Additional Chromosome Numbers of Hawaiian Flowering Plants1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Additional Chromosome Numbers of Hawaiian Flowering Plants1 Pacific Science (1985), vol. 39, no. 3 © 1985 by the University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Additional Chromosome Numbers of Hawaiian Flowering Plants 1 G ERALD D. CARR 2 ABSTRACT: Chromosome numbers of 30 collections representing 29 species and 16 families of Hawaiian flowering plants are presented an d discussed.The chromosome numbers of 24 of these species have not previously been reported. Chromosome numbers are also documented for the first time in the genera Colubrina (n = 24), Isodendrion (n = 8), Notho cestrum (n = c. 24), Remya (n = 18), and Schiedea (n = 30). As OF 1978, CHROMOSOME NUMBERS were In the remainder of thi s paper these indexes known for only about 17.1% ofthe species of are cited by number. Voucher specimens are Hawaiian flora (Carr 1978). Moreover , mo st deposited at HISH or HAW. In instances where of these taxa are known from a single deter­ voucher specimens were not collected con­ mination. Thus, the need for additional cyt­ comitant with cytological materials, an exist­ ological work in Hawaii is great. The present ing alternate specimen from the same popu­ paper provides first reports of chromosome lation is cited. numbers for an additional 24 species, 5 of which also represent first reports for the genera Colubrina, Isodendrion, Nothocestrum, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Remya, and Schiedea . This brings the nu mber of cytologically determined Hawaiian species CARYOPHYLLACEAE: The report ofn = 30 for to about 271 (18.8%). Schiedea verticillata (Table 1) represents the first for this Hawaiian endemic genus. The related Hawaiian genus Alsinodendron has also been MATERIALS AND METHODS reported to have n = 30 (Skottsberg 1955). At least half a dozen ot her genera in the The chromosome numbers reported herein fami ly also have been reported to have the were determined from meiotic divisions in mi­ same chromosome number (indexes 1-6). The crosporocytes. Material for study was pre­ number n = 12 given here for Silene struth­ served and stored in mo dified Carnoy's fixa­ ioloides agrees with most other reports for the tive (6 chloroform : 3 absolute ethanol : 1 gla­ genus, including an earlier one for this species cial acetic acid; v: v). Anthers were squashed by Krukeberg (1960) . The only other record in acetocarmine, and slides were made per­ for this genus from Hawaii (S. hawaiiensis manent in Hoyer's solution (cf. Beeks 1955). Sherff) also agrees (Carr 1978). Chromosome indexes consulted for this re­ AMARANTHACEAE: Amaranthus brownei, first po rt include (1) Fedorov (1974), (2) Moore reported here to have n = 17, is the on ly (1973), (3) Moore (1974), (4) Moore (1977), species ofthe genus that is endemic to the Ha­ (5) Goldblatt (198 1), and (6) Goldblatt (1984). waiian Islands. This record agrees with many other reports for extra-Hawaiian representa­ tives of the genus. The other prominent num ­ 1 Travel funds from National Science Found ation grant no. DEB-7822819 facilitated the collection of some ber in Amaranthus is n = 16 (indexes 1- 6). of the materials used in this study. Manuscript accepted 20 April 1985. POLYGONACEAE: The report here of n = 30 2 University of Hawaii, Dep artmen t of Botany, 3190 for the Hawaiian endemic Rumex skottsbergii Maile Way, Hon olulu , Hawaii 96822. agrees with an earlier one for this species given 302 Chromosome Numbers of Hawaiian Flowering Plants-CARR 303 TABLE I C HROMOSOME N UMBERS OF H AWAliAN PLA NTS . TAXON n COLLECTION DATA Car yoph yllaceae · ·Schiedea verticillata F. Br. in Christoph. & Caum 30 Nihoa, Devil's Slide, Conant 115 Silene struthioloides A. Gray 12 Hawaii, Mauna Kea summit road, Carr 1092, cf. M cEldowney 4 Amaranthaceae • Amaranthus brownei Christoph . & Caum 17 Nihoa, Miller Ridge, Conant III Polygonaceae Rumex skottsbergii Deg. & Deg. 30 Nihoa, Devil's Slide, Conant 116 Malvaceae •Abutilon menziesii Seem. 14 Oahu,Ewa Plains, Char et al. 81.002 Violaceac ··Isodendrion longifolium A. Gray 8 Oahu , Puu Pane, Obata et al. 77-311 •I. subsessilifolium Heller 8 Kauai, Milolii Ridge, Robi chaux , cf. Hobdy 1817 • Viola helena Forbes & Lydgate var. lanaiensis Rock 40 Lanai, Lanai Hale, Carr 1054 Cucurbitaceae "Sicyos nihoaensis St. John 12 Nihoa, Miller Ridge, Conant 112 Fabaceae "Sesbania sp. nov. Char 1 12 Kauai, Man a, Char 81.008 "Sesbania sp. nov. Char 2 12 Kauai , Polihale , Char 81.007 Thyme1aeaccae • Wikstroemia lanaiensis Skott sb. var. acutifolia Skottsb. 9 Lanai, Lanai Hale, Carr et al. 1053 Euph orbiaceae • Euphorbia arnott iana Endl. c. 19 Oahu, Waialae Nui , Robichaux , cf. Warshauer 2140 •E. celastroides Boiss. in A. DC . c. 19 Oahu , Kacna Point, Rob ichaux , cf. Degener 20814 • E. clusiaef olia Hook. & Am. c. 19 Oahu , Manana Trail, Robichaux , cf. Takeuchi 65 • E.fo rbesii Sherif c. 19 Oahu, Pahole Gulch , Robichaux, cr. Herbst 1428 •E. hillebrandii Levl . c. 19 Oahu, Pahole Gulch , Robichaux, cf. Herbst 1901 •E. multiformis Hook. & Am . c. 19 Oahu , Waahila Ridge, Robichaux , cf. Carlquist 1619 Rhamnaceae · · Colubrina oppositifolia Brogn. ex Mann 24 Hawaii, Kaupulehu Forest Reserve, Carr 1074 Rutaceae • Platydesma rostrata Hillebrand 18 Kau ai, Awaawapuhi Trail, Carr, cf. Stone 1599 Apiaceae • Sanicula sandwicensis A. Gray 8 Maui, Haleakala, Halemauu Tr. summit, Carr & Linney 1158 8 Hawaii , Mauna Kca, Herbst, cf. St. John 26958 Solanaceae ··Nothocestrum longifolium A. Gray var. longifolium c. 24 Oahu, Paho le Gulch , Stemmermann 1122 •Solanum nelsoni Dunal in A. DC. 12 Nihoa , Miller Valley, Conant 102 Boraginaceae Heliotropium curassavicum L. 13 Oahu , Kaen a Point, Carr 995 Goodeniaceae "Scaevola kauaiensis (Deg.) St. John 16 Kauai, Mt. Kahili, Robichaux, cf. Gagne & Montgomery 576 S. procera Hillebrand 8 Kauai, Wahiawa Bog Robichaux , cf. St. John & Fosberg 13594 Asteraceae •Keysseria helenae (Forbes & Lydgate) Cabrera 27 Kauai, Waialeale summit, Medeiros 604 •••Madia sativa Molina 16 Maui , Haleakala, Carr 1036 ••Remya mauiensis Hillebrand 18 West Maui, Manawainui Gulch , Stemmermann 2330 NOTE: *denotes species not reported in chromosome indexes; .* denotes genera not reported in chrom osome indexes; .*. denotes species not native to Hawaii. 304 PACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 39, July 1985 by Degraeve (1975) and also with a report EUPHORBIACEAE : The meiotic counts of n = for the endemic R . giganteus Ait. (Love 1967). c. 19 given here for six species of Euphorbia A third Hawaiian endemic species, R . albe­ (Table 1)apparently represent the first reports scens Hillebrand, is reported to have n = 18 for Hawaiian members of the genus. An at­ (Skottsberg 1955) and n = 20 (Love 1967). tempt was made to verify the chromosome Additional chromosome counts may be help­ number by examining mitotic divisions in root ful in clarifying the taxonomy of the Hawaiian tips of E. celastroides. Although two seemingly representatives of this genus. unambiguous cells were resolved at 2n = 38, the considerable range in size ofchromosomes MALVACEAE: Th e chromosome number of in the genome and the small sample size make Abutilon men ziesii is reported here for the first additional confirmation desirable. A very time as n = 14. This agrees with at least two wide range of chromosome numbers are known other species in the genus (index 1). The only in Euphorbia , including a continuous series oth er Hawaiian species of this genus that is from n = 18 to n = 22 (indexes 1-6). chromosomally known is A . incanum (Link) Sweet, with n = 7 (Carr 1978). RHAMNACEAE: The number of n = 24 for Colubrina oppos itifolia is the first report for VIOLAC EAE: The counts here for Isodendrion this Hawaiian endemic genus. Among Rham­ longifolium and I. subsessilifolium of n = 8 naceae , this number appears to be otherwise represent the first for this Hawaiian endemic restricted to Z izyphus, although n = 12 is genus. This number is kno wn in the genera common in at least five other genera (indexes Hybanthus (indexes 2, 3, 6) and Ionidium (in­ 1,2,4-6). dexes 2, 5, 6). It is also known, but rare, in the RUTACEAE: The first report here of n 18 genus Viola, for example, in V. kitaib eliana = for Platydesma rostrata agrees with a previous Schult. and V. hymettia Boiss. & Heldr. (index report for P. cornuta Hillebrand, the only 5). More recently , the author has detected other species cytologically known in this n = 8 in Agatea from New Caledonia. The Hawaiian endemic genus (Carr 1978). The count here of n = 40 for V. helena is the first same number is very common in other genera for this Hawaiian endemic species. It agrees of the family (indexes 1-6). with the count reported for V. tracheliifolia Gingins from Hawaii (Carr 1978). In Viola, APIACEAE: The chromosome number of this number is otherwise known only in V. Sanicula sandwicensis is reported here for the nannei Polakowsky (Davidse 1970). first time as n = 8. Most other species of this genus have the same number (index 1). CUCURBITACEAE: The first report here of n = 12 for Sicycos nihoaensis agrees with that SOLANACEAE: The chromosome number of for two other Hawaiian species of the genus Solanum nelsoni first recorded here as n = 12 (Carr 1978). The only other species of the agrees with most other reports for the genus. genus that is chromosomally known also has Numbers ofn = 11,18,23,24,30, and 36 also the same number (indexes 1, 4, 5). occur in the literature on Solanum (indexes 1-6). The report here ofn = c. 24 for No thoces­ FABACEAE: The chromosome numbers n = trum longifolium represents the first chromo­ 12reported here for Sesbania represent counts some determination in this Hawaiian endemic for two new species in the genus (Cha r 1983). genus. These counts agree with many others for the genus, although numbers ofn = 6,7,8, and 16 BORAGINACEAE: The indigenous Heliotro­ have also been reported (indexes 1,2,4-6).
Recommended publications
  • Towards an Understanding of the Evolution of Violaceae from an Anatomical and Morphological Perspective Saul Ernesto Hoyos University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 8-7-2011 Towards an understanding of the evolution of Violaceae from an anatomical and morphological perspective Saul Ernesto Hoyos University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Hoyos, Saul Ernesto, "Towards an understanding of the evolution of Violaceae from an anatomical and morphological perspective" (2011). Theses. 50. http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/50 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Saul E. Hoyos Gomez MSc. Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, University of Missouri-Saint Louis, 2011 Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science July 2011 Advisory Committee Peter Stevens, Ph.D. Chairperson Peter Jorgensen, Ph.D. Richard Keating, Ph.D. TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE BASAL EVOLUTION OF VIOLACEAE FROM AN ANATOMICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE Saul Hoyos Introduction The violet family, Violaceae, are predominantly tropical and contains 23 genera and upwards of 900 species (Feng 2005, Tukuoka 2008, Wahlert and Ballard 2010 in press). The family is monophyletic (Feng 2005, Tukuoka 2008, Wahlert & Ballard 2010 in press), even though phylogenetic relationships within Violaceae are still unclear (Feng 2005, Tukuoka 2008). The family embrace a great diversity of vegetative and floral morphologies. Members are herbs, lianas or trees, with flowers ranging from strongly spurred to unspurred.
    [Show full text]
  • One New Endemic Plant Species on Average Per Month in New Caledonia, Including Eight More New Species from Île Art (Belep Islan
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2018, 31, 448–480 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB18016 One new endemic plant species on average per month in New Caledonia, including eight more new species from Île Art (Belep Islands), a major micro-hotspot in need of protection Gildas Gâteblé A,G, Laure Barrabé B, Gordon McPherson C, Jérôme Munzinger D, Neil Snow E and Ulf Swenson F AInstitut Agronomique Néo-Calédonien, Equipe ARBOREAL, BP 711, 98810 Mont-Dore, New Caledonia. BEndemia, Plant Red List Authority, 7 rue Pierre Artigue, Portes de Fer, 98800 Nouméa, New Caledonia. CHerbarium, Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA. DAMAP, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRA, Université Montpellier, F-34000 Montpellier, France. ET.M. Sperry Herbarium, Department of Biology, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS 66762, USA. FDepartment of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden. GCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The New Caledonian biodiversity hotspot contains many micro-hotspots that exhibit high plant micro- endemism, and that are facing different types and intensities of threats. The Belep archipelago, and especially Île Art, with 24 and 21 respective narrowly endemic species (1 Extinct,21Critically Endangered and 2 Endangered), should be considered as the most sensitive micro-hotspot of plant diversity in New Caledonia because of the high anthropogenic threat of fire. Nano-hotspots could also be defined for the low forest remnants of the southern and northern plateaus of Île Art. With an average rate of more than one new species described for New Caledonia each month since January 2000 and five new endemics for the Belep archipelago since 2009, the state of knowledge of the flora is steadily improving.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Top
    America’s Top 40: A Call to Action for the Nation’s Most Imperiled Species A Report from WildEarth Guardians By Nicole Rosmarino, PhD April 2009 MISSION STATEMENT WildEarth Guardians protects and restores the wildlife, wild places and wild rivers of the American West. Inquiries about this report and WildEarth Guardians’ work can be made directly to: Nicole Rosmarino, PhD WildEarth Guardians 1536 Wynkoop St., Suite 301 Denver, CO 80202 303-573-4898 [email protected] Photos: Front cover (left column, top to bottom): crimson Hawaiian damselfly (Hawaii Biological Survey/Bishop Museum); Lanai tree snail (William Mull 1976, provided by University of Hawaii, Hawaii Biodiversity & Mapping Project); Cyanea calycina (J.K. Obata, provided by University of Hawaii); (middle column, top to bottom): Texas golden glade cress (Center for Plant Conservation/Mercer Arboretum and Botanic Gardens); Cyanea kuhihewa (Smithsonian Institute, Department of Botany, David H. Lorence); large-flowered Balsamo (Maya LeGrande, provided by University of Hawaii); Phyllostegia floribunda (C.H. Lamoureux, provided by University of Hawaii); (right column, top to bottom): chucky madtom (Conservation Fisheries, Inc.); jack bean (M. LeGrande, provided by University of Hawaii); Akikiki or Kauai creeper (National Biological Information Infrastructure/Pacific Basin Information Node); Nesiotes Megalagrion damselfly (Hawaii Biological Survey/Bishop Museum); Akoko (M. LeGrande, provided by University of Hawaii); Back cover, Papala (Jay Tutchton). ©WildEarth Guardians. All rights reserved. America’s Top 40 Executive Summary The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) keeps a list of species called its “Top 40,” which are the most imperiled candidates for Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Solanaceae
    TAXON 57 (4) • November 2008: 1159–1181 Olmstead & al. • Molecular phylogeny of Solanaceae MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae Richard G. Olmstead1*, Lynn Bohs2, Hala Abdel Migid1,3, Eugenio Santiago-Valentin1,4, Vicente F. Garcia1,5 & Sarah M. Collier1,6 1 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A. *olmstead@ u.washington.edu (author for correspondence) 2 Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, U.S.A. 3 Present address: Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt 4 Present address: Jardin Botanico de Puerto Rico, Universidad de Puerto Rico, Apartado Postal 364984, San Juan 00936, Puerto Rico 5 Present address: Department of Integrative Biology, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. 6 Present address: Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, U.S.A. A phylogeny of Solanaceae is presented based on the chloroplast DNA regions ndhF and trnLF. With 89 genera and 190 species included, this represents a nearly comprehensive genus-level sampling and provides a framework phylogeny for the entire family that helps integrate many previously-published phylogenetic studies within So- lanaceae. The four genera comprising the family Goetzeaceae and the monotypic families Duckeodendraceae, Nolanaceae, and Sclerophylaceae, often recognized in traditional classifications, are shown to be included in Solanaceae. The current results corroborate previous studies that identify a monophyletic subfamily Solanoideae and the more inclusive “x = 12” clade, which includes Nicotiana and the Australian tribe Anthocercideae. These results also provide greater resolution among lineages within Solanoideae, confirming Jaltomata as sister to Solanum and identifying a clade comprised primarily of tribes Capsiceae (Capsicum and Lycianthes) and Physaleae.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/04/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-17322, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2008–0063; 92300-1113-0000-9B] RIN 1018–AU62 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Amending the Formats of the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, amend the format of the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) to reflect current practices and standards that will make the regulations and Lists easier to understand. The Lists, in the new format, are included in their entirety and have been updated to correct identified errors. 1 DATES: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Morgan, Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA, 22041; telephone 703– 358–2171. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists), found in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 for wildlife and 50 CFR 17.12 for plants, contain the names of endangered species and threatened species officially listed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gei Et Al. 2020A
    A systematic assessment of the occurrence of trace element hyperaccumulation in the flora of New Caledonia Vidiro Gei1, Sandrine Isnard2,3, Peter D. Erskine1, Guillaume Echevarria1,4, Bruno Fogliani5, Tanguy Jaffré2,3, Antony van der Ent1,4* 1Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia 2botAnique et Modelisation de l’Architecture des Plantes et des végétation (AMAP), Université Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier, France 3botAnique et Modelisation de l’Architecture des Plantes et des végétation (AMAP), IRD, Herbier de Nouvelle-Calédonie, Nouméa, New Caledonia 4Laboratoire Sols et Environnement, Université de Lorraine – INRAE, F54000 Nancy, France 5Équipe ARBOREAL (AgricultuRe BiOdiveRsité Et vALorisation), Institut Agronomique néo-Calédonien (IAC), 98890 Païta, New Caledonia *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT New Caledonia is a global biodiversity hotspot known for its metal hyperaccumulator plants. X-ray fluorescence technology (XRF) has enabled non-destructive and quantitative determination of elemental concentrations in herbarium specimens from the ultramafic flora of the island. Specimens belonging to six major hyperaccumulator families (Cunoniaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Salicaceae, Sapotaceae, Oncothecaceae and Violaceae) and one to four specimens per species of the remaining ultramafic taxa in the herbarium were measured. XRF scanning included a total of c. 11 200 specimens from 35 orders, 96 families, 281 genera and 1484 species (1620 taxa) and covered 88.5% of the ultramafic flora. The study revealed the existence of 99 nickel hyperaccumulator taxa (65 known previously), 74 manganese hyperaccumulator taxa (11 known previously), eight cobalt hyperaccumulator taxa (two known previously) and four zinc hyperaccumulator taxa (none known previously).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and Related
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and related genera based on the nuclear ribosomal (nr) DNA sequence data (Asteraceae: Astereae) Vesna Karaman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Karaman, Vesna, "Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and related genera based on the nuclear ribosomal (nr) DNA sequence data (Asteraceae: Astereae)" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2200. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2200 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PHYLOGENY OF HINTERHUBERA, NOVENIA AND RELATED GENERA BASED ON THE NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL (nr) DNA SEQUENCE DATA (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Vesna Karaman B.S., University of Kiril and Metodij, 1992 M.S., University of Belgrade, 1997 May 2006 "Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children." Ancient Indian Proverb ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to many people who have contributed to the work of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Agatea Deplanchei
    Botanical characteristics of New Caledonia Constraints for mining industry and an opportunity for restoration Mining Revegetation T. Jaffré, F. Rigault, G. Dagostini One of the main biological characteristics of New Caledonia is its high biodiversity « There is probably no region of comparable area in the world with such a rich, archaic, pecular and endemic seed plant flora as that of New Caledonia » (Thorne 1965) •3300 indigenous species • 2475 (75%) endemics Primitive species Amborella trichopoda Parasitaxus usta T. Jaffré, F. Rigault, G. Dagostini Conifers diversity : (43 species all endemics of New Caledonia) Araucaria muelleri Araucaria scopulorum Araucaria humboldtiana Dacrydium guillauminii T. Jaffré, F. Rigault, G. Dagostini Diversity of Palms and various families 38 species, 37 endemics Cunonia atrorubens (Cunoniaceae 92 species) (Metrosideros Humboldtiana) (Myrtaceae 236 species) Pritchardiopsis Kentiopsis piriformis jeanneneyi T. Jaffré, F. Rigault, G. Dagostini Strasburgeria robusta One of the 5 Endemic Families Psychotria douarrei Sebertia acuminata Homalium kanaliense Nickel hyperaccumulators T. Jaffré, F. Rigault, G. Dagostini New Caledonia was recognised by « International Conservation » as one of the world’s most important biodiversity « hot spots » (Myers, 1988) largely because of the exceptional number of endemic taxa T. Jaffré, F. Rigault, G. Dagostini Floristic (vascular plants) richness and endemicity on ultramafic soils in New Caledonia 2200 species (66,7% of the native flora) are found on ultramafic soils containing low levels of P, Ca, K, N and high levels of Ni, Cr and Mn. About 1140 species, (nearly 35%) of the total native flora, are found only on ultramafic soils. So ultramafic biotopes in New Caledonia may also be considered as a « hot spot » for plants growing on Ni mining soils T.
    [Show full text]
  • Cordell Et Al.: Towards Restoration of Hawaiian Tropical Dry Forests 281
    Towards restoration of Hawaiian tropical dry forests: the Kaupulehu outplanting programme SUSAN CORDELL1, MOANA MCCLELLAN2, YVONNE YARBER CARTER3 and LISA J. HADWAY4 Hawaiian tropical dry forests contain diverse assemblages of woody canopy species, including many endemic and endangered species that warrant conservation attention before completely disappearing. Today, tropical dry forests in Hawaii are not viable ecosystems. Poor land use practices, fragmentation, non-native plant invasions, and inadequate native vegetation regeneration are all factors that have contributed to their endangerment. Only an ambitious restoration programme that includes non-native ungulate exclusion, weed control, fire management, and the outplanting of seeds and seedlings will be sufficient to enhance Hawaiian tropical dry forests. We selected a 25 ha preserve within the Kaupulehu Dry Forest Preserve, located in North Kona on the Island of Hawaii, to test dry forest restoration strategies. In 1997, the preserve was fenced and all non-native ungulates were removed. Altogether, 4892 outplants were planted from 1999–2006. In 2007, we surveyed all of the outplants. The survey found 1487 live plants, 3357 dead, and 48 plants missing. This equates to an overall survival rate of 30%. Survival by vegetation type indicated that vines had the highest rate of survival (63%) followed by trees (34%). Herbs had the lowest rate of survival (12%). Twelve of a total of 35 species that were outplanted in the Kaupulehu Dry Forest Preserve accounted for more than 90% of the total surviving plants species, while five federally listed species represent almost 60% of the total. The outplanting of dry forest species into the Kaupulehu Dry Forest Preserve considerably increased the population of many federally listed endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Extinctions, Rediscoveries, and New Plant Records Within The
    Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2011. Edited by 91 Neal L. Evenhuis & Lucius G. Eldredge. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 113: 91 –102 (2012) Possible Extinctions , Rediscoveries, and New Plant Records within the Hawaiian Islands 1 KeNNetH R. W ooD 2 National Tropical Botanical Garden, 3530 Papalina Road, Kalaheo, Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i 96741, USA; email: [email protected] eleven possible new extinctions are reported for the Hawaiian flora, in addition to 5 island records, 3 range rediscoveries, 1 rediscovery, and 1 new naturalized record. the remark - able range rediscoveries of Ctenitis squamigera (Dryopteridaceae) and Lysimachia filifo - lia (Primulaceae) give hope toward their future conservation, as both are federally listed as endangered and were undocumented on Kaua‘i for ca 100 years. Yet there is great con - cern over numerous possible plant extinctions in Hawai‘i. two extinctions were recently reported from Kaua‘i (i.e., Dubautia kenwoodii and Cyanea kuhihewa ) (Wood 2007), and an additional 11 are now reported to have no known living individuals in the wild. Species abundance will naturally fluctuate, yet for very rare taxa there is little room for decline. the ongoing decline of native pollinators (Kearns et al. 1998) and seed dispersers (Mil - berg & tyrberg 1993), in combination with other primary extrinsic factors such as inva - sive nonnative plants, predation by introduced vertebrates, loss and fragmentation of nat - ural habitats, and devastation by severe storms, are leading to an increase in extinctions throughout the islands of oceania (Sakai et al. 2002; Wood 2007; Kingsford et al. 2009). the assertion of extinction is potentially fallible and can only be inferred from absence of sighting or collection records (Solow & Roberts 2003).
    [Show full text]