FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 31 • NUMBER 131

Friday, July 8, 1966 • Washington, D.C. Pages 9333-9393

Agencies in this issue— Agriculture Department Army Department Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Coast Guard Commodity Credit Corporation Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Food and Drug Administration Foreign Assets Control Office Internal Revenue Service Interstate Commerce Commission Labor Standards Bureau Land Management Bureau Reclamation Bureau Securities and Exchange Commission State Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside« Just Released

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

(As of January 1, 1966)

Title 7—Agriculture (Parts 400-899) (Revised) $3.25

Title 32—National Defense (Parts 700-799) (Pocket Supplement) $1.00

General Index (Revised) $1.00

IA cumulative checklist of CFR issuances for 1966 appears in the first issue of the Federal Register each month under Title 11

Order from Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402

r r n r n i l lo j» D C flC T C D Published dally, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, ■ I 1 III il/ll r i l on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Na ^ ■ LiULrlU Archives ,__ » and______Recordsa _____ Service,i___ General___in,»» Services address Administration Nation»* (mail address Naw Area Code 202 Phone 963-3261------Archives Building, Washington, D.O. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained Federal Register Act, approved July 20. 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by W dent istratlve Committee of the Federal Renter, approved by the President (1 CFR Oh. I). Distribution Is made only by the Superin of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. _ • Q_ „«vable 1® The F ederal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, ior advance. The charge for Individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (15 cents for the first 80 pages ana nt8, each additional group of 40 pages, as actually bound). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent oi Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. , „ ■ ' . . . _ titles, Pur' The regulatory material appearing herein Is keyed to the Cods of F ederal Regulations, which is published, under "V y dent o t suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act. as amended. The Code of F ederal R egulations Is sold by the Superinw Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal Register issue of each month. t?s-rnTLationS. There are no restrictions on the «publication of material appearing In the F ederal Register or the Code of F ederal b e « Contents

AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT DEFENSE DEPARTMENT FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL See also Commodity Credit Cor- See Army Department. OFFICE poration; Consumer and Mar­ Notices keting Service. FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY Notices Cotton manufactures from Czech­ Proposed Rule Making oslovakia; intention to issue Areas for emergency loans: licenses for importation______9391 Missouri; designation______9364 Control zone and transition area; Human hair items from Portugal; Texas; designation and exten­ alteration______9362 import restriction______9391 sion______- _____ 9364 Transition area; alteration___ 9361 Merchandise from Taiwan; im­ Federal airway, jet route, control portation; available certifica­ ARMY DEPARTMENT area, and reporting points; al­ tion: terations and designation_____ 9363 Foodstuffs, Chinese-type, Rules and Regulations frozen______j______9391 Payments toward expenses of stu­ Jelly grass products______9391 dents attending OCD school___ 9348 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Rules and Regulations WELFARE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations Stations on land and shipboard See FOod- and Drug Administra­ Selection of contractors by board in maritime services; frequency tion. process; miscellaneous amend­ available for public ship-shore ments______9349 use in Baltimore, Md., area__ 9350 INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Notices Notices See Land Management Bureau; California Nuclear, Inc.; proposed Hearings, etc.: Reclamation Bureau. issuance of byproduct, source, Century Broadcasting Co., Inc., and special nuclear material li- and RKO General, Inc____ 9387 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE cense______9371 Sherman, Gordon, and Omicron Proposed Rule Making Curators of University of Missouri; Television Corp______9388 extension of completion date__ 9372 Income taxes; interest or divi­ TVue Associates, Inc., and Gal­ dends paid by certain savings veston Television, Inc______9390 institutions on certain deposits CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Valparaiso Broadcasting Co. et or withdrawable accounts; hear­ Proposed Rule Making a l ------*____ .______9390 ing------9351 Certificated air carriers; refine­ ments to facilitate costing of FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION INTERSTATE COMMERCE services______9358 COMMISSION Rules and Regulations Notices Notices Natural gas pipeline facilities; Hearings, etc.: general certificate condition re­ Fourth section applications for British Eagle International Air­ specting safe operating pres- relief------9381 lines, Ltd______9387 su res______9347 Motor carrier: Piedmont Aviation, Inc______9384 Broker, water carrier and Notices freight forwarder applica­ COAST GUARD Hearings, etc.: tions______9372 Temporary authority applica­ Notices Abercrombie, A. L., èt al_____ 9370 Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co___ 9370 tions______9381 Vessels certificated for ocean and Arkla Exploration Co______9368 coastwise service; lifeboat equip­ Champlin Petroleum Co______9370 LABOR DEPARTMENT ment------9390 Shell Oil Co______9369 See Labor Standards Bureau. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co____ 9369 COMMODITY CREDIT Texaco, Inc., and Amerada Pe­ LABOR STANDARDS BUREAU CORPORATION troleum Corp______9370 Tidewater Oil Co. et al______9364 Rules and Regulations Pules and Regulations Child labor; state certificates of age------9348 Loan and purchase agreement FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Programs, 1966: Oats------9337 Rules and Regulations LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU Rye------9341 Prohibited trade practices: Notices Evergreen Warehouse Distribu­ California; proposed withdrawal CONSUMER AND MARKETING tors, Inc., et.al______9345 and reservation of lands_ 9382 SERVICE French Poodle, Inc., and Louella Idaho; proposed classification of Epstein__**_____^*— 9346 lands for retention for multiple Pules and Regulations use management.:______9382 shade-grown cigar-leaf, Montana; opening of public lands m Florida and Georgia; order FOOD AND DRUG (2 documents)______* 9383 suspending certain provisions-* 9337 ADMINISTRATION Oregon: La Grande Townsite; sale of Proposed Rule Making Notices town lots—______9383 £ Minnesota-North Dakota Drugs, new; approval of applica- Land Classification-9383 marketing area; hearing______9351 tions- ______9370 ( Continued on next page ) 9335 9336 CONTENTS RECLAMATION BUREAU Notices Bridger and Caribou national forests, ; transfer of administrative jurisdiction of certain lands------— - 9384 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Notices Hearings, etc.: Townsend U.S. & International Growth Fund, Inc------— 9372 United Security Life Insurance Co______Z____ — - 9372 STATE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations International Educational and Cultural Exchange Program ; grants to foreign participants to observe, consult, or demon­ strate special skills------— 9348 TREASURY DEPARTMENT See Coast Guard; Foreign Assets Control Office; Internal Rev­ enue Service.

List of CFR Parts Affected

(Codification Guide)

The following numerical guide is a fist of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations documents plashed in todays issue. A cumulative list of.pacta affected covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the »onth. ___. «.«rKons A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lasts the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1966. and specifies how they are affected.

16 CFR 29 CFR 7 CFR iiuiflf ____ 9348 1201______9337 13 (2 documents)______9345, 9346 1421 (2 documents)------9337, 9341 32 CFR 18 CFR __ 9348 P roposed R u l e s: 157______-____ - ______0347 inno 1060______- 9351 41 CFR 22 CFR 9349 14 CFR 61______- 9348 Q P roposed R u l e s: 26 CFR 4 7 CFR 71 (3 documents)------9381-9363 _ 9350 75______9363 P roposed R u l e s: 241______9358 1______9351 9337 Rules and Regulations

be completed by the effective time there­ States. To obtain price support through Title 7— AGRICULTURE of; arid this modification relieves restric­ sales a producer must give the appro­ tions on the handling of Type 62 shade- priate ASCS county office notice of his Chapter XI— Consumer and Market­ grown cigar-leaf tobacco and should be­ intent to sell the oats to CCC on or before ing Service (Marketing Agreements come effective as herein provided. May 31, 1967, in the States named in and Orders; Miscellaneous Com­ Order. The provisions of § 1201.53 are this section and on or before April 30, hereby suspended for the 1966-67 crop 1967, in all other States. modities), Department of Agricul­ year. ture §1421.2663 Maturity of loans. (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat, 31, as amended; 7 UJS.b. 601-674) Unless demand is made earlier, loans PART T201— TYPE 62 SHADE-GROWN on oats stored in Alaska, Idaho, Maine, CIGAR-LEAF TOBACCO GROWN IN Dated: July 5, 1966, to become effec­ Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North DESIGNATED PRODUCTION AREA tive on the date of its publication in the Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Wash­ OF FLORIDA AND GEORGIA F ederal R egister. ington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, ma­ G eorge L. M ehren, ture on May 31, 1967, and loans on oats Order Suspending Certain Provisions Assistant Secretary. stored in all other States mature on April 30, 1967. Findings. (1) Pursuant to the provi­ [F.R. Doc. 66-7456; Filed, July 7, 1966; sions of the Agricultural Marketing 8:48 am .] § 1421.2664 Deduction of storage Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 charges. Ü.S.C. 601 et seq.), and of the order (7 The following tables are for use in CFR Part 1201) regulating the handling Chapter XIV— Commodity Credit Cor­ computing deductions for sto rag e of Type 62 shade-grown cigar-leaf tobac­ poration, Department of Agriculture charges for oats delivered to UCSA ware­ co grown in designated production area of Florida and Georgia, and upon the SUBCHAPTER B— LOANS, PURCHASES, AND houses prior to maturity in accordance OTHER OPERATIONS with the provisions of section 1421.2658 basis of the recommendation of the Con­ of the regulations. trol Committee established under the [C.C.C. Grain Price Support Regs., 1966 Crop aforesaid order, and other available Oat Supp.] Maturity date, Deduction Maturity date, information, it is hereby found and de­ Apr. 30,1967 (cents per May 31,1967 termined that the provisions of § 1201.53 PART 1421— GRAINS AND SIMILARLY bushel) of the order imposing a restriction on HANDLED COMMODITIES the handling of tobacco leaves obstructs (»):...... (9. or does not tend to effectuate the de­ Subpart-^-1966 Crop Oat Loan and Prior to May 14, 10 Prior to June 14, 1966. 1966. clared policy of the act for the 1966-67 Purchase Program May 14-June 19___ 9 June 14-July 20. crop year, and that the suspension of June 20-July 26___ 8 July 21-Aug. 26. The General Regulations Governing July 27-Sept. 1.. 7 Aug. 27-Oct. 2. the section will tend to effectuate the Sept. 2-Oct. 8 6 Oct. 3-Nov. 8. declared policy of the act for the 1966-67 Price Support for the 1964 and Subse­ Oct. 9-Nov. 14____ 6 Nov. 9-Dec. 15. crop year. ' v quent Crops (Revision 1) (31 F.R. 5941) Nov, 15-Dec. 21.__ 4 Dec. 16, 1966-J an. and the 1966 and Subsequent Crops Oats 21,1967. (2) The 1966 crop of Type 62 tobacco Dec, 22,1966-Jan. l 3 Jan. 22-Feb. 27. . Supplement (31 F.R. 4581), which con­ 27,1967. was badly damaged by hurricane winds tain regulations of a general nature with Jan. 28-Mar. 5..—... 2 Feb. 28-Apr. 5. during the early part of June. Only a respect to price support loans and pur­ Mar. 6-Apr. 30,1967. 1 Apr. 6-May 31,1967. very small proportion of the crop had chase operations, are further supple­ been harvested at the time the hurricane mented for the 1966 crop oats as follows: 1 Dates storage charges start, all dates inclusive. hit the area. Tobacco leaves suitable for § 1421.2665 Support rates. cigar wrappers must be free of breaks Sec. or holes in the leaves and many of the 1421.2661 Purpose. (a) Basic support rates. The basic leaves have been ruined for such pur­ 1421.2662 Availability. l county support rates for use in making pose. No grower will have an average 1421.2663 Maturity of loans. loans and for use in settling loans and of 18 sound leaves per plant to harvest, 1421.2664 Deduction of storage charges. • for purchases are listed below. Farm hi view of the damage to the crop, there - 1421.2665 Support rates and discounts, c stored loans shall be made at the basic is no need to continue the restriction on Authority : The provisions of this subpart support rate for the county in which the the number of leaves which may be issued under sec. 4, 62 Stat. 1070, as amended; oats were produced, adjusted by the Weed handled this yeari 15 UiS.C. 714b. Interpret or apply sec, 5, Control discount .where applicable. 62 Stat. 1072, secs. 105, 401, 63 Stat. 1051, as tw*- ^ *s ^ere^y further determined amended; 15 U.S.C. 714c, 7 U.S.C. 1421, 1441. Warehouse stored loans, farm storage that it is impracticable, unnecessary, or loan settlements and purchases shall be contrary to the public -interest to give § 1421.2661 Purpose. made on the basis of the basic support Preliminary notice, engage in public rule- rate for the county in which the oats were inaking procedure, and postpone the This supplement contains additional produced adjusted by the premiums and effective date of this section until 30 days program provisions which, together with discounts shown in paragraph (b) of this Mter publication thereof in the F ederal the applicable provisions of the General section and any other discounts estab­ Register (5 u .S .C . 1001-1011) because Regulations Governing Price Support for lished by CCC, applicable to the grade the tune when the recommendation and the 1964 and Subsequent Crops and any and quality of the oats on which the loan information upon which this section is amendments thereto and the oat supple­ or settlement is made. The basic county cased became available and the time ment to such regulations for 1966 and support rate applies to oats grading No. wnen this section must become effective subsequent crops, apply to loans and pur­ 3, having moisture not in excess of 14 in order to effectuate the declared policy chases for the 1966-crop oats. percent. th in *s insufficient; the harvest of § 1421.2662 Availability and disburse­ Alabama * 7 7 cr°P is in progress and will be ment. R ate completed in the immediate future; this County per bushel ion will assure equitable treatment for Producers desiring price support must All counties______fo. 71 growers since they are in varying request a loan on his eligible oats on or Alaska s ages of completion of harvest; compli- before April 30, 1967, in Alaska, Idaho, All counties______$1. 20 ce with this section will not require Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Arizona y special preparation on the part of North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, All counties______$o. 78 Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, Arkansas sons affected thereby which cannot and by March 31, 1967, in all other All counties______$o. 68 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9338 RULES AND REGULATIONS I owa California Illinois—Continued Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate R ate per per per per per per County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel bushel J efferso n ___ Placer ------$0.71 F u lto n ------_ $0.61 M ercer______$0.61 A dair______$0.61 $0.61 $0.74 J o h n so n ___ _ .61 .72 P lu m as______.70 G a lla tin ____ .65 Monroe _____ .64 A dam s_____ . .61 Alpine A llam akee_ . .61 J o n es______.61 Amador - .72 R iversid e___ .74 G re en e _____ .62 Montgomery _ .62 Sacram ento_ .72 Grundy ------.61 Morgan ------.61 A ppanoose_ . .61 K eokuk_____ .61 Butte — _ .71 K o ssu th _ .72 San Benito — .73. H am ilton ___ .64 Moultrie ___ .61 Audubon __ . .60 ___ _ .60 .61 B e n to n ____ . .61 L e e ______.61 Colusa .72 San Bernar- Hancock ___ .61 Ogle ------.74 Hardin ____ .65 Peoria ------.61 Black Hawk- - .61 Linn ______.61 t_ .74 dino ______. .60 L ou isa______.61 _ .70 San Diego------.74 Henderson —. .61 Perry ______.64 Boone ______San Francisco- .74 H en ry __ — .61 Piatt ______.61 B rem er_____ .61 L u c a s ______.61 .72 L y o n ______.58 .73 San Joaquin— .73 Iroquois ___ .61 Pike ------.61 Buchanan _ . .61 Fresno • 65 Buena Vista. _ .60 M adison___ - .61 Glenn . .71 San Luis J a c k so n ------. .64 P o p e ______- O b isp o _— .73 Jasper ____ . .63 P u la sk i______.64 B u tle r ______. .60 M ahaska____ .61 .72 Marion ___ _ .61 .74 San Mateo— .74 J efferso n __ .64 P u tn a m __ ___ .61 C alh ou n___ .60 .64 Carroll______.60 Marshall .60 Inyo .... .74 Santa Barbara .73 Jersey ______. .62 Randolph ___ Santa Clara— .74 Jo Daviess .61 R ic h la n d ___ .63 C ass______- .61 Mills ______.61 Kern .74 M itc h e ll____ .60 .73 Santa Cruz— .73 J o h n s o n __ .64 Rock Island— .61 Cedar _____ . .61 Kings . .64 Cerro Gordo. - .60 M o n o n a ____ .59 Lake .72 S h a s t a ______.69 Kane ____ . .61 Saint Clair — 69 .70 K a n k a k ee_ .61 S a lin e ______.65 C h erokee__ - .59 M onroe_____ .61 Lassen Montgomery . .61 .75 S isk iyou ------.68 K e n d a ll___ _ .61 Sangamon ___ .61 C hickasaw _- .61 S o la n o ______.74 Knox ______.61 S c h u y le r ------.61 C lark______.61 M u scatin e_ .61 Madera .73 O’Brien _____ .59 Marin _ .74 S o n o m a ____ .73 L a k e ______.62 Scott ______.61 Clay ------.60 S ta n isla u s__ .73 La S a lle ___ .61 S h e lb y ___ - .61 C layton____ .61 Osceola _____ .58 .73 .61 .72 S u tter ______.72 Law rence__ .63 Stark ------.61 C lin ton____ .61 P age______T e h a m a ____ .70 Lee ___ — .61 S tep h en son _ .61 C raw ford__ - .59 Palo Alto____ .60 Merced .73 Plym outh___ .59 Modoc .68 T r in ity ______.72 Livingston _- .61 Tazewell ___ .61 D a lla s______.60 Tulare ------.73 L o g a n ______.61 U n io n ______.64 D a v is______- .62 Pocahontas .. .60 Mono .73 .60 .73 T u o lu m n e__ .72 McDonough _ .61 V e rm ilio n __ .61 Decatur ____ - .61 P o lk ______.64 _ .61 Pottawat- N a p a _ .73 V en tu ra ____ .74 M cH en ry__ .61 Wabash _ — D elaw are__ 70 Vf>1o .73 M cL ea n ------_ .61 Warren ------.61 Des Moines_ - .61 ta m ie_____ .61 Nevada - .59 Poweshiek ... .60 Orange .74 Y u b a______.71 Macon _ — .61 Washington - . .64 Dickinson __ M a co u p in __ .62 Wayne ______.64 Dubuque __ - .61 Ringgold ----- .61 Colorado M adison----- .63 W h ite ______.64 E m m e t____ _ .59 S a c ______.60 .61 All counties____ _—------$0* 65 Marion ___ .63 W h ite sid e ___ .61 F a y ette____ _ .61 S c o tt______Marshall — - .61 W ill______.62 Floyd ______.60 S h elb y_____ .60 Connecticut Mason ____ .61 W illiam son _ .64 F ran klin___ . .60 S io u x ______„ .58 All counties. .71 M assac____ . .64 W in n eb ago_ .61 F rem ont___ - .61 Story ------. .60 M en a rd ___ _ .61 W o od ford __ .61 G reen e____ .60 T am a______.60 Delaware G rundy____ .60 T aylor_____ . .61 All counties------$0* 70 I ndiana G u th r ie ___ . .60 U n io n _____ . .61 $0.64 H am ilto n __ .60 Van Buren__ . .61 F lorida Adams ____ _ $0.62 Law rence___ .61 .62 M adison_____ .62 Hancock ___ .60 W a p ello ----- All counties- $0.75 Allen _____ . .61 Bartholomew .63 M arion ______.62 H a rd in ____ .60 W arren____ .62 H arrison___ .60 Washington _ .61 G eorgia B e n to n ____ .61 M a rsh a ll__ - - .61 .62 M a r tin ______.64 H en ry _____ .. .61 Wayne ------All counties. $0 .71 Blackford — W eb ster___ „ . 60 Boone _____ .62 M iam i______.62 H oward____ .61 .64 Humboldt ..._ .60 Winnebago —_ .60 I daho B row n_— .64 Monroe ----- _ .61 .62 Montgomery— .62 I d a ______- .59 Winneshiek _ C arroll____ Woodbury —« .59 A d a ______$0. 65 Gem ______$0. 65 C ass______.62 Morgan ------.62 I o w a ____ _ .61 .63 G ooding____ .64 .61 J a c k so n ___ .61 W orth _____ .60 Adams _____ Clark _ ----- .64 N ew ton------.60 Bannock ___ .63 Idaho ______.62 C lay------.62 N o b le ______.62 Jasp er____ .60 W r ig h t------Bear Lake----- .63 J efferso n ___ .61 C lin ton____ .62 O h io ______• 65 Benewah ___ .63 J ero m e_____ .64 Crawford — .64 O ran ge------.64 K ansas .61 K o o ten a i___ .63 B in g h a m ___ D aviess____ .64 Owen ______- .62 $0.64 G raham ----- __ $0.64 Blaine _____ .63 L a ta h ______. 64 .61 A llen _____ D earborn___ .65 Parke ______Anderson — . . .64 G r a n t_____ .66 Boise ______.65 L em h i______.61 D e ca tu r ____ . 63 Perry ______.64 .66 .61 Lewis ______.63 .64 Atchison — .64 G ray------B o n n er____ De Kalb_____ . 62 Pike ______.67 Greeley - — B onn eville__. .61 L incoln------.64 .62 P orter______- .62 B a rb er ------D elaw are----- B a r to n ------.65 Greenwood _. ¿65 Boundary ... .61 M adison__ .61 .64 Posey ------.64 j .66 D u b o is------B ourbon__ .65 Hamilton — B u t t e ______.61 M in id oka__ ' 64 E lkhart____ - . 63 P u la sk i______.62 .64 Nez Perce__ .64 .62 .63 Harper - ___ C am as______F ayette_____ . 62 P u tn a m ___ .66 H a rvey------.65 Canyon ___ .65 O n e id a ____ .63 Floyd ______. 64 Randolph — .62 .66 • 65 . 65 H askell____ C a rib o u ___ . .62 O w y h e e ___ F o u n ta in ___ . 61 R ip ley ------.65 Hodgeman - .65 Payette ------. .65 Chautauqua _ .6 6 C a ssia ____ - .64 Franklin ___ .64 R u s h ____ i.— .62 J a c k so n ----- C lark______. .61 P o w e r _____ . .63 . 62 St. J o se p h ___ .63 C herokee_ .66 Fulton _____ C heyenne_ .64 Jefferson — .63 S h osh on e__ . .61 .65 ?‘ Clearwater — G ib so n _____ . 64 S c o t t _____— 87 6 C uster______.61 T e t o n ______.61 . 62 Shelby —:------.62 „ .65 G r a n t____ _ .63 Johnson E lm o re_____ .65 Twin F a lls_ .64 G reen e __ _ . 64 S p e n c e r _____ .64 C la y ------66 Valley ____ .63 .62 C lo u d ____ .63 K earny------F r a n k lin __ _ .63 Hamilton — . . 62 Stark e______Kingman — Frem ont___ - .61 Washington _. .64 .62 Steuben _____ .63 C offey____ .64 66 Hancock <__ -. .67 K iow a------Harrison — . 64 S u lliv a n _____ .63 Comanche _ llinois .66 L abette------I Hendricks ... . 62 Switzerland — .65 C ow ley------65 Craw ford___ .65 $0.61 C oles______$0 61 H en ry ------. 62 Tippecanoe — .62 Leavenworth Adams ______.62 D e c a tu r __ .63 A lexan d er__ .64 C o o k ____ :---- 63 Howard___ — . 62 T ip to n ___ — L incoln------. 62 U n io n ___ .62 Dickinson _. . .64 B o n d ______.62 C raw ford------63 Huntington L in n ------62 J a c k so n ____ . 64 Vanderburgh _ .64 Doniphan _— .6 4 .65 Boone ------.61 Cumberland - D o u g la s__ .64 Logan ------.61 De K a lb _____ 61 Jasp er------.61 Vermillion — .61 .64 B row n______.62 Edwards — — .65 B u rea u ____ - .61 De W it t ------61 J a y ------.62 V igo------— McPherson Jefferson ___ . 65 W a b a sh _____ .62 Elk ______.65 65 C alh ou n____ .62 D o u g la s------61 Rill 55 .64 M arion------.61 Du P a g e ------61 J e n n in g s___ .65 W arren_____ - .61 .63 Carroll - ____ .64 E llsw orth_— .64 M arshall----- C ass____ — - .61 E d g a r ------61 Johnson ____ .62 Warrick __— . 64 Washington — .64 F in n e y ___ — .66 .64 Champaign __ .61 Edwards ------64 Knox ______M iam i------62 Kosciusko — . 62 W ayne____ L— .62 F o r d _____ .66 C h ristian ___ .61 E ffingham ---- — .64 M itch ell----- Fayette ------62 L agrange---- .63 Wells ______.62 F r a n k lin _ 66 Clark______.62 G ea r y ____ .64 Montgomery F o r d ______61 L a k e ------. 62 W hite ------.62 .64 Clay ------.63 .62 G o v e _____ .65 C lin ton ______.63 F r a n k lin ____ 64 La Porte------. 63 W h itle y ______

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 9339

K ansas—Continued issouri Minnesota M - -Continued Rate Rate R ate Rate Rate R ate per per per per per County "bushel County bushel per County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel Morton ——. $0. 67 Scott ______$0.65 Aitkin Linn ______$0. 64 R a lls ______$0.61 Nemaha__ i. $0. 57 M arshall___ _ $0. 51 . 63 Sedgw ick_;_ .66 A noka___ ,__ .59 Livingston ¿1 .64 R andolph__ .63 Neosho__ __.. .65 Seward ______Martin .57 .67 Becker .. .53 McDonald .66 Ray ------___ _ . 65 Ness ______. .65 Shawnee __ _ .64 M eeker______.57 Macon B e ltr a m i___ .52 Mille Lacs__ _ .63 R ey n o ld s__ _ .65 Norton ------. .63 Sheridan ___ .64 .57 Madison -____ Benton .57 M orrison ____ .56 .65 Ripley .66 Osage ____ ¡p . 64 S h er m a n ___ .64 Big Stone____ Maries .65 Saint Charles_ .63 Osborne ____. .54 Mower .58 . 63 Sm ith ______.62 Blue Earth__ .58 Murray __ Marion 61 Saint Clair__ .64 Ottawa —__ . 63 Stafford _____ .65 .55 Mercer Brown ______.57 Nicollet .58 .63 Sainte Pawnee____ . 65 Stanton .66 C a r lto n ____ Miller .65 Genevieve-_ .64 Phillips . .62 Stevens ______.58 Nobles .56 .67 Carver ______.59 Norman Mississippi _•_ .64 Saint Francois . 65 Pottawatomie . .63 Sumner :___ .67 .51 Cass ______. 55 Olmsted .58 Moniteau i _;_ .65 Saint Louis_ .64 Pratt _____ . 66 T h o m a s_ _ .64 Monroe .62 S a lin e ______.64 Rawlins _____ . 64 Trego C h ip p ew a __ ; . 55 Otter Tail___ .54 .64 Chisago .59 Montgomery _ .64 Schuyler ___ .63 Reno _ i . 65 W abau nsee_ P en n in gton _ .51 Morgan .64 Clay ------.52 Pine ______. 65 S cotlan d ___ .62 Republic _.__ .62 Wallace .65 .58 New Madrid_ .65 .64 Clearwater __ .52 P ip e s to n e __ .55 S c o tt______Rice_ . 65 Washington _ .62 Cook Newton _ _ .65 Shannon __ _ .65 Riley ___ _ . 63 Wichita .59 Polk .51 .65 Cottonwood _ ...... N od aw ay__ _ . 62 S h e lb y ______.62 Rooks .63 Wilson ______.56 Pope .55 Oregon .65 Crow Wing__ .56 Ramsey .66 Stoddard __ _ .65 Rush__;___ .65 Woodson .64 .59 Osage __-__ _ .65 Stone ______.66 Russell _ Dakota .59 Red Lake .51 Ozark ...... 64 W yandotte__ .65 Dodge ______.66 Sullivan _ .63 Saline i .64 .58 R ed w o o d ___ .56 P em isc o t__ D o u g la s____ .55 Renville .65 Taney ______.66 .57 Perry _ .64 T e x a s ______. .65 K entucky F arib au lt___ .58 Rice .58 P e t t i s __ __ F illm o r e _,_ .65 V ern o n ___ _ .64 All counties_ $0. 71 .59 Rock .56 P h elp s___ — .65 W arren_____ . .64 F reeb o rn ____ .58 Roseau .51 Louisiana Pike —______.61 Washington _ .65 Goodhue ___ .58 Saint Louis_ .58 Platte .65 All counties. _ $0.70 Grant .54 Wayne .65 Scott ______.59 P o lk ____ , ___ .64 W eb ster_•__. .65 H ennepin___ .59 Sherburne .__ .58 Pulaski ______.65 Maine H ou ston _____ W orth ___ . .62 All counties .59 Sibley .58 Putnam — ■_ .63 W r ig h t____ .65 $0. 71 Hubbard .54 S tearn s____ _ ;. 57 Maryland Isanti .58 Steele .58 Montana Itasca All counties_ $0.70 .55 Stevens .54 B eaverhead_ $0.60 Jackson Swift M adison____ $0.58 . 57 .55 Big Horn— _ .5 5 Meagher ___ _ . 55 Massachusetts Kanabec ___ .58 T o d d ______.56 Blaine K and iyoh i__ , .51 Mineral .60 All counties $0.71 .57 Traverse .53 B roadw ater_ .56 Missoula ___ .59 Kittson ...... 50 W a b a sh a ____ .58 Carbon Koochiching _ .55 Musselshell _.. .53 Michigan .54 W a d en a _____ .55 Carter .53 Park ' . .56 Lac Qui Parle_ .55 Waseca .59 Cascade Lake . .55 P etro leu m __ .52 Alcona ______$0.62 K ew eenaw __ $0.63 .59 W ashington_ .59 Chouteau ____ .53 Alger------.64 Lake of the Phillips — . .50 Lake —______. 64 W atonw an__ .57 Custer .52 Pondera .54 Allegan____ . 64 Lapeer _ .(62 W o o d s __ _ .52 Wilkin .53 Daniels Alpena_____ . 62 .49 Powder River. .53 Leelanau ___ .63 Le Sueur _ _ .58 Winona .59 Dawson .49 A ntrim .—__ .63 Lincoln P ow ell_____ .58 Lenaw ee___ _ . 63 .55 Wright .58 Deer Lodge__ .58 Prairie .51 Arenac _____ . 62 L iv in g sto n _ .63 L y o n ______.55 Yellow Fallon _ 59 Baraga ______. 63 .60 L u c e ______.64 McLeod . . . 58 Medicine __ .55 Fergus . 53 Richland _ .49 Barry ______.64 Mackinac ___ £ . 64 Mahnomen __ .52 Bay _— _____ .62 Flathead ___ .58 R oosevelt___ .48 Macomb _____ .63 Gallatin .56 Rosebud . .53 Benzie__ _ .63 M a in ste e ___ .64 Mississippi Berrien ______. 63 All counties______2______$0.70 Garfield .51 Sanders .60 Marquette ___ . 63 Glacier .55 Sheridan —— .48 B ranch.__ _ .63 Mason _____. 64 Missouri Golden Valley .64 Silver Bow___ .58 Calhoun _____ . 63 M ecosta_____ .63 Cass ------.63 Granite _ .59 Stillwater __— .55 M en om in ee_ . 63 Adair ______$0. 63 D a d e ____ !_ Hill Charlevoix_ . 63 - $0.64 .52 Sweet Grass. _ .55 M id lan d ____ . 62 Andrew .63 D a lla s______.65 Jefferson .57 Teton .54 Cheboygan — .63 Missaukee ___ .63 A tc h iso n ___ .62 Chippewa___ .64 Daviess - .64 Judith Basin_ .54 Toole ___ ■__ .54 Monroe ______. 63 Audrain .62 De Kalb____ .64 Lake ...... 59 Treasure .54 Clare ------. 63 Montcalm ___ v .63 Barry ______Clinton____ _ .63 .66 Dent .65 Lewis and Valley _ .50 M o n tm o re n c y V .62 Barton . 65 Douglas ____ .66 Clark .57 W h ea tla n d _ .54 Crawford___ .62 M u sk egon _& .64 Bates Delta------.63 .64 Dunklin _ .65 Liberty ... .53 W ib a u x __ .50 Newaygo__ .64 Benton .64 Franklin _ - .65 Lincoln ______.60 Yellowstone_ .55 Dickinson__ _ . 63 O a k la n d __ _ ■. 63 E aton______. 03 B o llin g er_— .65 Gasconade _, .65 McCone .50 Oceana ____ ^ . 64 Boone Emmet____ _ " 63 .64 Gentry - .63 O gem aw _____ 62 B u ch a n a n __ , .65 Greene _ ,6 5 N ebraska Genesee ______62 Ontonagon __ .63 Butler Gladwin___ _ .62 .65 Grundy ____ .63 Adams $0. 60 C olfax______$0.59 O sceola__ _ . 63 Caldwell ____ .65 Harrison ____ .63 Antelope ___ _ Gogebic_ «3 O sco d a ___ ;_ ,62 . 57 Cuming .59 Grand ' C allaw ay_,_ ,64 Henry .64 Arthur .58 Custer ; .58 Otsego ______.63 Camden Traverse ___ . 63 .65 Hickory .64 Banner .58 Dakota .59 O tta w a ______. 64 Cape Holt .63 Blaine .57 D aw es______Gratiot._____ .63 Presque Isle— .62 .58 Hillsdale _____ . 63 Girardeau _ .64 H o w a r d __ .64 Boone .58 Dawson .59 Roscommon _ .62 Carroll .64 H o w e ll____ 6- .66 Box Butte—_ .58 Deuel Houghton__ 63 Saginaw _____ .62 Carter .59 Huron____ _ ' 62 .65 Iron - . 65 Boyd .56 Dixon .59 Saint Clair__ _ . 63 Cass -6 4 Jackson .64 Brown .57 Dodge Ingham ------.es* Saint Joseph- .63 .60 tonia ------.63 Cedar .64 Jasper - . 65 Buffalo .59 Douglas .61 Iosco------. 62 Sanilac______.62 Chariton ,__ .64 J efferso n ___ _ .64 B u r t ______.59 D u n d y __,__ Schoolcraft_ .64 .62 Iron____ Ro C h ristian____ - .66 Johnson ___ - . 64 Butler .60 Fillmore .60 Shiawassee ¡s_ . 62 Clark .61 Knox - .62 Csss v61 Isabella III” i 63 T u s c o la __ _ .62 Franklin ____ .61 Jackson ____ '03 C l a y ------.65 Laclede .65 Cedar .58 Frontier .60 Van Buren___ .64 Clinton .65 Lafayette ___ . .64 Chase .61 Furnas % Kalamazoo .04 W ashtenaw __ . 63 .61 Kalkaska " «q Cole ______.65 Lawrence — .- .65 Cherry .57 Gage .62 Wayne ______.63 Cooper .65 . fit C h ey e n n e __ .59 Garden W exford__ .6 4 .58 C raw ford_— .65 Lincoln . .63 Clay ______.60 Garfield .57

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 31, NO. 131--FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9340 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Nebraska—Continued Oh io—Continued South Dakota—Continued Rate Rate R ate Rate Rate Rate per per per per per per County "bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel G o sp er_____ $0. 60 O t o e ------_ $0.61 D a r k e ______. $0.63 M ercer------_ $0.63 H y d e ------$0. 52 Pennington _- $0.52 Grant — .----- .5 7 Pawnee — .62 D efiance___ .63 Miami ___ - .64 J a c k so n __ — .52 Perkins ___ - .50 Greeley ------.58 Perkins __— .60 Delaware ___ .65 Monroe ___ .70 Jerauld ______.53 Potter ____ - .51 H a ll______.59 Phelps _____ .60 Erie i,______.65 Montgomery _ .64 J o n e s______.52 Roberts - .52 H am ilton ------.59 P ie rc e ______.57 F airfield ___ _ .65 M organ__ — .69 K in gsb u ry__ .53 S an born___ - .53 H a r la n _____ .61 Platte __ _ _ .58 Payette _____ .65 M orrow____ .65 L a k e ____— .53 Shannon __ - .54 H a y e s______.61 Polk — — .59 Franklin ____ .65 Muskingum - - .68 L aw rence___ .51 S p in k _____ - .52 Hitchcock — .62 Red Willow. .61 P u lto n _____ .64 N oble______.69 L in co ln _____ .56 Stanley ____ - .52 Holt ______.57 Richardson _ .62 Gallia _ - . 69 O tta w a ____ .65 Lyman _____ .52 S u lly ______- .52 H ook er______.57 R o c k ------_ .57 Geauga ____ .68 P a u ld in g __ _ .63 M cC ook ___ .54 Todd _____ H o w a rd _____ .58 Saline ,______.61 G re en e _.•__ . 65 Perry ______.67 M cPherson__ .50 Tripp _____ - .53 J efferso n __ - .61 Sarpy — — .61 G uern sey__ .69 Pickaway — _ .65 M arshall____ .51 Turner - .56 J o h n so n ___ _ .62 Saunders _ .61 H am ilton __ .65 P ik e __ ___ .68 M ead e______.51 Union - .57 K earn ey___ - .60 Scotts Bluff. _ .58 Hancock .64 P ortage_ .68 M ellette _— .53 Walworth _ - .51 Keith ------.59 S ew ard ____ - .60 H a rd in ____ .64 P re b le _____ .63 Miner ______.53 Washabaugh _ .53 Keya Paha__ .56 S h er id a n __ . 58 Harrison .69 P u tn a m ___ .64 Minnehaha .55 Yankton __ - .56 K im b a ll____ .59 S h er m a n __ . 58 Henry .64 Richland . 65 Moody ____ _ .54 Z ie b a c h ___ - .51 Knox ______.57 S i o u x __ — . 58 H ig h la n d __ _ .67 Ross - _____ .66 .65 Tennessee L a n c a ste r __ .61 S ta n to n ___ . 58 H o ck in g ___ .67 Sandusky _ All counties— - $0.71 Lincoln ____ .59 T h a y er____ .61 H o lm es____ _ .67 S c io to __ .— .68 L o g a n ______.58 T h o m a s___ _ .57 Huron _ .65 S e n e c a ___ .65 T esas L o u p ______. 57 Thurston — _ .59 J a c k so n __ . 68 S h e lb y ____ .64 All counties-. - $0.70 .68 McPherson .58 V a lley _____ . 58 Jefferson___ .70 S ta r k _____ Utah .67 M adison___ .58 W ashington .60 K n o x ______.65 S u m m it__ All counties.. _ $0.72 Merrick ____ .58 Wayne ____ - .58 Lake _r ___ .68 T rum bu ll_ — .69 M orrill_____ .58 W eb ster___ ._ . 61 Lawrence __ .68 Tuscarawas „ .68 Vermont N a n c e ______. 58 W h eeler___ _ .57 L ick in g____ .65 U n io n ____ .65 All counties— . $0.71 Van Wert— ..63 N em a h a ____ .62 York —____ _ .59 L o g a n _____ .65 Virginia Nuckolls ___ .61 Lorain ____ .66 Vinton ____ .68 L u c a s ___ _ .64 W arren___ .65 All counties— . $0.70 Nevada Washington .70 M adison___ - .65 Washington - $0.75 Mahoning .69 W a y n e ___ .67 New Hampshire M arion ____ _ .65 Williams__ — .64 Adams ____ . $0.65 Lewis ______$0.70 All counties.. $0.71 M ed in a____ .67 W ood______.64 Asotin ____ - .65 Lincoln ___ _ .65 M e ig s __ .__ .69 Wyandot __— . 65 B e n to n ____ _ .67 M ason_____ - .70 New J ersey C h e la n ____ . .68 Okanogan —_ .68 Oklahoma All counties-_ ._ $0.71 Clallam ____ - .70 Pacific ____ _ .70 All counties. $0. 68 New Mexico Clark _____ - .70 Pend Oreille. - .63 All counties— - $0.72 Oregon C olum bia__ . .65 Pierce ------_ .70 Cowlitz ___ - .70 San Juan— _ .70 New York Baker _____ $0.65 L a k e _____ — $0.67 D o u g la s___ .67 S k a g it------.70 All counties.. .- $0.70 B e n to n ____ .70 L a n e _____ .69 Ferry _____ .66 Skamania —._ .70 Clackamas _. .70 L in co ln ___ .70 North Carolina F r a n k lin __ _ .65 Snohomish .70 C latsop ____ .70 L i n n ______.69 Spokane ___ .64 $0.71 .65 G arfield ___ .65 Columbia .70 M alh eu r__ G r a n t______- .66 Stevens ____ .64 North Dakota Coos ______.69 M a rio n ___ __ .70 Grays Harbor. .70 Thurston . .70 C rook _____ .68 Morrow ____ — .67 Isla n d ______.70 Wahkiakum _ .70 Adams ____ - $0.49 McLean __ „ $0.47 Curry _____ .69 Multnomah — .70 Barnes —— . .51 Mercer ____ .47 J efferso n __ _ .70 Walla Walla.- .65 Deschutes _ - .68 Polk ______— .70 K in g ----- — _ .70 Whatcom —.._ .70 B e n so n ____ . .49 Mountrail - .46 D o u g la s__ .69 Sherman — .68 .48 Morton ____ — .48 Kitsap ____ _ .70 Whitman —. .64 Billings ___ G illia m ___ .68 Tillamook _— .70 _ .68 B o ttin e a u _ - .47 N e ls o n ___ .50 .66 K ittitas ___- _ .68 Yakima ——. G r a n t____ .67 U m atilla__ K lic k ita t__ - .68 Bowman — .49 O liv e r __ _ .48 H arn ey___ „ . 66 Union ___ -_ .66 B u r k e __ — - .46 Pembina — .49 Hood Rivers .70 W allow a__ .65 West Virginia B u r le ig h __ _ .49 Pierce ______.48 J a c k so n __ .69 Wasco ____ .68 All counties__ $0.71 Cass ------_ .51 Ramsey __ — .49 .68 Washington — .70 Jefferson __ Wisconsin C avalier___ .49 R a n so m __ — .51 Josephine _ — .69 Wheeler .68 D ic k e y ______.51 R e n v ille __ . 47 K lam ath__ .67 Y a m h ill__ .70 Adams ______$0. 61 J u n ea u ____ - $0.61 Divide ____ .46 Richland ___ .51 A sh la n d ____ .61 K enosha------.63 Dunn ______- .47 R o le tte ___ „ .47 P ennsylvania Kewaunee — .60 — $0.70 Barron ______.59 E d d y ------.50 Sargent __ __ . 51 All counties B a y field ____ .60 LaCrosse ----- .60 E m m o n s__ .49 S h er id a n _— .48 R hode Island Brown ______. 60 LaPayette —- .63 P o ster______. 50 Sioux _____— .49 All counties $0. 71 B u ffa lo ______.59 L a n g la d e----- .61 Golden Valley- .48 S l o p e ____ — .48 B u r n e tt____ .60 Lincoln ------.61 Grand Porks .50 S t a r k __ __ .48 South Carolina Calumet ___ .60 Manitowoc — .60 G r a n t______.48 Steele ____ .50 All counties __ $0.71 Chippewa__ _ .60 Marathon — - .61 .62 Griggs — .50 Stutsm an ___ .51 South Dakota Clark ______.60 Marinette —- H ettinger__ _ .48 T o w n e r __ .48 Columbia ___ .61 Marquette — .61 Kidder _____ .50 TraUl ...... 50 Armstrong _„ $0.52 Davison __ __ $0.53 C raw ford___ .62 Menominee — .61 La Moure__ _ .51 W a lsh ...... — .49 A u ro ra ___ .53 D a y ------.52 Dane ______.62 Milwaukee — .63 L o g a n ______- .50 Ward ______.47 . 53 DriirT .54 D o d g e ______.61 Monroe — - — . 61 M cH en ry__ _ .47 Wells ____ .49 B e n n e t t __ — .53 D ew ey ____ .51 D o o r ______.60 OcontO §j------*■ .61 M cIntosh__ _ .50 Williams___ .46 Bon Homme „ .55 D o u g la s__ — .54 D o u g la s____ .59 Oneida ------.62 M cK enzie__ - .47 Brookings ___ .54 Edmunds —— .51 Dunn ______.60 Outagamie -- .60 — .54 O zaukee------.62 B row n____ .51 Pall River_. Eau Claire— .60 .59 Ohio B ru le______.53 Paulk _____ — .51 .62 .53 . 54 .60 Pierce 1------.59 Adams ____ _ $0.68 Carroll — ___ $0.69 B u ffa lo ___ G r a n t____ Fon du Lac_ .59 Allen ______.64 Champaign — . 65 Butte ____ .51 Gregory __ — .53 62 Polk ______Haakon ___ .52 .62 Portage —— .61 A sh la n d ___ _ .65 C lark_____ • . 65 C am p bell_ — .50 Grant ______.61 A sh ta b u la _ .69 C lerm on t_— .66 Charles Mix„ .54 Hamlin ___ — .53 G reen ______.62 Price —------— .63 Athens ______.69 Clinton___ .66 C lark______.52 H a n d __ .__ __ .52 Green Lake__ .61 Racine — - — R ic h la n d ------.62 A u glaize___ - .64 Columbiana _ .69 C lay------__ .57 H a n so n ___ .53 ------.63 .62 R o c k ------Belm ont ___ .70 Coshocton ___ .67 Codington . .53 H a rd in g __ .50 .| 62 - .60 Brown ______.67 C raw ford_— .65 C o r so n ___ .50 Hughes _ — .52 .59 Butler ______.6 4 Cuyahoga ____ .67 Custer------.54 Hutchinson — .55 Jefferson — _ .62 Saint Croix---

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY ß, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 9341

Wisconsin—Continued Stat. 1072, secs. 105, 401, 63 Stat. 1051 as Rate R ate R a te { amended; 15 U.S.C. 714c, 7 U.S.C. 1421, 1441; per Terminal Market bushel per per §1421.2851 Purpose. County "bushel County bushel Housten, Tex_— —— ______$1.32 S a u k ______$0. 62 W alworth_____ $0. 62 This supplement contains additional Port Arthur, Tex„ — 1.32 Sawyer ___— .60 Washburn__ .59 Beaumont, Tex ______1.32 Shawano —— . 61 Washington _ .62 program provisions, which together with Long Beach, Calif_____ i ______1.35 Sheboygan __ .61 W au k esh a__ .63 the provisions of the General Regulations Los Angeles, Calif-__ — ______1.35 Taylor __ — _ .61 W au p aca____ .61 Governing Price Support for the 1964 and Oakland, Calif______.______1.35 Trempealeau., .60 Waushara — .61 Subsequent Crops (Revision 1) and any San Francisco, Calif_— ______l. 35 Vernon__ —- .61 Winnebago__ .60 amendments thereto or revisions thereof, Stockton, Calif-______1. 35 V ilas______^ . 62 Wood ______.61 Wilmington, Calif______— ____1.35 and the 1966 and Subsequent Crop Rye Astoria, Oreg_____ .___ ^ ____„„„_____l, 33 Wyoming Supplement and any amendments there­ Kalama, Wash______—_____ 1. 33 All counties— ______- — $0. 62 to, apply to loans and purchases for the Longview, Wash______—_____ *.*_— 1.33 1966 crop rye. Portland, Oreg______„ ____ 1 .______1. 33 (b) Premiums and discounts. Seattle, Wash______1. 33 Cents § 1421.2852 Availability. Tacoma, Wash______1. 33 per Vancouver, Wash-______l. 33 bushel A producer desiring a price support Albany, N.Y_____ ...______l, 46 Premiums: 3 loan must request a loan on his eligible Baltimore, Md______1. 46 Grade No. 2 or better. ______1 rye on or before March 31, 1967. To New York, N.Y______1.46 Test weight: obtain price support through a sale to Norfolk, Va______.____ - ______*_____1.46 Heavy —!______.______1 CCC, a producer must give the appropri­ Philadelphia, Pa______1.46 Extra heavy ______2 ate ASCS County Office notice of his in­ Discounts: . (b) County support rates. B a sic Grade No. 4 on the factor of test tent to sell his eligible rye to CCC on or county support rates are as follows: weight only but otherwise No. 3 before April 30, 1967. Alabama or better______.__ __ 3 All counties______$1.17 Grade No. 4 because of being “badly § 1421.2853 Maturity of loans. stained or materially weathered” 7 Arizona No. 4 on the factor of test Unless demand is made earlier, all All counties__ — —_____.______$1. 07 loans on rye will mature on April 30,1967. weight and because of being Arkansas J “badly stained” or “materially All counties__ __ $1.05 weathered”______:______10 § 1421.2854 Warehouse charges. Garlicky1 _.... ____ f._■’______:___ 3 The following table is for use in com­ California Weed control discount (where re­ C o lu s a ___ _ $1. 21 P lu m a s______quired by § 1421.74)1______10 puting deductions for storage charges for $ 1.12 Contra Costa. 1. 23 Riverside ___ 1.18 1 These discounts shall be in addition to rye delivered to UGSA warehouses prior G le n n ______1.20 San Joaquin_ 1.24 other applicable dicounts established by CCC to maturity in accordance with the pro­ K e r n ______1.19 S h a s t a __ ___ 1.10 to reflect the value of oats delivered to or visions of section 1421.2847 of the Lassen ______1.05 Sierra ______1.04 acquired by CCC. M a rin ______1.23 S isk iy o u ____ 1.10 3 Premiums shall not be applicable to regulations. Merced ______1.23 S o n o m a _—_ 1.21 Deduc­ M odoc______1.10 “badly stained or materially weathered oats.” tion S ta n isla u s__ 1.23 Mono .99 Y u b a ______1.21 Effective date. Upon publication in (cents the F ederal R egister. per Colorado M aturity Date April 30, 1967 bushel) Signed at Washington, D.C., on July 1, V) ------— — ------— B a c a ______$0.93 Prowers ____ $1.94 1966. Prior to May 16, 1966— -----.— ------13 Cheyenne __ .94 S ed gw ick ___ .94 May 16-June 12—------.— ------12 Kiowa _1___ .93 Y u m a ______.93 H. D. G odfrey, Kit Carson.— .94 All other Executive Vice President, June 13-July 10------— ------11 July 11-Aug. 7______—- ___ - —— 10 Las Animas_ .91 counties ___ .92 Commodity Credit Corporation. Aug. 8-Sept. 4___!______:------9 Phillips . .94 [F.R. Doc. 66-7411; Filed, June 7, 1966; Sept. 5—Oct. 2______— 8 Connecticut 8:45 a.m.] Oct. 3-Oct. 30______7 All counties__ $1. 16 Oct. 31-Nov. 27______—— ____ 6 Nov. 28-Dec. 25-______5.______. 5 Delaware All counties.__ .______.______:__.__$1.16 [CCC Grain Price Support Regs., 1966 Crop Dec. 26-Jan. 22, 1967— ______4 Rye SUpp.] Jan. 23-Feb. 19— ______— — — 3 F lorida Feb. 20—Mar. 19______,_ 2 All counties-______$1.22 PART 1421— GRAINS AND SIMILARLY Mar. 20-Apr. 30, 1967— — __ — 1 HANDLED COMMODITIES Georgia 1 Dates storage charges start, all dates in­ All counties______;______$1.22 Subpart—-1966 Crop Rye Loan and clusive. Idaho Purchase Program § 1421.2855 Support rates. Ada ______$1.06 Gem ______$1.06 The General Regulations Governing (a) Basic terminal rates. The follow­ Adams ______1.04 Gooding 1.03 Pnce Support for the 1964 and Subse­ ing rates are to be applied in accordance Bannock __ .98 Idaho 1.08 quent Crops (Revision 1) (31 F.R. 5941) with section 1421.2849: Bear Lake.__ .95 J efferso n ___ .94 and the 1966 and Subsequent Crops Rye Benewah —„ 1.11 J ero m e______1.03 Supplement (31 F.R. 6406), which con- R ate B in g h a m ____ .96 K o o ten a i____ 1.10 per Blaine 1.00 L a t a h ______1.11 jam regulations of a general nature with Terminal Market bushel Boise ______1.06 Lemhi .95 *° price support operations, are Omaha, Nebr____ .______$1.19 B o n n er______1.05 Lewis 1.09 iurther supplemented for the 1966-crop Sioux City, Iowa______1.19 B on n eville__ .95 Lincoln _____ 1.02 rye as follows: Duluth, Minn______1.23 B o u n d a r y __ 1.04 Madison _____ .94 Sec. - - Minneapolis, Minn______1.23 B utte ______.96 M inidoka___ 1.01 St. Paul, Minn______1.23 Camas ______1.00 1421.2861 Purpose. Nez Perce___ 1. 11 Superior, Wis______1.23 Canyon _____ 1.06 Oneida _ .98 ito!'2852 Availability. Atchison, Kans______1. 22 C a rib o u _____ .96 O w y h e e _____ 1.06 H9i odc3 Maturlty of loans. Kansas City, Mo______1.22 Cassia 1.00 Payette 1.06 1421 28SK Warehouse charges. St. Joseph, Mo—______.______1.22 Clark ______.93 Power 1 *41.2855 .99 Support rates. Chicago, 111_L-,______1. 32 Clearwater__ 1.09 Shoshone ____ 1.00 Milwaukee, Wis— ______1.32 Custer ______.96 T e t o n ______.92 The Provisions of this subpart Memphis, Tenn-____ i . ______s ___ 1.33 Elmore 1.05 Twin F a lls__ 1.01 15 tjo f, 4, 62 Stat. 1070 as amended; St. Louis, Mo______1.33 Franklin ____ .98 Valley o. 714b. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 62 1.05 Galveston, Tex_—___—______1. 32 F r e m o n t_ .93 Washington „ 1.06

No. 131------2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9342 RULES AND REGULATIONS

I llinois I ndiana—Continued K ansas—Continued B ate R ate B ate Bate B ate Bate per per per per per per bushel County bushel County Bushel County Bushel County bushel County bushel County Ness ______A d a m s___ __ $1.14 Lee ______$1.18 P ik e ______$1.11 Switzerland __ $1.00 Ford — ----- _ $0.99 $1.00 __ 1.12 L iv in g sto n _ 1.17 P orter______1.14 Tippecanoe - _ 1.10 Franklin — _ 1.04 N o r to n ____ . 1.00 Alexander - . 1.04 Osage _____ B o n d ______1.15 Logan ______X. 14 Posey ______1.10 T ip to n ____ - 1.09 G ea ry ------1.04 1.19 McDonough — 1.12 P u la sk i_____ 1.12 U n io n ______1.07 Gove ----- — _ .98 Osborne ___ 1.02 Boone ____ - 1.00 Ottawa ____ B row n______1.14 M cH en ry___ 1.19 P u tn a m ____ 1.07 Vanderburgh - 1.16 G rah am ___ - 1.03 __ 1.18 M cL ea n ____ 1.15 R andolph____ 1.08 Vermillion —_ 1.15 G r a n t______.96 Pawnee ___ . 1.01 Bureau ___ _ .98 Phillips ___ 1.01 C alh ou n __ — 1.13 Macon _j ------1.14 R ip ley ------1.04 Vigo ------_ 1.15 G r a y ------C a rro ll___ __ 1.17 Macoupin __ 1.15 R u s h ______1.07 Wabash — _ 1. 10 Greeley _ —_ .96 Pottawatomie- 1 .0 4 1.12 M adison____ 1. 16 Saint Joseph- 1.10 Warren _ _ __ 1. 13 Greenwood _- 1.04 Pratt ______- 1.01 Cass ______.96 Champaign „ 1.16 M a rio n ______1.14 S c o tt______1.02 Warrick — _ 1.16 H am ilton __ R a w lin s___ . .97 — 1.12 Marshall ------, 1. 17 S h e lb y ______1.05 Washington _ 1.02 H a rp er____ _ 1.02 R e n o ______- 1.02 C h ristian _ _ 1.03 R e p u b lic __ C lark_____ 1.12 Mason ______1.13 Spencer ------1.14 Wayne ------_ 1.07 H arvey------1.03 _ .97 R ic e ______- 1.02 C lay------1.12 M a ssa c ______1. 12 Starke ______1.11 W ells______1.07 H ask ell------1.18 Menard ____ 1.13 S te u b e n ------1.07 W h ite ------_ 1.13 H odgem an__ 1.00 R ile y ______. 1.04 C lin ton ___ _ 1.04 - 1.01 C o les______1.13 Mercer _____ 1.15 S u lliv a n ____ 1. 10 W h itle y ----- _ 1.09 Jackson ___ Rooks _____ 1.19 Monroe ______1.15 J efferso n __ _ 1.04 R u sh ______1.01 C o o k ___ __ Iowa _ 1.02 R u sse ll____ _ 1.01 C raw ford_„ 1.12 Montgomery— 1.14 J e w e ll------_ 1.13 Morgan------.1.14 Adair ______$1.01 J o h n so n ___ _ $1.07 J o h n so n ___ _ 1.04 S a lin e _____ - 1.03 Cumberland .96 Scott ______- .97 De Kalb___ 1. 19 M o u ltr ie ____ 1. 14 Adams ______1.01 Jones ------_ 1.08 Kearny — 1.14 Ogle — ------1.18 Allamakee — 1.04 Keokuk ------_ 1.05 K in g m a n __ _ 1.02 Sedgwick __ - 1.03 De W itt___ _ 1.01 S ew ard ____ I .96 D o u g la s__ __ 1.14 P eo ria ______1.16 A ppanoose__ 1.07 Kossuth _ 1.00 K iow a______P erry______1.12 Audubon ___ 1.01 Lee ------_ 1. 10 L abette____ _ 1.04 Shawnee __ _ 1.04 Du Page— __ 1.19 - .98 __ 1.12 Piatt ______1.14 1 06 Linn ______1. 07 L a n e ------_ .98 S h er id a n __ Edgar ____ Leavenworth _ 1.04 Sherman - __ .96 E dw ards__ __ 1.13 Pike ______1.14 Black Hawk— 1. 05 Louisa _____ 1.07 1.10 1. 01 L u c a s______1.04 L incoln____ _ 1.02 Smith _____ - 1.02 Effingham _„ 1.12 P o p e ______1.01 __ 1.12 P u la sk i_—_ 1. 12 1. 04 Lyon ____ .97 L in n ______- 1.04 S ta ffo rd ___ F a y ette ___ S ta n to n ___ - .95 F o r d ______1.17 P u tn a m ____ 1.16 Buchanan __ 1.05 Madison — . _ 1.02 L o g a n _____ .97 1.12 Buena Vista_ .98 Mahaska ___._ 1.05 L y o n ------_ 1.04 Steven s____ - .95 Franklin__ __ 1.12 R andolph__ _ - 1.03 R ic h la n d ___ 1.11 1. 04 Marion ____ 1.05 McPherson __ 1.02 Sumner ___ F u lt o n ___ 1.15 _ 1.03 T h o m a s___ _ .97 G a lla tin __ — 1.08 Rock Island_ 1.16 Calhoun _____ .99 Marshall__ _ ._ 1.04 Marion ___ 1. 00 Mills 1.01 M arshall___ _ 1.04 Trego ------_ 1.00 G re en e ___ — 1.15 Saint Clair— 1. 16 - 1.04 1.08 Cass ______1.00 Mitchell ___ 1.01 Meade ______.97 Wabaunsee _ Grundy __ „ 1.19 S a lin e ______W a lla c e ___ _ .96 S an gam on __ 1.13 1.08 M on on a____ 1.01 M iam i_____ 1.04 Hamilton __„ 1.12 _ 1.02 W ashington _ 1.04 H ancock__ __ 1.12 S c h u y le r ___ 1. 14 Cerro Gordo_ 1.00 M onroe____ ._ 1.06 M itch ell__ _ C herokee------.98 Montgomery _ 1.01 Montgomery _ 1.04 W ic h ita ------.96 H a r d in ___ 1.07 S c o tt______- 1. 14 - 1.04 1.12 C hickasaw __ 1.04 Muscatine — 1.10 Morris —------1.04 W ils o n ____ Henderson _„ 1.15 Shelby ______W ood son __ - 1.04 S tark ______1.16 1. 03 fVRriftr» .98 M orton------._ . 94 H e n r y ______1.16 _ 1.04 Wyandotte - - 1.04 Iro q u o is__ — 1.18 Stephenson — 1.18 .99 .98 N em a h a ___ Jackson — — 1.12 Tazewell ___ 1. 14 1.06 1.01 N e o sh o _- ___ 1.04 Jasp er______1.13 Union __ - __ 1.12 Clinton — _ 1.09 Palo Alto__ .99 K entucky Jefferson __ 1.20 V e rm ilio n __ 1.16 Crawford___ 1.01 Plymouth _ . 99 All counties------$!• 16 J e rsey ______1.15 W a b a sh _____ 1.14 D a lla s______1.02 Pocahontas _ .98 W arren___ __ 1.15 Davis ------1.07 Polk ______1.03 Louisiana Jo Daviess_ __ 1.15 All counties____ .______.___ $1.07 J o h n so n __ 1.07 Washington _ 1.13 Decatur _____ 1.03 Potta- 1. 06 K a n e ______1.19 Wayne __— - 1.15 D elaw are------wattamie 1.01 Maine Kankakee — 1.19 W h ite ______1.09 Des Moines__ 1.09 Poweshiek „ 1.04 All counties—------16 1.19 Whiteside — 1.18 Dickinson — .99 Ringgold — — 1.02 Kendall —- Maryland K n o x ___ _ 1.15 W ill_____ — 1.19 D u b u q u e____ X. 07 S a c ------.99 L a k e ___ . . . 1.19 Williamson — T. 12 1.01 1.10 All counties___ .— ------— ------$!• 16 . . . 1.18 Winnebago __ 1.19 1.05 RhAlhy 1. 01 La Salle. 1.00 Massachusetts Lawrence 1.11 Woodford _— 1.16 .98 F ra n k lin ------1.03 Story ------1.02 All counties__ ------— ------$!• 16 Indiana 1.01 Fremont _— T a m a _____ — 1.05 Michigan flreetie 1.00 1.02 Adams — . . . $1.07 H en d rick s__ $1.07 1.04 1.04 Isabella ----- $1.03 1.07 H en ry ______1.08 A lc o n a __ — $0.97 A lle n ___ G u th r ie ------1.00 Van Buren._ — 1.07 A lger______.99 J a c k so n ------1.10 Bartholomew- 1.05 Howard______1.10 Hamilton .— 1.02 — 1.06 1.09 1.08 W ap ello___ A llegan______1.06 Kalamazoo — B e n to n ___ __ 1.13 Huntington — Hancock ------1.00 Warren ----- — 1.03 K alk ask a----- .96 J a c k s o n _____ 1. 04 Alpena ______.97 Blackford _ __ 1.09 H ard in ______1.03 Washington — 1.06 .98 K e n t _------1.05 1.07 Jasper ______1.14 Arenac —____ B o o n e ___ Harrison ____ 1.01 W a y n e ------1. 05 B a r r y __ _— 1.06 L a k e ______1.03 B row n ___ — 1.04 Jay ------— 1. 08 H en ry...... 1. 07 1. 00 Lapeer ------1.07 Jefferson ___ 1.02 Bay ------1.03 Carroll — — 1.10 Howard _____ 1.04 Winnebago _— 1.01 1.04 L eela n a u ----- .96 Jennings — 1.03 B e n z ie ___ __ Cass ____ — 1.10 H u m b o ld t__ .99 Winneshiek-__ 1.04 1.10 Lenawee ----- 1. 11 . . . 1.02 J o h n so n ____ 1.05 B errien______C lark____ Ida ______.99 Woodbury ._— 1.00 B ra n ch ______1. 07 Livingston — 1.07 C lay------1.10 Knox ______1.08 I o w a ______1. 05 Worth ____ _ 1.01 1* 10 1.09 C a lh o u n ------1.10 M acom b------C lin ton __ — 1.09 Kosciusko — " Jack son __ __ 1.11 Wright _ —__ 1.00 M a n iste e ----- 1. 03 . . . 1.14 Lagrange ___ 1.08 Oass __ .____ 1.10 Crawford _ Jasper ______1.03 1.04 Marquette — .99 ___ 1.05 Lake ______1.17 C lare______D a v iess__ Jefferson ____ 1.06 Clinton ____ 1. 05 Mason ------1.03 Dearborn _— 1.05 La Porte____ 1.12 1.03 1.08 C raw ford___ .98 M eco sta ------Decatur _ 1.05 Law rence------Kansas Menominee — 1. 03 1.08 Madison _ — 1.08 D e l t a _' __ _ 1.00 De K a lb ... D ic k in so n __ 1.02 M id lan d ------1.04 Delaware . . 1.07 M arion ------1.07 Allen ------$1.04 C lo u d ____ — $1.08 1.00 — 1.04 E a to n ______1.06 Missaukee —- D u b o is __ 1.15 M arshall____ 1.10 A n d erso n ----- 1.04 Coffey ___ l. n A tc h iso n ------1.04 Comanche — .99 G en esee ____ 1.07 M onroe------E lkhart__ — 1.10 M a r tin _____ 1.07 Montcalm —- 1.03 1.07 Miami _____ 1.10 1. 01 1. 03 G lad w in____ 1.03 Fayette — G o g eb ic____ .99 Montmorency- .96 F lo y d ___ — 1.02 M onroe_____ 1.11 Barton — — 1.01 Crawford — — 1.04 1.03 Bourbon ------1.04 Decatur ___ .99 Grand Tra- Muskegon — Fountain ____ 1.08 Montgomery _ 1.09 Newaygo ----- 1.02 M organ_____ 1.05 Brown ______1.04 Dickinson _— 1.03 verse ______.96 Franklin _— 1.08 1.05 Oakland — — 1.08 Fulton — 1.11 N ew ton------1.15 Butler ______1.03 Doniphan —__ 1.04 G ra tio t______1.03 H ills d a le __ 1.07 O ceana------G ib so n __ 1.10 N o b le ______1.08 C h a se------1.04 D o u g la s----- — 1.04 1.01 Chautauqua . 1.04 Edwards __ — 1.01 H uron __ ___ 1.07 Ogemaw ----- G r a n t___ 1.09 O h io ------1.02 Ontonagon — .98 1.12 C herokee------1.04 Elk — — — 1.04 I n g h a m ------1.07 G re en e __ — 1.05 O ran ge------Osceola ------1.03 ___ Owen ------1.05 Cheyenne .— .96 Ellis ______1. 0Î Io n ia ------1.05 Hamilton _ 1.07 .98 Oscoda —- — 1.01 1.07 Parke ______1.08 Clark —------.97 Ellsworth —— 1.02 Iosco ______1.06 H ancock_ .99 O tta w a ------Harrison - — 1.02 Perry______1. 14 C la y ------.— 1.04 F in n e y ____ .91 Iron ______

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 9343

Michigan—-Continued Missouri—Continued —Continued R ate Rate Rate Rate R ate Rate per per per per per per County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel Roscommon _ $1.01 Van Buren__ $1.08 L afayette___ $1.06 P u tn a m ____ $1.02 G reeley____ _ $1.01 P aw nee___ — $1.04 Saginaw------1.05 W ashtenaw _ 1.09 L aw rence___ 1.07 R a lls ______1.11 Hall _ 1.01 Perkins .95 Saint Clair— 1.09 Wayne ______1.09 Lew is______1.11 R andolph___ 1.10 H a m ilto n __ _ 1.01 Phelps ____— 1.01 Saint Joseph- 1.09 W exford____ 1.01 L in c o ln ___ _ 1.15 R a y ------1. 05 Harlan __ _ 1.01 Pierce __ 1.01 Sanilac_____ 1.07 A l l o t h e r Linn ______1.08 Reynolds ____ 1.14 Hayes .95 Platte __ __ 1.01 Shiawassee — 1.07 c o u n ties__ .95 L ivin gston__ 1.04 R ip ley ______1.14 H itc h c o ck _ .96 Polk _ __ 1.01 Tuscola ----- 1.07 M cD on ald __ 1.04 Saint Charles- 1.19 H o lt______1.01 Red Willow- .98 Macon ______1. 09 Minnesota Saint Clair _ 1.09 Hooker .95 Richardson „ 1.04 Madison ___ 1.17 Saint Fran- H oward____ _ 1.01 R o c k _____ .98 Aitkin___ __ $1.12 Martin ___ !_ $1.09 M aries______1.12 c o i s ______1.19 J efferso n __ _ 1.04 Saline — 1.04 Anoka ______1.10 M eeker______1.10 Marion 1.11 Saint Gene- J o h n so n ___ _ 1.04 Sarpy ------„ 1.04 Becker_—_ 1.05 Mille Lacs___ 1.10 Mercer ...... 1.04 v ie v e _____ 1.19 Kearney _ 1.01 S a u n d ers___ 1.04 Beltrami____ 1.07 Morrison ___ 1.10 Miller . _ . 1. 08 Saint Louis__ 1.20 K e i t h ______.95 Scotts Bluff. .90 Benton ______1.10 Mower ______1.10 Mississippi__ 1.13 S a lin e ______1.08 Key a Paha__ - .98 Seward 1.04 Big Stone___ 1.07 M urray______1. 06 M oniteau___ 1.09 Schuyler__ __ 1.08 Kimball .92 S h e r id a n _ .92 Blue Earth__ 1.10 Nicollet _____ 1.10 Monroe 1. 10 S c o tla n d ___ 1.09 Knox ______1.01 Sherman _ — 1.01 Brown______1.10 Nobles ______1.03 Montgomery _ 1. 13 Scott ______1.15 L a n c a ste r _ 1.04 S i o u x ____ .90 Carlton _____ 1.12 N o rm a n ____ 1. 03 Morgan 1.08 Shannon ___ 1.06 Lincoln .97 Stanton „ 1.01 Carver__ 1.10 O lm sted ___ _ 1.10 New Madrid_ 1.14 Shelby ______1.10 Logan _ .98 Thayer — 1.04 C a ss______1.09 Otter Tail__ 1.07 Newton 1.06 S to d d a rd ___ 1. 15 L o u p ______1.00 Thomas .97 Chippewa__ 1.09 Pennington _ 1.03 N od a w a y ___ 1.02 Stone __1___ 1.06 McPherson _ .97 Thurston ___ 1.01 Chisago___ - 1.10 Pine ______1.11 O regon _____ 1.06 S u lliv a n ____ 1.03 M adison___ 1.01 Valley __ 1.01 Clay ------1.04 P ip e s to n e __ 1.04 Osage ______1.11 T a n e y ______1.06 Merrick - 1.01 Washington — 1.02 Clearwater__ 1.06 Polk ______1.03 O za rk ______1.07 Texas ______1.06 M o rrill____ .91 Wayne __ 1 .01 Cottonwood _ 1.08 P o p e ______1.09 P e m isc o t___ 1.13 Vernon 1.06 Nance _ 1.01 Webster — 1.02 Crow Wing__ 1.10 R a m s e y _____ 1.10 P erry______1.18 W arren______1.16 Nemaha - _ 1.04 Wheeler __ 1.01 Dakota 1.10 Red Lake ___ 1. 04 Pettis 1.07 Washington _ 1.19 Nuckolls _ 1.03 Y o r k ______— 1.02 Dodge ______1.10 R ed w ood ___ 1.09 P h elp s______1. 17 Wayne 1.15 Otoe ______- 1.04 Douglas 1.09 R en v ille_____ 1. 10 Pike ______1.12 W eb ster____ 1.11 Faribault___ 1.09 Rice ______1.10 Platte ______1.04 W orth ______1.02 Nevada Fillmore____ 1.07 R o c k ______1. 02 Polk ______1.09 W rig h t______1.08 All counties______;______$o. 97 Freeborn___ 1.10 Roseau ______1.00 P u la sk i______1.15 New Hampshire Goodhue ___ 1.10 Saint Louis__ 1.06 Montana All counties. $1.16 Grant 1.08 S c o tt______1.10 Hennepin___ 1.10 Sh erburne__ 1.10 Beaverhead n $0.93 M adison__ __ $0.99 New J ersey Houston . 1.06 S ib le y ______1.10 Big Horn____ .81 M eagher_____ .94 All counties. Hubbard 1.07 S tearn s_____ 1.10 Blaine ■ _x. .82 Mineral 1.00 Isanti New Mexico 1. 10 S t e e le ______1.10 B roadw ater_ .97 Missoula 1.00 All counties. $0 92 Itasca ___ 1.12 Stevens ______1.08 Carbon .91 Musselshell_ .89 Jackson 1.08 Swift ______1.10 C arter______.86 P a r k ______.97 New York Kanabec __ 1.10 T o d d ______1.09 Cascade .91 P etro leu m __ .85 All counties. Kandiyohi__ 1.10 Traverse ____ 1.06 C h o u te a u __ .88 Phillips .78 Kittson North Carolina .99 W a b a sh a ___ 1.10 Custer .82 Pondera .90 All counties- Koochiching _ 1.05 Wadena 1. 08 Daniels .77 Powder River _ .80 Lac Qui Parle- 1.07 W aseca______1.10 Dawson .83 Powell .99 North Dakota Lake of the Washington _ 1.10 Deer Lodge__ .99 Prairie .83 Adams ______W oods___ Fallon $0.91 M cLean_____ $0. 90 1.03 W atonw an__ 1. 10 .85 Ravalli .98 Barnes .99 Le Sueur . _ 1.10 W ilk in ______Fergus______Mercer .90 1.06 .88 R ic h la n d ___ .82 Benson .92 Morton ...... Lincoln 1.05 Winona 1.10 Flathead .92 .98 R oosevelt__ _ .80 B illin g s_____ .90 M o u n tra il__ Lyon______1. 07 Wright 1.10 Gallatin .99 Rosebud .85 .86 McLeod _ Garfield B ottin eau ___ .87 Nelson .97 1.10 Yellow Medi- .80 Sanders 1.00 Bowman .90 Oliver Mahnomen_ 1.04 G la cier______.91 c in e ______1.08 .90 S h er id a n ___ .79 B u r k e ______.86 Pembina Marshall ___ 1.02 Golden Valley- .91 Silver Bow___ .98 .99 B u rleigh___ .93 Pierce .90 Granite .98 Stillw ater___ .91 C a ss______Mississippi Hill 1.01 R am sey...... 94 All counties______ig .85 Sweet Grass_ .94 C avalier____ .93 Ransom _ _ Jefferson .97 Teton 1. 01 .90 Dickey 1.00 Renville .86 Missouri Judith Basin - .88 Toole .89 D iv id e ______.85 Adair ____ Lake .98 R ic h la n d ___ 1.04 $1.08 C oop er______$l. 09 Treasure ____ .86 D u n n ______.89 HQ A ndrew __ Lewis and Valley 1.04 C raw ford____ 1.18 .76 Eddy .95 Sargent _ . 1. 03 Atchison__ 1.01 D a d e ______l. 08 Clark______.90 W heatland__ .91 Emmons _ .93 Liberty S h er id a n __ .91 Audrain ___ 1.11 Dallas _____ 1.11 .86 W ibaux______.86 Foster ... .96 Sioux Barry ____ Lincoln .98 .93 1.08 D aviess__ ___1. 06 Yellowstone_ .91 Golden Valley. .86 Slope .90 B arton___ 1.06 De Kalb______1.04 McCone .81 Grand Forks_ Bates ____ 1.00 Stark .90 1.07 D e n t ______1.16 Grant .91 Steele Benton___ Nebraska .99 1.06 D o u g la s____ 1.08 G riggs------.98 S tu tsm a n ___ .97 Bollinger 1.16 D u n k lin ____ 1.13 Adams H ettin ger__ _ Boone__ I] $1.02 C u m in g ____ $1.02 .90 Towner .91 1.11 Franklin___ _ 1.15 Antelope _ 1. 01 Custer .99 Kidder .94 Traill _ 1.00 Buchanan . 1.04 G asconade__ 1.13 Arthur Butler____ .95 Dakota 1.01 La Moure____ .98 W a lsh ______.99 1.14 G e n tr y _____ 1.03 Banner .90 D a w es______.90 Logan .96 Ward ______.87 Caldwell _I 1.04 G re en e ___ __1.10 Blaine M cH en ry___ Callaway .98 Dawson _ 1.00 .89 Wells .94 1.11 G rundy______1.02 Boone 1.01 Deuel ______.94 M cIn tosh ___ .96 Williams .85 Camden __ 1.14 H arrison_____ 1.03 Box B utte___ Cape Girar­ .93 D ix o n ______1.01 M cK enzie__ _ .83 H en ry ______1.08 B o y d ______1.02 Dodge 1.02 deau _____ Ohio 1.16 Hickory______1. 09 Brown .97 Douglas 1.03 Carroll 1.07 Holt ______1.02 Carter__ Buffalo 1.01 Dundy .94 A dam s______$1.09 C h am paign_ $1. 09 1.06 Howard______1.10 Burt 1.02 Fillmore Cass_____ ~ 1.04 Allen ----- 1.10 Clark ______1. 0« 1.07 H owell______1.06 Butler 1.03 Franklin 1.01 Ashland ___ 1.12 Cedar 1.07 Ir o n ______1. 18 C lerm on t___ 1.09 Cass 1.04 Frontier .98 Ashtabula __ 1.14 Clinton 1.09 Chariton__ 1.08 Jackson _____ 1. 04 Cedar Christian 1.01 Furnas 1.00 Athens ___ 1.11 Columbiana _ 1. 13 1.07 Jasp er______1.06 C h a se ______.94 G a g e ______1.04 Auglaize —___ 1.09 Clark___ 1.10 Coshocton 1. 12 Clay Jefferson ___ 1.21 Cherry .95 Garden .93 Belmont ----- 1.12 C raw ford___ 1.11 1.04 Jo h n so n Clinton______1. 05 C heyenne__ _ .92 Garfield 1.01 Brown ___ 1.09 Cuyahoga __ 1.12 1.04 K n ox______1. 09 C lay------1.03 Gosper 1.00 Butler ___ 1.09 Cole__ 1.10 D a r k e ______1.09 Laclede______1.13 Colfax 1.02 Grant .93 Carroll ___ 1. 12 Defiance ____ 1.09

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9344 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Oh io —Continued Oregon—-Continued T exas—Continued Bate Bate Bate Bate Bate Bate per per per per per per County bushel County bushel County bushel County bushel County btishel County bushel D elaw are___ $1.11 M ia m i______$1.09 J a c k so n ___ _ $1.08 Multnomah _ $1.21 Jack ______$1.05 Palo Pinto $1.06 Erie ______1.11 Monroe ------1.12 J efferso n __ - 1.19 P o l k ______1.20 J o h n so n ___ _ 1.10 Parker 1.08 Fairfield __ 1.11 Montgomery _ 1.09 J o se p h in e _ _ 1.08 S h er m a n _ __ 1.21 Jones _ ___ 1.02 Parmer_____ 1.01 Fayette ____ 1.09 Morgan ____ j 1.12 K la m a th __ _ 1.10 Tillamook ___ 1.22 K a rn es__ - __ 1 .14 Potter _____ 1.01 F r a n k lin ___ 1.11 Morrow _____ 1.11 L a k e ______. 1.09 Umatilla _ __ 1.17 K in g ------1.01 Randall____ 1.01 F u lt o n ______1.09 Muskingum _ 1.12 L a n e ______1.14 U n io n ______1.12 Knox ____- 1.01 Reeves ____ .91 G a llia ______1.09 N o b le ______1. 12 L in c o ln ___ _ 1.08 W allow a__ __ 1.09 Lamb ______1.01 Roberts __ 1.00 Geauga _ __ 1.14 O tta w a ______1.11 Linn — __ _ 1.18 W asco____ 1.22 L a m p a sa s__ 1.11 R u n n e ls .__ 1.04 G reen e______1.09 P a u ld in g _£- 1.09 M a lh e u r __ _ 1.06 W ashington _ 1.21 Limestone .__ 1.15 San Saba___ 1.07 G uernsey___ 1.12 Perry ____ _ 1.11 M arion ____ _ 1.20 Wheeler__ __ 1.17 L ipscom b__ _ 1.00 Scurry__ _ _ 1.01 H a m ilto n __ 1.09 Pickaway ____ 1.10 M orrow ___ _ 1.18 Yamhill__ 1.21 Lubbock ___ 1.01 Sherman___ 1.00 L y n n ____ _ 1. 01 S m ith _____ 1.12 Hancock ____ 1.11 Pike ______1.09 P ennsylvania M cCulloch__ 1. 06 Stonewall__ « 1.01 H a rd in _____ 1.11 Portage _____ 1.12 All counties — $1.16 Harrison ___ 1. 12 Preble ____ 1.09 M cLennan__ 1.14 Swisher___ 1.01 H en ry ______1.09 P u tn a m ____ 1.10 R hode Island Mason ______1.07 Tarrant ___ 1.10 H ig h la n d ___ 1.09 R ic h la n d ___ 1.12 All counties $1.16 M itch ell____ 1.01 Taylor _____ 1.03 Hocking _ _ _ 1. 11 R o s s ------1. 10 M o n ta g u e__ 1.05 T erry______1.01 South Carolina M oore______1. 00 W h eeler___ 1.01 Holmes __ — 1.12 Sandusky __ 1.11 All counties __ $1.22 1.11 S c io to ______1.09 M o tle y ______1.01 W ichita . . . . 1.03 J a c k so n ____ 1.09 Seneca _ ___ 1. 11 South Dakota N ew ton_— 1.16 W ilbarger__— 1.01 J efferso n ___ 1.13 Shelby _1___ 1.09 Nolan ______1.01 Wise ______1.07 A u rora______$0.98 Jackson ____ $0.94 O ch iltree___ 1. 00 Y oak u m ___ 1.01 Knox ______1. 11 Stark ______1.12 .99 Sum m it - __ 1. 12 Beadle ______1.01 Jerauld _____ O ld h a m _____ 1.01 Young ____ 1.05 Lake ______1.13 Jones ______.97 1.09 T r u m b u ll__ 1.14 B e n n e tt___ _ .93 Law rence___ Bon Homme - .99 Kingsbury__ 1.02 Utah Licking ____ 1.11 T uscaraw as_ 1.12 1.01 All counties_ $0.92 Logan — — 1. 10 Union :______1.11 Brookings __ 1.02 Lake —______B r o w n ___ __ 1.01 Lawrence ____ .89 Vermont Lorain ____ 1.12 Van Wert ____ 1.09 1. 00 V in to n ______1. 11 Brule ______.98 L in c o ln _____ All counties__ $1.16 L u c a s _ __ 1.10 Buffalo _____ .98 L y m a n ______.98 Madison ____ 1.10 Warren ____ 1.09 Virginia Washington _ B u t t e ______.88 McCook _____ .99 M a h o n in g __ 1.14 1. 12 McPherson __ .98 All counties__ $L 16 1.11 Wayne ______1.12 C am pbell___ .95 M arion ______Charles Mix _ M a rsh a ll____ 1.03 M ed in a______1. 12 W illia m s__ _ 1.09 .98 Washington 1. 11 C la r k __ __ 1. 03 Meade ______.90 Meigs ______1.09 Wood ______M ellette Adams _____ $1.15 Lewis — - $1.14 M ercer______1.09 Wyandot 1.11 Clay — ------1.00 ____ .98 C od in gton__ 1.04 M in er ______1.00 Asotin _4—___ « 1.11 L incoln----- 1.14 Oklahoma C o rso n ____ _ .93 Minnehaha _ 1. 01 B e n to n ______1.18 M ason____ 1.13 C u s te r _____ .90 Moody ______1.03 C h e la n _____ 1.16 Okanogan _ — 1.14 Adair ______$1.01 Le F lo r e ____ $0.97 D a v iso n ____ .99 Pennington _ .92 Clallam _____ 1.06 Pacific ___ 1.13 A lfa lfa _____ 1.00 L in c o ln ____ 1.01 D a y ------1.03 Perkins _____ .91 Clark ______1.21 Pend Oreille 1.00 Atoka ______1.01 L o g a n ______1.01 Deuel ______1.01 P o tter ______; 99 C olum bia___ 1.15 Pierce ____ 1.19 Beaver ------1. 00 Love _ ____ 1.02 Dewey ___ __ .93 R o b e r ts___ _ 1.05 C o w litz __ ;_ 1.18 San Juan_— 1.15 B eck h a m ------1.01 M cC lain____ 1.01 Douglas ; __ .98 S an born____ .99 D o u g la s____ 1.15 S k a g it ___ 1.15 Blaine ______1.01 McCurtain _ .97 E dm unds____ .99 Shannon .___ .92 F erry______.95 Skamania __ 1.21 B r y a n ______1.00 M cIntosh__ _ 1.01 Fall R iv e r __ .88 Spink ______1.01 Franklin____ 1.17 Snohomish — 1.17 Caddo ______1.01 Major _____ 1.00 F a u lk ______1. 00 Stanley ____ .98 G arfield _____ 1.14 Spokane __ L 11 C anadian___ 1.01 Marshall ____ 1.01 G r a n t______1.06 Sully ______.99 G r a n t______1.16 S t e v e n s __ 1.08 Carter — — 1.01 M ayes______1. 04 G regory_____ .99 T o d d ______.98 Grays Harbor. 1.13 T h u rsto n __ 1.14 C herokee__ _ 1.02 Murray ____ 1.01 Tripp ______.99 Is la n d ______1.17 Wahkiakum • 1.18 Haakon _____ .95 1.17 Choctaw -— .97 M u sk o g ee__ 1.01 Hamlin _____ 1.04 T u rn er______.98 J efferso n ___ 1.07 Walla Walla _ Cim arron__ _ 1.00 Noble ______1.00 H a n d ______.99 U n io n ______1. 00 K in g ------1.20 Whatcom —_ 1.15 C lev ela n d __ 1.01 Nowata ----- 1.04 W a lw o rth ___ .97 K itsap ______1.11 W h itm an _ 1.12 Hanson _____ .99 1.20 Coal ______1.01 Okfuskee___ 1.01 H ard in g____ .90 Washabaugh _ .94 K ittita s _____ 1.21 Y a k im a __ C om an ch e_- 1.01 O klahom a__ 1.01 Hughes ____ .98 Y an kton____ . .98 K lic k ita t__ _ 1.21 C o tto n ___ __ 1.01 O k m u lgee___ 1.01 Hutchinson _ . 98 Z ie b a c h ____ .92 West Virginia Craig ______1.04 Osage ------1.02 H y d e______.99 $1.16 1. 01 Ottawa 1. 04 Custer ______1.00 Pawnee ____ 1.01 Tennessee Wisconsin D elaw are____ 1.04 P a y n e ______1.01 All counties $1.17 1.00 P ittsb u rg ___ 1.01 J efferso n _ $1.17 D ew ey ______Texas Adams _____ $1.13 E l l i s ------1.00 P o n to to c ___ 1.01 A sh la n d ____ 1.09 J u n ea u ___ 1.12 G arfield _____ 1.01 Pottawa- Archer _____ $1.02 Denton ____ , $1.07 Barron ______1.06 K enosha__ 1.1.9 G a r v in ______1.01 t o m ie _____ 1.01 A rm stro n g _ 1.01 D ic k e n s____ 1.01 B a y field ------1.03 Kewaunee -— 1.10 Grady ______1.01 Pushmataha _ .97 Bailey ______1.01 D o n le y ______1.01 Brown ------1.12 La Crosse—-- 1.08 G r a n t___ — 1.00 Roger M ills_ .97 1.01 Eastland ____ 1. 06 B u ffa lo ______1.03 Lafayette -— 1.14 Baylor ______1.08 G r e e r ------1.01 Rogers ------1.04 B o sq u e_____ 1.11 Fannin ..____ 1.06 B u r n e tt____ 1.11 Langlade —— H a rm on ------1.01 S e m in o le ___ 1.01 F ish er______1.01 Calumet ___ 1.14 L incoln----- 1. 07 B o w ie ______1.06 1. 14 Harper______.99 S e q u o y a h __ 1. 00 B riscoe______1.01 Floyd ______1.01 C h ip p ew a __ 1.06 Manitowoc - — Haskell ------.98 S te p h en s___ 1.01 Clark ------1.07 Marathon _-- B row n______1.07 Foard ______1. 01 1.09 Hughes _____ 1.01 Texas ______1.00 C a lla h a n ___ 1. 04 Gaines ______1.01 C o lu m b ia __ 1.15 Marinette - — J a c k so n ____ 1.01 Tillman _____ 1.01 1. 09 C raw ford___ 1.07 Marquette _— 1.13 C a rso n ______1.01 Gillespie ____ 1.10 Jefferson ____ 1.01 Tulsa ______1.03 Cass ____ — 1.07 G r a y ------1.01 Dane ------1.16 Menominee — Johnston ____ 1.01 W a g o n er___ 1.03 1. 06 Dodge ------1.16 Milwaukee _— 1.19 C a s tr o ___ — 1.01 G rayson____ 1. iu Kay ------— 1.01 Washington _ 1. 04 1.01 Hale ______1.01 1 07 C h ild ress___ m i K in g fish e r _ 1.01 W a sh ita ____ 1.01 C la y ------1. 04 H a ll______1.01 D o u g la s_____ 1.09 Oconto —:— Kiowa ______1.01 Woods ____ - .99 C ochran____ 1.01 H am ilton ___ 1. 09 Dunn ______1.07 O n eid a ----- L a tim er ___ - .97 W oodward__ 1. 00 Eau Claire___ 1.07 Outagamie -- 1. lo Collin i _____ 1.09 H an sford ___ 1.00 1. li H ardem an__ 1.01 Florence — 1.02 Ozaukee — — Oregon Collings- worth ___ 1.01 Hartley ___ ^ 1.00 Fond du Lac. 1. 15 P e p in ------Pierce — B a k e r __ *___ $1.10 C u rry ______$1.07 C om anche__ 1.07 Haskell ____ 1.01 Forest ______1. 07 Deschutes — 1.17 C oncho_____ 1. 05 H em p h ill___ 1.00 111 Polk _____ B e n to n _____ 1.18 Portage — 1.10 C la ck a m a s_ 1.19 D o u g la s____ 1.08 C oryell_'___ 1.12 H id a lg o ____ 1.05 Green ------1.16 Green Lake— 1.14 P rice------Clatsop —; __ 1.14 Gilliam ____ 1.19 C o ttle ______1.01 H o ck ley _____ 1.01 D a lla m _____ 1. 00 H o o d ______1.07 I o w a ------1.14 R a c in e ----- C o lu m b ia _- 1.16 Grant ______1.17 Richland — 1.13 H arn ey____ _ 1.02 Dawson —_— 1.01 H o w a rd __ — 1.01 Ir o n ______1. 04 — Coos ------1.05 Rock ------Crook ______1.17 Hood River — 1.22 Deaf Smith __ 1.01 Hunt ______1.07 J a c k so n ____ 1.08

FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL. 3 t, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 9345 Wisconsin—Continued ship; Conrad A. Charles, Doing Busi­ B ate R ate Title 16-COMMERCIAL ness Under the Firm Name and Style per per of Con’s Auto Parts, a Sole Proprietor­ County bushel County bushel PRACTICES ship; Hercules Specialty Co., a Cor­ R usk------_ $1.08 Vilas _____ — $1.06 poration; Charles Douglas Miller, St. Croix___ _ 1.07 W alworth_„ 1.18 Chapter I— Federal Trade Commission Sauk------_ 1.14 Washburn _— 1.04 Doing Business Under the Firm Name Sawyer------_ 1.05 Washington _ 1.17 [Docket No. C-1070] and Style of Miller-Pybus Auto Parts, a Sole Proprietorship; Richard Lager- Shawano----- _ 1.10 Waukesha - __ 1.18 PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE Sheboygan —- 1.16 Waupaca_— 1.12 quist and Milton Lagerquist, Copart­ Taylor------_ 1.06 Waushara _— 1.12 PRACTICES ners Doing Business Under the Firm _ 1.07 Winnebago — 1.14 Trempealeau Evergreen Warehouse Distributors, Name and Style of Motor Specialty Vernon------_ 1.09 Wood ____ — 1.09 Co.; Robert D. Williams and Fred W. Inc., et al. W yoming Robb, Copartners Doing Business Un­ All counties.. — $0.92 Subpart—Discriminating in price un­ der the Firm Name and Style of der sec. 2, Clayton Act—Knowingly in­ Mountain Auto Parts; Frank H. Van (a) Discounts. The basic support ducing or receiving discriminating price Valkenburg and J. Robert Van Valken- rate shall be adjusted by discounts as under 2(f) : § 13.855 Inducing and re­ burg, Copartners Doing Business Un­ follows: Rye containing more than ceiving discriminations. der the Firm Name and Style of Piston three-tenths of 1 percent but not more Service Co.; Roland L. Huggins and (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Inter­ Raymond E. Huggins, Copartners than 1 percent ergot (ergoty rye con­ prets or applies sec. 2, 49 Stat. 1526; 15 U.S.C. Doing Business Under the Firm Name taining in excess of 1 percent is not eli­ 13) [Cease and desist order, Evergreen Ware­ house Distributors, Inc., et al., Seattle, Wash., and Style of Sedro Woolley Auto Parts; gible for warehouse-storage loans): Docket C-1070, June 1, 1966] C. A. Solberg Co., a Corporation; Glen Ergot content (percent): M. Shearer and Allan Pedee, Copart­ Discount In the Matter of Evergreen Warehouse ners Doing Business Under the Firm (cents per Distributors, Inc., a Corporation; Air­ Name and Style of Valley Auto Parts; bushel) port Machinery Co., Inc., a Corpora­ 0.31-040...... 1 Fred L. Pease, Individually and as Con­ 0.41-0.50...... 2 tion; Automotive Products, Inc., a trolling Member of a Partnership 0.51-0.60______6 Corporation, Doing Business Under Doing Business Under the Firm Name 0.61-0.70-...... 4 the Firm Name and Style of Allen Auto and Style of Pease Bros.; Ernest V. 0.71-0.80—...... 5 Electric; Burien Auto Parts, Inc., a Pitzer, Doing Business Under the Firm 0.81-0.90...... 6 Corporation; Burns Auto Parts, Inc., Name and Style of Yakima Grinding 0.91-1.00______7 a Corporation; Car Parts, Inc., a Cor­ Co., a Sole Proprietorship; John R. Rye grading No. 4 on the factor of test poration; Materiel, Inc., a Corporation, Selland, Doing Business Under the weight only: __ Doing Business Under the Firm Name Firm Name and Style of Selland Motor Discount and Style of Ephrata Auto Parts; Parts, a Sole Proprietorship; Ellsworth (cents per Gardner Supply Co., a Corporation; O. Sawyer, Doing Business Under the bushel) Gosney Motor Parts, a Corporation; Firm Name and Style of Sawyers Val­ Test weight (pounds): Hill Auto Parts, Inc., a Corporation; 51.0- 51.9-______5 ley Parts, a Sole Proprietorship; Mario 50.0- 50.9__ 10 Jameson Machine Supply, Inc., a Cor­ A. Bianchi, Doing Business Under the 49.0- 49.9______15 poration; Kellogg Automotive Supply, Firm Name and Style of Rainier Auto Inc., a Corporation; Lyle’s Auto Parts, Parts, a Sole Proprietorship; Frank Rye grading No. 3 on account of being Inc., a Corporation; Marilley Auto Padavich, Doing Business Under the “thin”: Parts Co., a Corporation; Middleton Firm Name and Style of North Bend Discount Motor Parts Co., a Corporation; Motor (cents per Auto Parts, a Sole Proprietorship; bushel) Car Supply Co. of Seattle, Inc., a Jack Sheridan, Doing Business Under Thin” rye (percent): Corporation; Motor Parts & Equip­ the Firm Name and Style of Motor 15.1-17.0 ...... 1 ment, Inc., a Corporation; Motor Parts Co., a Sole Proprietorship; 17.1- 19.0—...... — I 2 Parts Machine Co., Inc., a Corpora­ Donald E. Cornell, Doing Business Un­ 19.1- 21.0______~~I 3 tion; Northwest Motor Parts & Manu­ der the Firm Name and Style of 21.1- 23.0...... —Ill—I—II 4 facturing Co., a Corporation; Olym­ Cornell Automotive Parts Co., a Sole 23.1- 25.0______IIIIIIIIIIII 6 pian Auto Parts, Inc., a Corporation; Proprietorship; Wayne T. McCann, Pacific Wholesale, Inc., a Corporation; Rye grading No. 4 on account of being Doing Business Under the Firm Name "thin”: Piston Service, Inc., a Corporation; and Style of Wayne’s Auto Parts, a Piston Service of University, Inc., a Sole Proprietorship; and Woodrow C. The discounts shall be 5 cents per bushel Corporation; Piston Service of Wenat­ Wilson, Doing Business Under the plus 1 cent for each 2 percent of “thin” rye chee, Inc., a Corporation; Piston Firm Name and Style of Woody’s Auto or fraction thereof, in excess of 25 percent. Service of Westlake, Inc., a Corpora­ Parts, a Sole Proprietorship. tion; Regalia Auto Parts, Inc., a , Discount Corporation; Siler Auto Parts, Inc., a Consent order requiring 55 automotive (cents per Corporation; Skaggs Automotive, Inc., parts jobbers and their buying organiza­ — bushel) a Corporation; Spoon Automotive tion of Seattle, Wash., to cease knowingly Weed control discount (where re­ Parts, Inc., a Corporation; Sullivan inducing and receiving discriminatory quired by § 1421.74)______io Distributing Co., a Corporation; Ulins, prices from their suppliers in violation . discounts shall be cumulative except Inc., a Corporation; Walla Walla of section 2(f) of the Clayton Act. t only-one grade discount shall apply.) Motor Supply, Inc., a Corporation; The order to cease and desist, includ­ West Seattle Auto Parts„ Inc., a Cor­ ing further order requiring report of date. Upon publication in poration; G & M Auto Supply, Inc., a compliance therewith, is as follows: tne Federal R egister. Corporation; Gale Pfueller and Gladys It is ordered, That, respondents Ever­ Gooding, Copartners Doing Business Signed at Washington, D.C., on July green Warehouse Distributors, Inc., a 1.1966. Under the Firm Name and Style of corporation; Airport Machinery Co., Inc., Automotive Parts Service; Albert C. a corporation; Automotive Products, H. D . G odfrey, Shields, Doing Business Under the Inc., a corporation, doing business under Executive Vice President, Firm Name and Style of Bert Shields the firm name and style of Allen Auto Commodity Credit Corporation. Auto Supply, a Sole Proprietorship; Electric; Burien Auto Parts, Inc., a cor­ R. R. Caldwell, Doing Business Under poration; Bums Auto Parts, Inc., a cor­ IF-R. Doc. 66-7412; Piled, July % 1966; the Firm Name and Style of Caldwell 8:45 a.m.] poration; Car Parts, Inc., a corporation; Bearing & Parts Co., a Sole Proprietor- Materiel, Inc., a corporation, doing busi-

FE0ERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9346 RULES AND REGULATIONS ness under the firm name and style of Padavich, doing business under the firm Products Labeling Act; § 13.1852 Formal Ephrata Auto Parts; Gardner Supply name and style of North Bend Auto regulatory and statutory requirements: Co., a corporation; Gosney Motor Parts, Parts, a sole proprietorship; Jack 13.1852-35 Fur Products Labeling Act. a corporation; Hill Auto Parts, Inc., a Sheridan, doing business under the firm (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret corporation; Jameson Machine Supply, name and style of Motor Parts Co., a or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; sec. Inc., a corporation; Kellogg Automotive sole proprietorship; and Donald E. 8, 65 Stat. Î79; 15 U.S.C. 45, 69f) [Cease and Supply, Inc., a corporation; Lyle’s Auto Cornell, doing business under the firm desist order, the French Poodle, Inc., et al., Parts, Inc., a corporation; Marilley Auto name and style of Cornell Automotive W ashington, D.C., Docket C-1069, May 26, Parts Co., a corporation; Middleton Parts Co., a sole proprietorship; Wayne 1966] Motor Parts Co., a corporation; Motor T. McCann, doing business under the Consent order requiring a Washington, Car Supply Co. of Seattle, Inc., a cor­ firm name and style of Wayne’s Auto D.C., retail furrier, to cease falsely ad­ poration; Motor Parts & Equipment, Inc., Parts, a sole proprietorship; Woodrow vertising and invoicing its fur products a corporation; Motor Parts Machine Co., C. Wilson, doing business under the firm in violation of the Fur Products Labeling Inc., a corporation; Northwest Motor name and style of Woody’s Auto Parts, Act. Parts & Manufacturing Co., a corpora­ a sole proprietorship; and respondents' The order to cease and desist, includ­ tion ; Olympian Auto Parts, Inc., a cor­ officers, agents, representatives, em­ ing further order requiring report of poration; Pacific Wholesale, Inc., a cor­ ployees, and members directly or through compliance therewith, is as follows: poration; Piston Service, Inc., a corpora­ any corporate or other device, in con­ It is ordered, That respondents the tion; Piston Service of University, Inc., nection with the offering to purchase or French Poodle, Inc., a corporation, and a corporation; Piston Service of Wenat­ purchase of any automotive products or its officers, and Louella Epstein, indi­ chee, Inc., a corporation; Piston Serv­ supplies in commerce, as “commerce” vidually and as an officer of said corpo­ ice of Westlake, Inc., a corporation; is defined in the Clayton Act, as ration, and respondents’ representatives, Regalia Auto Parts, Inc., a corporation; amended, do forthwith cease and desist agents, and employees, directly or Siler Auto Parts, Inc., a corporation; from: through any corporate or other device, in Skaggs Automotive, Inc., a corporation; Knowingly inducing, or knowingly connection with the introduction into Spoon Automotive Parts, Inc., a cor­ receiving or accepting, any discrimina­ commerce, or the sale, advertising, or poration; Sullivan Distributing Co., a tion in the price of such products and offering for sale in commerce, or the corporation; Ulins, Inc., a corporation; supplies by directly or indirectly induc­ transportation or distribution in com­ Walla Walla Motor Supply, Inc., a cor­ ing, receiving or accepting from any merce, of any fur product; or in connec­ poration; West Seattle Auto Parts, Inc., seller a net price known by respondents tion with the sale, advertising, offering a corporation; G & M Auto Supply, Inc., to be below the net price at which said for sale, transportation or distribution,' a corporation; Gale Pfueller and Gladys products and supplies of like grade and of any fur product which is made in Gooding, copartners, doing business un­ quality are being sold by such seller to whole or in part of fur which has been der the firm name and style of Auto­ other customers, where the seller is shipped and received in commerce; as motive Parts Service; Albert C. Shields, competing with any other seller for re­ the terms “commerce,” “fur,” and “fur doing business under the firm name and spondents’ business, or where respond­ product” are defined in the Fur Products style of Bert Shields Auto Supply, a sole ents are competing with other customers Labeling Act, do forthwith cease and proprietorship; R. R. Caldwell, doing of the seller. desist from: business under the firm name and style For the purpose of determining “net A. Falsely or deceptively advertising of Caldwell Brg. & Parts Co., a sole price” under the terms of this order, fur products through the use of any ad­ proprietorship; Conrad A. Charles, doing there should be taken into account dis­ vertisement, representation, public an­ business under the firm name and style counts, rebates, allowances, deductions, nouncement or notice which is intended of Con’s Auto Parts, a sole proprietor­ or other terms and conditions of sale by to aid, promote or assist, directly or in­ ship; Hercules Specialty Co., a corpora­ which net prices are effected. directly, in the sale, or offering for sale tion ; Charles Douglas Miller, doing busi­ It is further ordered, That the re­ of any fur product, and which: ness under the firm name and style of spondents herein shall, within sixty (60) 1. Fails to set forth in words and fig­ Miller-Pybus Auto Parts, a sole propri­ days after service upon them of this ures plainly legible all the information etorship; Richard Lagerquist and Milton order, file with the Commission a report required to be disclosed by each of the Lagerquist, copartners, doing business in writing setting forth in detail the subsections of section 5(a) of the Fur under the firm name and style of Motor manner and form in which they have Products Labeling Act. Specialty Co.; Robert D. Williams and complied with this order. -2. Sets forth the name or names of any animal or animals other than the name Fred W. Robb, copartners, doing business Issued: June 1, 1966. under the firm name and style of of the animal producing the furs con­ Mountain Auto Parts; Frank H. Van By the Commission. tained in the fur product as specified in the Fur Products Name Guide and Valkenburg and J. Robert Van Valken- [SEAL] J oseph W. Shea, burg, copartners, doing business under Secretary. as prescribed by the rules and the firm name and style of Piston Serv­ regulations. ice Co.; Roland L. Huggins and Raymond [F.R. Doc. 66-7434; Filed, July 7, 1966; 3. Fails to set forth the term “natural E. Huggins, copartners, doing business 8:46 a.m.] as part of the information required to under the firm name and style of Sedro be disclosed in the advertisements under the Fur Products Labeling Act and the Woolley Auto Parts; C. A. Solberg Co., a [Docket No. C-10691 corporation; Glen M. Shearer and Allan rules and regulations promulgated there­ PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE under to describe fur products which are Pedee, copartners, doing business under not pointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed or the firm name and style of Valley Auto PRACTICES Parts; Fred L. Pease, individually and otherwise artificially colored. The French Poodle, Inc., and 4. Fails to set forth all parts of the in­ as controlling member of a partnership, formation required under section 5(a) oi doing business under the firm name and Louella Epstein style of Pease Bros.; Ernest V. Pitzer, tiie Fur Products Labeling Act and the doing business under the firm name and Subpart—Advertising falsely or mis­ rules and regulations promulgated there­ style of Yakima Grinding Co., a sole pro­ leadingly: § 13.30 Composition of goods: under in type of equal size and conspicu­ prietorship; John R. Selland, doing busi­ 13.30-30 Fur Products Labeling Act; ousness and in close proximity with eacn ness under the firm name and style of § 13.73 Formal regulatory and statutory other. ,]ir Selland Motor Parts, a sole proprietor­ requirements: 13.73-10 Fur Products B. Falsely or deceptively invoicing iur ship; Ellsworth O. Sawyer> doing busi­ Labeling Act. Subpart—Invoicing prod­ products by; ness under the firm name and style of ucts falsely: § 13.1108 Invoicing products 1. Failing to furnish invoices, as the Sawyers Valley Parts, a sole proprietor­ falsely: 13.1108-45 Fur Products Labeling term “invoice” is defined in the Fur ship; Mario A. Bianchi, doing business Act. Subpart—Neglecting, unfairly or Products Labeling Act, showing in_ word? under the firm name and style of Rainier deceptively, to make material disclosure; and figures plainly legible all the in­ Auto Parts, a sole proprietorship; Frank § 13.1845 Composition: 13.1845-30 Fur formation required to be disclosed oy

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 9347 each of the subsections of section 5(b) (1) hibit operation of certificated facilities ulation will automatically prohibit of the Fur Products Labeling Act. at pressures exceeding applicant’s own operation of the certificated facilities at 2. Setting forth information required maximum, unless a different m aximum any pressure higher than that proposed under section 5(b) (1) of the Fur Prod­ pressure is prescribed by the Commission by applicant itself, unless our certificate ucts Labeling Act and the rules and in the final certificate order. order prescribes a different condition. regulations promulgated thereunder in The first amendment, to § 157.14(a) (9) As a matter of general policy, we an­ abbreviated form. requires that applications for a certifi­ nounce that any applicant proposing a 3. Failing to set forth the term “nat­ cate of public convenience and necessity maximum operating pressure which of­ ural” as part of the information re­ under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act fers, a lesser measure of safety than the quired to be disclosed on invoices under state in Exhibit G-II the maximum oper­ relevant standard of the ASA B31.8 the Fur Products Labeling Act and the ating pressure of each facility to be certi­ would bear a heavy burden to justify is­ rules and regulations promulgated there­ ficated by the Commission as determined suance of an unconditional certificate of under to describe fur products which are by the provisions set out in the most re­ public convenience and necessity. The not pointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed or cent edition of the American Standard rule here promulgated does not, how­ otherwise artificially colored. Code for Pressure Piping, Gas trans­ ever, compel a pipeline company to use 4. Failing to disclose that fur prod­ mission and Distribution Piping Systems, ucts contain or are composed of second­ the ASA B31.8 code as its standard and ASA B31.8, or such other standard as the Commission would not object to use hand used fur. the company may propose. A full ex­ 5. Failing to set forth on invoices the of more stringent standards by the ap­ planation is required if the company’s plicant. In the absence of a Federal item number or mark assigned to fur standard is less stringent than ASA products. safety code governing interstate natural B31.8. gas pipeline companies we have chosen C. Making claims and representations The second amendment, to §157.20, of the types covered by subsections (a), ASA B31.8 as a guide, without preempt­ (b), (c), and (d) of Rule 44 of the rules General Conditions Applicable to Certifi­ ing the States from adopting more strin­ and regulations promulgated under the cates, prohibits operation of the facilities gent codes. Fur Products Labeling Act unless there at pressures exceeding the maximum This is not the first time we have used are maintained by respondents full and operating pressure as set forth by ap­ the ASA B31.8 code as a frame of refer­ adequate records disclosing the facts plicant itself in Exhibit G-II. The Com­ ence. We have recently issued a rule upon which such claims and representa­ mission, of course, may by special con­ requiring the annual filing of system tions are based. dition prescribe a lower maximum pres­ flow diagrams by the larger natural gas It is further ordered, That the re­ sure than applicant proposes. The rule pipeline companies. These diagrams spondents herein shall, within sixty (60) also states that it does not authorize oper­ must show the maximum operating pres­ days after service upon them of this ation of facilities in violation of any State sure allowable under the Code for (1) order, file with the Commission a report regulations which call for a lower maxi­ the discharge side of compressor stations in writing setting forth in detail the mum pressure. and (2) other critical points on the com­ manner and form in which they have In response to our notice of proposed pany’s system (18 CFR 260.8). The complied with this order. rulemaking issued November 2, 1965 (30 system flow diagrams are submitted for F.R. 14110, Nov. 9, 1965), we received systems already in operation to show Issued: May 26,1966. comments and suggestions from or on be­ their peak day and average day capabil­ By the Commission. half of 19 natural gas companies1 and ity. The data which we are requiring the Independent Natural Gas Association in this order will be supplied with appli­ J oseph W . S hea, of America. Most of them pointed out cations to the Commission for new facil­ Secretary. that as originally proposed the new con­ ities and will set pressure limits for those [P.R. Doc. 66-7435; Filed, July 7, 1966; dition would restrict a company to oper­ facilities for the company’s subsequent 8:46 a.m.] ating at the pressure listed in Exhibits G, operations. G-I, and G-II; that such pressure mere­ The Commission finds: ly indicates the anticipated operating Title 18— CONSERVATION OF pressure in the particular circumstances (1) The amendments herein adopted illustrated by the exhibit; that in many are necessary and appropriate for the POWER AND WATER RESOURCES cases such pressure may be below the purposes of the administration of the maximum safe operating pressure for Natural Gas Act. Chapter I— Federal Power which the line was designed and tested. (2) In view of the reasons given above Commission The Commission agrees that our orig­ for the use of Exhibit G-II, it is un­ necessary to comply with the notice pro­ [Docket No. Rr-290; Order No. 324] inal proposal would be unnecessarily re­ strictive in some cases if we based it on vision of the Administrative Procedure PART 157— APPLICATIONS FOR CER­ the operating pressure now included in Act with respect to the amendment to TIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVEN­ Exhibits G, G-I, and G-II to the certifi­ § 157.14(a) (9) here adopted. IENCE AND NECESSITY AND FOR cate application. We therefore require a The Commission, acting pursuant to ORDERS PERMITTING AND AP­ specific indication from the applicant of the authority granted by the Natural the maximum safe operating pressure Gas Act, as amended, particularly sec­ PROVING ABANDONMENT UNDER for the facilities to be certificated. This tions 7, 16, and 20 thereof (52 Stat. 825, SECTION 7 OF THE NATURAL GAS amendment was suggested in substance 830, 832, 56 Stat. 84, 15 U.S.C. 717f, 717o ACT by seven of the respondents.2 Our reg- 717s), orders: General Certificate Condition Respect­ (A) Part 157 of Chapter I of Title 18 ing Safe Operating Pressures 1 Algonquin Gas Transmission Co., Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Columbia Gas System of the Code of Federal Regulations is J u n e 30,1966. Service Corp., Consolidated Gas Supply amended as follows: (1) Section 157.14(a)(9) is amended Æ ation of natural &as pipeline f acil Corp., El Paso Natural Gas Co., Kansas- Nebraska Natural Gas Co., Inc., Lake Shore by adding a new subdivision (vi) as snrpc ^ pres?Ìu*es ln excess of design pre; Pipe Line Co., Lone Star Gas Co., Michigan follows: tiene ^Pecifled in certificate applies Gas Storage Co., Natural Gas Pipeline Com­ certi^en®ral Editions applicable 1 pany of America, Northern Natural Gas Co., § 157.14 Exhibits. Thi«8*®? issued to pipeline companie Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. and Trunk­ (a) To he attached to each applica­ reÌi!Ìt0rder amends two sections of tt line Gas Co., Pacific Gas Transmission Co., tion. * * * totofo^nS^Under *** Natural Gas A< Southern Natural Gas Co., Texas Eastern mumfnî^ the Commission of the max: Transmission Corp., Texas Gas Transmission * (9) * * Exhibit G-II—Flow diagram data. Corp., Transwestem Pipeline Co., United Gas S 5 RSSS? at which a certificate af Pipe Line Co., W ashington Gas Light Co. (vi) The maximum allowable operat­ Posed fQ^v?7es ^ may operate the pre 2 Algonquin, Colorado Interstate, Consoli­ risk of S ties safely and without unde ing pressure of each proposed facility of failure, and unmistakably to pre dated, El Paso, Kansas-Nebraska, United Gas for which a certificate is requested, as Pipeline, and Washington Gas Light. permitted under the latest edition of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9348 RULES AND REGULATIONS the American Standard Code for Pres­ cial skills, paragraph (c) is amended to sure Piping, Gas Transmission and Dis­ read as follows: Title 32— NATIONAL DEFENSE tribution Systems, ASA B31.8, or as § 61.3 Grants to foreign participants to Chapter XVIII— Office of Civil De­ otherwise proposed by the applicant. If observe, consult, or demonstrate spe­ fense, Office of the Secretary of a standard other than that of the ASA cial skills. the Army B31.8 code is used, explain the nature of * * # * ♦ PART 1809— REIMBURSEMENT TO­ such standard; whether it is more strin­ (c) Per diem allowances. Per diem gent than ASA B31.8 and, if not, the allowance not to exceed $25 in lieu of WARD EXPENSES OF STUDENTS justification for its use; and designate subsistence expenses while participating ATTENDING OCD SCHOOLS by an appropriate symbol or legend. As in the program in the United States, its Part 1809 is revised to read as follows: a matter of general policy, the Commis­ territories or possessions and while trav­ sion will not normally grant a certifi­ Sec. eling within or between the United 1809.1 Purpose. cate authorizing operation of facilities States, its territories or possessions: 1809.2 Definitions. at any pressure higher than the maxi­ Provided, however, That, in accordance 1809.3 Conditions of payment. mum permitted by ASA B31.8 and the with standards and procedures pre­ Authority: The provisions of this Part burden will be on the applicant to justify scribed from time to time by the Assist­ 1809 issued under secs. 201(e) and 401(g) 64 any such deviation. ant Secretary of State for Educational Stat. 1249-1257, as amended, 72 Stat. 1799- ***** and Cultural Affairs, a per diem allow­ 1801, 23 F.R. 4991; E.O. 10952, as amended 26 F.R. 6577; Delegation of Authority Re­ (2) Section 157.20 is amended by add­ ance of not to exceed $35 may be estab­ garding Civil Defense Functions and Estab­ ing a new paragraph to read as follows: lished in the case of participants whose lishm ent of the Office of Civil Defense, pub­ status and position require special treat­ lished Apr. 10, 1964, 29 F.R. 5017. § 157.20 General conditions applicable ment; And provided further, That the to certificates. Assistant Secretary of State for Educa­ § 1809.1 Purpose. ***** tional and Cultural Affairs may in the The regulations in this Part 1809 (g) In the interest of safety and re­ case of any particular participant au­ govern the payment by the Office of Civil liability of service, facilities authorized thorize a per diem allowance in excess of Defense, Office of the Secretary of the by the certificate shall not be operated $35. The participant shall be considered Army, pursuant to section 201(e) of the at pressures exceeding the maximum op­ as remaining in a travel status during Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950, as erating pressure set forth in Exhibit G- the entire period covered by his grant amended, of not to exceed one-half of the II to the application as it may be unless otherwise designated. travel expenses and per diem allowances amended prior to issuance of the certifi­ * * * * * * for students attending an OCD school. cate. In the event the applicant there­ after wishes to change such maximum Dated: June 30,1966. § 1809.2 Definitions. operating pressure it shall file an appro­ For the Secretary of State. As used in this Part 1809: priate petition for amendment of the (a) “Act” means the Federal Civil De­ W illiam J. C rockett, fense Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. certificate. Such petition shall include Deputy Under Secretary the reasons for the proposed change. for Administration. App. 2251-2297). Nothing contained herein authorizes a (b) “OCD” means the Office of Civil natural gas company to operate any fa­ [F.R. Doc. 66-7447; Filed, July 7, 1966; Defense, Office of the Secretary of the cility at a pressure above the maximum 8:47 a.m.] Army. Where action is to- be taken this prescribed by state law, if such law re­ term denotes the Director of Civil De­ quires a lower pressure than authorized fense or other duly authorized offlcial(s) hereby. Title 29— LABOR acting under authority delegated to the Chapter XIII— Bureau of Labor Stand­ Secretary of Defense by Executive Order (Secs. 7, 16, 20, 52 Stat. 825, 830, 832; 56 10952, F.R. 6577. > Stat. 84; 15 U.S.C. 717f, 717o, 717s) ards, Department of Labor (c) “OCD school” means a school (B) The amendments ordered herein PART 1500— CHILD LABOR REGULA­ operated by OCD pursuant to section shall be effective as to all applications 201(e) of the Act. filed on or after August 1, 1966. TIONS, ORDERS, AND STATEMENTS (d) “OCD student expenses program (C) The Secretary shall cause prompt OF INTERPRETATION guidance material” means written cri­ publication of this order to be made in State Certificates of Age teria and procedures officially promul­ the F ederai. R egister. gated by OCD over the signature of the The age, employment, or working cer­ Director of Civil Defense or of the As­ By the Commission. tificates or permits of several States are sistant Director of Civil Defense (Plans [ seal! J oseph H. G utride. designated in 29 CFR 1500.21 as having and Operations) for uniform application Secretary. the same force and effect as Federal cer­ in the student expenses program con­ tificates of age issued under section 3(1) [PH. Doc. 66-7422; Piled, July 7, 1966; ducted pursuant to section 201(e) of the 8:45 a.m.] of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 Act and under the regulations in this (52 Stat. 1061 as amended; 29 U.S.C. Part 1809. The guidance material to be 203). applied to a particular payment will be In a document promulgated on June that current at the time of OCD approval Title 22— FOREIGN RELATIONS 16, 1965, and published in the F ederal of the request for payment. .. R egister on June 22,1965 (30 F.R. 7997), (e) “Student” means a civil defense Chapter I—-Department of State it was provided that these designations official or other person who has been ap­ SUBCHAPTER G— INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL would expire on June 30,1966, proved by the State and OCD for attend­ AND CULTURAL EXCHANGE Pursuant to section 3(1) and section ance and who registers for and attends 11(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act a course of instruction at an OCD school [Dept. Reg. 108.533 J of 1938 (52 Stat. 1061 and 1066 as as specified in OCD student expenses pro­ PART 61— PAYMENTS TO AND ON amended; 29 U.S.C. 203 and 211), and gram guidance material. BEHALF OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1946 (3 (f) “Student expenses” means tne CFR 1943-1948 Comp., p. 1064), I hereby costs of travel from place of residence to INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL extend the designations contained in 29 an OCD school and return, and per diem AND CULTURAL EXCHANGE PRO­ CFR 1500.21 until June 30, 1967. allowances in lieu of subsistence while in GRAM travel status and while in attendance ai Signed at Washington, D.C., this 30th such school, to be partially reimburse Grants to Foreign Participants to Ob­ day of June 1966. (up to one-half) under procedures am* serve, Consult, or Demonstrate W . W illard W irtz, in accordance with terms and conditions Special Skills Secretary of Labor. prescribed in this Part 1809 and in ocv In § 61.3 Grants to foreign participants [F.R. Doc. 66-7443; Filed, July 7, 1966; student expenses program guidance ma­ to observe, consult, or demonstrate spe- 8:47 a.m.] terial, but not exceeding the standard FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 9349 or payments prescribed or authorized un­ Sec. § 9—56.101 Use of Contract Proposal der Standardized Government Travel 9-56.000 Scope of part. Evaluation Boards. Regulations and the Travel Expense Act 9—56.001 Applicability. of 1949, as amended. 9-56.002 Policy, cost-type contractor pro­ It is the policy of AEC to use Contract (g) “Program paper” means the writ­ curement. Proposal Evaluation Boards in the selec­ ten statement of a State or political sub­ Subpart 9—56.1— Contract Proposal Evaluation tion of contractors for contracts of the division, as the case may be, identifying Boards type referred to in AECPR 9-56.001 (a), its civil defense programs, projects and 9-56.100 Scope of subpart. (b), and (c). activities planned for the fiscal year 9-56.101 Use of Contract Proposal Evalua­ § 9—56.102 Purpose of Contract Pro­ covered and which has been approved tion Boards. posal Evaluation Boards. as provided for in the then current cri­ 9—56.102 Purpose of Contract Proposal Eval­ teria and procedures issued by OCD. uation Boards. The use of Contract Proposal Evalua­ § 1809.3 Conditions of payment. Subpart 9—56.2 [Reserved! tion Boards is designed to: (a) Facilitate the selection of con­ (a) The State civil defense director Subpart 9—56.3 [Reserved! tractors; and, where applicable, the civil defense Subpart 9—56.4— Policy Governing Particular (b) Provide for selection of the best director of a political subdivision must Types of Contracts contractor for a given job; have approved in writing the particular (c) Insure consistent treatment of training of the named student as being 9-56.401 Replacement of contractors operat­ firms under consideration; and in furtherance of civil defense goals set ing AEC-owned plants or lab­ oratories. (d) Help promote mutual understand­ forth in its current civil defense program 9—56.402 Replacement of service-type con­ ing between AEC and its prospective paper. Approvals in the absence of a tractors performing services of contractors. current civil defense program paper will a continuing nature for the Subparts 9-56.2—Contractor Selection, be made only as specifically provided for AEC at AEC-owned locations. and 9-56.3—Review and Approval of in OCD student expenses program guid­ 9-56.403 Selection of new on-site service Selection Actions, are deleted and ance material. In any event the signing contractors. reserved. of approval shall constitute a promise 9-56.404 Selection of research and develop­ ment contracts for work in com­ by the State (and political subdivision, mercial facilities. In § 9-56.405 Selection of contractors where applicable) to comply with OCD 9—56.405 Selection of contractors for en­ for engineering and construction work, regulations (the regulations in this chap­ gineering and construction work. paragraph (a) (2) and paragraph (b) ter) and with the provisions of OCD are revised; and paragraph (c) is sub­ student expenses program guidance Authority: The provisions of this Part 9-56 stituted for Note A, as follows: material. issued undèr sec. 161, Atomic Energy Act of (b) The student must have signed a 1954, as amended, 68 Stat. 948, 42 U.S.C. § 9—56.405 Selection of contractors for 2201; sec. 205, Federal Property and Adminis­ engineering and construction work. statement of his intention to participate trative Services Act of 1949, as amended, 63 in the civil defense activities of the State Stat. 390, 40 U.S.C. 486. (a) * * * and where applicable of the political subdivision. Section 9-56.000 Scope of part, is re­ ***** (c) As to each student, the total of vised to read as follows: (2) Develop and maintain a broad base Federal payments shall be limited to of contractors with atomic energy ex­ one-half the sum of the student expenses § 9—56.000 Scope of part. perience and/or nuclear capability which (uncompensated from any other Federal This part sets forth AEC policies for may be used for AEC or commercial source) approved by OCD for such the use of Contract Proposal Evaluation requirements. student for the session covered. Boards and policies governing particu­ (b) A firm currently under contract (d) No advance of Federal funds will lar types of contracts. to AEC or to a cost-type AEC contractor be made to the student or to the State or Section 9-56.002 Policy, cost-type con­ shall not be invited to submit a proposal political subdivision. tractor procurement, is revised to read for work in the same field if the proposed (e) Federal checks shall be made as follows: project would be performed concurrently Payable either to the individual student with the existing contract and if the incurring the expenses or to the State or § 9-56.002 Policy, cost-type contractor estimated cost of the new construction political subdivision, which incurred the procurement. work involved is in excess of $10 million expraises on behalf of the student, or The following portions of this part or the estimated cost of the architect- jointly, in accordance with procedures constitute specific provisions which the engineer services is in excess of $1 million set forth in OCD student expenses pro- contracting officer shall bring to the where a construction cost estimate can­ ' £ram guidance material. attention of Class A and Class B cost- not be determined. If, for cogent rea­ sons, the designating official believes p ^a^e' The regulations In type contractors as constituting areas ran 1809 are effective upon publical which require appropriate treatment in that such a firm should be invited, m the F ederal R egister. the development of statements of con­ approval shall be obtained from the Dated: June 30, I960. tractor procurement practices in order to Division of Contracts. This requirement carry out the basic AEC procurement shall not apply to: W illiam P . D urkee, policy set forth in AECPR 9-1.5203. ***** Director of Civil Defense. AECPR and subject Ip-B. Doc. 66-7418; Filed, July 7, 1966; (c) Normally, only those firms which 8:45 am .] 9-56.000 Scope of part. are compatible with the size and com­ 9-56.001 Applicability. 9—56.404 Selection of research and develop­ plexity of the job requirements should Title 41— PUBLIC CONTRACTS ment contracts for work in com­ be invited; that is, for a small relatively mercial facilities. simple job, firms whose resources and 9-56.405 Selection of contractors for engi­ AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT neering and construction work. qualifications are far in excess of the job requirements should not be solicited, Chapter 9— Atomic Energy Subpart 9-56.1—Contractor Selection and where size and simplicity of the job Commission Boards, is revised to read as follows: permit, invitees should be limited to the PtAdRJ ’ - 56~ SELECT,ON OF CON­ Subpart 9—56.1— Contract Proposal geographic area of the job. TRACTORS BY BOARD PROCESS Evaluation Boards Effective date: These amendments are Miscellaneous Amendments § 9—56.100 Scope of subpart. effective upon publication in the F ederal R egister. SeSionU0^ 8^SeCîi0ns to Part 9-58 This subpart sets forth AEC policy Procp-. Contractors by Boa: concerning the use of Contract Proposal Dated at Germantown, Md., this 30th " ocess* are revised as follows: Evaluation Boards. day of June 1966.

No. 131------3 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 3 !, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9350 RULES AND REGULATIONS For the U.S. Atomic Energy Commis- which is now available for 24-hour use Adopted: June 29, 1966. sion. in the Baltimore area. Released: July 5,1966. J oseph L. Smith, 5. The Port of Baltimore is one of the Director, major eastern ports utilized by the mari­ F ederal C ommunications Division of Contracts. time industry. This port and the Chesa­ C om m ission,1 [ seal] B en F . W aple, (F.R. Doc. 66-7415; Filed, July 7, 1966; peake Bay are used by approximately Secretary. 8:45 a.m.] 6.000 ocean going vessels a year as well as many thousands of smaller craft, both A ppendix commercial and pleasure. At the pres­ ent time, the Port of Baltimore and the I. Part 81 is amended as follows; Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION Chesapeake Bay area are being served § 81.804 [Amended] Chapter I— Federal Communications with only one frequency pair on a 24- hour basis for public ship-shore com­ 1. In § 81.304(a), 2400 is added in sub- Commission munications service by Class II-B Public paragraph (1) in numerical order. [Docket No. 16219; FCC 66-573] 2. The table in § 81.306(c) is amended Coast Station, Call Sign WLF, located by the addition of the following entry: PART 81— STATIONS ON LAND IN at Bodkin Point, Md. This frequency THE MARITIME SERVICES pair is shared with public coast stations § 81.306 Frequencies available below at Wilmington, Delaware, and Ocean 27.5 Mc/s. PART 83— STATIONS ON SHIPBOARD Gate, N.J. This requires sharing of the * • * * * IN THE MARITIME SERVICES available channel time to serve the coastal area off the coast of New Jersey, (c) * * * Frequency Available for Public Ship- the Delaware River, the Delaware Bay, Shore Use in Baltimore, Md., Area; the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, the Coast stations Carrier Specific limitations im. located in the frequency posed upon availability Report arid Order upper and middle portions of the Chesa­ vicinity of— (kc/s) for use In the matter of amendment of Parts peake Bay, and the Baltimore Harbor. 81 and 83 of the Commission’s rules to As a result, radio-telephone ship-shore * a * * * a a • * service in the Port of Baltimore does not Baltimore, Md.. 2400 Available on condition that make the frequency 2400 Kc/s (coast harmful interference is and ship) employing telephony available meet current demands. not caused to the service 6. The Commission recognizes the of any coast station lo­ for public ship-shore use in the Balti­ cated in the vicinity of- more, Md., area for continuous hours of problems encountered when using sim­ Boston, Mass. service; the Chesapeake & Potomac Tele­ plex operation for rendering a public phone Co. of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., correspondence service in the maritime • • • * • • • Docket No. 16219 (RM-412) (RM-888). services. However,, it is the responsi­ 1. A notice of proposed rule making in bility of the Commission when making II. Part 83 is amended as follows: the above-captioned matter was released frequencies available in certain areas to 1. In § 83.134, the introductory text of on October 8, 1965, and was published consider the demonstrated needs of the paragraph (d) is amended to read as in the F ederal R egister on October 14, public for adequate and sufficient radio follows: 1965 (30 F.R. 13079). The dates for fil­ communications and to allocate fre­ § 83.134 Transmitter power. ing comments and replies thereto has quencies that would satisfy those princi­ * * * * * passed. pal needs. (d) Other than for the frequencies 2. Comments were filed by Charles R. 7. Based on the volume of maritime specified in § 83.351(a) (4) and as may Butz; George C. Ruehl, Jr.; Robert B, traffic using the facilities of the Port of be specified in the specific limitations in Cockrane; Curtis Bay Towing Co.; the Baltimore and the comments of the par­ § 83.354(a) (2), transmitter power for Baker Whiteley Towing Co.; Baltimore ties to this proceeding, it is evident that telephony on frequencies below 27.5 Mc/s Maritime Exchange; the Chesapeake & the present ship-shore radiotelephone shall not exceed the following values in Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland; the service in the area is inadequate and the Diamond State Telephone Co. and the establishment of additional service will watts: Eastern Yacht Club, Inc. Reply com­ serve the public interest, convenience, * * * * * ments were filed by Maryland Port and necessity. Moreover, it is equally § 83.351 [Amended] Authority. evident that the business of the Port of 3. All parties to the proceeding are Baltimore is a 24-hour a day operation 2. In § 83.351 (a), 2400 is added in sub- in agreement that there is a definite need and that additional radio services on this paragraph (1) in numerical order. for an additional 2 Mc/s public corre­ basis will be of greater value to the pub­ 3. The table in § 83.354(a) (2) w spondence channel in the Baltimore area. lic as well as a more effective utilization amended by the addition of the follow­ Of those participants, all, except the of marine frequencies. ing entry: Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of 8. Accordingly, it is ordered, That, the § 83.354 Frequencies below 5000 kc/s Maryland and the Diamond State Tele­ petition (RM-888) submitted by the for public correspondence. phone Co., supported the rule making Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of as proposed. Both parties are in opposi­ Maryland is hereby denied. The rules (a) * * * tion to the rule making because it would are amended as proposed in accordance (2) * * * employ the use of simplex operation on with the petition (RM-412) filed by the For communica­ the frequency 2400 Kc/s. Maryland Port Authority to make the tion with coast Carrier Specific limitations impM*

agreement and order, hereinafter set Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY forth, and any appropriate modifications Becker. Pope. Internal Revenue Service thereof; and for the purpose of deter­ Clay. Red Lake. mining (1) whether the handling of milk Douglas. Stevens. [ 26 CFR Part 1 I in the area proposed for regulation is in Grant, Todd. the current of interstate or foreign com­ K ittson. Traverse. INCOME TAXES merce or directly burdens, obstructs, or Mahnomen. Wadena. Marshall. Interest or Dividends Paid by Certain affects interstate or foreign commerce, Wilkin. (2) whether there is need for a market­ Norman. Savings Institutions on Certain De­ ing agreement or order regulating the Otter Tall. posits or Withdrawable Accounts; Pennington. handling of milk in the area, and (3) Polk (except that Hearing whether provisions specified in the pro­ portion of Polk The proposed amendment to the reg­ posals or some other provisions appro­ County lying east ulations under section 461 of the Code, priate to the terms of the Agricultural of Ù.S. relating to the treatment of interest or Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as No: 59). dividends paid by certain savings institu­ amended, will tend to effectuate the de­ North Dakota tions on certain deposits or withdrawable clared policy of the Act. Barnes. Pierce. accounts, was published in the F ederal The proposals, set forth below, have Benson. Ramsey. Register for May 26,1966. not received the approval of the Secre­ Cass. Ransom. A public hearing on the provisions of tary of Agriculture. Cavalier. Richland. Proposed by Land O’Lakes Creameries, Dickey. Roletta. this proposed amendment to the regula­ Eddy. tions will be held on Thursday, July 21, Inc: r Sargent. Proposal No. 1. Foster. Steele. 1966, at 10 am ., e.d.s.t., Room 3313, In­ Grand Forks. Stutsm an. ternal Revenue Building, 12th and Con­ D efin itio n s Griggs. Towner. stitution Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. § 1060.1 Act. Kidder, Traill. Persons who plan to attend the hear­ La Moure. Walsh. ing are requested to notify the Commis­ “Act” means Public Act No. 10, 73d Nelson. Wells. sioner of Internal Revenue, Attention: Congress, as amended, and as reenacted Pembina. and amended by the Agricultural Mar-; CC:LR:T, Washington, D.C. 20224; by § 1060.7 Producer. July 18, 1966, Telephone (Washington, keting Agreement Act of 1937, as D.C.), 964-3935. amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) . “Producer” means any person, except a § 1060.2 Secretary. producer-handler, who produces milk [seal] J am es F . D ring, in compliance With Grade A inspection Director, “Secretary” means the Secretary of requirements of a duly constituted health Legislation and Regulations Division. Agriculture or any officer or employee of authority, which milk is received at a pool the United States authorized to exercise plant. [Pit. Doc. 66-7446; Filed, July 7, 1966; the powers and to perform the duties Of 8:47 am .] the Secretary of Agriculture. § 1060.8 Distributing plank § 1060.3 Department. “Distributing plant” means a plant in which any Grade A fluid milk product DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE “Department” means the U.S. Depart­ is processed or packaged and disposed ment of Agriculture. of during the month on routes in the Consumer and Marketing Service § 1060.4 P'erson. marketing area. 1 7 CFR Part 1060 3 “Person” means any individual, part­ § 1060.9 Supply plank [Docket No. AO 360] nership, corporation, association, institu­ tion, or other business unit. “Supply plant” means a plant from MILK IN MINNESOTA-NORTH which Grade A milk, skim milk or cream § 1060.5 Cooperative association. DAKOTA MARKETING AREA is shipped during the month to a pool “Cooperative association” means any plant. Notice of Hearing on Proposed Mar­ cooperative marketing association of pro­ § 1060.10 Fluid milk plank keting Agreement and Order ducers which the Secretary determines, after application by the association: “Fluid milk plant” means: », ?urs,ian^ to the provisions of the Agri- (a) To be qualified under the provi­ (a) A pool plant, or i? , * 1 Marketing Agreement Act ol sions of the Act of Congress of February (b) A distributing plant which is a “ amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 18,1922, as amended, known as the “Cap- nonpool plant. n™L“ie applicable rules of practice anc per-Volstead Act,” and § 1060.11 Pool plank governing the formulation ol agreements and markèting

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9352 PROPOSED RULE MAKING ing the month on routes in the marketing issued pursuant to the Act shall be (a) To administer its terms and pro­ area; and deemed to have been received by the visions; (2) Not less than 25 percent in anydiverting handler at the plant from (b) To receive, investigate, and report month of July through February and which diverted: And provided further, to the Secretary complaints of violations; not less than 20 percent in any other That in any of the months of July (c) To make rules and regulations to month of the Grade A milk received at through March, the quantity of milk of effectuate its terms and provisions; and such plant from dairy farmers and other any producer diverted from pool plants (d) To recommend amendments to plants is disposed of during the month to nonpool plants which are not subject the Secretary. either on routes or by transfer to another to the classification and pricing provi­ § 1060.32 Duties. plant and classified as Class I pursuant sions of another order issued pursuant to to § 1060.44. the Act that is greater than the quantity The market administrator shall per­ (b) A supply plant from which not lessdelivered to pool plants shall not be form all duties necessary to administer than 25 percent of the Grade A milk deemed to have been received by the the terms and provisions of this part, received from dairy farmers at such plant diverting handler at the plant from including but not limited to the follow­ during the month is shipped as fluid milk which diverted and shall not be producer ing: products to pool plants qualified pursuant milk. (a) Within 30 days following the date to paragraph (a) of this section: Pro­ on which he enters upon his duties, or vided, That if such shipments are not § 1060.16 Fluid milk product. such lesser period, as may be prescribed less than 25 percent of the Grade A milk “Fluid milk product" means milk, skim by the Secretary, execute and deliver to received directly from dairy farmers at milk, buttermilk, flavored milk, flavored the Secretary a bond effective as of the such plant during each of the imme­ milk drinks, sweet or sour cream disposed date on which he enters upon his duties diately preceding months of September of as such or any mixture in fluid form and conditioned upon the faithful per­ through November, such plant shall be a of cream and milk or skim milk (except formance of such duties, in an amount pool plant for the months of March eggnog, ice cream mix, frozen dessert and with surety thereon satisfactory to through June unless written application mix, aerated cream products, evaporated the Secretary; is filed with the market administrator on or condensed milk or skim milk, and (b) Employ and fix the compensation or before the 1st day of any such month sterilized products packaged in hermeti­ of such persons as may be necessary to to be designated a nonpool plant for such cally sealed metal containers). enable him to administer its terms and provisions ; " month and for each subsequent month § 1060.17 Other source milk. through June during which it would not (c) Obtain a bond in a reasonable, qualify otherwise as a pool plant. “Other source milk” means all skim amount, and with reasonable surety milk and butterfat contained in or repre­ thereon, covering each employee who § 1060.12 Nonpool plant. sented by: handles funds entrusted to the market “Nonpool plant” means a plant which (a) Fluid milk products from any administrator; (a) is neither a pool plant nor the plant source except (1) fluid milk products re­ (d) Pay out of the funds provided by of a producer-handler and (b) receives ceived from pool plants, (2) producer § 1060.78, the cost of his bond and of the milk from dairy farmers or is a milk milk or (3) inventory of fluid milk prod­ bonds of his employees, his own compen­ manufacturing, processing, or bottling ucts at the beginning of the month; and sation, and all other expenses except plant. (b) Products other than fluid milk those incurred under § 1060.77, neces­ products from any source (including sarily incurred by him in the mainte­ § 1060.13 Handler. those produced at the plant) which are nance and functioning of his office and “Handler” means: reprocessed or converted into or com­ in the performance of his duties; (a) Any person in his capacity as the bined with another product in the plant (e) Keep such books and records as operator of one or more fluid milk plants, during the month. will clearly reflect the transactions pro­ or dded for in this part, and upon request (b) Any cooperative association with § 1060.18 ' Route. by the Secretary, surrender the same to respect to milk from producers which it “Route” means delivery (including dis­ such other person as the Secretary may causes to be diverted from a pool plant position from a plant store or from a designate; to a nonpool plant for the account of distribution point and distribution by a (f) Publicly announce at his discre­ such cooperative 'association. vendor or vending machine) of any fluid tion, unless otherwise directed by the § 1060.14 Producer-handler. milk product classified as Class I pursu­ Secretary, by posting in a conspicuous ant to 9 1060.41(a) (1) to a retail or place in his office and by such other “Producer-handler” means any person wholesale outlet other than a milk plant means as he deems appropriate, the name who operates a dairy farm and a distrib­ or a distribution points of any person who, after the date upon uting plant and who receives no fluid which he is required to perform such milk products from other dairy farmers § 1060.19 Butter price. acts, has not made reports pursuant to or from sources other than pool plants: “Butter price” means the simple aver­ §§ 1060.35 and 1060.36, nor payments Provided, That such person provides age as computed by the market adminis­ pursuant to §§ 1060.62, 1060.70, 1060.74, proof satisfactory to the market admin­ trator of the daily wholesale selling 1060.76, 1060.77, and 1060.78; istrator that (a) the care and manage­ prices (using the midpoint of any price (g) Submit his books and records to ment of all the dairy animals and other range as one price) per pound of Grade examination by the Secretary and fur­ resources necessary to produce the entire A (92-score) bulk creamery butter at nish such information and reports as volume of fluid milk products handled Chicago as reported during the month may be required by the Secretary; (excluding receipts from pool plants) is by the Department. (h) Verify all reports and payments Idle personal enterprise of and at the of each handler by audit of such han­ personal risk of such person, and (b) the M arket Administrator dler’s records and of the records of any operation of the processing and distrib­ § 1060.30 Designation. other handler or person upon whose uting business is the personal enterprise The agency for the administration of utilization the classification of skim miix of and at the personal risk of such this part shall be a market administra­ or butterfat for such handler depends or person. tor, selected by the Secretary, who shall by such investigation as the market ad­ be entitled to such compensation as may ministrator deems necessary. § 1060.15 Producer milk. be determined by, and shall be subject (i) Prepare and disseminate to tn “Producer milk” means the skim milk to removal at the discretion of, the public such statistics and such infor- and butterfat contained in Grade A milk Secretary. mation as he deems advisable and as ao received at a pool plant directly from a not reveal confidential information.; dairy farmer: Providing, That milk di­ § 1060.31 Powers. (j) Publicly announce on or before. verted from pool plants to nonpool plants The market administrator shall have (1) The 6th day of each month the which are not subject to the classification the following powers with respect to this minimum price for Class I milk pursuant and pricing provisions of another order part: to 9 1060.51(a) and the Class I butterfat

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 9353 differential pursuant to § 1060.52(a), : (2) Fluid milk products received from dler in writing that the retention of such both for the current month, and the pool plants, books and records is necessary in con­ iTiinimum price for Class n milk pur­ (3) Other source milk, nection with a proceeding under section suant to § 1060.51(b) and the Class II (4) Milk diverted to nonpool plants 8c(15)(A) of: the Act or a court action butterfat differential pursuant to pursuant to § 1060.15; and specified in such notice, the handler shall § 1060.52(b), both for the preceding (5) Inventories of fluid milk products retain such books and records, or speci­ month; and on hand at the beginning and end of fied books and records until further (2) The 10th day after the end ofthe month; written notification from the market ad­ each month the uniform price pursuant r for such month, reportin All books and records required tinder § 1060.42 Shrinkage. PlanStfly^ fi)r» each of his fluid mil this part to be made available to the bv tho’nf detail and on forms prescribe market administrator shall be retained The market administrator shall allo­ market administrator: cate shrinkage-over a handler’s receipts by the handler for a period of 3 years to at each of his fluid milk plants as butterfTt6 qpautities of skim milk am begin at the end of the month to which follows: (l) ^ or represented by books and records pertain: Provided, (a) Compute the total shrinkage of farmers rade A received from dair; That if within such 3-year period, the skim milk and butterfat at each fluid market administrator notifies the han­ milk plant, and hst&

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— -FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9354 PROPOSED RULE MAKING (b) Prorate the resulting amounts paragraph in his report submitted to utilization under such other order) avail­ among the receipts of skim milk and the market administrator pursuant to able for such assignment pursuant to butterfat contained in: § 1060.35 for the month within which the allocation provisions of the trans­ (1) Producer milk (except milk di­ such transaction occurred; feree order; verted to a nonpool plant pursuant to (2) The operator of such nonpool (4) If information concerning the § 1060.15), plus fluid milk products in plant maintains books and records show­ classification to which allocated under bulk from other pool plants and less ing the utilization of all skim milk and the other order is not available to the transfers of fluid milk products in bulk butterfat received at such plant which market administrator for purposes of es­ to other plants; and are made available if requested by the tablishing classification pursuant to this (2) Other source milk. market administrator for the purpose of paragraph, classification shall be as Class verification; and I, subject to adjustment when such in­ § 1060.43 Responsibility of handlers (3) The skim milk and butterfat so formation is available; and reclassification of milk. transferred shall be classified on the basis (5) For purposes of this paragraph, if All skim milk and butterfat shall be of the following assignment of utiliza­ the transferee order provides for more Class I milk unless the handler who first tion at such nonpool plant in excess of than two classes of utilization, milk allo­ receives such skim milk or butterfat receipts of packaged fluid milk products cated to a class consisting primarily of proves to the market administrator that from all pool plants and other order fluid milk products shall be classified such skim milk or butterfat should be plants: as Class I, and milk allocated to other classified otherwise. (i) Any Class I utilization disposed of classes shall be classified as Class II; and on routes in the marketing area shall (6) If the form in which any fluid § 1060.44 Transfers. be first assigned to the skim milk and milk product is transferred to another Skim milk or butterfat in the form of a butterfat in the fluid milk products so order plant is not defined as a fluid milk fluid milk product shall be classified: transferred from pool plants, next pro product under such other order, classifi­ (a) At the utilization indicated by the rata to receipts from other order plants cation shall be in accordance with the operators of both plants, otherwise as and thereafter to receipts from dairy provisions of § 1060.41. Class I milk, if transferred from a pool farmers who the market administrator § 1060.45 Computation of skim milk plant to the pool plant of another han­ determines constitute regular sources of and butterfat in each class. dler, subject in either event to the follow­ supply of Grade A milk for such nonpool plant; For each month the market adminis­ ing conditions: trator shall correct for mathematical and (1) The skim milk or butterfat so as­ (ii) Any Class I utilization disposed of for other obvious errors the reports of signed to either class shall be limited to on routes in the marketing area of an­ receipts and utilization submitted pur­ the amount thereof remaining in such other order issued pursuant to the Act suant to § 1060.35 for each pool plant class in the transferee plant after com­ shall be first assigned to receipts from and shall compute the pounds of skim putations pursuant to § 1060.46(a) (5) plants fully regulated by such order, milk and butterfat in each class at each and the corresponding step of § 1060.46 next pro rata to receipts from pool such plant: Provided, That if any water (b); plants and other order plants not reg­ contained in the milk from which a (2) If the transferor plant received ulated by such order, and thereafter product is made is removed before the during the month other source milk to to receipts from dairy farmers who the product is utilized or disposed of by a be allocated pursuant to § 1060.46(a) (2), market administrator determines con­ handler, the pounds of skim milk dis­ the skim milk and butterfat so trans­ stitute regular sources of supply for such posed of in such product shall be con­ ferred shall be classified so as to allocate nonpool plant; sidered to be a quantity equivalent to the least possible Class I utilization to (iii) Class I utilization in excess of that the nonfat milk solids contained in such such other source milk; and assigned pursuant to subdivisions (i) and product plus all the water originally as­ (3) If the transferor handler received (ii) of this subparagraph shall be as­ sociated with such solids. during the month other source milk to signed first to remaining receipts from be allocated pursuant to § 1060.46(a) (4) dairy farmers who the market adminis­ § 1060.46 Allocation of skim milk and or (5) and the corresponding steps of trator determines constitute the regular butterfat classified. § 1060.46(b), the skim milk and butter­ source of supply for such nonpool plant After making the computations pur­ fat so transferred up to the total of such and Class I utilization in excess of such suant to § 1060.45, the market adminis­ receipts shall not be classified as Class receipts shall be assigned pro rata to trator shall determine the classification I milk to a greater extent than would be unassigned receipts at such nonpool plant of producer milk for each handler as applicable to a like quantity of such other from all pool and other order plants, and follows: source milk received at the transferee (iv) To the extent that Class I utiliza­ (a) Skim milk shall be allocated in plant; tion is not so assigned to it, the skim the following manner: (b) As Class I milk, if transferred from milk and butterfat so transferred shall (1) Subtract from the pounds of skim a pool plant to a producer-handler; be classified as Class II milk; milk in each class the pounds of skim (c) As Class I milk, if transferred to a (e) As follows, if transferred to an­milk in fluid milk products received in nonpool plant that is neither another other order plant in excess of receipts packaged form from other order plants order plant nor a producer-handler plant from such plant in the same category as follows: and is located more than 150 miles from as described in subparagraph (1), (2), (1) From Class II milk, the lesser of the nearest of the post offices of Devils or (3) of this paragraph: the pounds remaining or 2 percent of Lake, Fargo, Grand Forks, and James­ (1) If transferred in packaged form, such receipts; and town, North Dakota; classification shall be in the classes to (ii) From Class I milk, the remainder (d) As Class I milk, if transferred in which allocated as a fluid milk product of such receipts; bulk to a nonpool plant that is neither under the other order; (2) Subtract in the order specified be­ another order plant nor a producer-han­ low from the pounds of skim milk re­ dler plant and is not more than 150 miles (2) If transferred in bulk form, clas­ maining in each class, in series beginning from the nearest of the post offices of sification shall be in the classes to which with Class n , the pounds of skim milK Devils Lake, Fargo, Grand Forks, and allocated as a fluid milk product under the other order (including allocation un­ in each of the following: Jamestown, North Dakota, unless the re­ (i) Other source milk in a form other quirements of subparagraphs (1) and (2) der the conditions set forth in subpara­ graph (3) of this paragraph); than that of a fluid milk product; of this paragraph are met, in which case (ii) Receipts of fluid milk products the skim milk and butterfat so trans­ (3) If the operators of both the trans­ feror and transferee plants so request in for which Grade A certification is not ferred shall be classified in accordance established, or which are from u n id en ti­ with the assignment resulting from sub- the reports of receipts and utilization paragraph (3) of this paragraph: filed with their respective market ad­ fied sources; and (1) The transferring handler claims ministrators transfers in bulk form shall (iii) Receipts of fluid milk products classification pursuant to the assignment be classified as Class £E to the extent of from a producer-handler, as defined set forth in subparagraph (3) of this the Class II utilization (or comparable under this or any other Federal order,

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 9355 (3) Subtract, in the order specified in Minnesota and Wisconsin, as reported (a) Multiply the quantity of producer below, from the pounds of skim milk re­ by the Department for the month. Such .milk, in each class (including any such maining in Class II, but not in excess of price shall be adjusted to a 3.5 percent milk caused to be delivered to such han­ such quantity: butterfat basis by a butterfat differential dler from the farms of producers for the (i) Receipts of fluid milk products rounded to the nearest one-tenth cent account of a cooperative association), from an unregulated supply plant; computed at 0.12 times the butter price as computed pursuant to § 1060.46(c), by (a) For which the handler requests for the month. The basic formula price the applicable class prices; Class n utilization ; or shall be rounded to the nearest full cent. (b) Add the amount obtained from (b) Which are in excess of the pounds § 1060.51 Class prices. multiplying the pounds of overage of skim milk determined by subtracting deducted from each class pursuant to from 125 percent of the pounds of skim Subject to the provisions of §§ 1060.62 § 1060.46(a) (7) and the corresponding milk remaining in Çlass I milk the sum and 1060.53 the class prices per hundred­ step of § 1060.46(b) by the applicable of the pounds of skim milk in producer weight for the month shall be as follows: class prices; milk, receipts from pool plants of other (a) Class I milk price. The price for Cc) Add an amount equal to the dif­ handlers, and receipts in bulk from other Class I milk shall be the price established ference between the Class I and Class II order plants ; and for Class I milk under Order 68, regulat­ price values at the pool plant of the skim (ii) Receipts of fluid milk products in ing the handling of milk in the Minne- milk and butterfat subtracted from Class bulk from an other order plant in excess apolis-St. Paul marketing area, plus 20 I pursuant to § 1060.46(a) (2) and the of similar transfers to such plant, if cents. corresponding step of § 1060.46(b); and Class II utilization was requested by thé (b) Class II milk price. The price for (d) Add the value at the Class I price operator of such plant and the handler; Class II milk shall be the basic formula adjusted for location of the nearest non- (4) Subtract from the pounds of skim price. pool plant (s) from which an equivalent milk remaining in each class, pro rata to § 1060.52 Butterfat differentials to han­ volume was received, of the skim milk such quantities, the pounds of skim milk dlers. and butterfat subtracted from Class I in receipts of fluid milk products from pursuant to § 1060.46(a) (4) and the unregulated supply plants which were For milk containing more or less than corresponding step of § 1060.46(b). not subtracted pursuant to subparagraph 3.5 percent butterfat, the class prices for (3)(i) of this paragraph; the month pursuant to § 1060.51 shall be § 1060.61 Computation of uniform (5) Subtract from the pounds of skim increased or decreased, respectively, for price. each one-tenth percent butterfat at a milk remaining in each class, in the fol­ For each month the market adminis­ lowing order, the pounds of skim milk in rate, rounded to the nearest one-tenth cent, determined as follows: trator shall compute a uniform price as receipts of fluid milk products in bulk follows: from another order plant(s), in excess (a) Class I price. Multiply the butter price for the preceding month by 0.120. (a) Combine into one total the values in each case of similar transfers to the computed pursuant to § 1060.60 for all same plant, which were not subtracted (b) Class II price. Multiply the but­ ter price for the month by 0.115. handlers who filed reports pursuant to pursuant to subparagraph (3) (ii) of this § 1060.35 for the month and who made paragraph: § 1060.53 Location differentials to han­ the payments pursuant to § § 1060.70 and (i) In series beginning with Class II, dlers. 1060.74 for the preceding month; the pounds determined by multiplying The Class I price for Grade A milk (b) Subtract, if the average butterfat the pounds of such receipts by the larger received from dairy farmers at a fluid content of the milk specified in para­ of.the percentage of estimated Class II milk plant shall be increased 1.2 cents graph (a) of this section is more than utilization of skim milk announced for for each 10 airline miles or fraction 3.5 percent, or add, if such butterfat con­ the month by the market administrator tent is less than 3.5 percent, an amount pursuant to § 1060.32(1) or the percent­ thereof that such plant is more than 285 age that Class II utilization remaining airline miles, or decreased 1.2 cents for computed by multiplying the amount by is of the total remaining utilization of 10 airline miles or fraction thereof that which the average butterfat content of skim milk of the handler; and such plant is less than 220 airline miles, such milk varies from 3.5 percent by the from the Minnesota Transfer Viaduct butterfat differential computed pursuant (ii) From Class T, the remaining over University Avenue in St., Paul, to § 1060.71 and multiplying the result by pounds of such receipts; Minn., as determined by the market ad­ the total hundredweight of such milk. (6) Subtract from the pounds of skim ministrator: Provided, That for the pur­ (c) Add an amount equal to the total nulk remaining in each class the pounds pose of calculating such location differ­ value of the location differentials com­ of skim milk received in fluid milk prod- ential, fluid ,milk products transferred puted pursuant to § 1060.72; ucts from other pool plants according to between fluid milk plants shall be as­ (d) Add an amount equal to not less * classifioation assigned pursuant to § 1060.44(a); signed to any remainder of Class n mill? than one-half of the unobligated balance in the transferee plant after making the in the producer-settlement fund; (7) If the pounds of skim, milk re­ calculations prescribed in § 1060.46 (a) (e) , Divide the resulting amount by the maining in both classes exceed the and (b) for such plant, such assignment sum of the following for all handlers in­ S skim milk in producer milk, subtract such excess from the pounds of to the transferor plant to be made in cluded in these computations : skim milk remaining in each class in séquence according to the location differ­ (1) The total hundredweight of pro­ senes beginning with Class II. Any ential applicable at each plant, beginning ducer milk; and amount so subtracted shall be known as with the plant nearest the Minnesota (2) The total hundredweight for overage”; Transfer Viaduct over University Avenue which a value is computed pursuant to in St. Paul, Minn. § 1060.60(d); and Butter fat shall be allocated in ac- § 1060.54 Use of equivalent prices. (f) Subtract not less than 4 cents nor tlie Procedure outlined for more than 5 cents per hundredweight. uon; and ln Paragraph (a) of this sec- If for any reason a price quotation re­ The result shall be the “uniform price” quired by this order for computing class for milk received from producers. the amounts of skim mi prices or for other purposes is not avail* determined pursuant able in the manner described, the market § 1060.62 Obligation of handler operat­ into * and (b) of this secti< administrator shall use a price deter­ ing a partially regulated distributing min* t i l for each class and dete mined by the Secretary to be equivalent plant. tent J*16 w®lgIlted average butterfat coi to the price which is required. tent of producer milk in each class. Each handler who operates a partially A pplication of P rices regulated distributing plant shall pay to m in im u m P rices § 1060.60 Computation of the net pool the market administrator for the pro­ obligation of each pool handler. ducer-settlement fund on or before the § 1060.50 Basic formula price. 25th day after the end of the month The net pool obligation of each pool either of the amounts (at the handler’s av S L baiS formula Price shall 1 handler during each month shall be a election) calculated pursuant to para­ mattiifn/>tPr*C€ 1)61 hundredweigl manufacturing grade milk, f.o.b. sum of money computed by the market graph (a) or (b) of this section. If the administrator as follows: handler fails to report pursuant to FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 31, NO, 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8,, 1966 9356 PROPOSED RUIF MAKING § 1060.35 the information necessary to (4) From the value of such milk at the has received milk a supporting state­ compute tiie amount specified in para­ Class I price applicable at the location ment in such form that it may be re­ graph (a) of this section, he shall pay of the nonpool plant, subtract its value at tained by the recipient, which shall the amount computed pursuant to para­ the uniform price pursuant to § 1060.61 show: graph (b) of this section: at the same location or at the Class n (1) The month and identity of the (a) An amount computed as follows: price, whichever is higher. producer; (1) (i) The obligation that would have (2) The daily and total pounds and § 1060.63 Plant subject to other Federal the average butterfat content of pro­ been computed pursuant to §1060.60 orders. at such plant shall be determined as ducer milk; though such plant were a pool plant. The provisions of this order shall not (3) The minimum rate or rates at For purposes of such computation, re­ apply to a distributing plant or a supply which payment to the producer is re­ ceipts at such nonpool plant from a pool plant during any month in which such quired pursuant to the order; plant or an other order plant shall be plant would be subject to the classifica­ (4) The rate which is used in making assigned to the utilization at which clas­ tion and pricing provisions of another the payment, if such rate is other than sified at the pool plant or other order order issued pursuant to the Act, unless the applicable minimum rate; plant and transfers from such nonpool such plant is qualified as a pool plant (5) The amount or the rate per plant to a pool plant or an other order pursuant to § 1060.11 and a greater hundredweight and nature of each de­ plant shall be classified as Class II milk volume of fluid milk products is disposed duction claimed by the handler; and if allocated to such class at the pool plant of from such plant on routes in the (6) The net amount of payment to or other plant and be valued at the uni­ Minnesota-North Dakota marketing area such producer or cooperative association. form price of the respective order if and to pool plants qualified on the basis § 1060.71 Butterfat differential to pro­ of route distribution in the Minnesota- ducers. so allocated to Class I milk. There shall North Dakota marketing area than in be included in the obligation so com­ the marketing area regulated pursuant The uniform price for producer milk puted a charge in the amount specified to such other order: Provided, That the shall be increased or decreased for each in § 1060.60(d) and a credit in the operator of a distributing plant or a one-tenth of 1 percent that the butterfat amount specified in § 1060.74(b) (2) supply plant which is exempt from the content of such milk is above or below with respect to receipts from an un­ provisions of this order pursuant to this 3.5 percent, respectively, at the rate de­ regulated supply plant, unless an obliga­ section shall, with respect to the total termined by multiplying the pounds of tion with respect to such plant is com­ receipts and utilization or disposition of butterfat in producer milk allocated to puted as specified below in this skim milk and butterfat at the plant, Class I and Class II milk pursuant to subparagraph. make reports to the market administra­ § 1060:46 by the respective butterfat dif­ (ii) if the operator of the partially tor at such time and in such manner as ferential for each class, dividing the sum regulated distributing plant so requests, the market administrator may require of such values by the total pounds of and provides with his report pursuant to (in lieu of the reports required pursuant such butterfat, and rounding the re­ § 1060.35(b) a similar report with re­ to § 1060.35) and allow verification of sultant figure to the nearest one-tenth spect to the operations of any other non­ cent. pool plant which serves as a supply plant such reports by the market admin­ istrator. § 1060.72 Location differentials to pro­ for such partially regulated distributing ducers and on nonpool milk. plant by shipments to such plant during P aym ents F or M ilk the month equivalent to the require­ (a) In making payments pursuant to ments of § 1060.11(b), with agreement § 1060.70 Time and method of pay­ § 1060.70 (b) and (c) for milk received of the operator of such plant that the ment. at a pool plant, each handler shall in­ market administrator may examine the (a) Each handler shall pay each pro­ crease the applicable price payable to books and records of such plant for pur­ ducer for producer milk for which a pay­ such producer 1.2 cents per hundred­ poses of verification of such reports, ment is not made to a cooperative asso­ weight for each 10 airline miles or frac­ . there will be added the amount of the ciation pursuant to paragraph (b) of this tion thereof that such plant is more than obligation computed at such nonpool section, as follows: 285 airline miles, or decrease the applica­ supply plant in the same manner and (1) On or before the last day of each ble price payable to such producer 1.2 subject to the same conditions as for the month, for producer milk received during cents per hundredweight for each 10 air­ partially regulated distributing plant. the first 15 days of the month, at not less line miles or fraction thereof that such (2) From this obligation there will be than the Class n price for the preceding plant is less than 220 airline miles from deducted the sum of (i) the gross pay­ month; and the Minnesota Transfer Viaduct over ments made by such handlers for Grade (2) On or before the 15th day after University Avenue in St. Paul, Minn., as A milk received during the month from the end of each month, for each hundred­ determined by the market administrator; dairy farmers at such plant and like weight of producer milk received during (b) For the purpose of computations payments made by the operator of a such month, an amount computed at not pursuant to §§ 1060.74 and 1060.75 the supply plant(s) included in the computa­ less than the uniform price adjusted pur­ uniform price shall be adjusted at the tions pursuant to subparagraph (1) of suant to §§ 1060.71, 1060.72, and 1060.77, rates set forth in paragraph (a) of this this paragraph, and (ii) any payments and less the payment made pursuant to section applicable at the location of the to the producer-settlement fund of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph. nonpool plant from which the milk was another order under which such plant (b) Each handler shall make payment received. is also a partially regulated distributing to a cooperative association for producer § 1060.73 Producer-settlement fund. plant; milk which it caused to be delivered to (b) An amount computed as follows: such handler, if such cooperative asso­ The market administrator shall main­ (1) Determine the respective amounts ciation is authorized to collect such pay­ tain a separate fund known as the “pro­ of skim milk and butterfat disposed of as ment for its members and exercises such ducer-settlement fund” into which he Class I milk on routes (other than to authority, an amount equal to the sum of shall deposit all payments made to sucn pool plants) in the marketing area; the individual payments otherwise pay­ fund and out of which he shall make an (2) Deduct (except that deducted un­ able for such producer milk, as follows: payments from such fund pursuant to der a similar provision of another order (1) On or before the 26th day of each §§ 1060.62, 1060.74, 1060.75, and 1060.7b: Issued pursuant to the Act) the re­ month for producer milk received during Provided, That the market administrator spective amounts of skim milk and but­ the first 15 days of the month; and shall offset the payment due to a han­ terfat received as Class I milk at the (2) On or before the 13th day after dler against payments due from sucn partially regulated distributing plant the end of each month for milk received handler. from pool plants and other order plants; during such month. §1060.74 Payments to the producer- (3) Combine the amounts of skim (c) In making the payments for pro­ settlement fund. milk and butterfat remaining into one ducer milk pursuant to this section, each total and determine the weighted average handler Shall furnish each producer or On or before the 12th day aiter.tijfi butterfat content; and cooperative associatioii from whom he end of the month each handler snau

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 3.1, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 0, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 9357 pay to the market administrator the § 1060.78 Expense of administration. obligation are made available to the amount if any by which the total As his pro rata share of the expense market administrator or his representa­ amounts specified in paragraph (a) of of the administration of the order, each tives. this section exceed the amount specified handler shall pay to the market admin­ (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of in paragraph (b) of this section: istrator on or before the 15th day after paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, (a) The net pool obligation computed the end of each month 4 cents per hun­ a handler’s obligation under this part to pursuant to § 1060.60 for such handler; dredweight or such lesser amount as the pay money shall not be terminated with and Secretary may prescribe with respect to respect to any transaction involving (b) The sum of (1) the value of such skim milk and butterfat contained in (a) fraud or willful concealment of a fact, handler’s producer milk at the applica­ producer milk (including a handler’s material to the obligation, on the part ble uniform prices specified in § 1060.70, own farm production), (b) other source of the handler against whom the obliga­ and (2) the value of the weighted aver­ milk at a pool plant which is allocated tion is sought to be imposed. age prices applicable at the location of to Class I milk pursuant to § 1060.46(a) (d) Any obligation on the part of the the plants, from which received (not to (3) and (4) and the corresponding steps market administrator to pay a handler be less than the value at the Class n in § 1060.46 (b) and (c) receipts at a any money which such handler claims price) with respect to other source milk fluid milk plant which is a nonpool plant to be due him under the terms of this for which a value is computed pursuant of Grade A milk from dairy farmers on part shall terminate 2 years after the to § 1060.60(d). which no administration expense assess­ end of the calendar month during which § 1060.75 Payments from the producer- ment is being paid pursuant to another the milk involved in the claim was re­ settlement fund. order issued pursuant to the Act: Pro­ ceived if an underpayment is claimed, vided, That if the operator of such non­ or 2 years after the end of the calendar On or before the 13th day after the pool plant elects to make payment to month during which the payment (in­ end of each month the market adminis­ the producer-settlement fund pursuant cluding deduction or setoff by the mar­ trator shall pay to each handler the to § 1060.62 (a), the expense of adminis­ ket administrator) was made by the amount by which the obligation, pur­ tration pursuant to this section shall be handler if a refund on such payment is suant to § 1060.70, of such handler for applicable only to the hundredweight of claimed, unless such handler, within the producer milk received during the month skim milk and butterfat on which pay­ applicable period of time files pursuant exceeds the value of such producer milk ment to the producer-settlement fund is to section 8c (15) (A) of the Act, a pe­ pursuant to § 1060.60. due pursuant to that paragraph. tition claiming such money. § 1060.76 Adjustment of accounts. § 1060.79 Termination of obligations. E ffective T im e, S u spe n sio n or T ermination Whenever verification by the market The provisions of this section shall administrator of reports or payments of apply to any obligation under this part § 1060.80 Effective time. any handler discloses errors resulting in for the payment of money. The provisions of this part, or any money due (a) the market administrator (a) The obligation of any handler to amendments to this part, shall become from such handler, (b) such handler pay money required to be paid under the effective at such time as the Secretary from the market administrator, or (c) terms of this part shall, except as pro­ any producer or cooperative association may declare and shall continue in force from such handler, the market adminis­ vided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this until suspended or terminated. trator shall promptly notify such han­ section, terminate 2 years after the last §1060.81 Suspension or termination. dler of any amount so due and payment day of the calendar month during which thereof shall be made not later than the market administrator receives the The Secretary shall suspend or termi­ the date for making payment next fol­ handler’s utilization report on the milk nate any or all of the provisions of this lowing such disclosure. involved in such obligation unless within part whenever he finds that it obstructs such 2-year period the market adminis­ or does not tend to effectuate the de­ § 1060.77 Marketing services. trator notifies the handler in writing that clared policy of the Act. This part such money is due and payable. Service shall, in any event, terminate whenever Except as set forth in paragraph of such notice shall be complete upon the provisions of the Act authorizing it (b) of this section, each handler in mak­ mailing to the handler’s last known cease to be in effect. ing payments to each producer pursuant address and it shall contain, but need to § 1060.70 shall deduct 5 cents per hun­ not be limited to, the following infor­ § 1060.82 Continuing power and duty of dredweight or such lesser amount as the mation: the market administrator. Secretary may prescribe with respect to (1) The amount of the obligation; (a) If, upon the suspension or termi­ producer milk received by such handler (2) The months during which the nation of any or all of the provisions of (except such handler’s own farm produc­ milk, with respect to which the obliga­ tion) during the month, and shall pay this part, there are any obligations aris­ tion exists, was received or handled; and ing hereunder, the final accrual or ascer­ such deductions to the market adminis­ (3) If the obligation is payable to one trator not later than the 15th day after tainment of which requires further acts or more producers or to an association of by any handler, by the market adminis­ of the month. Such money producers, the name of such producers or trator, or by any other person, the power 2 f? h® used hy the market adminis- association of producers, or if the obli­ and duty to perform such further acts irator to verify or establish weights, gation is payable to the market adminis­ ampies, and tests of producer milk and shall continue notwithstanding such trator, the account for which it is to be suspension or termination: Provided, f n J ^ lde Producers with market in- paid. That any such acts required to be per­ Such services shall be per- (b) If a handler fails or refuses, with formed by the market administrator adS!? ? Yhole or Part by the market respect to any obligation under this part, and “*lstrator or by an agent engaged by shall, if the Secretary so directs, be per­ and rosponsibte to him. to make available to the market admin­ formed by such other person, persons, or istrator or his representatives all books agency as the Secretary may designate. a cmrJ?1 case °* Producers for whom and records required by this part to be (b) The market administrator or such as association Is performing, made available, the market administra­ other person as the Secretary may desig­ ke sS T S ? by the Seerotary, the serv- tor may, within the 2-year period pro­ nate shall (1) continue in such capacity sS ™ 5?r?Vin Paragraph (a) of this vided for in paragraph (a) of this sec­ until dircharged by the Secretary; (2) of tha'rt handier shall make, in lieu tion, notify the handler in writing of from time to time account for all receipts (a) of ^^ductions specified in paragraph such failure or refusal. If the market and disbursements and deliver all funds are 2,25 such deductions as administrator so notifies a handler, the or property on hand together with the o n o r T m t by such Producers and, said 2-year period, with respect to such books and records of the market admin­ !5th day after the end obligation, shall not begin to run until istrator, or such person, to such person to the o?2!5 h;.pay over such deductions the 1st day of the calendar month fol­ as the Secretary shall direct; and (3) if ices, ^ee^tion rendering such serv- lowing the month during which all such so directed by the Secretary execute such books and records pertaining to such assignment or other instruments neces-

No. 131- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9358 PROPOSED RULE MAKING sary or appropriate to vest in such per­ Valley, Grant, Hettinger, Logan, McHen­ available for examination by interested son full title to all funds, property and ry, McIntosh, McKenzie, McLean, Mer­ persons in the Docket Section of the claims vested in the market administra­ cer, Morton, Mountrail, Oliver, Renville, Board, Room 710 Universal Building, tor or such person pursuant thereto. Sheridan, Sioux, Slope, Stark, Ward, and 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washing­ Williams. ton, D.C., upon receipt thereof. § 1060.83 Liquidation after suspension Proposal No. 5. The method of pay­ By the Civil Aeronautics Board. or termination. ment to producers shall be on the basis Upon the suspension or termination of of individual-handler pooling. [seal] H arold R . S anderson, any or all provisions of this part the Proposed by Rugby Creamery Co.: Secretary. market administrator, or such person Proposal No. 6. The western edge of Explanatory statement. During the as the Secretary may designate shall, if the marketing area should be North Da­ last several years there has been a sig­ so directed by the Secretary, liquidate kota Highway No. 1. If any territory nificant growth and expansion of air the business of the market administra­ west of the highway is included in the freight service including a general tran­ tor’s office and dispose of all funds and marketing area, the area should include sition to large, economical all-cargo jet property then in his possession or under the entire State of North Dakota. aircraft and the construction of modem his control together with claims for any Proposed by Farmers Cooperative cargo terminals and related facilities. funds which are unpaid or owing at the Creamery Co. : During this^period the industry also in­ time of such suspension or termination. Proposal No. 7. Add the Minnesota troduced new classes of passenger serv­ Any funds collected pursuant to the pro­ counties of Roseau and Lake of the ice, such as nonreservation services, visions of this part, over and above the Woods to the marketing area. which do not utilize the full scope of amounts necessary to meet outstanding Proposed by Bemidji Cooperative passenger services generally available. obligations and the expenses necessarily Creamery Association: The system of accounts and reports as incurred by the market administrator Proposal No. 8. Add the Minnesota now constituted is oriented essentially or such person in liquidating such funds, counties of Beltrami and Hubbard to the toward a general passenger operation shall be distributed to the contributing marketing area. and thus does not contain sufficient de­ handlers and producers in an equitable Copies of this notice may be procured tail to permit a satisfactory costing of manner. from the Hearing Clerk, Room 112-A, operations. To fill this gap, the Board Administration''Building, U.S. Depart­ promulgated a regulation1 requiring the M iscellaneous P rovisions ment of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. certificated air carriers to file separate § 1060.90 Separability of provisions. 20250, or may be there inspected. reports on scheduled all-cargo opera­ Signed at Washington, D.C., on July 5, tions, based on their own allocations of If any provision of this part, or its 1966. cost and investment. This regulation application to any person or circum­ Clarence H. G irard, was given an expiration date of July 1, stances, is held invalid, the application Deputy Administrator, 1968 in anticipation of interim action of such provision, and of the remaining Regulatory Programs. which would provide the basic informa­ provisions of this part, to other persons [F.R, Doc. 66-74:57; Filed July 7, 1966; tion for the Board to develop such cost or circumstances shall not be affected 8:48 a.m.I data. thereby. To achieve this end, the system iff ac­ counts and reports would have to be § 1060.91 Agents. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD amended to produce more refined finan­ The Secretary may, by designation in cial information. However, because of writing, name any officer or employee of [ 14 CFR Part 241 1 the far-reaching effects of accounting the United States to act as his agent or [Docket No. 17461] changes upon the carriers’ internal pro­ representative in connection with any of cedures, any formal modification of the the provisions of this part. UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS accounts and reports would be postponed Proposed by Red River Valley Milk AND REPORTS FOR CERTIFICATED until January 1, 1968, to allow a test Producers Pool, Barnes County Coopera­ AIR CARRIERS period before implementation. The tive Creamery, Cass-Clay Creamery, Inc,, present proposal, in addition to making Fergus Dairy, Red River Valley Milk Refinements To Facilitate Costing of various clarifying and updating revisions Producers Association, Jamestown Milk Services to the regulations, would require Group Producers Association, North. Central J u ly 1,1966. in air carriers to report certain addi­ Milk Producers Association, Southern Notice is hereby given that the Civil tional financial detail on a memorandum Valley Milk Producers Association, and Aeronautics Board has under considera­ basis, effective January 1, 1967. The Lakes Dairy Cooperative: tion a proposed amendment to Part 241 proposed memorandum report forms are Proposal No. 2. Amend § 1060.6 of the of the Economic Regulations which attached hereto as Exhibits 1 and 2.1 proposed order by adding the following would provide certain additional finan­ With respect to the investment in counties to the marketing area: In Min­ cial detail to facilitate costing of opera­ ground property and equipment and re­ nesota, the counties of Beltrami, Big tions and would update or clarify present lated current depreciation expense, the Stone, Clearwater, Hubbard, Lake of the provisions of the regulation. proposal would require subclassification Woods, Roseau, Swift and that part of The principal features of the proposed of property units within certain accounts Polk County lying east of U.S. Highway amendment are described in the explan­ according to use for aircraft, passengers, No. 59; and in South Dakota, the coun­ atory statement below and the proposed or cargo, withUnits used for more than ties of Grant, Marshall, and Roberts. amendment is set forth below in the one of these or for other purposes classi­ Proposed by Oak Grove Dairy; proposed rule. The amendment is pro­ fied in “general” classifications. The Proposal No. 3. Increase to at least posed under authority of sections 204(a) investment and depreciation expense in 20 percent the percentage of a handler’s and 407(a) of the Federal Aviation Act each account or subclassification would total receipts from dairy farmers that of 1958, as amended (72 Stat. 743, 766; then be assigned or allocated to aircraft he must deliver in the marketing area 49 U.S.C. 1324,1377). servicing, passenger servicing, cargo in order to qualify him for the pool. Interested persons may participate in servicing, or “other” functions. Simi­ Proposed by Foremost Dairies, Inc,: the proposed rule making through sub­ larly, expenses are to be subclassified Proposal No. 4. In the event the North mission of ten (10) copies of written within certain expense accounts and as­ Dakota counties of Dickey, Eddy, Foster, data, views, or arguments pertaining signed or allocated to aircraft, passenger, Griggs, Kidder, La Moure, Stutsman, and thereto, addressed to the Docket Section, or cargo servicing functions as appro­ Wells are included in the marketing area, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, priate. the marketing area should be extended D.C. 20428. All relevant material re­ 1 Part 242—Reporting Results of Scheduled to include the following counties; all in ceived on or before August 8, 1966, will All-Cargo Services; Regulation ER-430, effec­ the State of North Dakota: Adams, Bill­ be considered by the Board before taking tive Apr. 5,1965. , , . ings, Bottineau, Bowman, Burke, Bur­ final action on the proposed rule. 1 Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 filed as part of original leigh, Divide, Dunn, Emmons, Golden Copies of such communications will be document.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131—rFRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 9359 The submission of the above detail in breviations—Group I Air Carriers, as corded in account 89 Miscellaneous Non­ memorandum form is proposed solely to follows: operating Debits. minimize the task of incorporating the A. By deleting the following air 6. By amending Section 14—Objective refinements in the carriers’ accounting carriers: Classification—Nonoperating Income and systems. The experience gained through South Pacific Air Lines___ South Pacific. Expense, by revising account 89 “Mis­ these memorandum reports is expected AAXICO Airlines, Inc_____ AAXICO. cellaneous Nonoperating Debits” to read: to disclose problems or deficiencies that TJ.S. Overseas Airlines, Inc— U.S. Overseas. could be remedied before modifying the 89 Miscellaneous Nonoperating Debits. account structure. B. By changing the formal designa­ In addition to-the foregoing, the pro­ tions of the following air carriers to read: Record here all debits of a nonoperat­ posal updates or clarifies certain sections Alaska Coastal Airlines-___Alaska Coastal. ing character not provided for otherwise, and incorporates the following changes. Vance International Air­ such as fines or penalties imposed by gov­ The instructions for account 57, retitled ways, Inc------Vance. ernmental authorities; costs related to “Employee Benefits and Pensions,” are property held for future use; donations revised to reflect current usage. Ac­ 4. By amending Section 1—Introduc­ for charitable, social or com m u n ity wel­ tion to System of Accounts and Reports, fare purposes; losses on reacquired and count 66 “Uncollectible Accounts” and as follows: account 89 “Miscellaneous Nonoperating retired or resold debt securities of the A. By amendinng Section 1-7 “Inter­ air carrier; and losses on uncollectible Debits” are revised to include an instruc­ pretation of accounts” to read: tion for recording losses and provisions nonoperating receivables or accruals to for losses on nonoperating receivables in Sec. 1—7 Interpretation of accounts. reserve for uncollectible nonoperating re­ the latter account. The reporting on ceivables. This account shall be charged To the end that uniform accounting with amortization of amounts carried in Schedule B-7 (a) and Schedule B-8(a) is may be maintained within the prescribed expanded to include a memorandum balance sheet account 1870 Property Ac­ system, questions involving matters of quisition Adjustment unless otherwise summary of section 406(d) capital gain significance which are not clearly pro­ balances remaining unused. The in­ approved or directed by the Civil Aero­ vided for should be submitted to the nautics Board. structions for Schedule B-41 “Invest­ Director, Bureau of Accounts and Sta­ ments Held by, or for the Account of, tistics, for explanation, interpretation, or 7. By amending Section 21—Introduc­ Respondent” are clarified, and a column resolution. tion to System of Reports, as follows: is added for reporting the current market B. By amending Section 1-8 “Address A. By revising paragraph (e) to read: value or the net book value of the secu­ for reports and correspondence” to read: (e) Each air carrier shall submit to rities, as shown in Exhibit 3 s attached the Bureau of Accounts and Statistics, hereto. Sec. 1—8 Address for reports and corre­ Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, Proposed rule. It is proposed to amend spondence. D.C. 20428, four (4) copies of each sched­ Part 241 of the Economic Regulations Reports, statements and correspond­ ule, except as hereinafter indicated in (14 CFR Part 241), effective .Tfl.nnq.ry i, ence submitted to the Civil Aeronautics section 22 General Reporting Instruc­ 1967, as follows: Board in accordance with or relating to tions. All schedules are set up in units 1. By amending Section 02—Adminis-instructions and requirements contained of eight sheets each with snap-out inter­ wation of Accounting and Reporting herein shall be addressed to the Bureau leaf carbons between sheets. The first Regulations, by revising the introductory of Accounts and Statistics, Civil Aero­ sheet of each set is of white opaque paper paragraph to read: nautics Board, Washington, D.C. 20428, and the second of white translucent Delegated authority. Under authority the organizational unit responsible for paper. The third, fourth, and fifth sheets * oofated ky the Board as set forth in administering the accounting and re­ are of green opaque paper and the sixth, §385.18 of Part 385 of the Organization porting functions of the Civil Aeronau­ seventh, and eighth are of buff opaque Regulations (14 CFR Part 385), the Di­ tics Board. paper. The data columns of the first rector, Bureau of Accounts and Statis- 5. By amending Section 13—Objective sheet of certain schedules are separated HCS’ js,authorized to take any or all of Classification—Operating Expenses, as by perforations to permit disassembly the following actions in administering follows: for clipboard statistical processing. The tne accounting, reporting and record- A. By revising account 57 “Insur- remaining sheets are imperforated and retention requirements of the sundry ance—Employee Welfare” to read as are of a format which permits filing parts of the Economic Regulations: follows: within binders designed for standard *y amending Section 03—Glossary, 8M2" x 14" sheets. The four copies of to restate the definitions for “Aircraft 57 Employee Benefits and Pensions. each schedule filed with the Civil Aero­ to service—carrier’s equip- nautics Board shall consist of the original Record here all costs for the benefit white sheet and the three green sheets. me.n.t f°r “Cargo” as follows: or protection of employees including all days assigned to service— pension expenses whether for payments B. By deleting paragraph (h) thus: daZ ewiPment. The number of to or on behalf of retired employees or (h) [Reserved] thmnc/h htrcraft owned or acquired for accruals or annuity payments to pro­ C. By revising paragraph (i) as fol­ chamro^ rental or lease (bu t n o t in te r- vide for pensions; and all expenses for lows: in?n?2 are V1 Possession of the report- accident, sickness, hospital and death (1) By deleting the following line from servip^ ca*3ler hnd are available for benefits to employees or the cost of in­ the list of Route Air Carrier Reporting Dlustho.0« reporting carrier’s routes surance or provisions for self-insurance Entities: in sprvii1Uinker of days such aircraft are to provide these benefits. Include, also, in te S ^ °n routes of others under expenses incurred in medical, educa­ South Pacific Air Lines_____ Int/Ter-Paciflc SoJerW Includes days tional or recreational activities for the due to 1 tothPorarily out of service (2) By changing the formal corporate benefit of employees. Do not include va­ name or operations abbreviation as fol­ £ t t ^ eCanceUations- E lu d e s cation and sick leave pay, which shall be lows: h a n d h n f^ ly ac9uired aircraft are on recorded in the regular salary accounts. use davs .avaiJal>le for productive B. By revising account 66 “Uncollecti­ Alaska Coastal Airlines— Dom/Can-Special. other San w orJ eased to others (for ble Accounts” to read as follows: Eastern Air Lines, Inc____Dom/Can-Trunk, Possession^*« ^ tet'oh an ge) a n d days in Int/Ter. 66 Uncollectible Accounts. Pan American World fr0m Airways, Inc___...... Int/Ter-Atlantic, Record here losses on uncollectible Int/Ter-Latin P asS gm *“ revenUe trafflc other 111811 operating receivables for which no re­ Amer., Int/T er- serve has been established. Also enter Pacific. Her Q?„aS dineJSectl“n 04—Air Car- ______^hgs and Standard Name Ab- in this account provisions for estimated 8. By amending Section 22—General losses on operating receivables and ad­ Reporting Instructions, as follows: justments of accumulated provisions. docume^^6 2, and 3 filed as part of original A. By amending the list of schedules Losses on nonoperating receivables or in paragraph (a) to add lines for two provisions for such losses shall be re­ memorandum schedules as follows *

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9360 PROPOSED RULE MAKING erty or equipment is to be reported ac­ Filing cording to use. A “general” subclassifi­ cation is provided for units of property Schedule No. Postmark utilized in more than one type of service Frequency interval (days) or for other than the services listed. With respect to account 1636 Furniture, Monthly______30 Fixtures and Office Equipment, data Memorandum Allocation of Ground Property to Services——------Quarterly...... 40 processing machines used for reserva­ ——.do______40 tions purposes shall be included in the * * * • • • * * • * * * data processing machines subclassifica­ Monthly...... — 3a tion; all other technical reservations Mnmnrandirm Allocation of Selected Expenses to Services.-.—— Quarterly______40 equipment, such as remote inquiry sta­ T-L ...... Monthly Statement of Summarized Traffic and Capacity Statistics. Monthly______tions, whether at reservations control centers or at ticket counters, shall be classified as reservations equipment. B. By amending paragraph (d) as 406(d) of the Act. The summary shall (e) Columns 2 through 5, and 6 follows: list the date of sale or other disposition through 9 shall reflect, respectively, de­ (1) By amending the introductory from which the gain was derived and the preciated cost at the end of the report­ paragraph of paragraph (d) to read as related balance remaining in account ing period and depreciation expense for follows: 1550. the reporting period. Property units (d) Statements of accounting or sta­ C. By amending the reporting instruc­ used predominantly in servicing passen­ tistical procedures required to be filed tions for Schedule B-41—Investments gers, cargo (including baggage), or air­ under this system of accounts and re­ Held by, or for the Account of, Respond­ craft shall be directly assigned to such ports axe recapitulated below. These ent to read as follows: service; units used in more than one of these services or for other functions shall statements, where applicable, shall be S chedule B-41—I nvestments H eld by , filed in duplicate at least 30 days before OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF, RESPONDENT be allocated on a basis commensurate the date on which the procedures are to with the facts. Because of the broad dis­ become effective. Each statement shall (a) This schedule shall be filed by all tribution and minimal amounts involved, be submitted on a separate page to facili­ route air carriers. Furniture, Fixtures, and Office Equip­ tate processing and filing. Such proce­ (b) The data in this schedule shall ment other than data processing ma­ dures shall be regarded as effective 30 agree, in total, with corresponding chines and reservations equipment, and days after receipt by the Board unless amounts reflected in balance sheet ac­ Miscellaneous Ground Equipment may the carrier is notified before that time counts 1510 Investments in Associated be allocated entirely to the “General” of Board objections; provided that effec­ Companies and 1530 Other Investments classification in columns 5 and 9. To tive 60 days following notice the Board and Receivables. The data shall be facilitate reporting, guidelines are drawn may require modification of any pre­ grouped as between investments held in opposite each ground property item in viously effective procedure covered by the name of the air carrier and invest­ the applicable columns. such statements. ments held in the name of others for the (f ) For units of property used by more (2) By adding new items (14) and account of the air carrier. Each group than one operating entity or service, a (15) to the statements of accounting shall be separately subtotaled by invest­ statement shall be filed no later than procedures to read as follows: ments in associated companies and by January 1,1967, describing for each type (14) Procedures for allocation ^ of investments in other than associated of property the basis of allocation. No­ ground property to services as required companies. tice of any change in allocation methods by section 23 Memorandum Allocation of (c) Column 1 shall reflect the name shall be filed no later than the report in Ground Property to Services. of each associated company, and each which first reflected. (See section (15) Procedures for allocation of -other issuer of securities held by the air 22(d).) selected expenses to services as required cdjricr« 10. By amending Section 24—Profit by section 23 Memorandum Allocation of (d) Column 4, “Cost” shall reflect the and Loss Elements, to insert, after the Selected Expenses to Services. cost of the investments to the carrier. Interim Income Statement, a schedule (3) By deleting in its entirety the final (e) Column 5, “Market or Book Value” providing an allocation of certain ex­ shall reflect the market value as at the penses as follows : r unnumbered paragraph of paragraph date of the schedule, or, where the se­ (d) which presently follows subpara­ M emorandum A llocation of S elected graph (13) and precedes paragraph (e)^ curity is not traded publicly, the book value thereof. E xpenses to S ervices 9. By amending Section 23—Certifica­ (f) Column 6, “Number of Shares or tion and Balance Sheet Elements, as (a) This schedule shall be filed, in Debt Principal Amount” shall reflect the duplicate, by each Group IH air carrier. follows: number of shares of stock or the prin­ (b) Separate schedules shall be filed A. By adding new paragraph (f) to cipal amount of bonds or notes held by for each operating entity of the air Schedule B-7(a) Reinvestment of Flight the air carrier. Equipment Capital Gains to read as carrier. D. By inserting, after the Interim Bal­ (c) This schedule includes only se­ follows: ance Sheet, a schedule providing an allo­ lected objective expense accounts within (f) This schedule shall include a sep­cation of ground property investment those functions relating to aircraft ana arate memorandum summary of the re­ and depreciation expense as follows: equipment funds in account 1550 Special traffic servicing, reservations, sales ana Funds—Other, under benefit of section M emorandum Allocation of G round advertising. 406(d) of the Act. The summary shall P roperty to S ervices (d) Columns 2 through 10 shall reflect list the date of sale or other disposition (a) This schedule shall be filed, in a direct assignment or allocation of tne from which the gain was derived and the duplicate, by each Group IH air carrier. expense in each of the indicated accoun related balance remaining in account (b) Separate schedules shall be filed and functions to the several services on 1550. for each operating entity of the air a basis commensurate with the fac. carrier. Column 6 shall reflect compensation to B. By adding new paragraph (h) to passenger handling personnel and otner Schedule B-8(a)—Flig h t Equipment (c) This schedule shall include the net investment after depreciation and expenses at reservations control cente Capital Gains Invested or Deposited for and related facuities used essentially m Reinvestment in Flight Equipment to the current depreciation expense for all read as follows: ground property and equipment in ac­ the reservations activity. Tim a®f counts 1630 through 1640. ment or allocation to services shouia This schedule shall include a sep­ made with the same degree of contro arate memorandum summary of the re- (d> Column 1 lists the ground prop­ erty accounts and, for certain accounts, if the data were being entered in equipment funds in account 1550 Special accounts within the carrier’s system o Funds—other, under benefit of section the subclassifications in which the prop-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 9361 accounts. To facilitate reporting, guide are of buff opaque paper. The data pal amount of bonds or notes held by the lines are drawn opposite each expense columns of the first sheet of certain air carrier. item in the applicable columns. schedules are separated by perforations [F.R. Doc. 66-7416; Filed, July 7, 1966; (e) For expenses not directly assign­to permit disassembly for clipboard 8:49 a.m.] able to a particular service, a statement statistical processing. The remaining shall be filed no later than January 1, sheets are unperforated and are of a for­ 1967, describing the basis for allocating mat which permits filing within binders each item to the indicated services. designed for standard 8% " by 14" Notice of any change in allocation sheets. The four copies of each schedule FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY methods shall be filed no later than the filed with the Civil Aeronautics Board [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 report in which first reflected. (See sec­ shall consist of the original white sheet [Airspace Docket No. 66-CE-52] tion 22(d).) and the three green sheets. 11. By amending Section 25—Traffic B. By revising the list of “Supplemen­ TRANSITION AREA and Capacity Elements by revising in­ tal Air Carrier Reporting Entities” in structions for Schedule T-5—Monthly paragraph (h) to read: Proposed Alteration Listing of Summarized Passenger Loads Supplemental Air Carrier R eporting The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ by Flight Stages—Local Service Air Car­ Entities sidering an amendment to Part 71 of the riers, as follows: American Flyers Airline Corp.- Federal Aviation Regulations which A By revising the table for punch Capitol Airways, Inc. would alter controlled airspace in the cards in paragraph (b) in pertinent part Johnson Flying Service, Inc. Springfield, 111., terminal area. to read: Modem Air Transport, Inc. The Springfield, 111., transition area is Overseas National Airways, Inc. presently designated as: Card column Item Purdue Aeronautics Corp. Description Saturn Airways, Inc. That airspace extending upward from 700 Southern Air Transport, Inc. feet above the surface within a 7-mile lft-17____ ... Standard Airways, Inc. radius of Capital Airport, Springfield, 111. 18-19...... Segment num- The segment in Trans International Airlines, Inc. (latitude 39°50'35" N., longitude 89°40'35" ber of flight which the two city W.); within 2 miles each side of the ILS stage. pairs are operated. Vance International Airways, Inc. World Airways, Inc. localizer SW course, extending from the 7- Zantop Air Transport, Inc. mile radius area to 12 miles S of the OM; and B. By adding new item (10) to para­ that airspace extending upward from 1,200 graph (d) to read: 13. By amending Section 33—Certifi­ feet above the surface within a 26-mile (10) Column 12 shall reflect the seg­ cation and Balance Sheet Elements, as radius of Capital Airport; that airspace ex­ follows: tending from the 26-mile radius area ment number in which the flight stage is bounded on the E by longitude 89° 33'00" W., operated, as authorized by the Civil Aero­ A. By revising paragraph (h) of on the SE byV—426, on the S by the arc of nautics Board. Schedule B -ll—Current and Long Term a 33-mile radius circle centered on the Lam- C. By revising paragraph (f) to read: Receivables; Current and Long Term bert-St. Louis Municipal Airport (latitude (f) The aircraft type codes for each Payables, to read: 38°44'50". N., longitude 90°21'55" W.), on aircraft type to be used for reporting on (h) Line^items which include claims the W by the W boundary of V-9W and longi­ this schedule shall be as follows: in litigation or unpaid court judgments tude 90°10'00" W.; and that airspace W of shall be footnoted and such claims and Springfield within 6 miles N and 10 miles S Aircraft judgments shall be listed by amount and of the Capital VOR 269° radial, extending Aircraft types typ e codes from the 26-mile radius area to 45 miles W explained at the bottom of the schedule of the VOR. Convair: in the space provided therefor. CV-600 ______------23 CV-580______------24 B. By amending the reporting instruc­ The Federal Aviation Agency, having CV-240 ______"2 ------26 tion for Schedule B-41—Investments completed a comprehensive review of the cv-34o/44o______: ___ ------26 Held by, or for the Account of, Respond­ terminal airspace structural require­ Douglas: ent to read as follows: ments in the Springfield, 111., terminal DC-3______--- 37 area, proposes the following airspace DC-9...... 39 S chedule R -41— I nvestm ents H eld by, action : Fairchild: OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF, RESPONDENT Redesignate the Springfield, Illinois, P -2 7 ______--- 48 PH-227_____ (a) This schedule will be filed by transition area as that airspace extend­ Martin: Z~Z_I_ zzizrzzz ----- 49 each supplemental air carrier. ing upward from 700 feet above the sur­ M-202 ______------69 (b) The data in this schedule shall face within a 7-mile radius of Capital M-404 —i m i l l l l ” " ~~ --- 70 agree, in total, with corresponding Airport, Springfield, Illinois (latitude British Aircraft Corp., BAC 1-11 ___ 75 amounts reflected in balance sheet ac­ 39°50'35" N„ longitude 89°40'35" W.) ; Nord, N-262______80 counts 1510 Investments in Associated within 2 miles each side of the ILS Companies and 1530 Other Investments localizer SW course, extending from the As additional aircraft types are placed in and Receivables. The data shall be service, carriers will be advised by the 7-mile radius area to 12 miles SW of the grouped as between investments held in OM; and that airspace extending up­ if rector, Bureau of Accounts and Sta­ the name of the air carrier and invest­ tistics of the code numbers to be used ward from 1,200 feet above the surface lor reporting purposes. ments held in the name of others for within an area bounded by a line begin­ the account of the air carrier. Each ning at intersection of longitude 89 °- 12. By amending Section 31—Intro- group shall be separately subtotaled by 33'00" W. and the NW boundary of V- low1011 to System of Reports as fol- investments in associated companies and 426, thence SW along the NW boundary by investments in other than associated of V—426 to and counter-clockwise along revising paragraph (e) to read: companies. the arc of a 33-mile radius circle centered «¡ha?i supplemental air carrier (c) Column 1 shall reflect the name on the Lambert-St. Louis Municipal Air­ and t'*16 Bureau of Accounts of each associated company, and each port (latitude 38°44'50" N., longitude xls^lcs’ ^v il Aeronautics Board, other issuer of securities held by the 90°21'55" W.) to and N along the W wsshmgtcm, D.C. 20428, four (4) copies air carrier. boundary of V-9W, to and N along longi­ indwh i ? hedule’ except as hereinafter (d) Column 4, “Cost” shall reflect the tude 90°18'00" W., to and W along a line in a T n ^ in section 32, “General Report- cost of the investments to the carrier. 10 miles S of and parallel to the Capital, ing Instructions.” All schedules are set (e) Column 5, “Market or Book Value” 111., VOR 269° radial, to and N along ,of eight sheets each with shall reflect the market value as at the longitude 90°29'00" W., to and E along Th carbons between sheets, date of the schedule, or, where the secu­ a line 6 miles N of and parallel to the lam i Sheet of each set is of white rity is not traded publicly, the book Capital VOR 269° radial, to and clock­ tra m w aFer 811(1 second of white value thereof. wise along the arc of a 26-mile radius and flf^nt v?aper> Th® third, fourth, (f) Column 6, “Number of Shares or circle centered on Capital Airport, to Paper and ,are of sreen opaque Debt Principal Amount” shall reflect the Per and the sixth, seventh, and eighth and NE along the SE boundary of V-173, number of shares of stock or the princi­ to and S along longitude 88°39'59" W.,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9362 RULES AND REGULATIONS to and SW along the NW boundary of will be considered before action is taken W of the 195° bearing from the Brain­ V-191, to and counter-clockwise along on the proposed amendment. No public erd-Crow Wing County Municipal Air­ the arc of a 15-mile radius circle cen­ hearing is contemplated at this time, but port extending from the airport to 15 tered on the Decatur, 111., VOR, to and arrangements for informal conferences miles S of the airport. W along a line 6 miles N of and parallel with Federal Aviation Agency officials One special approach procedure for to the Decatur 285° radial, to and clock­ may be made by contacting the Regional Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport has wise along the arc of a 26-mile radius Air Traffic Division Chief. Any data, been modified and a new special approach circle centered on the Capital Airport, to views, or arguments presented during procedure has been developed. As a and S along longitude 89°33'00" W. to such conferences must also be submitted result, and having completed a com­ the point of beginning, and that airspace in writing in accordance with this notice prehensive review of airspace structural extending upward from 3,000 MSL in order to become part of the record for requirements at Brainerd, Minn., the within an area bounded on the N by consideration. The proposal contained Federal Aviation Agency proposes to latitude 40°20'00" N., on the E by the in this notice may be changed in the light alter the control zone and transition area W boundary of V-233 on the S by the of comments received. at Brainerd, Minn., as follows: arc of a 26-mile radius circle centered The public docket will be available for (1) Redesignate the Brainerd, Mirrn., on the Capital Airport, on the west by examination by interested persons in the control zone as that airspace within a longiture 90°00'00" W.; within an area office of the Regional Counsel, Federal 5-mile radius of Brainerd-Crow Wing bounded on the N by latitude 40°20'00" Aviation Agency, 601 East 12th , County Airport (latitude 46°23'25" N., W., on the SE by the NW boundary of Kansas City, Mo. 64106. longitude 94°08'20" W.); within 2 miles V-9, on the S by the arc of a 26-mile This amendment is proposed under each side of the Brainerd VOR 300° ra­ radius circle centered on Capital Airport, the authority of sec. 307(a) of the Fed­ dial extending from the 5-mile radius on the W by the E boundary of V-233; eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 UJS.C. 1348). zone to the VOR; within 2 miles each side of the 313° bearing from Brainerd- within an area bounded on the N by lati­ Issued at Kansas City, Mo., on June 24, tude 40°20'00" N., on the SE by the Crow Wing County Airport extending NW boundary of V-173, on the NW by 1966. from the 5-mile radius zone to 7 miles E dward C. M arsh, NW of the airport; and within 2 miles the SE boundary of V-9; and within an Director, Central Region. area bounded on the NW by the arc of each side of the 043° bearing from a 26-mile radius circle centered on Cap­ [FJR. Doc. 66-7419; Filed, July 7, 1966; Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport, ex­ ital Airport on the N by a line 10 miles 8:45 a.m.] y tending from the 5-mile radius zone to 7 S of and parallel to the Decatur 285° miles NE of the airport. This control radial, on the SE by the NW boundary [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 zone shall be effective during the specific of V-191 and V-426, on the W by longi­ [Airspace Docket No. 66—CE-58] dates and/or times established in ad­ tude 89°33'00" W. vance by a Notice to Airmen and con­ A review of existing and planned air­ CONTROL ZONE AND TRANSITION tinuously published in the Airman’s In­ craft activity makes modification of the AREA formation Manual. Springfield, HI., transition area neces­ (2) Redesignate the Brainerd, Minn., sary to provide controlled airspace Proposed Alteration transition area as that airspace ex­ for aircraft operations. Ozark Airlines The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ tending upward from 700 feet above the plans to provide turbojet DC-9 service sidering an amendment to Part 71 of the surface within a 7-mile radius of at Capital Airport in the near future. Federal Aviation Regulations which Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport The existing controlled airspace is not would alter the controlled airspace at (latitude 46°23'25" N., longitude 94°08'- sufficient in size to contain the required Brainerd, Minn. 20" W.); within 2 miles each side of the outer fixes and the associated holding The Brainerd, Minn., control zone is 043° bearing from Brainerd-Crow Wing patterns for these aircraft. Controlled presently designated as that airspace County Airport, extending from the 7- airspace is also necessary to provide within a 5-mile radius of Brainerd-Crow mile radius area to 8 miles NE of the air­ controlled airspace for a proposed JAL/ Wing County Airport (latitude 46°23'25" port; within 2 miles each side of the ADP approach procedure to be estab­ N„ longitude 94°08'20" W.); and within 198° bearing from Brainerd-Crow Wing lished on the radio beacon at the outer 2 miles each side of the Brainerd VOR County Airport, extending from the 7- marker. Additional controlled airspace 300° radial, extending from the 5-mile mile radius area to 12 & miles S of the is necessary to provide sufficient area for radius zone to the VOR; and within 2 airport; and within 5 miles NE and 8 the Kansas City Center to provide more miles each side of the 313° bearing from miles SW of the 313° bearing from efficient radar service to aircraft in the the Brainerd-Crow Wing County Muni­ Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport, area. cipal Airport, extending from the 5-mile extending from the airport to 12 miles The proposed transition area in con­ radius zone to 7 miles NW of the air­ NW of the airport; and that airspace ex­ junction with the existing control zone port. This control zone shall be effec­ tending upward from 1,200 feet above will provide controlled airspace for air­ tive during the times established by a the surface within 5 miles SW and o craft executing prescribed instrument Notice to Airmen and published in the miles NE of the Brainerd VOR 120 flight rule procedures in the Springfield, Airman’s Information Manual. radial, extending from the VOR to 13 HI., terminal area. The Brainerd, Minn., transition area miles SE of the VOR; within 5 miles SE The floors of the airways that traverse is presently designated as that airspace and 8 miles NW of the 043° bearing from the transition area proposed herein will extending upward from 700 feet above Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport, automatically coincide with the floors of the surface within a 7-mile radius of extending from the airport to 12 miles the transition area. the Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport NE of the airport; and within 5_miles w Specific details of this proposal and (latitude 46°23'25" N., longitude 94°- and 8 miles E of the 198° bearing from changes in approach procedures may be 08'20" W.); and within 2 miles each side Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport, examined by contacting the Chief, Air­ of the 195° bearing from the Brainerd- extending from the airport to 16 miles o space Branch, Air Traffic Division, Fed­ Crow Wing County Municipal Airport of the airport. eral Aviation Agency, 601 East 12th extending from the 7-mile radius area During the times of its designation, the Street, Kansas City, Mo. 64106. to 11 miles S of the airport; and within altered proposed control zone would pro­ 5 miles NE and 8 miles SW of the 313° vide controlled airspace protection to Interested persons may submit such aircraft executing the prescribed PUDUc written data, views or arguments as they bearing from the Brainerd-Crow Wing County Municipal Airport extending and special instrument approach pr may desire. Communications should be cedures at Brainerd-Crow Wing County submitted in triplicate to the Director, from the airport to 12 miles NW of the airport; and that airspace extending up­ Airport during descent below 1,000 iee Central Region, Attention: Chief, Air above the surface, and for departing at - Traffic Division, Federal Aviation ward from 1,2000 feet above the surface within 5 miles SW and 8 miles NE of the craft during climb to 700 feet above t Agency, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas surface. Weather reporting services ior City, Mo. 64106. All communications re­ Brainerd VOR 120° and 300° radials, ex­ tending from 5 miles NW to 13 miles SE this control zone will continue to be pr received within 45 days after publication vided by North Central Airlines. of this notice in the F ederal R egister of the VOR; within 8 miles E and 5 miles

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 9363 The altered proposed 700-foot floor This amendment is proposed under the its state aircraft will be operated in in­ transition area would provide controlled authority of section 307(a) of the Federal ternational airspace with due regard for airspace protection for aircraft departing Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348). the safety of civil aircraft. Brainerd-Crow Wing County Airport Since this action involves, in part, the during climb from 700 to 1,200 feet above Issued at Kansas City, Mo., on June 24, designation of navigable airspace outside the surface. It would provide the same 1966. the United States, the Administrator has protection for aircraft departing the E dward C. M arsh, consulted with the Secretary of State airport when the control zone is not in Director, Central Region. and the Secretary of Defense in accord­ effect. During the times the control [F.R. Doc. 66-7420; Filed, July 7, 1966; ance with the provisions of Executive zone is not designated, the 700-foot floor 8:45 a.m.] Order 10854. transition area would provide controlled Interested persons may participate in airspace protection for aircraft executing the proposed rule making by submitting the prescribed instrument approach pro­ [ 14 CFR Parts 71, 75 ] such written data, views, or arguments cedures for Brainerd-Crow Wing County as they may desire. Communications Airport during descent from 1,500 to 700 [Airspace Docket No. 65-AL-28] should identify the airspace docket num­ feet above the surface, and during ber and be submitted in triplicate to the descent from 1,500 to 1,000 feet above FEDERAL AIRWAY, JET ROUTE, CON­ Director, Alaskan Region, Attention: the surface when the control zone is TROL AREA, REPORTING POINTS Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ designated. tion Agency, 632 Sixth Avenue, Anchor­ The proposed 1,200-foot floor transi­ Proposed Alterations and Designation age, Alaska 99501. All communications tion area would provide controlled air­ The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ received within 30 days after publication space protection for the portions of the sidering amendments to Parts 71 and 75 of this notice in the F ederal R egister prescribed instrument approach proce­ of the Federal Aviation Regulations will be considered before action is taken dures which are executed at and above which would: Extend and establish VOR on the proposed amendments. The pro­ 1,500 feet above the surface. It would Federal airway No. 317 between Harbor posals contained in this notice may be also provide controlled airspace for the Point Intersection and Anchorage, changed in the light of comments holding patterns at the Brainerd VOR. Alaska, with a south alternate between received. The floors of the airways which tra­ Hinchinbrook, Alaska, and Anchorage; An official docket will be available for verse the transition areas proposed here­ alter Control 1310; realign Jet Route No. examination by interested persons at the in would automatically coincide with the 501 between Yakutat, Alaska, and Federal Aviation Agency, Office of the floors of the transition areas. Anchorage and designate Hinchinbrook General Counsel, Attention: Rules Since the actions proposed herein were VOR as a low altitude and high altitude Docket, 800 Independence Avenue SW., developed to provide controlled airspace reporting point. Washington, D.C. 20553. An informal for a new approach procedure and for As parts of these proposals relate to the docket also will be available for exami­ revision to an established procedure, no navigable airspace outside the United nation at the office of the Regional Air procedural changes will be required. States, this notice is submitted in conso­ Traffic Division Chief. Specific details of this proposal and the nance with the ICAO International The Federal Aviation Agency has un­ procedures which it was developed to pro­ Standards and Recommended Practices. der consideration the following airspace tect may be examined by contacting the Applicability of International Stand­ actions associated with the commission­ Chief, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Divi­ ards and Recommended Practices, by the ing of a VOR at Hinchinbrook, Alaska. sion, Federal Aviation Agency, Federal Air Traffic Service, FAA, in areas outside 1. Extend VOR Federal airway No. 317 Building, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas the domestic airspace of the United from the intersection of Sisters Island, City, Mo. 64106. States is governed by Article 12 and Alaska, 272° T (243° M) and Yakutat, Alaska, 139° T (110° M) radials (Harbor Interested persons may submit such Annex 11 to the Convention on Interna­ tional Civil Aviation (ICAO), which per­ Point Intersection) via Yakutat; Hinch­ written data, views, or arguments as they inbrook, Alaska, VOR (commissioned in may desire. Communications should be tains to the establishment of air navi­ gation facilities and services necessary May 1966); intersection of Hinchinbrook submitted in triplicate to the Director, 286° T (259° M) and Anchorage, Alaska, Central Region, Attention: Chief, Air to promoting the safe, orderly and expe­ ditious flow of civil air traffic. Its pur­ 117° T (092° M) radials; to Anchorage, p*affic Division, Federal Aviation Agency, including a south alternate from Hinch­ 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, Mo. pose is to insure that civil flying on in­ ternational air routes is carried out inbrook to Anchorage via the intersection 64106. All communications received under uniform conditions designed to of the Hinchinbrook 275° T (248° M) and within 45 days after publication of this improve the safety and efficiency of air Anchorage 130° T (105° M) radials, ex­ notice in the F ederal R egister will be operations. cluding the airspace below 2,000 feet MSL considered before action is taken on the outside the United States. The International Standards and Rec­ 2. Alter Control 1310 to exclude the Proposed amendment. No public hear­ ommended Practices in Annex 11 apply airspace below 2,000 feet MSL outside ing is contemplated at this time, but ar­ in those parts of the airspace under the the United States. rangements for informal conferences jurisdiction of a contracting state, de­ 3. Realign Jet Route No. 501 between with Federal Aviation Agency officials rived from ICAO, wherein air traffic serv­ Yakutat and Anchorage via the Hinchin­ ices are provided and also whenever a brook VOR. mny be made by contacting the Regional contracting state accepts the responsibil­ Air Traffic Division Chief. Any data, 4. Designate the Hinchinbrook VOR as ity of providing air traffic services over a low altitude and high altitude reporting views, or arguments presented during high seas or in airspace of undetermined point. sovereignty. A contracting state accept­ ®fl®h conferences must also be submitted These amendments are proposed un­ writing in accordance with this notice ing such responsibility may apply the International Standards and Recom­ der the authority of sec. 307(a) and 1110 order to become part of the record for mended Practices to civil aircraft in a of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 consideration. The proposal contained manner consistent with that adopted for U.S.C. 1348, 1510) and Executive Order to this notice may be changed in the light airspace under its domestic jurisdiction. 10854 (24F.R. 9565). of comments received. In accordance with Article 3 of the Issued in Washington, D.C., on June 30, The public docket will be available for Convention on International Civil Avia­ 1966. examination by interested persons in the tion, Chicago, 1944, state aircraft are H . B. H elstrom, office of the Regional Counsel, Federal exempt from the provisions of Annex 11 Chief, Airspace and and its Standards and Recommended Air Traffic Rules Division, Aviation Agency, 601 East 12th Street, Practices. As a contracting state, the Kansas City, Mo. 64106. [FJl. Doc. 66-7421; Filed, July 7, 1066; United States agreed by Article 3(d) that 8:45 am.] 4

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9364 Notices Original its own certificate and has submitted the t p t / m designation contract comprising Champlin’s rate DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Refugio...... 30 FR . 11977 schedule as its own rate schedule. The Office of the Secretary Victoria______— ------30 F.R. 11977 presently effective rate under said rate MISSOURI Pursuant to the authority set forth schedule with respect to sales from Ap­ above, emergency loans will not be made plicant’s interests is in effect subject to Designation of Areas for Emergency in the above-named counties after June refund in Docket No. RI65-196.1 Ap­ Loans 30, 1967, except to applicants who pre­ plicant has submitted an agreement and viously received emergency or special undertaking to assure the refund of any For the purpose of making emergency livestock loan assistance and who can amounts collected by it in excess of the loans pursuant to section 321 of the qualify under established policies and amount determined to be just and rea­ Consolidated Farmers Home Adminis­ procedures. sonable in said proceeding. Accordingly, tration Act of 1961 (7 U.S.C. 1961), it Applicant will be made party respondent has been determined that in the herein­ Done at Washington, D.C., this 5th in said proceeding, the proceeding will after-named counties in the State of day of July 1966. be redesignated, and the agreement and Missouri natural disasters have caused O rville L. F reeman, undertaking will be accepted for filing. a need for agricultural credit not readily Secretary. After due notice, a petition to inter­ available from commercial banks, co­ vene by the Brooklyn Union Gas Co. operative lending agencies, or other [FR . Doc. 66-7459; Filed, July 7, 1966; was filed in Docket No. CI60-142, in the responsible sources. 8:49 am .] matter of the application filed April 11, 1966, in said docket. Petitions to inter­ Missouri vene by Long Island Lighting Co., Public Butler. Pemiscot. Service Electric & Gas Co. and the Brook­ Dunklin. Ripley. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION lyn Union Gas Co. and a notice of inter­ Mississippi. Scott. [Docket Nos. CI60-142, etc.] vention by the Public Service Commis­ New Madrid. Stoddard. sion of the State of New York were filed Pursuant to the authority set forth TIDEWATER OIL CO. ET AL. in Docket No. CI66-161, in the matter of above, emergency loans will not be made Findings and Order After Statutory the application filed August 26, 1965, in in the above-named counties after June Hearing said docket. A petition to intervene by 30, 1967, except to applicants who pre­ Long Island Lighting was filed in Docket viously received emergency or special J u n e 27,1966. No. CI66-1037, in the matter of the ap­ livestock loan assistance and who can Each of the Applicants listed herein plication filed April 25, 1966, in said qualify under established policies and has filed an application pursuant to docket. A petition to intervene by Long procedures. section 7 of the Natural Gas Act for a Island Lighting Co. was filed in Docket certificate of public convenience and Nos. CI66-1057, CI66-1058, CI66-1059, Done at Washington, D.C., this 5th necessity authorizing the sale and de­ CI66-1060, CI66-1063, CI66-1066, C166- day of July 1966. livery of natural gas in interstate com­ 1068, CI66-1069, and CI66-1070, in the matter of the application filed May 2, O rville L. F reeman, merce, for permission and approval to Secretary. abandon service, or a petition to amend 1966, in said dockets. The petitions to an existing certificate authorization, all intervene and the notice of intervention [P.R. Doc. 66-7456; Filed, July 7, 1966; as more fully described in the respective have been withdrawn, and no other peti­ 8:49 am .] applications and petitions (and any sup­ tions to Intervene, notices of interven­ plements or amendments thereto) which tion, or protests to the grafting of any are on file with the Commission. of the respective applications or peti­ TEXAS The Applicants herein have filed re­ tions in this order have been received. At a hearing held on June 23,1966, the Designation and Extension of Areas lated FPC Gas Rate Schedules and pro­ pose to initiate, abandon or add natural Commission on its own motion received for Emergency Loans gas service in interstate commerce as and made a part of the record in these indicated by the tabulation herein. All proceedings all evidence, including the For the purpose of making emergency applications, amendments and exhibits loans pursuant to section 321 of the Con­ sales certificated herein are either equal thereto, submitted in support of the re­ solidated Farmers Home Administration to or below the ceiling prices established spective authorizations sought herein, Act of 1961 (7 TJ.S.C. 1961), it has been by the Commission’s Statement of Gen­ eral Policy 61-1, as amended, or involve and upon consideration of the record. determined that in the hereinafter- The Commission finds: named counties in the State of Texas sales for which permanent certificates natural disasters have caused a need for have been previously issued; except that (1) Each Applicant herein is a “nat­ agricultural credit not readily available initial sales from the Permian Basin area ural-gas company” within the meaning from commercial banks, cooperative of Texas are authorized to be made at of the Natural Gas Act as heretofore or below the applicable area base rates found by the Commission or will be en­ lending agencies, or other responsible gaged in the sale of natural gas in inter­ sources. and under the conditions prescribed in T exas Opinion Nos. 468 and 468-A. state commerce for resale for ultimate Mobil Oil Corp., Applicant in Docket public consumption, subject to the juris- Hansford. Ochiltree. No. CI66-1Q37, proposes to continue in __4J 4.1_OnH Will Lipscomb. part the sale of natural gas heretofore therefore, be a “natural-gas company It also has been determined that in authorized in Docket No. G-11481 and the hereinafter-named counties in the made pursuant to Champlin Petroleum 1 Pursuant to an offer of settlement file State of Texas a natural disaster has Co. (Operator), et al., FPC Gas Rate Apr. 12, 1966, in Docket N os.RI62—233, et aJU caused a continuing need for agricultural Schedule No. 27. Deliveries of gas from the proceeding in Docket No. RI65-196 w credit not readily available from com­ Applicant’s interests have heretofore terminated with respect to the interests mercial banks, cooperative lending agen­ been made by the operator, Champlin Champlin Petroleum Co. by orde„ cies, or other responsible sources. Petroleum Co. Applicant has filed for June 10, 1966, in Docket Noe. RI62-233, et

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9365 within the meaning of said Act upon tion herein and in the respective appli­ shall the grant of the certificates afore­ the commencement of the service under cations are subject to the requirements said for service to the particular cus­ the respective authorizations granted of subsection (b) of section 7 of the Nat­ tomers involved imply approval of all of hereinafter. ural Gas Act, and such abandonments the terms of the respective contracts (2) The sales of natural gas herein­ should be permitted and approved as particularly as to the cessation of service before described, as more fully described hereinafter ordered. upon termination of said contracts, as in the respective applications, amend­ (8) It is necessary and appropriate in provided by section 7(b) of the Natural ments and/or supplements herein, will carrying out the provisions of the Nat­ Gas Act. Nor shall the grant of the cer­ be made in interstate commerce, sub­ ural Gas Act that the certificates of tificates aforesaid be construed to pre­ ject to the jurisdiction of the Commis­ public convenience and necessity here­ clude the imposition of any sanctions sion, and such sales by the respective tofore issued to the respective Applicants pursuant to the provisions of the Natural Applicants, together with the construc­ herein relating to the abandonments Gas Act for the unauthorized commence­ tion and operation of any facilities sub­ hereinafter permitted and approved ment of any sales of natural gas subject ject to the jurisdiction of the Commission should be terminated. to said certificates. necessary therefor, are subject to the (9) It is necessary and appropriate in (D) The grant of the certificates is­ requirements of subsections (c) and (e) carrying out the provisions of the Nat­ sued herein on all applications filed after of section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. ural Gas Act that the rate suspension April 15,1965, is upon the condition that (3) The sales of natural gas by the proceeding in Docket No. RI65-129 no increase in rate which would exceed respective Applicants, together with the should be terminated. the ceiling prescribed for the given area construction and operation of any fa­ (10) It is necessary and appropriate by paragraph (d) of the Commission’s cilities subject to the jurisdiction of the in carrying out the provisions of the Statement of General Policy 61-1, as Commission necessary therefor, are re­ Natural Gas Act that Mobil Oil Corp. amended, shall be filed prior to the ap­ quired by the public convenience and should be made party respondent in the plicable dates, as indicated by footnotes necessity and certificates therefore proceeding pending in Docket No. RI65- 2 and 4 in the attached tabulation. should be issued as hereinafter ordered 196, that the proceeding should be re­ (E) Certificates are issued herein to and conditioned. designated accordingly, and the agree­ Applicants in Docket Nos. CI66-691, (4) The respective Applicants are ment and undertaking submitted by CI66-762, CI66-841, CI66-929, CI66-955, able and willing properly to do the acts Mobil in said proceeding should be ac­ and CI66-1081 authorizing the continu­ and to perform the services proposed cepted for filing. ance of the related sales which were and to conform to the provisions of the (11) It is necessary and appropriate initiated without prior Commission au­ Natural Gas Act and the requirements, in carrying out the provisions of the thorization. rules and regulations of the Commission Natural Gas Act that the respective re­ (F) Certificates are issued herein to thereunder. lated rate schedules and supplements as Tenneco Oil Co. and Continental Oil Co. (5) It is necessary and appropriate in designated or redesignated in the tabula­ in Docket Nos. CI66-101 and CI66-114, carrying out the provisions of the Nat­ tion herein should be accepted for filing respectively, authorizing Applicants to ural Gas Act and the public convenience as hereinafter ordered. continue the service previously rendered and necessity require that the certificate The Commission orders: by Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp., for which no authorizations heretofore issued by the (A) Certificates of public convenience certificate authorization was granted. Commission in Docket Nos. G-4143, G- and necessity are issued upon the terms (G) Within 45 days from the date of 11481, G-12352, CI60-43, CI60-142, and conditions of this order, authorizing this order Applicants in Docket Nos. CI62-604, CI65-54, CI65-1159,'and CI6&- the sales by the respective Applicants CI66-101 and CI66-114 shall file Rate 478 should be amended as hereinafter herein of natural gas in interstate com­ Schedule-Quality Statements in the for­ ordered and conditioned. merce for resale, together with the con­ mat set forth in ordering paragraph (F) (6) It is necessary and appropriate in struction and operation of any facilities of Opinion No. 468, as modified by carrying out the provisions of the Nat­ subject to the jurisdiction of the Com­ Opinion No. 468-A. No increase in rate ural Gas Act that certificates of public mission necessary for such sales, all as shall be filed prior to January 1, 1968, convenience and necessity should be hereinbefore described and as more fully except in compliance with a specific or­ issued to Natural Gas & Oil Corp. in the described in the respective applications, der of the Commission, for a rate in following dockets by authorizing the amendments, supplements and exhibits excess of the applicable area rate as de­ continuation of service previously ren­ in this proceeding. termined pursuant to Opinion No. 468, dered by Mississippi River Corp.; further, (B) The certificates granted in para­ as modified by Opinion No. 468-A, or the certificates previously issued to Mis­ graph (A) above are not transferable pursuant to a later order of the Com­ sissippi River Corp. should be termi­ and shall be effective only so long as mission. nated: Applicants continue the acts or opera­ (H) Applicant in Docket No. CI66-161 Terminated tions hereby authorized in accordance shall submit a supplement to its related New predecessor's with the provisions of the Natural Gas rate schedule reflecting the 20-cent price certificate certificate Act and the applicable rules, regulations and a revised billing statement indicat­ CI66-1056__ and orders of the Commission. ing such price. CI66-1057- (C) The grant of the certificates is­ (I) Applicant in Docket No. CI66-1097 CI66-1058__ shall submit three copies of a billing CI66-1059_ sued in paragraph (A) above shall not CI66-1060- . be construed as a waiver of the require­ statement for the first month of service. CI66-1061. ments of section 4 of the Natural Gas (J) A certificate is issued herein to CI66-1062 Act or of Part 154 or Part 157 of the Mobil Oil Corp., in Docket No. CI66-1037, CI66-1063__ Commission’s regulations thereunder, authorizing Applicant to continue the CI66-1064- and is without prejudice to any findings sale of natural gas previously covered by CI66-1065-. or orders which have been or may here­ the operator’s certificate (Champlin CI66—1066__ Petroleum Co.) in Docket No. G-11481. CI66-1067- after be made by the Commission in any CI66-1068 proceeding now pending or hereafter in­ (K) The certificate heretofore issued CI66-1069 stituted by or against the respective Ap­ in Docket No. G-11481 is amended by de­ CI66-1070 plicants. Further, our action in this leting therefrom authorization to sell proceeding shall not foreclose nor prej­ gas from the interest of Mobil Oil Corp. i P sS'les of natural gas prop« udice any future proceedings or objec­ (L) The certificates heretofore issued nHn 6 akandoned by the respective tions relating to the operation of any in Docket Nos. CI60-142, CI62-604, CI65- p cants, as hereinbefore described, price or related provisions in the gas 54, CI65-1159, and ÇI66-478 are amended niore fully described, in the tabi purchase contracts herein involved. Nor by adding thereto authorization to sell

Ho. 131---- g FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 3T, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9366 NOTICES natural gas to the same purchasers and FPC rate schedule to be acc¡epted in the same areas as covered by the x Docket No. Purchaser, field, and original authorizations, pursuant to the and date filed Applicant location rate schedule supplements as indicated Description and date of No. Supp. in the tabulation herein. document (M) The certificates heretofore issued F CI60-142____ Tidewater Oil Co. I___ in Docket Nos. G-4143, G-12352 and (C160-43) Co., West Bastian Bay Assignment 3-10-66 i___ 108 9 CI60-43 are amended by deleting there­ C 4-11-66 Field, Plaquemines Assignment 3-22-66 >___ 108 10 Parish, La. Effective date: 1-1-66... from authorization to sell natural gas CI62-604______from acreage assigned to Applicants in C 4-27-66 2 Meade and Buckhannon 4-20-66.« Docket Nos. CI66-160, CI66-1083, and Districts, Upshur County, W. Va. CI6Q-142. €165-54______Tenneco Oil Co. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Supplemental agree- 168 2 (N) Certificates of public convenience C 6-6-66 4 (Operator), et al. Co., South Pine Hollow ment 4-20-66.« Field, Pittsburg and necessity are issued to Natural Gas County, Okla. & Oil Corp. in the following dockets au­ CI65-1159...... Tenneco Oil Co., et al—- El Paso Natural Gas Co., Supplemental agree- 176 7 thorizing the continuation of service C 6-5-66 2 San Juan Basin, Rio ment 4-26-66.« Arriba County, N. Mex. previously rendered by Mississippi River CI66-101...... Tenneco Oil Co.« Contract 10-19-566____ 179 Corp. ; further, the certificates previously A 7-29-65 as South Andrews Field, Assignment 12-16-57 7__ 179 1 amended Andrews County, Tex. Assignment 12-31-57 «... 179 2 issued to Mississippi River Corp. are 5-9-66 and Amendatory agree- 179 3 terminated: 5-16-66.2 ment 10-26-59. Terminated Conveyance (undated) 179 4 Effective date: 1-1-64... New predecessor’s CI66-114...... Continental Oil Co.®______do...... Contract 10-19-56 «___ _ 305 certificate certificate A 8-6-65 as Assignment 12-16-57 7.. . 305 1 CI66-1056. G—10422 amended Assignment 12-31-57 «... 305 2 5-16-66.2 Amendatory agree- 305 3 CI66—1057. G—10466 ment 10-26-59. CI66-1058. G—10467 Conveyance (undated) «_ 305 4 CI66—1059. G—10820 Effective date: 1-1-64__ CI66—1060. G-15039 A C166-160___ Robert E. Campbell Northern Natural Gas Contract 3-6-47...... 1 (G-4143) (successor to Gulf Oil Co., Hugoton Field, Agreement 1-11-60_____ 1 1 CI66-1061. G—15292 F 8-23-65 Corp.). Kearny County, Kans. Assignment 12-7-64 10__ 1 2 CI66-1062. G—18214 C166-161...... Joseph F. Homer and 1 CI66—1063. G—17413 A 8-26-65 Grace Francine Hill Co., a division of Ten- G—7376 Homer.n neco, Inc.,12 Patterson CI66—1064. Field, St. Mary Parish, CI66-1065. G—7376 La. CI66—1066. CP61-62 CI66-478-...... Thomas E. Berry, et al— Arkansas Louisiana Gas Supplemental agree- 16 4 CI66-1067. CP61-233 C 5-9-66 ‘ Co., Arkoma Area, ment 1-17-66.« CP61-141 Latimer County, Okla. CI66—1068. CI66-556______Tidewater Oil Co. (Op- Wunderlich Development Notice of cancellation «78 3 CI66—1069. CP61-141 (G-16928) erator), et al. Co., Southwest Ponca 12-27-65.1« M CI66-1070. CP64-133 B 12-36-65 City Field, Kay County, Okla. (O) Permission for and approval of CI66-691 2 A 2-2-66 « Line Co., Hugoton Statement 1-24-6617.: ... 2 1 the abandonment of service by the re­ Field, Texas County, Court order 4-2-6418___ 2 2 spective Applicants, as hereinbefore de­ Okla. Assignment 4-6-64 i*___ 2 3 CI66-762 - . 1 scribed and as more fully described, in A 2-21-66 2 22 Aztec-Fruitland Field,' Letter agreement 7-5- 1 1 the respective applications herein are San Juan County, N. 60.2‘ granted. Mex. Letter agreement 11- 1 2 23-64. «22 (P) The certificates heretofore issued OI66-R2fi 45 in Docket Nos. G-4824, G-7445, and G- A 3-4-66 Petroleum Corp.22 Blanco Field, San Juan Assignment 7-11-53 2®32. 45 1 County, N. Mex. Assignment 7-11-53 25 ««. 45 2 16928 are terminated. 45 3 (Q) The rate suspension proceeding Letter agreement 9-28- Assignment 9-30-53...... 45 4 in Docket No. RI65-129 is terminated. Assignment 10-26-53 27 «2. 45 5 (R) Mobil Oil Corp. shall be re­ Assignment 10-20-5327 ««. 45 6 spondent in the proceeding pending in Amendatory agreement 45 7 11-10-53. Docket No. RI65-196, the proceeding is Assignment 7-8-55 28 «2. - 45 8 redesignated accordingly,2 and the agree­ Assignment 7-8-55 28 ««. _ 45 9 Name change 4-9-5928.. 45 10 ment and undertaking submitted by Name change 6-11-62 «°.. 45 11 Mobil Oil Corp. in said proceeding is Merger 10-1-64 «1______45 12 accepted for filing. CT66-R41 1 (S) Mobil Oil Corp. shall comply with A 3-11-66 2 M West Kutz-Fruitland Letter agreement 7-5- 1 î Field, San Juan 60.2i the refunding and reporting procedure County, N. Mex. required by the Natural Gas Act and fJTfifi-029 -1 A 3-31-66 2 « Co., Green District, section 154.102 of the regulations there­ Wetzel County, W. Va. under, and the agreement and under­ 2 taking filed by Mobil Oil Corp. in Docket A 4-11-66 2 « Blanco Mesa Verde Field, San Juan No. RI65-196 shall remain in full force County, N. Mex. and effect until discharged by the 2 A 4-8-662 Corp. Co., Ace Unit Area, Commission. Moffat County, Colo. -firm frost. 0-14-Kfi 27 387 (T) The respective related rate sched­ Ï A 4-25-66«« merly Socony Mobil mission Corp., Chap- Amendment 1-25-67.___ 387 ules and supplements as indicated in the (G-11481) Oil Co., Inc.). man Ranch Field, Notice of change 387 tabulation herein are accepted for filing Nueces County, Tex. 8-27-59.38 3 Letter agreement 1-6-58. 387 4 and are accepted, subject to the appli­ Letter agreement 387 cable Commission regulations under the 12-1-64. 1 Letter agreement 387 Natural Gas Act to be effective on the 12-1-64. dates as indicated in the tabulation Effective date: 5-26-6 6 .. herein. Filing code: A—Initial service. B—Abandonment. By the Commission. C—Amendment to add acreage. D—Amendment to delete acreage. [seal] J oseph H. Gutride, E—Succession. Secretary. F—Partial succession. 2 Mobil Oil Corp. See footnotes at end of table.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 FFC rate schedule to be accepted FPC rate schedule to be accepted Docket N o . Purchaser, field, and Docket No. Purchaser, field, and and date filed Applicant location and date filed Applicant location Description and date of No. Supp. Description and date of No. Supp: document document

CI66-1056...... Natural Gas & Oil Texas Eastern Trans­ Mississippi River Corp., CI66-1069...... do. Texas Gas Transmission Mississippi River Corp., 14 (Q-10422) »» Corp. (successor to mission Corp., Bethany' FPC GRS No. 7. (CP61-141) « Corp., Bayou Piquant FPC GRS No. 21. È 5—266 Mississippi Elver Longstreet Field, De Notice of succession___ È 6-266 Field, Terrebonne Supplement No. 1____ 14 1 Corp). Soto Parish, La. 6-9-66. Parish, La. Effective date: 7-1-66... 6-966. CI66-1057...... ---- do...... Tennessee Gas Pipeline Mississippi River Corp., Effective date: 7-166__ (G-10466) «9 Co., a division of Ten- FPC GRS No. 8. CI66-1070...... do. Texas Gas Transmission Mississippi River Corp., 15 E 5-2-66 neco Inc.,48 La Rose Notice of succession (CP64-133) 8» Corp., Lake Palourde FPC GRS No. 23. Field, Lafourche 6-9-66. E 6-2-66 Field, St. Mary and 15 1 Parish, La. Effective date: 7-166. _. St. Martin Parishes, La. Notice of succession CI66-1058...... do. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Mississippi River Corp., 6-966. (G-10467) » Co., a division of Ten- FPC GRS No. 9. Effective date: 7-166... E 5-2-66 neco Inc.,40 Little Lake Notice of succession CI66-1073... Glenn, Inc. Equitable Gas Co., Contract 11-2563 »...... 2 Field, Jefferson Parish, 6-9-66. A 6-4-66 * Hackers Creek District, La. Effective date: 7-1-68__ Lewis County, W. Va. C166-1059...... -do. Southern Natural Gas Mississippi River Corp., CI66-1076___ A. F. Morris, agent United Fuel Gas Co., Notice of cancellation 1 2 (G-10820) »* Co., Kings Ridge, East FPC GRS No. 10. (G-7445) Union District, Lincoln 6-366.18 it E 5-2-66 Golden Meadow Field, Notice of succession B 5-466 County, W. Va. Lafourche Parish, La. 6-9-66. CI66-1081..,.. A. M. Snider, et al., Carnegie Natural Gas Contract 5-23-49 ...... 6 Effective date: 7-1-66... A 5-566*« d.b.a. Century Oil & Co., Clay District, C166-1060...... -do. Southern Natural Gas Mississippi River Corp., Gas Co. Monongalia County, (G-15039) 8» Co., Coquille Bay , FPC GRS No, 11. W. Va. ■ E 6-2—66 Field, Plaquemines Notice of succession A CI66-1083...- Gulf Oil Corp. (succes­ Texas Gas Transmission Contract 2-19-5741...... 311 Parish, La. 6-9-66. (G-12852) sor to Sinclair Oil & Corp., West Lisbon Letter agreement 7-965. 311 1 Effective date: 7-1-66... F 6666 Gas Co.). Field, Claiborne Assignment 8-2465___ 311 2 C166-1061...... -do. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Mississippi River Corp., , Parish, La. (G-15292) » Line Co., Lerado Field, FPC GRS No. 12. CI66-1084... An-Son Corp. Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Contract 11-2465 3 . 15 E 6-2-66 Reno County, Kans. Notice of succession A 5666 4 Line Co., Lovedale 6-9-66. Field, Harper County, Effective date: 7-1-66... Okla. CI66-1062__ -do. Cities Service Gas Co., Mississippi River Corp., CI66-1091...... Violet Oil & Gas (Op- Valley Gas Transmission, 1 ... (0-18214) »• Cherryvale Field, FPC GRS No. 13. A 5-1066 * erator), et aL Inc., Knolle Field, E 5-2-66 Grant County, Okla. Notice of succession ' Nueces County, Tex. NOTICES 6-9-66. CI66-1092-. Texaco, Inc. Kansas-N ebraska Natural Notice of cancellation 64 4 Effective date: 7-1-66... (G-4824) Gas Company, Inc., Hu- 6 -2-66.14 « 0166-1063...... -do. Consolidated Gas Supply Mississippi River Corp., B 5-966 goton Field, Finney (G-17413) »» Corp., Block 4 Field, FPC GRS No. 14. County, Kans. E 6 -2 -6 6 East Cameron Area, La. Supplement No. 1_____ CI66-1095__ Cleary Petroleum, Inc. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Contract 3-366...... 18 Notice of succession A 6-1066» (Operator), et al. Line Co., Kismet Field, Letter agreement 18 1 6-9-66. Seward County, Kans. 3-166.43 Effective date: 7-1-66... Letter of ratification 18 2 CI66-1064___ -do. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Mississippi River 4-766.8 44 (G-7376) 8» Co., a division of Ten- Corp., FPC GRS CI66-1097... Graridge Corp. Arkansas Lousiana Gas Contract 4-26548_____ 22 E 6-2-66 neco, Inc.,44 Placedo No. 15. A 56-664 Co., Milton Field, Contract 5-24-62 48 _ _ 22 1 Field, Victoria County, Notice of succession Haskell County, Okla. Amendatory agreement 22 2 Tex. 6-9-66. 3-2263. Effective date: 7-1-66__ Letter agreement 3-563. 22 3 C166-1065.. .do. United Gas Pipe Line Mississippi River Letter 1-1066 3 22 4 (0-7376) Co., Elysian Field, Corp.. FPGGRS CI66-1098-...... Robert E. Cloud Texas Eastern Trans­ Contract 12-165______1 E 6 -2 -6 6 Harrison County, Tex. No. 16. A 6 666 * (Operator), et al. mission Corp., East Letter agreement 1 1 Notice of succession Timpson Field, Shelby 12-165.» 6-9-66. County, Tex. Effective date: 7-1-66__ CI66-1101...... Midterra Associates, Lake Shore Pipe Line Contract 3-286647____ 4 CI66-1066...... do. Consolidated Gas Supply Mississippi River A 5-966 Inc. Co., Bushnell Field, Contract 3-2866 48____ 5 (CP61-62) 8* Corp., Simon Pass Corp., FPC GRS Erie County, Pa. Contract 4-2666 » «...... 6 E 5-2-66 Field, St. Martin No. 18. CI66-1107_____ Nathan Appleman, Kansas-N ebraska N atur al Contract 12-1665 »____ 9 Parish, La. Notice of succession A 5-466 » d.b.a. N. Appleman Gas Co., Inc., Brad­ 6-9-66. Co., et al. shaw Field, Hamilton Effective date: 7-1-66.... County, Kans. C166-1067...... do. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Mississippi River 12 (CP61-233) 8» Line Co.. Wil Pool Corp.. FPC GRS E 6 -2 -6 6 Field, Edwards No. 19. » Transfers a portion of the properties from Gulf Oil Corp. to Tidewater Oil Co. (Gulf’s FPC GRS No. 214). County, Kans. Notice of succession »Jan. 1, 1968, moratorium date pursuant to Commission’s Statement of General Policy 61-1, as amended. 6-9-66. 3 Effective date: Date of initial delivery (Applicant should advise the Commission as to such date). Effective date: 7-1-66.... 4 July 1,1967, moratorium date pursuant to Commission’s Statement of General Policy 61-1, as amended. C 166-1068...... do. Texas Gas Transmission Mississippi River 5 Predecessor (Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.) does not have certificate authorization or rate schedule on file. (CP61-141) Corp., Pass Wilson and Corp., FPC GRS 8 Between Signal Oil & Gas Co., Hancock Oil Co., Statex, and El Paso Natural Gas Co. E 5-2-66 Bay Round Fields, No. 20. 7 Partial assignment from Signal Oil & Gas Co. to Delhi-Taylor. Terrebonne Parish, La. Supplement No. 1 ...__ 8 Partial assignment from Statex to Delhi-Taylor. Notice of succession 4 Sale of Delhi-Taylor properties to Tenneco Oil Co. and Continental Oil Co. 6-9-66. 80 Conveys leases to Applicant formerly covered by Gulf Oil Corp., FPC GRS No. 117 (Docket No. G-4143). Effective date: 7-1-66.... 11 Applicants have expressed willingness to accept a permanent certificate at a total initial price of 20 cents per Mcf. >» Formerly Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. See footnotes at end of table. 9367

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9368 NOTICES

18 Source of gas depleted, u Effective date: Date of this order. 18 Rate of 7.2 cents in effect subject to refund in Docket No. RI65-129. Applicant has filed, concurrently, a motion to terminate said proceeding, as amount collected is “de minimus.” 14 This is a June 7, 1954, sale. » Submitted originally as a Short-Form Rate Schedule pursuant to sec. 154.92(c) of the regulations. 14 Settle estate of Leo J. Portman and awards Y% interest each to his wife, Catherine T. Portman, and son, William E. Portman, including properties here involved. 14 From Catherine T. Portman to Applicant of her Y i interest. 44 Service being rendered without prior authorization. M Changes frequency of determinations for specific gravity and gasoline content from 3 to 6 months. 22 Provides for discontinuation of testing for gasoline content. 23 Predecessors never filed certificates or related rate schedules. Predecessor (Rip C. Underwood) commenced deliveries on Aug. 5, 1954. 24 Between Sunshine Royalty Co., and El Paso Natural Gas Co. 24 Conveys certain interest from Sunshine Royalty to H. K. Riddle. 24 Between Riddle and El Paso. 27 Conveys certain interests from Riddle to Rip C. Underwood. 24 Conveys interest from Underwood to Oroco Oil & Gas Co. 24 Change in company name from Oroco OU & Gas Co. to Stekoll Petroleum Corp. 44 Change in company name from Stekoll Petroleum Corp. to Sunac Petroleum Corp. 31 Merging of Sunac Petroleum Corp. into Sunset International Petroleum Corp. (effective Sept. 1,1964). 42 Lot 4, Sec. 19, T. 31 N., R. 11 W. 34 Sec. 19, T. 31 N „ R. 11 W. 44 Applicable to production down to and including Pictured Cliffs Formation. 45 Adopts terms and provisions of Apr. 3,1954, contract between Pan American and Mountain Fuel. 44 Mobil Oil Corp. is filing to cover its own interests which service is currently being rendered under Champlin Petroleum’s certificate in Docket No. G-11481 and under Champlin Petroleum Co. (Operator), et al., FPC GRS No. 27. 47 Basic contract between the Chicago Corp. (now Champlin Petroleum Co.) and Republic Natural Gas Co. predecessor to Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc. (how Mobil Oil Corp.), as sellers and Texas Eastern, as buyer. 44 Provides for a rate of 14.6 cents. 44 Docket under which predecessor was previously authorized. 44 Formerly Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. 41 Also on file as Sinclair Oil & Gas Co., FPC GRS No. 138. 42 Well no longer capable of delivering into purchaser’s line. 44 Agreement with respect to first contract year reserves. 44 Ratification of basic contract by nonsignatory coowner. 48 Adopts terms of contract dated May 24, 1962. 44 Between Humble Oil & Refining Co. and buyer. 47 R. G. King leases and R. G. King No. 1 Well. 44 C. Wade leases and C. Wade No. 1 Well. 44 Harold and Louise Thayer leases and Salisbury-Thayer No. 2 Well. [F.R. Doc. 66-7358; Filed, July 7, 1966; 8:45 a.m.]

[Docket No. RI66-339] pended in Docket No. RI66-339. The The suspension period, however, will ter­ ARKLA EXPLORATION CO. proposed decrease in rate, from 21.75 minate as of September 16, 1966, only cents to 21.50 cents, is due to the buyer, if Arkla files a motion to place the in­ Order Amending Order Providing for United Gas Pipe Line Co., exercising its creased rate in effect subject to refund Hearings on and Suspension of contractual right to discontinue the tax prior to that time. Otherwise the sus­ Proposed Changes in Rates reimbursement. The decreased rate fil­ pension period will continue as provided ing which has been designated as Supple­ in the April 8 suspension order. J une 29, 1966. ment No. 11 to Arkla’s FPC Gas Rate The Commission finds: Good cause On March 16, 1966, Arkla Exploration Schedule No. 11 is set forth in Appendix exists for amending the Commission’s Co. (Arkla) filed with the Commission A hereof. order issued on April 8, 1966, in Docket a proposed change in rate from 18.25 Arkla requests that its proposed de­ No. RI66-339, to the extent hereinafter cents to 21.75 cents (including 1.75 cents creased rate filing be allowed to become provided. per Mcf tax reimbursement) designated effective on September 16, 1966, the end The Commission orders: (A) Arkla’s as Supplement No. 10 to Arkla’s FPC Gas of the suspension period for Arkla’s Sup­ amended rate filing, designated as Sup­ Rate Schedule No. 11, which pertains plement No. 10 ordered in Docket plement No. 11 to Arkla’s FPC Gas Rate to its jurisdictional sales of natural gas No. RI66-339. Since the proposed tax Schedule No. 11, is hereby accepted for from the Ada Area, Bienville Parish, La. change does not affect the base rate filing subject to the suspension proceed­ (North Louisiana) to United Gas Pipe which exceeds the ceiling level for in­ ing in Docket No. RI66-339. The sus­ Line Co. The Commission by order creased rates in Northern Louisiana as pension period for such amended rate issued April 8, 1966, suspehded Arkla’s set forth in the Commission’s Statement filing to terminate concurrently with the proposed rate increase and deferred the of General Policy No. 61-1, as amended, suspension period (Sept. 16, 1966) pres­ use thereof for five months until Sep­ we believe that it would be in the public ently in effect in said docket. tember 16, 1966, and thereafter until interest to accept such tax decrease for (B) In all other respects, the order such further time as it is made effective filing and to amend our order issued issued by the Commission on April 8, in the manner prescribed by the Natural April 8, 1966, to make such rate filing 1966, in Docket No. RI66-339, shall re­ Gas Act. subject to the suspension proceeding in main unchanged and in full force and On June 3, 1966, Arkla submitted a Docket No. RI66-339, with the suspen­ effect. notice of change in rate reflecting a tax sion period of such filing to terminate By the Commission. reimbursement reduction in the previ­ concurrently with the suspension period [seal] J oseph H. Gutride, ously filed rate increase which is sus­ (Sept. 16, 1966) ordered in said docket. Secretary. A ppendix A

Effective Cents per Mcf Rate in Rate Sup­ Amount Date date Date sus­ effect sub­ Docket Respondent sched­ ple­ Purchaser and producing area of annual filing unless pended ject to No. ule ment decrease tendered sus­ until— Rate in Proposed refund in No. N o^ pended effect decreased docket rate Nos.

RI66-339. . Arkla Exploration 11 i l l United Gas Pipe Line Co. (Ada Area, $19,500 6-3-66 29-16-66 3 4 8 21.50 Go., Post Office Box Bienville Parish, La.) (North 4 21.75 1734, Shreveport, Louisiana). La. 71102.

» Includes letter from buyer dated Apr. 18, 1966, in which buyer exercises its right 4 Pressure base is 15.025 p.s.i.a. to discontinue tax reimbursement effective Sept. 16,1966. 4 Plus tax reimbursement. 2 The stated effective date is the end of the suspension period for rate increase 4 Rate increase from 18.25 cents to 21.75 cents currently suspended until Sept. *6» suspended in Docket No. RI66-339 under Supplement No. 10. 1966, in Docket No. RI66-339 (Supplement No. 10). Rate includes 1.75 cents P® 4 Tax reimbursement decrease. Mcf tax reimbursement. [FJt. Doc. 66-7429; Filed, July 7, 1966; 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9369 [Docket No. CP65-120] procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the (B) Pending hearing and decision regulations under the Natural Gas Act thereon, the rate supplement herein is TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO. (§ 157.10) on or before July 27, 1966. suspended and its Use deferred until date Notice of Petition To Amend J oseph H. Gutride, shown in the “Date Suspended Until” Secretary. column, and thereafter until made effec­ J une 29, 1966. tive as prescribed by the Natural Gas Take notice that on June 27, 1966, [F.R. Doc. 66-7426; Filed, July 7, 1966; Act: Provided, however, That the sup­ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., a division 8:46 am .] plement to the rate schedule filed by of Tenneco, Inc.1 (Petitioner), Post Of­ Respondent shall become effective sub­ fice Box 2511, Houston, Tex. 77001, filed [Docket No. RI66—418] ject to refund on the date and in the in Docket No. CP65-120 a petition to manner herein prescribed if within 20 amend the certificate of public conven­ SHELL OIL CO. days from the date of the issuance of this ience and necessity issued by the Com­ order Respondent shall execute and file mission in said docket on March 30,1965 Order Providing for Hearing on and under its above-designated docket num­ (33 PPC 657), requesting that said cer­ Suspension of Proposed Change in ber with the Secretary of the Commis­ tificate be amended so as to reflect a sale sion its agreement and undertaking to for resale by Fitchburg Gas & Electric Rate, and Allowing Rate Change to comply with the refunding and report­ Light Co. (Fitchburg) to Gardner Gas, Become Effective Subject to Refund ing procedure required by the Natural Fuel & Light Co. (Gardner) of a portion J une 29, 1966. Gas Act and § 154.102 of the regulations of the volume of gas authorized by the thereunder, accompanied by a certificate subject certificate to be sold by Petitioner Respondent named herein has filed a proposed change in rate and charge of showing service of a copy thereof upon to Fitchburg, all as more fully set forth the purchaser under the rate schedule in the petition to amend which is on file a currently effective rate schedule for the sale of natural gas under Commis­ involved. Unless Respondent is advised with the Commission and open to public to the contrary within 15 days after the inspection. sion jurisdiction, as set forth in Appen­ dix A hereof. filing of its agreement and undertaking, The Commission’s order of March 30, such agreement and undertaking shall be 1965, issued in the instant docket au­ The proposed changed rate and charge deemed to have been accepted. may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly dis­ thorized Petitioner, inter alia, to increase (C) Until otherwise ordered by the the maximum contract quantity of nat­ criminatory, or preferential, or otherwise unlawful. Commission, neither the suspended sup­ ural gas to its existing customer, Fitch­ plement, nor the rate schedule sought burg, from 5,453 Mcf per day to 5,747 Mcf The Commission finds: It is in the to be altered, shall be changed until dis­ per day.8 Petitioner states that it has public interest and consistent with the position of this proceeding or expiration been advised that Fitchburg desires to Natural Gas Act that the Commission of the suspension period. sell a portion of such authorized quantity enter upon a hearing regarding the law­ of natural gas to Gardner for ultimate fulness of the proposed change, and that (D) Notices of intervention or peti­ resale by Gardner. Petitioner states that the supplement herein be suspended and tions to intervene may be filed with the it does not oppose such sale for resale its use be deferred as ordered below. Federal Power Commission, Washington, and accordingly requests that the Com­ The Commission orders: D.C. 20426, in accordance with the rules mission amend its order of March 30, (A) Under the Natural Gas Act, par­ of practice and procedure (18 CFR' 1.8 1965, issued in the instant proceeding to ticularly sections 4 and 15, the Regula­ and 1.37(f)) on or before August 15, reflect such sale for resale by Fitchburg. tions pertaining thereto (18 CFR Ch. I ) , 1966. Protests or petitions to intervene may and the Commission’s rules of practice be filed with the Federal Power Com­ and procedure, a public hearing shall be By the Commission. mission, Washington, D.C. 20426, in ac­ held concerning the lawfulness of the [seal] J oseph H. Gutride, cordance with the rules of practice and proposed change. Secretary. ______Appendix A è Effective Cents per Mcf Rate in Rate Sup­ Amount Date date Date sus­ effect sub­ Docket Respondent sched­ ple­ Purchaser and producing area of annual filing unless pended ject to No. ule ment increase tendered sus­ until— Rate in Proposed refund in No. No. pended effect. increased docket rate Nos.

RI66-418.. Shell Oil Co., 50 West 1253 4 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (James $6,648 5-31-66 17-1-66 *7-2-66 •T 15.8563 *8 816.5843 RI64-242.8 60th St., New York, Ranch (Los Medaños) Field, Eddy N.Y. 10020. County, N. Mex.) (Permian Basin Area).

s m?n^r.acj; dated May 25,1961, and covers sale of “new” gas-well gas. 8 Base rate of 16.5 cents per Mcf plus 0.0843 cent per Mcf tax reimbursement, i ¿{Je stated effective date is the effective date requested by Respondent. 1 Base rate of 15.5 cents per Mcf plus 0.3563 cent per Mcf tax reimbursement. ine suspension period is limited to 1 day. 8 Previous rate of 15.6238 cants per Mcf was collected subject to refund in Docket ’Periodicrate increase. No. RI64-141.

Appendix A On March 21, 1966, Shell filed, in com­ tion of New Mexico tax reimbursement. Shell Oil Co. (SheU), a producer respond­ pliance with Opinion No. 468, a rate schedule Consistent with prior Commission action, no ent m the Permian Basin Opinion No. 468, quality statement for the subject sale. Al­ consideration will be given to the proposed though the quality statement has not been P oposes a periodic and partial tax reim- credit for B.t.u. content between 1,000 and oursement increase from 15.8563 to 16.5843 accepted for filing by the Commission, it shows that the gas does not meet the quality 1,050 in determining the propriety of the cents per Mcf, amounting to $6,648 annually, adjustm ent for treating cost. i r . a sale of “new” gas-well gas to El Paso standards prescribed by Opinion No. 468 only insofar as water content is concerned, r,„..ura; Gas Co. (El Paso) in the Permian Since the increased rate proposed by Shell aasln Area of New Mexico. with a related treating cost of 0.10 cent per may exceed the applicable area just and rea- Mcf. The quality statement further reflects amend orders and pending applications ls- a credit for B.t.u. content between 1,000 and sonable ceiling (area base celling subject to ^t0rmerly named Tennessee Gas Trans- 1,050, which is applied to offset the treating sued *** °°" notice of petitions to quality adjustments) determined in Opinion et^i MaJ lfl’ 1968’ ln Docket Nos. G-165, cost, and an additional B.t.u. adjustment of No, 468, as amended, such rate should be e^al and CP60-57, et al. plus 0.08 cent per Mcf for the 1,055 B.t.u. suspended for 1 day, as ordered herein. aDiiw.2 °f 6’ Llne 61> Exhibit Z-3 to the gas. El Paso did not sign the quality state­ [F.R. Doc. 66-7433; Filed. July 7, 1966; PPUcation filed in Docket No. CP65-120. ment due to the unresolved contractual ques­ 8:46 am .]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 6, 1966 9370 NOTICES [Docket Nos. RI66—320 etc.] In the order providing for hearings on “u” to read footnote “4” after Docket No. and suspension of proposed changes in RI66-402, Amerada Petroleum Corp. A. L. ABERCROMBIE, ET AL. rates, issued June 7, 1966, and published G ordon M. G rant, in the F ederal R egister, June 15, 1966 Order Accepting Contract Acting Secretary. Amendment; Correction (F.R. Doc. 66-6486, 31 F.R. 8385-86), in the chart under the column headed “Pro­ [F.R. Doc. 66-7427; Filed, July 7, 1966; J une 23,1966. posed Increased Rate” change footnote 8:46 a.m.] A. L. Abercrombie, et al., Docket Nos. RI66-320, et al.; Union Oil Company of DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE California (Operator), et al., Docket No. RI66-325. Food and Drug Administration In the order accepting contract amend­ NEW DRUGS ment, providing for hearing on and suspension of proposed changes in Notice of Approval of Applications rates, issued March 31, 1966, and pub­ As provided in § 130.33 of the new-drug regulations (21 CFR 130.33), notice is lished in the F ederal R egister April 8, 1966 (F.R. Doc. 66-3721 31 F.R. 5588), in given of the following new drugs for which applications, or supplemental applica­ the chart after Docket No. RI66-325, Un­ tions for substantive labeling changes, have been approved on the dates specified: ion Oil Company of California (Opera­ D rugs for H uman U se tor) , et al. substitute “Supplement No. 5” in lieu of “Supplement No. 4“ for FPC Trade name or Principal indica- Active ingredients other designated tion or pharma- Applicant Date How dis- Gas Rate Schedule No. 137. (as declared on label) name and dosage cological category approved pensed1 form J oseph H . G utride, Secretary. Epinephrine bitartrate, Medihaler-Epi Bronchodilator__ Hiker Laborato- Apr. 13,19642 OTC [F.R. Doc. 66-7423; Filed, July 7, 1966; O.fi percent. (inhalant). ries. Idoxuridine, 0.1 percent__ Herplex Liqui- Herpes simplex Allergan Pharma- July 28,1965 2 Ri 8:45 ajn.] film (ophthal- infection of the ceuticals. mic solution). eye. [Docket No. CP61—311] Tolbutamide sodium Orinase Diagnos- Diagnosis for The Upjohn C o... Aug. 12,19652 Rx (sterile), 1 gm. per vial. tic (injectable). mild diabetes mellitus. ARKANSAS LOUISIANA GAS CO. Tromethamine, 36 gm.; Tham-E (sterile For systemic aci- Abbott Labora- Dec. 16,19652 R. sodium chloride, 1.75 lyophilizea dosis in cardiac tories. Notice of Petitions to Amend; gm.; and potassium powder for in- bypass surgery chloride, 0.37 gm., all travenous use). and cardiac Correction per 100 nil. arrest. Gold Au-198, 30-60 milli- Aurcoloid-198 Therapeutic ra- ...... do...... Jan. 17,19662 Rx J une 27, 1966. curies per ml. at time of (intracavitary diopharmaceu- preparation. injection). tical. In the notice of petitions to amend Sodium phosphate P-32, Radioisotope, di­ „do „ Jan. 19, Rx 1.5 millicuries per ml. phate E-32 (oral agnostic and 19662 Issued June 21, 1966, and published in and injectable). therapeutic the F ederal R egister June 28,1966 (F.R. agent. Doc. 66-7050, 31 F.R. 8929), change the Diphenhydramine hydro­ Benadryl (par- Antihistamine___ Parke, Davis & Mar. 9, 19662 Rx chloride, 50 mg. per cc., enteral). Co. date “July 22, 1966” to read “July 22, 1 cc. per ampoule. 1967” in the 4th paragraph. Diphenhydramine hydro­ ___ do...... «______do______Mar. 10, Rx chloride, 10 mg. per cc.; dryl (paren­ 1966* J oseph H . G utride, per 10 cc. and per 30 teral). cc. Secretary. Diphenhydram ne hydro­ Benadryl and Antihistamine ...... do...... do.*...... Rx chloride, 25 mg. and 60 Benadryl with and sympatho- [F.R. Doc. 66-7424; Filed, July 7, 1966; mg. per capsule; 50 mg. Ephedrine Sul­ minetic amine. 8:46 aju.] ier enteric-coated tab- fate (oral, tab­ iet; diphenhydramine let, capsule). hydrochloride and ephed- [Docket Nos. RI62-233, etc.} rine sulfate, 50 mg. and 25 mg., respectively, per capsule. CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM CO. Chlortnalidone, 100 mg— Hygroton (tablet). Diuretic, anti- Geigy Chemical Mar. 16,1966 2 Rx hypertensive. Corp. Order Accepting Offer; Correction Tolbutamide, 0.5 gm. Orinase (tablet)... Hypoglycemic ...... d o .2...... Rx agent. J une 23,1966. Levorphanol tartrate, Levo-Dromoran Narcotic analgesic. Hoffman-La Roche Mar. 18,1966* Rx 2 mg. per cc. (injectable). Inc. In the order accepting offer of settle­ Levorphanol tartrate, ___ do______...... d o .2____ Rx 2 mg. (tablet). ment, requiring notices of change, sever­ Ethynodiol diacetate, Ovulen (tablet)__ Oral contracep- G. D. Searle & Mar. 23, 1966 Rx ing and terminating proceedings and re­ 1 mg.; mestranol, 0.1 tive. Co. quiring refunds, Issued June 10,1966 and mg. Amopyroquin dihydro­ Steri-Vial Propo- Antimalarial Parke, Davis & Mar. 25,1966 Rx published in the F ederal R egister June chloride, equivalent to quin Dihydro­ agent. C o . 21,1966 (F.R. Doc. 66-6679,31 F.R. 8604), 150 mg. amopyroquin chloride (injec­ base per vial. tion). in the findings and ordering paragraph Acetylcysteine, 20 percent Mucomyst (solu- Mucolytic agent... Mead Johnson Apr. 6 ,19662 Rx (A) change the date “April 1, 1966” to sterile solution. tion for aeroso- Laboratories. lization). read “April 12, 1966”. Cortisone acetate, 15 mg. Cortisone Acetate do * ____ Rx (1.5 percent), per gm. (ophthalmic tory drug. J oseph H . G utride, ointment). Secretary. Meprobamate, 200 and 400 Meprobamate Apr. 19,1966 R< mg. Tablets N.F. [F.R. Doc. 66-7425; Filed, July 7, 1966; (tablet). 8:46 ajn.] Quinaldine blue, 0.25 per­ Vemitest (tissue- Laboratory diag- Fuller Pharma- Apr. 21,1966 OTC cent. staining solu- nostic reagent ceutical Co. tion). for cytodiagno- [Docket Nos. RI66-397, etc.] sis of ruptured fetal mem­ branes. TEXACO, INC., AND AMERADA Meprobamate, 200 mg. Meprobamate Tranquilizer_____ Rexall Drug C o... Apr. 22,1966» Rx PETROLEUM CORP. and 400 mg. N.F. (tablet). ___ Order Providing for Hearings; * The abbreviation “ R,”, means restricted by law to prescription only; the abbreviation “ OTC applies to drugs that by law are not required to be sold on prescription, Correction i Supplemental application, labeling change. J une 29,1966. Dated: June 28, 1966. Texaco, Inc., Docket Nos. RI66-397, J. K. Kirk» etc. ; Amerada Petroleum Corp., Docket Assistant Commissioner for Operations. No. RI66-402. [F.R. Doc. 66-7408; Filed, July 7,1966; 8:45 ajn.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9371

Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of Is subject to the provisions of 10 CFR Part ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 1954, as amended; 10 CFR Part 30, “Rules o f 20, “Standards for Protection Against Radia­ General Applicability to Licensing of By­ tion,” all other applicable rules, regulations, [Docket No. 27-89] product Material”; 10 CFR Part 40, “Licens­ orders of the Atomic Energy Commission ing of Source Material”; 10 CFR Part 70, now or hereafter in effect, and to the follow­ CALIFORNIA NUCLEAR, INC. “Special Nuclear Material”; a license is here­ ing conditions: Notice of Proposed Issuance of by issued to receive and possess waste by­ 1. The licensee shall not possess at any product and source material in any State of one time at each of its facilities located in Amendment of Byproduct, Source, the United States except in “Agreement Benton County, Wash., and Will County, 111., and Special Nuclear Material States” as defined in § 150.3(b), 10 CFR Part more than : 150; to receive and possess special nuclear A. 50,000 curies of byproduct material. License material In any State of the United States; Please take notice that California Nu­ to receive, possess, process, repackage, store, B. 4,000 pounds of source material. and to dispose by burial in the soil, waste C. 5,000 grams of special nuclear material clear, Inc., 2323 South Ninth Street, byproduct, source, and special nuclear ma­ in accordance with the following: Lafayette, Ind., has applied for an terial at a facility located in Benton County, (à) No single package shall contain more amendment to License No. 13-10042-1, Wash.; and to receive, possess, and store than 100 grams of Uranium 235 or 60 grams which would authorize the receipt, pos­ waste byproduct, source, and special nuclear of Uranium 233 or 60 grams of Plutonium or session, and storage of packaged waste material at a facility located in Lockport any combination thereof such that the sum byproduct, source, and special nuclear Township, WiU County, 111. of the ratios of the quantity of each special material at a facility located in Lockport This license shall be deemed to contain the nuclear material to the quantities specified Township, Will County, HI. conditions specified in section 183 of the herein does not exceed unity. Unity shall Within fifteen (15) days from the date Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and be determined by the following formula: of publication of this notice in the F ed­ grams contained U235 . grams contained U233 _ grams contained Pu ^ eral Register, any person whose inter­ ÏÔ5 * 60 +■ 60 — 1 est may be affected by this proceeding (b) No single package shall contain more than 15 grams of any combined Uranium 235, may file a petition for leave to intervene. Uranium 233, and Plutonium per cubic foot of total volume. Requests for a hearing and petitions to 2. Each accumulation of packages shall contain not more than 500 grams of Uranium 235 intervene shall be filed in accordance or 300 grams of Uranium 233 or 300 grams of Plutonium or combinations thereof such that with the Commission’s regulations (10 the stun of the ratios of the quantity of each special nuclear material to the quantities CFR Part 2). If a request for a hear­ specified herein does not exceed unity, as determined by the following formula: ing or a petition for leave to intervene is filed within the time prescribed in this grams contained U235 > grams contained U23* grams contained Pu J notice, the Commission will issue a no­ 500 jrj 300 "I ~ 300 — 1 tice of hearing or an appropriate order. and shall be stored at least 12 feet from any those requirements shall he filed with, or For further details with respect to this other packages containing special nuclear made to, the Atomic Energy Commission. proceeding see: (1) The application and material. 7. The licensee may process and repackage amendments thereto and (2) the related 3. Except as specifically provided otherwise byproduct, source, and special nuclear mate­ by this license, the licensee shall receive, rial only at its facility in Benton County, memorandum prepared by the Division possess, process, repackage, store, and dispose Wash, of Materials Licensing, all of which are of byproduct, source, and special nuclear 8. The licensee shall not process or re­ available for public inspection at the material in accordance with the radiological package any radioactive waste until the struc­ Commission’s Public Document Room, safety procedures and limitations contained tures described in the application have been 1717 H Street NW., Washington, D.C. A in the application dated October 23, 1963, erected and until radiation safety equipment copy of Item 2 above may be obtained and amendments thereto dated December 9, has been secured and Installed. at the Commission’s Public Document 1963; April 21, 1964; August 18, 1964; August At such time as the licensee begins to Room, or upon request to the Atomic 28, 1964; September 18, 1964; October 12, process and repackage waste material, the 1964; February 3, 1965; November 24, 1965; licensee shall notify the Chief, Isotopes Energy Commission, Washington, D.C. and March 31,1966. Branch, Division of Materials Licensing. 20545, Attention: Director of Materials 4. Operations shall he conducted by J. 9. The licensee shall not store any package Licensing. Stewart Corbett, Radiation Protection Officer, at its facility in Benton County, Wash., for The text of the proposed amendment Frederick P. Beierle, William D. Johnson, and more than 6 months from date of receipt. which revises the license in its entirety other individuals designated by the licensee’s 10. Byproduct, source, and special nuclear Radiation Protection Officer upon satisfac­ material may be disposed of by burial at a to incorporate the changes and to con­ tory completion of the licensee’s training site located in the southeast corner of sec. solidate the license is attached to this program. 9, T. 12 N., R. 26, EMW, Benton County, notice. 5. A copy of the “Radiological Physics Wash., in accordance with procedures and Dated at Bethesda, Md., June 30,1966. Safety Manual for Atomic Energy Commis­ limitations set forth in the application dated sion Operations” dated April 21,1964, shall be August 18, 1964, and amendments thereto Eor the Atomic Energy Commission. supplied to each employee engaged in opera­ dated August 28, 1964; September 18, 1964; tions under this license. and February 3,1965. J. A. McBride, 6. The transportation of AEC-licensed 11. The licensee shall bury any accumula­ Director, material shall be subject to all applicable tion of packages containing special nuclear Division of Materials Licensing. regulations of the Interstate Commerce material in the quantities specified in Con­ [License Commission, U.S. Coast Guard, Federal Avia­ dition 2 of this license In such a manner No. 13-10042-1; Amdt. No. 5] tion Agency, and other agencies of the United as to have a minimum of 8 Inches of earth Atomic Energy Commission havim States having jurisdiction. in all directions from any other packages round that: When Interstate Commerce Commission containing special nuclear material. ^censee’s equipment, facilities, anc regulations are not applicable to shipments 12. Should any water sample obtained ande , rf® are adequate to protect healtt by land of AEC-licensed material by reason from the test well reveal an increase in the n minimize danger to life or property. of the fact that the transportation does not concentrations of radioactive material deter­ 6 ^censee is qualified by training anc occur in interstate or foreign commerce, (1) mined prior to commencement of the burial xperlence to use the material for the pur- the transportation shall be in accordance operations, the licensee shall perform fur­ *q,U6sted 111 accordance with the regu- with the requirements relating to packaging ther surveys to determine whether or not the tion*13 in Title 10, Code of Federal Regula- of radioactive material, marking and label­ increase is due to the land burial operations. he&i+i.a ^ in su°h manner as to protecl ing of the package, placarding of the trans­ Should the radioactivity be determined to erty ** &nd mInimize danger to life and prop- portation vehicle, and accident reporting set originate In the burial ground, the licensee forth in the regulations of the Interstate shall notify the Director, Division of Mate­ *PPUcation dated March 31, 1966 Commerce Commission in §§ 73.391-73.395, 49 rials Licensing within thirty (30) days of Atomip6» w ittl th e re q u ire m e n ts o f th< CFR Part 73, “Regulations Applying to Ship­ such findings. is for o *ergy °f 1954, as amended, anc pers”, and §§ 77.823, 77.860 (c) and (d), 49 13. The licensee shall not open any pack­ D Tshi**111^086 a u th o rize d b y t h a t A c t. CFR Part 77, “Regulations Applying to Ship­ ages at its facility in Lockport Township, inim w iT^ of 0x6 amendment w ill not b< ments Made by Way of Common, Contract, Will County, 111., except to repair or re­ nor to th? "he common defense and security or Private Carriers by Public Highways,” and package containers damaged in transit. “ 4 “ fet, of the public. (2) any requests for modifications or excep­ 14. The licensee shall not store any pack­ Material t ? 4’ Source- and Special Nucleai tions to those requirements, any request for age at its facility in Lockport Township, Will inite e m w enfe No- 13-10042-1 Is amendec special approvals referred to in those require­ County, 111., for more than 1 year from date entirety to read as follows: ments, and any notifications referred to in of receipt.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9372 NOTICES 15. The licensee shall not receive any by­Fund, Inc.'(“Townsend”), has ceased to UNITED SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE product, source, or special nuclear material be an investment company. CO. at the Lockport Township, Will County, site On May 14, 1958, the company, a until the building, fencing, and other safe­ Order Suspending Trading guards designed to protect against unauthor­ closed-end non-diversified management ized entry have been completed. company, registered under section 8(a) J uly 1, 1966. At such time as the licensee begins to of the Act as “Townsend International It appearing to the Securities and store packages, the licensee shall notify the Growth Fund, Inc.,” and subsequently Exchange Commission that the summary Chief, Isotopes Branch, Division of Materials changed its name to its present one. suspension of trading in the common Licensing. Townsend filed a voluntary petition This license shall expire two (2) years from stock, $1 par valuej of United Security the last day of the month in which this li­ under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, Life Insurance Co., Birmingham, Ala., cense is issued. and on May 10,1961, an order was issued otherwise than on a national securities in the U.S. District Court for the South­ exchange is required in the public in­ Date of issuance: ------ern District of New York appointing a terest and for the protection of investors; For the Atomic Energy Commission. trustee for Townsend. A plan of re­ It is ordered, Pursuant to section organization was approved by a sub­ 15(c) (5) of the Securities Exchange Act Director, stantial majority of Townsend’s share­ of 1934, that trading in such securities Division of Materials Licensing. holders, and on October 23, 1964, such otherwise than on a national securities [FJR. Doc. 66-7416; Filed, July 7, 1966; plan was approved by the District Court. exchange be summarily suspended, this 8:45 am .] Townsend was dissolved on December 11, order to be effected for the period July 2, 1964 in accordance with the Plan. 1966, through July 11, 1966, both dates Pursuant to a notice to its share­ inclusive. [Docket No. 50-186] holders dated January 11, 1965, Town­ By the Commission. CURATORS OF UNIVERSITY OF send made a partial distribution of its assets. Approximately $482,500 in cash [seal] Orval L. DuBois, MISSOURI is presently held for the benefit of share­ Secretary. Notice of Extension of Completion holders by the Irving Trust Co., Cus­ [F.R. Doc. 66-7445; Filed, July 7, 1966; Date todian, until the Court orders a further 8:47 a.m.] distribution. Please take notice that the Atomic Section 8(f) of the Act provides, in Energy Commission has issued an order pertinent part, that when the Commis­ extending to June 30, 1967, the latest sion on its own motion finds that a reg­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE completion date specified in Construction istered investment company has ceased Permit No. CPRR-68 for construction of to be an investment company, it shall COMMISSION the 10,000 kilowatt (thermal) hetero­ so declare by order, and that upon the geneous, light water-cooled and mod­ taking effect of such order, the registra­ [Notice 942] erated pressurized tank research reactor located on the campus at Columbia, Mo. tion of such company shall cease to be MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATER Copies of the order and of the applica­ in effect. CARRIER, AND FREIGHT FOR­ tion by the Curators of the University Notice is further given that any inter­ WARDER APPLICATIONS ested persons may, not later than,July 20, of Missouri are available for public in­ J uly 1,1966. spection at the Commission’s Public Doc­ 1966, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the Com­ ument Room, 1717 H Street NW., Wash­ mission in writing a request for a hear­ The following applications are gov­ ington, D.C. ing on the matter accompanied by a erned by Special Rule 1.2471 of the Com­ statement as to the nature of his interest, mission’s general rules of practice (49 Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 28th day the reason for such request and the is­ CFR, as amended), published in the Fed­ of June 1966. sues of fact or law proposed to be con­ eral Register, issue of April 20, 1966, For the Atomic Energy Commission. troverted, or he may request that he be effective May 20, 1966. These rules pro­ notified if the Commission shall order a vide, among other things, that a protest R. L. Doan, hearing thereon. Any such communica­ to the granting of an application must Director, tion should be addressed: Secretary, be filed with the Commission within 30 Division of Reactor Licensing.. Securities and Exchange Commission, days after date of notice of filing of the [F,R. Doc. 68-7417; Filed, July 7, 1966; Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such application is published in the F ederal 8:45 a.m.] request shall be served personally or by Register. Failure seasonably to file a mail (airmail if the person being served protest will be construed as a waiver of is located more than 500 miles from the opposition and participation in the pro­ point of mailing) upon applicant at the ceeding. A protest under these rules SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE address stated above. Proof of such should comply with § 1.247(d) (3) of the service (by affidavit or in case of an at­ rules of practice which requires that it COMMISSION torney at law by certificate) shall be filed set forth specifically the grounds upon [811-813] contemporaneously with the request. At which it is made, contain a detailed state­ any time after such date, as provided ment of protestant’s interest in the pro­ TOWNSEND U.S. & INTERNATIONAL by Rule 0-5 of the rules and regulations ceeding (including a copy of the specific GROWTH FUND, INC. promulgated under the Act, an order portions of its authority which protestant disposing of the application herein may believes to be in conflict with that sought Notice of Proposal to Terminate be issued by the Commission upon the in the application, and describing iu de­ Registration basis of the information stated in said tail the method—whether by joinder, application, unless an order for hearing interline, or other means—by which pro­ J uly 1, 1966. upon said application shall be issued testant would use such authority to pro- In the matter of Townsend U.S. & In­ upon request or upon the Commission’s vide all or part of the service proposecu, ternational Growth Fund, Inc., c/o own motion. and shall specify with particularity tn Leslie Kirsch, Trustee, 405 Lexington facts, matters, and things relied UP0“* Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017; (811-813). For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ but shall not include issues or allegations Notice is hereby given that the Securi­ gated authority. phrased generally. Protests not in rea- ties and Exchange Commission proposes [seal] Orval L. DuBois, on its own motion to declare by order, 1 Copies of Special Rule 1.247 (as amended) pursuant to section 8(f) of the Invest­ Secretary. can be obtained by writing to the Secret»?,» ment Company Act of 1940 (“Act”), that [FR. Doc, 66-7444; Filed, July 7, 1966; Interstate Commerce Commission, Wasiu g Townsend U.S. & International Growth 8:47 a.m.] ton, D.C. 20423.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131—-FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9373 sonable compliance with the require­ and, on the other, points in New London over regular routes, transporting: Gen­ ments of the rulës may be rejected. The and Middlesex Counties, Conn. Note: eral commodities (except those of un­ original and one copy of the protest shall If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ usual value, livestock, classes A and B be filed with the Commission, and a copy cant requests it be held at Washington, explosives, household goods, as defined shall be served concurrently upon appli­ D.C. by the Commission, commodities in bulk, cant’s representative, or applicant if no No. MC 6078 (Sub-No. 54), filed June and those requiring special equipment), representative is named. If the protest 21, 1966. Applicant: D. F, BAST, INC., serving points in Putnam County, HI., includes a request for oral hearing, such 1425 North Maxwell Street, Allentown, in connection with carrier’s regular route request shall meet the requirements of Pa. 18001. Applicant’s representative: operations to and from Chicago, 111. § 1.247(d) (4) of the special rule, and A. David Millner, 1060 Broad Street, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, shall include the certification required Newark,x N.J. 07102. Authority sought applicant requests it be held at Chicago, therein. to operate as a common carrier, by motor 111. Section 1.247(f) of the Commission’s vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 24379 (Sub-No. 32), filed June rules of practice further provides that ing: Iron and steel and iron and steel 21, 1966. Applicant: LONG TRANS­ each applicant shall, if protests to its articles, and steelmill equipment, ma­ PORTATION COMPANY, a corporation, application have been filed, and within terials, and supplies, between points in 3755 Central Avenue, Detroit, Mich. Ap­ 60 days of the date of this publication, Putnam County, HI., on the one hand, plicant’s representative: A. David Mill­ notify the Commission in writing (1) and, on the other, points in Alabama, ner, 1060 Broad Street, Newark, N.Y. that it is ready to proceed and prosecute Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, 07102. Authority sought to operate as the application, or (2) that it wishes to Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, In­ a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over withdraw the application, failure in diana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisi­ irregular routes, transporting: Iron and which the application will be dismissed ana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, steel and iron and steel articles, steelmill by the Commission. Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, equipment, materials, and supplies, be­ Further processing steps (whether New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Okla­ tween points in Putnam County, 111., on modified procedure, oral hearing, or homa, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South the one hand, and, on the other, points Other procedures) will be determined Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wash­ in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, generally in accordance with the Com­ ington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Ken­ mission’s general policy statement con­ Note: Applicant states the authority tucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, cerning motor carrier licensing proce­ presently held would be tacked through Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North dures, published in the Federal Register common Pennsylvania points. If a Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, issue of May 3, 1966. This assignment hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. N ote : will be by Commission order which will requests it be held at Chicago, HI., Pitts­ Applicant states it will tack the proposed be served on each party of record. burgh, Pa., or Washington, D.C. authority at common Ohio points. If a The publications hereinafter set forth No. MC 6380 (Sub-No. 8), filed June 24, hearing is deemed necessary, applicant reflect the scope of the applications as 1966. Applicant: R. F. TRUESDELL, requests it be held at Chicago, 111., Pitts­ filed by applicants, and may include de­ INC., 1616 West 47th Street, Ashtabula, burgh, Pa., or Washington, D.C. scriptions, restrictions, or limitations Ohio 44004. Applicant’s representative: No. MC 25869 (Sub-No. 70), filed which are not in a form acceptable to T. Baldwin Martin, 700 Home Federal June 24, 1966. Applicant: NOLTE the Commission. Authority which ulti­ Building, Macon, Ga. 31201. Authority BROS. TRUCK LINE, INC., 2509 O mately may be granted as a result of the sought to operate as a contract carrier, Street, Omaha, Nebr. 68107. Applicant’s applications here noticed will not neces­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, representative: Duane W. Acklie, Post sarily reflect the phraseology set forth in transporting: Corrugated fiberboard Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. Author­ the application as filed, but also will boxes, knocked down flat, and corrugated ity sought to operate as a common car­ eliminate any restrictions which axe not fiberboard packing supplies, from Cock- rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular acceptable to the Commission. eysville, Md., to points in Delaware; routes, transporting: General commodi­ No. MC 665 (Sub-No. 65), filed Jui Atlantic, Camden, Cape May, Cumber­ ties, between points in Putnam County, 22, 1966. Applicant! RED ARRO' land, Gloucester, and Salem, N.J.; 111., on the one hand, and, on the other, TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, IN( Adams, Bedford, Berks, Bucks, Chester, points in Colorado, Wyoming, North 1401 Independence Avenue, Kansas Cit Cumberland, Dauphin, Delaware, Frank­ Dakota, South Dakota,'Nebraska, Kan­ Mo. Authority sought to operate as lin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Juniata, sas, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wiscon­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, ov Lancaster, Lebanon, Lehigh, Mifflin, sin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, regular routes, transporting: Gener Montgomery, Northumberland, Perry, and Kentucky. Note: Common control commodities (except those of unusu Schuylkill, Snyder, and York Counties, may be involved. If a hearing is deemed value, and except dangerous explosive Pa. (except Philadelphia, P a.); Albe­ necessary, applicant does not specify a livestock, household goods as defined marle, Accomack, Caroline, Clarke, location. Practices of Motor Common Carriers Culpeper, Essex, Fairfax, Fauquier, No. MC 30887 (Sub-No. 147), filed Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, con Frederick, King George, Lancaster, June 20, 1966. Applicant: SHIPLEY modifies in bulk, and those requirii Loudoun, Madison, Northampton, North­ TRANSFER, INC., 49 Main Street, Box special equipment), serving Californi umberland, Orange, Page Prince Wil­ 55, Reisterstown, Md. 21136. Applicant’s Mo as an off-route point in connects liam, Rappahannock, Richmond, Shen­ representative: Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, with applicant’s authorized regula andoah, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Warren, Madison Building, 1155 15th Street NW., route operations. Note : If a hearing and Westmoreland Counties, Va.; and Washington, D.C. 20005. Authority fleemed necessary, applicant requests Berkeley, Hampshire, Jefferson, and sought to operate as a common carrier, De «eld at Kansas City, Mo. Morgan Counties, W. Va.; and to Scran­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, 3OT4 (Sub-No. 9), filed May 1 ton, Pa., and Norfolk and Newport News, transporting: Dry cement, between 1966. Applicant: L. C. CORP., doii Va.; under contract with the Inland points in Delaware, Maryland, New Jer­ ¡giness as GREY LINES, 1137 Statl Container Corp., Cockeysville, Md. sey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Vir­ r.®?0 Building, 20 Providence Stre< Note: Common control may be involved. ginia, and the District of Columbia; re­ Applicant’s represent If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ stricted to transportation of shipments Sfirm oCoh5 lea w - singer, Tower Sui cant requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga. having an immediately prior movement Hi «nenoNorth La Salle Street, Chicag No. MC 22278 (Sub-No. 35), filed by rail or water and having originated at ui. 60602. Authority sought to opera June 22, 1966. Applicant: TAKEN plantsites or facilities of Atlantic Cement „ a common carrier, by motor vehic] BROS. FREIGHT LINE, INC., Post Of­ Co., Inc. Note: If a hearing is deemed JVPino„*rregu*ar r°utes, transportini fice Box 5000, 2125 Commercial Street, necessary, applicant requests it be held £?jPers’ ^emspaper inserts, and su\ Waterloo, Iowa 50704. Applicant’s rep­ at Washington, D.C. tetevision guides and magi resentative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., No. MC 52616 (Sub-No. 3), filed June SlS'rf between New York and Loi The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver, 22, 1966. Applicant: SAMUEL D. PER- South rrlty’ N‘Y’’ ant* Jersey City ai Cclo. 80202. Authority sought to operate LOW, doing business as GERSON h Kearney, N.J., on the one han as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, TRANSPORTATION, 475 Burlington

No. 131- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9374 NOTICES Avenue, Bridgeton, N,J. 08302. Appli­ equipment (except those defined in T. E. Home Foods, division of American Home cant’s representative: H. Charles Eph­ Mercer, Extension, AH M.C.C. 845) when Products Corp. at or near Milton, Pa., to raim, Esq., 1411 K Street NW., Washing­ moving in the same vehicle with heavy points in New York on and west of New ton, D.C. 20005. ; Authority sought to machinery and heavy or cumbersome York Highway 12, extending from Clay­ operate as a common carrier, by motor commodities which, because of size or ton, N.Y., to Binghamton, N.Y., and vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ weight, require the use of special equip­ thence over U.S. Highway 11 to the New porting: Glass bottles, from Salem, N.J., ment; between Houston, Tex., oh the one York-Pennsÿlvania State line. N ote: If to Linfield, Pa., and returned or rejected hand, and, on the other, points in a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant empty glass bottles on return. Note: If Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. Note : requests it be held at New York, N.Y., or a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Applicant states that it presently holds Washington, D.C. cant requests it be held at Washington, the authority in (1) (a) and (2) (a) above No. MC 75185 (Sub-No. 269), filed D.C. and seeks no extension of territory. Ap­ June 22, 1966. Applicant: SERVICE No. MC 55883 (Sub-No. 11), filed April plicant states that it is seeking only an TRUCKING CO., INC., Preston Road, 14, 1966. Applicant: TRIANGLE EX­ extension of authority in (1) (b) and (2) Post Office Box 276, Federalsburg, Md. PRESS, INC., Box 22, Stephenson, Va. (b) above. Applicant states that it in­ 2 16 3 2. Applicant’s representative: Applicant’s representative: C. P. Ger- tends to tack any grant of authority James W. Lawson, 1000 16th Street NW., melman, Post Office Box 81, Winchester, with presently held authority, in which Washington, D.C. 20036. Authority Va. 22601. Authority sought to operate it is authorized to operate in the States sought to operate as a common carrier, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, of Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, over irregular routes, transporting: Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, transporting: Fresh and frozen eggs, Canned goods, from Winchester, Va., New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and dressed and frozen poultry, and butter, and Martinsburg, W. Va., to points in Wyoming. Also, to the extent possible cheese and oleomargarine, from points Escambia, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Wal­ applicant intends to tack the authority in Wisconsin to points in Maryland, ton, Holmes, Washington, Bay, Jackson, contained in the separate paragraphs of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Calhoun, and Gulf Counties, Fla. Note: this application. If a hearing is deemed New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Applicant states the purpose of this ap­ necessary, applicant requests it be held Rhode Island, and the District of Co­ plication is to provide privilege of stop- at Dallas, Tex., or Washington, D.C. lumbia. Note: If a hearing is deemed off to partially unload in Alabama (al­ No. MC 65941 (Sub-No. 24), filed June necessary, applicant requests it be held ready authorized) mixed loads to points 22, 1966. Applicant: TOWER LINES, at Washington, D.C., or Chicago, HI. in that State and points in the destina­ INC., North Third Street and Warwood No. MC 80428 (Sub-No. 59) . filed June tion area named in this application. If Avenue, Wheeling, W. Va. Applicant’s 22, 1966. Applicant: McBRIDE TRANS­ a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ representative: Clyde W. Carver, 1600 PORTATION, INC., Main and Nelson cant requests it be held at Washington, First Federal Building, Atlanta, Ga. , Goshen, N.Y. Applicant’s repre­ DC. 30303. Authority sought to operate as sentative: Robert V. Gianniny, 900 Mid­ No. MC 59367 (Sub-No. 47), filed a common carrier, by motor vehicle, oyer town Tower, Rochester, N.Y. 14604. Au­ June 22, 1966. Applicant: DECKER irregular routes, transporting: General thority sought to operate as a common TRUCK LINE, INC., Post Office Box 915, commodities (except those of unusual carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501. Applicant’s value, classes A and B explosives, live­ routes, transporting: Dry foundry core representative r William A. Landau, 1307 stock, household goods as defined by the additives, in bulk, (1) from Buffalo, N.Y., East Walnut Street, Des Moines, Iowa Commission, commodities in bulk, com­ to points in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New 50306. Authority sought to operate as a modities requiring special equipment, Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Ver­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over and those injurious or contaminating mont, Rhode Island, and Michigan, and irregular routes, transporting: Meats, to other lading), between the plantsite (2) from points in Rhode Island to meat products, meat byproducts, and of Revere Copper and Brass, Inc., located Buffalo, N.Y. Note: If a hearing, is articles distributed by meat packing­ approximately 6 miles south of Scotts- deemed necessary, applicant requests it houses,. as described in sections A and C boro, Ala., on the one hand, and, on the be held at Washington, D.C. of appendix I to the report in Descrip­ other, points in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and No. MC 83539 (Sub-No. 189), filed West Virginia. Note: If a hearing is June 20,1966. Applicant: C & H TRANS­ tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 deemed necessary, applicant requests it PORTATION CO., INC., 1935 West Com­ M.C.C. 209 and 766, from Spencer, Iowa, be held at Birmingham, Ala., or Atlanta, merce Street, Dallas, Tex. 75222. Ap­ to points in Wisconsin and those in the Ga. plicant’s representative: W. T. Brunson, Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Note : If No. MC 71902 (Sub-No. 69), filed 419 Northwest Sixth Street, Oklahoma a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant June 22, 1966. Applicant: UNITED City, Okla. 73102. Authority sought to requests it be held at Des Moines, Iowa. TRANSPORTS, INC., 4900 Santa Fe operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 63792 (Sub-No. 11), filed June Street, Post Office Box 15847, Oklahoma vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ 22, 1966. Applicant: TOM HICKS City, Okla. Applicant’s representative: ing: Iron and steel, iron and steel arti­ TRANSFER COMPANY, INC., Peters James W. Wrape, 2111 Sterick Building, cles, iron and steel products, and steel- Road, Post Office Box 283, Harvey, La. Memphis, Tenn. 38103. Authority sought mill equipment, materials and supplies, 70058. A p p 1 i c a n t’s representative: to operate as a common carrier, by motor between the plantsite of the Jones « James M. Doherty, 721 Brown Building, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Laughlin Steel Corp. located at or near Austin, Tex. 78701. Authority sought to ing: Automobiles, in initial movements Hennepin (Putnam County), 111., °n operate, as a common carrier, by motor by truckaway and driveaway, from the one hand, and, on the other, points in vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ plantsite of Cord Automobile Co., Tulsa, the United States (except Alaska and ing: (1) (a) Heavy machinery which re­ Okla., to points in the United States Hawaii) . Note: Applicant states it does quires the use of special equipment, in (except Alaska and Hawaii). Note: If not seek any duplicating authority, u truckload lots, and (2) machinery which a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant a hearing is deemed necessary, applj" does not require the use of special equip­ requests it be held at Oklahoma City or cant requests it be held at Chicago, Hi., ment when moving in the same shipment Tulsa, Okla.; St. Louis, Mo., or Dallas, Washington, D.C., or Pittsburgh, Pa. or same vehicle with heavy machinery Tex. No. MC 94350 (Sub-No. 170) (Amend­ which requires the use of special equip­ No. MC 74846 (Sub-No. 58), filed June ment), filed May 5, 1966, published Fed­ ment, in truckload lots, between points 20, 1966. Applicant: LEWIS G. JOHN­ eral Register issue of May 26, 1»®"> in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi; SON, INC., Port Gibson, N.Y. 14537. Ap­ amended June 15, 1966, and republished and (2) (a) heavy machinery and heavy plicant’s representative: Raymond A. as amended this issue.- Applicant- or cumbersome commodities (except Richards, 35 Curtice Park, Webster, N.Y. TRANSIT HOMES, INC., 210 West MC- those commodities defined in T. E. Mer­ 14580. Authority sought to operate as a Bee Avenue, Greenville, S.C. Appfieftn cer, Extension, 46 M.C.C. 845) which, be­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over representative: Henry P. Wilnm0“’ cause of size or weight, require the use of irregular routes, transporting: Food­ Greenville, S.C. Authority sought w special equipment, and (b) commodities stuffs (other than those in bulk, in tank operate as a common carrier, by na° which do not require the use of special vehicles), from the facilities of American vehicle, over irregular routes, transpo

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9375 ing: Trailers designed to be drawn by eral Register, issue of June 3, 1966, LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East passenger automobiles, in initial move­ amended June 14, 1966, and republished Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. ments, from White Marsh, Md., to points as amended this issue. Applicant: 19335. Applicant’s representatives: in the United States. Note: The pur­ RUAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street pose of this republication is to show that Keosauqua Way at Third, Des Moines, NW„ Madison Building, Washington, the application has been amended to Iowa 50309. Applicant’s representative: D.C. 20005, and Edwin H. Vandeusen, change the origin point from points in H. L. Fabritz (same address as appli­ 520 Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Baltimore County, Md., to White Marsh, cant). Authority sought to operate as Pa. 19335. Authority sought to operate Md. If a hearing is deemed necessary, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, applicant requests it be held at Baltimore, irregular routes, transporting: Poly- over irregular routes, transporting: Md. ' urethene, and polyurethene products, in Liquid chemicals, in bulk, in tank vehi­ No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 676), filed bulk, from McCook, 111., to points in cles, from the plantsite of the Glidden June 22, 1966. Applicant: WATKINS Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Iowa, Wis­ Co., located at or near Huron, Ohio, to MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Highway, consin, and Illinois. Note : The purpose points in Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Thomasville, Ga. 31792. Applicant’s rep­ of this republication is to redescribe the Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, resentative: Harry Ross, Warner Build­ commodity description. If a hearing is Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New ing, Washington, D.C. 20004. Authority deemed necessary, applicant requests it York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, sought to operate as a common carrier, be held at Chicago, 111. West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Note: by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 108068 (Sub-No. 57), filed June Applicant states that no duplicating au­ transporting: Animal, poultry, fish, food 22, 1966. Applicant: U.S.A.C. TRANS­ thority is sought. If a hearing is deemed and feed and feed ingredients and sup­ PORT, INC., 25200 West Six Mile Road, necessary, applicant requests it be held plements thereto (except in bulk, in tank Detroit, Mich. 48240. Applicant’s rep­ at Washington, D.C., or Cleveland, Ohio. vehicles), from points in Lafourche Par­ resentative: Anthony N. Jacobs (same No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 789), filed ish, La., to points in Illinois, Iowa, Kan­ address as applicant). Authority sought June 6, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL sas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, to operate as a common carrier, by motor LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wis­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. consin. Note: If a hearing is deemed ing: Iron and steel, iron and steel prod­ 19335. Applicant’s representatives: necessary,/applicant requests it be held ucts, and steelmill equipment, materials Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street at New Orleans, La. and supplies, between points in Putnam NW., Washington, D.C., and Edwin H. No. MC 105375 (Sub-No. 27), filed June County, 111., on the one hand, and, on the van Deusen, 520 East Lancaster Avenue, 20, 1966. Applicant: DAHLEN TRANS­ other, points in the United States on and Downingtown, Pa. Authority sought to PORT OP IOWA, INC., 875 North Prior west of a line beginning at the mouth of operate as a common carrier, by motor Avenue, St. Paul, Minn. 55104. Appli­ the Mississippi River, and extending vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ cant’s representative: Leonard A. Jaskie- along the Mississippi River to Grand ing: Liquid chemicals, in bulk, in tank wicz, Madison Building, Washington, Rapids, Minn., thence northerly along vehicles and urea, dry in bulk, from D.C. 20005. Authority sought to operate Minnesota Highway 38 to junction Min­ Olean, N.Y., to points in Connecticut, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, nesota Highway 6, thence along Minne­ Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, over irregular routes, transporting: Com­ sota Highway 6 to junction U.S. Highway Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New mercial chemicals, feed, urea, fertilizer, 71, and thence along U.S. Highway 71 to Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsyl­ and fertilizer ingredients, including, but the International Boundary line between vania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, not limited to anhydrous ammonia in the United States and Canada at Pelland, West Virginia, and ports of entry on the bulk, from points in Woodbury County, Minn. Note: If a hearing is deemed international boundary line between the Iowa, including the Port Neal Industrial necessary, applicant requests it be held United States and Canada located in District, located south of Sioux City, at Chicago, 111., or Washington, D.C. New York. Note: If a hearing is Iowa, to points in Colorado, Illinois, Kan­ No. MC 110354 (Sub-No. 12), filed June deemed necessary, applicant requests it sas, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Ne­ 22, 1966. Applicant: V. KAP TRUCK­ be held at Washington, D.C. braska, North Dakota, South Dakota, ING, INC., Post Office Box 706, Fairport No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 790), filed Wisconsin, and Wyoming, and rejected or Nursery Road, Painesville, Ohio. Appli­ June 9, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL returned shipments on return. Note: cant’s representative: Richard H. Bran­ LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East Applicant states it proposes to tack with don, 79 East State Street, Columbus, Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. authority held in its Subs 18 and 20, Ohio. Authority sought to operate as a 19335. Applicant’s representatives: wherein it is authorized to conduct op­ contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street erations in the States of Illinois, In­ irregular routes, transporting: Liquid NW., Madison Building, Washington, diana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mich- chlorines, in containers, from Paines­ D.C., and Edwin H. van Deusen, 520 East Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, ville, Ohio, and points within 5 miles Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and thereof to Parkersburg, W. Va., and Authority sought to operate as a com­ Wisconsin. If a hearing is deemed neces­ empty containers for liquid chlorines, on mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ sary, applicant requests it be held at return, for Diamond Alkali Co., Cleve­ regular routes, transporting: Latex, in Minneapolis, Minn. land, Ohio. Note : If a hearing is bulk, from Cheswold and Dover, Del., No MC 107107 (Sub-No. 370), filed deemed necessary, applicant requests it and points within 10 miles thereof, to 20, 1966. Applicant: ALTERMAN be held at Columbus or Cleveland, Ohio. points in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, l in e s , INC., 2424 North­ No. MC 110420 (Sub-No. 525), filed North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennes­ west 46th Street, Miami, Fla. 33142. Ap­ June 20, 1966. Applicant: QUALITY see, Virginia, and West Virginia. Note: plicant’s representative: Ford W. Sewell CARRIERS, INC., 100 South Calumet If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ sn?S?Address 93 applicant). Authority Street, Burlington, Wis. 63105. Appli­ cant requests it be held at Washington, ugnt to operate as a common carrier, cant’s representative: Fred H. Figge D.C. JL. vehicle> over irregular routes, (same address as applicant). Authority No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 791), filed S P^rtmg: Meats> ^ ea i products, sought to operate as a common carrier, June 21, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL dairy products, and by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East hniieJO* distributed by meat packing - transporting: Corn syrup, unmixed (glu­ Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. fmmcs’ as defined by the Commission, cose), corn syrup and blends thereof, 19335. Applicant’s representatives: 5 Okla., and points within corn oil, steepwater, starch, dextrine, and Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street Flm-irta ^ ereof, to points in Alabama, corn flour, in bulk, from Lafayette, Ind., NW., Washington, D.C., and Edwin H. 2 pnGe,0rgia' North Carolina, and to points in the United States (except van Deusen, 520 East Lancaster Avenue, deempriC«r°lma' Note: If a hearing is Alaska and Hawaii). Note: If a hear­ Downingtown, Pa. 19335. Authority behpirfo+1^ ? Sary’ aPPiicant requests it ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ sought to operate as a common carrier, ii?eid at Chicago, 111. quests it be held at St. Louis, Mo. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, (Sub-No.481) (Amend- No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 788), filed transporting: Baron trifluoride gas, in ’ filed May 9, 1966, published Fed­ June 2, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL tube trailers, from Marcus Hook, Pa., to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9376 NOTICES

Baytown, Tex. N o t e : If a hearing is No. MC 112063 (Sub-No. 11), filed June plicant: WARREN TRANSPORT, INC., deemed necessary, applicant requests it 22, 1966. Applicant: P. I. & I. MOTOR Post Office Box 420, Waterloo, Iowa» be held at Washington, D.C. EXPRESS, INC., Broadway Avenue Ex­ Applicant’s representative: Charles W. No. MC 111729 (Sub-No. 152) (Cor­ tension, Masury, Ohio. Applicant’s rep­ Singer, 33 North La Salle Street, rection), filed May 18, 1966, published resentative: Edward Bazelon, 39 South Chicago, HL Authority sought to oper­ Federal Register, issue of June 23, 1966, La Salle Avenue, Chicago, 111. Authority ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ and republished as corrected this issue. sought to operate as a common carrier, cle, over irregular routes, transporting; Applicant: ARMORED CARRIER COR­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Plastic pipe, tubing, conduit, valves or PORATION, 222-17 Northern Boulevard, transporting: Iron and steel and iron fittings, compound, joint sealer, bonding Bayside, N.Y. Applicant’s representa­ and steel articles, as described in appen­ cement, primer, coating, thinner and tive: Russell S. Bernhard, 1625 K Street dix V to the report in Description in accessories used in the installation of NW„ Washington, D.C. 20006. Authority Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 such products, from points in Mayes sought to operate as a common carrier, (except commodities which by reason of County, Okla., to points in Kansas, Colo­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, their size or weight require the use of rado, Wyoming, Nebraska, North Dakota, transporting: (1) Drugs,, narcotics, and special equipment) and equipment, ma­ South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, pharmaceuticals, limited to shipments terials, and supplies used in the manu­ Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, and not to exceed 50 pounds from one con­ facture or processing, of iron and steel Michigan. Note: The purpose of this signor at one location to one consignee articles, between points in Putnam republication is to correct the docket at one location on the same day, between County, 111., on the one hand, and, on the number, inadvertently shown as No. Cleveland, Ohio, on the one hand, and, other, points in Arkansas, Alabama, Ari­ MC 114111 (Sub-No. 100). If a hearing on the other, points in the Lower Pe­ zona, California, Colorado, Florida, is deemed necessary, applicant does not ninsula of Michigan (except points in Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, specify a location. Wayne County), and (2) business Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, No. MC 114533 (Sub-No. 139), filed papers, records, checks, recordak film, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Mon­ May 16, 1966. Applicant: B.D.C. and audit and accounting media of all tana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, CORPORATION, 4970 South Archer kinds (except cash letters), (a) between New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Okla­ Avenue, Chicago, HI. 60632. Authority Belpre, Ohio, on the one hand, and, on homa, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Da­ sought to operate as a common carrier, the other, points in Cabell, Harrison, kota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washing­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Marion, Mason, Pleasants, Tyler, Wayne, ton, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wy­ transporting: Commercial papers, docu­ and Wood Counties, W. Va., (b) between oming. Note: If a hearing is deemed ments, business papers, records, and ac­ Erie, Pa., on the one hand, and, on the necessary, applicant does not specify a counting media, between Milwaukee, other, points in Ashtabula County, Ohio, location. Wis., on the one hand, and, on the other, and Chautauqua County, N.Y., (c) be­ No. MC 112520 (Sub-No. 146), filed Detroit, Mich. Note: If a hearing, is tween Dayton, Ohio, on the one hand, June 20, 1966. Applicant: McKENZIE deemed necessary, applicant requests it and, on the other, Lexington and Louis­ TANK LINES, INC., New Quincy Road, be held at Milwaukee, Wis. ville, Ky., (d) between Louisville, Ky., Post Office Box 1200, Tallahassee, Fla. No. MC 115212 (Sub-No. 12), filed and Indianapolis, Ind., and (e) between 32302. Applicant’s representative: Sol June 24, 1966. Applicant: H. M. H> Cleveland, Ohio, and Buffalo, N.Y. H. Proctor, 1730 American Heritage Life MOTOR SERVICE, Route 130, Cran- Note: Applicant is authorized to operate Building, Jacksonville, Fla. 32202. Au­ bury, N.J; Applicant’s representative: as a contract carrier in MC 112750, there­ thority sought to operate as a common Morton E. Kiel, 140 Cedar Street, New fore, dual operations may be involved. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular York, N.Y. Authority sought to operate The purpose of this republication is to routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, include the restriction in (1) above. If from De Ridder, La., to points in Mis­ over irregular routes, transporting: Such a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant sissippi. Note: If a hearing is deemed commodities as are dealt in by retail necessary, applicant requests it be held at women’s and children’s ready-to-wear requests it be held at Cleveland, Ohio. apparel stores, and in connection there- No. MC 111740 (Sub-No. 19), filed June New Orleans, La. No. MC 114045 (Sub-No. 247) (Amend­ with supplies and equipment vised in the 20, 1966. Applicant: OIL TRANSPORT conduct of such business, between North COMPANY, a corporation, East Highway ment), filed April 11, 1966, published Federal Register issue of April 28, 1966, Bergen, N.J., on the one hand, and, on 80, Post Office Drawer 2679, Abilene, Tex. the other, points in Pennsylvania, under 79604, Applicant's representative: Jerry amended June 20, 1966, and republished as amended, this issue. Applicant: contract with Diana Stores Corp. Note; Prestridge, Post Office Box 1148 Austin, TRANS-COLD EXPRESS, INC., Post If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Tex. 78767. Authority sought to oper­ Box 5842, Dallas, Tex. Authority sought cant requests it be held at New York, ate as a common carrier, by motor ve* to operate as a common carrier, by motor N.Y. hide, over irregular routes,’ transporting.j_ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 147), filed Liquid sulphur, in bulk, in tank vehicles; ing: Fresh meats, from points in Cali­ June 23,1966. Applicant: W . J. DIGBY, from Oil Center, N. Mex., to Plainview, INC., Post Office Box 5088, Terminal Tex. Note: If a hearing is deemed nec­ fornia to Dallas and Texarkana, Tex. Note: Applicant states it proposes to Annex, Denver, Colo. 80217. Applicant’s essary, applicant requests it be held at tack the proposed authority with its au­ representative: Harry Ross, 848 Warner Dallas, Tex., Santa Fe, N. Mex., or Al­ thority in MC 114045, Sub Nos. 1, 64, and Building, Washington, D.C. 20004. Au­ buquerque, N. Mex. } 115, wherein it is authorized to operate thority sought to operate as a common ' No. MC 111812 (Stib-No. 351), filed in the States of New York, Arkansas, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular June 21, 1966. Applicant: MIDWEST Oklahoma, Texas, Tennessee, Pennsyl­ routes, - transporting: Animal, poultry* COAST TRANSPORT, INC., Post Office vania, New Jersey, Maryland, Kentucky, fish, food and feed, and feed ingredients Box 747,' Sioux Falls, S. Dak. 57101. Louisiana, Connecticut; Rhode Island, and supplements thereto (except in bulk Applicant’s representative: Harry Ross, Virginia, West Virginia, Delaware, the in tank vehicles), from points ® 848,Warner Building, Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, Indiana, Georgia, Lafourche Parish, La., to points in Dn- 20004. Authority sought to operate as Alabama, Ohio, Michigan, Missouri, New nois, : Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa* Mexico, California; Massachusetts, Flor­ Nebraska, Missouri, Kansas, Colorado, a common cafriet, by motor vehicle, over ida. North Carolina, and South Carolina; Oregon, Washington, California, Utah, irregular routes, transporting: Animal, The purpose of this republication is to Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, South poultry, fish, food and feed, and feed add the destination point of Dallas, Tex., Dakota, Idaho, North Dakota, Montana, ingredients and, supplements thereto (ex­ and also to add the additional tacking Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, an cept in bulk in tank vehicles), from information. If a hearing is deemed Nevada. Note: If a hearing is deem«* Woburn, Boston, and Lawrence, Mass., necessary, applicant requests it be held necessary, applicant requests it be he at Washington, D.C. to points in Illinois, Missouri, Wisconsin, No. MC 114211 (Sub-No. 100) (Correc­ at New Orleans, La. , Minnesota, Nebraska, and Iowa. ■ Note: tion)-, filed May 16, 1966, published Fed­ No. MC 115841 (Sub-No. 294), If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ eral Register, issue of June 23,1966, and June 23, 1966. Applicant: COLONIAL cant requests it be held at Boston, Mass. republished as corrected this issue. Ap­ REFRIGERATED TRANSPORTATION,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO- 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9377 INC., Post Office Box 2169, 1215 Bank- carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Office Box 948, Commercial Station, head Highway West, Birmingham, Ala. routes, transporting: (1) Tractors, wheel Springfield, Mo. 65803. Authority Applicant's representative: Harry Ross, and crawler type vehicles of the type sought to operate as a common carrier, 848 Warner Building, Washington, D.C. used for mining, construction, farming, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, 20004. Authority sought to operate as earth moving, and material handling, transporting: (1) Food products and (2) a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over (2) articles which because of size or agricultural commodities, the trans­ irregular routes, transporting: Animal, weight require the use of special equip­ portation of which is partially exempt poultry, fish, food and feed and feed ment, (3) articles which do not require under the provisions of section 203(b) (6) ingredients and supplements thereto (ex­ the use of special equipment when mov­ of the Interstate Commerce Act if trans­ cept in bulk in tank vehicles), from points ing in the same shipment with articles in ported in vehicles not used in carrying in Lafourche Parish, La., to points in (2) above, (4) attachments and parts tor any other property when moving in the Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, items in (1) above, between points in same vehicle at the same time with food and Illinois. Note: If a hearing is Ohio, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, products, from Sedalia, Mo., to points in deemed necessary, applicant requests it Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Is­ Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Dela­ be held at New Orleans, La. land, New York, New Jersey, Pennsyl­ ware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, No. MC 116544 (Sub-No. 77) (Correc­ vania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, tion), filed May 17, 1966, published in West Virginia, and the District of Co­ Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Federal R egister issue of June 9, 1966, lumbia, on the one hand, and, on the New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and republished as corrected this is­ other, points in Ohio, Minnesota, Michi­ North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, sue. Applicant: WILSON BROTHERS gan, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Mis­ Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Caro­ TRUCK LINE, INC., 700 East Fairview souri, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Note: lina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Avenue, Carthage, Mo. Applicant’s rep­ Common control may be involved. If a Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, resentative: Harry Ross, Warner Build­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant and the District of Columbia. Note: ing, Washington, D.C. 20004. Authority requests it be held at Washington, D.C. If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ sought to operate as a common carrier, No. MC 119934 (Sub-No. 123), filed plicant requests it be held at St. Louis or by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, June 24, 1966. Applicant: ECOFF Kansas City, Mo., Memphis, Tenn., or transporting: Animal, poultry, fish, food TRUCKING, INC., Fortville, Ind. Ap­ Oklahoma City, Okla. and feed and feed ingredients and sup­ plicant’s representative: Robert C. No. MC 124070 (Sub-No. 11), filed plements thereto (except in bulk, in tank Smith, 620 Illinois Building, Indianapolis, June 23, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL vehicles) from points in Lafourche Par­ Ind. 46204. Authority sought to oper­ HAULERS, INC., 5723 Kennedy Avenue, ish, La., to points in Georgia, Florida, ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ Hammond, Ind. 46323. Applicant’s rep­ Alabama, and Mississippi. N o te: The cle, over irregular routes, transporting: resentative : David Axelrod, 39 South La purpose of this republication is to de­ Flour, in bulk, from Decatur, 111., to Salle Street, Chicago, HI. 60603. Au­ lete Mississippi as an origin point and points in Indiana (except Indianapolis, thority sought to operate as a common to add it as a destination point. If a Ind.). Note: Applicant has pending an carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular hearing is deemed necessary, applicant application for contract carrier authority routes, transporting: Limq, in bulk, from requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga. in MC 128161, therefore dual operations Buffington, Ind., to points in Hlinois, No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 306) (Amend­ may be involved. If a hearing is deemed Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, ment), filed December 23, 1965, pub­ necessary, applicant requests it be held Missouri, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, lished Federal R egister issue of January at Indianapolis, Ind., or Chicago, HI. West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Note: 20, 1966, amended June 22, 1966, and No. MC 123099 (Sub-No. 4), filed June If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ republished as amended, this issue. Ap­ 21,1966. Applicant: HOWARD ANDER­ cant requests it be held at Chicago, HI. plicant: WILLIS SHAW FROZEN EX­ SON, doing business as ANDERSON’S No. MC 124105 (Sub-No. 22), filed PRESS, INC., Elm Springs, Ark. Ap­ TRUCKING COMPANY, Tioga Street, June 23, 1966. Applicant: BAGGETT plicant’s representative: John H. Joyce, Wellsboro, Pa. 16901. Applicant’s repre­ BULK TRANSPORT, INC., 2 South 32d 26 North College, Fayetteville, Ark. sentative: Warren H. Spencer, 17 Central Street, Birmingham, Ala. 35233. Appli­ "2702. Authority sought to operate as a Avenue, Wellsboro, Pa. 16901. Author­ cant’s representative: Harold G. Hernly, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over ity sought to operate as a common car­ 711 14th Street NW., Washington, D.C. irregular routes, transporting: Frozen rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular 20005. Authority sought to operate as a foods, from Modesto and Turlock, Calif., routes, transporting: Malt beverages, be­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over to points in Idaho, Oregon, and Wash- tween Buffalo, Rochester, and Utica, irregular routes, transporting: Cement, mston. Note: The purpose of this re­ N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, in bags, and in bulk, from the plantsite of publication is to add another origin points in Bradford and Sullivan Coun­ the Alpha Portland Cement Co., Birming­ point, if a hearing is deemed necessary, ties, Pa. Note: If a hearing is deemed ham, Ala., to points in Alabama, Georgia, applicant requests it be held at Boise, necessary, applicant requests it be held North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Idaho, or Los Angeles, Calif. at Buffalo or Rochester, N.Y., or Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee. No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 351) (Amend­ Scranton, Pa. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, ment), filed March 2, 1SB6, published No. MC 123157 (Sub-No. 13), filed applicant requests it be held at Birming­ «» eral Register, issue of March 24, June 20, 1966. Applicant: CEMENT ham, Ala., or Washington, D.C. ¿*55» amended June 22, 1966, and re­ TRANSPORTERS, INC., Rillito, Ariz. No. MC 124383 (Sub-No. 4) (Amend­ published as amended this issue. Appli- Applicant’s representative: A. Michael ment) , filed September 27, 1965, pub­ SHAW FROZEN EX- Bernstein, 1327 Guaranty Bank Building, lished Federal Register issue of October 7,’ INC-’ Elm Springs, Ark. Ap- Phoenix, Ariz. 85012. Authority sought 14, 1965, amended June 17,1966, and re­ representative: John H. Joyce, to operate as a common carrier, by motor published, as amended, this issue. Ap­ College, Fayetteville, Ark. Au- vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ plicant: DREYER TRANSPORT, INC. ?0U8ht to operate as a common porting: Cement, from Rillito and Clark- (DAVID F. KOPPLIN, RECEIVER), 4939 miifier7by m°tor vehicle, over irregular dale, Ariz., to the port of entry on the North 36th Street', Milwaukee, Wis. S Vtransporting: Frozen foods, from international boundary line between the Applicant’s representative: Frank M. K t ? V nd Turlock» Calif., to points United States and Mexico, located at or Coyne, Bank of Madison Building, 1 West Si& ZSt N,ote: The purpose of this near Douglas, Ariz. Note: If a hearing Main Street, Madison, Wis. 53703. Au­ point ^ 13 to add another origin is deemed necessary, applicant requests thority sought to operate as a common aon1i ‘ * a lieartog Is deemed necessary, it be held at Phoenix or Tucson, Ariz. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular geles r iU equests be held at ^ An- No. MC 123393 (Sub-No. 136), filed routes, transporting: Lightweight ag­ S ’ tS?-, or ^ Vegas, Nev. June 24,1966. Applicant: BILYEU RE­ gregates, in bulk (lightweight stone), May i ^ n L 1757.4 (Sub-No. 149), filed FRIGERATED TRANSPORT COR­ from Marseilles and Ottawa, HI., to Ap­ Press’ APPUcant: DAILY EX- PORATION, 2105 East Dale Street, Post pleton, Brillion, Burlington, Hales Cor­ MouS L £*C;f Post ° ffice Box 39, Office Box 965, Commercial Station, ners, Neenah, Waukesha, and West Allis, Route No. 3, Carlisle, Pa. Au- Springfield, Mo. 65803. Applicant’s rep­ Wis. Note: The purpose of this repub­ toority sought to operate as k common resentative: Harley E. Laughlin, Post lication is to show that the applicant

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9378 NOTICES seeks to operate as a common carrier; No. MC 125996 (Sub-No. 7) (Amend­ tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ in lieu of contract carrier, as previously ment), filed May 6, 1966, published in regular routes, transporting: Dry fertil­ published, and also to add Mr. Coyne, as Federal R egister issue May 26, 1966, izer, in bags and in bulk, in dump vehi­ attorney for the applicant. If a hear­ amended and republished as amended, cles, from Danville, HI., to points in ing is deemed necessary, applicant this issue. Applicant: JENSEN TRUCK­ Benton, Boone, Clinton, Fountain, Mont­ requests it be held at Milwaukee, Wis. ING CO. INC., 807 Washington Street, gomery, Parke, Tippecanoe, Vermillion, No. MC 124679 (Sub-No. 3) , filed June Gothenburg, Nebr. Applicant’s repre­ and Warren Counties, Ind.; under con­ 24, 1966. Applicant: C. R. ENGLAND & sentative: Charles J. Kimball, Box 2028, tract with the Agrico Chemical Co., divi­ SONS, INC., 228 West Fifth South, Salt Lincoln, Nebr. 68501. Authority sought sion of Continental Oil Co., Danville, 111. Lake City, Utah 84101; Applicant’s rep­ to operate as a common carrier, by motor Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, resentative: Daniel B. Johnson, 847 vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ applicant requests it be held at Indian­ Warner Building, 501 13th Street NW., ing: Bird, fish, poultry, and animal feed apolis, Ind., or Chicago, 111. Washington, D.C. 20004. Authority ingredients and bird, fish, poultry, and No. MC 128236 (Sub-No. 1) (Correc­ sought to operate as a common carrier, animal feed, from (1) Buhl and Hager- tion) , filed May 19, 1966, published Fed­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, man, Idaho, to points in Washington and eral Register, issue of June 16, 1966, transporting: Meats, meat products, Oregon (except Ontario, Oreg.), and (2) and republished as corrected this issue. meat "byproducts and articles distributed points in Arizona and California to Applicant: L & M TRUCKING COM­ by meat packinghouses, as described in points in Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, PANY, INC., Box 271, Remington, Ind. appendix I to the report in Descriptions Nebraska, and Wisconsin. Note: The Applicant’s representative: Warren C. in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. purpose of this republication is to delete Moberly, 1212 Fletcher Trust Building, 209, from points in Weber County, Utah, part of note. If a hearing is deemed Indianapolis, Ind. Authority sought to to points in Connecticut, Delaware, Mas­ necessary, applicant requests it be held operate as a contract carrier, by motor sachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New at Lincoln, Nebr. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, No. MC 126459 (Sub-No. 2), filed June ing: Iron and steel castings, stampings Virginia, and the District of Columbia. 22, 1966. Applicant: ALBERT S. HAR­ and, metal forms, unfinished, from the Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, MON and NORMA HARMON, a partner­ plants or warehouses of Remington applicant requests it be held at Salt lake ship, doing business as HARMON jForge, Inc., at Remington, Ind., and City, Utah. TRUCKING COMPANY, 167 North State points within 5 miles thereof, to points No. MC 125364 (Sub-No. 3) (Correct Street, Caro, Mich. Applicant’s repre­ in Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, tion), filed May 19, 1966, published in sentative: William B. Elmer, 22644 Ohio, and Michigan (including ports of F ederal Register issue of June 23, 1966, Gratiot Avenue, East Detroit, Mich. entry on the international boundary line and republished as corrected this issue. 48021. Authority sought to operate as a between the United States and Canada Applicant: CAREL TRUCKING CORP., contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over for export in foreign commerce). Note: Post Office Box 147, South Omaha Sta­ irregular routes, transporting: Sugar- The purpose of this republication is to tion, Omaha, Nebr. Applicant’s repre­ beet pulp, in bulk, sugarbeet molasses, in set forth more clearly the destination sentative: Donald E. Leonard, Box 2028, tank trucks and sugarbeet pulp and sug­ territory. If a hearing is deemed nec­ Lincoln, Nebr. 68501. Authority sought arbeet molasses blend, in bulk or pack­ essary, applicant requests it be held at to operate as a contract carrier, by motor ages, (1) from Caro, Carrollton, Croswell, Indianapolis, Ind. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ and Sebewaing, Mich., to Bremen, Ind., No. MC 128286, filed May 19, 1966. ing: Meats, meat products, and meat by­ and (2) from Bremen, Ind., to Caro, Applicant : WILSON W. REARICK, Star products, and dairy products, as de­ Carrollton, Croswell, and Sebewaing, Route, Apollo, Pa. Applicant’s repre­ scribed in sections A and B of appendix I Mich., under contract with Michigan sentative: Jerome Solomon, 1302 Grant to the report in Descriptions in Motor Sugar Co. Note: If a hearing is deemed Building, Pittsburgh, Pa. Authority Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and necessary, applicant requests it be held sought to operate as a contract carrier, 766 (except commodities in bulk, in tank at Lansing or Detroit, Mich. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, vehicles) from Sioux City, Iowa, to New No. MC 126600 (Sub-No. 1) (Clarifica­ transporting: (1) Refractory products York, N.Y., under continuing contract tion), filed June 20, 1966, published and refractory materials (except refrac­ with Sioux Quality Packers, Inc., Sioux Federal Register, issue of June 30,1966, tory and firebrick), between Latrobe, City, Iowa. Note: The purpose of this and republished as clarified this issue. Somerset, and points in Gilpin Township, republication is to add the file date which Applicant: EHRSAM TRANSPORT, Armstrong County, Pa., on the one hand, was inadvertently omitted. If a hearing INC., 108 North Factory, Enterprise, and, on the other, points in New York, is deemed necessary, applicant requests Kans. Applicant’s representative : John Maryland, Ohio, Delaware, Illinois, In­ it be held at Omaha, Nebr., or Sioux E. Jandera, 641 Harrison Street, Topeka, diana, Kentucky, and West Virginia and City, Iowa; Kans. Authority sought to operate as a (2) sand and loam, in bulk in dump ve­ No. MC 125708 (Sub-No. 56) (Amend­ contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over hicles, between points in Gilpin Town­ ment) . filed May 6, 1966, published Fed­ irregular routes, transporting: (1) Forest ship, Armstrong County, Pa., and pointe eral Register, issue of May 26, 1966, products and lumber products, and (2) in Ohio, West Virginia, Maryland, and amended June 17, 1966, and republished, commodities, the transportation of which New York, under contract or continuing as amended, this issue. Applicant: is partially exempt under the provisions contract with Bognar & Co., InC., Union HUGH MAJOR, 150 Sinclair Avenue, of section 203(b) (6) of the interstate Mining Co., Union Refractories, Inc., South Roxana, HI. Applicant’s repre­ Commerce Act if transported in vehicles and Union Fire Brick Co., Pittsburgh, sentative: Edward G. Bazelon, 39 South not used in carrying any other property, Pa. Note: If a hearing is deemed nec­ La Salle Street, Chicago, IU. 60603. Au­ when moving in the same vehicle at the essary,. applicant requests it be held at thority sought to operate as a common same time with (1) above, from points Pittsburgh, Pa. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Cali­ No. MC 128326 (Sub-No. A* JJ * routes, transporting: Pipe and pipe fit­ fornia, and AriZonia, to points in Kansas, June 20, 1966. Applicant: SANTEE tings, couplings, connections and acces­ Nebraska, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, TRANSPORT COMPANY, 1308 Nortn sories, from points in Sangamon, Rock and Iowa, under contract with J. B. 34th Street, Tampa, Fla. Applicants Island, and Logan Counties, 111., to Ehrsam & Sons Manufacturing Co. representative: Lewis H. Hill, Jr-> °* points in Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, Ken­ Note: The purpose of this republication Lewis H. Hill m , 1014 First National tucky, Tennessee, Iowa, Kansas, Penn­ is to clarify the commodity description. Bank Building, Tampa, Fla. 33602. Au­ sylvania, and West Virginia. Note: Ap­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ thority sought to operate as a c o m m o n plicant holds contract carrier authority cant requests it be held at Topeka, Kans., carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular in MC 116434 and Subs, therefore dual or Kansas City, Mo. routes, transporting : Drained fruit, frut operations may be involved. The pur­ No. MC 127813 (Sub-No. 1), filed June peel and fruitcake mix other than pose of this repubUcation is to add appli­ 20, 1966. Applicant: HALE LEGG, do­ cant’s representative. If a hearing is ing business as LEGG FARM SERVICE, candied; crystallized, or stuffed, fiu® deemed necessary, applicant requests it Post Office Box 356, Wayne town, Ind; Plant City, Fla., to points in the Unitea be held at Chicago, 111., or St. Louis, Mo. Authority sought to operate as a con­ States, (excluding Alaska) . Note.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31* NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9379 hearing is deemed necessary, applicant by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, to Dannebrog, Nebr., thence over Ne­ requests it be held at Tampa, Fla. transporting: Agricultural limestone, in braska Highway 11 to junction Nebraska No. MC 128336, filed June 20, 1966. bulk, in vehicles with permanently at­ Highway 92 near Farwell, Nebr., thence Applicant: WESLEY E. GARNER, North tached equipment for regulated spread­ return over Nebraska Highway 92 to Carolina Highway 133, Southport, N.C. ing of limestone, from the plant of Ivan junction U.S. Highway 281, and thence 28461. Applicant’s representative: M. Martin, Inc., in Blue Ball, Pa., and over U.S. Highway 281 to Grand Island, Ernest E. Parker, Jr., Box 877, Southport, from the plant of Limeville Quarries, and (3) between Grand Island and N.C. 28461. Authority sought to operate Inc. (a subsidiary of Ivan M. Martin, O’Neill, Nebr., over U.S. Highway 281, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Inc.), in Limeville, Pa., to points in serving all intermediate points in (1), (2), over irregular routes, transporting : Fish Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and New and (3) above. Note: If a hearing is byproducts, fish meal, fish scrap and fish Jersey. Note: Applicant states it now deemed necessary, applicant requests it solubles, from Southport, Morehead City, holds authority in MC 117284 (Sub-No. be held at Grand Island, Nebr. and Beaufort, N.C., to points in North 1), as a contract carrier, transporting No. MC 128212 (Amendment), filed Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Ala­ agricultural limestone, in bulk, from May 16,1966, published Federal Register bama, Tennessee, and Virginia. Note: Blue Ball, Pa., to points in Delaware and issue of June 23, 1966, and republished Applicant holds contract carrier author­ Maryland, under a continuing contract issue of June 30,1966, amended June 24, ity in MC 119799, therefore dual opera- with Ivan M. Martin, Inc., and requests 1966, and republished as amended, this tions may be involved. If a hearing is that such contract carrier authority be issue. Applicant: CREST TRANSIT deemed necessary, applicant requests it canceled upon the grant of the authority CORF., 38 Lyncrest Avenue, New City, be held at Southport, Wilmington, herein sought. If a hearing is deemed N.Y. Applicant’s representative: Robert Raleigh, or Charlotte, N.C. necessary, applicant requests it be held E. Goldstein, 8 West 40th Street, New No. MC 128337, filed June 20, 1966. at Philadelphia, Pa. York, N.Y. 10018. Authority sought to Applicant: ZED DAVIS, 1401 State No. MC 128341, filed June 23, 1966. operate as a common carrier, by motor Street, Washington, Ind. 47501. Appli­ Applicant: GALE L. HELBLING, 1455 vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ cant’s representative: James R. Arthur, Pennsylvania Avenue, New Brighton, ing; Passengers and their baggage in the Box 491, Washington, Ind. 47501. Au­ Pa. 15066. Applicant’s representative: same vehicle with passengers, (1) be­ thority sought to operate as a common Jerome Solomon, 1302 Grant Building, tween junction U.S. Highway 202 and carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219. Authority sought New York Highway 45 and New York, routes, transporting: Malt beverages, to operate as a contract carrier, by N.Y.; from junction U.S. Highway 202 and empty containers for malt bever­ motor vehicle, over irregular routes, and New York Highway 45 at Mount Ivy, ages, between Washington, Vincennes, transporting: Plastics and plastic forms N.Y., south on New York Highway 45 to Petersburg, and Bloomfield, Ind., Cin­ and containers, from the Borough of New Maple Avenue, thence west On Maple cinnati, Ohio, Newport and Louisville, Brighton, Beaver County, Pa., to points Avenue to New York Highway 306, thence Ky., and Peoria, 111. Note: If a hearing in New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Indiana, south on New York Highway 306 to Sec­ is deemed necessary, applicant requests Illinois, and West Virginia; and supplies, ond Street, thence west on Second Street it be held at Indianapolis, Ind., or materials and equipment used or useful to Saddle River Road, thence south on Louisville, Ky. in the manufacture of plastics and Saddle River Road to East Allendale No. MC 128338, filed June 22, 1966. plastic forms and containers, and cor­ Avenue, thence east on East Allendale Applicant: WILLARD RINGER, Route rugated cardboard or paper containers, Avenue to East Saddle River Road, No. 1, Box 54, Markleysburg, Pa. 15459. on return; limited to transportation to thence south on East Saddle River Road Applicant’s representative: Arthur J. and from the plantsite of the Tuscarora to New Jersey Highway 17, thence over Diskin, 302 Frick Building, Pittsburgh, Plastics, Inc., located in the Borough of New Jersey Highway 17 to Interstate Pa. 15219. Authority sought to operate New Brighton, Beaver County, Pa. Highway 80, thence over Interstate High­ as a contract carrier, by motbr vehicle, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, way 80 to George Washington Bridge over irregular routes, transporting: applicant requests it be held at Pitts­ Plaza to New York, N.Y,, and return over Chemicals, between Morgantown, W. Va., burgh, Pa. the same route, serving all intermediate and points in Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsyl­ No. MC 128342, filed June 23, 1966. points except between Lake Street and vania, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Applicant: BRUCE W. CLARK, North Saddle River Road in Upper Saddle Delaware, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Main Street, Angola, N.Y. Applicant’s River and Saddle River Road and East and Connecticut, under continuing con­ representative: Samuel Rosenthal, 530 Allendale Avenue, and (2) also between tract with Weston Chemical Co., Inc. Walbridge Building, Buffalo, N.Y. Au­ junction New York Highway 45 and Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, thority sought to operate as a contract Eckerson Road and Maple Avenue and applicant requests it be held at Washing­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular New York Highway 306; from junction ton, D.C., or Pittsburgh, Pa. routes, transporting: Wallboard, from New York Highway 45 and Eckerson No. MC 128339, filed June 22, 1966. Lockport, N.Y., to points in Pennsylvania., Road at Hillcrest, N.Y., west on Eckerson Applicant: REGISTER VAN AND Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, and Illinois, Road to Union Avenue, thence south on STORAGE COMPANY, INC., 1371 Jac­ under contract with Upson Co., Inc., Union Avenue to Myrtle Avenue, thence queline Drive, Columbus, Ga. Appli­ Lockport, N.Y. Note : If a hearing is south on Myrtle Avenue to Maple Avenue, cant’s representative: C. E. Walker, 306 deemed necessary, applicant requests it thence west on Maple Avenue to New First National Bank Building, Colum­ be held at Buffalo, N.Y. bus, Ga. 31902. Authority sought to York Highway 306, and return over the Motor Carriers op Passengers same route, serving all intermediate operate as a common carrier, by motor points. The operations above shall be vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 52655 (Sub-No. 3), filed May restricted against the transportation of ing: General commodities, including bulk 2, 1966. Applicant: UNITED MOTOR passengers between the junction of Race commodities and commodities in tank WAYS, INC., 409 North Walnut, Grand Track Road at New Jersey Highway 17, trucks, between points within the com­ Island, Nebr. Authority sought to oper­ at or near Waldwick, N.J., on the one mercial zone (or zones) of the two con- ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ hand, and, on the other, New York, N.Y. municipalities of Columbus, Ga.r hicle, over regular routes, transporting: and Phenix City, Ala. Note: If a hear- Note: The purpose of this republication Passengers and their baggage, and ex­ is to delete a portion of the route de­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ press and newspapers, in the same ve­ quests it be held at Columbus or Atlanta, scription in (1) above. If a hearing is «a. hicle with passengers, (1) between Grand deemed necessary, applicant requests it Island and Broken Bow, Nebr., over be held at New York, N.Y. No. Me 128340, filed June 23, 1966. , (2) between Grand No. MC 128274 (Sub-No. 1) (Clarifica­ Applicant: RAYMOND D. WEBER, Island, Nebr., and Grand Island, Nebr., tion), filed June 2, 1966, published in «ural Delivery No. 1, East Earl, Pa. moving in a circuitous manner; from Federal Register, issue of June 23, 1966, Applicant’s representative: Morris J. Grand Island over U.S. Highway 281 to and republished as clarified, this issue. »°*ur’ 1920 Two Penn Center Plaza, junction Nebraska Highway 92, thence Applicant: PEORIA-ROCKFORD BUS Philadelphia, pa. 19102. Authority over Nebraska Highway 92 to Loup City, COMPANY, a corporation, 1034 South cught to operate as a common carrier, Nebr., thence over Nebraska Highway 58 Seminary Street, Rockford, 111. Appli-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9380 NOTICES cant’s representative: Louis R. Gentili, gaged in work for the U.S. Engineers for TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., Post 38 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, HI. use by such Engineers and contractors as Office Box 249, Peabody, Mass. Appli­ 60603. Authority sought to operate as a tenders at the sites of marine construc­ cant’s attorney: Mary E. Kelley, 10 Tre- contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over tion jobs on the Mississippi River and its mont Street, Boston, Mass. Authority regular routes, transporting: Passengers, tributaries below Cairo, 111.; such use not sought to operate as a common carrier, from Beloit, Wis., to Harvard, HI., from to include movements in excess of 50 by motor vehicle, over regular routes, Beloit, thence northeast on Wisconsin miles from the jobsite except that where transporting: General commodities (ex­ Highway 15 to junction U.S. Highway 14 the charter is for a period of not less cept those of unusual value, and except at Darien, Wis., thence southeast on U.S. than 100 hours the vessel may be used classes A and B explosives, livestock, Highway 14 to Harvard, and return over for initial movement of contractors’ household goods as defined by the Com­ the same route, serving all intermediate equipment to the jobsites and removal mission, commodities in bifik, commodi­ points. Note: Applicant states that thereof from such sites at the conclusion ties requiring special equipment, and of the project. those injurious or contaminating to these passengers are employees, agents, other lading), (1) between Boston, servants, officers, invitees, and licensees Applications in Which Handling With­ Mass., and New York, N.Y.: (a) From of Admiral Corp. at Harvard, 111. Com­ out Oral Hearing Has Been Requested mon control may be involved. Applicant Boston over Massachusetts Highway 9 to is also authorized to conduct operations No. MC 19553 (Sub-No. 27), filed June junction U.S. Highway 20 (also via Mas­ as a common carrier in No. MC 66810 and 21, 1966. Applicant: KNOX MOTOR sachusetts Turnpike (Interstate High­ Subs thereunder. The purpose of this SERVICE, INC., Box 359, Rockford, way 90) to junction U.S. Highway 20), republication is to clarify the note. If 111. 61105. Applicant’s representative: thence over U.S. Highway 20 to junction a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Robert M. Kaske (same address as ap­ Massachusetts Highway 15, thence over plicant). Authority sought to operate Massachusetts Highway 15 to Massa- requests it be held at Rockford or as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, chusetts-Connecticut State line, thence Chicago, HI. over regular routes, transporting: Gen­ over Connecticut Highway 15 to junction Applications for Brokerage Licenses eral commodities (except dangerous ex­ U.S. Highway 5, thence over U.S. High­ No. MC 12986, filed March 18, 1966. plosives, livestock, household goods as way 5 to junction Interstate Highway Applicant: DOUGLAS D. FOX, doing defined in Practices of Motor Common 95, thence over Interstate Highway 95 business as DOUG FOX TRAVEL SERV­ Carrier of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. to New York, and return over the same ICE, 341 White Henry Stuart Building, 467, commodities in bulk, including bulk route, serving all intermediate points in Seattle, Wash. 98101. For a license liquids, assembled automobiles and heavy Massachusetts and intermediate and off- (BMC 5) to engage in operations as a machinery requiring special equipment or route points in that part of New York broker, at Seattle, Bremerton, Yakima, handling), between Davenport, Iowa, and east of the Hudson River, south of New and Kent, Wash., in arranging for the Peoria, HI., over U.S. Highway 150, and York Highway 119, and west of New transportation, in interstate or foreign return over the same route, serving no York Highway 110, including points on commerce, of passengers and their bag­ intermediate points and as an alternate the indicated portions of the highways gage, as individuals organized into route for operating convenience only in specified, and (b) from Boston over US. groups and special groups, in charter connection with applicant’s authorized Highway 1 to junction Interstate High­ operations, in round-trip organized regular route authority. way 95, thence over Interstate Highway tours, between points in the United No. MC 19553 (Sub-No. 28), filed June 95 to New York, and return over the States. 21, 1966. Applicant: KNOX MOTOR same route, serving all intermediate No. MC 130004, filed June 16, 1966. SERVICE, INC., Box 359, Rockford, points in Massachusetts and intermedi­ Applicant: McMULLEN TOURS, INC., HI. 61105. Applicant’s representative: ate and off-route points in that part of 224 South Broad Street, Grove City, Robert M. Kaske (same address as ap­ New York east of the Hudson River, Pa. 16127. Applicant’s representative: plicant). Authority sought to operate south of New York Highway 119, and Charles J. Williams, 1060 Broad Street, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, west of New York Highway 110, includ­ Newark, N.Y. 07102. For a license (BMC over regular routes, transporting: Gen­ ing points on the indicated portions of 5) to engage in operations as a broker at eral commodities (except household the highways specified, and (2) between Butler, Erie, Franklin, and Grove City, goods as defined by the Commission), Peabody, Mass., and Norwood, Mass.: Pa., in arranging for the transportation, between junction Wisconsin Highway 20 From Peabody over Massachusetts High­ in interstate or foreign commerce, of and Wisconsin Highway 31, and Wauke­ way 128 to Norwood, and return over the passengers and their baggage, in special gan, HI., as follows: From junction Wis­ same route, serving all intermediate consin Highway 20 and Wisconsin High­ points. Note: Applicant states no and charter operations, between points way 31, over Wisconsin Highway 31 to duplicating authority sought. This ap­ in the United States, including Alaska junction Illinois Highway 131, thence and Hawaii. Note: Applicant states its plication is filed pursuant to MC-C 4366, president, Robert L. McMullen, holds a over Hlinois Highway 131 to Waukegan, effective May 1, 1964, which provides the broker’s license in No. MC 12606, and if and return over the same route, serving special rules for conversion of irregular the instant application is granted, a re­ no intermediate points, as an alternate to regular route motor carrier opera­ route for operating convenience only, tions. Special Note: Protests to this quest for revocation of such license will in connection with applicant’s presently be made. application may be filed within 45 days authorized regular route operations. instead of 30 days. Application of Water Carrier No. MC 32882 (Sub-No. 36), filed No. MC 114194 (Sub-No. 112) (Amend­ No. W-1228, WARREN Q. AND June 23, 1966. Applicant: MITCHELL ment), filed September 15, 1965, pub" PARTHENA K. KEEL—Exemption ap­ BROS. TRUCK LINES, a corporation, lished Federal Register, issue of Oc­ plication, filed June 22, I960. Appli­ 2300 Northwest 30th Avenue, Portland, tober 7, 1965, amended June 20, 1966, cant: WARREN Q. KEEL & PARTHENA Oreg. 97210. Applicant’s representa­ and republished, as amended, this i^u®- K. KEEL, a partnership, doing busi­ tive: Norman E. Sutherland, 1200 Jack- Applicant: KREIDER TRUCK SERV­ ness as KWK TOWING COMPANY, son Tower, Portland, Oreg. 97205. Au­ ICE, INC., 8003 Collinsville Road, East Box 232, Lake Providence, La. Ap­ thority sought to operate as a common St. Louis, 111. Authority sought to oper­ plicant’s representative: George F. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ Fox, Jr., Varco Building, 405 Morgan routes, transporting: Lumber, from hicle, over irregular routes, transporting. Street, Lake Providence, La. 71254. Ap­ points In' Oregon to points in Nevada. Syrups, sweeteners, and blends, in bum, plication filed June 22, 1966, for exemp­ Note: Applicant states that it intends from Granite City, 111., to Edinburg, Ind., tion from part HI of the Interstate Com­ to tack proposed authority with previ­ and rejected shipments, on returni. merce Act, and section 302(e) thereof. ously held authority, in which applicant Note: Applicant states the authority Applicant seeks exemption for the char­ is authorized to operate between points intends to tack to out of Edinburg, in •> tering of owned towing vessels of not in Oregon and Washington. would permit it to go to points in tn more than 600 horsepower to the U.S. No. MC 113566 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ United States, except Wisconsin, in ' Engineers and marine contractors en- ruary 28, 1965. Applicant: MASSIE ana, Illinois, Kansas, and Missouri.

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9381 purpose of this republication Is to add FSA No. 4 0 5 84—Joint motor-rail cation, within 15 calendar days after the the tacking information. rates—Central States. Filed by Central date notice of the filing of the applica­ States Motor Freight Bureau, Inc., agent tion is published in the Federal Register. By the Commission. (No. 109), for interested carriers. Rates One copy of such protest must be served [seal] H . N eil G arson, on property moving on class and com­ on the applicant, or its authorized repre­ Secretary. modity rates over joint routes of appli­ sentative, if any, and the protest must [F.R. Doc. 66-7398; Piled, July 7, 1966; cant rail and motor carriers, between certify that such service has been made. 8:45 a.m.] points in Central States territory. The protest must be specific as to the Grounds for relief—Motor-truck com­ service which such protestant can and petition. will offer, and must consist of a signed FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS Tariff—Supplement 11 to Central original and six (6) copies. FOR RELIEF States Motor Freight Bureau, Inc., agent, A copy of the application is on file, and tariff MF-ICC 1163. can be examined, at the Office of the J uly 5, 1966. FSA No. 40585—Petroleum products Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com­ Protests to the granting of an applica­ from Denver, Colo. Filed by Western mission, Washington, D.C., and also in tion must be prepared in accordance Trunk Line Committee, agent (No. the field office to which protests are to be with Rule 1.40 of the general rules of A-2457), for interested rail carriers. transmitted. practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within Rates on residual fuel oil,^distillate fuel Motor Carriers of Property 15 days from the date of publication of oil, not suitable for illuminating pur­ this notice in the Federal Register. poses and gas oil, in tank carloads, from No. MC 82079 (Sub-No. 11 TA), filed Denver, Colo., to specified points on June 30, 1966. Applicant: KELLER Long-and-Short Haul Great Northern Railway, in Minnesota TRANSFER LINE, INC., 1239 Randolph PSA No. 40580—Liquefied Petroleum and South Dakota. Avenue SW., Grand Rapids, Mich. 49502. gas to points in western trunkline terri­ Grounds for relief—Market competi­ Applicant’s representative: J. M. Neath, tory. Filed by Western Trunk Line tion. Jr., Warner, Norcross & Judd, 1 Vanden- Committee, agent (No. A-2456), for in­ Tariff—Supplement 21 to Western berg Center, Grand Rapids, Mich. 49502. terested rail carriers. Rates on liquified Trunk Line Committee, agent, tariff ICC Authority sought to operate as a com­ petroleum gas, in tank carloads, from A-4572. mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Bitter Creek, Shoshoni, Wyo., to points FSA No. 40586—Cement and related regular routes, transporting: Bulk flour, in western trunkline territory. articles from Logansport, Ind. Filed by from Lowell and Quincy, Mich., to Chi­ Grounds for relief—Market competi­ Traffic Executive Association-Eastern cago, 111., and the Chicago commercial tion. Railroads, agent (E.R. No. 2852), for in­ zone, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Tariff—Supplement 26 to Western terested rail carriers. Rates on cement, King Milling Co., Lowell, Mich. 49331. Trunk Line Committee, agent, tariff viz: common, hydraulic, masonry, mor­ Send protests to: C. R. Flemming, Dis­ ICC A-4530. tar, natural, and Portland, alsotile grout, trict Supervisor, Bureau of Operations PSA No. 40581—Export and import cement clinker and dry building mortar, and Compliance, Interstate Commerce rates from and to points in Indiana. in carloads, from Logansport, Ind., to Commission, 221 Federal Building, Lan­ Filed by Southern Ports Foreign Freight points in official (including Illinois) ter­ sing, Mich. 48933. Committee, agent (No. 63), for inter­ ritory. No. MC 115022 (Sub-No. 12 TA), filed ested rail carriers. Rates on property Grounds for relief—Market competi­ June 29, 1966. Applicant: CHAMBER- moving on export and import class and tion. LAIN MOBILEHOME TRANSPORT, commodity rates, in carloads, between Tariff—Supplement 46 to Traffic Ex­ INC., 64 East Main Street, Thomas ton, Points in Indiana, on the Central Indi­ ecutive Association-Eastern Railroads, Conn. Applicant’s representative: Reu- ana Railway Co., on the one hand, and agent, tariff ICC C-435. bin Kaminsky, 410 Asylum Street, Hart­ sulf, south Atlantic and south Florida FSA No. 40587—Class and commodity ford, Conn. Authority sought to operate Ports, on the other (export and import). rates from and to Pine, Miss. Filed by as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Grounds for relief—Carrier competi­ O. W. South, Jr., agent (No. A-4912), for over irregular routes, transporting: Trail­ tion. interested rail carriers. Rates on prop­ ers and mobilehomes, designed to be Tariffs—Supplements 47, 58, 66, a erty moving on class and commodity drawn by passenger cars, in truckaway 64 to Southern Ports Foreign Freii rates, between Pine, Miss., on the one and towaway service from the plantsite Committee, agent, tariffs ICC 132, 1 hand, and points in the United States of Schult Mobile Homes Corp. at Elkton, 185, and 145, respectively. and Canada, on the other. Md., to points in Delaware, New Jersey, FSA No. 40582—Joint motor- 7 Grounds for relief—New station and New York, Maine, New Hampshire, Ver­ rates—Central States. Filed by Cent grouping. mont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode states Motor Freight Bureau, Inc., ag< By the Commission. Island, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and iNo. 107), for interested carriers. Ra North Carolina and refused, damaged, on property moving on class and co; [seal] H. Neil Garson, and rejected shipments, on return, for modity rates over joint routes of apf Secretary. 180 days. Supporting shipper: Schult cant rail and motor carriers, betwe [F.R. Doc. 66-7449; Filed, July 7, 1966; Mobile Homes Corp., Post Office Box 299, Points in Central States territory. 8:48 a.m.] Elkton, Md. Send protests to: David J. _ ^fpnnds for relief—Motortruck co: Kiernan, District Supervisor, Bureau of Petition. Operations and Compliance, Interstate [Notice 208] Commerce Commission, Room 324, U.S. Tariff—Supplement 11 to Cent Post Office Building, 135 High Street, r^sM otor Freight Bureau. Inc., age MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY tariff mp_ioc1163 , s Hartford, Conn. 06101. AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS No. MC 128287 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed 40583—joint motor-r J uly 5,1966. June 30, 1966. Applicant: CLARENCE razes-centrai States. Filed by Cent O. TRIPP, 4607 North Avenue West, Motor Freight Bureau, Inc., ag< The following are notices of filing of Missoula, Mont. 59801. Applicant’s rep­ for interested carriers. Ra applications for temporary authority un­ resentative: J. Robert Riley, Suite 2, m J-f0perty moving on class and co: der section 210a(a) of the Interstate Duncan Block, 240 North Higgins, Mis­ on«* f1a*ies over joint routes of app Commerce Act provided for under the soula, Mont. 59801. Authority sought to an(t motor carriers, betwe new rules in Ex Parte No. MC 67, (49 operate as a common carrier, by motor ts in Central States territory. CFR Part 240) published in the Federal vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Register, issue of April 27, 1965, effec­ Petition^ *°r re^e*—Motortruck co: ing: Lumber and wood products from, tive July 1, 1965. Thes^ rules provide points in western Montana to points in S taw ?r?upplemenfc 11 to Cent that protests to the granting of an appli­ Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota, and tariff Freight Bureau, Inc., age cation must be filed with the field official building materials from points in Wis­ wnff M F -ic c 1163. named in the Federal Register publi­ consin, Iowa, and Minnesota to points in

No. 131------7 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY I, 1966

\ 9382 NOTICES western Montana, for 180 days. Sup­ The areas described aggregate approx­ porting shippers: United States Gypsum DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR imately 75 acres. Co., 101 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Bureau of Land Management R. J. Litten, HI. 60606; L. A. Hamilton Lumber Co., Chief, Lands Adjudication Section, Inc., Box 1432, Missoula, Mont. 59801; CALIFORNIA Sacramento Land Office. Smith’s Flooring & Building Supply, 1939 Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and [F.R. Doc. 66-7436; Filed, July 7, 1966; South Avenue West, Missoula, Mont. 8:46 am .] 59801; Kalispell Lumber Co., Box 217, Reservation of Lands Kalispell, Mont.; Montana Lumber Sales, J une 30,1966. Inc., West Bank Building, Missoula, Mont. Send protests to: Paul J. Labane, The Forest Service, U.S. Department of [Serial No. Idaho 017512; Classification District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations Agriculture, has filed an application, 11- 02- 1- 66 ] and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Serial No. Sacramento 080442 for the IDAHO Commission, U.S. Post Office Building, withdrawal of lands described below, from prospecting, location, entry, and Notice of Proposed Classification of Billings, Mont. 59101. purchase under the mining laws, subject No. MC 128331 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed to valid existing claims, but not from Public Lands for Retention for Mul­ June 30, 1966. Applicant: CONTINEN­ leasing under the mineral leasing laws. tiple Use Management TAL BARREL & DRUM COMPANY, The applicant desires the land for the INC., 2829 East Fourth Avenue, Colum­ Rhodonite Tree Improvement Adminis­ J uly 1, 1966. bus, Ohio 43219. Applicant’s representa­ trative Site in the Klamath National Pursuant to the Act of September 19, tive: William E. Ranee, 1200 West Fifth Forest. 1964 (78 Stat. 986, 43 U.S.C. 1411-18) Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212. Au­ For a period of 30 days from the date and to the regulations in 43 CFR, Parts thority sought to operate as a -contract of publication of this notice, all persons 2410 and 2411, it is proposed to classify carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular who wish to submit comments, sugges­ all the vacant public domain lands routes, transporting: Vsed wooden bar­ tions, or objections in connection with within the descriptions below,' together rels, used fiber drums and used and re­ the proposed withdrawal may present with any lands therein that may become conditioned steel drums, between Colum­ their views in writing to the undersigned public lands in the future, but specifically bus, Ohio, on the one hand, and, on the officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ excluding L.U. lands (acquired under other, points in Illinois on and east of ment, Department of the Interior, Room Title m of the Bankhead-Jones Farm U.S. Highway 51, Indiana, points in 4201, U.S. Courthouse and Federal Build­ Tenant Act), in Oneida County, Idaho, Kentucky on and north of U.S. Highway ing, 650 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, Calif. for retention for Multiple Use Manage­ 60, points in the lower peninsula of 95814. ment. Michigan on and south of Michigan The Department’s regulations (43 CFR Boise Meridian, Idaho Highway 46, points in Pennsylvania on 2311.1-3(c)) provide that the authorized Tps. 13, 14, 15, and 16 S., R. 30 E. and west of U.S. Highway 19, and points T. 13 S., R. 31 E., officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ Sec. 7; in West Virginia in Kanawha Comity, ment will undertake such investigations Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive; and within 10 miles of the Ohio River, as are necessary to determine the exist­ Secs. 28 to 33, inclusive. for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Co­ ing and potential demand for the lands T. 14 S., R. 31 E., and their resources. He will also under­ sec. 3, sw ^ sw ^ , Ey2swy4, Wy2SE!4, lumbus Steel Drum Co., division of take negotiations with the applicant SE14SE&; Franklin Steel Co., 2829 East Fourth agency with the view of adjusting the ap­ Secs. 4 to 10, inclusive; Avenue, Post Office Box 19008, Columbus, Secs. 14 to 36, inclusive. plication to reduce the area to the mini­ Tps. 15 and 16 S., R. 31 E. Ohio 43219. Send protests to: A. J. mum essential to meet the applicant’s Tps. 13,14, and 15 S., R. 32 E. Stevens, District Supervisor, Bureau of needs, to provide for the maximum con­ T. 16 S., R. 32 E., Operations and Compliance, Interstate current utilization of the lands for pur­ Secs. 4 to 9, inclusive; poses other than the applicant’s, to elim­ Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive; Commerce Commission, 236 New Post inate lands needed for purposes more es­ Secs. 28 to 30, inclusive. Office Building, Columbus, Ohio 43215. sential than the applicant’s, and to reach T. 12 S., R. 33 E., No. MC 128353 TA, hied June 30, 1966. agreement on the concurrent manage­ Secs. 6,13, and 24. T. 13 S., R. 33 E., Applicant: LEE J. PRENTICE, West ment of the lands and their resources. Sec. 13; Bend, Iowa. Applicant’s representative: The authorized officer will also prepare Sec. 14, E^NE% , SE ^; William A. Landau, Motorways, Inc., a report for consideration by the Secre­ Secs. 22 to 27, inclusive; tary of the Interior who will determine Secs. 34 and 35. 1307 East Walnut, Des Moines, Iowa. Au­ whether or not the lands will be with­ Tps. 14,15 and 16 S., R. 33 E. thority sought to operate as a common drawn as requested by the applicant T. 11 S., R. 34 E. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular agency. T. 12 S., R. 34 E., Secs. 4 to 8, inclusive; routes, transporting: Crushed rock, in The determination of the Secretary on Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive; bulk, in dump trucks from Northwood, the application will be published in the Sec. 21, w y 2Wy2, SE ^ S W ^ , SW&SEftJ F ederal R egister. A separate notice will Sec. 28, w y 2Ey2, w y2; Iowa, and points within 3 miles thereof be sent to each interested party of record. to points in Freeborn County, Minn., for Secs. 29 to 32, inclusive; If circumstances warrant, a public Sec. 33, w y2Ey2, w y2. 180 days. Supporting shipper: Welp & hearing will be held at a convenient time Tps. 13 and 14 S., R. 34 E. McCarten, Inc., 522 South 22d Street, T. 15 S., R. 34 E., and place, which will be announced. Secs. 1 to 6, inclusive; Fort Dodge, Iowa. Send protests to: The lands involved in the application Secs. 10 to 13, inclusive; Ellis L. Annett, District Supervisor, Bu­ are: Secs. 24 and 25. reau of Operations and Compliance, In­ Humboldt Meridian, California T. 16 S., R. 34 E., Secs. 1 and 12. terstate Commerce Commission, 227 Fed­ KLAMATH NATIONAL FOREST T. 13 S., R. 35 E., eral Office Building, Des Moines, Iowa Rhodonite Tree Improvement Administrative Secs. 28 to 33, inclusive. 50309. Site T. 14 S., R. 35 E., Secs. 5 to 8, inclusive; By the Commission. T. 17 N., R. 7 E. Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive; Secs. 29 to 33, inclusive. [seal] H. N eil Garson, sec. 3, sy2sw%Nw%swi4 and wy2sw% SWi/4; T. 15 S., R. 35 E., Secretary. Sec. 4, sy2sy2NEiASE^, N^SE^SEVi, and Secs. 5 to 8, inclusive; [F.R. Doc. 66-7450; Filed, July 7, 1966; s e 14 s e 14 s e y4; Secs. 17 to 21, Inclusive; 8:48 am .] Sec. 9, N E ^ N E ^ N E ^ . Secs. 29 to 36, inclusive.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9383 T. 16 S., R. 35 E. 2. The lands are located in Blaine Land Office, Bureau of Land Manage­ T. 15 S., R. 36 E., County, Mont. The topography gently ment, Billings, Mont. 59101. Secs. 31 and 32. slopes to the south. Vegetative cover is T. 16 S., R. 36 E., Eugene H. N ewell, Secs. 5 to 8, Inclusive; predominantly blue grama grass and Acting Land Office Manager. Secs. 17 to 21, Inclusive; western wheatgrass. There are several Secs. 28 to 30, inclusive. stock reservoirs on the lands. Presently [F.R. Doc. 66-7439; Filed, July 7, 1966; the lands are licensed for grazing and 8:47 a.m.] Containing approximately 265,000 are fenced within grazing allotments. acres. The lands proposed to be classified are 3. Subject to valid existing rights, the [Oregon 017352} provisions of existing withdrawals, and more specifically shown on a map desig­ OREGON nated 1-2 PL-4-6(l), on file in the Bur­ the requirements of applicable law, the ley District Office and at the BLM Land lands are hereby open to application, Notice of Classification petition, location and selection. All Office in Boise, Idaho. 1. Pursuant to section 2 of the act of Publication of this notice segregates valid applications received at or prior to the described lands from settlement, 10 a.m., on August 5, 1966, shall be con­ September 19, 1964 (43 U.S.C. 1412), the location, sale, selection, entry, lease or sidered as simultaneously filed at that lands described below are hereby classi­ other forms of appropriation under all time. Those received thereafter shall fied for disposal through exchange the public land laws except State, private, be considered in the order of filing. under section 8 of the act of June 28, and Forest Service exchanges (including 4. The mineral rights in the lands 1934 (48 Stat. 1269), as amended by Forest Service adjustments), State lieu were not exchanged. Therefore the section 3 of the act of June 26, 1936 (49 selections, scrip, rights-of-way, and the mineral status of the lands are not af­ Stat. 1976), for lands located in Harney fected by this order. County, Oreg. mining and mineral leasing laws. 2. There were no comments received This segregative effect shall continue 5. Inquiries concerning the lands following publication of notice of the for a period of 2 years from the date of should be addressed to the Manager, proposed classification (31 F.R. 6381). publication in the F ederal R egister, sub­ Land Office, Bureau of Land Manage­ ject to a possible 2-year extension in ment, Billings, Mont. 59101. 3. The lands affected by this proposal accordance with the provisions of section are located in Harney County and are Eugene H. N ewell, described as follows: 4 of the Act. Acting Land Office Manager. Willamette Meridian, Oregon A public hearing on the proposed [FJEt. Doc. 66-7438; Filed, July 7, 1966; classification will be held on August 17, 8:47 a.m.] T. 25 S., ft. 27 E., 1966, commencing at 10 am . at Malad Sec. 13, SEA; City, Idaho. Sec. 24, EA; [Montana 073797] Sec. 25, lots 1,2, NEANEA, and W ^ N E ^ . For a period of 60 days from the date T. 26 S., R. 27 E., of publication of this notice in the F ed­ MONTANA Sec. 18, lot 4; eral Register, all persons who wish to Sec. 19, lots 1 and 2. submit comments, suggestions or objec­ Order Providing for Opening of T. 27 S., R. 27 E., tions in connection with the proposed Public Lands Sec. 20, SW ^SE^; classification may present their views in Sec. 28, E%W&; writing to the State Director, Bureau of J uly 1, 1966. Sec. 29, SE14NE14, NW%NE$4, and E% Land Management, Post Office Box 2237, SEA; 1. In an exchange of lands made under Sec. 32, E%NE%; Boise, Idaho 83701. the provisions of section 8 of the Act of Sec. 33, NW14. J oe T. F allini, June 28,1934 (48 Stat. 1272), as amended T. 25 S., R. 28 E., State Director. June 26, 1936 (49 Stat. 1976; 43 U.S.C. Sec. 7, lot 4; [FR. Doc. 66-7437; Filed, July 7, 1966; 315g), the following lands have been Sec. 16, SW&SEV4; 8:46 a.m.] reconveyed to the United States: Sec. 17, SW A and W^SE^A; Sec. 18, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, SW ANEA. EANW A. P rincipal Meridian, Montana. EASW&.andSEA; [Montana 073796] T. 3 N., R. 26 E., Sec. 19, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, NEA, Ei/2NWA. Sec. 8, SE A ; Ey2SWiA.Ny2SE%, and SW%SE%; MONTANA Sec. 10, SWA* Sec. 20, N&, NASWA, N%SE&, and SEA s e a ; Order Providing for Opening of The areas described aggregate 320 Sec. 21, WANWA. WASWA. and NEA Public Lands acres. SWA; 2. The tracts are located in Yellow­ Sec. 28, NW ANW A. J une 29, 1966. stone County, Mont. Both are gently T. 25 S., R. 29 E., , *n exchanges of lands made under rolling and accessible by county road. Sec. 19, SEA and E%SWA: the provisions of section 8 of the Act of The lands are presently used for grazing Sec. 30, NEA, EANW A, andN A SW A - June 28, 1934 (48 Stat. 1272), as livestock, and both parcels are fenced in The areas described above aggregate amended June 26, 1936 (49 Stat. 1976; with other public land as part of a large 4150.92 acres. *3 U.S.C. 315g), the following lands have pasture. For a period of 30 days, interested Been reconveyed to the United States: 3. Subject to valid existing rights, the parties may submit comments to the Sec­ Principal Meridian, Montana provisions of existing withdrawals, and retary of the Interior, LLM, 721, Wash­ T- 34 N., R. 26 E., the requirements of applicable law, the ington, D.C. 20240 (43 CFR 2411.1-2(d) ). Sec- 6, Lots 2 to 14, Inclusive, SW ANEA, lands are hereby open to application, R eginald A. Ross, andWy2SE&; Acting State Director. Sec. 7, Lots 1 to 7, inclusive, and Lots 11 petition, location and selection. All - 1 ,„12, NE1A. and NWfcSEft; valid applications received a t or prior to [F.R. Doc. 66-7440; Filed, July 7, 1966; Sec. 17, SEASEA; 10 am., August 8, 1966, shall be con­ 8:47 aon.] Sec-18, Lots 1 and 2; sidered as simultaneously filed at that ILC- if?® l* 2> 5> 6> 7> 8. « . and 12; time. Those received thereafter shall [Oregon 015758] ^d N S ’yNEy4NWy4’S%NW1/4- sw% ' Sec. 29, All-, be considered in the order of filing. LA GRANDE TOWNSITE, OREG. 4. The mineral rights in the lands Sei a d ° w S i to 12’ lnC lU slve* S ^ N E y4> were not exchanged. Therefore the Sale of Town Lots 35 N., R. 26 E., mineral status of the lands are not J uly 1, 1966. ^ 31, Lots 3 and 4, E&SWJ4, and SEA- affected by this order. 1. Statutory authority. The remain­ acrS? areaS described aggregate 3,747.32 5. Inquiries concerning the lands ing lots in the townsite of La Grande, should be addressed to the Manager, Oreg., will be disposed of under section

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9384 NOTICES 10. Improvements. Tract No. 2, con­ dian, thence south 89°52' east, 1,320.66 feet; 2382, U.S. Revised Statutes (43 U.S.C. thence south 0°04' east, 1,170 feet; thence 713) and regulations contained in 43 sisting of town lots 1 and 2, of Block 2, D north 35 ”55' west, 718.32 feet; thence north CFR Part 2242. The lots which will be Street, contain a bam and some fences 89°51' west, 900 feet; thence north 0°04' west, disposed of by sale at public auction are claimed by Jesse Tumbow, 308 C Avenue, 588.95 feet to the point of beginning con­ designated on official plat of survey of La Grande, Oreg. In the event Mr. taining 20.66 acres, more or less, in a portion La Grande Townsite, dated February 4, Tumbow is not the successful bidder for of the NWy4SWi4 of sec. 28, T. 37 N., R. 118 1868, and filed in the Land Office, La this tract, he will be allowed a reasonable W., sixth principal meridian. Grande, Oreg., on May 29, 1891. period of time within which to negotiate Adjacent to the Caribou National Forest, with the successful bidder as to the dis­ Wyo., beginning at the section corner com­ 2. Tracts, areas and minimum prices. mon to sec. 3, 4, 9, and 10 of T. 36 N., R. 119 The lots which will be sold as tracts and position of the improvements thereon. W., sixth principal meridian, thence east the appraised prices, which are the mini­ Mr. Turnbow has the right to remove any along the north line of sec. 10,1,764.30 feet to mum amounts at which the tracts will improvements that can be removed with­ a point on the west line of the right-of-way be offered, are listed as follows: out substantial damage or sell them to for U.S. Highway 89; thence south 3° 56' east, the successful bidder. along said right-of-way line 501.73 feet; thence west 431.43 feet; thence south 40°29' Description Area Appraisal The successful bidder will be required to pay Mr. Tumbow a price mutually west, 1,096 feet to a point on the south line of the NW%NW% of sec. 10; thence south Tract No. 1 consisting of Town S q u a r e agreed upon with him for any improve­ 89° 53' west, along said line 660 feet to its in­ Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of Block 1, D fe e t ments he decides to leave upon the land 6,520 $335 tersection with the west line of sec. 10; Tract No. 2 consisting of Town and which are of value to the success­ thence north 0°H' east, along said west line Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2, D ful bidder. Proof of such agreement and 199.94 feet; thence north 54° 52' west, 450.99 Street.— —, ------3,360 200 payment must be filed within a reason­ feet; thence north 5 *,15' west, 879.72 feet to a able time with the Manager, Land Office, point on the north line of sec. 9, thence 729 Northeast Oregon Street, Portland, east along said section line 442.82 feet to the 3. Public sale. The tracts will be of­ point of beginning, containing 50.52 acres, fered for sale by the Manager, Land Of­ Oreg. 97232. more or less, in portions of the NE^NE% of fice, Portland, Oreg., or his representa­ Upon a showing of inability to agree, sec. 9 and the Ny2NW% of sec. 10, T. 36 N., tive, at public outcry to the highest the Bureau of Land Management will de­ R. 119 W., sixth principal meridian. bidder at City Hall, La Grande, Oreg., termine the fair and reasonable value of on Monday, July 18, 1966, beginning at the improvements left upon the land for The two areas thus comprise a total 10 a.m., P.d.t. The sale will continue which compensation must be paid. Fail­ of some 70.98 acres. Pursuant to said until both tracts have been offered. ure of the successful bidder within a rea­ section 7(c) of the aforesaid Act of July 4. Payments. No offering will be sold sonable time to file proof of full com­ 9,1965, the above lands shall become Na­ for less than the appraised price. Pay­ pensation to Jesse Tumbow, as herein tional Forest lands, provided, that all ment in full must be made on the day provided, will lead to the vacation of the lands and waters within the Palisades of sale, and may be in the form of cash, sale and return of the high bid. Reservoir area needed or used for the operation of the project or for other Re­ certified check, bank draft or money or­ 11. Warning. All persons are warned der made payable to the Bureau of Land clamation purposes shall continue to against forming any combination or be administered by the Commission of Management. The payment must be agreement which will prevent either or tendered to the officer in charge before Reclamation to the extent he determines both tracts from selling advantageously, to be necessary for such operation. the close of business on the day of the or which will in any way hinder or em­ sale. barrass the sale. All persons so offending This order shall be effective upon publi­ 5. Citizenship requirements. Each in­ will be prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. 1860. cation in the F ederal R e g is t e r . dividual purchasing a tract will be re­ quired to make a showing or to furnish I r v in g W. A n d e r s o n , Dated: June 28,1966. evidence that he is a citizen of the Manager. N. M. B e n n e t t , Jr. United States, or that he has declared [F.R. Doc. 66-7441; Filed, July 7, 1966; Acting Commissioner, his intention to become a citizen, and 8:47 am .] Bureau of Reclamation. every corporation purchasing a tract will [F.R. Doc. 66-7442; Filed, July 7, 1966; be required to furnish evidence, includ­ 8:47 a.m.] ing a certified copy of its articles of in­ Bureau of Reclamation corporation, showing that it was orga­ BRIDGER NATIONAL FOREST, AND nized under the laws of the United States or of some State, Territory, or Possession CARIBOU NATIONAL FOREST, CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD WYOMING thereof, and that it is authorized to ac­ [Docket No. 16456; Order No. E-23897] quire and hold real estate in Oregon. Order of Transfer of Administrative 6. Manner of sale. Bids and payments PIEDMONT AVIATION, INC. will be made in person or by agent, but Jurisdiction of Land at Palisades may not be made by mail or at any time Reservoir of the Palisades Project, Order to Show Cause or place other than fixed by this notice. Idaho-Wyoming Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Any bidder may purchase both tracts if Board at its office in Washington, DL., he is the successful bidder. No bids will By virtue of the authority vested in on the 5th day of July 1966. be made in increments of less than $10. the Secretary of the Interior by section Application of Piedmont Aviation, inc., 7. Authority of officer conducting the 7(c) of the Act of July 9, 1965 (79 Stat. for amendment of its certificate OJ.Pu®" sale. The officer conducting the sale is 213), and his delegation of authority to lie convenience and necessity for Rou hereby authorized to reject any and all the Commissioner of Reclamation dated February 25, 1966, published March 4, 87; Docket No. 16456. bids for either or both tracts, and to sus­ 1966 (31 F.R. 3426), jurisdiction over the On August 27, 1965, Piedmont Avia­ pend, adjourn or postpone the sale of tion, Inc. (Piedmont), filed an aPPJ1® “ either or both tracts. After both tracts following described lands, some of which tion for authority to operate a new seg­ have been offered, the sale will be closed. lie within the exterior boundaries of the Bridger National Forest, Wyo., and the ment between the terminal P° 8. Disposal of tracts after sale has Roanoke, Va., and the terminal po been closed. The tract or tracts remain­ remainder adjacent to the Caribou Na­ New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., v ia L y ^ - ing unsold at close of the sale and the tional Forest, Wyo., and which were ac­ burg, Hot Springs, Staunton, and cnar- tract or tracts which may be forfeited by quired by the Bureau of Reclamation in lottesville, Va., and Washington, D. • any high bidder for any reason will be the development of the Palisades Reser­ subject to private sale for cash by the voir, Palisades Project, is hereby trans­ 1 Petitions for leave to intervene wereifll Manager, Land Office, Portland, Oreg. ferred to the Secretary of Agriculture by Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (E astern ), 9. Reservations. Patents for the lots, for recreational and other National For­ Air Lines, Inc.; Albemarle County, « when issued, will contain a reservation of est System purposes: Charlottesville, Roanoke, Lynchburg, __ ,g rights-of-way for ditches or canals in ac­ Within the Bridger National Forest, Wyo., Metropolitan Washington Board oi _ __ cordance with the Act of August 30,1890 beginning at the west quarter corner of sec. The Virginia Airports Authority filed a (26 Stat. 391). 28, T. 37 N., R. 118 W., sixth principal meri­ lution in support of the application. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9385 On March 21, 1966, Piedmont filed a The Virginia Airports Authority joined England points. Further, Allegheny con­ motion to expedite its application for in a consolidated answer with various tends that Board disposition of Pied­ New York service. northern Virginia civic parties support­ mont’s application will require an In support of its motion Piedmont ing Piedmont’s answer on the grounds extensive effort by the staffs of the Board contends that its proposal closely paral­ that (1) the proposed Dulles-New York and the carriers; that the precedent of lels the recent route award to Mohawk,1* service would provide air transportation Sioux City-Denver Case is not applicable connecting that carrier’s system with to over one-half million Washington resi­ to this case because in the Sioux City- Washington and Philadelphia; that such dents who live close to Dulles, (2) Pied­ Denver market there existed no single­ authority would reduce its subsidy by mont’s Dulles service would improve con­ plane single-carrier service, which is not $170,006 and would otherwise strengthen nections available to travelers on Pied­ the case in the Washington-New York its system; that New York would provide mont’s system, and (3) the Dulles Air­ market; and that the Elmira/Coming to Piedmont with a strong terminal and port would get first local service carrier Washington route award to Mohawk in enable it to meet a compelling need for flights. the Route 34 case cannot be used to sup­ single-plane service to New York from The Metropolitan Washington Board port the need for a strong terminal for 24 cities served by it. The carrier states of Trade also joined in support of Pied­ Piedmont beyond Washington at New that New York is the first or second mar­ mont’s motion on the grounds that Pied­ York. ket of 19 of the 24 cities which exchanged mont’s proposed service offers the The Board has considered all of the 87,704 O&D passengers with New York prospect of meaningful improvement in relevant f actors raised by the application, in 1964. service at, and utilization of Dulles In­ the motion to expedite and the answers Piedmont suggests a series of restric­ ternational Airport, would provide a sub­ filed with reference thereto. These de­ tions to be placed on its proposed opera­ stantial source of support for long- tailed pleadings along with our own inde­ tion and contends that such restrictions haul flights from that airport and would pendent analysis established a prima would reduce to a minimal level the ad­ help to alleviate both ground and air con­ facie- case for awarding Piedmont the verse effect on other carriers.3 gestion at Washington National Airport.4 authority it seeks. We have decided that Answers in support of Piedmont’s Answers were also filed by Eastern and a show cause procedure is the most ex­ motion were filed by Charlottesville, Allegheny Airlines, Inc. (Allegheny). peditious means, consistent with the pub­ Roanoke, Lynchburg, the Virginia Air­ Eastern’s answer, while not opposing lic interest, of processing Piedmont’s ports Authority, the Metropolitan Wash­ expedition of the hearing, requests that application. Therefore, we will order ington Board of Trade and various other a restriction be imposed on Piedmont’s interested persons to show cause, within northern Virginia civic parties.3 proposed through-plane service between 20 days of this order, why the Board The cities of Roanoke and Lynchburg New York and those points on Piedmont’s should not amend Piedmont’s certificate state that under Piedmont’s proposal system also provided direct service by of public convenience and necessity for they would receive a single-plane, single­ Eastern.5 Route 87 to authorize a new segment be­ carrier service that would accommodate Allegheny’s answer opposed the motion tween Roanoke and New York, via a substantial and growing number of to expedite and in support thereof states Lynchburg, Hot Springs, Staunton, passengers to New York; that New York that Piedmont’s proposed route would Charlottesville, and Washington, D.C., is Roanoke’s top ranking market and parallel Allegheny’s segments 2 and 8 for subject to the conditions hereinafter dis­ Lynchburg’s second top ranking market 215 miles north of Washington; that cussed. in terms of total passengers; that traffic Allegheny would be subject to a total po­ We tentatively find that Piedmont’s between Lynchburg/Roanoke and New tential diversion of 18,425 passengers certificate should be amended as sought York is four times greater than the 6,100 connecting at serveral points on Alle­ in its application. The proposed opera­ passengers that the Board felt should not gheny’s system, and a potential loss of tion appears to be a profitable one which be relegated to two-carrier connecting $415,000 in revenues; that Allegheny will provide significant benefits to a sub­ service between Elmira-Corning and would be most directly subject to a po­ stantial number of passengers. Pied­ Washington; that Piedmont’s proposal tential diversion of 7,312 passengers who mont estimates a total of over 40,000 net would provide direct service to and from in 1965 connected at Washington on their annual passengers between cities on its the Dulles Airport with its many connec­ way to and from New York and other system and New York with a net operat­ points north and east; that potential rev­ ing gain of some $400,000 and a sub­ tion possibilities with national and in­ enue lost from these passengers would sidy reduction of approximately $170,000. ternational flights; and that Piedmont’s amount to $187,000; that Piedmont’s Our review of Piedmont’s proposal proposal is consonant with the objectives northeast anchor point is Washington, supports the economic feasibility of the °f strengthening the local service. and extension of it§ route to New York operation. We have analyzed the traffic carriers. would entail a major realignment of local in the markets to be affected by the new service routes; that because of a substan­ service and determined that, after allow­ u United Air Lines, Inc. Deletion of tial overstatement of Piedmont’s traffic ing-for self diversion, Piedmont would Route 34 Points. the proposed service would result in a carry approximately 36,000 additional „ restrictions as proposed by the appli- large operating loss ($573,797) and a passengers between New York and points <&ut would (l) place a two-stop restriction on its system with a revenue gain of some service between New York-Newark and subsidy increase; and that Piedmont’s wee^bor° .High Point> Asheville, Raleigh- proposal does not show public need in $1.9 million.* (See Appendices A and ^uruam, Richmond and Knoxville; (2) that the connecting service for passen­ C.) 8* We estimate that the total operat­ iL a two-stop requirement (exclusive of gers in the Roanoke-New York market ing expense required to generate the Vn,iTS8t011’ D-c -) on service between New was found adequate by the Board just 4 additional revenue would be about $1.4 turn« eWark an<* Atlanta; (3) preclude years ago in the American- Airlines million leaving an operating gain of ap­ Wnev?f011nt* serv*ce between New York and Roanoke Termination Case and, since proximately $488,000 and a subsidy re­ ioo k ?^ton’ preclude single-plane serv­ then, there has been a marked improve­ duction after return on investment and ant xTtWeei1 ^ew York-Newark and Norfolk ment in the service for the connecting taxes of $238,000.7 Thus, we are esti­ JVJP-. ®wport News and (5) require all seg- mating a more favorable result than that vi* n 9 service to Washington to be operated passengers between Washington and New Interaational Airport. This latter York as well as Washington and New projected by the carrier. This difference Dosort li*011,ls d ig u ed to eliminate the pro- is attributable in large part to a $240,000 DeHt^e^ Ces as a fa°tor in the highly com- * It Is our understanding that increasing overstatement of local station expenses.8 d Washington-New York market which congestion in terminal and parking facilities donai Airport*06 Washington Na- at Washington National has resulted in the * We estimate the total carriage of Pied­ Institution of discussions among the various mont to be approximately 90,000 passengers Co^ t01 County Supervisors of Fairfax interested parties (including the FAA, the of which 54,000 would be self-diverted traffic. veionmiri8”’.Fairiax County Industrial De- commercial airlines, and general aviation «* Appendices A, B, and C filed as part of SunervieJ* ^uthority; Board of County operators) looking toward a solution to this the original document. S m T ? °f Loudoun County. Va.; Depart­ problem. * Appendix C. ment t eoPomic Industrial Develop- 5 The following points were listed as ex­ * Piedmont appears to have used the total Councilnfr?OUu County;. Northern Virginia amples : Atlanta, Augusta, Charlotte, Colum­ New York O&D traffic in computing its local fax conni CÌ,ambers of Commerce; and Fair- bia, Greensboro-High Point-WInston Salem, station expense instead of just the additional ty Chamber of Commerce. Louisville, Raleigh-Durham, and Richmond. passengers.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9386 NOTICES Ice by the subsidized carrier, and impede The holder shall not schedule turnaround Another favorable aspect of Pied­ service between New York, N.Y.-Newark, mont’s proposal is the minimal diversion the expected financial benefits expected N.J., and Washington, D.C., and Washington, involved particularly from subsidized for Piedmont. We have analyzed the D.C., and Richmond, Va. carriers. The traffic and revenue fore­ service levels of the potentially competi­ cast heretofore projected by the carrier tive markets and have tentatively deter­ e. The amendment of condition (11) and by the Board has been limited solely mined that the restrictions proposed by to add the following pairs of points: to New York O&D traffic as to which Piedmont should be sufficient to obviate New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Norfolk, Allegheny claims only an insignificant tiie problems raised by Eastern. Va. participation.® If the beyond segment Finally, in view of the favorable poten­ New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Newport diversion claimed by Allegheny is to be tial of the instant proposal, we tenta­ News, Va. taken into account, a commensurate in­ tively conclude that Piedmont will prob­ f. The amendment of condition (2) to crease would have to be made in our ably realize profits from its New York read as follows: foregoing revenue forecasts as well as services in excess of those required to The holder may continue to serve regularly that of Piedmont to reflect the addi­ meet the cost of the service and fair re­ any point named herein, except Washington, tional traffic over the segment with an turn on investment. In these circum­ D.C., on segment 9, through the airport last origin or destination at points beyond stances, we tentatively find and conclude regularly used by the holder to serve such the New York gateway. None of this that approval of such proposal should point prior to the effective date of this cer­ traffic is presently included in either of be conditioned upon the provision of such tificate. Upon compliance with such pro­ the foregoing forecasts but, since it is services by the applicant on a subsidy cedure relating thereto as may be prescribed reasonable to conclude that a portion by the Board, the holder may, in addition to free basis, and that an ad hoc adjustment the service hereinabove expressly prescribed, of this traffic would utilize Piedmont’s should be made to the carrier’s existing regularly serve a point named herein, other proposed through service, we conclude subsidy rate to insure that the excess than a point required to be served through that to this extent the traffic forecasts profits realized from the services au­ an airport named herein, through any air­ herein may be understated. In any thorized herein will be offset against sub­ port convenient thereto. event, we do not believe that the dollar sidy paid for the remainder of Pied­ amount of diversion claimed by Alle­ mont's system operations. Any order g. The addition of a new condition gheny is sufficient (when measured making final the tentative findings and (15) reading as follows: against the substantial gain to be made conclusions made herein will be withheld All flights scheduled to and from New by Piedmont and the benefits accruing to until such an ad hoc adjustment can be York/Newark regardless of the point of origin the traveling public) to warrant delay­ or terminatiion shall be ineligible for subsidy made. in their entirety as operated. The points ing the implementation of the proposed In granting interested persons the op­ Washington, D.C. (Dulles International Air­ services.10 portunity to show cause why our tenta­ port), and New York/Newark shall not be In addition to the benefits accruing tive findings and conclusions should not deemed “stations” or “airports” for subsidy from the single-plane and single-carrier be finally adopted, we expect such per­ purposes. New York service, Piedmont’s proposed sons to support their objections with de­ service through Dulles should also be 2. All interested persons are directed tailed answers, specifically setting forth to show cause why the Board should not useful to passengers desiring connections the tentative findings and conclusions with long-haul domestic or international issue an order making final the tentative to which objection is taken. Such ob­ findings and conclusions stated herein flights. In this connection, the recent­ jections should be accompanied by argu­ ly proposed cutback in jet schedules at and issue to Piedmont a certificate of ments of fact or law supported by legal public convenience and necessity Washington National indicates the in­ precedent or detailed economic analysis. creasing need for relieving the conges­ amended in the manner set forth in tion there by the implementation of a Accordingly, it is ordered, That: ordering paragraph 1 above; full range of schedules at other area air­ 1. A proceeding be, and hereby is, in­ 3. Any interested persons having ports, including Dulles. A necessary stituted in Docket 16456 pursuant to sec­ objection to issuance of an order making corollary to increased schedules at Dulles tion 401(g) of the Act, to determine final the proposed findings, conclusions is an increase in the availability of con­ whether the public convenience and ne­ and certificate amendment set forth necting services. We think that Pied­ cessity require, and the Board should herein shall, within 20 days of service mont’s proposal for providing the first order, the amendment of the certificate of a copy of this order, file with the local service carrier connecting service of public convenience and necessity held Board and serve upon all persons made at that facility should benefit a signifi­ parties to this proceeding a statement cant number of passengers. by Piedmont so as to authorize the of objections together with a summary oi We have incorporated herein the re­ following: testimony, statistical data and other strictions proposed by the applicant. a. A new segment 9 to read as follows: evidence expected to be relied upon to We feel that the restriction proposed by Between the terminal point, Roanoke, Va., support the stated objection; Eastern is unnecessarily severe and that the intermediate points, Lynchburg, Hot 4. If timely and properly support*“ this healthy trunkline needs no protec­ Springs, Staunton, and Charlottesville, Va., objections are filed, further considera­ tion from Piedmont. However, in order and Washington, D.C. (to be served through tion will be accorded the matters or is­ Dulles International Airport), and the to expedite award of authority which we terminal point, New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J. sues raised by the objections before believe is in the public interest we will further action is taken by the Board; impose stop requirements in those mar­ b. The amendment of condition (4) to kets wherein Piedmont’s service might add the following pairs of points: 5. In the event no objections ar® tend to become competitive with that of all further procedural steps will d New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Greens­ deemed to have been waived, and t e the trunkline carrier. To impose a boro-High Point, N.C. greater restriction would unnecessarily New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Asheville, case will be submitted to the Board for inhibit the development of the new serv- N.C. final action; and . New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Raleigh- 6. Copies of this order shall be serv 9 556 passengers and $10,898 in revenue for Durham, N.C. upon the following persons who are he 1965. New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Rich­ by made parties to this proceeding- 10 Allegheny’s claim of a $187,000 potential mond, Va. diversion assumes that all of the beyond New New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Knox­ York traffic would utilize the through serv­ ville, Tenn. “ AU motions and/or petitions for reco ices. We believe this to be an unreasonable sidération shall be filed within ^ke P® assumption in view of the level of service to c. The amendment of condition (5) to allowed for filing objections and no i®*“ the Washington gateway as compared with add the following pair of points: such motions, requests or petitions the through frequencies over the proposed New York, N.Y.-Newark, N.J., and Atlanta, consideration of this order will be new segment. Moreover, Allegheny has Ga. tained. Nor shall the filing of any failed to offset against its diversion estimate, motions, requests or petitions for reco ___ traffic to be obtained by it at the New York d. The amendment of condition (10) ation operate to stay the effective gateway destined to points on its system. to read as follows: paragraph 3 above.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9387 Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Allegheny Air­ issue to determine whether Century is to lend Century $45,000.T RKO further lines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc.“ financially qualified to construct and urges that “more than 1 year having This order will be published in the operate its proposed station.1 elapsed since the consummation of these F e d e r a l Register. 2. In support of its request, RKO firsttwo loan commitments, their amortiza­ By the Civil Aeronautics Board. points out that Century's application tion now represents a current liability to shows that it will require $35,4572 for pay both interest and principal” and con­ [ s e a l ] H arold R. S anderson, construction and $10,000 to operate for 1 cludes that the total amount due for 1 Secretary. year (a total of $45,457), and that it has year for both loans is $23,147.52.* [PH. Doc. 66-7462; Filed, July 7, 1966; available $12,000 in existing capital, 3. Century did not file a pleading in 8:49 a.m.] $3,000 profits from an existing station, response to RKO’s petition. However, and $21,450 in deferred equipment pay­ the Broadcast Bureau, in its opposition, ments (a total of $36,450). Thus, RKO points out that on October 1, 1965, Cen­ [Docket 17286] concludes, Century’s application shows a tury filed an amendment to its applica­ BRITISH EAGLE INTERNATIONAL deficit of $9,007. In addition to the fig­ tion which contained a loan commitment AIRLINES, LTD. ures in Century’s application, RKO urges for $50,000 from Dalworth.® Even as­ that there are various other grounds suming that Century’s estimated ex­ Notice of Postponement of Prehearing warranting addition of a financial quali­ penses should be increased by $4,000, the Conference and Other Procedural fications issue. First, RKO alleges, Cen­ Bureau urges that with the $50,000 loan, Dates tury’s reliance on $3,000 in profits from Century will have adequate funds to its existing operation* is misplaced be­ construct and operate its proposal.1“ In accordance with the request of cause Century stated in its application 4. In its reply, RKO reiterates the counsel for the applicant, British Eagle that the existing station had been oper­ arguments made in its petition, and International Airlines, Ltd., the pre- ating at a loss and because the balance points out, for the first time, that an hearing conference in the above-entitled sheet (dated October 31,1964) submitted examination of a Dalworth balance proceeding now assigned to be held on with Century's application indicates a sheet, dated February 1966, and filed July 13, 1966, is rescheduled and will be deficit of $23,936.49. Citing Ultravision,4 with Dalworth’s assignment application held on August 9,1966, at 10 a.m., e.d.s.t., RKO also notes that Century cannot for KCUL-AM-FM, Fort Worth, Tex. in Room 911, 1825 Connecticut Avenue rely upon proposed revenues since it did (BAL-5757, BALH-895), reveals that NW., Washington, D.C., before the not furnish a basis for its $10,000 esti­ Dalworth now holds another promissory undersigned. mate of revenue. Furthermore, RKO'' note from Century in the amount of The date for the submission of pro­ contends Century's first year expenses $19,997.06.“ Since there is no indication posed statements of issues; requests for are underestimated by approximately in the assignment application of the information; proposed stipulations; $4,000* Finally, RKO points out that duration or repayment terms of this statements of positions of parties; and Century’s balance sheet lists $200,000 in note, it must be assumed, RKO contends, proposed procedural dates; is hereby ex­ notes payable under the heading, “Other that this note represents an additional tended to July 25,1966. liabilities.” Since there is no explana­ liability of almost $20,000 to be due by Dated at Washington, D.C., July 1, tion in Century’s application, RKO con­ the end of the first year. With this 1966. tends that it must be assumed that this additional liability, RKO asserts that represents two loans that were made to Century has not established its financial [seal] Leslie G. D onahue, Century for its acquisition of standard qualifications, even taking into account Hearing Examiner. broadcast Station WMQM, Memphis the $50,000 loan. [PR. Doc. 66-7463; Filed, July 7, 1966; (BAL-4957). That application indi­ 8:49 a.m.] cated that Dalworth Broadcasting Co., 1 The terms of this note, dated Oct, 22, 1963 Inc., an 80 percent stockholder in Cen­ (hereinafter referred to as May Note), are tury, agreed to lend Century $155,000* as follows: “The loan will he over a 5-year and that an officer and 20 percent stock­ period at 6 percent interest to be amortized FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS In the following manner: the first 12 months holder in Century, L. Rodger May, agreed Interest only at 6 percent, then principal and interest over the next 4 years payable COMMISSION 1 Also before the Board axe (a) opposition, m onthly.” [Docket Nos. 16577, 16578; FOC 66R-256] filed May 12, 1966, by the Broadcast Bureau; 8 RKO alleges that the amounts due on and (b) reply, filed May 24, 1966, by RKO. these notes will be: $11,733.60 on Dalworth CENTURY BROADCASTING CO., INC., 2 From the Century application, Form 301, Note— 1963 and $11,413.92 on the May Note, AND RKO GENERAL, INC. Section m , this amount should be $35,468, a total of $23,147.52. Calculations by the computed as follows: Board, based on the payment of Interest and Memorandum Opinion and Order Transmitter ______$20,412 principal for 1 year, Indicate that approxi­ Antenna system— 10,012 mately $20,371 would be due on the Dalworth Enlarging Issues Frequency monitors______2, 044 Note— 1963 ($11,071 principal and $9,300 In­ ^ re abPlleations of Century Broad-- Other items______.______3, 000 terest) and approximately $13,950 would be Co., Inc., Memphis, Tenn., Docket due on the May Note ($11,250 principal and Total ______35,468 $2,700 interest), a total of $34,321. S i t 1 ^ No- BPH-4785; RKO Gen­ * Century is , the licensee of standard 8 The letter of commitment indicates that ii MemPhis, Tenn., Docket No. broadcast Station WMQM, Memphis. the terms of this loan (hereinafter referred n>578, File No. BPH-4788; for construc- * Ultravision Broadcasting Company, 1 to as Dalworth Note—1965) axe as follows: tI0n permit. FCC 2d 544, 5 RR 2d 343 (1965) and its “This Is to be a 10-year note at 6 percent aiiv Proceeding involves the mutu- subsequent clarification, 1 FCC 2d 550, 5 RR interest repayable Interest only the first 2 RrL,fXC ,.s*ve applications of Century 2d 349 (1965). years, and the balance over 8 years principal 5 In support of this contention, RKO sub­ and Interest." Co" Inc- (Century), and mitted an affidavit from D. A. Noel, the 10 The Bureau’s computations, however, do Kt,m^Penera^’.Inc< (BKO), for a eon- general manager of Its AM and television not include any payments of principal permi<: for a new PM broadcast stations in Memphis. The affidavit lists a and/or interest on the $200,000 in notes lfcmnvton?perate on Channel 290, in number of specific costs for an FM station mentioned by RKO. desi^hf’,iT*enn‘ The applications were which indicate that the minimum'first year »Existence of this note (hereinafter 66-Sate? for hearin& by Order, FCC expenses will be in excess of $14,000, rather referred to as Dalworth Note—1966) is shown lvun°Lreleas?d April u - 1966- Present- than the $10,000 estimated by Century. only by the listing of “Note Receivable— lamp J consi(leration is a motion to en- * The terms of this note, dated October 22, Century Broadcasting $19,997.06” In Exhibit 1963 (hereinafter referred to as Dalworth 5 of Dalworth’s assignment application for in flled on April 29,1966, where- Note—1963), are as follows: “The loan will KCUL. In light of the facts that RKO’s _ requests the Board to add an be over a 15-year period at 6 percent interest petition was not opposed by Century and to be amortized in the following manner: that the application in which the existence on 5? ^tlon taken herein, ruling the first year 'interest only at 6 percent, be­ of this note was revealed was filed only 3 1)6 deferred. f°r leave to Intervene will ginning the second year for 14 years principal days before RKO’s subject petition was filed, and Interest semiannually.” the Board will consider this information.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9388 NOTICES 5. in view of Century’s failure to re­to construct and operate its proposed proposal In part with $90,000 in cash; fute RKO’s allegations concerning Cen­ station. yet the availability of this amount is tury’s estimated costs and standing Released: July 1,1966. . shown by a cursory financial statement debts, the Board will, for purposes of only,® with the bare allegation that the determining whether a financial issue is F ederal Communications money is available. Omicron maintains warranted, assume that the debts exist Co m m issio n, that such a statement does not conform and the costs will be as alleged.“ Based [seal] B en F. W aple, to the requirements contained in the on RKO’s allegations and an examina­ Secretary. Commission’s application form, and “is tion of Century’s application, it appears [F.R. Doc. 66-7452; Filed, July 7, 1966; certainly not consistent with the under­ that Century may require funds in the 8:48 a.m.] lying rationale of full and complete dis­ amount of $106,786.49 in order to con­ closure upon which that requirement is struct its proposal and meet first year premised.” Inquiry into the availability expenses, as follows: $57,318.49 payments [Docket Nos. 16536,16537; FCC 06R-255] of these funds is especially needed, Omi­ of principal and interest on notes;13 cron asserts, because of the questions GORDON SHERMAN AND OMICRON concerning the bank loan. Since a con­ $35,468 for construction; “ and $14,000 TELEVISION CORP. for 1 year’s operating costs. Century’s dition of the bank loan is that sufficient amended application indicates that it Memorandum Opinion and Order assets be demonstrated by Sherman, will have available $86,450 as follows: Enlarging Issues Omicron insists that Sherman must be $50,000 loan commitment; $12,000 in ex­ able to provide security for the bank loan isting capital; $3,000 in profit from the In re applications of Gordon Sherman, and be able to provide funds for the op­ existing station; “ and an equipment Orlando, Fla., Docket No. 16536, File No. ération of the station. Omicron alleges credit of $21,450.ie The above figures BPCT-3529; Omicron Television Corp., that an accurate appraisal of Sherman’s indicate that a substantial question ex­ Orlando, Fla., Docket No. 16537, File No. financial position is impossible. In ad­ ists as to Century’s financial qualifica­ BPCT-3596; for construction permit for dition, Omicron questions whether Sher­ tions, and therefore the requested issue new television broadcast station. man has committed all or a part of his will be added. 1. The Review Board has before it a cash to other ventures. It cites another Accordingly, it is ordered, This 30th petition to enlarge issues filed April 11, assertion by Sherman that he has cash day of June 1966, that the motion to en­ 1966, by Omicron Television Corp. (Omi­ “in excess of $100,000,” once again with large issues, filed April 29, 1966, by RKO cron) ,* seeking to add the following issues no supporting data, in an application to General, Inc., is granted; and that the against Gordon Sherman (Sherman): acquire the construction permit of issues in this proceeding are enlarged by (a) To determine whether the $90,000 WFAC, Mount Dora, Fla. (BAPH-378).4 the addition of the following issues: cash committed by Gordon Sherman is With the consummation of the purchase in fact available to him and, even if such of WFAC, Omicron alleges that “Sher­ (a) To determine the basis of Century man’s ‘cash position’ has, in all prob­ Broadcasting Co., Inc.’s (1) estimated funds are found to be available, to deter­ mine whether the applicant possesses the ability, been reduced by some $7,000— construction costs and (2) estimated op­ the contemplated consideration to the erating expenses for the first year of financial qualifications to construct, own and operate the proposed station if or a assignor.” This, Omicron claims, fur­ operation. period of 1 year; ther impairs Sherman’s ability to finance (b) In the event that Century Broad­ (b) To determine whether Gordon the proposed Orlando television outlet. casting Co., Inc., will depend upon oper­ Sherman has failed to reveal substantial Moreover, a corporation in which Sher­ ating revenues during the first year of man is a major stockholder, Broadcast and decisionally significant information Enterprises, Inc., has now acquired Sta­ operation to meet fixed costs and oper­ regarding his other broadcast interests tion WMMB, Melbourne, Fla. In order ating expenses, to determine the basis and, if so, to what extent such failure to do so, Omicron asserts, Broadcast of its estimated revenues for the first reflects upon Sherman’s comparative Enterprises obtained a loan commitment standing. from the Pan American Bank of Miami year of operation; and 2. Omicron and Sherman are mutually (c) To determine, in light of the evi­ for up to $170,000 to be extended on a exclusive applicants for a construction corporate and individual basis. Omi­ dence adduced, whether Century Broad­ permit for a new UHF television station cron concludes that ‘‘once again, Sher­ casting Co., Inc., is financially - qualified to operate on Channel 35, in Orlando, man has taken on a liability which, with­ Fla. The proceeding was designated for out more, must be assumed to operate M As stated by the Commission in the hearing by order, FCC 66-264, released against whatever total assets he may Ultravision case, su'pra, “ * * * where an March 22, 1966. The designation order have, including the ‘Cash on hand’ asset applicant is able to demonstrate [its] finan­ noted, among other things, that a bank which he has so freely asserted and com­ cial ability * * * without income * * * only loan commitment from the Pan Ameri­ because * * * payments * * * [for] fixed mitted.” The Bureau supports the ad­ charges have * * * been deferred * * * we can Bank of Miami, Fla., to Sherman was dition of an issue inquiring into tne will scrutinize with care the applicant’s not unconditional;8 accordingly an issue availability of the $90,000, based on tn itemization of expenses.” was specified inquiring into the avail­ lack of detailed information as to Sher­ 13 See the following table: ability of this loan. man’s financial position. Dalworth Note—1966 (see 3. In support of its request to add an 4. In opposition, Sherman attacks t e note 11, supra)______$19,997. 06 issue inquiring as to the availability of Omicron petition as “gross speculation, Dalworth Note—1966 (in­ the $90,000 cash commitment, Omicron terest only) (see note alleges the following: Sherman has asserting that an amendment is before 9, supra)______— 3, 000. 00 the Examiner which shows him to have Dalworth Note— 1963 (see claimed that he is willing to finance his note 6, supra)______20,371.43 May Note (see note 7, 1 Also before the Review Board are (a) ® Exhibit 1 in the Sherman apphc^“ supra) 13,950.00 partial support, filed May 10, Ì966, by the stated: “As of Mar. 1, 1965, Mr. SherisJ Total— — ——— — — 57,318.49 Broadcast Bureau; (b) opposition, filed May Pad cash on hand of in excess of ** This figure is taken from note 2, supra. 10, 1966, by Sherman; and (c) reply, filed over and above all current and long- “ The Board accepts this figure only in May 25, 1966, by Omicron. liabilities. His income after federal ^ computing the amount available in the light a « * * * with respect to the bank loan, the taxes exceeded $25,000 in each of t most favorable to Century. Since the ex­ letter from Pan American indicates that the 2 years.” eW,s isting station has been operating at a loss, availability of the loan is subject to the * Sherman incorporated by re£®ren!Lr an­ availability of these funds remains in doubt. condition that ** * * the loan is properly il, III, and IV of an Orlando, to “ Submitted with Century’s application is collateralized by a first lien in the physical plication (BPH—4378) in the appheatm a letter from RCA Indicating that as much assets of the new station and that personal acquire the Mount Dora constructionv* as $24,352.07 (75 percent of $32,469.43) may guarantees and/or endorsements, supported In pertinent part, Sherman’s finance ^ be taken as equipment credit, instead of the by detailed current financial statements, are dition was stated as follows: L on $21,450 listed in section HI. (See par. 2, satisfactory to use when and if funds are Sherman, hereby attest that I have_ supra). However, the difference does not required.’ This is hot an unconditional hand, and in banks in excess of all affect the result herein. commitment to lend funds.” and in excess of $100,000.”

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NÒ. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTIGES 9389 cash, stocks listed on major exchanges cial issue to encompass a determination graph 19, of Sherman’s application form, and life insurance loan value totaling of whether Sherman possesses the requi­ wherein it is stated that Sherman’s other in excess of $145,000, and current and site financial qualifications in other re­ broadcast interests are or have been as long term liabilities of less than $55,000.* spects. This request is based on Omi- follows: WHTY, Orlando, Fla.; WROD, The amendment also states that while cron’s allegations that Sherman has sub­ Daytona Beach, Fla.; WMAY, Spring- Sherman is an endorser of a note made stantially underestimated his first year’s field, 111.; and WMAY-TV, Springfield, for the purchase of TOMB, Melbourne, costs. As previously indicated Sherman 111. Omicron states that the Sherman and has a contingent commitment to a estimates his first year’s costs to be application has been amended twice wholly owned corporation to lend funds $468,019, consisting of $223,019 for con­ since first being filed, but that no amend­ for the construction of an PM station struction and $245,000 for operation. ment has shown his acquisition of Sta­ to be operated in conjunction with an Omicron contends that these costs have tion WFAC, Mount Dora, Fla., or Station existing AM station, sufficient cash flows been underestimated by at least $21,890, WMMB, Melbourne, Fla. Omicron al­ from the respective corporations will and possibly by as much as $49,750. In leges that not only do these acquisitions obviate the respective contingent liabili- support of these allegations, Omicron constitute two purchases in the Orlando ties. submits with its petition affidavits of a market, but they also affect Sherman’s 5. Sherman’s amended applicationprograming consultant and of the gen­ financial picture. Omicron contends herein indicates that he will require eral manager of a UHF television sta­ that under § 1.65 of the rules, Sherman $468,019 in order to construct and op­ tion in Orlando, each of whom alleges was required to report these matters, and erate his proposal for 1 year. To meet various deficiencies in Sherman’s esti­ his failure to do so justifies the requested this requirement, Sherman relies upon mates. issue. The Bureau supports addition of an equipment credit of $135,000, a pro­ 7. We need not resolve the merits of a like issue, but frames it so as not to be posed bank loan, which has already been Omicron’s allegations concerning Sher­ “conclusionary in its form.’’ placed in issue, of $250,000, and cash of man’s costs because, assuming arguendo 9. The opposition filed by Sherman $90,000. Thus, it is apparent that the that Sherman has understated its costs points out that the interests acquired $90,000 is essential to Sherman’s finan­ by approximately $50,000, the requested could net have been listed in the original cial proposal. To establish the avail­ enlargement of the financial issue would application since they were acquired ability of the $90,000, Sherman relies still be unwarranted. If Sherman estab­ after the application was filed. Further­ upon the statements contained in the lishes the availability of his bank loan more, Sherman contends, since the pur­ aforementioned amendment. See note 5, and his $90,000 cash commitment, he chases were shown on other Commission supra. However, the Commission has will have available $475,000. Adding documents and Commission files are consistently held that a bare assertion $50,000 to Sherman’s estimate of costs cross-indexed, no amendment was re­ of the availability of funds, without a would make for a total requirement of quired here. Finally, Sherman disputes detailed showing of liquid and fixed approximately $518,000. Thus, there the contention that the interests bought assets, current and long term liabilities would be a deficiency of $43,000. Al­ are in the same “area,” pointing out and complete showing of net worth, is though Sherman placed no reliance on that Melbourne is more than 50 miles insufficient to establish that such funds revenues in order to establish its finan­ from Orlando. are in fact available. See Continental cial qualifications, he estimated his first 10. Sherman’s argument that he has Broadcasting Corp. (WHOA), FCC 59- year’s revenues to be $260,000. Omi­ notified the Commission of his acquisi­ 676,18 RR 826; Publix Television Corp., cron, in its application, estimated its tions through ownership reports is not FCC 59-643, 18 RR 762; and Marion revenues to be $300,000 for the first year persuasive. The Board has specifically Moore, FCC 64R-523, 3 RR 2d 920. Cf. of operation; and the Board, in simul­ held in Cleveland Broadcasting, Inc., 2 WLOX Broadcasting Co. v. FCC 260 F. taneously disposing of a petition to en­ FCC 2d 717, 7 RR 2d 205 (Rev. Bd. 1966), 2d 712, 17 RR 2120 (D.C. Cir. 1958). large issues filed by Sherman against that the bare filing of ownership reports The requirement for a detailed showing Omicron, has allowed Omicron to rely does not satisfy the requirements of is particularly appropriate in this case upon approximately $175,000 in revenues §1.65 of the rules. Also see Central where a bank loan is, in part, dependent to meet its cost of first year’s operation. Broadcasting Corp., FCC 66Rr-117, 3 FCC on the applicant’s financial position, and Our determination in this regard has 2d 115, reconsideration denied, FCC 60R- where the applicant has financial com­ been based in part on a market analysis 170, 3 FCC 2d 577. The acquisition of mitments to two other stations, and of Orlando, which took into account other stations by Sherman is a signifi­ merely alleges that these commitments Omicron’s rate card. Because Omi­ cant matter which could have an im­ will not affect his financial position be­ cron’s study was based partly on its rate cause these stations have sufficient cash portant effect on the outcome of this card and the number of spot announce­ proceeding, regardless of how far these nows to meet their needs. Cf. Nelson ments Omicron proposes, and because ^ c a s tin g Co., FCC 64Rr-505, 4 RR stations are located from Orlando. Sherman places no reliance on revenues, Therefore, the issue as framed by the ? . Thus, an issue inquiring into the we are unwilling to allow Sherman to Broadcast Bureau will be added. acuity of Sherman to meet his $90,000 rely upon revenues to any great extent commitment wifi be added. Accordingly, it is ordered, This 30th in the absence of an adequate showing day of June 1966, that the petition to ^ Sherman can establish the of the bases for his estimate. However, enlarge issues, filed April 11, 1966, by of the $90>000. Omicron re­ in view of the showing made by Omicron, Omicron Television Corp. is granted to quests the Board to broaden the finan- and the Board’s limited acceptance of the extent indicated herein, and deified that showing, it appears equitable to give in all other respects; and that the issues a^ endment states in pertinent part: Sherman credit for up to $43,000 in reve­ in this proceeding are enlarged by addi­ cash appUcartfc. Gordon Sherman * * * has nues.6 We therefore conclude that fur­ tion of the following issues: and in hanks; stocks listed on ther enlargement of the financial issue, cash J XcllanSes computed at current prices; (a) To determine whether the $90,000 value <* life insurance; and as requested by Sherman, could serve cash committed by Gordon Sherman is in deduct, ®n\ securitles: 611 totaling, after the no useful purpose, and this request will fact available to him for the construction abilitiPfinhu?°tion « of all“ current anaand long-term UU- be denied. and/or operation of the station he pro­ $90 0no ’ rL.?11111 substantially In excess o 8. In support of its request to add an poses herein, and if such funds are found Plicant ,r>*S sum be used by the ap issue concerning Sherman’s alleged fail­ to be unavailable, to determine whether and oner connection ®onnecti°n with the construotioi ure to disclose other broadcast interests, ?f UHP station bein, the applicant possesses the financial excess of~$90 onn Moreover> this sum Is h Omicron quotes from section n, para- qualifications to construct, own, and op­ term Uabiiit,«,0 * y current and long the purcha«iel.incurred ln connection wit! 6 Although we would utilize Sherman’s rev­ erate the proposed station for a period order radio station WMMB.” B' enues to this extent, in view of our reliance of 1 year; S released May 25, 196€ ln this paragraph on Omicron’s study, it is (b) To determine whether Gordon ferring to i*er« ^^Pted the amendment, re our judgment that the extension of the utili­ dent of part- se “a purported state zation of Sherman’s revenues for use as a Sherman failed to perform the responsi­ man,» nnancl£d position of Gordon Sher credit toward the $90,000 cash commitment bilities of continuing accuracy and com­ Is not warranted. pleteness of information furnished in a

No. 131----- 8 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9390 NOTICES pending application as required by § 1.65 place to be specified in a subsequent Notification as to witnesses, Septem­ of the Commission’s rules; and order, upon the following issues: ber 2. (c) To determine 'Whether the facts ad­ 1. To determine whether there is a Hearing on engineering issues, Sep­ duced pursuant to the foregoing issue (b) reasonable possibility that the tower tember 7. bear adversely upon the comparative height and location proposed by Galves­ Hearing on nonengineering issues, qualifications of Gordon Sherman. ton Television, Inc., would constitute a September 14. . menace to air navigation. It is ordered, This 27th day of June Released: July 1,1966. 2. To determine which of the pro­ 1966, that the date for commencement F ederal Communications posals would better serve the public of hearing is continued from July 19 to C om m ission,7 interest, , V,. September 7, 1966, and that the fore­ [ seal] B en F. W aple, 3. To determine, in the light of the going schedule will be observed. Secretary. evidence adduced pursuant to the fore­ Released: June 28, 1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-74:53; Filed, July 7, 1966; going issues, which of the applications 8:48 a.m.] should be granted. F ederal Communications It is further ordered, That the Federal Com m issio n, Aviation Agency is made a party to this [seal] B en F. W aple, [Docket Nos. 16735, 16736; FCC 66-577] proceeding with respect to the applica­ Secretary. tion of Galveston Television, Inc. [F.R. Doc. 66-7455; Filed, July 7, 1966; TVUE ASSOCIATES, INC., AND GAL­ It is further ordered, That, to avail 8:48 a.m.] VESTON TELEVISION, INC. themselves of the opportunity to be heard, the applicants herein pursuant to Order Designating Applications for § 1.221(c) of the Commission’s rules, in Consolidated Hearing on Stated Issues person or by attorney, shall within DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY twenty (20) days of the mailing of this In re applications of TVue Associates, Coast Guard Inc., Galveston, Tex., Docket No. 16735, order, file with the Commission, in trip­ licate, a written appearance stating an [OGFR 66-37] File No. BPCT-3690; Galveston Tele­ intention to appear on the date fixed for vision, Inc., Galveston, Tex., Docket No. the hearing and present evidence on the VESSELS CERTIFICATED FOR OCEAN 16736, File No. BPCT-3747; for con­ issues specified in this order. AND COASTWISE SERVICE struction permit for new television It is further ordered, That the appli­ broadcast station. Lifeboat Equipment At a session of the Federal Communi­ cants herein shall, pursuant to section cations Commission, held at its offices in 311(a) (2) of the Communications Act of 1. The President by Proclamation Washington, D.C., on the 29th day of 1934, as amended, and § 1.594(a) of the dated March 24, 1965, announced that Commission’s rules, give notice of the the International Convention for Safety June 1966. hearing either individually or, if feasible, 1. The Commission has before it for Of Life at Sea, 1960 (SOLAS) (Treaties consideration the above-captioned appli­ jointly, within the time and in the man­ and Other International Acts, Series cations, each requesting a construction ner prescribed in such rule, and shall 5780), shall come into force and effect permit for a new television broadcast advise the Commission of the publican on May 26, 1965, and thereafter this station to operate on Channel 16, Gal­ tion of such notice as required by § 1-594 Convention shall be observed and ful­ veston, Tex. Since the operation pro­ (g) of the rules. filled with good faith by the United posed by both of the applicants would Released: July 5,1966. States of America, by the citizens of the result in mutually destructive interfer­ United States of America and by all F ederal Communications others subject to the jurisdiction thereof. ence, they are mutually exclusive and a Com m ission, hearing will be required to determine By Executive Order 11239 (July 31,1965, [ seal] Ben F. W aple, 30 F.R. 9671, 3 CFR 1965 Supp.), the which application should be granted. Secretary. 2. Since Fédéral Aviation Agency ap­ President designated the various Federal proval has not been obtained for Gal­ [F.R. Doc. 66-7454; Filed, July 7, 1968; agencies to administer the provisions of veston Television, Inc.’s antenna struc­ 8:48 a.m.] this Convention. ture, an air menace issue has been 2. For those matters relating to mer­ specified. [Docket Nos. 16626-16628; FCC 66M-910] chant vessels and currently adminis­ tered by the Commandant, U.S. Coast 3. TVue Associates, Inc., is qualified to VALPARAISO BROADCASTING Cp. construct, own and operate the proposed Guard, the implementing regulations are new television broadcast station and ex­ ET AL. in 46 CFR Chapter I. These imple­ menting regulations were appropriately cept as indicated by the issue specified Order Governing Course of Hearing below, Galveston Television, Inc., is amended by changes published in the qualified to Construct, own and operate In re applications of William H. F ederal R egister of September 8, I960 the proposed new television broadcast Wardle, Robert A. Jones, and F. Patrick (30 F.R. 11414-11495). At that time a station. The applications are, however, Nugent, doing business as Valparaiso was noted that certain items of new hie" mutually exclusive in that operation by Broadcasting Co., Valparaiso, Ind., boat equipment primarily necessitated By the applicants as proposed would result Docket No. 16626, File No. BPH-4147; the 1960 SOLAS Convention may not Be in mutually destructive interference. Porter County Broadcasting Corp., Val­ available and a reasonable time wou Thè Commission is, therefore, unable:to paraiso, Ind., Docket No. 16627, File No. be given to bring the vessel into comP ' make the statutory finding that a grant BPH-4972; Northwestern Indiana Radio ance (30 F.R. 11415). Except for me of the applications would serve the pub­ Co., Inc., Valparaiso, Ind., Docket No. 15-minute floating orange smoke distr lic interest, convenience and necessity, 16628, File No. BPH-5045; for construc­ signal which is undergoing develo;P® , and is of the , opinion that they must be tion permits. and tests but not yet commercially av designated fòr hearing in a consolidated It appearing, that due to conflicts in able in the United States, the other aam proceeding on the issues set forth below: the hearing schedule it has been neces­ tional items of lifeboat equipment, w Accordingly, it is ordered, That, pur­ sary to change the schedule of events are the fishing kits, the desalter kits, suant to section 309(e) of the Communi­ .Which was adopted at a prehearing con­ the lifeboat protecting covers, are. cations Act of 1934, as amended, the ference held on June 6, 1966, and set available from the manufacturers : above-captioned applications of TVue forth in an order of the Hearing Exam­ in paragraph 3 in this documW Associates, Inc., and Galveston Tele­ iner dated June 6,1966; and Therefore, the desalter kits, fishing . vision, Inc., are designated for hearing in It further appearing, that as a result and lifeboat protecting covers sn _ a consolidated proceeding at a time and of an informal conference between coun­ provided at the time specm sel and the Hearing Examiner the follow­ paragraph 4 or 5, as applicable. n 7 Board members Nelson and Kessler not ing dates have been established: 3. The following approvals have ^ participating. Exchange of all exhibits, August 25. granted:

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NÖ. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 NOTICES 9391

D esalter B i r r (R.S. 4405, as amended, 4462, as amended, are now available with respect to the im­ 4417a, as amended, 4421, as amended, 4453, portation into the United States directly, Approval No. 160.058/1/0, desalter kit, as amended, sec. 10, 35 Stat. 428, as amended, manufactured by Ionac Chemical Co., secs. 1, 2, 49 Stat. 1544, 1545, as amended, or on a through bill of lading, from Birmingham, N.J. 08011. sec. 3, 54 Stat. 347, as amended, sec. 3, 70 Taiwan (Formosa) of the following addi­ Approval No. 160.058/3/0, desalter kit, Stat. 152, sec. 3, 68 sta t. 675; 46 UJ3.C. tional commodity; manufactured by Ionac Chemical Co., 375, 416, 391a, 399, 435, 395, 367, 390b, 50 Jelly grass products. Inc., Clinton, Mass. 01510. U.S.C. 198; E.O. 11239, July 31, 1965, 30 FJR. Approval No. 160.058/3/0, desalter kit, 9671, 3 CFR, 1965 Supp. Treasury Department [seal] M argaret W. S chwartz, manufactured by Ionac Chemical Co. Orders 120, July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 6521; 167- Director, 14, Nov. 26,1954,19 F.R. 8026; 167-20, June 18. Office of Foreign Assets Control. Birmingham, N.J. 08011. 1956, 21 FJt. 4894; CGFR 56-28, July 24, 1956, 21 F.R.5659) [F.R. Doc. 66-7512; FUed, July 7, 1966; P ish in g K it 11:07 am .] Approval No. 160.061/2/0, fishing kit, Dated: June 30, 1966. manufactured by Monroe Industries, [ seal] W. D. S hields, IMPORTATION OF FROZEN CHINESE- Inc., Post Office Box 894, New Haven, Vice Admiral, V.S. Coast Guard, Conn. 06504. TYPE FOODSTUFFS DIRECTLY FROM Acting Commandant. TAIWAN (FORMOSA) Approval No. 160.061/3/0, fishing kit, [F.R. Doc. 66-7448; Filed, July 7, 19W»* manufactured by Van Brode Milling Co., 8:48 am .] Available Certification by Government Inc., Clinton, Mass. 01510. of Republic of China Lifeboat P rotecting Cover Office of Foreign Assets Control Notice is hereby given that the com­ Approval No. 160.065/1/0, lifeboat pro­ modity item “Foodstuffs, Chinese-type, tecting cover, manufactured by Centex HUMAN HAIR ITEMS FROM canned, frozen, or otherwise prepared,” Corp., Carbondale, Pa. 18407. (The life­ PORTUGAL with respect to which a notice published boat protecting covers manufactured in the F ederal R egister on June 25,1966, prior to January 11, 1966, by Gentex Restriction on Importation announced that certificates of origin are Corp., which were constructed in accord­ Notice is hereby given that effective now available, is amended to read as ance with MMT Guide for Protecting July 15, 1966, Customs will detain wigs follows: Cover for Lifeboat (5946/160.035), are and other human hair products imported Foodstuffs, Chinese-type, frozen. also acceptable.) from Portugal unless either a Foreign Approval No. 160.065/2/0, lifeboat pro­ Assets Control license or a certificate of [ seal] M argaret W. S chwartz, tecting cover, manufactured by Marine origin appropriate for Foreign Assets Director, Safety Equipment Corp., foot of Payn- Control purposes is presented. Office of Foreign Assets Control. ter’s Road, Parmingdale, N.J. 07727. Appropriate certificates of origin are [F.R. Doc. 66-7513; Filed, July 7, 1966; Approval No. 160.065/4/0, lifeboat pro­ not presently available with respect to 11:07 am .] tecting cover, manufactured by C. J. the importation of wigs and other human Hendry, 139 Townsend Street, San hair products from Portugal. An­ Francisco, Calif. 94107. COTTON MANUFACTURES FROM nouncement will be made in the F ederal CZECHOSLOVAKIA 4. The available additional equipment R egister when such certificates become necessary to meet the applicable rules available. Intention To Issue Licenses for and regulations is required in all life­ Wigs and other human hair products Importation boats on ocean and coastwise vessels. from Portugal will be denied unlicensed All passenger vessels shall have this entry into the United States pursuant The Office of Foreign Assets Control, equipment on board at the time Of the to the November 10, 1965, amendment to Treasury Department, will issue licenses first inspection for certification after Appendix (12) of § 500.204 of the For­ for the importation into the United May 26,1966. All tank, cargo, and mis­ eign Assets Control Regulations because States from Czechoslovakia of cotton cellaneous vessels shall have this equip­ it has now been determined that sub­ piece goods and other cotton manufac­ ment on board at the time of the first in­ stantial quantities of Asiatic hair are tures. Applications for such licenses spection for certification or midperiod being used in the production of wigs should be filed on form TFAC-1 with the inspection, whichever occurs first, after and other hair products sent to the Foreign Assets Control Division, Federal May 26,1966. United States from Portugal. Unli­ Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty 5. The cooperation of owners, masters,censed purchase and importation of such Street, New York, N.Y. 10045. and agents of ocean and coastwise vessels hair products have been prohibited since The licenses will not authorize any Js requested and they are urged to obtain November 10,1965. entry or withdrawal from warehouse of tne additional new equipment required any cotton products which are affected ior lifeboats at the earliest possible date. [ seal] M argaret W. S chwartz, by section 204 of the Agricultural Act of However, upon request for deferment of Director, 1956, 70 Stat. 200, as amended by Public la« liance such equipment regu­ Office of Foreign Assets Control. Law 87-488, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 104 lations for any reason, the Officer in [F.R. Doc. 66-7511; Filed, July 7, 1966; (7 U.S.C.A. 1854), if such entry or with­ H0fl’r-ge’ Marin* Inspection, may issue a 11:07 am .] drawal from warehouse is prohibited by aenciency notice on Form CG-835 speci- the aforesaid act as amended, or any u& da^ ky which the equipment IMPORTATION OF JELLY GRASS directive which has been or may here­ . * *?e °n board, which in no event shall after be issued thereunder. Applicants xceed six months from date Form CG- PRODUCTS DIRECTLY FROM TAI­ for licenses may wish to obtain further 8i>5 is issued. WAN (FORMOSA) information with respect to the above- dnoiim11 da^e of Publication of this Available Certification by Government mentioned restrictions from the Chair­ in tlle P ederal R egister, the of Republic of China man, Interagency Textile Administrative dfiiS n uard document CGPR 66-8, Committee, Department of Commerce, JWi<^FeS uary 24, 1966, and Federal Notice is hereby given that certificates Washington, D.C. 20230. lishS^r Dd superseded by this eign Assets Control in connection with [FJR. Doc. 66-7514; Filed, July 7, 1966; the Foreign Assets Control Regulations 11:07 am .]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 131— FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1966 9392 FEDERAL REGISTER

CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— JULY The following numerical guide is a list of thé parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during July.

3 CFR 7 CFR—Continued Page 7 CFR— C o n tin u e d Pa^e 1099______9206 Proposed R ules—Continued E xécutive O rders: 2216 (revoked in part by PLO 1101 ______9206 1097______— —— 9127 4042) ————————— 9108 1102 ______9206 1098: __ ——______9127,9303 3672 (revoked in part by PLO 1103 ______9206 1099______9127 4042)______W l à 0108 1106_____ — ______— ____ 9206 1101______— 9127 6626 (revoked in part by PLO 1108— ——— —:—— —______— 9206 ; 1102______,______9127 4042)______9108 1125 ______—;_ 92061103______—___ 9127 11258 (superseded by EO 11288) —- 9261 1126 ______9114, 9206 1104-______—— _ 9127 11288______— 9261 1131______— 9206 1106-——— — —— ———— 9127 11289— ___ 9265 1132___— ______— ___ 9206 1108— — ____— ___ — 9127 1133______— — — — 9206 1120______— 9127 1136— ———————————_ 9206 1125______—- 9127 5 CFR 1126— — — ______— 9127 213-...... 9043, 9271 1137— — — ______— — 9206 1138— —— ——¿———— i - —— 9206 1127 ______9127 1201———— — ______—— — 9337 1128 ______: 9127 6 CFR 1421— — — 9116, 9337, 9341 , 1129______9127 310-______— —„ ——— —- 9199 1427—— — — ——— — — — 9270 1130——— — ——______9127 1490—— — ___ — ___ _— 9208 1131 ______9127 7 CFR 1132 ______9127 81______9043 P roposed R u l e s: 1133 ______9127 7281—— ———— ———— —— 9110 967—;_— ______9118 1134______9127 777______9111 991______9118 1136 ______9127 908______9112 1001 ______9127 1137 ______9127 910______9113, 9206 1002 ______9127 1138 ______9127 915______9044 1003 ______9127 946 ______9044 1005______- 9127 8 CFR 947 __:______9269 1008 ______— 9127 235______9103 1002______9206 1009 ______9127 252______9267 1004 ______9045 1011 ____s>______L______9127 1005 ______9206 1012 _ 9127 1 2 CFR 1008 ______9206 1015 ______9127 204______9103 1009 ______9206 1016 ______9127 217______9103 1011 ______9206 1031 ______9127 1012 ______9206 1032 ______9127, 91521 3 CFR 1013 ______9045, 9206 1033 ______9127 108______9270 1031 ______9206 1034 ______9127 1032 ______9206 1035 ______9127 1 4 CFR 1033 ______- ____ 9206 1036-______9127 Qh I ______9211 1034 ______9206 1038 ______9127 qq ’ 9046.9109 1035 ______9206 1039 ______9127 63— ~------iriril- - - - - 9047 1036—______9206 1040 ______9127 7 1 ____ 9 0 4 7. 9 10 9 ,9 110 1038 ______9206 1041 ______9127 7 3 9110,9267 1039 ______i___ 9206 1043 ______9127 « ------:::::: ____ 9257 1040 ______9206 1044 ______9127 Q7 ______9048,9212 1041 ______9206 1045 _____ 9127 103______9058 1043 ______9206 1046 ______9127 Proposed R ules: 1044 ______9206 1047 ______9127 1045 ______9206 1048 ______9127 45——III— 9131 1046 ______9206 1049 ______9127 71— 1II19137, 9306, 9307,9361-9363 1047 ______9206 1050 ______9152 757 c ------9131 936.5 1049______9206 1051 ______9127 1051______9206 1060 __ 9351 2 4 i i i i i i m i m i i i : i i ______9358 1062 ______9206 1061 ______9127, 9279 1062 ______9127 1063 ______9206 |,6 CFR 9345,9346 1064 ______9206 1063 ______9127 id------,------_ 921.4 1065 _ 9206 1064 ______—— 9127, 9279, 9306 1 5 ------” 1- 9267 1066-______9206 1065 ______9127 221— — ------m 1068 _____ 9206 1066 ______9127 1069 ______9206 1067 ______9127 1070 ______9206 1068 ______9127 1 7 CFR 91M 1071 ______9206 1069 ______9127 1073 ______1______9206 1070 ______9127 2 4 9 — 9104 1074 ______9113, 9206 1071 ______9127 1075 ______9206 1073 ______9127, 92181 8 CHI _ 9347 1076 ______9206 1074 ______9127, 9218157------9902 1078 ______9206 1075 ______— 9127260______1079 ______9206 1076 ______9127 1090______9206 1078 ______9127 2 1 CFR 9215 1094___ 9206 1079 ______9127 3------— ------9105 1096 ______9206 1090______9127 1097 ______9206 1094______9127 1098 ______9206 1096______9127 146d______FEDERAL REGISTER 9393

22 CFR Page 36 CFR Page 46 CFR page 61______-___ - _____ 9348 1-______9062 401__------9064 3______9107 402____ 9067 23 CFR 7 ______9062 1______9270 P roposed R ules: 29______9278 47 CFR 25 CFR 38 CFR 25------9216 . Proposed Rules: 3______— 9063 73-----^ ------9216 255______——______9087 36____ 9063 81______.. 9350 41 CFR 83— ----- 9273, 9350 26 CFR 1-5______9216 P roposed R ules: 1______9199 9-7_____ 9063 73— ______9088, 9239 Proposed Rules: 9-56__.______9349 1______9276,9351 43 CFR 48______9086 8 ______9108 49 CFR P ublic Land Orders: 71-79______9067 29 CFR 829 (revoked In part by PLO 95__ 9084, 9085 1500...... -______— 9348 4044)______9268 P roposed R ules: 3873 (revoked in part by PLO 30 CFR 4043)______9268 95______9240 4042 ______9108 97______9240 229______9062 4043 ___ 9268 170_____ 9308 4044 ______9268 32 CFR 4045 ______-__ 9268 721.______9271 4046 ______9269 50 CFR 1809______9348 4047 ______9269 256— __ 9108

PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES

Now available Lyndon B. Johnson 1963-64

Book I (November 22, 1963 to June 30, 1964) Price $6.75 Book II (July 1, 1964 to December 31, 1964) Price $7.00

Contents • Messages to the Congress • Public speeches and letters • The President’s news conferences Radio and television reports to the American people • Remarks to informal groups Prior volumes Published by Prior volumes covering most of the Truman Office of the Federal Register administration and all of the Eisenhower and National Archives and Records Service Kennedy years are available at comparable General Services Administration prices from the Superintendent of Documents, Order from Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C Superintendent of Documents 20402. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C 20402