DOCSLIB.ORG

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY with the TMX - Anchor Loop Project (The “Project”) Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY with the TMX - Anchor Loop Project (The “Project”) Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. Vegetation TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With the TMX - Anchor Loop Project (the “Project”) Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. (“Terasen Pipelines”) proposes to loop a portion of its existing National Energy Board (“NEB”) regulated oil pipeline system (the “Trans Mountain pipeline” or “Trans Mountain”) to increase the capacity of the Trans Mountain pipeline to meet growing shipper demand. The Project involves the construction of 158 km of 812 mm or 914 mm (32-inch or 36-inch) diameter pipe between a location west of Hinton, Alberta at Kilometre Post/Kilometre Loop (“KP/KL") 310.1 and a location near Rearguard, British Columbia (BC) (KP/KL 468.0). The Project also includes the installation of two new pump stations at locations along the Trans Mountain pipeline, one in Alberta at Wolf (KP 188.0) and one in BC, at Chappel (KP 555.5), and the installation of associated aboveground facilities including block valves at several locations and a receiving trap for pipeline cleaning and inspection tools at a location near Rearguard, BC (KP/KL 468.0). Construction of the Project will require temporary construction camps and other temporary work yards. The Project will traverse federal, provincial and private lands, including Jasper National Park (JNP) in Alberta and Mount Robson Provincial Park (MRPP) in BC. Two pipeline route options are being assessed by Terasen Pipelines for the TMX - Anchor Loop, namely the Proposed Route and the Existing Route. Both route options are evaluated within this report. Plant surveys to identify vascular and nonvascular plants as well as communities of concern within the Project Footprint were undertaken in the spring and summer of 2005. In addition, non-native and invasive species were documented and the Ecological Land Classification was verified during the field surveys. Twenty-two species of rare vascular plants (with a provincial rank between S1 and S3) were identified along the Proposed Route and twenty-four species along the Existing Route. On the Proposed Route a total of 101 rare vascular plant populations were found, of which 8 species are ranked as S1, 12 species are ranked S2, and 2 species are ranked S3. Along the Existing Route, a total of 103 rare vascular plant populations were found, of which 7 species are ranked as S1, 15 species are ranked S2, and 2 species are ranked S3. In addition, one population of Canada anemone (considered a Valued Ecosystem Components (VEC) in the Scope and Requirements of the Environmental Assessment for the Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. TMX - Anchor Loop Project (TOR) (CEA Agency et al. 2005) was found along the Existing Route, while no VEC populations were identified along the Proposed Route. Canada anemone was the only plant species considered a VEC observed during the 2005 field investigations. Sixty-two species of rare nonvascular plants were recorded along the Proposed Route and sixty-one species along the Existing Route. A total of 112 rare nonvascular plant populations were recorded on the Proposed Route, of which 16 species are ranked S1, 27 species are ranked S2, 18 species are ranked S3 and 2 species are considered rare in BC. Along the Existing Route, a total of 111 rare nonvascular plant populations were observed, of which 17 species are ranked S1, 26 species are S2, 17 species are S3 and 2 species are considered rare in BC. No nonvascular plant VECs, Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) or Species At Risk Act listed species were observed on either route. Ten plant community types of concern were found along the Proposed Route, including rare, unique and VEC communities. One S1 ranked community, five S2 communities and four S3 communities were noted along the Proposed Route, while five S2 plant communities and no S1 or S3 communities were found along the Existing Route during the vegetation surveys. Four unique plant communities (three in JNP and one in MRPP) were found along the Proposed Route, whereas only two unique plant communities were found along the Existing Route; one of which was noted in JNP and the other in MRPP. Five plant communities identified as VECs in the Scope and Requirements of the Environmental Assessment for the Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. TMX - Anchor Loop Project (TOR) (Canadian Environmental Assessment (CEA) Agency et al. 2005) were found along the Proposed Route while four plant communities identified as VECs were found along the Existing Route. Estimates of salvageable timber volumes that would be cleared within the Footprint of the Proposed and Existing routes were calculated, and are not substantially different between the two route options. Although the Proposed Route would entail slightly more clearing of salvageable timber than the Existing Route in terms of volume, the area of salvageable timber that would be cleared is the same for both routes. Additional site-specific information to be collected in 2006 is also identified in the report. Page i Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. Vegetation TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The TERA/Westland staff and subconsultants responsible for the TMX - Anchor Loop Project Vegetation Program gratefully acknowledge the assistance and cooperation of Parks Canada, BC Parks, BC Conservation Data Centre, BC Ministry of Forests and Range, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre. Specifically we want to thank the following field and administrative staff: x In Jasper National Park, Thea Mitchell, Anne Forshner, Alan Westhaver, Jennifer McPhee and Jurgen Deagle; x In BC Parks, Rick Rockwell, Donna Thornton, Gail Ross, Lyle Gawalko and Wayne Van Velzen; x Jenifer Penny, Carmen Cadrin and Katrina Stipec of the BC Conservation Data Centre; x Edward Fong of the BC Ministry of Forests and Range; x In Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Jeff Kneteman and Robin Gutsel; x Joyce Gould, Lorna Allen, John Rintoul and Drajs Vujnovic of the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Center. Numerous rare plant specialists conducted the field component of the Vegetation Program: Patrick Williston, Paula Bartemucci, Karen Golinski, Joanne Marchand, Michelle Lanois, Graham Griffiths, Roberta Yakimchuk, Beth Cornish, Kim Ottenbreit, Marge Meijer, Adrian de Groot, Kristi Iverson, Terry McIntosh, Ken Simonar, Saphida Migabo and Cal Clark. Field assistance was provided by Zane Pillipow, Brant Rowling, Valerie Kerr, Martin Edwards and Crystal Waters. The help and support of Simpcw First Nation field assistants Jeff Eustache and Darrell Eustache is also acknowledged. The Simpcw field personnel enthusiastically participated in the rare vascular plant and plant community surveys. We thank all of the field staff for their hard work and interest in this Project. Page ii Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. Vegetation TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Route Options ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Proposed Route ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Existing Route........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Regulatory Standards ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Goals of the Report............................................................................................................. 7 2.0 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Study Area Boundaries ....................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Literature Review and Consultation.................................................................................... 8 2.3 Data Collection.................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Baseline Data Collection........................................................................................ 8 2.3.2 Field Data Collection............................................................................................ 10 2.4 Data Interpretation ............................................................................................................ 14 3.0 SETTING........................................................................................................................................ 16 3.1 Overall Project................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Alberta / Jasper National Park (KP 310 to KP 406).......................................................... 18 3.3 Mount Robson Provincial Park / British Columbia (KP 406 to KP 468)............................ 19 4.0 RESULTS....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Proposed Route ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park
    A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park David W. Mayhood Part 3 of a Fish Management Plan for Jasper National Park Freshwater Research Limited A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park David W. Mayhood FWR Freshwater Research Limited Calgary, Alberta Prepared for Canadian Parks Service Jasper National Park Jasper, Alberta Part 3 of a Fish Management Plan for Jasper National Park July 1992 Cover & Title Page. Alexander Bajkov’s drawings of bull trout from Jacques Lake, Jasper National Park (Bajkov 1927:334-335). Top: Bajkov’s Figure 2, captioned “Head of specimen of Salvelinus alpinus malma, [female], 500 mm. in length from Jaques [sic] Lake.” Bottom: Bajkov’s Figure 3, captioned “Head of specimen of Salvelinus alpinus malma, [male], 590 mm. in length, from Jaques [sic] Lake.” Although only sketches, Bajkov’s figures well illustrate the most characteristic features of this most characteristic Jasper native fish. These are: the terminal mouth cleft bisecting the anterior profile at its midpoint, the elongated head with tapered snout, flat skull, long lower jaw, and eyes placed high on the head (Cavender 1980:300-302; compare with Cavender’s Figure 3). The head structure of bull trout is well suited to an ambush-type predatory style, in which the charr rests on the bottom and watches for prey to pass over. ABSTRACT I conducted an extensive survey of published and unpublished documents to identify the native fish stocks of Jasper National Park, describe their original condition, determine if there is anything unusual or especially significant about them, assess their present condition, outline what is known of their biology and life history, and outline what measures should be taken to manage and protect them.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration in the Rocky Mountains North of the Yellowhead Pass Author(S): J
    Exploration in the Rocky Mountains North of the Yellowhead Pass Author(s): J. Norman Collie Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3 (Mar., 1912), pp. 223-233 Published by: geographicalj Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1778435 Accessed: 12-06-2016 07:31 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Wiley, The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 155.69.24.171 on Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:31:04 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms EXPLORATION IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS. 223 overtures to Bhutan and Nepal, which have been rejected by these states, and I am very glad they have been. The Chinese should not be allowed on the Indian side of the Himalayas. The President : We will conclude with a vote of thanks to Mr. Rose for his excellent paper. EXPLORATION IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS NORTH OF THE YELLOWHEAD PASS.* By J. NORMAN OOLLIE, Ph.D., LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.G.S., etc. The part of the Koeky mountains, that run north through what is now the Dominion of Canada, have only in the last twenty-five years been made accessible to the ordinary traveller.
    [Show full text]
  • North America: Physical Geography by National Geographic, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 09.22.17 Word Count 681 Level 610L
    North America: Physical geography By National Geographic, adapted by Newsela staff on 09.22.17 Word Count 681 Level 610L Valley of the Ten Peaks and Moraine Lake, Banff National Park, Canada. Mountains (from left to right) Tonsa (3,057 meters), Mount Perren (3,051 m), Mount Allen (3,310 m), Mount Tuzo (3,246 m), Deltaform Mountain (3,424 m), Neptuak Mountain (3,233 m). North America is the third-largest continent. It includes Canada, the United States, and Mexico. It also includes smaller countries in Central America. Below it sits South America. North America is made up of five main areas. They are the mountainous west, the Great Plains, the Canadian Shield, the eastern region, and the Caribbean. Each area includes different types of biomes. A biome is a type of environment where plants and animals live. North America includes many biomes. It has deserts, grasslands, tundras, coral reefs, and more. Western Region North America's western region is famous for its mountains and deserts. The Rocky Mountains are found there. They are North America's largest mountain chain. The Rockies are part of a system of mountains called the Cordilleras. They include the Sierra Madre Mountains. They stretch from the southwestern United States, through Mexico, and all the This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. way south to Honduras. The mountains include a rare biome called a temperate rainforest. These areas get much rain. This helps them support a large mix of life forms. Black bears are found there. Some trees grow up to 300 feet tall.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Failure to Control Elk Valley Coal Mine Pollution
    THIS PAGE TO BE REPLACED BY COVER PAGE Embargo until 12:01am on Fri 16, 2021 IMAGE: Randall Request for an Inquiry into Regulatory Negligence: Canada’s Failure to Control Elk Valley Coal Mine Pollution An ELC Clinic Submission prepared for Wildsight Law Student: Jesse Langelier Coop Student: Russell Chiong Articled Student: Ellen Campbell Supervising Lawyer: Calvin Sandborn, QC JULY 2021 Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the important contributions of law students Jesse Langelier, Justine Jarvis, Russell Chiong and articled student Ellen Campbell in developing this submission. We also appreciate Daniel Cheater for his participation in reviewing this submission. Lars Sander-Green of Wildsight has provided absolutely invaluable contributions to the submission, along with his Wildsight colleague, Randal Macnair. Copyright © 2021 The Environmental Law Centre Society. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce and distribute these materials in whole or in part for educational and public interest purposes, provided such copies are disseminated at or below cost, provided that each copy bears this notice, and provided that the Environmental Law Centre is credited as the original published source. DISCLAIMER: This material is provided for general information as a public and educational resource. We attempt to ensure the accuracy of the material provided, however the Environmental Law Centre does not warrant the quality, accuracy or completeness of information in this document. Such information is provided "as is" without warranty or condition of any kind. The information provided in this document is not intended to be legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Many factors unknown to us may affect the applicability of any statement that we make in this material to one’s particular individual circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Resiliency and Restoration Program Maps
    VU32 VU33 VU44 VU36 V28A 947 U Muriel Lake UV 63 Westlock County VU M.D. of Bonnyville No. 87 18 U18 Westlock VU Smoky Lake County 28 M.D. of Greenview No. 16 VU40 V VU Woodlands County Whitecourt County of Barrhead No. 11 Thorhild County Smoky Lake Barrhead 32 St. Paul VU County of St. Paul No. 19 Frog Lake VU18 VU2 Redwater Elk Point Mayerthorpe Legal Grande Cache VU36 U38 VU43 V Bon Accord 28A Lac Ste. Anne County Sturgeon County UV 28 Gibbons Bruderheim VU22 Morinville VU Lamont County Edson Riv Eds er on R Lamont iver County of Two Hills No. 21 37 U15 I.D. No. 25 Willmore Wilderness Lac Ste. Anne VU V VU15 VU45 r Onoway e iv 28A S R UV 45 U m V n o o Chip Lake e k g Elk Island National Park of Canada y r R tu i S v e Mundare r r e Edson 22 St. Albert 41 v VU i U31 Spruce Grove VU R V Elk Island National Park of Canada 16A d Wabamun Lake 16A 16A 16A UV o VV 216 e UU UV VU L 17 c Parkland County Stony Plain Vegreville VU M VU14 Yellowhead County Edmonton Beaverhill Lake Strathcona County County of Vermilion River VU60 9 16 Vermilion VU Hinton County of Minburn No. 27 VU47 Tofield E r i Devon Beaumont Lloydminster t h 19 21 VU R VU i r v 16 e e U V r v i R y Calmar k o Leduc Beaver County m S Leduc County Drayton Valley VU40 VU39 R o c k y 17 Brazeau County U R V i Viking v e 2A r VU 40 VU Millet VU26 Pigeon Lake Camrose 13A 13 UV M U13 VU i V e 13A tt V e Elk River U R County of Wetaskiwin No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Robson Provincial Park, Draft Background Report
    Mount Robson Provincial Park Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks DRAFT BACKGROUND REPORT September, 2006 Ministry of Environment Ministry of Environment BC Parks Omineca Region This page left blank intentionally Acknowledgements This Draft Background Report for Mount Robson Provincial Park was prepared to support the 2006/07 Management Plan review. The report was prepared by consultant Juri Peepre for Gail Ross, Regional Planner, BC Parks, Omineca Region. Additional revisions and edits were performed by consultant Leaf Thunderstorm and Keith J. Baric, A/Regional Planner, Omineca Region. The report incorporates material from several previous studies and plans including the Mount Robson Ecosystem Management Plan, Berg Lake Corridor Plan, Forest Health Strategy for Mount Robson Provincial Park, Rare and the Endangered Plant Assessment of Mount Robson Provincial Park with Management Interpretations, the Robson Valley Land and Resource Management Plan, and the BC Parks website. Park use statistics were provided by Stuart Walsh, Rick Rockwell and Robin Draper. Cover Photo: Berg Lake and the Berg Glacier (BC Parks). Mount Robson Provincial Park, Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks: DRAFT Background Report 2006 Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................1 Park Overview.................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Alberta Highway #93 "Icefields Parkway, Jasper to Lake Louise, Banff"
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Alberta Highway #93 "Icefields Parkway, Jasper to Lake Louise, Banff" Kms ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Junction of Highways #93 This highway is a toll highway, They have a seniors rate. & #16 Yellowhead Route NOTE, There is no FUEL, for 156kms. This highway passes through Jasper and Banff National Parks. Altitude: 3471 feet 0.0 The Town of Jasper, East To Hinton, Alberta, Edson, Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. For travel Alberta - Junction of East see Milebymile.com - Alberta Road Map Travel Guide, Edmonton Highways #93 & #16 to Jasper, Alberta/British Columbia Border, for driving directions. Yellowhead Route - Jasper Altitude: 3471 feet National Park 0.0 Junction of Highways #93 West to Prince George, B.C., Kamloops, B.C.. & #16 Yellowhead Route - For travel West see Milebymile.com - Alberta Road Map Travel Guide, Jasper National Park Edmonton to Jasper, Alberta/British Columbia Border for driving directions. Altitude: 3471 feet 0.7 Pull Out Area Miette River bridge crossing - Jasper National Park. Altitude: 3432 feet 1.8 Access Road - Jasper Whistlers Campground, AB; Camping, 100 elec and 604 non elec sites. National Park, AB Jasper Tramway, Jasper National Park Whistlers International Hostel, AB. Altitude: 3419 feet 3.4 Wapiti Campground - Camping 40 elec sites, 57 non elec. Jasper National Park. This campground is open all year. Altitude: 3504 feet 5.0 Beckers Chalet Accommodations Altitude: 3543 feet 5.0 View from highway. Driving south, Jasper National Park, Alberta. Altitude: 3560 feet 6.1 Icefields Parkway -Jasper Toll Gate, They have a Seniors rate you have to ask for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Interpretation of Convolutional-Recurrent Networks For
    https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-113 Preprint. Discussion started: 11 March 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Evaluation and interpretation of convolutional-recurrent networks for regional hydrological modelling Sam Anderson1, Valentina Radic1 1Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada 5 Correspondence to: Sam Anderson ([email protected]) Abstract. Deep learning has emerged as a useful tool across geoscience disciplines; however, there remain outstanding questions regarding the suitability of unexplored model architectures and how to interpret model learning for regional scale hydrological modelling. Here we use a convolutional-recurrent network, a deep learning approach for learning both spatial 10 and temporal patterns, to predict streamflow at 226 stream gauges across the region of southwestern Canada. The model is forced by gridded climate reanalysis data and trained to predict observed daily streamflow between 1979 and 2015. To interpret the model learning of both spatial and temporal patterns, we introduce two experiments with evaluation metrics to track the model’s response to perturbations in the input data. The model performs well in simulating the daily streamflow over the testing period, with a median Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.68 and 35% of stations having NSE > 0.8. When 15 predicting streamflow, the model is most sensitive to perturbations in the input data prescribed near and within the basins being predicted, demonstrating that the model is automatically learning to focus on physically realistic areas. When uniformly perturbing input temperature timeseries to obtain relatively warmer and colder input data, the modelled freshet timing and intensity changes in accordance with the transition timing from below- to above-freezing temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999-2010 Canadian Heritage River Monitoring Report
    Athabasca River: 1999-2010 Canadian Heritage River Monitoring Report April 2011 Cover Photos (left to right): Athabasca Falls, Jasper Lake Sand Dunes, Bridge at Old Fort Point Photos by: Parks Canada (left), J. Deagle (middle, right) Également offert en français © Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2011 ISBN: 978-1-100-18504-0 Catalog No.: R64-410/2011E-PDF CHR MONITORING REPORT: ATHABASCA RIVER ii Table of Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 Background .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Policy Context ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Nomination Values ................................................................................................................7 4.0 Chronology of Events .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jasper National Park Mountain Biking Guide 2013
    RIDE A MOUNTAIN PLAN AHEAD AND PREPARE JASPER NATIONAL PARK Cruisy, cross-country fun... Mountain Biking Guide In most places, ‘Mountain Biking’ either means one of two things; finding some dirt next to the sidewalk to ride on, or expert level downhill riding. However, if you bike in Jasper, you get that rare third option; cruisy, Photo: N. Gaboury N. Photo: cross-country fun. Gaboury N. Photo: Darren Langley Photo: While most of the trails described are fun, flowing, valley bottom trails, Jasper does have some Remember, you are responsible for your own safety. - Photo: N. Gaboury N. - Photo: Jasper has what might be the best trail great climbing for riders looking for physical challenges and eye-popping alpine scenery. • Always wear a helmet and safety gear. Know your equipment. system in the world. Ask any cyclist why they • Get advice at a Parks Canada Information Centre, including 16a trail conditions, descriptions and weather. P 7 Palisades Lookout Overlander Trail come back to Jasper, and you’ll likely hear 100 12 (MAP A & D) Distance: 11 km one way Elevation gain: 840 m P Signal Mountain • Pack adequate water, food, gear, maps, first aid. Carry bear (MAP A ) Distance: 9.1 km one way Elevation gain: 925 m spray and know how to use it. that it’s because the park’s well-connected, Hardy riders who persevere up the long, steep climb are • Tell someone where you are going and when you are rewarded with panoramic views of the Athabasca River Valley Single speed bikers, beware! This sustained uphill requires expected back.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Intraprovincial Miles
    GREYHOUND CANADA PASSENGER FARE TARIFF AND SALES MANUAL GREYHOUND CANADA TRANSPORTATION ULC. BRITISH COLUMBIA INTRA-PROVINCIAL MILES The miles shown in Section 9 are to be used in connection with the Mileage Fare Tables in Section 6 of this Manual. If through miles between origin and destination are not published, miles will be constructed via the route traveled, using miles in Section 9. Section 9 is divided into 8 sections as follows: Section 9 Inter-Provincial Mileage Section 9ab Alberta Intra-Provincial Mileage Section 9bc British Columbia Intra-Provincial Mileage Section 9mb Manitoba Intra-Provincial Mileage Section9on Ontario Intra-Provincial Mileage Section 9pq Quebec Intra-Provincial Mileage Section 9sk Saskatchewan Intra-Provincial Mileage Section 9yt Yukon Territory Intra-Provincial Mileage NOTE: Always quote and sell the lowest applicable fare to the passenger. Please check Section 7 - PROMOTIONAL FARES and Section 8 – CITY SPECIFIC REDUCED FARES first, for any promotional or reduced fares in effect that might result in a lower fare for the passenger. If there are none, then determine the miles and apply miles to the appropriate fare table. Tuesday, July 02, 2013 Page 9bc.1 of 52 GREYHOUND CANADA PASSENGER FARE TARIFF AND SALES MANUAL GREYHOUND CANADA TRANSPORTATION ULC. BRITISH COLUMBIA INTRA-PROVINCIAL MILES City Prv Miles City Prv Miles City Prv Miles BETWEEN ABBOTSFORD BC AND BETWEEN ABBOTSFORD BC AND BETWEEN ABBOTSFORD BC AND ALLISON PASS BC 87 GREENWOOD BC 308 OLIVER BC 235 ARMSTRONG BC 251 HEDLEY BC 160 ONE HUNDRED MILE
    [Show full text]