DOCSLIB.ORG

Res Judicata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT . iv II. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT . vii III. POINT ON APPEAL AND PRINCIPAL AUTHORITIES .......................................x IV. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................ xi V. ABSTRACT ...................................... Abs 1 A. Hearing on Motion to Dismiss . Abs 1 1. Argument by Counsel for Beebe, et al. ........ Abs 1 2. Argument by Counsel for Deer/Mt. Judea . Abs 5 3. Argument by Counsel for Beebe, et al. ....... Abs 14 5. Statement by the Circuit Court . Abs 18 VI. STATEMENT OF THE CASE .......................SoC 1 A. Introduction ..................................SoC 1 i B. School Funding Generally . SoC 2 VII. ARGUMENT ..................................... Arg 1 A. Standard of Review ............................ Arg 1 B. The Claim Preclusion Aspect of Res Judicata ....... Arg 2 C. Post-Lake View Educational Outcomes . Arg 4 D. Constitutional Compliance is an Ongoing Task Requiring Constant Study, Review and Adjustment . Arg 11 E. The Events Giving Rise to Deer/Mt. Judea’s Complaint .................................. Arg 13 1. Failure to Comply with Act 57 . Arg 13 2. Extra Help for Struggling Students . Arg 18 3. Professional Development for Teachers . Arg 21 4. Transportation Funding and Excessive Transportation Time ...................... Arg 25 F. Conclusion.................................. Arg 30 IX. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.......................... xiv XI. ADDENDUM ........................................xv ii A. Pleadings. 1. Deer/Mt. Judea’s Complaint, Record (“R”) 1 ..........................Add 1 2. Beebe, et al., Motion to Dismiss, R 123 .....Add 113 3. Beebe, et al., Motion to Dismiss Brief, R 126 . Add 116 4. Darr, Moore and Bookout Motion to Dismiss, R 720 ................Add 162 5. Darr, Moore and Bookout Motion to Dismiss Brief, R 723 ............Add 165 6. Deer/Mt. Judea’s Response to Motion to Dismiss, R 726 ................Add 168 7. Deer/Mt. Judea’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, R 741 ........Add 183 8. Order Granting Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, R 744 ........Add 186 9. Order on Motion to Dismiss, R 746 .........Add 188 10. Notice of Appeal, R 749 .................Add 191 iii I. INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT I. ANY RELATED OR PRIOR APPEAL: None II. BASIS OF SUPREME COURT JURISDICTION: (__) Check here if no basis for Supreme Court Jurisdiction is being asserted, or check below all applicable grounds on which Supreme Court Jurisdiction is asserted. (1) X Construction of Constitution of Arkansas (2) ___ Death penalty, life imprisonment (3) ___ Extraordinary writs (4) ___ Elections and election procedures (5) ___ Discipline of attorneys (6) ___ Discipline and disability of judges (7) ___ Previous appeal in Supreme Court (8) ___ Appeal to Supreme Court by law III. NATURE OF APPEAL (1) ___ Administrative or regulatory action (2) ___ Rule 37 (3) ___ Rule on Clerk (4) ___ Interlocutory appeal (5) ___ Usury (6) ___ Products liability (7) ___ Oil, gas, or mineral rights iv (8) ___ Torts (9) ___ Construction of deed or will (10) ___ Contract (11) ___ Criminal Deer/Mt. Judea School District (“Deer/Mt. Judea”) alleged that the State failed to conduct adequacy studies in compliance with Ark. Code Ann. § 10-3-2102 (commonly referred to as “Act 57") in 2008 and 2010 and to make necessary adjustments to maintain an education system in compliance with the Arkansas Constitution article 14, section 1 and articles 2, 3 and 18. Deer/Mt. Judea asserted causes of action pursuant to Arkansas Constitution article 16, section 13 (public funds illegal exaction); the Arkansas Declaratory Judgment Act, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-111-101 to -111; and, the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-123-101 to -108. The Circuit Court (the Honorable Chris Piazza presiding) dismissed Deer/Mt. Judea’s complaint finding it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata based on this Court’s decision in Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007). Deer/Mt. Judea appeals. v IV. IS THE ONLY ISSUE ON APPEAL WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE JUDGMENT? No. V. EXTRAORDINARY ISSUES? ( x ) appeal presents issue of first impression, (__) appeal involves issue upon which there is a perceived inconsistency in the decisions of the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court, (__) appeal involves federal constitutional interpretation, ( x ) appeal is of substantial public interest, ( x ) appeal involves significant issue needing clarification or development of the law, or overruling of precedent, ( ) appeal involves significant issue concerning construction of statute, ordinance, rule, or regulation. VI. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION (1) Does this appeal involve confidential information as defined by Section III (A)(11) and VII (A) of Administrative Order 19? Yes x No (2) If the answer is “yes”, then does this brief comply with Rule 4- 1(d)? Yes No vi II. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT 1. Deer/Mt. Judea School District (“Deer/Mt. Judea”) alleged that the State failed to conduct adequacy studies in compliance with Ark. Code Ann. § 10-3-2102 (commonly referred to as “Act 57") in 2008 and 2010 and to make necessary adjustments to maintain an education system in compliance with the Arkansas Constitution article 14, section 1 and articles 2, 3 and 18. The Circuit Court (the Honorable Chris Piazza presiding) dismissed Deer/Mt. Judea’s complaint finding it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata based on this Court’s decision in Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007). Does the claim preclusion aspect of res judicata bar Deer/Mt. Judea’s Complaint based on this Court’s decision in Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007)? 2. I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied professional judgment, that this appeal raises the following questions of vii legal significance for jurisdictional purposes: • The case presents an issue of first impression: No Arkansas appellate court has considered the extent to which this Court’s decision in Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007) precludes subsequent claims that the education system violates the Arkansas Constitution article 14, section 1 and article 2, sections 2, 3 and 18. • The appeal is of substantial public interest: Intelligence and virtue being the safeguards of liberty and the bulwark of free and good government, the people of Arkansas have a substantial interest in securing the advantages and opportunities of education. See Ark. Const. art. 14, § 1. • The appeal involves significant issue needing clarification or development of the law, or overruling of precedent: The claim preclusive effect of Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007) needs clarification. For these reasons, the Supreme court should hear and decide this viii case. By Cl~l~:"uy!IL.1L:1i'~~~ Attorney for Appellant Deer/Mt. Judea School District IX III. POINT ON APPEAL AND PRINCIPAL AUTHORITIES Does the claim preclusion aspect of res judicata bar Deer/Mt. Judea’s Complaint based on this Court’s decision in Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007)? Baptist Health v. Murphy, 2010 Ark. 358. Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007). x IV. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page A. Cases Baptist Health v. Murphy, 2010 Ark. 358 .................. Arg 1, 3 Koch v. Adams, 2010 Ark. 131 ............................ Arg 2 Henry v. Continental Cas. Co., 2011 Ark. 224 ............... Arg 1 Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 370 Ark. 139, 257 S.W.3d 879 (2007) .................... SoC 1, Arg 1, 3, 11, 12 Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 364 Ark. 398, 220 S.W.3d 645 (2005) ............................. Arg 16, 17 Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 358 Ark. 137, 189 S.W.3d 1 (2004) ....................................SoC 5 Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 351 Ark. 31, 91 S.W.3d 472 (2003) .............................. Arg 17, 21 Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist., 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990) ........................... Arg 30 Thomas v. Pierce, 87 Ark. App. 26, 184 S.W.3d 489 (2004) ................................. Arg 1 xi B. Statutes and Rules Ark. Const., art. 14, § 1 ..................................SoC 1 Ark. Const., art. 2, §§ 2, 3 and 18 . SoC 1 Ark. Const., amend. 74 ................................SoC 4, 5 Ark. Code Ann. § 6-20-2301 to-2307 . SoC 2, 3 Ark. Code Ann. § 6-20-2305..............................SoC 5 Ark. Code Ann. § 10-3-2101 to-2104 . SoC 3 Ark. Code Ann. § 10-3-2104 ............................ Arg 13 Ark. Code Ann. § 10-3-2102 . SoC 1, Arg 14 Act 1604 of 2007, § 1 ............................... Arg 28, 29 Act 1573 of 2007, § 60 ................................. Arg 28 Act 1452 of 2005, § 2 .................................. Arg 28 C. Books and Treatises None. D. Miscellaneous None. xii V. ABSTRACT A. Hearing on Motion to Dismiss 1. Argument by Counsel for Beebe, et al. Scott Richardson with the Attorney General’s office. R 754. The exhibits attached to our motion to dismiss are public records that the Court can take judicial notice of without converting the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. We would like to keep this a motion to dismiss. R 762. There’s lots of revenue going into the Deer/Mt. Judea School District to support education there. R 770. The Complaint kind of goes all over, and it complains about a lot of different aspects of the State's educational system. I think very telling in the Complaint is several places where it says that the problem is that the State hasn't forced school districts to do what's supposed to be done. That's interesting in light of a 2007 Lake View opinion which concluded Abs 1 with the statement that the State's funding system is now constitutional, and the obligation of providing adequacy passes to the school districts.
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
  • Amendments to the Constitution of Arkansas of 1874

    Amendments to the Constitution of Arkansas of 1874

    AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 Constitution Of The State Of Arkansas Of 1874 AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 AMEND. 1. “HOLFORD” BONDS (CONST., ART. 20 ADDED). AMEND. 2. REGULATION OF CARRIERS (CONST., ART. 17, § 10 AMENDED). AMEND. 3. COUNTY ROAD TAX [REPEALED.] AMEND. 4. SURETIES ON OFFICIAL BONDS (CONST., ART. 19, § 21 AMENDED). AMEND. 5. PER DIEM AND MILEAGE OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY (CONST., ART. 5, § 16 AMENDED). AMEND. 6. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT AND OFFICERS (CONST., ART. 6, § 1, AMENDED AND SECTIONS ADDED). AMEND. 7. INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM (CONST., ART. 5, § 1, AMENDED). AMEND. 8. QUALIFICATIONS OF ELECTORS (CONST., ART. 3, § 1, AMENDED). AMEND. 9. SUPREME COURT. AMEND. 10. LIMITATION ON LEGISLATIVE AND TAXING POWER (CONST., ART. 12, § 4, AMENDED). AMEND. 11. SCHOOL TAX (CONST., ART. 14, § 3, AMENDED). AMEND. 12. TEXTILE MILLS, TAX EXEMPTION. AMEND. 13. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 14. LOCAL ACTS. AMEND. 15. SALARIES OF STATE OFFICERS. AMEND. 16. JURY TRIAL (CONST., ART. 2, § 7, AMENDED). AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 AMEND. 17. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 18. TAX TO AID INDUSTRIES. AMEND. 19. PASSAGE OF LAWS (CONST., ART. 5, §§ [37]-[41] ADDED). AMEND. 20. STATE BONDS. AMEND. 21. CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS - SALARIES OF PROSECUTORS. AMEND. 22. EXEMPTION OF HOMESTEADS FROM CERTAIN STATE TAXES. AMEND. 23. APPORTIONMENT (CONST., ART. 8 AMENDED). AMEND. 24. PROBATE COURTS - CIRCUIT AND COUNTY CLERKS (CONST., ART. 7, §§ 19, 34, 35, AMENDED). AMEND. 25. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 26. WORKERS' COMPENSATION (CONST., ART. 5, § 32, AMENDED). AMEND. 27. EXEMPTING NEW MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENT FROM TAXATION. AMEND. 28. REGULATING PRACTICE OF LAW. AMEND. 29. FILLING VACANCIES IN OFFICE.
  • House Bill Returned to the Senate As Requested

    House Bill Returned to the Senate As Requested

    --ooOoo-- FIFTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS SENATE CHAMBER EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Little Rock, Arkansas April 7, 2006 The Senate was called to order at 11:00 o'clock a.m. by the President. The Secretary called the roll, and the following members answered to roll call: ALTES, ARGUE, BAKER, BISBEE, BROADWAY, BROWN, BRYLES, CAPPS, CRITCHER, FARIS, GLOVER, HENDREN, HIGGINBOTHOM, HILL, HOLT, HORN, G.JEFFRESS, J.JEFFRESS, JOHNSON, LAVERTY, LUKER, MADISON, MALONE, MILLER, SALMON, SMITH, STEELE, TAYLOR, TRUSTY, WHITAKER, WILKINS, WILKINSON, WOMACK, WOOLDRIDGE. The Senate was led in prayer by Senator Jimmy Jeffress. The Senate was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by the President. On motion of Senator Hill, the reading of the Journal was dispensed with. ARKANSAS SENATE EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION April 7, 2006 Mr. President: We, your Committee on EDUCATION, to whom was referred: HOUSE BILL NO. 1016, BY REPRESENTATIVE ABERNATHY, HOUSE BILL NO. 1030, BY REPRESENTATIVE WALTERS beg leave to report that we have had the same under consideration, and herewith return the same with the recommendation that they do pass. Respectfully submitted, (SIGNED) SENATOR JIM ARGUE, CHAIRMAN Senate Bill No. 12 was returned from the House as passed, emergency clause having failed of adoption, and ordered enrolled. Senate Bill No. 27 was returned from the House as passed, as amended. On motion of Senator Broadway, Senate Bill No. 27 was ordered re-referred to the Committee on EDUCATION. 234 SENATE MEMORIAL RESOLUTION NO. 4 EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION BY: SENATOR BAKER SENATE MEMORIAL RESOLUTION IN RESPECTFUL MEMORY OF DR.
  • CV-20-454 in the Arkansas Supreme Court an Original Action Arkansas

    CV-20-454 in the Arkansas Supreme Court an Original Action Arkansas

    ELECTRONICALLY FILED Arkansas Supreme Court Stacey Pectol, Clerk of the Courts 2020-Aug-14 17:56:26 CV-20-454 42 Pages CV-20-454 In the Arkansas Supreme Court An Original Action Arkansas Voters First, a ballot question committee; Bonnie Miller, individually and on behalf of Arkansas Voters First; and Open Primaries Arkansas, a ballot question committee Petitioners v CV-20-454 John Thurston, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; the State Board of Election Commissioners Respondents Arkansans for Transparency, a ballot question committee; and Jonelle Fulmer, individually and on behalf of Arkansans for Transparency Intervenors Petitioners’ Brief on Counts 1 & 2 Ryan Owsley (2007-151) Adam H. Butler (2003-007) Nate Steel (2007-186) Robert F. Thompson (97-232) Alex Gray (2008-127) 414 West Court Street Alec Gaines (2012-277) Paragould, AR 72450 Steel, Wright, Gray, PLLC 870.239.9581 400 W. Capitol Ave., Suite 2910 [email protected] Little Rock, AR 72201 [email protected] 501.251.1587 [email protected] Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................... 2 Informational Statement ........................................................................ 4 Jurisdictional Statement ......................................................................... 6 Issues and Principal Authorities ............................................................ 7 Table of Authorities ...............................................................................
  • Arkansas Constitution

    Arkansas Constitution

    CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 Updated as of October 5, 2015 Table of Contents Preamble ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Articles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1. Boundaries --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2. Declaration of Rights -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Section: 1. Source of power --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2. Freedom and independence -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 3. Equality before the law ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 4. Right of assembly and of petition ------------------------------------------------------------ 2 5. Right to bear arms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 6. Liberty of the press and of speech – Libel -------------------------------------------------- 2 7. Jury trial – Right to – Waiver – Civil cases – Nine jurors agreeing --------------------- 2 8. Criminal charges – Self-incrimination – Due process – Double jeopardy – Bail ------ 2 9. Excessive bail or punishment prohibited – Witnesses – Detention ---------------------- 3 10. Right of accused enumerated – Change of venue ----------------------------------------- 3 11. Habeas corpus ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • June 30, 2011

    June 30, 2011

    Arkansas Lottery Commission An Enterprise Fund of the State of Arkansas Alicia Rose Jonesboro Chukwukere Ekeh Ratasha Whaley Shayla Morrow North Little Rock Blytheville Hartman Bradley Huggins Jessica Corbitt Benton Lexa Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended JUNE 30, 2011 Kent Broughton Brandon Booth Pine Bluff Little Rock Receiving this scholarship has helped me tremendously with my finances and has given me THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUCCEED in reaching my future goals. While furthering my education has been costly, being a recipient has helped me with my undergraduate experiences and my overall life.” Britni Means | Junior Philander Smith College Malvern Arkansas Lottery Commission An Enterprise Fund of the State of Arkansas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 Mike Beebe Governor, State of Arkansas Julie Baldridge Interim Director Prepared by Finance Division I am currently a freshman at Arkansas State University majoring in the Radiologic Sciences program. Upon receiving the Arkansas Lottery Scholarship, I have been able to pursue my EDUCATIONAL DREAMS without the burden of financial instability. I am blessed to have received this scholarship for it has allowed me to focus more on my studies while reducing my parents’ fear of not being able to financially support my decision to attend college.” Kourtney Hatcher | Freshman Arkansas State University Jonesboro Arkansas Lottery Commission An Enterprise Fund of the State of Arkansas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the
  • La Dolce Vita: Law and Equity Merged at Last!

    La Dolce Vita: Law and Equity Merged at Last!

    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 1970 La Dolce Vita: Law and Equity Merged at Last! George P. Smith II The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Walter W. Nixon III Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation George P. Smith II and Walter W. Nixon III, La Dolce Vita: Law and Equity Merged at Last!, 24 ARK. L. REV. 162 (1970). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. La Dolce Vita-Law and Equity Merged at Last! The forms of actions we have buried, but they still rule us from their graves. F.W. Maitland, 1909. Article 5, section 6 (a) of the proposed Constitution of Ar- kansas of 1970 states simply, "District Courts are established as trial divisions of the Trial Department. They shall have original jurisdiction of all justiciable matters not otherwise provided in this constitution, and such powers of review of administrative action as may be provided by law." The schedule of the new document contains temporary provisions going to the scope of jurisdiction of the present courts by declaring: The jurisdiction hereby conferred on District Courts shall in- clude all matters previously cognizable by Circuit, Chancery, and Probate Courts and all judicial matters previously cog- nizable by County and Common Pleas Courts.
  • Arkansas Supreme Court Received a New Chief Council, Inc

    Arkansas Supreme Court Received a New Chief Council, Inc

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. , ,~E==-===:::::::::=~_"-'" .. "".'.-----'--~ .. ~_".'-~ ... -.'."""_ .... ~--..._~._ ~_~.;_ ~'~";'_." ,'---'-----C., .... --::.:::::::= ..... ~.. c:. :'~l'::C""";'C:"C='=,.".j.... :'" .I__ "~ ___ ~_ ---------- J: ' " .., • • • ~ -' National crim~,-t_ic_e_R_e_fe_r_e_n_c_e_s_e_rv_ic_e______ ---------:1·. • ... - .- • ~~-1 '• - nCJrs ::1 • -• I • I ; • .. -. This microfiche was produced from documents received for I -- inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, ., I " .A ., ..,• A T .. ~ J I I the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on , 1 - • • ... this frame may be used to eva!,yate the document quality. \ , ~.-,-;..~ :'-'- - . .::..:.. .... .....l.'-_'__ •. ~..:..~_._~... , •• "".:......:~ .........:.- i, I~' .~ . '. ~ - , ,' .. ! I -, :; 1I11I?·8 1111'2.5 • " 1.0 Ww ~3.2 22. '" nm3.6 "=- 1l1U~ &:.i Q :! Ug ... u L:.:t.::.u '1 111111.1 1/ ( ~ "'" 1.25 111111.4_ 111111.6 ,t I MICROCOPY PESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A I ! ,,~ .... _ ·4'•. "\ ..... ,.:. '1 Microfilmingprocedures used to create this fiche comply with . ij; ·•.... 1 the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. .,I Points of view or opinions stated in this document are I' I those of the author(s) and do not represent the official I ! ' position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. " . ~- --,.-....,....,.,,- ... '-.,;.~-~, .,-;--.,..,..,~.1 I -II y- , .. o rN;:'ti~.i>aI I~~Jiut~ otJ~siic~-=jt:f~~ .. ~~~~,.. ~~~ ", •'" . United States Department of Justice .-._-.. _..... I Washington, D. C. 20531 f f 'I • • I, i I:, , · . /' STATE OF iKANSAS CHIEF JUSTICE Richard B. Adkisson JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Bob Lowery JUSTICE BUILDING 371-2295 LITTLE ROCK 7220 I ~ 0 ru, n Honorable Richard B.
  • Answer to 3 Combined Complaints-Asa Hutchinson

    Answer to 3 Combined Complaints-Asa Hutchinson

    ELECTRONICALLY FILED Pulaski County Circuit Court Terri Hollingsworth, Circuit/County Clerk 2021-Aug-27 11:29:10 60CV-21-4692 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS C06D06 : 22 Pages CIVIL DIVISION VERONICA McCLANE, as parent and next friend of her minor children, Walter and Beckett McClane; and ASHLEY SIMMONS, as parent and next friend of her minor children, August and Henry Simmons PLAINTIFFS vs. Case No. 60CV-21-4692 THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, acting through the 93rd General Assembly; JIMMY HICKEY, JR., in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Arkansas Senate; MATTHEW SHEPHERD; in his official capacity as Speaker of the Arkansas House of Representatives; and ASA HUTCHINSON; in his official capacity as the Governor of Arkansas DEFENDANTS BARRY HYDE, in his official capacity as the County Judge for Pulaski County; and ERIC HIGGINS, in his official capacity as Pulaski County Sheriff INTERVENORS / THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS and LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT and MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS vs. Case No. 60CV-21-4763 HON. ASA HUTCHINSON, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, and STATE OF ARKANSAS DEFENDANTS COMBINED ANSWER OF HON. ASA HUTCHINSON in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas Comes now the Defendant and Third-Party Defendant, Hon. Asa Hutchinson in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, and for his Answer to the 1 of 22 Complaint Seeking a Temporary Restraining Order filed August 2, 2021 by Plaintiffs McClane et al; his Answer to the Complaint filed August 5, 2021 filed by the Little Rock School District et al; and his Answer to the Third-Party Complaint filed August 5, 2021 by Barry Hyde and Eric Higgins in their respective, official capacities, alleges and states: A.
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas

    Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas

    ***THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE*** No. _____________ 3Jn tbe $,ilpreme QCourt of tbe Wniteb $)tates STACEY JOHNSON, JASON McGEHEE, BRUCE WARD, TERRICK NOONER, JACK JONES, MARCEL WILLIAMS, KENNETH WILLIAMS, DON DAVIS, and LEDELL LEE Petitioners V. WENDY KELLEY, in her official capacity as Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Respondents On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI MEREDITH L. BOYLAN Counsel ofRecord GEORGE KOSTOLAMPROS VENABLELLP 575 7th Street, NW Washington, DC (202) 344-4000 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners (Additional counsel follows) JENNIFFER HORAN JEFF ROSENZWEIG Federal Public Defender 300 Spring Street, Ste. 310 Eastern District of Arkansas Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 372-524 7 JOHN C. WILLIAMS [email protected] Ass't Federal Public Defender 1401 W. Capitol, Ste. 490 Counsel for Petitioners Little Rock, AR 72201 Johnson, Jones, Lee, and (501) 324-6114 Kenneth Williams [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners McGehee, Nooner, Ward, and Marcel Williams JENNIFER MERRIGAN DEBORAH R. SALLINGS JOSEPH FERKOVICH 35715 Sample Road PHILLIPS BLACK Roland, AR 72135 P.O. Box 2171 [email protected] New York, NY 10008 (212) 400-1660 Counsel for Petitioner Davis [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner Ward QUESTIONS PRESENTED ***CAPITAL CASE*** The Eighth Amendment requires a prisoner challenging a method of execution to (1) establish that the method will likely cause extreme pain and (2) "plead and prove a known and available alternative." Glossip v. Gross, 135 S. Ct. 2726, 2739 (2015).
  • Case No. Cv-14-462

    Case No. Cv-14-462

    CASE NO. CV-14-462 IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT MARK MARTIN, ET AL APPELLANTS V. FREEDOM KOHLS, ET AL APPELLEES __________________________________________________________________ AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS HONORABLE TIMOTHY DAVIS FOX, CIRCUIT JUDGE __________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT/COUNTY CLERK LARRY CRANE __________________________________________________________________ Amanda Mankin-Mitchell (97010) Chastity Scifres (99143) PULASKI COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 201 South Broadway, Suite 400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 340-8285 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Amicus Curiae CASE NO. CV-14-462 IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT MARK MARTIN, ET AL APPELLANTS V. FREEDOM KOHLS, ET AL APPELLEES __________________________________________________________________ AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS HONORABLE TIMOTHY DAVIS FOX, CIRCUIT JUDGE __________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT/COUNTY CLERK LARRY CRANE __________________________________________________________________ Amanda Mankin-Mitchell (97010) Chastity Scifres (99143) PULASKI COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 201 South Broadway, Suite 400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 340-8285 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Amicus Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………..…….i TABLE
  • Standard & Poor's: AA Moody's: Aa1 $197005000 STATE of ARKANSAS FEDERAL HIGHWAY GR

    Standard & Poor's: AA Moody's: Aa1 $197005000 STATE of ARKANSAS FEDERAL HIGHWAY GR

    NEW ISSUE RATINGS: Standard & Poor’s: AA BOOK- ENTRY ONLY Moody’s: Aa1 In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming compliance with covenants of the State in the Bond documents, interest on the Bonds is excludable from grossn i comef o owners of the Bonds for federal income tax purposes. Interest on the Bonds will not constitute a preference item for the purpose of computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on certain individuals and corporations. Interest on the Bonds will be included in the computation of adjusted current earnings for the purpose of the alternative minimum tax imposed on some corporations. In Bond Counsel’s further opinion, interest on the Bonds is exempt from all taxes of the State of Arkansas including income, inheritance, and property taxes. See TAX EXEMPTION herein. $197,005,000 STATEF O ARKANSAS FEDERAL HIGHWAY GRANT ANTICIPATION AND TAX REVENUE BONDS (GENERAL OBLIGATION), SERIES 2012 Dated: ,October 1 2012 Due: As shown below The State of Arkansas Federal Highway Grant Anticipation and Tax Revenue Bonds (General Obligation), Series 2012 (the "Bonds") will be issued pursuant to a book-entry only system and will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC" ), New York, New York. There will be no distribution of the Bonds to ultimate purchasers ("Beneficial Owners"). (See THE BONDS, Book-Entry Only System, herein.) The Bonds are issuable as registered bonds without coupons in the denominations of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof. Principal is payable semiannuallyn o April 1 and October 1,s a shown below, and interest is payable semiannuallyn o April 1 and October 1, commencing April 1, 2013.