DOCSLIB.ORG

Stellarators and Linear Devices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stellarators and Linear Devices Stellarators and linear devices Gábor Veres/Gergő Pokol BME NTI Fusion devices 24. February 2020 Ingredients of fusion Confinement and Stability 2 Confinement (force-free equilibrium) + Stability („rigidity” against perturbations) 3 Linear devices I 4 The magnetic mirror In slowly varying magnetic fields the constant magnetic moment is constant. 푣0 If the initial parallel velocity of the 푣⊥ particle is too large, the particle escapes 푣∥ 5 Linear devices II 6 Linear devices III (Magneto-Optical Traps, MOT) anti-Helmholtz coils and Ioffe-Pritchard trap twisted metal bars to achieve 3D trapping The magnetic field B, versus position 7 The Bennett-pinch (Z-pinch) 1D (linear) equilibrium The simplest equilibrium is the Bennett-pinch (Z-pinch) Why it does not work?: Suffers from numerous, violent instabilities 8 The theta-pinch 1D (linear) equilibrium This equilibrium is stable, but transient. 9 The screw-pinch 1D (linear) equilibrium This equilibrium is stable, but end-losses are substantial 10 Linear devices summary Problems: Loss cones at the ends Instabilities Proposed solutions: - Tandem mirror (electrostatic boundary) - Plasma rotation - Multiple mirrors (diffusive losses) around the axis - ICRH at ends (empty loss cones) - Inverse curved - strong NBI heating (non-thermal population) regions - long device (~100 m) 11 2D (toroidal) equilibrium Partcle drifts in electrical and inhomogeneous magnetic fields: This leads to an outward drift electron gradB-drift Rotational transform (= helical magnetic field) is necessary E ExB-drift ion gradB-drift 12 Rotational transform (iota) 휗 휄 = lim 푛 푛→∞ 2휋푛 2휋 푞 = 휄 The safety factor for tokamaks 13 ZETA Reactor (UK) „Zero Energy Thermonuclear Assembly” – from 1957 14 Plasma balls: 3D equilibrium No „self-confinement” in 3D!!!! 15 Some history (fake news I) Ronald Richter and the Huemul Project (1951), Thermotron → a complete fiasco 16 Some history (fake news II) 17 The helical field is necessary, but not sufficient Vertical field + strong toroidal field to supress instabilities 18 Stellarator zoology 19 Stellarator history Lyman Spitzer with his Model-A stellarator in 1958 20 Stellarator history - Princeton Model-B stellarator T 1 2n D ~ B2 1 kT D B 16 eB Model C stellarator 21 Wendelstein stellarators Wendelstein I-A (1961): „Racetrack” geometry Major radius: 35 cm Minor radius: 2 cm Magnetic field: 1 T Ohmic heating l=3 winding Wendelstein I-B l=2 winding22 Classical stellarator 23 Wendelstein stellarators Wendelstein II-A (1968): Torus geometry Major radius: 50 cm Minor radius: 5 cm Magnetic field: 0,6 T RF heating 24 Classical stellarator – WII-A 25 Wendelstein stellarators Wendelstein II-B (1971): Torus geometry Major radius: 50 cm Minor radius: 5 cm Magnetic field: 1,25 T RF heating OH transformer 26 Confinement depends on iota Let’s design the iota-profile! = 1/q Ratios of small rational numbers are infavourable, because field line close on themselvs after a few turns 27 Modular stellarator 28 (Advanced) Wendelstein stellarators Wendelstein 7-A (1976): Torus geometry Major radius: 2 m Minor radius: 0,1 m Magnetic field: 3,4 T Hydrogen plasma Neutral beam heating 29 Wendelstein stellarators Wendelstein 7-AS (1988): Modular stellarator (5 modules) Partially optimized Major radius: 2 m Minor radius: 0,18 m Magnetic field: 2,5 T Hydrogen and deuterium plasma 30 W7-AS 31 Wendelstein stellarators WEGA (1970 2001 2013): Torus geometry Major radius: 0,72 m Minor radius: 0,11 m Magnetic field: 0,9 T Hydrogen plasma Educational purpose From 2014: Hybrid Illinois Device for Research and Applications 32 Magnetic geometry 33 Island divertor 34 W-7x stellarator (full 3D) 35 Wendelstein stellarators 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 W7-X Greifswald Wega Garching München Wendelstein 7-AS W 7-A W 2-B W 2-A W1-B Wendelstein line stellarators W 1-A 36 Modular stellarator – HSX 37 Heliotron 38 Heliotron – LHD 39 Heliotron – LHD 40 Torsatron 41 Torsatron – TJ-K 42 Heliac 43 Heliac – TJ-II 44 Heliac – TJ-II 45 Stellarator magnetic fields 46 Sources 1. J.L. Johnson: The evolution of stellarator theory st Princeton, PPPl-3629 (2001) 2. H. Wobig et al.: Stellarator research at the IPP Garching, IPP report (2002) 3. M. Hirsch et al.: Major results form the stellarator Wendelstein 7-AS, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 50, 053001 (2008) 4. B.A. Carreras et al.: Progress in strellarator/heliotron research:1981-1986, Nuclear Fusion, 28, 1613 (1988) 5. http://npre.illinois.edu/news/hidra%E2%80%99s-many-uses 6. http://www.hsx.wisc.edu/ 7. http://www.lhd.nifs.ac.jp/en/lhd/ 8. http://www.igvp.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung/projekte-pd/tjk.en.html 9. http://fusionsites.ciemat.es/tj-ii-2/ 10.Stellarator News: http://web.ornl.gov/sci/fed/stelnews/ 47.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Controlled Nuclear Fusion
    Controlled Nuclear Fusion HANNAH SILVER, SPENCER LUKE, PETER TING, ADAM BARRETT, TORY TILTON, GABE KARP, TIMOTHY BERWIND Nuclear Fusion Thermonuclear fusion is the process by which nuclei of low atomic weight such as hydrogen combine to form nuclei of higher atomic weight such as helium. two isotopes of hydrogen, deuterium (composed of a hydrogen nucleus containing one neutrons and one proton) and tritium (a hydrogen nucleus containing two neutrons and one proton), provide the most energetically favorable fusion reactants. in the fusion process, some of the mass of the original nuclei is lost and transformed to energy in the form of high-energy particles. energy from fusion reactions is the most basic form of energy in the universe; our sun and all other stars produce energy through thermonuclear fusion reactions. Nuclear Fusion Overview Two nuclei fuse together to form one larger nucleus Fusion occurs in the sun, supernovae explosion, and right after the big bang Occurs in the stars Initially, research failed Nuclear weapon research renewed interest The Science of Nuclear Fusion Fusion in stars is mostly of hydrogen (H1 & H2) Electrically charged hydrogen atoms repel each other. The heat from stars speeds up hydrogen atoms Nuclei move so fast, they push through the repulsive electric force Reaction creates radiant & thermal energy Controlled Fusion uses two main elements Deuterium is found in sea water and can be extracted using sea water Tritium can be made from lithium When the thermal energy output exceeds input, the equation is self-sustaining and called a thermonuclear reaction 1929 1939 1954 1976 1988 1993 2003 Prediction Quantitativ ZETA JET Project Japanese Princeton ITER using e=mc2, e theory Tokomak Generates that energy explaining 10 from fusion is fusion.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Issue No. 7 September 2017
    NEWSLETTER September 2017 Issue no. 7 Nuclear Industry Group Newsletter September 2017 Contents Notes from the Chair ................................................................................... 3 IOP Group Officers Forum .......................................................................... 4 NIG Committee Elections ............................................................................ 6 Nuclear Industry Group Career Contribution Prize 2017 .......................... 7 Event – Gen IV Reactors by Richard Stainsby (NNL) ................................ 8 Event – Nuclear Security by Robert Rodger (NNL) and Graham Urwin (RWM) ......................................................................................................... 12 Event – The UK’s Nuclear Future by Dame Sue Ion ................................ 13 Event – Regulatory Challenges for Nuclear New Build by Mike Finnerty. .................................................................................................................... 15 Event – European Nuclear Young Generation Forum ............................. 18 Event – Nuclear Fusion, 60 Years on from ZETA by Chris Warrick (UKAEA), Kate Lancaster (York Plasma Institute), David Kingham (Tokamak Energy) and Ian Chapman (UKAEA) ....................................... 19 IOP Materials and Characterisation Group Meetings .............................. 25 “Brexatom” – the implications of the withdrawal for the UK from the Euratom Treaty. ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Footnotes for ATOMIC ADVENTURES
    Footnotes for ATOMIC ADVENTURES Secret Islands, Forgotten N-Rays, and Isotopic Murder - A Journey into the Wild World of Nuclear Science By James Mahaffey While writing ATOMIC ADVENTURES, I tried to be careful not to venture off into subplots, however interesting they seemed to me, and keep the story flowing and progressing at the right tempo. Some subjects were too fascinating to leave alone, and there were bits of further information that I just could not abandon. The result is many footnotes at the bottom of pages, available to the reader to absorb at his or her discretion. To get the full load of information from this book, one needs to read the footnotes. Some may seem trivia, but some are clarifying and instructive. This scheme works adequately for a printed book, but not so well with an otherwise expertly read audio version. Some footnotes are short enough to be inserted into the audio stream, but some are a rambling half page of dense information. I was very pleased when Blackstone Audio agreed wholeheartedly that we needed to include all of my footnotes in this version of ATOMIC ADVENTURES, and we came up with this added feature: All 231 footnotes in this included text, plus all the photos and explanatory diagrams that were included in the text. I hope you enjoy reading some footnotes while listening to Keith Sellon-Wright tell the stories in ATOMIC ADVENTURES. James Mahaffey April 2017 2 Author’s Note Stories Told at Night around the Glow of the Reactor Always striving to beat the Atlanta Theater over on Edgewood Avenue, the Forsyth Theater was pleased to snag a one-week engagement of the world famous Harry Houdini, extraordinary magician and escape artist, starting April 19, 1915.1 It was issued an operating license, no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist's Free E-Mail Newsletters Twist and Shout and Alerts
    Log in Register My account Subscribe Digital & mobile Newsletters RSS Jobs Help Thursday September 1st 2011 Search World politics Business & finance Economics Science & technology Culture Blogs Debate & discuss Multimedia Print edition Fusion power Be the first to comment Print Next ITERation? E-mail Reprints & permissions Generating electricity by nuclear fusion has long looked like a chimera. A reactor being built in Germany may change that Advertisement Sep 3rd 2011 | from the print edition Like 3 7 Most commented Most recommended 1. China's military power: Modernisation in sheep's clothing 2. Charlemagne: Among the dinosaurs 3. Anti-corruption protests in India: No modern-day AS THE old joke has it, fusion is the power of the future—and always will be. The sales Mahatma pitch is irresistible: the principal fuel, a heavy isotope of hydrogen called deuterium, 4. German business and politics: Goodbye to Berlin can be extracted from water. In effect, therefore, it is in limitless supply. Nor, unlike 5. Libya: The birth of free Libya fusion’s cousin, nuclear fission, does the process produce much in the way of 6. Immigration: Let them come radioactive waste. It does not release carbon dioxide, either. Which all sounds too good 7. Climate science (II): Clouds in a jar to be true. And it is. For there is the little matter of building a reactor that can run for 8. Language learning: No, she's foreign! long enough to turn out a meaningful amount of electricity. Since the first attempt to do 9. Martin Luther King: A blockheaded memorial so, a machine called Zeta that was constructed in Britain in the 1950s, no one has even 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research Association Euratom-CEA, Centre De
    Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research P. STOTT Association Euratom-CEA, Centre de Cadarache, 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance, France. This article gives a short overview of the origins of nuclear fusion and of its development as a potential source of terrestrial energy. 1 Introduction A hundred years ago, at the dawn of the twentieth century, physicists did not understand the source of the Sun‘s energy. Although classical physics had made major advances during the nineteenth century and many people thought that there was little of the physical sciences left to be discovered, they could not explain how the Sun could continue to radiate energy, apparently indefinitely. The law of energy conservation required that there must be an internal energy source equal to that radiated from the Sun‘s surface but the only substantial sources of energy known at that time were wood or coal. The mass of the Sun and the rate at which it radiated energy were known and it was easy to show that if the Sun had started off as a solid lump of coal it would have burnt out in a few thousand years. It was clear that this was much too shortœœthe Sun had to be older than the Earth and, although there was much controversy about the age of the Earth, it was clear that it had to be older than a few thousand years. The realization that the source of energy in the Sun and stars is due to nuclear fusion followed three main steps in the development of science.
    [Show full text]
  • IYNC2016 and Beyond 2 3
    IYNC BULLETIN International Youth Nuclear Congress SPECIAL EDITION #12 September 2016 www.iync.org IYNC2016 and beyond 2 3 Editorial Dear IYNC community, Some innovating solutions are already in development. Small modular reactors (SMRs), hybrid renewable-nuclear energy solutions, and accident tolerant fuel (ATF) are good As the newly elected IYNC President examples. Innovation will also have to happen in other areas, such as, licensing, waste I would like to welcome you to the 12th management and decommissioning. Successful projects will result in multi-disciplinary IYNC Bulletin. This issue marks the be- and multi-cultural initiatives requiring partnerships between various experts and cultures. ginning of a new term for IYNC. A new With its network of 49 countries, IYNC has the potential to support innovation in nuclear leadership team was elected in July 2016 energy. for the period 2016 – 2018. Innovation will be the focus of this term. Innovating for IYNC2016 was also a unique opportunity to discuss the future of IYNC. The first IYNC IYNC but also supporting innovation in Alumni event took place in Hangzhou where several ideas were discussed. A need to nuclear science and technology. innovate within IYNC was also identified. In this new term, we will work to develop IYNC activities beyond the bi-annual congress. As an example we plan to develop an innova- There is a growing consensus that the global warming mitigation objective of limiting to a tion contest, which you will hear more about soon. Other priorities will have to do with 2°C rise in global temperatures cannot be met without nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Years of Fusion Research
    “50” Years of Fusion Research Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ Independent Activities Period (IAP) January 19, 2011 MIT PSFC Cambridge, MA 02139 1 FiFusion Fi FiPre Powers th thSe Sun “We nee d to see if we can mak e f usi on work .” John Holdren @MIT, April, 2009 3 Toroidal Magg(netic Confinement (1940s-earlyy) 50s) • 1940s - first ideas on using a magnetic field to confine a hot plasma for fusion. • 1947 Sir G.P. Thomson and P. C. Thonemann began classified investigations of toroidal “pinch” RF discharge, eventually lead to ZETA, a large pinch at Harwell, England 1956. • 1949 Richter in Argentina issues Press Release proclaiming fusion, turns out to be bogus, but news piques Spitzer’s interest. • 1950 Spitzer conceives stellarator while on a ski lift, and makes ppproposal to AEC ($50k )-initiates Project Matterhorn at Princeton. • 1950s Classified US Program on Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion (Project Sherwood) carried out until 1958 when magnetic fusion research was declassified. US and others unveil results at 2nd UN Atoms for Peace Conference in Geneva 1958. Fusion Leading to 1958 Geneva Meeting • A period of rapid progress in science and technology – N-weapons, N-submarine, Fission energy, Sputnik, transistor, .... • Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion had great potential – Much optimism in the early 1950s with expectation for a quick solution – Political support and pressure for quick results (but bud gets were low, $56M for 1951-1958) – Many very “innovative” approaches were put forward. – Early fusion reactor concepts - Tamm/Sakharov, Spitzer (Model D) very large. • Reality began to set in by the mid 1950s – Coll ectiv e eff ects - MHD instability ( 195 4), Bo hm d iffus io n was ubi qui tous – Meager plasma physics understanding led to trial and error approaches – A multitude of experiments were tried and ended up far from fusion conditions – Magnetic Fusion research in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ITER Session at the IAEA Fusion Energy Conferencexa304 3
    ITER activities in 2003 is expected to be on the same level as in previous years, It was reported that the mandate of the Russian delegation to participate in the Negotiations in 2003 is expected to be approved soon by the Government. The RF delegation also reported that they had received informal enquiries from the Republic of Korea about possible participation in ITER. Dr. S. Matsuda, Moderator of the Fifth Meeting of the Negotiations Standing Sub-Group (NSSG-5, held in Rokkasho-mura on 7-9 October 2002) introduced the progress report of the NSSG. The delegations noted the progress report from the NSSG on the Joint Assessment of Specific Sites (JASS). The joint assessment of the Japanese site at Rokkasho-mura was conducted on 2-5 October 2002. This followed the assessment in September of the proposed Canadian site at Clarington. With the successful conduct of these two assessments, the JASS process is at the halfway mark. The last two site assessments will be carried out i] December at the two sites proposed by the European Union one at Cadar-ache in France and the other at Vandellos in Spain. It was agreed that the final report of the JASS would be presented at the Eighth Negotiations Meeting (N8), Significant progress was also made on a wide range of other issues, including matters such as the treaty to implement ITER (the Joint Implementation Agreement - JIA), procurement allocation and the intellectual property rights thait would accrue to participants in the project. The Negotiators agreed that the international organization responsible for implementing the project would be called the ITE-R International Fusion Energy Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Nuclear Fusion, Energetic Utopia
    International Journal of Applied Research 2016; 2(7): 224-230 ISSN Print: 2394-7500 ISSN Online: 2394-5869 Impact Factor: 5.2 Controlled nuclear fusion, energetic utopia IJAR 2016; 2(7): 224-230 www.allresearchjournal.com Received: 02-05-2016 Leandro Meléndez Lugo and José Arturo Aguilar Jiménez Accepted: 03-06-2016 Leandro Meléndez Lugo Abstract Instituto Nacional de Through a comprehensive analysis, accentuated by theoretical scientific and economic aspects, using a Investigaciones Nucleares, basic physical approach about compressed air, an observation about magnetic field plasma compression Centro Nuclear de México, is made. This observation, about the attempt to use the magnetic field confinement in controlled nuclear Departamento de Física, La fusion, is related to the fact, aside from several technological and economic problems, that a magnetic Marquesa, Ocoyoacac, C.P. field cannot properly confine ionized gas; in the best case it can only constrict the movement of ions 52750 Edo. De Mexico and electrons. The analysis results leave little confidence that the conventional method intended to achieve the goal of controlled nuclear fusion could succeed. Also facing this complex scenario plenty José Arturo Aguilar Jiménez of technical and economic difficulties; we try to offer an alternative method that could provide hope for Universidad Autónoma de the commercial use of nuclear fusion reactions. Yucatán Facultad de Ingeniería Ingeniería Física Keywords: nuclear fusion, magnetic confinement, tokamaks, cold fusion, energy production 1. Introduction On 8 May 1946, Sir George Paget Thomson and Moses Blackman applied for a patent for a device based on electrical discharges in gases that would supposedly constitute a nuclear fusion reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years on from ZETA …
    Sixty years on from ZETA … Chris Warrick The Sun … What is powering it? Coal? Lifetime 3,000 years Gravitational Energy? Lifetime 30 million years – Herman Von Helmholtz, Lord Kelvin - mid 1800s The Sun … Suggested the Earth is at least 300 million years old – confirmed by geologists studying rock formations … The Sun … Albert Einstein (Theory of Special Relativity) and Becquerel / Curie’s work on radioactivity – suggested radioactive decay may be the answer … But the Sun comprises hydrogen … The Sun … Arthur Eddington proposed that fusion of hydrogen to make helium must be powering the Sun “If, indeed, the subatomic energy is being freely used to maintain their great furnaces, it seems to bring a little nearer to fulfilment our dream of controlling this latent power for the well-being of the human race – or for its suicide” Cambridge – 1930s Cockcroft Walton accelerator, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge. But huge energy losses and low collisionality Ernest Rutherford : “The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing . Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Oxford – 1940s Peter Thonemann – Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford. ‘Pinch’ experiment in glass, then copper tori. First real experiments in sustaining plasma and magnetically controlling them. Imperial College – 1940s George Thomson / Alan Ware – Imperial College London then Aldermaston. Also pinch experiments, but instabilities started to be observed – especially the rapidly growing kink instability. AERE Harwell Atomic Energy Research Establishment (AERE) Harwell – Hangar 7 picked up fusion research. Fusion is now classified. Kurchatov visit 1956 ZETA ZETA Zero Energy Thermonuclear Apparatus Pinch experiment – but with added toroidal field to help with instabilities and pulsed DC power supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert
    SE0100262 TRITA-A Report ISSN 1102-2051 VETENSKAP OCH ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE IONST KTH Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert Research and Training programme on CONTROLLED THERMONUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS (Association EURATOM/NFR) FUSION PLASMA PHYSICS ALFV N LABORATORY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK TRITA-ALF-2001-04 ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert VETENSKAP OCH KONST Stockholm, June 2001 The Alfven Laboratory Division of Fusion Plasma Physics Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden (Association EURATOM/NFR) Printed by Alfven Laboratory Fusion Plasma Physics Division Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION RESEARCH DURING HALF A CENTURY Bo Lehnert Alfven Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT A review is given on the historical development of research on plasma physics and controlled fusion. The potentialities are outlined for fusion of light atomic nuclei, with respect to the available energy resources and the environmental properties. Various approaches in the research on controlled fusion are further described, as well as the present state of investigation and future perspectives, being based on the use of a hot plasma in a fusion reactor. Special reference is given to the part of this work which has been conducted in Sweden, merely to identify its place within the general historical development. Considerable progress has been made in fusion research during the last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fusion Power – an Overview of History, Present and Future
    International Journal of Advanced Network, Monitoring and Controls Volume 04, No.04, 2019 Nuclear Fusion Power – An Overview of History, Present and Future Stewart C. Prager Department of Physics University of Wisconsin – Madison Madison, WI 53706, USA E-mail: [email protected] Summary—Fusion power offers the prospect of an allowing the nuclei to fuse together. Such conditions almost inexhaustible source of energy for future can occur when the temperature increases, causing the generations, but it also presents so far insurmountable ions to move faster and eventually reach speeds high engineering challenges. The fundamental challenge is to enough to bring the ions close enough together. The achieve a rate of heat emitted by a fusion plasma that nuclei can then fuse, causing a release of energy. exceeds the rate of energy injected into the plasma. The main hope is centered on tokamak reactors and II. FUSION TECHNOLOGY stellarators which confine deuterium-tritium plasma In the Sun, massive gravitational forces create the magnetically. right conditions for fusion, but on Earth they are much Keywords-Fusion Energy; Hydrogen Power; Nuclear Fusion harder to achieve. Fusion fuel – different isotopes of hydrogen – must be heated to extreme temperatures of I. INTRODUCTION the order of 50 million degrees Celsius, and must be Today, many countries take part in fusion research kept stable under intense pressure, hence dense enough to some extent, led by the European Union, the USA, and confined for long enough to allow the nuclei to Russia and Japan, with vigorous programs also fuse. The aim of the controlled fusion research underway in China, Brazil, Canada, and Korea.
    [Show full text]