DOCSLIB.ORG

Mars Orbiter Operating Near Satellites Team Lead: Bailey Miller

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mars Orbiter Operating Near Satellites Team Lead: Bailey Miller University of Kansas AIAA 2017 Undergraduate Spacecraft Design Competition Submission Mars Orbiter Operating Near Satellites Team Lead: Bailey Miller Supervised by: Dr. Mark Ewing University of Kansas Team: Arno Prinsloo Brian Frew Brooke Reid Colin Murphy Conner Murphy Philip Guzman May 10, 2017 Acknowledgments A dreamer sits, her heels dig into soil. The Kansas wind knocks wheat that ebbs and flows. The sky this night is infinite and royal - She wonders where the spiral arms might go. A grit of teeth, a flutter in her chest; The pressure in the lock is counting down. Her feet again move dirt from where it rests - The ground this time a rusted red, not brown. From years of time we spent in lecture halls Our hearts are heavy with the thoughts of planes. The atmosphere is laden with the call To let our love for stars and planets wane. To dreamers now who still chase after stars, We give this plan to make that future ours. Aerospace Engineering Department i Signatures Aerospace Engineering Department ii Contents 1 Mission Description 2 2 Executive Summary 3 3 History 8 4 Trajectory 10 4.1 Launch . 10 4.2 Rendezvous . 11 4.3 Mars Transfer . 11 4.4 Earth Return . 14 5 Human Habitation and Safety 15 5.1 Habitat Selection . 15 5.2 Fitness and Health . 21 5.3 Radiation Protection . 21 5.4 Crew Psychology . 23 6 ECLSS 25 7 Propulsion System 28 7.1 Reasons for Selecting Liquid Methane . 28 7.2 Reasons Against Alternate Propulsion Systems . 29 7.3 Fuel Mass and Volume . 30 7.4 Fuel Valves and Power, Command, and Data Lines . 31 8 Command and Data Handling 33 8.1 Vehicle Management Computer . 33 8.2 Solid State Recorders . 34 9 Communications 35 9.1 High Gain Antenna . 36 9.2 Low Gain Antenna . 38 9.3 Transponders . 38 9.4 Radio Frequency Amplifier Enclosures . 39 9.5 UHF Communications Assembly . 39 10 Attitude Determination and Control System 40 10.1 System-Level Requirements . 40 10.2 Spacecraft Control Selection . 40 10.3 External Disturbance Environment . 41 10.3.1 Worst Case External Disturbance Torques . 42 10.3.2 Momentum Sizing . 42 10.3.3 Thruster Sizing . 43 10.4 Hardware Selection . 44 10.4.1 Actuator Assembly Trade Study . 44 10.4.2 Sensors . 45 Aerospace Engineering Department iii 10.4.3 ADCS Hardware Block Diagrams . 46 10.5 Actuator Assembly Placement . 46 11 Thermal 48 11.1 Passive Systems . 48 11.2 Active Systems . 49 11.3 Sizing . 49 11.4 Design, Risk Assessment, and Risk Mitigation . 51 12 Power 52 12.1 Solar Panels . 53 12.2 Nuclear Reactor . 53 12.3 Batteries . 55 12.4 Power Block Diagram . 56 12.5 Design Down Selection . 56 13 Science Objectives 59 13.1 Non-Biological Craft Based . 59 13.2 Non-Biological Autonomous . 62 13.3 Biological Studies . 63 14 Cost Analysis 66 15 Marketing 69 15.1 Technology . 69 15.2 Competition . 69 15.3 Regulatory . 70 15.4 Economic . 71 15.5 Socio-Cultural . 71 16 Mission Operations Plan 72 17 Future of Spacecraft 80 17.1 Manned-Lander Configuration . 80 Appendices 84 A C&DH 85 B Power 86 C Science 87 D Spacecraft Views 88 List of Figures 2.1 MOONS Vehicle Configuration . 7 4.1 SLS Launch Configuration . 10 4.2 Falcon 9 and Falcon 9 Heavy Launch Configuration . 11 4.3 ∆V Map for Earth to Mars Leg . 13 Aerospace Engineering Department iv 4.4 Spacecraft Trajectory Overlaid with the Planets . 14 5.1 Schematic for the torpor module1 ............................. 18 5.2 Radiation Shielding Material Comparison2 ........................ 22 6.1 Each Step of the Bosch Process3 ............................. 25 6.2 Diagram Showing the Flow of the Bosch Reactor4 .................... 26 7.1 Overview of Propulsion System . 32 8.1 C&DH Subsystem Block Diagram . 33 9.1 Transmitting Data Rates . 36 9.2 Telecommunications Subsystem Block Diagram . 37 9.3 HGA1 Assembly . 38 9.4 HGA2 Assembly . 38 10.1 Spacecraft Configuration and Axes Orientation . 41 10.2 AA Configuration with Five CMGs . 45 10.3 ADCS Block Diagrams . 46 11.1 Thermal Truss Panel Laying . 48 11.2 Active Thermal Loops . 49 11.3 Heat Flow Diagram . 50 11.4 MOONS Vehicle Thermal Radiation Curves . 51 12.1 Kilopower Concept . 54 12.2 Power Selection Graph . 55 12.3 Power Block Diagram . 57 12.4 Configuration Table . 58 15.1 Public's Rating of Job Done by NASA Conducted by the Roper Center5 . 71 17.1 Lander Configuration Concept . 81 List of Tables 2.1 Mission ∆V and TOF Breakdown . 3 2.2 System Mass and Volume Breakdown . 4 2.3 Mission Mass and Power Breakdown . 6 4.1 Candidate Trajectory Overview . 12 5.1 Qualitative Analysis of Various Habitats . 15 5.2 Second Iteration of Habitat Sizing . 16 5.3 Comparison between Dragon II and Orion6 ....................... 17 5.4 Data for the Spaceworks torpor module1 ......................... 19 5.5 Data for the Bigelow Modules7, 8 ............................. 20 5.6 Derived Data for the B125 Module . 20 5.7 LEO Career Dose Limits in Sv2 .............................. 21 5.8 Recommended Organ Dose Limits2 ............................ 22 5.9 Torpor Schedule for First 24 Mission Days . 23 Aerospace Engineering Department v 6.1 Series-Bosch Reactor Subsystem Breakdown9 ...................... 26 6.2 Series-Bosch Reactor Subsystem Breakdown9 ...................... 27 7.1 Fuel Storing Temperatures10 ................................ 28 7.2 Pressure Needed to Keep Fuel a Liquid . 28 7.3 Fuel Impulse Comparison . 29 7.4 Volume and Mass of Selected Fuel . 30 7.5 Mass Difference Depending on Change in Velocity . 30 8.1 CDS and Telecommunications Mass and Power Breakdown . 34 9.1 Data Rate Breakdown . 35 9.2 Link Budget . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 Spinoff Spinoff 2006 Innovative Partnerships Program
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2006 f spinof Spinoff 2006 Innovative Partnerships Program Developed by Publications and Graphics Department NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI) Early in the next decade, the new Crew Exploration Vehicle will begin to ferry crew and supplies to the International Space Station. Cutting-edge technology like this National Aeronautics and leads the way for development of new Space Administration spinoff products that benefit life on Earth. Table of Contents 3 Foreword Environmental and Agricultural Resources 4 Introduction PRP: The Proven Solution for Cleaning Up Oil Spills .............................62 5 Partnership Benefits Progressive Plant Growing Has Business Blooming ..................................64 FLIPPER: Validation for Remote Ocean Imaging ....................................68 Health and Medicine Paper-Thin Plastic Film Soaks Up Sun to Create Solar Energy ................70 Ingestible Thermometer Pill Aids Athletes in Beating the Heat ................6 Saving Space and Time: The Tractor That Einstein Built.........................74 Space-Proven Medical Monitor: The Total Patient-Care Package ............10 Computer Technology From Planetary Imaging to Enzyme Screening .........................................12 A Predictive Approach to Eliminating Errors in Software Code ................76 Transportation Scheduling Software for Complex Scenarios .............................................78 Damage-Tolerant Fan Casings for Jet Engines .........................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
    Chapter 6 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Jim Taylor, Dennis K. Lee, and Shervin Shambayati 6.1 Mission Overview The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) [1, 2] has a suite of instruments making observations at Mars, and it provides data-relay services for Mars landers and rovers. MRO was launched on August 12, 2005. The orbiter successfully went into orbit around Mars on March 10, 2006 and began reducing its orbit altitude and circularizing the orbit in preparation for the science mission. The orbit changing was accomplished through a process called aerobraking, in preparation for the “science mission” starting in November 2006, followed by the “relay mission” starting in November 2008. MRO participated in the Mars Science Laboratory touchdown and surface mission that began in August 2012 (Chapter 7). MRO communications has operated in three different frequency bands: 1) Most telecom in both directions has been with the Deep Space Network (DSN) at X-band (~8 GHz), and this band will continue to provide operational commanding, telemetry transmission, and radiometric tracking. 2) During cruise, the functional characteristics of a separate Ka-band (~32 GHz) downlink system were verified in preparation for an operational demonstration during orbit operations. After a Ka-band hardware anomaly in cruise, the project has elected not to initiate the originally planned operational demonstration (with yet-to-be­ used redundant Ka-band hardware). 201 202 Chapter 6 3) A new-generation ultra-high frequency (UHF) (~400 MHz) system was verified with the Mars Exploration Rovers in preparation for the successful relay communications with the Phoenix lander in 2008 and the later Mars Science Laboratory relay operations.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 13, EGU2011-5107-2, 2011 EGU General Assembly 2011 © Author(s) 2011 NASA’s Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Richard Elphic (1), Gregory Delory (1,2), Anthony Colaprete (1), Mihaly Horanyi (3), Paul Mahaffy (4), Butler Hine (1), Steven McClard (5), Joan Salute (6), Edwin Grayzeck (6), and Don Boroson (7) (1) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA USA ([email protected]), (2) Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA, (3) Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO USA, (4) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD USA, (5) LunarQuest Program Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL USA, (6) Planetary Science Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA, Washington, DC USA, (7) Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington MA USA Nearly 40 years have passed since the last Apollo missions investigated the mysteries of the lunar atmosphere and the question of levitated lunar dust. The most important questions remain: what is the composition, structure and variability of the tenuous lunar exosphere? What are its origins, transport mechanisms, and loss processes? Is lofted lunar dust the cause of the horizon glow observed by the Surveyor missions and Apollo astronauts? How does such levitated dust arise and move, what is its density, and what is its ultimate fate? The US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council decadal surveys and the recent “Scientific Context for Exploration of the Moon” (SCEM) reports have identified studies of the pristine state of the lunar atmosphere and dust environment as among the leading priorities for future lunar science missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gnc 2021 Abstract Book
    GNC 2021 ABSTRACT BOOK Contents GNC Posters ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Poster 01: A Software Defined Radio Galileo and GPS SW receiver for real-time on-board Navigation for space missions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Poster 02: JUICE Navigation camera design .................................................................................................... 9 Poster 03: PRESENTATION AND PERFORMANCES OF MULTI-CONSTELLATION GNSS ORBITAL NAVIGATION LIBRARY BOLERO ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Poster 05: EROSS Project - GNC architecture design for autonomous robotic On-Orbit Servicing .............. 12 Poster 06: Performance assessment of a multispectral sensor for relative navigation ............................... 14 Poster 07: Validation of Astrix 1090A IMU for interplanetary and landing missions ................................... 16 Poster 08: High Performance Control System Architecture with an Output Regulation Theory-based Controller and Two-Stage Optimal Observer for the Fine Pointing of Large Scientific Satellites ................. 18 Poster 09: Development of High-Precision GPSR Applicable to GEO and GTO-to-GEO Transfer ................. 20 Poster 10: P4COM: ESA Pointing Error Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science
    MaRS: Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science M. Pätzold1, F.M. Neubauer1, L. Carone1, A. Hagermann1, C. Stanzel1, B. Häusler2, S. Remus2, J. Selle2, D. Hagl2, D.P. Hinson3, R.A. Simpson3, G.L. Tyler3, S.W. Asmar4, W.I. Axford5, T. Hagfors5, J.-P. Barriot6, J.-C. Cerisier7, T. Imamura8, K.-I. Oyama8, P. Janle9, G. Kirchengast10 & V. Dehant11 1Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität zu Köln, D-50923 Köln, Germany Email: [email protected] 2Institut für Raumfahrttechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, D-85577 Neubiberg, Germany 3Space, Telecommunication and Radio Science Laboratory, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA 4Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91009, USA 5Max-Planck-Instuitut für Aeronomie, D-37189 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany 6Observatoire Midi Pyrenees, F-31401 Toulouse, France 7Centre d’etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planetaires (CETP), F-94107 Saint-Maur, France 8Institute of Space & Astronautical Science (ISAS), Sagamihara, Japan 9Institut für Geowissenschaften, Abteilung Geophysik, Universität zu Kiel, D-24118 Kiel, Germany 10Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria 11Observatoire Royal de Belgique, B-1180 Bruxelles, Belgium The Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science (MaRS) experiment will employ radio occultation to (i) sound the neutral martian atmosphere to derive vertical density, pressure and temperature profiles as functions of height to resolutions better than 100 m, (ii) sound
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Tianwen-1: China's Mars Mission
    Tianwen-1: China's Mars Mission drishtiias.com/printpdf/tianwen-1-china-s-mars-mission Why In News China will launch its first Mars Mission - Tianwen-1- in July, 2020. China's previous ‘Yinghuo-1’ Mars mission, which was supported by a Russian spacecraft, had failed after it did not leave the earth's orbit and disintegrated over the Pacific Ocean in 2012. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is also going to launch its own Mars mission in July, the Perseverance which aims to collect Martian samples. Key Points The Tianwen-1 Mission: It will lift off on a Long March 5 rocket, from the Wenchang launch centre. It will carry 13 payloads (seven orbiters and six rovers) that will explore the planet. It is an all-in-one orbiter, lander and rover system. Orbiter: It is a spacecraft designed to orbit a celestial body (astronomical body) without landing on its surface. Lander: It is a strong, lightweight spacecraft structure, consisting of a base and three sides "petals" in the shape of a tetrahedron (pyramid- shaped). It is a protective "shell" that houses the rover and protects it, along with the airbags, from the forces of impact. Rover: It is a planetary surface exploration device designed to move across the solid surface on a planet or other planetary mass celestial bodies. 1/3 Objectives: The mission will be the first to place a ground-penetrating radar on the Martian surface, which will be able to study local geology, as well as rock, ice, and dirt distribution. It will search the martian surface for water, investigate soil characteristics, and study the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team
    NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor Science Applications International Corporation Houston, Texas David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, 800 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 (301) 621-0390. Foreword Mars has long beckoned to humankind interest in this fellow traveler of the solar from its travels high in the night sky. The system, adding impetus for exploration. ancients assumed this rust-red wanderer was Over the past several years studies the god of war and christened it with the have been conducted on various approaches name we still use today. to exploring Earth’s sister planet Mars. Much Early explorers armed with newly has been learned, and each study brings us invented telescopes discovered that this closer to realizing the goal of sending humans planet exhibited seasonal changes in color, to conduct science on the Red Planet and was subjected to dust storms that encircled explore its mysteries. The approach described the globe, and may have even had channels in this publication represents a culmination of that crisscrossed its surface. these efforts but should not be considered the final solution. It is our intent that this Recent explorers, using robotic document serve as a reference from which we surrogates to extend their reach, have can continuously compare and contrast other discovered that Mars is even more complex new innovative approaches to achieve our and fascinating—a planet peppered with long-term goal.
    [Show full text]
  • H M 7 P a G E 1 a MEMORIAL HONORING the MEMORY OF
    H A MEMORIAL M HONORING THE MEMORY OF THE SEVEN ASTRONAUTS WHO SERVED ON THE 7 P SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA. a g e WHEREAS, the members of this chamber are grief-stricken at the loss of the 1 space shuttle Columbia and her seven astronauts on Saturday, February 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, the women and men who perished aboard Columbia embodied the very best qualities of mankind. Their intelligence, diligence and valor led to their selection for the space program and their presence on Columbia; and WHEREAS, today we pause not only to remember this tragedy, but we also pause to honor the achievements of seven exemplary people; and WHEREAS, let us recite the names of the seven astronauts: Rick D. Husband, age forty-five and the commander of Columbia. Commander Husband was a colonel in the United States air force. He was selected as an astronaut in 1994 and prior to this mission had logged two hundred thirty hours in space. His home was Amarillo, Texas; William C. McCool, age forty-one and the pilot for the mission. He was a commander in the United States navy and a former test pilot. Commander McCool became an astronaut in 1996, and this was his first space flight. His home was Lubbock, Texas; Michael P. Anderson, age forty-three and the payload commander for Columbia. Lieutenant Colonel Anderson was an air force man who grew up as the son of an air force man. Selected as an astronaut in 1994, he had previously logged over two hundred eleven hours in space.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS)
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2011 A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2 Chad Lee Davis University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Commons, Other Aerospace Engineering Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Chad Lee, "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/965 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Chad Lee Davis entitled "A Feasibility Study for Using Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Hardware for Meeting NASA’s Need for a Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) to the International Space Station - [COTS]2." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aerospace Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Venus Missions
    Appendix 1: Venus Missions Sputnik 7 (USSR) Launch 02/04/1961 First attempted Venus atmosphere craft; upper stage failed to leave Earth orbit Venera 1 (USSR) Launch 02/12/1961 First attempted flyby; contact lost en route Mariner 1 (US) Launch 07/22/1961 Attempted flyby; launch failure Sputnik 19 (USSR) Launch 08/25/1962 Attempted flyby, stranded in Earth orbit Mariner 2 (US) Launch 08/27/1962 First successful Venus flyby Sputnik 20 (USSR) Launch 09/01/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Sputnik 21 (USSR) Launch 09/12/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Cosmos 21 (USSR) Launch 11/11/1963 Possible Venera engineering test flight or attempted flyby Venera 1964A (USSR) Launch 02/19/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Venera 1964B (USSR) Launch 03/01/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Cosmos 27 (USSR) Launch 03/27/1964 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Zond 1 (USSR) Launch 04/02/1964 Venus flyby, contact lost May 14; flyby July 14 Venera 2 (USSR) Launch 11/12/1965 Venus flyby, contact lost en route Venera 3 (USSR) Launch 11/16/1965 Venus lander, contact lost en route, first Venus impact March 1, 1966 Cosmos 96 (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Possible attempted landing, craft fragmented in Earth orbit Venera 1965A (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Flyby attempt (launch failure) Venera 4 (USSR) Launch 06/12/1967 Successful atmospheric probe, arrived at Venus 10/18/1967 Mariner 5 (US) Launch 06/14/1967 Successful flyby 10/19/1967 Cosmos 167 (USSR) Launch 06/17/1967 Attempted atmospheric probe, stranded in Earth orbit Venera 5 (USSR) Launch 01/05/1969 Returned atmospheric data for 53 min on 05/16/1969 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Crew Dragon ECLSS
    ICES-2020-333 Development of the Crew Dragon ECLSS Jason Silverman1, Andrew Irby2, and Theodore Agerton3 Space Exploration Technologies, Hawthorne, California, 90250 SpaceX designed the Crew Dragon spacecraft to be the safest ever flown and to restore the ability of the United States to launch astronauts. One of the key systems required for human flight is the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS), which was designed to work in concert with the spacesuit and spacecraft. The tight coupling of many subsystems combined with an emphasis on simplicity and fault tolerance created unique challenges and opportunities for the design team. During the development of the crew ECLSS, the Dragon 1 cargo spacecraft flew with a simple ECLSS for animals, providing an opportunity for technology development and the early characterization of system-level behavior. As the ECLSS design matured a series of tests were conducted, including with humans in a prototype capsule in November 2016, the Demo-1 test flight to the ISS in March 2019, and human-in-the-loop ground testing in the Demo-2 capsule in January 2020 before the same vehicle performs a crewed test flight. This paper describes the design and operations of the ECLSS, the development process, and the lessons learned. Nomenclature AC = air conditioning AQM = air quality monitor AVV = active vent valve CCiCap = Commercial Crew Integrated Capability CCtCap = Commercial Crew Transportation Capability CFD = computational fluid dynamics conops = concept of operations COPV = composite overwrapped
    [Show full text]