DOCSLIB.ORG

Damn the Torpedoes: the History of Science And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DAMN THE TORPEDOES: THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE AND UNDERSEA WARFARE IN WORLD WAR II by Gary Lee Sims A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in History MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April, 2017 ©COPYRIGHT by Gary Lee Sims 2017 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to two World War II Navy men from my youth, Ward Franklin Sims, and Donald Schwab, crewmates and friends who served on the battleship USS North Carolina. Young men like these two volunteered to fight for their country before their adult lives began. There were many other young men like these two who chose to serve on the most dangerous duty of the war with the U.S. Navy Submarine Service. The Submarine Service was the smallest, most elite section of the U.S. Navy and sank more enemy ships than any other group of warships involved in the war. But there was a price they paid. Fifty-two submarines, three hundred seventy-four officers and 3,131 submariners perished during the war. This dissertation is dedicated to them, as well. iii ACKNOWLEGEMENTS I could not have completed this work without travel grant help from the Montana State University College of Letters and Science and the Montana State University Graduate School. Special thanks go Dr. Karlene Hoo, Dean of the MSU Graduate School, who gave me personal support as well as a special dissertation completion fellowship. Mary Kuthmiller and Jan Zauha at the Renne Library, Montana State University, Bozeman, Ginny Kilander, Amanda Shaw and staff at the American Heritage Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie and Mary Ryan and staff at the U.S. Naval Undersea Museum, Keyport, Washington were especially helpful and gracious during my research visits. Mr. Charles R. Gunderson, former Mechanical Engineer with the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division met with me twice. Chapter Two could not have been written without Mr. Gunderson’s expertise. I had the greatest dissertation committee members, Dr. Tim LeCain, Dr. Robert Rydell and Dr. Brett Walker. I especially thank my Chairman, Dr. Michael Reidy who literally went above and beyond. My youngest son Connor helped with research at Keyport, my oldest son Graham created art for my dissertation presentation. My wife Mary was constantly by my side during this process. Mary assisted in research, editing, formatting and gave me constant support during the difficult days of the writing process. Her parents also supported me in every way. They made this dissertation possible. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………. 1 The USS Sargo ........................................................................................................1 Thesis and Organization ………..………………………………….…………...... 5 Resources and Past Scholarship …………………………………………………16 1. EARLY SUBMARINES AND TORPEDOES …………………………...………… 22 Battle of Tsushima ……………………………………………………………... 22 Thesis and Organization.……………………………………………………….. 23 High-risk Systems …………………….………………………………………... 25 Black Boxes ……………………………………………………………………. 27 Warfare on the High Seas ……………………………………………………… 29 Early Submarine Precursors: The Submersibles ……………………………….. 30 The Submarine: Initial Basic Development …………………………………… 34 The Submarine Part One: Submersion ……………………...………………….. 35 The Submarine Part Two: Propulsion.………………………………………….. 37 Steam Engines ………………………………………………….. 37 Internal Combustion Engine …………………………………… 37 Fuel …………………………………………………………….. 38 Diesel Engines …………………………………………………. 39 Battery Power for Undersea Travel ……………………………. 41 Analysis …………………………………………………….…………………... 41 John Phillip Holland …………………………………………… 42 Early Submarine Strategy: Europe …………………………….. 44 The First Torpedoes ……………………………………………………………. 47 Underwater Warfare Going into World War I ……………………….………… 52 Tactics and Strategy -- Alfred Thayer Mahan …………………. 53 Blockade: Gentlemen’s War Part One …………………………. 55 The Submarine Comes into its Own …………………………… 59 Interwar Years: Gentleman’s War Part Two …………………………………... 63 Designing the Fleet Submarine ………………………………… 67 War Plan Orange ……………………………………………….. 70 German Influences ……………………………………………... 72 Conclusion …………………………………………………...………………... 74 2. MODERN MARVELS ……………………………………………………………… 76 The USS Halibut ……………………………………………………………….. 76 Thesis and Organization ……………………………………………………….. 78 Designing the Fleet Submarine ………………………………………………… 79 v TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED Basic Function …………………………………………………………. 84 Submarines in Combat …………………………………………………. 85 The Science Behind Sinking a Ship ……………………………………………. 86 The Mark XIV Torpedo ………………………………………………………... 88 The Warhead……..……….………………………………………….…. 89 Exploders ………………………………………………………………. 90 The Air-Flask Section ………………………………………………….. 93 The Midships Section ………...………………………………………... 95 The Afterbody ………………………………………………………….. 96 The Development of the Mark XIV Magnetic Influence Exploder ……………. 97 Organizations and People ……………………………..……………………… 100 Requests of Vessels for Live Testing …….……...……………………. 100 Bureau of Ordnance, Bureau of Ships, Bureau of Construction and Repair …………………...……….……… 101 Newport Torpedo Station ……….….…………………….…………… 104 U.S. Naval Command, Bureau of Ordnance, and Men in the Field …….…………...……………………...…………….. 108 Charles Andrews Lockwood …………..…………….………………... 108 Ralph Waldo Christie ……………… ……………….………………. 111 William Henry Purnell Blandy ……………………………………….. 114 James Fife …………………………………………………………….. 116 Command Changes in the Pacific …………………………………….. 118 Analysis of Production Issues ………………………………………… 119 Analysis of Exploder Development ….……………………………….. 120 Pre-War Testing …………………………….………… 122 Sink-Ex Testing ………………………………………. 123 Administrative and Staffing Issues of Torpedo Construction ………………………………………………………… 125 3. CONFLICT AND RESOLUTION ………………………………………………… 131 The USS Wahoo ……………………………………………………………… 131 Thesis and Organization ……………………………………………………… 135 Torpedo Shortage and Conservation Measures ………………………………. 137 Contact, Attack and Firing Solutions …………………..………………….…. 142 Searching for a Target ………………………………………………… 143 Periscope ……………………………………………………………… 143 Masthead height ………………………………………………………. 144 Torpedo Data Computer ……………………………………………… 147 The Torpedo Rooms ………………………………………………….. 149 Analysis of the Fire Control Process …….…………….………...…… 148 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED Wartime Problems ……………………………………..………..……………. 151 Command and Skipper Problems ….………………………..……..….. 153 Torpedo Issues ……………………….……………………..…….…... 156 Initial Response by Command …….………………………………….. 158 Changes in Personnel ……………….………………………………… 161 Depth Issue ….…………………….………………………….……..… 163 Prematures …………………………………………………….………. 168 Duds …….…………………......…………………………….………... 179 Conclusion ……………………………….……………………………..…..… 183 4. HIGH-RISK SYSTEMS ……………………………..…………………………….. 187 The USS Squalus ……………………………………………………………... 187 Thesis and Organization ……………………………………………………… 194 High-risk Systems ………………………………………..…………………… 195 Incidents and Accidents …………….………………………………… 196 Failures ………………………………………………………..………. 197 Squalus as a High-Risk System ………………………………………………. 198 Degree of Disturbance ………………………………………………... 199 Coupling …………………………………………………….………… 199 Linear vs. Complex Systems ………………………………….………. 200 Engineered Safety Features ……………………………...….………… 202 Mental Models and No time for Correction …………………………... 203 Resolution of the Squalus Story ………………………………………. 206 Operator Error ………………………………………………………… 208 MK XIV Torpedo …………………………...………………………………... 209 Hydro Diaphragm …………………………………………………….. 211 Depth-Setting Mechanism ……………………………………………. 212 The Mark VI Exploder: Electrical Engineering View ………………... 213 The Arming and Delay Switch ……………………………………….. 217 Generator …………………………………..…………………….…… 218 Voltage Regulator and Noise Filter …………………………………... 219 Pick-up Coil …………………………………………………………... 219 Thyratron Tube ……………………………………………………….. 221 To the Target …………………………………………………….……. 221 Capacitors …………………………………………………………….. 223 Solenoid ………………………………………………………………. 224 Analysis ………………………………………………………………. 224 Analysis of the Mark XIV/VI High-Risk System ……………………………. 225 Definitions ……...……….………………..…………………….……. 226 Task Analysis …………..……………………………..…..…………. 226 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED Degree of Disturbance ……………………….……………………….. 227 Incident versus Accident ……….…………………………….……….. 227 Engineered Safety Features ….……………………………….……….. 227 Linear versus Complex, Visible versus Invisible ………………….…. 228 Redundancy ……………….………………………………………….. 228 Mental Models ………………….………………………………..…… 228 Coupling ………………………………………………………….…… 229 Transformation Processes and the Environment ……………………… 230 Materials and Relationships in Action ………………………………... 233 Science in War ………………………………………………………………... 233 Submarine Reports ……………………………………………………. 234 Testing ………………………………………………………………… 235 Corrective Systems for the MK XIV/VI ……………………………… 235 Torpedo Failure Response Program ………………………….……….. 241 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………….…… 243 5. BLACK BOXES ……...…………………………………………………………… 245 The USS Sculpin ……………………………………………………………… 245 Thesis and Organization ……………………………………………………… 246 Command Structure …………………………………………………………... 247 History of Science …………………………………………………………….. 248 The Strong Programme ……………………………………….. 248 Materialism, Actor Network Theory and Black Boxes ………. 249 Networks ……………………………………………………… 251 Black Boxes …………………………………………………... 253 MK XIV Depth Control as a Black Box ……………………… 255 MK VI Magnetic Influence Exploder as a Black Box ………... 267 Production Science ……………………………………………………………. 259 Opening a Black Box ………………………………………………………….
Recommended publications
  • The Effectiveness of Canada's Navy on Escort Duty

    The Effectiveness of Canada's Navy on Escort Duty

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Effectiveness of Canada’s Navy on Escort Duty Skogstad, Karl Lakehead University 16 January 2015 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61467/ MPRA Paper No. 61467, posted 20 Jan 2015 09:32 UTC The Effectiveness of Canada’s Navy on Escort Duty Karl Skogstad1 January 2015 Abstract This paper examines the potential costs a country faces when it fails to develop domestic arms manufacturing. I examine these costs using the historical example of Canada’s decision to not develop domestic naval shipbuilding capacity prior to World War II. Canada’s primary naval responsibility during the war was to escort convoys be- tween the United Kingdom and North America. However its lack of advanced domestic shipbuilding capacity and congestion at Allied shipyards, meant that Canada could not obtain the relatively advanced destroyer class vessels necessary for convoy duty. Instead it had to rely on less advanced corvette class vessels, which were simple enough to be manufactured domestically. Using a unique data set, created for this project, I match convoy movements to German U-boat locations in order to examine the escort compo- sition and the number of merchant ships lost when an engagement occurred. Using this data I find that destroyers were 2.14 more effective than corvettes at preventing the loss of a merchant ship. Then, by constructing a counterfactual scenario, I find that developing a domestic ship building industry in Canada would have netted the Allies a benefit of 28.7 million 1940 Canadian dollars. JEL classification: N42, F51, F52, H56, H57 Keywords: Canadian Navy, World War II, Convoys, Domestic Arms industries.
  • Development of 155Mm M795 IM Precision Guidance Kit (PGK) Compatible Projectile

    Development of 155Mm M795 IM Precision Guidance Kit (PGK) Compatible Projectile

    Development of 155mm M795 IM Precision Guidance Kit (PGK) Compatible Projectile Briefed by: Philip Samuels October 7 - 10, 2013 973-724-4064 2013 NDIA IM/EM [email protected] San Diego, CA 1 Distribution Statement Statement A: A: Approved Approved for forpublic public release; release; distribution distribution is unlimited is unlimited Background • The Army Qualified IMX-101 as the main fill for the 155mm M795 Artillery Projectile in June 2010 • The Army is now moving towards guided fuzes, ie Precision Guidance Kit (PGK), which is a deep intrusion fuze. – Due to the supplementary charge being removed for PGK use, IMX-101 would not be compliant with this fuze 2 Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited System Description Changes via Army ECP (a) Changes via Army ECP (b) TNT PBXN-9 PBXN-9 IMX-104 TNT IMX-101 IMX-101 Legacy D529 DA54 DA54 PGK Fuze Compatible Non-PGK Fuze Compatible • Army developed projectile • Replaces TNT with IMX-101 • Similar to DA54 non-PGK fuze • Contains 24lbs of HE • Consists PBXN-9 compatible, uses IMX-101 and • Consists TNT supplemental supplemental charge PBXN-9 as supplemental charge charge • Less sensitive than legacy • Contains IMX-104 transfer • Poor IM testing results D529 charge to accommodate PGK • Not compatible with PGK fuze compatibility fuze • Maintains same IM performance • Currently not in inventory as DA54 non-PGK fuze and no plans to field compatible projectile 3 Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
  • Report Japanese Submarine 1124

    Report Japanese Submarine 1124

    REPORT JAPANESE SUBMARINE 1124 Mike McCarthy Maritime Archaeology Department WAMaritime Museum Cliff Street, Fremantle, WA 6160 October 1990 With research, advice and technical assistance from Captain David Tomlinson Or David Ramm Or J. Fabris Or Thomas O. Paine Mr Garrick Gray Mr George G. Thompson Mr Henri Bourse Mr J. Bastian Mr P.J. Washington RACAL The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade The Department of the Arts, Sport, the Environment, Tourism and Territories Underwater Systems Australia Report-Department of Maritime Archaeology, Western Australian Museum, No. 43 2 Background to the report In July 1988, a wreck believed to be the SS Koombanah, which disappeared with all hands in waters off Western Australia in 1921, was officially reported to the W. A. Museum and the federal government by Captain David Tomlinson, (Master/owner of the Darwin based Research Vessel Flamingo Bay) and Mr Mike Barron, a Tasmanian associate of Tomlinson's, fr;om the Commonwealth Fisheries. In order to facilitate an inspection of the site, it was decided on analysis of the available options and in the light of the W.A. Museum's policy of involving the finders where possible, to join with Messrs Tomlinson and Barron in an inspection out of Darwin on board the RV Flamingo Bay, a very well equipped and most suitable vessel for such a venture. Due to the depth of the water in which the site lay and the distance off­ shore, this required not only the charter of Flamingo Bay which normally runs at circa $2000 per day, but also the hire of a sophisticated position fixing system, a Remote Operated Submersible Vehicle with camera (ROV), echo sounder and side scan sonar.
  • Submarines in the United States Navy - Wikipedia Page 1 of 13

    Submarines in the United States Navy - Wikipedia Page 1 of 13

    Submarines in the United States Navy - Wikipedia Page 1 of 13 Submarines in the United States Navy There are three major types of submarines in the United States Navy: ballistic missile submarines, attack submarines, and cruise missile submarines. All submarines in the U.S. Navy are nuclear-powered. Ballistic subs have a single strategic mission of carrying nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missiles. Attack submarines have several tactical missions, including sinking ships and subs, launching cruise missiles, and gathering intelligence. The submarine has a long history in the United States, beginning with the Turtle, the world's first submersible with a documented record of use in combat.[1] Contents Early History (1775–1914) World War I and the inter-war years (1914–1941) World War II (1941–1945) Offensive against Japanese merchant shipping and Japanese war ships Lifeguard League Cold War (1945–1991) Towards the "Nuclear Navy" Strategic deterrence Post–Cold War (1991–present) Composition of the current force Fast attack submarines Ballistic and guided missile submarines Personnel Training Pressure training Escape training Traditions Insignia Submarines Insignia Other insignia Unofficial insignia Submarine verse of the Navy Hymn See also External links References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarines_in_the_United_States_Navy 3/24/2018 Submarines in the United States Navy - Wikipedia Page 2 of 13 Early History (1775–1914) There were various submersible projects in the 1800s. Alligator was a US Navy submarine that was never commissioned. She was being towed to South Carolina to be used in taking Charleston, but she was lost due to bad weather 2 April 1863 off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.
  • Alternative Anti-Personnel Mines the Next Generations Landmine Action Consists of the Following Co-Operating Organisations

    Alternative Anti-Personnel Mines the Next Generations Landmine Action Consists of the Following Co-Operating Organisations

    Alternative anti-personnel mines The next generations Landmine Action consists of the following co-operating organisations: ActionAid International Alert Refugee Council Action for Southern Africa Jaipur Limb Campaign Royal College of Paediatrics & Action on Disability and Development Jesuit Refugee Service Child Health Adopt-A-Minefield UK MEDACT Saferworld Afghanaid Medical & Scientific Aid for Vietnam Laos & Save the Children UK Amnesty International UK Cambodia Soroptimist International UK Programme Action Committee CAFOD Medical Educational Trust Tearfund Cambodia Trust Merlin United Nations Association Campaign Against Arms Trade Mines Advisory Group United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) UK Child Advocacy International Motivation VERTIC Christian Aid Mozambique Angola Committee War Child Comic Relief Omega Foundation War on Want Concern Worldwide One World Action Welsh Centre for International Affairs Disability Awareness in Action Oxfam GB Women’s International League for Peace & Environmental Investigation Agency Pax Christi Freedom Global Witness Peace Pledge Union World Vision UK Handicap International (UK) People and Planet Hope for Children POWER Human Rights Watch Quaker Peace & Service The member organisations of the German Initiative to Ban Landmines are: Bread for the World Social Service Agency of the Evangelical Church Misereor Christoffel Mission for the Blind in Germany Oxfam Germany German Justitia et Pax Commission Eirene International Pax Christi German Committee for Freedom from Hunger Handicap International Germany
  • Adapting to Innovation: the Us Navy, High-Steam Destroyers, and the Second World War

    Adapting to Innovation: the Us Navy, High-Steam Destroyers, and the Second World War

    ABSTRACT Title of Document: ADAPTING TO INNOVATION: THE US NAVY, HIGH-STEAM DESTROYERS, AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR. Tyler A. Pitrof, Master of Arts, 2013 Directed By: Associate Professor Jon T. Sumida, Department of History The US Navy’s move to high-pressure and -temperature steam propulsion, otherwise known as “high steam,” has been viewed in the postwar period as a critical advance that made long-range operations possible during World War II. This position, which is almost entirely reliant on the autobiography of Rear Admiral Harold G. Bowen, has neglected to consider the complex and problematic nature of the supply chain required to produce high-steam turbines. Archival research has revealed that the US Navy’s insensitivity to these changes after 1938 caused severe bottlenecks in wartime destroyer production. Also overlooked was the aggressive administrative action on the part of the Navy’s Bureau of Ships and its turbine subcontractors required to mitigate this crisis. Together, these events formed an important example of the need to adapt administratively to match the advance of technology. ADAPTING TO INNOVATION: THE US NAVY, HIGH-STEAM DESTROYERS, AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR. By Tyler A. Pitrof Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Military History 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T. Sumida, Chair Professor Arthur Eckstein Professor Robert Friedel © Copyright by Tyler A. Pitrof 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................. iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................
  • The Weeping Monument: a Pre and Post Depositional Site

    The Weeping Monument: a Pre and Post Depositional Site

    THE WEEPING MONUMENT: A PRE AND POST DEPOSITIONAL SITE FORMATION STUDY OF THE USS ARIZONA by Valerie Rissel April, 2012 Director of Thesis: Dr. Brad Rodgers Major Department: Program in Maritime History and Archaeology Since its loss on December 7, 1941, the USS Arizona has been slowly leaking over 9 liters of oil per day. This issue has brought about conversations regarding the stability of the wreck, and the possibility of defueling the 500,000 to 600,000 gallons that are likely residing within the wreck. Because of the importance of the wreck site, a decision either way is one which should be carefully researched before any significant changes occur. This research would have to include not only the ship and its deterioration, but also the oil’s effects on the environment. This thesis combines the historical and current data regarding the USS Arizona with case studies of similar situations so a clearer picture of the future of the ship can be obtained. THE WEEPING MONUMENT: A PRE AND POST DEPOSITIONAL SITE FORMATION STUDY OF THE USS ARIZONA Photo courtesy of Battleship Arizona by Paul Stillwell A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Program in Maritime Studies Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters in Maritime History and Archaeology by Valerie Rissel April, 2012 © Valerie Rissel, 2012 THE WEEPING MONUMENT: A PRE AND POST DEPOSITIONAL SITE FORMATION STUDY OF THE USS ARIZONA by Valerie Rissel APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS______________________________________________________________________ Bradley Rodgers, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER________________________________________________________ Michael Palmer, Ph.D.
  • English Comes from the French: Guerre De Course

    English Comes from the French: Guerre De Course

    The Maritime Transport War - Emphasizing a strategy to interrupt the enemy sea lines of communication1 (SLOCs) - ARAKAWA Kenichi Preface Why did the Imperial Japanese Navy not aggressively develop a strategy to interrupt the enemy sea line of communication (SLOC) during the Second World War? Japan’s SLOC connecting her southern and Asian continental fronts to the mainland were destroyed mainly by the U.S. submarine warfare. Consequently, Japanese forces suffered from shortages of provisions as well as natural resources necessary for her military power. Furthermore, neither weapons nor provisions could be delivered to the fronts due to the U.S. operations to disrupt the Japanese SLOCs between the battlegrounds and the Japanese home island. Thus soldiers on the front were threatened with starvation even before the battle. In contrast, the U.S. and British military forces supported long logistical supply lines to their Asian and Pacific battlegrounds. However, there are no records indicating that the Imperial Japanese Navy attempted to interrupt these vital sea lines. Surely Japanese officers were aware of the German use of submarines in World WarⅠ. Why did the Imperial Japanese Navy not adopt a guerre de course strategy, that is a strategy targeting the enemy merchant marine and logistical lines? The most comprehensive explanation indicates that the Imperial Japanese Navy had no doctrine providing for this kind of warfare. The core of its naval strategy was the doctrine of “decisive battles at any cost.” Under the Japanese naval doctrine submarines were meant to contribute to fleet engagements not to have an independent combat role or to target anything but the enemy fleet.
  • A „Szőke Tisza” Megmentésének Lehetőségei

    A „Szőke Tisza” Megmentésének Lehetőségei

    A „SZŐKE TISZA” MEGMENTÉSÉNEK LEHETŐSÉGEI Tájékoztató Szentistványi Istvánnak, a szegedi Városkép- és Környezetvédelmi Bizottság elnökének Összeállította: Dr. Balogh Tamás © 2012.03.27. TIT – Hajózástörténeti, -Modellező és Hagyományőrző Egyesület 2 TÁJÉKOZTATÓ Szentistványi István, a szegedi Városkép- és Környezetvédelmi Bizottság elnöke részére a SZŐKE TISZA II. termesgőzössel kapcsolatban 2012. március 27-én Szentistványi István a szegedi Városkép- és Környezetvédelmi Bizottság elnöke e-mailben kért tájékoztatást Dr. Balogh Tamástól a TIT – Hajózástörténeti, -Modellező és Hagyományőrző Egyesület elnökétől a SZŐKE TISZA II. termesgőzössel kapcsolatban, hogy tájékozódjon a hajó megmentésének lehetőségéről – „akár jelentősebb anyagi ráfordítással, esetleges városi összefogással is”. A megkeresésre az alábbi tájékoztatást adom: A hajó 2012. február 26-án süllyedt el. Azt követően egyesületünk honlapján – egy a hajónak szentelt tematikus aloldalon – rendszeresen tettük közzé a hajóra és a mentésére vonatkozó információkat, képeket, videókat (http://hajosnep.hu/#!/lapok/lap/szoke-tisza-karmentes), amelyekből szinte napi ütemezésben nyomon követhetők a február 26-március 18 között történt események. A honlapon elérhető információkat nem kívánom itt megismételni. Egyebekben a hajó jelentőségéről és az esetleges városi véleménynyilvánítás elősegítésére az alábbiakat tartom szükségesnek kiemelni: I) A hajó jelentősége: Bár a Kulturális Örökségvédelmi Hivatal előtt jelenleg zajlik a hajó örökségi védelembe vételére irányuló eljárás (a hajó örökségi
  • 216 Allan Sanford: Uss Ward

    216 Allan Sanford: Uss Ward

    #216 ALLAN SANFORD: USS WARD Steven Haller (SH): My name is Steven Haller, and I'm here with James P. Delgado, at the Sheraton Waikiki Hotel in Honolulu, Hawaii. It's December 5, 1991, at about 5:25 PM. And we have the pleasure to be interviewing Mr. Allan Sanford. Mr. Sanford was a Seaman First Class on the USS WARD, at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack. Mr.[Sanford], Ward's gun fired what is in essence the first shot of World War II, and so it's a great pleasure to be able to be talking with you today. We're going to be doing this tape as a part of the National Park Service and ARIZONA Memorial's oral history program. We're doing it in conjunction with KHET-TV in Honolulu. So thanks again for being with us today, Mr. Sanford. Allan Sanford: It's a pleasure to be here. SH: Good. How did you get into the Navy? AS: I joined the Naval reserve unit in St. Paul, Minnesota and with two others of my classmates in high school. And we enjoyed the meetings, and uniforms, and drills, and it was a nice social activity that was a little more mature than some of the high school activities that we had participated in. So we enjoyed the meetings of the St. Paul Naval reserve. And we called it also the Minnesota Naval Militia. However, in September 1940, the commanding officer of the unit came to the meeting and said, "Attention to orders, the Minnesota Naval Militia is hereby made part of the U.S.
  • Downloaded April 22, 2006

    Downloaded April 22, 2006

    SIX DECADES OF GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic Smarter and Budgetary Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks: Progress and Prospects by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments March 2007 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonprofit, public policy research institute established to make clear the inextricable link between near-term and long- range military planning and defense investment strategies. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundations, corporations, government, and individual grants and contributions. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), and The Revolution in War (2004). The first of these, on the military-technical revolution, reproduces the 1992 Pentagon assessment that precipitated the 1990s debate in the United States and abroad over revolutions in military affairs. Many friends and professional colleagues, both within CSBA and outside the Center, have contributed to this report. Those who made the most substantial improvements to the final manuscript are acknowledged below. However, the analysis and findings are solely the responsibility of the author and CSBA. 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................. v SUMMARY ............................................................... ix GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………xix I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 Guided Munitions: Origins in the 1940s............. 3 Cold War Developments and Prospects ............
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The

    'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The

    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.