DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetlands, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Fragmentation1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetlands, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Fragmentation1 Black Nubble Wind Farm Redington Township, T1 R2 WBKP, Maine Section 7: Wetlands, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Fragmentation1 Prepared by Woodlot Alternatives, Inc. Topsham, Maine 1 The title of this section was changed to make it more clear where wetland information could be found and reflect the inclusion of a fragmentation discussion taken from previous pre-filed testimony. Black Nubble Wind Farm Page i Section 7 – Wetlands, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Fragmentation Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Ecological Setting of Project area........................................................................... 3 2.1 Methods................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Natural Community Descriptions ........................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Terrestrial Communities ................................................................................ 8 2.2.2 Beech-Birch-Maple Forest............................................................................. 9 2.2.3 Spruce-Northern Hardwood Forest.............................................................. 10 2.2.4 Spruce-Fir-Mountain Sorrel-Feathermoss Forest ........................................ 11 2.2.5 Fir-Heartleaved Birch Subalpine Forest ...................................................... 11 2.2.6 Regenerating Forest Stands.......................................................................... 14 2.2.7 Wetlands and Streams.................................................................................. 16 3.0 Fish and Fisheries ................................................................................................. 20 3.1 Methods.............................................................................................................. 20 3.1.1 Habitat Assessment and Agency Consultation ............................................ 20 3.1.2 Field Surveys............................................................................................... 20 3.2 Fish Community Characterization ..................................................................... 20 3.3 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................ 22 4.0 Reptiles and Amphibians ...................................................................................... 23 4.1 General Community Description ....................................................................... 23 4.2 Methods.............................................................................................................. 24 4.2.1 Species-Habitat Association........................................................................ 24 4.2.2 Incidental Observations ............................................................................... 25 4.3 Results................................................................................................................ 25 4.4 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................ 26 5.0 Birds...................................................................................................................... 27 5.1 General Community Description ....................................................................... 27 5.1.1 Game Birds and Waterfowl ......................................................................... 28 5.1.2 Raptors and Owls......................................................................................... 28 5.1.3 Forest Birds and Songbirds.......................................................................... 28 5.1.4 Migratory Birds............................................................................................ 29 5.2 Methods.............................................................................................................. 30 5.2.1 Species – Habitat Matrix.............................................................................. 30 5.2.2 Incidental Observations ............................................................................... 30 5.2.3 Breeding Bird Surveys................................................................................. 31 5.2.4 Golden Eagle Surveys.................................................................................. 32 5.2.5 Hawk Migration Surveys ............................................................................. 33 5.2.6 Nocturnal Songbird Migration Surveys....................................................... 33 Black Nubble Wind Farm Page ii Section 7 – Wetlands, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Fragmentation 5.2.6.1 1994 Ceilometer and Moonwatching Surveys....................................... 34 5.2.6.2 2002 Radar Surveys ............................................................................... 35 5.2.6.3 Acoustical Monitoring........................................................................... 39 5.3 Results................................................................................................................ 41 5.3.1 Species – Habitat Matrix.............................................................................. 41 5.3.2 Breeding Bird Survey Results...................................................................... 41 5.3.3 Hawk Migration Survey Results.................................................................. 43 5.3.4 Songbird Migration Survey Results............................................................. 46 5.3.4.1 Ceilometer and Moonwatching Surveys................................................ 46 5.3.4.2 Radar Surveys........................................................................................ 47 5.3.4.3 Acoustic Surveys................................................................................... 59 5.4 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................ 63 6.0 Mammals............................................................................................................... 65 6.1 General Community Description ....................................................................... 65 6.2 Methods.............................................................................................................. 68 6.2.1 Species-Habitat Matrix................................................................................ 68 6.2.2 Incidental Observations ............................................................................... 68 6.2.3 Small Mammal Trapping ............................................................................. 68 6.2.4 Deer and Moose Wintering Habitat Surveys ............................................... 69 6.2.5 Canada Lynx Snow Tracking Surveys......................................................... 70 6.3 Results................................................................................................................ 71 6.3.1 Species-Habitat Matrix................................................................................ 71 6.3.2 Deer and Moose Wintering Habitat ............................................................. 72 6.3.3 Canada Lynx Snow Tracking Surveys......................................................... 73 6.4 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................ 73 7.0 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species.......................................................... 75 7.1 Reptiles and Amphibians ................................................................................... 75 7.1.1 Spring Salamander – Special Concern Species ........................................... 75 7.1.2 Northern Leopard Frog – Special Concern Species..................................... 76 7.2 Birds................................................................................................................... 76 7.2.1 Golden Eagle – Maine Endangered Species ................................................ 76 7.2.2 Cooper’s Hawk – Special Concern Species................................................. 77 7.2.3 Three-toed Woodpecker – Special Concern Species................................... 78 7.2.4 Olive-sided Flycatcher – Special Concern Species ..................................... 78 7.2.5 Bicknell’s Thrush – Special Concern Species ............................................. 78 7.3 Mammals............................................................................................................ 81 7.3.1 Long-tailed Shrew – Special Concern Species ............................................ 81 7.3.2 Yellow-nosed Vole – Special Concern Species........................................... 81 7.3.3 Northern Bog Lemming – Maine Threatened Species ................................ 82 7.3.4 Bats – Special Concern Species................................................................... 82 7.3.5 Canada Lynx – Federal Threatened Species, Maine Special Concern Species ......................................................................................................... 94 7.4 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................ 95 Black Nubble Wind Farm Page iii Section 7 – Wetlands, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Fragmentation 8.0 Impact Assessment................................................................................................ 96 8.1 Roads.................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distributions, Vulnerability of Amphibians, T\]Ova Scotia
    Curatorial Report Number 45 Nova Scotia Museum 1747 Summer St. Distributions, Halifax. Nova Scotia. Canada Habitats and Vulnerability of Amphibians, Reptiles,and Small Native Mammals in t\]ova Scotia By John Gil hen and Fred Scott January 1981 Curatorial Report Number 45 Nova Scotia Museum 1747 Summer St. Distributions, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Habitats and Vulnerability of Amphibians, Reptiles, and Small Native Mammals in Nova Scotia By John Gil hen and Fred Scott January 1981 T ~ r T 1 NOVA SCOTIA MUSEUM l Curatorial Reports The Curato~ial Reports of the Nova Scotia Museum contain information , on the collections and the preliminary results of research projects carried out under the program of the museum. The reports may be cited in publications but their manuscript status should be clearly indicated. , 1, 1 l 11 INTRODUCTION In recent years the Science Section of the Nova Scotia Museum has r ecei ved increasingly frequent requests from government and private agencies , and from individuals, for information on plant and animal species or communiti es which are of exceptional scientific value or interest and which may be affected by various kinds of proposed development. These requests fall i nto two categories : information on species or communities occurring at a particular location, and information on the distribution and vulnerability of a species or group of species throughout the province as a whole. Requests in the first category generally cannot be anticipated, and the Science Section r esponds to each one, using a Locality File listing its biological collections by county and location, supplemented by special knowledge of the staff when possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Studies of the Smooth Earth Snake and Redbelly Snake, and Niche Modeling of Forest Species in Eastern Kansas
    Ecological Studies of the Smooth Earth Snake and Redbelly Snake, and Niche Modeling of Forest Species in Eastern Kansas August 12, 2014 William H. Busbya, George R. Pisania, E. Townsend Petersonb, and Narayani Barveb aKansas Biological Survey 2101 Constant Avenue Lawrence, KS 66047-3759 bBiodiversity Institute University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045 Submitted to: Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism 512 SE 25th Avenue Pratt, KS 67124-5911 1 Table of Contents Chapter I. Ecological Studies of the Smooth Earth Snake and Redbelly Snake in Eastern Kansas Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................4 Methods............................................................................................................................................6 Results ..............................................................................................................................................8 Discussion ......................................................................................................................................11 Specific Proposal Questions Addressed by New Work ............................................................16 Northeast Kansas Habitats ........................................................................................................16 Reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • Muller Hill Unit Management Plan- Final
    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands & Forests MULLER HILL UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL Towns of Georgetown, DeRuyter, Lincklaen, Otselic, and Cuyler, in Madison, Chenango and Cortland Counties MARCH 2012 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Region 7 Sub Office 2715 State Highway 80 Sherburne, NY 13460 (607) 674- 4036 ANDREW CUOMO , Governor JOSEPH MARTENS , Commissioner ROBERT DAVIES, State Forester ANDREW M. CUOMO JOE MARTENS GOVERNOR COMMISSIONER STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ALBANY, NEW YORK 12233-1010 MEMORANDUM TO: The Record FROM: Joseph J. MartensD~ DATE: MAR - 9 2012 SUBJECT: Final Muller Hill UMP The Unit Management Plan for Muller Hill UMP has been completed. The Plan is consistent with Department policy and procedure, involved public participation and is consistent with the Environmental Conservation Law, Rules and Regulations. The plan includes management objectives for a ten year period and is hereby approved and adopted. FINAL Muller Hill Unit Management Plan A Management Unit Consisting of Three State Forests in Southwestern Madison and Northwestern Chenango Counties Prepared By: Greg Owens, Senior Forester Jason Schoellig, Senior Forester New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Lands & Forests Office 2715 State Highway 80 Sherburne, New York 13460 607-674-4036 P r e f a c e It is the policy of the Department to manage State Forests for multiple uses to serve the People of New York State. The Muller Hill Unit Management Plan is the basis for supporting a multiple use* goal through the implementation of specific objectives and management strategies. This management will be carried out to ensure the sustainability, biological improvement and protection of the Unit’s ecosystems and to optimize the many benefits to the public that these State Forests provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin No. 36: Amphibians and Reptiles of the Connecticut College Arboretum Jill Devito
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Bulletins Connecticut College Arboretum 12-1998 Bulletin No. 36: Amphibians and Reptiles of the Connecticut College Arboretum Jill Devito Joseph Markow Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/arbbulletins Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Biology Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Devito, Jill and Markow, Joseph, "Bulletin No. 36: Amphibians and Reptiles of the Connecticut College Arboretum" (1998). Bulletins. Paper 36. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/arbbulletins/36 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Connecticut College Arboretum at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. r AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF TH E CONNECTICVT COLLEGE ARBORETVM THE CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ARBORETUM Bulletin No. 36 • December 1998 CONNECTICUT COLLEGE Duncan N. Dayton '81, Chair, Board of Trustees Claire L. Gaudiani '66, President David K. Lewis, ProvosUDean of Faculty ARBORETUM STAFF Glenn D. Dreyer MA '83, Director William A Niering, Research Director Jeffrey D. Smith, Horticulturist Katherine T. Dame '90, Program Coordinator James C. Luce, Supervisor of Grounds Craig O. Vine, Horticultural Assistant Jesse J. Locantore '98, Intern Sally L. Taylor, Education Coordinator Robert A Askins, Paul E. Fell, Research Associates Pamela G. Hine, MA'84, R. Scott Warren, Research Associates Richard A. Orson MA '82, Research Associate John W. Deering, Earth Management Consultant Richard H. Goodwin, Technical Advisor THE CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ARBORETUM ASSOCIATION Membership is open to individuals and organizations interested in supporting the Arboretum and its programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Snakes of New Jersey Brochure
    Introduction Throughout history, no other group of animals has undergone and sur- Snakes: Descriptions, Pictures and 4. Corn snake (Elaphe guttata guttata): vived such mass disdain. Today, in spite of the overwhelming common 24”-72”L. The corn snake is a ➣ Wash the bite with soap and water. Snakes have been around for over 100,000,000 years and despite the Range Maps state endangered species found odds, historically, 23 species of snakes existed in New Jersey. However, sense and the biological facts that attest to the snake’s value to our 1. Northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon sipedon): ➣ Immobilize the bitten area and keep it lower than your environment, a good portion of the general public still looks on the in the Pine Barrens of NJ. It heart. most herpetologists believe the non-venomous queen snake is now 22”-53”L. This is one of the most inhabits sandy, forested areas SNAKES OF extirpated (locally extinct) in New Jersey. 22 species of snakes can still snake as something to be feared, destroyed, or at best relegated to common snakes in NJ, inhabit- preferring pine-oak forest with be found in the most densely populated state in the country. Two of our glassed-in cages at zoos. ing freshwater streams, ponds, an understory of low brush. It ➣ lakes, swamps, marshes, and What not to do if bitten by a snake species are venomous, the timber rattlesnake and the northern All snakes can swim, but only the northern water snake and may also be found in hollow queen snake rely heavily on waterbodies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Redbelly Snakes in the Black Hills of South Dakota
    Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science, Vol. 96 (2017) 25 A SURVEY OF REDBELLY SNAKES IN THE BLACK HILLS OF SOUTH DAKOTA Charles D. Dieter* and Tait Ronningen Department of Natural Resource Management South Dakota State University Brookings, SD 57007 *Corresponding author email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Black Hills redbelly snake (Storieria occipitomaculata pahasapae) is an isolated population and has received little study. We captured redbelly snakes in the Black Hills of South Dakota in 2004, 2005 to determine general mor- phological and population characteristics and to document which habitats were most utilized. We captured 104 redbelly snakes in 2004 (0.34 captures per hour) and 146 redbelly snakes in 2005 (0.45 captures per hour). Redbelly snakes were found an average of 14 m (SD = 20.8 m) from water, usually under cover objects. Females were larger (18.4 cm, SD = 2.45) than males (15.4 cm, SD = 2.22) (t = 4.37, df = 148, P < 0.01). The sex ratio favored females 3:2 (χ2 = 10.9, df = 1, P < 0.01). More than half of captured snakes (60%) were gray phase vs. 40% as brown phase (χ2 = 4.00, df = 1, P < 0.05). Our capture rate indicates Black Hills redbelly snakes are more common than previously thought. We found more redbelly snakes in the northern portion of the Black Hills which receives more moisture than the southern portion. We found redbelly snakes in wet areas so practices which reduce the abundance of moist habitats (cattle-grazing, construc- tion) could threaten the redbelly snake.
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Bellied Snake (Storeria Occipitomaculata) Copulation in South Dakota
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The Prairie Naturalist Great Plains Natural Science Society 12-2018 RED-BELLIED SNAKE (STORERIA OCCIPITOMACULATA) COPULATION IN SOUTH DAKOTA Drew R. Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tpn Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Systems Biology Commons, and the Weed Science Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Natural Science Society at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Prairie Naturalist by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 72 The Prairie Naturalist • 50(2): December 2018 RED-BELLIED SNAKE (STORERIA crossing roads in this region during snake surveys from 28 OCCIPITOMACULATA) COPULATION IN SOUTH April–3 May 2018, corresponding with the first series of DAKOTA — Storeria occipitomaculata is a small, terrestrial warm days for the year (ambient high temperatures: 16.7–30° species of snake that occurs across much of eastern North C). America (Ernst and Barbour 1989, Ernst 2002, Ernst This observation provides the first published account of and Ernst 2003). Due to this widespread distribution, S. S. occipitomaculata copulation in South Dakota and is likely occipitomaculata faces varied climates that likely result one of the earliest observed copulation events for this species. in regional differences in reproductive phenology. Much Other authors such as Kiesow (2006), Collins et al. (2010), of what is known about the reproductive ecology of S. LeClere (2013), and Moriarty and Hall (2014) have suggested occipitomaculata has been documented from the southeastern spring and/or fall copulation for S.
    [Show full text]
  • GTR-NE-108 Part B
    AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES This section provides a compilation ot natural histo- and no breeding populations are known to exist. We rles, distributions, and habitat associations for the 26 am- have also omitted the rough green snake (Opheodrys phibians and 30 reptiles occurring in New England. The aestivus)-although two records exist tor Connecticut, distributions of several s~eciesare not well known in no breeding populations are known. New England-maps need to be up-dated periodically. Species are listed in phylogenetic order. Measure- Nomenclature follows that of Collins and others (1982): ment units here are as reported in the original work. Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for When the original work used English units, metric equiv- North American Amphibians and Reptiles. alents have been supplied. Variations in development We have included the mudpuppy (Necturus m, rna- and hatching times for a species may be attributed to ge- culosus) and red-eared slider (Pseudemys scripta ele- netic and environmental factors. Although key reter- gans), introduced species that have established popula- ences are given for each species, the species accounts tions in parts of the region. We have omitted the eastern point up many gaps in our knowledge of amphibians and mud turtle fKinosternon s. subrubrum) because Con- reptiles. necticut individuals are believed to haie been released Species and Subspecies Caudata Emydidae Necturidae Spotted Turtle (Clemmys guffafa) . .72 Mudpuppy (Necfurus m. maculosus) . .39 Bog Turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii) . .73 Ambystomatidae Wood Turtle (Clemmys insculpta) . .75 Marbled Salamander (Ambystoma opacum) . .40 Eastern Box Turtle (Terrapene c. caroiina) . .77 Jefferson Salamander (Ambystoma Map Turtle (Grapfemys geographica) .
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use and Population Biology of the Northern Redbelly Snake at Oaklake Field Station, SD Regina D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Oak Lake Field Station Research Publications Oak Lake Field Station 2004 Habitat Use and Population Biology of the Northern Redbelly Snake at Oaklake Field Station, SD Regina D. Cahoe South Dakota State University Nels H. Troelstrup South Dakota State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/oak-lake_research-pubs Recommended Citation Cahoe, Regina D. and Troelstrup, Nels H., "Habitat Use and Population Biology of the Northern Redbelly Snake at Oaklake Field Station, SD" (2004). Oak Lake Field Station Research Publications. 16. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/oak-lake_research-pubs/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Oak Lake Field Station at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oak Lake Field Station Research Publications by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science, Vol. 83 (2004) 137 HABITAT USE AND POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN REDBELLY SNAKE AT OAKLAKE FIELD STATION, SD Regina D. Cahoe and Nels H. Troelstrup, Jr. Department of Biology & Microbiology South Dakota State University Brookings, SD 57007 ABSTRACT Habitat use and population biology of the northern redbelly snake (Storeria occipitomaculata occipitomaculata) were studied at the Oak Lake Field Station to enhance existing knowledge and future management efforts for this species in eastern South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Snakes
    Kentucky Snakes Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Fish & Wildlife Mission Statement To conserve and enhance fish and wildlife resources and provide opportunity for hunting, fishing, trapping, boating and other wildlife-related activities. Kentucky Snakes Dr. Jonathan Gassett, Commissioner Compiled by Bill Moore Wildlife Diversity Biologist and Tim Slone Information and Education Director Photographs by John MacGregor April 2002 Reprinted December 2007 The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability in employment or the provision of services, and provides, upon request, reasonable accommodation including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in all programs and activities. Preface The purpose of this booklet is to assist in the identification of Kentucky’s snakes. While some snakes can be easily identified with a quick comparison to a photograph, others can be a little more difficult. Therefore, in addition to photographs, this booklet contains brief writ- ten descriptions and range maps. The general range where each species is known to occur within the state is indicated by blue on these maps. If you discover a snake in the field, observe it from a safe distance. In addi- tion to the snake’s color and pattern, also pay attention to its behavior as this can sometimes provide clues to its identification. In those situations where a snake is discovered in a place where it may be a problem, this booklet contains some suggestions on ways to discourage its presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian and Reptile Species Occuring Near the Project Area Number Three Wind Farm
    Amphibian and Reptile Species Occuring Near the Project Area Number Three Wind Farm Order in NYS US Category Atlas Common Name Scientific Name Status Status Frogs 2 Gray Treefrog Hyla versicolor - - Frogs 3 Northern Spring Peeper Pseudacris crucifer - - Frogs 4 Western Chorus Frog Pseudacris triseriata - - Frogs 5 Bullfrog Rana catesbeiana - - Frogs 6 Green Frog Rana clamitans melanota - - Frogs 7 Mink Frog Rana septentrionalis - - Frogs 8 Wood Frog Rana sylvatica - - Frogs 9 Northern Leopard Frog Rana pipiens - - Frogs 11 Pickerel Frog Rana palustris - - Salamanders 5 Jefferson Salamander Ambystoma jeffersonianum sc - Salamanders 6 Blue-spotted Salamander Ambystoma laterale sc - Salamanders 9 Red-spotted Newt Notophthalmus viridescens - - Salamanders 10 Northern Dusky Salamander Desmognathus fuscus - - Salamanders 11 Allegheny Dusky Salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus - - Salamanders 12 Northern Redback Salamander Plethodon cinereus - - Salamanders 16 Northern Spring Salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus - - Salamanders 18 Northern Two-lined Salamander Eurycea bislineata - - Salamanders 2 Common Mudpuppy Necturus maculosus - - Salamanders 7 Spotted Salamander Ambystoma maculatum - - Salamanders 15 Four-toed Salamander Hemidactylium scutatum - - Snakes 1 Northern Water Snake Nerodia sipedon - - Snakes 3 Northern Brown Snake Storeria dekayi - - Snakes 4 Northern Redbelly Snake Storeria occipitomaculata - - Snakes 5 Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis - - Snakes 7 Eastern Ribbon Snake Thamnophis sauritus - - Snakes 12 Smooth Green Snake
    [Show full text]