DOCSLIB.ORG

And Herbaria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Herbaria Phytotaxa 165 (1): 001–101 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Monograph ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.165.1.1 PHYTOTAXA 165 The plants by Daniel Rolander (c. 1723–1793) in Diarium Surinamicum (1754–1765) and herbaria PEDRO LUÍS RODRIGUES DE MORAES1, JAMES DOBREFF2 & LARS GUNNAR REINHAMMAR3 1Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Botânica, Av. 24 A 1515, Bela Vista, Caixa Postal 199, 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. Email: [email protected] 2University of Massachusetts Boston, College of Liberal Arts, Classics Department, 100 Morrissey Blvd., 02125-3393 Boston, MA, USA. Email: [email protected] 3The Bergius Foundation at The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by Hans-Joachim Esser: 4 Jan. 2014; published: 16 Apr. 2014 1 De Moraes et al. The plants by Daniel Rolander (c. 1723–1793) in Diarium Surinamicum (1754–1765) and herbaria (Phytotaxa 165) 101 pp.; 30 cm. 16 Apr 2014 ISBN 978-1-77557-372-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-373-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ © 2014 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1179-3155 (Print edition) ISSN 1179-3163 (Online edition) 2 • Phytotaxa 165 (1) © 2014 Magnolia Press MORAES ET AL. Table of contents Abstract . 3 Resumo . 3 Introduction. 4 The ostracised Linnaean apostle . 5 The Diarium Surinamicum . 5 Rolander’s travel to Suriname. 6 The plants in Diarium Surinamicum. 6 Rolandrian specimens . 6 Reconstructing Rolander’s herbarium . 7 Annotated list of plant names in Diarium Surinamicum . 8 Rolander’s specimens in collections. 70 Acknowledgements. 78 References. 78 Index to Families. 100 Abstract The manuscripts of Diarium Surinamicum by Daniel Rolander practically remained ignored and unpublished for over 240 years, till the recent publication of its translation into English, which occurred in 2008. In this, the names of species described and/or cited by Rolander were faithfully retained, hence preserving the indication of them without authorship, for the vast majority. In the present work, all the names of plants that were treated by Rolander in his journal, about 664, including by tradition the fungi and algae, are contextualised in relation to the authorship, reference to the publication of the protologue, pagination of citations/descriptions in the manuscripts and in the published translation, indication of probable misidentifications with possible alternative names, vernacular names, and related literature. Additionally, we searched for the vouchers collected by Rolander, scattered in several herbaria, which have been linked to the probable names and descriptions in the diary. Given the considerable time till the publication of these names, and by the lack of indication of their nomenclatural types in the English version, the great majority of the new species described by Rolander, which would have priority if published in due time, became invalid names according to the ICN. Nevertheless, the list of Rolandrian species here presented, from his work that has finally taken a place in the history of natural sciences, shows that he was also a competent botanist, besides being a skilled entomologist, having recognised and detailedly described many of the Surinamese plants hitherto unknown to science. Key words: Carl Linnaeus, Christen Friis Rottbøll, historical collections, Peter Jonas Bergius, taxonomy, Surinamese flora Resumo Os manuscritos do Diarium Surinamicum de Daniel Rolander permaneceram praticamente ignorados e inéditos por mais de 240 anos, até a recente publicação de sua tradução para o Inglês, ocorrida em 2008. Nesta, os nomes das espécies descritas e/ou citadas por Rolander foram reproduzidos fielmente daquilo que se encontra nos manuscritos, conservando desta forma a não indicação da autoria, para a grande maioria dos mesmos. No presente trabalho, todos os nomes das plantas que foram tratadas por Rolander em seu diário, cerca de 664, incluindo-se por tradição os fungos e algas, são contextualizados quanto à autoridade, referência à publicação do protólogo, paginação das citações/descrições nos manuscritos e na tradução publicada, indicação de prováveis más identificações com possíveis nomes alternativos, nomes vernáculos, e literatura relacionada. Adicionalmente, buscou-se pelos vouchers coletados por Rolander, dispersos em vários herbários, que ora são indicados aos prováveis nomes e descrições do diário. Dado o considerável tempo para a publicação desses nomes, e por não terem a indicação dos tipos nomenclaturais na tradução para o Inglês, a grande maioria das espécies novas descritas por Rolander, que teriam prioridade se publicadas em sua devida época, tornaram-se nomes inválidos perante o Código Internacional de Nomenclatura Botânica (ICN). Apesar disso, a partir da listagem das espécies de Rolander aqui apresentadas, de seu trabalho que finalmente alcançou uma colocação na história das ciências naturais, denota-se que ele foi também um botânico competente, tendo reconhecido e detalhadamente descrito muitas das espécies surinamenses até então desconhecidas da ciência. PLANTS BY DANIEL ROLANDER IN DIARIUM SURINAMICUM Phytotaxa 165 (1) © 2014 Magnolia Press • 3 Introduction The ostracised Linnaean apostle.—Daniel Rolander (c. 1723–1793) was born and raised in the Swedish province of Småland, as was Carl Linnaeus (see Dobreff 2010, for further bibliographic and biographic information). He was one of Linnaeus’s apostles, selected by Linnaeus to go to Suriname. His voyage to Suriname started on 26 April 1755, departing from the Dutch port of Texel. He disembarked at Paramaribo on 21 June 1755, remaining in Suriname for seven months, and departed by ship on 20 January 1756. He returned to Texel on 14 April 1756, but only arrived by ship in Stockholm on 2 October (Dobreff 2010: 13). Once in Stockholm, he refused to let Linnaeus use or even see his journal (Diarium Surinamicum) and herbarium, which was mentioned by Linnaeus in his Diary: ‘This ungrateful pupil did not give Linnæus any thing he had collected, but slandered him every where’; Pulteney 1805: 548, Linnaeus 1823: 57, Linnaeus 1826: 59, Fries 1903: 54). His intransigence resulted in a permanent break with Linnaeus, who ended his patronage of Rolander (Dobreff in Rolander 2008: 1572, Dobreff 2010: 14). After Rolander’s return, he only published a description of the genus Doliocarpus in the proceedings of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (Rolander 1756), and never published the results of his Suriname expedition, nor succeeded in obtaining an academic position. This, in conjunction with the so-called troubled life after his return from Suriname, have certainly contributed for the poor evaluation given to him by sections of the scholarly community, particularly after Fries (Dobreff 2008: 138). Rolander’s reputation enjoyed till recently the status of being a mentally weak alcoholic. His name was associated with a failed expedition to Suriname, what according to Dobreff (2008: 135–136) could be traced back to the harsh judgment of Theodor Magnus Fries (1903: 51–55), who condemned Rolander in his well documented Linnaeus biography, and whose influence has gained followers. Nevertheless, apart from any dispute or polemical envisage about the man Daniel Rolander (see Pain 2007: 41–45), here we will focus on the work he did in Suriname, based on his own words (which were never read by his detractors), and on the material he brought with him to Europe. The Diarium Surinamicum.—The major legacy left by Rolander from his expedition to Suriname, together with his collections, is a 699 pages manuscript written in Latin that he entitled “Diarium Surinamicum, quod sub itinere exotico conscripsit Daniel Rolander” (unpubl. manuscripts in two parts, hereafter referred as “Mss.”; currently housed at the Botanisk Centralbibliotek of the Botanical Garden and Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark; see Dobreff 2008, 2010, Rolander 2008, Moraes et al. 2009, 2010, Moraes 2012). This scientific journal was initially composed by Rolander during his journey from Uppsala to Suriname and back to Sweden from 1754 to 1756 (Dobreff in Rolander 2008: 1571). A detailed exposition on why Rolander’s journal is currently in Denmark, and not in Sweden, can be found in Dobreff in Rolander (2008: 1572). Dobreff (2008: 138) has also clarified the period from 1761 through 1765, when Rolander lived in Denmark. With the financial assistance and support of Prof. Christian Gottlieb Kratzenstein, in Copenhagen, Rolander completed the final composition of Diarium Surinamicum in 1765 (Dobreff in Rolander 2008: 1572, Dobreff 2008: 138). The personal correspondence of Kratzenstein makes it quite clear that he gave Rolander room and board in his home from 1763 to 1765 on the condition that Rolander used the time to complete the expedition report. Once concluded by Rolander in 1765, he left it with Kratzenstein who promised to find a publisher for it and to see that the profits would go to Rolander. Nevertheless, the diary was never published. It passed eventually to Rottbøll, to other people, and finally in 1811 into the collections of Museum Botanicum in Copenhagen (Dobreff 2010: 25, Moraes et al. 2010: 180). The English translation of Diarium Surinamicum (Rolander 2008; hereafter referred as “DS”) was published by the IK Foundation as part of the project 'The Linnaeus Apostles—Global Science & Adventure'. This translation made by Dobreff and co-workers was the first edition of Rolander’s Diarium Surinamicum to appear in print in any language.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Two Newly Naturalized Plants in Taiwan
    Taiwania, 53(2): 230-235, 2008 Notes on Two Newly Naturalized Plants in Taiwan Ming-Jer Jung(1), Tien-Chuan Hsu(2) and Shih-Wen Chung(3,4) (Manuscript received 17 December, 2007; accepted 20 March, 2008) ABSTRACT: Hypochaeris glabra L. (Asteraceae) was recently collected in central Taiwan, and Kyllinga polyphylla Willd. ex Kunth. (Cyperaceae) was found in northern Taiwan. Both two species were considered as naturalized plants to the flora of Taiwan. Herein, the authors provide line drawings, distribution maps and descriptions of these two alien plants. KEY WORDS: Asteraceae, Cyperaceae, flora, Hypochaeris glabra, Kyllinga polyphylla, Taiwan. INTRODUCTION 1. Hypochaeris glabra L. Sp. Pl. 2: 811. 1753. Barkley et al., 2006. Asteraceae. In: Baillargeon Two alien plants were considered as naturalized G. et al. (eds.), Flora of North America 19: in Taiwan, and were described in this article. 297-299; DeFilipps R. A., 1976. In: Tutin, T. G. Hypochaeris glabra L. (Asteraceae) was found in et al. (eds.), Flora Europaea 3: 308-309; Koyama, central Taiwan (Fig. 1) and considered as naturalized H., 1995. In: Iwatsuki, K. et al. (eds.), Flora of by the authors. Many naturalized members of Japan III b: 2-3. 光貓兒菊 Figs. 1 & 2 Asteraceae in Taiwan were reported in recent (Chang et al., 2002; Chen, 2007; Chung et al., 2007; Hsu et Herb, annual or perennial, taproot one or roots al., 2006; Jung et al., 2005, 2006; Wang and Chen, several, stems erect, basal leaves oblanceolate, 2006; Yang and Hsieh, 2006). Nearly half of toothed, glabrous to hispidulate, hispid 0.3-0.5 mm naturalized species of Asteraceae were considered as long.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Plantas, Reserva
    Lista de Plantas, Reserva, Jardín Botanico de Vallarta - Plant List, Preserve, Vallarta Botanical Garden [2019] P 1 de(of) 5 Familia Nombre Científico Autoridad Hábito IUCN Nativo Invasor Family Scientific Name Authority Habit IUCN Native Invasive 1 ACANTHACEAE Dicliptera monancistra Will. H 2 Henrya insularis Nees ex Benth. H NE Nat. LC 3 Ruellia stemonacanthoides (Oersted) Hemsley H NE Nat. LC 4 Aphelandra madrensis Lindau a NE Nat+EMEX LC 5 Ruellia blechum L. H NE Nat. LC 6 Elytraria imbricata (Vahl) Pers H NE Nat. LC 7 AGAVACEAE Agave rhodacantha Trel. Suc NE Nat+EMEX LC 8 Agave vivipara vivipara L. Suc NE Nat. LC 9 AMARANTHACEAE Iresine nigra Uline & Bray a NE Nat. LC 10 Gomphrena nitida Rothr a NE Nat. LC 11 ANACARDIACEAE Astronium graveolens Jacq. A NE Nat. LC 12 Comocladia macrophylla (Hook. & Arn.) L. Riley A NE Nat. LC 13 Amphipterygium adstringens (Schlecht.) Schiede ex Standl. A NE Nat+EMEX LC 14 ANNONACEAE Oxandra lanceolata (Sw.) Baill. A NE Nat. LC 15 Annona glabra L. A NE Nat. LC 16 ARACEAE Anthurium halmoorei Croat. H ep NE Nat+EMEX LC 17 Philodendron hederaceum K. Koch & Sello V NE Nat. LC 18 Syngonium neglectum Schott V NE Nat+EMEX LC 19 ARALIACEAE Dendropanax arboreus (l.) Decne. & Planchon A NE Nat. LC 20 Oreopanax peltatus Lind. Ex Regel A VU Nat. LC 21 ARECACEAE Chamaedorea pochutlensis Liebm a LC Nat+EMEX LC 22 Cryosophila nana (Kunth) Blume A NT Nat+EJAL LC 23 Attalea cohune Martius A NE Nat. LC 24 ARISTOLOCHIACEAE Aristolochia taliscana Hook. & Aarn. V NE Nat+EMEX LC 25 Aristolochia carterae Pfeifer V NE Nat+EMEX LC 26 ASTERACEAE Ageratum corymbosum Zuccagni ex Pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial SOCIETY NEWS Important Notices
    THE LINNEAN I The post will be paid but priority will be given to a suitable volunteer prepared to work on an honorarium. Applicants, who do not need to be members of either Society, should write enclosing a C.V. to: Nigel Winser Esq., Expedition Officer, Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, London sw7. Editorial The Bicentenary Scientific Programme got off to a good start on 2 April when the Phytochemical Society joined with us to study the Euphorbiales. In the next twelve months there will be a further six Bicentenary joint meetings. In addition to listing them under the Meetings section of The Linnean, each meeting will be separately announced by means of a coloured insert. These inserts also serve as booking forms and it is essential to complete and return them by the date indicated if you wish to attend particular meetings. The picture quiz proved a great success with most of you getting ‘Squire’ (Charles Davies Sherborn), the author of Index Animalium. Index Animalium ( 1922-1 933) is an exhaustive index of all the scientific names that had been applied to animals since the time of Linnaeus. It starts with the tenth edition of Systema Naturae 1758 and covers the period up to 1850, giving, for each name, the exact date and place of publication. In this day of word processors and data-bases it is interesting to note that the Index contains some 440 000 references, and that in the first year of his task (1890) Squire indexed over 500 volumes and recorded in duplicate a total of 40000 genera and species using only a pencil and slips of card measuring 127 x 63 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistema De Clasificación Artificial De Las Magnoliatas Sinántropas De Cuba
    Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA Pedro- Pabfc He.r retira Qltver CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA Y UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA ASPIRANTE: Lie. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Investigador Auxiliar Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente DIRECTORES: CUBA Dra. Nancy Esther Ricardo Ñapóles Investigador Titular Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente ESPAÑA Dr. Andreu Bonet Jornet Piiofesjar Titular Departamento de EGdfegfe Universidad! dte Mearte CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver I. INTRODUCCIÓN 1 II. ANTECEDENTES 6 2.1 Historia de los esquemas de clasificación de las especies sinántropas (1903-2005) 6 2.2 Historia del conocimiento de las plantas sinantrópicas en Cuba 14 III.
    [Show full text]
  • New Synonymies in the Genus Peperomia Ruiz & Pav
    Candollea 61(2): 331-363 (2006) New synonymies in the genus Peperomia Ruiz & Pav. (Piperaceae) – an annotated checklist GUIDO MATHIEU & RICARDO CALLEJAS POSADA ABSTRACT MATHIEU, G. & R. CALLEJAS POSADA (2006). New synonymies in the genus Peperomia Ruiz & Pav. (Piperaceae) – an annotated checklist. Candollea 61: 331-363. In English, English and French abstracts. In this annotated checklist, 111 names of taxa of Peperomia Ruiz & Pav. (Piperaceae) are placed into synonymies, 26 former synonymized names are re-established, and 10 existing synonyms are transferred and placed under a different accepted name of taxon. In addition, 43 lectotypes are designated. Appropriate nomenclatural as well as taxonomic justification is provided. RÉSUMÉ MATHIEU, G. & R. CALLEJAS POSADA (2006). Nouvelles synonymies dans le genre Pepero- mia Ruiz & Pav. (Piperaceae) – une liste annotée. Candollea 61: 331-363. En anglais, résumés anglais et français. Dans cette liste annotée, 111 noms de taxa de Peperomia Ruiz & Pav. (Piperaceae) sont placés en synonymies, 26 anciens noms synonymes sont ré-établis, et 10 synonymes existants sont transferrés et placés sous un nom de taxon différent. En addition, 43 lectotypes sont désignés. La nomenclature appropriée ainsi que la ju stification taxonomique est donnée. KEY-WORDS: PIPERACEAE – Peperomia – Synonymy – TRGP database Introduction Taxonomy underlies every biological concept. Any formulation of hypothesis in ecology, systematics, biogeography and comparative biology in general is based on taxonomic decisions. A choice of areas for conservation relies on abundance, population structure and geographical distribution of a targeted species, whose taxonomy is of critical importance for final considerations on its real status. In our age of genomics, nomenclatural issues may seem irrelevant for many, but yet are crucial for maintaining a clear and rigid perspective on the taxonomy of a particular group.
    [Show full text]
  • 19. KYLLINGA Rottbøll, Descr. Icon. Rar. Pl. 12. 1773, Nom. Cons., Not Killinga Adanson (1763)
    Fl. China 23: 246–249. 2010. 19. KYLLINGA Rottbøll, Descr. Icon. Rar. Pl. 12. 1773, nom. cons., not Killinga Adanson (1763). 水蜈蚣属 shui wu gong shu Dai Lunkai (戴伦凯); Gordon C. Tucker, David A. Simpson Herbs, perennial or rarely annual, with rhizomes or only fibrous roots. Culms tufted or scattered, usually slightly slender, rarely slightly stout. Leaves basal, 3-ranked; ligule absent; leaf blade elongated or reduced. Involucral bracts spreading, leaflike. Inflores- cences terminal, capitate, with 1–3 spikes. Spikes sessile, capitate, with densely numerous spikelets. Spikelets short, compressed, each usually with 1 or 2(–5) bisexual flowers; rachilla articulate near base, deciduous at articulation when mature. Glumes disti- chous, persistent on rachilla and deciduous with it, basal 2 without a flower, apicalmost rarely with a male flower, remaining ones each with a bisexual flower. Flowers without perianth bristles or scalelike perianth parts. Style base not swollen, deciduous; stigmas 2. Nutlet compressed biconvex, one angle toward rachilla. About 75 species: tropics and warm temperate regions worldwide; seven species (one introduced) in China. 1a. Glumes abaxially keeled. 2a. Perennials, with rhizomes; glumes with membranous spiny denticulate wings ................................................. 6. K. nemoralis 2b. Annuals, with fibrous roots; glumes with papery broadly dentate wings shaped like a cockscomb ................ 7. K. squamulata 1b. Glumes not abaxially keeled. 3a. Rhizomes short; culms tufted; spikes (1–)3; glume abaxial keel without spinules. 4a. Middle spike broadly ovoid, 5–6 mm; lateral spikes globose, 3–4 mm; spikelets oblong, 1-flowered; glumes greenish yellow and reddish brown maculate ....................................................................................... 1. K. bulbosa 4b. Middle spike oblong-cylindric to oblong, 6–14 mm; lateral spikes oblong, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Download
    wjpls, 2020, Vol. 6, Issue 9, 114-132 Review Article ISSN 2454-2229 Arjun et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical World Journaland Life of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Life Science WJPLS www.wjpls.org SJIF Impact Factor: 6.129 A REVIEW ARTICLE ON PLANT PASSIFLORA Arjun Saini* and Bhupendra Kumar Dev Bhoomi Institute of Pharmacy and Research Dehradun Uttrakhand Pin: 248007. Corresponding Author: Arjun Saini Dev Bhoomi Institute of Pharmacy and Research Dehradun Uttrakhand Pin: 248007. Article Received on 29/06/2020 Article Revised on 19/07/2020 Article Accepted on 09/08/2020 ABSTRACT Nature has been a wellspring of remedial administrators for an enormous number of year and a vital number of present day calm have been isolated from customary sources, numerous reliant on their use in ordinary medicine. Plants from the family Passiflora have been used in standard drug by various social orders. Flavonoids, glycosides, alkaloids, phenolic blends and eccentric constituents have been represented as the major phyto- constituents of the Passiflora spe-cies. This overview delineates the morphology, standard and tales uses, phyto- constituents and pharmacological reports of the prominent kinds of the sort Passiflora. Diverse virgin areas of investigation on the kinds of this sort have been highlighted to examine, detach and recognize the therapeutically huge phyto- constituents which could be utilized to help various diseases impacting the mankind. The objective of the current examination was to concentrate all Passiflora species. The sythesis of each specie presented particularities; this legitimizes the essentialness of studies concentrating on the phenolic bit of different Passiflora species. Flavones C- glycosides were recognized in all concentrates, and are found as the central constituents in P.
    [Show full text]
  • I Carl Von Linnés Fotspår
    I CARL VON LINNÉS FOTSPÅR I Carl von Linnés fotspår Svenska Linnésällskapet 100 år erik hamberg Svenska Linnésällskapet Uppsala 2018 © Erik Hamberg och Svenska Linnésällskapet 2018 Omslaget visar den Linnémedaljong som tillverkades av Wedgwood till Linnéjubileet 1907. I privat ägo. Foto: Magnus Hjalmarsson, UUB. Produktion: Grafisk service, Uppsala universitet Utformning: Martin Högvall Texten satt med Adobe Garamond Pro ISBN 978-91-85601-43-1 Tryckt i Sverige av DanagårdLiTHO AB, Ödeshög 2018 Innehåll Förord ...................................................................................................... 7 Linnébilden tar form .............................................................................. 11 Tidiga Linnésällskap i Sverige ................................................................ 13 Linnéjubileer 1807–1907 ........................................................................ 15 Forskare och samlare med Linnéintressen .............................................. 19 Svenska Linnésällskapet bildas ............................................................... 23 Insamling av Linnéminnen .................................................................... 29 Linnémuseet .......................................................................................... 33 Linnéträdgården .................................................................................... 47 Elof Förbergs bibliotek ........................................................................... 63 Linnés Hammarby ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Herbaria
    Phytotaxa 165 (1): 001–101 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Monograph ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.165.1.1 PHYTOTAXA 165 The plants by Daniel Rolander (c. 1723–1793) in Diarium Surinamicum (1754–1765) and herbaria PEDRO LUÍS RODRIGUES DE MORAES1, JAMES DOBREFF2 & LARS GUNNAR REINHAMMAR3 1Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Botânica, Av. 24 A 1515, Bela Vista, Caixa Postal 199, 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. Email: [email protected] 2University of Massachusetts Boston, College of Liberal Arts, Classics Department, 100 Morrissey Blvd., 02125-3393 Boston, MA, USA. Email: [email protected] 3The Bergius Foundation at The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by Hans-Joachim Esser: 4 Jan. 2014; published: 16 Apr. 2014 1 De Moraes et al. The plants by Daniel Rolander (c. 1723–1793) in Diarium Surinamicum (1754–1765) and herbaria (Phytotaxa 165) 101 pp.; 30 cm. 16 Apr 2014 ISBN 978-1-77557-372-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-373-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ © 2014 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbariet Publ 2010-2019 (PDF)
    Publikationer 2019 Amorim, B. S., Vasconcelos, T. N., Souza, G., Alves, M., Antonelli, A., & Lucas, E. (2019). Advanced understanding of phylogenetic relationships, morphological evolution and biogeographic history of the mega-diverse plant genus Myrcia and its relatives (Myrtaceae: Myrteae). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 138, 65-88. Anderson, C. (2019). Hiraea costaricensis and H. polyantha, Two New Species Of Malpighiaceae, and circumscription of H. quapara and H. smilacina. Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 1-16. Athanasiadis, A. (2019). Carlskottsbergia antarctica (Hooker fil. & Harv.) gen. & comb. nov., with a re-assessment of Synarthrophyton (Mesophyllaceae, Corallinales, Rhodophyta). Nova Hedwigia, 108(3-4), 291-320. Athanasiadis, A. (2019). Amphithallia, a genus with four-celled carpogonial branches and connecting filaments in the Corallinales (Rhodophyta). Marine Biology Research, 15(1), 13-25. Bandini, D., Oertel, B., Moreau, P. A., Thines, M., & Ploch, S. (2019). Three new hygrophilous species of Inocybe, subgenus Inocybe. Mycological Progress, 18(9), 1101-1119. Baranow, P., & Kolanowska, M. (2019, October). Sertifera hirtziana (Orchidaceae, Sobralieae), a new species from southeastern Ecuador. In Annales Botanici Fennici (Vol. 56, No. 4-6, pp. 205-209). Barboza, G. E., García, C. C., González, S. L., Scaldaferro, M., & Reyes, X. (2019). Four new species of Capsicum (Solanaceae) from the tropical Andes and an update on the phylogeny of the genus. PloS one, 14(1), e0209792. Barrett, C. F., McKain, M. R., Sinn, B. T., Ge, X. J., Zhang, Y., Antonelli, A., & Bacon, C. D. (2019). Ancient polyploidy and genome evolution in palms. Genome biology and evolution, 11(5), 1501-1511. Bernal, R., Bacon, C. D., Balslev, H., Hoorn, C., Bourlat, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenotypic Landscape Inference Reveals Multiple Evolutionary Paths to C4 Photosynthesis
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Phenotypic landscape inference reveals multiple evolutionary paths to C4 photosynthesis Ben P Williams1†, Iain G Johnston2†, Sarah Covshoff1, Julian M Hibberd1* 1Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom Abstract C4 photosynthesis has independently evolved from the ancestral C3 pathway in at least 60 plant lineages, but, as with other complex traits, how it evolved is unclear. Here we show that the polyphyletic appearance of C4 photosynthesis is associated with diverse and flexible evolutionary paths that group into four major trajectories. We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 lineages containing species that use C3, C4, or intermediate C3–C4 forms of photosynthesis to parameterise a 16-dimensional phenotypic landscape. We then developed and experimentally verified a novel Bayesian approach based on a hidden Markov model that predicts how the C4 phenotype evolved. The alternative evolutionary histories underlying the appearance of C4 photosynthesis were determined by ancestral lineage and initial phenotypic alterations unrelated to photosynthesis. We conclude that the order of C4 trait acquisition is flexible and driven by non-photosynthetic drivers. This flexibility will have facilitated the convergent evolution of this complex trait. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00961.001 Introduction *For correspondence: Julian. The convergent evolution of complex traits is surprisingly common, with examples including camera- [email protected] like eyes of cephalopods, vertebrates, and cnidaria (Kozmik et al., 2008), mimicry in invertebrates and †These authors contributed vertebrates (Santos et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2012) and the different photosynthetic machineries of equally to this work plants (Sage et al., 2011a).
    [Show full text]