DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI 14/03/18, 755 PM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI 14/03/18, 7�55 PM On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI 14/03/18, 7*55 PM HOME TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC FAITH MASS LOCATIONS PUBLICATIONS CMRI LINKS STORE PHOTOS CONTACT US CMRI Home > Article Index > Sedevacantist Position On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See By Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI Our conference on the vacancy of the Apostolic See, the sedevacantist position, is most important, for it is a theological position which is very misunderstood, often misrepresented, and emotionally difficult for many groups. But before we proceed on this topic, it is paramount to stress that it is because of our belief in the Papacy and in Papal Infallibility that we necessarily must reject Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI as legitimate Popes. Many accuse us of rejection of the papacy. That is furthermost from the truth. In our earlier conference, we made reference to the main errors of religious indifferentism, false ecumenism and religious liberty which have infected the Conciliar Church of Vatican II. It is for us to demonstrate that the true Catholic Church—the Pope and the Bishops in union with him—could not promulgate such errors to the universal Church, and that no true Pope could promulgate a defective liturgy (Novus Ordo Missae) and a sacrilegious law (1983 Code of Canon Law 844.3 and 4 Communion to non-Catholics). It is for us to demonstrate that men who promulgate heresy are heretics; and as such, they lose the authority in the Church Although we can consider many different aspects of our position with the papacy, it will be sufficient for us today to limit our studies to a few main premises upon which our conclusion (the vacancy) rests. The first premise to consider is the infallibility of the Catholic Church. What is this attribute of the Church? How does it provide clear and compelling evidence against Benedict XVI and the Conciliar Church? The attribute of infallibility means the inability and impossibility of the Teaching Magisterium to err when teaching the universal Church on matters of faith and morals. As Vatican Council I taught: “Moreover, by divine and Catholic faith everything must be believed that is contained in the written word of God or in tradition, and that is proposed by the Church as a divinely revealed object of belief either in a solemn decree or in Her ordinary, universal teaching.” The possessors of infallibility are: a) the Pope, (The Pope is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra). http://www.cmri.org/02-vacancy.html Page 1 of 10 On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI 14/03/18, 7*55 PM b) the whole Episcopate, (The totality of the Bishops in union with the Pope is infallible, when they, either assembled in general council or scattered over the earth, propose a teaching of faith or morals as one to be held by all the faithful). Many are familiar with the concept of infallibility in the “ex cathedra” pronouncements of the Pope and also in the decrees of an Ecumenical Council, but they are not familiar with the concept of the infallibility of “the ordinary, universal magisterium of the Church.” What is the ordinary, universal magisterium? For a clear and concise answer, we read in The Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, by Dr. Ludwig Ott: “The bishops exercise their infallible teaching power in an ordinary manner when they, in their dioceses, in moral unity with the Pope, unanimously promulgate the same teachings on faith and morals. The Vatican Council expressly declared that also the truths of Revelation proposed as such by the ordinary and general teaching office of the Church are to be firmly held with ‘divine and catholic faith’ (D 1792). But the incumbents of the ordinary and general teaching office of the Church are the members of the whole episcopate scattered over the whole earth. The agreement of the Bishops in doctrine may be determined from the catechisms issued by them, from their pastoral letters, from the prayer books approved by them, and from the resolutions of particular synods. A morally general agreement suffices, but in this the express or tacit assent of the Pope, as the supreme Head of the Episcopate, is essential.” Clearly, the Vatican II church, Benedict XVI (with his predecessors, John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, and John Paul II) and the Vatican II bishops have promulgated in their “ordinary and universal magisterium” the errors of religious liberty, false ecumenism and religious indifferentism. This has been the constant theme of the Conciliar Church for the last 40 years! And in particular, with the introduction of the Novus Ordo Missae and the sacrilegious Canon 844, 3 and 4, we find it an impossibility that a true pope could have officially enacted such an erroneous liturgy and legislation. When we consider the area of infallibility, we find the object of the Church’s infallibility is two-fold as described by Ludwig Ott in Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma: a) “The primary object of the Church’s infallibility is the formally revealed truths of Christian Doctrine concerning faith and morals. b) “The secondary object of the Church’s infallibility is truths of the Christian teaching on faith and morals, which are not formally revealed, but which are closely connected with the teaching of Revelation.” Included in the secondary object of infallibility are the following: 1. theological conclusions; 2. dogmatic facts; 3. the general discipline of the Church; 4. approval of religious orders; 5. canonization of saints. Why must these areas be objects of the Church’s infallibility? An excellent explanation is found in Christ’s Church, by Monsignor G. Van Noort, S.T.D.: “The charism of infallibility was bestowed upon the Church so that She could piously safeguard and confidently explain the deposit of Christian revelation, and thus could be in all ages the teacher of Christian truth and of the Christian way of life.” “It is evident from Christ’s promises that the magisterium, the teaching office of the Church, was endowed http://www.cmri.org/02-vacancy.html Page 2 of 10 On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI 14/03/18, 7*55 PM with infallibility so that She might be able to carry out her mission properly, that is, to safeguard reverently, explain confidently, and defend effectively the deposit of faith.” “The security of the deposit requires the effective warding off or elimination of all error which may be opposed to it, even though only indirectly. This would be simply impossible without infallibility in the matters listed above.” Here it would be well for us to focus on a further explanation of the secondary object of infallibility, in the area of the general discipline of the Church. Once again, let us read from Christ’s Church, by Van Noort: “The Church’s infallibility extends to the general discipline of the Church. This proposition is theologically certain. By the term ‘general discipline of the Church’ are meant those ecclesiastical laws passed for the universal Church for the direction of Christian worship and Christian living.” “The imposing of commands belongs not directly to the teaching office but to the ruling office; disciplinary laws are only indirectly an object of infallibility, i.e., only by reason of the doctrinal decision implicit in them. When the Church’s rulers sanction a law, they implicitly make a two-fold judgment: 1) ‘This law squares with the Church’s doctrine of faith and morals;’ that is, it imposes nothing that is at odds with sound belief and good morals. This amounts to a doctrinal decree.” Proof: “—From the purpose of infallibility. The Church was endowed with infallibility that it might safeguard the whole of Christ’s doctrine and be for all men a trustworthy teacher of the Christian way of life. But if the Church could make a mistake in the manner alleged when it legislated for the general discipline, it would no longer be either a loyal guardian of revealed doctrine or a trustworthy teacher of the Christian way of life. It would not be a guardian of revealed doctrine, for the imposition of a vicious law would be, for all practical purposes, tantamount to an erroneous definition of doctrine; everyone would naturally conclude that what the Church had commanded squared with sound doctrine. It would not be a teacher of the Christian way of life, for by its laws it would induce corruption into the practice of religious life. —From the official statement of the church, which stigmatized as ‘at least erroneous’ the hypothesis that the ‘church could establish discipline which would be dangerous, harmful, and conducive to superstition and materialism.’” “The well-known axiom,Lex orandi est lex credendi(The law of prayer is the law of belief), is a special application of the doctrine of the Church’s infallibility in disciplinary matters. This axiom says in effect that formulae of prayer approved for public use in the universal Church cannot contain errors against faith or morals.” How could the Catholic Church continuously renew the unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary in the Holy Mass and then abruptly substitute it with a Lutheran ”memorial of the Last Supper?” How could the Catholic Church so firmly legislate in her laws against interfaith and intercommunion, as fostering religious indifferentism, and then suddenly abrogate these laws and permit these undertakings? Are we to suppose that the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of Truth, has suddenly changed His mind and allowed contradictions in matters of the Faith, the Mass and her universal laws? Are we to suppose that Christ suddenly abandoned His Church and let her fall into error and heresy> Yet, it is primarily this issue of infallibility that divides those who call themselves traditional Catholics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Catholic Reformation 1545
    10$ THE CATHOLIC REFORMATION $ 1545 - 1648AD In this article, we will look at: Hadrian (1459-1523), sometimes called Adrian, succeeds Pope Leo X. He is a respected scholar and • Catholic reform prior to the Council of Trent former teacher of Erasmus. This Dutchman is the • Council of Trent last non-Italian pope until the election of John Paul II • Implementing the Council in 1978. He is in Spain when elected pope. But • The Jesuits before leaving for Rome, he writes a stern letter to • Catholic mystics and activists the College of Cardinals stating that he is coming not to celebrate with them but to chastise and correct • Enduring legacy of Trent them. He also writes to secular leaders throughout There is no doubt that the Catholic Church is in dire the Empire, criticizing them for creating a culture need of reform when Martin Luther posts his Ninety- prone to clerical corruption. Five Theses on the door of the church in Wittenberg in 1517. Many of the popes and other church leaders In one such letter to a Prince, Hadrian said: “All of lead scandalous lives and neglect the pastoral care of us, prelates and clergy, have turned aside from the their people. road of righteousness and for a long time now there has been not even one who did good…. You must Having said that, some people within the Church try therefore promise in our name that we intend to exert to bring reform. Cardinal de Cisneros, a Catholic ourselves so that, first of all, the Roman Curia, from leader in Spain from 1495 to1517, brings about many which perhaps all this evil took its start, may be reforms in his country, which is the main reason improved.
    [Show full text]
  • XVII. Other XVI Century Developments A. Anabaptism 1. Defined And
    XVII. Other XVI Century Developments A. Anabaptism 1. Defined and described a. “baptize again” = believer’s baptism b. classed as “Radical Reformation” = Restitutionists vs. Reformers c. most representatives were very pious 1) Bible only; many reject theology and the fathers 2) took names “Brethren” or “Christians” 3) Christians should have no part in civil government 4) rejected state church 5) many were post-mil chiliasts; some were Socinian 2. Fanaticism a. Melchior Hoffmann in Strasbourg from 1522-1548 declares it the New Jerusalem b. Munster fiasco (ca. 1534-1536) 1) Jan Mathys a) self-proclaimed “reincarnated Enoch” to usher in the Kingdom of God b) opponents purged from New Jerusalem c) community of goods instituted 2) Jan of Leyden a) self-crowned “King David” after Mathys killed during siege b) appointed 12 apostles c) polygamy promoted 3) Lutherans and RCs unite in conquest 4) black eye for Anabaptists c. Menno Simons (1496-1561) 1) Dutch RC priest converted by Luther’s writings a) evolved into Anabaptist b) active in Holland and N. Germany 2) wrote vs. Protestants and radical Anabaptists like Jan of Leyden 3) ideas of the Mennonites a) community of believers b) non-violence and non-resistance; pacifism c) distrust of learning & dogma d) footwashing 4) spread a) before 1700 to Poland and Russia and Switzerland b) after 1700, many Swiss Mennonites to N. America 10.1 * B. Counter-reformation 1. early attitude of the papacy a. popes not the main force behind RC reforms b. significant popes 1) Paul III (1534-1549) 1540 - approved Jesuits 1542 - initiated Roman Inquisition 1545 - presided at opening session of Trent 2) Paul IV [Cardinal Caraffa] (1555-1559) a) unwilling to make concessions to Protestants b) nepotism is somewhat curbed 3) Pius IV eradicates all nepotism c.
    [Show full text]
  • AP European History Trouble in the Church • Babylonian Captivity – 1309-78 • Great Schism – 1378-1417
    The Reformation AP European History Trouble in the Church • Babylonian Captivity – 1309-78 • Great Schism – 1378-1417 Clement VII Leo X w/ Giulio Seven Sacraments • Baptism – takes away Original Sin • Confirmation – receive Holy Ghost • Holy Eucharist – Body / Blood of Christ • Penance – confession; takes away sin • Extreme Unction – prepares you for death • Holy Orders – preparation for priesthood • Matrimony – marriage; obey God’s law Signs of Disorder •What are some of the problems in the Church? Thomas a Kempis John Wyclif (1328-1384) John Hus (1369-1415) Martin Luther (1483-1546) Pope Leo X • Grants permission to Archbishop of Magdeberg, Albert, to sell indulgences John Tetzel Indulgences Tetzel and Indulgence Box Actual Letter of Indulgence 95 Thesis - Wittenberg Charles V Holy Roman Empire • Eventually becomes an aristocratic federation of seven electors • Archbishops of Mainz, Trier, Cologne • Margrave of Brandenburg • Duke of Saxony • Count Palatine of the Rhine • King of Bohemia Duke Frederick of Saxony Edict of Worms • Diet of Worms – Jan. through April 1521 – Presided by Charles V – Frederick III, Elector of Saxony offers protection • Edict of Worms – May 1521 states: – Luther = outlaw, heretic and banned all of his literature – Open season to kill Luther (without legal consequence) Katharina von Bora Luther’s Four Questions • How is a person to be saved? • Where does religious authority reside? • What is the Church? • What is the highest form of Christian life? Luther’s Sacraments • Baptism • Holy Eucharist Social Impact of
    [Show full text]
  • India- Holy See Relations Diplomatic Relations Between India and The
    India- Holy See relations Diplomatic relations between India and the Holy See were established soon after India’s independence. India’s Ambassador in Berne, Switzerland, has traditionally been accredited to the Holy See which maintains a Nunciature (Embassy) in New Delhi, presently headed by a Nuncio (Ambassador). 2. India has the second largest Catholic population in Asia which also including those from Kerala dating from Apostolic times. With a shortage of priests and nuns from developed countries, a large number of Indians have joined various Roman Catholic Orders and a number of them have started occupying high positions within the Catholic Church institutions including those in Rome. India and Indians have a positive image in the Catholic community. 3. Although the strength of the Christian (and hence the Catholic) community forms only a small proportion of India’s population, the Holy See has always acknowledged the importance of India, both in global and Asian terms. There have been three Papal visits to India so far. The first Pope to visit India was Pope Paul IV, who came to Bombay in 1964 to attend the International Eucharistic Congress. Pope John Paul II visited India in February 1986 and November 1999. During his latter visit, he met the President, Vice President, Prime Minister and EAM. He participated in the concluding session of Synod of Bishops of Asia at which he signed and released post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation. 4. Several Indian dignitaries have, from time to time, called on the Pope in the Vatican. These have included the late Smt. Indira Gandhi in 1981 and Shri I.K.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to the CREEDS I\N INTRODUCTION to the CREEDS
    AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CREEDS i\N INTRODUCTION TO THE CREEDS AND TO THE TE DEUM BY A. E. BURN, B.D. TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE RECTOR OF KVNNERSLEV, WELLINGTON, SALOP EXAMINING CHAPLAIN TO THE LORD BISHOP OF LICHFIELD METHUEN & CO. 36 ESSEX STREET, W.C. LONDON 1899 PREFACE --+- THE following Introduction to the Creeds· and to the Early History of the Te Deum has been designed, in the first instance, for the use of students reading for the Cambridge Theological Tripos. I have edited all the Creed-forms set for that examination, with the exception of three lengthy formularies, which belong rather to a history of doctrine than to my present subject. These are-the letter of Cyril to N estorius, the letter of Leo to Flavian, and the Definition of the Council of Chalcedon. At the same time, I hope that the book may be useful to a wider circle of readers-to clergy and candidates for Holy Orders. The subject is of supreme importance to all teachers of Church doctrine ; and the only excuse for adding to the number of books which already deal with it, is the desire to enable others to gather the first-fruits of many writers and of recent researches in England and abroad. During the past three years I have had the privilege, with the aid of the Managers of the Hort Memorial Fund at Cambridge, of visiting many libraries to collate MSS., and have endeavoured to make good use of the opportunities so kindly offered. In 1896 I visited Leiden, Cologne, Wiirzburg, Munich, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Eye of the Dragon: an Examination of the Artistic Patronage of Pope Gregory XIII (1572-1585)
    Through the eye of the Dragon: An Examination of the Artistic Patronage of Pope Gregory XIII (1572-1585). Vol.1 Title of Degree: PhD Date of Submission: August 2019 Name: Jacqueline Christine Carey I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other University and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. For Sadie and Lilly Summary This subject of this thesis is the artistic patronage of Pope Gregory XIII (1572-1585). It examines the contribution of the individual patron to his patronage with a view to providing a more intense reading of his artistic programmes. This approach is derived from the individual interests, influences, and ambitions of Gregory XIII. It contrasts with periodization approaches that employ ‘Counter Reformation’ ideas to interpret his patronage. This thesis uses archival materials, contemporaneous primary sources, modern specialist literature, and multi-disciplinary sources in combination with a visual and iconographic analysis of Gregory XIII’s artistic programmes to develop and understanding of its subject. Chapter one examines the efficacy and impact of employing a ‘Counter-Reformation’ approach to interpret Gregory XIII’s artistic patronage. It finds this approach to be too general, ill defined, and reductionist to provide an intense reading of his artistic programmes. Chapter two explores the antecedent influences that determined Gregory XIII’s approach to his papal patronage and an overview of this patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditionalists, Infallibility and the Pope (1995, 2006)
    Traditionalists, Infallibility and the Pope (1995, 2006) by Rev. Anthony Cekada The very men who appear to possess authority in the Church teach errors and impose harmful laws. How reconcile this with infallibility? IF YOU NOW assist regularly at the traditional Latin Mass, it is because you concluded at some point that the old Mass and doc- trines were Catholic and good, while the new Mass and modern teachings, somehow, were not. But (like me) you probably had some initial worries: What if the traditional Mass I go to is not approved by the diocese? Am I defying the legitimate authority in the Church? Am I disobeying the pope? This is the “authority issue,” and it seems to present a real dilemma. The Church teaches that the pope is infallible in faith and morals. Good Catholics, moreover, obey the laws of the pope and the hierarchy. Bad Catholics pick and choose what laws they want to obey. Yet at the same time, the very men who would appear to possess authority in the hierarchy command us to accept doctrines and a Mass which harm the faith or have other disastrous effects. What is a Catholic to do? Why Reject the Changes? In order to solve the dilemma, we should begin by con- sidering what drove us out of our Vatican II parishes in the first place. In most cases, it was either contradiction of established Catholic teaching or irreverence in worship. In other words, we instantly recognized some element of the new religion to be ei- ther a doctrinal error or an evil.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRIAL of GALILEO-REVISITED Dr
    THE TRIAL OF GALILEO-REVISITED Dr. George DeRise Professor Emeritus, Mathematics Thomas Nelson Community College FALL 2018 Mon 1:30 PM- 3:30 PM, 6 sessions 10/22/2018 - 12/3/2018 (Class skip date 11/19) Sadler Center, Commonwealth Auditorium Christopher Wren Association BOOKS: THE TRIAL OF GALILEO, 1612-1633: Thomas F. Mayer. (Required) THE CASE FOR GALILEO- A CLOSED QUESTION? Fantoli, Annibale. GALILEO; THE RISE AND FALL OF A TROUBLESOME GENIUS. Shea, William; Artigas, Mariano. BASIC ONLINE SOURCES: Just Google: “Galileo” and “Galileo Affair” (WIKI) “Galileo Project” and “Trial of Galileo-Famous Trials” YOUTUBE MOVIES: Just Google: “GALILEO'S BATTLE FOR THE HEAVENS – NOVA – YOUTUBE” “GREAT BOOKS, GALILEO’S DIALOGUE – YOUTUBE” HANDOUTS: GLOSSARY CAST OF CHARACTERS BLUE DOCUMENTS GALILEO GALILEI: b. 1564 in Pisa, Italy Astronomer, Physicist, Mathematician Professor of Mathematics, Universities of Pisa and Padua. In 1610 he observed the heavens with the newly invented telescope- mountains and craters of the moon, moons of Jupiter, many stars never seen before; later the phases of Venus; sunspots. These observations supported his belief that the Copernican (Heliocentric) system was correct, i.e. that the Sun was the center of the Universe; the planets including earth revolved around it. This was in direct contrast to the Ptolemaic-Aristotelian (Geocentric) System which was 1500 years old at the time. Galileo’s Copernican view was also in conflict with the Christian interpretation of Holy Scripture. Because of the Counter Reformation Catholic theologians took a literal interpretation of the Bible. Galileo was investigated by the Inquisition in 1615 and warned not to defend the Copernican view.
    [Show full text]
  • India- Holy See Relations Diplomatic Relations Between India and The
    India- Holy See Relations Diplomatic relations between India and the Holy See were established soon after India’s independence. India’s Ambassador in Berne, Switzerland, has traditionally been accredited to the Holy See which maintains a Nunciature (Embassy) in New Delhi, presently headed by a Nuncio (Ambassador). India has the second largest Catholic population in Asia including those from Kerala dating from Apostolic times. With a shortage of priests and nuns from developed countries, a large number of Indians have joined various Roman Catholic Orders and a number of them have started occupying high positions within the Catholic Church institutions including those in Rome. India and Indians have a positive image in the Catholic community. Although the strength of the Christian (and hence the Catholic) community forms only a small proportion of India’s population, the Holy See has always acknowledged the importance of India, both in global and Asian terms. There have been three Papal visits to India so far. The first Pope to visit India was Pope Paul IV, who visited Mumbai in 1964 to attend the International Eucharistic Congress. Pope John Paul II visited India in February 1986 and November 1999. He participated in the concluding session of Synod of Bishops of Asia at which he signed and released post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation. HH Pope Francis, the 76- year-old Jorge Mario Bergoglio from Argentina was elected as Supreme Pontiff on 13th March 2013. In December 2013, H.E. Archbishop Parolin was inaugurated as the new Secretary of State of the Holy See in place of H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Tudor Conciliar Theorists
    Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 9-1975 Tudor Conciliar Theorists Daniel E. Mitchel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Mitchel, Daniel E., "Tudor Conciliar Theorists" (1975). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 1074. https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/1074 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract TUDOR CONCILIAR THEORISTS I by Daniel E. Mitchel This thesis ~nalyzes a variety of sources such as printed books, diplomatic correspondence, letters, and notes, from which a description of Tudor ideas in relation to proposals to hold a general council can be derived. This Tudor Conciliar Theory has a definite beginning. Henry VII I developed a.flexible foreign policy to deal with continental suggestions to hold a general council of the church. The position which he took was that the English nation was not opposed to such a gathering, but on every occasion, matters of detail were used to block English participation. While these procedural details kept Henry from participating, a second 11wal1 11 of defense was raised: Henrician propagandists insisted that the princes of Christendom, not the pope, should be instrumental in calling a council into session.
    [Show full text]
  • The True and False Infallibility of the Popes, Will Speedily Appear in an English Translation, I Refrain from Doing So
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. http://books.google.com THE TRUE AND THE FALSE Infallibility of iThe Popes. A CONTROVERSIAL REPLY TO DR. SCHULTE. ST Dr. JOSEPH JFESSLER, Late Bishop of St. Fatten, in Awtria, and Secretary- General of the Vatican Council. A Work honoured by a Brief of Approbation from His Holiness Pope Pius IX. ftnuMlatcfe from fyc ttltfrt Coition VY PERMISSION OF THE EDITORS OP THE LATE BISHOP FESSLER'S WORKS. New York : THE CATHOLIC PUBLICATION SOCIETY, No. 9 WARREN STREET. i875- THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CONTENTS. I. True and False Infallibility.— Fessler. II. Mr. Gladstone's Expostulation Unravelled. — Bishop Ullathorne. Submission to a Divine Teacher. — Bishop Vaughan. Syllabus for the People. JSx trad from a Brief addressed to Bishop Fessler by his Holiness Pope Pius IX. April vj, 1871. ' . Peropportunum autem et utilissimum existimavimus retudisse te audaciam Professoris Schulte incitantis saeculares Potestates ad- versus dogma Pontificiae infallibilitatis ab cecumenica Vaticana Syno- do definitae. Non omnes enim, inter laicos praesertim, rei indolem perspectam habent ; et Veritas luculenter exposita multas abigere so- let ab honestorum mentibus obliquas opiniones, saepe cum lacle haustas, aliosque confirmare in recta sententia et adversus insidias munire. Quamobrem si hujusmodi commenta refellere pergas, op- time certe merebis de sanctissima religione nostri. et Christiano po- pulo, quem, uti bonus Pastor, a venenatis pascuis abduces. Pergra- tum Nos tibi profitemur animum, cum ob volumen oblatum, turn ob amantissimas litteras tuas ; tibique amplam apprecamur obsequii de- votionisque tuae mercedem ' Translation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1B Anthropology [PDF]
    B. ANTHROPOLOGY In this part of dogmatics we treat of 1. Man's present abode. 2. Man's nature. 3. Image of God. 4. Fall of man. 5. Sin. 1. Man's Present Abode I. The universe was created by God in the beginning to be the home of man. 1. The Creator is God, particularly the Father. a) God, the Triune God, is the Creator. Gn 1:1-2:3 Note: Gn 2:4-25 is not a second account of creation but a chapter of the world's history following creation. References in it to creation must be understood in the light of chapter 1. Phillip Hefner: A number of scholars have classified the myths of creation in the world’s religions. Charles Long, for example, has provided five different categories of such myths: emergence myths, world-parent myths, myths of creation from chaos and from the cosmic egg, creation from nothing, and earth- diver myths. Within the creation-from-nothing classification, he gathers the following: the Australian myth of the Great Father, Hesiod, Rig Veda, the ancient Maya myth from the Popol Vuh, and myths from Polynesia, the Maori, the Tuamotua, the Egyptians, and the Zuni- in addition to the Hebrew myth from Genesis…. Scholars are nearly unanimous that Genesis 1-11 is put together from several literary accounts. The one called “J” begins with Gen 2:4 and continues off and on through chapter 11. The other called “P” begins with the first chapter (Braaten/Jenson, Christian Dogmatics, I, p 277-278, 280). _____ 2 Kings 19:15 Hezekiah prayed to the LORD: “O LORD, God of Israel, enthroned between the cherubim, you alone are God over all the kingdoms of the earth.
    [Show full text]