The study was based on large datasets representative of summer and winter meteorological conditions over North Amer- ica, Europe, Central Africa, South America and the Atlantic obtained from short-range forecasts with the operational ECMWF model. The information content was traded off against noise that is mainly produced by geophysical variables such as surface emissivity, land surface skin temperature, atmospheric temperature and moisture. The estimation of the required error statistics was based on ECMWF model forecast error statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Venus Missions
    Appendix 1: Venus Missions Sputnik 7 (USSR) Launch 02/04/1961 First attempted Venus atmosphere craft; upper stage failed to leave Earth orbit Venera 1 (USSR) Launch 02/12/1961 First attempted flyby; contact lost en route Mariner 1 (US) Launch 07/22/1961 Attempted flyby; launch failure Sputnik 19 (USSR) Launch 08/25/1962 Attempted flyby, stranded in Earth orbit Mariner 2 (US) Launch 08/27/1962 First successful Venus flyby Sputnik 20 (USSR) Launch 09/01/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Sputnik 21 (USSR) Launch 09/12/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Cosmos 21 (USSR) Launch 11/11/1963 Possible Venera engineering test flight or attempted flyby Venera 1964A (USSR) Launch 02/19/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Venera 1964B (USSR) Launch 03/01/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Cosmos 27 (USSR) Launch 03/27/1964 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Zond 1 (USSR) Launch 04/02/1964 Venus flyby, contact lost May 14; flyby July 14 Venera 2 (USSR) Launch 11/12/1965 Venus flyby, contact lost en route Venera 3 (USSR) Launch 11/16/1965 Venus lander, contact lost en route, first Venus impact March 1, 1966 Cosmos 96 (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Possible attempted landing, craft fragmented in Earth orbit Venera 1965A (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Flyby attempt (launch failure) Venera 4 (USSR) Launch 06/12/1967 Successful atmospheric probe, arrived at Venus 10/18/1967 Mariner 5 (US) Launch 06/14/1967 Successful flyby 10/19/1967 Cosmos 167 (USSR) Launch 06/17/1967 Attempted atmospheric probe, stranded in Earth orbit Venera 5 (USSR) Launch 01/05/1969 Returned atmospheric data for 53 min on 05/16/1969 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Instruments for Earth Science Measurements
    NASA SBIR 2004 Phase I Solicitation E1 Instruments for Earth Science Measurements NASA's Earth Science Enterprise (ESE) is studying how our global environment is changing. Using the unique perspective available from space and airborne platforms, NASA is observing, documenting, and assessing large- scale environmental processes with emphasis on atmospheric composition, climate, carbon cycle and ecosystems, the Earth’s surface and interior, the water and energy cycles, and weather. A major objective of the ESE instrument development programs is to implement science measurement capabilities with small or more affordable spacecraft so development programs can meet multiple mission needs and therefore, make the best use of limited resources. The rapid development of small, low cost remote sensing and in situ instruments is essential to achieving this objective. Consequently, the objective of the Instruments for Earth Science Measurements SBIR topic is to develop and demonstrate instrument component and subsystem technologies that reduce the risk, cost, size, and development time of Earth observing instruments, and enable new Earth observation measurements. The following subtopics are concomitant with this objective and are organized by measurement technique. Subtopics E1.01 Passive Optics Lead Center: LaRC Participating Center(s): ARC, GSFC The following technologies are of interest to NASA in the remote sensing subtopic “passive optics.” Passive optical remote sensing generally requires that deployed devices have large apertures and large throughput. NASA is interested primarily in instrument technologies suitable for aircraft or space flight platforms, and these inherently also prefer low mass, low power, fast measurement times, and a high degree of robustness to survive vibrations in flight or at launch.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 7-24-2018 2:00 PM Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury Jeffrey Daniels The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Neish, Catherine D. The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Geology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Jeffrey Daniels 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Geology Commons, Physical Processes Commons, and the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Daniels, Jeffrey, "Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5657. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5657 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Impact cratering is an abrupt, spectacular process that occurs on any world with a solid surface. On Earth, these craters are easily eroded or destroyed through endogenic processes. The Moon and Mercury, however, lack a significant atmosphere, meaning craters on these worlds remain intact longer, geologically. In this thesis, remote-sensing techniques were used to investigate impact melt emplacement about Mercury’s fresh, complex craters. For complex lunar craters, impact melt is preferentially ejected from the lowest rim elevation, implying topographic control. On Venus, impact melt is preferentially ejected downrange from the impact site, implying impactor-direction control. Mercury, despite its heavily-cratered surface, trends more like Venus than like the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of Contents
    Complete List of Contents Volume 1 Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center ......213 Publisher’s Note ......................................................... vii Chandra X-Ray Observatory ....................................223 Introduction ................................................................. ix Clementine Mission to the Moon .............................229 Preface to the Third Edition ..................................... xiii Commercial Crewed vehicles ..................................235 Contributors ............................................................. xvii Compton Gamma Ray Observatory .........................240 List of Abbreviations ................................................. xxi Cooperation in Space: U.S. and Russian .................247 Complete List of Contents .................................... xxxiii Dawn Mission ..........................................................254 Deep Impact .............................................................259 Air Traffic Control Satellites ........................................1 Deep Space Network ................................................264 Amateur Radio Satellites .............................................6 Delta Launch Vehicles .............................................271 Ames Research Center ...............................................12 Dynamics Explorers .................................................279 Ansari X Prize ............................................................19 Early-Warning Satellites ..........................................284
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Geochemistry of the Martian Crust: Integrating Mission Datasets
    Seventh International Conference on Mars 3179.pdf EVOLUTION AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE MARTIAN CRUST: INTEGRATING MISSION DATASETS. B. C. Hahn1 and S. M. McLennan1, 1Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-2100 ([email protected], [email protected]). Introduction: The Martian crust is an important the Odyssey GRS has an inherently low resolving ca- geochemical reservoir. It is the only portion of the pacity with a spatially large footprint and thus cannot planet surveyed by broad-scale remote sensing obser- be used effectively for fine-scale regional analysis. vations (beginning with the Mariner program through Additionally, element abundance maps are subject to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter) or by in situ lander considerable smoothing and auto-correlation effects experiments (from the Viking missions through the due to element correction factors, the large footprint Mars Exploration Rovers). Mars experienced a unique and necessary data processing [6, 10]. This too, limits mechanism for crustal emplacement, resurfacing, and GRS analysis to areally-large regional or global stud- recycling [1] – different from the continuous plate tec- ies. For cross-instrument data analysis (e.g., comparing tonic regime of Earth or the episodic, widespread ba- GRS elemental abundances to TES mineralogies or salt flooding of Venus. USGS relative apparent surface ages), higher- Further, it is well-established that crusts of the in- resolution global datasets (e.g., TES mineralogical ner planets and rocky satellites become substantially maps) must be smoothed to GRS’s lower-resolution. enriched in a suite of geochemically important ele- The Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Oppor- ments during early differentiation and further evolu- tunity, have each traveled several kilometers across the tion [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Rain “Contamination” in ARM Two
    An assessment of rain “contamination” in ARM two-channel microwave radiometer measurements Roger Marchand1, Casey Wall1*, Wei Zhao1 and Maria Cadeddu2 1University of Washington, 2Argonne National Laboratory, *Presenting Author Case 1 Case 3 Motivation! ? !! ✔ ? � ✔ 5000 wet-window flag (open/covered) ! Microwave radiometers (MWRs) are the most commonly used and wet-window flag (open/covered) 1500 3000 accurate instruments ARM has to retrieve cloud liquid water path. open MWR open MWR Unfortunately, MWR data are not easily used in precipitating conditions. 1000 500 There are two reasons for this:" 5000 ) ) 2 1500 " 2 1. The measurements are “contaminated” by water on the MWR radome." 3000 covered! covered! MWR MWR 2. Precipitating particles can scatter microwave radiation, yet traditional 1000 500 MWR retrievals neglect scattering." 5000 " 1500 "We designed an experiment that alleviates the “wet radome” problem. 3000 1000 500 5000 The Experiment! 1500 !! 3000 500 ! Two MWRs were operated side by side in a “scanning” or tip-cal mode. Path (g/m Water Liquid 1000 Liquid Water Path (g/m Path Water Liquid One MWR was placed under a cover that kept the radome dry while still 5000 permitting measurements away from zenith (photograph below). The 1500 other MWR was operated normally, with the radome exposed to the sky. 3000 We refer to these as the “covered” and “open” MWRs, respectively. 1000 500 Coincident measurements from the 17.8 18.2 18.6 19 19.4 19.8 covered and open MWRs are 17.5 18 18.5 19 compared to estimate contamination Hours (UTC) Hours (UTC) Case 2 due to a wet radome.
    [Show full text]