And Herbaria
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Herbariet Publ 2010-2019 (PDF)
Publikationer 2019 Amorim, B. S., Vasconcelos, T. N., Souza, G., Alves, M., Antonelli, A., & Lucas, E. (2019). Advanced understanding of phylogenetic relationships, morphological evolution and biogeographic history of the mega-diverse plant genus Myrcia and its relatives (Myrtaceae: Myrteae). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 138, 65-88. Anderson, C. (2019). Hiraea costaricensis and H. polyantha, Two New Species Of Malpighiaceae, and circumscription of H. quapara and H. smilacina. Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 1-16. Athanasiadis, A. (2019). Carlskottsbergia antarctica (Hooker fil. & Harv.) gen. & comb. nov., with a re-assessment of Synarthrophyton (Mesophyllaceae, Corallinales, Rhodophyta). Nova Hedwigia, 108(3-4), 291-320. Athanasiadis, A. (2019). Amphithallia, a genus with four-celled carpogonial branches and connecting filaments in the Corallinales (Rhodophyta). Marine Biology Research, 15(1), 13-25. Bandini, D., Oertel, B., Moreau, P. A., Thines, M., & Ploch, S. (2019). Three new hygrophilous species of Inocybe, subgenus Inocybe. Mycological Progress, 18(9), 1101-1119. Baranow, P., & Kolanowska, M. (2019, October). Sertifera hirtziana (Orchidaceae, Sobralieae), a new species from southeastern Ecuador. In Annales Botanici Fennici (Vol. 56, No. 4-6, pp. 205-209). Barboza, G. E., García, C. C., González, S. L., Scaldaferro, M., & Reyes, X. (2019). Four new species of Capsicum (Solanaceae) from the tropical Andes and an update on the phylogeny of the genus. PloS one, 14(1), e0209792. Barrett, C. F., McKain, M. R., Sinn, B. T., Ge, X. J., Zhang, Y., Antonelli, A., & Bacon, C. D. (2019). Ancient polyploidy and genome evolution in palms. Genome biology and evolution, 11(5), 1501-1511. Bernal, R., Bacon, C. D., Balslev, H., Hoorn, C., Bourlat, S. -
12 Linnaean Paper Tools
STAFFAN MÜLLER-WILLE 12 Linnaean paper tools In this chapter, I am going to explore a theme that has recently become a ‘hot topic’ in cultural studies of early modern science and medicine more generally: the use of ink-and-paper tools, both in script and print, to accumulate, process and communicate information across geographic, socio-political and cultural dis- tances. This is a topic that promises to deepen our understanding of the history of natural history, especially in its ‘classical’ period, which stretches between the tenth edition of Carl Linnaeus’s Systema naturae (1758) and Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of 1 Species (1859). In the first section, I shall provide an outline of the information economy of classical natural history, contending that it was characterised by an increasing heterogeneity, rather than homogeneity, of sources of knowledge. In the second section, I shall argue that the adoption of two information-processing devices that Linnaeus had introduced – namely binomial nomen- clatureandtheso-calledhierarchyoftaxonomicranks– gave discursive unity to classical natural history despite this heterogen- eity. The third section, finally, will present some examples of how these devices were deployed in the form of paper tools designed for the storage, indexing and exchange of information on plants and animals. Overall, I want to suggest that attention to the mater- ial construction and practical deployment of such paper tools can tell us a lot about natural history and its highly dynamic research culture. The information economy of classical natural history Late eighteenth and early nineteenth-century natural history experienced social and institutional changes that involved both diversifying and centralising tendencies. -
The Linnaean Collections
THE LINNEAN SPECIAL ISSUE No. 7 The Linnaean Collections edited by B. Gardiner and M. Morris WILEY-BLACKWELL 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ © 2007 The Linnean Society of London All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The designations of geographic entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers, the Linnean Society, the editors or any other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The Linnaean Collections Introduction In its creation the Linnaean methodology owes as much to Artedi as to Linneaus himself. So how did this come about? It was in the spring of 1729 when Linnaeus first met Artedi in Uppsala and they remained together for just over seven years. It was during this period that they not only became the closest of friends but also developed what was to become their modus operandi. Artedi was especially interested in natural history, mineralogy and chemistry; Linnaeus on the other hand was far more interested in botany. Thus it was at this point that they decided to split up the natural world between them. Artedi took the fishes, amphibia and reptiles, Linnaeus the plants, insects and birds and, while both agreed to work on the mammals, Linneaus obligingly gave over one plant family – the Umbelliforae – to Artedi “as he wanted to work out a new method of classifying them”. -
Zoist V2 N8 January 1845
THE ZOIST. No. VIII. JANUARY, 1845. 1. Intellectual Freedom—its Advocates and Opponents. Teach the people to think. How difficult the task ! The mass of men are the slaves of prejudice; they are afraid to think. In these days of boasted intelligence and vaunted intellectual progress such a change may almost assume the nature of a paradox, but strange as it may appear to the superficial observer—it is nevertheless true. It is really lamentable to reflect on the ignorance which prevails on the most important topics. Few, indeed, recognize their own position in the scale of creation, or appreciate any of the objects which they ought to fulfil during their existence. The search after truth the majority neglect, and yet they suffer severely from the want of that knowledge which would result from free and accurate investigation. We have said that men are afraid to think. Of what arc they afraid ? Afraid of the workings of their own cerebral organism—of the honest accumulation of facts, and of the conscientious conclusions to which they necessarily lead ! Why do they fear ? It is ignorance that makes cowards of them—it is ignorance that leads them to mistrust their own powers, and causes them to consider the honest investigator in the light of a criminal. No man is justified in neglecting the investigation of any subject bearing on his own or his neighbour’s freedom and happiness. To teach the truth, meaning by that expression, not merely the fashionable so phisms and orthodox opinions of the fleeting moment, but that which a free, careful, and laborious research convinces us is truth, is the highest duty of man. -
Zoologische Verhandelingen
MENISTERIE VAN ONDHRWIJS, KUNSTEN EN WETBNSCHAPPEN •".•<..••• . •'•„• . ' V ...'...• ;- ' ' •• — ,!•• - -...-•- !*.•••'••' ' , . • w . ".>/"' ' • < •> ' ••• . \ ' ; . T? ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN UITGEGEVEN DOOR HET RIJKSMUSEUM VAN NATUURLIJKE HISTORIE TE LEIDEN No. 44 THE CRUSTACEA DECAPODA OF SURINAME (DUTCH GUIANA) by L. B. HOLTHUIS LEIDEN E. J. BRILL 12 aovember 1959 MINISTERIE VAN ONDERWIJS, KUNSTEN EN WETENSCHAPPEN ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN UITGEGEVEN DOOR HET RIJKSMUSEUM VAN NATUURLIJKE HISTORIE TE LEIDEN No. 44 THE CRUSTACEA DECAPODA OF SURINAME (DUTCH GUIANA) by L. B. HOLTHUIS LEIDEN E. J. BRILL 12 november 1959 Copyright 1959 by Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or translated in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without written permission from the publisher. PRINTED IN THE NETHERLANDS THE CRUSTACEA DECAPODA OF SURINAME (DUTCH GUIANA) by L. B. HOLTHUIS Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden CONTENTS A. Introduction i B. History of Suriname Carcinology 4 I. Popular literature 4 II. Scientific literature 11 III. Economic literature 17 IV. Collectors 17 V. Expeditions 34 C. Occurrence of Decapoda in Suriname 41 D. Economic Importance of Suriname Decapoda 43 E. Enemies of Suriname Decapoda 44 F. Vernacular Names 47 G. Notes on the Species 49 a. Macrura 49 b. Anomura 130 c. Brachyura 162 H. Literature cited 277 A. INTRODUCTION The decapod fauna of the three Guianas (British, Dutch, and French) is very poorly known. A few scattered notes exist which deal with the crabs and shrimps of the region, but no comprehensive account of the Decapoda of any of the three countries has ever been published apart from Young's (1900) "The stalk-eyed Crustacea of British Guiana, West Indies and Bermuda", which, however, also covers the West Indian Islands and Bermuda (including the deep-water species), and furthermore is incomplete. -
HUNTIA a Journal of Botanical History
HUNTIA A Journal of Botanical History VOLUME 16 NUMBER 1 2017 Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh The Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, a research division of Carnegie Mellon University, specializes in the history of botany and all aspects of plant science and serves the international scientific community through research and documentation. To this end, the Institute acquires and maintains authoritative collections of books, plant images, manuscripts, portraits and data files, and provides publications and other modes of information service. The Institute meets the reference needs of botanists, biologists, historians, conservationists, librarians, bibliographers and the public at large, especially those concerned with any aspect of the North American flora. Huntia publishes articles on all aspects of the history of botany, including exploration, art, literature, biography, iconography and bibliography. The journal is published irregularly in one or more numbers per volume of approximately 200 pages by the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation. External contributions to Huntia are welcomed. Page charges have been eliminated. All manuscripts are subject to external peer review. Before submitting manuscripts for consideration, please review the “Guidelines for Contributors” on our Web site. Direct editorial correspondence to the Editor. Send books for announcement or review to the Book Reviews and Announcements Editor. All issues are available as PDFs on our Web site. Hunt Institute Associates may elect to receive Huntia as a benefit of membership; contact the Institute for more information. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation Carnegie Mellon University 5th Floor, Hunt Library 4909 Frew Street Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Telephone: 412-268-2434 Email: [email protected] Web site: http://www.huntbotanical.org Editor and layout Scarlett T. -
![Pdf> [Hämtad 050523]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/3927/pdf-h%C3%A4mtad-050523-3103927.webp)
Pdf> [Hämtad 050523]
Bachelor project in the Danish-Swedish Horticulture programme 2005-02 (ISSN 1652-1579) Selecting plant species for the occasion of the 300th anniversary of Carl von Linné at Möckelsnäs Val av växter till Carl von Linnés 300-års jubileum på Möckelsnäs by Johannes Albertsson Simon Jeppson Biology Supervisor Helena Karlén Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agriculture Science, P.O. Box 44, SE-230 53 Alnarp 1 Tack Vi vill framför allt tacka Helena Karlén för hennes inspiration och idéer, men även för de många och långa diskussionerna som pågick under arbetets gång. Vi vill även tacka Mats Gustafsson för hans positiva inställning som fick oss att skriva denna rapport. Ett stort tack även till Inger Hjalmarsson och Johnny Andreasson som hjälpte oss med att hitta gamla namnsorter av grönsaker, frukt och bär. Vi vill även visa vår uppskattning till Lars Nexe som gav oss möjligheten att göra detta arbete. Ett speciellt tack till Mariette Manktelow och Karin Martinsson som båda tog sig tid och hjälpte oss med fakta angående Linnés liv. Till slut vill vi tacka Kenneth Lorentzon och Bruno Wollberg som båda tog sig tid att faktagranska våra utvalda arter. 2 Abstract This report was an outcome of a cooperation between “The Visitor and Knowledge Project Carl von Linné” and SLU, the Swedish University of Agricultural Science. The aim with the cooperation was to create a garden and to suggest suitable plants for an orangery already built. All species suggested should have a documented relationship with Carl von Linné. The project is located in the southern part of Sweden at an estate named Möckelsnäs not far away from Linné’s birthplace. -
Abhandlungen Herausgegeben Vom Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein Zu Bremen
; © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Linne's Beziehungen zu Neu-Granada. Von Hermann A. Schumacher. Der grosse schwedische Naturforscher, dessen Name den Beginn der neuzeitlichen Entwicklung unserer Naturkenntniss bezeichnet, hat seit der 1741 erfolgten Begründung der Stockholmer Academie der "Wissenschaften, namentlich während seiner letzten zwanzig Lebens-Jahre (1758— 1778), von seinem europäischen Universitäts- sitze aus in den verschiedensten Theilen der Welt wissenschaftliche Anregung gegeben und an vielen, ein selbstständiges Geistesleben entbehrenden Orten eigene Forschungen hervorgerufen. Vor dem Professor von Upsala hat kein europäischer Gelehrter, selbst nicht ein Pariser oder Londoner, ähnlich weitgehende Einflüsse ausgeübt, weder in den europäischen Ländern von Russland bis Portugal, noch in Asien oder Aegypten, geschweige denn in Amerika. Wie Carl von Linne mit dem Newyorker Gouverneur Cadwallader Colden und seiner Tochter lateinisch correspondirte, wie er der pensylvanischen Gelehrtengesellschaft zu Philadelphia, der ersten amerikanischen Vereinigung ihrer Art, angehörte, so empfing er für seine Studien aus Virginia und Surinam, von den westindischen Inseln und Plätzen des lateinischen Amerika's zahlreiche Beiträge, welche theils für die Ausbildung der wissenschaftlichen Botanik, theils für die Entdeckung von Arzneigewächsen und Zierpflanzen grosse Wichtigkeit erlangt haben. Ein Beispiel, wie vielseitig diese Beziehungen sich gestalteten, bietet ein vom 20. December 1771 -
The Apostles They Risked Their Lives in Distant Lands Linnaeus’S Apostles
The Apostles They Risked their Lives in Distant Lands Linnaeus’s Apostles the wind, billowing sails spread out above your head. The smell of salt is blended with the stench of unwashed bodies. You are standing on the starboard side, gripping the railing tightly with both hands. Your stomach feels rather unruly, one moment it seems to rise up into your throat, the next moment it lands with a sigh on your knees. Time and time again and relentlessly it is forced to follow the movements of the ship. Linnaeus’s farewell rings in your ears: “I avoid long voyages. Now you are on your own. You’ll manage well.” In other words, you are standing alone this time, without your travelling companion. But you have the goal in front of you – to follow one of Linnaeus’s disciples on an adventure far from home in Sweden. A It is 1775. The world is huge and unknown, entic- ing, full of possibilities and new trading contacts – but also tainted with despicable slave-trading and misery. The three-decker Stavenisse which you are aboard is ap- proaching the Japanese port of Nagasaki. The crew are relieved at having survived the dangerous voyage. Its sister ship, the Bleijenburg, was badly damaged in one of the storms but just managed to get to Macao on the south coast of China. Voyages in the 18th century are dangerous in many ways. Apart from storms that tear at the ships, many people on board fall ill from under- nourishment or serious infections that spread like wild- fire among the crew. -
Linnaeus's Plantæ Surinamenses Revisited
Phytotaxa 41: 1–86 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 41 Linnaeus’s Plantæ Surinamenses revisited PEDRO LUÍS RODRIGUES DE MORAES Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Botânica, Av. 24 A 1515, Bela Vista, Caixa Postal 199, 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by H. Esser: 1 Dec. 2011; published online in PDF: 16 Jan. 2012 PEDRO LUÍS RODRIGUES DE MORAES Linnaeus’s Plantæ Surinamenses revisited (Phytotaxa 41) 86 pp.; 30 cm. 16 Jan. 2012 ISBN 978-1-86977-851-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-852-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2012 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ © 2012 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1179-3155 (Print edition) ISSN 1179-3163 (Online edition) 2 • Phytotaxa 41 © 2012 Magnolia Press MORAES Table of contents Abstract . 3 Resumo . 3 Introduction . 3 Taxonomic Treatment . 13 Remarks . 61 Acknowledgements . 67 References . 67 Index to Scientific Names . -
Systema Naturae '735
~j loe ,1 ,', Qt. ,;t Ll3 573 IIi,l /735 II "Ii ,I ,, CAROLUS LINNAEUS SYSTEMA NATURAE '735 FACSIMILE OF THE FIRST EDITION With (m introductioll alJd a first Ellgiish trallsiatioll of thc IfObscrvatioticS" BY DR M. S. J. ENGEL·LEDEBOER AND DRR. ENGEL Professor of Zoology at the University of Amsterdam LlNNAEUS ~ENC'LD"AW'NC BY AN UNKNOWN MASTER (from T. Tullberg, LinncpOItriitt. Stockhohn, 1907. Plate 1lI) NIEUWKOOP 0 B. DE GRAAF MCMLXXY Introduction CAROLUS LINNAEUS AND THE SYSTEMA NATURAE HEN LINNAEUS arrived in Holland in 1735 the Systema Naturae, as here again Wwe present it to the public, was among the many unpublished manuscripts he had taken with him in his 'luggage. His life has been told over and over again, by himself and by others1). From his biographies we learn how Linnaeus became interested in the secrets of nature, how he had a feeling that God Himself led him during his life, permitted him to have a look into His secret council chamber2). He considered the discovery of the p!Ocre ation in plants his most important contribution to botany, as it revealed "the very footprints of the Creator"S). The system of nature was to him the wOIkingplan underlying Creation. That is why he tried. to trace a "Systema Naturae", in botany first, then also in zoology and in mineralogy. It was first announced by him in Hamburgische Berichte von nenen gelehrten Sachen auf das Jahr 1735, nr. 46, 10 Juni, p. 3864). It was the first MS to be printed (after the Doctor's Thesis) in Holland. -
The Linnean Society of London and Its Library Evaluating a Library Usage Questionnaire Through the IFLA Guidelines and Other Methods
Institutionen för ABM Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap The Linnean Society of London and its Library Evaluating a Library Usage Questionnaire through the IFLA Guidelines and other Methods Yasmin Mandani Magisteruppsats, 20 poäng, vt 2004 Institutionen för ABM Handledare: Sten Hedberg Uppsatser inom biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap, nr 222 ISSN 1650-4267 Introduction .....................................................................................3 Concepts and Terminology.................................................................................... 4 Concept ..........................................................................................................................4 Terminology ...................................................................................................................5 Used Literature ...................................................................................................... 9 Purpose and Method ............................................................................................ 16 Theoretical Background ...............................................................17 The IFLA Guidelines........................................................................................... 17 Evaluating Library Functions According to Lancaster........................................ 24 The SERVQUAL Model...................................................................................... 26 Eighteenth Century Ideology .......................................................28