Moving Men and Supplies: Military Transportation on the Northern Great Plains, 1866-1891

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moving Men and Supplies: Military Transportation on the Northern Great Plains, 1866-1891 Copyright © 1984 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. Moving Men and Supplies: Military Transportation on the Northern Great Plains, 1866-1891 GARY S. FREEDOM Copyright © 1984 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. Moving Men and Supplies 115 In the twenty-five years after the Civil War, the northern Great Plains was transformed from a frontier with limited trans- portation into a settled region with a complex transportation in- frastructure. In any assessment of this landscape modification, the military presence deserves consideration as an agent of change. In this period, 1866 to 1891, the army organized the terri- tories of Dakota and Montana into the Military Department of Dakota and established a network of forts that extended from the Red River to the Rockies and from the Canadian border to the Platte River (Figure 1). The isolation and vast distances between the individual forts on the northern Great Plains, and between this network and supply depots in the East, necessitated a com- plex transportation system to move men and materials. In order to facilitate these logistical operations, the military built a sys- tem of roads while protecting and utilizing established trails, waterways, and rail networks. Although the army had its own means of transport, for reasons of economy it preferred to em- 0 ver land freight wagons drawn by mules, 1885 Copyright © 1984 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. 116 South Dakota History ploy civilian carriers to move men and supplies on a contractual basis. Various modes of commercial transportation were used, in- cluding freight wagons, stage coaches, riverboats, and railroads. The military road system performed important logistical func- tions. It connected the forts, integrated the fort network, pro- vided feeder lines to link the forts to the rivers and, later, to the railroads, and supplied access for the wagons and stage coaches of civilians who hauled military and civilian goods. In doing so, it unified the region by connecting widely scattered areas (Figure 2). The roads themselves varied from Indian traces to more per- manent routes etched by the movement of heavy wagons. Most of them were laid out along the shortest distance between the forts. A good day's travel for a wagon with a heavy load was fifteen to twenty miles. However, factors such as gradient, watercourses, swamps, and proximity to wooded areas often added extra time Figure 1. Forts on the Northern Great Plains, 1866-1891 FORTS ON THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS, 1866-1891 108' •ÍL'*•'*. \ASSINIBOINE. ABERCROMBIE RICE NRANSOM I YATESji,_ +• 1 SISSETON LEGEND o TOWN SOURCE: Compiled by author from multiple sources. Copyright © 1984 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. Moving Men and Supplies 117 and miles. Roads between the forts were in constant use by the army for over twenty years, from the 1860s to the 1890s. Even after the forts were abandoned, the roads served the farmers who had settled along them.' One of the major concentrations of forts in the Department of Dakota lay between the Missouri and Red rivers in northern Dakota. Roads were built along these rivers to connect the posts, while a number of feeder routes running from the river forts to inland posts provided interior lines of communication. Important roads branched out from Fort Abercrombie on the Red River, connecting both the fort and the river with the interior forts. Roads led north to Fort Pembina, south to Fort Sisseton, and west to forts Seward, Ransom, and Totten. Other roads con- nected forts Ransom and Totten, Totten and Stevenson, Steven- son and Ransom, Rice and Sisseton, Totten and Pembina, and Seward and Totten (Figure 2).^ The Missouri River forts in north- ern Dakota were linked by a road running along the north, or left, bank of the river. Ferries crossed the Missouri to provide access to forts Abraham Lincoln, Yates, and Buford. The ferries were commercial enterprises, and the military was usually charged ci- vilian rates. The fees for a proposed ferry at Fort Buford in 1879 were $1.50 for a six-horse or mule team, $1.00 for a four-horse or mule team, $.50 for each horseman if there were less than ten, $.15 if there were ten or more, $1.00 for one thousand pounds of cargo or less, and $1.00 for each one thousand pounds of cargo beyond that.' In southern Dakota, six of the military posts were located along the Missouri River to take advantage of steamboat transporta- tion, but each of these forts was also connected to each of the others and to some civilian settlements in an intricate road net- work. River transports carried large bulk shipments, but road connections often provided shorter travel times and distances than did the Missouri. Fort Sully 2, for example, was located 351 miles from Yankton by river, but only 262 miles by road. It was 1. Dana Wright. "Military Trails in Dakota: The Fort Totten—Abercrombie Trail," North Dakota History 13 (Jan. Apr. 1946): 80. 84. 2. Ibid.. pp. 80-84. See also Dana Wright. "Military Trails in North Dakota: Fort Abercrombie to Fort Ransom, with Notes on the History of Fort Ransom." North Dakota History 17 (Oct. 1950): 246. 3. A. P. Ayott. Letter (requesting permission to build a ferry at Fort Buford). 20 Oct. 1879. Fort Buford Collection. State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bis- marck. N.Dak. Copyright © 1984 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. 118 South Dakota History 1 o o o 4j o c a a o . • <, .—• ^^ UJ «1 _^ 1 H ¡^E O % _ — 1 ir / j¿ 1 V -^ * --^ ^ * <i ^ s i ^••^ Q : 1 - o ; 1 7 i li- i f ;" i Hol O i \ /I 1 o i r 1 \— 1 \ i Q 1 £ T 1 1 \ 1 UJ ¡ j \ i O ^j =^? ' >--- 1 O h- i Î 1 i /\ i 1 m j •o cr 1 : • ; u S o" Û_ VL / !1 (n J! m O. L H o LJÜ O Û v> H ( Ul i VI ÜJ 1 i X \ 1- i \ o •o , 1 \ E J o / í 0o^ \ 05 ' ce — i ( f—-} ¡'. UJ O t- i ¡y 1 il/ o . Assi V o ( I o: rces 3 tr ^/ "\ 1 UJ O c 1— u // l 1 o s // >_ li lip • o í :J ir 1 X í O _, o n < / K-g QOC m í ro 1 Ol :^ ir Ï <Q- z — 1 À Ul OO OÛ. bj u. H tr <t —" P ,/ ( 1 0< M 1 LU 1 t • O '; 3 . /UJ o S • o 1 : í O _j >, < " .' kiJ _"7 I .-^ -•a° -l¿ .• _u O ß' -••^ 'o. i VlM—^^ E i in f o X /"• — . -i» I ¿i . y" O I o: *^. o w Copyright © 1984 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. Moving Men and Supplies 119 575 miles by river from the fort to Sioux City, but only 343 miles by road.^ One important road in southern Dakota connected Fort Randall with Sioux City. The federal government spent twenty- five thousand dollars to construct the road between these two points and then built a number of bridges across the Big Sioux, Vermillion, and James rivers. Fort Randall became an important transportation center, with other roads extending from the post to various forts and civilian communities in both Dakota and Ne- braska.^ Only a few roads crossed the largely empty area between the Missouri and the Tongue River, where the Montana fort system began. Because navigation on tbe Missouri and Yellowstone rivers was seasonal and unreliable, direct overland routes were needed to ensure year-round transportation to Fort Keogb on tbe Yellowstone. A minor route started from Fort Hale on the Mis- souri and, for a time, became a gateway to tbe Black Hills of Dakota Territory. Passengers and freight were unloaded at this transshipment point and went west by wagon train.^ One of the most important roads from the Missouri to the Yellowstone ran between Fort Keogh (Miles City) and Fort Abraham Lincoln (Bis- marck). The Fort Keogh Trail was not a road in the modern sense but was a wagon track across the empty prairie. In some places, the wagon ruts were nearly a foot deep, and the road became im- passable in bad weather. At other points, the trail spread into parallel sets of wagon tracks sixty to one hundred feet across.^ Despite the limitations of the Keogh Trail, it established freight service between the Missouri and Yellowstone rivers in 1878, connecting Bismarck, the railhead for the Northern Pacific Railroad, and Miles City. This route from Fort Abraham Lincoln closed the gap in coast-to-eoast communication along a northern route. It remained a highway of national importance until the completion of the railroads. In 1879, when the Northern Pacific 4. Outline Descriptions of the Posts in the Military Division of the Missouri, Commanded by Lieutenant General P. H. Sheridan (Chicago: Headquarters Mili- tary Division of the Missouri, 1876), p. 17. 5. Harold E. Briggs, "Early Freight and Stage Lines in Dakota, North Dakota Historical Quarterly 3, no. 4 (July 1929): 236-38; Carleton W. Kenyon, "History of Fort Randall" (M.A. thesis. University of South Dakota, 1950), p. 46. 6. "Early Settlers in Lyman County," Lyman County Historical Society Collec- tions, Presho, S.Dak. 7. Louis Pfaller, "The Fort Keogh to Bismarck Stage Route," North Dakota His- tory 21 (July 1954): 96-97. Copyright © 1984 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. 120 South Dakota History Railroad began building west of the Missouri, equipment and men were moved along the Keogh Trail, which paralleled the rails for a hundred miles.
Recommended publications
  • History of Navigation on the Yellowstone River
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1950 History of navigation on the Yellowstone River John Gordon MacDonald The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation MacDonald, John Gordon, "History of navigation on the Yellowstone River" (1950). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2565. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2565 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY of NAVIGATION ON THE YELLOWoTGriE RIVER by John G, ^acUonald______ Ë.À., Jamestown College, 1937 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mas­ ter of Arts. Montana State University 1950 Approved: Q cxajJL 0. Chaiinmaban of Board of Examiners auaue ocnool UMI Number: EP36086 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Ois8<irtatk>n PuUishing UMI EP36086 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Post on the Northern Plains, 1865-1885
    The Army Post on the Northern Plains, 1865-1885 (Article begins on page 2 below.) This article is copyrighted by History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society). You may download it for your personal use. For permission to re-use materials, or for photo ordering information, see: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/re-use-nshs-materials Learn more about Nebraska History (and search articles) here: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/nebraska-history-magazine History Nebraska members receive four issues of Nebraska History annually: https://history.nebraska.gov/get-involved/membership Full Citation: Ray H. Mattison, “The Army Post on the Northern Plains, 1865-1885,” Nebraska History 35 (1954): 17-43 Article Summary: Frontier garrisons played a significant role in the development of the West even though their military effectiveness has been questioned. The author describes daily life on the posts, which provided protection to the emigrants heading west and kept the roads open. Note: A list of military posts in the Northern Plains follows the article. Cataloging Information: Photographs / Images: map of Army posts in the Northern Plains states, 1860-1895; Fort Laramie c. 1884; Fort Totten, Dakota Territory, c. 1867 THE ARMY POST ON THE NORTHERN PLAINS, 1865-1885 BY RAY H. MATTISON HE opening of the Oregon Trail, together with the dis­ covery of gold in California and the cession of the TMexican Territory to the United States in 1848, re­ sulted in a great migration to the trans-Mississippi West. As a result, a new line of military posts was needed to guard the emigrant and supply trains as well as to furnish protection for the Overland Mail and the new settlements.1 The wiping out of Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana GAR Posts & History
    Grand Army of the Republic Posts - Historical Summary National GAR Records Program - Historical Summary of Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) Posts by State MONTANA Prepared by the National Organization SONS OF UNION VETERANS OF THE CIVIL WAR INCORPORATED BY ACT OF CONGRESS No. Alt. Post Name Location County Dept. Post Namesake Meeting Place(s) Organized Last Mentioned Notes Source(s) No. PLEASE NOTE: The GAR Post History section is a work in progress (begun 2013). More data will be added at a future date. 000 (Department) N/A N/A MT Org. 10 March Ended 1940 Provisional Department of the Territory of Montana organized as The Montana Post (Virginia 1885 early as 22 June 1867. Montana and Dakota were assigned to the City), 22 June 1867; Beath, Department of the Mountains in March 1878, until it was 1889; Carnahan, 1893; discontinued in 1882. Provisional Department of Montana National Encampment organized in 1885. Permanent Department of Montana organized Proceedings, 1940 10 March 1885. The Department came to an end in July 1940 with the death of its last member. 001 Post No. 1 Virginia City Madison MT No namesake. Known only by its Court Room (1867) In existence as early as June 1867. The Montana Post (Virginia number. City), 15 June 1867 001 Myles W. Keogh Fort Keogh Custer CO/WY CPT Myles Walter Keogh (1840- Org. 1878 About forty original members. One of the five original Posts in the Smiley, J. C., 1901, History of 1876), Co. I, 7th US Cav. (post Mountain Department (later Colorado and Wyoming). Denver; Warhank, J.
    [Show full text]
  • CUSTER BATTLEFIELD National Monument Montana (Now Little Bighorn Battlefield)
    CUSTER BATTLEFIELD National Monument Montana (now Little Bighorn Battlefield) by Robert M. Utley National Park Service Historical Handbook Series No. 1 Washington, D.C. 1969 Contents a. A CUSTER PROFILE b. CUSTER'S LAST STAND 1. Campaign of 1876 2. Indian Movements 3. Plan of Action 4. March to the Little Bighorn 5. Reno Attacks 6. The Annihilation of Custer 7. Reno Besieged 8. Rescue 9. Collapse of the Sioux 10. Custer Battlefield Today 11. Campaign Maps c. APPENDIXES I. Officers of the 7th Cavalry at the Battle of the Little Bighorn II. Low Dog's Account of the Battle III. Gall's Account of the Battle IV. A Participant's Account of Major Reno's Battle d. CUSTER'S LAST CAMPAIGN: A PHOTOGRAPHIC ESSAY e. THE ART AND THE ARTIST f. ADMINISTRATION For additional information, visit the Web site for Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument or view their Official National Park Handbook (#132): Historical Handbook Number One 1969 The publication of this handbook was made possible by a grant from the Custer Battlefield Historical and Museum Association, Inc. This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Price lists of Park Service publications sold by the Government Printing Office may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. 20402. The National Park System, of which Custer Battlefield National Monument is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Frontier on the Upper Missouri
    The Military Frontier on the Upper Missouri (Article begins on page 2 below.) This article is copyrighted by History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society). You may download it for your personal use. For permission to re-use materials, or for photo ordering information, see: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/re-use-nshs-materials Learn more about Nebraska History (and search articles) here: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/nebraska-history-magazine History Nebraska members receive four issues of Nebraska History annually: https://history.nebraska.gov/get-involved/membership Full Citation: Ray H Mattison, “The Military Frontier on the Upper Missouri,” Nebraska History 37 (1956): 159- 182 Article Summary: Many military posts were built on the Upper Missouri at the beginning of the nineteenth century as the United States struggled to keep its frontier secure against various Indian tribes. The Army gradually abandoned the posts as the Indian frontier disappeared. Cataloging Information: Names: Manuel Lisa, Henry Atkinson, J L Grattan, William S Harney, G K Warren, John Pope, Henry H Sibley, Alfred H Sully, P H Sheridan, Crazy Horse, Sitting Bull Trading Companies: Missouri Fur Company, Rocky Mountain Fur Company, American Fur Company Army Posts: Camp Missouri (later Cantonment Missouri), Fort Atkinson, Fort Yates, Fort Rice, Fort Benton, Fort Stevenson, Fort Hale, Fort Bennett, Fort Shaw, Fort Lookout, Fort Randall, Fort Sully, Fort Buford, Camp Poplar, Fort Omaha Keywords: Arikara, Sioux, Cheyenne, Treaty of 1868, “Custer Massacre,” Bighorn, Ghost Dance Rebellion Photographs / Images: interior of Fort Rice, Dakota Territory; Fort Abraham Lincoln, near Bismarck, North Dakota; Fort Hale, near Chamberlain, South Dakota; Battalion, Twenty-Fifth US Infantry, Fort Randall THE MILITARY FRONTIER ON THE UPPER MISSOURI BY RAY H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plains Forts: a Harsh Environment
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: The Plains Forts: A Harsh Environment Full Citation: John D McDermott, “The Plains Forts: A Harsh Environment,” Nebraska History 91 (2010): 2-15 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH2010Forts.pdf Date: 7/28/2014 Article Summary: The US Army had an almost impossible task to perform during the last half of the nineteenth century. Fewer than 15,000 men guarded some 3,000 miles of frontier and an equal length of seacoast. Cataloging Information: Names: William Bisbee, George Holliday, Mrs Andrew S Burt, Mary Rippey Heistand, Gerhard Stullken, Edward W Johns Military Installations: Fort Harker, Kansas; Fort Custer and Camp Poplar River, Montana; Fort Robinson and Fort Kearny, Nebraska; Fort Buford and Fort Union, North Dakota; Fort Phil Kearny, Fort Caspar, Fort Laramie and Fort Fred Steele, Wyoming Keywords: quarters, blizzards, hail, mosquitoes,
    [Show full text]
  • Burial Registers for Military Posts, Camps, and Stations 1768-1921
    Publication Number: M-2014 Publication Title: Burial Registers for Military Posts, Camps, and Stations, 1768-1921 Date Published: 1996 BURIAL REGISTERS FOR MILITARY POSTS, CAMPS, AND STATIONS 1768-1921 Introduction On the single roll of this microfilm publication, M2014, is reproduced a two-volume register of burials at military posts, camps, and stations from 1768 to 1921; however, the bulk of the burials occurred between 1860 and 1890. These registers are part of the Records of the Office of the Quartermaster General, Record Group (RG) 92. This publication was financed by The Malcolm H. Stern-NARA Gift Fund and the National Archives Trust Fund. Background The registers included on this microfilm were created by the Cemetery Branch, established shortly after the Civil War in the Office of the Quartermaster General, Washington, DC. Entries in the two volumes were based on each post's burial records or grave markers. The first volume was created in 1873, updated periodically until 1883, and updated sporadically until 1932. The second was created in 1883 and updated periodically until 1932. Some burials (generally those that occurred before 1883 in cemeteries that were still active in 1883) are listed in both volumes. In the book, Quartermaster Support of the Army: A History of the Corps, 1775-1939 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1962, reprinted 1989), Erna Risch provided the following history of the quartermaster's role in burying deceased military personnel at military posts: Ever since 1775, the [War] Department had assumed certain duties in caring for the dead. In line with its responsibility for construction, repair, and maintenance at Army posts, quartermasters had long administered post burial grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Cavalry and Infantry: the U.S. Military on the Montana Frontier
    Cavalry and Infantry: The U.S. Military on the Montana Frontier User Guide Provided by The Montana Historical Society Education Office (406) 444-4789 www.montanahistoricalsociety.org Funded by a Grant from the E.L. Wiegand Foundation ©2002 The Montana Historical Society Cavalry and Infantry: The U.S. Military on the Montana Frontier Table of Contents I. Introduction Inventory . .2 Footlocker Use – Some Advice for Instructors . .6 Evaluation Form . .7 MHS Educational Resources . .9 Primary Sources and How to Use Them . .13 Standards and Skills for Cavalry and Infantry: The U.S. Military on the Montana Frontier . .20 II. Background Information Historical Narrative for Fourth Graders . .22 Historical Narrative for Instructors . .24 Outline for Classroom Presentation . .26 Amazing Montanans—Biography . .28 Vocabulary List . .29 III. Lesson Plans Lesson 1: Kind Regards to All: James Court Blackwood’s Letters Home . .30 Lesson 2: Recruits at Fort Assiniboine . .38 Lesson 3: In the Barracks . .41 Lesson 4: Mapping Fort Benton . .44 Lesson 5: May I Have Your Autograph? . .46 Lesson 6: Tons of Tunics . .47 IV. Resources and Reference Materials Worksheets and Independent Work . .50 Bibliographies . .58 — 1 — Cavalry and Infantry: The U.S. Military on the Montana Frontier Inventory Borrower: ___________________________________________ Booking Period: ____________________ The borrower is responsible for the safe use of the footlocker and all its contents during the designated booking period. Replacement and/or repair for any lost items and/or damage (other than normal wear and tear) to the footlocker and its contents while in the borrower’s care will be charged to the borrower’s school.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/30/21 05:45 PM UTC MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
    OUTOBER,1882. MONTHLY WEATHER BEVIEW. 16 . ... I __ - PRECIPITATION. that period, the largest October rainfdl, 7.90, occurred in 1862; (Ezpreesed in inches and hqbmhedths.) the sinallest is that of the present year. North Volney, The distribution of rainfall over the Utiited States an1 monthly rainfall, 1.20, or 2.84 below the October average of Canada, as determined from observations taken at more than si: the 1)iimst ten years, and is the smallest for any October during hundred stations, is exhibited on chart iii. The table in th tha,t period ;the largest 0ct.ober rainfall, 6.30, occurred in 1872; lower left-hand corner of this chart shows the average moiithl! the smallest, 1.85, (with the exception of October, 1882), oc. rainfall, determined from the records of Signal Service statioii~ curred in 1879. in the several districts, and the excess or deficiency as coni Virginia: Wytheville, monthly rainfall, 1.10, or 1.90 below pared with the average of many years. the October avera6e of a period of eighteen years. The total There has been an escess of rainfall in the Roiith Atlantic precipitation for the ten months ending October 31, 1882, .is states and in Florida, of 1.36 and 0.48, respectively. In the dG.59, or 10.00 above the average of the corresponding months npper lake region and from the Mississippi westwsrrl to the of eighteen years. Viwiet.y Mills, monthly rainfitll, 1.53, or Pacific coast, except in the northern slope, Rio Graude valley 1.31 below the average of the past four years.
    [Show full text]
  • Custer's Last Stand Program Transcript
    Page 1 Custer's Last Stand Program Transcript Narrator: The news flashed across telegraph wires on July 6th, 1876. George Armstrong Custer and 261 members of his 7th Cavalry had been massacred by Cheyenne and Lakota warriors, near a river called the Little Bighorn, in Montana Territory. There were no survivors. Nathaniel Philbrick, Author, The Last Stand: This was a thunderbolt. The West was won, how could this happen? It's like the sinking of the unsinkable Titanic, you know, it just doesn't compute. Narrator: All across the nation -- in big cities and small towns, word of Custer's death was greeted with stunned disbelief. Richard Slotkin, Historian: It's shocking; it's astonishing. It's not the way the script was written. It was not supposed to end that way. Narrator: In Philadelphia, at the Centennial International Exhibition, an exuberant celebration of America's 100th birthday, was in full swing. As they marked their first century, Americans were in an expansive and optimistic mood. The nation had survived the Civil War, built a railroad across the continent, and was settling the vast spaces of the interior. Richard Slotkin, Historian: It's two days after the happy birthday of America. A century of incredible progress and achievement has just been celebrated. And then comes news that Custer, this representative of the victorious military of the Civil War, of railroad building, of pushing back the frontier has been wiped out by a bunch of savages. Nathaniel Philbrick, Author, The Last Stand: He embodied so much of America. And, and not just our good impulses, but very many of our worst impulses.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Osprey in Southeastern Montana Before and After the Construction of Reservoirs
    STATUS OF THE OSPREY IN SOUTHEASTERN MONTANA BEFORE AND AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION OF RESERVOIRS JON E. SWENSON, Montana Departmentof Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Box 36, Rosebud, Montana 59347 Ospreys (Pandion l•aliaetus)readily colonizesuitable habitat created by manmadeimpoundments. Henny et al. (1978a) found that about47 percent of the Ospreysin Oregon, and a greaterpercentage of thosein the interiorof the state, nest along reservoirs.In northern California, about 20 percent of the Ospreysnest along reservoirs,including 49 percent in the interior of the region (Henny et al. 1978b). Henny et al. (1978a,b) suspectedthat Osprey numbers had increased in both areas due to the construction of the reser- voirs. Also, Henny and Noltemeier (1975) and Henny et al. (1978b) have describedsituations where Ospreys or their progeny, nesting on natural lakes, have colonizednearby reservoirs as nestsites became less available at the natural lakes. Childress and Eng (1979) documented an increased Ospreypopulation with the constructionof shallowimpoundments in an ex- istingreservoir. However, the establishmentof a breedingOsprey population in an area wherebreeding Ospreys were not previouslyfound hasapparently not been documented.This paper documentssuch a situation. STUDY AREA AND METHODS The study area (Figure 1) comprisessoutheastern Montana, bounded on the northby the MissouriRiver (exceptthat the entireFort PeckReservoir on the MissouriRiver was included), on the southby Wyoming,on the westby the Bighorn River and the north-flowingportion of the MusselshellRiver, and on the east by North and South Dakota. This area containsno natural lakes, exceptfor oxbowson major rivers.Three mainstreamreservoirs have been constructed in this area: Fort Peck Reservoir (1,000 km 2) on the MissouriRiver in 1939, Tongue River Reservoir(14 km2) on the Tongue River in 1940 and Bighorn Lake or YellowtailReservoir (70 km2) on the BighornRiver in 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • General Nelson Miles
    General Nelson Miles (From Wikipedia) Miles was working as a crockery store clerk in Boston when the Civil War began. He entered the Union Army on September 9, 1861, as a volunteer and fought in many crucial battles. He became a lieutenant in the 22nd Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, and was commissioned lieutenant colonel of the 61st New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment on May 31, 1862. He was promoted to colonel after the Battle of Antietam. Other battles he participated in include Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville, and the Appomattox Campaign. Wounded four times in battle (he was shot in the neck and abdomen at Chancellorsville), he was awarded the honorary grade (on March 2, 1867) of brevet brigadier general in the regular army in recognition of his actions at Chancellorsville, and the honorary grade of brevet major general for Spotsylvania Court House. He received the Medal of Honor (on July 23, 1892) for gallantry at Chancellorsville. He was appointed brigadier general of volunteers as of May 12, 1864, for the Battles of the Wilderness and Spotsylvania Court House. On October 21, 1865, he was appointed major general of volunteers at age 26. After the war, he was commandant of Fort Monroe, Virginia, where former Confederate President Jefferson Davis was held prisoner. During his tenure at Fort Monroe, Miles was forced to defend himself against charges that Davis was being mistreated. Indian Wars In July 1866, Miles was appointed a colonel in the regular army. Miles played a leading role in nearly all of the Army's campaigns against the American Indian tribes of the Great Plains.
    [Show full text]