Environmental Permit Variation Application
Brinklow Quarry Limited
Brinklow Quarry, Highwood Farm, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ.
Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Document Control Table
Project Reference 19/003a
Project Title Brinklow Permit Application
Document Title Environment Permit Variation Application
Document Issue No. 1
Document Issue Date 19 October 2020
Client Brinklow Quarry Limited
Status Issue
Report Produced by/Date Georgina Watkins 02 October 2020
Report Checked by/ Date Kate Brady 19 October 2020
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road i Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Contents
Introduction ...... 1 Site location and setting ...... 2 Operator details ...... 3 Non-technical summary ...... 4 List of waste codes ...... 5 Site Management ...... 9 Condition of the Site and environmental risk ...... 10
Application Forms
Part A Part C2 Part C4 Part F1
Drawings
Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Permit Section Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 002
Appendices
Appendix 1 Approved Waste Recovery Plan Appendix 2 Recovery versus disposal opinion (pre application reference EPR/GB3502FS/V002) Appendix 3 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report Appendix 4 Evidence of Technically Competent Management Appendix 5 Site Condition Report Part 1 Appendix 6 Environmental Risk Assessment Appendix 7 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment, ref. 2812/HRA Appendix 8 Dust Management Plan for Deposit Appendix 9 Waste Acceptance Procedures
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road ii Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Introduction
1.1. This Environmental Permit application seeks to vary the existing Environmental Permit Ref. EPR/GB3502FS at Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ on behalf of Brinklow Quarry Limited (the Operator).
1.2. The Operator is undertaking waste operations under two environmental permits at Brinklow Quarry. The variation seeks to consolidate both permits into a single boundary as shown on Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 (hereinafter referred to as the Site).:
1.3. The proposed changes to the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS are: x Change Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS from a Standard Rules 2015 No. 39 set to a bespoke Environmental Permit for deposit for recovery operations. x Consolidate the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS for waste recovery with the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502GL for waste treatment (Standard Rules 2010 No. 12). x Increase the boundary of Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS to what is shown on Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001. x Reference the Approved Waste Recovery Plan GRFXPHQW HQWLWOHG ³$PHQGPHQW WR WKH $SSURYHG:DVWH5HFRYHU\3ODQ´ (see Appendix 1). x Increase the permitted capacity of the recovery operation from 57,000m3 to 4,489,507m3 to accord with the Approved Waste Recovery Plan.
1.4. The relevant Environment Agency application forms (Part A, Part C2, Part C4 and Part F1) are included within this Environmental Permit Variation Application report.
Background
1.5. The original permit application was submitted to the Environment Agency in October 2017 by PT-CE Limited to obtain a permit based on standard rules set SR2015 No.39. The application was accompanied by the original Waste Recovery Plan, prepared by PT-CE Limited (See Appendix 1 of Appendix 1 Amendment to Approved Waste Recovery Plan). This Waste Recovery Plan was approved by the Environment Agency in 2017. The original Waste Recovery Plan and existing Environmental Permit (EPR/GB3502FS) extends to cover Section A on the Permit Section Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 002.
1.6. An amendment to the original Waste Recovery Plan was necessary as it only considered a small area of the Site and the calculations of the required volume were inaccurate.
1.7. An amendment to the Waste Recovery Plan (Appendix 1) was submitted to the Environment Agency and ZDVGHHPHGDV³UHFRYHU\´E\WKH(QYLURQPHQW$JHQF\RQ7 June 2019. The Recovery versus Disposal (RvD) Assessment letter (EPR/GB3502FS/V002) is included as Appendix 2 of this Environmental Permit Application report.
1.8. Permit number EPR/GB3520GL, based upon standard rule set SR2010 No.12, for the treatment of waste is sited within the footprint of the proposed permit boundary extension area. As such it is proposed to consolidate EPR/GB3502GL with this Permit variation application (EPR/GB3502FS). There are no proposed changes to the waste treatment operation.
1.9. Both the Environmental Permits included in this permit variation application (EPR/GB3502GL and EPR/GB3502FS) are operated under by Brinklow Quarry Limited.
1.10. There are no proposed changes to the type of waste operations being undertaken on Site. It is considered that the variation of this Environmental Permit comprises a Normal Variation and therefore will attract the associated application fee(per section 1.17.9 of the Charging Scheme, V1, 2019).
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 1 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Site location and setting
2.1. Brinklow Quarry is located off Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ.
2.2. The quarry is a regionally significant sand, gravel and clay quarry located approximately 1km west of the village of Brinklow and approximately 8km east of the centre of Coventry. Access to the quarry is via Coventry Road which runs west-east along part of the northern boundary of the Site.
2.3. The Site, covered by this Environmental Permit Variation, extends to approximately 82.7ha.
2.4. The land-use surrounding the Site is predominantly agricultural fields with associated farmhouses under ownership of Brinklow Quarry Limited.
2.5. The majority of the Site is not located on a superficial drift aquifer, however a portion of the south western area of the Site is located on a secondary (undifferentiated) superficial drift aquifer. The Site is located on a Secondary B bedrock aquifer. The Site is not located within a Groundwater Source Protection Zone.
2.6. Areas of deciduous woodland and ancient and semi-natural woodland are located on the boundaries of the Site. Combe Pool, a Site of Special Scientific Interest, is located 800m to the northwest of the Site.
2.7. Treatment operations are currently undertaken in the south-eastern area of the proposed new permit area, as shown on Permit Section Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 002.
2.8. An Environmental Setting and Site Design (ESSD) Report has been completed for the Site and is included as Appendix 3.
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 2 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Operator details
3.1. Company details for Brinklow Quarry Limited are provided below:
Company Name Brinklow Quarry Limited Company Number 06765411 4 Bank Court, Weldon Road, Registered Address Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 5RF Incorporation Date 4 December 2008 Companies House Link https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06765411
3.2. Brinklow Quarry Limited currently has three directors. The names and dates of birth of these directors are included in the table below.
Name Date of Birth Anthony Mark Aston Dale William Aston Jessie May Aston
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 3 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Non-technical summary
Existing Operations
4.1. Deposit of waste for recovery operations in accordance with standard rules set SR2015 No. 39 are permitted under the existing Environmental Permit (EPR/GB3502FS). Mineral extraction operations are ongoing.
4.2. It has been confirmed that no waste has yet been deposited under the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS to date.
4.3. Treatment operations in accordance with standard rules set SR2010 No. 12 are permitted under the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502GL.
Proposed Operations
4.4. The proposed changes to the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS are to: x Change EPR/GB3502FS from a Standard Rules 2015 No. 39 set Environmental Permit to a bespoke Environmental Permit for deposit for recovery operations. x Consolidate the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS for waste recovery with the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502GL for waste treatment (Standard Rules 2010 No. 12). x Increase the area of the Environmental Permit to what is shown on Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001. x Include the Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan (Appendix 1) under the Environmental Permit. x Increase the volumetric capacity of the recovery operation from 57,000m3 to 4,489,507m3.
4.5. There are no proposed that any changes are made to the List of Waste Codes to be accepted for deposit of waste for recoveU\RSHUDWLRQVRUIRUWUHDWPHQWRSHUDWLRQV7KHUHVKRXOGEHWZR³/LVWRI:DVWH7\SHV´ tables in the varied Environmental Permit: one for deposit of waste for recovery operations and one for treatment operations.
4.6. The Environmental Management System (EMS), which includes a Waste Acceptance Procedure, ensures that suitable waste types are accepted on to the Site. The Waste Acceptance Procedure includes strict waste acceptance criteria which ensure that only permitted waste types are accepted for the deposit for recovery operations. A copy of the amended Waste Acceptance Procedure for Brinklow Quarry Limited is provided as part of the Environmental Setting & Site Design (ESSD) Report, see Appendix 3 ESSD ± Appendix 5 Waste Acceptance Procedures.
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 4 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
List of waste codes
5.1. This permit variation application does not seek to add or remove any List of Waste codes.
5.2. The List of Waste codes accepted onto the Site for the bespoke deposit of waste for recovery operations are listed below.
Exclusions Wastes having any of the following characteristics shall not be accepted: x Consisting solely or mainly of dusts, powders or loose fibres x Wastes that are in a form which is either sludge or liquid
Source Sub-source Waste Description Additional restrictions code 01 Waste resulting 01 01 wastes 01 01 02 Wastes from Restricted to waste from exploration, from mineral mineral non- overburden and interburden mining, quarrying and excavation metalliferous only. physical and chemical excavation treatment of minerals 01 04 wastes 01 04 08 Waste gravel and from physical crushed rocks other and chemical than those processing of mentioned in 01 04 non- 06 metalliferous minerals 01 04 09 Waste sand and clays 17 17 01 17 01 01 Concrete Construction and concrete, demolition wastes bricks, tiles 17 01 02 Bricks and 17 01 03 Tiles and ceramics ceramics 17 01 07 Mixtures of Metal from reinforced concrete, bricks, concrete must have been tiles and ceramics removed. other than those mentioned in 17 01 06 17 03 bituminous 17 03 02 Bituminous Road planings only. mixtures mixtures other than those mentioned in 17 03 01 17 05 soil stones 17 05 04 Soil and stones other Restricted to topsoil, peat, and dredging than those mentioned subsoil and stones only. spoil in 17 05 03 19 Wastes from waste 19 12 wastes 19 12 09 Minerals (for example Restricted to wastes from management facilities from the sand, stones) only treatment of waste mechanical aggregates that are treatment of otherwise naturally waste (for occurring minerals. example sorting, Does not include fines from crushing, treatment of any non- compacting, hazardous waste or pelletising) not gypsum from recovered otherwise plasterboard. specified 19 12 12 Other wastes Restricted to crushed (including mixture of bricks, tiles, concrete and materials) from ceramics only. mechanical treatment Metal from reinforced of wastes other than concrete must be those mentioned in 19 removed. 12 11 Does not include fines
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 5 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Source Sub-source Waste Description Additional restrictions code from treatment of any non-hazardous waste or gypsum from recovered plasterboard. 20 Municipal wastes 20 02 garden 20 02 02 Soils and stones Restricted to topsoil, peat, (household waste and and park wastes subsoil and stones only. similar commercial, industrial and institutional wastes) including separately collected fractions
5.3. The List of Waste codes accepted under the SR 2010 No. 12 treatment operations are listed below. There is no proposed change to the List of Waste codes to be accepted for treatment operations.
Exclusions Wastes having any of the following characteristics shall not be accepted: x Consisting solely or mainly of dusts, powders or loose fibres x Wastes that are in a form which is either sludge or liquid Waste code Description 01 WASTES RESULTING FROM EXPLORATION, MINING, QUARRYING AND PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF MINERALS 01 04 wastes from physical and chemical processing of non-metalliferous minerals 01 04 08 waste gravel and crushed rocks other than those mentioned in 01 04 07 01 04 09 waste sand and clays 02 WASTES FROM AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AQUACULTURE, FORESTRY, HUNTING AND FISHING, FOOD PREPARATION AND PROCESSING 02 02 waste from preparation and processing of meat, fish and other foods of animal origin 02 02 02 shellfish shells from which the soft tissue or flesh has been removed only 03 WASTES FROM WOOD PROCESSING AND THE PRODUCTION OF PANELS AND FURNITURE, PULP, PAPER AND CARDBOARD 03 01 wastes from wood processing and the production of panels and furniture 03 01 01 waste bark and cork 03 03 wastes from pulp, paper and cardboard production and processing 03 03 01 waste bark and wood 10 WASTES FROM THERMAL PROCESSES 10 01 waste from power stations and other combustion plants 10 01 01 bottom ash and slag only 10 01 02 pulverised fuel ash only 10 01 05 gypsum (solid) only 10 01 07 gypsum (sludge) only 10 01 15 bottom ash and slag only from co-incineration other than those mentioned in 10 01 14 10 11 wastes from manufacture of glass and glass products 10 11 12 clean glass other than those mentioned in 10 11 11 10 12 wastes from manufacture of ceramic goods, bricks, tiles and construction products
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 6 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Waste code Description 10 12 08 waste ceramics, bricks, tiles and construction products(after thermal processing) 10 13 wastes from manufacture of cement, lime and plaster products and articles and products made from them 10 13 14 waste concrete only 15 WASTE PACKAGING 15 01 packaging 15 01 07 clean glass only 17 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTES (INCLUDING EXCAVATED SOIL FROM CONTAMINATED SITES) 17 01 concrete, bricks, tiles and ceramics 17 01 01 concrete 17 01 02 bricks 17 01 03 tiles and ceramics 17 01 07 mixtures of concrete, bricks, tiles and ceramics other than those mentioned in 17 01 06 17 02 wood, glass and plastic 17 02 02 clean glass only 17 03 bituminous mixtures, coal tar and tarred products 17 03 02 road base and road planings (other than those containing coal tar) only 17 05 soil (including excavated soil from contaminated sites) stones and dredging spoil 17 05 04 soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05 03 17 05 06 dredging spoil other than those mentioned in 17 05 05 17 05 08 track ballast other than those mentioned in 17 05 07 17 08 gypsum based construction material 17 08 02 gypsum only other than that mentioned in 17 08 01 19 WASTES FROM WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES, OFF SITE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS AND PREPARATION OF WATER INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION / INDUSTRIAL WASTE
19 05 wastes from aerobic treatment of solid waste 19 05 03 compost from source segregated biodegradable waste only 19 08 wastes from waste water treatment plants not otherwise specified 19 08 02 washed sewage grit (waste from desanding) free from sewage contamination only 19 08 99 stone filter media if free from sewage contamination only 19 09 wastes from the preparation of water intended for human consumption or water for industrial use 19 09 02 sludges from water clarification 19 12 wastes from the mechanical treatment of wastes 19 12 05 clean glass only 19 12 09 minerals (for example sand, stones) 19 12 12 treated bottom ash including IBA and slag other than that containing dangerous substances only 19 13 wastes from soil and groundwater remediation 19 13 02 solid wastes from soil remediation other than those mentioned in 19 13 01 19 13 04 sludges from soil remediation other than those mentioned in 19 13 03
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 7 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Waste code Description 20 MUNICIPAL WASTES (HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND SIMILAR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL WASTES) INCLUDING SEPARATELY COLLECTED FRACTIONS 20 01 separately collected fractions 20 01 02 clean glass only 20 02 garden and park wastes 20 02 02 soil and stones
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 8 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Site Management
Environmental Management System
6.1. Brinklow Quarry Limited operate the permitted activities under an EMS.
6.2. A hard copy of the EMS is kept on Site at all times.
6.3. The EMS folder includes:
x A copy of the Environmental Permit. x Risk Assessments. x Procedures for waste acceptance. x Plans of the site. x Accident and incident procedures. x Duty of Care Records.
Technically Competent Management
6.4. A copy of the Original WAMITAB Certificate and most recent continuing competence certificate for Paul Taylor is provided in Appendix 4 Evidence of Technically Competent Management. Paul Taylor is the Technically Competent Manager for the Site.
6.5. Paul Taylor acts as a Technically Competent Manager for the following other sites/permits:
Permit number Site Address Postcode EPR/GB3307GT Relief Road, Broughton Astley, Leicestershire LE9 6SN EPR/RP3095CR Butlers Leap, Rugby, Warwickshire CV21 3RQ EPR/KP3898CH 44 Arches Lane, Rugby, Warwickshire CV21 1BG EPR/RP3096EQ Cwikskip, Butlers Leap, Rugby, Warwickshire CV21 3UY EPR/KP3598CM Templar Avenue, Coventry, Warwickshire CV4 9AP Unit 1, Ashford Industrial Centre, Brunswick Road, Cobbs Wood, EPR/WP3092ED TN23 1EL Ashford, Kent EPR/HB3232AR Bluebell Copse, Hook Mill Lane, Windlesham, Surrey GU18 5SR
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 9 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Condition of the Site and environmental risk
Site Condition
7.1. Part 1 of a Site Condition Report has been produced for the extension area of the Site. A copy of this Site Condition Report is included as Appendix 5, Site Condition Report Part 1.
Environmental Risk
7.2. An Environmental Risk Assessment has been completed and is included as Appendix 6, Environmental Risk Assessment.
7.3. This Environmental Risk Assessment considers the risks associated with the operations carried out on the Site.
7.4. The Environmental Risk Assessment considers the potential impacts of the proposed waste operations with regard to the local population, watercourses and protected sites.
7.5. A Hydrogeological Risk Assessment has been produced by Hafren Water Limited to assess the risk to groundwater from the proposed recovery operations. The Hydrogeological Risk Assessment is included as Appendix 7, Hydrogeological Risk Assessment, ref. 2812/HRA.
Dust Management Plan
7.6. Due to the location of sensitive receptors including residential dwellings within 500m of the Site boundary, a Dust Management Plan has been completed for the waste recovery operations at the Site.
7.7. The Dust Management Plan lists a number of mitigation measures that will be implemented on the Site to mitigate dust emissions from the Site boundary.
7.8. The Dust Management Plan is included as Appendix 8 of this Permit Application Report.
Waste Acceptance Procedures
7.9. The Waste Acceptance Procedures for the recovery operations at the Site have been provided as part of this Environmental Permit Variation Application, see Appendix 9 Waste Acceptance Procedures.
7.10. The Waste Acceptance Procedures will ensure that only suitable wastes will be accepted onto the Site for the recovery operations.
7.11 7KH:DVWH$FFHSWDQFH3URFHGXUHVZLOOIRUPSDUWRIWKH6LWH¶V(06
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 10 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Application Forms
Part A
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Form EPA: Application for an environmental permit – Part A about you Application for an environmental permit Part A – About you
You will need to fill in this part A if you are applying for a new It will take less than one hour to fill in this part of the permit, applying to change an existing permit or surrender application form. your permit, or want to transfer an existing permit to yourself. Where you see the term ‘document reference’ on the form, give Please check that this is the latest version of the form the document references and send the documents with the available from our website. application form when you’ve completed it. Please read through this form and the guidance notes that Contents came with it. 1 About you The form can be: 2 Applications from an individual 1) saved onto a computer and then filled in. Please note 3 Applications from an organisation of individuals or charity that the form follows a logic that means questions will 4 Applications from public bodies open or stay closed depending on a previous answer. So 5 Applications from companies or corporate bodies you may not be able to enter text in some boxes. 6 Your address 7 Contact details 2) printed off and filled in by hand. Please write clearly in 8 How to contact us the answer spaces. 9 Where to send your application Note: if you believe including information on a public register Appendix 1 – Date of birth information for installation and would not be in the interests of national security you must waste activities (applications for a new permit or transferring a enclose a letter telling us that you have told the Secretary of permit) only State. We will not include the information in the public register unless directed otherwise.
1 About you Are you applying as an individual, an organisation of individuals (for example, a partnership), a company (this includes Limited Liability Partnerships) or a public body?
An individual F Now go to section 2 and if you are applying for a new permit or transferring a permit for an installation or waste activity please also fill in Appendix 1 An organisation of individuals (for example, a partnership) F Now go to section 3 and if you are applying for a new permit or transferring a permit for an installation or waste activity please also fill in Appendix 1 A public body F Now go to section 4
A registered company or other corporate body ✔F Now go to section 5 and if you are applying for a new permit or transferring a permit for an installation or waste activity please also fill in Appendix 1
2 Applications from an individual 2a Please give us the following details Name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) First name Last name Now go to section 6
3 Applications from an organisation of individuals or charity 3a Type of organisation For example, a charity, a partnership, a group of individuals or a club
EPA Version 13, January 2020 page 1 of 7 Form EPA: Application for an environmental permit – Part A about you
3 Applications from an organisation of individuals, continued 3b Details of the organisation or charity If you are an organisation of individuals, please give the details of the main representative below. If relevant, provide details of other members (please include their title Mr, Mrs and so on) on a separate sheet and tell us the document reference you have given this sheet Contact name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) First name Last name Now go to question 3c or section 6 3c Details of charity Full name of charity This should be the full name of the legal entity not any trading name. 3d Company registration number If you are registered with Companies House please tell us your registration number 3e Charity Commission number If you are registered with the Charity Commission please tell us your registration number Now go to section 6
4 Applications from public bodies 4a Type of public body For example, NHS trust, local authority, English county council 4b Name of the public body 4c Please give us the following details of the executive An officer of the public body authorised to sign on your behalf Name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) First name Last name Position Now go to section 6
5 Applications from companies or corporate bodies 5a Name of the company Brinklow Quarry
5b Company registration number 06765411 Date of registration (DD/MM/YYYY) 04/12/2008 If you are applying as a corporate organisation that is not a limited company, please provide evidence of your status and tell us below the reference you have given the document containing this evidence. Document reference
EPA Version 13, January 2020 page 2 of 7 Form EPA: Application for an environmental permit – Part A about you
5 Applications from companies or corporate bodies, continued 5c Please give details of the directors If relevant, provide details of other directors and company secretary, if there is one, on a separate sheet and tell us the reference you have given this sheet. Document reference Permit Application Report Section 3 Details of company secretary (if relevant) and director/s Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Mr First name Anthony Last name Aston
Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Mr First name Dale Last name Aston Now go to section 6
6 Your address 6a Your main (registered office) address For companies this is the address on record at Companies House. Contact name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Mr First name Anthony Last name Aston Address 4 Bank Court Weldon Road Loughborough Leicestershire Postcode LE11 5RF Contact numbers, including the area code Phone 02476 454 293 Fax Mobile Email For an organisation of individuals every partner needs to give us their details, including their title Mr, Mrs and so on. So, if necessary, continue on a separate sheet and tell us below the reference you have given the sheet. Document reference 6b Main UK business address (if different from above) Contact name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Mr First name Anthony Last name Aston Address Brinklow Quarry Coventry Road Brinklow Warwickshire Postcode CV23 0NJ
EPA Version 13, January 2020 page 3 of 7 Form EPA: Application for an environmental permit – Part A about you
6 Your address, continued Contact numbers, including the area code Phone 02476 454 293 Fax Mobile Email Now go to section 7
7 Contact details 7a Who can we contact about your application? It will help us if there is someone we can contact if we have any questions about your application. The person you name should have the authority to act on your behalf. Please add a second contact on a separate sheet if this person is not always available. Document reference of this separate sheet This can be someone acting as a consultant or an ‘agent’ for you. Contact name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Ms First name Tracey Last name Westbury Address Westbury Environmental Limited Agriculture House Southwater Way Telford, Shropshire Postcode TF3 4NR Contact numbers, including the area code Phone 01952 879705 Fax Mobile 07762 580839 Email [email protected] 7b Who can we contact about your operation (if different from question 7a)? Contact name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Mr First name Anthony Last name Aston Address Brinklow Quarry Coventry Road Brinklow Warwickshire Postcode CV23 0NJ Contact numbers, including the area code Phone 02476 454 293 Fax Mobile Email
EPA Version 13, January 2020 page 4 of 7 Form EPA: Application for an environmental permit – Part A about you
7 Contact details, continued 7c Who can we contact about your billing or invoice? Note: Please provide the name and address that all invoices should be sent to for your subsistence fees.
As in question 7a F As in question 7b ✔F Please give details below if different from question 7a or 7b. Contact name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) First name Last name Address
Postcode Contact numbers, including the area code Phone Fax Mobile Email
8 How to contact us If you need help filling in this form, please contact the person who sent it to you or contact us as shown below. General enquiries: 03708 506 506 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Textphone: 03702 422 549 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Email: HQTXLULHV#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN Website: ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\ If you are happy with our service, please tell us. It helps us to identify good practice and encourages our staff. If you’re not happy with our service, please tell us how we can improve it. More information on how to do this is available at: ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\DERXWFRPSODLQWVSURFHGXUH. Please tell us if you need information in a different language or format (for example, in large print) so we can keep in touch with you more easily.
9 Where to send your application For how many copies to send see the guidance note on part A. For water discharges by email to 36&:DWHU4XDOLW\#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN For waste and installations by email to 36&#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN For flood risk activity permits send 1 copy only to enquiries@environmentagency.gov.uk or to the local Environment Agency office for where the work is proposed to be carried out. Or Permitting Support Centre 4XDGUDQW 99 Parkway Avenue Parkway Business Park Sheffield S9 4WF
EPA Version 13, January 2020 page 5 of 7 Form EPA: Application for an environmental permit – Part A about you
Feedback (You don’t have to answer this part of the form, but it will help us improve our forms if you do.) We want to make our forms easy to fill in and our guidance notes easy to understand. Please use the space below to give us any comments you may have about this form or the guidance notes that came with it.
How long did it take you to fill in this form? We will use your feedback to improve our forms and guidance notes, and to tell the Government how regulations could be made simpler. Would you like a reply to your feedback?
Yes please F
No thank you F
For Environment Agency use only Date received (DD/MM/YYYY) Payment received? No F Our reference number Yes F Amount received £
EPA Version 13, January 2020 page 6 of 7 Form EPA: Application for an environmental permit – Part A about you
Appendix 1 – Date of birth information for installation and waste activities (applications for a new permit or transferring a permit) only Date of birth information in this appendix will not be put onto our Public Register Are you applying as an individual, an organisation of individuals (for example, a partnership) or a company (this includes Limited Liability Partnerships)?
An individual F Now go to 2
An organisation of individuals (for example, a partnership) F Now go to 3 A registered company or other corporate body ✔F Now go to 4 2 Applications from an individual Please give us the following details Name Date of birth (DD/MM/YY) 3 Applications from an organisation of individuals or charity Details of the organisation or charity If you are an organisation of individuals, please give the date of birth details of the main representative below. If relevant, provide details of other members on a separate sheet and tell us the document reference you have given this sheet. Name Date of birth (DD/MM/YY) Document reference 4 Applications from companies or corporate bodies Name of the company Brinklow Quarry Limited Please give the date of birth details for all directors and company secretary if there is one. If relevant, provide those details of other directors on a separate sheet and tell us the document reference you have given this sheet. Details of company secretary (if relevant) and director/s Name Anthony Mark Aston Date of birth (DD/MM/YY) Name Dale William Aston Date of birth (DD/MM/YY) Name Jessie May Aston Date of birth (DD/MM/YY) Document reference
EPA Version 13, January 2020 page 7 of 7 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Application Forms
Part C2
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
Application for an environmental permit Part C2 – General – varying a bespoke permit
Fill in this part of the form, together with part A and the The form can be: relevant parts of C3 to C7 and part F1 or F2, if you are 1) saved onto a computer and then filled in. Please note that applying to vary (change) the conditions or any other part of the form follows a logic that means questions will open or the permit. Please check that this is the latest version of the stay closed depending on a previous answer. So you may form available from our website. not be able to enter text in some boxes. You only need to give us details in this application for the 2) printed off and filled in by hand. Please write clearly in the parts of the permit that will be affected (for example, if you answer spaces. are adding a new facility or changing existing ones). It will take less than two hours to fill in this part of the Waste operation changing to installation or vice versa? application form. If your changes mean that a waste operation becomes an Contents installation (or vice versa) you also need to fill in either part C3 (waste to installation) or part C4 (installation to 1 About the permit waste). 2 About your proposed changes 3 Your ability as an operator You do not need to resend any information from your original 4 Consultation permit application if it is not affected by your proposed 5 Supporting information changes. 6 Environmental risk assessment Please read through this form and the guidance notes that 7 How to contact us came with it. Appendix 1 – Low impact installation checklist Appendix 2 – Date of birth information for Relevant offences and/or Technical ability questions only
1 About the permit Note: If you are applying to convert your existing permit to a standard permit or add a standard facility you need to fill out form C1. 1a Discussions before your application If you have had discussions with us before your application, give us the permit reference or details on a separate sheet. Tell us below the reference you have given this extra sheet. Permit or document reference EPR/GB3502FS/V002 1b Permit number What is the permit number that this application relates to? EPR/GB3502FS 1c Site details What is the name, address and postcode of the site? Site name Brinklow Quarry Address Brinklow Quarry Coventry Road Brinklow Warwickshire Postcode CV23 0NJ
2 About your proposed changes 2a Type of variation What type of variation are you applying for? Minor technical F Normal variation ✔F Substantial F
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 1 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
2 About your proposed changes, continued 2b Changes or additions to existing activities Please give us brief details in the box below. More detailed information can be given in Table 1 below.
The proposed changes to the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS: - including the Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan - increasing the volume of waste permitted under the Environmental Permit to 4,489,507m3 - extending the permit boundary to what is shown on the Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001 v2
It is also required to consolidate this Environmental Permit with the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502GL.
Fill in Table 1 with details of all the proposed changes to current activities. In the final column of the table, give us the document reference for the proposed changes and send them to us with your filled in application form. Fill in a separate table for each activity you are applying to vary or add. Use a separate sheet if you have a long list and send it to us with your application form. Tell us below the reference you have given this document. Document reference You only need to fill in one table for your mining waste operations. 2c Consolidating (combining) or updating existing permits If your proposed change is to modernise (update) your permit, now answer 2c1; otherwise go to 2d. If your proposed change is to consolidate (combine) a number of permits, now answer 2c2; otherwise go to 2d. Note: In both cases we may require additional information from you about, for example, your management system. Therefore we would always advise you to talk to us before you submit any application to modernise or consolidate permits. 2c1 Do you want to have a modern style permit? No F Yes ✔F 2c2 Identify all the permits you want to consolidate (combine) by listing the permit numbers in Table 2 below Table 2 – Permit numbers EPR/GB3502FS EPR/GB3502GL
2d Treating batteries 2d1 Are you proposing to treat batteries? No ✔F Yes F Tell us how you will do this and send us a copy of your explanation and tell us below the reference you have given this explanation Document reference for the explanation 2e Ship recycling 2e1 Is your activity covered by the Ship Recycling Regulations 2015? (See the guidance notes on part C2.) No ✔F Yes F Tell us how you will do this. Please send us a copy of your explanation and your facility recycling plan, and tell us below the reference numbers you have given these documents Document reference for the explanation Document reference for the facility recycling plan 2e2 Is this a renewal of an existing authorisation covered by the Ship Recycling Regulations 2015? No ✔F Yes F Tell us the expiry date of your existing authorisation (DD/MM/YYYY)
EPC2 Version 13, July 2019 page 2 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
2 About your proposed changes, continued Table 1 – Changes to existing activities Fill in Table 1 with details of all the proposed changes to current activities. In the final column of the table, give us the document reference for the proposed changes and send them to us with your filled in application form. Name Installation schedule Description of the Description of waste Description of the Description of water Description of Proposed changes 1 references installation activity operation mining waste discharge activity groundwater activity document reference operations i.e. name of installation, waste operation, mining waste operation, water discharge activity or groundwater activity Example – effluent Example – treated unique name sewage effluent If you do not have enough room, go to the line below or send a separate document and give us the document reference here
Brinklow Quarry Deposit for recovery Permit Application
Report - Section 4
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 3 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
2 About your proposed changes, continued 2f Low impact installations (installations only) 2f1 Will any changes mean that any of the regulated facilities will become low impact installations? No F Now go to section 3 Yes F If yes, tell us how you meet the conditions for a low impact installation (see the guidance notes on part C2 – Appendix 1) Document reference Tick the box to confirm you have filled in the low impact installation checklist in appendix 1 for each regulated facility F 3 Your ability as an operator If you are applying to add waste installations or waste operations to a permit that has not previously had them, you need to fill in all of section 3. If you are applying to consolidate (combine) two or more permits or have an updated permit you must fill in question 3d. This section does not apply for applications to surrender a permit. 3a Relevant offences Installations and waste operations only (see the guidance notes on part C2). 3a1 Have you, or any other relevant person, been convicted of any relevant offence? No ✔F Now go to question 3b Yes F Please give details below Name of the relevant person Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) First name Last name Position held at the time of the offence Name of the court where the case was dealt with Date of the conviction (DD/MM/YY) Offence and penalty set Date any appeal against the conviction will be heard (DD/MM/YYYY) If necessary, use a separate sheet to give us details of other relevant offences and tell us below the reference number you have given the extra sheet. Document reference Now go to question 3b Please also complete the details in Appendix 2. 3b Technical ability Specified waste management activities and waste operations only (see the guidance notes on part C1). Please indicate which of the two schemes you are using to demonstrate you are technically competent to operate your facility and the evidence you have enclosed to demonstrate this. ESA/EU skills I have enclosed a copy of the current Competence Management System certificate F CIWM/WAMITAB scheme Please select one of the following: x I have enclosed a copy of:
о the relevant qualification certificate/s ✔F or о evidence of deemed competence F or EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 4 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
3 Your ability as an operator, continued
о Environment Agency assessment F or о evidence of nominated manager status under the transitional provisions for previously exempt activities F DQGLIGHHPHGFRPSHWHQWRU$JHQF\DVVHVVHG, or if there is evidence of a nominated manager, or if the original qualification is over two years old: I have enclosed a copy of the relevant current continuing competence certificate/s ✔F For each technically competent manager please give the following information. If necessary, use a separate sheet to give us these details and tell us below the document reference you have given the extra sheet. Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Mr First name Paul Last name Taylor Date of birth (DD/MM/YY) Phone Mobile 07763 823281 Email [email protected] Please provide the environmental permit number/s and site address for all other waste activities that the proposed technically competent manager provides technical competence for, including permits held by other operators. Continue on a separate sheet as required. Permit number Site address Postcode
See Permit Application Report - Section 6 Site Management
Document reference Permit Application Report - Section 6 Site Management Now go to question 3c Please also complete the details in Appendix 2. 3c Finances Installations, waste operations and mining waste operations only (see the guidance notes on part C2). Please note that if you knowingly or carelessly make a statement that is false or misleading to help you get an environmental permit (for yourself or anyone else), you may be committing an offence under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016. Do you or any relevant person or a company in which you were a relevant person have current or past bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings against you? No ✔F Yes F Please give dHWDLOVEHORZLQFOXGLQJWKHUHTXLUHGVHWXSFRVWV LQFOXGLQJLQIUDVWUXFWXUH PDLQWHQDQFHDQGFOHDQXSFRVWVIRU the proposed facility against which a credit check may be assessed
We may want to contact a credit reference agency for a report about your business’s finances.
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 5 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
3 Your ability as an operator, continued Landfill, Category A mining waste facilities and mining waste facilities for hazardous waste only How do you plan to make financial provision (to operate a landfill or a mining waste facility you need to show us that you are financially capable of meeting the obligations of closure and aftercare)? Bonds F Escrow account F Trust fund F Lump sum F Other F Provide a plan of your estimated expenditure on each phase of the landfill or mining waste facility. Document plan reference Now go to question 3d 3d Management systems You must have an effective, written management system in place that identifies and reduces the risk of pollution. You may show this by using a certified scheme or your own system. Your permit requires you (as the operator) to ensure that you manage and operate your activities in accordance with a written management system. You need to be able to explain what happens at each site and which parts of the overall management system apply. For example, at some sites you may need to show you are carrying out additional measures to prevent pollution because they are nearer to sensitive locations than others. You can find guidance on management systems on our website at ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\. Tick this box to confirm that you have read the guidance and that your management system will meet our requirements F What management system will you provide for your regulated facility? EC EcoManagement and Audit Scheme (EMAS) F EMAS Easy F ISO 14001 F BS 8555 (Phases 1–5) F Acorn F Green dragon F Own management system ✔F Please make sure you send us a summary of your management system with your application. Document reference/s Permit Application Report - Section 6
4 Consultation Fill in 4a to 4c for installations and waste operations and 4d for installations only. Could the waste operation or installation involve releasing any substance into any of the following? 4a A sewer managed by a sewerage undertaker? No ✔F Yes F Please name the sewerage undertaker 4b A harbour managed by a harbour authority? No ✔F Yes F Please name the harbour authority 4c Directly into relevant territorial waters or coastal waters within the sea fisheries district of a local fisheries committee? No ✔F Yes F Please name the fisheries committee
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 6 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
4 Consultation, continued 4d Is the installation on a site for which: 4d1 a nuclear site licence is needed under section 1 of the Nuclear Installations Act 1965? No F Yes F 4d2 a policy document for preventing major accidents is needed under regulation 5 of the Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 2015, or a safety report is needed under regulation 7 of those Regulations? No F Yes F
5 Supporting information 5a Provide a plan or plans for the site See the guidance notes on part C2 for what needs to be marked on the plan. Clearly mark the site boundary or discharge point, or both. Also include site drainage plans, site layout plans, and plant design drawings/process flow diagrams (as required). (See the guidance notes on part C2.) Document reference/s of the plans Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001 5b Do any of the variations you plan to make need extra land to be included in the permit? No F Yes ✔F Please provide a site report for the extra land Document report reference/s Appendix 5 Site Condition Report Part 1 5c Provide a nontechnical summary of your application Document reference of the summary Permit Application Report - Section 4 5d Risk of fire from sites storing combustible waste Are you applying for an activity that includes the storage of combustible wastes? (This applies to all activities excluding standalone water and groundwater discharges.) No ✔F Go to question 5f Yes F Go to question 5e 5e Will your variation increase the risk of a fire occurring or increase the environmental risk if a fire occurs? See the guidance notes on part C2. No F Yes F Provide a fire prevention plan. You need to highlight any changes you have made since your preapplication discussions Document reference of the plan 5f Adding an installation If you are applying to add an installation, tick the box to confirm that you have sent in a baseline report and provide a reference F Document reference of the report
6 Environmental risk assessment If you need one, see the guidance notes on part C2. Provide an assessment of any additional risks the proposed changes or additions to your regulated facilities poses to the environment as part of your application to vary this permit. The risk assessment must follow the methodology set out in ‘Risk assessments for your environmental permit’ at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/riskDVVHVVPHQWVIRU\RXUHQYLURQPHQWDOSHUPLW or an equivalent method. Document reference for the assessment Appendix 6 Environmental Risk Assessment
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 7 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
7 How to contact us If you need help filling in this form, please contact the person who sent it to you or contact us as shown below. General enquiries: 03708 506 506 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Textphone: 03702 422 549 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Email: HQTXLULHV#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN Website: ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\ If you are happy with our service, please tell us. It helps us to identify good practice and encourages our staff. If you’re not happy with our service, please tell us how we can improve it. Please tell us if you need information in a different language or format (for example, in large print) so we can keep in touch with you more easily. Feedback (You don’t have to answer this part of the form, but it will help us improve our forms if you do.) We want to make our forms easy to fill in and our guidance notes easy to understand. Please use the space below to give us any comments you may have about this form or the guidance notes that came with it.
How long did it take you to fill in this form? We will use your feedback to improve our forms and guidance notes, and to tell the Government how regulations could be made simpler. Would you like a reply to your feedback? Yes please F
No thank you F
For Environment Agency use only Date received (DD/MM/YYYY) Payment received? No F Our reference number Yes F Amount received £
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 8 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
Plain English Campaign’s Crystal Mark does not apply to appendix 1.
Appendix 1 – Low impact installation checklist
Installation reference Condition Response Do you meet this?
A – Management techniques Provide references to show how your application meets A Yes F References No F
B – Aqueous waste Effluent created m3/day Yes F No F C – Abatement systems Provide references to show how your application meets C Yes F References No F
D – Groundwater Do you plan to release any hazardous substances or Yes F Yes F nonhazardous pollutants into the ground? No F No F E – Producing waste Hazardous waste Tonnes per year Yes F Nonhazardous waste Tonnes per year No F F – Using energy Peak energy consumption MW Yes F No F G – Preventing accidents Do you have appropriate measures to prevent spills and Yes F Yes F major releases of liquids? (See ‘How to comply’.) No F No F Provide references to show how your application meets G References
H – Noise Provide references to show how your application meets H Yes F References No F
I – Emissions of polluting Provide references to show how your application meets I Yes F substances References No F
J – Odours Provide references to show how your application meets J Yes F References No F
K – History of keeping to the Say here whether you have been involved in any Yes F regulations enforcement action as described in Compliance History No F Appendix 1 explanatory notes
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 9 of 10 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C2 general – varying a bespoke permit
Appendix 2 – Date of birth information for Relevant offences and/or Technical ability questions only Date of birth information in this appendix will not be put onto our Public Register Have you filled in the Relevant Offences question? Yes F No ✔F Have you filled in the Technical ability question? Yes F No ✔F 2 Relevant Offences date of birth information Please give us the following details Name Date of birth (DD/MM/YY) 3 Technical ability date of birth information Name Date of birth (DD/MM/YY)
EPC2 Version 13, +BOVBSZ page 10 of 10 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020
Application Forms
Part C4
Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit
Application for an environmental permit Part C4 – Varying a bespoke waste operation permit
Fill in this part of the form, together with parts A, C2 and F1, if It will take less than three hours to fill in this part of the you are applying to vary (change) the conditions or any other application form. part of the permit. Please check that this is the latest version Contents of the form available from our website. 1 What waste operations are you applying to vary? You only need to give us details in this application for the 2 Emissions to air, water and land parts of the permit that will be affected (for example, if you 3 Operating techniques are adding a new facility or making changes to existing ones). 4 Monitoring You do not need to resend any information from your original 5 How to contact us permit application if it is not affected by your proposed Appendix 1 – Specific questions for clinical transfer and changes. treatment waste operations Appendix 2 – Specific questions for waste facilities that Please read through this form and the guidance notes that accept hazardous waste came with it. Appendix 3 – Specific questions for the recovery to land for The form can be: agricultural benefit of compost like outputs from the treatment of mixed municipal solid wastes 1) saved onto a computer and then filled in. Please note Appendix 4 – Specific questions for inert waste landfill and that the form follows a logic that means questions will deposit for recovery operations open or stay closed depending on a previous answer. So you may not be able to enter text in some boxes. 2) printed off and filled in by hand. Please write clearly in the answer spaces.
1 What waste operations are you applying to vary? Fill in Table 1a with details of what you are applying to vary. Fill in a separate table for each waste operation you are applying to vary. Use a separate sheet if you have a long list and send it to us with your application form. Tell us below the reference you have given this document. Document reference Types of waste accepted For each line in Table 1a, fill in a separate document to list those wastes you will accept on the site for that operation, giving the List of Wastes catalogue code (search for ‘Technical guidance on how to assess and classify waste’ at ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\). If you need to exclude waste from your activity or facility by restricting the description, quantity, physical nature, hazardous properties, composition or characteristic of the waste, include these in the document. Send it to us with your application form.
EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 1 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit
1 What waste operations are you applying to vary?, continued Table 1a – Waste operations which do not form part of an installation Name of the waste operation Description of the waste operation Annex I (D codes) and Annex II (R codes) Hazardous waste treatment Nonhazardous waste and descriptions capacity (if this applies) treatment capacity (if this (See note 1) applies) (See note 1) Add extra rows if you need them. If you Use the description from the guidance. do not have enough room, go to the Include any extra detail that you think line below or send a separate would help to accurately describe what document and give us the document you want to do reference here
Brinklow Quarry Deposit for recovery R3: Storage of waste pending any of the operations numbered R5 and R10 4,489,507.00
R5: Recycling or reclamation of other inorganic materials
R10: Land treatment resulting in benefit to agriculture or ecological improvement
Treatment of waste to produce soil (SR No proposed change to codes, storage 2010 No.12) capacity or throughput
For all waste operations Total storage capacity (see note 2) New total if varying to increase 300,000.00 Annual throughput (tonnes each year) New total if varying to increase 500,000.00 Notes 1 By ‘capacity’, we mean the total landfill capacity (cubic metres) for landfills, the total treatment capacity (tonnes each day) for waste treatment and the total storage capacity (tonnes) for waste storage operations. 2 By ‘total storage capacity’, we mean the maximum amount of waste in tonnes you store on the site at any one time. EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 2 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit
1 What waste operations are you applying to vary?, continued Please provide the document reference. You can use Table 1b as a template. If you want to accept any waste with a code ending in 99, you must provide more information and a full description in the document. Document reference Permit Application Report - Section 5 List of Waste Codes Table 1b – Template example – types of waste accepted and restrictions Waste code Description of waste Example Example 02 01 08* Agrochemical waste containing hazardous substances 06 01 02* Hydrochloric acid
1c Deposit for recovery purposes (see the guidance notes on part C4) Are you applying for a waste recovery activity involving the permanent deposit on waste on land for construction or land reclamation restoration or improvement? No F Go to section 2 Yes ✔F Have we advised you during preapplication discussions that we believe the activity is waste recovery? No F Go to section 2 Yes ✔F Have there been any changes to your proposal since the discussions? No ✔F Yes F Please send us a copy of your waste recovery plan that complies with our guidance at KWWSV ZZZJRYXNJXLGDQFHZDVWHUHFRYHU\SODQVDQGSHUPLWV 2 Emissions to air, water and land Fill in Table 2 below with details of the emissions that result from the operating techniques at each of your waste operations. Fill in one table for each waste facility. Table 2 – Emissions Name of the waste operation Brinklow Quarry Point source emissions to air Emission point reference and location Source Parameter Quantity Unit N/A EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 3 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit 2 Emissions to air, water and land, continued Point source emissions to water (other than sewers) Emission point reference and location Source Parameter Quantity Unit N/A Point source emissions to sewers, effluent treatment plants or other transfers off site Emission point reference and location Source Parameter Quantity Unit N/A Point source emissions to land Emission point reference and location Source Parameter Quantity Unit N/A Supporting information 3 Operating techniques 3a Technical standards Fill in Table 3a for each waste operation you refer to in Table 1a above and list the ‘appropriate measures’ you are planning to use. If you are using the standards set out in the relevant technical guidance(s) (TGN) there is QRQHHGWRMXVWLI\XVLQJWKHP within your documents in Table 3a. EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 4 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit 3 Operating techniques, continued Table 3a – Technical standards Fill in a separate table for each waste operation. Waste operation Description of the waste operation Appropriate measure (TGN reference) Document reference (if appropriate) Deposit for recovery Waste Recovery Plans and Permits gov.uk Develop a management system: environmental permits gov.uk In all cases, describe the type of facility or operation you are applying for and, if appropriate, use location plans, process flow diagrams or block diagrams to help describe the operation and process. Give the document references you use for each plan, diagram and description. Document reference Permit Application Report 3b General requirements Fill in a separate table for each waste operation. Table 3b – General requirements Name of the waste operation Brinklow Quarry If the TGN or your risk assessment shows that emissions of substances not controlled Document reference or references by emission limits are an important issue, send us your plan for managing them Appendix 8 Dust Management Plan(recovery) If the TGN or your risk assessment shows that odours are an important issue, send us Document reference or references your odour management plan. N/A If your activity type is listed in the guidance document ‘Control and monitor emissions for your environmental permit’ as needing an odour management plan, or your risk assessment shows that odours are an important issue, you need to send us your odour management plan. If the TGN or your risk assessment shows that noise or vibration are important Document reference or references issues, send us your noise or vibration management plan (or both) N/A We may need to ask for management plans or risk assessments in other circumstances based on our regulatory experience. If you are unsure as to whether you need to submit a management plan with your application, please discuss this with the Environment Agency prior to submission. Search for ‘Risk assessment for your environmental permit’ at ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\. 3c Information for specific sectors For some of the sectors, we need more information to be able to set appropriate conditions in the permit. This is as well as the information you may provide in sections 5, 6 and 7. For those activities listed in Table 3c, you must answer the questions in the related document. Table 3c – Questions for specific sectors Sector Appendix Clinical waste See the questions in appendix 1 Disposing of and recovering hazardous waste See the questions in appendix 2 Recovery to land for agricultural benefit of compost like outputs See the questions in appendix 3 from the treatment of mixed municipal solid wastes Inert landfill and deposit of waste on land for construction, land See the questions in appendix 4 reclamation, restoration or improvement EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 5 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit General information 4 Monitoring 4a Describe the measures you use for monitoring emissions by referring to each emission point in Table 2 above You should also describe any environmental monitoring. Tell us: x how often you use these measures x the methods you use x the procedures you follow to assess the measures Document reference N/A 4b Point source emissions to air only Provide an assessment of the sampling locations used to measure point source emissions to air. The assessment must use M1 (search for ‘M1 sampling requirements for stack emission monitoring’ at ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDgency). Document reference of the assessment N/A 5 How to contact us If you need help filling in this form, please contact the person who sent it to you or contact us as shown below. General enquiries: 03708 506 506 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Textphone: 03702 422 549 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Email: HQTXLULHV#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN Website: ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\ If you are happy with our service, please tell us. It helps us to identify good practice and encourages our staff. If you’re not happy with our service, please tell us how we can improve it. Please tell us if you need information in a different language or format (for example, in large print) so we can keep in touch with you more easily. Feedback (You don’t have to answer this part of the form, but it will help us improve our forms if you do.) We want to make our forms easy to fill in and our guidance notes easy to understand. Please use the space below to give us any comments you may have about this form or the guidance notes that came with it. How long did it take you to fill in this form? We will use your feedback to improve our forms and guidance notes, and to tell the Government how regulations could be made simpler. Would you like a reply to your feedback? Yes please F No thank you F For Environment Agency use only Date received (DD/MM/YYYY) Payment received? No F Our reference number Yes F Amount received £ EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 6 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit Plain English Campaign’s Crystal Mark does not apply to appendices 1 to 4. Appendix 1 – Specific questions for clinical transfer and treatment waste operations These questions apply to sites that store and/or treat clinical wastes listed in subtables 2.1a to 2.1b, EPR 5.07 ‘Technical guidance for managing clinical waste’. If other hazardous waste is received you should additionally refer to Appendix 2. 1 Are you proposing to either x accept additional waste for thermal or chemical disinfection not included in Table 2.1a of EPR 5.07? x treat a waste in Table 2.1a or Table 2c other than by the specified methods? No F Yes F Please pURYLGHMXVWLILFDWLRQIRUWKHWUHDWPHQWRIWKLVZDVWH Document reference 2 Provide a summary description of the treatment activities carried out on the waste facility which cover the standards set out in the relevant technical guidance note(s) (TGN) Document reference 3 Provide layout plans detailing the location of: x waste storage (including areas and structures for separately storing wastes which may be dangerous to store together) x each treatment plant x main plant items Also provide process flow diagrams for each treatment plant and capacity of waste storage areas and structures Document reference Appendix 2 – Specific questions for waste facilities that accept hazardous waste 1 Provide a summary description of the treatment activities carried out on the waste facility which cover the standards set out in the relevant technical guidance note(s) (TGN) Document reference 2 Provide layout plans detailing the location of: x waste storage (including areas and structures for separately storing wastes which may be dangerous to store together) x each treatment plant x main plant items Also provide process flow diagrams for each treatment plant and capacity of waste storage areas and structures Document reference(s) Appendix 3 – Specific questions for the recovery to land for agricultural benefit of compost like outputs from the treatment of mixed municipal solid wastes 1 Please provide an accurate and reliable characterisation of your compost like outputs (CLO). This should be based on sampling and analysis of the CLO produced by the treatment process over a 12month period and in accordance with section 2 of TGN 6.15 Document reference 2 Please provide an agricultural benefit assessment for the use of your CLO. This should be based on section 2 of TGN 6.15 and should be signed and dated by an appropriate technical expert Document reference 3 Please provide a sitespecific risk assessment of risks to soil and food chain receptors. This should be based on Schedule 2 of TGN 6.15 and include a map with a green outline showing the boundary of the area being treated and include: x locations where the waste will be stored and spread x any spring, well or borehole used to supply water for domestic or food production purposes that is within 250 metres of the area being treated EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 7 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit Appendix 3 – Specific questions for the recovery to land for agricultural benefit of compost like outputs from the treatment of mixed municipal solid wastes, continued x any spring, well or borehole not being used for domestic or food production purposes that is within 50 metres of the area being treated x any European designated sites (candidate or Special Area of Conservation, proposed or Special Protections Area in England and Wales or Ramsar Site) or Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) which are within 500 metres of the place where waste is to be stored or spread x the location of public rights of way x any Groundwater Source Protection Zones x surface watercourses x any buildings or houses within 250 metres of the area being treated x land drains within the boundary Document reference 4 Are the technical standards and measures fully in line with those set out in section 3 of TGN 6.15? No F 3URYLGHMXVWLILFDWLRQIRUGHparture from TGN 6.15 and a copy of the proposed technical standards, measures or procedures Document reference Yes F Appendix 4 – Specific questions for inert waste landfill and deposit for recovery operations 1 Please provide your Environmental Setting and Site Design (ESSD) report Document reference Appendix 3 ESSD Note: You should use the Environment Agency template to help you develop an environmental setting and site design (ESSD) report. 2 Please provide your Waste Acceptance Procedures (including Waste Acceptance Criteria) Document reference 3 Have you provided a hydrogeological risk assessment (HRA) for the site? No F Please refer to the section of your ESSD that explains why this is unnecessary for your site Yes ✔F Document reference Appendix 7 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment 4 Have you completed an outline engineering plan for the site? No ✔F Please refer to the section of your ESSD that explains why this is unnecessary for your site Yes F Document reference 5 Have you provided a stability risk assessment (SRA) for your site? No ✔F Please refer to the section of your ESSD that explains why this is unnecessary for your site Yes F Document reference 6 Have you completed a monitoring plan for the site? No ✔F Please refer to the section of your ESSD that explains why this is unnecessary for your site Yes F Document reference 7 Have you completed a plan for closing the site and procedures for looking after the site once it has closed? No ✔F If no for deposit for recovery activities please refer to the section of your ESSD that explains why this is unnecessary for your site Yes F For inert waste landfill you must provide a closure plan Document reference Spreading waste to support plant growth 8a Does the activity involve the deposit of waste to create or treat a growing medium (R10 for land treatment)? No F Now go to question 9 Yes ✔F EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 8 of 9 Form EPC: Application for an environmental permit – Part C4 varying a bespoke waste operation permit Appendix 4 – Specific questions for inert waste landfill and deposit for recovery operations, continued 8b If you have answered ‘Yes’ to question 8a, can you meet both of the following criteria? x Waste types to be used for the R10 activity are top soils (EWC 17 05 04 or 20 02 02), peat (EWC 17 05 04 or 20 02 02) and/or soil from cleaning and washing beet (EWC 02 04 01) only, and x The depth of deposit for the R10 activity will not exceed the final 50cm No F Yes ✔F 8c If you have answered ‘No’ to question 8b, have you completed a benefit statement? No F Please explain why Document reference Yes F Note: Refer to our guidance when completing your statement (including EPR 8.01, section 6). EPC4 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 9 of 9 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Application Forms Part F1 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations Application for an environmental permit Part F1 – Charges and declarations Fill in this part for all applications for installations, waste It will take less than two hours to fill in this part of the operations, mining waste operations, water discharges, point application form. source groundwater discharges and groundwater discharges Contents onto land. Please check that this is the latest version of the form available from our website. 1 Working out charges 2Payment Please read through this form and the guidance notes that 3Privacy notice came with it. 4 Confidentiality and national security The form can be: 5Declaration 6 Application checklist 1) saved onto a computer and then filled in. Please note 7 How to contact us that the form follows a logic that means questions will 8 Where to send your application open or stay closed depending on a previous answer. So you may not be able to enter text in some boxes. 2) printed off and filled in by hand. Please write clearly in the answer spaces. Each individual who is applying for their name to appear on the permit must complete the declaration in section 5. You will have to print a separate copy of the declaration page for each additional individual to complete. 1 Working out charges You must fill in this section. You have to submit an application fee with your application. You can find out the charge by searching for ‘Environment Agency charging scheme and guidance: environmental permits’ at ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\. Please remember that the charges are revised on 1 April each year and that there is an annual subsistence charge to cover the costs we incur in the ongoing regulation of the permit. Table 1 – Type of application (fill number of activity being applied for in each column) Installation Waste Mining waste Medium Combustion Water Groundwater Plant (MCP)/Specified discharge/point spreading onto land Generator (SG) source discharge to groundwater Normal variation Table 2 – Charge type (A) Charge activity reference Charge activity description What are you applying to do? Amount E.g. new, minor variation, normal variation, substantial variation, surrender, low risk surrender, transfer e.g. 1.17.3 e.g. Sect 5.2 landfill for hazardous waste e.g. transfer e.g. £5,561 1.17.9 Deposit for recovery Normal variation £ 4,604.00 Total A £ 4,604.00 EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 1 of 8 Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations 1 Working out charges (you must fill in this section), continued Table 3 – Additional assessment charges (B) Part 1.19 Charges for plans and assessments Tick appropriate Reference Plan or assessment Charge 1.19.1 Waste recovery plan £1,231 F 1.19.2 Habitats assessment (except where the application activity is a flood risk activity) £779 ✔F 1.19.3 Fire prevention plan (except where the application activity is a farming £1,241 F installation) Pests management plan (except where the application activity is a farming 1.19.4 £1,241 F installation) 1.19.5 Emissions management plan (except where the application activity is a farming £1,241 ✔F installation) 1.19.6 Odour management plan (except where the application activity is a farming £1,246 F installation) 1.19.7 Noise and vibration management plan (except where the application activity is a £1,246 F farming installation) 1.19.8 Ammonia emissions risk assessment (intensive farming applications only) £620 F 1.19.9 Dust and bioaerosol management plan (intensive farming applications only) £620 F Advertising £500 F Total B £ 2,020.00 Total charges Total A plus total B £ 6,624.00 2 Payment Tick below to show how you have paid. Cheque F Postal order F Cash F Tick below to confirm you are enclosing cash with the application Credit or debit card F Electronic transfer (for example, BACS) ✔F Remittance number PSCAPPBRINK002 Date paid (DD/MM/YYYY) How to pay Paying by cheque, postal order or cash Cheque details Cheque made payable to Cheque number Amount £ You should make cheques or postal orders payable to ‘Environment Agency’ and make sure they have ‘A/c Payee’ written across them if it is not already printed on. Please write the name of your company and application reference number on the back of your cheque or postal order. We will not accept cheques with a future date on them. We do not recommend sending cash through the post. If you cannot avoid this, please use a recorded delivery postal service and enclose your application reference details. Please tick the box below to confirm you are enclosing cash. I have enclosed cash with my application F EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 2 of 8 Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations 2 Payment, continued Paying by credit or debit card If you are paying by credit or debit card we can call you. We will destroy your card details once we have processed your payment. We can accept payments by Visa, MasterCard or Maestro card only. Please call me to arrange payment by debit or debit card F Paying by electronic transfer BACS reference If you choose to pay by electronic transfer you will need to use the following information to make your payment. Company name Environment Agency Company address SSCL (Environment Agency), PO Box 797, Newport Gwent, NP10 8FZ Bank RBS/NatWest Address London Corporate Service Centre, CPB Services, 2nd Floor, 280 Bishopsgate, London EC2M 4RB Sort code Account number 10014411 Account name EA RECEIPTS Payment reference number PSCAPPXXXXXYYY You need to create your own reference number. It should begin with PSCAPP (to reflect that the application is for a permitted activity) and it should include the first five letters of the company name (replacing the X’s in the above reference number) and a unique numerical identifier (replacing the Y’s in the above reference number). The reference number that you supply will appear on our bank statements. You should also email your payment details and reference number to [email protected]. If you are making your payment from outside the United Kingdom, it must be in sterling. Our IBAN number is GB23NWK60708010014411 and our SWIFTBIC number is NWBKGB2L. If you do not quote your reference number, there may be a delay in processing your payment and application. Now read section 3 below 3 Privacy notice The Environment Agency runs the environmental permit application service. We are the data controller for this service. A data controller determines how and why personal information is processed. Our personal information charter explains: x your rights x what we do with your personal information We’re allowed to process your personal information because we have official authority as the environmental regulator. We need this information to carry out a task in the public interest that is set out in law. As the data controller, when you apply for an environmental permit, we have a legal obligation to process your personal data under the Environmental Permitting Regulations. The second lawful basis for processing your personal data is to comply with this legal obligation. We need your personal information to process your environmental permit application. If you do not give us this information we cannot issue a permit to you. After we’ve issued a permit to you, we use your personal information: x to check that you’re complying with your permit x during any potential enforcement action What personal information we collect If you’re the individual applicant, director or company secretary of a company applying or a technically competent manager we need your: x name x date of birth x address x email address If you’re the agent, consultant, employee responsible for the activity or the employee responsible for billing and invoicing we need your: x name x address x email address EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 3 of 8 Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations 3 Privacy notice, continued If you’re the applicant we need details of any: x convictions x bankruptcy We also collect any questions or feedback you leave, including your email address if you contact us. Your responsibility with other people’s personal information If you’ve included personal information about other people on your application, you must tell them. You must provide them with a copy of this privacy notice so that they know how their personal information will be used. What we do with your personal information We use your personal information to help us decide whether to issue you with a permit. The information (except dates of birth) is available online on our consultation website during the consultation period. This website is available to everyone so your information may be seen outside the European Economic Area. After consultation we put all the information (except dates of birth) you give us in your application on our public register. If you can demonstrate that any information you send us is commercially or industrially confidential, we’ll consider withholding that information from our public register. If you think that the information you’ll send us may be a threat to national security you must contact the Secretary Of State before you apply. You must still send us that information with your application. We will not include this information on our public register unless the Secretary of State decides it can be included. See the environmental permitting guidance for guidance on national security. We may use your email address to contact you for user research to improve our service. You don’t have to take part in the research. Where your personal information is processed and stored We store and process your personal information on servers in the UK. We will not host your personal information outside the European Economic Area. We do not use your personal information to make an automated decision or for automated profiling. How long we keep your personal information We keep your personal information while your permit is in use and for 7 years after you surrender your permit. If the permit is for a landfill site, we keep the data for 10 years after surrender. Removing personal information from the public register We will remove your personal information from the public register if: x you withdraw your application x we refuse your application and the time limit for appealing the decision has expired or an appeal is dismissed x the information is no longer relevant for public participation purposes under the Environmental Permitting Regulations Contact Our Data Protection Team gives independent advice. They monitor how the Environment Agency uses your personal information. If you have questions or concerns about how we process personal information, or to make a complaint or request relating to data protection, please contact: Address: Data Protection Team Environment Agency Horizon House Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: GDWDSURWHFWLRQ#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN You can also make a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO is the supervisory authority for data protection legislation. The ICO website has a full list of your rights under data protection legislation. Now read section 4 below EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 4 of 8 Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations 4 Confidentiality and national security Confidentiality We will normally put all the information in your application on a public register of environmental information. However, we may not include certain information in the public register if this is in the interests of national security, or because the information is confidential. You can ask for information to be made confidential by enclosing a letter with your application giving your reasons. If we agree with your request, we will tell you and not include the information in the public register. If we do not agree with your request, we will let you know how to appeal against our decision, or you can withdraw your application. You can find guidance on confidentiality in ‘Environmental permitting guidance: core guidance’, published by Defra and available via our website at www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\. Only tick the box below if you wish to claim confidentiality for your application Please treat the information in my application as confidential F National security You can tell the Secretary of State that you believe including information on a public register would not be in the interests of national security. You must enclose a letter with your application telling us that you have told the Secretary of State and you must still include the information in your application. We will not include the information in the public register unless the Secretary of State decides that it should be included. You can find guidance on national security in ‘Environmental permitting guidance: core guidance’, published by Defra and available via our website at ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\. You cannot apply for national security via this application. Now fill in section 5 5 Declaration If you knowingly or carelessly make a statement that is false or misleading to help you get an environmental permit (for yourself or anyone else), you may be committing an offence under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016. A relevant person should make the declaration (see the guidance notes on part F1). An agent acting on behalf of an applicant is NOT a relevant person. Each individual (or individual trustee) who is applying for their name to appear on the permit must complete this declaration. You will have to print a separate copy of this page for each additional individual to complete. If you are transferring all or part of your permit, both you and the person receiving the permit must make the declaration. You must fill in the declaration directly below; the person receiving the permit must fill in the declaration under the heading ‘For transfers only’. Note: we will issue a letter to both current and new holders to confirm the transfer. If you are changing address we will need to send this letter to your new address; therefore please tell us your new address in a separate letter. If you are unable to trace one or more of the current permit holders please see below under the transfers declaration. I declare that the information in this application is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that this application may be refused or approval withdrawn if I give false or incomplete information. If you deliberately make a statement that is false or misleading in order to get approval you may be prosecuted. I confirm that my standard facility will fully meet the rules that I have applied for (this only applies if the application includes standard facilities) ✔F Tick this box to confirm that you understand and agree with the declaration above, then fill in the details below (you do not have to provide a signature as well) ✔F Tick this box if you do not want us to use information from any ecological survey that you have supplied with your application (for further information please see the guidance notes on part F1) F Name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) Mr First name Anthony Last name Aston on behalf of Brinklow Quarry Limited (if relevant; for example, a company or organisation and so on) Position Director (if relevant; for example, in a company or organisation and so on) EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 5 of 8 Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations 5 Declaration, continued Today’s date (DD/MM/YYYY) 19/10/2020 For transfers only – declaration for person receiving the permit A relevant person should make the declaration (see the guidance notes on part F1). An agent acting on behalf of an applicant is NOT a relevant person. I declare that the information in this application to transfer an environmental permit to me is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that this application may be refused or approval withdrawn if I give false or incomplete information. Note: If you cannot trace a person or persons holding the permit you may be able to transfer the permit without their declaration as above. Please contact us to discuss this and supply evidence in your application to confirm you are unable to trace one or all of the permit holders. If you deliberately make a statement that is false or misleading in order to get approval you may be prosecuted. Tick this box to confirm that you understand and agree with the declaration above, then fill in the details below F (you do not have to provide a signature as well) Name Title (Mr, Mrs, Miss and so on) First name Last name on behalf of (if relevant; for example, a company or organisation and so on) Position (if relevant; for example, in a company or organisation and so on) Today’s date (DD/MM/YYYY) Now go to section 6 6 Application checklist You must fill in this section. If your application is not complete we will return it to you. If you aren’t sure about what you need to send, speak to us before you submit your application. You must do the following: Complete legibly all parts of this form that are relevant to you and your activities ✔F Identify relevant supporting information in the form and send it with the application ✔F List all the documents you are sending in the table below. If necessary, continue on a separate sheet. This separate sheet also needs to have a reference number and you should include it in the table below ✔F For new permits or any changes to the site plan, provide a plan that meets the standards given in the guidance note on part F1 ✔F Provide a supporting letter for any claim that information is confidential F Get the declaration completed by a relevant person (not an agent) ✔F Send the correct fee ✔F EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 6 of 8 Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations 6 Application checklist, continued Question reference Document title Document reference All Permit Application Report Permit Application Report Amendment to the Approved Waste RecoveryPlan Appendix 1 Pre-application Advice Letter Appendix 2 Environmental Setting & Site Design Report Appendix 3 Evidence of Technically Competent Management Appendix 4 Site Condition Report Part 1 Appendix 5 Environmental Risk Assessment Appendix 6 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Appendix 7 Dust Management Plan Appendix 8 Waste Acceptance Procedures Appendix 9 Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Permit Section Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 002 7 How to contact us If you need help filling in this form, please contact the person who sent it to you or contact us as shown below. General enquiries: 03708 506 506 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Textphone: 03702 422549 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm) Email: HQTXLULHV#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN Website: ZZZJRYXNJRYHUQPHQWRUJDQLVDWLRQVHQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\ If you are happy with our service, please tell us. It helps us to identify good practice and encourages our staff. If you’re not happy with our service, or you would like us to review a decision we have made, please let us know. More information on how to do this is available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environmentDJHQF\DERXWFRPSODLQWVSURFHGXUH. Please tell us if you need information in a different language or format (for example, in large print) so we can keep in touch with you more easily. 8 Where to send your application For how many copies to send see the guidance note on part F1. Please send your filled in application form to: For water discharges by email to 36&:DWHU4XDOLW\#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN For waste and installations by email to 36&#HQYLURQPHQWDJHQF\JRYXN Or Environment Agency Permitting and Support Centre Environmental Permitting Team Quadrant 2 99 Parkway Avenue Parkway Business Park Sheffield S9 4WF Do you want all information to be sent to you by email? Please tick this box if you wish to have all communication about this application sent via email (we will use the details provided in part A) F EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 7 of 8 Form EPF: Application for an environmental permit – Part F1 Charges and declarations Feedback (You don’t have to answer this part of the form, but it will help us improve our forms if you do.) We want to make our forms easy to fill in and our guidance notes easy to understand. Please use the space below to give us any comments you may have about this form or the guidance notes that came with it. How long did it take you to fill in this form? We will use your feedback to improve our forms and guidance notes, and to tell the Government how regulations could be made simpler. Would you like a reply to your feedback? Yes please F No thank you F For Environment Agency use only Date received (DD/MM/YYYY) Payment received? No F Our reference number Yes F Amount received £ EPF1 Version 12, +BOVBSZ page 8 of 8 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Drawings Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Drawing Name Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Agriculture House, Site Address Brinklow Quarry, Southwater Way, Highwood Farm, Telford, Coventry Road, TF3 4NR Brinklow, Warwickshire, T: 01952 879705 CV23 0NJ. M: 07762 580839 E: [email protected] 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m Date 09/05/2019 www.westburyenv.co.uk A Original EPR/GB3502FS permit area (SR 2015 No.39) B Original EPR/GB3502GL permit area (SR 2010 No.12) C Proposed extension of EPR/GB3502FS C A Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Drawing Title Permit Section Plan B Drawing No. 19/003a 002 Agriculture House, Site Address Brinklow Quarry, Southwater Way, Highwood Farm, Telford, Coventry Road, TF3 4NR Brinklow, Warwickshire, T: 01952 879705 CV23 0NJ. M: 07762 580839 E: [email protected] www.westburyenv.co.uk 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m Date 24/09/2020 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 1 Approved Waste Recovery Plan Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Brinklow Quarry Brinklow Quarry Limited Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ. Produced by Westbury Environmental Limited On behalf of Brinklow Quarry Limited Version 1. 5th April 2019 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 This Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan was prepared by Westbury Environmental Limited on behalf of Brinklow Quarry Limited. Document Control Table Project Reference 19/003b Project Title Brinklow Quarry Waste Recovery Plan Document Title Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan Document Version No. 1 Document Issue Date 5th April 2019 Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Report Produced By / Date Georgina Watkins 5th April 2019 Report Checked By / Date Tracey Westbury 5th April 2019 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Contents Introduction ...... 1 Reasons for this Amendment to the Volume of Waste ...... 4 Suitability of the Recovered Waste for the Intended Purpose ...... 5 Minimal Amount of Waste Being Used to Achieve the Intended Benefit ...... 8 Proposal Completed to an Appropriate Standard ...... 10 Conclusion ...... 11 Tables Table 3.1 Waste Types Table 4.1 Volumes required in the restoration of Brinklow Quarry Drawings Site Location Plan, Drawing No. PAO/01/16 [Approved Waste Recovery Plan] Restoration Sections, Drawing No. BQR/01 Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15 Restoration Sections, Drawing No. WRPB/03 Site Areas for Volume Calculation, Drawing No. 19/003b 001 Appendices Appendix 1 Approved Waste Recovery Plan ± PT-CE Ltd, October 2017 Appendix 2 Planning Permission RBC/16CM004 Appendix 3 Planning Obligation Letter ± Senior Planner, Warwickshire County Council. Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Introduction This Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan has been prepared to amend the approved volume of material required to complete the restoration of Brinklow Quarry, expand the area of recovery operations and to regularise the permitting situation at Brinklow Quarry. This Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan provides information on the recovery operation at Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ (the Site) operated by Brinklow Quarry Limited. The proposed area of the waste recovery works covered by this Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan is shown in the Site Location Plan, Drawing No. PAO/01/16. The Approved Waste Recovery was written in October 2017 by PT-CE Limited and was submitted to the Environment Agency as part of a Standard Rules 2015 No. 39 set Environmental Permit application, see Appendix 1, Approved Waste Recovery Plan ± PT-CE Ltd, October 2017. The Site currently has a Standard Rules 2015 No. 39 set Environment Permit with reference (35*%)6ZKLFKDOORZV³XVHRIZDVWHLQDGHSRVLWIRUUHFRYHU\RSHUDWLRQV´7KH$SSURYHG Waste Recovery Plan was submitted to the Environment Agency as part of the application to obtain the Environmental Permit. This Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan is necessary as the Approved Waste Recovery Plan only considered a small area of the Site and the calculations of the required volume were inaccurate. The Site is a regionally significant sand, gravel and clay quarry located approximately 1km west of the village of Brinklow and approximately 8km east of the centre of Coventry. Access to the Site is via Coventry Road which runs west-east along part of the northern boundary of the Site. The land use surrounding the Site is predominantly agricultural fields with associated farmhouses under ownership of Brinklow Quarry Limited. Only a part of the Site has been extracted to date. It is planned for phases of the Site to be restored as other areas are undergoing mineral extraction. The Site extends to approximately 82.7 Hectares. Only a fraction of the Site, 17.8 Hectares, was considered in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan, see [Approved Waste Recovery Plan] Restoration Sections, Drawing No. BQR/01. Only 57,000m3 of imported soil was considered to be required to restore the 17.8 Hectares included in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan. The Approved Waste Recovery Plan considered only 17.8 Hectares of the Site with an average depth of 0.32m imported soil. This consideration met the requirements of a Standard Rules 2015 No. 39 Environmental Permit. Planning permission RBC/16CM004 IRU ³Full planning application to complete the existing consented extraction of minerals and extend the geographic area of the existing quarry into land south of Coventry Road, incorporating the extraction of up to 30,000 tpa of clay and the reciprocal importation of soils for restoration purposes, with the co-terminus operation of the existing ancillary on site composting facility, mortar plant and inert waste recycling facility´ZDVJUDQWHGRQ 6th July 2017 by Warwickshire County Council, see Appendix 2 Planning Permission RBC/16CM004. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 1 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 There is a legal obligation placed on the landowner to restore the quarry following the quarry operations. The objectives of the restoration of the quarry are to: x provide land for agriculture. x create a variety of habitats for different wildlife including but not limited to lakes, ponds, mixed plantation woodland and scrub. x create a landform that is congruous with the surrounding landscape. The restoration of the Site is considered to be a legal obligation for the following reasons: x Condition 1 of Planning Permission RBC/16CM004 VWDWHV WKDW ³The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the application forms, Ecological Appraisal, Great Crested Newt Survey, Protected Species Survey, +HGJHURZ6XUYH\ $OOSUHSDUHGE\µ-XVW(FRORJ\¶ 1RLVH$VVHVVPHQW 3UHSDUHGE\ µ$FFRQ8.¶GDWHG $LU4XDOLW\$VVHVVPHQW 3UHSDUHGE\µ*DLU&RQVXOWLQJ¶ dated October 2015) supporting Planning Statement ref: PTCE/13/2207/2 vs. 1.2 and approved plans ref: PA0/01/16, PAB/10/15, PPB/10/15, PRB/10/15, Figure 7-6 2015: 5HVWRUDWLRQ3ODQSUHSDUHGE\µ-XVW(FRORJ\¶VXEPLWWHGWRWKH&RXQW\3ODQQLQJ$XWKRULW\ and any details approved in accordance with the conditions attached to this permission, except to the extent that any modification is required or allowed by or pursuant to these conditions.´ The restoration works for the Site will be carried out in accordance with the restoration documents submitted to and approved by Warwickshire County Council x Legal obligation to restore the quarry in accordance with the plans within the planning permission is further evidenced by Tom Evans, a Senior Planner at Warwickshire County Council, who confirmed via a letter to Paul Taylor of PT-CE Ltd (the author of the Approved Waste Recovery Plan) that ³WKHUHLVDGXW\LQFXPEHQWRQWKHRSHUDWRUWR restore the site to the levels shown on Plan Ref: RPB/10/15 (Restoration Scheme Plan) which is listed as one of the approved plans by condition 1 of planning permission referHQFH 5%&&0´ This letter is provided as Appendix 3, Planning Obligation Letter ± Senior Planner, Warwickshire County Council. This Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan describes the works with regard to demonstrating that restoration of the quarry constitutes a waste recovery activity and would therefore not be considered to be a waste disposal operation. This Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan corrects the report volume of material required to complete the restoration of the quarry from 57,000m3 to 4,489,507m3 and to increase the area from 17.9Ha to 82.7Ha. The reasons for this amendment are considered in Section 2 of this report. The proposed Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan will allow the quarry to be restored in accordance with the planning permission for the Site. It is anticipated that the Site will be operated under a bespoke Environmental Permit. The volume of waste required in the restoration works means that a standard rules permit is no longer suitable for the Site. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 2 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 On approval of this Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan, an Environmental Permit variation application will be submitted to the Environment Agency to change the Environment Permit EPR/GB3502FS to increase the area and increase the volume limits for the Site. These changes will result in the Environmental Permit changing from a Standard Rules Environmental Permit to a bespoke Environmental Permit. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 3 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Reasons for this Amendment to the Volume of Waste There is planning obligation to restore the Site in accordance with the plans listed within the planning permission RBC/16CM004. The reasons for the amendment to the volume of waste is discussed in this section of this report. Larger area to be restored than in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan The Approved Waste Recovery Plan considers an area of only 17.8Ha. The entire Site actually extends to 82.7Ha. Brinklow Quarry Limited are obliged to restore the quarry in accordance with the Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15 as specified by the planning permission. The planning permission covers the whole area of the Site, 82.7Ha rather than the 17.8Ha described in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan. The Approved Waste Recovery Plan only considered a small area of the Site (17.8Ha) and met the requirements of a Standard Rules 2015 No.39 Environmental Permit. Less overburden available than anticipated in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan The Approved Waste Recovery Plan estimates an average depth of waste fill 0.32m across the 17.8Ha considered in the Waste Recovery Plan. Resulting in a total volume of approximately 57,000m3. The Approved Waste Recovery Plan includes the drawing [Approved Waste Recovery Plan] Restoration Sections, Drawing No. BQR/01. A representative restoration profile is provided on this drawing which shows that the predicted amount of overburden from the mineral extraction works would provide sufficient volume of materials to allow for a layer of between 8.00m and 11.00m deep. Assuming that overburden would provide a significant depth of the restoration profile it was considered that only 0.32m of imported soils would be required. In fact, the amount of overburden from the mineral extraction has been found to be significantly less than anticipated. Revised cross-sections are included as part of this Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan, see Restoration Sections Drawing No. WRPB/03. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 4 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Suitability of the Recovered Waste for the Intended Purpose Environment Agency guidance requires that chemical and physical properties of the waste proposed to be used in this waste recovery operation are suitable for the intended purpose and will not cause pollution. The assessment of the types of waste that will be suitable for use in this development has been made by Tracey Westbury, Director of Westbury Environmental Limited and is suitably qualified to make this assessment based on: x Chartered status with the Chartered Institute of Waste Managers. x Over 30 \HDUV¶ZRUNH[SHULHQFHZLWKLQWKHHQYLURQPHQWDO industry including chemical industry waste, contaminated land, waste water treatment and regulation. x Qualified person status under the Development of Waste Code of Practice. x Over 18 \HDUV¶ZRUNH[SHULHQFHDFWLQJDVDQHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQVXOWDQWGHDOLQJZLWK both landfill and recovery permits. The types of waste that will be used in the proposed development will include soils, subsoils and minerals. These materials will not be classified as hazardous waste. These wastes will include the waste codes in Table 3.1 ± Waste Types. These waste codes are already within the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS for the Site. Table 3.1 ± Waste Types Exclusions Wastes having any of the following characteristics shall not be accepted: Consisting solely or mainly of dusts, powders or loose fibres Wastes that are in a form which is either sludge or liquid Permitted waste types Source Sub-source Waste Description Additional restrictions code 01 Waste resulting 01 01 wastes 01 01 02 Wastes from Restricted to waste from exploration, from mineral mineral non- overburden and mining, quarrying excavation metalliferous interburden only. and physical and excavation chemical treatment 01 04 wastes 01 04 08 Waste gravel and of minerals from physical crushed rocks and chemical other than those processing of mentioned in 01 non- 04 06 metalliferous 01 04 09 Waste sand and minerals clays 17 17 01 17 01 01 Concrete Construction and concrete, demolition wastes bricks, tiles 17 01 02 Bricks and 17 01 03 Tiles and ceramics ceramics 17 01 07 Mixtures of Metal from reinforced Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 5 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 concrete, bricks, concrete must have tiles and ceramics been removed. other than those mentioned in 17 01 06 17 03 17 03 02 Bituminous Road planings only. bituminous mixtures other mixtures than those mentioned in 17 03 01 17 05 soil 17 05 04 Soil and stones Restricted to topsoil, stones and other than those peat, subsoil and stones dredging spoil mentioned in 17 only. 05 03 19 Wastes from waste 19 12 wastes 19 12 09 Minerals (for Restricted to wastes management facilities from the example sand, from treatment of waste mechanical stones) only aggregates that are treatment of otherwise naturally waste (for occurring minerals. example Does not include fines sorting, from treatment of any crushing, non-hazardous waste or compacting, gypsum from recovered pelletising) not plasterboard. otherwise specified 19 12 12 Other wastes Restricted to crushed (including mixture of bricks, tiles, concrete materials) from and ceramics only. mechanical Metal from reinforced treatment of wastes concrete must be other than those removed. mentioned in 19 12 Does not include fines 11 from treatment of any non-hazardous waste or gypsum from recovered plasterboard. 20 Municipal wastes 20 02 garden 20 02 02 Soils and stones Restricted to topsoil, (household waste and and park peat, subsoil and stones similar commercial, wastes only. industrial and institutional wastes) including separately collected fractions The operator applies strict waste acceptance procedures as part of the implementation of the Environmental Management System (EMS), in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Permit for these operations. This ensures that only suitable waste materials are imported for use in the restoration works. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 6 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 A Waste Acceptance Procedure is included in the EMS that will control how waste is accepted to ensure that only suitable waste is deposited in the development. This procedure is implemented via the EMS. The proposed waste materials (largely soils) will replace the non-waste materials that would otherwise be used. These materials are largely the same despite one being defined as a waste and another not a waste. Therefore, waste materials will be not chemically different and will have similar engineering properties as non-waste materials that would otherwise be used. The waste soils imported on to the Site for use in the restoration will be placed as subsoils below the existing topsoil present on the Site. The topsoil (up to 300mm deep) will be stripped from the relevant areas of the Site, stored, then replaced on top of the imported waste to complete the landscaping works. In this way, the imported waste is not used as a surface growing medium. 7KH³6XLWDEO\RIWKH5HFRYHUHG:DVWHIRUWKH,QWHQGHG3XUSRVH´KDVDOVREHHQFRYHUHGLQWKH Approved Waste Recovery Plan. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 7 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Minimal Amount of Waste Being Used to Achieve the Intended Benefit Topographical data for the proposed restoration contours on the Site have been used to calculate the amount of waste soil that is required to be imported to complete the restoration. It is estimated that a total volume of 4,489,507m3 of waste soil will be needed to complete the restoration of the quarry. Boreholes on and around the Site show that the mineral, in some parts of the Site, extends to approximately 15m below the original ground surface. The results from these boreholes have been used to estimate the depth of excavation of mineral across the whole Site and this is included on the Restoration Sections, Drawing No. WRPB/03. Cross-sections produced by a collaboration of Green Tyger Designs Limited and PT-CE Limited have been provided to show the proposed new restoration profile see Restoration Sections, Drawing No. WRPB/03. This profile contains: x The anticipated base of excavation between 70 and 77mAoD across the Site. x Depth of overburden between 1m and 8m deep across the Site. x Depth of imported fill between 1m and 8m across the Site. x Proposed restoration level between 76mAoD and 91mAoD across the Site The Restoration Sections for the Site have been created by using the contours shown on the Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15 which show the ground levels the landowners are obliged to restore the quarry to. To calculate the total volume of waste soil required in the restoration of the quarry, the Site has been split into areas as shown on Site Areas for Volume Calculation, Drawing No. 19/003b 001. The division of the Site into these areas was based on their general restoration profile rather than the restoration phasing. The average base of mineral in each area has been calculated. The top 1m of the restoration will be comprised of 0.3m of topsoil as a growing medium and 0.7m of subsoil from stockpiles of indigenous soils on the Site. For ease of calculation the topsoil and VXEVRLOKDVEHHQLQFOXGHGLQWKH³2YHUEXUGHQ9ROXPHV´LQ7DEOH since all of this material is Site derived. The total volume of waste soil and the total overburden volume required in each area is shown in Table 4.1 Volumes required in the restoration of Brinklow Quarry. Table 4.1 Volumes required in the restoration of Brinklow Quarry Quarry Area Average Total void Overburden Import fill Area (m2) depth to (m3) volume volume (m3) base of (m3) mineral (m) 1 30,564 5.0 152,589 122,024 30,564 2 121,449 4.7 575,864 454,414 121,449 3 157,456 8.4 1,324,007 694,176 629,824 4 1,880 13.5 25,363 6,563 18,800 5 17,899 12.3 220,004 76,812 143,192 6 11,677 11.4 133,034 39,618 93,146 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 8 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 7 49,394 10.8 532,968 137,814 395,152 8 250,746 13.5 3,394,747 1,639,528 1,755,222 9 185,984 12.9 2,407,117 1,105,229 1,301,888 Total 827,049 8,765,693 4,276,177 4,489,507 Note: Overburden and import volumes do not add up to total void space due to rounding. It has been calculated that approximately 49% of the void space within the quarry will be restored using overburden from the quarrying operations and stockpiled topsoil and subsoil. The remaining 51% will be restored using imported waste soils. As shown on the Restoration Scheme Plan, the restoration has been designed to create a landform that is congruous with the surrounding landscape. There are no steep gradients on the Site. A volume of 4,489,507m3 of imported waste soils has been calculated to ensure that the quarry is restored in accordance with the Restoration Scheme Plan. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 9 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Proposal Completed to an Appropriate Standard The proposed restoration works will be completed in accordance with the planning permission that has been obtained to date from Warwickshire County Council. The local planning authority will regulate the requirements of this planning permission. The waste will used to restore the quarry to the agreed contours shown on Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15 as enforced by the planning permission. Topsoils are to be stripped from successive quarry phases only when in a dry and friable condition and will be placed directly above previously restored zones wherever possible. The imported waste will be deposited in accordance with best practice by experience staff members. The final levels will be measured to ensure compliance with the planning permission requirements. Incoming waste will be controlled by the use of strict Waste Acceptance Procedures. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 10 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Conclusion From the information provided within this Amendment to the Waste Recovery Plan, it has been demonstrated that: x there is a legal obligation for the Site to be restored in accordance with the plans listed within Planning Permission RBC/16CM004. x there is a clear benefit from the use of waste in the restoration of the site at Brinklow Quarry including the creation of agricultural land, the formation of lakes and ponds as well as other habitats. x the type of waste to be used in the restoration is suitable for its intended purpose and will not cause pollution to the environment. x the amount of waste proposed to be used is appropriate in order to complete the development works to achieve the intended benefit. x the proposed development at the Site will be carried out and maintained to an appropriate standard which is enforced through the requirements of the planning permission and the Environmental Permit obtained to permit these works. This Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan seeks to: x correct the proposed volume of soils to be recovered to 4,489,507m3, not the 57,000m3 originally proposed in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan. x increase the area of the recovery operations from 17.8Ha to 82.7Ha. The difference between the originally proposed volume and the amended volume has resulted from: x deeper excavation than originally estimated. x a greater area to be restored than specified in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan by PT-CE Ltd. The Approved Waste Recovery Plan incorrectly did not refer to the whole Site covered by the Restoration Scheme Plan in Planning Permission RBC/16CM004. x less overburden excavated than estimated. x a greater depth of fill than specified in the Approved Waste Recovery Plan by PT-CE Ltd due to the presence of less overburden. It is therefore requested that approval is provided on this Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan to allow an Environmental Permit variation application to be made. This Environmental Permit variation application will seek to allow a total of 4,489,507m3 to be deposited at the Site in order to restore the Site in accordance with the plans of Planning Permission RBC/16CM004, and to increase the area from 17.8Ha to 82.7Ha. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 11 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Drawings Site Location Plan, Drawing No. PAO/01/16 [Approved Waste Recovery Plan] Restoration Sections, Drawing No. BQR/01 Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15 Restoration Sections, Drawing No. WRPB/03 Site Areas for Volume Calculation, Drawing No. 19/003b 001 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road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Į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ey Site Boundary Area 2 Area 6 Access Road Area 3 Area 7 Proposed contours Area 4 Area 8 Area 1 Area 5 Area 9 3 2 4 9 5 1 7 6 Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited 8 Site Areas for Volume Drawing Name Calculation Drawing No. 19/003b 001 Agriculture House, Southwater Way, Site Address Brinklow Quarry, Telford, Coventry Road, TF3 4NR Brinklow, Warwickshire, T: 01952 879705 CV23 0NJ. M: 07762 580839 E: [email protected] 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m Date 03/04/2019 www.westburyenv.co.uk Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Appendix 1 Approved Waste Recovery Plan ± PT-CE Ltd, October 2017 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road BRINKLOW QUARRY DEPOSIT FOR RECOVERY PERMIT Waste Recovery Plan Client: Anthony Mark Aston and Jessie May Aston T/A Brinklow Quarry Document Reference: WRP01 Issue No 1 23/10/17 Brinklow Quarry REPORT SCHEDULE Client: Brinklow Quarry Project Title: Waste Recovery Plan for an Environmental Permit Document Title: Waste Recovery Plan Document Reference: WRP01_Waste Recovery Plan Report Status: Final 3.0 AUTHOR DATE Diane Cave 21st September 2017 UPDATED DATE Diane Cave 12th December 2017 APPROVED DATE Paul Taylor 23rd October 2017 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared with all reasonable skill, care and diligence. It has been prepared in accordance with instructions from the client and within the terms and conditions agreed with the client. The report is based on information provided by the Client and our professional judgment at the time this report was prepared. This report is for the sole use of PT-CE Ltd and Brinklow Quarry. The Author shall not be held responsible for any user of the report or its content for any other purpose other than that which is was prepared and provided to the client. The Author accepts no liability to third parties. WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan i Brinklow Quarry CONTENTS 1. Introduction ...... 1 2. Waste Recovery Plan ...... 2 3. Waste recovery activities ...... 2 4. Other evidence that the waste is suitable ...... 3 5. Waste recovery plan information ...... 4 6. Using waste to grow or feed plants ...... 5 7. Waste recovery permit ...... 6 8. Engineering work ...... 7 9. Gas monitoring ...... 7 10. Aftercare monitoring ...... 7 ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS WRP02_Letter from Senior Planner regarding the importation of soils to achieve the restoration levels at Brinklow Quarry_31-07-2017 WRP03_Brinklow Quarry Restoration Sections_21-09-2017 WRP04_Decision Certificate granted by Warwickshire County Council RBC/16CM004 WRP05_PRB1015 Proposed Restoration Phasing Plan WRP06_Brinklow Quarry Location Plan WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan ii Brinklow Quarry 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.1. Brinklow Quarry Limited (the Applicant) is proposing to import up to 60,000m3 of suitable inert materials under a standard rules permit at Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ (the Site). 1.1.2. Brinklow Quarry is a regionally significant sand and gravel quarry located on a deposit of Dunsmore Gravel underlying agricultural land in Brinklow, Warwickshire and produces a range of primary aggregates for the construction industry. The Quarry is identified in the Warwickshire Draft Local Aggregate Assessment in 2014 as one of two operational sand and gravel quarries in the County of Warwickshire. 1.1.3. The Quarry also extracts clay materials that have very low permeability and high shear-strength characteristics. This material is extremely valuable for use in engineering projects, particularly road construction and flood defence applications. 1.1.4. The Planning Permission (document reference WRP04_Decision Certificate granted by Warwickshire County Council RBC/16CM004) places an obligation on the Applicant to restore the site to agreed levels. The proposed landform has slope gradients reflecting the original ground contours, designed to minimise the effects of erosion and to produce maximum benefit for the area’s intended after use. The restoration profile is detailed within the document WRP03_Brinklow Quarry Restoration Sections_21-09-2017. 1.1.5. Mr Tom Evans, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Group, Warwickshire County Council has confirmed via letter to Mr Paul Taylor (PT-CE Ltd) that ‘there is a duty incumbent of the operator to restore the site to the levels shown on the Plan Ref:RPB/10/15 (Restoration Scheme Plan) which is listed as on of the approved plans by condition 1 of planning permission reference: RBC/16CM004’. This letter is submitted as document WRP02_Letter from Senior Planner regarding the importation of soils to achieve the restoration levels at Brinklow Quarry_31-07-2017. The Restoration Plan is submitted as document WRP05_RPB1015 Restoration Scheme Plan. 1.1.6. The sub soil and top soil overburden generated as a result of the quarrying activities has been stored on site, this material will be used within the restoration phase. There will be a shortfall of material required to complete the restoration and the Applicant is proposing to import suitable inert materials under a standard rules permit, as the volumes required will be under 60,000m3. 1.1.7. Whilst considering Section 1.4.5 of the European Commission’s waste guidance, ‘What is meant by ‘recovery’, the Applicant considers that this application falls under the scope of a recovery operation, as the imported waste would be serving a useful purpose by replacing other materials which have been used to fulfil a particular function – for example, excavated clays will have been used within engineering projects such as flood defence schemes and the excavated gravels will have been used within the construction industry. General inert wastes would be unable to fulfil this role as they do not possess the required specific engineering specifications for such applications. However, they would be suitable to replace the excavated virgin materials to restore the quarry to original contours and allow the land to be reused for the intended agricultural after use, thereby fulfilling the Applicant’s restoration obligation. 1.1.8. The Applicant considers that the proposed operations can be defined as a recovery operation within a former mineral workings as outlined within Appendix 1, Section 7) of the document Defining Waste Recovery: Permanent Deposit of Waste on Land, RGS No EPR13. This document has been written using Environment Agency guidance documents. WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan 1 Brinklow Quarry 2. WASTE RECOVERY PLAN 2.1.1. This document is submitted as part of the application for a Standard rules SR2015 No39 Use of waste in a deposit for recovery operation (construction, reclamation, restoration or improvement of land other than by mobile plant) environmental permit. The maximum volumetric capacity of the recovery operation permit is 60,000m3. The total volume that is required to restore the quarry is estimated to be 57,000m3 at a depth of 0.32cm as shown within document WRP03_Brinklow Quarry Restoration Sections_21-09-2017. 3. WASTE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES 3.1.1. The following sections provide evidence that if the Applicant could not use waste material, they would be required to do work to get the same outcome using non-waste materials. 3.1.2. The Applicant has an ‘obligation to do work’ set by Warwickshire County Council. The Planning Permission has set conditions to restore the quarry to the levels allowed in the approved plan. Mr Tom Evans at Warwickshire County Council has confirmed to the Applicant’s Agent that he considers that this an obligation to restore the land under the conditions of the Planning Permission RBC/16CM004: The WARWICKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL, having considered the application to complete the existing permitted extraction of minerals and extended the geographical area of the existing quarry into the land south of Coventry Road, incorporating the extraction of up to 30,000 tpa of clay and the reciprocal importation of soils for restoration purposes, with the co-terminous operation of the existing ancillary on the site composting facility, mortar plant and inert waste recycling facility at Brinklow Quarry, Highwood Farm, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Rugby, CV23 0NJ (Grid ref: 441637.278785) made by you on behalf of Brinklow Quarry and deposited with the County Council on 3 February 2016 HEREBY GIVE YOU NOTICE that PERMISSION is GRANTED for the above mentioned development subject to the following considerations: - PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. The development hereby shall be carried out in accordance with the application forms, Ecology Appraisal, Great Crested Newt Survey, Protected Species Survey, Hedgerow Survey (All prepared by ‘Just Ecology’), Noise Assessment (Prepared by ‘Accon UK’ dated 05.10.205), Air Quality Assessment (Prepared by ‘Gair Consulting’ dated 18.09.2015) supporting Planning Statement ref: PTCE/13/2207/2 vs 1.2 and approved plans ref: PA0/01/16, PAB/10/15, PPB/10/15, PRB/10/15, Figure 7-6 2015: Restoration Plan prepared by ‘Just Ecology’ submitted to the County Planning Authority and any details approved in accordance with the conditions attached to this permission, except toteh extent that any modification is required or allowed by or pursuant to these conditions. Reason: In order to define the exact details of the planning permission granted and to secure satisfactory standard of development in the locality 3.1.3. The Planning Permission makes provision within Conditions 12 to 18 that all available turf, topsoil and subsoil shall be recovered and retained on site to ensure the satisfactory restoration of the site. The Operator has ensured that all materials are stored and used in compliance with the Planning Permission. WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan 2 Brinklow Quarry 3.1.4. Further to discussion with Warwickshire County Council regarding the environmental permit application for the Waste Recovery Plan, Mr Tom Evans, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Group, Warwickshire County Council has confirmed via letter to Mr Paul Taylor (PT- CE Ltd) that ‘there is a duty incumbent of the operator to restore the site to the levels shown on the Plan Ref:RPB/10/15 (Restoration Scheme Plan) which is listed as on of the approved plans by condition 2 of planning permission reference: RBC/16CM004’. This letter is submitted as document WRP02_Letter from Senior Planner regarding the importation of soils to achieve the restoration levels at Brinklow Quarry_31-07-2017. 3.1.5. The Applicant acknowledges that there will be a shortfall of restoration material required to ensure the satisfactory restoration of the site, and that the minimum amount of waste will be imported to restore the land back to agricultural use. The document WRP03_Brinklow Quarry Restoration Sections_21-09-2017 outlines where the imported materials will be used on site; the layer of imported material will not exceed 0.32cm depth. 4. OTHER EVIDENCE THAT THE WASTE IS SUITABLE 4.1.1. The Applicant wishes to import a selection of wastes that conform to the types outlined within Appendix 2 of ‘RGN13 Defining Waste Recovery: Permanent Deposit of Waste’. The Applicant will only import the waste types outlined within the Standard rules ‘SR2015 No39 Use of waste in a deposit for recovery operation (construction, reclamation, restoration or improvement of land other than by mobile plant)’ environmental permit. 4.1.2. The applicant will ensure that the incoming waste types will only be accepted if: the material is of a type listed within the environmental permit; the material has been identified as a suitable waste type in the approved waste recovery plan; the material conforms to the description in the documentation supplied by the producer and holder; and the chemical, physical and biological characteristics make it suitable for its intended use on the site. 4.1.3. The applicant will visually inspect the waste on arrival to ensure that the material is fit for purpose. Any waste that is not deemed to be satisfactory will be either removed from the site or moved to a designated quarantine area pending removal. The applicant will complete and maintain records of any rejected materials. 4.1.4. Paul Taylor of PT-CE Ltd holds a CoTC Level 4 Hazardous Waste Landfill (LS4) and a level 4 Hazardous Waste Treatment CoTC (4TMH) and will be appointed as the Technically Competent Manager for the site. He is a Member of the Chartered Institution of Wastes Management and has 26 years experience in landfill site management. He has managed the operation of inert, Non- hazardous and Hazardous landfill sites in Essex, Warwickshire, Northamptonshire and Leicestershire in addition to Hazardous Waste treatment and Anaerobic Digestion facilities. 4.1.5. Paul Taylor has managed the construction of landfill cells engineered to Construction Quality Assurance specifications and has developed and implemented Waste Acceptance procedures for landfill sites and other Permitted facilities. WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan 3 Brinklow Quarry 4.1.6. The project involves the restoration of a mineral quarry, the scheme is a straightforward operation that involves the management of imported inert waste materials and the placement of inert waste materials within specific areas of site, using specified equipment, to a specified plan as outlined within the Planning Permission. 4.1.7. In order for the imported waste to be suitable for the role as a replacement for excavated mineral subsoils, the imported waste must be physically stable to support the mass of replaced sub-and topsoils above and be capable of placement in a series of shallow lifts to allow the restoration of the site to the agreed profile. It must be chemically inert to prevent settlement due to biodegradation. Selected inert waste materials for importation will have similar physical properties to the virgin aggregate materials that they will replace. 4.1.8. The imported inert wastes will be generated from local construction and demolition projects within the local area. The inert waste will not have identical technical characteristics to the sand, gravel and clays removed from the quarry but will have suitable characteristics to allow the material to be used as fill in restoration. The guidance states that in some cases, it may be appropriate not to use a like for like replacement. In this case, there is no other suitable replacement for the extracted minerals other than inert waste materials generated from construction projects. 5. WASTE RECOVERY PLAN INFORMATION 5.1. Purpose of the work 5.1.1. The restoration works will be carried out in accordance with the restoration documents submitted to and approved by Warwickshire County Council. The restoration sections and the restoration scheme plan: WRP03_Brinklow Quarry Restoration Sections_21-09-2017 WRP05_RPB1015 Restoration Scheme Plan WRP06_Brinklow Quarry Location Plan 1-25000 5.1.2. The work is required to fulfil the Planning Permission obligation to restore the land to its former agricultural use. 5.2. Quantity of waste used 5.2.1. As previously outlined, the Applicant has stored turf, topsoil and subsoil overburden on site to carry out the restoration works. Unfortunately, there will be a shortfall of material and the Applicant must import suitable materials to ensure that the restoration is completed to the required standard and levels. 5.2.2. The waste will not be deposited above the subsoil upper levels agreed with Warwickshire County Council. The plans and cross sections show the original and planned final ground levels. WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan 4 Brinklow Quarry 5.3. Meeting quality standards The scheme has been approved by Warwickshire County Council Planning Authority. The Application provides evidence to demonstrate that the final contours and site profile were carefully considered and designed. 5.3.1. The inert waste will be deposited in accordance with best practice by experienced staff, using appropriate mobile plant. The final levels will be assessed and measured to ensure compliance with the planning permission requirements. 5.3.2. The Applicant will only import fit for purpose materials, as outlined within the environmental permit and within Section 4 of this Waste Recovery Plan. 5.3.3. The waste will be used to restore the landform to the agreed contours, the works consider the surface water and the topography of the surrounding area as required under the Conditions of the site’s Planning Permission. It is incumbent on the operator to ensure that the site is fully restored to the permitted profile resulting in a restored quarry area that is suitable for its agreed agricultural after use – if the waste was not imported and the site was left with steep slopes, the farmland would be difficult to farm and reliant on the repetitive addition of artificial fertilisers and soil ameliorants. The resulting landform would be prone to topsoil erosion by surface water leading to reduced agricultural production. Surface water drainage systems installed below the topsoil layer of the final landform will promote surface water drainage into designated ditches at the site boundary preventing localised saturation. Over time, without such measures, elevated areas would become denuded of topsoil and associated nutrients and the lower areas boggy and unworkable. 5.3.4. A flood risk assessment has been carried out and the assessment shows that the site falls within Flood Zone 1. The British Geological Society Groundwater Flood Map indicates that the site is not located within an area at risk of groundwater flooding. No proposed mitigation measures were proposed as part of the planning application nor required by the Environment Agency when consulted as part of the planning application process. 6. USING WASTE TO GROW OR FEED PLANTS 6.1.1 The guidance states that if the Applicant intends to use waste to grow plants and are applying for a bespoke permit, an agricultural benefit statement and an ecological improvement statement may be required. However, the Applicant’s proposal fulfils the criteria of a standard rules permit and accordingly will not apply for a bespoke permit. WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan 5 Brinklow Quarry 7. WASTE RECOVERY PERMITS 7.1. Type of permit 7.1.1. This application is for a Standard rules SR2015 No39 Use of waste in a deposit for recovery operation (construction, reclamation, restoration or improvement of land other than by mobile plant) environmental permit. The maximum volumetric capacity of recovery operation 60,000m3. 7.2. Waste acceptance procedures 7.2.1. The documents ‘Council Decision (2003/33/EC)’ and the Environment Agency’s ‘Waste acceptance at landfills – guidance on waste acceptance procedures and criteria’ will be used to establish the basic characterisation information. 7.2.2. The basic characterisation information is necessary to ensure that the incoming waste materials can be used safely within the project over a long-term basis. The waste acceptance procedures outlined within Sections 2.5 and 2.6 of the standard rules SR2015no39 permit will be adhered to: 2.5 Waste acceptance 2.5.1 Waste shall only be accepted if it is listed within the standard rules permit and that it meets the additional restrictions (does not consist solely or mainly of dusts, powders or loose fibres, or wastes that are in the form which is either sludge or liquid), and (a) it is inert waste, with the exception of topsoil, peat, soil from cleaning and washing beet and road planings; and (b) appropriate measures have been taken to ensure the waste is free from contamination; and (c) it has been identified as a suitable waste in the approved waste recovery plan; and (d) its chemical, physical, biological characteristics make it suitable for its intended use on site. 2.6 Waste acceptance procedures 2.6.1 The operator shall obtain, as a minimum, the following information about the characteristics of each waste stream prior to receiving the waste at the site: (a) the full address where the waste was produced; and (b) the identity of the producer; and (c) all the reasonably identifiable previous uses of the producer site where the waste is excavation waste; and (d) the process giving rise to the waste; and (e) the physical appearance of the waste including colour and texture; and (f) where a weighbridge isn’t used a metric conversion factor for volume (cubic metres) to weight (tonnes) for each waste stream; and (g) the quantity of waste to be imported; and (h) evidence of compliance with condition 2.5.1. 2.6.2 The operator shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with condition 2.6.1, which shall be kept until the permit is surrendered. 2.6.3 The operator shall satisfy themselves that any waste accepted for recovery conforms to the information submitted by the holder required by condition 2.6.1 and shall visually inspect: (a) without unloading it, waste that is in an open container or open vehicle on arrival at the site; and (b) waste at the point of deposit; WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan 6 Brinklow Quarry 2.6.4 Any waste that does not comply with all of the conditions of 2.5 or fit the description of the waste recorded in 2.6.1 shall be rejected and shall be: (a) removed from the site; or (b) moved to a designated quarantine area pending removal. 7.2.3. Pre-Acceptance Waste Characterisation Checks will be undertaken by the Authorised Person or their Authorised Deputy. Site investigation reports will be reviewed where available – if there is any doubt on the suitability of the material within the report, the waste will be refused. If during the pre- acceptance checks and/or during the site visits, if there is any doubt regarding the composition of the waste, the Applicant will request that the material is formerly characterized and WAC tested. Only suitable materials will be imported onto site. 7.2.4. The waste materials accepted on site will be: 17 01 07 mixtures of concrete, bricks, tiles and ceramics other than those mentioned in 17 01 06; 17 05 04 soils and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05 03* restricted to topsoil, peat, subsoil and stones only; 19 12 12 other wastes from the mechanical treatment of wastes, restricted to crushed bricks, tiles, concrete and ceramics only (‘Qualifying Materials’) and does not include fines from treatment of any non-hazardous waste or gypsum from recovered plasterboard; and 20 02 02 soil and stones restricted to topsoil, peat, subsoil and stones only. These waste types are permitted by the standard rules permit. 7.2.5. The Applicant will have fully documented Waste Acceptance, Waste Rejection, Quarantine and Non-conforming Waste Procedures. These procedures will be implemented and maintained by the Certificate of Technical Competence Holder and trained Authorised Persons. 8. ENGINEERING WORKS 8.1.1. The Applicant will only import suitable waste types that do not pose a risk to the site or to the local environment. The applicant is removing minerals and clays from the quarry and restoring the levels with overburden and imported waste soils and inert mixed wastes from the treatment of inert wastes. The waste will be placed in quarried cells in accordance with the Planning Permission. 8.1.2. There is no requirement for an engineered attenuation layer. 9. GAS MONITORING 9.1.1. The waste will not be deposited more than 2m below the surrounding ground surface. 9.1.2. The imported waste types will be strictly controlled and records will be kept demonstrating compliance with the Waste Recovery Plan. 9.1.3. There is no requirement to monitor the waste for methane, carbon dioxide or oxygen. 10. AFTERCARE MONITORING 10.1.1. The site will not be monitored during the operational phase and will not require aftercare monitoring. 10.1.2. The Planning Permission does require aftercare reports to be submitted on the 31st March on a rolling 12-month basis. 11. PLANNING PERMISSION 11.1.1. The Applicant has the relevant planning permission for the permanent deposit of waste on land as part of the restoration activities. WRP01 Waste Recovery Plan 7 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Appendix 2 Planning Permission RBC/16CM004 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Version 1: April 2019 Appendix 3 Planning Obligation Letter ± Senior Planner, Warwickshire County Council. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Your ref: My ref: RBC/16CM004 Your letter received: Transport and Economy Planning Development & Flood Risk Mr Paul Taylor Management PT-CE Ltd, PO Box 43 Unit 2 Granit House, Shire Hall Granit Close, Warwick Enderby, Leicestershire, CV34 4SX LE19 4AE Tel: 01926 412247 [email protected] www.warwickshire.gov.uk 31 July 2017 Dear Mr Taylor, RE: Importation of soils to achieve approved restoration levels at Brinklow quarry, as defined by Planning Permission Ref: RBC/6CM004. I can confirm that there is a duty incumbent on the operator to restore the site to the levels shown on Plan Ref: RPB/10/15 (Restoration Scheme Plan) which is listed as one of the approved plans by condition 1 of planning permission reference: RBC/16CM004. The planning permission granted allows for the importation of soils to secure restoration of the site. I trust the above provides sufficient clarification. If you require anything further, please feel free to contact me. Yours sincerely Tom Evans Senior Planner Planning and Development Group Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 2 Recovery versus disposal opinion (pre application reference EPR/GB3502FS/V002) Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Our ref: EPR/GB3502FS Brinklow Quarry Limited Brinklow Quarry Coventry Road Brinklow Date: 07 June 2019 Warwickshire CV23 0NJ Dear Georgie Watkins Environmental Permitting ± Recovery or Disposal Operation Pre-application Reference: EPR/GB3502FS/V002 Proposed Operator: Brinklow Quarry Limited Regulated facility: Brinklow Quarry Site Address : Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ You have submitted an amendment to your approved waste recovery plan for permit reference EPR/GB3502FS. We have now fully considered your submission and we would like to advise you that: We agree with your assessment that your activity is a recovery operation. This advice is based on the information you have provided in relation to waste types, amounts and nature of proposal including any proposed landform. If you change any of these between now and when you submit an application form, this advice may no longer apply. Please also note that following submission of an application, additional assessment will take place (for example, further assessment of the proposed waste types based on the sensitivity of the site location) and therefore agreement that an operation is a recovery activity does not guarantee that a permit will be granted or a variation issued. For the sake of clarity, the following documents are considered to form the approved waste recovery plan; Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Brinklow Quarry Version 1 Project reference 19/003b If you have any questions please phone me or email elisabeth.platts@environment- agency.gov.uk Yours sincerely Elisabeth Platts Permitting Officer Customer services line: 03708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 3 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report Brinklow Quarry Limited Brinklow Quarry, Highwood Farm, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ. Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Document Control Table Project Reference 19/003c Project Title Brinklow ESSD Document Title Environmental Setting & Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Document Issue No. 2 Document Issue Date 19 October 2020 Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Status Issue Report Produced by/Date Georgina Watkins 02 October 2020 Report Checked by/ Date Kate Brady 19 October 2020 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Contents Introduction ...... 1 Source...... 3 Pathway and receptors ...... 6 Pollution Control Measures ...... 10 Monitoring ...... 11 Site Condition Report ...... 13 Figures Figure 1.1 Location and extent of Brinklow Quarry Figure 5.1 Wind rose from Lawford Heath / Rugby Observing Station taken from 11/2008 to 10/2019 Tables Table 2.1 Waste types Table 3.1 Sensitive receptors within 500m of the Site boundary Drawings Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Permit Section Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 002 Sensitive Receptors Plan Drawing No. 19/003c 001 Restoration Scheme Plan Drawing No. RPB/10/15 Appendices Appendix 1 Planning Permission RBC/16CM004 Appendix 2 Approved Waste Recovery Plan (October 2017) Appendix 3 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan Appendix 4 Pre-application Advice Letter (EPR/GB3502FS/V002) Appendix 5 Waste Acceptance Procedures Appendix 6 Environmental Risk Assessment Appendix 7 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Appendix 8 Site Condition Report Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road iii Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Introduction Report Context This Environmental Setting and Site Design Report (ESSD) supports an Environmental Permit Variation Application for waste operations at Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ (the Site). This ESSD Report has been produced by Westbury Environmental Limited on behalf of Brinklow Quarry Limited. Westbury Environmental Limited are an environmental consultancy who assist waste operators with waste regulatory compliance issues. The current development at the Site consists of mineral extraction works. Planning permission 5%&&0IRU³Full planning application to complete the existing consented extraction of minerals and extend the geographic area of the existing quarry into land south of Coventry Road, incorporating the extraction of up to 30,000 tpa of clay and the reciprocal importation of soils for restoration purposes, with the co-terminus operation of the existing ancillary on site composting facility, mortar plant and inert waste recycling facility´ZDVJUDQWHGRQWK-XO\E\:DUZLFNVKLUH&RXQW\&RXQFLOVHH$SSHQGL[ 1 Planning Permission RBC/16CM004. The Planning Permission RBC/16CM004 places an obligation on the operator to import soils onto the Site in order to restore the land in accordance with the plans included within that planning permission. A Waste Recovery Plan for the restoration of the Site was submitted to the Environment Agency in October 2017, see Appendix 2 Approved Waste Recovery Plan. The Environment Agency deemed the proposed restoration as ³UHFRYHU\´DQGDSSURYHGWKH:DVWH5HFRYHU\3ODQ Subsequent to the Approval of the Waste Recovery Plan, a Standard Rules 2015 No. 39 Environmental Permit for the deposit of waste for recovery on land was obtained. The reference for this Environmental Permit is EPR/GB3502FS. An Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan was submitted to the Environment Agency April 2019, proposing to increase the area from 17.8ha to 82.7ha and increase the volume of material required to restore the quarry from 57,000m3 to 4,489,507m3, see Appendix 3 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan. The Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan was deemed ³UHFRYHU\´E\WKH(QYLURQment Agency on 7th June 2019, see Appendix 4 Pre-application Advice Letter (EPR/GB3502FS/V002). The changes to the Waste Recovery Plan require an Environmental Permit variation application to be made to the Environment Agency to: x Change the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS from a Standard Rules 2015 No. 39 set to a bespoke Environmental Permit for deposit for recovery operations. x Consolidate the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS for waste recovery with the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502GL for waste treatment (Standard Rules 2010 No. 12). x Increase the area of the consolidated Environmental Permit to what is shown on Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001. x Include the Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan (Appendix 2) under the Environmental Permit. x Increase the volumetric capacity of the recovery operation from 57,000m3 to 4,489,507m3. The Site will be restored to the ground levels shown on the Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15 (see Approved Waste Recovery Plan). The Environmental Permit Variation Application that this ESSD Report supports seeks to allow 4,489,507m3 of waste to be deposited in the restoration works at the Site. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 1 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Site Details The Site is a regionally significant sand, gravel and clay quarry located approximately 1km west of the village of Brinklow and approximately 8km east of the centre of Coventry. Access to the Site is via Coventry Road which runs west-east along part of the northern boundary of the Site. The access point to the Site from Coventry Road is located at grid reference SP 42193 79535. The Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS covers an area of approximately 17.8ha. Following the issue of the varied Environmental Permit being applied for, the Site will cover an area of approximately 82.7ha, as shown on Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001. The national grid reference for the centre of the Site is SP 41559 78870. The current locations of the Environmental Permits EPR/GB3502FS and EPR/GB3502GL are shown on the Permit Section Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 002. The increase in the area that the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS will cover will require a SR2010 No.12 Environmental Permit (EPR/GB3502GL) to be consolidated with that permit. The proposed boundary of the Site is shown in Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001 v2 and in Figure 1.1. Fencing and hedging exists along the boundaries of the Site. Figure 1.1: Location and extent of Brinklow Quarry Brinklo w The land-use surrounding the Site is predominantly agricultural fields with associated farmhouses under ownership of Brinklow Quarry Limited. Nearby sensitive receptors include deciduous woodland and ancient and semi-natural woodland, farmhouses, residential properties off Heath Road and Coventry Road and workers at the anaerobic digestion plant to the north-east. The sensitive receptors in close proximity to the Site are identified in Section 3 (Pathway & Receptor) of this report. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 2 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Source Quarrying operations are currently undertaken on the Site. Waste recovery operations are proposed to be carried out under a bespoke Environmental Permit in order to restore the quarry to productive agricultural land and create surface water features. Historical Development Historically, land-uses on the Site have included agricultural activities and mineral extraction operations. Neither of these activities are considered likely to have contaminated the land. Only part of the quarry has been extracted to date. Planning permission for the restoration of the quarry was granted by Warwickshire County Council on 6th July 2017, see Appendix 1 Planning Permission RBC/16CM004. The Approved Waste Recovery Plan for Brinklow Quarry was based on the requirements of the planning permission to import soils on Site in order to restore the land. However, the Approved Waste Recovery Plan only considered a part of the Site (17.8 Ha rather than the full 82.7Ha covered by the Planning Permission). Overburden from the mineral extraction operations has been deposited in the restoration. Treatment operations under the EnvironmentDO3HUPLW(35*%*/IRU651R³treatment of waste to produce soil, soil substitutes and aggregate´KDYHEHHQXQGHUWDNHQWKDWWKH6LWHVLQFH Proposed Development The ³$PHQGPHQWWRWKH$SSURYHGWaste Recovery Plan´ for the Site was submitted to the Environment Agency in April 2019 DQGVXEVHTXHQWO\ZDVGHHPHGE\WKH(QYLURQPHQW$JHQF\D³UHFRYHU\´RSHUDWLRQ on 7th June 2019, see Appendix 4 Pre-application Advice Letter (EPR/GB3502FS/V002). A variation application to vary the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS from a Standard Rules set to an Environmental Permit therefore needs to be made to: x increase the proposed volume of soils to be recovered at the Site from 57,000m3 to 4,489,507m3. x Increase the area of the recovery operations from 17.8ha to 82.7ha. x Consolidate the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS with the Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502GL. The reasoning for the above changes to the recovery operations is included in the Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan. There is a requirement for 4,489,507m3 of waste material to be used in the restoration in order to restore the Site in accordance with the restoration plans included in the planning permission RBC/16CM004. The waste types included in Table 2.1 Waste types are proposed to be used in the restoration of the quarry. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 3 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Table 2.1: Waste types Exclusions Wastes having any of the following characteristics shall not be accepted: Consisting solely or mainly of dusts, powders or loose fibres Wastes that are in a form which is either sludge or liquid Permitted waste types Source Sub-source Waste Description Additional restrictions code 01 Waste resulting 01 01 wastes 01 01 02 Wastes from Restricted to waste from exploration, from mineral mineral non- overburden and interburden mining, quarrying and excavation metalliferous only. physical and chemical excavation treatment of minerals 01 04 wastes 01 04 08 Waste gravel and from physical crushed rocks other and chemical than those processing of mentioned in 01 04 non- 06 metalliferous minerals 01 04 09 Waste sand and clays 17 17 01 17 01 01 Concrete Construction and concrete, demolition wastes bricks, tiles 17 01 02 Bricks and 17 01 03 Tiles and ceramics ceramics 17 01 07 Mixtures of Metal from reinforced concrete, bricks, concrete must have been tiles and ceramics removed. other than those mentioned in 17 01 06 17 03 bituminous 17 03 02 Bituminous Road planings only. mixtures mixtures other than those mentioned in 17 03 01 17 05 soil stones 17 05 04 Soil and stones other Restricted to topsoil, peat, and dredging than those mentioned subsoil and stones only. spoil in 17 05 03 19 Wastes from waste 19 12 wastes 19 12 09 Minerals (for example Restricted to wastes from management facilities from the sand, stones) only treatment of waste mechanical aggregates that are treatment of otherwise naturally waste (for occurring minerals. example sorting, Does not include fines from crushing, treatment of any non- compacting, hazardous waste or pelletising) not gypsum from recovered otherwise plasterboard. specified 19 12 12 Other wastes Restricted to crushed (including mixture of bricks, tiles, concrete and materials) from ceramics only. mechanical treatment Metal from reinforced of wastes other than concrete must be those mentioned in 19 removed. 12 11 Does not include fines from treatment of any non-hazardous waste or gypsum from recovered plasterboard. 20 Municipal wastes 20 02 garden 20 02 02 Soils and stones Restricted to topsoil, peat, (household waste and and park wastes subsoil and stones only. similar commercial, Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 4 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 industrial and institutional wastes) including separately collected fractions Waste to be used in the restoration works will be accepted and classified in accordance with the Waste Acceptance Procedures, see Appendix 5 Waste Acceptance Procedures. The final landform will be a relatively flat landscape to be used for agriculture. Final ground levels will be similar to the original ground levels of the Site before any mineral extraction was undertaken, see Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 5 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Pathway and receptors Sensitive Receptors There are number of sensitive receptors within 500m of the Site boundary. The direction and distances from the boundary of the Site to the sensitive receptors are provided in Table 3.1, Sensitive Receptors. The references 1 ± 13 are shown on the Sensitive Receptors Plan, Drawing No. 19/003c 001. Table 3.1: Sensitive receptors within 500m of the Site boundary Approximate Direction from distance from Ref Receptor Description Site Boundary Site Boundary (m) Ancient and semi-natural 1 Designated Protected Habitat Southwest 0 deciduous woodland 2 Coventry Road Main road North 0 3 Deciduous woodland Designated Protected Habitat North 10 4 Pond Surface water feature North 20 Agricultural buildings with 5 Woodhill Farm North 120 associated agricultural land Little Wood - Ancient and 6 semi-natural deciduous Designated Protected Habitat North 200 woodland Agricultural buildings with 7 Birchley Farm South 280 associated agricultural land 8 AD plant Anaerobic bio-digestion plant Northeast 300 Agricultural buildings with 9 Highwood Farm Northeast 360 associated agricultural land Ancient and semi-natural 10 Designated Protected Habitat North 380 deciduous woodland 11 East Lodge Residential dwelling North 400 12 Long Acre Residential dwellings East 470 Agricultural buildings with 13 Cottage Farm East 490 associated agricultural land The Sensitive Receptors identified in Table 3.1 have been considered within the Environmental Risk Assessment completed for the Site (Appendix 6 Environmental Risk Assessment) and are considered in this section of the ESSD Report. Geology Bedrock geology LVGHILQHGRQWKH%ULWLVK*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\ZHEVLWHDV³DWHUPXVHGIRUWKHmain mass of rocks forming the Earth and present everywhere, whether exposed at the surface in outcrops or FRQFHDOHGEHQHDWKVXSHUILFLDOGHSRVLWVRUZDWHU´ The Bedrock geology at the Site is classified as ³Mercia Mudstone Group ± Mudstone´. The sedimentary bedrock formed approximately 201 to 252 million years ago in the Triassic Period. The local environment was previously dominated by hot deserts. These sedimentary rocks are fluvial, lacustrine and marine in origin. They are detrital, deposited in lagoons or shallow seas; where a hot, arid climate also leads to the precipitation of beds of evaporites. This classification has been obtained from the British Geological Survey Geology Map. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 6 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Superficial deposits are defined on the British Geological Surve\ZHEVLWHDV³WKH\RXQJHVWJHRORJLFDO deposits forms during the most recent period of geological time, the Quaternary, which extends back DERXWPLOOLRQ\HDUVIURPWKHSUHVHQW´ The superficial deposit geology at the Site is generally classified DV³Bosworth Clay Member -Clay and 6LOW´7KHVXSHUILFLDOGHSRVLWVIRUPHGXSWRPLOOLRQ\HDUVDJRLQWKH4XDWHUQDU\3HULRG7KHORFDO environment was previously dominated by ice age conditions. These sedimentary deposits are glacigenic in origin. They are detrital, created by the action of ice and meltwater, they can form a wide range of deposits and geomorphologies associated with glacial and inter-glacial periods during the Quaternary. This classification has been obtained from the British Geological Survey Geology Map. No site investigations were available at the time of writing this ESSD Report. Hydrology The River Avon is located 1.6km south of the Site. The Site is located in Flood Zone 1, where the probability of fluvial flooding is 0.1% in any year. The majority of the Site is considered to be at a very low risk of flooding from surface water. There are isolated areas of the Site that are at a medium / high risk of flooding from surface water. This Site is not at risk of flooding from reservoirs. The Environmental Risk Assessment for the Site has assessed that there is a ³very ORZ´ risk to surface water due to the following reasons: x Permitted waste types will not include sludges or liquids and accepted waste types are non-hazardous. Strict waste acceptance procedures will ensure that no contaminated waste enters the Site. x There will be no point-source emissions to water. x All liquids on the Site will be provided with secondary containment. Hydrogeology The Site is not located within a Groundwater Source Protection Zone. The Site is located on a Secondary B bedrock aquifer. The majority of the Site is not located on a superficial drift aquifer, however in the western area of the Site is located on a secondary (undifferentiated) superficial drift aquifer. Strict waste acceptance procedures will be implemented at the Site to ensure that no contaminated waste types are accepted onto the Site. Only clean waste soils will be placed in the restoration works. The Environmental Risk $VVHVVPHQWKDVVKRZQWKDWWKHUHLVD³ORZ´ULVNWRJURXQGZDWHUGXHWRWKH nature of wastes being brought onto the Site. There are no Drinking Water Safeguard Zones for groundwater located on or in close proximity to the Site. A Hydrogeological Risk Assessment was completed by Hafren Water Limited in September 2020, see Appendix 7 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment, Ref. 2812/HRA. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 7 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 The Hydrogeological Risk Assessment concludes that: ³XQGHUQRUPDORSHUDWLRQDODQGSRVW-operational phases of landfilling, Hazardous substances will not be present in groundwater beneath the Site in concentrations discernible above background and Non-hazardous pollutants will not be present in concentrations such that pollution of nearby groundwater is caused. On the basis of the information presented in this report, it is considered that the Site will be compliant with respect to the Environmental 3HUPLWWLQJ (QJODQGDQG:DOHV 5HJXODWLRQV ´ Local human population There is not a large human population within 500m of the Site. The local human population includes the residents at nearby farmhouses, properties off Heath Road and Coventry Road and workers at the anaerobic digestion plant to the north-east. 7KHIROORZLQJVRXUFHVLQWKH6LWH¶V(QYLURQPHQWDO5LVN$VVHVVPHQWDUHFRQVLGHUHGWRKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDO to cause harm to the local human population. Dust and Particulates Dust and particulates from waste operations have the potential to cause harm to the local population by harming human health by respiratory irritation and to cause nuisance by leading to dust deposition on cars, homes and clothing etc. The only waste types to be used in the restoration are described in Table 2.1 Waste Types of this ESSD Report. Waste will be accepted onto the Site in strict accordance with the Waste Acceptance ProcedureVZLWKLQWKH6LWH¶V(06. It is considered that there is the potential of dust production from vehicle movements and from the placement of waste into the restoration. However due to the nature and location of the operations it is not considered that there will be a significant impact from dust. Due to the size of the dust particles, the majority of dust emissions are likely to be deposited within 50m of the source. Residential dwellings and workplaces are located more than 50m from the Site boundary. The Environmental Risk Assessment considers that there is a ³ORZ´ residual risk to nearby receptors from dust and particulates. A Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations has been completed for the Site and refers to mitigation measures that will be implemented at the Site for dust emissions. Noise Noise has the potential to cause nuisance, loss of amenity and loss of sleep to the local human population. All of the plant and equipment kept on the Site will be PDLQWDLQHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHPDQXIDFWXUHU¶V recommendations. This results in a low-likelihood of excessive noise from plant due to malfunction. ,WLVFRQVLGHUHGWKDWWKHUHLVD³ORZ´ULVNRIQXLVDQFHWRWKHORFDOKXPDQSRSXODWLRQIURPQRLVHfrom the 6LWH¶VRSHUDWLRQV Odour Waste types accepted onto the Site have a low potential to give rise to odour. They are not putrescible. Strict waste acceptance procedures are applied to incoming loads to ensure that they do not contain malodourous materials. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 8 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 ,WLVFRQVLGHUHGWKDWWKHUHLVD³YHU\ORZ´UHVLGXDOULVNRIWKHORFDOKXPDQSRSXODWLRQEHLQJFDXVHGD nuisance by odour from site operations. Mud & Debris Local residents can be sensitive to mud and debris on local roads from heavy goods vehicles entering and exiting the Site. The Site will have procedures and mitigation measures in place to ensure that mud and debris on local roads is minimised. The Site has a long access road. It considered likely that the majority of mud will be deposited on the access road before exiting vehicles reach Coventry Road. Waste types to be permitted under the Environmental Permit have a low potential to produce litter. A road sweeper will be used when necessary to clear local highways including Coventry Road from litter, mud and waste. ,WLVFRQVLGHUHGWKDWWKHUH LVD³ORZ´UHVLGXDOULVNRIPXG DQGGHEULVWRFDXVH QXLVDQFHDQG ORVVRI amenity to the local population. Pests and vermin Due to the nature of the waste types used in the restoration, it is considered that the risk to the local KXPDQSRSXODWLRQLV³very low´3HVWVDQGYHUPLQDUHJHQHUDOO\DWWUDFWHGWRZDVWHVLWHVWKDWDFFHSW putrescible wastes. There is likely to be a naturally-occurring YHUPLQSRSXODWLRQGXHWRWKH6LWH¶VVXUURXQGLQJODQG-use of agricultural fields and woodland. Housekeeping procedures and strict waste acceptance procedures will ensure that activities and materials that could attract vermin and pests are not undertaken or accepted onto the Site. Habitats and Protected Sites There are areas of deciduous woodland and ancient semi-natural deciduous woodland located within 500m of the Site boundary. The closest areas of deciduous woodland are located on the southern and northern boundaries of the Site. The potential harm to these protected sites could be toxic contamination, nutrient enrichment, disturbance and predation. 7KHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKH6LWH¶V(06SURFHGXUHVVKRXOGPLQLPLVHWKHULVNWR protected sites within 500m of the Site. Waste types accepted at the Site are non-hazardous and are not degradable. 7KHUHLVFRQVLGHUHGWREHD³ORZ´ residual risk to the deciduous woodland located in close proximity to the Site. Coombe Pool Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) is located 800m northeast of the Site. Due to its distance from the Site, it considered that Coombe Pool SSSI will be at a very low risk from operations at the Site. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 9 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Pollution Control Measures Site Engineering An outline engineering plan has not been provided. Waste materials will be placed in the restoration following good practice techniques. Restoration The majority of the Site is to be restored to agricultural land; therefore, the proposed ground levels are relatively flat and similar to the original ground levels of the Site before mineral extraction took place. The proposed levels are shown in the Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15. The restoration of the Site has been designed to create a landscape that is congruous with the surrounding area. The ESSD Report template on the Environment Agency website refers to pre-settlement and post- settlement contours. Settlement is only likely to be significant for sites filled with putrescible waste. Waste types to be imported at the Site will be inert and therefore the Site is not anticipated to be subject to significant settlement. Waste materials will be placed in the restoration following good practice techniques. A stability risk assessment has not been provided for this Site due to the scale and nature of the proposed restoration. The waste types and quantities to be used in the restoration are discussed in the Amendment to the Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan for the Site, Appendix 3. Once the restoration of the Site is complete it is considered that a total of 4,489,507m3 of waste material will have been used. The waste types to be used in the restoration of the Site are included in Table 2.1 Waste Types of this report. The Site will operate in accordance with strict waste acceptance procedures to ensure that only acceptable wastes are brought onto the Site. Past closure controls (Aftercare) The proposed after-use of the Site is agricultural fields for productive farming. There are also areas of lakes and the associated habitat. The Site is to be restored in accordance with the plans within the Planning Permission obtained for the Site. The likelihood of differential settlement and structural failure of the Site is considered to be low due to the types of wastes to be used in the restoration. The waste types are not biodegradable; therefore, it is anticipated that there will be no gas or significant settlement. The Environmental Permit will be surrendered when recovery operations are completed at the Site i.e. when the Site has been restored in accordance with the levels shown on Restoration Scheme Plan, Drawing No. RPB/10/15. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 10 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Monitoring Weather Local Wind Speeds and Directions Wind speed and direction data have been obtained from the Lawford Heath / Rugby observing station for the period from 11/2008 to 10/2019. Lawford Heath / Rugby observing station is located approximately 5.5km to the southeast of the Site. This observing station has wind speed and direction data appropriate for characterisation of the wind climate at the Site, see Figure 5.1: Wind rose from Lawford Heath / Rugby Observing Station 11/2008 to 10/2019. Direction Percentage (%) N 2.6 NNE 5.2 NE 5.1 ENE 3.9 E 3.5 ESE 3.8 SE 3.8 SSE 4.9 S 8.2 SSW 10.4 SW 13.5 WSW 11.3 W 7.6 WNW 5.1 NW 6.3 NNW 4.6 Figure 5.1: Wind rose from Lawford Heath / Rugby Observing Station 11/2008 to 10/2019 (Arrow indicates predominant wind direction) The predominant wind direction blows towards receptors to the north-east of the Site. It is calculated that winds blowing toward this direction account for approximately 35.2% of all winds recorded during the period from 11/2008 to 10/2019. Examination of the seasonal variations in wind speeds show that these do not change significantly, approximately 4ms-1. Therefore, seasonal variations in wind speeds have not been separately considered. Wind direction and speed is not monitored on-site. Rainfall According to data from the Met Office website, between 1981 and 2010, the average annual rainfall for Wymondham was 700mm to 800mm a year. Orographic enhancement is the effect that mountains and high-altitude areas have on clouds and winds. Higher altitude areas force the prevailing winds to rise, which cools the air and consequently enhances the formation of clouds. The landscape surround the Site is largely flat and there are no mountainous regions. Rainfall is not monitored on the Site. Data on rainfall has been obtained from the Met Office website. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 11 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Gas Monitoring Infrastructure There is no existing gas monitoring infrastructure at the Site. Due to the nature of the waste recovery activity there is no proposed gas monitoring infrastructure within the Site or around the perimeter. The waste types to be used in the restoration are inert. This waste will not biodegrade and therefore will not generate gas. Gas Monitoring Gas monitoring has not been undertaken at the Site. A monitoring plan is not deemed necessary for the Site due to the nature of the waste types being used in the restoration. It will be confirmed that no biodegradable waste will be present in the Site through the implementation of strict waste acceptance procedures. Waste Acceptance Procedures are in place on the Site to ensure that only waste types allowed under the Environmental Permit are accepted for placement in the restoration of the quarry. No putrescible wastes will be accepted on the Site as they will not be allowed under the Environmental Permit. Any contravening waste types will be identified at the following points: x Pre-acceptance checks on incoming soils by way of a Hazardous Waste Assessment in accordance with WM3 Technical Guidance. x By checking the accompanying Waste Transfer Note. For example, wastes that have been incorrectly coded on the Waste Transfer Note will not be accepted onto the Site. x By carrying out a visual assessment of the load prior to offloading. x By visual checks during offloading. x By visual checks during the placement of material. If contravening waste types are discovered during these checks, they will be removed in accordance ZLWKWKH6LWH¶V:DVWH5HMHFWLRQ3URFHGXUH A Gas Risk Assessment has not been provided. It is considered that implementation of the Waste Acceptance Procedures on the Site will ensure that no biodegradable waste will be used in the restoration works. There is not a potential of the proposed waste types to produce has even at depth of more than 2m. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 12 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Site Condition Report Site Condition Report Part 1 is included as Appendix 8 of this ESSD Report. Part 1 of a Site Condition Report has been produced for the extension area for the Site. A copy of this Site Condition Report is included as Appendix 5, Site Condition Report Part 1. On completion of the restoration works, Brinklow Quarry Limited will undertake a topographical survey to ensure the conditions of the planning permission has been complied with. This information will be added to the Site Condition Report in due course. A Site Closure Plan has not been provided. The Site will be restored in accordance with the plans submitted as part of Planning Permission RBC/16CM004. The Environmental Permit will be surrendered when waste recovery operations have been completed on the Site. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 13 Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Drawings Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Permit Section Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 002 Sensitive Receptors Plan Drawing No. 19/003c 001 Restoration Scheme Plan Drawing No. RPB/10/15 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Drawing Name Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Agriculture House, Site Address Brinklow Quarry, Southwater Way, Highwood Farm, Telford, Coventry Road, TF3 4NR Brinklow, Warwickshire, T: 01952 879705 CV23 0NJ. M: 07762 580839 E: [email protected] 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m Date 09/05/2019 www.westburyenv.co.uk A Original EPR/GB3502FS permit area (SR 2015 No.39) B Original EPR/GB3502GL permit area (SR 2010 No.12) C Proposed extension of EPR/GB3502FS C A Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Drawing Title Permit Section Plan B Drawing No. 19/003a 002 Agriculture House, Site Address Brinklow Quarry, Southwater Way, Highwood Farm, Telford, Coventry Road, TF3 4NR Brinklow, Warwickshire, T: 01952 879705 CV23 0NJ. M: 07762 580839 E: [email protected] www.westburyenv.co.uk 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m Date 24/09/2020 Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Title Sensitive Receptors Plan 6 11 10 Dwg No. 19/003c 001 Site Brinklow Quarry, 9 Coventry Road, 8 Brinklow, Warwickshire, 3 2 5 CV23 0NJ. 4 Scale See Drawing 4 Date 22/11/2019 Key 12 1 Deciduous Woodland 2 Coventry Road 3 Deciduous Woodland 1 4Pond 5 Woodhill Farm 6 Little Wood 7 Birchley Farm 13 8 Bio-digestion plant 9 Highwood Farm 7 10 Deciduous Woodland 11 East Lodge 12 Long Acre 13 Cottage Farm Site Boundary 500 buffer Agriculture House, T: 01952 879705 Southwater Way, M: 07762 580839 Telford, E: [email protected] 0m 200m 400m TF3 4NR www.westburyenv.co.uk Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendices Appendix 1 Planning Permission RBC/16CM004 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendix 2 Approved Waste Recovery Plan (October 2017) Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendix 3 Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendix 4 Pre-application Advice Letter (EPR/GB3502FS/V002) Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendix 5 Waste Acceptance Procedures Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendix 6 Environmental Risk Assessment Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendix 7 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment, Ref. 2812/HRA Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Setting and Site Design Report: Version 2, October 2020 Appendix 8 Site Condition Report Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 4 Evidence of Technically Competent Management Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 5 Site Condition Report Part 1 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Site Condition Report: Part 1 Site Condition Report, Part 1 1.0 SITE DETAILS Name of the applicant Brinklow Quarry Limited Activity address Brinklow Quarry, Highwood Farm, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ National grid reference SP 41559 78870 Document reference and dates for Site Condition Site Condition Report Part 1± September 2020 Report at permit application and surrender Document references for site plans (including location Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001 and boundaries) Restoration Scheme Plan Drawing No. RPB/10/15 Permit Section Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 002 Site Information The variation application to which this SCR supports applies to the entire Site (Areas A, B and C as shown on Drawing number 19/003a 002 Permit Section Plan). However, this Site Condition Report only describes the condition of Area C as this is the extension area for the permit (not previously covered by a permit). Summary Section A ± Part 1 Site Condition Report not available as this was not prepared when the permit was issued. Section B ± Part 1 Site Condition Report not available as not prepared when the permit was issued. Section C ± Included in this SCR 2.0 Condition of the land at permit issue Environmental setting including: Superficial deposit Geology: ³%RVZRUWK&OD\0HPEHU-Clay and 6LOW´7KHVXSHUILFLDOGHSRVLWVIRUPHGXSWRPLOOLRQ\HDUVDJRLQ x geology the Quaternary Period. The local environment was previously x hydrogeology dominated by ice age conditions. These sedimentary deposits x surface waters are glacigenic in origin. They are detrital, created by the action of ice and meltwater, they can form a wide range of deposits and geomorphologies associated with glacial and inter-glacial periods during the Quaternary. This classification has been obtained from the British Geological Survey Geology Map. Bedrock Geology: ³0HUFLD 0XGVWRQH *URXS ± 0XGVWRQH´ 7KH sedimentary bedrock formed approximately 201 to 252 million years ago in the Triassic Period. The local environment was previously dominated by hot deserts. These sedimentary rocks are fluvial, lacustrine and marine in origin. They are detrital, deposited in lagoons or shallow seas; where a hot, arid climate also leads to the precipitation of beds of evaporites. This classification has been obtained from the British Geological Survey Geology Map. The Site is not located within a Groundwater Source Protection Zone. The site is located on a Secondary B bedrock aquifer. The majority of the Site is not located on a superficial drift aquifer, however in the western area of the Site is located on a secondary (undifferentiated) superficial drift aquifer. There are a number of surface water bodies located on the site. Pollution history including: x pollution incidents that may have affected land No information on any pollution incidents which may have affected the state of the land has been identified. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 1 Site Condition Report: Part 1 x historical land-uses and associated Historical land-uses include quarrying operations and agricultural contaminants land. x any visual/olfactory evidence of existing No visual or olfactory evidence of any existing contamination was contamination found on the site during the site walkover. x evidence of damage to pollution prevention Not applicable. measures Evidence of historic contamination, for example, No records of historical site investigations, reports or remediation historical site investigation, assessment, remediation were available for this area of the site at the time of completing and verification reports (where available) this Site Condition Report. Supporting N/A information Site Reconnaissance Report (September 2020) The access point to the Site from Coventry Road is located at grid reference SP 42193 Access arrangements 79535. Site layout including presence and condition of above and Mobile plant is located on the site associated with the mineral extraction and restoration below ground works. buildings/structures etc. There is significant disturbance of the original ground on the site as of September 2020 Evidence of disturbed land, due to mineral extraction works. discoloured soil or water, subsidence, above ground Stockpiles of material evident across the Site associated with the mineral extractions deposits etc. works. Vegetation type and signs of Large areas of the Site have no vegetation as of September 2020 due to the ongoing distress or absence where it mineral extraction and restoration works. might be expected A Site Reconnaissance Report was not completed at the time the Environmental Permits (EPR/GB3502FS and EPR/GB3502GL) were issued. Significant odours from the land No odours detectable as of September 2020. Liquid discharges from the site There are no liquid discharges from the site. Direction and flow of surface Ponding observable on surface due to recent rainfall. Direction / flow of surface water water run-off and presence of run-off was towards the parts of the site at lower ground levels i.e. where mineral ponding extraction had taken place. Coventry Road bounds part of the northern boundary of the site. Land uses in the vicinity of the Residential properties and farmhouses are located within 500m of the proposed site site boundary. Other land-uses include agricultural land, deciduous woodland and ancient and semi-natural woodland. Presence and condition of A number of water bodies are located within the site boundary. surface water features Evidence of any accidental/uncontrolled No visual or other evidence of accidental/uncontrolled releases on Site. releases at the site (previous or current) Identity potential access constraints e.g. overhead No access constraints identified on the site. cables, location of machinery, operations at the site. Evidence of historic No records of historical site investigations, reports or remediation were available for the contamination, for example, area of this site. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 2 Site Condition Report: Part 1 historical site investigation, assessment, remediation and verification reports (where available) Baseline soil and groundwater None available for this site. reference data 3.0 Permitted activities Permitted activities This SCR describes the condition of Area C for which there have been no permitted waste operations to date. The entire site, as shown on Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 covers areas on which permitted activities take place under: x Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502FS (SR 2015 No.39) - Recovery operations to for the reclamation, restoration or improvement of land. x Environmental Permit EPR/GB3502GL - Treatment operations under (SR 2010 No.12). Non-permitted activities undertaken Mineral extraction operations Document references for: x Environmental Risk Assessment. x environmental risk assessment. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 3 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 6 Environmental Risk Assessment Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Risk Assessment Environmental Risk Assessment Data and Information Judgement Action (By Permitting) Receptor Source Harm Pathway Probability of Conseque Magnitude Justification for Risk Management Residual Exposure nce of Risk Magnitude Risk Local human Releases of Harm to Air transport Low Medium Medium Permitted waste types A number of mitigation measures Low population ± residents dusts and human health - then are non-hazardous and are in effect to reduce the risk of at closest residential micro- respiratory inhalation do not include dusts, dust nuisance as demonstrated in dwellings (Woodhill organisms irritation and powders or loose fibres the Dust Management Plan for the Farm located 120m (bioaerosols) illness and have a low potential proposed operations. Vehicles north, Birchley Farm to produce bioaerosols. entering and exiting the site are located 280m south Movement of waste has sheeted in order to reduce the and Highwood Farm the potential to emit dust. likelihood of dust emissions. Strict located 360m There is potential for waste acceptance procedures are northeast of the Site) increased dust also in place to ensure that and workers at the generation from excessively dusty loads are not anaerobic digestion permitted activities during accepted on Site. Water sprays plant (300m prolonged dry periods. It are used to minimise dust northeast) is considered that due to emissions from the movement of the size of the dust the waste. The mitigation particles, the majority of measures are considered to be dust is likely to be appropriate to account for the deposited within 50m of potential impact from the the source. The increased waste throughput. residential dwellings and workplaces identified as receptors are more than 50m from the permit boundary and therefore are considered unlikely to be exposed to dust from the site. It is considered that the increase in the waste throughput has the potential to increase dust emissions Nuisance - Air transport Medium Low Medium As above. As above Low dust on cars, then clothing etc. deposition Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Risk Assessment Receptor Source Harm Pathway Probability of Conseque Magnitude Justification for Risk Management Residual Exposure nce of Risk Magnitude Risk Local human Litter Nuisance, loss Air transport Low Medium Medium Residential properties Any litter found is collected and Low population (residents of amenity and then located around the site disposed of regularly to keep the at closest residential harm to deposition and work places to the Site tidy. dwellings (Woodhill human health northeast may be Farm located 120 sensitive to litter. The Strict waste acceptance criteria north, Birchley Farm local human is located at are applied within the VLWH¶V located 280m south least 120m from the site. Environmental Management and Highwood Farm Permitted waste types System (EMS) to ensure incoming located 360m have a low potential to loads of waste that have a high northeast of the Site) produce litter. litter content are rejected. and workers at the anaerobic digestion plant (300m northeast)), livestock and wildlife Local human Waste, litter Nuisance, loss Vehicles Low Medium Low Local residents often Access roads are checked Low population ± residents and mud on of amenity, entering and sensitive to waste, litter regularly, and a road sweeper will at closest residential local roads road traffic leaving the and mud on roads. be hired to clear local highways dwellings (Woodhill accidents site Permitted waste types from waste, litter and mud as Farm located 120 have a low potential to required. The mitigation north, Birchley Farm produce litter. It is measures are considered to be located 280m south considered that the appropriate to account for the and Highwood Farm increase in waste potential impact from the increase located 360m throughput will increase in waste throughput northeast of the Site) the number of vehicles and workers at the movements. The length anaerobic digestion of the access road to the plant (300m site is likely to result in northeast) the majority of mud/dust being deposited on the access road before vehicles reach the main road Odour Nuisance, loss Air transport Low Low Low Local residents often Waste imported onto the Site will Very low of amenity then sensitive to odour, be checked to ensure that it does inhalation however permitted waste not contain malodourous types have a low materials. potential to give rise to odour. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Risk Assessment Receptor Source Harm Pathway Probability of Conseque Magnitude Justification for Risk Management Residual Exposure nce of Risk Magnitude Risk Noise and Nuisance, loss Noise Low Medium Medium Local residents often All plant and equipment will be Low vibration of amenity, through the sensitive to noise and maintained in accordance with the loss of sleep air and vibration. Vehicle PDQXIDFWXUHUV¶recommendations vibration movements have the to minimise noise generation. through the potential to produce ground noise and vibration. There is not a large population in close proximity to the site. Local human Scavenging Harm to Air transport Low Medium Low Permitted waste types Implementation of strict waste Very low population - residents animals and human health - and over unlikely to attract acceptance procedures will at closest residential scavenging from waste land scavenging animals and ensure that materials that could dwellings (Woodhill birds carried off site birds but may become attract scavenging animals are not Farm located 120 and faeces. breeding / nesting sites. accepted on to the site. north, Birchley Farm Nuisance and Housekeeping will minimise the located 280m south loss of amenity risk from scavenging animals. and Highwood Farm located 360m northeast of the Site) Pests (e.g. Harm to Air transport Low Medium Low Permitted waste types As above. Very low and workers at the flies) human health, and over unlikely to attract pests. anaerobic digestion nuisance, loss land The permitted waste plant (300m of amenity types are not putrescible. northeast) Local human Flooding of If waste is Flood waters Low Low Low Permitted waste types All liquids shall be provided with Very low population (residents site washed off site are non-hazardous so secondary containment. at closest residential it may any waste washed off dwellings (Woodhill contaminate Site will add to the Farm located 120 buildings / volume of the local post- north, Birchley Farm gardens / flood clean-up workload, located 280m south natural rather than the hazard. It and Highwood Farm habitats is not considered likely located 360m that the Site would flood, northeast of the Site) due to the Site not being and workers at the located within a flood risk anaerobic digestion area. plant (300m northeast) ) and local environment Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Risk Assessment Receptor Source Harm Pathway Probability of Conseque Magnitude Justification for Risk Management Residual Exposure nce of Risk Magnitude Risk Local human All on-site Bodily injury Direct Medium Low Low Permitted waste types The site is constantly manned Low population and / or hazards: physical are non-hazardous during operational hours. livestock after gaining wastes, contact therefore a low unauthorised access machinery magnitude of risk is Inspections are carried out to to waste operation and vehicles estimated. ensure that the plant on the Site is sufficiently maintained, in order to reduce malfunction and accidents. Records are kept of any accidents / incidents on the site to identify any issues. Local human Arson and / Respiratory Air transport Low Low Low Permitted waste types do Site security measures are in Very low population (residents or vandalism irritation, of smoke. not include any place to help prevent acts of at closest residential causing the illness and Spillages flammable materials so a vandalism and arson. dwellings (Woodhill release of nuisance to and low magnitude of risk is Farm located 120 polluting the local contaminate estimated. north, Birchley Farm materials to population. d firewater located 280m south air (smoke or Injury to staff, by direct run- and Highwood Farm fumes), firefighters or off from site located 360m water or arsonists / and via northeast of the Site) land. vandals. surface and workers at the Pollution of water drains anaerobic digestion water or land. and ditches plant (300m northeast) ) and local environment. Local human Accidental Respiratory As above. Low Low Low Permitted waste types do The EMS contains procedures Very low population (residents fire causing irritation, not include any and forms relating to accidents at closest residential the release illness and flammable materials so a and incidents on the Site and what dwellings (Woodhill of polluting nuisance to low magnitude of risk is actions to take should one occur. Farm located 120 materials to the local estimated. Permitted north, Birchley Farm air (smoke or population. activities do not include located 280m south fumes), Injury to staff the burning of waste. and Highwood Farm water or or firefighters. located 360m land. Pollution of northeast of the Site) water or land. and workers at the anaerobic digestion plant (300m northeast) and local environment Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Risk Assessment Receptor Source Harm Pathway Probability of Conseque Magnitude Justification for Risk Management Residual Exposure nce of Risk Magnitude Risk All surface waters on, Spillage of Acute effects: Direct run-off Medium Low Low Permitted waste types do All liquids shall be provided with Very low close to and liquids, oxygen from site not include sludges or secondary containment. Wastes downstream of site ± leachate depletion, fish across liquids so only a low from potentially contaminated There are water from waste, kill and algal ground magnitude risk is sites require analysis. bodies and drains contaminate blooms. surface, via estimated. No point located on the site. d run-off surface source emissions to Strict waste acceptance from waste water drains, water are present. procedures ensure that no e.g. ditches etc. contaminated waste will enter the containing There are waterbodies site. suspended and drains located on the solids. site. All surface waters on, As above Chronic Direct run-off Low Low Low Waste types are non- As above. Very low close to and effects: from site hazardous, so harm is downstream of site ± deterioration of across likely to be temporary There are surface water quality ground and reversible. water features surface, via located on the Site. surface water drains, ditches etc. Indirect run- off via the soil layer. Groundwater ± The As above. Chronic Transport Low Low Low The Site is not located in Waste acceptance procedures Very low Site is not located in a effects: through soil / a Groundwater Source implemented on the site ensure Groundwater Source contamination groundwater Protection Zone. The that no contaminated waste types Protection Zone. of then Hydrogeological Risk are accepted onto the site. groundwater, extraction at Assessment has Implementation of the EMS will requiring borehole. demonstrated that during ensure that no substances treatment of and post operations of contaminate the groundwater at water or deposit of waste for the site. closure of recovery operations, borehole. hazardous substances will not be present in groundwater beneath the Site in concentrations discernible above background and Non- hazardous pollutants will not be present in concentrations such that pollution of nearby groundwater is caused. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Risk Assessment Receptor Source Harm Pathway Probability of Conseque Magnitude Justification for Risk Management Residual Exposure nce of Risk Magnitude Risk Local human Contaminate Harm to Direct Low Medium Low Unlikely to occur but Emissions of substances, such as Very low population - residents d waters human health, contact or might restrict recreational dust, will be minimised by the at closest residential used for skin damage ingestion. use. implementation of procedures dwellings (Woodhill recreational or gastro- within the EMS. Farm located 120 purpose intestinal north, Birchley Farm illness located 280m south and Highwood Farm located 360m northeast of the Site) and workers at the anaerobic digestion plant (300m northeast) Protected sites ± Any Harm to Any Low Low Low Areas of deciduous Implementation of the Site¶V(06 Low Deciduous woodland, protected site woodland and ancient should not cause harm to nearby ancient & semi- through toxic and semi-natural protected sites. It is considered natural woodland are contamination, woodland are located that the management of potential located along parts of nutrient along parts of the site hazards would result in a low the site boundary as enrichment, boundary. Coombe Pool residual risk to deciduous well as in areas within smothering, SSSI is located 800m to woodland and ancient and semi- 500m of the site. disturbance, the northwest and in natural woodland, and Coombe Coombe Pool SSSI is predation etc. considered to be at a Pool SSSI. located 800m to the distance from the Site northwest of the site. where it is unlikely to be affected by site operations. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 7 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment, ref. 2812/HRA Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT BRINKLOW QUARRY Report Reference: 2812/HRA Final version F1 September 2020 Report prepared for: PT-CE Limited Unit 2 Granite House Granite Close Enderby Leicestershire LE19 4AE Barkers Chambers x Barker Street x Shrewsbury x United Kingdom x SY1 1SB T : 01743 355770 x F: 01743 357771 x E : [email protected] Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT GENERAL NOTES Title of report: Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Site: Brinklow Quarry Report ref: 2812/HRA Date: September 2020 Version Date Issued to D1 August 2020 Westbury Environmental Ltd F1 September 2020 Westbury Environmental Ltd Author: John Olsen BSc MSc FGS Reviewer: Heather MacLeod BSc MSc FGS This report has been prepared by Hafren Water Ltd for the named Client, with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the agreed scope and terms of contract. Hafren Water Ltd disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of work. This report has been prepared for use by the client and others acting on their behalf. The report may be passed to regulators. This report does not constitute legal advice or opinion. This report does not represent advice to third parties and no reliance is offered to third parties. No liability is accepted with regard to third parties. Reliance required by any specific Third Party must be agreed in writing with Hafren Water Ltd. P:\Projects\Brinklow Quarry\Reports\HRA (Aug 20)\2812_HRA vn F1 (Sep 20).docx Version: F1 September 2020 Page i Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Report context ...... 1 1.1.1 Current operations ...... 1 1.1.2 Proposed operations...... 2 1.1.3 Scope of report ...... 2 1.2 Policy and guidance documents ...... 3 1.3 Data sources ...... 4 2 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ...... 6 2.1 Baseline information ...... 6 2.1.1 Restoration plan ...... 6 2.1.2 Site description ...... 7 2.1.3 Geology...... 8 2.1.4 Hydrology ...... 11 2.1.5 Hydrogeology ...... 14 2.1.6 Surrounding land use ...... 16 2.1.7 Landfill facilities ...... 16 2.1.8 Conceptual hydrogeological understanding ...... 16 2.1.9 Groundwater control ...... 17 2.1.10 Construction engineering ...... 18 2.1.11 HCSM - Source Pathway Receptor ...... 18 3 HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ...... 24 3.1 Nature of the Hydrogeological Risk Assessment ...... 24 3.2 Risk screening ...... 24 3.2.1 Location ...... 24 3.2.2 Waste types ...... 26 3.2.3 Waste acceptance procedures ...... 26 3.2.4 Compliance with Environmental Permitting Regulations ...... 26 3.2.5 Proposed technical precautions ...... 26 3.2.6 Screening assessment ...... 27 3.3 Proposed assessment scenarios ...... 28 3.3.1 Lifecycle phases ...... 28 3.3.2 Failure scenarios and accidents ...... 28 3.4 Rogue load assessment ...... 29 3.4.1 Priority contaminants to be assessed ...... 29 3.4.2 Regulatory guideline values ...... 30 3.5 Numerical modelling ...... 31 3.5.1 Justification for modelling approach and software ...... 31 3.5.2 Model parameterisation ...... 31 3.5.3 Results of the risk assessment ...... 34 3.6 Review of technical precautions...... 34 3.7 Emissions to groundwater ...... 35 3.7.1 Hazardous substances ...... 35 3.7.2 Non-hazardous pollutants ...... 35 3.7.3 Surface water management ...... 36 4 REQUISITE SURVEILLANCE ...... 37 4.1 Risk-based monitoring scheme ...... 37 Version: F1 September 2020 Page ii Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 5 CONCLUSIONS ...... 38 5.1 Compliance with the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations (2016) 38 TABLES 2812/HRA/T1: Summary of BGS Records ...... 9 2812/HRA/T2: Summary of 1985 investigation borehole records ...... 10 2812/HRA/T3: Summary of 2004 investigation borehole records ...... 10 2812/HRA/T4: Summary of identified receptors and pathways ...... 22 2812/HRA/T5: EALS for Hazardous substances ...... 30 2812/HRA/T6: EALS for Non-hazardous substances ...... 31 2812/HRA/T7: Model input parameters ...... 32 2812/HRA/T8: Results of quantitative risk assessment ...... 34 DRAWINGS 2812/HRA/01 Site location 2812/HRA/02 Phased plan of mineral operation, extraction and restoration 2812/HRA/03 Restoration plan 2812/HRA/04 Proposed restoration elevations 2812/HRA/05 Regional geology 2812/HRA/06 Regional mineral deposits 2812/HRA/07 Surface water bodies features 2812/HRA/08 Regional superficial hydrogeology 2812/HRA/09 Regional bedrock hydrogeology 2812/HRA/10 Groundwater contours for mineral deposits (water strikes) 2812/HRA/11 Sensitive land uses 2812/HRA/12 Hydrogeological conceptual model APPENDICES 2812/HRA/A1 Regulatory responses 2812/HRA/A2 Photographic log 2812/HRA/A3 Borehole records 2812/HRA/A4 Results from RAM Model Version: F1 September 2020 Page iii Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Report context Hafren Water has been commissioned by PT-CE Limited (Westbury) to complete a Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) to support a bespoke Environmental Permit for the Brinklow Quarry Ltd operation located at Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ. Brinklow Quarry (the Site) is centred on National Grid Reference (NGR) SP 41559 78870, as shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/01. This report supplements data presented in the draft Environmental Setting and Site Design Report (ESSD), produced by Westbury Environmental Limited (Westbury) who are preparing the Environmental Permit application, in December 2019 and provides the risk assessment required to support the application to be submitted to the Environment Agency (EA) by Westbury for the bespoke Environmental Permit. 1.1.1 Current operations Brinklow Quarry Ltd was granted planning permission (RBC/16CM004) in July 2017 by Warwickshire County Council to extract sand, gravel and clay minerals and import soil and materials for restoration purposes. The wider site also operates a composting, mortar and construction waste recycling facility to the southeast and an anaerobic digester plant to the northeast of the Site. These ancillary facilities were granted planning permission and operate under the conditions of various Environment Agency permits. Specific to Condition 1 of the planning permission, there is a legal requirement that the Site is progressively restored following/during quarrying operations. Restoration is to include returning the Site back to agricultural land use and the creation of wildlife habitats, including lakes and mixed plantations of woodlands and scrubs to create a landform that is similar to pre- disturbance conditions. To address Condition 1, a Waste Recovery Plan was prepared and submitted to the EA in October 2017, which was subsequently approved in December 2017. Subsequent to the approval of the Waste Recovery Plan, a Standard Rules 2015 No 39 Environmental Permit (EPR/GB3502FS) was obtained from the EA in May 2018 to allow the use of recovered materials in the restoration of the Site. The permit was issued on the basis that 17.8 hectares (ha) of site would be worked for mineral extraction and that 57,000 m3 of imported waste recovery material would be required for site restoration. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 1 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 1.1.2 Proposed operations To ensure that the Site remains compliant with the restoration conditions stated in the planning permission, an amendment to the approved Waste Recovery Plan was submitted to the EA in April 2019 for the following reasons: The approved Waste Recovery Plan only related to restoration of 17.8 ha of the Site, rather than the full extent of the Site which covers an area of 82.7 ha The approved Waste Recovery Plan only allowed for the importation of materials 57,000 m3 whereas, an additional 4,489,507 m3 of imported material would be needed to restore the entire Site The April 2019 amended Waste Recovery Plan was approved by the EA in June 2019. The May 2018 Environmental Permit, based on Standard rules set SR2015 No 39 (Standard Rules Permit) is now sufficient for the restoration of the entire site and hence a bespoke permit is needed. 1.1.3 Scope of report A Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) is needed to accompany the bespoke environmental permit application to the EA. The main objective of the HRA is to assess if the proposed restoration design described in the amended Waste Recovery Plan would present significant risks to controlled waters at and/or in close proximity to the Site. To meet the assessment objective, the HRA will involve the following elements: Collate data from a range of online sources, regulatory bodies and previous reports. As part of the data gathering process a site visit, interviews and water features survey was also completed to identify water receptors and current water management practices Develop a baseline understanding of the water environment and environmental setting at the Site and for the surrounding area Using the baseline information develop a qualitative Hydrogeological Conceptual Site Model to identify the potential impacts of the proposed restoration design on the water and environmental setting Using the information from the Hydrogeological Conceptual Site Model, assess the magnitude and significance of potential impacts of the planned restoration on the water Version: F1 September 2020 Page 2 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT environment through the completion of a risk assessment, to include a risk screening assessment and a quantitative risk assessment If required, derivation of appropriate mitigation measures for identified impacts and a determination over the need for the future monitoring of sensitive controlled water receptors 1.2 Policy and guidance documents This report was completed in general accordance with the policies, legislation and guidance provided in the following documents: Environment Agency, ´Landfill developments: groundwater risk assessment for Leachateµ, February 2016, (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/landfill-developments-groundwater-risk- assessment-for-leachate) Environment AgHQF\´6WDQGDUGUXOHV652015 No 39, The Environmental Permitting (England :DOHV 5HJXODWLRQVµ Environment Agency, ´Environmental permitting (England and Wales) regulations information in support of an application for landfill permit, Hydrogeological risk assessment template, version 1µ, March 2010, (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ hydrogeological-risk-assessment-report-template) Environment Agency, ´:DVWe AFFHSWDQFH SURFHGXUHV IRU ZDVWH UHFRYHU\ RQ ODQGµ, October 2016, (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/waste-acceptance-procedures-for-waste- recovery-on-land) EnvirRQPHQW$JHQF\´7KH(QYLURQPHQW$JHQF\·VDSSURDFKWRJURXQGZDWHUSURWHFWLRQµ version 1.2, February 2018 'HSDUWPHQWIRU(QYLURQPHQW)RRGDQG5XUDO$IIDLUV´(QYLURQPHQWDOSHUPLWWLQJJXLGDQFH the landfill directive, for the environmental permitting (England and Wales) regulations µYHUVLRQXSGDWHG0DUFK 'ULQNLQJ :DWHU ,QVSHFWRUDWH ´'ULQNLQJ ZDWHU VWDQGDUGVµ XSGDWHG -XQH , (http://dwi.defra.gov.uk/consumers/advice-leaflets/standards.pdf) (QYLURQPHQW $JHQF\ ´(QYLURQPHQWDO TXDOLW\ VWDQGDUGV GLUHFWLYH (46' OLVW IRU ZDWHU IUDPHZRUNDVVHVVPHQWµ'HFHPEHU, (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ list-of-chemicals-for-water-framework-directive-assessments/environmental-quality- standards-directive-eqsd-list-for-wfd-assessments) Version: F1 September 2020 Page 3 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 'HSDUWPHQW IRU (QYLURQPHQW )RRG DQG 5XUDO $IIDLUV ´6XUIDFH ZDWHU SROOXWLRQ ULVN DVVHVVPHQW IRU \RXU HQYLURQPHQWDO SHUPLWVµ $SULO , (https://www.gov.uk/ guidance/surface-water-pollution-risk-assessment-for-your-environmental-permit) (6,&RQVXOWLQJ´5$03 - Risk assessment modelling softwareµ, (www.esi-consulting.co.uk) 1.3 Data sources This report was completed with reference to the following information sources: Magic maps online mapping for environmental setting data including areas of ecological interest (https://magic.defra.gov.uk/) British Geological Society online geological and hydrogeological mapping and geological borehole logs (https://www.bgs.ac.uk/) Environment Agency Catchment online Data Explorer, October 2019 (https://environment.data.gov.uk/catchment-planning/) Ordnance Survey (OS) mapping Rugby Borough Council for information on private and unlicensed water supplies. The Council response is presented in Appendix 2812/HRA/A1 Environment Agency for licensed/deregulated surface/groundwater abstractions, active/revoked discharge consents, environmental permits, rainfall and groundwater level data, details of ecological protected areas, active/historical waste management facilities, waste recovery permits and aquifer designations/source protection zones, water flow/quality and flooding data. The Environment Agency response is presented in Appendix 2812/HRA/A1 Westbury Environmental Ltd, ´Amendment to the Approved Waste Recovery Plan: Brinklow Quarryµ, April 2019 Warwickshire County Council, ´1RWLFH of Decision of County Planning Authorityµ (reference RBC/16CM004), July 2017 Westbury Environmental Ltd, ´(QYLURQPHQWDO 6HWWLQJ DQG 6LWH 'HVLJQ (66' 5HSRUW Brinklow Quarry LimLWHGµ draft report, December 2019 PT-CE, ´%ULQNORZ 4XDUU\ 'HSRVLW IRU 5HFRYHU\ 3HUPLW :DVWH 5HFRYHU\ 3ODQµ UHIHUHQFH WRP01), 23rd October 2017 Institute of Geological Sciences, Natural Environment Research Council, ´0LQHUDO Assessment Report 125, The sand and gravel resources of the country between Coventry Version: F1 September 2020 Page 4 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT DQG5XJE\:DUZLFNVKLUH'HVFULSWLRQRI VKHHW63DQGSDUWRIµ5 G Crofts, July 1982 GeoCon Site Investigation Ltd, December 2014 A Landmark Information Group Envirocheck Report, reference 64396239_1_1, February 2015 Steetley Construction Materials Limited, ´7KH5HFRQQDLVVDQFHRI$VWRQ·V/DQGDW%ULQNORZ near Coventry, Warwickshire, May 1986 A site visit was completed by Hafren Water on 10th June 2020 to meet with Brinklow Quarry personnel, gain an understanding of current operations and water management systems and complete a water features survey to identify and visually inspect controlled waters in close proximity to the Site. Images taken during the inspection are presented in Appendix 2812/HRA/A2. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 5 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 2 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL A Hydrogeological Conceptual Site Model (HCSM) is a qualitative approach developed to represent the characteristics of the Site and identify the possible theoretical interactions between potential source and receptors via a range of exposure pathways. Through the various hierarchy of the assessment process, as more information becomes available, the HCSM can be refined. In the context of the HCSM, a source, pathway and receptor are defined as the following: A source is a potential contaminant present within imported waste materials used for site restoration that has the potential to cause harm Receptors are controlled waters (eg surface waters and aquifers), abstractions and ecology which could be adversely affected by the contaminant A pathway is the route or means by which a receptor could be exposed to, or affected by, a contaminant For a potential risk to exist all three of the above elements must be present, and linked to form a ´pollutant linkageµ. The potential risk associated with each pollutant linkage can be assessed by considering the nature of the contaminant, the degree of potential exposure of a receptor to a contaminant and the sensitivity of the receptor. As described below, the development of the HCSM and identification of source, pathways and receptors involved a review of baseline and environmental setting information presented in the data sources listed in Section 1.3. The information presented from this review process was then used to inform and evaluate viable pollutant linkages. 2.1 Baseline information 2.1.1 Restoration plan A summary of the pertinent features of the restoration design/approach are outlined below. For a detailed description of the restoration design, the reader should refer to the PT-CE October 2017 report, listed in Section 1.3. The restoration of the Site will be completed progressively over several phases to follow the program of mineral extraction. As mineral extraction exhausts available resources in one phase, it will be restored while mineral extraction is occurring in another phase. Drawing 2812/HRA/02 illustrates the planned phases of operation and extraction. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 6 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Once restoration is complete, the eastern half of the Site will be returned to agricultural land use with D ¶/DQGVFDSHG $UHD· and the western half will contain three lakes of differing configuration and restored woodland. A wildlife corridor will also be created along the southern boundary of the Site. Drawing 2812/HRA/03 shows how the Site will look post- restoration. It is estimated that 49% (4,276,177 m3) of materials required to complete the restoration will be sourced from overburden and materials (topsoil, subsoil, clays and sand and gravels) generated from quarry operations. The remaining 51% (4,489,507 m3) of restoration materials will be derived from off-site sources. The remaining 51% is in addition to the 57,000 m3 already permitted for use. The full list of authorised wastes is presented in Table 2.1 in the Westbury ESSD, December 2019 report which is derived from Table 2.5 in the EA Standard Rules Permit. To ensure regulatory compliance, the Site will apply strict waste acceptance procedures as part of their Environmental Management System. It is understood that excess clay reclaimed from the Site will be placed at the base and sides of the excavations formed from mineral extraction. This approach will facilitate the backfill and the placement of imported restoration materials by raising the base of the excavations to above the watertable and limiting the volume of groundwater ingress through the quarry faces. This approach is also designed to reduce the need for dewatering and water management during restoration. Once the infilling is complete each Phase will be topped with low permeability residual clay from the site, as well as utilising surplus clay this will also act to limit the ingress of precipitation and displace water. The proposed restoration elevations are shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/04. The placement of clay at the base and sides of the excavations will also be adopted for the construction of the lakes to be located in the west of the Site. Low permeability clays will provide a low permeability barrier to contain lake water. Topsoil/subsoils reclaimed from, and imported to, the Site will be placed over the upper low permeability layer in each Phase and across the wider site to provide a suitable growing medium. 2.1.2 Site description The Site covers an area of some 82.7 ha and has been in operation for ~5 years for the extraction of sand and gravels and clay. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 7 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT A water management system is in place to facilitate mineral extraction and processing. It is understood that water collecting in worked out areas is transferred around the Site as needed, but no off-site dewatering occurs. Water accumulating in areas of active mineral extraction is pumped into an area previously worked and separated by phase boundary earthworks (bunds) as required. It is understood that the Site is in the process of applying for an abstraction and transfer licence to support mineral extraction and processing options. As there is no need for off-site discharge there is no requirement to hold, or to obtain, a discharge consent to support current or future operations. 2.1.3 Geology Regionally, the bedrock geology comprises the Mercia Mudstone Group (MMG), a sedimentary deposit of Triassic age, as shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/05. The MMG is described as a red mudstone and subordinate siltstone with halite units and beds of gypsum/anhydrite and sandstone. The bedrock geology in the region is overlain by superficial deposits of the Wolston Glacigenic Formation of the Quaternary age which comprises the Bosworth Clay Member (BCM) and the Thrussington Member (TM). The BCM is a glacialacustrine (Glacial Lake) deposit that covers the majority of the Site and is described as clay and silt. The TM is a Glacial Till that covers a small area in the west of the Site and is described as diamicton, a mixture of brown to reddish- brown clay and silty clay with stones and subordinate sand, gravelly clay and silt. The location of the BCM and TM is shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/05. The BCM and TM are underlain by the Dunsmore Gravel (DG), Wolston Sand and Gravel (WSG) and the Baginton Sand and Gravel (BSG) as described below. The extent of mineral deposits is shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/06. DG is described as very clayey pebbly sand and clayey sandy gravel. It is generally located at higher elevations, with the nearest deposit located ~250 m north/northwest of the Site. The thickness ranges from ~0 to 3.3 m and averages ~1.6 m across the extent of the deposit BSG is a glacial deposit described as a pebbly sand clay, very clayey gravel and sandy gravel. It generally outcrops to the west of the Site and becomes increasingly overlain by the BCM deposits as they extend east below the Site. Locally and at the Site their thickness ranges from ~0.5 to 14.1 m and averages ~4.2 m across the extent of the deposit Version: F1 September 2020 Page 8 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT WSG is described as clayey, very clayey fine sand and gravel. It is generally located beyond the Site boundary to the north and east of the Site. Its thickness ranges from ~0 to 12 m and averages ~5.3 m across the extent of the deposit British Geological Survey (BGS) records indicate that eight boreholes are located within a 1 km radius of the Site, as summarised in Table 2812/HRA/T1. Copies of the detailed borehole records are presented in Appendix 2812/HRA/A3. 2812/HRA/T1: Summary of BGS Records Lithology Base depth range (mbgl) Soil 0.2 ² 0.5 Glacial Lake Deposits (BCM) 1.0 ² 23.4 Glacial Till (possibly TM) 1.2 ² 9.8 BSG 5.1 ² 12.3 DG 1.7 ² 2.5 WSG 15.2 ² 18.3 MMG 5.5 ² 79.0 Note: mbgl = metres below ground level In summary, in stratigraphical sequence from oldest to youngest, the published geology describes the ground conditions at and in the vicinity of the Site as follows: Bedrock ² MMG Superficial ² DG, WSG, BSG, BCM and TM It is understood that it is the combination of sand and gravel (BSG, WSG and DG) and clay (TM and BCM) deposits described above which forms the economic mineral at the Site. The mineral extraction is generally extended down to the top of the MMG. Previous assessments A ground investigation was completed by Steetley Construction Materials Limited in 1986 to determine the extent of mineral deposits at the Site. The investigation involved the drilling of eleven boreholes to depths up to 28 mbgl (59.2 metres Above Ordnance Datum (mAOD)). The main findings of the investigation were as follows: The southern and northeastern part of the Site was barren, ie no mineral deposits were identified, with Glacial clays and silts over Mercia Mudstone (formally Keuper Marl) reported Version: F1 September 2020 Page 9 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Mineral reserves were encountered in what appears to be a west to east band across the area of investigation. In the west of the Site ground conditions comprised Glacial clay/silts with average thicknesses of 3.8 m underlain by BSG, also with an average thickness of 3.8 m. In the east of the Site ground conditions comprised Glacial clays/silts with a thickness over 10 m in the north and south of the site. Average thickness across this area was 4.9 m. The glacial clays/silts are underlain with WSG and BSG with an average thickness of 3.6 m and 3.5 m respectively The base of the BSG and WSG is at ~70 to 72 mAOD and ~78 to 80 mAOD respectively A summary of the ground conditions encountered in the boreholes drilled at the Site is presented in Table 2812/HRA/T2. 2812/HRA/T2: Summary of 1985 investigation borehole records Lithology Description Base depth range (mAOD) Glacial clay and silts Reddish brown pebbly clay 80.5 to 61.2 WSG Brown, fine sand 78.8 to 76.7 BSG Sandy gravel 75.6 to 71.5 Mercia Mudstone Reddish brown clay 75.1+ to 69.9+ A second ground investigation was completed by GeoCon Site Investigations Ltd in 2004 to better characterise the extent of mineral deposits in the central area of the Site. The investigation involved the drilling of twenty boreholes to depths up to 28 mbgl. A summary of the ground conditions encountered in the boreholes drilled at the Site is presented in Table 2812/HRA/T3. 2812/HRA/T3: Summary of 2004 investigation borehole records Lithology Description Base depth range (mbgl) Topsoil Soft brown clay 0.1 to 0.4 Probable Glacial Deposits Soft to very stiff orange (labelled as Possible Alluvium brown reddish brown 0.5 to 2.2 or Head Deposits, but likely to slightly sandy slightly be Glacial Deposit) gravelly clay Probable WSG Reddish brown gravelly (labelled as Dunsmore Gravel, 4.2 to 15.8 sand/sand but likely to be WSG Possible BSG Reddish brown sand and (labelled as Dunsmore Gravel, 6.25 to 16.5 gravel but likely to be BSG Version: F1 September 2020 Page 10 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 2812/HRA/T3: Summary of 2004 investigation borehole records Lithology Description Base depth range (mbgl) Mercia Mudstone Group Weathered mudstone, recovered as stiff reddish 7.0+ to 17.0+ brown slightly sandy clay Water strikes ~5.9 to 14.0 To further characterise the geology of the Site, a review of a PT-CE drawing entitled ´%ULQNORZ 4XDUU\ 5HVWRUDWLRQ 6HFWLRQVµ UHIHUHQFH :53% 0DUFK (presented in the Westbury (QYLURQPHQWDO /WG UHSRUW HQWLWOHG ´$PHQGPHQW WR WKH $SSURYHG :DVWH 5HFRYHU\ 3ODQ %ULQNORZ4XDUU\µ$SULO ) was completed. The drawing indicated the following: The estimated base elevation of the quarry void will range between 70 and 77 mAOD The estimated base elevation of the imported fill material will range between 73 and 80 mAOD. The estimated elevation for the top of the imported fill will range between 76 and 88 mAOD. The thickness of the imported fill will range between ~1 to ~8 m. It is understood that the EDVHRIWKHLPSRUWHGILOOPDWHULDOUHSUHVHQWVWKHWRSRIWKH¶6LWH:RQ· clay to be used to raise the levels of the voids above groundwater levels The estimated restored ground level will range between 76 and 91 mAOD 2.1.4 Hydrology Regional setting Regionally, the Site is situated in the Warwickshire Avon Management Catchment area. Within this catchment the Site is located in the smaller catchments of Smith Brook and, to the immediate west and north of the Site, the Claycoton Yelvertoft Brook catchment. The meetings of these local catchments may indicate the presence of a watershed at or in close proximity to the Site. Within the local catchments, a number of surface waterbodies, as shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/07 have been identified at and in close proximity to the Site, these are as described below. The Site is located in a Flood Zone 1 area with a low (0.1%) probability of fluvial flooding in a given year. It is understood from representatives of the Site, that the Site is not affected by flooding. Site water features Within the Site there are some sixteen ponds (four in the west and twelve in the east) of various dimension formed as part of the current mineral extraction operations. The lagoons located Version: F1 September 2020 Page 11 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT in the southeast of the Site and used for mineral processing are naturally clay-lined. The remainder of the ponds are not artificially/naturally lined and are formed from groundwater seepage through the walls of excavations and water pumped directly to them from other areas of the Site to facilitate mineral extraction. As mineral extraction operations progress it is anticipated that the number and dimensions of the ponds will evolve. A small pond associated with farming operations is located in the centre west of the Site adjacent to a hedgerow. It is anticipated that the pond will be drained and removed to accommodate future mineral extraction. An unnamed ephemeral field boundary drainage ditch with an east/west orientation and flow is located in the south of the Site and exitVWKH6LWH·VZHVWHUQERXQGDU\It is understood that the field drain receives land drainage from agricultural fields to the north. At the time of inspection, the drainage ditch was dry. Due to the interruption of water flow within the channel as a result of mineral extraction operations, the east/west drainage ditch remains largely dry throughout the year. Water flow to the drainage ditch will be reinstated as part of the future restoration works. The east/west drainage ditch is surface water fed, with little evidence of groundwater ingress. Images of the drainage ditch are presented in Appendix 2812/HRA/A2. There are no naturally formed waterbodies, watercourses and/or springs at the Site. Off-site water features On exiting the Site, the east/west drainage ditch continues to flow southwest, west, northwest below (culverted) Coventry Road (B4428) and then west adjacent and to the south of Coombe Pool and enters Smite Brook to the west (down-gradient) of Coombe Pool ~2.2 km northwest of the Site. Visual inspection of the drainage ditch and Coombe Pool indicates the drainage ditch is at a lower elevation than the Coombe Pool, suggesting that the ditch and Coombe Pool are not hydraulically connected. Moreover, if seepage did occur, it would flow from the Coombe Pool into the ditch. It is understood that the pool is clay-lined with water levels regulated by a weir system at its western end. Images of the drainage ditch and Coombe Pool are presented in Appendix 2812/HRA/A2. At their nearest points, Smite Brook and Coombe Pool are located ~850 m north and 670 m northwest of the Site respectively. Smite Brook flows west/southwest past the Site and then around Top Pond and an unnamed pond before discharging into Combe Pool ~875 m northwest of the Site. Via a weir system, water discharges from Coombe Pool where Smite Brook continues flowing west and then north, eventually discharging into the River Sowe Version: F1 September 2020 Page 12 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ~2.65 km northwest/west of the Site. The River Sowe flows west and then southerly towards Coventry and discharges into the River Avon ~10 km southwest of the Site. At its nearest point Top Pond and the unnamed pond are located ~1.0 and 1.2 km northwest of the Site respectively and are sourced from neighbouring drainage ditches. Both ponds discharge to the south/southwest and into Coombe Pool. At its nearest point the River Avon is located ~1.5 km south of the Site and flows east towards Rugby. An unnamed field boundary drain (likely to be surface run-off fed) is located ~465 m southeast of the Site at Cottage Farm. The drain flows west and south until it enters the River Avon ~1.5 km southeast of the Site. The Oxford Canal is located ~1.8 km east of the Site. A general network of field boundary drains and ponds are located in the surrounding area associated with farming operations, the nearest of which is a small pond located ~40 m north of the Site. No springs have been identified within close proximity to the Site. Water quality Smite Brook and the River Avon have an overall Water Framework Directive waterbody status RI¶0RGHUDWH· (2016). At the time of reporting, no water quality data was available for the other surface waterbodies listed above. No hydrometric stations are located within a 3 km radius of the Site. The Site is not located at or within the vicinity of a Drinking Water Safeguard Zone for surface waters (England). Surface water abstractions and discharges There are five licensed surface water abstraction points within a 3 km radius of the Site, as follows: Abstraction registered (18/54/10/0190) to CW Reay and Son for abstraction up to 45 m3/year from the Grange, Church Lawford, a tributary of the River Avon located ~2.65 km southeast of the Site IRU¶6SUD\,UULJDWLRQ² Storage· Version: F1 September 2020 Page 13 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Abstraction registered (18/54/11/0068) to AG Hill and Co for abstraction up to 18 m3/year from Coombe Abbey Farm, Smith Brook located ~1.0 km northwest of the Site IRU¶6SUD\ Irrigation ² 'LUHFW· Abstraction registered (18/54/11/0122) to Rolland Hill & Son for abstraction to 41 m3/year from Old Lodge Farm, Binley, a tributary of the River Sowe located ~1.0 km west/southwest RIWKH6LWHIRU¶6SUD\,UULJDWLRQ² Storage· Abstraction registered (18/54/10/0046) to CW Reay & Son for abstraction up to 27 m3/year from Church Lawfords, River Avon located ~1.5 km southeast of thH6LWHIRU¶6SUD\,UULJDWLRQ ² Direct· Abstraction registered (18/54/10/0153) to J & N Reay & Son for abstraction up to 13.6 m3/year from The Hall, Kings Newnham, Rugby, River Avon located ~2.15 km southeast RIWKH6LWHIRU¶6SUD\,UULJDWLRQ² Direct· Representatives of the Site do not have data pertaining to surface water users in the vicinity of the Site. 2.1.5 Hydrogeology Aquifer designations The MMG Bedrock geology is designated as a Secondary ¶%· DTXLIHU ZKLFK is of low permeability and stores/yields limited volumes of groundwater. The superficial TM deposits located in the west of the Site are designated as a Secondary ¶8QGLIIHUHQWLDWHG·DTXLIHUZKLFKFDQQRWEHDWWULEXWHGWRHLWKHUSecondary ¶A· or ¶B· rock types and have historically contained the characteristics of both minor and non-aquifers. The sand and gravel mineral deposits (WSG, BSG and DG) located at and in close proximity to the Site are designated as Secondary ¶$·DTXLIHUVZKLFKFRPSULVHSHUPHDEOHGHSRVLWVWKDW can support local water supplies as base flow to rivers. The aquifer designations for superficial and bedrock geology are shown on Drawings 2812/HRA/08 and 2812/HRA/09. The Site is not located at or within the vicinity of a Source Protection Zone, or a groundwater drinking water safeguard zone. The majority oI WKH 6LWHLV ORFDWHG LQ D¶/RZ· JURXQGZDWHU vulnerability zone likely associated with protection afforded by the low permeability Bosworth &OD\$QDUHDLQWKHZHVWRIWKH6LWHLVORFDWHGRQDFRPELQDWLRQRID¶0HGLXP· and ¶Medium +LJK·YXOQHUDELOLW\]RQHOLNHO\DVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHPRUHSHUPHDEOH70 Version: F1 September 2020 Page 14 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Groundwater flow No groundwater monitoring wells are present at or in close proximity to the Site. In the absence of specific groundwater level data, water strike and elevation data contained on borehole logs in the Steetley Construction Materials Limited report, May 1986 was reviewed and assessed to determine groundwater elevations at the Site. Specific to the mineral deposits water strike elevations ranged from 76.9 mAOD in the northwest of the Site to 75.2 mAOD in the southeast of the Site. On the basis of the pattern of water strike elevations across the Site, the inferred groundwater flow direction is from northwest to southeast. Based on the 1986 information the thickness of the saturated zone within the sand and gravel ranges from ~3 m in the west of the Site to ~11.5 m in the east. Groundwater elevations and the inferred groundwater contours are shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/10. Data from BGS records indicates that water strikes in the vicinity of the Site ranged from 72 to 96 mAOD. It is anticipated that during mineral extraction and with the generation of ponds, there will be some disruption to local groundwater flow at the Site. Flow around the outside of the site should revert to natural flow direction after cessation of mineral extraction and completion of restoration. Groundwater abstractions Records indicate that there is one licensed and one private unlicensed groundwater abstraction within a 2 km radius of the Site, as follows: Licensed abstraction is registered (18/54/10/0146) to J C Channing & Sons for two boreholes (National Grid Reference 442540, 276461 and 442450, 276400) located at Brandon Grange Farm ~NPVRXWKRIWKH6LWHIRU¶*HQHUDO)DUPLQJ'RPHVWLFDQd Direct 6SUD\,UULJDWLRQ·XVH7KHERUHKROHVDUHVFUHHQHGLQWKH$YRQ$OOXYLXP and the Mercia Mudstone Group (formerly the Keuper Marl). Aggregate annual yields from both wells were recorded at 45,460 m3 Unlicensed private abstraction is registered to East Lodge, Brinklow Road, CV3 2AB located ~570 m northwest of the Site Representatives of the Site do not have data pertaining to groundwater users in the vicinity of the Site. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 15 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Groundwater quality At the time of reporting, no specific data was available on the groundwater quality at and in close proximity to the Site. However, information presented by the EA indicates that the overall ZDWHU TXDOLW\ LQ WKH ´0XGURFNVµ 0HUFLD 0XGVWRQH *URXS LV ¶Good·. However, the Site is located in a designated Nitrate Vulnerable Zone as being at risk from agricultural nitrate pollution and exhibiting concentrations in excess of 11.3 mg/l (as N). 2.1.6 Surrounding land use The Site is surrounded by predominantly arable agricultural fields and associated farm houses/buildings. As shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/11, several localised sensitive land use areas are also present within a 3 km radius of the Site, these are described below. Coombe Pool is designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), a nationally important ecological and conservation site. The SSSI is located ~790 m northwest of the Site. It comprises a registered recreation park and garden with woodlands and ponds. It is understood that the SSSI is surface water fed from Smite Brook. Four woodlands (semi natural deciduous/deciduous) are located at distance from adjacent to the VRXWKHUQERXQGDU\RIWKHVLWH ¶%LUFKOH\:RRG· WRaPQRUWK RI WKH 6LWH 7KHVH woodlands are designated as protected habitats and likely to be rain-fed. It is understood that there are no current or former contaminated land use activities located at or in close proximity to the Site. 2.1.7 Landfill facilities One landfill facility was identified within a 3 km radius of the Site. The landfill is closed and is LGHQWLILHG DV ¶%UDQGRQ :RRG· ($+/' ~2.5 km southwest of the Site at NGR SP 39869 76550. It operated between January 1968 and December 1972 and was licensed to accept restoration waste materials. 2.1.8 Conceptual hydrogeological understanding The geology of the Site comprises mainly low permeability superficial BCM glacial deposits (non-aquifer) and relatively higher permeability superficial TM glacial deposit ¶8QGLIIHUHQtiatHG$DQG%·DTXLIHU which range in thickness from ~1.5 to 27 m. These deposits are underlain by high permeability sand and gravel (Secondary ¶$·DTXLIHU superficial mineral deposits which range in thickness from ~2.0 to 10.0 m. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 16 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Groundwater data indicates that the mineral deposits are saturated, with groundwater levels ranging from ~76.9 to ~75.2 mAOD and saturated thicknesses of ~3 m. The superficial strata are underlain by the MMG, which is a lower permeability lithological unit (Secondary ¶%· DTXLIHU). While there may be some hydraulic connection between the superficial deposits and MMG, the horizontal bedding of the MMG is such that vertical permeabilities tend to be very low, hence they support a watertable in the overlying superficial strata. Based on available water strike data, the estimated groundwater flow direction through the mineral deposits is from the northwest to southeast of the Site towards the River Avon located ~1.5 km south of the Site. The main surface water feature at the Site is an ephemeral east/west orientated drainage ditch located in the south of the Site. This flows west/northwest towards Coombe Pool, it does not discharge into Coombe Pool but passes to the south and west before discharging to Smite Brook ~2.2 km northwest of the Site. The drainage ditch is run-off/surface water fed from other land drains located at the Site and is unlikely to receive groundwater inputs. The drainage ditch is also unlikely to be hydraulically connected to Coombe Pool which is at a higher elevation. Even if both features were connected, given the difference in elevations, it is likely that water flow would be from Coombe Pool into the drainage ditch. As water is pumped within the site to allow dry mineral extraction and no water is discharged off-site, changes in groundwater levels as a result of the operation of the site are likely to be very localised and temporary. Following restoration, groundwater flow should largely return to its pre-existing state around the site. A simplified schematic cross-section representing the hydrogeological conceptual model for the Site is shown on Drawing 2812/HRA/12. 2.1.9 Groundwater control To facilitate site operations groundwater management comprises two main operations as follows: Use of natural clay-lined lagoons located in the southeast of the Site to treat water from mineral processing. Water is pumped to the processing area and returned to the lagoons to allow sediment settlement. As required, the lagoons are replenished by pumping groundwater that has accumulated in open excavations Version: F1 September 2020 Page 17 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Water accumulating in the operational mineral extraction area is pumped into neighbouring previously worked areas, separated by earthen bunds. As required water that seeps through the walls and base of the extraction area is pumped back to the neighbouring water-filled voids It is understood that none of the water generated at the Site is discharged off-site, only transferred around the Site to facilitate operations. Post-restoration, no groundwater or surface water controls are anticipated. 2.1.10 Construction engineering In accordance with regulations, due to the nature of the restoration waste materials to be used as the Site, there is no requirement for the provision of engineering solutions (eg artificial sealing liner and/or geological barrier) for pollution control at the Site. Despite the absence of a need for a geological barrier¶6LWH:RQ·ORZSHUPHDELOLW\FOD\will be placed at the base of each worked out area and up the sidewalls to raise the base of the Phase above the watertable and hence limit/prevent the ingress of groundwater during backfill. Once each Phase is filled to the design restoration contours residual, site-derived, low permeability clays will be placed above the waste. On this basis, it is expected that restoration waste materials will be placed dry. Over time it is anticipated that there should be limited ingress and egress of groundwater to the areas of infill. The presence of low permeability superficial glacial and MMG bedrock deposits below and surrounding the Site will further limit the movement of potential groundwater contaminants that may originate from the Site post-restoration. 2.1.11 HCSM - Source Pathway Receptor Source On the basis of the defined waste codes, listed in Table 2.1 in the Westbury draft ESSD, December 2019 report, with the exception of waste codes ¶20 02 02·, ¶·, ¶17 03 02· and · ·, the restoration materials will be entirely non-reactive, are unlikely to contain and/or release mobile contaminants that may impact controlled waters/users and are non- putrescible or biodegradable. Specific to the above waste codes these materials should be largely non-reactive. Further comments are as follows: WDVWHFRGH¶·DQG¶·(soils and stones, restricted to topsoil, peat, subsoil and stone only) ² wastes comprising or containing topsoil or peat will be placed in the Version: F1 September 2020 Page 18 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT upper 0.5 m of the restoration profile only and will not be included in the main body of the waste. This would negate risks associated with gas production Waste code ¶· ELWXPLQRXVPL[WXUHVRWKHUWKDQPHQWLRQHGLQURDGSODQLngs only) - this material is to be recycled at the on-site recycling/processing facility for resale and will not form part of the restoration materials to be used at the Site :DVWH FRGH · · RWKHU ZDVWHV LQFOXGLQJ PL[WXUH RI PDWHULDOV IURP PHFKDQLFDl treatment of waste other than those mentioned in 19 12 11, restricted to waste from the treatment of non-hazardous construction and demolition waste only. Metal from reinforced concrete must be removed. Does not include gypsum from recovered plasterboard To ensure that restoration materials meet the requirements of the waste recovery plan and permit, Brinklow Quarry will operate under strict waste acceptance procedures and testing, throughout the life of the restoration. The management and testing associated with the restoration program will be completed by suitably qualified and experienced staff. There will be no open gate policy, with all deliveries pre-arranged and approved subject to full adherence to operational procedures. Chemicals and fuels required to facilitate mineral extraction and restoration operations will be stored in designated areas with appropriate secondary containment and managed/handled in strict accordance with the Environmental Management System (EMS), best practice and guidance to prevent contaminant release to the Site. In the event of an accidental release, appropriate equipment and suitably trained and experienced personnel will be in place to contain, clean up and document the release and area of impact to limit contaminant migration. Pathways The waste will be placed above the watertable. In terms of groundwater pathways, the formation of large open excavations and transfer of ingress water during mineral extraction operations will likely result in an inward hydraulic gradient which will likely prevent contamination migrating from the Site into the surrounding controlled waters. Following restoration, it is assumed that pre-existing groundwater levels and hydraulic gradients will resume. Groundwater should flow around the Site through unworked aquifer/geological units associated with the granular high permeability sand and gravel mineral deposits. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 19 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Considering its aquifer classification, some flow through the superficial TM deposits is likely. The presence of low permeability BCM DQGWKHXVHRI¶6LWH:RQ·FOD\DVSDUWRIWKHUHVWRUDWLRQLV likely to inhibit the flow of groundwater through the Site itself. With respect to bedrock, although there may be some vertical hydraulic connectivity between the MMG and the overlying deposits, due to its general low permeability, it is more likely that groundwater in the superficial deposits will preferentially flow horizontally over the MMG rather than vertically into it. In terms of surface water, during operations, given that nearby land drains are receiving little if any run-off water, there is likely to be a limited direct flow path to down-gradient receiving surface waterbodies. Once flow is restored, the drainage ditch in the south of the Site will provide a direct flow path to down-gradient receiving surface waterbodies. Receptors On the basis of the information presented in the baseline and environmental setting review, and on the assumption that the direction of groundwater flow is southeasterly the following receptors were identified: The Secondary ¶A·, Secondary ¶B· and ¶8QGLIIHUHQWLDWHG $DQG% ·aquifers associated with superficial and bedrock deposits located below and adjacent to the Site though the migration of impacted shallow groundwater into deeper and neighbouring geological units. These aquifers are important catchments for controlled water supply, especially the Secondary ¶$· associated with the mineral deposits which can be highly productive Two groundwater abstraction wells have been identified within a 2 km radius of the Site, however considering their up-hydraulic gradient position in relation to the Site and natural attenuation afforded by the distance from the Site, they are not considered viable receptors The Coombe Pool SSSI is located ~800 m northwest of the Site, however, given its up- hydraulic gradient position in relation to the Site from a groundwater perspective and the likely absence of a hydraulic connection between the drainage ditch and the ponds, the SSSI is not considered to be a viable receptor Smite Brook and the downstream River Soar located ~875 m and ~2.65 km northwest/west of the Site respectively. From a groundwater perspective given the up-hydraulic position of these waterbodies and distance in relation to the Site, they are unlikely to be viable receptors. With respect to surface water discharge, when restored Smite Brook will receive periodic flow from the ephemeral drainage ditch located at the Site. Given the distance Version: F1 September 2020 Page 20 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT to the discharge point (~2.2 km), allowing for natural attenuation and considering the drainage ditch is surface run-off/water fed and unlikely to be in contact with groundwater, Smite Brook and the River Soar are not considered to be viable receptors The River Avon is located ~1.5 km south of the Site. Although down-hydraulic gradient of the Site, given its distance from the Site and allowing for natural attenuation, it is not considered to be a viable receptor Five surface water abstraction points have been identified within a 3 km radius of the Site. Two of the abstractions are located up-hydraulic gradient of the Site and sourced between ~1.0 km northwest and southwest/west of the Site from Smite Brook and the River Soar for spray irrigation purposes. Given their up-hydraulic location, distance to the Site and the type of water use, these abstractions are not considered to be viable receptors. The remaining three abstractions are sourced from the River Avon ~1.5 to 2.65 km southeast of the Site. Given their distance, use and allowing for natural attenuation, these abstractions are also not considered to be viable receptors A field drainage ditch is located ~465 m east of the Site at Cottage Farm and flows south into the River Avon ~1.5 km southeast of the Site. Given its distance from the Site and the likelihood that it is sourced from surface run-off water from local fields, this feature is not considered to be a viable receptor During the operational phase, while the inward flow of groundwater and operational controls will limit the off-site migration of potential contaminants, the primary receptor is considered to be the underlying/neighbouring aquifer units, primarily the Secondary ¶A· aquifer catchment associated with the mineral deposits. As there is no off-site discharge to surface/groundwater bodies, no associated compliance point is anticipated during operations. Following restoration, and with the placement of restoration materials, the primary receptor and compliance point will be the underlying and neighbouring aquifer units, especially the Secondary ¶$·FDWFKPHQWDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHPLQHUDOGHSRVLWV. On this basis (and allowing for southeasterly flow direction) the compliance point would be the southern boundary of the Site. Typically, secondary receptors are receiving surface waterbodies, groundwater/surface water abstraction points and sensitive land uses. As described above the viability of such receptors has been qualitatively discounted at the Site. Identified receptors and pathways are summarised in Table 2812/HRA/T4. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 21 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 2812/HRA/T4: Summary of identified receptors and pathways Hazard In accordance with Table 2.1 of the December 2019 draft ESSD report, to meet the restoration plan design requirements, 4,489,507 m3 of restoration waste materials will be imported to the Site. With the exception of four waste types, the restoration materials to be used at the Site will be entirely non-reactive, unlikely to contain and/or release mobile contaminants and are none putrescible or biodegradable. :DVWH FRGH · · & ¶ · may contain/comprise topsoil/subsoil, peat and stones. While this material will not present a hazard to controlled waters, materials comprising or containing topsoil or peat could be prone to gas production, the risks of which will be negated by its placement in the upper 0.5 m of the restoration profile. :DVWHFRGH¶·ZLOOFRQWDLQURDGSODQings, however, this material will be processed for off-site resale and not used as a restoration material. :DVWHFRGH· ·ZLOO be restricted to waste from the treatment of non-hazardous construction and demolition waste only. Overall, the majority of the waste will pose a minimal potential hazard to controlled waters at and in the vicinity of the Site post-restoration. Source In accordance with EA guidance, all waste imported and deposited at the Site throughout the restoration program will adhere to strict waste acceptance procedures which shall ensure the waste is correctly characterised and compliant with the approved waste codes. Management and waste testing associated with the restoration program will be completed by suitably qualified and experienced staff and accredited laboratories. To manage groundwater ingress during the placement of restoration materials, ORZSHUPHDELOLW\¶6LWH:RQ·FOD\ZLOOEHSODFHGon the base and sides of the extraction areas. Such an operation will limit potential for contaminants, if present, to migrate from the Site. On this basis it is considered unlikely that significant concentrations of contaminants will be present in the waste material and/or become mobilised beyond the excavated areas by the infiltration and flow of precipitation and groundwater through waste medium post-restoration. Hazardous contaminants associated with hazardous wastes will be prohibited for use at the Site. Potential primary Mobilisation and vertical/horizontal migration into the superficial and pathway solid geological aquifer units directly underlying and neighbouring the Site. Potential secondary Mobilisation and vertical/horizontal migration through unworked pathway superficial and solid geological units to surface water features and users in contact with groundwater Potential primary The underlying and neighbouring superficial and bedrock aquifer units, receptor especially the Secondary ¶$·FDWFKPHQWDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHPLQHUDO deposits. Potential secondary No viable secondary receptor has been identified at the Site. receptor Version: F1 September 2020 Page 22 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 2812/HRA/T4: Summary of identified receptors and pathways Compliance point For the presence of contaminants that fall under the hazardous or non- hazardous substances classification, the compliance point post- restoration will be the Secondary ¶$·aquifers associated with mineral deposits neighbouring the southern boundary of the Site. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 23 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 3 HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 3.1 Nature of the Hydrogeological Risk Assessment The EA does not necessarily require an HRA to support a bespoke environmental permit for waste recovery to land. These are only required where the Site and environmental setting is deemed particularly sensitive. However, on the basis that the restoration waste may over time become partly saturated and to maintain a robust assessment of risk to controlled waters post- restoration, a quantitative risk assessment has been completed to support the application for the bespoke environmental permit. Environment Agency guidance proposes a tiered approach to risk assessment such that the degree of effort and complexity reflects the potential risk posed by a particular site or situation, the sensitivity of the site setting and the degree of uncertainty and likelihood of the risk being realised. To meet the requirement, a robust conceptual model for the Site has been set out and basic risk screening undertaken. The conceptual model is set out in the December 2019 ESSD report and supplemented in Section 2. A risk screening exercise has been undertaken as summarised in Section 3.2 below to determine whether a restoration development represents, or potentially represents, a risk to controlled waters. Risk screening is partially covered by the assessment of the application of the E$·V Landfill Location Policy, the identification of source-pathway-receptor linkages (described in Section 2) and the proposed technical precautions to be put in place to reduce any potential impacts (described in Section 3.2.5). 3.2 Risk screening 3.2.1 Location Although an application for a landfill permit is not being made, the location of the Site is conservatively assessed against the E$·Vpolicy on the location of landfills, which is described in the ($·V GRFXPHQW HQWLWOHG ¶7KH (QYLronment Agency·s approach to groundwater protection, version 1.2, section ¶3RVLWLRQ6WDWHPHQW(/DQGILOO/RFDWLRQ·)HEUXDU\ that states the following: ´ The Environment Agency will normally object to any proposed landfill site in groundwater SPZ1. For all other proposed landfill site locations, a risk assessment must be conducted based on the nature and quantity of the wastes and the natural setting and properties of the location. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 24 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Where this risk assessment demonstrates that active long-term site management is essential to prevent long-term groundwater pollution, the Environment Agency will object to sites: x below the watertable in any strata where the groundwater provides an important contribution to river flow, or other sensitive receptors x within SPZ2 or 3 x on or in a Principal Aquiferµ Restoration waste materials are to be placed above the watertable. Low permeability clay reclaimed from the Site will be used to raise the base of the excavations above the watertable and placed up the quarry faces to limit/prevent groundwater ingress during and following restoration. The aquifers underlying the Site and neighbouring areas range from Secondary ¶$· WR Secondary ¶%·. No ¶3rincipal Aquifers·DUHSUHVHQWDWRULQWKHYLFLQLW\RIWKH6LWH. The Site is not located at or within close proximity to a groundwater SPZ. It is assumed that the aquifers at and neighbouring the Site, in part, contribute towards the baseline flow of surface waterbodies surrounding the Site, primarily waterbodies located down-hydraulic gradient to the south/ southeast of the Site. Albeit over distance, Smite Brook receives ephemeral discharge from the east/west orientated drainage ditch located at the Site. The Site will only receive a range of restoration materials which are compliant with waste acceptance procedures and listed on the Standard Rules set for waste recovery. The stringent controls placed on imported materials to be deposited for restoration are such that there will be a low risk of deterioration in groundwater or surface water quality. Due to the nature of the restoration waste materials and the baseline conditions, long-term management will not be necessary to prevent groundwater pollution. Based on the review of waste types, baseline conditions and the use of low permeability clay deposits to control groundwater ingress and maintain dry conditions during the placement of restoration materials, it was concluded that the Site complies with the EA landfill location policy. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 25 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 3.2.2 Waste types The Site will accept a restricted range of wastes as detailed in December 2019 ESSD report. Waste will only be accepted on condition that it adheres to the waste acceptance procedures and analytical test data provided in advance of delivery to Site to indicate that the material is uncontaminated and compliant with the waste code classification. It is understood that the Site will be notified of the origin of the waste. By their nature, most of the waste types to be used in the restoration will be non-reactive, unlikely to contain and/or release mobile contaminants and are not putrescible or biodegradable. Waste code · 02 ·may comprise topsoil which contains a higher proportion of organic matter. While this material will not present a hazard to controlled waters, any topsoil accepted under this waste code will be placed in the upper 0.5 m to negate the risks associated with gas production. :DVWH FRGH · · will be restricted to waste from the treatment of non- hazardous construction and demolition wastes only. Hazardous wastes will be prohibited from use at the Site. 3.2.3 Waste acceptance procedures Strict waste acceptance procedures and testing have been prepared and are detailed elsewhere in the permit application. The Site will not operate on an ´RSHQJDWHµ policy, with all deliveries prearranged, and subject to strict waste characterisation. Incoming waste will be from known sources and carefully scrutinised. 3.2.4 Compliance with Environmental Permitting Regulations Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations (2016), Schedule 22 ¶Groundwater $FWLYLWLHV·DSSO\7KHVHHQVXUHWKDWHazardous substances must not be present in groundwater beneath the Site at concentrations discernible above background and Non-hazardous pollutants must not be present in concentrations such that pollution of nearby groundwater is caused. 3.2.5 Proposed technical precautions Leachate collection As this is not a landfill but a recovery operation, there will be no requirement to collect and manage leachate generated at the Site and therefore no requirement for the installation of engineered leachate drainage layers, an artificial sealing liner or collection system. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 26 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Geological barrier As this is not a landfill but a recovery operation, a geological and/or engineered barrier system is not required. However, to manage groundwater ingress and raise the imported waste DERYHWKHZDWHUWDEOH¶6LWH:RQ·ORZSHUPHDELOLW\FOD\LVWREHSODFHGDWWKHEDVHDQGXSWKH sides of the extraction areas. The use of low permeability clays will act as a basal layer and an aquitard, reducing the infiltration of rainwater and groundwater into the restored areas and thus reducing the mobilisation and migration of potential contaminants into the underlying and neighbouring aquifers. The low permeability MMG and glacial deposits which underlie and surround the Site will also provide a natural basal geological barrier further inhibiting groundwater flow into sensitive aquifers. Monitoring See Section 4 where the requirement for groundwater, surface water and ground gas monitoring schemes are discussed. 3.2.6 Screening assessment Based on the following, it is considered that the proposed waste recovery operation will not pose a significant risk to controlled waters at and in the vicinity of the Site: Apart from the SecondDU\ ¶$· aquifer associated with the mineral deposits which is of moderate sensitively, the 6HFRQGDU\ ¶%· and ¶8QGLIIHUHQWLDWHG A and B· aquifer units associated with MMG and TM are low sensitivity and relative productivity. There are no SPZs at or in close proximity to the Site Considering groundwater flow direction, distance/proximity of the Site to surrounding receptors and allowing for natural attenuation, the likelihood of a mobile contaminant reaching and significantly impacting on a controlled waterbody is considered to be low There are no users of surface water or groundwater resources identified that would be considered a viable receptor All restoration waste materials are to be placed in excavations that will contain a layer of ¶6LWH:RQ·ORZSHUPHability clay at the base and the sides to raise the waste above the watertable and manage groundwater ingress. This operation will restrict groundwater ingress and egress and the potential mobilisation/migration of contaminant and impacts on controlled waters The presence of low permeability glacial and mudstone deposits will afford additional restriction to contaminant movement through the presence of a natural basal layer which Version: F1 September 2020 Page 27 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT will slowly recharge and promote attenuation of any potential contaminants contained in the waste stream By their nature most of the waste codes to be accepted at the Site are non-reactive, unlikely to contain and/or release mobile contaminants and are non-putrescible or biodegradable. Strict adherence to the waste acceptance criteria will be maintained throughout the life of the project It is considered that the proposed waste recovery operation does not pose a significant risk to controlled waters at and/or in the vicinity of the Site. 3.3 Proposed assessment scenarios 3.3.1 Lifecycle phases EA guidance states that a Hydrogeological Risk Assessment must be carried out for the whole lifecycle of the landfill, ie from the start of the operational phase until the point at which the landfill is no longer capable of posing an unacceptable environmental risk. Given the outcome of the risk screening, a quantitative Hydrogeological Risk Assessment of the intended operational and post-closure phases is not deemed necessary. 3.3.2 Failure scenarios and accidents Failure scenarios As this is a recovery operation and not a landfill there will be no requirement for the incorporation of engineering structures and/or management systems to prevent the ingress of precipitation/groundwater or the egress of leachate at the Site. On this basis, failure of water management systems is not possible, and associated failure scenarios have not been considered any further. Accidents Accidents are considered to be unintentional incidents that could reasonably occur, which are unforeseeable at their time of occurrence. An assessment of the potential impacts of accidents, together with the likelihood of their occurrence and magnitude of the consequences in relation to compliance with the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations (2016)) is presented below. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 28 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Accidents at the Site could include the acceptance of contaminated material through the DFFHSWDQFH RI ¶URJXH ORDGV·. However, due to the proposed strict waste acceptance procedures and absence of any historical waste at the Site, it is considered highly unlikely that ¶URJXHORDGV·ZLOOEHDFFLGHQWDOO\DFFHSWHGDWWKHSiteKRZHYHUD¶URJXHORDG·DVVHVVPHQW has been undertaken. 3.4 Rogue load assessment To support the application for bespoke environmental permit, a ¶URJXHORDGDVVHVVPHQWwas completed using the RAM spreadsheet modelling software. The software was used to assess natural attenuation capacity at the Site and surrounding area and model the potential for contaminants at the Site to impact on water quality of sensitive controlled water receptors. 3.4.1 Priority contaminants to be assessed For groundwater and surface waters, Environmentally Acceptable Levels (EALs) are used as a measure against which the results of models can be compared. EALs have been determined on the basis of available water quality standards for the parameters below in the absence of background groundwater concentrations. The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 (EPR, 2016) require there to be no discernible discharge of non-hazardous and hazardous substances to controlled waters. Therefore, the appropriate EAL would be the concentration at which they become ¶GLVFHUQLEOH· At the time of reporting, there was no appropriate chemical/background data for controlled waters at and/or in close proximity to the Site and no known contaminative land uses other than agricultural. Therefore, contaminants were selected to represent typical persistent harmful contaminants that would likely be present in hazardous and non-hazardous waste as described below. Hazardous contaminants The wider site operates an ancillary composting, mortar and inert waste recycling facility in the southeast area and an anaerobic digester plant to the northeast of the Site. On the understanding that these operations are regulated and subject to the condition of the EA permit conditions they are unlikely to impact on controlled waters. Accordingly, elevated concentrations of hazardous substances are not expected either at or in the vicinity of the Site. In the absence of chemical data for the Site and surrounding area, arsenic and benzene were selected as representative of Hazardous metals and hydrocarbons respectively. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 29 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Non-hazardous contaminants There are no known land uses at or in the vicinity of the Site that would result in the release of non-hazardous substances to controlled waters. Accordingly, elevated concentrations of non-hazardous substances are not expected at or in the vicinity of the Site. In the absence of chemical data for the Site and surrounding area ammoniacal nitrogen would normally be selected as a surrogate contaminant as it frequently occurs where biodegradable matter has been incorporated within the waste mass. However, as potential exists for elevated ammoniacal nitrogen concentrations in the superficial strata due to the former/current farming operations (eg fertiliser spreading) at and in close proximity the Site, the use of this parameter has been discounted. As an alternative cadmium was used to represent a non-hazardous metal and chloride was selected as a conservative, non-reactive/degradable/retarded parameter, which will travel at the same rate as groundwater. 3.4.2 Regulatory guideline values In the absence of background data, to determine if a substance presents a significant risk, Environmentally Acceptable Levels (EALs) have been used as guideline values to compare with model output concentrations. If modelled output parameter concentrations exceed the ($/·VWKHUHLVDSRWHQWLDOULVNWRFRQWUROOHGZDWHUV2XWSXWSDUDPHWHUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVEHORZ the EALs are unlikely to present a risk to controlled waters. The Drinking Water Inspectorate UK Drinking Water Standards, 2017 and the EA Environmental Quality Standards (EQS), 2016 were used for the Site. In each case, the most stringent guideline value was used in completing the generic quantitative risk assessment as presented in Tables 2812/HRA/T5 and 2812/HRA/T6. 2812/HRA/T5: EALS for Hazardous substances Substance UK Drinking Water Standard Fresh Water EQS Resultant EAL (μg/l) (μg/l) (μg/l) Arsenic 10 50 10 Benzene 1 10 1 Version: F1 September 2020 Page 30 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 2812/HRA/T6: EALS for Non-hazardous substances Substance UK Drinking Water Standard Fresh Water EQS Resultant EAL (μg/l) (μg/l) (μg/l) Chloride 250,000 250,000 250,000 Cadmium 5 0.45 0.45 3.5 Numerical modelling 3.5.1 Justification for modelling approach and software 7KH DVVHVVPHQW KDV EHHQ XQGHUWDNHQ XVLQJ (6,·V 5LVN $VVHVVPHQW 0RGHO 5$0 which was developed in collaboration with the EA. The tool is widely recognised and accepted by the regulators and wider industry as a robust and accurate fate and transport modelling tool for sub watertable conditions and to estimate the maximum concentrations of the determinands that could be accepted at a Site without breaching the EALs. The model assumes the following conditions: An accidental deposit of non-compliant waste in the centre of the site? The model assumes 10 x 10 x 2 m ¶rogue load· is deposited 10 m from the compliance point (southern site boundary) The recharge to the Site has been taken to be effective rainfall as determined from the MAFF bulletin (Technical Bulletin 34; Climate and Drainage (1976) A minimum thickness of ~2 m DQGPRI¶6LWH:RQ·FOD\ZLOOEHSODFHGDWWKHEDVHDQG walls of the excavations, respectively 3.5.2 Model parameterisation The parameters used in the RAM assessment are described together with justification for their use within the RAM model in Table 2812/HRA/T7. Where known, site-derived hydraulic properties have been used. In the absence of site-derived data, published and literature- based data has been used to run the model. The following pathway has been modelled: a) From the source (200 m3), vertically and horizontally through the ¶6LWH :RQ· ORZ permeability clay into the underlying and neighbouring unsaturated mineral deposits to the watertable located at the southern site boundary The model was run for a maximum time period of 100 years, which is significantly longer than the period likely to be required to achieve Permit Surrender and is therefore considered to be a conservative upper time limit for the simulation. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 31 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT The RAM model simulates the resultant concentrations in groundwater surrounding the Site based on initial source concentrations and a declining source term. It also calculates the mD[LPXP VRLO FRQFHQWUDWLRQV WKDW FRXOG EH DFFHSWHG EHIRUH IDLOXUH RI WKH ($/·V DW WKH modelled receptors. 2812/HRA/T7: Model input parameters Parameter Value/distribution Justification SOURCE TERM Waste volume (m3) 200 m3 Assuming five rogue loads dimensions 10 x 10 x 2 m GENERAL CONTAMINANT INFORMATION Free water diffusion coefficient (m2/s): Arsenic 9.05 x 10-10 Chloride and benzene from Buss et al, 2004, Table 3.1 Benzene 7 x 10-10 and arsenic from Allison & Allison, 2005 Chloride 2.03 x 10-9 Cadmium 7.17 x 10-10 HYDROGEOLOGICAL UNITS Thickness (m): Clay side wall 1 m Minimum clay thickness on side wall (base is 2 m) Unsaturated sand and gravel 4.0 m For unsaturated & saturated - average from borehole Saturated sand and 3.0 m logs formed in close proximity to southern boundary gravel Hydraulic conductivity (m/s): Clay side wall 1 x 10-9 m/s Estimated maximum Unsaturated sand 1 x 10-4 m/s Average value derived from Domenico, PA and and gravel Schwartz, FW 1990. Physical and Chemical Saturated sand and 1 x 10-4 m/s Hydrogeology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 824 p. gravel Hydraulic gradient: Clay sidewall 0.25 Assumed reasonable worst case (will not be directly Unsaturated sand 1 vertical) and gravel Assumed vertical Saturated sand and Estimated using water strike data from previous gravel 0.001 assessment, ie 76.7 (BK1) ² 75.5 mAOD (BK3) / 784 m) Porosity: Clay side wall 0.4 C.W. Fetter, 1994. Applied Hydrogeology, 3rd edition. 0.20 Unsaturated sand Heath, R.C., 1983. Basic ground-water hydrology, U.S. and gravel Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2220, 86p Saturated sand and 0.20 gravel Tortuosity 5 Assumed generic value for all hydrogeological layers Version: F1 September 2020 Page 32 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 2812/HRA/T7: Model input parameters Parameter Value/distribution Justification Horizontal travel Assumed approximate distance from edge of waste distance to: deposits allowing for placement of clay at the base Southern boundary 10 m (assumed minimum of 3 m) and up the walls (assumed minimum of 1 m) of the quarry extraction areas ATTENUATION PARAMETERS Dispersivity Up to unit Based on average sand and gravel thickness thickness 7 m Mixing depth in 3 m Based on averaged saturated thickness saturated sand and gravel Bulk density (kg/m3): Clay side wall 1600 Average bulk density from Freeze, RA, and Cherry, JA, Unsaturated sand 1800 1979, Groundwater: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall and gravel Saturated sand and 1800 gravel Fraction of organic carbon: Clay sidewall 0.01 Average FoC from Unsaturated sand 0.001 https://www.itrcweb.org/DNAPL-ISC_tools- and gravel selection/Content/Appendix%20I.%20Foc%20Tables.htm Saturated sand and 0.001 gravel Arsenic Partition coefficient 1580 Allison & Allison, 2005 (koc) (L/kg) Benzene Koc 135 Average from Earl, et al, 2003 Partition coefficient calculated (kd) (L/kg) 240 Average from California EPA, 1994, p25, also USEPA, Half life in 1996. groundwater (days) Chloride Partition coefficient 0 (kd) (L/kg) No decay Half life (days) Cadmium Partition coefficient 501 Allison & Allison, 2005 (koc) (L/kg) WATER BALANCE Precipitation 685 MAFF Technical Bulletin 34, Area 24 (mm/yr) Effective rainfall Effective 342 Precipitation (mm/yr) Version: F1 September 2020 Page 33 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 2812/HRA/T7: Model input parameters Parameter Value/distribution Justification References Allison, JD & Allison, TL, 2005. Partition coefficients for metals in surface water, soil and waste. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Report EPA/600/R-05/074 Buss, SR, Herbert, AW, Morgan, P & Thornton, SF, 2003. Review of ammonium attenuation in soil and groundwater. Environment Agency NGWCLC report No NC/02/49 Buss, SR, Herbert, AW, Green, KM & Atkinson, C. Contaminant fluxes from hydraulic landfills ² a review. Environment Agency Science Report SC0310/SR California EPA & Department of Toxic Substances Control, 1994. Intermedia transfer factors for contaminants found at hazardous waste sites Earl, N, Cartwright, CD, Horrocks, SJ, Worboys, M, Swift, S, Kirton, A, Askan, AU, Kellener, H & Nancarrow, DJ, 2003. Review of the fate and transport of selected contaminants in the soil environment. Environment Technical Report P5-079/TR1 Thrasher, J, Morgan, P & Buss, SR, 2004. Attenuation of mecoprop in the subsurface. Environment Agency Science Group report NC/03/12 3.5.3 Results of the risk assessment A summary of the RAM modelling results is presented in Table 2812/HRA/T8. A copy of the model outputs is presented in Appendix 2812/HRA/A4. 2812/HRA/T8: Results of quantitative risk assessment Determinand EAL at compliance Maximum permitted leachability concentration in point rogue loads ensuring compliance at the appropriate boundary for Hazardous substances and Non-hazardous pollutants Hazardous: Arsenic 0.01 mg/l 10,000 mg/l Benzene 0.001 mg/l 10,000 mg/l Non-hazardous: Chloride 250 mg/l 30,000 mg/l Cadmium 0.00045 mg/l 90 mg/l The results indicate that 1 rogue load (10 m x 10 m x 2 m) with the above elevated concentrations of arsenic, benzene, chloride and cadmium could be accepted at the site without breaching the appropriate EAL in groundwater at the site boundary. 3.6 Review of technical precautions Due to the nature and characteristics of the restoration waste it is considered that the proposed technical precautions detailed below would be appropriate and sufficient to prevent any unacceptable discharge from the Site: Version: F1 September 2020 Page 34 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Strict adherence to Waste Acceptance Procedures Strict control of waste types sourced and accepted The placement of waste above the watertable only 7KH SODFHPHQW RI ORZ SHUPHDELOLW\ ¶6LWH :RQ· FOD\ DW WKH EDVH DQG XS WKH VLGHV RI extraction areas to raise the base above the watertable and prevent groundwater ingress Progressive restoration to a suitable profile to encourage surface water run-off and minimise water ingress As required, the provision of ditches/berms to minimise surface water ingress to the operational area 3.7 Emissions to groundwater With respect to the assessment objectives, the main purpose of the HRA is to establish whether the predicted discharge from hazardous/non-hazardous substances would comply with the requirements of the EA Environmental Permitting Regulations, October 2016. Moreover, if there would be a need for the installation of controls above those described in Section 3.6 at the Site to mitigate against risks to controlled waters. 3.7.1 Hazardous substances With respect to Hazardous substances the HRA must demonstrate that the proposed technical precautions will prevent Hazardous substances from entering groundwater. Consequently, the HRA must consider whether there is likely to be a discernible discharge of Hazardous substances to groundwater. The compliance point is, therefore, the watertable prior to any dilution occurring. The imported restoration waste materials will be non-hazardous; hence Hazardous substances are not expected to be present in concentrations likely to cause a breach of the EPR (2016). It is therefore considered that the technical precautions discussed in Section 3.6 are sufficient to ensure that during normal operation and through to long-term post-closure, there would be no discernible discharge of Hazardous substances from the waste into controlled waters. This has been demonstrated through quantitative modelling. 3.7.2 Non-hazardous pollutants The HRA must demonstrate that technical precautions will limit the introduction of Non- hazardous pollutants into groundwater so as to avoid pollution. Consequently, it must consider whether predicted concentrations of Non-hazardous pollutants are likely to exceed relevant Version: F1 September 2020 Page 35 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT standards and other environmental quality criteria, or cause an unacceptable deterioration in groundwater quality following dilution. A pathway exists for Non-hazardous pollutants to a receptor, namely groundwater surrounding the Site. However, given the nature of the restoration waste and the XVHRI¶6LWH:RQ·ORZ permeability clays and the presence of low permeability glacial tills and mudstone deposits, it is concluded that, under normal operation and through to long-term post-closure, concentrations of Non-hazardous pollutants would be sufficiently low as to avoid pollution of the groundwater. This has been demonstrated through quantitative modelling. 3.7.3 Surface water management The quarry void and proposed recovery operation are not located in an area that is liable to flood. The site is partially below the watertable; however, whilst water is moved around the site to allow dry mineral extraction and restoration, no water is discharged off-site. Any surface water run-off from the Site will be directed into the lakes in the northwest of the Site and off-site via the existing field drainage system. There will be no need for any additional management of surface water post-closure. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 36 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 4 REQUISITE SURVEILLANCE 4.1 Risk-based monitoring scheme The risk screening and the quantitative modelling indicate under normal operation and through to post-closure that the proposed waste recovery scheme does not pose a risk to the water environment. On this basis it is considered that a leachate collection/management system and/or long-term groundwater/surface water/gas monitoring scheme is not required for the Site post-restoration. Version: F1 September 2020 Page 37 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 5 CONCLUSIONS 5.1 Compliance with the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations (2016) The risk assessment has demonstrated that under normal operational and post-operational phases of landfilling Hazardous substances will not be present in groundwater beneath the Site in concentrations discernible above background and Non-hazardous pollutants will not be present in concentrations such that pollution of nearby groundwater is caused. On the basis of the information presented in this report, it is considered that the Site will be compliant with respect to the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations (2016). Version: F1 September 2020 Page 38 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT DRAWINGS September 2020 Version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ainfall Water pumped Rainfall during Ephemeral extraction to land drain* previously Flows to Smite worked area Brook Clay (Bosworth clay - Thrussington Member) Sand and Gravel Sand and Gravel Seepage (Dunsmore Gravel/ back to Wolston Sand/ Gravel worked area & Baginton Sand Mercia Mudstone *Dry during extraction as flow interupted by extraction. 2. RESTORATION West Rainfall East Low permeability Client Westbury Environmental Ltd. clay reclaimed from Clay capping site and placed at Ephemeral base and pushed up land drain* side of excavations Flows to Smite Brook Clay Title Hydrogeological conceptual (Bosworth clay model Restoration - Thrussington Project Inert Waste Lake Member) Brinklow Quarry Sand and Gravel Drawing 2812/HRA/12 Version 1 (Dunsmore Gravel/ Date Scale Wolston Sand/ Gravel Jul-20 nts & Baginton Sand Mercia Mudstone %DUNHUV&KDPEHUV%DUNHU6WUHHW6KUHZVEXU\ 8QLWHG.LQJGRP6<6% E LQIR#KDIUHQZDWHUFRPT: 01743 355 770 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 2812/HRA/A1 Regulatory responses September 2020 Version: F1 Our Ref: 149860 Megan Williams Hafren Water [email protected] Your Ref: Date: 09 December 2019 Dear Megan Enquiry regarding Brinklow Quarry near Coventry, Warwickshire Thank you for your enquiry which was received on 7 November. We respond to requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information Regulations 2004. 1. Attached is a list of the abstraction licences within 3km of the location specified (point 1). All the info (except aquifer designations but thaW¶V ok) is available on the public register so nothing extra is required on top of the usual conditional licence. Abstraction licence data (attached) which specifies the location of public water supply abstraction sources: x Water Abstractions (AfA135) ± detailed information about this dataset including conditions can be found on the Register Licence Abstract (you will need to download this spreadsheet by clicking on the Data Link µResource LocatoU¶ to access the information about AfA135). You MUST first check the supporting information available online to determine if the conditions on use are suitable for your purposes. If they aren¶Wthis information is not provided with a licence for use, and the data is provided for read right only. 2. See attached data regarding discharge outlets. 3. There are no hydrometric sites with the specified 3km boundary. 4. There are boreholes associated with an abstraction licence at Brandon Grange Farm, Brandon nr Coventry CV8 3GE. Relevant details of these boreholes can be found on the BGS site at: Environment Agency, 9 Wellington Crescent, Fradley Park, Lichfield, Staffs. WS13 8RR Customer services line: 03708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.gov.uk/environment-agency https://www.bgs.ac.uk/data/boreholescans/home.html We can confirm we have no further sources of information for this 3km search area. 5. There are no protected sites of ecological or conservation value within the search area. 6. See attached date regarding historic landfill sites. 7. See excel sheet showing exemptions. 8. There are no aquifer designations and groundwater source protection zones within the vicinity of the site. 9. There are no hydrometric sites with the specified 3km boundary. 10. Water quality designations for any watercourses near to the site. - A breakdown of the 2016 WFD classification for the GB109054044630 catchment (Smite Bk - source to conf R Sowe) is as follows: o Ecological Status - Moderate Biological quality elements ± Moderate x Fish ± Good x Invertebrates ± Good x Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Combined ± Moderate Physico-chemical quality elements ± Moderate x Ammonia ± High x Dissolved oxygen ± Good x pH ± High x Phosphate ± Moderate x Temperature ± High Hydromorphological Supporting Elements ± Supports Good x Hydrological regime ± High x Morphology ± Supports Good o Chemical Status ± Good - This information is available on the external EA Catchment Data Explorer. 11. Please confirm the site is located with the following Water Framework Directive waterbodies; Surface water catchment: The site is located within the Smite Bk - source to conf River Sowe (GB109054044630) catchment. The is part of the wider Warwickshire Avon Management Catchment. Groundwater catchment: GB40902G990900 (Warwickshire Avon- Secondary Mudrocks) Correct 12. Water Framework Directive status for groundwater and surface water bodies at the site. - Groundwater: GB40902G990900 (Warwickshire Avon - Secondary Mudrocks) ± Overall water body status is Good (2016). - Surface water body: There are no WFD surface water bodies at the site; the nearest WFD surface water bodies to the site are: o GB109054044630 (Smite Bk - source to conf R Sowe) ± Overall water body status is Moderate (2016). o GB109054043920 (Avon - ClaycotonYelvertoft Bk to conf R Sowe) ± Overall water body status is Moderate (2016). - Further information is available via the external EA Catchment Data Explorer. Please refer to Open Government Licence which explains the permitted use of this information. The information on Flood Zones in the area relating to this address is as follows: The property is in an area located within Flood Zone 1 shown on our Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea). Note - This information relates to the area that the above named property is in and is not specific to the property itself as it is influenced by factors such as the height of door steps, air bricks or the height of surrounding walls. We do not have access to this information and is not currently used in our flood modelling. Flood Zone definitions can be found at www.gov.uk/guidance/flood-risk-and- coastal-change#Table-1-Flood-Zones Please find attached a copy of the Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea) for the area relating to your address. More information can be found on the website at: https://flood-map-for- planning.service.gov.uk/ You can draw your development extent and the service then provides details on what level of Flood Risk Assessment you would require and the reasons why. Abstract Name Product 1 Description Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea) centred on SP42007585 Licence Open Government Licence Information The mapping of features provided as a background in this Warning - OS product is © Ordnance Survey. It is provided to give context to background this product. The Open Government Licence does not apply to mapping this background mapping. You are granted a non-exclusive, royalty free, revocable licence solely to view the Licensed Data for non-commercial purposes for the period during which the Environment Agency makes it available. You are not permitted to copy, sub-license, distribute, sell or otherwise make available the Licensed Data to third parties in any form. Third party rights to enforce the terms of this licence shall be reserved to OS. Attribution Contains Environment Agency information © Environment Agency and/or database rights. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright 2017 Ordnance Survey 100024198. Data Available Online Many of our flood datasets are available online: x Flood Map For Planning (Flood Zone 2, Flood Zone 3 ,Flood Storage Areas, Flood Defences, Areas Benefiting from Defences) x Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Sea x Historic Flood Map x Current Flood Warnings Further details about the Environment Agency information supplied can be found on the GOV.UK website: https://www.gov.uk/browse/environment-countryside/flooding-extreme-weather If you have requested this information to help inform a development proposal, then you should note the information on GOV.UK on the use of Environment Agency Information for Flood Risk Assessments. https://www.gov.uk/planning-applications-assessing-flood-risk https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pre-planning-application-enquiry-form- preliminary-opinion Please get in touch if you have any further queries or contact us within two months if you¶G like us to review the information we have sent. Yours sincerely Diane Edwards Customers & Engagement Officer For further information please contact the Customers & Engagement Team Team Tel: 02084747856 E-mail: [email protected] Brandon Wood EAHLD28541 historic landfill BrandonWood Farm 6635 & 7663 Brandon Lane, Woston, Coventry 01 January 1968 ± 31 December 1972 (inert) SP3986976550 Flood Map for Planning(Rivers & Sea) centred SP42007858 Date 05/12/19 Legend Risk of flooding from rivers and sea High (>=3.3%) Medium (3.3% - 1%) Low (1% - 0.1%) Very Low (<0.1%) 1: 10,000 0 250 Metres © Crown Copyright and database rights2019 . Ordnance Survey 100024198. Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 2812/HRA/A2 Photographic log September 2020 Version: F1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P1: Site entrance Photograph 2812/HRA/P2: looking south across northern extent of Site Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry %DUNHUV&KDPEHUV%DUNHU6WUHHW6KUHZVEXU\ Photosheet 8QLWHG.LQJGRP6<6% 2812/HRA/PS1 E LQIR#KDIUHQZDWHUFRPT: 01743 355 770 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P3: Looking northwest at retention ponds Photograph 2812/HRA/P4: Looking west in west of Site Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry Photosheet 2812/HRA/PS2 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P5: Looking southwest in west of Site Photograph 2812/HRA/P6: Looking northwest across centre of Site Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry Photosheet 2812/HRA/PS3 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P7: Looking west at land drain Photograph 2812/HRA/P8: Looking west at retention pond Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry Photosheet 2812/HRA/PS4 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P9: Looking northwest across Site Photograph 2812/HRA/P10: Looking at dry east/west land drain Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry Photosheet 2812/HRA/PS5 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P11: Weir at the west end of Coombe Pond Photograph 2812/HRA/P12: Path between Coombe Pond and stream partly sourced by field land drain Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry Photosheet 2812/HRA/PS6 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P13: Confluence of discharge from Coombe Pond and stream partly sourced by field land drain Photograph 2812/HRA/P14: Overflow point at Coombe Pond Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry Photosheet 2812/HRA/PS7 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Photograph 2812/HRA/P15: Stream partly sourced by field land drain Photograph 2812/HRA/P16: Coombe Pond Client Westbury Environmental Ltd Project Brinklow Quarry Photosheet 2812/HRA/PS8 Date Jul-20 Version 1 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 2812/HRA/A3 Borehole records September 2020 Version: F1 Westbury Environmental Ltd Brinklow Quarry HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 2812/HRA/A4 Results from RAM Model September 2020 Version: F1 Source Type Soil Source Groundwater Source Restoration Waste Level Number Clay Side Unsat S &G Advanced Parameter Values Sat S & G Deterministic Probabilistic GW Created: 7/22/2020 3:14:42 PM by: John Olsen Version: 3.00.00 Adv Site: Brinklow Quarry Numerical value Suggested formula Probabilistic parameters Data specified elsewhere Suggested formula edited CONTAMINANT INFORMATION Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Source determinand names 4 Cadmium Chloride Arsenic Benzene Receptor Target Concentrations Name Values in mg/L Quality Standard 1 EAL 0.00045 250 0.01 0.001 Quality Standard 2 Quality Standard 3 Quality Standard 4 Not Specified Generic Contaminant Properties Contaminants_Organic_Carbon_Water_Partition_Coefficient_Koc L/kg 501 0 1580 135 Contaminants_Free_Water_Diffusion_Coefficient m2/s 7.17E-10 2.03E-09 9.05E-10 7E-10 HYDROGEOLOGICAL UNITS Hydrogeological Units Clay Side Unsat S G Sat S G Hydrogeology_Unit_Thickness m 143 Hydrogeology_Log_Hydraulic_Conductivity log(m/s) Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Conductivity m/s 1.00E-09 1.00E-04 1.00E-04 Hydrogeology_Head m Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient [-] 0.25 1 0.001 Hydrogeology_Porosity [-] 0.4 0.2 0.2 Hydrogeology_Velocity m/s 6.25E-10 0.0005 5E-07 Hydrogeology_Tortuosity [-] 555 ATTENUATION PARAMETERS Hydrogeological Units Clay Side Unsat S G Sat S G General properties Attenuation_Dry_bulk_density kg/m3 1600 1800 1800 Attenuation_Fraction_organic_carbon [-] 0.01 0.001 0.001 Contaminant specific parameters Cadmium Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_1 L/kg 5.01 0.501 0.501 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_1 [-] 21.04 5.509 5.509 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_1 days No Decay No Decay No Decay Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_1 1/s 000 Chloride Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_2 L/kg 000 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_2 [-] 111 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_2 days No Decay No Decay No Decay Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_2 1/s 000 Arsenic Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_3 L/kg 15.8 1.58 1.58 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_3 [-] 64.2 15.22 15.22 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_3 days No Decay No Decay No Decay Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_3 1/s 000 Benzene Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_4 L/kg 1.35 0.135 0.135 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_4 [-] 6.4 2.215 2.215 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_4 days 240 240 240 Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_4 1/s 3.34E-08 3.34E-08 3.34E-08 WATER BALANCE User defined Enter your own calculations for the water balance Carry fluxes and velocities over onto the Pathway sheet Infiltration through the soil zone source Source Name: Restoration waste Effective_Rainfall 342 mm/year Infiltration_Factor 1 [-] Infiltration_Rate 342 mm/year Infiltration_Area 100 m2 Q_Infiltration 1.08E-06 m3/s Jan feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Rainfall (m 61 46 47 46 61 51 48 72 60 58 71 64 Potential transpiration (mm) 1 8 29 55 79 91 93 72 4 19 4 0 Effective rainfall (mm) 60 38 18 0 56 39 67 64 Total ER 342 Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Source Unit Unit Unit Receptor Restoration Waste Clay Side : Node 4 Unsat S &G: Node 4 Sat S & G: Node 4 GW Declining source ADRD (1D) + Dilution ADRD (1D) + Dilution ADRD (1D) + Dilution Monitoring Borehole Target Standard EAL Q_managed [m3/s] 0.000E+00 Velocity [m/s] 6.250E-10 Velocity [m/s] 5.000E-04 Velocity [m/s] 5.000E-07 Managed time [years] 0.000E+00 Dispersivity [m] 0.1 Dispersivity [m] 0.4 Dispersivity [m] 1.0 Q_path [m3/s] 1.084E-06 Travel Distance [m] 1.0 Travel Distance [m] 4.0 Travel Distance [m] 10.0 Q_decline [m3/s] 1.084E-06 Mixing Depth [m] Mixing Depth [m] Mixing Depth [m] 3.0 Mixing Width [m] Mixing Width [m] Mixing Width [m] 10.0 Q_Dilute [m3/s] 0.000E+00 Q_Dilute [m3/s] 0.000E+00 Q_Dilute [m3/s] 3.000E-06 Q_dilute [m3/s] 0.000E+00 SIMULATION PARAMETERS Monte Carlo Analysis with Crystal Ball Named Constants Reported Percentile 95 s_per_year 31557600 Number of simulations 10000 s_per_day 86400 Stop on calculation error Use same sequence of random numbers Laplace Transform Solution Parameters Minimise while running: sigma 0 Nothing nu 1 All Spreadsheets (faster) nsum 16 Microsoft Excel (fastest) omega 11 Reporting Options Include Remedial Targets and Attenuation Factors on the results sheets in Advanced level. Use the array form of the RAM function Include a set of timeslices for each contaminant in each pathway Number of timeslices for breakthrough curves 10 The timeslices specified on the results sheets are saved below. Path1 timeslices in years TS_Path1_Spec1 TS_Path1_Spec2 TS_Path1_Spec3 TS_Path1_Spec4 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 30 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 50 50 50 50 60 60 60 60 70 70 70 70 80 80 80 80 90 90 90 90 100 100 100 100 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Site Name: "Brinklow Quarry" Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 2.101E+02 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 1.899E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 1.284E+02 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 8.919E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 6.457E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 4.839E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 3.727E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 2.933E+01 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 2.350E+01 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 1.909E+01 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 3.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 Source Type Soil Source Groundwater Source Restoration Waste Level Number Clay Side Unsat S &G Advanced Parameter Values Sat S & G Deterministic Probabilistic GW Created: 7/22/2020 3:14:42 PM by: John Olsen Version: 3.00.00 Adv Site: Brinklow Quarry Numerical value Suggested formula Probabilistic parameters Data specified elsewhere Suggested formula edited CONTAMINANT INFORMATION Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Source determinand names 4 Cadmium Chloride Arsenic Benzene Receptor Target Concentrations Name Values in mg/L Quality Standard 1 EAL 0.00045 250 0.01 0.001 Quality Standard 2 Quality Standard 3 Quality Standard 4 Not Specified Generic Contaminant Properties Contaminants_Organic_Carbon_Water_Partition_Coefficient_Koc L/kg 501 0 1580 135 Contaminants_Free_Water_Diffusion_Coefficient m2/s 7.17E-10 2.03E-09 9.05E-10 7E-10 HYDROGEOLOGICAL UNITS Hydrogeological Units Clay Side Unsat S G Sat S G Hydrogeology_Unit_Thickness m 143 Hydrogeology_Log_Hydraulic_Conductivity log(m/s) Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Conductivity m/s 1.00E-09 1.00E-04 1.00E-04 Hydrogeology_Head m Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient [-] 0.25 1 0.001 Hydrogeology_Porosity [-] 0.4 0.2 0.2 Hydrogeology_Velocity m/s 6.25E-10 0.0005 5E-07 Hydrogeology_Tortuosity [-] 555 ATTENUATION PARAMETERS Hydrogeological Units Clay Side Unsat S G Sat S G General properties Attenuation_Dry_bulk_density kg/m3 1600 1800 1800 Attenuation_Fraction_organic_carbon [-] 0.01 0.001 0.001 Contaminant specific parameters Cadmium Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_1 L/kg 5.01 0.501 0.501 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_1 [-] 21.04 5.509 5.509 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_1 days No Decay No Decay No Decay Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_1 1/s 000 Chloride Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_2 L/kg 000 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_2 [-] 111 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_2 days No Decay No Decay No Decay Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_2 1/s 000 Arsenic Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_3 L/kg 15.8 1.58 1.58 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_3 [-] 64.2 15.22 15.22 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_3 days No Decay No Decay No Decay Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_3 1/s 000 Benzene Attenuation_Partition_Coefficient_Kd_Species_4 L/kg 1.35 0.135 0.135 Attenuation_Retardation_Species_4 [-] 6.4 2.215 2.215 Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_4 days 240 240 240 Attenuation_Decay_Coefficient_Species_4 1/s 3.34E-08 3.34E-08 3.34E-08 WATER BALANCE User defined Enter your own calculations for the water balance Carry fluxes and velocities over onto the Pathway sheet Infiltration through the soil zone source Source Name: Restoration waste Effective_Rainfall 342 mm/year Infiltration_Factor 1 [-] Infiltration_Rate 342 mm/year Infiltration_Area 100 m2 Q_Infiltration 1.08E-06 m3/s Jan feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Rainfall (m 61 46 47 46 61 51 48 72 60 58 71 64 Potential transpiration (mm) 1 8 29 55 79 91 93 72 4 19 4 0 Effective rainfall (mm) 60 38 18 0 56 39 67 64 Total ER 342 Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Source Unit Unit Unit Receptor Restoration Waste Clay Side : Node 4 Unsat S &G: Node 4 Sat S & G: Node 4 GW Declining source ADRD (1D) + Dilution ADRD (1D) + Dilution ADRD (1D) + Dilution Monitoring Borehole Target Standard EAL Q_managed [m3/s] 0.000E+00 Velocity [m/s] 6.250E-10 Velocity [m/s] 5.000E-04 Velocity [m/s] 5.000E-07 Managed time [years] 0.000E+00 Dispersivity [m] 0.1 Dispersivity [m] 0.4 Dispersivity [m] 1.0 Q_path [m3/s] 1.084E-06 Travel Distance [m] 1.0 Travel Distance [m] 4.0 Travel Distance [m] 10.0 Q_decline [m3/s] 1.084E-06 Mixing Depth [m] Mixing Depth [m] Mixing Depth [m] 3.0 Mixing Width [m] Mixing Width [m] Mixing Width [m] 10.0 Q_Dilute [m3/s] 0.000E+00 Q_Dilute [m3/s] 0.000E+00 Q_Dilute [m3/s] 3.000E-06 Q_dilute [m3/s] 0.000E+00 SIMULATION PARAMETERS Monte Carlo Analysis with Crystal Ball Named Constants Reported Percentile 95 s_per_year 31557600 Number of simulations 10000 s_per_day 86400 Stop on calculation error Use same sequence of random numbers Laplace Transform Solution Parameters Minimise while running: sigma 0 Nothing nu 1 All Spreadsheets (faster) nsum 16 Microsoft Excel (fastest) omega 11 Reporting Options Include Remedial Targets and Attenuation Factors on the results sheets in Advanced level. Use the array form of the RAM function Include a set of timeslices for each contaminant in each pathway Number of timeslices for breakthrough curves 10 The timeslices specified on the results sheets are saved below. Path1 timeslices in years TS_Path1_Spec1 TS_Path1_Spec2 TS_Path1_Spec3 TS_Path1_Spec4 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 30 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 50 50 50 50 60 60 60 60 70 70 70 70 80 80 80 80 90 90 90 90 100 100 100 100 AUDIT TRAIL SHEET Author Date Time Cell Address New Value Old Value Cell Name John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:43:02 PM Pathways:$E$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:43:02 PM Pathways:$G$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:43:02 PM Pathways:$I$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:49:09 PM Pathways:$E$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:49:09 PM Pathways:$G$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:49:09 PM Pathways:$I$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:49:38 PM Pathways:$E$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:49:38 PM Pathways:$G$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 3:49:38 PM Pathways:$I$6 No Processes Path1_Process Section4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:07:21 PM Restoration Was:$B$19 10 Restoration_Was_Source_length John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:07:22 PM Restoration Was:$B$20 10 Restoration_Was_Source_width John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:07:25 PM Restoration Was:$B$22 2 Restoration_Was_Source_thickness John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:05 PM Contaminants:$D$4 Cadmium Contaminants_Source_determinand_names Contaminants_Species1 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:09 PM Contaminants:$E$4 Chloride Contaminants_Source_determinand_names Contaminants_Species2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:15 PM Contaminants:$F$4 Arsenic Contaminants_Source_determinand_names Contaminants_Species3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:18 PM Contaminants:$G$4 Benzene Contaminants_Source_determinand_names Contaminants_Species4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:25 PM Contaminants:$D$9 0.00045 Quality_Standard_1 Contaminants_Species1 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:29 PM Contaminants:$E$9 250 Quality_Standard_1 Contaminants_Species2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:32 PM Contaminants:$F$9 0.01 Quality_Standard_1 Contaminants_Species3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:35 PM Contaminants:$G$9 0.001 Quality_Standard_1 Contaminants_Species4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:16:43 PM Contaminants:$B$9 EAL John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:18:07 PM Contaminants:$D$31 501 Contaminants_Organic_Carbon_Water_Partition_Coefficient_Koc Contaminants_Species1 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:18:11 PM Contaminants:$E$31 0 Contaminants_Organic_Carbon_Water_Partition_Coefficient_Koc Contaminants_Species2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:18:14 PM Contaminants:$F$31 1580 Contaminants_Organic_Carbon_Water_Partition_Coefficient_Koc Contaminants_Species3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:18:18 PM Contaminants:$G$31 135 Contaminants_Organic_Carbon_Water_Partition_Coefficient_Koc Contaminants_Species4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:18:34 PM Contaminants:$D$38 9E-10 Contaminants_Free_Water_Diffusion_Coefficient Contaminants_Species1 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:19:12 PM Contaminants:$D$38 7.17E-10 9E-10 Contaminants_Free_Water_Diffusion_Coefficient Contaminants_Species1 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:19:26 PM Contaminants:$E$38 2.03E-09 Contaminants_Free_Water_Diffusion_Coefficient Contaminants_Species2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:19:36 PM Contaminants:$F$38 9.05E-10 Contaminants_Free_Water_Diffusion_Coefficient Contaminants_Species3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:19:43 PM Contaminants:$G$38 7E-10 Contaminants_Free_Water_Diffusion_Coefficient Contaminants_Species4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:20:28 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 1 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:20:32 PM Restoration Was:$D$75 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:20:36 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 100 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:20:37 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 100 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:33:19 PM Hydrogeology:$C$5 1 Hydrogeology_Unit_Thickness Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:33:27 PM Hydrogeology:$D$5 4 Hydrogeology_Unit_Thickness Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:33:28 PM Hydrogeology:$E$5 3 Hydrogeology_Unit_Thickness Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:07 PM Hydrogeology:$C$12 0.00000001 Hydrogeology_Log_Hydraulic_Conductivity Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:13 PM Hydrogeology:$D$12 0.0001 Hydrogeology_Log_Hydraulic_Conductivity Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:18 PM Hydrogeology:$E$12 0.0001 Hydrogeology_Log_Hydraulic_Conductivity Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:32 PM Hydrogeology:$C$26 0.001 Hydrogeology_Head Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:36 PM Hydrogeology:$D$26 0.001 Hydrogeology_Head Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:39 PM Hydrogeology:$E$26 0.001 Hydrogeology_Head Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:54 PM Hydrogeology:$C$33 0.001 Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:56 PM Hydrogeology:$D$33 0.001 Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:34:57 PM Hydrogeology:$E$33 0.001 Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:35:13 PM Hydrogeology:$D$40 0.2 Hydrogeology_Porosity Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:35:14 PM Hydrogeology:$E$40 0.2 Hydrogeology_Porosity Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:36:13 PM Hydrogeology:$C$40 0.4 Hydrogeology_Porosity Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:36:17 PM Hydrogeology:$C$54 5 Hydrogeology_Tortuosity Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:36:17 PM Hydrogeology:$D$54 5 Hydrogeology_Tortuosity Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:36:18 PM Hydrogeology:$E$54 5 Hydrogeology_Tortuosity Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:38:35 PM Attenuation:$D$7 1800 Attenuation_Dry_bulk_density Attenuation_Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:38:38 PM Attenuation:$E$7 1800 Attenuation_Dry_bulk_density Attenuation_Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:38:43 PM Attenuation:$E$14 0.001 Attenuation_Fraction_organic_carbon Attenuation_Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:38:45 PM Attenuation:$D$14 0.001 Attenuation_Fraction_organic_carbon Attenuation_Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:40:38 PM Attenuation:$C$7 1000 Attenuation_Dry_bulk_density Attenuation_Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:41:51 PM Attenuation:$C$7 1600 1000 Attenuation_Dry_bulk_density Attenuation_Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:51:00 PM Attenuation:$C$14 0.01 Attenuation_Fraction_organic_carbon Attenuation_Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:51:58 PM Attenuation:$C$130 240 No Decay Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_4 Attenuation_Clay_Side_ John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:52:00 PM Attenuation:$D$130 240 No Decay Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_4 Attenuation_Unsat_S_G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:52:01 PM Attenuation:$E$130 240 No Decay Attenuation_Half_Life_Species_4 Attenuation_Sat_S__G John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:53:29 PM WaterBalance:$D$9 Infiltration through the soil zone sou Infiltration_Factor John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:54:31 PM WaterBalance:$E$14 342 Error 2015 No Name John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:54:34 PM WaterBalance:$E$15 100 100 No Name John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:56:25 PM Pathways:$K$7 EAL Not Specified Path1_Standards Section5 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:57:29 PM Pathways:$G$6 ADRD (1D) + Dilut No Processes Path1_Process Section3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:57:34 PM Pathways:$I$6 ADRD (1D) + Dilut No Processes Path1_Process Section4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 4:59:19 PM Pathways:$E$6 ADRD (1D) + Dilut No Processes Path1_Process Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:02:05 PM Pathways:$E$10 1 Path1_Param3 Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:02:12 PM Pathways:$G$10 4 Path1_Param3 Section3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:02:15 PM Pathways:$I$10 3 Path1_Param3 Section4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:02:23 PM Pathways:$E$9 0.1 Path1_Param2 Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:02:30 PM Pathways:$G$9 0.4 Path1_Param2 Section3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:02:37 PM Pathways:$I$9 0.3 Path1_Param2 Section4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:02:54 PM Pathways:$E$6 ADRD (1D) + Dilut ADRD (1D) + Dilut Path1_Process Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:04:35 PM Pathways:$I$11 3 Path1_Param4 Section4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:04:47 PM Pathways:$I$10 9 3 Path1_Param3 Section4 Saved 7/22/2020: 5:10:05 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+00 1.000E+04 1.000E+02 1.000E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor #DIV/0! for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Saved 7/22/2020: 5:17:30 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+00 1.000E+04 1.000E+02 1.000E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor #DIV/0! for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:17:49 PM Restoration Was:$D$75 250 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:17:52 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 0.01 1 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:17:55 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 50 100 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:17:57 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 50 100 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:18:28 PM Pathways:$E$6 No Processes ADRD (1D) + Dilut Path1_Process Section2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:18:40 PM Pathways:$E$6 ADRD (1D) + Dilut No Processes Path1_Process Section2 Saved 7/22/2020: 5:20:09 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E-02 2.500E+02 5.000E+01 5.000E+01 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor #DIV/0! for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:20:21 PM Restoration Was:$D$75 10000 250 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:20:25 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 1000 50 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:20:27 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 1000 50 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 John Olsen 22/07/2020 5:20:30 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 1000 0.01 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 Saved 7/22/2020: 5:22:38 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+03 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor #DIV/0! for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Saved 7/22/2020: 5:24:50 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+03 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor #DIV/0! for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Saved 7/22/2020: 5:31:17 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 10 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 20 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 30 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 40 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 50 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 60 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 70 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 80 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 90 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 100 -9.990E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+03 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor #DIV/0! for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 10 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 20 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 30 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 40 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 50 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 60 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 70 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 80 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 90 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 100 1.000E+40 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 9:58:50 AM Restoration Was:$C$28 0.2 Restoration_Was_Source_field_capacity Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:02:14 AM Pathways:$C$10 1.08373E-06 Path1_Param3 Section1 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:02:23 AM Pathways:$C$11 1.08373E-06 Path1_Param4 Section1 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:02:31 AM Pathways:$E$9 0 Path1_Param2 Section2 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:02:39 AM Pathways:$E$10 1 Path1_Param3 Section2 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:09:54 AM Restoration Was:$C$28 0.2 Restoration_Was_Source_field_capacity Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:10:53 AM Hydrogeology:$C$19 0.00000001 1.000000023 Formula59 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:12:18 AM Hydrogeology:$C$19 0.000000001 0.00000001 Formula59 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:12:34 AM Hydrogeology:$D$19 0.0001 1 Formula60 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:12:41 AM Hydrogeology:$E$19 0.0001 1 Formula61 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:13:46 AM Hydrogeology:$D$33 1 0.001 Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient Unsat_S_G Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:14:36 AM Hydrogeology:$C$33 0.5 0.001 Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient Clay_Side_ Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:14:42 AM Hydrogeology:$C$33 0.025 0.5 Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient Clay_Side_ Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:14:51 AM Hydrogeology:$C$33 0.25 0.025 Hydrogeology_Hydraulic_Gradient Clay_Side_ Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:15:34 AM WaterBalance:$D$10 Source Name: Res Source Name: Ine No Name Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:20:44 AM Pathways:$I$10 10 9 Path1_Param3 Section4 Heather MacLeod 23/07/2020 10:21:39 AM Pathways:$I$12 10 Path1_Param5 Section4 Saved 7/23/2020: 11:50:10 AM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-38 10 2.400E-15 20 3.258E-17 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-13 30 8.812E-12 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-21 30 1.166E-15 40 1.839E-08 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-19 50 1.509E-06 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-17 50 1.562E-22 60 2.545E-05 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-16 60 0.000E+00 70 1.777E-04 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-13 70 1.798E-23 80 7.246E-04 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-12 80 5.468E-23 90 2.083E-03 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-10 90 1.072E-24 100 4.715E-03 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-09 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.404E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.561E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.332E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+03 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.476E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.477E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:50:18 AM Restoration Was:$C$75 750 1000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:50:28 AM Restoration Was:$E$75 10000 1000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:50:30 AM Restoration Was:$F$75 10000 1000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 Saved 7/23/2020: 11:51:10 AM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.443E-17 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 6.609E-12 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.379E-08 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.132E-06 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 1.909E-05 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.333E-04 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 5.435E-04 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.562E-03 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 3.536E-03 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 7.500E+02 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:51:25 AM Restoration Was:$C$75 50 750 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 Saved 7/23/2020: 11:52:56 AM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 1.629E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 4.406E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 9.193E-10 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 7.547E-08 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 1.273E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 8.884E-06 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 3.623E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.042E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 2.358E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 5.000E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:53:02 AM Restoration Was:$C$75 100 50 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:53:07 AM Restoration Was:$D$75 100000 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:53:11 AM Restoration Was:$E$75 100000 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 23/07/2020 11:53:15 AM Restoration Was:$F$75 100000 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:05:41 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+02 10 4.040E-36 10 2.400E-13 20 3.258E-18 20 6.330E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-11 30 8.812E-13 30 4.279E+02 30 9.095E-19 30 1.166E-13 40 1.839E-09 40 2.973E+02 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-17 50 1.509E-07 50 2.152E+02 50 2.731E-15 50 1.562E-20 60 2.545E-06 60 1.613E+02 60 6.178E-14 60 0.000E+00 70 1.777E-05 70 1.242E+02 70 1.299E-11 70 1.798E-21 80 7.246E-05 80 9.777E+01 80 9.490E-10 80 5.466E-21 90 2.083E-04 90 7.832E+01 90 2.518E-08 90 1.079E-22 100 4.715E-04 100 6.365E+01 100 3.325E-07 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.561E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.830E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.268E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+02 1.000E+05 1.000E+05 1.000E+05 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.476E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.855E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.460E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:05:50 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 10000000 100000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:05:53 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 10000000 100000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:06:47 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+02 10 4.040E-34 10 2.400E-11 20 3.258E-18 20 6.330E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-09 30 8.812E-13 30 4.279E+02 30 9.095E-17 30 1.166E-11 40 1.839E-09 40 2.973E+02 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-15 50 1.509E-07 50 2.152E+02 50 2.731E-13 50 1.562E-18 60 2.545E-06 60 1.613E+02 60 6.178E-12 60 0.000E+00 70 1.777E-05 70 1.242E+02 70 1.299E-09 70 1.796E-19 80 7.246E-05 80 9.777E+01 80 9.490E-08 80 5.468E-19 90 2.083E-04 90 7.832E+01 90 2.518E-06 90 1.079E-20 100 4.715E-04 100 6.365E+01 100 3.325E-05 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.404E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.567E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.264E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 1.000E+02 1.000E+05 1.000E+07 1.000E+07 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.477E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.853E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.458E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:06:54 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 75 100 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:07:01 PM Restoration Was:$D$75 10000 100000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:07:15 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 10000 10000000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:07:23 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 10000 10000000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:09:14 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.443E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 6.609E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.379E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.132E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 1.909E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.333E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 5.435E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.562E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 3.536E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 7.500E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:09:24 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 50 75 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:09:42 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 1.629E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 4.406E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 9.193E-10 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 7.547E-08 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 1.273E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 8.884E-06 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 3.623E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.042E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 2.358E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 5.000E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:09:47 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 75 50 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:12:20 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.443E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 6.609E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.379E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.132E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 1.909E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.333E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 5.435E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.562E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 3.536E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 7.500E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:12:28 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 100 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:12:30 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 100 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:12:53 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-39 10 2.400E-16 20 2.443E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-14 30 6.609E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-22 30 1.166E-16 40 1.379E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-20 50 1.132E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-18 50 1.562E-23 60 1.909E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-17 60 0.000E+00 70 1.333E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-14 70 1.801E-24 80 5.435E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-13 80 5.471E-24 90 1.562E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-11 90 1.070E-25 100 3.536E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-10 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.553E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.828E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.343E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 7.500E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+02 1.000E+02 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.474E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.850E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.479E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:13:01 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 1000 100 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:13:03 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 1000 100 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:22:59 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-38 10 2.400E-15 20 2.443E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-13 30 6.609E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-21 30 1.166E-15 40 1.379E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-19 50 1.132E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-17 50 1.562E-22 60 1.909E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-16 60 0.000E+00 70 1.333E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-13 70 1.798E-23 80 5.435E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-12 80 5.468E-23 90 1.562E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-10 90 1.072E-24 100 3.536E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-09 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.404E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.561E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.332E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 7.500E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.476E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.477E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:28:45 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 250 75 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:31:15 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-38 10 2.400E-15 20 8.145E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-13 30 2.203E-12 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-21 30 1.166E-15 40 4.597E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-19 50 3.773E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-17 50 1.562E-22 60 6.363E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-16 60 0.000E+00 70 4.442E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-13 70 1.798E-23 80 1.812E-04 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-12 80 5.468E-23 90 5.208E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-10 90 1.072E-24 100 1.179E-03 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-09 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.404E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.561E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.332E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 2.500E+02 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.476E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.477E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:31:22 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 95 250 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:31:36 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-38 10 2.400E-15 20 3.095E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-13 30 8.372E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-21 30 1.166E-15 40 1.747E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-19 50 1.434E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-17 50 1.562E-22 60 2.418E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-16 60 0.000E+00 70 1.688E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-13 70 1.798E-23 80 6.884E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-12 80 5.468E-23 90 1.979E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-10 90 1.072E-24 100 4.480E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-09 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.404E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.561E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.332E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.500E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.476E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.477E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:31:42 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 96 95 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:32:41 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-38 10 2.400E-15 20 3.128E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-13 30 8.460E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-21 30 1.166E-15 40 1.765E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-19 50 1.449E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-17 50 1.562E-22 60 2.444E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-16 60 0.000E+00 70 1.706E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-13 70 1.798E-23 80 6.957E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-12 80 5.468E-23 90 2.000E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-10 90 1.072E-24 100 4.527E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-09 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.404E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.561E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.332E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.600E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+03 1.000E+03 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.476E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.477E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:32:49 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 1E+14 1000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:32:55 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 1E+22 1000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:33:00 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 1E+22 1E+14 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:34:40 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-19 10 2.400E+04 20 3.128E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E+06 30 8.460E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-02 30 1.166E+04 40 1.765E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E+00 50 1.449E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E+02 50 1.562E-03 60 2.444E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E+03 60 0.000E+00 70 1.706E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E+06 70 1.800E-04 80 6.957E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E+07 80 5.469E-04 90 2.000E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E+09 90 1.067E-05 100 4.527E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E+10 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.555E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.370E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.600E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+22 1.000E+22 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.474E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.853E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.487E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:34:50 PM Restoration Was:$C$75 90 96 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species1 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:35:00 PM Restoration Was:$E$75 10000 1.00E+22 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species3 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:35:03 PM Restoration Was:$F$75 10000 1.00E+22 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species4 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:35:28 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+01 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 6.330E+01 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 4.279E+01 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 2.973E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 2.152E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 1.613E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 1.242E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 9.777E+00 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 7.832E+00 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 6.365E+00 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:35:35 PM Restoration Was:$D$75 100000 10000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:35:52 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 7.003E+02 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 6.330E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 4.279E+02 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 2.973E+02 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 2.152E+02 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 1.613E+02 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 1.242E+02 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 9.777E+01 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 7.832E+01 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 6.365E+01 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 1.000E+05 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:36:10 PM Restoration Was:$D$75 50000 100000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:36:29 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 3.501E+02 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 3.165E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 2.140E+02 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 1.486E+02 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 1.076E+02 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 8.065E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 6.211E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 4.889E+01 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 3.916E+01 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 3.182E+01 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 5.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 John Olsen 23/07/2020 12:38:31 PM Restoration Was:$D$75 30000 50000 Restoration_Was_Pore_water_concentration Restoration_Was_Species2 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:41:07 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 2.101E+02 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 1.899E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 1.284E+02 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 8.919E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 6.457E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 4.839E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 3.727E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 2.933E+01 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 2.350E+01 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 1.909E+01 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 3.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:42:29 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 2.101E+02 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 1.899E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 1.284E+02 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 8.919E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 6.457E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 4.839E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 3.727E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 2.933E+01 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 2.350E+01 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 1.909E+01 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 3.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 Saved 7/23/2020: 12:43:15 PM Level Number: 5 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 2.101E+02 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 1.899E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 1.284E+02 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 8.919E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 6.457E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 4.839E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 3.727E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 2.933E+01 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 2.350E+01 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 1.909E+01 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 3.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices end of data Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years) Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 BREAKTHROUGH RESULTS Site Name: "Brinklow Quarry" Advanced Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Concentrations in mg/L in GW Compared with EAL target concentration in mg/L 4.500E-04 2.500E+02 1.000E-02 1.000E-03 Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 0.000E+00 10 2.101E+02 10 4.040E-37 10 2.400E-14 20 2.932E-18 20 1.899E+02 20 0.000E+00 20 2.450E-12 30 7.931E-13 30 1.284E+02 30 9.095E-20 30 1.166E-14 40 1.655E-09 40 8.919E+01 40 0.000E+00 40 6.009E-18 50 1.358E-07 50 6.457E+01 50 2.731E-16 50 1.562E-21 60 2.291E-06 60 4.839E+01 60 6.178E-15 60 0.000E+00 70 1.599E-05 70 3.727E+01 70 1.299E-12 70 1.796E-22 80 6.522E-05 80 2.933E+01 80 9.490E-11 80 5.468E-22 90 1.875E-04 90 2.350E+01 90 2.518E-09 90 1.053E-23 100 4.244E-04 100 1.909E+01 100 3.325E-08 100 0.000E+00 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Remedial Target Concentrations in mg/L in Restoration Was Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.570E+04 10 2.475E+38 10 4.167E+14 20 1.381E+16 20 3.949E+04 20 1.000E+40 20 4.082E+12 30 5.106E+10 30 5.842E+04 30 1.100E+21 30 8.577E+14 40 2.447E+07 40 8.409E+04 40 1.000E+40 40 1.664E+18 50 2.981E+05 50 1.162E+05 50 3.662E+17 50 6.403E+21 60 1.768E+04 60 1.550E+05 60 1.619E+16 60 1.000E+40 70 2.533E+03 70 2.013E+05 70 7.697E+13 70 5.568E+22 80 6.210E+02 80 2.557E+05 80 1.054E+12 80 1.829E+22 90 2.160E+02 90 3.192E+05 90 3.972E+10 90 9.500E+23 100 9.543E+01 100 3.928E+05 100 3.007E+09 100 1.000E+40 Compared with source concentrations in mg/L 9.000E+01 3.000E+04 1.000E+04 1.000E+04 Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Dilution Factor 3.768E+00 for all species and timeslices Pollutant Linkage: Restoration Was, Clay Side , Unsat S &G, Sat S & G, GW Attenuation Factor Species1 Species2 Species3 Species4 Time(years Cadmium Time(years) Chloride Time(years) Arsenic Time(years) Benzene 10 1.000E+40 10 3.789E+01 10 6.569E+39 10 1.106E+17 20 8.146E+18 20 4.192E+01 20 1.000E+40 20 1.083E+15 30 3.011E+13 30 6.201E+01 30 2.918E+22 30 2.276E+17 40 1.443E+10 40 8.927E+01 40 1.000E+40 40 4.417E+20 50 1.758E+08 50 1.233E+02 50 9.717E+18 50 1.699E+24 60 1.043E+07 60 1.645E+02 60 4.296E+17 60 1.000E+40 70 1.494E+06 70 2.136E+02 70 2.043E+15 70 1.478E+25 80 3.662E+05 80 2.714E+02 80 2.796E+13 80 4.854E+24 90 1.274E+05 90 3.388E+02 90 1.054E+12 90 2.521E+26 100 5.628E+04 100 4.169E+02 100 7.981E+10 100 1.000E+40 Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 8 Dust Management Plan Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Dust Management Plan Brinklow Quarry Limited Brinklow Quarry, Highwood Farm, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Warwickshire, CV23 0NJ. Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Document Control Table Project Reference 19/003e Project Title Dust Management Plan Document Title Dust Management Plan for Deposit for Recovery Operations Document Issue No. 1 Document Issue Date 19 October 2020 Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Status Issue Report Produced by/Date Georgina Watkins 02 October 2020 Report Checked by/ Date Kate Brady 19 October 2020 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road i Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Contents 1. Introduction ...... 1 2. Relevant legislation ...... 3 3. Site location and sensitive receptors ...... 4 4. Operations at the Site ...... 7 5. Dust management and mitigation ...... 9 6. Monitoring ...... 18 7. Actions when alarm is triggered ...... 20 8. Reporting and complaints response ...... 21 Figures Figure 1 Location and extent of Brinklow Quarry Figure 2 Wind rose from Lawford Heath / Rugby Observing Station 11/2008 to10/2019 Drawings Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Site Layout Plan Drawing No. 19/003e 001 Sensitive Receptors Plan Drawing No. 19/003c 001 Appendices Appendix 1 Inspection Checklists Appendix 2 Complaints Form Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road ii Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 1. Introduction Westbury Environmental Limited has prepared this Dust Management Plan for the Deposit for Recovery Operations in support of an Environment Permit variation application, on behalf of Brinklow Quarry Limited (the Operator). The Environmental Permit variation application seeks to allow the deposit of 4,489,507m3 of waste to restore Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road, Brinklow, Rugby, CV23 0NJ as shown on Figure 1 (the Site). The Site extends to an area of approximately 82.7ha. The location and extent of the Site is shown in Figure 1 below and on Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001. The land-use surrounding the Site is predominantly agricultural fields with associated farmhouses under ownership of Brinklow Quarry Limited. Figure 1: Location and extent of Brinklow Quarry Brinklow This Dust Management Plan for Deposit for Recovery Operations provides detailed information on the sources, risks and mitigation measures related to the potential emission of dust from the deposit of waste for recovery operations proposed to be undertaken on this Site only. Content of the Dust Management Plan for Deposit for Recovery Operations This Dust Management Plan will form part of the Environmental Management System (EMS) for the Site. Procedures and forms referenced within this Dust Management Plan will be included within the EMS. Completed forms (records) will be kept, as required by conditions included in an Environmental Permit. This Dust Management Plan is structured as follows: x Section 2 provides a summary of the relevant legislation and guidelines. x Section 3 provides information relating to the Site setting, including the location of the Site and nearby sensitive receptors. x Section 4 provides a summary of the deposit for recovery operations carried out on the Site and the delivery of materials. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 1 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 x Section 5 provides information on the site management and the mitigation measures employed at the Site. x Section 6 provides information on how dust emissions are monitored. x Section 7 provides a summary of what happens when an alarm is triggered. x Section 8 provides a description of how complaints can be made and how they are addressed by the site management. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 2 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 2. Relevant legislation The Air Quality Strategy (AQS) for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland fulfils the requirement under Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 for a national air quality strategy which sets out policies for improving ambient air quality and keeping these under review. The first strategy, the National Air Quality Strategy (NAQS), was published in March 1997. In January 1999, proposals to amend the strategy were put out for consultation and a consultation document was produced. Following consultation, a revised version of the strategy was published in January 2000. This was further revised in 2007 and has not been revised since this date. The AQS provides a framework for air quality control through air quality management and air quality standards and objectives for different pollutants (including particulate matter). These air quality standards and objectives were transposed into English Law by the Air Quality (Standards) Regulations 2010. The AQS was published on the gov.uk website in March 2011 under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) The system of local air quality management (LAQM) was introduced under the Environment Act 1995. LAQM requires local authorities to periodically review and assess the current and future quality of air in their areas. Where it is determined that an air quality objective is not likely to be met within the relevant time period, the authority must designate an AQMA. The Site is not located within an AQMA. Low Emission Zone (LEZ) A LEZ is an area that has restrictions on the type and age of vehicles permitted in it, therefore, vehicles emitting high levels of pollution can be prevented from entering and operating within the zone. The Site is not located within a LEZ. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 3 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 3. Site location and sensitive receptors Site Location The Site is a regionally significant sand, gravel and clay quarry located approximately 1km west of the village of Brinklow and approximately 8km east of the centre of Coventry. Access to the Site is via Coventry Road which runs west-east along part of the northern boundary of the Site. The access point to the Site from Coventry Road is located at grid reference SP 42193 79535. The entire Site extends to approximately 82.7ha, see Permit Boundary Plan, Drawing No. 19/003a 001 v2. The land-use surrounding the Site is predominantly agricultural fields with associated farmhouses under ownership of Brinklow Quarry Limited. The Site is located in Flood Zone 1, where the probability of fluvial flooding is 0.1% in any year. The majority of the Site is considered to be at a very low risk of flooding from surface water. There are isolated areas of the Site that are at a medium / high risk of flooding from surface water. This Site is not at risk of flooding from reservoirs. The Site is not located within a Groundwater Source Protection Zone The Site is located on a Secondary B bedrock aquifer. The majority of the Site is not located on a superficial drift aquifer, however in the western area of the Site is located on a secondary (undifferentiated) superficial drift aquifer. Meteorology Unlike many other atmospheric pollutants, the generation of dust is particularly dependent upon weather conditions. The prevailing meteorological conditions at any site will be dependent upon many factors, including its location in relation to macroclimatic conditions as well as more site specific, microclimatic conditions. Clearly the most significant meteorological factor is the predominant wind direction and wind speeds, and consequently data has been collected regarding the predominant wind speeds and directions appropriate to the Site. Figure 2: Wind rose from Lawford Heath / Rugby Observing Station 11/2008 to10/2019 (Arrow indicates predominant wind direction) Direction Percentage (%) N 2.6 NNE 5.2 NE 5.1 ENE 2.9 E 3.5 ESE 3.8 SE 3.8 SSE 4.9 S 8.2 SSW 10.4 SW 13.5 WSW 11.3 W 7.6 WNW 5.1 NW 6.3 NNW 4.6 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 4 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Wind speed and direction data have been obtained from the Lawford Heath / Rugby observing station for the period from 11/2008 to 10/2019. Lawford Heath / Rugby observing station is located approximately 5.5km to the southeast of the Site. This observing station has wind speed and direction data appropriate for characterisation of the wind climate at the Site, see Figure 2: Wind rose from Lawford Heath / Rugby Observing Station 11/2008 to 10/2019. The predominant wind blows towards receptors to the north-east of the Site which includes agricultural buildings and the anaerobic digestion plant (see Table 3.1: Sensitive Receptors). It is calculated that winds blowing towards the northeast account for approximately 35.2% of all winds recorded. Examination of the seasonal variations in wind speeds show that these do not change significantly - approximately 4ms-1 monthly averages are recorded throughout the year. Therefore, seasonal variations in wind speed have not been separately considered in this Dust Management Plan. Sensitive Receptors This Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations identifies all types of receptors within 500m of the Site that may be sensitive to dust emissions. Locations with a high sensitivity to dust for this Dust Management Plan include deciduous woodland, agricultural land, farmhouses and residential dwellings. The distance from the Site boundary to the sensitive receptor plays an important role in the potential impact experienced from airborne dust. Concentrations of airborne dust reduce significantly further away from the source. Due to the nature of the materials being handled on this Site the particle size of the dust emitted is of intermediate to large particles. Therefore, it can be concluded that these particles are highly likely to be deposited within 50m of the source. The direction and distances from the boundary of the Site to the boundary of sensitive receptors are provided in Table 3.1 Sensitive Receptors, see Drawing No. 19/003c 001 Sensitive Receptors Plan. Table 3.1: Sensitive receptors Direction Approximate Ref Receptor Description from Site distance from Site Boundary Boundary (m) Ancient and semi- 1 natural deciduous Designated Protected Habitat Southwest 0 woodland 2 Coventry Road Main road North 0 3 Deciduous woodland Designated Protected Habitat North 10 4 Pond Surface water feature North 20 Agricultural buildings with 5 Woodhill Farm North 120 associated agricultural land Little Wood - Ancient 6 and semi-natural Designated Protected Habitat North 200 deciduous woodland Agricultural buildings with 7 Birchley Farm South 280 associated agricultural land 8 AD plant Anaerobic bio-digestion plant Northeast 300 Agricultural buildings with 9 Highwood Farm Northeast 360 associated agricultural land Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 5 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Ancient and semi- 10 natural deciduous Designated Protected Habitat North 380 woodland 11 East Lodge Residential dwelling North 400 12 Long Acre Residential dwellings East 470 Agricultural buildings with 13 Cottage Farm East 490 associated agricultural land It is considered unlikely that dust emissions will impact the ancient and semi-natural woodland (1) and Birchley Farm (7) due to the predominant southwesterly wind direction. Due to the distance from the Site to the sensitive receptors ref. 8-13 (more than 300m), it is considered unlikely that dust from the waste operations at the Site will reach these sensitive receptors. The mitigation measures discussed in Section 5 of this Dust Management Plan will further limit the possibility of dust emissions reaching sensitive receptors around the Site. It is considered unlikely that dust emissions from the waste operations at the Site will impact Coventry Road (2), Woodhill Farm (5), the deciduous woodland (3), pond (4) and Little Wood (6) to the north of the Site due to the mitigation measures detailed in Section 5 of this Dust Management Plan being implemented. Other Sources of Dust There is the potential for dust to be emitted from vehicle movements along Coventry Road which runs west-east to the north of the Site. It is considered that agricultural activities carried out at particular times of the year and the surrounding agricultural land will have the potential to cause dust emissions. Mineral extraction is currently undergoing at the Site. This Dust Management Plan relates to the waste operation to be undertaken at the Site only. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 6 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 4. Operations at the Site Waste Deliveries All waste deliveries will be accompanied by a Waste Transfer Note (WTN) which will be obtained from the load driver. The WTN will provide information on the driver, waste haulier name, permit number, description of waste etc. Loads that are not accompanied by a WTN or that do not match the description on the WTN will be rejected. A record will be kept of all vehicles delivering waste to and from the Site, along with the type, quantity DQGVRXUFHRIZDVWHGHOLYHUHG:71¶VZLOOEHDSSURSULDWHO\VWRUHGIRUDPLQLPXPRIWZR\HDUV Waste acceptance procedures will be applied to ensure that only suitable waste is accepted. Only those waste codes detailed in the Environmental Permit will be accepted onto the Site. Waste will be delivered onto the Site by Heavy Good Vehicles. The movement of vehicles visiting the Site has the potential to cause dust emissions, particularly in dry and windy conditions. A 10mph speed limit and the minimisation of vehicle movements will be enforced on the Site to help minimise the amount of dust generated by vehicle wheels. All vehicles entering / exiting the Site will be sheeted to minimise the likelihood of dust emissions. Loaded vehicles arriving onto the Site that are not sheeted will be rejected in accordance with the Waste Rejection Procedure within the EMS. All incoming loads will be checked at the weighbridge to the north of the Site boundary, see Site Layout Plan, Drawing No. 19/003e 001. The operator will monitor the volume of waste coming into the Site by recording the net tonnage of each incoming load at the weighbridge. A record will be kept of the total tonnage brought into the Site for the restoration and the agreed conversion factor would be applied to the tonnage to determine the total volume. Vehicles entering the Site will be visually inspected prior to unloading to ensure that excessively dusty loads are not accepted. Excessively dusty loads will be rejected from the Site in accordance with the Waste Rejection Procedure in the EMS. Mud could be tracked out of the site by vehicles potentially causing dust emissions from the road surface. The Site has wheel washing facilities in place to help reduce the occurrence of significant dust emissions. Overview of Waste Operations The operations carried out at the Site will include the importation and deposit of waste to restore the quarry. Specific operations to be carried out on the Site are listed below with further information regarding the potential for these activities to cause dust emissions: x Waste Handling and Movement o Wastes such as soils can be considered to be dusty materials if they are dry. Therefore movement of wastes has the potential to cause dust emissions. o Loading and off-loading of vehicles and equipment has the potential to cause dust emissions. x Waste Storage o Imported wastes may be temporarily stored in stockpiles before being deposited in the restoration. Should these stockpiles of waste become dry, then they may be a potential source of dust emissions. x Vehicle Movements Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 7 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 o The movement of vehicles within the Site has the potential to cause dust emissions, particularly in dry and windy conditions. o Mud could be tracked out of the Site by vehicles potentially causing dust emissions from the road surface. Site Layout The proposed layout of the Site is shown on the Site Layout Plan, Drawing No. 19/003e 001. Incoming loads are directed to the Site Office and weighbridge, which are located outside of the proposed permit boundary. The incoming loads will then be directed down the access road to an area for temporary waste storage or will be directed to an offloading area on the Site to input waste straight into the restoration works. There is not specific waste storage area within the proposed permit boundary. The Site is to be restored over a number of years and in stages. Waste storage stockpiles and placement areas can therefore be anywhere within the proposed permit boundary depending on what phase is being restored. As such, the waste storage stockpiles are not marked on the Site Layout Plan, Drawing No. 19/003e 001. The wheel wash location is shown on the Site Layout Plan, Drawing No. 19/003e 001. The wheel wash consists of a system of nozzles that spray water on the treads and sides of vehicle wheels. The wheel wash pumps are fed from the lagoons located on the Site and are driven by a diesel engine. There is a rumble strip included as part of the facility to assist with the removal of mud from wheels. All vehicles are required to use the wheel wash facility. Dust monitoring can be undertaken anywhere within the Site boundary. There are no specific dust monitoring points. Monitoring is undertaken by all site operatives. Plant and Equipment All on-site mobile plant use low-emissions engines. This will apply to any new mobile plant to be brought onto the Site. The following equipment will be used on the Site for the deposit of waste for operations: x Bulldozer ± CAT D6T x Excavator - Doosan DX340 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 8 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 5. Dust management and mitigation Responsibility for Implementation of the Dust Management Plan The Site Manager is responsible for the implementation of the Dust Management Plan and for ensuring that the mitigation strategies in place are adhered to. Where the Site Manager is unavailable to oversee the implementation of dust suppression measures, a suitably experienced Site Operative is allocated responsibility. The Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations will be reviewed annually or when a change in operations is deemed to have a potential effect on increasing dust emissions. The review process will amend any mitigation measures that have been identified as areas for improvement in reducing dust emissions on Site. All staff members have the necessary training to deliver dust suppression measures detailed within this Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations. All staff will be given training on the EMS for the Site, which include a Dust Procedure. All staff on the Site will be trained on the Dust Procedure which includes details regarding mitigation measure and monitoring/recording visual inspections. Site procedures will be communicated between staff via EMS training and weekly toolbox talks. Where new dust suppression measures are to be implemented refresher training will be provided to ensure staff remain competent. This training will be delivered by the Site Manager. Overview of Dust Control Brinklow Quarry Limited have dust control measures in place to help mitigate dust emissions at the Site, see Table 5.2 Mitigation Measures. These measures are implemented when appropriate, particularly in periods of dry weather or when dust is identified to be escaping the Site boundary. The Site boundary is inspected regularly to identify any dust emissions / dust leaving the Site. If dust emissions are observed, then the use of water sprays is instigated. Bowsers and water sprays will be employed at the Site to dampen surfaces and stockpiles of material to prevent particulate matter becoming airborne. The condition and integrity of the bowsers and water sprays will be checked as part of the Inspection Checklists. The handling height of material will be minimised at all times by all mobile plant in order to reduce the distance in which dust and particulates could be blown and dispersed by winds. Site surfacing will be checked by way of the Inspection Checklists, see Appendix 1. Build-up of materials on the site surface will be minimised by implementing the procedures within the EMS. A front shovel loader will be used to scrape the surface of the Site where dust build-up has been recognised. The Site Manager may decide to cease operations should there be excessive dust emissions from the Site. Operations will resume on the Site when the circumstances causing the excessive dust have been resolved. It is the Site Manager who decides when operations will continue. Sources and Control of Fugitive Dust Emissions Table 5.1 details the potential sources of dust on the Site and which mitigation measures are implemented in order to break the source-pathway-receptor routes for dust emissions. Table 5.2 lists the mitigation measures to control dust emissions at the Site. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 9 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Table 5.1: Source-Pathway-Receptor Routes Source Pathway Receptor Type of Impact Where relationship can be interrupted Mud Transportation of dust on Coventry Road Mud on Coventry Road and other local Wheel washing facilities at the Site removes the mud and wheels and vehicles, then roads. dust on vehicles entering and exiting the Site. mud dropping off wheels/vehicles when Resuspension of mud as airborne A road sweeping vehicle is deployed when necessary to dry. particulates. control the amount of mud on the public highways and minimise the generation of dust. Debris Falling off lorries Coventry Road and Visual soiling, also consequent Vehicles delivering waste are sheeted. other public highways resuspension as airborne particulates Where debris is identified as an ongoing issue a road sweeper is deployed. All areas are subject to regular housekeeping. Vehicle / Plant movements Atmospheric dispersion Surrounding sensitive Airborne particulates and build-up of The Site is subject to regular housekeeping and water receptors including dust on surfaces of site and local roads. sprays are utilised. designated protective habitats and farms. Tipping and storage of Atmospheric dispersion Surrounding sensitive Visual build-up of dust. The potential of dust emissions will be minimised by wastes in the open receptors lowering drop heights. Waste may be stored in managed stockpiles which are dampened down in periods of dry weather. It is intended for incoming waste to be deposited directly into the restoration of the quarry. Operations will be halted when wind speeds are deemed to be excessive. Waste stored in stockpiles Atmospheric dispersion Surrounding sensitive Visual build-up of dust and particulates Dampening of stockpiles in dry weather or when receptors including and airborne particulates excessive dust is identified to be leaving the site designated protected boundary. habitats and farms. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 10 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Storage of waste in stockpiles will be minimised when possible. Imported wastes are most likely to be deposited straight into the restoration of the Site. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 11 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Table 5.2: Mitigation Measures Mitigation Description / Effect Use on Site Trigger for How is it implemented? Further mitigation if not Measure implementation effective Preventative Measures Site speed Reducing vehicle movements There is a no-idling policy in place on 10mph speed limit These measures will be If excessive dust OLPLWµQRLGOLQJ¶ reduces dust emissions from the site for vehicles. signage. implemented by staff training emissions are continued policy and the Site. Enforcement of the on the EMS and 10mph speed to be observed leaving Enforcement of speed the Site boundary, then minimisation of speed limit and limiting Vehicle movements will be minimised limit signs on the Site. limit by Site Manager and the further mitigation vehicle movements will reduce the by ensuring that the double handling constant observation and measure(s) will be movements on chance and amount of re- of materials is avoided where triggered. If there is mud reminders by Site Site. suspension of dust and possible. on the access road, then operatives. particulates by vehicle wheels. A 10mph speed limit is enforced on a road sweeper/mobile the entire Site. bowser will be deployed to clean and dampen the surface. If excessive dust emissions from vehicle movements continue after these measures, then operations shall cease. Minimising Minimising the height at which The EMS will require that the handling This measure will be By plant operators lowering the Water sprays will also be drop heights waste is dropped should reduce of waste material on Site should be implemented whenever grabs, shovels, conveyors etc available to dampen for waste. the distance over which dust minimised at all times. the Site is operational i.e. on the equipment being used surfaces and stockpiles to reduce dust generation. could be blown and dispersed Staff will be trained with regard to whenever material is to move potentially dusty by winds. minimising drop heights. being moved. materials. If excessive dust emissions continue after these measures, then operations shall cease. Good Having a consistent, regular The EMS to be implemented on the These measures will be Good housekeeping is If excessive dust housekeeping housekeeping regime that is Site will have a specific procedure for implemented whenever implemented by following the emissions are continued supported by management, will enforcing good housekeeping. the Site is operational. housekeeping procedure within to be observed leaving ensure the Site is regularly the EMS and by carrying out the Site boundary, then On-site litter will be collected and checked and issues remedied disposed of daily by a Site Operative site inspections. the further mitigation to prevent and remove dust and to keep the Site tidy. measure(s) will be particulate build up. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 12 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Mitigation Description / Effect Use on Site Trigger for How is it implemented? Further mitigation if not Measure implementation effective The waste types to be accepted at the triggered e.g. water Site will contain very little, if any, litter. suppression. Due to the presence of hedging / fencing around the perimeter of the Site there is little risk of litter from the waste operations leaving the Site. Sheeting of Prevents the escape of debris, The EMS will state that all vehicles Loading of potentially The sheeting equipment will be If excessive dust vehicles dust and particulates from entering / exiting the Site must be dusty materials on to a activated and checked to emissions are continued vehicles as they travel. sheeted to minimise the likelihood of vehicle will be followed by ensure proper coverage before to be observed leaving closing of the sheet the vehicle is allowed to leave dust emissions. Excessively dusty the Site boundary, then covers on that vehicle. the site. loads will not be accepted onto the Visual observation of the further mitigation Site. incoming vehicles will Incoming vehicles that are not measure(s) will be take place. sheeted will be rejected from triggered. Materials may the site or sheeted be dampened. All vehicles carrying immediately. waste to the site will be sheeted at all times unless being loaded or unloaded. Wheel washing Provides a high-pressure wash The wheel washing facility, comprising Wheel washing is Site operatives will ensure that If excessive dust of vehicle wheels using a of a jet hose and water supply, is used undertaken on all wheel washing facilities are emissions are continued system of spray nozzles. Helps to remove mud from the wheels of vehicles leaving the Site. used as required. to be observed leaving vehicles and is inspected on a regular to remove some dirt, dust and the Site boundary, then basis to ensure the facility is in particulates from the vehicles. working order. The wheel wash pumps All vehicles will be required to the further mitigation are fed from the lagoons located on use the wheel wash measure(s) will be the Site and are driven by a diesel irrespective of the weather triggered. Use of water engine. There is a rumble strip conditions. suppression or cease included as part of the facility to assist dusty activities. with the removal of mud from wheels. Ceasing Mobilisation of dust and During exceptionally dry and/or windy If excessive dust is being The Site Manager makes the N/A operations particulates is likely to be conditions, if any operations / Site generated by the decision to cease activities that during high greater during periods of strong movements cause or are likely to operations, then the Site are causing the dust Manager will notify staff winds and/or winds or exceptionally dry cause visible dust emissions beyond emissions. and operations may be exceptionally conditions and hence ceasing the Site boundary, or if abnormal dust temporarily ceased. dry conditions. emissions are observed within the Operations commence Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 13 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Mitigation Description / Effect Use on Site Trigger for How is it implemented? Further mitigation if not Measure implementation effective operation at these times may Site, site waste operations may be once the wind has reduce peak pollution events. suspended to avoid further dust subsided and/or the area emissions. The weather conditions at is dampened down. the Site will be considered and Prevailing weather recorded at the start of each working condition monitoring GD\VRWKDWWKHGD\¶VZRUNPD\EH (Visual observation) planned to take in regard any potential including wind strength, dust emissions. If the wind speed and wind direction and direction are likely to increase the risk rainfall. This monitoring of nuisance to neighbouring receptors, will be recorded on the then operations may be temporarily Inspection Checklists. stopped. There is no specific wind speed limit and/or no specific criteria for this to occur, as dust is dependent on other conditions such as rain. The Site manager will decide whether to cease operations as a result of weather conditions. This decision is based on a combination of factors, including those mentioned above. The conditions are recorded on the Inspection Checklists. The record includes an overall description of the weather conditions including, but not limited to, wind strength (e.g. windy, not windy), wind direction (e.g. towards northern boundary) and rain. Reduction in In windy conditions, ceasing Operations may cease in one area of In windy conditions, if The Site Manager makes the If excessive dust operations operations in one area of the the site or operations could be moved excessive dust is being decision to cease activities that emissions are continued Site and moving to another to/continue in a sheltered area at a generated by the are causing the dust emissions to be observed leaving sheltered area of the Site could lower level and/or in the lee of an operations in a part of the in an area of the Site. the Site boundary, then lead to reduced dust emissions existing structure. Site but not in sheltered Directions are given to site the Site Manager gives as dust is prevented from areas, then the Site operatives to continue the instruction for all dusty leaving the Site boundary down- Manager will notify staff operations in another part of activities to cease. wind. and operations may be Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 14 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Mitigation Description / Effect Use on Site Trigger for How is it implemented? Further mitigation if not Measure implementation effective temporarily cease in that the Site or move operations to part of the site. a sheltered area of the Site. Operations may be moved to or continue in the sheltered area of the site i.e. at a lower level of the quarry / in lee of existing structure. Minimisation of Minimising stockpile heights The EMS will include a stockpile plan These measures are The Site Manager keeps a If excessive dust waste storage should reduce the distance over for the maximum height and volume implemented whenever record on the Inspection emissions are continued heights on Site. which debris and dust could be allowed for the stockpiles present on the Site is operational. Checklists to ensure stockpiles to be observed leaving blown and dispersed by wind. Site in order to reduce the potential for do not exceed the heights the Site boundary, then excessive dust emissions. The specified in the stockpile plan the further mitigation stockpiles will not exceed the heights in the EMS. measure(s) is triggered. stated in the EMS. E.g. Use of water suppression or cessation It is considered that storage of waste of dusty activities. on the Site will be unlikely due to the intention for incoming waste to be deposited directly into the restoration works at the Site. Remedial Measures Road sweeper Removes the mud from the A road sweeping vehicle is deployed Visual observation of the Road sweeper is deployed to N/A access road and Coventry Road to control the amount of mud on local state of the access road clean the access road and and reduces the potential for roads and minimise the generation of and local roads - findings local roads (Coventry Road). dust emissions from vehicle dust when appropriate. Brinklow recorded on the Site management instructs the movements in the area. Quarry Limited have their own road Inspection Checklists in trained operative to carry out sweeper that is based on the Site. the EMS. This identifies the road sweeping. The road sweeper will be deployed the need for the use of when the access road and/or Coventry the road sweeper. The Site will be swept 3 times Road is observed to be muddy or Constant observation by per week default, and more dusty. The road sweeper will be all operatives on the Site. regularly during wet or windy maintained in accordance with the weather. PDQXIDFWXUHU¶VVSHFLILFDWLRQV$ The Site Manager will Planned Preventative Maintenance check on the state of the Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 15 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Mitigation Description / Effect Use on Site Trigger for How is it implemented? Further mitigation if not Measure implementation effective List included in the EMS will be road at least once daily populated with items on the Site that and if mud is visible on are required to be maintained on a the road, that has been scheduled basis, such as the road tracked out from the Site, sweeper. then the road sweeper will be deployed. The cleanliness of roads in the vicinity of the Site entrance are checked as part of the maintenance procedure and included on the Inspection Checklists. If the Inspection Checklist identifies a requirement for the road sweeper to be used, then a road sweeper will be deployed and used by a trained member of staff. Water Using mobile water bowsers Sprays will be in use at the Site to When excessive dust The water levels in the If excessive dust suppression and spray attachments. This dampen surfaces and stockpiles of emissions are observed bowsers are monitored by site emissions are continued measure can remove particles material to prevent dust emissions. to be leaving the Site operatives to ensure that there to be observed leaving boundary. Visual from the air and dampen down The condition and integrity of the is a sufficient supply available the Site boundary, then observation will be dry / dusty materials. water bowser and sprays will be carried out by all for the water sprays. Water for the further mitigation checked as part of the Inspection employees on the Site. suppression is sourced from measure(s) is triggered. Checklists. Findings from the visual lagoons. Cease operations causing observations will be the dust emission. recorded on Inspection Checklists. Use of water sprays on the Site are used to minimise dust emissions unless the Site is not operational or there is wet weather. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 16 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Other Considerations: Water availability Waste for dust suppression will be drawn from the lagoons on the Site. The quarry working face is dewatered continuously with high-capacity, high-lift pumps. There is not a shortage of water on the Site nor water pressure variations to consider in this Dust Management Plan. A mains water supply is also available on Site but is principally used for municipal use. Brinklow Quarry Limited operate a fleet of water bowsers at the Site that can be deployed to anywhere within the Site boundary and on the access road. The majority of the water bowsers at the Site have a capacity of 5,000 litres of water. The largest bowsers on the Site have a capacity of 20,000 litres of water. In the event of a drought During exceptionally dry and/or windy conditions, if any operations / site movements cause or are likely to cause visible dust emissions beyond the Site boundary, or if abnormally high dust emissions are observed within the Site, operations may be suspended to avoid further dust emissions. This will be decided by the Site Manager. Depending on the severity of the drought conditions, restrictions may be in place on the amount of water available for use on Site from the supplier (mains water supply). In this case, operations may be reduced or suspended in order to comply with any water usage restrictions. Length of access road The access road from Coventry Road to the proposed permit boundary is approximately 450m long. It is therefore considered that the majority of mud and stones on vehicle wheels will be removed before exiting vehicle reach Coventry Road (the nearest public highway). Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 17 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 6. Monitoring Visual Dust Monitoring Dust emissions from the Site will be assessed by visual observation. Assessments will be recorded daily on the Inspection Checklists in the EMS. It will be HYHU\ PHPEHU RI VWDII¶V UHVSRQVLELOLW\ WR continually monitor the emission of dust from the Site. Monitoring of dust will be carried out by visual assessment and this can take place anywhere within the Site boundary. If dust emissions are perceived to be leaving the Site boundary then the Site Manager will establish what is causing the excessive dust emission to be generated and will take remedial action. The results of the investigation and what action was taken will be recorded and retained. The prevailing weather conditions at the Site will be considered and recorded at the start of each working GD\VRWKDWWKHGD\¶VZRUNPD\EHSODQQHGDVDSSURSULDWHUHJarding potential dust emissions. The prevailing conditions will be recorded on the Daily Inspection Checklists. Information on the Daily Inspection Checklists will contain an overall description of the weather conditions including, but not limited to, wind strength (e.g. windy, not windy), wind directions (e.g. towards northern boundary) and rain. Table 5.2 states the mitigation measures that will be in place in case of excessive dust emissions on Site. Monitoring Location There will be no particulate matter monitoring equipment located on the Site. Only visual monitoring of dust emissions will take place. Visual monitoring will take place whenever the Site is operational and from anywhere within the Site boundary and the vicinity. Operation of the PM Monitoring Equipment There will be no particulate matter monitoring equipment located on the Site. Only visual monitoring of dust emissions will take place. Quality Assurance/Quality Control and Record Keeping There will be no particulate matter monitoring equipment located on the Site. Only visual monitoring of dust emissions will take place. Equipment and Data Management There will be no particulate matter monitoring equipment located on the Site. Only visual monitoring of dust emissions will take place. Reporting of Data There will be no particulate matter monitoring equipment located on the Site. Only visual monitoring of dust emissions will take place. No data from equipment will therefore be reported to the Environment Agency. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 18 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Additional Detailed Monthly Reporting There will be no particulate matter monitoring equipment located on the Site. Only visual monitoring of dust emissions will take place. No data from equipment will therefore reported to the Environment Agency. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 19 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 7. Actions when alarm is triggered There is no specific dust monitoring equipment on the Site with trigger alarms. Monitoring will be carried out by visual observation and assessing whether dust emissions are excessive i.e. leaving the Site boundary. If dust emissions are perceived to be excessive then the Site Manager will establish what is causing the excessive dust emission to be generated and take remedial action. The remedial measures are stated in Table 5.2 Mitigation Measures. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 20 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 8. Reporting and complaints response The EMS on the Site has a procedure for responding and dealing with complaints. A complaints form is available on Site and must be filled in and kept on file whenever a complaint is received in accordance with the EMS complaints procedure. Engagement with the Community The Site Notice Board will be placed at the entrance of the Site with the following information: x 7KH3HUPLWKROGHU¶VQDPH Brinklow Quarry Limited). x The operators name (Brinklow Quarry Limited). x An emergency contact name and telephone number. x A statement that the Site is permitted by the Environment Agency x The Environmental Permit Reference. x The Environment Agency national numbers, 03708 506506 and 0800 807060 (incident hotline). The provision of the above information will ensure that members of the community can contact Brinklow Quarry Limited should they be concerned by dust emissions or wish to make a complaint. This also applies to any events that may happen when the Site is unmanned / not operational. Reporting of Complaints Should a complaint regarding dust be received by the Site, the complaint will be recorded on the Complaints Form in the EMS and investigated in accordance with the Complaints Procedure within the EMS. The Complaints Form will record who made the complaint, what the complaint was about and what has been done to resolve the issue and make sure this does not happen again. A copy of the Complaints Form is included as Appendix 2. The Site Manager will identify what caused the excessive dust emission to be generated. This generation may have been caused by failure of site machinery or dust procedures. If the excessive dust emission has been caused by a procedure not being carried out properly, then staff will receive further training on the dust procedures and site management. If the excessive dust emission has been caused by plant failure, then the plant will be repaired as soon as possible. All complaints will be acknowledged and investigated, with resultant actions reported to the complainant. Any complaints received by the Environment Agency relating to dust emissions from the site are dealt with on the same day. Management Responsibilities Site staff will be responsible for dust management issues and detecting/reporting dust emissions. All members of staff will be given training on the EMS for the Site, which will include a Dust Procedure. All staff on the Site will be trained on the Dust Procedure which will include details regarding mitigation measures and monitoring/recording visual inspections. On receipt of a complaint the Site Manager will investigate and establish the cause. The most effective corrective or preventative action must then be determined to prevent future emissions occurring. Where additional time is required in order to implement the appropriate corrective or preventative action the complainant will be contacted with details of the actions to be implemented and the estimated timescales for completion. The maximum response time for investigating the cause of the complaint and contacting a complainant will be two working days. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 21 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Should numerous complaints be received at the Site regarding the same issue, the cause of the complaint(s) will be investigated in accordance with the Accidents, Incidents & Complaints Procedure within the EMS. Operations on the Site will cease, should excessive dust emissions be seen leaving the boundary following the implementation of additional mitigation measures or when instruction from the Environment Agency to cease operations has been received. Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road 22 Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Drawings Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Site Layout Plan Drawing No. 19/003e 001 Sensitive Receptors Plan Drawing No. 19/003c 001 Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Drawing Name Permit Boundary Plan Drawing No. 19/003a 001 Agriculture House, Site Address Brinklow Quarry, Southwater Way, Highwood Farm, Telford, Coventry Road, TF3 4NR Brinklow, Warwickshire, T: 01952 879705 CV23 0NJ. M: 07762 580839 E: [email protected] 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m Date 09/05/2019 www.westburyenv.co.uk Key Permit Boundary Existing Contours Wheel wash Restoration Contours Access Road Weighbridge Note that dust monitoring, waste storage and waste deposit can take place anywhere within the permit boundary Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Drawing Site Layout Plan Name Drawing No. 19/003e 001 Agriculture House, Brinklow Quarry, Site Southwater Way, Address Highwood Farm, Telford, Coventry Road, TF3 4NR Brinklow, Warwickshire, T: 01952 879705 CV23 0NJ. M: 07762 580839 E: [email protected] www.westburyenv.co.uk 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m Date 06/01/2020 Brinklow Quarry Client Brinklow Quarry Limited Title Sensitive Receptors Plan 6 11 10 Dwg No. 19/003c 001 Site Brinklow Quarry, 9 Coventry Road, 8 Brinklow, Warwickshire, 3 2 5 CV23 0NJ. 4 Scale See Drawing 4 Date 22/11/2019 Key 12 1 Deciduous Woodland 2 Coventry Road 3 Deciduous Woodland 1 4Pond 5 Woodhill Farm 6 Little Wood 7 Birchley Farm 13 8 Bio-digestion plant 9 Highwood Farm 7 10 Deciduous Woodland 11 East Lodge 12 Long Acre 13 Cottage Farm Site Boundary 500 buffer Agriculture House, T: 01952 879705 Southwater Way, M: 07762 580839 Telford, E: [email protected] 0m 200m 400m TF3 4NR www.westburyenv.co.uk Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Appendices Appendix 1 Inspection Checklists Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Inspection Checklists V.1 October 2020 Daily Inspection Checklists Item for Visual Action Form Aspects for Inspection Checked? Details Remedial Action Required? Inspection Completed Within extraction / restoration area Within waste storage area Litter Within mineral processing area Along site boundaries Outside site boundary No excessive dust emissions Dust emissions should be escaping the boundary of the site Public highway clear of mud Roads and debris Mobile water bowsers Water levels in bowsers Please describe (temperature, Weather wind speed, wind direction, dry/wet) Date: ______Completed by: ______Signature: Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Inspection Checklists Weekly Inspection Checklists Item for Visual Action Form Aspects for Inspection Checked? Details Remedial Action Required? Inspection Completed Locks on gates working and no holes in gate. Site Security No damage to boundary fencing / hedging Date: ______Completed by: ______Signature: Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Inspection Checklists Monthly Inspection Checklists Item for Visual Action Form Aspects for Inspection Checked? Details Remedial Action Required? Inspection Completed Spill kits present on the Site and Spill kits ready for use. Tanks free from leaks. Water bowser Spray attachments in good working order. Date: ______Completed by: ______Signature: Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Inspection Checklists Annual Inspection Checklists Item for Visual Action Form Aspects for Inspection Checked? Details Remedial Action Required? Inspection Completed Date: ______Completed by: ______Signature: Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Dust Management Plan for Waste Operations: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 2 Complaints Form Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Complaints Form V.1 October 2020 Who made the complaint? Name: Address: Phone No.: Date and time they made the complaint: What happened? What was it about? Was anyone else aware of this ± other neighbours or your staff? If so, who? Did the complaint relate to your site? If so, what happened? What went wrong? What have you done to make sure that it does not happen again? Was there any significant pollution ± for example: dust, odour or noise outside the site or spillage of polluting liquids onto the ground, into a drain or a watercourse? If there was, then you must notify the Environment At what time did you phone? Agency on 0800 807060 and any other relevant regulators. Have you done so? Yes No You must also write or send an email to confirm this What date did you contact? to your local Environment Agency office. Have you done so? Yes No Please print and sign your name: Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Environmental Permit Variation Application: Version 1, October 2020 Appendix 9 Waste Acceptance Procedures Brinklow Quarry Limited: Brinklow Quarry, Coventry Road Procedure: Waste Acceptance V.1 October 2020 Purpose: To ensure that all waste accepted is permitted under the conditions of the Environmental Permit for Deposit of Waste for Recovery. RESPONSIBLE RECORD PERSON Environmental Permit & Waste Codes 1. The Environmental Permit contains the list of waste types that are All Table 1 permitted to be accepted at the site. There are two tables containing the Permitted Waste Types for codes and descriptions of waste types that are permitted on this site Treatment which are included at the end of this procedure for ease of reference. Operations See Table 1 Permitted Waste Types for Recycling Operations and Table 2 Permitted Waste Types for Deposit for Recovery Operations. Table 2 Permitted Waste Types for These lists of waste types should be consulted if you are unsure whether Deposit for a load can be accepted, alternatively the Site Manager should be Recovery consulted. Please note the Permit will always contain the most up to Operations date list of waste codes acceptable at the Site and should be consulted if in any doubt. 2. If the waste code on the Waste Transfer Note (WTN) is not listed in the Site Operative Procedure: Environmental Permit / Table 1/Table 2 of this procedure, the load must Waste Rejection be rejected in accordance with the Waste Rejection Procedure. 3. Waste codes used must be the best description of the incoming waste. Procedure: Waste Rejection Note: Waste may be better described by other List of Waste codes. If a waste is better described by a List of Waste code that is not listed in the Environmental Permit, then the load must be rejected in accordance with the Waste Rejection Procedure. 4. The maximum amount of waste which can be brought onto the site for Site Manager recycling operations each year shall not exceed 75,000 tonnes as stated in the Environmental Permit. 5. The maximum amount of waste which can be deposited on the Site for Site Manager recovery shall not exceed that allowed by the Permit (4,489,507m3). Waste Pre-Acceptance 6. Following a customer enquiry, information on the waste is requested Site Manager Form: Waste from the producer, such information could include site investigation Information reports / laboratory test reports / hazardous waste assessments. This information is recorded on the Waste Information Form and the information reviewed to assess if the waste is acceptable or not. 7. A judgement should be made as to the necessity to obtain Site Manager comprehensive information at this stage. If the source of the waste is not likely to be contaminated, then it may not be necessary to obtain a full site investigation or hazardous waste assessment. If the source of the waste is likely to be contaminated, then a full site investigation and/or a hazardous waste assessment should be requested. 8. Review of the information in the Waste Information Form will determine Site Manager Procedure: the need for (further) sampling/testing/Hazardous Waste Assessment. Waste Classification Form: Waste Information 9. Where a Hazardous Waste Assessment based on WM3 Guidance is Procedure: required this should be completed, in accordance with the Waste Waste Classification Classification Procedure. 10. All associated Waste Information records and Hazardous Waste Site Manager Form: Waste Assessments will be kept along with Waste Transfer Notes in a secure Information location. These records will be maintained for a minimum of two years. Collection of a Load 11. A driver arriving at a site to collect waste will: Site Operative x Ensure that the waste type is acceptable as per instructed. x Ensure a Waste Transfer Note is issued with the load and that the description matches the load. 12. If a driver collecting a load suspects that the description on the WTN is Site Operative not accurate then the Site Manager will be contacted. The waste producer will be requested to review/reconsider the information on the WTN so that the description is accurate. All Vehicles 13. All vehicles carrying waste on the public highway must be registered as Site Operative waste carriers and a copy of their certificate should be held on file in the site office. A regular check should be carried out to ensure that registrations are still in date, and where they are found not to be, a copy of the new registration should be obtained immediately. Acceptance of Waste onto the Site 14. The driver will provide a WTN to the site operative, who will complete the Site Operative section relating to transfer of waste, unless a season WTN has been provided. The site operative will then return the WTN to the driver, keeping a copy of the WTN for his own records. A WTN will be generated if one is not provided by the driver. 15. A WTN for every load is obtained from the driver and the WTN is checked Site Operative Waste Transfer to ensure it contains the following: Note x 9HKLFOHUHJLVWUDWLRQDQGGULYHU¶VQDPHDQGVLJQDWXUH x Waste haulier name and valid Waste Carriers registration number. x Name, address (of source site) and signature of the transferor. x Name, address (of destination site) and signature of the person receiving the waste (transferee). x Permit number or exemption reference of person receiving the waste (if applicable). x Description of waste including; waste type, waste source, waste containment and waste quantity. x List of Waste (LoW) code. x SIC Code of the waste holder using SIC Codes (2007). x Date and time of waste transfer and waste transfer note number. x Confirmation that the Waste Hierarchy has been considered. 16. Loads not accompanied by a WTN or that do not match the description Site Operative Procedure: on the WTN will be rejected in accordance with the Waste Rejection Waste Rejection Procedure once the Site Manager has been informed. 17. Every load is visually inspected prior to being off loaded. Site Operative Table 1 Permitted Waste Types If there is any doubt about the waste type delivered, then a message is relayed to the Site Manager. 18. After checking the load and the associated paperwork the vehicle is Site Operative directed to the offloading area for inspection and stockpiling. A Site Operative will inspect tipped loads. 19. If there is a discrepancy with the load or its paperwork, then the Site Site Operative Procedure: Manager shall be informed immediately. If the load is not acceptable Waste Rejection under the Environmental Permit then, if possible it should be re-loaded onto the vehicle and rejected from site in accordance with the Waste Rejection Procedure. 20. If it is impossible to load a rejected load back onto the delivering vehicle Site Operative Procedure: the load will be put into the quarantine area. Waste will be rejected from Waste Rejection the Site in accordance with the Waste Rejection Procedure. Compliance Testing 21. Compliance testing will be carried out on waste accepted on to the Site. Site Manager Procedure: Samples taken from waste piles will be tested at a laboratory to Waste Classification determine the characteristics of the waste and to ensure that the waste is as described on the WTN. 22. $Qµ(QYLURQPHQWDO6XLWH¶VKRXOGEHUHTXHVWHGIURPWKHODERUDWRU\IRUWKH Site Manager sample of waste. The tests must be carried out on the waste itself and not in leachate. The Environmental Suite must contain at least the following parameters: x Total Sulphate. x Boron. x Arsenic. x Cadmium. x Metals, including; Chromium III, Chromium VI, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Selenium, Zinc. x Acid Soluble Sulphide. x Phenols (Monohydric). x Total Cyanide. x Elemental Sulphur. x pH Value. x PAH (total/speciated). x TPH (total/speciated). x BTEX. x Total Sulphate, Water Soluble Sulphate. 23. A Hazardous Waste Assessment, in accordance with WM3 Guidance, Site Manager Procedure: will be completed using the testing results received from the laboratory. Waste Rejection This Hazardous Waste Assessment will classify the waste as non- hazardous or hazardous. 24. If a waste sample is found to be hazardous in nature, then the Site Operative corresponding waste pile will be quarantined and removed from the Site in accordance with the Waste Rejection Procedure. Records 25. Waste Transfer Notes will be appropriately stored for a minimum of two years. 26. Information from the Waste Transfer Notes will be used to provide the necessary data to complete the Waste Return as required by the Environment Agency. Consequences 27. The consequence of not following this procedure may result in unsuitable waste being accepted on to the site. This may constitute a breach in the conditions of the Environmental Permit, in addition to causing potential contamination of the site. Table 1: Permitted waste types for recycling operations Exclusions Wastes having any of the following characteristics shall not be accepted: x Consisting solely or mainly of dusts, powders or loose fibres x Wastes that are in a form which is either sludge or liquid Waste Description code 01 WASTES RESULTING FROM EXPLORATION, MINING, QUARRYING AND PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF MINERALS 01 04 wastes from physical and chemical processing of non-metalliferous minerals 01 04 08 waste gravel and crushed rocks other than those mentioned in 01 04 07 01 04 09 waste sand and clays 02 WASTES FROM AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AQUACULTURE, FORESTRY, HUNTING AND FISHING, FOOD PREPARATION AND PROCESSING 02 02 waste from preparation and processing of meat, fish and other foods of animal origin 02 02 02 shellfish shells from which the soft tissue or flesh has been removed only 03 WASTES FROM WOOD PROCESSING AND THE PRODUCTION OF PANELS AND FURNITURE, PULP, PAPER AND CARDBOARD 03 01 wastes from wood processing and the production of panels and furniture 03 01 01 waste bark and cork 03 03 wastes from pulp, paper and cardboard production and processing 03 03 01 waste bark and wood 10 WASTES FROM THERMAL PROCESSES 10 01 waste from power stations and other combustion plants 10 01 01 bottom ash and slag only 10 01 02 pulverised fuel ash only 10 01 05 gypsum (solid) only 10 01 07 gypsum (sludge) only 10 01 15 bottom ash and slag only from co-incineration other than those mentioned in 10 01 14 10 11 wastes from manufacture of glass and glass products 10 11 12 clean glass other than those mentioned in 10 11 11 10 12 wastes from manufacture of ceramic goods, bricks, tiles and construction products 10 12 08 waste ceramics, bricks, tiles and construction products(after thermal processing) 10 13 wastes from manufacture of cement, lime and plaster products and articles and products made from them 10 13 14 waste concrete only 15 WASTE PACKAGING 15 01 packaging 15 01 07 clean glass only 17 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTES (INCLUDING EXCAVATED SOIL FROM CONTAMINATED SITES) 17 01 concrete, bricks, tiles and ceramics 17 01 01 concrete 17 01 02 bricks 17 01 03 tiles and ceramics 17 01 07 mixtures of concrete, bricks, tiles and ceramics other than those mentioned in 17 01 06 17 02 wood, glass and plastic 17 02 02 clean glass only 17 03 bituminous mixtures, coal tar and tarred products 17 03 02 road base and road planings (other than those containing coal tar) only 17 05 soil (including excavated soil from contaminated sites) stones and dredging spoil 17 05 04 soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05 03 17 05 06 dredging spoil other than those mentioned in 17 05 05 17 05 08 track ballast other than those mentioned in 17 05 07 17 08 gypsum based construction material 17 08 02 gypsum only other than that mentioned in 17 08 01 19 WASTES FROM WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES, OFF SITE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS AND PREPARATION OF WATER INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION / INDUSTRIAL WASTE 19 05 wastes from aerobic treatment of solid waste 19 05 03 compost from source segregated biodegradable waste only 19 08 wastes from waste water treatment plants not otherwise specified 19 08 02 washed sewage grit (waste from desanding) free from sewage contamination only 19 08 99 stone filter media if free from sewage contamination only 19 09 wastes from the preparation of water intended for human consumption or water for industrial use 19 09 02 sludges from water clarification 19 12 wastes from the mechanical treatment of wastes 19 12 05 clean glass only 19 12 09 minerals (for example sand, stones) 19 12 12 treated bottom ash including IBA and slag other than that containing dangerous substances only 19 13 wastes from soil and groundwater remediation 19 13 02 solid wastes from soil remediation other than those mentioned in 19 13 01 19 13 04 sludges from soil remediation other than those mentioned in 19 13 03 20 MUNICIPAL WASTES (HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND SIMILAR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL WASTES) INCLUDING SEPARATELY COLLECTED FRACTIONS 20 01 separately collected fractions 20 01 02 clean glass only 20 02 garden and park wastes 20 02 02 soil and stones Table 2: Permitted waste types for deposit for recovery operations Exclusions Wastes having any of the following characteristics shall not be accepted: Consisting solely or mainly of dusts, powders or loose fibres Wastes that are in a form which is either sludge or liquid Source Sub-source Waste code Description Additional restrictions 01 Waste resulting from 01 01 wastes 01 01 02 Wastes from Restricted to waste exploration, mining, from mineral mineral non- overburden and interburden quarrying and physical excavation metalliferous only. and chemical treatment excavation of minerals 01 04 wastes 01 04 08 Waste gravel and from physical crushed rocks other and chemical than those processing of mentioned in 01 04 non- 06 metalliferous minerals 01 04 09 Waste sand and clays 17 17 01 17 01 01 Concrete Construction and concrete, demolition wastes bricks, tiles 17 01 02 Bricks and ceramics 17 01 03 Tiles and ceramics 17 01 07 Mixtures of Metal from reinforced concrete, bricks, concrete must have been tiles and ceramics removed. other than those mentioned in 17 01 06 17 03 bituminous 17 03 02 Bituminous Road planings only. mixtures mixtures other than those mentioned in 17 03 01 17 05 soil stones 17 05 04 Soil and stones other Restricted to topsoil, peat, and dredging than those mentioned subsoil and stones only. spoil in 17 05 03 19 Wastes from waste 19 12 wastes 19 12 09 Minerals (for example Restricted to wastes from management facilities from the sand, stones) only treatment of waste mechanical aggregates that are treatment of otherwise naturally waste (for occurring minerals. example sorting, Does not include fines from crushing, treatment of any non- compacting, hazardous waste or gypsum pelletising) not from recovered plasterboard. otherwise 19 12 12 Other wastes Restricted to crushed specified (including mixture of bricks, tiles, concrete and materials) from ceramics only. mechanical treatment Metal from reinforced of wastes other than concrete must be removed. those mentioned in 19 Does not include fines from 12 11 treatment of any non- hazardous waste or gypsum from recovered plasterboard. 20 Municipal wastes 20 02 garden and 20 02 02 Soils and stones Restricted to topsoil, peat, (household waste and park wastes subsoil and stones only. similar commercial, industrial and institutional wastes) including separately collected fractions Form: Waste Information V.1 October 2020 Waste Producer: Contact Name: Telephone No.: Please tick the box if person completing the form: Fax No.: Waste Carrier: Contact Name: Telephone No.: Please tick the box if person completing the form: Fax No.: General Information General Information 3 Anticipated Volume of waste: m Anticipated Date(s) of Indicate whether estimate is for: Loose / solid / stockpile delivery: Full address of source of waste (including Postcode) 'RHVWKHZDVWHSURGXFHU¶VVLWH YES NO accept hazardous waste? Process from which waste arises: Hazardous Waste Assessment Type of Non- YES NO Hazardous (based on WM3) carried out? Waste: Hazardous Description and/or composition of waste: Tonnes Per Tonnes Per Delivery Week 43.1 Demolition 41.1 Construction 41.2 Roads Standard Industrial Classification & Site Preparation (SIC) Code: Please circle most appropriate LoW 01 01 01 04 17 01 17 01 17 01 17 01 17 05 19 12 20 02 Other: Code: 02 08 01 02 03 07 04 09 02 Details of existing and/or previous use of site (if known) (identify any known previous potentially polluting uses). Has a Site Investigation been carried out? Information required for Waste Information Information for Waste required Information (If YES, attach ALL information e.g. Borehole and trial pit logs) YES NO Is waste being generated as a result of site decontamination works? YES NO Does waste contain any biodegradable material? (e.g. wood, paper, YES NO vegetation) Customer Declaration: ,ZHFHUWLI\WKDWWKHDERYHLQIRUPDWLRQDQGDWWDFKPHQWVDUHFRUUHFWHGLQHYHU\UHVSHFW:KHUH³<(6´LVFRQILUPLQJWKDWWR the best of our knowledge the samples that have been taken are representative of the waste material to be deposited for recovery and that the chemical analysis have been carried out using accredited analytical methods by a UKAS accredited laboratory. Declaration Declaration 1DPH V «««««««««««6LJQHG «««««««««« 'DWH «««««««««« This section is to be completed by the Waste Assessor. Hazardous Waste Assessment (WM3) Required? YES NO Accept the waste? YES NO Compliance Testing to be carried out? YES NO Frequency of Compliance Testing? assessment Comments: Waste testing and Waste testing Signature of Waste Assessor: Date returned: Procedure: Waste Classification V.1 October 2020 Purpose: To outline the steps to be taken to classify waste in accordance with WM3 Guidance. RESPONSIBLE RECORD PERSON 1. This procedure describes how PT-CE Limited will test and classify waste in accordance with the Waste Classification ± Guidance on the Classification and Assessment of Waste ± Technical Guidance WM3 (WM3 Guidance) produced by the Environment Agency. 2. A Hazardous Waste Assessment may be required in the following situations: x Waste pre-acceptance. x Compliance testing. x Removal of waste from the Site. Further information relating to these situations can be found in the sub- sections in this Procedure. 3. Waste will be classified as non-hazardous or hazardous following an Site Manager assessment in accordance with WM3 Guidance (Hazardous Waste Assessment). Waste classified as hazardous will need to be dealt with appropriately, as follows: x Waste Pre-acceptance ± Hazardous waste should not be accepted. x Compliance testing - Hazardous waste should be quarantined and removed from Site accompanied by a Hazardous Waste Consignment Note and sent to a suitably licensed facility. Testing of Waste 4. Samples should be sent to a laboratory in order to obtain analysis results. Site Operative 5. $Q µ(QYLURQPHQWDO 6XLWH¶ VKRXOG EH UHTXHVWHG IURP WKH ODERUDWRU\ IRU WKH Site Operative sample of waste. The tests must be carried out on the waste itself and not in leachate. The Environmental Suite must contain at least the following parameters: x Total Sulphate. x Boron. x Arsenic. x Cadmium. x Metals, including; Chromium III, Chromium VI, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Selenium, Zinc. x Acid Soluble Sulphide. x Total Phenols (Monohydric). x Total Cyanide. x Elemental Sulphur. x pH Value. x PAH (total/speciated). x TPH (total/speciated). x BTEX. x Total Sulphate, Water Soluble Sulphate. 6. Additional analysis may be required if there is suspicion of specific Site Manager contaminants, for example pesticides. 7. Where there is a suspicion that asbestos may be present this must be tested Site Operative for: x Testing is required to determine if the waste contains visible pieces of asbestos containing materials. If individual pieces of material are considered to contain asbestos these should be removed from the RESPONSIBLE RECORD PERSON waste and sent for testing. If these are found to contain 0.1% or more asbestos, then the waste should be classified as hazardous. x Testing for asbestos is also required where there is suspicion that the waste may contain asbestos fibres. If these are found at 0.1% or more then the waste should be classified as hazardous. Waste Classification 8. A Hazardous Waste Assessment will be completed using the waste analysis Site Manager results received from the laboratory. This Hazardous Waste Assessment will classify the waste as non-hazardous or hazardous. 9. A Hazardous Waste Assessment may be carried out by manual assessment Site Operative or by using a software package to determine the relevant hazardous properties of the waste. 10. A copy of the Hazardous Waste Assessment should be kept with the Duty of Site Operative Care information for that waste. Procedure: Waste Rejection V.1 October 2020 Purpose: To ensure non-compliant waste is rejected and that associated records of rejected loads are created. RESPONSIBLE RECORD PERSON Reasons for Rejection 1. A waste may be non-conforming and rejected from the Site for the Site Manager Waste Transfer following reasons: Notes x Delivery vehicle is unsuitable for site operations / conditions. x The waste is not acceptable at the Site under the Environmental Permit. x There is a prohibited waste within the load. x The load is not accompanied by the correct documentation. x The waste does not match the description on the accompanying documentation. x The waste contains putrescible waste. The list is not exhaustive, if you are unsure speak to the Site Manager. 2. If a waste is identified as being unacceptable at the Site entrance or at Site Manager Form No. 2.3a the point of offloading the Site Manager is contacted and a Waste Waste Rejection Rejection Form is issued to the driver. 3. 7KHGULYHURIWKHORDGLVLQIRUPHGRIWKHORDG¶VUHMHFWLRQ7KHGULYHUZLOO Site Manager be informed of the reasons for this and requested to leave the Site. 4. If the load is being rejected because the description of the waste on the transfer note is incorrect, the driver may be given the opportunity to correct the mistake so long as the waste is acceptable at the Site. 5. A load will be rejected if the waste is likely to be contaminated and Site Manager sufficient information e.g. full site investigation and/or a hazardous waste assessment is not provided. A judgement should be made as to the necessity to obtain comprehensive information. If the source of the waste is not likely to be contaminated, then it may not be necessary to obtain a full site investigation or hazardous waste assessment. 6. In the event of a rejected load the Environment Agency may be Site Manager contacted by telephone and / or email with details of the rejected load. These details should include information relating to the nature and quantity of waste involved, the time and date, the name and address of the waste producer, the registration number of the vehicle delivering the waste and the name and address of the vehicle driver and haulage contractor. 7. If the load is not safe to be sent back onto the road, then the vehicle is kept in the Quarantine Area until appropriate arrangements can be for its removal. Waste Rejected after Offloading of the Vehicle 8. If appropriate, a rejected load should be reloaded onto the delivery vehicle. 9. If waste cannot be reloaded onto the delivery vehicle, the waste will be Form No. 2.3a stored in the quarantine area. The customer will be contacted, Waste Rejection arrangements to remove the quarantined waste will be made and a copy of the rejection form containing reasons for the rejection will be supplied. RESPONSIBLE RECORD PERSON 10. If arrangements for the customer to remove the waste cannot be made, Site Manager Pt-CE Limited will make these arrangements themselves. Waste material in the quarantine area will be exported off Site by a licensed waste carrier to an appropriately licensed facility. If necessary, PT-CE Limited will contact the EA regarding the rejection of the waste. 11. Waste will be stored for a maximum of seven working days in the Site Manager quarantine area. 12. Details of any unauthorised waste and its subsequent removal from Site Site Manager Form No. 2.3a is recorded and retained on Site. Waste Rejection Form: Waste Rejection V.1 October 2020 Customer / Producer (if Haulier: different): Contact: Contact: Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Email: Email: Transfer Note Date: No: Vehicle Time: Registration: Carriers 'ULYHU¶V Certificate: Name: Reason for Rejection: Actions Taken: You MUST inform the Site Manager or other member of management before taking any further action. Manager Informed: Destination for Waste: Transfer Note No: Date: Vehicle Registration: Time: Carriers Certificate: Drivers Name: Hazardous: Yes / No Consignment Note No: Signed Date Name Position