DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 July 2009 “We are all . children of this universe. Not just Earth, or Mars, or this System, but the whole grand fireworks. And if we are interested in Mars at all, it is only because we wonder over our past and worry terribly about our possible future.” — Ray Bradbury, 'Mars and the Mind of Man,' 1973 Cover Art: An artist’s concept depicting one of many potential Mars exploration strategies. In this approach, the strengths of combining a central habitat with small pressurized rovers that could extend the exploration range of the crew from the outpost are assessed. Rawlings 2007. NASA/SP–2009–566 Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 Mars Architecture Steering Group NASA Headquarters Bret G. Drake, editor NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas July 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The individuals listed in the appendix assisted in the generation of the concepts as well as the descriptions, images, and data described in this report. Specific contributions to this document were provided by Dave Beaty, Stan Borowski, Bob Cataldo, John Charles, Cassie Conley, Doug Craig, Bret Drake, John Elliot, Chad Edwards, Walt Engelund, Dean Eppler, Stewart Feldman, Jim Garvin, Steve Hoffman, Jeff Jones, Frank Jordan, Sheri Klug, Joel Levine, Jack Mulqueen, Gary Noreen, Hoppy Price, Shawn Quinn, Jerry Sanders, Jim Schier, Lisa Simonsen, George Tahu, and Abhi Tripathi. Available from: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service 7115 Standard Drive 5285 Port Royal Road Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 301-621-0390 or 703-605-6000 Fax: 301-621-0134 This report is also available in electronic form at http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/ CONTENTS 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 Design Reference Architecture 5.0 Summary ................................................................... 2 2.1 Surface Reference Mission ................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Communication and Navigation ....................................................................................... 8 3 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Mars Planetary Science Objectives (Goals I–III) ............................................................. 10 3.1.1 Taking advantage of the unique attributes of humans in scientific exploration ................. 10 3.1.2 Scientific objectives for Mars: present and future ............................................................. 11 3.1.3 Geology scientific objectives for the initial human exploration of Mars ........................... 13 3.1.4 Geophysics scientific objectives for the initial human exploration of Mars ...................... 13 3.1.5 Atmosphere/climate scientific objectives for the initial human exploration of Mars ........ 14 3.1.6 Biology/life scientific objectives for the initial human exploration of Mars ..................... 16 3.1.7 The search for extant life ................................................................................................... 16 3.1.8 The search for past life ...................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Objectives Related to Preparation for Sustained Human Presence (Goal IV+) ............... 17 3.2.1 Sustainability-related objectives for the initial human missions to Mars .......................... 18 3.3 Objectives Related to Other Classes of Science (Goal V) ................................................. 18 3.3.1 Heliophysics of Mars' environment ................................................................................... 19 3.3.2 Space weather ................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.3 Laser ranging for astrophysics........................................................................................... 19 3.4 Goals and Objectives Summary Implications ................................................................... 19 4 Transportation Systems ..................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Interplanetary Trajectory and Mission Analysis ............................................................... 21 4.2 Heavy-Lift Launch Vehicle ................................................................................................ 23 4.3 In-Space Transportation: Nuclear Thermal Rocket Reference ......................................... 25 4.4 In-Space Transportation: Chemical/Aerocapture Option ................................................. 27 4.4.1 Trans-Mars injection module ............................................................................................ 28 4.4.2 Mars orbit insertion modules (cargo and crew missions) .................................................. 28 4.4.3 Trans-Earth injection module ............................................................................................ 28 4.4.4 Low-Earth orbit assembly reboost module ........................................................................ 28 4.5 Launch Processing ............................................................................................................ 29 4.6 Crew Exploration Vehicle/Earth Return Vehicle .............................................................. 30 4.7 Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing ................................................................................... 31 4.8 Mars Transit Habitat ........................................................................................................ 34 5 Surface Systems ................................................................................................................ 36 5.1 Surface Habitation Systems .............................................................................................. 37 5.2 Surface Mobility Systems .................................................................................................. 38 5.2.1 Surface transportation: unpressurized and pressurized rovers ........................................... 39 5.3 In-Situ Resource Utilization .............................................................................................. 40 5.4 Surface Power Systems ..................................................................................................... 41 5.4.1 Stationary power ............................................................................................................... 41 5.4.2 Mobile power .................................................................................................................... 42 6 Architectural Assessments ................................................................................................. 44 6.1 Figures of Merit ................................................................................................................ 45 iii 6.1.1 Safety and mission success ................................................................................................ 45 6.1.2 Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... 46 6.1.3 Affordability ...................................................................................................................... 46 6.2 Decision 1: Mission Type .................................................................................................. 47 6.2.1 Mission-class scientific position........................................................................................ 48 6.2.2 Crew health and performance assessment ......................................................................... 49 6.2.3 Risk and cost assessments ................................................................................................. 49 6.2.4 Mission type recommendation .......................................................................................... 50 6.3 Decision 2: All-up vs. Pre-deploy Cargo .......................................................................... 51 6.3.1 Pre-deploy option .............................................................................................................. 51 6.3.2 All-up mission option ........................................................................................................ 52 6.3.3 Cargo mission mode recommendation .............................................................................. 52 6.4 Decision 3: Aerocapture vs. Propulsive Mars Orbit Capture of Cargo ........................... 53 6.4.1 Overview of aerocapture ................................................................................................... 53 6.4.2 System-level trades ........................................................................................................... 54 6.4.3 Aerocapture for the reference payload .............................................................................. 54 6.4.4 Aerocapture vs. propulsive capture comparison................................................................ 55 6.4.5 Aerocapture recommendation ........................................................................................... 55 6.5 Decision 4: In-Situ Resource Utilization for Mars Ascent ................................................ 56 6.5.1 In-situ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of 13 Human Mars Mission Design – the Ultimate Systems Challenge
    Human Mars Mission Design – The Ultimate Systems Challenge John F. Connolly a, B. Kent Joostenb, Bret Drakec, Steve Hoffmanc, Tara Polsgroved, Michelle Ruckera, Alida Andrewsc, Nehemiah Williamsa a NASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, Texas 77058, john.connolly- [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b Consultant,2383 York Harbour Ct., League City, TX 77573, [email protected] c The Aerospace Corporation, 2310 E El Segundo Blvd, El Segundo, California 90245, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] d NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, [email protected] Abstract A human mission to Mars will occur at some time in the coming decades. When it does, it will be the end result of a complex network of interconnected design choices, systems analyses, technical optimizations, and non-technical compromises. This mission will extend the technologies, engineering design, and systems analyses to new limits, and may very well be the most complex undertaking in human history. It can be illustrated as a large menu, or as a large decision tree. Whatever the visualization tool, there are numerous design decisions required to assemble a human Mars mission, and many of these interconnect with one another. This paper examines these many decisions and further details a number of choices that are highly interwoven throughout the mission design. The large quantity of variables and their interconnectedness results in a highly complex systems challenge, and the paper illustrates how a change in one variable results in ripples (sometimes unintended) throughout many other facets of the design.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolated and Confined Environments
    17 Isolated and Confined Environments Carole Tafforin Ethospace, Toulouse, France Characteristics of space analogue environments with regard to human per- formance concern the crew adaptation in a socio-psychological context and in a temporal dynamics. Isolation, confinement and time are major features on Earth to reproduce an extra-terrestrial environment for manned mission simulations. In the current space missions (low Earth orbit, LEO) and in the perspective of interplanetary missions (near-Earth asteroid, Moon, Mars), men and women will have to adapt to social constraints (crew size, multinationality, mixed-gender) and spatial restrictions (volume, multi-chambers, life-support) on short-term, medium-term and long-term durations. The crewmembers also will have to perform intra-vehicular activities (IVA)and extra-vehicular activ- ities (EVA). For training, preventing and optimizing such tasks, simulations of living and working together in isolated and confined environments, and simulations of operating with a space suit on geological surfaces are the new requirements. During the two decades (1991–2011), space simulators (confinement) and analogue settings (isolation) were adequately developed on Earth with the ultimate goal of walking on Mars. Time periods extended up to 500 days. Space analogue environments are located worldwide (Canada, United States, Russia, Europe, Antarctica and Arctic). Mission durations in space analogue environments cover days, weeks and years. Isolation and confinement facilities implemented for such simulations are listed in Table 17.1. Over a 7-day duration, the Canadian Astronaut Program Space Unit Life Simulation (CAPSULS) was an Earth-based initiative that simulated a typical space shuttle or space station mission [1]. CAPSULS provided the Canadian astronaut participants with space mission training.
    [Show full text]
  • Lara (Lander Radioscience) on the Exomars 2020 Surface Platform
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-891-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. LaRa (Lander Radioscience) on the ExoMars 2020 Surface Platform. Véronique Dehant1,2, Sébastien Le Maistre1, Rose-Marie Baland1, Özgür Karatekin1, Marie-Julie Péters1, Attilio Rivoldini1, Tim Van Hoolst1, Bart Van Hove1, Marie Yseboodt1, and Alexander Kosov3 (1) Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB), Brussels, Belgium, (2) Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, (3) Space Research Institute Russian Academy of Sciences (IKI), Moscow, Russia Abstract The surface platform Kazachok will house the radio science experiment LaRa (Lander Radioscience) to support specific scientific objectives of the ExoMars 2020 mission. The LaRa experiment is described and the scientific objectives and strategies are detailed in this presentation. Figure 1. LaRa principle. 1. Introduction 2. The LaRa instrument In the last decade, several missions and observations As LaRa performs a coherent retransmission of the have brought new data on the planet Mars, obtained uplink carrier to the downlink carrier, the downlink by either spacecraft orbiting around Mars or landers frequency is scaled by a constant multiplier, the and rovers on the surface. Among other things, the transponder ratio (880/749). By emitting the uplink information acquired will improve our understanding signal from Earth, the masers in the ground stations of Mars’ interior, evolution and habitability. Data ensure frequency stability of LaRa’s radiosignal. obtained by new space missions are driving further The LaRa instrument is built in collaboration with progress in this field. In 2020, the European Space other Belgian actors under the lead of ESA PRODEX, Agency ESA and the Russian space agency and ROB providing the instrument specifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Mars Architecture
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Mars Architecture Tara Polsgrove NASA Human Mars Study Team 15th International Planetary Probe Workshop June 11, 2018 Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN Gateway Initial ConfigurationLunar Orbital Platform-Gateway (Notional) Orion 4 5 A Brief History of Human Exploration Beyond LEO America at DPT / NEXT NASA Case the Threshold Constellation National Studies Program Lunar Review of Commission First Lunar Architecture U.S. Human on Space Outpost Team Spaceflight Plans Committee Pathways to Exploration Columbia Challenger 1980 1990 2000 2010 Bush 41 Bush 43 7kObama HAT/EMC MSC Speech Speech Speech Report of the 90-Day Study on Human Exploration of the Moon and Mars NASA’s Journey to National Aeronautics and November 1989 Global Leadership Space Administration Mars Exploration and 90-Day Study Mars Design Mars Design Roadmap America’s Reference Mars Design Reference Future in Reference Mission 1.0 Exploration Architecture Space Mission 3.0 System 5.0 Exploration Architecture Blueprint Study 6 Exploring the Mars Mission Design Tradespace • A myriad of choices define
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of the Insight Landing Site M. Golombek1, D. Kipp1, N
    Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript InSight Landing Site Paper v9 Rev.docx Click here to view linked References Selection of the InSight Landing Site M. Golombek1, D. Kipp1, N. Warner1,2, I. J. Daubar1, R. Fergason3, R. Kirk3, R. Beyer4, A. Huertas1, S. Piqueux1, N. E. Putzig5, B. A. Campbell6, G. A. Morgan6, C. Charalambous7, W. T. Pike7, K. Gwinner8, F. Calef1, D. Kass1, M. Mischna1, J. Ashley1, C. Bloom1,9, N. Wigton1,10, T. Hare3, C. Schwartz1, H. Gengl1, L. Redmond1,11, M. Trautman1,12, J. Sweeney2, C. Grima11, I. B. Smith5, E. Sklyanskiy1, M. Lisano1, J. Benardino1, S. Smrekar1, P. Lognonné13, W. B. Banerdt1 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 2State University of New York at Geneseo, Department of Geological Sciences, 1 College Circle, Geneseo, NY 14454 3Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001 4Sagan Center at the SETI Institute and NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 5Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302; Now at Planetary Science Institute, Lakewood, CO 80401 6Smithsonian Institution, NASM CEPS, 6th at Independence SW, Washington, DC, 20560 7Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, London 8German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Planetary Research, 12489 Berlin, Germany 9Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA; Now at Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926 10Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 11Institute for Geophysics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 12MS GIS Program, University of Redlands, 1200 E. Colton Ave., Redlands, CA 92373-0999 13Institut Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris Cité, Université Paris Sorbonne, France Diderot Submitted to Space Science Reviews, Special InSight Issue v.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculating the Potato Radius of Asteroids Using the Height of Mt. Everest
    Calculating the Potato Radius of Asteroids using the Height of Mt. Everest M. E. Caplan∗ Center for the Exploration of Energy and Matter, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408 (Dated: November 16, 2015) Abstract At approximate radii of 200-300 km, asteroids transition from oblong `potato' shapes to spheres. This limit is known as the Potato Radius, and has been proposed as a classification for separating asteroids from dwarf planets. The Potato Radius can be calculated from first principles based on the elastic properties and gravity of the asteroid. Similarly, the tallest mountain that a planet can support is also known to be based on the elastic properties and gravity. In this work, a simple novel method of calculating the Potato Radius is presented using what is known about the maximum height of mountains and Newtonian gravity for a spherical body. This method does not assume any knowledge beyond high school level mechanics, and may be appropriate for students interested in applications of physics to astronomy. arXiv:1511.04297v1 [physics.ed-ph] 7 Nov 2015 1 I. INTRODUCTION Spacecraft are currently exploring asteroids and dwarf planets, such as the Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous mission (NEAR) landing on Eros,1 the Dawn mission orbiting Ceres and Vesta,2 and the New Horizons flyby of Pluto and Charon.3 Additionally, the Mars Re- connaissance Orbiter (MRO) has observed the Martian moons Phobos and Deimos.4 These missions observe a remarkable variety of shapes for these bodies, shown in Fig. 1. Smaller asteroids have irregular shapes while dwarf planets (large asteroids) are nearly spherical.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science
    MaRS: Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science M. Pätzold1, F.M. Neubauer1, L. Carone1, A. Hagermann1, C. Stanzel1, B. Häusler2, S. Remus2, J. Selle2, D. Hagl2, D.P. Hinson3, R.A. Simpson3, G.L. Tyler3, S.W. Asmar4, W.I. Axford5, T. Hagfors5, J.-P. Barriot6, J.-C. Cerisier7, T. Imamura8, K.-I. Oyama8, P. Janle9, G. Kirchengast10 & V. Dehant11 1Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität zu Köln, D-50923 Köln, Germany Email: [email protected] 2Institut für Raumfahrttechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, D-85577 Neubiberg, Germany 3Space, Telecommunication and Radio Science Laboratory, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA 4Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91009, USA 5Max-Planck-Instuitut für Aeronomie, D-37189 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany 6Observatoire Midi Pyrenees, F-31401 Toulouse, France 7Centre d’etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planetaires (CETP), F-94107 Saint-Maur, France 8Institute of Space & Astronautical Science (ISAS), Sagamihara, Japan 9Institut für Geowissenschaften, Abteilung Geophysik, Universität zu Kiel, D-24118 Kiel, Germany 10Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria 11Observatoire Royal de Belgique, B-1180 Bruxelles, Belgium The Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science (MaRS) experiment will employ radio occultation to (i) sound the neutral martian atmosphere to derive vertical density, pressure and temperature profiles as functions of height to resolutions better than 100 m, (ii) sound
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured By
    Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured by MAVEN By Ali Rahmati Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Physics and Astronomy, and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Professor Thomas E. Cravens, Chair ________________________________ Professor Philip S. Baringer ________________________________ Professor David Braaten ________________________________ Professor Mikhail V. Medvedev ________________________________ Professor Stephen J. Sanders Date Defended: 22 January 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Ali Rahmati certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured by MAVEN ________________________________ Professor Thomas E. Cravens, Chair Date approved: 22 January 2016 ii Abstract Mars possesses a hot oxygen exosphere that extends out to several Martian radii. The main source for populating this extended exosphere is the dissociative recombination of molecular oxygen ions with electrons in the Mars ionosphere. The dissociative recombination reaction creates two hot oxygen atoms that can gain energies above the escape energy at Mars and escape from the planet. Oxygen loss through this photochemical reaction is thought to be one of the main mechanisms of atmosphere escape at Mars, leading to the disappearance of water on the surface. In this work the hot oxygen exosphere of Mars is modeled using a two-stream/Liouville approach as well as a Monte-Carlo simulation. The modeled exosphere is used in a pickup ion simulation to predict the flux of energetic oxygen pickup ions at Mars. The pickup ions are created via ionization of neutral exospheric oxygen atoms through photo-ionization, charge exchange with solar wind protons, and electron impact ionization.
    [Show full text]
  • Tianwen-1: China's Mars Mission
    Tianwen-1: China's Mars Mission drishtiias.com/printpdf/tianwen-1-china-s-mars-mission Why In News China will launch its first Mars Mission - Tianwen-1- in July, 2020. China's previous ‘Yinghuo-1’ Mars mission, which was supported by a Russian spacecraft, had failed after it did not leave the earth's orbit and disintegrated over the Pacific Ocean in 2012. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is also going to launch its own Mars mission in July, the Perseverance which aims to collect Martian samples. Key Points The Tianwen-1 Mission: It will lift off on a Long March 5 rocket, from the Wenchang launch centre. It will carry 13 payloads (seven orbiters and six rovers) that will explore the planet. It is an all-in-one orbiter, lander and rover system. Orbiter: It is a spacecraft designed to orbit a celestial body (astronomical body) without landing on its surface. Lander: It is a strong, lightweight spacecraft structure, consisting of a base and three sides "petals" in the shape of a tetrahedron (pyramid- shaped). It is a protective "shell" that houses the rover and protects it, along with the airbags, from the forces of impact. Rover: It is a planetary surface exploration device designed to move across the solid surface on a planet or other planetary mass celestial bodies. 1/3 Objectives: The mission will be the first to place a ground-penetrating radar on the Martian surface, which will be able to study local geology, as well as rock, ice, and dirt distribution. It will search the martian surface for water, investigate soil characteristics, and study the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team
    NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor Science Applications International Corporation Houston, Texas David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, 800 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 (301) 621-0390. Foreword Mars has long beckoned to humankind interest in this fellow traveler of the solar from its travels high in the night sky. The system, adding impetus for exploration. ancients assumed this rust-red wanderer was Over the past several years studies the god of war and christened it with the have been conducted on various approaches name we still use today. to exploring Earth’s sister planet Mars. Much Early explorers armed with newly has been learned, and each study brings us invented telescopes discovered that this closer to realizing the goal of sending humans planet exhibited seasonal changes in color, to conduct science on the Red Planet and was subjected to dust storms that encircled explore its mysteries. The approach described the globe, and may have even had channels in this publication represents a culmination of that crisscrossed its surface. these efforts but should not be considered the final solution. It is our intent that this Recent explorers, using robotic document serve as a reference from which we surrogates to extend their reach, have can continuously compare and contrast other discovered that Mars is even more complex new innovative approaches to achieve our and fascinating—a planet peppered with long-term goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Mars' North Polar Water Ice Cap I. Analysis of Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter Imaging Data
    Icarus 144, 382–396 (2000) doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6300, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Variability of Mars’ North Polar Water Ice Cap I. Analysis of Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter Imaging Data Deborah S. Bass Instrumentation and Space Research Division, Southwest Research Institute, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, Texas 78228-0510 E-mail: [email protected] Kenneth E. Herkenhoff U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 and David A. Paige Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567 Received May 15, 1998; revised November 17, 1999 1. INTRODUCTION Previous studies interpreted differences in ice coverage between Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter observations of Mars’ north residual Like Earth, Mars has perennial ice caps and an active wa- polar cap as evidence of interannual variability of ice deposition on ter cycle. The Viking Orbiter determined that the surface of the the cap. However,these investigators did not consider the possibility northern residual cap is water ice (Kieffer et al. 1976, Farmer that there could be significant changes in the ice coverage within et al. 1976). At the south residual polar cap, both Mariner 9 the northern residual cap over the course of the summer season. and Viking Orbiter observed carbon dioxide ice throughout the Our more comprehensive analysis of Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter summer. Many have related observed atmospheric water vapor imaging data shows that the appearance of the residual cap does not abundances to seasonal exchange between reservoirs such as show large-scale variance on an interannual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Aurora Funding
    Outline of Aurora funding The £3 million from the Aurora Science Programme has gone to the following 17 academics and individual scientists working at UK research organisations: 1. An improved understanding of Mars photochemistry using NOMAD and ACS measurements – Professor Paul Palmer, Edinburgh University - £73,442 The proposal aims to develop the existing photochemistry (the chemistry effects of light) to prepare for measurements collected by the NOMAD and ACS instruments aboard the Trace Gas Orbiter. They will develop the chemical mechanism so it can be used to interpret observed variations of atmospheric gases on Mars. 2. Dust storms and the dust transport cycle: their impact on the Martian climate in a multi annual reanalysis of MCS, THEMIS and TGO/ACS data – Professor Peter Read, Oxford University - £346,592 The proposal aims to improve our understanding of the Martian dust cycle, its impact on climate and the physical features of the Martian surface. Using a new approach towards analysing daily variations in the Martian atmosphere it is proposed to extend this dataset using measurements of the Martian atmosphere from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and Mars Odyssey missions in orbit around Mars, and from the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) on ESA's Trace Gas Orbiter mission when they become available. This may be useful for future spacecraft operations at the Martian surface, as well as to improve our understanding of both the present and past states of the Martian climate. 3. ExoMars TGO Guest Investigator Support – Dr Matt Balme, Open University - £56,367 This proposal seeks funding for a Guest Investigator position on ESA's ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter mission.
    [Show full text]