Innovation. Perspectives for the 21St Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Innovation. Perspectives for the 21St Century Innovation: Changing the Face of Disability Hugh Herr and Ernesto Approximately 650 million people in the the physical capabilities of healthy able- Martinez-Villalpando world suffer from some type of disability bodied individuals. The Affective Computing MIT Media Lab and as the population ages this figure is group works towards the development of expected to increase. Those afflicted with technologies to expand our understanding of a physical, emotional or cognitive disability affect and its role in the human experience, face a myriad of serious and debilitating with a focus on autism research and therapy. challenges. Fortunately, the modern The interdisciplinary nature of the work of explosion in scientific and technological both groups integrates a broad gamut of innovations provides an extraordinary disciplines, ranging from medicine to opportunity to deliver profound improvements engineering. to their quality of life. Moreover, the same The Biomechatronics Group and Affective cutting-edge technology that can minimize Computing Group are part of MIT’s Human 2.0 or eliminate the adverse effects of disabling initiative to mitigate the effects of disability conditions can also be used to expand human and redefine the limits of human capability. abilities and transcend the ordinary limits of the human condition. BIoMECHaTRonICS: DISaBLED PEoPLE oR At the Massachusetts Institute of DISaBLED TECHnoLoGIES? Technology’s (MIT) Media Laboratory, the Though often taken for granted, walking Biomechatronics Group and the Affective remains essential in modern life, as stairs, Computing Group are focusing on developing uneven terrain, and other obstacles easily novel technologies that can deeply impact conquered by legs but not wheels remain people’s lives at the physical and emotional ubiquitous. The loss or disability of a leg levels. The Biomechatronics Group seeks tremendously impacts quality of life and to understand the basic principles of patients strive to regain or retain the ability biological locomotion in order to develop to walk even in the presence of severe both rehabilitation technologies that restore impairment. functionality to the physically challenged In the United States there are more and augmentation technologies that amplify than 26 million people with physical HUGH HERR anD ERnESTo MaRTínEz-vILLaLPanDo 367 disabilities including more than 1.7 million comfort. Such technologies cover a large (more than 1 in 200) living with limb loss spectrum, from gel liners and vacuum- (NLLIC, 2008). In order to restore lost assisted sockets to modern interfaces limb functions, prosthetic and orthotic that rely on residual limb laser scanning technology is generally required. The need and computer-aided manufacturing. Two for rehabilitation and prosthetic technology particular technologies that have proved to is latent, as the total number of persons be successful in pain reduction have been with an amputation and using a prosthesis is shock absorbing pylons and dynamic elastic expected to reach 2.4 million by the year 2020 response (DER) prosthetic feet (Perry et al., (Ziegler-Graham, 2008). 1992). The damping and compliance features Currently commercially-available they provide have made them popular in technologies for lower limb amputees most of the commercially available prosthetic are still far from providing fully functional systems. Despite their success in preference replacements of biological legs. Even with the among amputees, abnormal gait patterns most advanced prosthetic systems available and associated with walking fatigue are still on the market, amputees still exhibit clinical prevalent. problems associated with lack of adequate Walking fatigue is synonymous with mobility. These include gait asymmetry, higher metabolic expenditure and is a instability, decreased walking speeds and common affliction of lower-limb amputees. higher energy requirements. Together these Walking fatigue in lower-limb amputees is gait pathologies result in significant pain considerably higher than in their matched and walking fatigue for lower limb amputees able-bodied counterparts at comparable (Postema et al., 1997). speeds. Measures of metabolic expenditure Although the pain felt at the residual limb during walking are commonly obtained by corresponds to the behavior of the entire analyzing oxygen level consumptions. For prosthetic system (i.e. from the liner and unilateral below-the-knee amputees, the socket interface to the pylon and the rest of rate of oxygen consumption is 20-30% higher the prosthetic components), it is particularly (Herbert et al., 1994; Molen, 1973) than that associated with the coupling between the for healthy persons with no impairments, residual limb and the prosthetic leg. The and for above-knee amputees this rate imperfect coupling allows relative motion increases by an additional 25% (James, 1973; between the socket and the femur stump Waters and Mulroy, 1999). caused by the compression of soft tissue. Conventional lower-limb prostheses, This motion is uncomfortable for the amputee despite their damping and compliance and causes a lack of confidence to apply large features, have not provided a real metabolic forces to the prosthetic leg. In addition, the advantage for amputees (Lehmann et al., relatively short moment arm between the hip 1993; Torburn et al., 1990; Colborne et joint and the socket reduces the force that the al., 1992; Huang et al., 2000; Thomas et hip muscles can apply to the artificial limb al., 2000). In addition to higher energetic (Whittle, 1991). requirements, lower-limb amputees show a Recent advances in socket technology reduction in their self-selected speed, and in have reduced pain in patients by focusing consequence they present overall diminished on cushioning, a primary contributor to endurance. 368 Robotic Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Currently commercially- The human ankle joint is essential “ to locomotion because it provides a available technologies for significant amount of energy to push the body off the ground and propel it forward lower limb amputees are during walking, especially at moderate to fast speeds (Winter, 1983; Palmer, 2002; still far from providing fully Gates, 2004). For transtibial (below-the- knee) amputees, the loss of this energy functional replacements of generation at the ankle produces an abnormal asymmetric gait, with higher biological legs metabolic energy requirements and slower ” speeds. Additionally, the mechanical behavior of commercially available ankle- foot prostheses greatly differs from that of a Prosthetic systems ideally need to fulfill healthy human ankle-foot. Even though most a diverse set of requirements in order to of these prostheses offer some compliance restore the biological behavior of normal and function as initial and terminal rockers and healthy limbs. For the Biomechatronics due to their shape, they cannot provide Group, the biomechanics of normal the amount of external energy required walking provide a basis for the design and in walking, making them inadequate in development of new actuated artificial limbs. replicating the natural ankle’s flexibility and This unique biomimetic approach to the actuation (Whittle, 1991). design and development of these prostheses In order to overcome the disadvantages shows promise in improving amputees’ gait of current prosthetic technologies for below- symmetry, walking speed and metabolic knee amputees, the Biomechatronics Group requirements while enhancing the adaptation has developed the world’s first robotic to the particular amputee’s gait. ankle-foot prosthesis that can successfully One of the objectives of the recreate the actions of the biological lower Biomechatronics Group is to develop leg (Au and Herr, 2006; Au et al., 2007). Using sophisticated modular biomimetic leg advanced biologically-inspired design and prosthesis for lower-limb amputees that intelligent computer algorithms, this novel is capable of restoring the functionality device can propel an amputee forward while of the ankle and knee joints of the intact easily adapting to changes in ambulation human leg and fully emulating their natural speed and the walking environment. This behavior. This task poses many challenges artificial ankle-foot prosthesis allows for researchers as they investigate novel amputees to enjoy a natural human gait over electromechanical designs and control level ground, stairs, ramps, and even uneven strategies that can adequately integrate and terrain. Moreover, the device’s low weight and adapt to the patients’ needs. The complete biological form-factor make it comfortable to robotic lower l3 limb is comprised of two wear and inconspicuous to even the trained modular robotic joint prostheses: a powered eye. Most importantly, this innovative device ankle-foot and robotic knee prosthesis. reduces the rate of oxygen consumption in HUGH HERR anD ERnESTo MaRTínEz-vILLaLPanDo 369 walking amputees by up to 20% relative to accurate control of the knee joint, particularly conventional prosthetic devices (Au et al., while the leg is swinging during each step. 2009). The knee cannot be allowed to swing freely The success of the active ankle prosthesis because it will extend too rapidly and stop derives from the Biomechatronics Group’s suddenly as it reaches full extension. On commitment to biomimetic design. The the other hand, the knee joint cannot be so mechanical design of this motorized device rigid that it does not bend in response to imitates the biological structures of the ankle dynamics;
Recommended publications
  • Meet the Faculty Candidates
    MEET THE FACULTY CANDIDATES Candidates are displayed in alphabetically by last name. Prospective employers are invited to attend and while no event pre-registration is required however they must be registered for the BMES 2018 Annual Meeting. A business card will be required to enter the event. COMPLETE DETAILED CANDIDATE INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT www.bmes.org/faculty. Specialty - Biomaterials Alessia Battigelli Woo-Sik Jang Sejin Son John Clegg Patrick Jurney Young Hye Song R. Cornelison Kevin McHugh Ryan Stowers Yonghui Ding Yifeng Peng Varadraj Vernekar Victor Hernandez-Gordillo Shantanu Pradhan Scott Wilson Marian Hettiaratchi Eiji Saito Yaoying Wu Era Jain Andrew Shoffstall Specialty - Biomechanics Adam Abraham Vince Fiore Panagiotis Mistriotis Edward Bonnevie Zeinab Hajjarian Simone Rossi Alexander Caulk Xiao Hu Alireza Yazdani Venkat Keshav Chivukula Heidi Kloefkorn Rana Zakerzadeh Jacopo Ferruzzi Yizeng Li Specialty - Biomedical Imaging Mahdi Bayat Chong Huang Katheryne Wilson Zhichao Fan Jingfei Liu Kihwan Han Alexandra Walsh Specialty - BioMEMS Jaehwan Jung Aniruddh Sarkar Mengxi Wu Specialty - Cardiovascular Engineering Reza Avaz Kristin French Zhenglun (Alan) Wei Specialty - Cellular Engineering Annie Bowles Kate Galloway Kuei-Chun Wang Alexander Buffone Laurel Hind Mahsa Dabagh Matthew Kutys See other side for more candidates Specialty - Device Engineering (Microfluidics, Electronics, Machine-Body interface) Taslim Al-Hilal Brian Johnson David Myers Jungil Choi Tae Jin Kim Max Villa Haishui Huang Jiannan Li Ying Wang Specialty
    [Show full text]
  • USI2019 Usievents.Com
    2019 24 25 usievents.com #USI2019 line-up Robert PLOMIN MRC Research Professor of Behavioural Genetics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience KING’S COLLEGE LONDON THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE DNA REVOLUTION Prof. Plomin is one of the world’s top behavioral geneticists who offers a unique, insider’s view of the exciting synergies that came from combining genetics and psychology. His research shows that inherited DNA differences are the major systematic force that make us who we are as individuals. The DNA Revolution, namely using DNA to predict our psychological problems and promise from birth, calls for a radical rethink about what makes us who we are, with sweeping—and no doubt controversial—implications for the way we think about parenting, education and the events that shape our lives. A pioneer of what’s sometimes called “hereditarian” science. - The Guardian - Read Blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are Sylvia EARLE Robert Oceanographer PLOMIN © Todd Richard_ synergy productions synergy Richard_ © Todd NO WATER, NO LIFE. NO BLUE, NO GREEN Dr. Sylvia Earle is a living legend. If the celebrated oceanographer, marine biologist, explorer, author, and lecturer isn’t already your hero, allow us to enlighten you. ‘Her Deepness’ has spent nearly a year of her life underwater, logging more than 7,000 hours beneath the surface. She has led countless deep-sea expeditions, was the first female chief scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the first human—male or female—to complete an untethered walk across the seafloor at a depth of 1,250 feet. Sylvia has been a National Geographic explorer-in-residence since 1998, and continues to share her knowledge and experiences on stage, through film, in writing, and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Based on a Neuromuscular Model
    TNSRE – 2009-00034 1 Control of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Based on a Neuromuscular Model Michael F. Eilenberg, Hartmut Geyer, and Hugh Herr, Member, IEEE devices permit some energy storage during controlled Abstract— Control schemes for powered ankle-foot prostheses dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, and subsequent energy rely upon fixed torque-ankle state relationships obtained from release during powered plantar flexion, much like the Achilles measurements of intact humans walking at target speeds and tendon in the intact human [3], [4]. Although this passive- across known terrains. Although effective at their intended gait elastic behavior is a good approximation to the ankle's speed and terrain, these controllers do not allow for adaptation to environmental disturbances such as speed transients and terrain function during slow walking, normal and fast walking speeds variation. Here we present an adaptive muscle-reflex controller, require the addition of external energy, and thus cannot be based on simulation studies, that utilizes an ankle plantar flexor implemented by any passive ankle-foot device [5]-[7]. This comprising a Hill-type muscle with a positive force feedback deficiency is reflected in the gait of transtibial amputees using reflex. The model's parameters were fitted to match the human passive ankle-foot prostheses. Their self-selected walking ankle’s torque-angle profile as obtained from level-ground speed is slower, and stride length shorter, than normal [8]. In walking measurements of a weight and height-matched intact subject walking at 1 m/sec. Using this single parameter set, addition, their gait is distinctly asymmetric: the range of ankle clinical trials were conducted with a transtibial amputee walking movement on the unaffected side is smaller [9], [10], while, on on level ground, ramp ascent, and ramp descent conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines
    Human Enhancement and Technologies Our Merger with Machines Human • Woodrow Barfield and Blodgett-Ford Sayoko Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines Edited by Woodrow Barfield and Sayoko Blodgett-Ford Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Philosophies www.mdpi.com/journal/philosophies Human Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines Human Enhancement Technologies and Our Merger with Machines Editors Woodrow Barfield Sayoko Blodgett-Ford MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editors Woodrow Barfield Sayoko Blodgett-Ford Visiting Professor, University of Turin Boston College Law School Affiliate, Whitaker Institute, NUI, Galway USA Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/philosophies/special issues/human enhancement technologies). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Volume Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-0365-0904-4 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-0365-0905-1 (PDF) Cover image courtesy of N. M. Ford. © 2021 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Herr Wants to Build a More Perfect Human
    strategy+business ISSUE 85 WINTER 2016 Hugh Herr Wants to Build a More Perfect Human At MIT’s Media Lab, an engineer and biophysicist — and double amputee — is designing prosthetics that connect body and brain. BY SALLY HELGESEN REPRINT 16410 feature innovation 1 AT MIT’S MEDIA LAB, AN ENGINEER AND BIOPHYSICIST — AND HUGHDOUBLE AMPUTEE — IS DESIGNING PROSTHETICS THAT CONNECT BODY AND HERR BRAIN BY SALLY HELGESEN feature WANTS innovation TO BUILD A MORE 2 PERFECT HUMAN Sally Helgesen [email protected] is an author, speaker, and leadership development consultant whose most recent book is The Female Vision: Women’s Real Power at Work (with Julie Johnson; Berrett- Koehler, 2010). Hugh Herr sits at a table in his austere glass office we have to ask ourselves now is: What would be more in the famous Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute useful here, skin or polymer? Fit, function, comfort, and feature of Technology, scrolling through images of a striking aesthetics will dictate our decisions.” fashion model born without a right forearm. As head of A computer scientist, mechanical engineer, and biomechatronics research at MIT and one of the world’s biophysicist, Herr is himself a double amputee. And innovation leading developers of wearable robotics, Herr is making his immersion in robotics was initially driven by a per- a point about how disability is becoming obsolete as the sonal quest to develop superior prosthetics. By analyz- boundary between humans and robots vanishes. ing human motion, studying how electronic devices The model, Rebekah Marine, strikes a pose on the interface with the nervous system, and using live mus- runway.
    [Show full text]
  • ÉDITION Unexpected Sourcesusievents.Com of Inspiration François HISQUIN Président & Curateur D'usi
    ÉDITION Unexpected Sourcesusievents.com of Inspiration François HISQUIN Président & Curateur d'USI VERS UNE SOCIÉTÉ INCLUSIVE, RÉSILIENTE ET ÉCORESPONSABLE Il y a 12 ans, en lançant la première conférence USI, nous avions la conviction que l’IT jouerait un rôle fondamental dans la transformation de nos Sociétés. Nos convictions n’ont pas changé. Résolument visionnaires, nous souhaitons offrir à tous une conférence novatrice et singulière, pour explorer, challenger et questionner les grands enjeux de notre avenir. Au service, dans un premier temps, d’un développement purement économique, les technologies sont aujourd’hui présentes dans toutes les strates de la société et nous poussent à redéfinir nos pratiques, nos valeurs et notre responsabilité. Face à l’immensité des enjeux, le seul objectif qui vaille, celui d’une société inclusive, résiliente, écoresponsable et offrant à tous une meilleure qualité de vie, ne pourra être atteint qu’en mobilisant toutes les ressources possibles. Les technologies sont souvent tenues comme grandes responsables de nos maux, mais ne renferment-elles pas une partie de la solution ? USI décrypte les transformations sociétales au sens large en conviant des visionnaires engagés. Philosophes, chercheurs, experts en cybersécurité, économistes, sociologues, scientifiques, éthologues, ou encore astrophysiciens... Tous ont choisi USI pour nous aider à donner du sens à nos transformations. Donner du sens, mais aussi du temps. Laisser la part belle à la créativité et à la réflexion, avant de passer à l’action. Car agir,
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of Living Machines
    THE AGE OF LIVING MACHINES HOW BIOLOGY WILL BUILD THE NEXT TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION SUSAN HOCKFIELD W. W. NORTON & COMPANY Independent Publishers Since 1923 New York | London TO TOM AND ELIZABETH, FOR THEIR CONSTANT PATIENCE, WISDOM, AND LOVE. CONTENTS Prologue 1 WHERE THE FUTURE COMES FROM 2 CAN BIOLOGY BUILD A BETTER BATTERY? 3 WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE 4 CANCER-FIGHTING NANOPARTICLES 5 AMPLIFYING THE BRAIN 6 FEEDING THE WORLD 7 CHEATING MALTHUS, ONCE AGAIN: Making Convergence Happen Faster Acknowledgments Notes Index PROLOGUE For the last couple of decades, as a dean and then provost at Yale, and then as president and now president emerita of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), I’ve had the privilege of looking over the scientific horizon, and what I’ve seen is breathtaking. Ingenious and powerful biologically based tools are coming our way: viruses that can self-assemble into batteries, proteins that can clean water, nanoparticles that can detect and knock out cancer, prosthetic limbs that can read minds, computer systems that can increase crop yield. These new technologies may sound like science fiction, but they are not. Many of them are already well along in their development, and each of them has emerged from the same source: a revolutionary convergence of biology and engineering. This book tells the story of that convergence—of remarkable scientific discoveries that bring two largely divergent paths together and of the pathbreaking researchers who are using this convergence to invent tools and technologies that will transform how we will live in the coming century. We need new tools and technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Annual Report 2017 of the Christian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function
    CD- Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function Annual Report 2017 Annual Report 2017 of the Christian Doppler Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function Report Authors: Oskar C. Aszmann, Clemens Gstöttner, Aron Cserveny Head and Address of the Christian Doppler Laboratory Prof. Dr. Oskar C. Aszmann Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Surgery Medical University of Vienna Spitalgasse 23 1090 Vienna, AUSTRIA Phone: +43 1 40400 69940 / 68290 Fax: +43 1 40400 69820 Email: [email protected] Web: www.bionicreconstruction.com Table of Contents Introduction 5 Press Highlights 2017 7 2017 – A Year in Numbers 8 Vienna – Bionic Capital of Europe 10 Projects Overview 12 Scientific Output 20 Funding 29 Awards & Scholarships 30 Cooperations 32 Teaching & Public Relations 34 Impressions of a Great Year 36 People 38 2018 – An Outlook 48 Annex – Projects in Detail 50 Introduction 2017 has been the sixth year since the inauguration of the With her special gift of writing she has compiled their CD-Laboratory for Restoration of Extremity Function. The amazing stories in our textbook “Bionische Rekonstruk- foundations have been laid out wide and well providing a tion – Wieder herstellung an der Grenze zwischen Mensch solid structure for the current tasks and future growth. In und Maschine”, which will be published by the Manz Verlag the life-cycle of the Lab we have reached a plateau and in March 2018. The psychological dimension of losing bodily steady-state both in regards to the number of PhD students integrity and finding restoration in mechatronic parts has and projects that are under way.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Herr Press Release
    EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE Contacts: Jon Newman SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 (804) 788-1414 Russ Martz (412) 497-5775 Biomechatronics Pioneer Honored with $250,000 Heinz Award for Technology, the Economy and Employment Dr. Hugh Herr recognized for breakthrough innovations in prosthetics and orthotics PITTSBURGH, September 12, 2007 – A double amputee whose trailblazing work in the emerging field of biomechatronics has led to the development of new prosthetic innovations that merge body and machine has been selected to receive the 13th annual Heinz Award for Technology, the Economy and Employment, among the largest individual achievement prizes in the world. Dr. Hugh Herr, 43, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Media Lab whose advances in prosthetics and orthotics – technology that marries robotics and human biomechanics – have given greater mobility and new hope to those with physical disabilities, is among six distinguished Americans selected to receive one of the $250,000 awards, presented in five categories by the Heinz Family Foundation. “Everything about Dr. Herr is an expression of the triumph of the human spirit over adversity,” said Teresa Heinz, chairman of the Heinz Family Foundation. “His breakthrough advances in rehabilitation technologies are immeasurably improving the quality of life for thousands of people with physical challenges, but for him, every breakthrough is just an invitation to push harder and do more. Accomplished yet modest, determined yet good natured, he approaches his work with great skill and great wonder. Both his life and his inventions demonstrate what an unbeatable combination that is.” - more - Page 2 of 5 – Heinz Awards, Technology, the Economy and Employment With more than 36,000 new amputees in the United States every year – including hundreds of American soldiers who have lost limbs in the War in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001 – Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT 150 | Hugh Herr SM '93
    MIT 150 | Hugh Herr SM '93 INTERVIEWER: Today is November 16, 2015. I'm Barbara Seidl. And as part of MIT's Infinite History Project, we're speaking with Professor Hugh Herr. Professor Herr heads the Biomechatronics Research Group at the MIT Media Lab, is associate professor of media arts and science at MIT, and associate professor at the Harvard MIT division of Health Sciences and Technology. His revolutionary work in the emerging field of biomechatronics focuses on developing physically assistive technologies that are intimate extensions of the human body. A double amputee himself, he's hailed as the leader of the bionic age for his breakthrough advances in bionic limbs that emulate the function of natural limbs, and for challenging us to rethink the meaning of disability and the potentials of human augmentation. Professor Herr, thank you so much-- HERR: Thank you. INTERVIEWER: --for speaking with us today. So it's well known that you are a prodigious climber, and have been since a very young age. And I wonder if you would take us back to growing up in rural Pennsylvania, and what it was that got you started in climbing-- got you started to being the person you are now. HERR: My parents were adventurous, and that led the family every summer to going on extended road trips across North America, often three-month trips out to California and then into Canada and to Alaska, often. And in those trips we would hike and canoe and fish. And the adventure became more and more pronounced. And the walls became steeper and steeper.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncertain Bioethics
    Uncertain Bioethics “Stephen Napier argues with verve and subtlety for a cautious and restrained approach to acts of killing in bioethics; central to his argu- ment is the difficulty of being sure that active interventions are per- missible. This book intriguingly combines insights from a wide variety of different recent philosophical literatures to offer an important and interesting contribution to numerous current debates.” Sophie-Grace Chappell, Professor of Philosophy at Open University, UK Bioethics is a field of inquiry and as such is fundamentally an epistemic discipline. Knowing how we make moral judgments can bring into relief why certain arguments on various bioethical issues appear plausible to one side and obviously false to the other. Uncertain Bioethics makes a significant and distinctive contribution to the bioethics literature by culling the insights from contemporary moral psychology to highlight the epistemic pitfalls and distorting influences on our apprehension of value. Stephen Napier also incorporates research from epistemology addressing pragmatic encroachment and the significance of peer disa- greement to justify what he refers to as epistemic diffidence when one is considering harming or killing human beings. Napier extends these developments to the traditional bioethical notion of dignity and argues that beliefs subject to epistemic diffidence should not be acted upon. He proceeds to apply this framework to traditional and developing issues in bioethics including abortion, stem cell research, euthanasia, decision- making for patients in a minimally conscious state, and risky research on competent human subjects. Stephen Napier is an associate professor of philosophy at Villanova University. His previous publications include Virtue Epistemology: Motivation and Knowledge, and he edited Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • Aaron M. Dollar Updated 1/6/20 15 Prospect St
    Aaron M. Dollar Updated 1/6/20 15 Prospect St. Becton 215 New Haven, CT 06511 Office - (203) 436-9122 [email protected] http://www.eng.yale.edu/grablab/ PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Yale University Professor (July 2019 - present) Associate Professor with Tenure (Jan. 2016-June 2019) John J. Lee Associate Professor on Term (Jan. 2014 – Dec. 2015) John J. Lee Assistant Professor (Oct. 2012 – Dec. 2013) Assistant Professor (Jan. 2009 – Oct. 2012) Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Rhode Island Research Associate, Without Compensation (WOC) (Fall 2011 – present) Brown University Visiting Professor (June 2014 – June 2015) Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (Host: Prof. Stephen Gatesy) Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy Visiting Professor (Jan. 2012 – July 2012) Biorobotics Institute (Host: Prof. Maria Chiara Carrozza) Massachusetts Institute of Technology Postdoctoral Associate (Dec. 2006 – Dec. 2008) Harvard/MIT Health Sciences and Technology and MIT Media Lab Research Advisor: Hugh Herr EDUCATION Harvard University Ph.D. Engineering Sciences (2007) S.M. Engineering Sciences (2002) Dissertation Title: “Design Principles for Robust Grasping in Unstructured Environments” Thesis Advisor: Robert D. Howe University of Massachusetts at Amherst B.S. Mechanical Engineering (2000) HONORS AND AWARDS Major Awards: UMass Amherst College of Engineering Outstanding Junior Alumni Award, Sept. 2016 NASA Early Career Faculty Award, July 2014 DARPA Young Faculty Award, July
    [Show full text]