DOCSLIB.ORG

Sistema De Clasificación Artificial De Las Magnoliatas Sinántropas De Cuba

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA Pedro- Pabfc He.r retira Qltver CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA Y UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA ASPIRANTE: Lie. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Investigador Auxiliar Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente DIRECTORES: CUBA Dra. Nancy Esther Ricardo Ñapóles Investigador Titular Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente ESPAÑA Dr. Andreu Bonet Jornet Piiofesjar Titular Departamento de EGdfegfe Universidad! dte Mearte CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver I. INTRODUCCIÓN 1 II. ANTECEDENTES 6 2.1 Historia de los esquemas de clasificación de las especies sinántropas (1903-2005) 6 2.2 Historia del conocimiento de las plantas sinantrópicas en Cuba 14 III. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS 17 3.1 Características físico - geográficas del Archipiélago cubano 17 3.1.1 Ubicación 17 3.1.2 Clima 17 3.1.3 Geología 18 3.1.4 Suelos 18 3.1.5 Relieve 18 3.1.6 Hidrología 18 3.1.7 Diversidad biológica y vegetación 19 3.1.8 Población 20 3.2 Trabajo de campo 20 3.3 Selección del grupo taxonómico 21 3.4 Metodología y desarrollo 21 IV. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN 28 4.1 Efectos provocados por la acción antrópica 28 4.2 Sistema de Clasificación 33 4.2.1 Stirps ecsynanthropophyta 38 4.2.2 Stirps synanthropophyta 39 4.2.3 Substirps parapophyta 39 4.2.4 Substirps apophyta 39 4.2.5 Substirps anthropophyta 40 4.3 Claves para el Sistema de Clasificación Artificial de los Magnoliófitos Sinántropos de Cuba 41 4.3.1 Clave para los táxones artificiales de la Stirps (Estirpe) Synanthropophyta 41 4.3.2 Clave para los táxones artificiales de la Subestirpe Apophyta 42 4.3.3 Clave para los táxones artificiales de la Subestirpe Anthropophyta 43 4.4 Stirps synanthropophyta 44 4.4.1 Substirps parapophyta 54 4.4.1.1 Superphydium parapophyta 54 4.4.1.1.1 Phydium parapophyta 54 4.4.2 Substirps apophyta 63 4.4.2.1 Superphydium extrapophyta 63 4.4.2.1.1 Phydium extrapophyta endémica 63 4.4.2.1.2 Phydium extrapophyta normalia 69 4.4.2.1.3 Phydium extrapophyta secundaria 75 4.4.2.2 Superphydium intrapophyta 81 4.4.2.2.1 Phydium intrapophyta endémica 81 4.4.2.2.2 Phydium intrapophyta normalia 89 4.4.2.2.3 Phydium intrapophyta primaria 97 4.4.2.2.4 Phydium intrapophyta recurrentia 104 4.4.3 Substirps anthropophyta 111 4.4.3.1 Superphydium archaeophyta 111 4.4.3.1.1 Phydium archaeophyta 111 4.4.3.2 Superphydium cenophyta 126 4.4.3.2.1 Phydium efemerophyta 126 4.4.3.2.2 Phydium ergasiolipophyta 133 4.4.3.2.3 Phydium holagriophyta 144 4.4.3.2.4 Phydium holagriophyta-hemiagriophyta 151 4.4.3.2.5 Phydium hemiagriophyta 156 4.4.3.2.6 Phydium hemiagriophyta-epecophyta 164 4.4.3.2.7 Phydium epecophyta 170 4.5 Especies de filiación dudosa (incertae sedis) 175 4.6 Sinantropismo, Biogeografía, Ecología y Antropocentrismo de las Magnoliatas sinántropas cubanas 177 4.6.1 Especies expansivas de Magnoliatae 177 4.6.2 Especies invasoras de Magnoliatae 199 4.7 El sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba en español 205 V. CONCLUSIONES 207 VI. REFERENCIAS 208 ANEXOS Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver 1 I. INTRODUCCIÓN La ecología de la invasión es una de las ramas de la ecología que ha tenido un desarrollo más rápido en los últimos años (Williamson, 1996; Pysek, et al., 2004; Rejmánek et al., en prensa) y aunque De Candolle (1855) y Darwin (1859) notaron ya la importancia de las invasiones biológicas, Elton (1958) fue el primero en estudiarlas a fondo, seguido por programas internacionales como los coordinados por SCOPE (Drake et al., 1989) y el Programa de Especies Invasoras Globales (GISP; Mooney, 1999; Mooney et Hobbs, 2000; McNeely et al., 2001). Ésta se basa principalmente en las especies alóctonas cuyo número de individuos y poblaciones crece sin cesar, a medida que estas especies son introducidas íntencionalmente o no, en todos los países, e invaden, a nivel mundial, los ecótopos ruderalizados y/o cultivados. Sólo para las especies alóctonas pueden emplearse los términos invasión y especie invasora, ya que estos términos no son apropiados para las especies autóctonas, en las cuales los términos correctos son expansión y especie expansiva (Pysek et al., 2004). Ambos grupos están constituidos por especies sinántropas o sinantrópicas (Font Quer, 1975), vinculadas al impacto antrópico o seguidoras de las actividades humanas, aunque sólo desde el punto de vista antropocéntrico se les puede llamar a ambos grupos malezas, malas hierbas, plantas indeseables o banalizadoras del paisaje. Desde el punto de vista ecológico son especies colonizadoras, propias de los primeros estadios de la sucesión en tránsito hacia la vegetación climax, si bien este último término actualmente se sustituye por el de "no equilibrio dinámico". Conforme al enfoque biogeográfico se les separa netamente en invasoras (alóctonas) y expansivas (autóctonas). Según Pysek et al. (2004), este último enfoque debe ser priorizado. Las plantas sinántropas o sinantrópicas interfieren con las actividades económicas del hombre, ya que compiten con los cultivos básicos por la luz, los nutrientes y el agua, y sirven, en algunos casos, de hospederas intermedias de muchos fitopatógenos (virus, bacterias, hongos, nemátodos, insectos y arácnidos), y de refugio a animales ponzoñosos y/o que transmiten Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver 2 enfermedades a las comunidades humanas. También destruyen o aceleran con sus raíces el proceso de desgaste de azoteas, aleros, paredes, aceras, contenes e incluso calles pavimentadas sometidas a descuido y/o a poco tránsito automotor y sus raíces pueden secretar sustancias que inhiben el desarrollo de las plantas cultivadas. Algunas son venenosas para el ganado, los animales domésticos e incluso para el hombre, lo cual resulta extraordinariamente peligroso en el caso de que los niños lleguen a tener contacto con ellas (Went, 1961; Ricardo era/., 1995). En las plantas sinántropas se incluyen las especies cultivadas, integradas por dos grupos (Font Quer, 1975): los eciófitos (plantas autóctonas cultivadas) y los ergasiófitos (plantas alóctonas cultivadas). La supervivencia de varias especies animales terrestres, incluida la humana, depende de ellas en gran medida. El resto de las especies sinántropas terrestres, tanto invasoras como expansivas, cubren los espacios vacíos y retienen la tierra con sus raíces, ayudando a combatir la erosión eólica e hídrica, emiten oxígeno, consumen carbono, absorben la energía solar reflejando y devolviendo sólo una parte de ella y además, muchas son alimenticias, medicinales, maderables, ornamentales, artesanales o industriales e incluso esotéricas. Rapaport (Lozano, 2004) clasifica los llamados malos cultivos, que con humor prefiere llamar "buenezas" en lugar de malezas, y estima que de las 250 mil especies vegetales existentes unas 13 mil son comestibles, pero la humanidad apenas utiliza unas 110 de ellas. Lozano (2004) refiere que la Doctora Rhonda Janke, de la Universidad de Kansas City, en indagaciones sobre el llamado diente de león (Taraxacum officinale), afirma que los investigadores aseguran que contiene más calcio que la leche, más vitamina C que la lechuga, más hierro que la espinaca, más vitamina A que el tomate y sus hojas son adecuadas para cocinarlas como si se tratara de tallarines y que la cuarta parte de las especies vegetales de un bosque son comestibles, así como el 60% de las malezas más agresivas. La verdolaga (Portulaca olerácea), especie sinántropa común en Cuba, se encuentra entre las plantas recomendadas por los especialistas argentinos. Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver 3 Went (1961) define las malezas en sentido negativo como plantas que no deseamos, es decir, que si no existieran, sería mejor. Otra característica es que están donde no queremos que estén. Este autor señala que una espuela de caballero o una amapola son malezas en un huerto, mientras que los rábanos que quedan tras la cosecha son malezas en cualquier lugar menos en un huerto de rábanos. La gran importancia negativa que tienen las malezas para los cultivos ha hecho que se hayan realizado muchos estudios sobre su determinación, cantidad de cultivos que atacan y de países atacados (Holm eí al., 1977), control químico y biológico, morfología externa, anatomía, fisiología, genética y ciclos de vida, pero hasta ahora, no se ha tratado de agrupar las plantas sinántropas en grupos coherentes que puedan ser ubicados en un sistema de clasificación formal, faciliten su estudio y permitan poner orden en el caos que constituye el gran número de malezas que existen.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • SFRC T-593 Phenology of Flowering and Fruiting

    SFRC T-593 Phenology of Flowering and Fruiting

    Report T-593 Phenology of Flowering an Fruiting In Pia t Com unities of Everglades NP and Biscayne N , orida RESOURCE MANAGEMENT EVERGLi\DES NATIONAL PARK BOX 279 NOMESTEAD, FLORIDA 33030 Everglades National Park, South Florida Research Center, P.O. Box 279, Homestead, Florida 33030 PHENOLOGY OF FLOWERING AND FRUITING IN PLANT COMMUNITIES OF EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK AND BISCAYNE NATIONAL MONUMENT, FLORIDA Report T - 593 Lloyd L. Loope U.S. National P ark Service South Florida Research Center Everglades National Park Homestead, Florida 33030 June 1980 Loope, Lloyd L. 1980. Phenology of Flowering and Fruiting in Plant Communities of Everglades National Park and Biscayne National Monument, Florida. South Florida Research Center Report T - 593. 50 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES • ii LIST OF FIGU RES iv INTRODUCTION • 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. • 1 METHODS. • • • • • • • 1 CLIMATE AND WATER LEVELS FOR 1978 •• . 3 RESULTS ••• 3 DISCUSSION. 3 The need and mechanisms for synchronization of reproductive activity . 3 Tropical hardwood forest. • • 5 Freshwater wetlands 5 Mangrove vegetation 6 Successional vegetation on abandoned farmland. • 6 Miami Rock Ridge pineland. 7 SUMMARY ••••• 7 LITERATURE CITED 8 i LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Climatic data for Homestead Experiment Station, 1978 . • . • . • . • . • . • . 10 Table 2. Climatic data for Tamiami Trail at 40-Mile Bend, 1978 11 Table 3. Climatic data for Flamingo, 1978. • • • • • • • • • 12 Table 4. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, area of Elliott Key Marina, Biscayne National Monument, 1978 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Table 5. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, Bear Lake Trail, Everglades National Park (ENP), 1978 • . • . • . 17 Table 6. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, Mahogany Hammock, ENP, 1978.
  • California Indian Garden – Plant List and Plant Uses

    California Indian Garden – Plant List and Plant Uses

    California Indian Garden Plant List Spring 2018 Common name Scientific name Indian Uses Bladderpod Isomeris arborea Seeds and flowers eaten Black sage Salvia mellifera Seeds ground into a meal for baking; tea made from leaves and stem Blue elderberry Sambucus nigra Berries used as food and sauce, plant also used for medicine, dyes for basketry, arrow shafts, flute, whistles, clapper sticks, and folk medicine Bush monkey flower Mimulus aurantiacus Young stems and leaves eaten as greens; used to treat burns, wounds, colds, cough, flu, stomach disorders and heart ailments CA buckwheat Eriogonum fasciculatum Leaf tea used for headache and stomach pain, root tea for colds and laryngitis; root poultice applied to wounds Chamise Adenostoma fasciculatum Infusion of bark and leaves used to cure syphilis; oils used to treat skin infections; scale insect on plant used as a binding agent; branches used to make arrow shafts and points Coast cholla Cylindropuntia prolifera Flowers and fruits for food Coast live oak Quercus agrifolia Acorns used as an important food staple Coast prickly pear Opuntia littoralis Fruit used for food, syrup, juice, candy and gum; young, green nopales (stems) also eaten; used to treat wounds, rheumatism, mumps, and reduce swelling; spines for needles and juice for dye Coast sunflower Encelia californica No known uses Coastal sagebrush Artemisia californica Leaves used for a variety of medicinal treatments: toothaches, wounds, asthma, colds, coughs, rheumatism, menstrual problems, to ease childbirth, menopausal symptoms,
  • 1 Spring 2021 Founded by the Cherokee Garden Club In

    1 Spring 2021 Founded by the Cherokee Garden Club In

    GARDEN SPRING 2021 CITINGS FOUNDED BY THE CHEROKEE GARDEN CLUB IN 1975 A LIBRARY OF THE KENAN RESEARCH CENTER AT THE ATLANTA HISTORY CENTER 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 04 THE EARTH IN HER HANDS: 75 EXTRAORDINARY WOMEN WORKING IN THE WORLD OF PLANTS 06 DIRECTOR & EDITOR NEW BOOKS, OLD WISDOM Staci L. Catron ASSOCIATE EDITORS 10 Laura R. Draper Louise S. Gunn Jennie Oldfield SNOWFLAKES IN SPRING FOUNDING PRESIDENT Anne Coppedge Carr 14 (1917–2005) HEAD, HEART, HANDS, HEALTH, AND HISTORY CHAIR Tavia C. McCuean 18 WELCOME INCOMING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS ADVISORY BOARD C. Duncan Beard Wright Marshall 22 Helen Mattox Bost Tavia C. McCuean Jeanne Johnson Bowden Raymond McIntyre THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT ORCHARD AT ATLANTA HISTORY CENTER Sharon Jones Cole Ann James Offen Jennifer Cruse-Sanders Caye Johnson Oglesby Elise Blitch Drake Nancy Roberts Patterson Laura Rains Draper Betsy Wilkins Robinson Lee C. Dunn Claire McCants Schwahn 26 Ginger Dixon Fasy T. Blake Segars Kinsey Appleby Harper Melissa Stahel Chris Hastings Martha Tate GIFTS & TRIBUTES TO THE CHEROKEE GARDEN LIBRARY ANNUAL FUND Dale M. Jaeger Yvonne Wade James H. Landon Jane Robinson Whitaker Richard H. Lee Melissa Furniss Wright 34 BOOK, MANUSCRIPT, AND VISUAL ARTS DONATIONS ON COVER Plate 2 from Jane Loudon’s The Ladies’ Flower-Garden of Ornamental Bulbous Plants (London: William Smith, 1841), Cherokee Garden Library Historic Collection. THE EARTH IN HER HANDS: 75 EXTRAORDINARY WOMEN WORKING IN THE WORLD OF PLANTS JENNIFER JEWELL The Earth in Her Hands: 75 Extraordinary CHEROKEE GARDEN LIBRARY UPCOMING Women Working in VIRTUAL TALK WEDNESDAY MAY 12, 2021 the World of Plants 7:00pm Join us on May 12th for a conversation with Jennifer Jewell—host of public radio’s award-winning program and podcast Cultivating Place—as she introduces 75 inspiring women featured in her book, The Earth in Her Hands: 75 Extraordinary Women Working in the World of Plants.
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)

    Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)

    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
  • Phenotypic Landscape Inference Reveals Multiple Evolutionary Paths to C4 Photosynthesis

    Phenotypic Landscape Inference Reveals Multiple Evolutionary Paths to C4 Photosynthesis

    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Phenotypic landscape inference reveals multiple evolutionary paths to C4 photosynthesis Ben P Williams1†, Iain G Johnston2†, Sarah Covshoff1, Julian M Hibberd1* 1Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom Abstract C4 photosynthesis has independently evolved from the ancestral C3 pathway in at least 60 plant lineages, but, as with other complex traits, how it evolved is unclear. Here we show that the polyphyletic appearance of C4 photosynthesis is associated with diverse and flexible evolutionary paths that group into four major trajectories. We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 lineages containing species that use C3, C4, or intermediate C3–C4 forms of photosynthesis to parameterise a 16-dimensional phenotypic landscape. We then developed and experimentally verified a novel Bayesian approach based on a hidden Markov model that predicts how the C4 phenotype evolved. The alternative evolutionary histories underlying the appearance of C4 photosynthesis were determined by ancestral lineage and initial phenotypic alterations unrelated to photosynthesis. We conclude that the order of C4 trait acquisition is flexible and driven by non-photosynthetic drivers. This flexibility will have facilitated the convergent evolution of this complex trait. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00961.001 Introduction *For correspondence: Julian. The convergent evolution of complex traits is surprisingly common, with examples including camera- [email protected] like eyes of cephalopods, vertebrates, and cnidaria (Kozmik et al., 2008), mimicry in invertebrates and †These authors contributed vertebrates (Santos et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2012) and the different photosynthetic machineries of equally to this work plants (Sage et al., 2011a).
  • Identification Guide of Invasive Alien Species of Union Concern

    Identification Guide of Invasive Alien Species of Union Concern

    Identification guide of Invasive Alien Species of Union concern Support for customs on the identification of IAS of Union concern Project task ENV.D.2/SER/2016/0011 (v1.1) Text: Riccardo Scalera, Johan van Valkenburg, Sandro Bertolino, Elena Tricarico, Katharina Lapin Illustrations: Massimiliano Lipperi, Studio Wildart Date of completion: 6/11/2017 Comments which could support improvement of this document are welcome. Please send your comments by e-mail to [email protected] This technical note has been drafted by a team of experts under the supervision of IUCN within the framework of the contract No 07.0202/2016/739524/SER/ENV.D.2 “Technical and Scientific support in relation to the Implementation of Regulation 1143/2014 on Invasive Alien Species”. The information and views set out in this note do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this note. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents Gunnera tinctoria 2 Alternanthera philoxeroides 8 Procambarus fallax f. virginalis 13 Tamias sibiricus 18 Callosciurus erythraeus 23 Gunnera tinctoria Giant rhubarb, Chilean rhubarb, Chilean gunnera, Nalca, Panque General description: Synonyms Gunnera chilensis Lam., Gunnera scabra Ruiz. & Deep-green herbaceous, deciduous, Pav., Panke tinctoria Molina. clump-forming, perennial plant with thick, wholly rhizomatous stems Species ID producing umbrella-sized, orbicular or Kingdom: Plantae ovate leaves on stout petioles.
  • The Santa Margarita River Arundo Donax Control Project: Development of Methods and Plant Community Response1

    The Santa Margarita River Arundo Donax Control Project: Development of Methods and Plant Community Response1

    The Santa Margarita River Arundo donax Control Project: Development of Methods and Plant Community Response1 Dawn M. Lawson2, Jesse A. Giessow, and Jason H. Giessow3 Abstract A large-scale effort to control the aggressively invasive exotic species Arundo donax in the Santa Margarita River watershed in California’s south coast ecoregion was initiated in 1997. The project was prompted by the need for Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton to address impacts to habitat for federally-listed endangered species and wetlands regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers. As of 2000, 27 km of the main stem of the Santa Margarita River had been treated. The methods employed were tested in preliminary trials before widespread implementation; additional techniques emerged during the course of the project. Although the primary target is A. donax, 14 other invasive exotic species that also threaten riparian ecosystem functions were treated when encountered. Vegetation-monitoring transects were established in A. donax removal areas to document the effectiveness of the different treatments and recovery of plant communities. A. donax was reduced by over 90 percent after the first treatment and accounted for less than 2 percent absolute cover after three follow-up annual treatments. An experiment testing low-cost methods for establishing woody species after A. donax control was also conducted. Cuttings were installed with no follow-up maintenance. Approximately 30 percent of Baccharis salicifolia and large (3-6 m) willow cuttings survived 2 years. Key words: Arundo donax control, invasive species, riparian restoration, Santa Margarita River Introduction Arundo donax is an invasive, non-native plant seriously impacting much of the riparian habitat throughout coastal California including Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.
  • Biodiversity in Forests of the Ancient Maya Lowlands and Genetic

    Biodiversity in Forests of the Ancient Maya Lowlands and Genetic

    Biodiversity in Forests of the Ancient Maya Lowlands and Genetic Variation in a Dominant Tree, Manilkara zapota (Sapotaceae): Ecological and Anthropogenic Implications by Kim M. Thompson B.A. Thomas More College M.Ed. University of Cincinnati A Dissertation submitted to the University of Cincinnati, Department of Biological Sciences McMicken College of Arts and Sciences for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 25, 2013 Committee Chair: David L. Lentz ABSTRACT The overall goal of this study was to determine if there are associations between silviculture practices of the ancient Maya and the biodiversity of the modern forest. This was accomplished by conducting paleoethnobotanical, ecological and genetic investigations at reforested but historically urbanized ancient Maya ceremonial centers. The first part of our investigation was conducted at Tikal National Park, where we surveyed the tree community of the modern forest and recovered preserved plant remains from ancient Maya archaeological contexts. The second set of investigations focused on genetic variation and structure in Manilkara zapota (L.) P. Royen, one of the dominant trees in both the modern forest and the paleoethnobotanical remains at Tikal. We hypothesized that the dominant trees at Tikal would be positively correlated with the most abundant ancient plant remains recovered from the site and that these trees would have higher economic value for contemporary Maya cultures than trees that were not dominant. We identified 124 species of trees and vines in 43 families. Moderate levels of evenness (J=0.69-0.80) were observed among tree species with shared levels of dominance (1-D=0.94). From the paleoethnobotanical remains, we identified a total of 77 morphospecies of woods representing at least 31 plant families with 38 identified to the species level.
  • Pineland Golden Trumpet (Angadenia Berteroi)

    Pineland Golden Trumpet (Angadenia Berteroi)

    Pineland golden trumpet (Angadenia berteroi) For definitions of botanical terms, visit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_botanical_terms. Pineland golden trumpet is an erect or vine-like wildflower found in pinelands, dry hammocks and marl prairies of Monroe County and the Keys. It is a state-listed threatened species. Its creamy yellow flowers typically bloom in spring and summer, but may bloom throughout the year. They attract a variety of insects, especially moths, which are its primary pollinator. The plant is a larval host for the Oleander and Polka dot wasp Photo by Scott Zona (CC BY-NC 2.0) moths. The flower is trumpet-shaped with a broad, five- lobed corolla. The lobes overlap, giving the flower a pinwheel-like appearance. Red lines mark the interior of the floral tube. Five stamens are fused to the tube and enclose the stigma to increase the likelihood of pollination. Leaves are linear to oblong, glabrous and leathery with entire, slightly revolute margins. They are oppositely arranged. Stems are smooth and produce a milky sap when broken. The fruit is a cylindrical follicle and is born in pairs. Seeds are flat, brown and bear a silky pappus that catches the wind to aid in dispersal. Family: Apocynaceae (Dogbane family) Native range: Miami-Dade County, the Keys To see where natural populations of Pineland golden trumpet have been vouchered, visit www.florida.plantatlas.usf.edu. Hardiness: Zones 10B–11 Lifespan: Perennial Soil: Dry to moist, well-drained calcareous or sandy soils Exposure: Full sun to partial shade Growth habit: 6–24” tall, or up to 3’ long Propagation: Seeds Garden tips: Pineland golden trumpet is suitable for use in a wildflower garden.
  • Palaeoecological Potential of Phytoliths from Lake Sediment Records from the Tropical Lowlands of Bolivia

    Palaeoecological Potential of Phytoliths from Lake Sediment Records from the Tropical Lowlands of Bolivia

    Palaeoecological potential of phytoliths from lake sediment records from the tropical lowlands of Bolivia Article Accepted Version Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Plumpton, H. J., Mayle, F. E. and Whitney, B. S. (2020) Palaeoecological potential of phytoliths from lake sediment records from the tropical lowlands of Bolivia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 275. 104113. ISSN 0034-6667 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.104113 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/87043/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.104113 Publisher: Elsevier All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online 1 Palaeoecological potential of phytoliths from lake sediment records from the tropical 2 lowlands of Bolivia 3 Authors 4 Heather J. Plumptona*, Francis M. Maylea, Bronwen S. Whitneyb 5 Author affiliations 6 aSchool of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, UK 7 bDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, UK 8 *Corresponding author. Email address: [email protected]. Postal address: Russell Building, 9 School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Whiteknights, 10 P.O. Box 227, Reading RG6 6DW, Berkshire, UK.