DOCSLIB.ORG

The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor Science Applications International Corporation Houston, Texas David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, 800 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 (301) 621-0390. Foreword Mars has long beckoned to humankind interest in this fellow traveler of the solar from its travels high in the night sky. The system, adding impetus for exploration. ancients assumed this rust-red wanderer was Over the past several years studies the god of war and christened it with the have been conducted on various approaches name we still use today. to exploring Earth’s sister planet Mars. Much Early explorers armed with newly has been learned, and each study brings us invented telescopes discovered that this closer to realizing the goal of sending humans planet exhibited seasonal changes in color, to conduct science on the Red Planet and was subjected to dust storms that encircled explore its mysteries. The approach described the globe, and may have even had channels in this publication represents a culmination of that crisscrossed its surface. these efforts but should not be considered the final solution. It is our intent that this Recent explorers, using robotic document serve as a reference from which we surrogates to extend their reach, have can continuously compare and contrast other discovered that Mars is even more complex new innovative approaches to achieve our and fascinating—a planet peppered with long-term goal. A key element of future craters, cut by canyons deep enough to improvements to this document will be the swallow the Earth’s Grand Canyon, and incorporation of an integrated robotic/human shouldering the largest known volcano in the exploration strategy currently under solar system. They found intriguing evidence development. that water played an important role on Mars with channels that bear a striking We will continue to develop alternative resemblance to stream beds and clouds of approaches, technologies, precursor missions, crystalline ice that still traverse its red sky. and flight demonstrations that collectively But they also found that Mars was cold and move us forward. Inputs have been, and will dry, and believed to be devoid of life. always be, encouraged from all sources— NASA centers, industry, research Now present day explorers have organizations, entrepreneurs, government announced that pieces of Mars have arrived agencies, international partners, and the on Earth as meteorites, and that these bits of public at large—which will improve our the red planet contain evidence pointing to understanding and current planning. We the possible existence of life early in Mars plan to use the results of these assessments to history. This has resulted in renewed public shape our investments in technology, and to III look for high leverage, innovative, break- must search for alternatives to substantially through approaches to the most cost effective reduce the cost of exploration, while exploration. These data will also help us increasing the inherent value to humankind. understand the required infrastructure, as This Reference Mission provides a viable well as provide important insights into how starting point for NASA’s continuing efforts we can use the International Space Station to to develop the technologies and systems, as validate key assumptions and technologies. well as the international partnerships, needed for the grand adventure of sending humans to To achieve our goal, we must explore another planet in our solar system— fundamentally change the way in which we one that may have once, and may yet again, explore with both humans and robots. We harbor life. IV Acknowledgments Sending people to Mars has been a will be added to and improved upon by long-held dream of humankind, and many others in the future. This report has benefited have approached the task of turning the from the contributions and advice of many dream into reality. This document is another individuals from the government and private chapter in the ongoing process of melding sectors. The individuals listed on the new and existing technologies, practical following page assisted in preparing the operations, fiscal reality, and common sense concepts described in this report and in into a feasible and viable human mission to compiling the words, images, and data used Mars. However, this is not the last chapter in for that description. the process, but marks a snapshot in time that Stephen J. Hoffman David I. Kaplan V Contributing Authors Los Alamos National Laboratory: Dr. Paul Keaton Ames Research Center: Roger Arno Marshall Space Flight Center: Dr. Geoff Briggs William Huber Dr. Yvonne Clearwater General Contributors Dr. Marc Cohen Andy Gonzales Ames Research Center: Betsy Dunsky Johnson Space Center: Paul Espinosa Dr. Michael Duke Vladimir Garin David Kaplan Lynn Harper Catherine Larson Butler Hine David Weaver Larry Lemke Laurie Weaver Doug O’Handley Lewis Research Center: Nelson Schlater Robert Cataldo Michael Sims Dr. Stanley Borowski Boeing: SAIC: Brent Sherwood Dr. Stephen Hoffman Lewis Research Center: Paul Phillips Dr. Stanley Borowski Study Team Members Rockwell International: Ames Research Center: Robert Raasch Dr. Geoff Briggs (co-lead) Lisa Rockoff Johnson Space Center: Reviewers and Commenters Jeri Brown Johnson Space Center: Nancy Ann Budden Nancy Ann Budden Beth Caplan John Connolly John Connolly Dr. Michael Duke (co-lead) Other Support and Contributions Dallas Evans Dr. Steve Hawley Ames Research Center: Kent Joosten Dr. Chris McKay David Kaplan Jeff Moore Darrell Kendrick Dr. Carol Stoker Barbara Pearson Anthony Gross Barney Roberts Editorial and Graphics Support Ed Svrcek David Weaver J. Frassanito and Associates: J. Frassanito Lewis Research Center: Dr. Stanley Borowski SAIC: Robert Cataldo R. Patrick Rawlings VI There is a set of supplemental technical reports which provide greater depth into many of the design features of the Mars Reference Mission than is given in section 3 of this document. Had those papers been included as appendices, the size of this document would have greatly expanded. Consequently, we decided to make those supplemental materials available through the world wide web. We intend to post new materials as to the web as they are produced and hope to maintain a site with the latest information which describes key technologies and design features of a human mission to Mars. The site for the Mars Reference Mission is http://www_sn.jsc.nasa.gov/marsref/contents.html VII VIII Contents Section Page Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................... xv 1. OVERVIEW AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................ 1-5 1.3 REFERENCE MISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. 1-6 1.3.1 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.2 Groundrules and Assumptions .................................................................................................. 1-7 1.3.3 Mission and Systems ................................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.3.1 Mission Design ............................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3.3.2 In Situ Resource Production ..................................................................................... 1-16 1.3.3.3 Flight Crew ................................................................................................................. 1-16 1.3.3.4 Robotic Precursors ..................................................................................................... 1-17 1.3.3.5 Launch Systems .......................................................................................................... 1-18 1.3.3.6 Interplanetary Transportation Systems .................................................................. 1-18 1.3.3.7 Surface Systems .......................................................................................................... 1-22 1.3.3.8 Operations ................................................................................................................... 1-24 1.3.3.9 Mission and Systems Summary ............................................................................... 1-27 1.4 TESTING PRINCIPAL ASSUMPTIONS AND CHOICES ................................................................ 1-28 1.4.1 Robust Surface Infrastructure .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of the Insight Landing Site M. Golombek1, D. Kipp1, N
    Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript InSight Landing Site Paper v9 Rev.docx Click here to view linked References Selection of the InSight Landing Site M. Golombek1, D. Kipp1, N. Warner1,2, I. J. Daubar1, R. Fergason3, R. Kirk3, R. Beyer4, A. Huertas1, S. Piqueux1, N. E. Putzig5, B. A. Campbell6, G. A. Morgan6, C. Charalambous7, W. T. Pike7, K. Gwinner8, F. Calef1, D. Kass1, M. Mischna1, J. Ashley1, C. Bloom1,9, N. Wigton1,10, T. Hare3, C. Schwartz1, H. Gengl1, L. Redmond1,11, M. Trautman1,12, J. Sweeney2, C. Grima11, I. B. Smith5, E. Sklyanskiy1, M. Lisano1, J. Benardino1, S. Smrekar1, P. Lognonné13, W. B. Banerdt1 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 2State University of New York at Geneseo, Department of Geological Sciences, 1 College Circle, Geneseo, NY 14454 3Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001 4Sagan Center at the SETI Institute and NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 5Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302; Now at Planetary Science Institute, Lakewood, CO 80401 6Smithsonian Institution, NASM CEPS, 6th at Independence SW, Washington, DC, 20560 7Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, London 8German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Planetary Research, 12489 Berlin, Germany 9Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA; Now at Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926 10Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 11Institute for Geophysics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 12MS GIS Program, University of Redlands, 1200 E. Colton Ave., Redlands, CA 92373-0999 13Institut Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris Cité, Université Paris Sorbonne, France Diderot Submitted to Space Science Reviews, Special InSight Issue v.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science
    MaRS: Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science M. Pätzold1, F.M. Neubauer1, L. Carone1, A. Hagermann1, C. Stanzel1, B. Häusler2, S. Remus2, J. Selle2, D. Hagl2, D.P. Hinson3, R.A. Simpson3, G.L. Tyler3, S.W. Asmar4, W.I. Axford5, T. Hagfors5, J.-P. Barriot6, J.-C. Cerisier7, T. Imamura8, K.-I. Oyama8, P. Janle9, G. Kirchengast10 & V. Dehant11 1Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität zu Köln, D-50923 Köln, Germany Email: [email protected] 2Institut für Raumfahrttechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, D-85577 Neubiberg, Germany 3Space, Telecommunication and Radio Science Laboratory, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA 4Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91009, USA 5Max-Planck-Instuitut für Aeronomie, D-37189 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany 6Observatoire Midi Pyrenees, F-31401 Toulouse, France 7Centre d’etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planetaires (CETP), F-94107 Saint-Maur, France 8Institute of Space & Astronautical Science (ISAS), Sagamihara, Japan 9Institut für Geowissenschaften, Abteilung Geophysik, Universität zu Kiel, D-24118 Kiel, Germany 10Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria 11Observatoire Royal de Belgique, B-1180 Bruxelles, Belgium The Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science (MaRS) experiment will employ radio occultation to (i) sound the neutral martian atmosphere to derive vertical density, pressure and temperature profiles as functions of height to resolutions better than 100 m, (ii) sound
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Mars' North Polar Water Ice Cap I. Analysis of Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter Imaging Data
    Icarus 144, 382–396 (2000) doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6300, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Variability of Mars’ North Polar Water Ice Cap I. Analysis of Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter Imaging Data Deborah S. Bass Instrumentation and Space Research Division, Southwest Research Institute, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, Texas 78228-0510 E-mail: [email protected] Kenneth E. Herkenhoff U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 and David A. Paige Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567 Received May 15, 1998; revised November 17, 1999 1. INTRODUCTION Previous studies interpreted differences in ice coverage between Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter observations of Mars’ north residual Like Earth, Mars has perennial ice caps and an active wa- polar cap as evidence of interannual variability of ice deposition on ter cycle. The Viking Orbiter determined that the surface of the the cap. However,these investigators did not consider the possibility northern residual cap is water ice (Kieffer et al. 1976, Farmer that there could be significant changes in the ice coverage within et al. 1976). At the south residual polar cap, both Mariner 9 the northern residual cap over the course of the summer season. and Viking Orbiter observed carbon dioxide ice throughout the Our more comprehensive analysis of Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter summer. Many have related observed atmospheric water vapor imaging data shows that the appearance of the residual cap does not abundances to seasonal exchange between reservoirs such as show large-scale variance on an interannual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – a Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration
    Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Report by the NASA Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG) November 2020 Front Cover: Artist Concepts Top (Artist concepts, left to right): Early Mars1; Molecules in Space2; Astronaut and Rover on Mars1; Exo-Planet System1. Bottom: Pillinger Point, Endeavour Crater, as imaged by the Opportunity rover1. Credits: 1NASA; 2Discovery Magazine Citation: Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG), Jakosky, B. M., et al. (2020). Mars, the Nearest Habitable World—A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration. MASWG Members • Bruce Jakosky, University of Colorado (chair) • Richard Zurek, Mars Program Office, JPL (co-chair) • Shane Byrne, University of Arizona • Wendy Calvin, University of Nevada, Reno • Shannon Curry, University of California, Berkeley • Bethany Ehlmann, California Institute of Technology • Jennifer Eigenbrode, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center • Tori Hoehler, NASA/Ames Research Center • Briony Horgan, Purdue University • Scott Hubbard, Stanford University • Tom McCollom, University of Colorado • John Mustard, Brown University • Nathaniel Putzig, Planetary Science Institute • Michelle Rucker, NASA/JSC • Michael Wolff, Space Science Institute • Robin Wordsworth, Harvard University Ex Officio • Michael Meyer, NASA Headquarters ii Mars, the Nearest Habitable World October 2020 MASWG Table of Contents Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return
    2001-01-2138 Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return Joe C. Parrish NASA Headquarters ABSTRACT This paper discusses long-range rovers to be flown as part of NASA’s newly reformulated Mars Exploration Program (MEP). These rovers are currently scheduled for launch first in 2007 as part of a joint science and technology mission, and then again in 2011 as part of a planned Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission. These rovers are characterized by substantially longer range capability than their predecessors in the 1997 Mars Pathfinder and 2003 Mars Exploration Rover (MER) missions. Topics addressed in this paper include the rover mission objectives, key design features, and Figure 1: Rover Size Comparison (Mars Pathfinder, Mars Exploration technologies. Rover, ’07 Smart Lander/Mobile Laboratory) INTRODUCTION NASA is leading a multinational program to explore above, below, and on the surface of Mars. A new The first of these rovers, the Smart Lander/Mobile architecture for the Mars Exploration Program has Laboratory (SLML) is scheduled for launch in 2007. The recently been announced [1], and it incorporates a current program baseline is to use this mission as a joint number of missions through the rest of this decade and science and technology mission that will contribute into the next. Among those missions are ambitious plans directly toward sample return missions planned for the to land rovers on the surface of Mars, with several turn of the decade. These sample return missions may purposes: (1) perform scientific explorations of the involve a rover of almost identical architecture to the surface; (2) demonstrate critical technologies for 2007 rover, except for the need to cache samples and collection, caching, and return of samples to Earth; (3) support their delivery into orbit for subsequent return to evaluate the suitability of the planet for potential manned Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Analysis of Mars Exploration and Colonization Clayton Knappenberger Depauw University
    DePauw University Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University Student research Student Work 2015 An Economic Analysis of Mars Exploration and Colonization Clayton Knappenberger DePauw University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.depauw.edu/studentresearch Part of the Economics Commons, and the The unS and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Knappenberger, Clayton, "An Economic Analysis of Mars Exploration and Colonization" (2015). Student research. Paper 28. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Economic Analysis of Mars Exploration and Colonization Clayton Knappenberger 2015 Sponsored by: Dr. Villinski Committee: Dr. Barreto and Dr. Brown Contents I. Why colonize Mars? ............................................................................................................................ 2 II. Can We Colonize Mars? .................................................................................................................... 11 III. What would it look like? ............................................................................................................... 16 A. National Program .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Fluvial Channels in the Walls of Juventae Chasma: Evidences of Groundwater Sapping? P
    47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016) 1878.pdf ORIGIN OF FLUVIAL CHANNELS IN THE WALLS OF JUVENTAE CHASMA: EVIDENCES OF GROUNDWATER SAPPING? P. Singh1, R. Sarkar1, I. Ganesh1 and A. Porwal1, 1Geology and Mineral Resources Group, CSRE, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India ([email protected]) Introduction: Juventae Chasma is a deep box- Type IV: This type includes channels emanating from canyon located to the north of Valles Marineris. The gullies between the spurs on the chasma wall (Fig. 1d). main geological units of the chasma are chaotic terrain, They are mainly found in the southern wall of the four mounds of interior layered deposits (ILDs) and an chasma. These channels have shorter lengths ranging outflow channel. The presence of the outflow channel from 1-6 km and at places converge into a single chan- indicates that water played an important role in the nel. geological and geomorphological evolution of the Age determination: We estimated the ages of the chasma. In this paper, we report ground-water sapping geological units containing Type 1 and Type III chan- features from the wall of Juventae Chasma. We also delineate and characterize fluvial channels originating nels using crater size-frequency distributions. The re- from the chasma wall. This study was carried out using sults indicate that Type 1 channels are younger than panchromatic data from the CTX and digital terrain 790+- 200 Ma and Type III channels are younger than models from the HRSC onboard the MRO and MEX 620+-300 Ma. Type II and IV were left out because of respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration1
    June 24, 2012 Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration1 ‐ Report of a Workshop at LPI, June 12‐14, 2012 – Stephen Mackwell2 (LPI) Michael Amato (NASA Goddard), Bobby Braun (Georgia Institute of Technology), Steve Clifford (LPI), John Connolly (NASA Johnson), Marcello Coradini (ESA), Bethany Ehlmann (Caltech), Vicky Hamilton (SwRI), John Karcz (NASA Ames), Chris McKay (NASA Ames), Michael Meyer (NASA HQ), Brian Mulac (NASA Marshall), Doug Stetson (SSECG), Dale Thomas (NASA Marshall), and Jorge Vago (ESA) Executive Summary Recent deep cuts in the budget for Mars exploration at NASA necessitate a reconsideration of the Mars robotic exploration program within NASA’s Science Mission Directorate (SMD), especially in light of overlapping requirements with future planning for human missions to the Mars environment. As part of that reconsideration, a workshop on “Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration” was held at the USRA Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, TX, on June 12‐14, 2012. Details of the meeting, including abstracts, video recordings of all sessions, and plenary presentations, can be found at http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/marsconcepts2012/. Participation in the workshop included scientists, engineers, and graduate students from academia, NASA Centers, Federal Laboratories, industry, and international partner organizations. Attendance was limited to 185 participants in order to facilitate open discussion of the critical issues for Mars exploration in the coming decades. As 390 abstracts were submitted by individuals interested in participating in the workshop, the Workshop Planning Team carefully selected a subset of the abstracts for presentation based on their appropriateness to the workshop goals, and ensuring that a broad diverse suite of concepts and ideas was presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Field Geology, Biology, and Paleontology Workshop, Summary
    MARS FIELD GEOLOGY, BIOLOGY, AND PALEONTOLOGY WORKSHOP: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS November 18–19, 1998 Space Center Houston, Houston, Texas LPI Contribution No. 968 MARS FIELD GEOLOGY, BIOLOGY, AND PALEONTOLOGY WORKSHOP: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS November 18–19, 1998 Space Center Houston Edited by Nancy Ann Budden Lunar and Planetary Institute Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 968 Compiled in 1999 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautcis and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This volume may be cited as Budden N. A., ed. (1999) Mars Field Geology, Biology, and Paleontology Workshop: Summary and Recommendations. LPI Contribution No. 968, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 80 pp. This volume is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Phone: 281-486-2172 Fax: 281-486-2186 E-mail: [email protected] Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. _________________ Cover: Mars test suit subject and field geologist Dean Eppler overlooking Meteor Crater, Arizona, in Mark III Mars EVA suit. PREFACE In November 1998 the Lunar and Planetary Institute, under the sponsorship of the NASA/HEDS (Human Exploration and Development of Space) Enterprise, held a workshop to explore the objectives, desired capabilities, and operational requirements for the first human exploration of Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance Mars Ascent Vehicles, Earth Return Vehicles and “All-Up” Launch Strategy for Low Cost Sample Return
    Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration (2012) 4356.pdf HIGH PERFORMANCE MARS ASCENT VEHICLES, EARTH RETURN VEHICLES AND “ALL-UP” LAUNCH STRATEGY FOR LOW COST SAMPLE RETURN. L. G. Lemke1, C. R. Stoker1, B. J. Glass1, J. S. Karcz1, J. V. Bowles1, A. A. Gonzales1, S. Davis2 . 1NASA Ames Research Center, 2SpaceX Company. Introduction: Robotic missions to return carefully straints force a complex architecture to be fractionated selected samples of Mars atmosphere, regolith, and into smaller pieces and implemented over a longer rock have been actively studied and advocated by time than might otherwise be desireable. One conse- NASA for at least the last 15 years and remain a very quence of this mission fractionation is that the DSA high priority objective of both the Science Mission uses a small (≈ 300 kg) Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) Directorate (SMD) and the Human Exploration and with a ΔV of ≈ 4 km/s—just enough to attain low Mars Operations Mission Directorate (HEOMD) programs. orbit. This, in turn requires MOR to place the sample As a practical matter, such missions are intrinsically container in a hermetically sealed Earth Return Vehicle among the most complex robotic planetary missions (ERV) before departure toward Earth. The Mars Or- that can be engineered. The current Decadal Survey biter in the DSA is itself a large and highly capable Architecture (DSA) incorporates virtually every tech- spacecraft requiring a dedicated launch and mission nical capability in the robotic spaceflight repertoire— control. atmospheric Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) at A Johnson Space Center (JSC) study con- Mars, Mars surface mobility, subsurface sample acqui- ducted by the then Office of Exploration [1] examined sition, autonomous sample handling for planetary pro- the cost and risk benefits of MSR alternatives not re- tection, Mars surface rendezvous with rovers, launch quiring MOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation Dynamics of Spatio-Temporal Wave Packets
    PROPAGATION DYNAMICS OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL WAVE PACKETS Thesis Submitted to The School of Engineering of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Science in Electro-Optics By Qian Cao UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio August, 2014 PROPAGATION DYNAMICS OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL WAVE PACKETS Name: Cao, Qian APPROVED BY: Andy Chong, Ph.D. Joseph Haus, Ph.D. Advisor Committee Chairman Committee Member Assistant Professor, Department of Professor, Electro-Optics Graduate Physics Engineering Program Partha Banerjee, Ph.D. Committee Member Professor, Electro-Optics Graduate Engineering Program John G. Weber, Ph.D. Eddy M. Rojas, Ph.D., M.A., P.E. Associate Dean Dean, School of Engineering School of Engineering ii c Copyright by Qian Cao All rights reserved 2014 ABSTRACT PROPAGATION DYNAMICS OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL WAVE PACKETS Name: Cao, Qian University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Andy Chong We measured the three-dimensional (3D) propagation dynamics of the Airy-Bessel wave packet, inculding its intensity and phase evolution. Its non-diffraction and non-dispersive features were verified. Meanwhile, we built a spatial light modulator (SLM) based wave packet shaping system to generate other types of wave packets such as Airy-Airy-Airy and dual-Airy-Airy-rings. These wave packets were also measured in 3D. The abrupt 3D autofocusing effect was observed on dual-Airy- Airy-rings. iii To my family, my advisor and committee members and the time in University of Dayton. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I want to express my thank to my advisor, Prof. Andy Chong. Although the time when I became his student it was the second year of his professor career, he taught and guided me in the world of science in such an experienced way.
    [Show full text]