PRELIMINARY INVENTORY of the MOTH FAUNA of the FEN and CEDAR SWAMP COMPLEXES at PIERCE CEDAR CREEK INSTITUTE P. Gleave And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PRELIMINARY INVENTORY of the MOTH FAUNA of the FEN and CEDAR SWAMP COMPLEXES at PIERCE CEDAR CREEK INSTITUTE P. Gleave And PRELIMINARY INVENTORY OF THE MOTH FAUNA OF THE FEN AND CEDAR SWAMP COMPLEXES AT PIERCE CEDAR CREEK INSTITUTE P. Gleave and J.H. Wilterding III, Department of Natural and Physical Sciences Olivet College Olivet, MI 49076 [email protected]; 269.749.7634 Introduction Biological inventories are important components of research in natural areas. They can serve as the foundation for subsequent research by providing biologists with information on the composition of communities and occurrence of plant and animal species that occur there. Additionally, increasing habitat changes and fragmentation, and the threat of global environmental change increases the importance of sound biological inventories for the continued monitoring of environmental health in these natural areas. Botanical inventories are arguably the most important type of biotic inventory. Primarily they are carried out to characterize the variety of plants in communities that are present in particular ecosystems, and they also inform future studies of the fauna species composition in the same area. Botanical inventories have already been completed for the wetland complexes at Pierce Cedar Creek Institute (PCCI) (Slaughter and Skean 2003a). Good plant diversity reflects good faunal diversity, which in turn, mirrors the health of the ecosystem. The prairie fen at PCCI is one of Michigan's rarest ecosystems. These areas are peat- covered wetlands fed by a constant flow of mineral-rich groundwater found only in glaciated parts of the Midwest. There are 85 known prairie fens in southern Michigan, totaling about 2,000 acres. Although globally speaking they are not considered to be imperiled, they are often found only in very small isolated pockets and good quality sites can be very difficult to find (MNFI 2004). PCCI carries a small botanical community that resembles, in most aspects, those of prairie fens without conspicuous prairie grass components (Slaughter and Skean 2003a). The white cedar swamp which carries the name of the Institute is likely the most unique feature at PCCI when compared to the surrounding area. Given that this habitat is a southern disjunct of a more northern habitat type (Slaughter and Skean, 2003b), it might be hypothesized to also harbor more cool loving disjunct populations of Lepidoptera more commonly found in Northern Michigan. A complete inventory of Lepidoptera in the cedar swamp might reveal the same trend as was found in plants. In light of increasing interest in global climate change, it may offer an opportunity to assess the impact of increases in mean global temperature to both the flora and fauna of this habitat in the future (which, given its location could be assumed to be sensitive in part to perturbations in climate). The purpose of this study was to document the number of moth species of the fen and cedar swamp wetlands of PCCI and to produce an annotated list of these species. Materials and Methods A partial survey of micro-lepidoptera of the Pierce Cedar Creek wetland complexes (prairie fen and cedar swamp) was carried out between March and October of 2006 and two sampling events in 2005. Ten generator nights & 19 trap nights occurred for a total of 48 individual sampling events during the duration of this study. Sampling has occurred generally once every week to ten days since May, but less frequently during March and April when species numbers and diversity were more limited and the weather was less favorable. Locations of sampling occurred at the northern edge of the cedar swamp south of Cloverdale Road and the fen area on the southeast corner of Brewster Lake. All sampling was done nocturnally and generally done seven to ten nights apart. Since moths navigate by celestial light, sampling is improved on moonless nights or those nights with low lunar illumination. Specimens were gathered using two sampling strategies: hand collecting and trapping. The use of both methods was required to successfully sample the selected areas during any given flight period. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages. With hand collecting, a 250W Honda Generator, 150W Hg light and a sheet was used. Selected specimens were picked off of the sheet with glass vials which were immediately refrigerated. This method prevents over collecting, but has shorter collection duration than trapping. The trapping method involved use of BioQuip 8W black light traps which attracted moths into a funnel that led down into a bucket where ethyl acetate was used as a dispatching agent. Sampling was completed in roughly the same area each time. The traps were set at dusk and retrieved at dawn allowing a longer sampling period than hand collecting. Specimen preparation was carried out by dispatching with ethyl acetate then pinned through the thorax, spread, dried and labeled. The trapped specimens were field pinned then prepared the same way. Mounted specimens were then stored in drawers for future study. All specimens are deposited in the Lepidoptera collection at Olivet College. ID’s are complete for eight of the taxonomic groups collected: Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Saturniidae, Arctiidae, Lasiocampidae, Apatelodidae, Lymantriidae, and Limacodidae. ID’s are nearly complete for Noctuidae (134 spp. collected), Geometridae (70 spp.) and to a lesser extent, the Pyralidae (28 spp.). These are the three largest families and comprise much of the moth fauna in Michigan. At the time of this report, a number of species remain undetermined from samples collected in 2005-2006. Specimen determinations were done based on experience (John Wilterding), previously identified material at MSU, Olivet College, and the author's collection, and from standard literature sources (Covell 1984), systematic revisions (Ferguson 1982; Lafontaine and Poole 1991; Lafontaine 1987, 1998; Neunzig 2003), and regional faunal papers (Forbes 1923, 1954; Rings et al.1992). Discussion The moth fauna of the swamp, fen and surrounding mixed vegetation areas at PCCI presently stands at 309 determined species of Lepidoptera, excluding the butterflies. The number of moth species from these two areas at PCCI are predicted to exceed 400 species, but a number of species that require further study involving dissection, or those from poorly known taxonomic groups have not been included in this report. The present discussion will focus on species found at PCCI that are uncommon throughout their range or in Michigan and those species typical of wetland complexes. With the exception of two pyralid species, our discussion of the PCCI Lepidoptera fauna will mostly be concerned with the Noctuidae family. Perhaps the most unusual record of a moth found at PCCI was a worn male specimen of Chortodes enervata found in a light trap sample taken at the end of July in the small fen complex south of Brewster Lake. If confirmed, the specimen marks the first occurrence of this unusual moth in MI. Very uncommon throughout its range, it is concentrated in Atlantic coastal wetland communities and a few scattered wet prairies in the Midwest (Metzler et al. 2005). In addition to this lone MI record, it has been recorded in high quality wet prairies in WI, IL, IN, and OH. The relative rarity of this species in collections, the lack of supporting literature, and the unique PCCI specimen before us, mean that further study is needed to confirm the resident status of this species at PCCI. Sampling in the fen should be conducted sparingly in order to not impact this potentially small population negatively. Another uncommon lepidopteran only recently described from specimens found in MI and WI, Ortholepis baloghi (Pyralidae) (Neunzig 2003), has been sampled from the fen at PCCI. Known only from a handful of populations from WI and MI, and associated with Potentilla as its host, the population at PCCI is fragile and should be carefully monitored. To the best of my knowledge, there is but a small population of its host plant on the southeastern corner of Brewster Lake, and this population should also be carefully monitored to ensure that it remains large enough to support the moth. Another pyralid, Pediasia abnaki (Figure 1), was found in small numbers in the fen complex and is associated with rich, sedgy wetlands (G. Balogh personal communication, 2006) (Pohl et al. 2005). At PCCI it was not found in numbers, six specimens in total were collected. Uncommon everywhere, but particularly in the north, is the occurrence of Macrochilo louisiana at PCCI in the swamp complex. The population at PCCI appears very large for this species that is generally poorly represented in collections north of the Deep South (Ferguson, 1982). It has been associated in Michigan with small pocket wetlands that are surrounded by forest communities. Wilterding (personal observation, 2006) had collected a specimen from a small Panicum wetland in nearby Eaton County, and this grass, common in some of the swamp habitat south of Cloverdale road, is a possible host of this insect. The related noctuids, Phalaenostola hanhami (from the fen) and Zanclognatha deceptricalis (from the swamp) are also very rare in collections (personal observation) as they are also rare in Ohio (Rings et al. 1992). These three species are so poorly known that little is known of the specific wetland type (if they are restricted at all) that offers suitable habitat for these insects. A number of Lepidoptera from PCCI are associated with cat-tails, rushes and lilies and not surprisingly, they are well represented by insects there. The Institute has all three Eastern species of Bellura (Noctuidae) (Figures 2-4), with the most notable of these, Bellura densa (Figure 2). In addition, the Institute has two of the three species of Archanara (Figures 5-6) in the East, both of which are not commonly encountered, and of chief interest to the Institute is the rare and local Archanara laeta (Figure 6), apparently associated with Sparganium (Forbes, 1954). The fen yielded other species of noctuids that are of interest, if only that they suggest a healthy and diverse fauna of Lepidoptera in the fen complex.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory
    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory ........................................................................................... 3 Alaska ... ........................................ ............................................................... 3 LEPIDOPTERISTS Zone 2: British Columbia .................................................... ........................ ............ 6 Idaho .. ... ....................................... ................................................................ 6 Oregon ........ ... .... ........................ .. .. ............................................................ 10 SOCIETY Volume 53 Supplement Sl Washington ................................................................................................ 14 Zone 3: Arizona ............................................................ .................................... ...... 19 The Lepidopterists' Society is a non-profo California ............... ................................................. .............. .. ................... 2 2 educational and scientific organization. The Nevada ..................................................................... ................................ 28 object of the Society, which was formed in Zone 4: Colorado ................................ ... ............... ... ...... ......................................... 2 9 May 1947 and formally constituted in De­ Montana .................................................................................................... 51 cember
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Library for the Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada
    AComprehensiveDNABarcodeLibraryfortheLooper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada Jeremy R. deWaard1,2*, Paul D. N. Hebert3, Leland M. Humble1,4 1 Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2 Entomology, Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 3 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 4 Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Abstract Background: The construction of comprehensive reference libraries is essential to foster the development of DNA barcoding as a tool for monitoring biodiversity and detecting invasive species. The looper moths of British Columbia (BC), Canada present a challenging case for species discrimination via DNA barcoding due to their considerable diversity and limited taxonomic maturity. Methodology/Principal Findings: By analyzing specimens held in national and regional natural history collections, we assemble barcode records from representatives of 400 species from BC and surrounding provinces, territories and states. Sequence variation in the barcode region unambiguously discriminates over 93% of these 400 geometrid species. However, a final estimate of resolution success awaits detailed taxonomic analysis of 48 species where patterns of barcode variation suggest cases of cryptic species, unrecognized synonymy as well as young species. Conclusions/Significance: A catalog of these taxa meriting further taxonomic investigation is presented as well as the supplemental information needed to facilitate these investigations. Citation: deWaard JR, Hebert PDN, Humble LM (2011) A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Library for the Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada. PLoS ONE 6(3): e18290. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018290 Editor: Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis, American Museum of Natural History, United States of America Received August 31, 2010; Accepted March 2, 2011; Published March 28, 2011 Copyright: ß 2011 deWaard et al.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L Natural Resources Technical Report May 2020
    APPENDIX L NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT MAY 2020 and NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Corridors ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Study Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Alternatives Evaluated .................................................................................................................. 4 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ...............................................................9 2.1 Topography, Geology, and Soils .................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 Regulatory Context and Methods ......................................................................................... 9 2.1.2 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................. 10 2.1.3 Environmental Effects ......................................................................................................... 13 2.1.4 Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Records from Burkes Garden, Virginia
    14 BANISTERIA NO.2,1993 Banis~ria. Number 2, 1993 iCl 1993 by the Virginia Natural History Society Moth Records from Burkes Garden, Virginia Kenneth J. Stein Department of Entomology Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 In contrast to butterflies (Clark & Clark, 1951; Covell, and an average annual rainfall of about 119 cm (47 1972), the species composition and distribution of moths inches) (Cooper, 1944). The region was formerly charac­ have not been well-studied in Virginia. The proceedings terized by oak-chestnut forest, but the chestnut (extirpat­ of a recent (1989) symposium (Terwilliger, 1991) detailed ed in Virginia) is now replaced largely by hickory. the biological and legal status of numerous plants and Remnants of relict boreal forest persist at elevations animals found in the Commonwealth. Nine species of above 1100 m; Beartown Mountain on the western rim Lepidoptera were reported, with only one moth (Cato­ retains a vestige of the red spruce forest that occurred cala herodias gerhardi Barnes & Benjamin) designated there prior to intensive lumbering in the early decades as threatened (Schweitzer, in Hoffman, 1991). Covell of this century. Above 1050 m occurs a northern hard­ (1990) suggested that baseline data are needed to woods forest with a mixture of spruce (Picea rubens understand the diversity and population dynamics of Sarg.), American beech (Fagus grandifolia Erhr.), and both moths and butterflies. He urged that more resourc­ yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt) (Woodward & es be appropriated in order to develop regional lepidop­ Hoffman, 1991). The valley floor has been largely teran checklists, and to learn how best to preserve these deforested and converted into pastureland.
    [Show full text]
  • Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups
    Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Final Report Prepared by: Christopher S. Hobson For: The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias Date: 15 April 2010 This report may be cited as follows: Hobson, C.S. 2010. Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups. Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias. April 2010. 30 pages plus appendices. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12 April 2010 Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 Geology.................................................................................................................................. 2 Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Trap Catches of Moths Within and Above the Canopy of a Northeastern Forest
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 50(1), 1996, 21-45 LIGHT-TRAP CATCHES OF MOTHS WITHIN AND ABOVE THE CANOPY OF A NORTHEASTERN FOREST A, W, THOMAS Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest SelVice-Fredericton, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5P7, Canada ABSTRACT. A catch of 10,991 moths, comprising 311 species in 15 selected families, was identified from two 22-watt blacklight traps operating for 29 nights between 21 June and 30 July 1990. Nightly catches ranged from 4 to 824 individuals per trap. In the within­ canopy site, 6,088 individuals of 255 species were identified, whereas in the above-canopy site, 4,903 individuals of 269 species were identified. There were 213 species common to both sites. The coefficient of similarity (of species) between sites was 0.862 (Morisita­ Hom index). The percentage complementarity between sites was 31..5 (Marczewski-Stein­ haus distance). Moths in the family Noctuidae dominated the identified catches, accounting for 43.5% of the species and 36.6% of the individuals within the canopy, and 49.4% of the species and 52.4% of the individuals above the canopy. Moths in the family Geometridae were the next most common identified group, forming 33% of individuals in the canopy and 26% of individuals above the canopy. Members of no other Single family formed more than 8% of the identified individuals. Several non-tree-feeding species and four known migrants were collected only above the canopy. Each trap's nightly catch was separated into 30-minute sequential samples, 16/night, between 2130-0530 h ADT. Individuals were trapped all night, but on average catches peaked at 2300-2330 h, two hours after sunset.
    [Show full text]