DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Days 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Days 2013 OPEN DAYS 2013 Proceedings Published in December 2013 Edited by the Committee of the Regions and the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission © European Union, 2013 Organisers Table of contents and partners Organisers and partners 3 Opening session 13 Workshops Managing change 2014-2020 19 Synergies and cooperation 43 Challenges and solutions 69 Master class 135 Exhibition 100EUrban solutions 139 Local events 143 Football tournement 146 Evaluation 147 Media strategy and coverage analysis 153 OPEN DAYS 2014 157 Organisers and partners Editorial OPEN DAYS is one of those things that begin as a nice idea and grow to become an institution. 11 years since it was first organised, OPEN DAYS has become so much more than a series of events. This is the fourth OPEN DAYS I have attended in my capacity as Commissioner for Regional Policy. What surprises me year after year is how much information and new highlights I discover during this one week. Every year I take pleasure from the enthusiasm of the people implementing Regional Policy on the ground. And I also admire their commitment to making the most out of Regional Policy to supporting the economic and social cohesion of their regions. This year’s OPEN DAYS came at a point when the negotiations for the legislative package for the new period were still on-going, as well as the finalisation of the partnership agreements and operational programmes. Its main theme “Europe’s regions and cities taking off for 2020” reminded us that we are on the brink of the new, reformed cohesion policy era. I know that regions have lately been working very closely and intensively with Commission services to prepare the ground for that. This is the only way to ensure that they can start implementing the new programmes as soon as possible. And I am very glad to see that the OPEN DAYS 2013 programme provided the occasion to help regions, cities and national administrations in these preparations, and that the occasion was used to its full potential. Indeed, nearly all workshops were overbooked and at least as many people as were in the rooms watched the many of the sessions via webstreaming. I am also pleased that ten Directorates-General of the European Commission were involved in the organisation of the workshops and debates. It is a signal for our partners in the regional and national administrations that we need to work in partnership and across sectors in order to achieve more and better results. One of the most important assets of OPEN DAYS is the capacity to attract new audiences: 75% of all participants of the 2013 edition were newcomers (in comparison to 2012). This is certainly due to the variety of speakers and stakeholders the event brings together, and new elements which are introduced into the programme. In particular, I was delighted to inaugurate the outdoor part of the 100 EUrban solutions exhibition, showcasing how EU regional funds improve the life of people in towns and cities, and to welcome the Master Class programme for 77 young researchers in regional and urban development, raising their awareness about EU cohesion policy and creating links to the academic sector which need to be further exploited in the future. Let me use this opportunity to thank you for your commitment in participating in OPEN DAYS and to praise the excellent collaboration with the Committee of the Regions and all partners involved. I am very much looking forward to meeting you at OPEN DAYS 2014! Johannes Hahn European Commissioner for Regional and Urban Policy 4 OPEN DAYS 2013 - 11th European Week of Regions and Cities - Proceedings Editorial Another successful edition of the European Week of Regions and Cities took place during 7 -10 October in Brussels. Some 6,000 participants from all levels of government and stakeholders connected and looked forward to ‘take-off’ with new resources, incentives and programmes, while building on well-established contacts, networks and experience from the past programming period. At the critical moment of beginning a new chapter, this 11th edition of the OPEN DAYS responded more than ever to a real need for information and exchange of know-how about the new rules of implementing future EU cohesion policy programmes. The regional policy budget 2014-2020 is the Union’s main investment tool to stir growth and jobs. In quantitative terms, sub-national public authorities in the EU are responsible for one-third of public expenditure, about EUR 2,100 billion per year, and two-thirds of public investments, some EUR 200 billion. EUR 325 billion comes from EU funds through the cohesion policy programmes currently being planned. The OPEN DAYS set out to contribute towards the qualitative dimension of the equation, bringing officials at EU, national, regional and local level together to make sure that public money is well spent. It offered an inter-institutional platform for political communication to regional and local stakeholders. I would like to take the opportunity to thank in particular the partner regions and cities for their commitment and active involvement on so many strands: setting up partnerships, organising and/or hosting workshops, debates and networking sessions, as well as for their contribution to the inspiring ‘100 EUrban solutions’ exhibition. Introducing new initiatives in the programme can only work with enthusiastic partners buying in. The core of knowledge gained through the OPEN DAYS 2013 is gathered in these proceedings, where you can find the descriptions, relevant information and useful contacts to support your work until the next edition. Looking ahead to the 12th European Week of Regions and Cities in 2014, the initial experiences of implementing national, regional and territorial cooperation programmes may be at the forefront of the event. Policy and financial instruments are there, but in order to use them in a smart and effective way, partnerships are needed, together with networking to exchange good practice and know-how about new and innovative approaches. All of this happens at the local and regional level with those primarily responsible to deliver and where a wealth of expertise meets strong political commitment. ‘Going local’ is the most successful approach in the search for sustainable solutions to the manifold challenges faced by Europe today – and that’s what OPEN DAYS is all about. Let me thank all the participants for their valuable contribution and look forward to welcoming you at OPEN DAYS 2014! Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso President of the Committee of the Regions OPEN DAYS 2013 - 11th European Week of Regions and Cities - Proceedings 5 Partner regions and cities Abruzzo Region Akershus County Alsace Region City of Amadora Andalusia Aosta Valley Autonomous Region Bakirkoy Municipality Province of Barcelona Canton of Basel-Landschaft Canton of Basel-Stadt Basilicata Region Basque Country Brittany Brussels Capital Region City of Budapest Carinthia Region Castile and León Catalonia Deux-Sèvres Dubrovnik-Neretva Region Urban Community of Dunkirk East of England East Styria East Sweden G-4 EU Office (Amsterdam, The Hague, Province of Flevoland Province of Friesland Friuli Venezia Giulia Autonomous Region Rotterdam, Utrecht) Gabrovo Galicia Hedmark Helsinki Canton of Herzegovina-Neretva Hesse Ile-de-France Isère Lazio Region City of Leeuwarden Legnica-Glogowski Liège Province of Limburg (BE) Province of Limburg (NL) Lovech Lower Austria Lower Saxony Lower Silesia Lubelskie Region Lubuskie Region Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Merseyside Mid-Norway Molise Region Murcia Region Navarre 6 OPEN DAYS 2013 - 11th European Week of Regions and Cities - Proceedings Partner regions and cities Aosta Valley Autonomous Region Aragon Arnhem Nijmegen City Region Principality of Asturias Azores Bacau Municipality Baden-Württemberg Basque Country City of Berlin Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region Bornova Municipality Bratislava Region Braunschweig Bristol Catalonia Central and Eastern Pannonian Croatia Central Denmark Central Region of Portugal Central Serbian Municipalities Centre Region Crete East Sweden Eindhoven Emilia-Romagna Region Észak-Alföld Eure Extremadura Flanders German-speaking Community Galicia Gelderland of Belgium City of Gothenburg City of Guimarães Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg Hanover Region Isère Bagcilar Municipality / Istanbul Istria Region Karlovac County Kent Krapina-Zagorje County Kujawsko-Pomorskie Province of Limburg (NL) Lippe City of Ljubljana City of Lodz Lodzkie Region Lombardy Region London Lubuskie Region Luxembourg City of Maastricht Madrid Region Malmö Marche Region Mazovia Navarre Nemunas Euroregion Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region Norrbotten North Central Sweden North Denmark North Eastern Scotland OPEN DAYS 2013 - 11th European Week of Regions and Cities - Proceedings 7 Partner regions and cities North Region of Portugal North Rhine-Westphalia Province of North-Brabant Northern Ireland Northern Netherlands Provinces Northern Norway Pays de la Loire Region Picardie Piedmont Region Podlaskie Podravska Pomorskie Rhône-Alpes Region City of Riga Saarland Salzburg City of Saragossa Canton of Sarajevo Sicily Region Silesia Region Silivri Municipality Skåne Region Republic of Slovenia City of Sofia Southern Denmark Region Southern England Split-Dalmatia Republika Srpska City of Starogard Gdański Stavanger Region Trentino (Alpeuregio) Province of Treviso Province of Turin Tuscany Tyrol (Alpeuregio) Umbria Vejle Veneto Region Vidzeme Planning Region Vienna Virovitica-Podravina Vysočina Region Canton of West Herzegovina
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Les Systèmes De Transport Collectif Structurants
    la CeMathèque d oossier s s i e r tthématique h é m a t i q u e > Les systèmes de transpotransportr t collectif strstructurantsucturants > Définition, rôle et impact d’un sysystèmestème de trtransportansport ccollectifollectif structurstructurantant > CaracCaractéristiquestéristiques d’un sysystèmestème de trtransportansport colleccollectiftif strucstructurantturant > LeLess réponses possibles : différents types de matériel roulant enenvisageablesvisageables > LeLess infrinfrastructuresastructures de déplacdéplacementement > Coût des différents sysystèmes.stèmes. Eléments comparcomparatifsatifs > Domaine de perpertinencetinence de chaque sysystèmestème La CeMathèque_n°26n°26 décembre 2008 > Préambule Divers systèmes de transport collectif, plus ou moins innovants selon les cas, permettent la mise en place d’une desserte très efficiente dans des contextes précis. Ils dynamisent le trans- port en commun, le rendent plus attractif et favorisent un accroissement de sa clientèle, dans des conditions qui le rendent également plus concurrentiel avec la voiture individuelle. Ces systèmes ont la caractéristique d’être structurants, c’est-à-dire qu’ils constituent l’ossature d’un réseau et offrent, à ce titre, une desserte qui rencontre un ensemble d’exigences préci- ses, au moins en termes de régularité, de fréquence et de rapidité. Ils proposent également un niveau de service élevé. Ils structurent aussi l’environnement dans lequel ils s’inscrivent : en termes d’attractivité et de développement des lieux d’activités, d’habitat, … Différentes solutions existent et connaissent un succès croissant. Elles témoignent d’une diver- sification importante des alternatives possibles, qui peuvent être adoptées au sein d’une 8 même ville. Chacune dispose de son domaine de pertinence. Ce qui indique clairement 200 qu’à chaque situation correspond une solution, pas nécessairement parfaite, mais la mieux adaptée parmi ces différentes solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Validated Recommendations on the Integration of the 8 Individual Urban Nodes in the TEN-T Network D3.3
    Validated recommendations on the integration of the 8 individual urban nodes in the TEN-T network D3.3 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Horizon 2020 H2020-MG-2016-2017 GA No. 769458 Version: 1.0 Date: 31/10//2018 Authors:The sole responsibility Kevin for the van content der of this Linden document lies and with theRaymond authors. It does notLinssen necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 769458 Vital Nodes 769458 D3.3 – Validated recommendations on the integration of the 8 individual urban nodes in the TEN-T network Public (PU) Document Control Page Deliverable / Milestone number VITALNODES D3.3 Validated recommendations on the integration of the 8 individual urban Deliverable / Milestone title nodes in the TEN-T network Dissemination level Public (PU) Lead participant Rijkswaterstaat Kevin van der Linden (Rijkswaterstaat) Written by Raymond Linssen (Rijkswaterstaat) Rainer Müller (EuroVienna) Ricardo Poppeliers (Ecorys) Reviewed by Karin De Schepper (INE) Jos Arts (Rijkswaterstaat) Sjaak van der Werf (Project Coordinator) Approved by Jos Arts (Innovation Manager) Validated recommendations on the integration of the 8 individual urban Brief description nodes in the TEN-T network Creation date 17 August 2018 Version number 1.0 Version date 31 October 2018 Last modified by Kevin
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Potential Impacts of Light Rail Transit (LRT) on Land Development Case Study: Surabaya Municipality, Indonesia
    Exploring Potential Impacts of Light Rail Transit (LRT) on Land Development Case Study: Surabaya Municipality, Indonesia MASTER THESIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for The Master Degree from University of Groningen and The Master Degree from Institut Teknologi Bandung By: Andy Prihandoko RUG: S2279797 ITB: 25411047 Supervisors: Dr. Femke Niekerk (RUG) Dr. Ir. Iwan Pratoyo Kusumantoro, MT (ITB) Double Master Degree Programme Department of Regional and City Planning School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development Institut Teknologi Bandung and Environmental and Infrastructure Planning Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen 2013 Master Thesis 2012/2013 Exploring Potential Impacts of Light Rail Transit (LRT) on Land Development Case study: Surabaya Municipality, Indonesia By ANDY PRIHANDOKO ITB : 25411047 RUG : S2279797 Double Master Degree Programme Environmental and Infrastructure Planning Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen And Development Planning and Infrastructure Management Department of Regional and City Planning Institut Teknologi Bandung Approved Supervisors Date: August 2013 Supervisor I Supervisor II Dr. Femke Niekerk Dr. Ir. Iwan Pratoyo Kusumantoro, MT Andy Prihandoko i Master Thesis 2012/2013 Abstract Mass rapid transit is a transport mean that has been developed over decades to deal with transport problems, such as road traffic congestion, and promote the use of public transport instead of private vehicles. Light Rail Transit (LRT) is a kind of mass rapid transit that has been developed in some cities across the world, such as Strasbourg-France and Calgary-Canada. As a transport mean, LRT has inter-relationship with land use described in transport-land use feedback cycle. It will inherently influence land development if it is supported by local policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Politiques De Transport Et Inégalités Sociales D'accès
    ENAC Faculté de l’Environnement Naturel, Architectural et Construit INTER Institut du développement territorial LaSUR Laboratoire de sociologie urbaine POLITIQUES DE TRANSPORT ET INÉGALITÉS SOCIALES D’ACCÈS ANALYSE COMPARATIVE DE HUIT AGGLOMÉRATIONS EUROPÉENNES CHRISTOPHE JEMELIN, VINCENT KAUFMANN, JULIE BARBEY, TINA KLEIN GIUSEPPE PINI (Observatoire Universitaire de la Mobilité, Université de Genève) Projet de recherche PREDIT 3 Cahier du LaSUR 10 Cahier du LaSUR 10 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Faculté de l’Environnement Naturel, Architectural et Construit christophe.jemelin@epfl.ch ENAC - Impressum Janvier 2007 Photo de couverture : Le terminus du tramway à Hautepierre (Strasbourg), 2001 Christophe Jemelin FACULTÉ ENAC ENVIRONNEMENT NATUREL, ARCHITECTURAL ET CONSTRUIT LABORATOIRE DE SOCIOLOGIE URBAINE (LASUR) CELLULE D’ANALYSE DES MOBILITES URBAINES (CAMUS) Adresse postale : LASUR-EPFL, Bâtiment Polyvalent, Station 16, CH-1015 Lausanne PREDIT 3 Projet de recherche notifié par lettre de commande 03MT26 du 9 mai 2003 Politiques de transport et inégalités sociales d’accès Analyse comparative de huit agglomérations européennes Rapport final Christophe Jemelin Vincent Kaufmann Julie Barbey Tina Klein Giuseppe Pini* * Observatoire Universitaire de la Mobilité, Université de Genève Le présent rapport se décompose en quatre parties principales. Une première partie ex- pose le dispositif et la méthodologie comparative retenue, soit le choix des agglomérations et leur description et l’ensemble de la démarche comparative retenue, au plan des données d’enquête transports et mobilité notamment (chapitre 2). Les politiques de transport menées et la gestion de l’accès aux centres villes sont présentées au chapitre 3. La partie suivante propose une lecture cartographique des différenciations sociales dans les agglomérations considérées (chapitre 4, cartes au chapitre 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Format Acrobat
    - 1 - N° 76 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2004-2005 Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 25 novembre 2004 AVIS PRÉSENTÉ au nom de la commission des Affaires économiques et du Plan (1) sur le projet de loi de finances pour 2005, ADOPTÉ PAR L’ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE, TOME XVIII TRANSPORTS TERRESTRES Par M. Daniel SOULAGE, Sénateur. (1) Cette commission est composée de : M. Jean-Paul Émorine, président ; MM. Jean-Marc Pastor, Gérard César, Bernard Piras, Gérard Cornu, Marcel Deneux, Pierre Hérisson, vice-présidents ; MM. Gérard Le Cam, François Fortassin, Dominique Braye, Bernard Dussaut, Christian Gaudin, Jean Pépin, Bruno Sido, secrétaires ; MM. Jean-Paul Alduy, Pierre André, Gérard Bailly, René Beaumont, Michel Bécot, Jean Besson, Joël Billard, Michel Billout, Claude Biwer, Jean Bizet, Jean Boyer, Mme Yolande Boyer, MM. Jean-Pierre Caffet, Yves Coquelle, Roland Courteau, Philippe Darniche, Gérard Delfau, Mme Michelle Demessine, MM. Marcel Deneux, Jean Desessard, Mme Evelyne Didier, MM. Philippe Dominati, Michel Doublet, Daniel Dubois, André Ferrand, Alain Fouché, François Gerbaud, Alain Gérard, Charles Ginésy, Georges Ginoux, Adrien Giraud, Mme Adeline Gousseau, MM. Francis Grignon, Louis Grillot, Georges Gruillot, Mme Odette Herviaux, MM. Michel Houel, Benoît Huré, Mmes Sandrine Hurel, Bariza Khiari, M. Yves Krattinger, Mme Elisabeth Lamure, MM. Jean-François Le Grand, André Lejeune, Philippe Leroy, Claude Lise, Daniel Marsin, Jean-Claude Merceron, Dominique Mortemousque, Paul Natali, Ladislas Poniatowski, Daniel Raoul, Paul Raoult, Daniel Reiner, Thierry Repentin, Bruno Retailleau, Charles Revet, Henri Revol, Roland Ries, Claude Saunier, Daniel Soulage, Michel Teston, Yannick Texier, Pierre- Yvon Trémel, Jean-Pierre Vial. Voir les numéros : Assemblée nationale (12ème législ.) : 1800, 1863 à 1868 et T.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Squaring the Circle: the Bhls Concept
    SQUARING THE CIRCLE: THE BHLS CONCEPT María Eugenia López Lambas Associated Professor of Transport ETSI Caminos, Canales y Puertos –Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Spain Cristina Valdés PhD Researcher Transyt-UPM, Spain ABSTRACT The transport system known as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) was launched in Curitiba, Brazil, in 1974 as a means of offering efficient and effective bus travel within the fast expanding city. This experience, together with other such Ottawa (since 1983) or Quito (since 1994), has proven to be an efficient and effective solution to mass transport. Throughout Europe similar experiences have started to be developed, but addressing a different concept in terms of quality of service. Indeed, bus systems such as the “trunk network”, in Sweden, the Metrobus, in Germany, or the BHNS (Bus à Haut Niveau de Service in France), approach the quality of service from a wider perspective than the BRT, as it considers aspects such as image and comfort, apart from speed, frequency or reliability. These new systems - BHLS (Buses with a High Quality of Service) - allow to combine quality of service of tramways with the lower costs and higher flexibility of bus systems, offering very interesting solutions in terms of accessibility, as well as a wide range of service levels, that allows the system to be adapted to the different urban contexts (size, population, density , etc) The economic situation we are facing has beard a lack of funds that, at the end, means an opportunity for BHLS, called to play an important role in public transport: less costs with the same quality of service seems to be a very attractive option.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographie Sur L'émission Acoustique Des Tramways Certu
    les rapports Certu d’étude Bibliographie sur l’émission acoustique des tramways Modélisation des véhicules étendus par des sources sonores ponctuelles Bibliographie sur l’émission acoustique des tramways Modélisation des véhicules étendus par des sources sonores ponctuelles centre d’Études sur les réseaux, les transports, l’urbanisme et les constructions publiques 9, rue Juliette Récamier Certu 69456 Lyon Cedex 06 téléphone: 04 72 74 58 00 télécopie: 04 72 74 59 00 www.certu.fr Avis aux lecteurs La collection Rapports d’étude du Certu se compose de publications proposant des informations inédites, analysant et explorant de nouveaux champs d’investigation. Cependant l’évolution des idées est susceptible de remettre en cause le contenu de ces rapports. Le Certu publie aussi les collections : Dossiers : Ouvrages faisant le point sur un sujet précis assez limité, correspondant soit à une technique nouvelle, soit à un problème nouveau non traité dans la littérature courante. Le sujet de l'ouvrage s'adresse plutôt aux professionnels confirmés. Ils pourront y trouver des repères qui les aideront dans leur démarche. Mais le contenu présenté ne doit pas être considéré comme une recommandation à appliquer sans discernement, et des solutions différentes pourront être adoptées selon les circonstances. Références: Cette collection comporte les guides techniques, les ouvrages méthodologiques et les autres ouvrages qui, sur un champ donné, présentent de manière pédagogique ce que le professionnel doit savoir. Le Certu a suivi une démarche de validation du contenu et atteste que celui-ci reflète l'état de l'art. Il recommande au professionnel de ne pas s'écarter des solutions préconisées dans le document sans avoir pris l'avis d'experts reconnus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarens Bridges Germany and France!
    SARENS BRIDGES GERMANY AND FRANCE! Linking Germany and France, this bridge now spans the Rhine River between Kehl and Strasbourg. When finally completed, the bridge will be used by pedestrians, and cyclists. The bridge was designed by the French Bouygues Group in cooperation with the German company. Früh Ingenieurbau. It has two 20-metre-high arches consisting of small box-shaped steel elements. Like both neighbouring bridges, it rests on a central pier in the middle of the Rhine. Starting in April 2017, CTS's tram line D will cross the new Rhine bridge and reach Kehl railway station on the former traditional route. The first modern tram bridge between Kehl and Strasbourg had been opened as early as in 1897. In the following year, the Strasbourg tramway company's line 1 already went to Kehl town centre. Between 1920 and 1941, the route ended on the French side of the Rhine bridge as a consequence of the First World War. The tram line between Kehl and Strasbourg was re-opened in 1942, but existed only till November 1944 when the Rhine bridge was destroyed by German soldiers during the liberation of Strasbourg. Kehl and Strasbourg have been working on the expansion of the Strasbourg tramline D across the Rhine to Kehl for years. Once financing by the German federal government, the State government and the EU had been ensured, the project's implementation could be started. In April and July, the two bridge sections were transported one after the other to the stockyard on the Kehl side of the Rhine near the former customs yard under the supervision of our project manager, Peter Keyen.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport & Urban Design Hitrans Best Practice Guide
    %FWFMPQNFOUPGQSJODJQMFTBOETUSBUFHJFTGPSJOUSPEVDJOH)JHI2VBMJUZ1VCMJD5SBOTQPSUJONFEJVNTJ[FEDJUJFTBOESFHJPOT 1VCMJDUSBOTQPSUVSCBOEFTJHO )J5SBOT #FTUQSBDUJDFHVJEF )J5SBOT#FTUQSBDUJDFHVJEF 1VCMJDUSBOTQPSUVSCBOEFTJHO .BSJF#VSOT #VSOT /JDF-UE )J5SBOT *4#/ )J5SBOT "OJOUSPEVDUJPOUP)J5SBOT )J5SBOTJTBOBCCSFWJBUJPOGPSiUIFEFWFMPQNFOU BQQMZUPNFEJVNTJ[FEDJUJFTBOEVSCBOSFHJPOT*O PGQSJODJQMFTBOETUSBUFHJFTGPSJOUSPEVDJOHIJHI DPOUSBTUUPUIBUPGMBSHFDJUJFT QVCMJDUSBOTQPSUJO RVBMJUZQVCMJDUSBOTQPSUJONFEJVNTJ[FDJUJFTBOE NFEJVNTJ[FDJUJFTBOEVSCBOSFHJPOTUFOETUPCF VSCBOSFHJPOTw&YBNQMFTPGIJHIRVBMJUZQVCMJD CBTFEPOSFMBUJWFMZMPXRVBMJUZCVTTFSWJDFT4NBMMFS USBOTQPSUNBZCFMJHIUSBJM HVJEFECVTXBZTPSGSF QPQVMBUJPOTBOEUIVTMPXFSQBTTFOHFSEFNBOE RVFOU DPNGPSUBCMFCVTFT#VUUIFEFmOJOHDSJUFSJPO NFBOUIBUFYQFOTJWFJOGSBTUSVDUVSFTVDIBTIFBWZSBJM PGiIJHIRVBMJUZQVCMJDUSBOTQPSUwJTUIFBCJMJUZUP PSTVCXBZTDBOOPUOPSNBMMZCFKVTUJmFE DPNQFUFXJUIUIFQSJWBUFDBSGPSFWFSZEBZUSBWFMJO .FEJVNTJ[FDJUJFTUIBUBSFMPPLJOHGPSBMUFSOB DJSDVNTUBODFTXIFSFDBSPXOFSTIJQJTXJEFTQSFBE UJWFTUPOPSNBMCVTTFSWJDFTSBSFMZIBWFUIFSFTPVSDFT &TUBCMJTIFECZBQBSUOFSTIJQPGDJUJFTBOEUSBOTQPSU UPBEFRVBUFMZSFTFBSDIUIFBEWBOUBHFTBOEEJTBE BHFODJFTJOUIF6OJUFE,JOHEPNBOE4DBOEJOBWJB WBOUBHFTPGFNFSHJOHUFDIOPMPHJFTBOEDPODFQUTPG )J5SBOTJTTQFDJmDBMMZBJNFEBUDJUJFTBOEVSCBOSF IJHIRVBMJUZQVCMJDUSBOTQPSU QBSUJDVMBSMZBTUIFTF HJPOTJODPVOUSJFTCPSEFSJOHUIF/PSUI4FBUIBUIBWF XPVMEBQQMZJOUIFJSDJSDVNTUBODFT QPQVMBUJPOTCFUXFFOɲɱɱ ɱɱɱBOEɶɱɱ ɱɱɱQFPQMF )J5SBOTJTBDPPQFSBUJWFSFTFBSDIFõPSUUPPCUBJO 5IFQSPKFDUJTKPJOUMZGVOEFECZUIF&VSPQFBO UIJTLOPXMFEHFUPmOETVJUBCMFBOEDPTUFõFDUJWF
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHITECTURES DU TRANSPORT Rapport Final
    ARCHITECTURES DU TRANSPORT Rapport final Volume 1/4 : Présentation générale et actions transversales Anne Grillet-Aubert - Sabine Guth Décision de subvention n° 01 MT 50 - METL Ministère de l’Equipement, des Transports, de l’Aménagement du Territoire, du Tourisme et de la Mer Direction de la Recherche et des Affaires Scientifiques et Techniques Organisme bénéficiaire: EAPB : Ecole d’Architecture de Paris-Belleville Responsable scientifique: Pierre Clément, Directeur de l’IPRAUS Laboratoire: IPRAUS : Institut Parisien de Recherche: Architecture Urbanistique Sociétés Laboratoire de l’Ecole d’Architecture de Paris-Belleville et de l’Université Paris X Nanterre, Département de l’UMR n°7543 du CNRS. 78/80 rue Rébeval – 75019 Paris décembre 2005 Sommaire I. Le programme Architectures du transport : rapport final.................................................. 3 A. Présentation synthétique des éléments du programme....................................................... 3 1. Les travaux de recherche................................................................................................ 3 2. Les actions transversales d’accompagnement................................................................ 8 B. Résultats, perspectives et valorisation ................................................................................ 9 II. Séminaires / Colloque ......................................................................................................... 13 A. Programme du cycle.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fluckiger Ivan
    Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/Masterarbeit ist an der Hauptbibliothek der Technischen Universität Wien aufgestellt (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at). The approved original version of this diploma or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/englweb/). Diplomarbeit Master’s Thesis Fahrdynamische Einflussfaktoren des Übergangsbogens am Beispiel der Wiener Straßenbahn. ausgeführt zum Zwecke der Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Diplom-Ingenieurs unter der Leitung von Univ.Prof. Dipl.Dipl.----Ing.Ing. Dr.TIng. Dr.Techn.Dr.Techn.echn.echn. Norbert OSTERMANN undundund Univ.Ass. Dipl.Dipl.----Ing.Ing.Ing.Ing. Doris TUNA E2302 – Institut für Verkehrswissenschaften, Forschungsbereich für Eisenbahnwesen, Verkehrswirtschaft und Seilbahnen eingereicht an der Technischen Universität Wien Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen von Ivan FLUCKIGER Matr.: 0828323 Student der INSA STRASBOURG, FRANKREICH Wien, im Juni 2009 Ivan FLUCKIGER Danksagung In diesem Teil möchte ich mich bei allen die mir fachlich bei der Vorbereitung meiner Diplomarbeit beigestanden haben bedanken. Besonders möchte ich ein großes Dankeschön an meine Diplomarbeitsbetreuerin Univ. Ass. Dipl.-Ing. Doris Tuna und an Univ. Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.tech. Norbert Ostermann für die Ermöglichung dieser Arbeit weitergeben. Sie haben mir erlaubt, diese Diplomarbeit an der Technischen Universität Wien auszuarbeiten. Ich möchte auch ein großes Dankeschön an Herrn Wolfgang Rollinger richten. Er hat mir das Thema dieser Diplomarbeit vorgeschlagen. Frau Dipl.-Ing. Doris Tuna und Herr Wolgang Rollinger waren stets für mich da und sehr geduldig, trotz meiner großen Schwierigkeiten mit der deutschen Sprache. Ich bedanke mich bei Herrn Professor Pierre Regenass, meinem französischen Tutor, der mir während dieser Periode hilfreich zur Seite gestanden hat.
    [Show full text]
  • Easing Legal and Administrative Obstacles in EU Border Regions
    Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions Case Study No. 13 Urban transport Non-harmonised ticket pricing systems (Germany – France) Written by T. Stumm February 2017 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy Directorate D: European Territorial Co-operation, Macro-regions, Interreg and Programme Implementation I Unit D2: Interreg, Cross-Border Cooperation, Internal Borders Contacts: Ana-Paula LAISSY (head of unit), Alexander FERSTL (contract manager) E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions Case Study No. 13 Urban transport Non-harmonised ticket pricing systems (Germany – France) Annex to the Final Report for the European Commission Service Request Nr 2015CE160AT013 Competitive Multiple Framework Service Contracts for the provision of Studies related to the future development of Cohesion Policy and the ESI Funds (Lot 3) Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy 2017 EN Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN: 978-92-79-70489-5 doi: 10.2776/659206 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]