The United States Air Forces in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United States Air Forces in Europe An Air Force Major Air Command • . • The United States Air Forces in Europe ROOP airlifts and tactical airpower deployments bridging the Atlantic in record time with the Gen. Gabriel P. Disosway, T combat-ready forces shared top-line interest in the USAFE Commander in Chief since 1963, is a World War United States Air Forces in Europe ( USAFE ) during II veteran of the CBI air a year which focused attention on US capabilities for war and was shot down over rapid reinforcement of free-world defenses. China. He has served as Three major exercises, including Exercise Big Lift Commander, ATC's Flying of October-November 1963, brought troops and tacti- Training Air Force; with the cal aircraft from the US. Other intratheater maneuvers DoD's Weapons Systems demonstrated US Army-Air Force teamwork and capa- Evaluation Group; as TAC bilities of allied forces in NATO. Vice Commander; and as Extension of the in-flight range of tactical fighter USAFE Deputy Commander. rotations from the US and continued exchange of Army troops in Germany through Long Thrust air-mobility of Composite Air Strike Force (CASF) units to maneu- exercises were other operations in which USAFE had ver areas ranging from Germany to Iran and Norway. either direct or supporting roles. • Coordinated use of troop carrier aircraft in two At the end of June 1964, as the command continued simultaneous exercises under a new plan for single its day-by-day task of maintaining combat-ready management of theater airlift. strength for NATO defenses, the year's busy sequence Exercise Big Lift lived up to its name as USAFE of events had produced: support at bases in Germany and France helped the A record-breaking performance which established • Military Air Transport Service ( MATS ) move the en- Big Lift as the largest and fastest single deployment tire 2d Armored ("Hell on Wheels") Division from of troops in US military history. Texas to Europe in sixty-three hours and five minutes • Demonstration of tactical airpower's long-range without an accident. punch through successive transatlantic deployments Included in the airlift were 15,422 personnel and 975,200 pounds of equipment. MATS performed this gigantic task with 236 missions in C-135, C-133, C-130, C-124, and C-118 aircraft, from which deplaning troops Symbolic of USAFE moved in a steady stream to "marry up" with preposi- readiness, an F-105 tioned armor and equipment. Republic-built USAFE also provided bases and support for the Thunderchief is CASF deployed in this big show of joint capabilities. silhouetted against The force included sixty-nine tactical jet aircraft, forty- the sky. USAFE had a busy year, fea- nine C-130 transports, and supporting personnel, all tured by Operation from Tactical Air Command ( TAC ). Speed of tactical Big Lift and a num- aircraft flights from departure points in Maine, aver- ber of important aging from six to seven and one-half hours, contributed intratheater exer- to the over-all success. All flights were nonstop, with cises, testing its refueling by Strategic Air Command ( SAC ) KC-135 combat abilities. tankers. Theater forces had a direct role in the field-training phase. While 40,000 troops fought a mock war in West 90 AIR FORCE Magazine • September 1964 Germany, units of Seventeenth Air Force, one of two USAFE combat-ready air arms, joined the CASF in close-support missions. In April, long-range capabilities were again demon- Day or night, the strated as a brigade of the 101st Airborne Division USAFE job keeps from Fort Campbell, Ky., and two TAC F-100 squad- getting done. Right, rons from Cannon AFB, N. M., were deployed to Incir- an RB-66 crew chief lik AB, Turkey, in Exercise Delawar. This massive Iran- gives his pilot the US operation, sponsored by the Central Treaty Organi- okay on aircraft zation (CENTO), produced a successful test of mobility checkup prior to a and speed in deploying American forces to Iran. night mission out of Airlift requirements were met by eighty C-133 and RAF Station Wilden- C-130 transports from TAC and MATS units in the rath in Germany. US. Logistic support was provided by The United States Logistics Group in Turkey ( TUSLOG ), a major USAFE subcommand with headquarters at Ankara, Turkey. All told, a joint US task force of 6,800 personnel from three military services participated in Delawar. and forty minutes to join Dutch, British, Belgian, and War games included two jumps in Iran by 2,300 Norwegian tactical air units. paratroopers, amphibious operations in the Persian Exercise North Wind, held simultaneously near Guff by US naval forces and Marines, and refueled Gunzburg, Germany, was a joint US airborne field- close-air-support missions by F-100s over Iran. training operation. It included two jumps by 2,200 In June, focus shifted to Norway and Germany, where paratroopers airlifted from near Mainz and airdrops two air-ground exercises were held simultaneously. of heavy equipment. Tactical air support was provided The operation in Norway was Exercise Northern by Seventeenth Air Force and the 5th Air Division of Express, a major NATO exercise in which US interest the German Air Force. included both overseas and intratheater deployment Streamlining of theater airlift functions was demon- of troops, and a transatlantic CASF deployment con- strated in meeting the overlapping requirements of sisting of eighteen F-100s and six RF-101s from TAC these two exercises. MATS transports from the US par- units. Centered near Bardufoss, 200 miles above the ticipated in both, first flying US troops from Munich Arctic Circle, the exercise was primarily a test of the and Italian Alpine troops from Turin, Italy, to Norway, ability of Allied Command Europe ( ACE ) mobile and then joining TAC transport aircraft from rota- forces to reinforce NATO's northern flank. Approxi- tional squadrons in USAFE in airlift and airborne- mately 7,000 British, Italian, Belgian, Norwegian, and assault phases of North Wind. Redeployment, begin- American troops participated. ning with the return of North Wind troops, was simi- US troops included a contingent of Marines flown larly coordinated. in from the US to act as part of an "aggressor" force The two maneuvers were the first major tests of and ACE mobile elements drawn from Army troops realignment of theater airlift which became effective stationed in the Munich area of Germany. The CASF on April 1 with transfer to MATS of the 322d Air Divi- crossed the Atlantic from South Carolina in nine hours (Continued on following page) UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE Headquarters, Lindsey AS, Wiesbaden, Germany Commander in Chief. Gen. Gabriel P. Disosway 3d Air Force 17th Air Force Hq., South Ruislip, England Hq., Ramstein AB, Germany Maj. Gen. John S. Hardy Maj. Gen. James V. Edmundson Commander Commander 65th Air Division • The US Logistics Group (Defense) 322d Air Division 1MATt ITUSLOG) Torrejon AB, Spain Chateauroux AS, France Ankara, Turkey Col. Thomas C. Hayes, Jr. Col. Charles W. Howe Brig. Gen. Frederic C. Gray Commander Commander Commander AIR FORCE Magazine • September 1964 91 UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE CONTINUED sibilities, Third Air Force is the official point of con- tact in Great Britain in Air Force matters. In implementing realignment of airlift management, USAF's X-15 the redesignated 322d Air Division ( MATS ) moved astronaut, Lt. Col. its headquarters from Evreux-Fauville AB, France, to Robert M. White, Chateauroux AS, France. It controls two TAC rota- recently joined tional troop carrier squadrons at Evreux and a MATS USAFE as Com- rotational squadron at Rhein-Main AB, Germany. These mander of 53d units are used primarily for unscheduled logistic airlift Tactical Fighter within Europe and aerial delivery of cargo and per- Squadron, which is stationed at sonnel in conjunction with US Army forces in Europe. Bitburg AB, Ger- Scheduled air logistic service is to be accomplished by many. The 53d extension of MATS transatlantic routes. flies F-105s. A significant economy resulting from this plan was the return to the US of three squadrons of the 317th Troop Carrier Wing previously assigned to the 322d under USAFE. The move was completed in July. In Spain, USAFE's 65th Air Division was preparing sion, formerly a major USAFE subcommand. With this the Spanish Air Force for a final take-over of air de- change, the 322d assumed responsibility for centralized fense. Command personnel had assumed a training role management of all MATS and TAC aircraft performing in aircraft control-and-warning functions after depar- airlift operations within the European theater, respon- ture for the US of two F-102 interceptor squadrons. sive to needs of both MATS and USAFE. Over-all, the command continued to perform a mul- Other exercises during the year included Southex 63, tiple role as America's largest overseas air arm and a a NATO maneuver in September involving 60,000 primary instrument of western defense. Turkish, Greek, British, and US troops, twenty-nine Primarily, USAFE's mission is to train and equip US Navy ships and 200 naval aircraft, and tactical air combat-ready units pledged by the US to NATO. units of the Sixth Allied Tactical Air Force and In addition, the command provides tactical air and USAFE's 48th Tactical Fighter Wing. USAFE used logistic support for all NATO forces in Europe, assists twenty-five C-130s to airlift US troops and equipment air forces of other NATO members in developing their from Germany for airdrops in Turkey. combat capability, carries out Air Force responsibilities Long Thrust IX and X, in January and February, in the Military Assistance Program in the European continued Army-Air Force air-mobility exercises ro- area, provides command-wide aeromedical service, and tating troops to and from Germany.
Recommended publications
  • Air & Space Power Journal, September-October 2012, Volume
    September–October 2012 Volume 26, No. 5 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective Driving towards Success in the Air Force Cyber Mission ❙ 4 Leveraging Our Heritage to Shape Our Future Lt Gen David S. Fadok, USAF Dr. Richard A. Raines Features The Air Force’s Individual Mobilization Augmentee Program ❙ 12 Is the Current Organizational Structure Viable? Col Robin G. Sneed, USAFR Lt Col Robert A. Kilmer, PhD, USA, Retired An Evolution in Intelligence Doctrine ❙ 33 The Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Mission Type Order Capt Jaylan Michael Haley, USAF Joint Targeting and Air Support in Counterinsurgency ❙ 49 How to Move to Mission Command LTC Paul Darling, Alaska Army National Guard Building Partnership Capacity ❙ 65 Operation Harmattan and Beyond Col James H. Drape, USAF Departments 94 ❙ Ira C. Eaker Award Winners 95 ❙ Views An Airman’s Perspective on Mission Command . 95 Col Dale S. Shoupe, USAF, Retired Seeing It Coming: Revitalizing Future Studies in the US Air Force . 109 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF A Misapplied and Overextended Example: Gen J . N . Mattis’s Criticism of Effects-Based Operations . 118 Maj Dag Henriksen, PhD, Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy, US Air Force Research Institute 132 ❙ Historical Highlights Geopolitics versus Geologistics Lt. Col. Harry A. Sachaklian 146 ❙ Ricochets & Replies 154 ❙ Book Reviews Embry-Riddle at War: Aviation Training during World War II . 154 Stephen G. Craft Reviewer: R. Ray Ortensie A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon . 157 Neil Sheehan Reviewer: Maj Thomas F. Menza, USAF, Retired Khobar Towers: Tragedy and Response . 160 Perry D. Jamieson Reviewer: CAPT Thomas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Major General Jose Luis Triguero De La Torre, Spanish Air Force
    MAJOR GENERAL JOSE LUIS TRIGUERO DE LA TORRE, SPANISH AIR FORCE Born in Madrid, Spain, Major General Jose Luis Triguero de la Torre joined the Spanish Air Force Academy in 1975. During his more than 35 years’ experience in major CIS and C2 systems, he participated in the specification, development, acquisition, implementation and management of systems at different levels of responsibility, from Commander of a Maintenance Communications Squadron, to Commander of the Air C2 System. MGen Triguero has extensive experience related to Cyber Defence. He also has a deep understanding of managing human resources which was part of his core responsibilities. In March 2016, MGen Triguero took up the post of Director, NATO Headquarters Consultation, Command and Control Staff (NHQC3S) at NATO Headquarters. This post fulfils the role of Co-Vice-Chairman of the C3 Board and the role of C3 Capability Area Manager. From 2012, in the rank of Major General as Chief of the Air Force Technical Services, CIS and Cyber Defence Directorate, he was the CIS main adviser to the Chief of the Air Force Staff in Madrid. One of the responsibilities of this position was the definition and implementation of the Cyber Defence Capability in the Air Force. From October 2010 to Nov 2012 in the rank of Brigadier General, he commanded, led and managed the Spanish Air C2 real time system that provided the capabilities assigned by Spain to SACEUR for the NATINAMDS missions. He commanded and led more than 2,500 personnel and managed an organization composed of 22 Air Force units. From March to July 2011 in US Central Command in Macdill Air Force Base, Florida, he was the coordinating element of the Spanish Operational Command with the US Central Command for ISAF Operations.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eurofighter Typhoon in Service
    programme news and features issue 3 - 2006 eurofighter review I Tranche 2 • Final Assembly • New Engine Control I Export News At the beginning of November, the three Eurofighter Typhoon squadrons The lead Eurofighter Typhoon was piloted by Group Captain Bob of the Royal Air Force took to the skies from the Main Operating Base Judson, with aircraft from 3(F), 17(R) and 29 Squadrons making up of RAF Coningsby for a spectacular “Diamond Nine” formation flight. the formation. It was the first time that all the aircraft included in the formation were single-seat type. Focusing on the Air Forces Eurofighter Typhoon In Service 2 3 - 2006 eurofighter review - contents - - latest news - editorial - 3 - 2006 eurofighter review 3 Aloysius Rauen Contents CEO Eurofighter GmbH 03 Editorial Welcome note from Aloysius Rauen, Chief Executive Officer Dear Friends of Eurofighter Typhoon, 04 News Latest developments 2006 marked a significant change in the Eurofighter Typhoon programme. With more 06 06 Defendory International 2006 Review than 100 aircraft delivered, the four Partner Eurofighter Typhoon in Athens Air Forces have taken full ownership of the Eurofighter exhibi- programme. Seven units are already operating tions for 2006 ended in Athens 07 Export Expertise the aircraft and, with operational conversion Eurofighter Typhoon set to serve the global market ramping up across the four Nations, Eurofighter Typhoon is becoming increasingly responsible 08 Team Italy takes the Title for more and more tasks within the squadrons. International Aerospace Summer School The four Partner Nations have accumulated more than 12,000 flight hours. 09 4°Stormo Deployment The end of our work based on the Main Operational Training for the Italian Air Force Development Contract is approaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.THE IMPACT of NATO on the SPANISH AIR FORCE
    UNISCI Discussion Papers ISSN: 1696-2206 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España Yaniz Velasco, Federico THE IMPACT OF NATO ON THE SPANISH AIR FORCE: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND FUTURE PROSPECTS UNISCI Discussion Papers, núm. 22, enero, 2010, pp. 224-244 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76712438014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 22 (January / Enero 2010) ISSN 1696-2206 THE IMPACT OF NATO ON THE SPANISH AIR FORCE: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND FUTURE PROSPECTS Federico Yaniz Velasco 1 Brigadier General, Spanish Air Force (Retired) Abstract: The Spanish Air Force is one of the oldest independent Air Forces in the world and the youngest service of the Spanish Armed Forces. Since the early 50’s of the last century it was very much involved in exercises and training with the United States Air Force following the Agreements that Spain signed with the United States in 1953. That is why when Spain joined NATO in 1982 the Spanish Air Force was already somewhat familiar with NATO doctrine and procedures. In the following years, cooperation with NATO was increased dramatically through exercises and, when necessary, in operations. The Spanish Air Force is now ready and well prepared to contribute to the common defence of NATO nations and to participate in NATO led operations whenever the Spanish government decides to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Forces Flight 2011/2012 International
    SPECIAL REPORT WORLD AIR FORCES FLIGHT 2011/2012 INTERNATIONAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH Secure your availability. Rely on our performance. Aircraft availability on the flight line is more than ever essential for the Air Force mission fulfilment. Cooperating with the right industrial partner is of strategic importance and key to improving Air Force logistics and supply chain management. RUAG provides you with new options to resource your mission. More than 40 years of flight line management make us the experienced and capable partner we are – a partner you can rely on. RUAG Aviation Military Aviation · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen · Switzerland Legal domicile: RUAG Switzerland Ltd · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen Tel. +41 41 268 41 11 · Fax +41 41 260 25 88 · [email protected] · www.ruag.com WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 CONTENT ANALYSIS 4 Worldwide active fleet per region 5 Worldwide active fleet share per country 6 Worldwide top 10 active aircraft types 8 WORLD AIR FORCES World Air Forces directory 9 TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT FLIGHTGLOBAL INSIGHT AND REPORT SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES, CONTACT: Flightglobal Insight Quadrant House, The Quadrant Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS, UK Tel: + 44 208 652 8724 Email:LQVLJKW#ÁLJKWJOREDOFRP Website: ZZZÁLJKWJOREDOFRPLQVLJKt World Air Forces 2011/2012 | Flightglobal Insight | 3 WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 The French and Qatari air forces deployed Mirage 2000-5s for the fight over Libya JOINT RESPONSE Air arms around the world reacted to multiple challenges during 2011, despite fleet and budget cuts. We list the current inventories and procurement plans of 160 nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War and Beyond
    Contents Puge FOREWORD ...................... u 1947-56 ......................... 1 1957-66 ........................ 19 1967-76 ........................ 45 1977-86 ........................ 81 1987-97 ........................ 117 iii Foreword This chronology commemorates the golden anniversary of the establishment of the United States Air Force (USAF) as an independent service. Dedicated to the men and women of the USAF past, present, and future, it records significant events and achievements from 18 September 1947 through 9 April 1997. Since its establishment, the USAF has played a significant role in the events that have shaped modem history. Initially, the reassuring drone of USAF transports announced the aerial lifeline that broke the Berlin blockade, the Cold War’s first test of wills. In the tense decades that followed, the USAF deployed a strategic force of nuclear- capable intercontinental bombers and missiles that deterred open armed conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. During the Cold War’s deadly flash points, USAF jets roared through the skies of Korea and Southeast Asia, wresting air superiority from their communist opponents and bringing air power to the support of friendly ground forces. In the great global competition for the hearts and minds of the Third World, hundreds of USAF humanitarian missions relieved victims of war, famine, and natural disaster. The Air Force performed similar disaster relief services on the home front. Over Grenada, Panama, and Libya, the USAF participated in key contingency actions that presaged post-Cold War operations. In the aftermath of the Cold War the USAF became deeply involved in constructing a new world order. As the Soviet Union disintegrated, USAF flights succored the populations of the newly independent states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Air Warfare
    The Law of Air Warfare by Javier Guisandez Gomez Hostile aerial action Under aerospace doctrine an aerial action is a set of aerial sorties of the same nature which take place simultaneously in pursuit of a common aim. In other words, an action of this type would attain the objective pursued if it involved two or more aircraft engaging in any of a range of operations, namely attacks, reconnaissance, transportation and special aerial missions. The possible situations in which aerial actions may take place range from peacetime to warfare, including all the intermediate stages. It may therefore be said that when aerial action is described as hostile, it is because it is actually carrying out or intended to carry out acts that have a single common characteristic, that is, violence. In this context, violence must be understood as acts which are com- mitted without the consent of the affected group or country and which therefore constitute a violation of the rights or the status of other com- munities or nations. It is important to clarify this point, as otherwise hostile Francisco Javier Guisandez Gomez is a colonel in the Spanish Air Force and heads the Tactics and Doctrine Department at the Air Force Academy in Madrid. Colonel Guisandez Gomez teaches the law of war at the Academy, at the Madrid Centre for the Study of International Humanitarian Law, at the International Institute of Humanitarian Law in San Remo, Italy, and also as an instructor for the ICRC in El Salvador, Guatemala and Nicaragua. Original: Spanish 347 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF THE RED CROSS aerial action would cover only aerial attack missions, while those involv- ing transportation or reconnaissance and special missions, and also electronic warfare, in-flight refuelling and so on, would not be classified as hostile action.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Bombing of Yugoslavia
    “HENRI COANDA” “GENERAL M.R. STEFANIK” AIR FORCE ACADEMY ARMED FORCES ACADEMY ROMANIA SLOVAK REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE of SCIENTIFIC PAPER AFASES 2015 Brasov, 28-30 May 2015 NATO BOMBING IN THE FORMER REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA Diana Manolache*, Ciprian Chiş* *”Carol I” National Defense University, Bucharest, Romania Abstract: Within this work, we approached the bombing operation in Yugoslavia, named „Allied Force”, that was a part of the War which led to the establishment of Kosovo’s status. The development period of this operation, including bombardment operations, was 78 days, between 24th of March and 10th of June, 1999. In the conducted study, we chose to use the scientifique observation as method of scientifique research as well as we used the comparative-historical method and in terms of the techniques used, we focused mainly on documentary analysis, available with an extensive bibliography. In the conducted study, we have highlighted some dealt less aspects of the subject, and also, items related to the strategy used by combatants during the conflict emphasizing the pros and cons of strategic air power. From these elements can be formulated numerous lessons learned useful in future conflicts, and also, possible research directions. Keywords: Yugoslavia, NATO forces, bombing actions, aircraft. 1. INTRODUCTION The regulations, including the territorial ones, which took place during and after the The bombing operation in Yugoslavia was actions of all kinds from this conflict area, called „Allied Force” and was a part of the were framed within the provisions of United War led to the establishment of Kosovo’s Nations Security Council Resolution no. 1244.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers in Berets the Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003
    Brothers in Berets The Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003 Forrest L. Marion, PhD Air Force History and Museums Program In Conjunction With Air Force Special Operations Command Air University Press Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editors Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Belinda Bazinet and Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Names: Marion, Forrest L., author. | Air University (U.S.). Press, publisher. | Curtis E. LeMay Center for Copy Editor Doctrine Development and Education, issuing body. Tammi Dacus Title: Brothers in berets : the evolution of Air Force Cover Art and Book Design Special Tactics, 1953-2003 / Forrest L. Marion Daniel Armstrong Description: First edition. | Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama : Air University Press, Curtis E. LeMay Cen- Composition and Prepress Production Michele D. Harrell ter for Doctrine Development and Education, [2018]. | At head of title: Air University, Curtis E. LeMay Center Print Preparation and Distribution for Doctrine Development and Education. | Includes Diane Clark bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017059577| ISBN 9781585662784 | ISBN 158566278X Subjects: LCSH: United States. Air Force—Combat controllers—History. | United States. Air Force— Commando troops—History. | Special forces (Military science)—United States—History. | United States. Air Force Special Operations Command. Classification: LCC UG633 .M3144 2018 | DDC AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS 358.4131—dc23 | SUDOC D 301.26/6:T 11
    [Show full text]
  • The EAG – Seven Air Forces That Are Able to Operate As One Across 3 the Spectrum of Conflict
    European Air Group Annual Report 2019 CIS & Cyber Air Ops Force Protection Logs & Support European Air Group - Solutions for Interoperability www.euroairgroup.org 1 4 18 20 Contents Foreword 1 The EAG – Seven Air Forces that are able to operate as one across 3 the spectrum of conflict Building a common vision – what do we have to train for? 4 Military training airspace in the Single European Sky – 6 taking a multinational view 4th-5th Generation Interoperability – a holistic approach 8 Turning the spotlight on RED AIR 10 5th Generation – possible collaborative opportunities? 12 ‘The times they are a changing’ 14 The Interoperable MALE RPAS ISR Training (IMRIT) – innovative, 16 low cost, multinational Networked Synthetic Training Striking in a highly contested environment – the Air Launched Cruise 18 Missile Project EAG Aviation Medicine – developing a new way to collaborate 20 8 14 32 38 Fuel – a shared resource 22 Interoperability in Force Protection – as relevant as ever! 24 Gaining a better insight … Force Protection Seminar 26 Force Protection training – permanent effort to 28 bolster cohesion How CIS impacts the OODA Loop 30 EAG Cyber – building on national Cyber defence to support 32 multinational cooperation Improving communication and encouraging collaboration 34 through a digital workspace Technical Arrangements – at the heart of doing business 36 Agreeing Strategies – the seven Air Chiefs meet in Bruges to 38 steer the EAG into the future EAG Project Activities for 2019 39 1 European Air Group Foreword ince 31st of October 2018, I have been Sappointed Chief of Staff of the Italian Air Force, taking over also the duty of the EAG Director.
    [Show full text]