January 2, 2020 Tribute to Chief Frank T. Halcrow, Kapawe'no First Nation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

January 2, 2020 Tribute to Chief Frank T. Halcrow, Kapawe'no First Nation January 2, 2020 Tribute to Chief Frank T. Halcrow, Kapawe’no First Nation Today is a very sad day for all of Treaty No. 8, and Indian Nation as a whole, as we hear of the passing of Hereditary Chief Frank Halcrow, Kapawe’no First Nation. He was the last Hereditary Chief in Alberta and has served as Chief for his Nation since 1970. His wisdom, political knowledge and expertise will be missed, Chief Halcrow was a dedicated warrior and advocate for not only his Nation but the entire Indian Nation, including but not limited to, Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council and the Treaty 8 First Nations. On behalf of the Treaty No. 8 Chiefs, Elders, staff and citizens, we send our condolences to his wife Effie, his children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, his brothers and sisters and his community. Chief Halcrow made many contributions over his lifetime which included the establishment of the Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council, Lakeshore Regional Police Service, Grand Council of Treaty 8, Kapown Treatment Centre and the first ever licensed on-reserve day care, just to name a few. He worked with the Indian Association of Alberta and advocated in London England with the House of Lords, where the Queen was present for four of those meetings, to address the outstanding issues of Treaties in Alberta and he helped write a report on the London Lobby in 1981. Chief Halcrow was very passionate about Self Government and Self Determination for his nation and all nations. He fought hard to seek justice and implementation of modern means of Governance into First Nations to be able to fit into modern society as we know it using instruments such as Treaty and all other arrangements such as Treaty articles, treaty implementation processes, etc.. His work and his legacy will continue as the First Nations continue to implement their inherent rights, governances and structures as he did for his Nation with the Government of Canada recently in November 2019, whereby he signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Self Governing and Self Determination discussion process using inherent rights. He will be greatly missed as a true leader and role model for our youth and future leaders in Treaty No. 8 and Alberta. You Will be missed Chief Halcrow, but you will not be forgotten… .
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in Alberta (July 2019)
    frog Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in Alberta Page 2 For additional copies of the Community Profiles, please contact: Indigenous Relations First Nations and Metis Relations 10155–102 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4G8 Phone: 780-644-4989 Fax: 780-415-9548 Website: www.indigenous.alberta.ca To call toll-free from anywhere in Alberta, dial 310-0000. To request that an organization be added or deleted or to update information, please fill out the Guide Update Form included in the publication and send it to Indigenous Relations. You may also complete and submit this form online. Go to www.indigenous.alberta.ca and look under Resources for the correct link. This publication is also available online as a PDF document at www.indigenous.alberta.ca. The Resources section of the website also provides links to the other Ministry publications. ISBN 978-0-7785-9868-8 PRINT ISBN 978-0-7785-9870-8 WEB ISSN 1925-5179 PRINT ISSN 1925-5287 WEB Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in Alberta Page 3 INTRODUCTORY NOTE This Guide provides a list of Indigenous organizations and services in Alberta. Also included are national and umbrella organizations with offices located elsewhere. The Guide is compiled and produced by the Ministry of Indigenous Relations in order to provide contact information for these Indigenous organizations and services. Listings are restricted to not-for-profit organizations and services. The information provided in the Guide is current at the time of printing. Information is subject to change. You are encouraged to confirm the information with additional resources or with the organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in the Northwest Territories: Chapter 2: Early Treaty-Making in the NWT
    Understanding Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in the Northwest Territories: Chapter 2: Early Treaty-making in the NWT he first chapter in this series, Understanding Aboriginal The Royal Proclamation Tand Treaty Rights in the NWT: An Introduction, touched After Great Britain defeated France for control of North briefly on Aboriginal and treaty rights in the NWT. This America, the British understood the importance of chapter looks at the first contact between Aboriginal maintaining peace and good relations with Aboriginal peoples and Europeans. The events relating to this initial peoples. That meant setting out rules about land use contact ultimately shaped early treaty-making in the NWT. and Aboriginal rights. The Royal Proclamation of 1763 Early Contact is the most important statement of British policy towards Aboriginal peoples in North America. The Royal When European explorers set foot in North America Proclamation called for friendly relations with Aboriginal they claimed the land for the European colonial powers peoples and noted that “great frauds and abuses” had they represented. This amounted to European countries occurred in land dealings. The Royal Proclamation also asserting sovereignty over North America. But, in practice, said that only the Crown could legally buy Aboriginal their power was built up over time by settlement, trade, land and any sale had to be made at a “public meeting or warfare, and diplomacy. Diplomacy in these days included assembly of the said Indians to be held for that purpose.” entering into treaties with the indigenous Aboriginal peoples of what would become Canada. Some of the early treaty documents aimed for “peace and friendship” and refer to Aboriginal peoples as “allies” rather than “subjects”, which suggests that these treaties could be interpreted as nation-to-nation agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • TREATY 8: a British Columbian Anomaly
    TREATY 8: A British Columbian Anomaly ARTHUR J. RAY N THE ANNALS OF NATIVE BRITISH COLUMBIA, 1999 undoubtedly will be remembered as the year when, in a swirl of controversy, Ithe provincial legislature passed the Nisga'a Agreement. The media promptly heralded the agreement as the province's first modern Indian treaty. Unmentioned, because it has been largely forgotten, was the fact that the last major "pre-modern" agreement affecting British Columbia -Treaty 8 - had been signed 100 years earlier. This treaty encompasses a sprawling 160,900-square-kilometre area of northeastern British Columbia (Map 1), which is a territory that is nearly twenty times larger than that covered by the Nisga'a Agreement. In addition, Treaty 8 includes the adjoining portions of Alberta and the Northwest Territories. Treaty 8 was negotiated at a time when British Columbia vehemently denied the existence of Aboriginal title or self-governing rights. It therefore raises two central questions. First, why, in 1899, was it ne­ cessary to bring northeastern British Columbia under treaty? Second, given the contemporary Indian policies of the provincial government, how was it possible to do so? The latter question raises two other related issues, both of which resurfaced during negotiations for the modern Nisga'a Agreement. The first concerned how the two levels of government would share the costs of making a treaty. (I will show that attempts to avoid straining federal-provincial relations over this issue in 1899 created troublesome ambiguities in Treaty 8.) The second concerned how much BC territory had to be included within the treaty area.
    [Show full text]
  • 20. Aboriginal Rights and Interests Effects
    20. ASSESSMENT OF ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS AND RELATED INTERESTS 20.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses potential adverse effects on Aboriginal and Treaty rights and related interests which may arise from the Project during construction, operations, decommissioning/reclamation, and post-closure. Underground mining activities have the potential to adversely affect Aboriginal and Treaty rights by interfering with Aboriginal groups’ ability to engage in practices, customs, and traditions that are integral to their distinctive cultures, and/or by interfering with the exercise of rights expressly recognized in a treaty. Interference with Aboriginal and Treaty rights is generally indirect, resulting from changes to environmental conditions that are necessary for the continued exercise of Aboriginal and Treaty rights. The assessment is based on information derived from the Proponent’s engagement with potentially- affected Aboriginal groups, environmental assessments carried out elsewhere in the Application/EIS, and the review of secondary data. Wherever possible, the assessment addresses potential effects on Aboriginal and treaty rights and related interests as understood from the perspective of the Aboriginal groups in question. Baseline reports informing this assessment are appended to the Application/EIS and include: Ethnographic Overview and Traditional Knowledge and Use Desk-Based Research Report (Appendix 17-A) and Saulteau First Nations Knowledge and Use Study for HD Mining Murray River Coal Project (Appendix 17-B). 20.2 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK The Crown has a legal duty to consult with and, where appropriate, accommodate Aboriginal interests when it contemplates a conduct that might adversely impact the potential or established Aboriginal or Treaty right. The Crown delegated procedural aspects of this duty, with respect to the Project, to the Proponent through the Section 11 Order and EIS Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirit and Intent of Treaty Eight: a Sagaw Eeniw Perspective
    The Spirit and Intent of Treaty Eight: A Sagaw Eeniw Perspective A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Masters Degree in the College of Law University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Sheldon Cardinal Fall 2001 © Copyright Sheldon Cardinal, 2001. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for a graduate degree from the University ofSaskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries ofthis University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying ofthis thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head ofthe Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use ofthis thesis orparts thereoffor financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use ofmaterial in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: The Dean, College ofLaw University ofSaskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N5A6 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a number ofpeople that I would like to thank for their assistance and guidance in completing my thesis. First, I would like to acknowledge my family. My parents, Harold and Maisie Cardinal have always stressed the importance ofeducation.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Entitlement Under Treaty 8 951
    LAND ENTITLEMENT UNDER TREATY 8 951 LAND ENTITLEMENT UNDER TREATY 8 ROBERT METCS' AND CHRISTOPHER G. DEVLIN" This article provides an analysis of the land Cet article analyse /es dispositions sur /es droits entitlement provisions of Treaty 8 as they relate to fonciers du Traile 8 relalivement au traile federal current federal treaty land entitlement ([LE) policy actue/ sur la po/ilique sur /es droils fonciers el le and to the judgment in Lac La Ronge. The authors jugement du Lac La Ronge. Les auleurs delerminen/ identify and analyze significant textual, contextual, el analysent des differences lexluel/es. conlex/uelles el and historical differences between Treaty 8 and !he hisloriques considerables en/re le Traite 8 el /es sepl previous seven numbered Trealies. On !he basis of lraites precedenls. Comple /enu de celle analyse, /es !hat analysis, !he au/hors advance various proposals au/eursfont plusieurs propositions visanl a appuyer in support of a principled policy approach lo une demarche de polilique molivee dans le bu/ determining the existence and extenl of the d 'etablir I 'existence et la portee des obligations obligalions placed upon the Crown by Treaty 8 and imposees a la Couronne par le Traite 8 et /es the land enlitlemenl provisions contained therein. dispositions sur /es droits fanciers qu 'ii conlient. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 952 II. INTERPRETATION OF TREATY 8 ................................. 953 A. THE LAND ENTITLEMENT PROVISIONS OF TREATY 8 .......................................... 953 B. LEGAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE INTERPRETATION OF TREATIES ............................. 955 C. THE LAC LA RONG£ DECISION ............................. 958 D. APPLICATION OF LEGAL PRINCIPLES TO TREATY 8 .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledging Land and People
    * ACKNOWLEDGING LAND AND PEOPLE Smith’s Landing First Nation TREATY 4 Dene Tha’ Mikisew First Nation MNA Cree Lake REGION 6 Nation TREATY 6 Athabasca Athabasca Beaver First Nation Chipewyan TREATY 7 Little Red River First Nation Cree Nation TREATY 8 Tallcree MNA First REGION 1 Nation Fort McKay TREATY 10 PADDLE PRAIRIE MNA REGION 5 First Nation Métis Settlements Loon River Peerless/ Lubicon First Nation Trout Lake Fort McMurray Lake Nation MNA Regional Zones First Nation Woodland Cree Métis Nation of First Nation Whitefi sh Lake Fort McMurray Alberta (MNA) First Nation Bigstone Cree First Nation (Atikameg) Association Nation PEAVINE Cities and Towns GIFT LAKE Chipewyan Kapawe’no Duncan’s Prairie First First Nation First Nation Kapawe’no Nation Sucker Creek First Nation Grande First Nation Lesser Slave Lake Sawridge Horse Lake Prairie First Nation First Nation EAST PRAIRIE Swan Heart Lake River First Nation** Sturgeon Lake Driftpile First BUFFALO LAKE Nation Cree Nation First Nation Beaver Cold KIKINO Lake Cree Lake First Nation Nations Whitefi sh Lake First MNA N a t i o n ( G o o d fi s h ) Kehewin ELIZABETH TREATY 4 First Nation Frog REGION 4 Alexander First Nation Saddle Lake Michel First Lake First Alexis Nakota Sioux First Nation Cree Nation Nation TREATY 6 Nation FISHING Edmonton Paul First Nation LAKE TREATY 7 Papaschase First Nation Enoch Cree Nation (Edmonton) Ermineskin Cree Nation TREATY 8 Louis Bull Tribe Jasper Samson MNA Montana Cree Nation Cree Nation TREATY 10 REGION 2 Métis Settlements O’Chiese First Nation Sunchild First
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Reserves on the Prairies 243
    1985] INDIAN RESERVES ON THE PRAIRIES 243 INDIAN RESERVES ON THE PRAIRIES RICHARD H. BARTLETT~ Indian reserves comprise the only land left to the Indians of the Prairie Provinces. This paper endeavors to examine and explain the rights of ownership and administra­ tion held by the Indians and Governments in such lands. It endeavors to determine what the treaties between the Indians and the Crown promised and to what extent they have been fulfilled. Rights with respect to minerals and timber are examined in the course of the study. I. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF INDIANS RESERVES BY TREATY 1 Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan make up the Prairie Provinces of Canada. The southern reaches of the Provinces were the traditional lands of the plains' tribes: the Plains Cree, the Assiniboine, the Gros Ventre, the Blackfoot and the Sarcee. 2 To the north the forests were the territory of the Chipewyan, Beaver, Slave and Sekani tribes. 3 The traditional title of the Indians to their lands was recognized in the terms of the treaties that were entered into between the Crown in the right of the Dominion and the Indians. The treaties provided for the surrender of the Indian title in return for the establishment of reserves, guarantees as to hunting and fishing rights, annuities and certain social and economic undertakings. The treaties were entered into as the pressure of settlement and development demanded. Indian title in southern Manitoba and Saskat­ chewan was surrendered by Treaties #1 (1871), #2 (1871), #3 (1873) and #4 (1874). Central Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta was surrendered by Treaties #5 (1875) and #6 (1876).
    [Show full text]
  • Bigstone Cree Nation How Smart Planning and Quality Data of Helped One Alberta First Nation Transform DATA Its Reputation for Sickness to Success
    THE POWER Bigstone Cree Nation How smart planning and quality data OF helped one Alberta First Nation transform DATA its reputation for sickness to success BIGSTONE CREE NATION – If you drive north out of Edmonton, up past the boundless farmer’s fields, over the historic Athabasca River and right to the end of Highway 813, you’ll find yourself in Bigstone Cree Nation. Located in the heart of the Albertan oil sands, about four hours from the provincial capital, there’s no arguing that this beautiful and remote First Nations community is out-of-the-way—but that doesn’t mean it’s off-the-grid. Made up of a total of seven communities that house more than 3,000 residents on about 21,000 hectares of pristine lake-rich Northern boreal forest, this sprawling Woodland Cree community is home to a wealth of services and facilities. This includes its own hospital, health-care centre, home-care program and school, to hotels, restaurants, gyms, a beach and a full-service hockey arena. There’s even a nearby golf course. FNIGC’s Addie Pryce, Principal Christine Gullion and Andy Alook pose in Oski Pasikoniwew Kamik School, At the centre of all this is Wabasca, the geographic Bigstone’s Community School in Wabasca and administrative heart of Bigstone’s cluster of communities. Though it’s derived from the Cree who do house calls; we also have a lot of our own word wapuskau, which means “white rapids” (in businesses. We provide everything to our members. reference to a nearby river) Wabasca’s name could So, yes, we’ve seen a lot of change over the years, just as easily be interpreted as “where it all happens.” but it didn’t happen overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POINT of NO RETURN All Rights Reserved
    TABLED DOCUMENT 119-18(3) TABLED ON MARCH 1, 2018 THE POINT OF NO RETURN All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] ©Amnesty International 2016 First published in 2016 Index: AMR 20/428112016 by Amnesty International Ltd Original language: English Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Printed by Amnesty International, Street, London WClX ODW, UK International Secretariat, UK Cover Photo: Jason Dick and Dakota Kesick dance in traditional regalia overlooking the Peace and Moberly Rivers where the British Columbia public energy utility BC Hydro began construction of the Site C dam in 2015. © Little lnuk Photography AMNESTY Jt amnesty.org INTERNATIONAL qf The government of British Columbia ability of Indigenous peoples to carry out "We've never said no (BC) is pushing ahead with construction crucial cultural and economic practices of a massive hydro-electric dam in the such as hunting and fishing. A group of to the production northeast of the province, despite vigorous Canadian academics who reviewed the opposition by Indigenous peoples who assessment concluded that the "number would be severely harmed by the loss of a and scope" of harms identified by the of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNAL JOB POSTING – Executive Assistant Treaty & Lands
    INTERNAL JOB POSTING Executive Assistant Treaty & Lands – Saulteau First Nations (SFN) is a section 10 band within the meaning of the Indian Act. The Band has been formed by the amalgamation of Dunne - Za, Cree, and Saulteau residents. This First Nations community is covered by Treaty 8. The community is located at the east end of Moberly Lake, which is about 100km southwest of Fort St. John on Highway 29. There is one reserve, East Moberly Lake No.169, spread over 3025.8 hectares. SFN is currently accepting resumes for the fulltime position of Treaty & Lands Department INFORMATION Executive Assistant Duties include but are not limited to the following: For further information, 1. Sorts, records, distributes and files incoming/outgoing mail, faxes and purchase please feel free to contact orders to appropriate personnel ensuring consistency with Department Naomi Owens, Director of procedures; Treaty & Lands (250) 788- 2. Operates and maintains a variety of office equipment including photocopiers, 7259 (email: printers, computers, fax machines, label makers, and other office equipment and [email protected]) or ensures that adequate supplies for the equipment are available; Fernie Garbitt (250) 788- 3. Conducts file searches, compiles file summaries and assembles administrative 7258 (email: reports for Treaty and Lands Department staff and Chief and Council; [email protected]) 4. Prepares word processing documents, spreadsheets, newsletters, PowerPoint presentations and provides other administrative support including preparation of correspondence, meeting minutes, memorandums, reports and forms and other SFN offers a comprehensive documents and presentation materials as required by Treaty and Lands benefits package including Department staff; Qualifications extended medical and • Must be aware and sensitive to traditional Aboriginal values.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Elders' Interviews Treaty 6 Informant's Address
    DOCUMENT NAME/INFORMANT: SUMMARY OF ELDERS' INTERVIEWS TREATY 6 INFORMANT'S ADDRESS: INTERVIEW LOCATION: TRIBE/NATION: LANGUAGE: DATE OF INTERVIEW: INTERVIEWER: INTERPRETER: TRANSCRIBER: J. GREENWOOD SOURCE: OFFICE OF SPECIFIC CLAIMS & RESEARCH WINTERBURN, ALBERTA TAPE NUMBER: IH-221 DISK: TRANSCRIPT DISC 25A PAGES: 17 RESTRICTIONS: NONE SUMMARY OF ELDERS' INTERVIEWS TREATY 6 by Lynn Hickey Following is a summary of what the Treaty No. 6 elders have said in interviews about the nature of the treaty and the rights guaranteed to the Indian people by the treaty. Subjects discussed by the elders include mineral and other resource rights, hunting, fishing, and trapping rights, land and land surrenders, education and medicare, and economic development. In general, it would seem that most elders view the treaty as something which guarantees the Indian certain rights in exchange for permitting the white man the use of the land for farming, and perhaps timber for making houses, and grass for feeding animals. These are the only things that were requested by the treaty commissioners and the only things given up. In exchange for these, Indians received the right to pursue a livelihood in the traditional way, to live in particular areas unmolested, to be taught farming and be given agricultural implements and animals, to be provided with free education and medicare, and to receive such services on the reserve. The Treaty 6 elders, unlike the Treaty 7 elders, do not stress that the treaty was about establishing peace. Rather, the treaty was about land and permitting the white man to share in the use of that land whether the ideas is phrased as "selling" or "leasing" the land.
    [Show full text]