DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Improvement Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Improvement Program Transportation - 2022 - Improvement 7 Program FY 201 (Page intentionally left blank) Table of Contents MPO Self Certification ................................................................................................................... i Resolution of Approval ................................................................................................................. ii Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... vi Introduction .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Metropolitan Area Planning Agency Overview ............................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 MAPA as a Metropolitan Planning Organization ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 MAPA Committee Structure .................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 The Transportation Planning Process ............................................................................. 1-3 1.2.1 Long Range Transportation Plan .............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.2 Transportation Improvement Program ................................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.3 Unified Planning Work Program .............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.4 Congestion Management Process ........................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.5 Coordinated Transit Plan ......................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 Public Involvement ............................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.1 MAPA Public Involvement Strategies ...................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.2 Involvement through the MAPA Committee Structure ........................................................................... 1-7 1.3.3 Draft TIP Development Public Involvement ............................................................................................. 1-8 Programming Process .............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Legislative Requirements ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Maintenance of the Transportation Improvement Program ................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Regional Transportation Funding ..................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Surface Transportation Program (STP) .................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) ............................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.3 Section 5310 Funding .............................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.3 MAPA Project Selection Responsibilities ........................................................................ 2-5 2.3.1 Project Selection Subcommittee.............................................................................................................. 2-6 2.3.2 Transportation Alternatives Program Committee (TAP-C) ...................................................................... 2-8 2.3.3 Coordinated Transit Committee (CTC) ................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.4 MAPA Project Selection Results ............................................................................................................. 2-11 2.4 Development & Implementation of TIP Projects ........................................................ 2-12 2.4.1 Lifecycle of a Typical Project in the MAPA Region ................................................................................. 2-12 2.4.2 Funding Implementation: A Two Gate Process ..................................................................................... 2-13 2.5 Other Federal Transportation Programs ..................................................................... 2-13 2.5.1 Federal Transit Authority Funded Projects ............................................................................................ 2-13 2.5.2 Federal Aviation Administration Programs ............................................................................................ 2-15 2.6 Revisions the TIP ............................................................................................................... 2-15 2.6.1 TIP Amendments .................................................................................................................................... 2-15 2.6.2 TIP Administrative Modifications ........................................................................................................... 2-15 2.6.3 Emergency TIP Amendments ................................................................................................................. 2-17 Fiscal Constraint ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Year of Expenditure Calculations ............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Revenue Estimation ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 MAPA FY2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program iv 3.2 Fiscal Constraint and Federal Funding Tables ............................................................... 3-3 3.3 Apportionment and Obligation Flexibility .................................................................... 3-11 3.4 Operations and Maintenance .......................................................................................... 3-11 3.5 Federal Transit Administration Programs .................................................................... 3-12 Environmental Justice .............................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Environmental Justice Populations ................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Identification of Environmental Justice Areas ......................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Identification of the Transit Shed…………………………………………………………………………………………………………4-4 4.1.3 Identification of Funding Levels in EJ Areas and the Transit Shed (TS)………………………………………………….4-5 4.2 Funding Equity within the TIP Program .......................................................................... 4-6 4.2.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.3 Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.3.1 Distribution of Funding ............................................................................................................................ 4-8 4.3.2 Benefits & Burdens of the TIP Program ................................................................................................... 4-9 4.4 Findings ................................................................................................................................ 4-10 4.4.1 Transit Shed & Metro Transit Findings .................................................................................................. 4-10 4.4.2 Highway and Road Findings ................................................................................................................... 4-14 4.4.3 Conclusion of Findings ........................................................................................................................... 4-14 Project Tables ........................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Regionally Significant Project Information ...................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Regionally Significant Roadway & Trail Projects ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2 Regionally Significant Transit Projects ................................................................................................... 5-51 5.1.3 Regionally Significant Aviation Projects ................................................................................................. 5-51 5.2 FY2015 Project Status Update ........................................................................................ 5-59 Public Involvement ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ashland Hotel Feasibility Study
    Market Feasibility Study Ashland, NE For more information regarding this report, contact: LLC Group, Core Distinction Group LLC (612) 849-9775 [email protected] Distinction Core Table of Contents Introduction/Objective …………………………………………………..…………………………………………….3 General Market Overview …………………………………………………………………………………………………..4-5 General Market Location & Characteristics * General Market (Map) Site Analysis ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6-9 Economic Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………10-16 Population Effective Buying Income Retail Sales Workforce/Employment Distribution Major Employers Unemployment/Labor Supply/Wage Pressures Eating and Drinking Places Transportation Information * Nebraska Profile 2010 Census * In the news… Lodging Demand …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..17-42 Market Segmentation Lodging Demand Potential Index Seasonality of Lodging Demand Rate Sensitivity Feeder Markets Unaccommodated Lodging Demand Events and Attractions * Community Interviews * Benefits and Challenges of running a business in Ashland, NE Lodging Supply ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..43-57 Competitive Hotel Properties Projected Average Daily Room Rate & Positioning Competitive Property Performance Meeting/Convention Space * STR Data (5 Year Trends) Conclusions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………58-69 Property Recommendations Property Type, size, and rate strategy Property Features, Amenities, and Services LLC Sleeping Room Configuration Brand Affiliation Group, Opening Date
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Transportation Plan 2040
    Metropolitan Area Planning Agency Long Range Transportation Plan 2040 TABLE 7.1 ANTICIPATED FEDERAL REVENUES Nebraska Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Revenues (in $1,000s) Funding Annual 2016-2019 2020- 2026- 2031- Category Average (TIP) 2025 2030 2035 2036-2040 Total CMAQ $750 $1,930 $4,997 $4,897 $5,044 $5,195 $22,063 DPU $1,000 $4,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,360 HSIP $1,600 $6,248 $10,660 $10,447 $10,761 $11,084 $49,200 NHPP $18,500 $79,189 $3,065 $0 $0 $0 $82,254 STP-MAPA $15,071 $101,169 $100,410 $98,407 $101,359 $104,400 $505,745 STP-HBP $1,000 $5,000 $6,662 $6,530 $6,725 $6,927 $31,844 STP-State $2,500 $13,183 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,183 TAP-MAPA $1,000 $4,730 $6,662 $6,530 $6,725 $6,927 $31,574 Total $41,421 $215,809 $132,456 $126,811 $130,614 $134,533 $740,223 Iowa Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Revenues (in $1,000s) Funding Annual 2016-2019 2020- 2026- 2031- Category Average (TIP) 2025 2030 2035 2036-2040 Total CMAQ $150 $864 $946 $879 $897 $915 $4,501 DPS $1,150 $4,662 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,662 NHPP $98,000 $388,309 $84,681 $0 $0 $0 $472,990 STP-MAPA $1,700 $15,600 $10,724 $9,963 $10,162 $10,366 $56,815 STP-HBP $2,700 $0 $6,308 $5,861 $5,978 $6,097 $24,244 STP-State $5,000 $0 $6,557 $18,400 $0 $0 $24,957 TAP-MAPA $300 $700 $1,892 $1,758 $1,793 $1,829 $7,972 Total $109,000 $410,135 $111,108 $36,861 $18,830 $19,207 $596,141 Total Regional Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Revenues (in $1,000s) Funding Annual 2016-2019 2020- 2026- 2031- Category Average (TIP) 2025 2030 2035 2036-2040 Total CMAQ $900 $2,794 $5,943 $5,776 $5,941 $6,110
    [Show full text]
  • Blight & Substandard Determination Study
    providing Simply Smart Solutions ANALYSIS AREA BLIGHT & SUBSTANDARD DETERMINATION STUDY Agromac Sub - City of Gering, NE PRESENTED TO PREPARED BY City of Gering M.C. Schaff & Associates, Inc. City Council and Planning Commission 818 South Beltline Highway East Scottsbluff, NE 69361 PROJECT RM200232-00 November 24, 2020 Headquarters 818 South Beltline Highway East, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69361 Phone (308) 635-1926 Fax (308) 635-7807 www.MCSfamilyofcompanies.com introduction Purpose of this Analysis The Blighted and Substandard designation opens the door for stimulating new development and allowing developers, in fact all citizens, the ability to make significant public improvements related to their project. The mechanism allows property owners the use of real estate property taxes (normally paid to other government agencies) for improvements including land acquisition and site preparation. Tax money can be used up to 15 years for this purpose. This designation allows use of most of the new taxes Current TIF Projects as of Nebraska Department generated by way of redevelopment. An owner pays of Economic Development 2019 Annual Report the property tax but that tax is then used for certain ! eligible expenses of redevelopment including without ! 4 ! ! ! ! 4 4 ! 4 4 4 limitation land acquisition, site preparation, and placing 4 ! ! 4 4 4 public improvements on or near the site. The Nebraska 4 4 4 ! 4 4 4 4 ! Department of Revenue website, revenue.nebraska. ! 4 4 ! 4 4 ! 4 ! ! ! 4 4 ! 4 4 ! ! ! gov, 2019 annual report lists 140 cities in 72 counties 4 4 ! 4 4 4 ! ! 44 4 4 ! 4 4 444 4 ! ! 4 ! 4 4 across the state with a total of 1,037 current projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Transportation Plan 2040
    Metropolitan Area Planning Agency Long Range Transportation Plan 2040 7.6 REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS The list of street and highway projects eligible for Federal aid funding following in this section is fiscally-constrained to reasonably available local, state, and federal revenues. Project costs take inflation into account and appear in year-of-expenditure dollars. Therefore, project costs for future years appear higher than what they would cost if constructed today. As is described in Section 7.3, federal funding levels were identified based on past trends within the Omaha-Council Bluffs region. Local revenues were identified based on local financial reports and identified operations & maintenance costs. These projects listed in this LRTP are considered eligible for Federal-Aid funding by the MPO. Projects will be selected for Federal aid funding as they go through the MPO’s project selection and prioritization process for the TIP, while some projects may be advanced using solely local funding sources. The following sections divide the projects between Regionally Significant Roadway & Trail Projects, Regionally Significant Transit Investments, and Illustrative Projects. 7.5.1– REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY & TRAIL INVESTMENTS The tables that follow this section include regionally significant roadway and trail projects identified from the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan and the scenario planning process described earlier in this chapter. These investments represent the federal-aid eligible portion of this LRTP as the total funding for both local and state projects has been The FY2016-2019 Transportation Improvement Program serves as the four-year implementation program of this plan. Projects identified in this TIP are included in the first band of projects within this project list.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    SAUNDERS COUNTY PROJECT PARTICIPANTS SAUNDERS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS KENNETH KUNCL DEAN BUSING JAMES FAUVER RICHARD JURGENS DORIS M. KARLOFF SCOTT SUKSTORF LEROY HANSON SAUNDERS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CHARLES PROSKOVEC - CHAIRMAN NORMAN NELSON E. J. WAGEMAN JOHN BARRY HENRY A. JOHNSON JOHN TRUTNA DEL STARNS SAUNDERS COUNTY PATTI J LINDGREN, COUNTY CLERK SCOTT TINGELHOFF, COUNTY ATTORNEY GEORGE BORRESON , COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR PATRICIA HUNTER, COUNTY TREASURER CHUCK LACEY, COUNTY SHERIFF DON CLARK, REGISTER OF DEEDS PLANNING CONSULTANT JEO CONSULTING GROUP, INC. WAHOO, NEBRASKA SAUNDERS COUNTY, NEBRASKA COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2004 1 INTRODUCTION SAUNDERS COUNTY, NEBRASKA COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2004 2 INTRODUCTION LOCATION Saunders County is located in east central Nebraska. The Platte River forms the county’s northern and eastern borders. The county sits north and east of the most populated areas in Nebraska, the Lincoln and Omaha metropolitan areas. Cass and Lancaster Counties are south of Saunders County; while, Butler County is to the west. Saunders County embraces deep, rich, loamy soil, divided into bottom, plain and rolling lands. CLIMATE The climate of Saunders County is not unlike most of the climate in Eastern Nebraska. The climate consists of cold winters and hot summers. The average temperature during the winter months is 22 degrees Fahrenheit and the average summer temperature is 73 degrees. Precipitation for Saunders County is in the form of snowfall in the winter and rains in the spring and summer months. The average seasonal snowfall for the Saunders County area is 29 inches during the winter months. During the rest of the year precipitation in the form of rain falls in the amount of 32 inches.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wahoo, Nebraska Comprehensive Development Plan 2009 -Parks and Recreation Master Plan
    City of Wahoo, Nebraska Comprehensive Development Plan 2009 -Parks and Recreation Master Plan ii Comprehensive Plan 2009 Wahoo, NE Acknowledgements City Council Daryl Reitmajer - Mayor Diana Vasicek - Ward II Merle Hennings - Ward I Janet Jonas - Ward I James Svoboda - Ward II Gerry Tyler - Ward III Jerry Johnson* - Ward III, President of the Council R. Michael Lawver* - Ward II Planning Commission Dan Cady* Eric Gottschalk* Chairperson Adam Ronkar Mike Hancock* Thomas Hart Vice-Chairperson Michelle Libal John Skiff* Joe Vculek Tammie Kavan Dan Bunjer Scott Nielson R. Michael Lawver* (2008) Board of Adjustment Chad Aldrich Rich Chisholm Sherry Hageman Mike Hancock Mark Sutton Dale Jonas (alternate) City Personnel Melissa Harrell* - Administrator/Clerk/Treasurer Lucinda Morrow* - Deputy Clerk Jim Gibney* - Utilities General Manager Kevin Stuhr* - Parks and Recreation Director Jonathan Mohr Craig Wacker Loren Lindahl - Attorney Joe Sather JEO Consuling Group Inc. - Engineer/Street Supervisor Doug Watts* - Wahoo Chamber and Economic Development *Indicates Revision Steering Committee Members Wahoo, NE Comprehensive Plan 2009 iii Table of Contents Introduction ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 THE PUR P OSE OF COM P REHENSIVE PLANNING ��������������������������������������������������������� 4 Demographic Profile �������������������������������������������������������������������8 PO P ULA T ION TRENDS AND ANALYSIS ������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Article Title: the Nebraska State Historical Society in 1972
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: The Nebraska State Historical Society in 1972 Full Citation: Marvin F Kivett, “The Nebraska State Historical Society in 1972,” Nebraska History 53 (1972): 491- 520 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH1972NSHS.pdf Date: 4/13/2015 Article Summary: The Society carried out a comprehensive survey of Nebraska sites of historical, archeological, and architectural merit in 1971-1972. Cataloging Information: Names: Robert W Furnas, James C Olson, William E Lass, Merrill J Mattes NSHS sites: George W Norris Home; Neligh Mills, Chimney Rock, Fort Robinson Keywords: National Register of Historic Places, historic markers, Lincoln Junior League, mobile museums Photographs / Images: A R Owens and James A Rawley; historical marker recalling the death of White Buffalo Girl on the Ponca Trail of Tears; mobile museum; spring meeting, June 10, 1972 (5
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Wahoo Deer Unit
    ¯ 0 6.5 13 Miles 2020 Wahoo Deer Unit BOONE WASHINGTON !. Blair PLATTE COLFAX DODGE Kennard !. ¬«133 Rogers North Bend Arlington Fort !. !. !. Ames !. Calhoun !. !. !. Pl a !. att ¬«31 £ !. !. Schuyler e R ¤75 Morse Bluff !. iv w C o lum b us Richland !. Cedar Bluffs er !. Wash in gto n er !. o NANCE Duncan P te Riv Linwood ¬«109 I !. lat !. ¬«36 Bennington Octavia Leshara King !. Bellwood !. Abie SAUNDERS !. «¬64 !. Prague !. !. Lake !. Colon «¬64 !.Silver C r ee k !. Valley ¬«15 Bruno !.Wate rlo o Boys Town ¬«64 !. Malmo ¤£77 !. David City !. Yutan £275 !. ¤£30 !. ¤ O m ah a §¨¦480 ¬«39 !. !. §¨¦680 «¬92 MERRICK ¬«79 Venice Clarks !. Wahoo !. !. !. POLK Shelby Rising City BUTLER «¬ «¬92 Mead !. 92 !. Weston !.C h alco !. Osceola !. ¬«92 Brainard !. Ithaca Papillion !. !. Garrison !. !. Wann !. B elle vue ue R G re tn a ¬«370 r l iver e g B !. !. Offutt iv Bi Richfield !. Central R ¤£81 AFB e !. City tt Surprise la Stromsburg !. P !. !. Dwight !. ¬« Springfield !. SARPY ¬« Valparaiso Memphis 66 La Platte !. 69 !. !. e River Polk «¬66 Ceresco ¨¦§80 «¬50 Platt !.O ver lan d!. !. ¬«66 Ulysses !. !. Ashland !. Hordville !. Cedar Creek Gresham !. Bee !. «¬31 ¬«66 !. Davey !. !. Marquette !. Benedict South Louisville Staplehurst !. Bend «¬14 Thayer !. !. G re en wo o d !. Garland !. Raymond !. Murdock Manley Murray ¤£ Waverly !. !. !.75 SEWARD Malcolm ¬« ¬«1 Seward !. !. 63 YORK Waco !. Weeping Water Hampton Bradshaw !. !. !. Alvo ¤£6 !. !. !. !. ¤£34 Utica Tamora Elmwood !. Nehawka Eagle CASS !. Union §¨¦180 LANCASTER !. !. !. ¤£34 HAMILTON Lincoln OTOE MANAGEMENT UNIT DESCRIPTION - Butler, Douglas, Polk, Sarpy and Saunders counties and those parts of Cass, Colfax, Dodge, Hamilton, Lancaster, Merrick, Platte, Seward, Washington and York counties bounded by a line beginning at the junction of the Nebraska-Iowa state line and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 444-6866 Board of Directors
    OMAHA-COUNCIL BLUFFS METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY 2222 Cuming Street, Omaha (402) 444-6866 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Thursday, May 31, 2018 1:30 p.m. AGENDA This meeting of the Metropolitan Area Planning Agency Board of Directors will be conducted in compliance with the Nebraska Statues of the Open Meetings Act. For reference, the Open Meetings Act is posted on the wall of the Board Room. A. ROLL CALL / INTRODUCTIONS B. BOARD MINUTES of the April 26, 2018 meeting. (ACTION) C. FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES of the May 23, 2018 meeting. (ACTION) D. AGENCY REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS – (INFO) 1. AGENCY REPORTS a. Executive Director’s Report (includes Monthly Report) – Greg Youell 2. EQUITY GROWTH PROFILE UPDATE – Ms. Vicki Quaites-Ferris, Equity & Engagement Committee Chair E. PUBLIC COMMENTS – See Footnote F. CONSENT AGENDA – (ACTION) Any individual item may be removed by a Board Member for special discussion and consideration. Unless there is an exception, these items will be approved as one with a single vote of the Board of Directors. 1. FINAL CONTRACT PAYMENT – Lovgren – $8,192.50 2. JULY INSURANCE RENEWALS – The Board will consider renewal of MAPA’s Life / AD&D, Long Term Disability and Dental Plan. a. Life / AD&D b. Long Term Disability c. Dental Plan 3. TRAVEL – 2018 TRB TOOLS OF THE TRADE CONFERENCE – KANSAS CITY, MO – (ACTION) The Board will consider approval of travel for Kansas City, MO for staff members Mike Helgerson and Josh Corrigan to attend the 2018 TRB Tools of the Trade Conference on August 22 – 24, 2018. G. OLD BUSINESS 1. FY 2018 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AMENDMENT #7 – (ACTION) The Board will consider approval of amendment #7 to the FY 2018 TIP.
    [Show full text]
  • Ansley Viaduct PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET
    STP-183-3(112); C.N. 60942 Ansley Viaduct PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET LOCATION Identified as Ansley Viaduct, the proposed project would reconstruct approximately 0.55 miles of U.S. Highway 183 (US-183) and approximately 0.10 miles of Nebraska Highway 92 (N-92). On US-183, the project starts at about the west junction of US-183 and N-2 at mile marker (MM) 88.83, and extends east and north to about MM 89.38, approximately 0.15 miles north of the east junction of US-183 and N-92. On N-92, the project starts at about the east junction of US-183 and N-92 at MM 299.86 and extends east approximately 0.10 miles to MM 299.96. Construction may begin and/or end approximately 1,000 feet ahead of or beyond the actual project limits to accommodate transitioning the pavement, bridge work, updating guardrail and temporary surfacing to accommodate phasing requirements. PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of this proposed project is to preserve the US-183 & N-92 transportation asset, improve the reliability of the transportation system, and perpetuate the mobility of the traveling public. The need for this proposed project is based on the current condition of the roadways and bridges. SCOPE OF WORK The proposed improvements on this project consist of one bridge rehabilitation, one bridge removal and replacement with a concrete box culvert, removing the existing pavement and foundation course on the driving lanes and shoulders, rebuilding with doweled concrete pavement on a foundation course and removing and replacing guardrail.
    [Show full text]
  • Floor Debate March 13, 2018
    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate March 13, 2018 [LB44 LB694 LB702 LB749 LB776 LB778 LB786 LB891 LB909 LB944 LB945 LB946 LB950 LB993 LB1030 LB1052 LB1090 LB1090A LB1110 LB1119 LR335 LR336 LR337 LR338 LR346 LR347 LR348 LR349 LR350] PRESIDENT FOLEY PRESIDING PRESIDENT FOLEY: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the George W. Norris Legislative Chamber for the forty-second day of the One Hundred Fifth Legislature, Second Session. Our chaplain for today Pastor Tom Starkjohn of the Louisville Evangelical Free Church in Louisville, Nebraska, Senator Clements' district. Please rise. PASTOR STARKJOHN: (Prayer offered.) PRESIDENT FOLEY: Thank you, Pastor Starkjohn. I call to order the forty-second day of the One Hundred Fifth Legislature, Second Session. Senators, please record your presence. Roll call. Mr. Clerk, please record. CLERK: I have a quorum present, Mr. President. PRESIDENT FOLEY: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Are there any corrections for the Journal? CLERK: I have no corrections. PRESIDENT FOLEY: Thank you, sir. Are there any messages, reports, or announcements? CLERK: I have neither messages, reports, nor announcements, Mr. President. PRESIDENT FOLEY: While the Legislature is in session and capable of transacting business, I propose to sign and do hereby sign the following four legislative resolutions: LR335, LR336, LR337, and LR338. (Doctor of the day introduced.) We'll now proceed to the agenda, General File budget bills. Mr. Clerk. [LR335 LR336 LR337 LR338] CLERK: LB946, a bill introduced by the Speaker at the request of the Governor. (Read title.) Introduced on January 10, referred to Appropriations. Advanced to General File.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvements to Be Made at 148 and Nebraska Highway 2
    July 1, 2003 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Improvements to be made at 148th and Nebraska Highway 2 Work is scheduled to begin July 14th at the intersection of 148th and N-2, in Lincoln, according to the Nebraska Department of Roads. Constructors, Inc. of Lincoln has the $175,007 contract for intersection improvements, including a right-hand turn lane for westbound N-2 traffic. Through traffic on 148th Street will follow a marked detour on N-43 and N-34. Traffic will be maintained on Highway 2 with a 12’ width restriction and a lane closure for westbound traffic. Work is anticipated to be completed by fall of this year. The Department of Roads’ manager for this project is Bob Traudt of Lincoln. #NDOR# For additional information contact: District Construction Engineer Mike Sklenar in Lincoln, 471-0850, Ext. 1069, or Bob Traudt in Lincoln, 471-0850, Ext. 1119. RD-2-6(1024) NR964 July 1, 2003 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Work to begin on US Highway 77 north of Nebraska Highway 92 Work is scheduled to begin July 14 on US-77, beginning at N-92 (west of Yutan) and running north to the Platte River Bridge, according to the Nebraska Department of Roads. Ten Point Construction Company of Denison, Iowa has the $206,183 contract for pavement repair. Traffic will be maintained with lane restrictions, 12’ width restrictions, and lower speed limits. Work is anticipated to be completed in September. The Department of Roads’ manager for this project is Bob Traudt of Lincoln. #NDOR# For additional information contact: District Construction Engineer Mike Sklenar in Lincoln, (402) 471-0850, Ext.
    [Show full text]