DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Services Advisory Council Minutes of April 19, 2019 Meeting Transit Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Services Advisory Council Minutes of April 19, 2019 Meeting Transit Services Transportation Services Advisory Council Minutes of April 19, 2019 Meeting TransIT Services Members/Ex-Officio Present: Michael Levengood, Neil Fay, Dianne Lewis, Jaime McKay, Chris Hashemzadeh, Alderman Kelly Russell, Tim Davis, Sharon Suarez, Gunnar Pedersen, Ron Burns, and Nancy Norris. Staff and Guests: Kandese Holford, Darren Bean, Shayne Boucher, Roman Steichen, Joe Ortega, and Kendall Tiffany. Call to Order: Nancy Norris called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. Introductions: Attendees introduced themselves to the group. Approval of Minutes: The minutes from January’s meeting were not approved as there was no quorum. Elected Officials Report: Alderman Russell reported that The City of Frederick sent letters of support to the Maryland Legislature for transportation-related bills and all of those bills passed. Alderman Russell stated that one bill concerned the definition of electric low speed scooters so they can be regulated. Other bills related to defining three tiers of e-bikes based on the power and wattage of the bicycle, consistent State compliance with traffic calming devices in order to assist local agencies, and an amendment to the Complete Streets policy that will require criteria be included to provide access to healthy food and necessities. Old Business: • Golden Mile Transportation Alternatives Grant: Tim Davis provided an overview of the Golden Mile Multimodel Access Plan for members. Tim reported that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) will be presented to the Mayor and Board of Alderman on June 6 for signature; and once complete, the procurement process for design/engineering to perform the work can begin. • East Street Transportation Alternatives Grant: Tim Davis reported that the grant request is for final design funding from East Street at Family Meal Restaurant to Wormans Mill. Tim reported that below MD 26 the trail is a shared-use path in the railroad right-of-way; and above MD 26, the trail is adjacent to the Walkersville Southern railroad. The two will run together similar to the Rail Trail in Western Maryland. Tim said, to date, the MOU for this project has not been received. • Monocacy Boulevard Central Section: Tim Davis reported that work on the project is continuing and the road will open on /about August 1. However, landscaping and other work will continue. • Olli Update: Tim Davis provided an overview of the Olli autonomous vehicle for members. Tim reported that Local Motors was holding a contest for interested parties who would like to have an Olli demonstration. A company in Northern Virginia was selected as the winner in our region. • Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) CIP Recommendations: Tim Davis reported that The City of Frederick’s BPAC made its recommendations to the Board last September, including a budget item to continue with the installation of bicycle friendly grates throughout The City of Frederick. The City of Frederick’s Sewer Department will replace grates as time is available. The crew works from a list of grates needing replacement that are on bicycle routes or heavily traveled bicycle areas. The BPAC also recommended to maintain the level of funding for ADA improvements at intersections and corridors as well as $100,000 for sidewalk retrofits, with the number one location being Butterfly Lane at the new elementary school. The BPAC also recommended the funding of the design for the Carroll Creek shared used path. New Business: • Airport Runway Extension Project: Tim Davis reported that The City of Frederick has removed eleven buildings to allow for the extension of the airport runway. Tim stated that the area for the extension has been prepared and work is to begin this year. When work is complete, the runway wall be 5,880 feet long. The extended runway will allow jets to use and be based at the airport, providing a large revenue source. • Weekend MARC Rail Service To/From DC: Ron Burns reported that MTA has been running weekend MARC service on the Penn Line for nearly ten years and it has been very popular. Ron stated that he believes the Brunswick Line to the DC area would be just as successful. Ron recommend that TSAC become more proactive politically and by requesting technical analysis on ridership estimates from MTA. Ron said that the County had also suggested selecting a weekend to run the trains with the County paying the subsidy, which was approximately $6,000 a few years ago. Ron requested TSAC’s written support to start a more proactive approach with the State Delegation and to get feedback from MTA on how to present the idea. Nancy requested Jaime McKay research what current costs for weekend service would be. Jaime stated that since MTA’s Long Range Plan regarding MARC is being published shortly, the best option would be to invite the MARC Chief Transportation Officer, Dave Johnson, to attend or call into a TSAC Meeting to provide an update. Jaime reported that MTA is investigating reverse service on the 515 commuter bus. The MTA contractor will change on or about November 1st, and the 515 will shift to provide service to the North Frederick Park and Ride. Jaime offered to share ridership information with TransIT. Nancy Norris stated that TransIT would arrange for public service announcements regarding the new service for the North Frederick Park and Ride. Jaime suggested that TransIT contact James Authenreath, MTA Commuter Bus, to coordinate the announcements. Nancy requested that Jaime assist in scheduling a meeting with MARC. Jaime stated since it may prove difficult to schedule MARC to attend a TSAC Meeting, it may be more productive to schedule a conference call. Sharon Suarez suggested scheduling a TSAC Meeting at an alternate time to make it easier for all concerned to attend. • Pedestrian Bus Landing Retrofit Grant: Ron Burns reported he received notification from DPW that it is looking for federal grant funding to achieve mandated countywide ADA compliance. However, DPW did not want to combine/pursue transit access grants. Ron stated that he had reported previously to TSAC on the crosswalk at Guilford Road and Rt. 85; and as in that location, he and Joe Kelley were going to identify each transit stop in the County and its challenges, i.e., ADA compliance and pedestrian access, as with the sidewalk retrofit program. Since Joe Kelley only works part-time, they will be awarding the inventory work to a consultant on July 1st. Jaime McKay stated that MTA completed a full inventory of all of its bus stops and gave them a 0-7 ADA compliance rating, recommended specific actions for top offenders, and is asking jurisdictions to apply for State funding through the Statewide Innovations Grant to upgrade them. Jaime said there is no reason why MTA could not do the same here in Frederick. Jaime stated she would share the MTA model information with Frederick County to use best practices to begin work. Jaime stated there is $1.5 million available in FY20. The grant application period closes on June 26, 2019. Ron Burns asked Jaime to send him the link to the grant application. Planning Commission Update: Sharon Suarez reported that The Livable Frederick Comprehensive Plan for Frederick County is approaching Planning Commission approval. Sharon reported that the Plan has been under development for approximately 2-1/2 years and included meetings with various groups and organizations. The Plan has been under Planning Commission review for the last six months. Following the Planning Commission’s approval, the next step is for the Planning Commission to recommend presenting the Plan to the County Council. If the County Council does not act upon it within 90 days, the Plan will become law as it is. However, although the County Council can make recommendations, it cannot make any substantive changes to the Plan. Following review by the Council, the Planning Commission will begin working on small area plans. Sharon stated that the role of TransIT in linking communities is large. The Planning Commission is looking for the City of Frederick and all its communities to have increased transit access to work and shopping as well as mass transit opportunities. Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) Update: Jaime McKay reported that MTA recently completed an inclusive transportation planning program that demonstrated how to incorporate the needs of people with disabilities and older adults into the preliminary planning process. MTA is be glad to share this information with local jurisdictions. The program was funded by the Administration for Community Living through a program called Transit Planning for All. MTA has received second year funding for the program and will hold its first meeting next week. Jaime reported that the North Frederick Park and Ride will have a new contract on or about November 1st. Jaime reported that the State sent out letters of intent to award medium duty bus contracts which hasn’t been done in ten years. Once the contracts are approved by the Board of Public Works, local jurisdictions can order medium duty buses. Jaime stated that 5310 (Human Service agencies for vehicles) funding will be awarded in middle to late June along with job access reverse commute grants. Jaime reported that George Fabula, Office of Real Estate, who was handling transit-oriented development at Monocacy Station is retiring next Tuesday and Matt Lattin will be replacing him. SHA Update: Kandese Holford reported that SHA is updating its bicycle map and has a new Bicycle-Pedestrian (Bike-Ped) Coordinator, John Mayer. Kandese stated SHA hopes that the new map will function as a better route finding tool and as a way to showcase some locally designated routes. John is working with local jurisdictions to incorporate local routes into the map. If jurisdictions have any updated information they would like to share, please forward it to Kandese.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CSX Baltimore Division Timetable
    NORTHERN REGION BALTIMORE DIVISION TIMETABLE NO. 4 EFFECTIVE SATURDAY, JANUARY 1, 2005 AT 0001 HOURS CSX STANDARD TIME C. M. Sanborn Division Manager BALTIMORE DIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DESCRIPTION PAGE INST DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 Instructions Relating to CSX Operating Table of Contents Rules Timetable Legend 2 Instructions Relating to Safety Rules Legend – Sample Subdivision 3 Instructions Relating to Company Policies Region and Division Officers And Procedures Emergency Telephone Numbers 4 Instructions Relating to Equipment Train Dispatchers Handling Rules 5 Instructions Relating to Air Brake and Train SUBDIVISIONS Handling Rules 6 Instructions Relating to Equipment NAME CODE DISP PAGE Restrictions Baltimore Terminal BZ AV 7 Miscellaneous Bergen BG NJ Capital WS AU Cumberland CU CM Cumberland Terminal C3 CM Hanover HV AV Harrisburg HR NI Herbert HB NI Keystone MH CM Landover L0 NI Lurgan LR AV Metropolitan ME AU Mon M4 AS Old Main Line OM AU P&W PW AS Philadelphia PA AV Pittsburgh PI AS.AT Popes Creek P0 NI RF&P RR CQ S&C SC CN Shenandoah SJ CN Trenton TN NI W&P WP AT CSX Transportation Effective January 1, 2005 Albany Division Timetable No. 5 © Copyright 2005 TIMETABLE LEGEND GENERAL F. AUTH FOR MOVE (AUTHORITY FOR MOVEMENT) Unless otherwise indicated on subdivision pages, the The authority for movement rules applicable to the track segment Train Dispatcher controls all Main Tracks, Sidings, of the subdivision. Interlockings, Controlled Points and Yard Limits. G. NOTES STATION LISTING AND DIAGRAM PAGES Where station page information may need to be further defined, a note will refer to “STATION PAGE NOTES” 1– HEADING listed at the end of the diagram.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Compared
    Transportation OverviewElement Frederick’s strategic location within the larger Baltimore-Washington metropolitan region is an asset for the community’s economy, yet entails transportation challenges. The city’s placement at the confluence of two major interstates (I-270 and I-70) and the presence of other major US and State highways (US 15, US 40, US 340, MD 355 and MD 26) has contributed to Frederick’s growth as a regional center, but has placed increased traffic demands on the City. The bedrock of a city’s character is its transportation infrastructure. How people move dictates whether a city needs a redundant system of roadways, sidewalks, bicycle facilities, transit service, or parking, and the relationship to land uses and the built environment. As a result, a well-planned transportation system is critical to a local as well as regional economic stability and growth. [pop-out box] Transportation and land-use: two sides of the same coin The City of Frederick and this Plan describe transportation and land-use in separate chapters, but on the ground they are inseparable. Each decision about what sort of land-use the City should have, and each dollar spent on a given transportation mode, subtly influences how people travel and what sorts of places thrive and grow. The basic link of density and travel A place that has a dense mix of homes, businesses, and services works best when people move slowly through it on foot or bike, and those places can only form when there is significant investment in walking and bicycling. A place that is low-density and has little or no mixing of homes, businesses, and services works best when people move fast through it in a car, and those places can only function when there is significant investment in roads and parking.
    [Show full text]
  • MARC Cornerstone Plan Was Developed to Be Consistent with the Goals of the MDOT Maryland Transportation Plan (MTP)
    CORNERSTONE PLAN MARYLAND AREA REGIONAL COMMUTER Administrator’s Message Dear Maryland Residents, The Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration (MDOT MTA) has been providing transit services to the State for almost 50 years since its inception as the Metropolitan Transit Authority in 1969. Today, MDOT MTA operates the 12th largest multimodal transit system in the country with over 300,000 daily riders, five transit modes, and paratransit service, while providing support to locally operated transit systems throughout Maryland. In our MARC train operations, MDOT MTA operates 42 stations along 190 miles of track, with employees committed to managing, maintaining, and operating this system that delivers service to nearly 40,000 patrons daily. MDOT MTA is committed to improving the transit experience for our customers every day. To this end, we have adopted the following vision statement: To provide safe, efficient, and reliable transit across Maryland with world-class customer service. MDOT MTA’s Cornerstone Plans translate this vision statement into strategic priorities, policies, programs, and initiatives for each of our transit modes. We are committed to responsibly managing our assets, from rail cars to stations, in a manner that supports our operational demands while seeking ways to enhance our customers’ experience. Each Cornerstone Plan synthesizes MDOT MTA plans, policies, and reports, with performance data, local and national trends, and stakeholder input. MDOT MTA comprehensively analyzes this information to create targeted recommendations for investment in each mode that coordinate with the needs of the transit system overall. This Cornerstone Plan highlights MDOT MTA’s long-term plans and priorities for MARC Train over the next 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pa R K & R Id E
    800.745.RIDE commuterconnections.org !"a$!"a$ 800.745.RIDE !"a$ ImIm!"a$Im A} !"a$!"a$ !"`$ ?Ï!"a$ !"a$ !"a$ !"a$!"a$ !"a$Im Im!"a$Im!"a$ !"a$Im !"a$Im )" !"a$ FINKSBURG 14 6 A| !(6 Iq (!10 !"a$!"a$Im !"b$ CASCADE Im HYDES EMMITSBURG HUNT VALLEY A¡ !"a$ MAUGANSVILLE GLYNDON Im !"a$ !"a$)"5 W A S H I N G T O N !(23 !"a$Im18 !"a$ImIm!"a$!"a$Im ?ç Iu I¥ (!7 ImIm !"a$Im FORK Ix CLEAR SPRING ?è Aø Im 4 !( !(14 Io RISING SUN REISTERSTOWN AÇ ?þ !"c$ BIG POOL Iy SMITHSBURG LITTLE ORLEANS BERKELEY SPRINGS ?ë TANEYTOWN !(5 ?Ë CONOWINGO COLORA ?Î B A L T I M O R E 17 KINGSVILLE GREAT CACAPON ?¾ !"a$ ?ï ?ó LUTHERVILLE TIMONIUM (! Iq ?Ó THURMONT C A R R O L L !(24 DARLINGTON GLEN ARM JOPPA !(2 1 8 ROCKY RIDGE ?Í (! 15 (!8 ")!( KEYMAR !(3 JARRETTSVILLE !(10 !(4 OWINGS MILLS ?¾ !(7 Iu A{ ?Ï AÓ !"d$ 5 STEVENSON 25 M O R G A N ?Ë PORT DEPOSIT ELKTON (!3 (! ?¾ !(9 Io Aw NORTH EAST "5 AÃ Ig ?ï WESTMINSTER Ay !(1 TOWSON ) HEDGESVILLE 4 PAW PAW FALLING WATERS ?Å UNION BRIDGE ?ù (!2 (! !"d$ MONKTON !"d$ Iy ?¿ ?Ó 9 ?Î UPPERCO ") %&l( 7 !( CHARLESTOWN WHITE MARSH Ix !"e$ FAIRPLAY !"a$ %&l( Io CHURCHVILLE ?ñ !"c$ ")12 ")2 NEW WINDSOR C E C I L PIKESVILLE PARKVILLE LEVELS ")8 (!7 13 (!27 AÇ SPARKS GLENCOE !(4 RANDALLSTOWN (!2 6 NOTTINGHAM • SYKESVILLE !(3 1 Highways/Major Roads Highways/Major 11 H A R F O R D !( CHESAPEAKE CITY WOODBINE (! (!1 !(1 Iu B A L T I M O R E ")3 Iy KEEDYSVILLE ")9 ?Ï A} 10 13 MARRIOTTSVILLE (!2 ?Ò FINKSBURG !"d$ ") (! ROSEDALE !(15 LIBERTYTOWN !(10 14 ")6 • 3 !"c$ (! HOV/Express Lanes Access Lanes HOV/Express )"5 ")1 A¡ HYDES LISBON )"21 B E R K E L E Y F R E D E R I C K 15 4 ?Ð SHARPSBURG 5 ") WINDSOR MILL (! ?Õ !(2 !(7 18 ") ?Ì COOKSVILLE 19 MIDDLE RIVER FORK GWYNN OAK Baltimore (! MIDDLETOWN • ?Û ROHRERSVILLE 4 WOODSTOCK Free vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Overview
    Transportation Overview The bedrock of a city’s functionality is its transportation infrastructure. How people move dictates whether a city needs a redundant system of roadways, sidewalks, bicycle facilities, transit service, or parking, and the relationship to land uses and the built environment. As a result, a well-planned transportation system is critical to a local as well as regional economic stability and growth. [pop-out box] Transportation and land-use: Two sides of the same coin… The City of Frederick and this Plan describe transportation and land-use in separate chapters, but on the ground they are inseparable. Each decision about what sort of land-use the City should have, and each dollar spent on a given transportation mode influences how people travel and what sorts of places thrive and grow. The basic link of density and travel A place that has a dense mix of homes, businesses, and services works best when people move slowly through it on foot or bike, and those places can only form when there is significant investment in walking and bicycling. A place that is low-density and has little or no mixing of homes, businesses, and services works best when people move fast through it in a car, and those places can only function when there is significant investment in roads and parking. What about transit? Public transit moves people much faster than walking to places where they need to get around on foot. Transit, then, best serves those dense places that thrive best with foot traffic. MARC trains and MTA buses function well in bringing people from Frederick to Rockville, Silver Spring, and downtown Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Maryland Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study
    Southern Maryland Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study Prepared for the Maryland Transit Administration August 2009 Southern Maryland Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................1 Study Scope and Approach ..............................................................................................................1 Major Issues Associated with Southern Maryland Commuter Rail Service ...................................3 Order-of-Magnitude Capital Costs ...................................................................................................4 Conclusions and Recommendations................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................7 Historical Context .............................................................................................................................7 Definitions.........................................................................................................................................8 Previous and Related Work ...........................................................................................................11 Study Background and Approach..................................................................................................13 Analysis of St. Mary’s County Railroad Right-of-Way...................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • MD 355 & MD 85 Transportation Oriented Design
    DIVISION OF PLANNING AND ZONING FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND Winchester Hall 12 East Church Street Frederick County, Maryland 21701 (301) 600-1138 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Eric Soter, Division Director THROUGH: John Thomas, Principal Planner II, Transportation Jim Gugel, Chief of Comprehensive Planning DATE: April 6, 2010 RE: MD 85/MD 355 Transportation Land Use Connections Study ______________________________________________________________________________ ISSUE Funded through the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) Transportation & Land Use Connections (TLC) Program, the MD 85/MD 355 Transportation Oriented Design Study has been completed. The study and report were prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff consultants. BACKGROUND The research, recommended improvements and public outreach undertaken as part of this study will assist the County in developed a more detailed corridor and community plan for the study area and surrounding land uses. The plan also includes planning level cost estimates and recommended time frames for implementation of suggested improvements. The specific scope of the project included the following: Initial project scoping session with project stakeholders; Setup of a project web site to provide opportunities for public information and public comment including a public comment interactive mapping application; Prepare and implement project and surrounding area employee, commuter, land use surveys; Hosted community workshop to discuss potential changes in land use; Perform an opportunities and constraints analysis with respect to feasible changes in land use in the area; Make recommendations for improvements to the existing project area bicycle, pedestrian and public transportation networks with respect to safety and connectivity; Provide design recommendations for a passenger transfer center in the project area; Production of final report of recommendations, implementation plan and presentation to project sponsor(s) and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Page Fax Print
    M A N Y P L A C E S , O N E C O M M U N I T Y A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND ADOPTED APRIL 8, 2010 Board of County Commissioners Jan H. Gardner, President David P. Gray, Vice President Kai J. Hagen John. L. Thompson, Jr. Charles A. Jenkins (through January 2010) Blaine R. Young (since March 2010) Planning Commission Catherine Forrence, Chair Robert L. White Jr., Vice Chair John B. McClurkin, Secretary Joseph F. Brown III Richard Floyd Audrey L. Wolfe Kai J. Hagen - BOCC Liaison i ii Frederick County Division of Planning 12 East Church Street Frederick, MD 21701 General Information 301-600-1138 / 301-600-1140 http://www.frederickcountymd.gov/planning Eric Soter, Director Planning Staff Mark Depo, Deputy Director Jim Gugel, AICP, Chief Planner Tim Blaser, Land Preservation Admin. Anne Bradley Zoning Staff Janet Davis Larry Smith, Zoning Administrator John Dimitriou Rick Brace Tim Goodfellow, AICP Bill Bigelow Dial Keju Craig Terry Shawna Lemonds Denis Superczynski, AICP John Thomas Administrative Staff Todd Weidman Erica Cooke Susan Collins Allyson Desantis Mapping and GIS Staff Patti Garst Amber DeMorett, Manager Mapping/GIS Mary McCullough Angela Worley iii ii Table of Contents 01 Introduction Many Places... ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 One Community ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Frederick County Priority Letter
    I FREDERICK COUNTY GOVERNMENT Commissioners Blaine R. Young BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS President Winchester Hall, 12 East Church Street C. Paul Smith Frederick, Maryland 2 1701 Vice President Billy Shreve [email protected] David P. Gray www.FrederickCountyMD.gov Kirby Delauter 0:301-’600-1100 F: 301-600-1849 Lori L. Depies, CPA Coiintv Manager April 1,2014 Mr. James T. Smith, Jr., Secretary Maryland Department of Transportation 720 1 Corporate Center Drive Hanover, MD 2 1076 Re: 20 14 Frederick County Transportation Priorities Dear Secretary Smith: On behalf of the Board of County Commissioners of Frederick County and the Frederick County Delegation, we are writing to share Frederick County’s (“County”) transportation priorities for consideration in the development of the FY 2015 - FY 2020 Maryland ConsoIidated Transportation Program (CTP). The County has numerous transportation priorities to address both congestion and traffic safety which are enclosed in the Annual Transportation Priorities Review Report. You would note upfront in the report, several County funded and private-public partnership projects on the Maryland State system that demonstrate our willingness to partner with the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) with the goal to focus on safe and cost-effective improvements that eliminate existing and near term projected bottlenecks. Because of projects moving forward in the CTP and significant commitments by our development community to fund improvements on the state highway system, our overall top priorities for highways have changed since last year and include: #1- Proiect Plannine FundinP - MD 75: 1-70 to Lewisdale Road This improvement would address existing sufety and future capacity needs of the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Compared
    Transportation Overview The bedrock of a city’s functionality is its transportation infrastructure. How people move dictates whether a city needs a redundant system of roadways, sidewalks, bicycle facilities, transit service, or parking, and the relationship to land uses and the built environment. As a result, a well-planned transportation system is critical to a local as well as regional economic stability and growth. [pop-out box] Transportation and land-use: Two sides of the same coin… The City of Frederick and this Plan describe transportation and land-use in separate chapters, but on the ground they are inseparable. Each decision about what sort of land-use the City should have, and each dollar spent on a given transportation mode influences how people travel and what sorts of places thrive and grow. The basic link of density and travel A place that has a dense mix of homes, businesses, and services works best when people move slowly through it on foot or bike, and those places can only form when there is significant investment in walking and bicycling. A place that is low-density and has little or no mixing of homes, businesses, and services works best when people move fast through it in a car, and those places can only function when there is significant investment in roads and parking. What about transit? Public transit moves people much faster than walking to places where they need to get around on foot. Transit, then, best serves those dense places that thrive best with foot traffic. MARC trains and MTA buses function well in bringing people from Frederick to Rockville, Silver Spring, and downtown Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • MONOCACY Station Area Concept
    Station Area MONOCACY Concept Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) STATION Design Guidelines Table of Contents Introduction 2 Using This Document 2 Station Context 2 MONOCACY STATION Analysis 3 Street Network 4 Transit 4 Land Use and Zoning 4 Parking 4 Natural Features 4 View of station context. Concept 5 Objectives 6 Potential Connections 7 Program and Massing Options 8 Concept Illustrations 9 Introduction USING THIS DOCUMENT This station area concept applies the Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration (MDOT MTA) TOD Design Guidelines to a specific station in the MDOT MTA system, providing an example of what transit-oriented development (TOD) could look like in the station area. This concept can be used in discussions with local jurisdictions, developers, and community members to work towards a shared vision for TOD. MDOT MTA has not allocated any funding for this concept, and in some cases concepts may not fit with existing local zoning. STATION CONTEXT Located approximately three miles south of downtown Frederick, with easy access View from the station platform looking south. to I-70 and within a designated Opportunity Zone, the Monocacy Station area has Design Collective the potential to foster mixed-use development that encourages walking and the use of public transit. The Monocacy Station area includes all lands within a half-mile radius from Monocacy Station on the MARC Brunswick Line’s branch to Frederick. Urbana Pike (MD-355) is the major vehicular corridor through the station area. MARC commuters use Genstar Drive to connect to Urbana Pike and I-70. Existing area development includes a mix of retail, office, light industrial, and mineral mining uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Services Advisory Council Minutes of January 20, 2017 Meeting Transit Services Members/Ex-Officio Present
    Transportation Services Advisory Council Minutes of January 20, 2017 Meeting TransIT Services Members/Ex-Officio Present: Lib Rood, Janet Fogle, John Frawley, Mike Levengood, Nadine Autrey, Neil Fay, Michael Planz, Dianne Lewis, Councilman Bud Otis, Alderman Kelly Russell, Tim Davis, Jim Gugel, and Nancy Norris. Staff and Guests: Glenn Saffran, Chris Taylor, Joy Rowe, Samantha Biddle, Cherian Eapen, Carrie Anderson-Watters, Veronica Lowe, Kendall Tiffany, and Sandy Ruark. Call to Order: Lib Rood called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. Introductions: Attendees introduced themselves to the group. Approval of Minutes: Minutes from November’s meeting were approved as corrected. Committee Reports: Lib Rood distributed a list of TSAC Committees and requested that members review the list to see which committee(s) they may be interested in joining. Lib also provided a description of the role of each committee. Lib requested that members notify Nancy Norris of their committee selection(s). Executive Committee – The Committee did not meet; no report. Transportation Issues (TIC) – The Committee did not meet; no report. Marketing and Membership Development – The Committee did not meet; no report. Elected Officials Report: Alderman Russell had no report but did mention that the City was about to begin setting dates for conducting its budget hearings and that the dates will be published on the City’s website. Councilman Otis reported that 180 N. Market Street was dedicated as a community technical center and will house representatives from Ft. Detrick, the Chamber of Commerce, and the County Office of Economic Development. Councilman Otis reported that this center will be a destination that people will visit and they will need transportation to get there.
    [Show full text]