DOCSLIB.ORG

Municipal Law in Arkansas Questions and Answers Revised May 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Municipal Law in Arkansas Questions and Answers Revised May 2016 Municipal Law in Arkansas Questions and Answers Revised May 2016 MUNICIP S AL A L S E N A A G K U R E A « « G E R T E A A T T S C T IT A IE E S GR MAKE A ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 2 FINANCIAL AFFAIRS . 15 Budgeting .......................... 15 DISCLAIMERS . 2 Bidding Requirements .................. 15 Debt .............................. 16 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) . 3 Donations .......................... 17 BOUNDARY CHANGES . 3 Fees .............................. 18 Investments ......................... 18 BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION . 4 Property ........................... 18 Street Turnback Funds.................. 18 COURTS AND LAW . 5 Bond on City Officials ................. 19 Lawsuits Against Cities .................. 5 Taxes and Fees ...................... 19 District Courts ........................ 5 County Courts ........................ 6 FIRE PROTECTION AND DEPARTMENTS . 21 ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS . 7 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT . 22 Recorders and Treasurers ................ 7 Meetings........................... 22 Conflicts of Interest and Multiple-Office Holding 7 Executive Sessions .................... 23 Salaries ............................ 9 Records ........................... 23 Terms of Office ....................... 9 GOVERNING BODIES . 25 ELECTIONS . 10 Municipal Powers .................... 25 Eligibility for Office ................... 10 Meetings........................... 25 Filing Deadlines...................... 10 Vacancies .......................... 26 Runoff Elections ...................... 11 Ordinances and Voting ................ 27 Campaign Rules ..................... 11 POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT . 30 Campaign Finance.................... 11 STREETS . 31 EMPLOYMENT LAW . 12 Drug Testing ........................ 12 UTILITIES . 31 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) ...... 12 ZONING AND LAND USE . 33 Harassment and Discrimination ........... 12 Manufactured/Mobile Homes ............ 33 Hiring and Firing Employees ............. 12 Supervision of Employees . 13 COMMUNICATIONS . 35 Uniformed Employees.................. 13 Military Leave ....................... 14 PUBLICATIONS LIST . 35 1 Introduction The legal staff of the Arkansas Municipal League daily receives dozens of communications from city officials and employees who have questions about legal issues affecting them and their cities and towns. This booklet is a compilation of some of those questions, arranged by subject matter. It is intended to complement the Handbook for Arkansas Municipal Officials, which contains the most essential statutes and case notes relevant to municipalities. Most of the statutes from the Arkansas Code Annotated (A.C.A.) cited herein can be found in the Handbook. A few may not be, so contact your city attorney or the League legal staff if you need a copy, or search online at https://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/arcode/. A web browser search for “Arkansas Code Online” will also work. This publication also refers to Arkansas Attorney General Opinions. These may be found online at http://www.arkansasag.gov/opinions/index.php, or simply search for “Arkansas Attorney General Opinions.” Finally, we refer throughout to other publications, which may prove useful, and have included at the end a list of publications available from the League. Order or download them from the League website, www.arml.org, or call 501-374-3484, Ext. 248 to request hard copies. Disclaimers The information contained in this book is not intended as legal advice for any specific case. Only the most recent version should be used, though bear in mind that the law may change prior to a new edition. Readers are responsible for consulting with legal counsel when questions arise concerning the application of the law to a particular set of facts. This book is intended solely for educational and informational purposes. 2 Americans with Disabilities Act Q: Where can I get more information about the ADA? A: The U.S. Department of Justice has a toll-free ADA (ADA) information line staffed by specialists to answer your See also the Municipal League publications Americans questions, 800-514-0301. In addition, an automated with Disability Act Compliance Guide and Understanding service allows callers to listen to recorded information Municipal Personnel Law and Suggestions for Avoiding and order publications. The number is 800-514-0383. Lawsuits. You can also find information online at www.ada.gov. Q: Can the mayor or city attorney act as the ADA These services are not for employment-related ADA coordinator for the city? questions, however. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) website, A: While it would be permissible for either the mayor www.eeoc. gov, provides information on a range of or city attorney to hold this position, it would be employment law issues, including those raised by desirable to have a permanent employee fill this spot. the ADA. Since elected and appointed officials come and go, it would be advantageous to have someone develop the expertise and experience over a longer period of time Boundary Changes in this critical area. (Annexation, Consolidation, etc.) Q: Does the ADA apply to persons who are being See also Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other arrested? Boundary Changes. A: Yes. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Q: What are the proper procedures for reporting (which includes Arkansas) has held that the ADA boundary changes in Arkansas? What state and local applies during an arrest (Gorman v. Bartch, 152 F.3d offices should be contacted when we have a bound- 907 (8th Cir. 1998)). Gorman, a wheelchair-user, ary change? requested that police officers help him get back into a bar that had just ejected him. When Gorman began A: The statutes dealing with annexation, detachment to argue with the officers, they arrested him. Because and consolidation (A.C.A. §§ 14-40-303, 14-40-605, the patrol wagon that arrived was not equipped with and 14-40-608) provide for filing in the county clerk’s wheelchair restraints or a wheelchair lift, officers office. A.C.A. §§ 14-40-605 and 14-40-608 require placed Gorman on a bench and used his belt and a filing with the county clerk, who is required to notify seatbelt to secure him to the mesh wall behind the the Tax Division of the Public Service Commission. bench. In transit, the belts loosened, and Gorman These statutes require the filing of a map and other fell to the floor. He required surgery for the resulting listed documents. injuries he received. The ADA prohibits discrimina- In addition, a new law, Act 914 of 2015 (A.C.A. tion in the services of public entities. A United States § 14–40–101), now provides, “Before an entity Supreme Court decision held that state prisons fall undertakes an annexation, consolidation, or detach- within the statutory definition of a public entity. The ment proceeding under this chapter, the entity shall Eighth Circuit determined that a police department, coordinate with the Arkansas Geographic Information like a state prison, is a public entity and that the trans- Systems Office for preparation of legal descriptions portation of an arrestee is a program or service of the and digital mapping for the relevant annexation, police department. The police department’s failure to consolidation, and detachment areas.” provide adequate transportation for disabled persons was therefore discriminatory under the ADA. 3 Building And Construction is $50,000 or more (A.C.A. § 22-9-204, as amended by Act 1048 of 2015). However, an exception is made for Q: Is the city required to use an architect or engineer projects designed to meet the city’s need for utilities on building or other construction projects? (A.C.A. § 22-9-201). A: The answer depends on the type and cost of the Note that A.C.A. § 22-9-204 does not state that it project. Generally, the law requires the assistance and applies to cities, but only to work done for the State supervision of a registered professional engineer or of Arkansas. However, because A.C.A. § 22-9-201 architect (A.C.A. § 22-9-101). However, this rule does mentions an exception for city utility work, it appears not apply to: that the Legislature meant to apply A.C.A. § 22-9-204 a. engineering projects that do not exceed $25,000 to cities, according to the Arkansas Attorney General b. architectural projects that do not exceed $100,000 (Ark. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 91-352). c. municipal projects planned and executed accord- Q: If the city does its own contracting, is it considered ing to plans and specifications furnished by an a “prime contractor” under A.C.A. § 22-9-204? authorized state agency. A: The Attorney General has issued an opinion that These amounts apply to the fair market value a school district doing its own contracting is not a of the capital improvement (A.C.A. §§ 17-15-302, prime contractor subject to the statute’s requirements 17-15-307). The law sets forth criminal penalties and (Ark. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 94-401). civil remedies for violations in A.C.A. §§ 17-15-103 Q: Can we hire non-licensed contractors by dividing and 105. the project into segments costing less than $50,000? Q: Does issuance of a building permit require proof A: The law forbids dividing projects up in this manner that the contractor is licensed? with the intent to avoid the licensing requirements A: Yes. A.C.A. § 17-25-301 provides: (A.C.A. § 17-25-101(b)). However, situations may “Upon making application to the building inspec- arise in which the city is not trying to avoid the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philadelphia's Councilmanic Prerogative
    A report from July 2015 Philadelphia’s Councilmanic Prerogative How it works and why it matters Contents 1 Overview 3 Background 5 How prerogative has worked in Philadelphia 14 Prerogative and zoning 17 Analyzing prerogative’s reach 19 Prerogative in action 20 What happens in other cities 22 Conclusion 24 Endnotes About this report This report was produced by The Pew Charitable Trusts in partnership with PlanPhilly, a news website dedicated to covering design, planning, and development issues in Philadelphia. PlanPhilly is a project of WHYY and NewsWorks. The report was researched and written by journalists Patrick Kerkstra, Jared Brey, and Casey Thomas. It was edited by Matt Golas of PlanPhilly and Larry Eichel of Pew’s Philadelphia research initiative, as well as Elizabeth Lowe, Daniel LeDuc, Bernard Ohanian, and Carol Hutchinson of Pew. The report was designed by Kodi Seaton. Acknowledgments In producing this report, the authors interviewed more than two dozen officials from Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter’s administration, members of Philadelphia City Council and council staffers, for-profit and nonprofit developers in the city, neighborhood organization leaders, development consultants, academics, zoning lawyers, and lobbyists, all of whom spoke on the understanding that they would not be named. Research into the practices of other cities included interviews with about a dozen planning department staff members and veteran journalists in those cities. John Kromer, a housing and development consultant who served as Philadelphia’s director of housing from 1992 to 2001; Joseph P. McLaughlin Jr., director of the Institute of Public Affairs and the Center on Regional Politics at Temple University; and Kenneth Steif, a doctoral candidate in the City and Regional Planning Program at the University of Pennsylvania, were independent reviewers of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Amendments to the Constitution of Arkansas of 1874
    AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 Constitution Of The State Of Arkansas Of 1874 AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 AMEND. 1. “HOLFORD” BONDS (CONST., ART. 20 ADDED). AMEND. 2. REGULATION OF CARRIERS (CONST., ART. 17, § 10 AMENDED). AMEND. 3. COUNTY ROAD TAX [REPEALED.] AMEND. 4. SURETIES ON OFFICIAL BONDS (CONST., ART. 19, § 21 AMENDED). AMEND. 5. PER DIEM AND MILEAGE OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY (CONST., ART. 5, § 16 AMENDED). AMEND. 6. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT AND OFFICERS (CONST., ART. 6, § 1, AMENDED AND SECTIONS ADDED). AMEND. 7. INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM (CONST., ART. 5, § 1, AMENDED). AMEND. 8. QUALIFICATIONS OF ELECTORS (CONST., ART. 3, § 1, AMENDED). AMEND. 9. SUPREME COURT. AMEND. 10. LIMITATION ON LEGISLATIVE AND TAXING POWER (CONST., ART. 12, § 4, AMENDED). AMEND. 11. SCHOOL TAX (CONST., ART. 14, § 3, AMENDED). AMEND. 12. TEXTILE MILLS, TAX EXEMPTION. AMEND. 13. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 14. LOCAL ACTS. AMEND. 15. SALARIES OF STATE OFFICERS. AMEND. 16. JURY TRIAL (CONST., ART. 2, § 7, AMENDED). AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 AMEND. 17. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 18. TAX TO AID INDUSTRIES. AMEND. 19. PASSAGE OF LAWS (CONST., ART. 5, §§ [37]-[41] ADDED). AMEND. 20. STATE BONDS. AMEND. 21. CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS - SALARIES OF PROSECUTORS. AMEND. 22. EXEMPTION OF HOMESTEADS FROM CERTAIN STATE TAXES. AMEND. 23. APPORTIONMENT (CONST., ART. 8 AMENDED). AMEND. 24. PROBATE COURTS - CIRCUIT AND COUNTY CLERKS (CONST., ART. 7, §§ 19, 34, 35, AMENDED). AMEND. 25. [REPEALED.] AMEND. 26. WORKERS' COMPENSATION (CONST., ART. 5, § 32, AMENDED). AMEND. 27. EXEMPTING NEW MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENT FROM TAXATION. AMEND. 28. REGULATING PRACTICE OF LAW. AMEND. 29. FILLING VACANCIES IN OFFICE.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrason Act January 2014
    The Lawrason Act January 2014 "THE LAWRASON ACT" Prepared for the Louisiana Municipal Association by Jerry J. Guillot INTRODUCTION Louisiana municipalities are governed by the Lawrason Act (hereinafter referred to as "Act") except those municipalities governed by a special legislative charter or a home rule charter or plan of government. (R.S. 33:321) Prior to 1882, each municipality was incorporated by special legislative act which also set forth the municipal charter. In 1882, Act 49 was enacted, setting up a general method whereby any municipality might be incorporated. However this law allowed the body of a new municipality to draw up its municipal charter. Thus, between 1882 and 1898, each municipality enjoyed the right to draw up its own charter. In 1898, the Act was enacted. It set forth a general legislative charter for all municipalities created after its effective date, as well as for those created prior to its effective date which chose to accept its provisions. The intent of this law was to provide a uniform type of government for all municipalities in Louisiana. This fundamental municipal incorporation law currently governs some 248 villages, towns, and cities. The law is named after Judge Samuel McCutcheon Lawrason, a West Feliciana Parish lawyer born in 1852 in New Orleans. Educated in France, Spain, and West Virginia, he received his doctor of laws degree from the University of Louisiana in 1874 and opened his law practice that same year in New Orleans. He married and moved the following year to West Feliciana Parish, where he was elected parish judge. He later became a school board member, a member of the Louisiana State University's Board of Supervisors, a state senator (from 1896 to 1900 and again in 1920 to 1924), and vice president of the Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1898.
    [Show full text]
  • Meetings, Agendas, and Minutes
    ITEM CC1(b) OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL MINUTES of the meeting of the Extraordinary County Council held at County Hall on Tuesday 8 September 2009 commencing at 12.30 pm and finishing at 1.00 pm Present: Councillor TONY CRABBE – in the chair Councillors: Alyas Ahmed Timothy Hallchurch MBE Rodney Rose M Altaf-Khan Jenny Hannaby John Sanders Alan Armitage Steve Hayward Larry Sanders Lynda Atkins Mrs J Heathcoat Don Seale Marilyn Badcock Hilary Hibbert-Biles Bill Service Michael Badcock Ian Hudspeth Dave Sexon Roger Belson Ray Jelf Chip Sherwood Maurice Billington Peter Jones C H Shouler Norman Bolster Stewart Lilly Peter Skolar Ann Bonner Lorraine Lindsay-Gale Roz Smith Liz Brighouse Sandy Lovatt Val Smith Iain Brown Sajjad Hussain Malik Richard Stevens Nick Carter Kieron Mallon John Tanner Louise Chapman Charles Mathew Alan Thompson Jim Couchman Keith R Mitchell CBE Melinda Tilley Roy Darke David Nimmo-Smith Nicholas P Turner Arash Fatemian Neil Owen Carol Viney Jean Fooks Zoé Patrick Michael Waine Anthony Gearing Susanna Pressel David Wilmshurst Michael Gibbard G A Reynolds Patrick Greene David Robertson The Council considered the matters, reports and recommendations contained or referred to in the agenda for the meeting and decided as set out below. Except insofar as otherwise specified, the reasons for the decisions are contained in the agenda and reports, copies of which are attached to the signed Minutes. 82/09 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (Agenda Item 1) CCNOV0309R020.doc CC1 – page 2 Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Mrs Fitzgerald O’Connor, Mrs Fulljames, Goddard, Godden, Handley, Harbour, Harvey, Hutchinson, Purse, Stratford, Strangwood and David Turner.
    [Show full text]
  • House Bill Returned to the Senate As Requested
    --ooOoo-- FIFTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS SENATE CHAMBER EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Little Rock, Arkansas April 7, 2006 The Senate was called to order at 11:00 o'clock a.m. by the President. The Secretary called the roll, and the following members answered to roll call: ALTES, ARGUE, BAKER, BISBEE, BROADWAY, BROWN, BRYLES, CAPPS, CRITCHER, FARIS, GLOVER, HENDREN, HIGGINBOTHOM, HILL, HOLT, HORN, G.JEFFRESS, J.JEFFRESS, JOHNSON, LAVERTY, LUKER, MADISON, MALONE, MILLER, SALMON, SMITH, STEELE, TAYLOR, TRUSTY, WHITAKER, WILKINS, WILKINSON, WOMACK, WOOLDRIDGE. The Senate was led in prayer by Senator Jimmy Jeffress. The Senate was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by the President. On motion of Senator Hill, the reading of the Journal was dispensed with. ARKANSAS SENATE EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION April 7, 2006 Mr. President: We, your Committee on EDUCATION, to whom was referred: HOUSE BILL NO. 1016, BY REPRESENTATIVE ABERNATHY, HOUSE BILL NO. 1030, BY REPRESENTATIVE WALTERS beg leave to report that we have had the same under consideration, and herewith return the same with the recommendation that they do pass. Respectfully submitted, (SIGNED) SENATOR JIM ARGUE, CHAIRMAN Senate Bill No. 12 was returned from the House as passed, emergency clause having failed of adoption, and ordered enrolled. Senate Bill No. 27 was returned from the House as passed, as amended. On motion of Senator Broadway, Senate Bill No. 27 was ordered re-referred to the Committee on EDUCATION. 234 SENATE MEMORIAL RESOLUTION NO. 4 EIGHTY-FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1ST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION BY: SENATOR BAKER SENATE MEMORIAL RESOLUTION IN RESPECTFUL MEMORY OF DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Aldermen
    Agenda Item No. 5 Governance Committee 22 January 2018 Part I Honorary Aldermen Report by Director of Law and Assurance Electoral Division: N/A Executive Summary The County Council is able to appoint former members with eminent service as honorary aldermen of West Sussex. The Chairman has asked for the matter to be considered. The report sets out possible criteria and other considerations for the Governance Committee to discuss. Recommendation That the Governance Committee determines whether to recommend to the County Council that an honorary alderman scheme should be adopted. Proposal 1. Background and Context 1.1 Section 249 of the Local Government Act 1972 sets out a power for councils to appoint former members as honorary aldermen in recognition of eminent service as a councillor. The County Council has never used this power, but research has now been undertaken at the Chairman’s request. Research has found that about half of the County Councils in England appoint honorary aldermen, including Hampshire and Kent in the South East. 1.2 The Governance Committee is asked to consider whether an Honorary Alderman scheme should be established in West Sussex County Council. To be appointed, a member must have retired as a member of the County Council and have ceased to be politically active. 1.3 The Act leaves it for councils to define ‘eminent service’. From a check of other councils’ criteria, where published, it seems that most work on a system of either a certain minimum length of service, or holding certain senior positions, or a mixture of both. The number of aldermen can be capped (one council gives 12 as the maximum number at one time) but many others do not cap, with up to around 30 Aldermen.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Freemen of the Borough of Guildford
    Honorary Freemen of the Borough of Guildford Introduction In past centuries, admission to the Freedom of a Borough conferred upon the recipient possession of recognisable privileges. In order to carry out certain trades or professions in a particular Borough, one had to be enrolled as a freeman and admission to the freedom was frequently necessary in order to have a vote in parliamentary elections. To become a freeman of Guildford, one had to be: (a) apprenticed to a freeman of the Borough for at least seven years, or (b) the eldest son of a freeman, or (c) by admission into the “Corporation”. Records kept in the Guildford Muniment Room contain the names of 1,061 persons admitted to the freedom of the Borough between 1655 and 1933 and also record the production of indentures of apprenticeship between 1655 and 1903. Typical entries in the two volumes of Borough Records known as the Freemen’s Books are reproduced below: 39. BARRETT, John, of Ockley. Appr. by ind. 7 Nov. 1796 to Jos. Jennings of H.T., plumber and glazier, Jos Jennings having died. Adm. 10 Oct 1803. (Jos. Jennings was one of the Society of Bailiffs.) 2/41. 2/43. 2/101. 3/1 52. BAVERSTOCK, John, son of Wm. road-surveyor. Appr. Wm.Elkins, brewer and one of the Aldermen, by ind. 6 Jan. 1826, for 7 yrs from that date, “to learn the Art of a Brewer’s Clerk”, Adm. 14 Oct. 1833. 2/80. 2/133 186. COBBETT, Wm., of High St., G., son of Wm. of Littleton, St.N.
    [Show full text]
  • CV-20-454 in the Arkansas Supreme Court an Original Action Arkansas
    ELECTRONICALLY FILED Arkansas Supreme Court Stacey Pectol, Clerk of the Courts 2020-Aug-14 17:56:26 CV-20-454 42 Pages CV-20-454 In the Arkansas Supreme Court An Original Action Arkansas Voters First, a ballot question committee; Bonnie Miller, individually and on behalf of Arkansas Voters First; and Open Primaries Arkansas, a ballot question committee Petitioners v CV-20-454 John Thurston, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; the State Board of Election Commissioners Respondents Arkansans for Transparency, a ballot question committee; and Jonelle Fulmer, individually and on behalf of Arkansans for Transparency Intervenors Petitioners’ Brief on Counts 1 & 2 Ryan Owsley (2007-151) Adam H. Butler (2003-007) Nate Steel (2007-186) Robert F. Thompson (97-232) Alex Gray (2008-127) 414 West Court Street Alec Gaines (2012-277) Paragould, AR 72450 Steel, Wright, Gray, PLLC 870.239.9581 400 W. Capitol Ave., Suite 2910 [email protected] Little Rock, AR 72201 [email protected] 501.251.1587 [email protected] Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................... 2 Informational Statement ........................................................................ 4 Jurisdictional Statement ......................................................................... 6 Issues and Principal Authorities ............................................................ 7 Table of Authorities ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Committee(S): Policy and Resources Date: 3 June 2021
    Committee(s): Date: Policy and Resources 3 June 2021 Subject: Public Amendment to an Act of Common Council - Aldermanic Elections Which outcomes in the City Corporation’s Corporate Plan does this proposal aim to impact directly? Does this proposal require extra revenue and/or No capital spending? If so, how much? N/A What is the source of Funding? N/A Has this Funding Source been agreed with the N/A Chamberlain’s Department? Report of: Town Clerk For Decision Report Author: Lorraine Brook Summary The Act of Common Council (as amended) of 14 July 1960 requires that, following the death, resignation (surrender of Office) or disqualification of an Alderman, the matter shall be reported by the Town Clerk to the next regular meeting of the Court of Aldermen. 1 A report of such matters to the Court of Aldermen shall, as per paragraph 4 of the Act of Common Council, result in a Wardmote being summoned and held for the election of an Alderman of the Ward within forty-two working days. Following the death of Alderman Sir Roger Gifford (Alderman of the Ward of Cordwainer since 2004) on 25 May 2021, the Town Clerk is required to report this sad occurrence to the Court of Aldermen at its next scheduled meeting, which is due to take place on 6 July 2021. As per the current requirements, an election would be held within the Ward of Cordwainer within 42 working days. Within these timescales the latest date on which an election could take place would be 3 September 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Constitution
    CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS OF 1874 Updated as of October 5, 2015 Table of Contents Preamble ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Articles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1. Boundaries --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2. Declaration of Rights -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Section: 1. Source of power --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2. Freedom and independence -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 3. Equality before the law ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 4. Right of assembly and of petition ------------------------------------------------------------ 2 5. Right to bear arms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 6. Liberty of the press and of speech – Libel -------------------------------------------------- 2 7. Jury trial – Right to – Waiver – Civil cases – Nine jurors agreeing --------------------- 2 8. Criminal charges – Self-incrimination – Due process – Double jeopardy – Bail ------ 2 9. Excessive bail or punishment prohibited – Witnesses – Detention ---------------------- 3 10. Right of accused enumerated – Change of venue ----------------------------------------- 3 11. Habeas corpus ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Review of Council Constitution
    APPENDIX A REVIEW OF COUNCIL CONSTITUTION (Report by the Head of Legal and Democratic Services) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Under the Local Government Act 2000, local authorities were required to adopt written constitutions to regulate their systems of governance and proceedings. Since then the Council has continued to review its Constitution regularly and at biennial intervals since 2005. The purpose of the review exercise is to identify changes required to the Constitution to reflect new legislation and working practices which have emerged during the preceding two years, to overcome any inconsistencies which may have arisen and to make positive adjustments to reflect changes in circumstances. 1.2 The terms of reference of the Corporate Governance Panel includes responsibility for “oversight of the Council’s Constitutional arrangements and advising the Council on any changes that may be desirable”. This report, therefore, introduces the review commissioned during the current year. 1.3 Adopting the same approach as previously, Members have been requested to consider the content of the Constitution and to highlight any issues or areas which could be improved, clarified or revised based on practical experience over the past two years. In particular, Heads of Service have been requested to examine Part 3 – Responsibility for Functions: Scheme of Delegations and given proposed changes to the senior management structure, re-assign delegations appropriately. 1.4 To identify the changes proposed, Members will need to refer to the Constitution available electronically on both the Council’s website and intranet. A copy also is available to peruse in the Members’ Room. 2. GENERAL CHANGES 2.1 The Council may amend its Constitution at any time, subject to regard being paid to formal guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
    [Show full text]