DOCSLIB.ORG

Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-2000 Com pi led by: Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Director, Research Center David H. Napier Editorial Consultant Ann A. Hunter Design AAH Graphics, Inc. Published by: Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1250 Eye Street, N.W., #1200 Washington, D.C. 20005-3924 FAX (202) 371-8470 For information about orders, call (202) 371-8407 For information about content, call (202) 3 71-8563 Copyright © 2000 by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 Intern ational Standard Seri al No. 0898-4425 2 .,._,... ~· ' .. - . ' . \'T'~vr.':l\1 . \ ~\tK~JD:'~~LEDEwJEPFfS ·.:~ ·. · · · · LM•~:ru~f<~ :.a. ·~.;'f.:•. Air Transport Association of America Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company General Aviation Manufacturers Association Helicopter Association International International Civil Aviation Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bureau of the Census; International Trade Administration) U.S. Department of Defense (Air Force; Army; Ballistic Missile Defense Organization; Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operatiqps, and Reports; Navy) U.S. Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) U.S. Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airline Statistics) 3 4 CDNTf~TS ' Foreword. 6 Aerospace Summary ... ....... ........ .. 8 Aircraft Production . 26 Missile Programs . ..... ... .. .. 48 Space Programs ..... .. .... ...... .... ... 58 Air Transportation. .. .. .... .. .. .... .. 72 Research and Development . 98 Foreign Trade .. ... ... .. ..... ... .... 112 Employment . ...... ................. 134 Finance . .. .. ... .. ..... .... .... 148 Glossary . .. .. ........ ...... ... ... ... 157 Index ... ... ....... ... .. ..... .. 164 5 ROM TWO BICYCLE BUILDERS WORKING OUT OF THEIR garage in Ohio to a multinational team building a structure 225 ~ miles above the Earth's surface, the launch and subsequent mat­ ing of the first components of the International Space Station (cover) symbolizes the progress mankind has made during the 1900s. Over the span of less than a general aviation aircraft billings century, the aerospace industry has marked the seventh straight re­ brought amazing progress. Air cord year; exports, imports, and transportation was born, grew into the resulting trade surplus all a dominant form of long-distance reached new highs; industry sales travel, and now represents an intri­ peaked at $151 billion; and prof­ cate web of passenger & its soared to a record $10 billion freight-carrying flying machines. in 1999. Warfare has been permanently al­ However, 1999 was not free of tered; its use and duration, and the blemishes. Commercial satellites misery caused by it, have been sig­ were added to the State Depart­ nificantly reduced. Rocketry, itself ment's Munitions List thereby a product of warfare, begat space­ transferring responsibility for issu­ flight and space exploration, which ing of export licenses away from a has brought satellite communica­ legal system designed for export tions, remote sensing, and the of commercial products to one Global Positioning System to the developed for weapons systems. masses. Clearly, the crowning As a consequence, commercial achievement during the 1900s was satellite and parts exports de­ stepping onto the Moon andre­ clined by more than 35% and our turning safely home-a feat made market share fell from two-thirds possible by the work and ingenuity to one-half. Federal investment in of the U.S. aerospace industry. aerospace R&D in 1998 (latest Nineteen-ninety-nine may very data available) is 60% less than a well be the statistical capstone of decade earlier. In the last two the 1900s for the U.S. aerospace years alone, aerospace employ­ industry. A record number of com­ ment of R&D-performing scien­ mercial airliners were built; com­ tists and engineers (R&D-S&Es) mercial airline traffic (both freight has fallen 30 percent. As a per­ and passenger) reached new highs; centag. of national employment 6 of R&D-S&Es, it is at the lowest ploration to Mars and beyond in level on record. Further, the aero­ the next century. space industry is failing to attract No one knows the advances in young college graduates into its medicine that will spawn from the workforce. The share of aerospace experiments aboard the Interna­ workers in the age bracket 25-34 tional Space Station. Nor can we has fallen ten percentage points measure the benefits to space (2 7% to 17%) from 1992 to 1999. travel from our efforts to reduce As we stand at the cusp of a the transit time to Mars. There is new century, we recognize these much to be learned! What strides challenges, but we rightfully take we make in the coming century pride in our accomplishments and depend largely upon what we can't help but gaze into the un­ strive to undertake. The good imaginable future. Confident in our news is America possesses ample technical competence, the aero­ imagination and determination to space industry will assist in build­ improve and that the U.S. aero­ ing and servicing of the space industry will find the way! International Space Station, colo­ nize the Moon, and lead man's ex- John W. Douglass President and Chief Executive Officer, Aerospace Industries Association 7 .S. AEROSPACE INDUSTRY SALES INCREASED 2.1% IN 1999, following 1998's gain of 12.5% . DoD led with a 5% increase, ~ while NASA and other federal agencies' combined sales fell slightly. Sales to customers other than the U .S. government rose slightly to record levels. Here are the highlights of the in- of U.S. manufacturing sales, down dustry's 1999 performance: from 1.7% and 3.7% in 1998. Sales Earnings Overall industry sales totaled Net income after taxes was a $151 billion, compared with $148 record $10.2 billion, up from $7.7 billion in 1998. U.S. government billion in the previous year. As a sales reached $58 billion, up $2.1 percentage of sales, the industry's billion from the previous year. The profit amounted to 6.5 %, up from "other customers" category rose the 1998 aerospace profit-to-sales $464 million to a record $67.5 bil- ratio of 5.0%. By comparison, the lion. average for all U.S. manufacturing As usual, aircraft sector sales led industries was 6.2%. As a per­ all other product groups. Civil and centage of assets, aerospace earn­ military sales combined totaled ings amounted to 6.2%; as a $87 billion, compared with $84 percentage of equity, 21 .8%. billion in 1998. Total aircraft sales The consolidated aerospace break down into $51 billion for balance sheet showed net work­ civil and $35 billion for military, ing capital of $11.7 billion, up with civil aircraft sales dominating from $11.5 billion in 1998. Stock­ military sales for the third time holders' equity grew from $43 bil­ since 1993. lion in 1998 to $50 billion in There was also a gain in sales of 1999 and total assets climbed " related products and services," substantially from $160 billion to which surpassed $25 billion, up $170 billion. $517 million from the previous Orders and Backlog year. Likewise, missile sector sales Net new orders for aerospace grew to $8.9 billion, up from $7.7 products and services rose $4.3 billion. Unfortunately, space sector billion, or 3.9%, to $114 billion, sa les declined to $30 billion, down upfron . $110billion in 1998, re­ from $32 billion in 1998. versing the last two years' down­ For 1999, aerospace industry ward trend. The increase reflects a output amounted to 1.6% of the rise in military orders from $3,9 Gross Domestic Product and 3.5% 8 billion in 1998 to $51 billion in 1999. Orders in the civil sector fell from $71 billion in 1998 to $64 billion in 1999. The industry's backlog at year-end 1999 was $190 billion d?wn from $200 billion in the p're­ vious year. Of that, 63%, or $120 The industry produced 333 mil­ billion, are orders for non-military itary aircraft: 107 were delivered products. The backlog for military to U.S. military agencies and 226 systems held steady at $70 billion. ~ere exported either through For­ Civil Aircraft Production eign Mi Iitary Sales arrangements o~ through direct company-to-for­ U .S. manufacturers shipped eign-customer sales. The compa­ 3,477 civil aircraft in 1999 worth a rable figures for 1998 were 418 tot_al $45 billion. That represents a total, 149 for the U.S. military ser­ gam of 342 units and $3.7 billion vices, and 269 exports. in sales over 1998 levels. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2000, the Civil transport production-620 major aircraft types procured aircraft valued at a record $38 bil­ were: the Air Force C-1 7 lion-accounted for 84% of the to­ Globemaster Ill transport, the value. These figures compare ta~ Navy F/A-18EIF fighter, the Air :-vith 559 aircraft worth $36 billion Force F-22 Raptor fighter, the In 1998. Navy/Marine Corps V-22 Osprey of civil helicopters Pr~duction tiltrotor aircraft, the Army AH-64 remained almost even with 1998 Apache helicopter, the Air at 361 units (down 2) valued at Force/Navy C-130J Hercules $187 million (down $65 million). transport, the Navy E-2C General aviation aircraft sales Hawkeye early warning and con­ increased to 2,496 uni (up 283) trol aircraft, the Air Force E-8C and in dollar value to $6.9 billion JSTARS surveillance aircraft, the (up $1.2 billion). This sales level Navy CH-60S helicopter, and the marked the seventh straight record Navy T-45 Goshawk trainer. year for general aviation. Foreign Trade Military Aircraft Production Aerospace exports remained The Census Bureau reported strong at $62 billion, but declined 1999 sales of military aircraft and 2.5% from 1998's all-time high of parts, including engines, to be $64 billion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CAAM 3 Report
    3rd Technical Report On Propulsion System and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Related Aircraft Safety Hazards A joint effort of The Federal Aviation Administration and The Aerospace Industries Association March 30, 2017 Questions concerning distribution of this report should be addressed to: Federal Aviation Administration Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents iii List of Figures v I. Foreword 1 II. Background 1 III. Scope 2 IV. Discussion 3 V. Relationship to Previous CAAM Data 7 VI. General Notes and Comments 8 VII. Fleet Utilization 11 VIII. CAAM3 Team Members 12 IX. Appendices List of Appendices 13 Appendix 1: Standardized Aircraft Event Hazard Levels and Definitions 14 • General Notes Applicable to All Event Hazard Levels 19 • Rationale for Changes in Severity Classifications 19 • Table 1. Historical Comparison of Severity Level Descriptions and Rationale for CAAM3 Changes 21 Appendix 2: Event Definitions 39 Appendix 3: Propulsion System and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Related Aircraft Safety Hazards (2001 through 2012) 44 • Uncontained Blade 44 • Uncontained Disk 50 • Uncontained – Other 56 iii • Uncontained – All Parts 62 • High Bypass Comparison by Generation 63 • Relationship Among High Bypass Fleet 64 • Case Rupture 66 • Case Burnthrough 69 • Under-Cowl Fire 72 • Strut/Pylon Fire 76 • Fuel Leak 78 • Engine Separation 82 • Cowl Separation 85 • Propulsion System Malfunction Recognition and Response (PSMRR) 88 • Crew Error 92 • Reverser/Beta Malfunction – In-Flight Deploy 96 • Fuel Tank Rupture/Explosion 99 • Tailpipe Fire 102 • Multiple-Engine Powerloss – Non-Fuel 107 • Multiple-Engine Powerloss – Fuel-Related 115 • Fatal Human Ingestion / Propeller Contact 120 • IFSD Snapshot by Hazard Level – 2012 Data Only 122 • RTO Snapshot by Hazard Level – 2012 Data Only 123 • APU Events 123 • Turboprop Events 124 • Matrices of Event Counts, Hazard Ratios and Rates 127 • Data Comparison to Previous CAAM Data 135 [ The following datasets which were collected in CAAM2 were not collected in CAAM3.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelf List 05/31/2011 Matches 4631
    Shelf List 05/31/2011 Matches 4631 Call# Title Author Subject 000.1 WARBIRD MUSEUMS OF THE WORLD EDITORS OF AIR COMBAT MAG WAR MUSEUMS OF THE WORLD IN MAGAZINE FORM 000.10 FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM, THE THE FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM YEOVIL, ENGLAND 000.11 GUIDE TO OVER 900 AIRCRAFT MUSEUMS USA & BLAUGHER, MICHAEL A. EDITOR GUIDE TO AIRCRAFT MUSEUMS CANADA 24TH EDITION 000.2 Museum and Display Aircraft of the World Muth, Stephen Museums 000.3 AIRCRAFT ENGINES IN MUSEUMS AROUND THE US SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIST OF MUSEUMS THROUGH OUT THE WORLD WORLD AND PLANES IN THEIR COLLECTION OUT OF DATE 000.4 GREAT AIRCRAFT COLLECTIONS OF THE WORLD OGDEN, BOB MUSEUMS 000.5 VETERAN AND VINTAGE AIRCRAFT HUNT, LESLIE LIST OF COLLECTIONS LOCATION AND AIRPLANES IN THE COLLECTIONS SOMEWHAT DATED 000.6 VETERAN AND VINTAGE AIRCRAFT HUNT, LESLIE AVIATION MUSEUMS WORLD WIDE 000.7 NORTH AMERICAN AIRCRAFT MUSEUM GUIDE STONE, RONALD B. LIST AND INFORMATION FOR AVIATION MUSEUMS 000.8 AVIATION AND SPACE MUSEUMS OF AMERICA ALLEN, JON L. LISTS AVATION MUSEUMS IN THE US OUT OF DATE 000.9 MUSEUM AND DISPLAY AIRCRAFT OF THE UNITED ORRISS, BRUCE WM. GUIDE TO US AVIATION MUSEUM SOME STATES GOOD PHOTOS MUSEUMS 001.1L MILESTONES OF AVIATION GREENWOOD, JOHN T. EDITOR SMITHSONIAN AIRCRAFT 001.2.1 NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM, THE BRYAN, C.D.B. NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM COLLECTION 001.2.2 NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM, THE, SECOND BRYAN,C.D.B. MUSEUM AVIATION HISTORY REFERENCE EDITION Page 1 Call# Title Author Subject 001.3 ON MINIATURE WINGS MODEL AIRCRAFT OF THE DIETZ, THOMAS J.
    [Show full text]
  • Robust Gas Turbine and Airframe System Design in Light of Uncertain
    Robust Gas Turbine and Airframe System Design in Light of Uncertain Fuel and CO2 Prices Stephan Langmaak1, James Scanlan2, and András Sóbester3 University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7QF, United Kingdom This paper presents a study that numerically investigated which cruise speed the next generation of short-haul aircraft with 150 seats should y at and whether a con- ventional two- or three-shaft turbofan, a geared turbofan, a turboprop, or an open rotor should be employed in order to make the aircraft's direct operating cost robust to uncertain fuel and carbon (CO2) prices in the Year 2030, taking the aircraft pro- ductivity, the passenger value of time, and the modal shift into account. To answer this question, an optimization loop was set up in MATLAB consisting of nine modules covering gas turbine and airframe design and performance, ight and aircraft eet sim- ulation, operating cost, and optimization. If the passenger value of time is included, the most robust aircraft design is powered by geared turbofan engines and cruises at Mach 0.80. If the value of time is ignored, however, then a turboprop aircraft ying at Mach 0.70 is the optimum solution. This demonstrates that the most fuel-ecient option, the open rotor, is not automatically the most cost-ecient solution because of the relatively high engine and airframe costs. 1 Research Engineer, Computational Engineering and Design 2 Professor of Aerospace Design, Computational Engineering and Design, AIAA member 3 Associate Professor in Aircraft Engineering, Computational Engineering and Design, AIAA member 1 I. Introduction A. Background IT takes around 5 years to develop a gas turbine engine, which then usually remains in pro- duction for more than two decades [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Mach Number, Transonic Area Rule
    Critical Mach number - Compressibility Effects on Lift The design parameter that influences compressibility effects on lift is the Critical Mach number (Mcr). This is the free stream Mach number when sonic conditions (M = 1) is reached at some point on the airfoil surface The figure illustrates the same airfoil, at the same angle of attack at different free stream Mach numbers leading to the definition of the critical Mach number The critical Mach number can be obtained through the curve for the minimum pressure coefficient as a function of Mach number. It can be determined through the intersection of the two equations The lift coefficient correction for compressibility is The figure above illustrates that If you plan to fly at high free stream Mach number, you airfoil should be thin to (a) increase your critical Mach number as this will keep your drag rise small This will also result in lower minimum pressure: Therefore your lift coefficient will decrease Note that the minimum pressure coefficient on thick airfoil is high; this means that the velocity is also correspondingly high. Therefore the critical Mach number is reached for lower value of the free stream Mach number. Swept wing A B-52 Stratofortress showing wing with a large sweepback angle. A swept wing is a wing planform favored for high subsonic jet speeds first investigated in Germany from 1935 onwards until the end of the Second World War. Since the introduction of the MiG-15 and North American F-86 which demonstrated a decisive superiority over the slower first generation of straight-wing jet fighters during the Korean War, swept wings have become almost universal on all but the slowest jets (such as the A- 10).
    [Show full text]
  • Low Temperature Environment Operations of Turboengines
    0 Qo B n Y n 1c AGARD 2 ADVISORY GROUP FOR AEROSPACE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 3 7 RUE ANCELLE 92200 NEUILLY SUR SEINE FRANCE AGARD CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 480 Low Temperature Environment Operations of Turboengines (Design and User's Problems) Fonctionnement des Turborkacteurs en Environnement Basse Tempkrature (Problkmes Pos& aux Concepteurs et aux Utilisateurs) processed I /by 'IMs ..................signed-...............date .............. NOT FOR DESTRUCTION - NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION I Distribution and Availability on Back Cover AGARD-CP-480 --I- ADVISORY GROUP FOR AEROSPACE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 7 RUE ANCELLE 92200 NEUILLY SUR SEINE FRANCE AGARD CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 480 Low Temperature Environment Operations of Turboengines (Design and User's Problems) Fonctionnement des TurborLacteurs en Environnement Basse Tempkrature (Problkmes PoSes aux Concepteurs et aux Utilisateurs) Papers presented at the Propulsion and Energetics Panel 76th Symposium held in Brussels, Belgium, 8th-12th October 1990. - North Atlantic Treaty Organization --q Organisation du Traite de I'Atlantique Nord I The Mission of AGARD According to its Chartcr, the mission of AGARD is to bring together the leading personalities of the NATO nations in the fields of science and technology relating to aerospace for the following purposes: -Recommending effective ways for the member nations to use their research and development capabilities for the common benefit of the NATO community; - Providing scientific and technical advice and assistance to the Military Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Global Military Helicopters 2015-16 Market Report Contents
    GLOBAL MILITARY HELICOPTERS 2015-16 MARKET REPORT CONTENTS MARKET OVERVIEW 2 MILITARY HELICOPTER KEY REQUIREMENTS 4 EUROPE 5 NORTH AMERICA 10 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 12 AFRICA 15 ASIA-PACIFIC 16 MIDDLE EAST 21 WORLD MILITARY HELICOPTER HOLDINGS 23 EUROPE 24 NORTH AMERICA 34 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 36 AFRICA 43 ASIA-PACIFIC 49 MIDDLE EAST 59 EVENT INFORMATION 65 Please note that all information herein is subject to change. Defence IQ endeavours to ensure accuracy wherever possible, but errors are often unavoidable. We encourage readers to contact us if they note any need for amendments or updates. We accept no responsibility for the use or application of this information. We suggest that readers contact the specific government and military programme offices if seeking to confirm the reliability of any data. 1 MARKET OVERVIEW Broadly speaking, the global helicopter market is currently facing a two- pronged assault. The military helicopter segment has been impacted significantly by continued defense budgetary pressures across most traditional markets, and a recent slide in global crude oil prices has impacted the demand for new civil helicopters as well as the level of activity for existing fleets engaged in the offshore oil & gas exploration sector. This situation has impacted industry OEMs significantly, many of which had been working towards strengthening the civil helicopter segment to partially offset the impact of budgetary cuts on the military segment. However, the medium- to long-term view of the market is promising given the presence of strong fundamentals and persistent, sustainable growth drivers. The market for military helicopters in particular is set to cross a technological threshold in the form of next-generation compound helicopters and tilt rotorcraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Helicopter Turboshaft Engines
    Comparison of Helicopter Turboshaft Engines John Schenderlein1, and Tyler Clayton2 University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80304 Although they garnish less attention than their flashy jet cousins, turboshaft engines hold a specialized niche in the aviation industry. Built to be compact, efficient, and powerful, turboshafts have made modern helicopters and the feats they accomplish possible. First implemented in the 1950s, turboshaft geometry has gone largely unchanged, but advances in materials and axial flow technology have continued to drive higher power and efficiency from today's turboshafts. Similarly to the turbojet and fan industry, there are only a handful of big players in the market. The usual suspects - Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce - have taken over most of the industry, but lesser known companies like Lycoming and Turbomeca still hold a footing in the Turboshaft world. Nomenclature shp = Shaft Horsepower SFC = Specific Fuel Consumption FPT = Free Power Turbine HPT = High Power Turbine Introduction & Background Turboshaft engines are very similar to a turboprop engine; in fact many turboshaft engines were created by modifying existing turboprop engines to fit the needs of the rotorcraft they propel. The most common use of turboshaft engines is in scenarios where high power and reliability are required within a small envelope of requirements for size and weight. Most helicopter, marine, and auxiliary power units applications take advantage of turboshaft configurations. In fact, the turboshaft plays a workhorse role in the aviation industry as much as it is does for industrial power generation. While conventional turbine jet propulsion is achieved through thrust generated by a hot and fast exhaust stream, turboshaft engines creates shaft power that drives one or more rotors on the vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiche Pédagogique ANPI Date : 10/07/2019 – Page : 1/20 Référence : FICHE ANPI 2019/1 Rédacteur : Pierre Belair
    Fiche pédagogique ANPI Date : 10/07/2019 – page : 1/20 Référence : FICHE ANPI 2019/1 Rédacteur : Pierre Belair L’approche, l’atterrissage… et la remise des gaz Normalement, tout vol se termine par un atterrissage… Eventuellement une remise des gaz si celui-ci s’avère mal engagé ! A travers ce mémo (ok, un peu plus long que de coutume, mais le sujet le mérite), nous allons tenter de comprendre ce qui se passe, ou peut se passer, lors de cette phase critique du vol. Avant tout une histoire d’énergie Comme chacun sait, voler nécessite de l’énergie ! Si un planeur ne dispose que de sa perpétuelle chute comme source d’énergie, un avion profite d’un moteur aux ordres du pilote. Il pourra, dans certaines limites évidemment, ajuster la quantité d’énergie disponible à la quantité requise pour tenir une pente (vitesse verticale) et une vitesse (vitesse horizontale). Pour commencer, un petit rappel sur l’incidence : Exclusivement en palier (avion – 1 –), l’assiette « i » peut être 1 Incidence assimilée à l’incidence de l’avion « A » « A » ; L’incidence de l’aile est généralement légèrement plus horizon Pente élevée (calage de l’aile) mais pas représentée sur ces schémas. Vitesse « A » Incidence Pour une masse donnée, « A » l’incidence et la vitesse sont liées : Les schémas – 1 – et – 2 – représentent des avions volant à 2 la même incidence, donc la horizon même vitesse, pour une assiette « i » inférieure à « ii ». L’avion – 1 – est en palier. L’avion – 2 – est en montée. Incidence L’assiette « ii » est identique sur « B » 3 les schémas – 2 – et – 3 –, horizon toutefois l’incidence « B » est supérieure à l’incidence « A » correspondant à une vitesse plus faible.
    [Show full text]
  • NPA 2018-13 Table of Contents
    European Aviation Safety Agency Notice of Proposed Amendment 2018-13 Appendix I to AMC to Annex III (Part-66) Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licences RMT.0541 (66.024) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) addresses a regulatory coordination issue related to aircraft type ratings. According to the AMC to Annex III (Part-66), type ratings should be endorsed on an aircraft maintenance licence (AML) in accordance with Appendix I to AMC to Part-66 ‘List of type ratings’. An NPA is issued regularly to amend this list, after assessing feedback received from the industry, and to add new aircraft types or to remove aircraft types whose type certificate (TC) has been revoked or surrendered. This NPA adds also the tables of the new Group as a consequence of the introduction of the ‘L’ licence subcategories by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1142. The main objective is to ensure a common standard throughout the Member States. Action area: Regular updates/review of rules Affected rules: AMC/GM to Annex III (Part-66) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 Affected stakeholders: Maintenance certifying staff; maintenance training organisations; maintenance organisations; competent authorities Driver: Efficiency/proportionality Rulemaking group: No Impact assessment: None Rulemaking Procedure: Standard 12.5.2009 5.12.2018 2019/Q2 TE.RPRO.00034-008 © European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO 9001 certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA intranet/internet. Page 1 of 186 An agency of the European Union European Aviation Safety Agency NPA 2018-13 Table of contents Table of contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautical Engineering
    NASA SP-7037 (36) ND AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING A SPECIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH INDEXES Supplement 36 OCTOBER 1973 ZkS&-Sp-7037 (36) EROAUTIC&L N74-14702 0GIEEG A SPCILL BIBLIOGMPHY WITH INDEXES, SUPPLENgIT 36 (N3AS) $5.25 Unclas 00/01 27136 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ACCESSION NUMBER RANGES Accession numbers cited in this Supplement fall within the following ranges: IAA (A-10000 Series) A73-34073 -- A73-37144 STAR (N-10000 Series) N73-25997 - N 73-27884 This bibliography was prepared by the NASA Scientific and Technical Information Facility operated for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration by Informatics Tisco, Inc. The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business required by law of this Agency. Use of funds for printing this periodical has been approved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget through July 1, 1974. N74-14702 AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING - A SPECIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY (SUPPLEMENT 36) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Oct 73 N74-14702 1. Report No. 2. Governmmnt Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA SP-7037 (36) 4. Titleand Subtitle 5. Report Date October 1973 AERONAUTICAL ENG INEERING e.Performing Organization Code A Special Bibliography (Supplement 36) 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address National Aeronautics and Space Administration 11. Contractor Grant No. Washington, D. C; 20546 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XV
    Aviation Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XV. Issue 21, October 13, 2019 Hello all, To subscribe send an email to: [email protected] In this weeks edition of Aviation Human Factors Industry News you will read the following stories: ★FAA Aviation MX Human Factors ★FAA complains to ICAO of Quarterly weakening skills of "manual" aircraft piloting ★Two Former NTSB Experts Create atthe Bedford “Flight Safety a few Detectives”years ago was a perfect★Criminal example Charges of professionals Brought whoPodcast had drifted over years into a very unsafeAgainst operation. Aeroflot SJ100 This crewCrash Pilot was★Exposed literally Engine an “accident Forces Unitedwaiting to happen”★Japanese and never sailor throughkilled by a consciousAirlines Flight decision. To Return This Tovery Denver same processpropeller fooled while a very working smart on bunch aircraft ofInternational engineers andAirport managers at NASA andengine brought down two US space shuttles! This process is built into our human software. ★The Four Pillars of Safety ★‘Accident waiting to happen’: Management After death, airport workers want safety improvements Human Factors Industry News 1 FAA Aviation MX Human Factors Quarterly Human Factors Industry News 2 https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/maintenance_hf/fatigue/publications/ media/Aviation-Mx-HF-Newsletter-September-2019.pdf Two Former NTSB Experts Create the “Flight Safety Detectives” Podcast The new show will dig into all aspects of aviation. John Goglia and Gregory Feith, two well-known and outspoken aviation safety insiders, this week released episode three of their new podcast the "Flight Safety Detectives." The show looks in depth at aircraft accidents, aircraft technology and the big business of aviation around the world.
    [Show full text]