DOCSLIB.ORG

1992 Isbn #: 0-921631-13-8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1992 Isbn #: 0-921631-13-8 TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION Occasional Publication # 25 - 93 Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera Encountered in Ontario in 1992 ISBN #: 0-921631-13-8 BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1992 BY ALAN J. HANKS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS MAY 1993 CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1992 SEASON 5 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 6 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 7 4.1 The Galium Sphinx Nectaring - RA. Layberry 7 4.2 The Giant Swallowtail in Carleton County - RA. Layberry 7 4.3 The Gray Hairstreak at its Northern Limits - RA. Layberry 8 4.4 Partial List ofMoths Collected at Zurich, Ontario - Q.F. Hess 9 4.5 Habitat Restoration at St. Williams and The Pinery - K. Stead 11 4.6 Rearing Notes for Northumberland County - W.J.D. Eberlie 13 4.7 The Mottled Dusky Wing in Ontario - W. Lamond 14 4.8 List ofButterflies Observed at the Metro Zoo in 1992 - T. Mason 15 4.9 The Tiger Swallowtail in Ontario - Q.F. Hess 17 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 18 6. 1992 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES 20 Hesperiidae 20 Papilionidae 32 Pieridae 35 Lycaenidae 39 Libytheidae 49 Nymphalidae 50 Apaturidae 62 Satyridae 63 Danaidae 67 7. 1992 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO MOTHS 68 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 89 8. PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS 102 1. INTRODUCTION This is Occasional Publication # 25-93 ofthe Toronto Entomologists' Association. It is based on data selected from reports for 1992 (or as otherwise indicated) for the Province of Ontario (Canada) as contributed by members and non members ofthe Association as listed below: R.L. Bowles (RLB) Orillia Paul McGaw (PM) Toronto Robert Curry (RC) Ancaster Michael & Nancy VemeEvans (VB) van der Poorten (MNP) Toronto Jim Heslop (JH) John Prideaux (JP) Toronto Barry Jones (BJ) Chris Rickard (CR) Mississauga K. McLaughlin (KAM) Duncan Robertson (DR) Kingston John Olmsted (JO) Hamilton Tim Sabo (TS) Weston Greg Daniels (GD) North York Doug Scovell (DS) Nottawa Sid Daniels (SD) North York Carol Sellers (CS) Toronto Dr. W.lD. Eberlie (WIDE) Cobourg Ken Stead (KS) Brantford Wm.M.M. Edmonds(WE) Toronto Lloyd Taman (LT) Matachewan Barry Harrison (BH) Scarborough Nick Tzovolos (NT) Toronto Quimby F. Hess (QFH) North York Kirk Zufelt (KZ) Hamilton Gordon Vogg (GV) Alan Wormington (AW) Leamington Bill Lamond (WL) Hamilton Barbara Charlton (BNC) Waterloo Kathleen Gardiner (KG) B.M. Chomyshyn (BMC) Kingsville Robert Dobos (RZD) M.L. Chomyshyn (MLC) Kingsville Barbara Charlton (BNC) Robert H. Curry (RC) Ancaster John Galloway (JG) Greg C. Daniels (GCD) Willowdale Brian McHattie (BM) RobZ. Dobos (RZD) Waterloo Christine Bishop (CB) JonL. Dunn (JLD) Dayton,OH Marina Galloway (MG) N.G. Escott (NGE) Thunder Bay JeffLarson (JL) Windsor R. G. Finlayson (RGF) Hamilton Ross A. Layberry (RAL) Ottawa James N. Flynn (JNF) Wheatley Ray Holland (RH) Ottawa June M. Gordon (JMG) Wheatley Bob Bracken (BB) Ottawa M.K. Matheson (MKM) Wheatley David Biggs (DB) Ottawa Steven T. Pike (STP) Windsor Peter Hall (PH) Ottawa Ronald C. Ridout (RCR) St. Williams Dave Gravelle (DG) Ottawa Sue Utterback (SU) Dayton,OH Steve Wendt (SW) Ottawa The basis for selection ofthe data included in this publication was as follows: a) New information on range and new occurrence localities; b) Valuable data on flight period, broods and population monitoring, and c) Life history data including foodplants, nectar sources, larval description and habits, ovipositing data and behaviour, pupal description and siting, adult habits, predation, etc. Occasional Publication #'s 10 through 25 are designed to complement each other in such a way as to present in a common format all the information (as selected) known to the compiler with respect to Ontario Lepidoptera to the end of 1992. Please note that Section 3 in each ofthese publications addresses the corrections required to previous T.E.A. Occasional Publications. 1 Section 6 ofthis publication is organised in accordance with "A Catalogue/Check-list ofthe Butterflies of North America North ofMexico" by Lee D. Miller and F.M. Brown (Lepidopterists' Society Memoir No. 2 - 1981) as corrected by "Supplem~nt to A Catalogue/Checklist of the Butterflies of North America North of Mexico" by Clifford D. Ferris, Editor (Lepidopterists' Society Memoir No.3 - 1989). The compiler has also noted, where of interest, the usage of James A. Scott in his "The Butterflies ofNorth America" (1986). The common names are as per Alexander B. Klots - "A Field Guide to the Butterflies ofNorth America, East ofthe Great Plains", except in a few cases not included in Klots. For the Moths, "Check List ofthe Lepidoptera ofAmerica North ofMexico (1983)" by Ronald W. Hodges et al. is used. The contents of this publication have been checked for errors and accuracy as much as possible. Any errors and omissions will be corrected in future publications. Each locality listed herein is followed by a number in square brackets. This number is the County, District or Regional Municipality as shown in Figures 1 & 2, e.g. Hearst [53] means Hearst (Cochrane District). Note: Changes which have occurred in the county names or county amalgamations are incorporated into this publication and are as follows: WENTWORTH [11] is changed to HAMILTON-WENTWORTH [11] CARLETON [42] is changed to OTTAWA-CARLETON [42] NORFOLK [4] and HALDIMAND [5] are combined into HALDIMAND-NORFOLK [4] WELLAND [6] and LINCOLN [12] are combined into NIAGARA [6] LEEDS [27] and GRENVILLE [28] are combined into LEEDS AND GRENVILLE [27] DUNDAS [29], STORMONT [30] and GLENGARRY [31] are combined into STORMONT, DUNDAS AND GLENGARRY [29] RUSSELL [43] and PRESCOTT [44] are combined into PRESCOTT AND RUSSELL [43] Boundary changes are as follows: ONTARIO (N of Gamebridge) added to SIMCOE; ONTARIO (S of Gamebridge) added to DURHAM (ONTARIO disappears); DURHAM (E part incl. Janetville, Pontypool & Bethany) added to VICTORIA; DURHAM (E part incl. Mt. Pleasant, Cavan, Millbrook & S. Monaghan) added to PETERBOROUGH); DURHAM (E part incl. Campbellcroft, Welcome & Port Hope) added to NORTHUMBERLAND. These changes will affect previous records up to and including "The Ontario Butterfly Atlas" (Holmes, Hess, Hanks and Tasker, 1992), and numbers from those records should be noted in any citation with the necessary emendations. Where the date given is followed by a number in brackets, this represents the number of specimens encountered, i.e. (3). Also note that M = male, F = female, C = collected, R = released and S = sighting. Ifthere are any errors and/or omissions or suggestions please advise: Alan 1. Hanks, 34 Seaton Drive, Aurora, Ontario L4G 2K1 - (416) 727-6993 Back issues ofsome T.E.A. publications and memberships are available from the Treasurer ofthe T.E.A., Alan 1. Hanks (address above). ******************* 2 2. 1992 Weather (from Climatic Perspectives by Environment Canada) by Q.F. Hess. The weather in 1992 in Ontario was generally cool, wet and cloudy. It did not seem to be a good year for Lepidopterists! March - Winter continued with cold temperatures dominating and it was the coldest March in eight years. It was also dry throughout the north and in areas west of Lake Ontario to London. But extreme southeastern and south-western Ontario were slightly wetter than normal. April - This was a wet, stormy, cold and sunless month. Province-wide temperatures were 1 to 2 C colder than normal and it was the coldest April since 1989 at most locations. At Sault Ste. Marie it was the coldest April since 1978 while both Thunder Bay and Hamilton were the coldest since 1982. Precipitation was heavy over Ontario except for a region east of Georgian bay north to Temiskaming including the Ottawa valley. It was the wettest April ever recorded at St. Catherines. May - Generally it was a pleasant sunny month with near normal temperatures and close to normal precipitation. However, very warm and record cold was mixed in. The final 10 days ofthe month seemed more to herald winter than approaching summer. Seven cm of snow fell in Sudbury where it was the coldest May since 1961. June - This was a cold month averaging 2 deg. colder than normal province-wide. In the London ­ Windsor area it was the coldest June since 1980 and in Moosonee the coldest since 1978. On the morning ofJune 22nd the province was hit by a very late ground frost with damage to plants in areas as far south as Woodstock. The cool temperatures were accompanied by dry weather across most of Ontario except the extreme Northwest. For Petawawa this was the driest June ever recorded. July - This was the coldest July in Toronto in 102 years. It was also wet; London had the wettest July since 1932. It was also cloudy and sunshine was reduced 100 hours over normal, so it was the cloudiest July on record. Temperatures were 2 to 4 degrees below average everywhere in the province. Ontario did not reach an afternoon high of30 C or more during the whole month, which has never happened before. August - This was a cool, wet month. The whole June to August period was the coolest since 1927. Temperatures averaged 1 to 2 degrees below normal in the north and 2 to 3 degrees below average in the south. London, Hamilton and Sarnia endured generally the coldest August on record. However, the final week of August had hot, hazy weather over most of the province. Rainfall was again abundant across Ontario with 159 mm at Timmins leading the way. Most localities had 100 to 155 mm ofrain compared to the average 70 to 90 mm. August was also cloudier than normal. September - This month did not compensate for Ontario's most miserable summer of the century. However, near normal temperatures and sunshine provided a small consolation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Checklist Pagemaker
    thePembrokeAreaFieldNaturalists presents a MothChecklist of central Renfrew County, Ontario compiled by Jason J. Dombroskie ©chris michener February 2003 Checklist of Moths of the Pembroke Area Field Naturalists Compiled by Jason J. Dombroskie. Status: VR = very rare, R = rare, U = uncommon, C = common Scientific Name Common Name status Family Hepialidae Ghost Moths Sthenopis argenteomaculatus (Harris) Silver-spotted Ghost Moth U Sthenopis quadriguttatus (Grote) Four-spotted Ghost Moth U Family Nepticulidae Minute Eye-cap Moths Ectoedemia populella Busck Poplar Petiolegall Moth C Ectoedemia ulmella (Braun) C Glaucolepis saccharella (Braun) Stigmella corylifoliella (Clemens) U Stigmella saginella (Clemens) R Family Heliozelidae Shield Bearer Moths Antispila freemani Lafontaine R Family Adelidae Fairy Moths Adela purpurea Walker Willow Fairy Moth U Family Incurvariidae Leafcutter Moths Paraclemensia acerifoliella (Fitch) Maple Leafcutter C Family Tineidae Fungus Moths Eccritothrix trimaculella (Chambers) R Nemapogon granella (Linnaeus) R Family Gracillariidae Leaf Miner Moths Caloptilia fraxinella (Ely) Privet Leaf Miner C Caloptilia invariabilis (Braun) Cherry Leafcone Caterpillar C Caloptilia near stigmatella (Fabricus) C Caloptilia umbratella (Braun) R Parornix crataegifoliella (Clemens) R Parornix inusitatumella (Chambers) R Phyllonorycter aeriferella (Clemens) R Phyllonorycter argentifimbriella (Clemens) R Phyllonorycter basistrigella (Clemens) R Phyllonorycter lucetiella (Clemens) Basswood Squareblotch Miner U Phyllonorycter ostryaefoliella
    [Show full text]
  • Macrolepidoptera Inventory of the Chilcotin District
    Macrolepidoptera Inventory of the Chilcotin District Aud I. Fischer – Biologist Jon H. Shepard - Research Scientist and Crispin S. Guppy – Research Scientist January 31, 2000 2 Abstract This study was undertaken to learn more of the distribution, status and habitat requirements of B.C. macrolepidoptera (butterflies and the larger moths), the group of insects given the highest priority by the BC Environment Conservation Center. The study was conducted in the Chilcotin District near Williams Lake and Riske Creek in central B.C. The study area contains a wide variety of habitats, including rare habitat types that elsewhere occur only in the Lillooet-Lytton area of the Fraser Canyon and, in some cases, the Southern Interior. Specimens were collected with light traps and by aerial net. A total of 538 species of macrolepidoptera were identified during the two years of the project, which is 96% of the estimated total number of species in the study area. There were 29,689 specimens collected, and 9,988 records of the number of specimens of each species captured on each date at each sample site. A list of the species recorded from the Chilcotin is provided, with a summary of provincial and global distributions. The habitats, at site series level as TEM mapped, are provided for each sample. A subset of the data was provided to the Ministry of Forests (Research Section, Williams Lake) for use in a Flamulated Owl study. A voucher collection of 2,526 moth and butterfly specimens was deposited in the Royal BC Museum. There were 25 species that are rare in BC, with most known only from the Riske Creek area.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Plants Established in the United States That Are Found In
    Stellaria media Common chickweed Introduction The genus Stellaria contains approximately 190 species, occurring primarily in the temperate regions. Sixty-four species have been reported in China[12]. Taxonomy Order: Centrospermae Suborder: Caryophyllineae Family: Caryophyllaceae Subfamily: Alsinoideae Vierh. Tribe: Alsineae Pax Subtribe: Stellarinae Aschers. et apex and attenuate or subcordate base, stage of crop growth of wheat, rape and Graebn. lower leaf is petioled. The inflorescence some vegetables. It is also poisonous [39, 108, 187] Genus: Stellaria L. is a terminal cyme. The sepals are, to poultry . Section: Stellaria ovate lanceolate, about 4 mm in length, Subsection: Stellaria slightly obtuse or suborbicular apically Related Species Series: Petiolares Fenal and covered with short glandular hairs S. media var. micrantha (Hayata) T. S. Species: Stellaria media (L.) outside. Shorter than sepals, each Liu & S. S. Ying, native to Taiwan, is Cyr. petal is white, oblong, nearly bisected. a perennial herb. Its petals are nearly Shorter than petals, stamens are 3-5 equal to sepals, which are 2-2.5 mm Description with 3 linear styles. Slightly longer long, whereas S. media var. media has [12] Stellaria media is an annual or biennual than the persistent calyx, capsules are longer sepals and shorter petals . S. herb that can reach 10-30 cm in height. ovate, 6-lobed apically. The flowers media and five additional members The stem is light purplish red with one bloom from June to July and followed of the genus Stellaria are regarded as or two rows of hairs on the surface, and by fruits in July through August. The unwelcome plants in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Account
    Systematic Account Subfamily Ennominae DUpONChEL, 1845 (continued from volume 5) Abraxini + Cassymini + Eutoeini group of tribes (part): Addition (other species treated in volume 5) The tribes Abraxini, Cassymini and Eutoeini are morphologically similar (see SKOU & SIh­ VONEN 2015 for details) and their close relationship is supported by molecular data also (SIhVONEN et al. 2011). An extensive molecular study on the Geometroidea phylogeny is under preparation and preliminary results continue to support the relationships of the three mentioned Ennominae groups including the genus Odontognophos WEhrLI, 1951 (M­ UrILLO-RAMOS et al. 2019) which is tentatively placed here in the tribe Abraxini. Morphol- ogy of the genus Dicrognophos WEhrLI, 1951 also supports association with the mentioned group, tribe Cassymini (it has thus far not been included in a molecular study). Both genera are transferred here from the Gnophini (e.g. HAUSMANN et al. 2004; 2011a) to the Abraxini + Cassymini + Eutoeini group. Odontognophos had been included in the broad concept of Macariini in BELJAEV (2016). In volume 5 of the Geometrid Moths of Europe (SKOU & SIh­VONEN 2015) the following genera of the mentioned tribal group were treated: Abraxas LEACh, 1815, Ligdia GUENÉE, 1858, Lomaspilis HÜBNEr, 1825 and Stegania GUENÉE, 1845. The group is diagnosed by the following characters (HOLLOwAY 1994; SKOU & SIhVONEN 2015): Valva divided, its dorsal arm often narrow and curved, setose apically. Male 8th sternite unmodified. Fovea in male forewing often present. Chaetosemata present. Trans- verse setal comb often present on male 3rd abdominal sternite. Forewing radial veins often reduced in number. Female structures variable, diagnostic characters not yet identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Tenth Forum Herbulot 2018. Integrative Taxonomy, a Multidisciplinary Approach to Answer Compli- Cated Taxonomic Questions
    SPIXIANA 42 2 291-320 München, Dezember 2019 ISSN 0341-8391 Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer compli- cated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018) Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei (eds) Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds) 2019. Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2): 291- 320. The tenth International Congress of FORUM HERBULOT on “Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions” took place in the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (SMNS), from 11.- 16.06.2018, with 77 participants and 52 scientific presentations. The proceedings provide short information on the meeting and the abstracts of the oral presenta- tions. Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Short report and results Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. 2019. Short report and results. Pp. 291-292 in: Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds). Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2). Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Mu- nich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] The meeting was organized by an organization The conference started with a lecture on the ground- team of the ‘Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde breaking effects of “Willi Hennig and the synthesis of Stuttgart’ (SMNS).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of the Tolman Bridge Area (2000-2011)
    LEPIDOPTERA OF THE TOLMAN BRIDGE AREA, ALBERTA, 2000-2011 Charles Bird, 8 March 2012 Box 22, Erskine, AB T0C 1G0 [email protected] The present paper includes a number of redeterminations and additions to the information in earlier reports. It also follows the up-to-date order and taxonomy of Pohl et al. (2010), rather than that of Hodges et al. (1983). Brian Scholtens, Greg Pohl and Jean-François Landry collecting moths at a sheet illuminated by a mercury vapor (MV) light, Tolman Bridge, 24 July 2003, during the 2003 Olds meetings of the Lepidopterist’s Society (C.D. Bird image). Tolman Bridge, is located in the valley of the Red Deer River, 18 km (10 miles) east of the town of Trochu. The bridge and adjoining Park land are in the north half of section 14, range 22, township 34, west of the Fourth Meridian. The coordinates at the bridge are 51.503N and 113.009W. The elevation ranges from around 600 m at the river to 800 m or so near the top of the river breaks. In a Natural Area Inspection Report dated 25 June 1982 and in the 1989 Trochu 82 P/14, 1:50,000 topographic map, the land southwest of the bridge was designated as the “Tolman Bridge Municipal Park” while that southeast of the bridge was referred to as the “Tolman Bridge Recreation Area”. In an Alberta, Department of the Environment, Parks and Protected Areas Division paper dated 9 May 2000, the areas on both sides of the river are included in “Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park”.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphyia Unangulata Opnieuw in Nederland (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)
    Euphyia unangulata opnieuw in Nederland (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) H. Nagel, R. de Vos & F. Post NAGEL, H., R. DE VOS & F. POST, 200E THE RETURN OF EUPHYIA UNANGULATA IN THE NETHERLANDS (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE). - ENT. BER., AMST. 61 (5): 60-62. Abstract: Until recently, Euphyia unangulata was only known in The Netherlands from a single and very old record, dating from 1866. In spite of the wide distribution of this species in the surrounding countries and its very common food- plant Stellaria media, it was not recorded for The Netherlands again until 1981. It seems to have established a popula¬ tion in the country since it was seen in many later years in a row and in increasing numbers. Nevertheless, it seems to be restricted mainly to a relatively small area in the central and southeastern part of the province of Noord-Brabant. In The Netherlands E. unangulata has two generations. H. Nagel, P. K. Drossaartstraat 212, 3131 PJ Vlaardingen. R. de Vos, Zoölogisch Museum Amsterdam, Sectie Entomologie, Plantage Middenlaan 64, 1018 DH Amsterdam. E-mail: [email protected]. F. Post, Henriette Ronnerstraat 23, 5038 KH Tilburg. Inleiding landen, Duitsland (Koch, 1984), België (De Prins, 1998), Groot-Brittannië (Skinner, 1993) De spanner Euphyia unangulata (Haworth) en de Scandinavische landen (Skou, 1984) is (fig. 1) was volgens Lempke (1950) slechts uit de spanner inheems. Maar overal blijkt de Nederland bekend van een enkele vangst van vlinder tamelijk lokaal en zeldzaam voor te vóór 1866 door Maurissen “op de beboste komen. heuvel tussen Geulhem en Houthem” (Mau¬ Het eerste, en tot 1981 enige Nederlandse rissen, 1866).
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Library for the Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada
    AComprehensiveDNABarcodeLibraryfortheLooper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada Jeremy R. deWaard1,2*, Paul D. N. Hebert3, Leland M. Humble1,4 1 Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2 Entomology, Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 3 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 4 Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Abstract Background: The construction of comprehensive reference libraries is essential to foster the development of DNA barcoding as a tool for monitoring biodiversity and detecting invasive species. The looper moths of British Columbia (BC), Canada present a challenging case for species discrimination via DNA barcoding due to their considerable diversity and limited taxonomic maturity. Methodology/Principal Findings: By analyzing specimens held in national and regional natural history collections, we assemble barcode records from representatives of 400 species from BC and surrounding provinces, territories and states. Sequence variation in the barcode region unambiguously discriminates over 93% of these 400 geometrid species. However, a final estimate of resolution success awaits detailed taxonomic analysis of 48 species where patterns of barcode variation suggest cases of cryptic species, unrecognized synonymy as well as young species. Conclusions/Significance: A catalog of these taxa meriting further taxonomic investigation is presented as well as the supplemental information needed to facilitate these investigations. Citation: deWaard JR, Hebert PDN, Humble LM (2011) A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Library for the Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada. PLoS ONE 6(3): e18290. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018290 Editor: Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis, American Museum of Natural History, United States of America Received August 31, 2010; Accepted March 2, 2011; Published March 28, 2011 Copyright: ß 2011 deWaard et al.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]